EP1190019A1 - A multi stage selective catalytic cracking process and a system for producing high yield of middle distillate products from heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks - Google Patents

A multi stage selective catalytic cracking process and a system for producing high yield of middle distillate products from heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks

Info

Publication number
EP1190019A1
EP1190019A1 EP00929770A EP00929770A EP1190019A1 EP 1190019 A1 EP1190019 A1 EP 1190019A1 EP 00929770 A EP00929770 A EP 00929770A EP 00929770 A EP00929770 A EP 00929770A EP 1190019 A1 EP1190019 A1 EP 1190019A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
catalyst
riser
products
feed
hydrocarbons
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP00929770A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Debasis Bhattacharyya
Asit Kumar Das
Arumugam Velayutham Karthikeyani
Satyen Kumar Das
Pankaj Kasliwal
Manoranjan Santra
Latoor Lal Saroya
Jagdev Kumar Dixit
Ganga Sanker Mishra
Jai Prakash Singh
Satish Makhija
Sobhan Ghosh
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Indian Oil Corp Ltd
Original Assignee
Indian Oil Corp Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Indian Oil Corp Ltd filed Critical Indian Oil Corp Ltd
Publication of EP1190019A1 publication Critical patent/EP1190019A1/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G11/00Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils
    • C10G11/14Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils with preheated moving solid catalysts
    • C10G11/18Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils with preheated moving solid catalysts according to the "fluidised-bed" technique
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G51/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more cracking processes only
    • C10G51/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more cracking processes only plural serial stages only
    • C10G51/026Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more cracking processes only plural serial stages only only catalytic cracking steps

Definitions

  • middle distillate range products e.g. Heavy Naphtha, Kerosene, Jet fuel, Diesel oil and Light Cycle Oil (LCO) are produced in petroleum refineries by atmospheric/vacuum distillation of petroleum crude and also by the secondary processing of vacuum gas oil and residues or mixtures thereof.
  • Most commonly practiced commercial secondary processes are Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) and Hydrocracking.
  • Hydrocracking employs porous acidic catalysts similar to those used in catalytic cracking but associated with hydrogenation components such as metals of Groups VI and VII of the Periodic Table to produce good quality of middle distillate products in the boiling range of C 8 - C 24 hydrocarbons.
  • mixed catalyst is obtained from an intermediate vessel used for mixing the spent catalyst from the common stripper or preferably first stripper with the regenerated catalyst from the common regenerator and charging the mixed catalyst with coke content in the range of about 0.2 to 0.8 wt% to the bottom of the first riser at a temperature of 450 - 575°C.
  • the unconverted heavy hydrocarbon fraction from second riser recycled into the second riser ranges from about 0-50 wt% of the main feed rate to the second riser, depending on the nature of the feedstock and operating conditions kept in the risers.
  • amount of steam for feed dispersion and atomization in the first and the second riser reactors is in the range of 1-20 wt% of the respective total hydrocarbon feed depending on the quality of the feedstock.
  • the spent catalyst resides in the shipper for a period of upto 30 seconds.
  • the regenerated catalyst entering at the bottom of the second riser reactor has coke of about 0.1-0.3 wt% at a temperature of about 600-750°C and is lifted by catalytically inert gases.
  • the combined Total Cycle Oil ( 150-370°C) product which is a mixture of Heavy naphtha (150-216°C) and Light cycle oil (216- 370°C), has higher cetane number than that from conventional distillate mode FCC unit and other properties such as specific gravity, viscosity, pour point, etc. are in the same range as that of commercial distillate mode FCC unit.
  • the yield overall combined TCO product increases by 8-10 wt% and the combined TCO product has same properties but improved cetane number as that of TCO from commercial distillate mode FCC unit.
  • middle distillate yield can be mcieased.
  • the piesent invention provides a process foi producing maximized quantity middle distillate through catalytic crackmg of heavy hydrocarbon fractions employing multiple nsers
  • the applicants realized that the middle distillate selectivity is higher only at lower conversion
  • the ratio of yield of Total Cycle Oil (TCO 150-370°C) to the sum of other products, (such as, dry gas, LPG, gasolme and coke) mcreases as the conveision i educes
  • nser temperature has dramatic impact on the selectivity
  • the applicants have found that middle distillate selectivity impioves significantly as ⁇ ser temperature is reduced
  • CRC coke on regenerated catalyst
  • the hydrocarbon product vapor from the second riser is quickly quenched with water/other hydrocarbon fraction and separated for minimizing the post riser non-selective cracking.
  • the product from the second riser and the product boiling below 370°C from the first riser are separated in a common fractionator into several products, such as Dry gas, LPG, Gasoline, Heavy naphtha, Light Cycle Oil and cracked bottom.
  • Part of the unconverted bottom product (370°C+ fraction) from the second fractionator is recycled to the second riser and remaining part is sent to rundown after removal of catalyst fines.
  • the fresh regenerated catalyst Prior to the injection of the 370°C+ fraction of the first riser product, the fresh regenerated catalyst is contacted with the recycle stream of unconverted hydrocarbons from the second riser at a relatively lower elevation of the riser.
  • the recycle components are preferentially cracked at the high severity conditions prevailing in the second riser bottom before the injection of 370°C+ fraction of first riser product.
  • recycle ratio is maintained in the range of 0 - 50% of the second reactor feed throughput depending on the type of the feed to be processed and the conversion level in both the reactors. If the recycle quantity is less, it may be injected along with the main feed i.e., 370°C+ fraction of first riser product.
  • the catalyst temperature comes down due to utilization of part of the heat for vaporization and endothermic cracking reactions of the recycled feed.
  • the coke on catalyst increases which essentially blocks some of the active sites and thereby reduces the dynamic activity of the catalyst.
  • Catalysts used in this example are catalyst A & B which are commercially available FCC catalyst samples having properties as shown in the Table-6.
  • the pour point and the kinematic viscosity @ 50°C become 0.95°C and 2.44 CST respectively, which are almost same as that of 150 - 370°C product of the present invention as shown in the column 1 of Table- 18. Additionally, by this approach, the yield of the middle distillate increases from about 55 wf% to 63.6 wt% without any adverse impact on flash point.

Abstract

According to this invention, there is provided a novel process and opposition for catalytic cracking of various petroleum based heavy feed stocks in the presence of solid zeolite catalyst and high pore size acidic components for selective bottom cracking and mixtures thereof, in a multiple riser type continuously circulating fluidized bed reactors operated at different severities to produce high yield of middle distillates, in the range of 50-65 wt% of fresh feed.

