EP1350124B1 - Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow - Google Patents
Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1350124B1 EP1350124B1 EP01992063A EP01992063A EP1350124B1 EP 1350124 B1 EP1350124 B1 EP 1350124B1 EP 01992063 A EP01992063 A EP 01992063A EP 01992063 A EP01992063 A EP 01992063A EP 1350124 B1 EP1350124 B1 EP 1350124B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- reflected pulses
- precipitation
- condensation
- aircraft
- result
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S17/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/0017—Arrangements for implementing traffic-related aircraft activities, e.g. arrangements for generating, displaying, acquiring or managing traffic information
- G08G5/0026—Arrangements for implementing traffic-related aircraft activities, e.g. arrangements for generating, displaying, acquiring or managing traffic information located on the ground
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64F—GROUND OR AIRCRAFT-CARRIER-DECK INSTALLATIONS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH AIRCRAFT; DESIGNING, MANUFACTURING, ASSEMBLING, CLEANING, MAINTAINING OR REPAIRING AIRCRAFT, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; HANDLING, TRANSPORTING, TESTING OR INSPECTING AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B64F1/00—Ground or aircraft-carrier-deck installations
- B64F1/002—Taxiing aids
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S17/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
- G01S17/66—Tracking systems using electromagnetic waves other than radio waves
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S17/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
- G01S17/88—Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S17/93—Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S17/933—Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of aircraft or spacecraft
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/48—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
- G01S7/4802—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00 using analysis of echo signal for target characterisation; Target signature; Target cross-section
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/0073—Surveillance aids
- G08G5/0082—Surveillance aids for monitoring traffic from a ground station
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/06—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC] for control when on the ground
- G08G5/065—Navigation or guidance aids, e.g. for taxiing or rolling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S17/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
- G01S17/02—Systems using the reflection of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves
- G01S17/04—Systems determining the presence of a target
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S17/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
- G01S17/88—Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S17/95—Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications for meteorological use
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/06—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC] for control when on the ground
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A90/00—Technologies having an indirect contribution to adaptation to climate change
- Y02A90/10—Information and communication technologies [ICT] supporting adaptation to climate change, e.g. for weather forecasting or climate simulation
Definitions
- the present invention is directed to aircraft docking systems and more particularly to safety enhancements for aircraft docking systems for automatic checking of the apron before and during docking and for detection of fog and snowfall in front of the docking system.
- the present invention is further directed to methods implemented on such systems.
- U.S. Patent No. 6,023,665 issued February 8, 2000, to the same inventor named in the present application and hereby incorporated by reference into the present disclosure, teaches a system for detecting, identifying and docking aircraft using laser pulses to obtain a profile of an object in the distance.
- the system initially scans the area in front of the gate until it locates and identifies an object. Once the object is identified as an airplane, the system tracks the airplane. By using the information from the profile, the system can in real time display the type of airplane, the distance from the stopping point and the lateral position of the airplane.
- the modes of operation of the system include a capture mode, in which an object is detected and determined to be an aircraft, and a tracking mode, in which the type of aircraft is verified and the motion of the aircraft toward the gate is monitored.
- the docking guidance system of the above-referenced patent provides for the computerized location of an object, verification of the identity of the object and tracking of the object, the object preferably being an aircraft 12.
- the control tower 14 lands an aircraft 12, it informs the system that the aircraft is approaching a gate 16 and the type of aircraft (i.e., 747, L-1011, etc.) expected.
- the system 10 then scans the area 19 in front of the gate 16 until it locates an object that it identifies as an airplane 12.
- the system 10 compares the measured profile of the aircraft 12 with a reference profile for the expected type of aircraft and evaluates other geometric criteria characteristic of the expected aircraft type. If the located aircraft, at a minimum specified distance (e.g., 12 m) before the stop position, does not match the expected profile and the other criteria, the system informs or signals the tower 14, displays a stop sign and shuts down.
- a minimum specified distance e.g., 12 m
- the system 10 tracks it into the gate 16 by displaying in real time to the pilot the distance remaining to the proper stopping point and the lateral position of the plane 12.
- the lateral position of the plane 12 is provided on a display 18 allowing the pilot to correct the position of the plane to approach the gate 16 from the correct angle. Once the airplane 12 is at its stopping point, that fact is shown on the display 18 and the pilot stops the plane.
- the system 10 includes a Laser Range Finder (LRF) 20, two mirrors 21, 22, a display unit 18, two step motors 24, 25, and a microprocessor 26.
- LRF Laser Range Finder
- Suitable LRF products are sold by Laser Atlanta Corporation and are capable of emitting laser pulses, receiving the reflections of those pulses reflected off of distant objects and computing the distance to those objects.
- the system 10 is arranged such that there is a connection 28 between the serial port of the LRF 20 and the microprocessor 26. Through that connection, the LRF 20 sends measurement data approximately every 1/400th of a second to the microprocessor 26.
- the hardware components generally designated 23 of the system 20 are controlled by the programmed microprocessor 26.
- the microprocessor 26 feeds data to the display 18.
- the display unit 18 is placed above the gate 16 to show the pilot how far the plane is from its stopping point 29, the type of aircraft 30 the system believes is approaching and the lateral location of the plane. Using that display, the pilot can adjust the approach of the plane 12 to the gate 16 to ensure the plane is on the correct angle to reach the gate.
- the microprocessor 26 processes the data from the LRF 20 and controls the direction of the laser 20 through its connection 32 to the step motors 24, 25.
- the step motors 24, 25 are connected to the mirrors 21, 22 and move them in response to instructions from the microprocessor 26.
- the microprocessor 26 can change the angle of the mirrors 21, 22 and aim the laser pulses from the LRF 20.
- the mirrors 21, 22 aim the laser by reflecting the laser pulses outward over the tarmac of the airport.
- the LRF 20 does not move.
- the scanning by the laser is done with mirrors.
- One mirror 22 controls the horizontal angle of the laser, while the other mirror 21 controls the vertical angle.
- the microprocessor 26 controls the angle of the mirrors and thus the direction of the laser pulse.
- the system 10 controls the horizontal mirror 22 to achieve a continuous horizontal scanning within a ⁇ 10 degree angle in approximately 0.1 degree angular steps which are equivalent to 16 microsteps per step with the Escap EDM-453 step motor.
- One angular step is taken for each reply from the reading unit, i.e., approximately every 2.5 ms.
- the vertical mirror 21 can be controlled to achieve a vertical scan between +20 and -30 degrees in approximately 0.1 degree angular steps with one step every 2.5 ms.
- the vertical mirror is used to scan vertically when the nose height is being determined and when the aircraft 12 is being identified. During the tracking mode, the vertical mirror 21 is continuously adjusted to keep the horizontal scan tracking the nose tip of the aircraft 12.
- Fog is most often seen between 10-25m by the system. As that distance is closer, or in the area of, the stop position, the system will generate a gate blocked or ID-fail condition if the capture procedure triggers on the fog.
- the capture procedure needs a method to recognize that the object captured is most likely fog and is no obstruction to the docking procedure once the aircraft appears.
- Reference DE 43 01 637 teaches a collision avoidance system for airports. However, that reference does not teach or suggest using first and second sets of light pulses to detect an aircraft and obstacles.
- Reference US 5 627 511 teaches an automotive anti-collision system which measures the distance to an object ahead of a vehicle to avoid collision, not an aircraft docking system. That system is simply a distance measuring apparatus using "a reference distance range" (col. 12, line 62) based on “a plurality of distance data pieces showing substantially the same short distance value” (col. 8, lines 3-5). It does so because the system taught in that reference is “based on the fact that light dispersed by snow, fog, or rain is produced at very short range" (col. 9, lines 4-6).
