EP2473978A1 - Verfahren und vorrichtung zur prüfung von wertdokumenten - Google Patents
Verfahren und vorrichtung zur prüfung von wertdokumentenInfo
- Publication number
- EP2473978A1 EP2473978A1 EP10747629A EP10747629A EP2473978A1 EP 2473978 A1 EP2473978 A1 EP 2473978A1 EP 10747629 A EP10747629 A EP 10747629A EP 10747629 A EP10747629 A EP 10747629A EP 2473978 A1 EP2473978 A1 EP 2473978A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- magnetic
- signal
- coercive
- magnetization
- security element
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 11
- 230000005415 magnetization Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 102
- 239000000696 magnetic material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 70
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000036629 mind Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000005381 magnetic domain Effects 0.000 description 16
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 13
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
- G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
- G07D7/04—Testing magnetic properties of the materials thereof, e.g. by detection of magnetic imprint
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
- G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
- G07D7/20—Testing patterns thereon
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method and a device for checking value documents, such as e.g. Banknotes, checks, cards, tickets, coupons.
- the magnetic material can either be continuous or only in regions, for example in the form of a code on the security element on ebracht. For example, a specific sequence of magnetic and non-magnetic regions, which is characteristic of the type of security document to be secured, serves for the magnetic coding of a security element.
- various magnetic materials for magnetic encoding for example with different coercivities. In the magnetic codes known hitherto, for example, two different coercive magnetic materials are used, from which two types of magnetic regions are formed, which can be arranged next to one another or one above the other.
- banknotes with security threads which have a magnetic coding made of differently coercive materials.
- the banknotes are transported parallel to the course of the security element and pass successively first through a strong magnetic field parallel to the transport direction, which magnetizes both the high and the low-coercive magnetic regions along the transport direction.
- the remaining magnetization is checked by means of an inductive magnetic head, which is sensitive only parallel to the transport direction.
- the banknotes then pass through a weaker magnetic field perpendicular to the transport direction, which aligns only the low-coercive magnetic regions perpendicular to the transport direction, while the high-order magnetic fields are perpendicular to the transport direction. coercive magnet areas remain magnetized in the transport direction.
- the remaining magnetization by means of an inductive magnetic head, which is sensitive only parallel to the transport direction, checked.
- the security element also contains combined magnetic areas, which both contain different coercive magnetic materials, so that the differently coercive magnetic materials reach the detection area of the magnetic detector at the same time, a superposition of the magnetic signals of the different coercive magnetic materials is detected.
- the combined magnetic regions thereby provide a reduced magnetic signal, whose signal swing lies between that of the high-coercive and the low-coercive magnetic regions.
- a disadvantage of this method is that these combined magnetic regions are difficult to distinguish from the high-coercive and low-coercive magnetic regions.
- the invention is therefore based on the object to carry out the examination of the documents of value so that the high coercive, the low coercive and the combined magnetic regions can each be reliably distinguished from each other.
- the value document to be checked has a security element with a plurality of magnetic areas.
- the magnetic regions include at least one high-coercive magnetic region made of a highly coercive magnetic material with a first coercive force and at least one low coercive magnetic region of a low coercive magnetic material having a second coercive force lower than the first coercive force, and at least one combined magnetic region having both the high coercive and the low coercive magnetic materials.
- the at least one high-coercive, the at least one low-coercive and the at least one combined magnetic region on the security element are each spaced from each other by non-magnetic regions lying therebetween.
- the at least one combined magnetic region contains both the high-coercive and the low-coercive magnetic material.
- the combined magnetic region contains a smaller amount of the high-coercive magnetic material than the high-coercive magnetic region and a smaller one of the low-coercive magnetic material than the low-coercive magnetic region.
- the combined magnetic region is formed so that the high-coercive and the low-coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region have substantially the same remanent flux density.
- the combined magnetic region contains the same amount of the high-coercive magnetic material as the low-coercive one
- the high-coercive and the low-coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region are arranged on each other.
- the combined magnet region can also have the high-coercive and the low-coercive magnetic material in the form of a material mixture.
- the high-coercive magnetic material of the high-coercive magnetic region is not designed to be the low-coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region or the low-coercive magnetic material of the to relocate the low-coercive magnetic field.
- the high-coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region is not designed to remagnetize the low-coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region or the low-coercive magnetic material of the low-coercive magnetic region. This results from the fact that the magnetic field strength, which generates the respective high-coercive magnetic material at the location of the low-coercive magnetic material, is lower than the coercive field strength of the respective low-coercive magnetic material.
- the remanent flux density of the high-coercive magnetic region and that of the low-coercive magnetic region are the same.
- the remanent flux density of the high coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region is, for example, one half of the remanent flux density of the high coercive magnetic region and the remanent flux density of the low coercive magnetic material of the other magnetic region is one half of the remanent flux density of the low coercive magnetic region.
- a resulting remanent flux density results from the sum of the two remanent flux densities of the high-coercive and low-coercive magnetic materials of the combined magnet region.
- the resulting remanent flux density of the combined magnetic region is preferably equal to the remanent flux density of the high-coercive magnetic region and equal to the remanent flux density of the low-coercive magnetic region.
- the value document or the security element of the value document is magnetized by a first magnetic field whose magnetic field strength is greater than the first and second oerzitivf eidGood.