Description

A MULTI STAGE SELECTIVE CATALYTIC CRACKING PROCESS AND A SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING HIGH YIELD OF MIDDLE DISTILLATE PRODUCTS FROM HEAVY HYDROCARBON FEEDSTOCKS
Field
This invention relates to a process and a system for the production of middle distillate products comprising hydrocarbons having carbon atoms in the range of C8 to C24 in high yield, from heavier petroleum fractions through multistage catalytic cracking of varying severity levels with solid acidic catalyst without using external hydrogen.
Background
Conventionally, middle distillate range products e.g. Heavy Naphtha, Kerosene, Jet fuel, Diesel oil and Light Cycle Oil (LCO) are produced in petroleum refineries by atmospheric/vacuum distillation of petroleum crude and also by the secondary processing of vacuum gas oil and residues or mixtures thereof. Most commonly practiced commercial secondary processes are Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) and Hydrocracking. Hydrocracking employs porous acidic catalysts similar to those used in catalytic cracking but associated with hydrogenation components such as metals of Groups VI and VII of the Periodic Table to produce good quality of middle distillate products in the boiling range of C8 - C24 hydrocarbons. An excess of hydrogen is supplied to the hydrocracking reactor under very high pressure (150-200 arm.) and at a relatively lower temperature (375-425°C) in fixed bed reactors with two phase flow. Due to severe hydrogenation, all hydrocarbon products from Hydrocracker are highly saturated with low sulfur and aromaticity. The yield of middle distillate hydrocarbons (126-391°C boiling range) in hydrocracking is typically very high up to 65 - 80 wt% of feed. FCC process, on the other hand, is employed for essentially producing high octane Gasoline and LPG In countries, where demand of middle distillate pioduct is highei Heavy Ciacked Naphtha (HCN C8 - C-2 hydrocaibons) and Light Cycle Oil (LCO Ci - - C24 hydrocaibons) pioduction are maximized by manipulating opeiating vanables so as to vary the leaction and regeneiator severity levels U S Patent Nos 3.894,931 and 3,894,933 address such operations Typically, diesel yield m FCC is maximized by maintaining a lowei reaction and legeneiation severity (I e , lower legenerator and reactoi top temperatuie) and recycling of unconverted residual products Catalyst with lower zeolite/matπx ratio and MAT (Micro Activity Test) activity of 60-70 is normally preferred By proper selection of FCC vanables and innovations involving catalyst type and recycle of Heavy Cycle Oil and residual Slurry oil, distillate yield can be mcreased by considerable amount at the expense of Gasolme yield As the FCC unit operation is shifted from gasolme mode to middle distillate maximization mode, the LCO cetane number mcreases and thus could be more useful for blendmg to diesel pool
Howevei. while running at low seventy operations, for maximizing diesel yield, the unconverted bottom yield also mcreases to a significant extent and sometimes may even exceed 20 wt% of fresh feed as against 5-6 wt% for usual gasolme mode opeiation The other drawback of low seventy operation is the 1 high amount of recycle oil being used m the nser bottom with fresh feed for furthei ciackmg Firstly, this reduces the throughput of nser reactor and secondly, with single sei and pioduct ftactionatoi, the lecycle is nonselective This lesults mto iecyclmg of un-crackable, aromatic components into the nser and thereby increases Coke and Gas without appreciably increasing the conversion level Consequently, Diesel yield from FCC with the conventional cracking catalyst could be maximized upto 40-45 wt% m spite of ranning at low reaction severity (495°C riser temperature) and fairly higher recycle ratio (30% of fresh feed).
Besides the operation of conventional FCC in middle distillate maximization mode, there are several other processes aiming for improvement in middle distillate yield. U.S. Pat. No.5,098, 554 discloses a process of fluid catalytic cracking with multiple feed injection points where fresh feed is charged to upper injection points and unconverted slurry oil is recycled to a location below the fresh feed nozzles. Essentially, the process conditions are similar to that of gasoline mode FCC operation (e.g., 527°C riser top temperature) which favors gasoline production. By adopting split feed injection, middle distillate yield is marginally increased at the expense of Gasoline yield.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,481, 104 describes about an ultra-stable Y-zeolite of high framework silica to alumina ratio having low acidity, large pores, use of which in catalytic cracking of gas oil, enhances distillate yield with production of low Coke and Dry gas. It may be noted that yield of 420 - 650°F fraction is maximize about 28 wt% of feed and as 650°F- conversion increases beyond 67 wt%, the yield of 420-650°F fraction further reduces. Therefore, as discussed earlier, yield of the distillate is relatively more only at the higher yield of unconverted fraction.
Yet another process in U.S. Pat. No. 4,606,810 discloses a scheme of two riser cracking for improving total gasoline plus distillate yield. Here, the feed is first cracked in the first riser with spent catalyst from the second riser and the unconverted part is further cracked in a second riser in presence of regenerated catalyst. The basic operation is of high severity producing maximum amount of Gasoline and the yield of LFO is around 15 - 20 wt% of feed. It may also be noted that while increase in Gasolme yield is in the range of 7.5 - 8 0 wt%, increase m LFO yield is merely in the range of 1 5 - 3 0 wt% on fresh feed basis
Two stage processing of hydrocarbon feedstock has been employed by different researchers in the field of catalytic cracking Several processes have been developed m which first stage processing removes metals and Conradson carbon iesidue (CCR) impurities from feed using a low activity cheap contact matenal with abundant surface aiea The demetallized feed is then processed m a more conventional second stage reactor under high severity to maximize the conversion and gasolme production. U S Pat. No. 4,436,613 descnbes such a process of two stage catalytic cracking using two different types of catalyst. In the first stage, the CCR matenals and metals are separated from the rest of the feedstock along with mild cracking over a relatively lower active catalyst. The residual un-cracked product of the first stage is then contacted with a high active catalyst under higher reaction seventy for gasoline maximization. It may be noted that m this process, two dedicated strippers and regenerators are used to avoid the mixing of two different types of catalysts.
Dual nser high seventy catalytic cracking process described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,928, 172 utilizes a mixture of large pore REY zeolite catalyst and a shape selective zeolite catalyst where gas oil is cracked m the first nser m the presence of the aforesaid catalyst mixture The Heavy Naphtha product from the first nser and/or virgin straight run Naphtha are cracked in the second riser m the presence of catalyst mixture to produce high octane Gasolme together with C3 and C4 olefins U S Pat No 4,830.728 discloses a process for upgrading straight run Naphtha, catalytically cracked Naphtha and mixtures thereof m a multiple fluid catalytic cracking operation utilizing mixture of amorphous crackmg catalyst and/or large pore Y-zeohte based catalyst and shape selective ZSM-5 to produce high octane gasolme U.S. Pat. No. 5,401,387 describes a process of multistage catalytic cracking where the first stage cracks a first feed over a shape selective zeolite to produce lighter products rich in iso-compounds which may be used for making ethers. A second feed which may include 700°F+ liquid from first stage is cracked in the second stage. Another process as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,208, discloses a scheme in which hydrocarbon is initially contacted with cracking catalyst forming a first cracked product which after recovering of the product having boiling point of more than 430°F, is subjected to cracking in a second riser. The basic objective of this invention is to maximize the yield of light olefins and minimize the formation of aromatic compounds by avoiding undesirable hydrogen transfer reactions.
So far, most of the prior art methods have concentrated on multiple riser catalytic cracking for maximization of gasoline yield and its octane numbers, increased yield of iso-olefin for production of ethers, increased yield of light olefins, etc. From the prior art information and also from our experience of operating low severity FCC units, it is quite clear that maximizing middle distillate yield in FCC (without using external hydrogen) is not achieved beyond a level of 40-45 wt% of fresh feed. Further, persons involved in fluid cracking would be aware that middle distillate being an intermediate product in the complex catalytic cracking reactions, its maximization is very difficult because when the severity is increased, it is re-cracked to lighter hydrocarbons.
Objects
Accordingly, the main object of the present invention aims to propose a novel catalytic cracking process for producing middle distillate products in very high yield (about 50-65 wt%). Another object is to provide a multiple riser system that enables the production of middle distillate products including Heavy Naphtha and Light Cycle Oil in high yield.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide a multiple riser system to produce higher yield of Heavy Naphtha and Light Cycle Oil as compared to the prior art processes employing catalytic cracking of petroleum feedstock without any use of external supply of hydrogen.
A further objective of the process is to minimize the yield of unwanted dry gas and coke and also the yield of unconverted bottom products, at the same time, improving the cetane quality of the middle distillate product.
Summary
According to the present invention, there is provided a novel process for catalytic cracking of various petroleum based heavy feed stocks in the presence of solid zeolite catalyst and high pore size acidic components for selective bottom cracking and mixtures thereof, in a multiple riser type system wherein continuously circulating fluidized bed reactors are operated at different severities to produce middle distillate products in high yield, in the range of 50-65 wt% of fresh feed.
The invention also provides an improved system for catalytic cracking of heavy feed stock to obtain middle distillate products in high yield, employing the process herein described.
Detailed Description
The invention relates to a multi stage selective catalytic cracking process for producing high yield of middle distillate products having carbon atoms in the range of about C8 to C24, from heavy hydrocarbon feedstock, in the absence of added hydrogen, said process comprising the steps of:
i) contacting preheated feed with a mixed catalyst in a first riser reactor under catalytic cracking conditions including catalyst to oil ratio of 2 to 8, WHSV of 150-350 hr "\ contact period of about 1 to 8 seconds and temperature in the range of about 400°C to 500°C to obtain first cracked hydrocarbon products; ii) separating the first cracked hydrocarbon products from the first riser reactor into a first fraction comprising hydrocarbons with boiling points less than or equal to 370°C and a second fraction comprising unconverted hydrocarbons with boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C; iii) cracking the unconverted second fraction from the first riser reactor comprising hydrocarbons having boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C, in the presence of regenerated catalyst, in a second riser reactor operating under catalytic cracking conditions including WHSV of 75-275 hr"1, catalyst to oil ratio of 4-12 and riser top temperature of 425 - 525°C to obtain second cracked hydrocarbon products; iv) separating the catalytically cracked products from the second riser reactor alongwith cracked products comprising hydrocarbons having boiling points less than equal to 370°C, from the first riser reactor in a main fractionating column to yield cracked products comprising dry gas, LPG, gasoline, middle distillates, heavy cycle oil and slurry oil; v) recycling the entire heavy cycle oil comprising hydrocarbons having boiling points in the range of 370°C to 450°C and full or part of the slurry oil having boiling points greater than or equal to 450°C, into the second riser reactor at a vertically displaced position lower than the position of introduction of the main feed comprising bottom unconverted hydrocarbon fraction having boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C from the first riser reactor to obtain middle distillate products compπsing hydrocarbons having carbon atoms in the range of C8 - C24 ranging from about 50 to 65 wt % of the feed stock. iv) Optionally, recycling the fraction of unconverted hydrocarbons with boiling pomts greater than or equal to 370°C, obtained in step (v) in riser reactors by repeating steps (iii) to (iv) to obtain substantially pure middle distillate products.
In an embodiment, the feed stock is selected from petroleum based heavy feed stock, such as vacuum gas oil (VGO), visbreaker / coker heavy gas oil, coker fuel oil, hydrocracker bottom, etc.
In another embodiment, mixed catalyst is obtained from an intermediate vessel used for mixing the spent catalyst from the common stripper or preferably first stripper with the regenerated catalyst from the common regenerator and charging the mixed catalyst with coke content in the range of about 0.2 to 0.8 wt% to the bottom of the first riser at a temperature of 450 - 575°C.
In another embodiment, the exit hydrocarbon vapors from the first and second risers are quickly separated from respective spent catalysts using respective cyclones and/or other conventional separating devices to minimize the overcracking of middle distillate range products into undesirable lighter hydrocarbons. In yet another embodiment, the spent catalysts from the first and second riser reactors are passed through respective dedicated catalyst strippers or a common stripper to render the catalysts substantially free of entrained hydrocarbons.
In a further embodiment, the regenerated catalyst with coke content of less than 0.4 wt% is obtained by burning a portion of the spent catalyst from the first stripper, the spent catalyst from the second stripper or the common stripper in a turbulent or fast fluidized bed regenerator in the presence of air or oxygen containing gases at a temperature ranging from 600°C to 750°C.
In another embodiment, the catalyst between the fluidized bed riser reactors, strippers and the common regenerator is continuously circulated through standpipe and slide valves.
In yet another embodiment, the critical catalytic cracking conditions in the first reactor including mixed regenerated catalyst result in very high selectivity of middle distillate range products and conversion of hydrocarbon products of boiling point less than or equal to 370°C at lower than 50 wt% of the fresh feed.