- the present invention is directed to a method and a system as defined by appended claims 1 and 5, respectively.
- the apron is automatically checked for obstacles before and during docking.
- the aircraft may be approaching the gate at a high speed, it is essential that checking for obstacles occupy the system for the minimum amount of time so that the influence on the docking function is minimized.
- the area is checked which is swept by the wings of a narrow-body aircraft or swept by the engines of a wide-body aircraft.
- the present invention is directed to a system and method for aircraft detection in which fog and snowfall are detected by analyzing the laser sweep triggering the capture condition. If the measured distance to the caught object is found to vary randomly (in a non-deterministic way) across the width of the object, the object is considered to be a possible fog/snow condition. A possible fog condition is not considered by the system as a valid target for the tracking phase, so that the system remains in capture mode. If the fog condition prevails, the system informs the pilot/stand operator by displaying a warning message. Under those conditions, it is intended that the pilot shall continue, with caution, to approach the stand area, as the system will be able to pick up the aircraft as soon as it is seen through the fog.
- the display switches from the standard capture display to a display showing the aircraft type alternating with a message such as "DOWNGRADED” or "LOW VISB” to indicate that the system has downgraded performance due to reduced visibility.
- a corresponding message is displayed in the operator panel.
- the apron-checking embodiment will be disclosed first. Since it is conventional for ground support vehicles to approach an aircraft from the left, the preferred embodiment of the apron checking will be disclosed on that basis. Of course, if it is anticipated that ground support vehicles will approach from the right, the apron checking can be varied accordingly.
- Fig. 3 shows the area to be checked. It is assumed that the docking system has a horizontal scanning range of ⁇ 10°. As the 5° scan to the right of the center line covers only an area for which the pilot needs no support, the apron check is made only to the left of the center line. The 10° angle of the apron scan will cover the area in front of the right wing tip to an inner limit of about 60 m for aircraft of the same size as a B737. It will also cover the area swept by the inner engine of a wide-body aircraft into about 48 m. That corresponds to a nose position of about 45 m for a B737 and a nose position of about 25 m for B747.
- the smallest object to be detected has the following dimensions: a width of 1 m and a height of 1.5 m.
- the apron check feature ignores any echoes closer than stop position (nose) + 5m, in order to allow ground personnel to be present at the parking position.
- Fig. 4 shows a scanning geometry used for ground suppression.
- lg ( laserheight ⁇ g ) / sin ⁇
- lmax Length of "reference beam” achieved during centerline definition.
- laserheight The value automatically calculated during the center line definition procedure. In case there are several laserheight values due to ground level variations, the value is used that corresponds to the actual "Covered range" given below.
- d ⁇ 1 2 ⁇ [ ( h ⁇ g ) / ( laserheight ⁇ g ) ] ⁇ sin 2 ⁇
- Apron checking can be performed during capture mode, tracking mode or both. Apron checking during capture mode will be described first with reference to Fig. 6A. Then, apron checking during tracking mode will be described with reference to Fig. 6B.
- step 602 the normal capture scans ( ⁇ 5°) are interleaved (every second scan) with apron check scans from -15° to -5°.
- the vertical angle ⁇ of the apron check scan is changed between each scan according to Table 1 or 2 above in order to cover the -15° to -5° sector.
- step 604 If an object is detected in step 604, it is treated in step 606 as a possible aircraft, and the tracking mode is entered to check whether the object is moving (calculated speed above a certain value) in step 608. If it is moving, tracking continues in step 610. If it is not moving, it is considered in step 612 to be an obstacle; the system returns to capture mode, stores the representative coordinates of the obstacle and sets an "Obstacle Flag" indicating that there is an obstacle on the apron. If the obstacle is detected during a later apron check in step 614, the object is considered to be detected in step 616; otherwise, the coordinates are removed in step 618. If there is no stored obstacle coordinates, the flag is reset. The apron check ends in step 620.
- one apron check sweep is performed for every three capture sweeps.
- the apron check sweeps cycle through the apron area from capture point to the stop position, but never closer than 30m from the system, scanning to the side of the centerline (-15 to -5 degrees). If an object is detected, the docking procedure is paused with a gate-blocked condition. If the object disappears, the docking procedure will resume. To be considered as a blocking object, the object must remain in position over at least 2 checks, indicating that a non-moving object is present in the apron area.
- the apron check during capture uses a fixed set of checkpoints, selected to cover the designated apron check area.
- the system will halt the capture process and display a warning message.
- the system will cycle through the apron check points only, increasing the speed of apron check. This will continue until all apron check points report the area clear, at which time the system will revert to capture mode.
- apron area For the apron area to be considered free, at least 1.5 cycles through the apron check points must report no object, in order to keep up with a moving object in the apron check area.
- an apron check scan is done in step 634 and is repeated about every 2 seconds (e.g., after every 8 scans).
- the vertical angle of the apron check scan is chosen such that the scan covers the area from 5 m behind the aircraft nose and inwards. If a non-moving object is detected in step 636, then in step 638, the "Obstacle Flag" is set, and tracking mode continues. If it is determined in step 640 that the object disappears, the flag is reset in step 642. As long as the flag is set during tracking mode, the message WAIT - APRN BLKD is displayed in step 644. The process ends with step 646.
- one apron check sweep is performed for every 8 nose sweeps (4Hor+4Ver).
- the apron check sweep is synchronized not to coincide with the engine-id sweeps, as that would result in too much time spent not tracing the aircraft.
- Engine-id sweeps also have a periodicity of 8 nose sweeps.
- the sweep sequence would be: Ver Hor Ver Hor MotorId Ver Hor Ver Hor ApronCheck ... repeated until id fail at 12m from stop.
- the apron check sweep looks at a fixed position relative to the aircraft nose. If an object is found, the docking procedure is paused with an apron-blocked condition. If the object disappears, the docking procedure will resume.
- the system When an object has been found in front of the aircraft, the system will lock the apron check sweep to the object, regardless of the position of the aircraft, in order not to allow the apron check sweep to slide off the object as the aircraft continues to move forward.
- the system must still keep track of the nose of the aircraft, but not give any lead-in information. If the aircraft is found to be at the stop position while an apron-blocked condition exists, the system ignores the apron-blocked condition and displays the STOP message.
- the apron check will not continue once the aircraft is closer than 4m to the stop position or the aircraft is closer than 30m from the system, in order not to interfere with stop position accuracy.
- step 802 the aircraft docking system is started in accordance with the normal procedure.
- the normal display of Fig. 7A is shown.
- the stand area, shown in a top-down view in Fig. 7B, is covered in fog.
- step 804 the system considers the fog to be an object large enough to generate a capture.
- step 806 the system analyzes the data of Fig. 7C and determines that the captured object is most likely fog or snow.
- the system remains in the capture mode, but activates the low-visibility display, in which the display of Fig. 7D alternates with that of Fig. 7E.
- step 808 the aircraft approaches the stand.
- a top-down view of the approach is shown in Fig. 7F.
- step 810 as the aircraft approaches the stand, the system sees the aircraft through the fog.
- the echo picture is shown in Fig. 7G.
- step 812 as the system catches the aircraft, the distance and azimuth display of Fig. 7H is activated.
- step 814 the docking proceeds in accordance with normal operation, and the display of Fig. 7I is shown.
- Each of the algorithms discriminates an echo picture resulting from fog from an echo picture resulting from solid objects.
- the algorithms are based on the fact that the spatial distribution of echoes from fog is to a certain extent random. Any of the algorithms can be used during capture mode to avoid a "Gate blocked” or "ID fail” message caused by echoes from fog. Specific numerical ratios used in the algorithms, such as 50% or 60% of all echoes, are determined empirically.