- the magnetization of the high coercive magnetic material (both of the high coercive and the combined magnetic region) and the magnetization of the low coercive magnetic material (both of the low coercive and the combined magnetic region) are uniformly aligned in a first magnetization direction. After this first magnetization, first magnetic signals of the security element are detected by a first magnetic detector.
- the value document or the security element is magnetized by a second magnetic field whose magnetic field strength is smaller than the first coercive field strength, but greater than the second coercive field strength.
- the magnetization of the high-coercive magnetic material remains unchanged in the first magnetization direction.
- the second magnetic field is oriented so that the magnetization of the low-coercive magnetic material (both the low-coercive and the combined magnetic regions) is oriented anti-parallel to the first magnetization direction.
- the second magnetic field is anti-parallel to the first magnetic field.
- the second magnetic signals are detected by a second magnetic detector, which is identical in construction, for example, to the first magnetic detector.
- the second magnetic signals can also be detected by the first, that is, by the same magnetic detector as the first magnetic signals.
- the first and second magnetic signals are analyzed to determine at which positions on the security element the magnetic areas of the security element are located and to identify each of the magnetic areas of the security element either as one of the combined magnetic areas or as one of the high or low low- coercive magnet areas. Since the first magnetic field magnetizes all magnetic regions of the security element in a first direction of magnetization, it can be determined from the first magnetic signal at which positions on the security element magnetic regions are located.
- the high-coercive magnetic regions are not re-magnetized by the second magnetic field.
- the first and the second magnetic signals of the high-coercive magnetic regions are therefore essentially the same. Since the low-coercive magnetic material is aligned by the second magnetic field in anti-parallel to the first direction of magnetization, in each case the second magnetic signal of the at least one low-coercive magnetic field from the first magnetic signal of the at least one low-coercive magnetic field.
- the second magnetic signal of the low-coercive magnetic region is substantially inverted compared to the first magnetic signal of the low-coercive magnetic region.
- the antiparallel magnetization of the low-coercive magnetic material also causes each of the second magnetic signal of the at least one combined magnetic region from the first magnetic signal of the at least one combined magnetic region and the second magnetic signals of the high and low-coercive magnetic regions. It can be deduced from the second magnetic signal of the respective magnetic region whether the respective magnetic region is a high-coercive, a low-coercive or a combined magnetic region.
- the at least one combined magnetic region is magnetized by the second magnetic field so that a resulting magnetization of the at least one combined magnetic region, which results from the second magnetization, at least approximately disappears.
- the remanent flux densities of the low-coercive and the high-coercive magnetic material of the at least one combined magnetic area are selected so that a vanishing resulting magnetization of the respective combined magnetic area is set by an antiparallel magnetization of the high-coercive and low-coercive magnet material.
- the combined magnetic regions are formed so that the low coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region and the high coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region have the same remanent flux density.
- the first and second magnetization directions are preferably in the value document level. This is advantageous in comparison with a direction of magnetization perpendicular to the value document plane, since the magnetic material of the security element can be magnetized more easily in the value document plane than perpendicular to the value document plane. Due to the magnetization in the value document level, therefore, a more reliable examination of the value document is possible.
- the first magnetization direction is parallel or antiparallel to the transport direction of the value document and the second direction of magnetization opposite thereto.
- the first and second magnetization directions can also lie in the value document plane and run perpendicular or obliquely to the transport direction.
- Each of the magnetic regions of the security element makes a contribution to the first and to the second magnetic signal of the security element.
- the contribution which the respective magnetic area makes to the first or the second magnetic signal of the security element is referred to below as the first or second magnetic signal of the respective magnetic area.
- the first magnetic signal and the second magnetic signal of a magnetic region are formed as the first and second magnetic signal signature.
- the first and the second magnetic signal of the security element can therefore contain a plurality of individual magnetic signal signatures.
- the exact shape of the magnetic signal signatures depends on the magnetic detector used as well as on the remanent flux density of the respective magnetic area and on the length of the respective magnetic area.
- the first magnetic signal signature of the high-coercive, the low-coercive and the combined magnetic regions can each be designed as a single axis peak or as a double peak.
- the second magnetic signal of the combined magnetic domain consists of a magnetic signal amplitude which has no pronounced peaks and which remains close to a second signal offset that the second magnetic signal having.
- the second magnetic signals of the magnetic regions are analyzed.
- signal processing of the second magnetic signals using two thresholds is performed for this purpose. det, with which the respective second magnetic signal of the respective magnetic region is compared.
- the two thresholds are formed by an upper threshold and by a lower threshold, the lower threshold being below the upper threshold. With respect to a positive magnetic signal amplitude of the second magnetic signal, this means that the upper threshold is at a larger magnetic signal amplitude than the lower threshold.
- each magnetic region whose second magnetic signal exceeds the upper threshold or the second magnetic signal falls below the lower threshold identified as a high or low-coercive magnetic region.
- the length of the individual magnetic regions along the longitudinal direction of the security element can be determined, for example, from the width of the second magnetic signal of the respective magnetic region or from a signal derived from the second magnetic signal or from one of the first and second magnetic signals of the respective magnetic region.
- the decision as to whether a magnetic region is identified as a high-coherence or low-magnetic region depends on the type of magnetic detector.