In another embodiment, the catalyst comprises of a mixture of commercial ReUSY zeolite based catalyst having fresh surface area of 110-180 m2/gm., pore volume of 0.25-0.38 cc/gm and average particle size of 60-70 micron along with selective acidic bottom upgrading components in the range of 0-10 wt%.
In still another embodiment, the unconverted heavy hydrocarbon fraction from second riser recycled into the second riser ranges from about 0-50 wt% of the main feed rate to the second riser, depending on the nature of the feedstock and operating conditions kept in the risers.
In yet another embodiment, amount of steam for feed dispersion and atomization in the first and the second riser reactors is in the range of 1-20 wt% of the respective total hydrocarbon feed depending on the quality of the feedstock. In further embodiment, the spent catalyst resides in the shipper for a period of upto 30 seconds.
In another embodiment, pressure in the first and second nser reactors are in the range of 1.0 to 4.0 kg/cm"(g).
In yet another embodiment, the regenerated catalyst entering at the bottom of the second riser reactor has coke of about 0.1-0.3 wt% at a temperature of about 600-750°C and is lifted by catalytically inert gases.
In a further embodiment, the combined Total Cycle Oil ( 150-370°C) product which is a mixture of Heavy naphtha (150-216°C) and Light cycle oil (216- 370°C), has higher cetane number than that from conventional distillate mode FCC unit and other properties such as specific gravity, viscosity, pour point, etc. are in the same range as that of commercial distillate mode FCC unit.
In still another embodiment, changing the cut point of the TCO from the first riser to 120-370°C, processing 370°C+ part of the first riser product in the second riser, and changing the cut point of TCO from second riser to 120-390°C, the yield overall combined TCO product increases by 8-10 wt% and the combined TCO product has same properties but improved cetane number as that of TCO from commercial distillate mode FCC unit.
Brief description of the accompanying drawings:
The invention is illustrated hereinbelow with reference to the following accompanying drawings, wherein :
Fig.1 shows conventional fluid catalytic cracking single riser system. Fig.2 shows a fluidized catalytic cracking two riser system of the present invention. Fig.3 is a graph showing the ratio of TCO Yield / Yields of (Dry gas+LPG+Gasoline+ Coke) Vs. -370°C conversion with first riser feed at two different temperatures (425°C & 490°C). Fig.4 is a graph showing the ratio of TCO Yield / Yields of (Dry gas+LPG-
Gasoline+Coke) Vs. -370°C conversion with second riser feed at two different temperatures (490°C & 510°C).
Description of Fig.l :
In the conventional Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) unit, fresh feed (1) is injected at the bottom of the riser (2) which comes into contact with the hot regenerated catalyst from the regenerator (3). The catalyst along with hydrocarbon product vapors ascends the riser and at the end of the riser spent catalyst is separated from the hydrocarbon vapor and subjected to steam stripping. The hydrocarbon vapors from the riser reactor is sent to a main fractionator column (4) for separating into the desired products. The stripped catalyst is passed to the regenerator (3) where the coke deposited on the catalyst is burnt and the clean catalyst is circulated back to the bottom of the riser.
The fluidized catalytic cracking two riser system of the invention is schematically shown in Fig.2. and described in detail hereinbelow.
The fluidized bed catalytic cracking system for the production of high yield of middle distillate products comprising hydrocarbons having carbon atoms in the range of C8 to C24 from heavy petroleum feeds, by a process as defined in claim 1, said system comprising at least two riser reactors (1 and 2) wherein, a fresh feed is introduced into the first riser reactor (1), typically, at the bottom section above regenerated catalyst entry zone through a feed nozzle (3), and at the end of the first riser reactor (1), the spent catalyst is quickly separated from hydrocarbon product vapors using separating devices (4) and subjected to multistage steam stripping to remove any entrained hydrocarbons, and a conduit (5) feeds a part of the said stripped catalyst into a regenerating apparatus (7) and the other part of the stripped catalyst from the conduit (5) travels through another conduit (6) into a mixing vessel (10); and thereafter, the mixed catalyst from the mixing vessel (10) fravels through a conduit (19) and is fed to the bottom of the first riser reactor (1), the hydrocarbon product vapors from the first riser reactor (1) which are separated from the catalyst in the separating devices (4) are fed to a vacuum or atmospheric distillation column (13) through conduit (12) whereby the first cracked hydrocarbon products are separated into a first fraction comprising hydrocarbons having boiling points less than or equal to 370°C and a second fraction comprising uncracked hydrocarbons with boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C; the said second fraction comprising uncracked hydrocarbon products is fed through feed nozzle (16) into the bottom of second riser reactor (2) above the regenerated catalyst entry zone, and the regenerated catalyst from the regenerating apparatus (7) is fed to the bottom of the second riser reactor (2) through a conduit (9), and subsequently, the hydrocarbon products of the second riser reactor (2) are separated from the catalyst in separating devices (11), and the cracked products of the second riser reactor (2) along with the products of the first fraction of the first riser reactor (1) comprising hydrocarbons with boiling points less than or equal to 370°C are fed to a main fractionator column (15) which separates the said products into dry gas, LPG, gasoline, heavy naphtha, light cycle oil, heavy cycle oil, and slurry oil, and the entire heavy cycle oil and full or part of the slurry oil consisting mainly of hydrocarbons with boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C are recycled back to the second riser reactor (2) through a separate feed nozzle (17) located at a point lower than the position of introduction of main feed, and the feed and cracked product vapors travel along with the catalyst, into the reactor wherein the spent catalyst separated from product vapors of the second riser reactor (2) in separating devices and the spent catalyst is subjected to multistage steam stripping for removal of entrained hydrocarbons and the stripped catalyst travels through a conduit (18) into the regenerating apparatus (7), wherein the coke on catalyst is burnt in the presence of air and/or oxygen containing gases at high temperature, and the flue gas from regeneration is separated from the entrained catalyst fines in separating devices (23) and the flue gas leaves from top of the regenerating apparatus (7) through a conduit (22) for heat recovery and venting through stack; the hot regenerated catalyst is withdrawn from the regenerating apparatus (7) and divided into two parts, one going to the mixing vessel (10) through the conduit (8) and the other directly to the bottom of the second riser reactor (2), and the mixed catalyst from the mixing vessel (10) is fed through the conduit (19) to the inlet of the first riser reactor (1), controlling the catalyst bed level in the individual or common stripper, the catalyst circulation rate from the common regenerator and the quantity of the spent and regenerated catalyst entering into the mixing vessel (10) using slide valves placed on the conduits and thereby producing high yield of middle distillate products.
At the bottom 'Y' section of both the risers (1&2), steam is used to lift the catalyst in upward direction upto the feed entry zone. Also steam is used in the feed nozzles (3, 16 & 17) for atomization and dispersion of the feed. The quantity of the steam flow into the respective risers (1&2) are varied depending on the feedstock quality and the desired velocity in the risers.
As an example, the system designed to practice the process of the invention has been described employing only two riser reactors. It is pertinent to note that in practice, riser reactors of desired number may be connected to the second riser reactor so that the unconverted hydrocarbons obtained from the second riser may be further treated in accordance with the process described herein above and eventually, substantially the pure middle distillate products may be obtained in high yield fi om the original feed
In catalytic cracking processes usmg zeolite based catalyst, the leactions proceed sequentially High boiling large feed molecules first enter the catalyst through relatively laige poies which allows pre-crackmg to form intermediate middle distillate lange molecules which are furthei cracked to lighter molecules corresponding to Diy gas, LPG and Gasolme Ideally, middle distillate yield can be mcieased. if it's clacking to lighter products is restricted Any attempt m this regard is likel to 1 educe the conversion, resulting m higher yield of unconverted products Conventionally, lecyclmg of unconverted fraction has been practiced to impiove the overall conversion The seventy required for cracking of the unconverted lecycled fraction is adequate to produce significant quantity of gasolme and LPG by over-cracking of middle distillate range product It also promotes hydrogen transfer reactions producmg aromatics m middle distillate range products and therefore, detenorates the cetane quality To summanze, it may be noted that maximization of intermediate product middle distillate is more challenging as compared to maximization of gasolme
In distinction to othei prior art processes, the piesent invention provides a process foi producing maximized quantity middle distillate through catalytic crackmg of heavy hydrocarbon fractions employing multiple nsers The applicants realized that the middle distillate selectivity is higher only at lower conversion In fact, the ratio of yield of Total Cycle Oil (TCO 150-370°C) to the sum of other products, (such as, dry gas, LPG, gasolme and coke) mcreases as the conveision i educes Moreover, nser temperature has dramatic impact on the selectivity At same conversion, the applicants have found that middle distillate selectivity impioves significantly as πser temperature is reduced The applicants have also investigated the role of coke on regenerated catalyst (CRC) and discovered that there is an optimum CRC for maximum yield of TCO (Refi: Ind. Chem. Res., 32, 1081, 1993). Finally, the applicants have arrived at some specific conditions (comprising of very low riser temperature, low contact time, low catalyst oil ratio, higher CRC, etc.) and type of the catalyst with which yield of TCO is maximized.
According to the present invention, petroleum feed stocks such as Vacuum Gas Oil (VGO), Coker fuel oil, Coker/Visbreaker heavy gas oil, Hydrocracker bottom, etc. is catalytically cracked in presence of solid zeolite catalyst with or without selective acidic bottom cracking components in multiple riser-reactors. The feed is first preheated at a temperature in the range of 150-350°C and then injected to pneumatic flow riser type cracking reactor with residence time of 1-8 seconds and preferably of 2-5 seconds. At the exit of the riser, hydrocarbon vapors are quickly separated from catalyst for minimizing the over cracking of middle distillate to lighter products.
The product from the first riser is separated in a fractionator to at least two streams, one comprising hydrocarbons having boiling below 370°C and the other comprising hydrocarbons having boiling points greater than 370°C. The removal of hydrocarbons having boiling points less than or equal to 370°C products reduces the chance of over-cracking of middle distillate range molecules to lighter products. The unconverted fraction comprising hydrocarbons having boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C fraction f the first riser is pre-heated and then injected to the second riser reactor with residence time of about 1-12 seconds and preferably in the range of about 4-10 seconds, through the feed nozzles located at a higher elevation. In the second riser, the regenerated catalyst is contacted with the recycle stream of unconverted heavy hydrocarbons from the second riser at a relatively lower elevation of the riser. This allows preferential cracking of the recycle components under high severity conditions (e.g., higher temperature, higher dynamic activity of the catalyst owing to low coke on regenerated catalysts) at the bottom of second riser. Typically, recycle ratio is maintained in the range of 0-50% of the feed throughput in the second riser.
Steam and/or water, in the range of 1-20 wt% of feed is added for dispersion and atomization in both the risers depending on type of feedstock. The desired velocity in the risers, especially in the first riser is adjusted by addition of steam.
The hydrocarbon product vapor from the second riser is quickly quenched with water/other hydrocarbon fraction and separated for minimizing the post riser non-selective cracking. The product from the second riser and the product boiling below 370°C from the first riser are separated in a common fractionator into several products, such as Dry gas, LPG, Gasoline, Heavy naphtha, Light Cycle Oil and cracked bottom. Part of the unconverted bottom product (370°C+ fraction) from the second fractionator is recycled to the second riser and remaining part is sent to rundown after removal of catalyst fines.
The spent catalyst with entrained hydrocarbons from the riser exit is then passed through a common or separate stripping section where counter current steam stripping of the catalyst is carried out to remove the hydrocarbon vapors from the spent catalyst. The catalyst residence time in the strippers is required to be kept in the lower side of preferably less than 30 seconds. This helps to minimize undue thermal cracking reactions and also reduces the possibility of over- cracking of middle distillate range products. Stripped catalyst is then passed to a common dense or turbulent fluidized bed regenerator where the coke on catalyst is burnt in presence of air and or oxygen containing gases to achieve coke on regenerated catalyst (CRC) of lower than 0.4 wt% and preferably in the range of about 0.1 - 0.3 wt%. A part of the regenerated catalyst is directly circulated to the second riser reactor via standpipe / slide valve at a temperature of 600 -
750°C.
As mentioned earlier, there is an optimum CRC at which maximum TCO yield is obtained. In order to extract maximum TCO from the first riser, CRC is required to be maintained at relatively higher level, in the range of 0.2- 0.8 wt% depending on catalyst and operating conditions. In the second riser, the desirable
