EP1079351B1 - Einrichtung zur Raumüberwachung - Google Patents
Einrichtung zur Raumüberwachung Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1079351B1 EP1079351B1 EP99116919A EP99116919A EP1079351B1 EP 1079351 B1 EP1079351 B1 EP 1079351B1 EP 99116919 A EP99116919 A EP 99116919A EP 99116919 A EP99116919 A EP 99116919A EP 1079351 B1 EP1079351 B1 EP 1079351B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- image sensor
- window
- image
- sensor
- illumination
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/18—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength
- G08B13/189—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems
- G08B13/194—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems
- G08B13/196—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using image scanning and comparing systems using television cameras
- G08B13/19697—Arrangements wherein non-video detectors generate an alarm themselves
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
- G08B29/02—Monitoring continuously signalling or alarm systems
- G08B29/04—Monitoring of the detection circuits
- G08B29/046—Monitoring of the detection circuits prevention of tampering with detection circuits
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a device for room surveillance, with a housing, at least one image sensor having an objective window, at least one an entrance window presence or motion sensor and with a control and Evaluation electronics to which said sensors are connected.
- the known antimass devices of passive infrared sensors have an infrared transmitter and an infrared receiver and serve to detect the two types of coverage of the detector, these are the cover of the detector in a particular, possibly only small, distance from the detector window, and the immediate coverage of the detector window for example by covering with a foil or spraying with an infrared-opaque Spray, such as paint spray.
- the first type of cover will be referred to as a remote cover and the second is referred to as a spray cover, wherein with Femabdeckung a cover at a distance of a few millimeters up to a maximum of about 15 cm from the detector window is meant.
- the sabotage monitoring takes place in that the ultrasonic or microwave transmitter by briefly switching on / off or off / on emits a short pulse, creating a wide frequency spectrum, which then evaluated in terms of amplitude and time course in a certain frequency range becomes.
- the mentioned parameters are set for changes in the room in front of the detector typical deviations from mean values or previous measurement results are investigated, in particular on such deviations necessary for the attachment of a shield or cover are characteristic of the detector.
- a first preferred embodiment of the device according to the invention is characterized in that that the illumination means are arranged so that the light emission in the monitored space through the lens window and / or the entrance window or by a additional remote is done.
- a second preferred embodiment of the device according to the invention is characterized in that that when light emission through an additional window, the lighting means are formed by a light source provided for displaying alarms.
- a lighting means allows a clear Whether it is a dark room or whether the lens window or the whole device is covered, because with the lighting switched on, even in a dark Room still has a certain minimum brightness. Will, however, this minimum brightness is not reached when the lighting is switched on, then the lens window or the entire facility is covered and there is a sabotage attempt.
- a third preferred embodiment is characterized in that in the monitored Space reflectors are provided, whose arrangement is chosen so that the at least an image sensor receives a clear signal when the lighting means are switched on.
- the reliability and sabotage safety of the device according to the invention continues improved when said means for detecting sabotage means for storage and checking stable characteristics of the image taken by the image sensor.
- the checking of the stable features is carried out in that the image of the monitored Space is examined for stable characteristics, and the stable found Features are compared with methods of image processing with the stored.
- the inventive storage and verification of stable features allows detection partial coverage of the detector or the pretense of false scenes by a photo held in front of the image sensor or by changing the field of view of the detector.
- the stable features are stored immediately after installation of the device; while the operation is then a periodic examination of the respective image after stable Characteristics and a comparison of the found with the stored stable features.
- the illumination means are preferably activated only when the at least one Image sensor receives a dark image.
- the check of the stable features is preferred then performed when the device is not armed, or when in the monitored There are no activities in the room because the processor is underutilized during this time is.
- the decision as to whether or not activities take place in the monitored room takes place preferably based on the signal of the presence or movement sensor.
- the inventive device with at least one image sensor and at least one Presence or motion sensor has both over known dual detectors as well compared to pure image sensors significant advantages. Compared with the dual detectors, at which no or only a very rough spatial resolution is possible, so that a distinction between human and animal often can not be done, is the inventive Detector much more robust.