- the second magnetic signal of the high-coercive magnetic regions is formed in each case as a positive single peak, and the second magnetic signal of the low-coercive magnetic regions in each case as a negative single peak.
- each magnetic domain whose second magnetic signal exceeds the upper threshold is identified as a high-coercive magnetic domain
- each magnetic domain whose second magnetic signal falls below the lower threshold is identified as Low-Coercive Magnetic Area.
- the second magnetic signal of the high-coercive and the low-coercive magnetic regions is in each case formed as a double peak, wherein the double peak of the low-coercive magnetic region is formed inversely to the double peak of the high-coercive magnetic region.
- the signal shape of the second magnetic signals of the high-coercive and the low-coercive magnetic regions is additionally analyzed in this case.
- the second magnetic signal of the security element has a second signal offset.
- the second magnetic signals of the magnetic regions are formed relative to this second signal offset.
- the upper threshold is defined to be above the second signal offset and the lower threshold
- Threshold is defined to be below the second signal offset.
- all magnetic regions whose second magnetic signal neither exceeds the upper threshold above the second signal offset nor below the lower threshold below the second signal offset are identified as combined magnetic regions.
- comparing the second magnetic signal with these two thresholds results in a very reliable discrimination of the combined magnetic regions from the high and low coercive magnetic regions.
- a signal derived from the second magnetic signal or a signal derived from the second or from the first and second magnetic signals may also be used.
- the derived signal may be from the second magnetic signal, for example by forming a correlation of the second Magnetic signal are derived with a base signal which is characteristic of the magnetic detector which detects the second magnetic signal, and for the security element to be tested.
- the derived signal may correspond to the maximum value of a correlation curve determined for each position along the length of the security element.
- other characteristics of the correlation curve can also be used.
- the derived signal can also directly be the maximum value of the second magnetic signal which the second magnetic detector detects at the respective position along the longitudinal direction of the security element.
- the derived signal may also be the area under the second magnetic signal at the respective position along the security element or other characteristics of the second magnetic signal or characteristics of a signal derived from the first and second magnetic signals.
- the upper and lower thresholds are preferably defined so that the two thresholds are at a relatively large distance from each other.
- the distance between the upper and lower threshold is in particular at least 50%, preferably at least 75%, in particular at least 100% of a mean signal H2 (see Fig. 2) of the second magnetic signal, the second magnetic signal of the high coercive and / or the second magnetic signal of the low coercive magnetic regions relative to the second signal offset of have second magnetic signal.
- the mean signal deviation can be determined, for example, from empirical values that are set in the course of the calibration of the second magnetic detector in advance of the document of value verification.
- the average signal swing can also be determined, quasi online, from the second magnetic signal, for example by averaging the signal swing of the individual magnetic signal signatures of the high-coercive and / or low-coercive magnet regions contained in the second magnetic signal.
- the upper and / or lower threshold are selected in response to the first magnetic signal of the security element, in particular in response to a signal swing of the first magnetic signal having the first magnetic signal relative to a first signal offset.
- the upper and / or lower threshold are selected in response to the first magnetic signal of the security element, in particular in response to a signal swing of the first magnetic signal having the first magnetic signal relative to a first signal offset.
- the upper threshold and / or the lower threshold can be selected to be the same for all magnetic regions, so that all second magnetic signals of the magnetic regions are compared with the same upper and lower threshold, but which is dynamically selected as a function of the first magnetic signal of the security element , If the signal deviation of the first magnetic signals of the magnetic regions of the security element is relatively high or low, for example, on average, the upper threshold is also correspondingly increased or reduced.
- different upper thresholds or different lower thresholds can be selected for the magnetic areas of the security element, so that the second magnetic signals of the magnetic areas are compared with different upper or with different lower thresholds.
- the upper and / or the lower threshold is selected individually as a function of the first magnetic signal of the respective magnetic region, in particular as a function of a signal swing of the first magnetic signal of the respective magnetic field, which the first magnetic signal of the respective magnetic region relative to having a first signal offset of the first magnetic signal. It is particularly advantageous to select the upper and / or the lower threshold individually for all magnetic regions of the security element as a function of the signal deviation of the first magnetic signal of the respective magnetic region. For example, if the signal swing of the first magnetic signal of a magnetic domain is lower than a stored reference signal swing, the upper threshold for that magnetic domain is also reduced.
- the upper or lower threshold is adapted individually to the respective magnetic area and its nature, eg its length and quantity of magnetic material.
- an optimal position of the upper and lower threshold is achieved for each magnetic area.
- the distinction of the combined magnetic regions from the high and low coercive magnetic regions is thereby further improved.
- the invention also relates to a device for testing a value document, which has a security element with a plurality of magnetic regions, which has at least one highly coercive, at least one low coercive and at least one combined magnetic region.
- the pros direction comprises a first magnetic detector for detecting first magnetic signals of the security element.
- the device also has a magnetic detector for detecting second magnetic signals of the security element, wherein this magnetic detector is either the first magnetic detector or else a second magnetic detector which is, for example, identical to the first magnetic detector.
- the first and second magnetic detectors may be formed by one or more inductive elements, by Hall elements or by conventional magnetoresistive elements, GMR, AMR, TMR, SdT or spin valve elements.