- the first algorithm will be explained with reference to the flow chart of Fig. 9.
- the first algorithm includes a preconditioning phase 902 for preconditioning the echo pattern and a criteria phase 904 in which the preconditioned echo pattern is compared to criteria to determine whether the pattern results from fog or a solid object.
- the second algorithm will be explained with reference to Fig. 10.
- the second algorithm is similar to the first algorithm and also has a preconditioning phase 1002 and a criteria phase 1004.
- the preconditioning phase 1002 begins with step 1006, in which l mean and ⁇ are calculated for all of the echo data in accordance with the equations given above. For each echo i , the distances to adjacent echoes are assessed in step 1008. If
- the criteria phase 1004 applies two criteria to the preconditioned data. If it is determined in step 1012 that the remaining number of echoes is less than n /2, or in other words, more than half of the echoes were rejected in step 1010, then it is determined in step 1014 that there is no fog. Otherwise, in step 1016, l mean and ⁇ are recalculated for the remaining echoes to give l mean-new and ⁇ new . If
- the third algorithm will be explained with reference to Fig. 11.
- the third algorithm is based on two assumptions. First, it is assumed to be a characteristic of fog that little or no correlation exists between the positions of adjacent echoes. Second, it is assumed to be a characteristic for solid objects that most groups of three or four adjacent echoes are positioned such that an approximately straight line can connect them. In the third algorithm, a preconditioning step is not required, and all echo values are used.
- u i
- u i
- V is an empirically determined value
- Each laser sweep which triggers the standard capture conditions is analyzed for possible fog conditions before control is passed to the tracking algorithm.
- fog analysis only echoes from ⁇ 8m of the distance to the caught object and no closer than 2m and no farther away than 35m from the laser are considered.
- a count of direction changes is made, where a direction change is defined as an echo 2dm or more away from its neighbour, and with a different heading (inwards/outwards) from that of the previous distance step.
- the two first direction changes are not counted, as they are expected to be found on a real aircraft; only the changes beyond the first two are counted.
- the echo pattern is considered to be caused by fog or snow. If fog or snow is detected, the capture phase continues. If more than 4 of the last 8 capture sweeps report a fog condition, a 'low visibility' condition is considered to exist, and the display switches to 'low visibility' message.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Optical Radar Systems And Details Thereof (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
- Road Signs Or Road Markings (AREA)
- Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention is directed to aircraft docking systems and more particularly to safety enhancements for aircraft docking systems for automatic checking of the apron before and during docking and for detection of fog and snowfall in front of the docking system. The present invention is further directed to methods implemented on such systems.
- In recent years, there has been a significantly increased number of passenger, cargo and other aircraft traffic, including takeoffs, landings and other aircraft ground traffic. Also, there has been a marked increase in the number of ground support vehicles which are required to offload cargo and to provide catering services and ongoing maintenance and support of all aircraft. With that substantial increase in ground traffic has come a need for greater control and safety in the docking and identification of aircraft on an airfield.
- To that end, U.S. Patent No. 6,023,665, issued February 8, 2000, to the same inventor named in the present application and hereby incorporated by reference into the present disclosure, teaches a system for detecting, identifying and docking aircraft using laser pulses to obtain a profile of an object in the distance. The system initially scans the area in front of the gate until it locates and identifies an object. Once the object is identified as an airplane, the system tracks the airplane. By using the information from the profile, the system can in real time display the type of airplane, the distance from the stopping point and the lateral position of the airplane. The modes of operation of the system include a capture mode, in which an object is detected and determined to be an aircraft, and a tracking mode, in which the type of aircraft is verified and the motion of the aircraft toward the gate is monitored.
- Referring to Fig. 1A, the docking guidance system of the above-referenced patent, generally designated 10, provides for the computerized location of an object, verification of the identity of the object and tracking of the object, the object preferably being an
aircraft 12. In operation, once thecontrol tower 14 lands anaircraft 12, it informs the system that the aircraft is approaching agate 16 and the type of aircraft (i.e., 747, L-1011, etc.) expected. Thesystem 10 then scans thearea 19 in front of thegate 16 until it locates an object that it identifies as anairplane 12. Thesystem 10 then compares the measured profile of theaircraft 12 with a reference profile for the expected type of aircraft and evaluates other geometric criteria characteristic of the expected aircraft type. If the located aircraft, at a minimum specified distance (e.g., 12 m) before the stop position, does not match the expected profile and the other criteria, the system informs or signals thetower 14, displays a stop sign and shuts down. - If the object is the expected
aircraft 12, thesystem 10 tracks it into thegate 16 by displaying in real time to the pilot the distance remaining to the proper stopping point and the lateral position of theplane 12. The lateral position of theplane 12 is provided on adisplay 18 allowing the pilot to correct the position of the plane to approach thegate 16 from the correct angle. Once theairplane 12 is at its stopping point, that fact is shown on thedisplay 18 and the pilot stops the plane. - Referring to Fig. 1B, the
system 10 includes a Laser Range Finder (LRF) 20, twomirrors 21, 22, adisplay unit 18, twostep motors 24, 25, and a microprocessor 26. Suitable LRF products are sold by Laser Atlanta Corporation and are capable of emitting laser pulses, receiving the reflections of those pulses reflected off of distant objects and computing the distance to those objects. - The
system 10 is arranged such that there is aconnection 28 between the serial port of theLRF 20 and the microprocessor 26. Through that connection, the LRF 20 sends measurement data approximately every 1/400th of a second to the microprocessor 26. The hardware components generally designated 23 of thesystem 20 are controlled by the programmed microprocessor 26. In addition, the microprocessor 26 feeds data to thedisplay 18. As the interface to the pilot, thedisplay unit 18 is placed above thegate 16 to show the pilot how far the plane is from itsstopping point 29, the type ofaircraft 30 the system believes is approaching and the lateral location of the plane. Using that display, the pilot can adjust the approach of theplane 12 to thegate 16 to ensure the plane is on the correct angle to reach the gate. If thedisplay 18 shows thewrong aircraft type 30, the pilot can abort the approach before any damage is done. That double check ensures the safety of the passengers, plane and airport facilities because if the system tries to dock a larger 747 at a gate where a 737 is expected, it likely will cause extensive damage. - In addition to the
display 18, the microprocessor 26 processes the data from the LRF 20 and controls the direction of thelaser 20 through its connection 32 to thestep motors 24, 25. Thestep motors 24, 25 are connected to themirrors 21, 22 and move them in response to instructions from the microprocessor 26. Thus, by controlling thestep motors 24, 25, the microprocessor 26 can change the angle of themirrors 21, 22 and aim the laser pulses from theLRF 20. - The
mirrors 21, 22 aim the laser by reflecting the laser pulses outward over the tarmac of the airport. In the preferred embodiment, the LRF 20 does not move. The scanning by the laser is done with mirrors. Onemirror 22 controls the horizontal angle of the laser, while the other mirror 21 controls the vertical angle. By activating thestep motors 24, 25, the microprocessor 26 controls the angle of the mirrors and thus the direction of the laser pulse. - The
system 10 controls thehorizontal mirror 22 to achieve a continuous horizontal scanning within a ±10 degree angle in approximately 0.1 degree angular steps which are equivalent to 16 microsteps per step with the Escap EDM-453 step motor. One angular step is taken for each reply from the reading unit, i.e., approximately every 2.5 ms. The vertical mirror 21 can be controlled to achieve a vertical scan between +20 and -30 degrees in approximately 0.1 degree angular steps with one step every 2.5 ms. The vertical mirror is used to scan vertically when the nose height is being determined and when theaircraft 12 is being identified. During the tracking mode, the vertical mirror 21 is continuously adjusted to keep the horizontal scan tracking the nose tip of theaircraft 12. - While the system disclosed in the above-cited patent detects the airplane, that system does not detect ground support vehicles or other objects in the apron of the docking area. Because of the pilot's limited field of view, the aircraft may collide with such ground support vehicles or other objects. Also, the system may give erroneous warnings in fog or snow, particularly the former.