CRC is relatively lower (in the range of 0.1 - 0.3 wt%) in order to utilize the full activity potential of the catalyst. Also the temperature of the regenerated catalyst entering to the two risers are different. The lower temperature and higher CRC of the catalyst entering to the first riser is achieved by mixing a part of the stripped catalyst from the first riser / common stripper with regenerated catalyst in a separate vessel equipped with fluidization steam and circulating the mixed catalyst to the bottom of the first riser via stand pipe / slide valve. The mixed catalyst enters at the bottom of the first riser with a temperature in the range of
450 - 575°C (preferably in the range 475 - 550°C) and CRC of lower than 0.8 wt% (preferably in the range of 0.25 - 0.5 wt% depending on type of catalyst).
Another option of controlling the catalyst return temperature in the first riser is to employ catalyst cooler so that catalyst/oil ratio could be controlled almost independently. However, the mixing vessel is preferred since it acts as second stage stripper and helps to adjust the coke level on the catalyst.
Prior to the injection of the 370°C+ fraction of the first riser product, the fresh regenerated catalyst is contacted with the recycle stream of unconverted hydrocarbons from the second riser at a relatively lower elevation of the riser. The recycle components are preferentially cracked at the high severity conditions prevailing in the second riser bottom before the injection of 370°C+ fraction of first riser product. Typically recycle ratio is maintained in the range of 0 - 50% of the second reactor feed throughput depending on the type of the feed to be processed and the conversion level in both the reactors. If the recycle quantity is less, it may be injected along with the main feed i.e., 370°C+ fraction of first riser product.
In the present invention, the first riser operates in the range of 150 - 350 hr"1 weight hourly space velocity (WHSV), 2 - 8 catalyst to oil ratio, 400 - 500°C riser top temperature to convert the feedstock to selectively cracked product including 35 - 45 wt% mm. TCO yield and 40 - 60 wt% 370°C+ (bottom) yield. The second riser operates in the range of 75 - 275 hr"1 WHSV, 4 - 12 catalyst to oil ratio and 425 -525°C riser top temperature. The absolute pressure in both reactors are 1 - 4 kg/cm2 (g). Steam and / or water, in the range of 1 - 20 wt% of feed is added not only for dispersion and atomization of feed but also to attain the desired fluidization velocity in the risers, especially in the first riser bottom. It also helps in avoiding the coke formation or catalyst agglomeration.
Comparison of major process conditions of the process of the present invention with conventional FCC & multi stage process is shown below :
Table - 1
Multistage process of the present invention FCC
I Process first reactor second reactor
1 Range '; Preferred Range Preferred Range
! Range Range
WHSV, hr"1 1 150 - 350 | ! 200- 300 75 - 275 120 - 220 125 -200
Cataty st/Oil ! 2 - 8 i 3 - 5 4 -12 5 - 8 | 4 - 8 ratio (w/w) 1
Riser temp.,°C 1 400 - 500 ; 425 - 475 425 - 525 460 - 510 490- 540
Steam injection, 1 - 20 ! 8 - 12 1 - 20 4 - 8 0 - 10 wt% of feed Use of multiple riser concepts is not new, as each researcher has employed it for different purposes. The present invention utilizes dual or multiple riser systems for exclusive maximization of middle distillate products. Being an intermediate product, middle distillate range molecules have a tendency to undergo further cracking. There is always a trade off between maximization of an intermediate range product and minimization of bottom unconverted part. This invention includes the sequence of operation and operating conditions for control of over- crackmg of middle distillate in the first riser and upgradation of heavier molecules to middle distillate in the second riser. This invention provides a novel scheme for operation of two or multiple risers at entirely different operating conditions with a common regenerator. Use of so much lower temperature cracking is unusual so far. However, the applicants have found that reaction temperature has a predominant effect on the over cracking of middle distillate range products. For example, at 40 wt% of 370°C- conversion, the wt% yield ratio of TCO and all other products, (i.e., Dry Gas, LPG, Gasoline & Coke) except TCO and bottom (subsequently referred as TCO/Rest ratio) are in the range of about 3.0 - 3.5 and about 1.5 - 1.8 at reaction temperatures of 425°C and 490°C respectively. The difference in the above ratio is narrowed down as the conversion increases (Figure-3).
Therefore, for maximizing TCO, low reaction temperature and catalyst to oil ratio as well as low catalyst activity is desirable. The applicants identified that lower catalyst / oil ratio (2 - 8) and higher WHSV of (150 - 350 hr"1) along with lower riser temperature in the first riser of the process of the present invention are very important to achieve very low degree of over cracking for producing maximum middle distillate range components. The applicants also observed that the TCO/Rest ratio is significantly affected by the 370°C- conversion level. For example, for a given catalyst and reaction temperature, if 370°C- conversion is 40%), the TCO/Rest ratio is as high as 3.2 which comes down to about 1.3 when 370°C - conversion is increased to 70%. This shows that restricting the conversion in the first stage riser upto 40 - 45% is very important to maximize the yield of middle distillate.
In the second riser, the operating conditions need to be different for upgradation of relatively less crackable heavy material to lighter products. However, undue increase in severity parameters will lead to conversion to LPG and Gasoline. The applicants have discovered that operation at an intermediate severity as compared to gasoline maximization mode FCC operation is absolutely necessary. The applicants have also found that in order to reduce the yield of unconverted bottom and improve the middle distillate selectivity, recycle at a lower elevated entry point at the bottom of the second riser is very much effective. This allows the cracking of the recycled heaviest fraction in presence of regenerated catalyst at relatively higher temperature and lower CRC which improves the dynamic activity of the catalyst and offers maximum cracking of the recycled feed. After cracking of the recycled part, the catalyst temperature comes down due to utilization of part of the heat for vaporization and endothermic cracking reactions of the recycled feed. Also, the coke on catalyst increases which essentially blocks some of the active sites and thereby reduces the dynamic activity of the catalyst. The contacting of catalyst having relatively lower temperature and higher coke on catalyst with the main feed comprising the fraction of the first riser of hydrocarbons with boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C, assists to improve the selectivity of middle distillate range products out of the second riser. This contacting pattern is unique and highly effective in increasing the overall yield of the middle distillate and reducing yield of the unwanted slurry oil.
In the present invention, the delta coke (defined as the difference in coke content of spent and regenerated catalyst) is low due to lower coke make in the extremely low severity cracking in the first riser which is expected to keep the regenerator temperature at relatively lower level as compared to the conventional FCC operation using similar type of feedstocks. However, overall lower catalyst oil ratio is likely to compensate this effect and thereby maintain the regenerator temperature at least to the same level as that of conventional FCC as required for burning of coke on catalyst.
Further details of feedstock, catalyst, products and operating conditions of the process of the present invention are described below:
Feed Stock:
Feed stock for the present invention includes hydrocarbon fractions starting from carbon no. 20 to carbon no. 80. The fraction could be straight run light and heavy Vacuum Gas Oil, Hydrocracker bottom, Heavy Gas Oil fractions from Hydrocracking, FCC, Visbreaking or Delayed Coking. The conditions in the process of the present invention are adjusted depending on the type of the feedstock so as to maximize the yield of middle distillate. Details of the feedstock properties are outlined in the examples given hereinbelow.. The above feed stock types are for illustration only and the invention is not limited in any manner to only these feed stocks.
Catalyst:
Catalyst employed in the process of the present invention predominantly consists of Y-zeolite in rare earth ultra-stabilized form. Bottom cracking components consisting of peptized alumina, acidic silica alumina or T- alumina or a mixture thereof are also added to the catalyst formulation to produce synergistic effect towards maximum middle distillate under the operating conditions as outlined above. It may be noted that both the first and second stage risers are charged with same catalyst. The pore size range of the active components namely, Re- US Y zeolite and bottom selective active materials are in the range of 8 - 11 and 50 - 1000 angstrom respectively. The typical properties of the Y-zeolite based catalyst are given in Table-2. Table - 2
Surface Area. m2/g, Fresh 110 - 180
Steamed 100 - 140
% Crystallnity Fresh 10 - 15
Steamed 8 - 12
Unit Cell Size. °A Fresh 24.35 - 24.75
Steamed 24.2 - 24.6
Micro-pore area, mJg, Fresh 65 - 100
Steamed 60 - 90
Meso-pore area, m /g, Fresh 45 - 80
Steamed 40 - 50
Pore volume, cc/gm 0.25 - 0.38
The active components in the process of the present invention catalyst are supported on inactive materials of silica/alumma silica-alumina compounds including kaolinites. The active components could be mixed together before spray drying or separately binded, supported and spray-dried using conventional spray drying technique. The spray-dried micro-spheres are washed, rare earth exchanged and flash dried to produce finished catalyst particles. The finished micro-spheres containing active materials in separate particles are physically blended in the desired composition. The preferred range of physical properties of the finished fresh catalyst as required for the process of the present invention:
Particle size range, micron 20-120
Particle below 40 microns, wt% : < 20
Average particle size, micron 50-80
Average bulk density, micron 0.6 - 1.0 Typically, the above properties and other related physical properties, e.g., attrition resistance, fludizability etc. are in the same range as used in the conventional FCC process.
Products:
The main products in the process of the present invention is the middle distillate components namely, Heavy Cracked Naphtha (HCN : 150 - 216°C) and Light Cycle Oil (LCO : 216 - 370°C). The sum total of these two fractions which is called as Total Cycle Oil (TCO : 150 - 370°C) is obtained with a yield upto 50 - 65 wt% of the feed. The other useful products of the process are LPG (5 - 12%) and Gasoline (15 - 25 wf%). Range of other product yields from first and second stage risers are summarized in Table - 3:
Table - 3
The invention and its embodiments are described in further detail hereunder, with reference to the following examples, which should not be construed to limit the scope of the invention in any manner. Various modifications of the invention that may be apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be included within the scope of the present invention.
Example-1
Yield of middle distillate at different conversions in conventional FCC operation
This example illustrates the change in yield of the middle distillate product (TCO) at different conversion levels under conventional FCC conditions. -216°C conversion is defined as the total quantity of products boiling below 216°C including Coke. Similarly -370°C conversion is defined as the total quantity of products boiling below 370°C including Coke. The experiments were conducted in standard fixed bed Micro Activity Test (MAT) reactor described as per ASTM D-3907 with minor modifications indicated subsequently as modified MAT. The catalyst to be used is first steamed at 788°C for 3 hours in presence of 100% steam. The physico-chemical properties of the feed used in the modified MAT reactor are given in the Table - 4 & 5.
Table - 4
The runs were taken at a reaction temperature of 495°C, feed injection time of 30 seconds with WHSV in the range of 40 - 120 hr"1. Catalysts used in this example are catalyst A & B which are commercially available FCC catalyst samples having properties as shown in the Table-6.
Table - 5
Table - 6
APS, microns 74 77
The product yields along with conversions are given in Table-7 wherein it is observed that as in both -216 C and -370°C conversion increases, TCO yield increases upto an optimum value and thereafter, it reduces with increase in conversion. TCO being an intermediate product, undergoes further cracking as reaction severity increases. Therefore, in order to maximize TCO yield, the over- cracking is to be restricted.
Table - 7
Example-2
Effect of reaction temperature on middle distillate yields at same conversion
This example illustrates the effect of reaction temperature on the yield of middle distillate at a given -216°C conversion. The experiments were conducted in the modified MAT reactor with the same feed as mentioned in Example- 1, at two different temperatures, viz., 425°C and 495°C. Catalyst employed here is catalyst C which is commercially available FCC catalyst of following properties as shown in the Table - 8.
Table - 8
Table - 9
The conversion was varied by changing W/F ratio. The product yields are compared at same -216°C conversion but at different temperatures. It is noted from Table-9 that at higher temperature, TCO yield and more importantly the TCO/Rest ratio (the ratio of TCO yield and yield of other products e.g., Dry gas, LPG, Gasoline and Coke except bottom and TCO) are much lower in case of higher reaction temperature. For example, at a given -216°C conversion, TCO yield at 425°C temperature is about 6 - 10% higher than that at 495°C. The other significant point is that at low temperature of 425°C, it has been possible to get 46%o TCO yield (per pass) at 50% -216°C conversion. Similarly, there is a significant improvement in TCO/Rest ratio for 425°C as compared to that of 495°C at same conversion. This clearly demonstrates that in order to conserve middle distillate range molecules, low reaction temperature is essential. Example-3
First stage riser cracking conditions
This example illustrates the significance of first stage riser cracking conditions e.g., temperature, catalyst/oil ratio and conversion on the yield of middle distillate and other products while employing commercially available FCC catalysts A and C, properties of which are described in Example- 1 & 2 respectively. The tests were conducted in modified fixed bed MAT unit with same feed as described in Example- 1. Yield data were generated at different conversion level for the catalysts as indicated above and the yields of different products were obtained. TCO/Rest ratios at different conversion levels are plotted in Figure-3, from which it is observed that for both the catalysts, the TCO/Rest ratio increases as the -370°C conversion is reduced. Therefore, it is important to note that the per pass -370 °C conversion in the first stage riser should be kept below 45% and preferably below 40%.