- the apparatus further includes signal processing means arranged to analyze the first and second magnetic signals.
- the signal processing device is set up to determine at which positions on the security element magnetic areas of the security element are located, and to identify these magnetic areas. In identifying, each of the magnetic regions of the security element is identified either as one of the combined magnetic regions comprising both the high and low coercivity magnetic materials, or as one of the high or low magnetic magnetic regions, ie as one of the remaining magnetic regions which the security element may comprise ,
- the signal processing device is set up to identify those magnetic regions whose second magnetic signal neither exceeds an upper threshold nor falls below a lower threshold than combined magnetic regions.
- the upper threshold lies above the second signal offset and the lower threshold below the second signal offset.
- the upper and / or the lower threshold can either be stored in the signal processing device or will be generated dynamically by the signal processing device. In doing so, NEN the upper and lower threshold are selected according to the above.
- the device also includes first and second magnetization devices that are components of the device.
- the first magnetization device of the device is designed to provide a first magnetic field, which is designed for the first magnetization of the security element.
- the second magnetization device is designed to provide a second magnetic field, which is designed for the second magnetization of the security element.
- the first and second magnetic field can be provided, for example, by permanent magnets or by electromagnets.
- the first magnetic field provided by the first magnetizing means is arranged to first magnetize the high-coercive and low-coercive magnetic materials in a first magnetization direction, wherein the magnetic field strength of the first magnetic field used for the first magnetization is greater than the first coercive force.
- the first magnetization device is arranged so that, during operation of the device, the first magnetization is performed for each of the magnetic regions before the first magnetic signal of the respective magnetic region is detected.
- the second magnetic field provided by the second magnetizing means is arranged to second magnetize the low-coercive magnetic material in a second magnetization direction which is anti-parallel to a first magnetizing direction.
- the magnetic field strength used for the second magnetization is smaller than the first coercive field strength but larger than the second coercive field strength.
- the magnetization of the high-coercive magnetic material remains aligned in the first direction of magnetization in the second magnetization.
- the second magnetization device is arranged such that, in operating the device, for each of the magnet regions the second magnetization is performed after the first and before the second magnetic signal of the respective magnetic domain is detected.
- the magnetic field direction of the second magnetic field runs antiparallel to the magnetic field direction of the first magnetic field.
- the first magnetization device is not a component of the device, but is formed by an external magnetization device, which is arranged outside the device and provides the first magnetic field.
- an external magnetization device for example, a permanent magnet or an electromagnet can be used as an external magnetization device, past which the value document is passed manually or automatically in order to carry out the first magnetization of the security element.
- the external magnetization device provides a magnetic field strength which is greater than the first coercive field strength, so that all magnetic regions can be magnetized in the first magnetization direction.
- the second magnetization device can be embodied as part of the device in this exemplary embodiment, as described above. Alternatively, the second magnetization device may be formed by an external magnetization device which is arranged outside the device and provides the second magnetic field.
- the second magnetization for example, a permanent magnet or an electromagnet is used, on which the value document is passed manually or automatically in order to carry out the second magnetization of the security element.
- the external magnetization device provides a second magnetic field strength, which lies between the first and the second coercive field strength, so that the low-coercive magnetic material can be re-magnetized in an antiparallel direction.
- the first magnetization device may be performed either as part of the device in this embodiment, or also as an external magnetization device. In the latter case, the first and second magnetization devices can be embodied as two separate external magnetization devices or as a combined external magnetization device that provides both the first and the second magnetic field.
- Figure 1 Apparatus for testing a security element with two
- Magnetization devices and two magnetic detectors which are oriented perpendicular to the transport direction of the security element and perpendicular to the security element
- Magnetization devices and two magnetic detectors which are oriented perpendicular to the transport direction of the security element and parallel to the security element
- Figure 4 Apparatus for testing a security element with two
- Magnetization devices and two magnetic detectors which are oriented obliquely to the transport direction of the security element and obliquely to the security element
- Figure 5 shows a three-dimensional representation of a device for testing a security element, wherein the value document on a
- FIG. 7 Identification of the magnetic regions on the basis of a signal derived from the second magnetic signal.
- FIG. 1 shows schematically a device for checking the magnetic properties of a value document, in which a value document containing a security element 2 is transported past the device along a transport direction T (value document not shown).
- the device is designed to test a security element 2 that runs parallel to the transport direction T of the value document.
- the device can be part of a value-document processing machine with which value documents are checked for authenticity, type and / or condition, in particular a magnetic sensor that can be installed in such a machine.
- the device can also be a self-sufficient measuring device for testing the magnetic properties of value documents.
- the security element 2 is in this example designed as a security thread which contains along its longitudinal direction a first high-coercive magnetic region h, a combined magnetic region c, a low-coercive magnetic region 1 and a second high-coercive magnetic region h. Between these magnetic regions h, 1, c, h is non-magnetic material.
- the high-coercive and low-coercive magnetic materials of the combined magnetic region c have the same remanent flux density.
- the device has a first magnetization device 9 and a second magnetization device 19, which provide a magnetic field parallel or antiparallel to the transport direction T of the value document.
- the first magnetization device is formed in this example for the first magnetization of the security element 2 parallel to the transport direction T and the second magnetization device 19 for the second magnetization of the security element 2 antiparallel to the transport direction T.