- Fog is most often seen between 10-25m by the system. As that distance is closer, or in the area of, the stop position, the system will generate a gate blocked or ID-fail condition if the capture procedure triggers on the fog. The capture procedure needs a method to recognize that the object captured is most likely fog and is no obstruction to the docking procedure once the aircraft appears.
- Log files taken during foggy conditions show that fog is reported like a solid object in front of the system. A sweep into fog often reports close to 100% echoes, and the echoes vary in distance only with a few decimeters of each other. Snowfall is most often more spread out, giving 60-80% echoes with a spread of 5-10m. Thus, snow is generally easier to detect, i.e., discriminate from a solid object, than fog is. Figs. 2A and 2B show sample images of fog, while Figs. 2C and 2D show sample images of snow.
- Reference DE 43 01 637 teaches a collision avoidance system for airports. However, that reference does not teach or suggest using first and second sets of light pulses to detect an aircraft and obstacles.
- Reference US 5 627 511 teaches an automotive anti-collision system which measures the distance to an object ahead of a vehicle to avoid collision, not an aircraft docking system. That system is simply a distance measuring apparatus using "a reference distance range" (col. 12, line 62) based on "a plurality of distance data pieces showing substantially the same short distance value" (col. 8, lines 3-5). It does so because the system taught in that reference is "based on the fact that light dispersed by snow, fog, or rain is produced at very short range" (col. 9, lines 4-6). As a consequence, when a low reflectivity object such as a person wearing dark clothes, a dirty or dark vehicle, a portion beneath a bed of a truck is present at short range, it assumes the same physical properties as those of fog that the fog exists at close range and has a low reflectivity (col. 10,
lines 28 ff.). - It will be apparent from the above that a need exists in the art for an aircraft detection system which overcomes the above-noted problems of the prior art. It is therefore an object of the present invention to permit detection of objects in the apron.
- It is another object to support the pilot's judgment as to whether it is safe to proceed to the gate or there is a risk of collision.
- It is another object of the present invention to permit accurate detection of fog and snow.
- To achieve the above and other objects, the present invention is directed to a method and a system as defined by appended
claims - The present invention is directed to a system and method for aircraft detection in which fog and snowfall are detected by analyzing the laser sweep triggering the capture condition. If the measured distance to the caught object is found to vary randomly (in a non-deterministic way) across the width of the object, the object is considered to be a possible fog/snow condition. A possible fog condition is not considered by the system as a valid target for the tracking phase, so that the system remains in capture mode. If the fog condition prevails, the system informs the pilot/stand operator by displaying a warning message. Under those conditions, it is intended that the pilot shall continue, with caution, to approach the stand area, as the system will be able to pick up the aircraft as soon as it is seen through the fog.
- When a fog condition has been detected, the display switches from the standard capture display to a display showing the aircraft type alternating with a message such as "DOWNGRADED" or "LOW VISB" to indicate that the system has downgraded performance due to reduced visibility. A corresponding message is displayed in the operator panel.
- Any embodiment, or combination of embodiments, of the present invention can be implemented in the system of the above-referenced patent by appropriate modification.
- Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be set forth in detail with reference to the drawings, in which:
- Figs. 1A and 1B show the aircraft docking system of the above-cited patent, which can be modified in accordance with the present invention;
- Figs. 2A and 2B show images of fog taken with the aircraft docking system of Figs. 1A and 1B;
- Figs. 2C and 2D show images of snow taken with the aircraft docking system of Figs. 1A and 1B;
- Fig. 3 is a drawing showing an area to be checked during apron check;
- Fig. 4 is a drawing showing the geometry used in ground suppression during apron check;
- Fig. 5 is a drawing showing the geometry used in calculating vertical scan angles during apron check;
- Figs. 6A and 6B are diagrams of flow charts of the apron scan carried out during capture and tracking modes, respectively;
- Figs. 7A-7I are drawings showing stages in the fog detection procedure;
- Fig. 8 is a diagram of a flow chart of the fog detection procedure; and
- Figs. 9-11 are diagrams showing flow charts of three alternative algorithms used by the present invention for fog detection.
- Various preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be set forth in detail with reference to the drawings, in which the same reference numerals refer to the same components or operational steps throughout. First, a preferred embodiment of the apron checking will be disclosed; then, a preferred embodiment of the fog detection will be disclosed. While the two embodiments will be disclosed separately, it will be understood that they can be combined.
- The apron-checking embodiment will be disclosed first. Since it is conventional for ground support vehicles to approach an aircraft from the left, the preferred embodiment of the apron checking will be disclosed on that basis. Of course, if it is anticipated that ground support vehicles will approach from the right, the apron checking can be varied accordingly.
- Fig. 3 shows the area to be checked. It is assumed that the docking system has a horizontal scanning range of ±10°. As the 5° scan to the right of the center line covers only an area for which the pilot needs no support, the apron check is made only to the left of the center line. The 10° angle of the apron scan will cover the area in front of the right wing tip to an inner limit of about 60 m for aircraft of the same size as a B737. It will also cover the area swept by the inner engine of a wide-body aircraft into about 48 m. That corresponds to a nose position of about 45 m for a B737 and a nose position of about 25 m for B747. It is assumed that the smallest object to be detected has the following dimensions: a width of 1 m and a height of 1.5 m. The apron check feature ignores any echoes closer than stop position (nose) + 5m, in order to allow ground personnel to be present at the parking position.
- Fig. 4 shows a scanning geometry used for ground suppression. To reduce problems with ground echoes, e.g. due to heaps of snow, all echoes below a certain level g above ground are ignored. Thus, an echo is ignored if the measured distance l is larger than lg, given by
where γ = δ + β
δ = arcsin (laserheight / lmax)
β = Vertical angle referenced to "reference beam"
lmax = Length of "reference beam" achieved during centerline definition.
laserheight= The value automatically calculated during the center line definition procedure.
In case there are several laserheight values due to ground level variations, the value is used that corresponds to the actual "Covered range" given below. - The vertical angle of the scans for the apron check will be explained with reference to Fig. 5. In order to detect an object with a height h the scan thus has to hit the object at a height between g and h.
-
- As an example, assume that an area from 30 m out to 100 m is to be covered. This gives the following two examples of coverage and scan angles γ in degrees. For both examples, laserheight = 5 m. In the first example, h = 1.5 m, and g = 0.5 m. The resulting values of γ and of the covered range m are given in Table 1:
γ Covered range M 7.6 34 6.8 38 6.0 43 5.3 48 4.7 54 4.2 61 3.8 68 3.3 77 3.0 87 2.6 98 γ Covered range m 7.6 30-37 5.7 37-47 4.3 47 - 61 3.2 61 - 78 2.4 78-102 - The angular step in the horizontal scan will now be described. Assume that a 1m wide object is to be detected at 100 m. Assume that 3 hits on the object are required. That means that the resolution must be < arctan(0.3/100) ≈ 0,17° which means that 1 microstep per measurement is required, i.e., the same as for the normal scan.
- Apron checking can be performed during capture mode, tracking mode or both. Apron checking during capture mode will be described first with reference to Fig. 6A. Then, apron checking during tracking mode will be described with reference to Fig. 6B.