From Figure-3, it is also observed that the TCO/Rest ratio is a strong function of the reactor temperature for a given conversion and catalyst. For example, with catalyst C, while reducing reaction temperature from 490 to 425°C, the TCO/Rest ratio is increased from 3.4 to 3.75 at about -370°C conversion level of 40%). This clearly shows that for the first stage cracking, the reaction temperature should be kept lower, preferably in the range of 425 - 450°C.
Example - 4
Catalyst characteristics for middle distillate maximization
One of the important observation as illustrated in Example-3, is that for maximization of middle distillate yield, it is necessary to restrict the per-pass conversion within 40 - 45% and operate the first stage riser at lower reaction temperature. The low reaction temperature coupled with high coke on regenerated catalyst leads to lower dynamic activity of the catalyst. Therefore, the desired catalyst should have high intrinsic activity. However, the problem is that high active catalysts are not usually diesel selective. In this example, we illustrate the importance of catalyst characteristics to obtain higher yield of middle distillate out of the dual / multi - stage risers.
MAT activity is measured in ASTM MAT unit using a standard feedstock and defined as the wt% of products boiling below 216°C including coke at ASTM conditions. All other experiments were conducted at the temperature of 425°C in the modified MAT reactor with the same feed as described in Example- 1 and different catalysts. The important properties of the catalysts and the yield / conversion data are compared in Table- 10.
Table-10
Table -11
It is seen that the zeolite/matrix ratio, TCO yield at 40% -370°C conversion, TCO / Rest ratio are in the order of C > A > D. In catalyst C, the available active matrix is adequate to crack the large molecules which are crackable under the prevailing operating conditions but it requires slightly higher W/F ratio. Higher zeolite quantity is also synergistically taking part in the over all cracking activity but the conversion of middle distillate to lighter products is not increasing corresponding to higher zeolite content due to lower temperature. However for catalyst-E, whose activity is extremely low, at 40%) of-370°C conversion, both TCO yield and TCO/Rest ratio is comparable to those with the higher active catalysts. But W/F ratio required to achieve 40% -370°C conversion is much higher which is difficult to achieve. At comparable W/F ratio, -370°C conversion will be very low, producing very low amount of TCO. Therefore, such low active catalyst is not useful for producing maximum distillate.
Experiments with catalysts A, C & D at a reaction temperature of 495°C corresponding to the second riser conditions were taken and the TCO yield and TCO/ Rest ratio are compared at -370°C conversion of 80% in Table-11. Both the TCO yield and TCO/ Rest ratio are found to be in the order of D > A > C. It may be noted that the zeolite / matrix ratio is just in the reverse order i.e., C > A > D. The higher quantity of zeolite as well as the high zeolite/matrix ratio in catalyst C, is resulting in overcracking of middle distillate range molecules into lighter products. For a given -370°C conversion, the -216°C conversion is much higher for catalyst C. It is quite clear that the catalyst which is supposed to be the best in the first riser conditions, may not be that much good for the second riser conditions as for as TCO maximization is concerned. This demonstrates that in order to achieve maximum TCO and minimum Bottom yield, some optimization of the catalyst properties is essential. Example- 5
Impact of basic nitrogen compound on middle distillate yield
It is generally conceived that low activity of the catalyst is desirable for maximum distillate yield. Basic mfrogen compounds present in feed stock interact with the catalyst at reaction conditions leading to loss of the active acid sites and hence decrease of catalyst activity. Two feed stocks were prepared containing 200 and 700 PPM pyridine respectively. The experiments were conducted in the modified MAT reactor with catalyst C using the same feed stock as mentioned in Example- 1, but containing different PPM of pyridine, at the temperature of 425°C. The conversion and yield data are shown in Table- 12.
Table- 12
It is observed that both TCO and TCO/Rest ratio are decreasing as the feed basic nitrogen content is increasing. However, at 40% -370°C conversion, -216°C conversion is increasing with increase in basic nitrogen in feed upto 200 PPM after which it reduces marginally at 700 PPM of pyridine in feed. This is due to the irreversible adsorption of the nitrogenous basic compounds leading to preferential destruction/poisoning of the strong acid sites, which are responsible for heavy molecule cracking. This is reflected in the higher W/F requirement to achieve 40% -370°C conversion. However, so called relatively weaker acid sites which do not get affected by basic nitrogen, helps in cracking of middle distillate range molecules at higher W/F resulting higher -216°C conversion. In case of 700 PPM pyridine containing feed, even some of the relatively weaker acid sites are getting affected reducing both -216 C and -370°C conversion as compared to the 200 PPM pyridine containing feed case. This example demonstrates that just activity reduction may not lead to higher middle distillate yield.
Example - 6
Impact of cracking conditions for second stage riser operation
This example illustrates the significance of second stage riser cracking conditions e.g., temperature, catalyst/oil ratio and conversion on the yield of middle distillate. The tests were conducted in modified fixed bed MAT unit as described in Example- 1, using catalyst C, at the temperature of 425, 490 and 510°C. The feed stock used is 370°C" product obtained from first stage cracking in circulating riser FCC pilot plant, the properties of which is summarized in Table- 13. Product yields data were generated at different conversion levels at different temperatures for catalyst C and according the TCO/Rest ratios at different conversion levels are plotted in Figure-4.
- ι; 3
Density, gm cc @ 15°C 0.903
CCR, wt% 0.43
Sulfur, wt% 1.75
Olefins, wt% Nil
Saturates, wt% 59.0
Aromatics, wt%> 41.0
From the Figure-4, it is observed that at a given temperature, the TCO/Rest ratio increases as the -370°C conversion reduces. Also, at a given -370°C conversion, TCO/Rest ratio improves as the reaction temperature reduces. For example, at about -370°C conversion of about 55%, TCO/Rest ratio increases from 1.22 to 1.34 as the temperature is reduced from 510 to 490°C. This clearly shows that even for the second stage cracking, the reaction temperature should be kept preferably lower. However, it will also lead to generation of higher quantity of bottom at same W7F ratio. At 425°C. W/F required to crack the 370°C-r- product from first stage cracking along with the recycle stream (unconverted part from the second riser) will be very high and hence difficult to achieve. .Another important fact is that the mean average boiling point (MeABP) of second riser combined feed is definitely higher than that of first riser. Operation at lower temperature than the MeABP of the second riser combined feed is not desirable as it will lead to non-selective thermal cracking of the non-vaporized feed producing higher quantity of Coke and Dry gas. Considering these, it has been established that in the second riser, the reaction temperature should be preferably kept in the range of 460 - 510°C.
Example - 7
Combined effect of two stage cracking on middle distillate yield
In this example, the yields from two stage catalytic cracking for maximization of middle distillate is demonstrated. The experiments have been conducted using catalyst C m continuously circulating fluid bed pilot plant of feed rate 0.75 kg/hr where both the riser and regenerator are operated isothermally. The feed is the same as mentioned in Example- 1. After first stage cracking at 425°C, the product is separated into 370°C- and 370°C+ fractions. In the second stage 370°C+ fraction is cracked at 495°C using the same catalyst as used in the first stage. The product yields from the first and second stage cracking and also the combined yields are given in Table- 14. Table-14
It is clearly seen that the ratio of yield of TCO and the sum of yields of Dry gas, LPG, Gasoline and Coke (TCO/Rest) is very high in case of the first stage cracking which is essentially contributing higher TCO yield for the overall process. For second stage cracking, the TCO/Rest ratio is similar to that of conventional distillate mode FCC unit as the severity required for minimizing the bottom yield is high enough to crack significant portion of TCO produced from heavy molecule cracking.
The yield comparison between single and dual riser cracking at similar -216°C conversion with same catalyst and feed is compared in Table- 15. It is seen that for same -216°C conversion, -370°C conversion is much higher resulting about 20%o higher yield of TCO in case of two stage cracking. This establishes the workability of the concept of the present invention where process schemes, catalyst and operating conditions are such that TCO over-cracking is restricted with simultaneous the upgradation of heavy molecules to TCO range molecules. Here, the first riser operates to extract as much TCO as possible while minimizing the yields of lighter products and the second riser is operated to upgrade as much bottom as possible while maximizing the yield of TCO. This process overcomes the frade off between lower bottom yield and higher TCO yield.
Table-15
Example - 8
Comparison of Micro-reactor & Circulating pilot plant data
This example shows the comparison of individual product yields obtained from Micro-reactor and circulating Pilot Plant using same catalyst and feedstock at similar -216°C conversion range. From the data summarized in Table- 16, it is noticed that at similar conversion, there is an excellent match in Gasoline, TCO and bottom yields. The main difference is coming in the yields of Dry gas, LPG and Coke. This is mainly due to the non-selective thermal cracking reactions occurring at the riser bottom as well as at the end of the riser in the pilot plant. This has resulted relatively higher yield of Dry gas and Coke in the pilot plant riser. This example demonstrates that so far the yields of TCO and un-reacted bottom are concerned, the inferences drawn based on either Micro-reactor or Pilot Plant data are going to be same.
Table- 16
Example - 9
Comparison of the yields of present two stage process in present invention, commercial FCCU and two stage hydrocracker The product yields of the present invention is compared with that of commercial distillate mode FCC and two-stage hydrocracker units in Table- 17. The data for the process of the present invention is the combined yield obtained from two stage cracking where the two risers are operated at 425°C and 495°C respectively.
Table - 17
Product yields, Distillate Present Yields, wt% of Distillate mode 1 Present wt% of feed mode FCC process feed Hydrocracker i process
Diy gas 2.50 0.78 Dry gas 1.74 0.70
LPG 10.5 10.55 LPG 2.91 9. 1 1
Gasoline 27.5 21.88 Gasoline 16.28 12.86 (C5-150°C) (C5-120°C)
Heavy Naphtha 12.5 14.28 (120-216υC) 18.41 a (150-216°C) (120-285°C) 27.91
LCO 30.0 40.73 (216-390°C) 50.39
(216-370°C)
TCO 42.5 55.01 (120-390°C) 73.26 68.80
(150-370°C)
370UC 12.75 8.82 370ϋC 5.81 5.85
Coke 4.25 2.93 Coke 2.68
-216υC conv. 57.25 50.45 -216uC conv. _ 1
-370υC conv. 87.25 91.18 -370υC conv. ( 94.19 94.15 j
1
It is observed that in the process of the present invention, the TCO yield is higher by about 12.50% as compared to the commercial FCC unit. By varying the cut point of TCO from 150 - 370°C to 120 - 390°C as reported for Hydrocracker unit, and processing the hydrocarbon product vapors having boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C of the first riser product in the second riser, the yield of TCO increases by about 14 wt% which is only about 5% less than that from the commercial Hydrocracker unit. Also, the conversion of hydrocarbon product vapors having boiling points less than or equal to 370°C is similar to hydrocracker and better than distillate mode FCC unit. This demonstrates that without using external hydrogen and operating under very high pressure, it is possible to produce higher yield of middle distillate product which is close to that from a distillate mode two stage Hydrocracker unit.
Example -10
Comparison of properties of TCO obtained in the process of the present invention with middle distillate products obtained from commercial FCCU and two stage Hydrocracker
The properties of the TCO obtained from the process of the present invention is compared with TCO from commercial distillate mode FCC and Diesel from distillate mode two stage Hydrocracker units which is given in Table- 18.
Table -18
i PONA .Analysis. wt% j Olefins 19.97 6.82 18.6 Nil Saturates 24.64 ; 49.26 22.1 91 i Aromatics 55.39 43.92 59.3 9 :
Cetane no. 36.22 38.39 28 - 30 63 !
Expectedly. the quality of Diesel range product from Hydrocracker is much superior in terms of cetane no., olefm and aromatics contents etc. than the cracked products without using hydrogen. Mainly, the high aromatics content in cracked middle distillate product contribute to poor cetane quality However, the viscosity and the pour point of Hydrocracker Diesel is poor as compared to TCO from conventional FCC unit or the process of the present invention. From column 1 & 3, it is seen that the cetane no. of TCO obtained from the present process is higher by 6 units than TCO from conventional distillate mode FCCU. All other properties including the pour point are almost in the same range. In column 2. the properties of the product fraction of 120-390°C range for the present process is listed. While cetane no. of this fraction is further higher, the pour point as well as the viscosity is very high. This has been mainly contributed by the hydrocarbon fraction of 370 - 390°C cut from the first riser product of the present process. The pour point as well as the viscosity of this product fraction is very high and hence its inclusion in the middle distillate product is not desirable. If we take the 120 - 370°C cut from the first riser product and the 120 - 390°C cut from the second riser (while processing the unconverted 370°C+ part of the first riser product into the second riser), the pour point and the kinematic viscosity @ 50°C become 0.95°C and 2.44 CST respectively, which are almost same as that of 150 - 370°C product of the present invention as shown in the column 1 of Table- 18. Additionally, by this approach, the yield of the middle distillate increases from about 55 wf% to 63.6 wt% without any adverse impact on flash point.