- the security element 2 also antiparallel and then be magnetized parallel to the transport direction T.
- the device also includes a first magnetic detector 10, which is arranged between the two magnetization devices 9, 19, and a second magnetic detector 20, which, viewed in the transport direction T, is arranged after the two magnetization devices 9, 19.
- the two magnetic detectors 10, 20 are oriented perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of the security element 2 and have a detection element which is formed at least for detecting magnetic fields parallel and antiparallel to the transport direction T.
- the device also has a signal processing device 8, which is connected to the first and the second magnetic detector 10, 20 via the lines 7.
- the signal processing device 8 receives measurement signals from the two magnetic detectors 10, 20 and processes and analyzes them.
- the signal processing device 8 may e.g. be arranged together with the magnetic detectors 10, 20 in the same housing. Via an interface 6 data can be sent outwards from the signal processing device 8, e.g. to a control device which processes the data, and / or to a display device which informs about the result of the value-document check.
- the same reference numerals are used for the same elements.
- FIG. 2 shows, by way of example, the magnetic signals of the security element 2 as a function of time, which result when the security element 2 is transported past the device shown in FIG.
- the first magnetic detector 0 the first magnetic signal Ml of the security element 2 is detected.
- the first magnetization device 9 generates parallel to the transport direction T a first magnetic field with high magnetic field strength, through which, when passing the security element 2, all Magnetic regions h, c, 1 are magnetized parallel to the transport direction T.
- the first magnetic signal M1 shows, for all magnetic regions h, 1, c, h, at the beginning of the magnetic region a magnetic signal signature which consists of a positive peak at the beginning and a negative peak at the end of a magnetic region (Mlh, M1 C / Mli).
- the second magnetization device 9 By the second magnetization device 9, a magnetic field with a lower field strength is generated, the direction of which is anti-parallel to the first magnetic field of the first magnetization device 9.
- the field strength is dimensioned such that only the low-coercive magnetic material is re-magnetized while the magnetization of the high-coercive magnetic material is maintained. Consequently, the low-coercive magnetic domain 1 and the low-coercive material of the combined magnetic domain c are re-magnetized in the antiparallel direction.
- the two high-coercive magnetic regions h and the high-coercive material of the combined magnetic region c continue to be magnetized in the first magnetization direction.
- the second magnetic signal M2 of the security element 2 is detected.
- the second magnetic signals M2h of the high-coercive magnetic regions h show the same magnetic-signal signature as the first magnetic signals Mlh of the high-coercive magnetic regions h. Since the low-coercive magnetic materials have been remagnetized antiparallel, the second magnetic signal M2i of the low-coercive magnetic domain 1 shows a magnetic signal signature which is inverse to the magnetic signal signatures observed in the first magnetic signal and which is also inverse to the magnetic-signal signature of the high-coercive magnetic signals observed in the second magnetic signal Magnetic ranges h is (negative peak at the beginning, positive peak at the end of the magnetic region 1).
- the combined magnetic field c is a greatly reduced magnetic signal M2 C, which has relatively offset to a second signal 02 of the second magnetic signal M2 an almost vanishing signal amplitude is obtained. Since the magnetization of the highly coercive magnetic terials of the combined magnetic region c and the (antiparallel) magnetization of the low-coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region c are the same (and cancel each other out), this results in a resulting magnetic signal M2 C of the combined magnetic field with almost vanishing signal amplitude.
- the signal processing device 8 determines at which positions on the security element 2 magnetic regions are present. This can already be derived, for example, from the first magnetic signal M1 alone, for example by analyzing at which positions on the security element 2 the magnetic signal signature is to be found which is expected for the magnetic regions after the first magnetization (in this case a double peak).
- the signal processing device 8 is set up to determine the type of the respective magnetic region for each of the magnetic regions found. For this purpose, two thresholds Sl and S2 are used, with which the second magnetic signal M2 is compared. The upper threshold Sl is selected to be above the second signal offset 02 of the second magnetic signal M2, and the lower threshold S2 is selected to be below the second signal offset 02 of the second magnetic signal M2.
- each magnetic region whose second magnetic signal exceeds the upper threshold Sl and / or falls below the lower threshold S2 is identified as a high-coercive or low-coercive magnetic region.
- the respective magnetic signal signature of the second magnetic In this case, the M2h / M2i of these magnetic regions are analyzed to see whether first a positive and subsequently a negative peak has been detected (high-coercive magnetic regions h) or vice versa (low-magnetic magnetic region 1).
- high-coercive magnetic regions h high-coercive magnetic regions h
- low-magnetic magnetic region 1 low-magnetic magnetic region 1.
- the upper and / or lower thresholds S1, S2 can be selected as a function of the first magnetic signal M1 of the security element 2.
- the upper threshold Sl with which the second magnetic signal M2i of the low-coercive magnetic domain 1 is compared, can be individually reduced to the first threshold Sl * for the low-coercive magnetic domain 1, while the second magnetic signals of the remaining magnetic domains h, c, h be compared with the threshold Sl.
- the first threshold can be individually adapted to the relatively small signal Hli, which has the first magnetic signal Mli of the low-coercive magnetic field 1 relative to the first signal offset Ol of the first magnetic signal Ml.