- During the capture mode, in
step 602, the normal capture scans (±5°) are interleaved (every second scan) with apron check scans from -15° to -5°. The vertical angle γ of the apron check scan is changed between each scan according to Table 1 or 2 above in order to cover the -15° to -5° sector. - If an object is detected in
step 604, it is treated instep 606 as a possible aircraft, and the tracking mode is entered to check whether the object is moving (calculated speed above a certain value) instep 608. If it is moving, tracking continues instep 610. If it is not moving, it is considered instep 612 to be an obstacle; the system returns to capture mode, stores the representative coordinates of the obstacle and sets an "Obstacle Flag" indicating that there is an obstacle on the apron. If the obstacle is detected during a later apron check instep 614, the object is considered to be detected instep 616; otherwise, the coordinates are removed instep 618. If there is no stored obstacle coordinates, the flag is reset. The apron check ends instep 620. - During capture mode, one apron check sweep is performed for every three capture sweeps. The apron check sweeps cycle through the apron area from capture point to the stop position, but never closer than 30m from the system, scanning to the side of the centerline (-15 to -5 degrees). If an object is detected, the docking procedure is paused with a gate-blocked condition. If the object disappears, the docking procedure will resume. To be considered as a blocking object, the object must remain in position over at least 2 checks, indicating that a non-moving object is present in the apron area.
- The apron check during capture uses a fixed set of checkpoints, selected to cover the designated apron check area. When an object is detected in the apron check area, the system will halt the capture process and display a warning message. At that time, the system will cycle through the apron check points only, increasing the speed of apron check. This will continue until all apron check points report the area clear, at which time the system will revert to capture mode.
- For the apron area to be considered free, at least 1.5 cycles through the apron check points must report no object, in order to keep up with a moving object in the apron check area.
- During the tracking mode, as soon as possible after the aircraft ID is verified in step 623, an apron check scan is done in
step 634 and is repeated about every 2 seconds (e.g., after every 8 scans). The vertical angle of the apron check scan is chosen such that the scan covers the area from 5 m behind the aircraft nose and inwards. If a non-moving object is detected instep 636, then instep 638, the "Obstacle Flag" is set, and tracking mode continues. If it is determined instep 640 that the object disappears, the flag is reset instep 642. As long as the flag is set during tracking mode, the message WAIT - APRN BLKD is displayed instep 644. The process ends withstep 646. - During the tracking mode, one apron check sweep is performed for every 8 nose sweeps (4Hor+4Ver). The apron check sweep is synchronized not to coincide with the engine-id sweeps, as that would result in too much time spent not tracing the aircraft. Engine-id sweeps also have a periodicity of 8 nose sweeps. For an unsuccessfully identified aircraft, the sweep sequence would be: Ver Hor Ver Hor MotorId Ver Hor Ver Hor ApronCheck ... repeated until id fail at 12m from stop.
- The apron check sweep looks at a fixed position relative to the aircraft nose. If an object is found, the docking procedure is paused with an apron-blocked condition. If the object disappears, the docking procedure will resume.
- When an object has been found in front of the aircraft, the system will lock the apron check sweep to the object, regardless of the position of the aircraft, in order not to allow the apron check sweep to slide off the object as the aircraft continues to move forward. The system must still keep track of the nose of the aircraft, but not give any lead-in information. If the aircraft is found to be at the stop position while an apron-blocked condition exists, the system ignores the apron-blocked condition and displays the STOP message.
- The apron check will not continue once the aircraft is closer than 4m to the stop position or the aircraft is closer than 30m from the system, in order not to interfere with stop position accuracy.
- The fog detection embodiment will now be described. First, an overview will be given with reference to the drawings of Figs. 7A-7I and the flow chart of Fig. 8.
- In
step 802, the aircraft docking system is started in accordance with the normal procedure. The normal display of Fig. 7A is shown. The stand area, shown in a top-down view in Fig. 7B, is covered in fog. - The echo picture of the fog appears in Fig. 7C. In
step 804, the system considers the fog to be an object large enough to generate a capture. - In
step 806, the system analyzes the data of Fig. 7C and determines that the captured object is most likely fog or snow. The system remains in the capture mode, but activates the low-visibility display, in which the display of Fig. 7D alternates with that of Fig. 7E. - In
step 808, the aircraft approaches the stand. A top-down view of the approach is shown in Fig. 7F. - In
step 810, as the aircraft approaches the stand, the system sees the aircraft through the fog. The echo picture is shown in Fig. 7G. - In
step 812, as the system catches the aircraft, the distance and azimuth display of Fig. 7H is activated. - In
step 814, the docking proceeds in accordance with normal operation, and the display of Fig. 7I is shown. The procedure ends instep 816. - Three algorithms for fog detection will now be presented. Each of the algorithms discriminates an echo picture resulting from fog from an echo picture resulting from solid objects. The algorithms are based on the fact that the spatial distribution of echoes from fog is to a certain extent random. Any of the algorithms can be used during capture mode to avoid a "Gate blocked" or "ID fail" message caused by echoes from fog. Specific numerical ratios used in the algorithms, such as 50% or 60% of all echoes, are determined empirically.
- The first algorithm will be explained with reference to the flow chart of Fig. 9. The first algorithm includes a
preconditioning phase 902 for preconditioning the echo pattern and acriteria phase 904 in which the preconditioned echo pattern is compared to criteria to determine whether the pattern results from fog or a solid object. - The
preconditioning phase 902 includes two assessments of the spatial distribution of the echoes. There are n echoes having distances l i , i = 1 to n, from the laser range finder. If it is determined instep 906 that the distance between two adjacent echoes |(l i -l i+1 )| < 0.5m, then both echoes are rejected instep 908. If it is determined instep 910 that the distance change for three adjacent echoes in a row has the same sign, the three echoes are rejected instep 908. - The
criteria phase 904 applies two criteria to the preconditioned data. If it is determined in step 912 that fewer than 60% of all echoes remain after the preprocessing (that is, that more than 40% are rejected in step 908), than it is determined in step 914 that there is no fog. Otherwise, it is determined in step 916 whether the mean distance l mean = 20 ± 2 m and ν = 4 ± 1 m, where
If so, it is determined instep 918 that there is fog. Otherwise, it is determined in step 914 that there is no fog. The algorithm ends instep 920. - The second algorithm will be explained with reference to Fig. 10. The second algorithm is similar to the first algorithm and also has a
preconditioning phase 1002 and acriteria phase 1004. - The
preconditioning phase 1002 begins withstep 1006, in which l mean and ν are calculated for all of the echo data in accordance with the equations given above. For each echo i, the distances to adjacent echoes are assessed instep 1008. If |l i -l i-1| < 0.5 m or |l i -l i+1| < 0.5 m, then echo i is rejected instep 1010. - The
criteria phase 1004 applies two criteria to the preconditioned data. If it is determined instep 1012 that the remaining number of echoes is less than n/2, or in other words, more than half of the echoes were rejected instep 1010, then it is determined instep 1014 that there is no fog. Otherwise, instep 1016, l mean and ν are recalculated for the remaining echoes to give l mean-new and ν new . If |l mean-new -l mean |<2m and |ν new -ν|<2m, it is determined instep 1018 that there is fog. Otherwise, it is determined instep 1014 that there is no fog. The algorithm ends instep 1020. - The third algorithm will be explained with reference to Fig. 11. The third algorithm is based on two assumptions. First, it is assumed to be a characteristic of fog that little or no correlation exists between the positions of adjacent echoes. Second, it is assumed to be a characteristic for solid objects that most groups of three or four adjacent echoes are positioned such that an approximately straight line can connect them. In the third algorithm, a preconditioning step is not required, and all echo values are used.