- the image sensor offers the possibility of classification objects based on their geometry and motion, and therefore intelligent monitoring as well as the verification and storage of events and the later retrievability of these.
- the device according to the invention Compared with a pure image sensor, the device according to the invention has the advantage that they still the performance of a presence or even in poor lighting conditions Motion detector provides and thus fully functional. In addition, the presence or Motion detector, the image processing algorithms in the interpretation more difficult Support situations.
- the device for room monitoring consists essentially of a hereinafter referred to as a detector multi-criteria motion detector 1 and one of the following as electronics control and evaluation 2 with a control stage 3 and a processing stage 4 for local evaluation of the signals of the detector 1.
- a detector multi-criteria motion detector 1 and one of the following as electronics control and evaluation 2 with a control stage 3 and a processing stage 4 for local evaluation of the signals of the detector 1.
- electronics control and evaluation 2 with a control stage 3 and a processing stage 4 for local evaluation of the signals of the detector 1.
- This representation gives only the individual function blocks and not the concrete one apparatus construction of the device again.
- certain Parts of the electronics in the detector 1 be present. The latter is especially true when in Detector 1 is a processing or pre-evaluation of the detector signals.
- the detector 1 consists of at least one image sensor 5 and at least one below presence or motion sensor 6 referred to as P / B sensor.
- the detector indicates Means 7 for emitting light in the visible or infrared range in the monitored Clean up.
- Both the image sensor 5 and the P / B sensor 6 can each have a pre-processing stage (not shown) downstream, but also in the detector 1 or optionally may be included in the processing stage 4. Get from the preprocessing stages the signals in the processing stage 4th
- the processing level 4 is autonomous and allows local decisions and / or display the images taken by the image sensor 5; preferably, it is also for transmission the images formed at a remote center 8, where then, for example, an additional Verification can be done.
- the P / B sensor 6 is a motion or presence detector according to one of the known detection principles Passive infrared, active infrared, microwaves, ultrasound or any Combination of it.
- CMOS Biid9ensor a so-called APS [APS: Active Pixel Sensor], which is characterized by a very low power consumption and by the possibility of access to individual pixels.
- APS Active Pixel Sensor
- additional application-specific analog or digital functions for example simple ones Image processing algorithms such as filters or exposure control, are easily integrated.
- the image sensor 5 is directed to the space to be monitored, records this imagewise, digitizes the image and saves it as a reference image in a memory. If the image sensor 5 forming APS for example consists of 128 by 128 pixels, then would be in use a wide-angle lens at a distance of 15 m in front of the image sensor 5 one pixel a surface of about 12 by 12 cm. Such a screening is suitable, human and animal figures relatively reliably distinguish from each other.
- the possibility of detecting a person at a distance of 15 m is very beneficial, and is the area of the monitored space at this detection distance of about 15 by 15 meters quite realistic.
- the image sensor 5 makes the image sensor 5 at intervals fractions of a second each one image of the monitored space, stores them Pictures for a specific time and compares them to the reference image and / or each other.
- the storage of the images is preferably controlled so that the images taken by the detector 1 immediately preceded and / or immediately follow this event, until saved on further and that the remaining pictures automatically after the said time to be deleted.
- the image sensor 5 on large photosensitivity and a large dynamic range (sufficient visibility of details in strong light / dark contrast) optimized.
- the functions integrated on the APS chip allow an automatic electronic Integrate the shutter with a dynamic of 1: 1000.
- the P / B sensor 6 essentially serves the potential weaknesses of the image sensor 5 compensate. This includes in particular that the image sensor 5 below a critical Lighting does not provide any picture information, and that too a sharp change in picture information against the reference image is often not caused by an intruder. you For example, think of abrupt lighting changes in this context by turning on / off the street lighting, passing vehicles with flashing Headlamps, thunderstorms or the like may be caused. In these and similar Cases, by taking into account the signal of the P / B sensor 6, the robustness of the detector 1 significantly increased. The latter is achieved by a combined evaluation of the signals of the image sensor 5 and the P / B sensor 6 in the processing stage 4.