- FIG. 3 outlines a further exemplary embodiment in which the security element 2 is transported in such a way that its longitudinal direction is oriented perpendicular to the transport direction T of the value document.
- a first detector row 11 and a second detector row 21, each having a plurality of individual detection elements 12, 22, are used as first and second magnetic detectors.
- Each of these detection elements 12, 22 supplies a magnetic signal, so that in this example, a plurality of first magnetic signals Ml are detected by means of the detection elements 12 and a plurality of second magnetic signals M2 by means of the detection elements 22.
- Each detection element 12 of the first detector line 11 detects the same section of the transported security element 2 as a corresponding detection element 22 of the second detector line 21.
- the signal processing can be done, for example, analogous to the embodiment of Figures 1 and 2, wherein in each case the magnetic signals of two corresponding detection elements 12, 22 are processed as the first and second magnet signal.
- FIG. 4 shows a further exemplary embodiment, in which the security element 2, as also in FIG. 3, is transported with its longitudinal direction perpendicular to the transport direction T.
- the magnetic detectors 10, 20 and the magnetization devices 9, 19 but oriented obliquely to the transport direction T of the security element 2 in this embodiment. Due to the skew, a spatial resolution can be achieved without the use of elaborate detector lines.
- the two detection elements of the magnetic detectors 10, 20 detect the first and the second magnetic signal, analogously to the example of Figures 1 and 2, as a function of time.
- Figures 5 and 6 show a further embodiment in which the device is designed as a self-sufficient measuring device, which is designed to test the magnetic properties of individual value documents 1.
- the second magnetization device 19 and the second magnetic detector 23 are arranged next to the first magnetization device 9 and the first magnetic detector 13 in this embodiment.
- the two magnetic detectors 13, 23 and the two magnetizing devices 9, 19 are mounted on a scanning device 5, which is transportable along the direction B and is arranged at a small distance from the Trommel.3.
- the magnetic detectors 13, 23 each have a magnetic field-sensitive region 14, 24 on their underside.
- the value document 1 is on a
- Drum 3 is fixed, which is rotatable about the axis A, which is parallel to the direction B. Due to the rotation of the drum 3, the document of value 1 can be repeatedly transported along the circumference of the drum 3 past the magnetic detectors 13, 23 and the magnetizing devices 9, 19. During each rotation, the magnetic signals of those sections of the security element 2 can be detected, which, depending on the position of the scanning device 5, are located just in the detection range of the magnetic detectors 13 and 23, respectively. By slowly moving the scanning device 5 along the direction B and simultaneous, fast rotation of the drum 3, the magnetic regions h, 1, c of the security element 2, as in the previous embodiments, successively magnetized twice and then each detected their magnetic signals.
- the document of value 1 can also be mounted on the drum 3 such that the security element 2 is not oriented perpendicularly, but parallel to the transport direction T of the value document.
- the first and second magnetic signal respectively as a function of time, first detected by the first and then by the second magnetic detector.
- the first and second magnetic signals M1, M2 of the security element 2 can also be processed in the following manner: First, a first signal M1 'is obtained from the first magnetic signal M1. and from the second magnetic signal M2, a second signal M2 'is derived.
- FIG. 7 shows examples of such a derived first and second signal M 1 ', M 2'.
- the derived first signal M1 'shown in FIG. 7 was derived from the first magnetic signal M1 of the magnetic detector 10 by forming a correlation of the first magnetic signal M1 with a base signal characteristic of the magnetic detector 10, 11 used and the security element 2 to be tested derived first signal Ml 'shown in FIG.
- the derived second signal M2 ' was derived from the second magnetic signal M2 of the magnetic detector 20, 21 by forming a correlation of the second magnetic signal M2 with a base signal characteristic of the magnetic detector 20, 21 and the security element 2 used.
- the maximum value of the first magnetic signal M1 which the first magnetic detector 10, 11 or its individual detection elements 12 detect at the respective y position of the security element 2 can also be used as the derived first signal M1 '.
- a derived first signal Ml 'but also the area under the first magnetic signal Ml at the respective y-position of the security element 2 can be used or other characteristics of the first magnetic signal Ml.
- the derived second signal M2 ' is derived analogously from the second magnetic signal M2 as the derived first signal Ml' is derived from the first magnetic signal Ml.
- the derived second signal M2 ' may be derived either from the second magnetic signal M2 alone or from the first and second magnetic signals M1, M2. In the latter case, for example, first the maximum value or the area of the first and second magnetic signals M1, M2 or respectively a correlation value of the first and second magnetic signals M1, M2 are determined with the base signal, and subsequently the derived second signal M2 'is determined therefrom. derived, eg by a linear combination or ratio formation. For example, the derived second signal M2 'is derived by adding or subtracting the maximum values of the first M1 and the second magnetic signal M2 at the respective y-position or by adding or subtracting the correlation values of the first and second magnetic signals at the respective y-position. Position.