-
- In
step 1104, the variable ν i is calculated as follows:
ν i = 1 if u i ≥ U, where U = empirically decided, e.g. = 1;
ν i = 0 if u i < U. -
- In
step 1108, it is determined whether S > V, where V is an empirically determined value, e.g., V = 50. If so, it is determined instep 1110 that there is fog. Otherwise, it is determined instep 1112 that there is no fog. The algorithm ends instep 1114. - Each laser sweep which triggers the standard capture conditions is analyzed for possible fog conditions before control is passed to the tracking algorithm. During fog analysis, only echoes from ±8m of the distance to the caught object and no closer than 2m and no farther away than 35m from the laser are considered. For the valid echoes from the object, a count of direction changes is made, where a direction change is defined as an echo 2dm or more away from its neighbour, and with a different heading (inwards/outwards) from that of the previous distance step. The two first direction changes are not counted, as they are expected to be found on a real aircraft; only the changes beyond the first two are counted. If the ratio of valid echoes from the object to the number of direction changes is lower than 8 (echoes per change), the echo pattern is considered to be caused by fog or snow. If fog or snow is detected, the capture phase continues. If more than 4 of the last 8 capture sweeps report a fog condition, a 'low visibility' condition is considered to exist, and the display switches to 'low visibility' message.
- While various preferred embodiments of the present invention have been set forth above, those skilled in the art who have reviewed the present disclosure will readily appreciate that other embodiments can be realized within the scope of the invention. For example, numerical values are illustrative rather than limiting. In particular, empirically determined values can be varied as different conditions at different airports warrant. Also, the techniques disclosed above can be adapted to hardware other than that disclosed. Moreover, techniques disclosed for detecting fog can be used for any form of condensation or precipitation (snow, rain, sleet, etc.). Therefore, the present invention should be construed as limited only by the appended claims.
Claims (8)
- A method for detecting an object in an area in which condensation or precipitation may be present, the method comprising:(a) projecting light pulses into the area to generate reflected pulses;(b) receiving the reflected pulses in a detector; and(c) detecting the object based on the reflected pulses;the method further comprising (d) determining whether the reflected pulses result from the condensation or precipitation and in that step (c) is performed if it is determined that the reflected pulses do not result from the condensation or precipitation;
the method being characterized in that step (d) comprises:(i) calculating a quantity representing a spatial distribution of the reflected pulses, the quantity being a measure of randomness of spatial positions of the reflected pulses; and(ii) using the quantity calculated in step (d) (i) to determine whether the reflected pulses result from the condensation or precipitation on the basis of establishing whether the randomness of the spatial positions of the reflected pulses exceeds an empirically determined criterion. - The method of claim 1, further characterized in that, if it is determined in step (d) that the reflected pulses result from the condensation or precipitation, steps (a) and (b) are continued until the object is detected through the condensation or precipitation.
- The method of claim 2, wherein:the object is an aircraft;the method is implemented in an aircraft docking system which comprises an aircraft docking display; andfurther characterized in that if it is determined in step (d) that the reflected pulses result from the condensation or precipitation, the aircraft docking display is controlled to indicate downgraded performance of the aircraft docking system to a pilot of the aircraft.
- The method of any of claims 1 to 3, further characterized in that step (d)(i) comprises:(A)calculating a difference between distance values for adjacent ones of the reflected pulses;(B) rejecting those reflected pulses for which the difference calculated in step (d)(i)(A) is lower than a threshold;(C) rejecting any three adjacent ones of the reflected pulses which have a distance change with a same sign; and(D) calculating a quotient of a number of the reflected pulses remaining after steps (d)(i)(A) through (d)(i)(C) to a total number of the reflected pulses.
- A system for detecting an object in an area in which condensation or precipitation may be present, the system comprising:a light source for projecting light pulses into the area to generate reflected pulses;a detector for receiving the reflected pulses; anda computing device for detecting the object based on the reflected pulses;the computing device determining whether the reflected pulses result from the condensation or precipitation and, if the reflected pulses do not result from the condensation or precipitation, the computing device detects the object based on the reflected pulses;
the system being characterized in that the computing device determines whether the reflected pulses result from the condensation or precipitation by:(i) calculating a quantity representing a spatial distribution of the reflected pulses, the quantity being a measure of randomness of spatial positions of the reflected pulses; and(ii) using the quantity to determine whether the reflected pulses result from the condensation or precipitation on the basis of establishing whether the randomness of the spatial positions of the reflected pulses exceeds an empirically determined criterion. - The system of claim 5, further characterized in that if the computing device determines that the reflected pulses result from the condensation or precipitation, the light source and detector continue to operate until the object is detected through the condensation or precipitation.
- The system of claim 6, wherein:the system is implemented in an aircraft docking system which comprises an aircraft docking display; andfurther characterized in that if the computing device determines that the reflected pulses result from the condensation or precipitation, the computing device controls the aircraft docking display to indicate downgraded performance of the aircraft docking system.
- The system of any of claims 5 to 7, further characterized in that the computing device calculates the quantity by:(A)calculating a difference between distance values for adjacent ones of the reflected pulses;(B) rejecting those reflected pulses for which the difference calculated in step (A) is lower than a threshold;(C) rejecting any three adjacent ones of the reflected pulses which have a distance change with a same sign; and(D) calculating a quotient of a number of the reflected pulses remaining after steps (A) through (C) to a total number of the reflected pulses.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DK04013069.2T DK1482326T3 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2001-12-11 | Aviation docking system and method of automatic check of aircraft platform |
EP04013069A EP1482326B1 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2001-12-11 | Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/758,416 US6563432B1 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2001-01-12 | Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow |
US758416 | 2001-01-12 | ||
PCT/US2001/047561 WO2002056054A2 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2001-12-11 | Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04013069A Division EP1482326B1 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2001-12-11 | Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron |
EP04013069.2 Division-Into | 2004-06-03 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1350124A2 EP1350124A2 (en) | 2003-10-08 |
EP1350124B1 true EP1350124B1 (en) | 2006-05-17 |
Family
ID=25051664
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04013069A Expired - Lifetime EP1482326B1 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2001-12-11 | Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron |
EP01992063A Expired - Lifetime EP1350124B1 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2001-12-11 | Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04013069A Expired - Lifetime EP1482326B1 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2001-12-11 | Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron |
Country Status (14)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6563432B1 (en) |
EP (2) | EP1482326B1 (en) |
JP (2) | JP4080880B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR20030077001A (en) |
CN (2) | CN100483148C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE326707T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002232537B2 (en) |
CA (2) | CA2434444C (en) |
DE (1) | DE60119785T2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1482326T3 (en) |
ES (2) | ES2402294T3 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1063217A1 (en) |