- the detector 1 contains a distance meter (not shown), then this is in the presence a signal of the P / B sensor 6 of corresponding magnitude from the processing stage 4 activated via the control stage 3 and provides to the processing stage information about the Removal of the just detected event or object from the detector 1.
- this Distance information can from the signal of the image sensor 5 clear conclusions on the Size of a detected object and thus on its nature, such as human or animal, be drawn.
- the pre-evaluation is hardware and / or in the form of a processor core preferably integrated on the APS chip.
- the pre-evaluation of the signals are the number the pixels changed from the reference image, their clustering and features the pixel cluster determines.
- the reference image is constantly tracked, whereby detected Changes only after checking their stability in the reference image adopted become.
- the reference image tracking can be done by including the signals of the P / B sensor 6 stable.
- the combined evaluation of the signals gives a decision at the output of the processing stage 4 Alarm or non-alarm, this decision being essentially the image content, the overall lighting, the information from the P / B sensor 6 and the change and / or history this parameter, referred to below as global criteria, is taken into account. Plausibility connections are very helpful here: if, for example, lighting and image content change rapidly and sharply, but the signal of the P / B sensor 6 is weak, then no alarm is given, but the stability of the new image is checked and in this looking for movements. If the P / B sensor 6 reports no movement and only one Lighting and / or image change has taken place, then was certainly a lighting switched on or off so that there is no alarm.
- the illustrated device for room monitoring corresponds largely to that in the European Patent Application No. 99103260.8 of the Applicant of the present patent application described two- or Mehrkriterienmelder with an image sensor. That's why Here the signal processing is not described in detail, but it is referred to the European Referenced patent application.
- the detector 1 is a device equipped for sabotage monitoring, both for sabotage of the P / B sensor 6 as well as the image sensor 5.
- the device for monitoring sabotage of the P / B sensor is an anti-masking device of the known type, the concrete training according to the in the P / B sensor 6 implemented detection principle.
- Antimask wornen is on the cited in the introduction patent applications directed. Below is now the device for monitoring sabotage of the image sensor 5 will be described.
- This device which is used to detect full coverage of the detector 1 or the Image sensor 5 is formed, consists essentially of the illumination means 7 and the these associated components of the electronics 2.
- the illumination means 7 then send When the image sensor 5 receives a dark image of the monitored space, light enters it.
- the wavelength of this light depends on the wavelength to which the image sensor 5 sensitive is, and the intensity is preferably selected so that the image sensor 5 also at Dark room registers a certain brightness. Due to the brightness conditions at On and off lighting, a cover can be detected.
- the intensity of the light emitted by the illumination means 7 light selected so that the forming or 5 can recognize certain stable features of the monitored space (see below).
- FIGS. 2a to 2d each show a detector 1 with an image sensor 5 and a lens window 9, a P / B sensor 6 and an entrance window 10 for infrared radiation and a lighting means 7 is shown.
- the P / B sensor is preferably a passive infrared detector.
- the lighting means 7 can be light through either the lens window 9 in the monitored 2a), or through the entrance window 10 for the infrared radiation (FIG. 2b), or through an additional window 11 ( Figure 2c). In the latter case, the lighting means 7 may be formed by the or one of the already present for alarm display LEDs. It is also possible to provide two illumination means 7 and 7 '(FIG. 2d), of which the one through the lens window 9 and the other through the entrance window 10 lights.
- the suitable location for the arrangement of the illumination means 7 depends on the possible illuminance in relation to the room size, wherein the visibility of a cover depends substantially on the reflection factor R M of the covering material and the mean reflection factor R R of the monitored space.
- the covering material will reflect a part of the radiation emitted by the illumination means 7, which the image sensor 5 recognizes as a cover.
- the reliability of the arrangement according to FIG. 2a can be improved by comparing the signal of the reflected light with a nominal value measured in darkness, which includes both the reflection of the space and that of the objective window 9, or by checking stable features of the image (see below).