- Threshold Sl and a lower threshold S2 to identify the magnetic regions h, 1, c. If the comparison with the two thresholds Sl, S2 for one of the magnetic areas h, 1, c found that the derived second signal M2 'of the respective magnetic area neither exceeds the upper threshold Sl nor falls below the lower threshold S2, this magnetic area is called Combined magnetic domain c identified, cf. FIG. 7. When the upper threshold S1 is exceeded, the respective magnetic region is identified as a high-coercive magnetic region h and, when the lower threshold is undershot, as a low-coercive magnetic region 1.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
- Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102009039588A DE102009039588A1 (de) | 2009-09-01 | 2009-09-01 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung von Wertdokumenten |
PCT/EP2010/062681 WO2011026829A1 (de) | 2009-09-01 | 2010-08-31 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur prüfung von wertdokumenten |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2473978A1 true EP2473978A1 (de) | 2012-07-11 |
EP2473978B1 EP2473978B1 (de) | 2017-07-05 |
Family
ID=42989579
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10747629.3A Active EP2473978B1 (de) | 2009-09-01 | 2010-08-31 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur prüfung von wertdokumenten |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8544630B2 (de) |
EP (1) | EP2473978B1 (de) |
CN (1) | CN102576477B (de) |
BR (1) | BR112012004544B1 (de) |
DE (1) | DE102009039588A1 (de) |
ES (1) | ES2642105T3 (de) |
RU (1) | RU2560787C2 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2011026829A1 (de) |
ZA (1) | ZA201200778B (de) |
Families Citing this family (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102939620B (zh) * | 2010-06-09 | 2015-06-03 | 德国捷德有限公司 | 用于检查有价文件的方法和设备 |
DE102011109949A1 (de) * | 2011-08-10 | 2013-02-14 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Prüfanordnung zur Wertdokumentprüfung |
DE102011120972A1 (de) * | 2011-12-13 | 2013-06-13 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung von Wertdokumenten |
CN103971443B (zh) * | 2013-01-24 | 2016-08-10 | 中钞特种防伪科技有限公司 | 对防伪元件进行检测的方法和装置 |
CN105026924B (zh) * | 2013-03-22 | 2019-01-08 | 光荣株式会社 | 磁特性检测装置 |
DE102013205891A1 (de) * | 2013-04-03 | 2014-10-09 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Prüfung eines mit Magnetmaterialien versehenen Sicherheitselements |
CN103226865B (zh) * | 2013-04-16 | 2016-05-25 | 无锡乐尔科技有限公司 | 一种基于磁电阻技术检测磁性图形表面磁场的磁头 |
CN103544764B (zh) * | 2013-09-12 | 2016-11-16 | 无锡乐尔科技有限公司 | 一种用于识别磁性介质的传感器 |
CN103809137B (zh) * | 2014-02-21 | 2016-08-31 | 中国人民银行印制科学技术研究所 | 纸页检测装置和纸页检测方法 |
FR3028801B1 (fr) | 2014-11-24 | 2021-11-19 | Arjowiggins Security | Element de securite |
DE102015002219A1 (de) * | 2015-02-24 | 2016-08-25 | Meas Deutschland Gmbh | Vormagnetisierungsmagnet und Messvorrichtung zum Messen magnetischer Eigenschaften der Umgebung der Messvorrichtung sowie Verfahren zur Vormagnetisierung magnetischer Materialien auf einem Messobjekt |
CN105118137A (zh) * | 2015-07-31 | 2015-12-02 | 孙宗远 | 一种移动便携式手持验钞装置以及验钞方法 |
CN105160753A (zh) * | 2015-09-16 | 2015-12-16 | 深圳市倍量科技有限公司 | 一种纸币安全线防伪检测的装置及方法 |
DE102016015545A1 (de) | 2016-12-27 | 2018-06-28 | Giesecke+Devrient Currency Technology Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Detektieren eines Sicherheitsfadens in einem Wertdokument |
DE102016015559A1 (de) | 2016-12-27 | 2018-06-28 | Giesecke+Devrient Currency Technology Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Detektieren eines Sicherheitsfadens in einem Wertdokument |
BE1025465B1 (de) * | 2017-08-11 | 2019-03-11 | Phoenix Contact Gmbh & Co. Kg | Verfahren zum Magnetisieren von mindestens zwei Magneten unterschiedlicher magnetischer Koerzitivfeldstärken |
DE102018008519A1 (de) * | 2018-10-30 | 2020-04-30 | Giesecke+Devrient Currency Technology Gmbh | Magnetische Prüfung von Wertdokumenten |
CN110108781B (zh) * | 2019-05-15 | 2023-11-10 | 中钞印制技术研究院有限公司 | 移动设备及其物品鉴别方法、装置和***、存储介质 |
DE102019003491A1 (de) * | 2019-05-16 | 2020-11-19 | Giesecke+Devrient Currency Technology Gmbh | Prüfung der Koerzitivfeldstärke von Magnetpigmenten |
CN110738785A (zh) * | 2019-09-19 | 2020-01-31 | 中钞特种防伪科技有限公司 | 用于磁性防伪元件的检测方法及设备 |
CN113516216A (zh) * | 2021-04-26 | 2021-10-19 | 中钞特种防伪科技有限公司 | 防伪元件、防伪元件检测方法及防伪产品 |
Family Cites Families (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2834287C2 (de) | 1978-08-04 | 1984-03-22 | GAO Gesellschaft für Automation und Organisation mbH, 8000 München | Vorrichtung zur Echtheitsprüfung ferromagnetischer Sicherheitsfäden in Wertdrucken |
GB2130414A (en) * | 1982-11-18 | 1984-05-31 | Portals Ltd | Security documents and verification thereof |
GB8921435D0 (en) * | 1989-09-22 | 1989-11-08 | Bank Of England | Sensor system for document sorting machines |
ES2088884T5 (es) * | 1989-11-23 | 1999-11-16 | Mantegazza A Arti Grafici | Unidad para detectar codigos magneticos. |
WO1998038792A1 (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 1998-09-03 | University And Community College System Of Nevada | Magnetoresistive scanning system |
FR2838543B1 (fr) * | 2002-04-12 | 2004-06-04 | Cryptic | Systeme de marquage magnetique, procede et machine pour sa fabrication |
DE102004049999A1 (de) | 2004-10-14 | 2006-04-20 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Sicherheitselement |
DE102006055170A1 (de) * | 2006-11-22 | 2008-05-29 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Sicherheitselement zur Absicherung von Wertdokumenten |