Claims

We Claim
1. A multi stage selective catalytic cracking process for producing high yield of middle distillate products having carbon atoms in the range of about C8 to C24, from heavy hydrocarbon feed stocks in the absence of added hydrogen, said process comprising the steps of :
i) contacting preheated feed stock with a mixed catalyst in a first riser reactor under catalytic cracking conditions including catalyst to oil ratio of 2 to 8, WHSV of 150-350 hr "', contact period of about 1 to 8 seconds and top temperature in the range of about 400°C to 500°C to obtain first cracked hydrocarbon products;
ii) separating the first cracked hydrocarbon products from the first riser reactor in a vacuum or atmospheric distillation column into a first fraction comprising hydrocarbons with boiling points less than or equal to 370°C and a second fraction comprising unconverted hydrocarbons with boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C;
iii) cracking the unconverted second fraction from the first riser reactor comprising hydrocarbons having boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C, in the presence of regenerated catalyst, in a second riser reactor operating under catalytic cracking conditions including WHSV of 75-275 hr"1 , catalyst to oil ratio of 4-12 and riser top temperature of 425 - 525°C to obtain second cracked hydrocarbon products;
iv) separating the catalytically cracked products from the second riser reactor alongwith the cracked products comprising hydrocarbons having boiling points less than or equal to 370°C, from the first riser reactor in a main fractionating column to yield cracked products compπsmg dry gas, LPG, gasolme, middle distillates, heavy cycle oil and slurry oil,
v) lecy cling the entire heavy cycle oil comprising hydrocarbons having boiling pomts m the range of 370°C to 450°C and full 01 part of the sluny oil having boiling points greater than or equal to 450°C. into the second riser reactor at a vertically displaced position lowei than the position of introduction of the mam feed comprising bottom unconverted hydrocarbon fraction having boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C from the first riser reactoi to obtam middle distillate products compπsmg h diocarbons having carbon atoms m the range of - C24 ranging from about 50 to 65 wt % of the feed stock,
vi) optionally, recyclmg the fraction of unconverted hydrocarbons with boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C, obtamed in step (iv) m riser reactors by repeating steps (in) to (iv) to obtam substantially pure middle distillate products.
A process as claimed m claim 1 wherein, the feed stock is selected from petroleum based heavy feed stock such as vacuum gas oil (VGO), visbreaker/coker heavy gas oil, coker fuel oil and hydrocracker bottom, etc
A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the feed stock is preheated at a temperature m the range of 150-350 C and then injected to pneumatic flow πsei type crackmg reactor
A piocess as claimed m claun 1 wherein, the mixed catalyst is obtained from an intermediate vessel that mixes the spent catalyst from the common stripper or preferably first stripper with the regenerated catalyst from the common regenerator and charges the mixed catalyst with coke content in the range of about 0.2 to 0.8 wt% of catalyst to the bottom of the first riser at a temperature of 450 - 575°C.
5. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the cracked hydrocarbon vapor products from the first and second risers are quickly separated from respective spent catalysts using separating devices to minimize the over cracking of middle distillate range products into undesirable lighter hydrocarbons.
6. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the spent catalysts from the first and second riser reactors are passed through respective dedicated catalyst strippers or a common stripper to render the catalysts substantially free βf from entrained hydrocarbons.
7. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the regenerated catalyst with coke content of less than 0.4 wt% is obtained by burning a portion of the spent catalyst from the first stripper, the spent catalyst from the second stripper or the common stripper in a turbulent or fast fluidized bed regenerator in the presence of air or oxygen containing gases at a temperature in the range of about 600°C to 750°C.
8. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the catalyst between the fluidized bed riser reactors, strippers and the common regenerator is continuously circulated through standpipe and slide valves.
9. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the critical catalytic cracking conditions in the first reactor including mixed regenerated catalyst result in very high selectivity of middle distillate range products and conversion of hydrocarbon products of boiling point less than or equal to 370°C at lower than 50 wf% of the fresh feed.
10. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the catalyst comprises a mixture of commercial ReUS Y zeolite based catalyst having fresh surface area of 110- 180 m"/gm., pore volume of 0.25-0.38 cc/gm and average particle size of 60-70 micron along with selective acidic bottom upgrading components in the range of about 0-10 wt%.
11. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the unconverted heavy hydrocarbon fraction from second riser recycled into the second riser ranges from about 0-50 wt% of the main feed rate to the second riser, depending on the nature of the feedstock and operating conditions kept in the risers.
12. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein amount of steam for feed dispersion and atomization, catalyst lifting at the riser bottom in the first and the second riser reactors is in the range of 1-20 wt% of the respective total hydrocarbon feed depending on the quality of the feedstock.
13. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the spent catalyst resides in the stripper for a period of upto 30 seconds.
14. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the regenerated catalyst entering at the bottom of the second riser reactor has coke of about 0.1-0.3 wt% at a temperature of about 600-750°C and is lifted by catalytically inert gases.
15. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the combined Total Cycle Oil (150-370°C) product which is a mixture of Heavy naphtha ( 150-216°C) and Light cycle oil (216- 370°C), has higher cetane number than that from conventional distillate mode FCC unit and other properties such as specific gravity, viscosity, pour point, etc. are in the same range as that of commercial distillate mode FCC unit.
16. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein changing the cut point of the TCO from the first riser to 120-370°C, processmg 370 + part of the first riser product in the second riser, and changing the cut point of TCO from second riser to 120-390°C, the yield overall combined TCO product increases by 8-10 wt% and the combined TCO product has the same properties but improved cetane number as that of TCO from commercial distillate mode FCC unit.
17. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the Total Cycle Oil comprises a mixture of heavy naphtha hydrocarbons having boiling points from about 150°C to 216°C and light cycle oil hydrocarbons having boiling points from about 216 °C to 370 °C.
18. A fluidized bed catalytic cracking system for the production of high yield of middle distillate products comprising hydrocarbons having carbon atoms in the range of C8 to C24 from heavy petroleum feeds, by a process as defined in claim 1, said system comprising at least two riser reactors (1 and 2) wherein, a fresh feed is introduced into the first riser reactor (1), typically, at the bottom section above regenerated catalyst entry zone through a feed nozzle (3), and at the end of the first riser reactor (1), the spent catalyst is quickly separated from hydrocarbon product vapors using separating devices (4) and subjected to multistage steam stripping to remove any entrained hydrocarbons, and a conduit (5) feeds a part of the said shipped catalyst into a regeneratmg appaiatus (7) and the othei part of the snipped catalyst from the conduit (5) fravels through anothei conduit (6) into a mixing vessel ( 10), and thereafter, the mixed catalyst from the mixing vessel ( 10) travels through a conduit (19) and is fed to the bottom of the first user reactoi (1), the hydiocarbon product vapois from the fust πsei ieactor (1) which aie sepaiated from the catalyst in the sepaiatmg devices (4) aie fed to a vacuum oi atmospheric distillation column ( 13) thtough conduit (12) whereby the first ciacked hydiocaibon pioducts aie sepaiated into a first fraction comprising hydrocarbons havmg boiling points less than or equal to 370°C and a second fraction compπsmg uncracked hydrocarbons with boiling pomts greater than oi equal to 370°C, the said second fraction compnsmg uncracked hydrocarbon products is fed through feed nozzle (16) mto the bottom of second nsei ieactor (2) above the regenerated catalyst entry zone, and the regenerated catalyst from the regeneratmg apparatus (7) is fed to the bottom of the second nser reactor (2) tfuough a conduit (9), and subsequently, the hydrocarbon products of the second riser reactor (2) are sepaiated from the catalyst m separating devices (11), and the cracked products of the second nser reactor (2) along with the products of the first fraction of the first riser reactor (1) compnsmg hydrocarbons with boiling points less than oi equal to 370°C are fed to a mam fractionatoi column (15) which separates the said products mto dry gas, LPG, gasolme, heavy naphtha, light cycle oil. heavy cycle oil, and slurry oil, and the entire heavy cycle oil and full or part of the slurry oil consisting mainly of hydrocarbons with boiling points greater than or equal to 370°C aie recycled back to the second nser reactor (2) through a separate feed nozzle (17) located at a point lower than the position of introduction of mam feed, and the feed and cracked product vapors travel along with the catalyst, into the reactor wherein the spent catalyst separated from product vapors of the second riser reactor (2) in separating devices and the spent catalyst is subjected to multistage steam stripping for removal of entrained hydrocarbons and the stripped catalyst travels through a conduit ( 18) mto the regenerating apparatus (7), wherein the coke on catalyst is burnt in the presence of air and/or oxygen containing gases at high temperature, and the flue gas from regeneration is separated from the entrained catalyst fines in separating devices (23) and the flue gas leaves from top of the regenerating apparatus (7) through a conduit (22) for heat recovery and venting through stack; the hot regenerated catalyst is withdrawn from the regenerating apparatus (7) and divided into two parts, one going to the mixing vessel (10) through the conduit (8) and the other directly to the bottom of the second riser reactor (2), and the mixed catalyst from the mixing vessel (10) is fed through the conduit (19) to the inlet of the first riser reactor (1), controlling the catalyst bed level in the individual or common stripper, the catalyst circulation rate from the common regenerator and the quantity of the spent and regenerated catalyst entering into the mixing vessel (10) using slide valves placed on the conduits and thereby producing high yield of middle distillate products.
19. A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the separating device includes cyclone separator.
20. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein pressure in the first and second riser reactors are in the range of 1.0 to 4.0 kg/cm (g).
EP00929770A 2000-02-16 2000-02-16 A multi stage selective catalytic cracking process and a system for producing high yield of middle distillate products from heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks Ceased EP1190019A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/IN2000/000013 WO2001060951A1 (en) 2000-02-16 2000-02-16 A multi stage selective catalytic cracking process and a system for producing high yield of middle distillate products from heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1190019A1 true EP1190019A1 (en) 2002-03-27