- FIGS. 2 b and 2 c are in principle the same, since in both cases the light of the illumination means 7 is emitted by a separate window separated from the objective window 9. In these cases, the reflection factor R M of the covering material is irrelevant, and a cover of the lens window 9 can be recognized only at R R ⁇ 0. This means that the room just has to reflect so much light that it can be measured by the image sensor 5. Then, a cover of the lens window 9 can be recognized well.
- the arrangement according to FIG. 2d with two locally separated illumination means 7 and 7 ' the are preferably behind the lens window 9 and the entrance window 10 is for increased Claims thought.
- the objective window is also here be chosen so that it reflects as little light of the illumination means 7 to the image sensor 5. If an infrared LED is used for lighting, then this can both for the antimissive system of the passive infrared detector 6 as well as for the cover monitoring of the image sensor 5 are used.
- the two illumination means 7 and 7 ' the can be switched on independently, it is possible a larger number to recognize possible Abdeck flushe.
- the illumination means 7 a cover of the image sensor 5 and the illumination means 7 'a cover of the Passive infrared sensors 6 are detected, it being sufficient if either the room or the Covering material reflects light.
- Another way to increase the reliability of sabotage detection is the Use of reflectors in the monitored room. These reflectors are arranged that the image sensor 5 receives a clear signal even in poor lighting. Preferably The position of the reflector or reflectors is measured by measuring the coordinates determined and stored as a setpoint. During operation of the detector 1 then the measured Position values compared with the setpoints. If a deviation occurs here or if no reflector signal is received, it is clearly a cover of the Image sensor 5 or the respective reflector, both covers in less than be recognized at a great distance.
- the nominal position of the reflectors can either be measured during installation or it will become automatic in the first dark period after installation certainly.
- the detector 1 with an outside the detector housing arranged additional lighting or to an external auxiliary lighting be connected below a certain minimum brightness level is turned on, for example, by an intrusion signal of the passive infrared detector 6, so that at any time, so even in complete darkness, a picture can be taken and whose stable characteristics (see the following) can be determined.
- the image sensor 5 contains a memory in which the digitized Image of the monitored room is stored as a reference image.
- Stable features are to be understood as those features of the image which Do not change with a certain probability, so in particular boundary lines and edges of the room and of doors and windows, straight edges and generally curves larger pieces of furniture, and the like. There will be a number of such stable features digitized and stored in memory.
- the recorded image examined for stable characteristics and the stable features found are with compared to the saved ones.
- the presence or absence of activity in the monitored Space is detected with the P / B sensor. If no stable features found or the found stable features do not match the ones stored, sabotage alarm is triggered.
- the former is an indication that the image sensor 5 or the detector 1 was incompletely covered (for example, with a cloth or the like), the latter may indicate that the image sensor 5, for example by attaching a photo in front of the lens, a fake scene is faked.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Closed-Circuit Television Systems (AREA)
- Photometry And Measurement Of Optical Pulse Characteristics (AREA)
- Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
- Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
Description
- Fig. 1
- ein Blockschema einer erfindungsgemässen Einrichtung zur Raumüberwachung; und
- Fig. 2a-2d
- schematische Darstellungen der möglichen Anordnung der Beleuchtungsmittel.
- Vollständige Abdeckung des gesamten Melders, entweder mit reflektierendem oder stark absorbierendem Material,
- Abdecken des Bildsensors oder.des P/B-Sensors,
- Vortäuschung einer falschen Szene z.B. durch ein Foto,
- Verdrehen des Melders in seiner Halterung (Veränderung des Blickfelds des Melders),
- Abreissen des Melders von der Wand.
Claims (11)
- Einrichtung zur Raumüberwachung, mit einem Gehäuse, mindestens einem ein Objektivfenster (9) aufweisenden Bildsensor (5), mindestens einem ein Eintrittsfenster (10) aufweisenden Präsenz- oder Bewegungssensor (6) und mit einer Steuerungs- und Auswerteelektronik (2), an welche die genannten Sensoren (5, 6) angeschlossen sind, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass Mittel zur Erkennung von Sabotage des mindestens einen Bildsensors (5) vorgesehen, und dass diese durch im Gehäuse angeordnete Beleuchtungsmittel (7, 7') für die Aussendung von Licht in den überwachten Raum gebildet sind.