PT (1) | PT1482326E (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002056054A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2020127660A1 (en) | 2018-12-20 | 2020-06-25 | thyssenkrupp Airport Solutions, S.A. | Method for detecting an obstacle on an aircraft stand |
Families Citing this family (43)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7777675B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2010-08-17 | Era Systems Corporation | Deployable passive broadband aircraft tracking |
US8203486B1 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2012-06-19 | Omnipol A.S. | Transmitter independent techniques to extend the performance of passive coherent location |
US7782256B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2010-08-24 | Era Systems Corporation | Enhanced passive coherent location techniques to track and identify UAVs, UCAVs, MAVs, and other objects |
US7570214B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2009-08-04 | Era Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for ADS-B validation, active and passive multilateration, and elliptical surviellance |
US7667647B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2010-02-23 | Era Systems Corporation | Extension of aircraft tracking and positive identification from movement areas into non-movement areas |
US8446321B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2013-05-21 | Omnipol A.S. | Deployable intelligence and tracking system for homeland security and search and rescue |
US7739167B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2010-06-15 | Era Systems Corporation | Automated management of airport revenues |
US7889133B2 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2011-02-15 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Multilateration enhancements for noise and operations management |
US7908077B2 (en) | 2003-06-10 | 2011-03-15 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Land use compatibility planning software |
US6563432B1 (en) * | 2001-01-12 | 2003-05-13 | Safegate International Ab | Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow |
US6526615B1 (en) * | 2002-02-01 | 2003-03-04 | Dew Engineering And Development Limited | Flexible over the wing passenger loading bridge |
US7039978B2 (en) * | 2002-02-01 | 2006-05-09 | Dew Engineering And Development Limited | Flexible over the wing passenger loading bridge |
SE520914E (en) * | 2002-06-11 | 2010-05-18 | Fmt Int Trade Ab | Procedure for contactless measurement of distance and position of aircraft at docking, and device for this |
US6917309B2 (en) * | 2002-10-28 | 2005-07-12 | Integritech System Engineering Ltd. | Foreign object detection system and method |
JP3994941B2 (en) * | 2003-07-22 | 2007-10-24 | オムロン株式会社 | Radar equipment for vehicles |
EP1787142B1 (en) * | 2004-09-07 | 2008-11-19 | William Michael Butler | A collision avoidance warning and taxiing guidance device |
JP4487715B2 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2010-06-23 | 株式会社デンソー | Radar equipment for vehicles |
JP2006105688A (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2006-04-20 | Denso Corp | Radar apparatus for vehicle |
WO2007108726A1 (en) * | 2006-03-21 | 2007-09-27 | Safegate International Ab | Improved aircraft docking system |
US9284065B2 (en) * | 2006-03-21 | 2016-03-15 | Safegate International Aktiebolag | Aircraft docking system |
US7965227B2 (en) | 2006-05-08 | 2011-06-21 | Era Systems, Inc. | Aircraft tracking using low cost tagging as a discriminator |
JP5069040B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2012-11-07 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Base station apparatus and communication method in mobile communication system |
BRPI0817039A2 (en) * | 2007-08-24 | 2015-07-21 | Stratech Systems Ltd | Runway surveillance system and method |
US8972034B2 (en) | 2007-11-29 | 2015-03-03 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | Diagnosis system |
US8022841B2 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2011-09-20 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | System and method for ascription of foreign object debris detected on airport travel surfaces to foreign object sources |
US9135830B2 (en) | 2010-02-18 | 2015-09-15 | Xsight Systems Ltd. | Airport travel surface edge lighting and foreign object detection system and method |
WO2012001433A1 (en) | 2010-07-02 | 2012-01-05 | Marko Borosak | Laser obstacle avoidance device incorporating led illuminator |
US9043129B2 (en) | 2010-10-05 | 2015-05-26 | Deere & Company | Method for governing a speed of an autonomous vehicle |
FR2975669B1 (en) * | 2011-05-24 | 2013-07-05 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD FOR POINTING A PLURALITY OF PREDETERMINAL LOCATIONS WITHIN A STRUCTURE, AND CORRESPONDING SCORING SYSTEM |
WO2013141605A1 (en) * | 2012-03-21 | 2013-09-26 | (주)안세기술 | System and method for aircraft type identification and docking guidance |
US9177483B2 (en) * | 2013-11-20 | 2015-11-03 | Unibase Information Corp. | Guiding method for aircraft docking process |
CN105302151B (en) * | 2014-08-01 | 2018-07-13 | 深圳中集天达空港设备有限公司 | A kind of system and method for aircraft docking guiding and plane type recognition |
CN105329457B (en) | 2014-08-01 | 2017-09-22 | 深圳中集天达空港设备有限公司 | A kind of aircraft docking guidance systems and method based on laser scanning |
JP6256396B2 (en) * | 2015-03-20 | 2018-01-10 | 株式会社デンソーウェーブ | Irradiation angle determination method, laser radar device |
TR201815381T4 (en) | 2015-04-10 | 2018-11-21 | Adb Safegate Sweden Ab | Identification of aircraft. |
US10053231B2 (en) | 2015-10-20 | 2018-08-21 | Goodrich Lighting Systems, Inc. | Integration of aircraft exterior lighting with proximity sensing and warning |
JP6665497B2 (en) * | 2015-11-16 | 2020-03-13 | 株式会社デンソーウェーブ | Method for detecting snow on laser radar device, snow detection device, and snow detection program |
EP3222529B1 (en) | 2016-03-21 | 2019-07-31 | ADB Safegate Sweden AB | Optimizing range of aircraft docking system |
JP7086554B2 (en) * | 2017-09-29 | 2022-06-20 | 株式会社トプコン | Unmanned aerial vehicle control method and unmanned aerial vehicle control program |
SG11202008585RA (en) * | 2018-03-23 | 2020-10-29 | Hitachi Int Electric Inc | Radar device, radar system, and method for adjusting radar antenna |
ES2841748T3 (en) | 2018-06-18 | 2021-07-09 | Adb Safegate Sweden Ab | A procedure and system for guiding an aircraft pilot approaching a stop position in a parking space |
EP3680689A1 (en) | 2019-01-11 | 2020-07-15 | ADB Safegate Sweden AB | Airport stand arrangement |
JP7440760B2 (en) | 2020-04-06 | 2024-02-29 | 株式会社デンソーウェーブ | laser radar equipment |
Family Cites Families (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4249159A (en) | 1977-10-17 | 1981-02-03 | Stasko Thomas A | Aircraft docking system |
DE2818942C2 (en) | 1978-04-28 | 1986-03-27 | Zellweger Uster Ag, Uster | Method for room monitoring and device for carrying out the method |
DE3007893C2 (en) | 1980-03-01 | 1983-10-13 | Eltro GmbH, Gesellschaft für Strahlungstechnik, 6900 Heidelberg | Thermal imaging device |
EP0188757A1 (en) | 1984-12-20 | 1986-07-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Microwave intrusion alarm system |
JPH0680436B2 (en) | 1985-07-15 | 1994-10-12 | 株式会社日本自動車部品総合研究所 | Airborne particle detector |
JP2523633B2 (en) | 1987-05-13 | 1996-08-14 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Laser radar scanning method |
DE4016973C1 (en) * | 1990-02-24 | 1991-06-13 | Eltro Gmbh, Gesellschaft Fuer Strahlungstechnik, 6900 Heidelberg, De | |
DE4009668C2 (en) | 1990-03-26 | 1999-01-21 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for the precise positioning of aircraft |
US5323472A (en) * | 1990-03-27 | 1994-06-21 | The Boeing Company | Optical image analyzer using optical correlation and opto-electronic feedback |
JP2667924B2 (en) * | 1990-05-25 | 1997-10-27 | 東芝テスコ 株式会社 | Aircraft docking guidance device |
JPH04157393A (en) * | 1990-10-19 | 1992-05-29 | Nec Corp | Laser alarm device |
US5375058A (en) | 1991-12-20 | 1994-12-20 | University Of Central Florida | Surface detection system for airports |
GB9127188D0 (en) | 1991-12-21 | 1992-02-19 | Smithkline Beecham Plc | Novel compounds |
SE9203904D0 (en) | 1992-01-31 | 1992-12-23 | Kenneth Gustavsson | DEVICE FOR MONITORING A ZONE AND POSITION OF OBJECTS WITHIN THIS |
JP3153012B2 (en) * | 1992-08-31 | 2001-04-03 | 明星電気株式会社 | Visibility detection method using ranging radar signal and ranging radar |
US5475370A (en) | 1992-10-20 | 1995-12-12 | Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. | System for detecting ice or snow on surface which specularly reflects light |
US5589822A (en) | 1992-10-20 | 1996-12-31 | Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. | System for detecting ice or snow on surface which specularly reflects light |
DE4301228C1 (en) * | 1993-01-19 | 1994-04-21 | Daimler Benz Ag | Procedure for determining visibility |
DE4301637C2 (en) | 1993-01-22 | 1997-05-22 | Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag | Method for docking an aircraft to a passenger boarding bridge of an airport building |
US5424746A (en) | 1993-11-16 | 1995-06-13 | Cardion, Inc. | Method and system for monitoring vehicles |
JP3564800B2 (en) * | 1994-08-30 | 2004-09-15 | 株式会社デンソー | Distance measuring device |