Family

ID=11076225

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00929770A Ceased EP1190019A1 (en) 2000-02-16 2000-02-16 A multi stage selective catalytic cracking process and a system for producing high yield of middle distillate products from heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US7029571B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1190019A1 (en)
CN (1) CN100448953C (en)
AU (1) AU4777000A (en)
WO (1) WO2001060951A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (92)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6866771B2 (en) * 2002-04-18 2005-03-15 Uop Llc Process and apparatus for upgrading FCC product with additional reactor with catalyst recycle
EP1365004A1 (en) * 2002-05-23 2003-11-26 ATOFINA Research Production of olefins
US20040064007A1 (en) 2002-09-30 2004-04-01 Beech James H. Method and system for regenerating catalyst from a plurality of hydrocarbon conversion apparatuses
CN1438296A (en) * 2003-03-13 2003-08-27 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Three-section lift-pipe catalytic cracking process
ES2913654T3 (en) * 2004-03-08 2022-06-03 China Petroleum & Chem Corp FCC procedure with two reaction zones
US7582203B2 (en) 2004-08-10 2009-09-01 Shell Oil Company Hydrocarbon cracking process for converting gas oil preferentially to middle distillate and lower olefins
KR20070056090A (en) * 2004-08-10 2007-05-31 쉘 인터내셔날 리써취 마트샤피지 비.브이. Method and apparatus for making a middle distillate product and lower olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock
US20060231459A1 (en) * 2005-03-28 2006-10-19 Swan George A Iii FCC process combining molecular separation with staged conversion
US8027571B2 (en) 2005-04-22 2011-09-27 Shell Oil Company In situ conversion process systems utilizing wellbores in at least two regions of a formation
CN1888026B (en) * 2005-06-30 2010-04-28 洛阳石化设备研究所 Gasoline catalytic converting method and reactor
WO2007050469A1 (en) * 2005-10-24 2007-05-03 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Temperature limited heater with a conduit substantially electrically isolated from the formation
AR058345A1 (en) 2005-12-16 2008-01-30 Petrobeam Inc SELF-SUPPORTED COLD HYDROCARBONS
EP2010754A4 (en) 2006-04-21 2016-02-24 Shell Int Research Adjusting alloy compositions for selected properties in temperature limited heaters
CN101104576B (en) * 2006-07-13 2010-08-25 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Combination catalysis conversion method for organic oxygen-containing compound and hydrocarbons
KR20100016499A (en) * 2007-04-13 2010-02-12 쉘 인터내셔날 리써취 마트샤피지 비.브이. Systems and methods for making a middle distillate product and lower olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock
WO2008134612A1 (en) * 2007-04-30 2008-11-06 Shell Oil Company Systems and methods for making a middle distillate product and lower olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock
US7404889B1 (en) * 2007-06-27 2008-07-29 Equistar Chemicals, Lp Hydrocarbon thermal cracking using atmospheric distillation
US7727486B2 (en) * 2007-08-01 2010-06-01 Uop Llc Apparatus for heating regeneration gas
ITMI20071610A1 (en) * 2007-08-03 2009-02-04 Eni Spa INTEGRATED PROCESS OF CATALYTIC FLUID CRACKING TO OBTAIN HYDROCARBURIC MIXTURES WITH HIGH QUALITY AS FUEL
US20100324232A1 (en) * 2007-10-10 2010-12-23 Weijian Mo Systems and methods for making a middle distillate product and lower olefins from a hydrocarbon feedstock
US7866386B2 (en) 2007-10-19 2011-01-11 Shell Oil Company In situ oxidation of subsurface formations
US7931739B2 (en) * 2008-04-08 2011-04-26 China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation Agglomerate removal system
US20090299118A1 (en) * 2008-05-29 2009-12-03 Kellogg Brown & Root Llc FCC For Light Feed Upgrading
US20090299119A1 (en) * 2008-05-29 2009-12-03 Kellogg Brown & Root Llc Heat Balanced FCC For Light Hydrocarbon Feeds
CN102165044B (en) * 2008-07-28 2015-01-07 英特凯特公司 Composition and methods for preferentially increasing yields of one or more selected hydrocarbon products
US8003835B2 (en) * 2008-10-27 2011-08-23 Kior Inc. Biomass conversion process
US8137632B2 (en) * 2008-11-04 2012-03-20 Kior, Inc. Biomass conversion process
PE20120601A1 (en) * 2008-12-18 2012-05-12 Uop Llc PROCESS TO IMPROVE THE FLOW PROPERTIES OF CRUDE OIL
US8435401B2 (en) 2009-01-06 2013-05-07 Process Innovators, Inc. Fluidized catalytic cracker with active stripper and methods using same
US8007662B2 (en) 2009-03-27 2011-08-30 Uop Llc Direct feed/effluent heat exchange in fluid catalytic cracking
WO2011051434A2 (en) * 2009-11-02 2011-05-05 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Cracking process
CA2795120C (en) * 2010-03-31 2019-10-08 Indian Oil Corporation Ltd A process for simulataneous cracking of lighter and heavier hydrocarbon feed and system for the same
US9434892B2 (en) * 2010-07-08 2016-09-06 Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Two stage fluid catalytic cracking process and apparatus
US20130172173A1 (en) 2010-07-08 2013-07-04 Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Upflow regeneration of fcc catalyst for multi stage cracking
TR201907926T4 (en) * 2010-07-08 2019-06-21 Indian Oil Corp Ltd Multi-riser residual catalytic cracking process and apparatus.
CN102465044B (en) * 2010-11-15 2014-05-07 周向进 Method for joint production of low-octane gasoline and high-octane gasoline
US20130001131A1 (en) * 2011-06-30 2013-01-03 Shell Oil Company Dual riser catalytic cracking process for making middle distillate and lower olefins
RU2014103010A (en) * 2011-06-30 2015-08-10 Шелл Интернэшнл Рисерч Маатсхаппий Б.В. METHOD FOR CATALYTIC CRACKING USING TWO ELEVATOR REACTORS FOR PRODUCING A MEDIUM DISTRIBUTOR AND LOWER OLEFINS
JP5876575B2 (en) * 2011-07-29 2016-03-02 サウジ アラビアン オイル カンパニー Hydrogen rich feedstock for fluid catalytic cracking process
US20130130889A1 (en) * 2011-11-17 2013-05-23 Stone & Webster Process Technology, Inc. Process for maximum distillate production from fluid catalytic cracking units (fccu)
US9809762B2 (en) 2011-12-15 2017-11-07 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Saturation process for making lubricant base oils
US9029301B2 (en) * 2011-12-15 2015-05-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Saturation process for making lubricant base oils
RU2487160C1 (en) * 2012-03-26 2013-07-10 Борис Захарович Соляр Procedure for catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon material with yield of light olefins and device for its implementation
JP6262749B2 (en) 2012-10-19 2018-01-17 サウジ アラビアン オイル カンパニー High severity catalytic cracking method of crude oil
WO2016027219A1 (en) 2014-08-21 2016-02-25 Sabic Global Technologies B.V. Systems and methods for dehydrogenation of alkanes
US9816037B2 (en) 2014-09-22 2017-11-14 Uop Llc Methods and systems for increasing production of middle distillate hydrocarbons from heavy hydrocarbon feed during fluid catalytic cracking
US9864823B2 (en) 2015-03-30 2018-01-09 Uop Llc Cleansing system for a feed composition based on environmental factors
US10590360B2 (en) 2015-12-28 2020-03-17 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Bright stock production from deasphalted oil
US20170183578A1 (en) 2015-12-28 2017-06-29 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Bright stock production from low severity resid deasphalting
US10550335B2 (en) 2015-12-28 2020-02-04 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Fluxed deasphalter rock fuel oil blend component oils
US10494579B2 (en) 2016-04-26 2019-12-03 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Naphthene-containing distillate stream compositions and uses thereof
US10222787B2 (en) 2016-09-16 2019-03-05 Uop Llc Interactive petrochemical plant diagnostic system and method for chemical process model analysis
US10562771B1 (en) * 2017-02-06 2020-02-18 Triad National Security, Llc Fabrication of uranium nitride
US10684631B2 (en) 2017-03-27 2020-06-16 Uop Llc Measuring and determining hot spots in slide valves for petrochemical plants or refineries
US10754359B2 (en) * 2017-03-27 2020-08-25 Uop Llc Operating slide valves in petrochemical plants or refineries
US10678272B2 (en) 2017-03-27 2020-06-09 Uop Llc Early prediction and detection of slide valve sticking in petrochemical plants or refineries
US10670027B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2020-06-02 Uop Llc Determining quality of gas for rotating equipment in a petrochemical plant or refinery
US10794644B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2020-10-06 Uop Llc Detecting and correcting thermal stresses in heat exchangers in a petrochemical plant or refinery
US11396002B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2022-07-26 Uop Llc Detecting and correcting problems in liquid lifting in heat exchangers
US10752844B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2020-08-25 Uop Llc Rotating equipment in a petrochemical plant or refinery
US10670353B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2020-06-02 Uop Llc Detecting and correcting cross-leakage in heat exchangers in a petrochemical plant or refinery
US10844290B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2020-11-24 Uop Llc Rotating equipment in a petrochemical plant or refinery
US11130111B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2021-09-28 Uop Llc Air-cooled heat exchangers
US10752845B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2020-08-25 Uop Llc Using molecular weight and invariant mapping to determine performance of rotating equipment in a petrochemical plant or refinery
US11037376B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2021-06-15 Uop Llc Sensor location for rotating equipment in a petrochemical plant or refinery
US10962302B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2021-03-30 Uop Llc Heat exchangers in a petrochemical plant or refinery
US10663238B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2020-05-26 Uop Llc Detecting and correcting maldistribution in heat exchangers in a petrochemical plant or refinery
US10695711B2 (en) 2017-04-28 2020-06-30 Uop Llc Remote monitoring of adsorber process units
EP3615174B1 (en) * 2017-05-28 2022-03-09 Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited Fluid catalytic cracking process
US10870802B2 (en) 2017-05-31 2020-12-22 Saudi Arabian Oil Company High-severity fluidized catalytic cracking systems and processes having partial catalyst recycle
US11365886B2 (en) 2017-06-19 2022-06-21 Uop Llc Remote monitoring of fired heaters
US10913905B2 (en) 2017-06-19 2021-02-09 Uop Llc Catalyst cycle length prediction using eigen analysis
US10739798B2 (en) 2017-06-20 2020-08-11 Uop Llc Incipient temperature excursion mitigation and control
US11130692B2 (en) 2017-06-28 2021-09-28 Uop Llc Process and apparatus for dosing nutrients to a bioreactor
US10994240B2 (en) 2017-09-18 2021-05-04 Uop Llc Remote monitoring of pressure swing adsorption units
US11194317B2 (en) 2017-10-02 2021-12-07 Uop Llc Remote monitoring of chloride treaters using a process simulator based chloride distribution estimate
US11676061B2 (en) 2017-10-05 2023-06-13 Honeywell International Inc. Harnessing machine learning and data analytics for a real time predictive model for a FCC pre-treatment unit
US11105787B2 (en) 2017-10-20 2021-08-31 Honeywell International Inc. System and method to optimize crude oil distillation or other processing by inline analysis of crude oil properties
US10889768B2 (en) 2018-01-25 2021-01-12 Saudi Arabian Oil Company High severity fluidized catalytic cracking systems and processes for producing olefins from petroleum feeds
US10901403B2 (en) 2018-02-20 2021-01-26 Uop Llc Developing linear process models using reactor kinetic equations
US10734098B2 (en) 2018-03-30 2020-08-04 Uop Llc Catalytic dehydrogenation catalyst health index
US10953377B2 (en) 2018-12-10 2021-03-23 Uop Llc Delta temperature control of catalytic dehydrogenation process reactors
EP3918035A1 (en) * 2019-01-28 2021-12-08 SABIC Global Technologies B.V. Method for the conversion of feedstock containing naphtha to low carbon olefins and aromatics
TW202104562A (en) 2019-04-03 2021-02-01 美商魯瑪斯科技有限責任公司 Staged fluid catalytic cracking processes incorporating a solids separation device for upgrading naphtha range material
US11242493B1 (en) 2020-09-01 2022-02-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Methods for processing crude oils to form light olefins
US11434432B2 (en) 2020-09-01 2022-09-06 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Processes for producing petrochemical products that utilize fluid catalytic cracking of a greater boiling point fraction with steam
US11505754B2 (en) 2020-09-01 2022-11-22 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Processes for producing petrochemical products from atmospheric residues
US11230672B1 (en) 2020-09-01 2022-01-25 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Processes for producing petrochemical products that utilize fluid catalytic cracking
US11230673B1 (en) 2020-09-01 2022-01-25 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Processes for producing petrochemical products that utilize fluid catalytic cracking of a lesser boiling point fraction with steam
US11332680B2 (en) 2020-09-01 2022-05-17 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Processes for producing petrochemical products that utilize fluid catalytic cracking of lesser and greater boiling point fractions with steam
US11352575B2 (en) 2020-09-01 2022-06-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Processes for producing petrochemical products that utilize hydrotreating of cycle oil
EP4063468A1 (en) * 2021-03-25 2022-09-28 Indian Oil Corporation Limited A process for enhancement of ron of fcc gasoline with simultaneous reduction in benzene