- Einrichtung nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Beleuchtungsmittel (7, 7') so angeordnet sind, dass die Lichtaussendung in den überwachten Raum durch das Objektivfenster (9) und/oder das Eintrittsfenster (10) oder durch ein zusätzliches Fenster (11) erfolgt.
- Einrichtung nach Anspruch 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass bei Lichtaussendung durch ein zusätzliches Fenster (11) die Beleuchtungsmittel (7) durch eine zur Anzeige von Alarmen vorgesehene Lichtquelle gebildet sind.
- Einrichtung nach Anspruch 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass zwei Beleuchtungsmittel (7, 7') vorgesehen sind, von denen das eine (7) seine Strahlung durch das Objektivfenster (9) und das andere (7') seine Strahlung durch das Eintrittsfenster (10) sendet.
- Einrichtung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Beleuchtungsmittel (7, 7') durch Infrarot-Leuchtdioden gebildet sind.
- Einrichtung nach Anspruch 2 oder 4, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass bei Anordnung der Beleuchtungsmittel (7) zur Lichtaussendung durch das Objektivfenster (9) ein Vergleich des aus dem Raum reflektierten Lichts mir einem bei Dunkelheit gemessenen Sollwert erfolgt, der sowohl die Reflexion des Raumes als auch diejenige des Objektivfensters (9) mit einbezieht.
- Einrichtung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 6, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass im überwachten Raum Reflektoren vorgesehen sind, deren Anordnung so gewählt ist, dass der mindestens eine Bildsensor (5) bei eingeschalteten Beleuchtungsmitteln (7, 7') ein eindeutiges Signal empfängt.
- Einrichtung nach Anspruch 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die genannten Mittel zur Erkennung von Sabotage Mittel zur Speicherung und Überprüfung stabiler Merkmale des vom mindestens einen Bildsensor (5) aufgenommenen Bildes aufweisen.
- Einrichtung nach Anspruch 8, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Überprüfung der stabilen Merkmale dadurch erfolgt, dass das Bild des überwachten Raumes auf stabile Merkmale untersucht wird, und die dabei gefundenen stabilen Merkmale mit Methoden der Bildverarbeitung mit den gespeicherten verglichen werden.
- Einrichtung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 9, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Einrichtung mit einer ausserhalb des Gehäuses angeordneten Zusatzbeleuchtung ausgerüstet oder an eine externe Beleuchtung angeschlossen ist.
- Einrichtung nach Anspruch 10, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Zusatzbeleuchtung oder die externe Beleuchtung vom Präsenz- oder Bewegungssensor (6) getriggert ist.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP99116919A EP1079351B1 (de) | 1999-08-27 | 1999-08-27 | Einrichtung zur Raumüberwachung |
DE59912046T DE59912046D1 (de) | 1999-08-27 | 1999-08-27 | Einrichtung zur Raumüberwachung |
AT99116919T ATE295593T1 (de) | 1999-08-27 | 1999-08-27 | Einrichtung zur raumüberwachung |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP99116919A EP1079351B1 (de) | 1999-08-27 | 1999-08-27 | Einrichtung zur Raumüberwachung |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1079351A1 EP1079351A1 (de) | 2001-02-28 |
EP1079351B1 true EP1079351B1 (de) | 2005-05-11 |
Family
ID=8238870
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP99116919A Expired - Lifetime EP1079351B1 (de) | 1999-08-27 | 1999-08-27 | Einrichtung zur Raumüberwachung |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1079351B1 (de) |
AT (1) | ATE295593T1 (de) |
DE (1) | DE59912046D1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB0202467D0 (en) * | 2002-02-02 | 2002-03-20 | Qinetiq Ltd | Sensor with obscurant detection |
CZ16880U1 (cs) * | 2006-07-10 | 2006-09-21 | Jablotron S. R. O. | Zarízení k verifikaci pachatele v objektu |
US8810397B2 (en) | 2010-01-18 | 2014-08-19 | Stefan Wieser | Apparatus and method for monitoring a building opening |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0093773A1 (de) * | 1981-11-19 | 1983-11-16 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Optisch arbeitender einbruchdetektor |
DE4009912A1 (de) * | 1990-03-28 | 1991-10-02 | Grundig Emv | Videokontroll-einrichtung |
US5382943A (en) * | 1991-07-31 | 1995-01-17 | Tanaka; Mutuo | Remote monitoring unit |
FR2700046B1 (fr) * | 1992-12-30 | 1995-03-17 | Hymatom | Dispositif de transmission d'images d'un site protégé. |
EP0772171B1 (de) * | 1995-11-03 | 2003-01-08 | Siemens Building Technologies AG | Passiver Infrarot-Einbruchdetektor und dessen Verwendung |
-
1999
- 1999-08-27 DE DE59912046T patent/DE59912046D1/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-08-27 EP EP99116919A patent/EP1079351B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-08-27 AT AT99116919T patent/ATE295593T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ATE295593T1 (de) | 2005-05-15 |