ITMI20080053A1 (it) * | 2008-01-15 | 2009-07-16 | Fabriano Securities Srl | Elemento di sicurezza, particolarmente per banconote, carte di sicurezza e simili, avente caratteristiche anti-contraffazione. |
ITMI20080261A1 (it) * | 2008-02-19 | 2009-08-20 | Fabriano Securities Srl | Sensore di lettura di banconote, carte di sicurezza e simili, contenenti almeno un elemento di sicurezza. |
-
2009
- 2009-09-01 DE DE102009039588A patent/DE102009039588A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2010
- 2010-08-31 RU RU2012112338/08A patent/RU2560787C2/ru active
- 2010-08-31 WO PCT/EP2010/062681 patent/WO2011026829A1/de active Application Filing
- 2010-08-31 CN CN201080043437.3A patent/CN102576477B/zh active Active
- 2010-08-31 EP EP10747629.3A patent/EP2473978B1/de active Active
- 2010-08-31 ES ES10747629.3T patent/ES2642105T3/es active Active
- 2010-08-31 BR BR112012004544-0A patent/BR112012004544B1/pt not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2010-08-31 US US13/393,432 patent/US8544630B2/en active Active
-
2012
- 2012-02-01 ZA ZA2012/00778A patent/ZA201200778B/en unknown
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2011026829A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ZA201200778B (en) | 2012-10-31 |
US8544630B2 (en) | 2013-10-01 |
RU2560787C2 (ru) | 2015-08-20 |
US20120160632A1 (en) | 2012-06-28 |
EP2473978B1 (de) | 2017-07-05 |
RU2012112338A (ru) | 2014-10-20 |
BR112012004544A2 (pt) | 2018-06-26 |
ES2642105T3 (es) | 2017-11-15 |
WO2011026829A1 (de) | 2011-03-10 |
CN102576477B (zh) | 2015-10-14 |
BR112012004544B1 (pt) | 2021-03-16 |
CN102576477A (zh) | 2012-07-11 |
DE102009039588A1 (de) | 2011-03-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2473978B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur prüfung von wertdokumenten | |
EP2580745B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur prüfung von wertdokumenten | |
EP2376932B1 (de) | Magnetsensor zur prüfung von wertdokumenten | |
EP2791919B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur prüfung von wertdokumenten | |
EP2981948B1 (de) | Prüfung eines mit magnetmaterialien versehenen sicherheitselements | |
EP2742492B1 (de) | Prüfanordnung zur wertdokumentprüfung | |
EP2745277B1 (de) | Messvorrichtung zum messen magnetischer eigenschaften der umgebung der messvorrichtung | |
EP2307898A1 (de) | Messvorrichtung zum messen magnetischer eigenschaften und herstellungsverfahren für eine solche messvorrichtung | |
DE2834287C2 (de) | Vorrichtung zur Echtheitsprüfung ferromagnetischer Sicherheitsfäden in Wertdrucken | |
EP3262432B2 (de) | Verfahren zur vormagnetisierung magnetischer materialien auf einem messobjekt | |
DE102010035469A1 (de) | Sensor zur Prüfung von Wertdokumenten | |
WO2014090397A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur untersuchung eines wertdokuments und verfahren zur untersuchung eines wertdokuments | |
EP2941759B1 (de) | Messvorrichtung zum messen magnetischer eigenschaften der umgebung der messvorrichtung | |
EP3084731A1 (de) | Magnetisierungseinrichtung zum prüfen eines sicherheitselements | |
EP3874475B1 (de) | Magnetische prüfung von wertdokumenten | |
DE102016015545A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Detektieren eines Sicherheitsfadens in einem Wertdokument |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20120402 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170203 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170203 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 907075 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170715 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502010013826 Country of ref document: DE |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE SCHAAD, BALASS, MENZL AND PARTN, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20170705 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2642105 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: HC Ref document number: 907075 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH, DE Effective date: 20170918 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PUE Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GIESECKE AND DEVRIENT GMBH, DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171005 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20180118 AND 20180124 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171006 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171005 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171105 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502010013826 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20170831 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180406 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: TP Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH, DE Effective date: 20180530 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 907075 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20100831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170705 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170705 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20210823 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230520 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220831 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20230831 Year of fee payment: 14 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20230824 Year of fee payment: 14 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20230918 Year of fee payment: 14 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20230902 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230831 Year of fee payment: 14 |