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3928172A (en) 1973-07-02 1975-12-23 Mobil Oil Corp Catalytic cracking of FCC gasoline and virgin naphtha
US3894931A (en) 1974-04-02 1975-07-15 Mobil Oil Corp Method for improving olefinic gasoline product of low conversion fluid catalytic cracking
US3891540A (en) * 1974-04-02 1975-06-24 Mobil Oil Corp Combination operation to maximize fuel oil product of low pour
US3894933A (en) 1974-04-02 1975-07-15 Mobil Oil Corp Method for producing light fuel oil
US4481104A (en) 1981-10-26 1984-11-06 Mobil Oil Corporation Use of low acidity high silica to alumina ratio large pore zeolites for distillate production in catalytic cracking
US4388175A (en) * 1981-12-14 1983-06-14 Texaco Inc. Hydrocarbon conversion process
US4436613A (en) 1982-12-03 1984-03-13 Texaco Inc. Two stage catalytic cracking process
CA1237692A (en) * 1983-11-22 1988-06-07 Shell Canada Limited Dual riser fluid catalytic cracking process
US4606810A (en) * 1985-04-08 1986-08-19 Mobil Oil Corporation FCC processing scheme with multiple risers
US4830728A (en) 1986-09-03 1989-05-16 Mobil Oil Corporation Upgrading naphtha in a multiple riser fluid catalytic cracking operation employing a catalyst mixture
FR2625509B1 (en) * 1987-12-30 1990-06-22 Total France METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONVERTING HYDROCARBONS INTO A FLUIDIZED BED
US4874503A (en) * 1988-01-15 1989-10-17 Mobil Oil Corporation Multiple riser fluidized catalytic cracking process employing a mixed catalyst
US5098554A (en) 1990-03-02 1992-03-24 Chevron Research Company Expedient method for altering the yield distribution from fluid catalytic cracking units
US5401387A (en) 1991-12-13 1995-03-28 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalytic cracking in two stages
US5824208A (en) 1994-05-27 1998-10-20 Exxon Research & Engineering Company Short contact time catalytic cracking process
DE19805915C1 (en) * 1998-02-13 1999-09-23 Ruhr Oel Gmbh Hydrocarbon cracking process
US5944982A (en) * 1998-10-05 1999-08-31 Uop Llc Method for high severity cracking

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0160951A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN100448953C (en) 2009-01-07
US7029571B1 (en) 2006-04-18
AU4777000A (en) 2001-08-27
CN1345362A (en) 2002-04-17
WO2001060951A1 (en) 2001-08-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7029571B1 (en) Multi stage selective catalytic cracking process and a system for producing high yield of middle distillate products from heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks
US5154818A (en) Multiple zone catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons
EP3630924B1 (en) High-severity fluidized catalytic cracking processes having partial catalyst recycle
EP2591073B1 (en) Two stage fluid catalytic cracking process
US4786400A (en) Method and apparatus for catalytically converting fractions of crude oil boiling above gasoline
CA2657628C (en) Ancillary cracking of paraffinic naphtha in conjunction with fcc unit operations
US3886060A (en) Method for catalytic cracking of residual oils
US5372704A (en) Cracking with spent catalyst
US7261807B2 (en) Fluid cat cracking with high olefins production
JP5840840B2 (en) An improved integrated method for hydrogenating and catalytically cracking hydrocarbon oils
US20160333280A1 (en) Process for simultaneous cracking of lighter and heavier hydrocarbon feed and system for the same
EP3365412B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for fluid catalytic cracking
EP3077484B1 (en) Integrated solvent-deasphalting and fluid catalytic cracking process for light olefin production
US20090127161A1 (en) Process and Apparatus for Integrated Heavy Oil Upgrading
US20090129998A1 (en) Apparatus for Integrated Heavy Oil Upgrading
US8691077B2 (en) Process for converting a hydrocarbon stream, and optionally producing a hydrocracked distillate
US7544333B2 (en) Device for cracking of hydrocarbons using two successive reaction chambers
WO2009018722A1 (en) A process of catalytic conversion
US9896627B2 (en) Processes and systems for fluidized catalytic cracking
EP0382289B1 (en) Process for catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons
US20110139679A1 (en) Method for catalytic cracking with maximization of diesel base stocks
WO2016048816A1 (en) Methods and systems for production of middle distillate hydrocarbons
US4853105A (en) Multiple riser fluidized catalytic cracking process utilizing hydrogen and carbon-hydrogen contributing fragments
WO1993024591A1 (en) Staged catalytic cracking process
US11142703B1 (en) Fluid catalytic cracking with catalyst system containing modified beta zeolite additive

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20011016

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): NL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8566

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20050613

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 20101006