DE59912046D1 (de) | 2005-06-16 |
EP1079351A1 (de) | 2001-02-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0939387B1 (de) | Einrichtung zur Raumüberwachung | |
EP0973137B1 (de) | Bewegungsmelder | |
DE10011411C2 (de) | Bildgebender Brandmelder | |
DE3634628C2 (de) | ||
EP1418555B1 (de) | Präsenzmelder und dessen Verwendung | |
DE69815977T2 (de) | Gegen globale veränderungen unempfindlicher videobewegungsdetektor | |
DE102008001391B4 (de) | Brandmeldervorrichtung sowie Verfahren zur Branddetektion | |
EP1061489B1 (de) | Intrusionsmelder mit einer Einrichtung zur Sabotageüberwachung | |
EP0986912A1 (de) | Verfahren zum überwachen eines vorgegebenen überwachungsbereiches | |
EP3501018B1 (de) | Präsenzdetektor unbewegter objekte | |
EP1093100B1 (de) | Passiv-Infrarotmelder | |
EP1376502A1 (de) | Objektschutz-Einrichtung | |
DE4423947A1 (de) | Einbruchmeldeanlage | |
EP1079351B1 (de) | Einrichtung zur Raumüberwachung | |
EP0448803B1 (de) | Videokontroll-Einrichtung | |
DE60319346T2 (de) | Sensor mit erkennung von verdeckungen | |
WO2017102999A1 (de) | Alarmvorrichtung | |
EP1079350B1 (de) | Einrichtung zur Raumüberwachung | |
DE102023003008A1 (de) | Ein Verfahren zur Fahrzeug-Brandüberwachung und ein Fahrzeugbrandüberwachungssystem | |
EP1381005A1 (de) | Ereignismelder mit einer Kamera | |
EP0364812B1 (de) | Geldschrank mit Alarmeinrichtung | |
EP1865755A2 (de) | Vorrichtung zur Beleuchtungssteuerung | |
EP0939386A1 (de) | Einrichtung zur Raumüberwachung | |
JPS61127289A (ja) | 侵入警戒装置 | |
DE60204855T2 (de) | Verfahren und einrichtung zur erkennung von fasern auf der grundlage von bildanalyse |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20010814 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Free format text: AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050511 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050511 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 59912046 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20050616 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20050719 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050811 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050811 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050811 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050822 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050827 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050827 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050831 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051019 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20060214 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFA Owner name: SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES AG C-IPR Free format text: SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES AG#BELLERIVESTRASSE 36#8034 ZUERICH (CH) -TRANSFER TO- SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES AG C-IPR#GUBELSTRASSE 22#6300 ZUG (CH) |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: TP Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: CD |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PUE Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Free format text: SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES AG C-IPR#GUBELSTRASSE 22#6300 ZUG (CH) -TRANSFER TO- SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT#WITTELSBACHERPLATZ 2#80333 MUENCHEN (DE) Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20081020 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20081106 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20090514 AND 20090520 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20090821 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20090814 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20090813 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20090819 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090831 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090831 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20090826 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100302 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES A.G. Effective date: 20100831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: V1 Effective date: 20110301 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20100827 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20110502 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110301 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100827 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100831 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100827 |