BR9408629A (en) | 1994-10-14 | 1998-12-01 | Airport Tech Scandinavia | System and process for checking the shape of a detected object and system for tracking an object |
CN1053512C (en) * | 1994-10-14 | 2000-06-14 | 斯堪的纳维亚空港技术公司 | Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems |
JP3273530B2 (en) * | 1994-10-31 | 2002-04-08 | オムロン株式会社 | Distance measuring device and distance measuring method capable of estimating weather conditions |
WO1996020465A1 (en) | 1994-12-28 | 1996-07-04 | Kenneth Gustavsson | System for zone surveillance |
JP2655122B2 (en) * | 1995-03-10 | 1997-09-17 | 日本電気株式会社 | Radar equipment |
US5675661A (en) | 1995-10-12 | 1997-10-07 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Aircraft docking system |
FR2742876B1 (en) * | 1995-12-26 | 1998-02-06 | Thomson Csf | METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE PRECIPITATION RATE BY DUAL POLARIZATION RADAR AND METEOROLOGICAL RADAR USING THE SAME |
JPH10153661A (en) * | 1996-11-26 | 1998-06-09 | Omron Corp | Range-finding device |
FR2763727B1 (en) | 1997-05-20 | 1999-08-13 | Sagem | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GUIDING AN AIRPLANE TOWARDS A BERTH |
JPH1184001A (en) * | 1997-09-08 | 1999-03-26 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Vehicle-mounted radar device and automatic control system of vehicle using the same |
DE59801193D1 (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 2001-09-13 | Siemens Ag | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE AUTOMATICALLY ASSISTED GUIDE OF AIRCRAFT TO A PARKING POSITION AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM THEREFOR |
JP3986671B2 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2007-10-03 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Object detection device |
US6563432B1 (en) * | 2001-01-12 | 2003-05-13 | Safegate International Ab | Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow |
-
2001
- 2001-01-12 US US09/758,416 patent/US6563432B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-11 DE DE60119785T patent/DE60119785T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-11 DK DK04013069.2T patent/DK1482326T3/en active
- 2001-12-11 AU AU2002232537A patent/AU2002232537B2/en not_active Expired
- 2001-12-11 PT PT40130692T patent/PT1482326E/en unknown
- 2001-12-11 WO PCT/US2001/047561 patent/WO2002056054A2/en active IP Right Grant
- 2001-12-11 ES ES04013069T patent/ES2402294T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-11 JP JP2002556254A patent/JP4080880B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-11 CA CA2434444A patent/CA2434444C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-11 CA CA2746618A patent/CA2746618C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-11 KR KR10-2003-7009353A patent/KR20030077001A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2001-12-11 EP EP04013069A patent/EP1482326B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-11 CN CNB018226566A patent/CN100483148C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-11 CN CN2007101485885A patent/CN101196565B/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-11 AT AT01992063T patent/ATE326707T1/en active
- 2001-12-11 EP EP01992063A patent/EP1350124B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-11 ES ES01992063T patent/ES2266302T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2004
- 2004-08-09 HK HK04105905.9A patent/HK1063217A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2006
- 2006-11-20 JP JP2006312384A patent/JP2007121307A/en active Pending
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2020127660A1 (en) | 2018-12-20 | 2020-06-25 | thyssenkrupp Airport Solutions, S.A. | Method for detecting an obstacle on an aircraft stand |
DE102018222597A1 (en) | 2018-12-20 | 2020-06-25 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Method for recognizing an obstacle at an aircraft position |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ATE326707T1 (en) | 2006-06-15 |
CA2434444C (en) | 2012-08-28 |
ES2402294T3 (en) | 2013-04-30 |
JP2007121307A (en) | 2007-05-17 |
CN1489703A (en) | 2004-04-14 |
EP1482326B1 (en) | 2013-01-02 |
US6563432B1 (en) | 2003-05-13 |
ES2266302T3 (en) | 2007-03-01 |
EP1482326A1 (en) | 2004-12-01 |
HK1063217A1 (en) | 2004-12-17 |
CN100483148C (en) | 2009-04-29 |
WO2002056054A2 (en) | 2002-07-18 |
CN101196565B (en) | 2011-11-09 |
DK1482326T3 (en) | 2013-04-08 |
WO2002056054A3 (en) | 2003-01-16 |
JP4080880B2 (en) | 2008-04-23 |
KR20030077001A (en) | 2003-09-29 |
CA2746618A1 (en) | 2002-07-18 |
PT1482326E (en) | 2013-04-03 |
CA2434444A1 (en) | 2002-07-18 |
JP2004523746A (en) | 2004-08-05 |
AU2002232537B2 (en) | 2006-09-21 |
CN101196565A (en) | 2008-06-11 |
CA2746618C (en) | 2015-02-03 |
DE60119785D1 (en) | 2006-06-22 |
EP1350124A2 (en) | 2003-10-08 |
WO2002056054B1 (en) | 2003-03-27 |
DE60119785T2 (en) | 2007-04-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1350124B1 (en) | Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow | |
AU2002232537A1 (en) | Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow | |
CA3016499C (en) | Optimizing range of aircraft docking system | |
KR100350402B1 (en) | Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems | |
EP2109065B1 (en) | Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems | |
AU2006203759B2 (en) | Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow | |
CA2576216C (en) | Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20030722 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20031118 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060517 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 60119785 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20060622 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060817 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061017 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20061211 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20061231 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2266302 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20070220 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: PATENTS & TECHNOLOGY SURVEYS SA |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060818 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20061211 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060517 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060517 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFA Owner name: SAFEGATE INTERNATIONAL AB Free format text: SAFEGATE INTERNATIONAL AB#STORSJOESTRAKET 15#831 34 OESTERSUND (SE) -TRANSFER TO- SAFEGATE INTERNATIONAL AB#STORSJOESTRAKET 15#831 34 OESTERSUND (SE) |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: HC Owner name: ADB SAFEGATE SWEDEN AB; SE Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), CHANGE OF OWNER(S) NAME; FORMER OWNER NAME: SAFEGATE INTERNATIONAL AB Effective date: 20180622 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFA Owner name: ADB SAFEGATE SWEDEN AB, SE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SAFEGATE INTERNATIONAL AB, SE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 60119785 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: BARTELS UND PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 60119785 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: ADB SAFEGATE SWEDEN AB, SE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SAFEGATE INTERNATIONAL AB, OESTERSUND, SE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: HC Owner name: ADB SAFEGATE SWEDEN AB; SE Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), CHANGEMENT DE NOM DU PROPRIETAIRE, NOM + ADRESSE; FORMER OWNER NAME: SAFEGATE INTERNATIONAL AB Effective date: 20180621 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: PC2A Owner name: ADB SAFEGATE SWEDEN AB Effective date: 20181024 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: HC Ref document number: 326707 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Owner name: ADB SAFEGATE SWEDEN AB, SE Effective date: 20190220 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20201117 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20201117 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20201118 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20201116 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20201123 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20201117 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20201117 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20201116 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20201214 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20210105 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 60119785 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MK Effective date: 20211210 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20211210 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK07 Ref document number: 326707 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20211211 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MK Effective date: 20211211 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20211210 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20220405 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20211212 |