EP0811330B1 - Chaussure avec semelle à contour naturel - Google Patents

Chaussure avec semelle à contour naturel Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0811330B1
EP0811330B1 EP97250029A EP97250029A EP0811330B1 EP 0811330 B1 EP0811330 B1 EP 0811330B1 EP 97250029 A EP97250029 A EP 97250029A EP 97250029 A EP97250029 A EP 97250029A EP 0811330 B1 EP0811330 B1 EP 0811330B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
shoe sole
shoe
sole
concavely rounded
foot
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP97250029A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0811330A2 (fr
EP0811330A3 (fr
Inventor
Frampton E. Ellis Iii
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Anatomic Research Inc
Original Assignee
Anatomic Research Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=26913838&utm_source=***_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0811330(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority to EP99204164A priority Critical patent/EP0983734B1/fr
Priority to EP01204088A priority patent/EP1199001A1/fr
Priority to EP00201348A priority patent/EP1034714A3/fr
Priority to EP00200095A priority patent/EP1038457B1/fr
Priority to EP00204038A priority patent/EP1104658A1/fr
Application filed by Anatomic Research Inc filed Critical Anatomic Research Inc
Publication of EP0811330A2 publication Critical patent/EP0811330A2/fr
Publication of EP0811330A3 publication Critical patent/EP0811330A3/fr
Publication of EP0811330B1 publication Critical patent/EP0811330B1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/02—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the material
    • A43B13/12—Soles with several layers of different materials
    • A43B13/125—Soles with several layers of different materials characterised by the midsole or middle layer
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/141—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form with a part of the sole being flexible, e.g. permitting articulation or torsion
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/143—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form provided with wedged, concave or convex end portions, e.g. for improving roll-off of the foot
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/143—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form provided with wedged, concave or convex end portions, e.g. for improving roll-off of the foot
    • A43B13/145—Convex portions, e.g. with a bump or projection, e.g. 'Masai' type shoes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/143—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form provided with wedged, concave or convex end portions, e.g. for improving roll-off of the foot
    • A43B13/146—Concave end portions, e.g. with a cavity or cut-out portion
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/143—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form provided with wedged, concave or convex end portions, e.g. for improving roll-off of the foot
    • A43B13/148—Wedged end portions
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B5/00—Footwear for sporting purposes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B5/00—Footwear for sporting purposes
    • A43B5/06—Running shoes; Track shoes

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a shoe, such as a street shoe, athletic shoe, and especially a running shoe with a contoured sole. More particularly, this invention relates to a novel contoured sole design for a running shoe which improves the inherent stability and efficient motion of the shod foot in extreme exercise. Still more particularly, this invention relates to a running shoe wherein the shoe sole conforms to the natural shape of the foot, particularly the sides, permitting the foot to react naturally with the ground as it would if the foot were bare, while continuing to protect and cushion the foot.
  • a wide variety of designs are available for running shoes which are intended to provide stability, but which lead to a constraint in the natural efficient motion of the foot and ankle.
  • such designs which can accommodate free, flexible motion in contrast create a lack of control or stability.
  • a popular existing shoe design incorporates an inverted, outwardly-flared shoe sole wherein the ground engaging surface is wider than the heel engaging portion.
  • such shoes are unstable in extreme situations because the shoe sole, when inverted or on edge, immediately becomes supported only by the sharp bottom sole edge where the entire weight of the body, multiplied by a factor of approximately three at running peak, is concentrated.
  • existing shoes maintain a constant distance from the ground - the thickness of the shoe sole - only when they are perfectly flat on the ground. As soon as the shoe is tilted, the distance between foot and ground begins to change unnaturally, as the shoe sole pivots around the outside comer edge. With conventional athletic shoes, the distance most typically increases at first due to the flared sides and then decreases; many street shoes with relatively wide heel width follow that pattern, though some with narrower heels only decrease. All existing shoes continue to decrease the distance all the way down to zero, by tilting through 90 degrees, resulting in ankle sprains and breaks.
  • a corrected shoe sole design avoids such unnatural interference by neutrally maintaining a constant distance between foot and ground, even when the shoe is tilted sideways, as if in effect the shoe sole were not there except to cushion and protect. Unlike existing shoes, the corrected shoe would move with the foot's natural sideways pronation and supination motion on the ground.
  • there are two possible geometric solutions depending upon whether just the lower horizontal plane of the shoe sole surface varies to achieve natural contour or both upper and lower surface planes vary.
  • both upper and lower surfaces or planes of the shoe sole vary to conform to the natural contour of the human foot.
  • the two plane solution is the most fundamental concept and naturally most effective. It is the only pure geometric solution to the mathematical problem of maintaining constant distance between foot and ground, and the most optimal, in the same sense that round is only shape for a wheel and perfectly round is most optimal. On the other hand, it is the least similar to existing designs of the two possible solutions and requires computer aided design and injection molding manufacturing techniques.
  • U.S. Patent No. 4,305,212 discloses a unitary shoe sole S having a convexly rounded inner surface 20, relative to a section of the sole directly adjacent to the inner surface.
  • the shoe sole S also includes rounded portions of the outer surface 21 as shown in Figs. 8-11.
  • the sole S is integrally formed as one body from a flexible and resiliently depressible elastomer that is adapted to be distorted by force and to return to its original form at a predetermined rate. See col. 6, lines 17-29. Fig.
  • a cross-section at the heel area shows the sole S provided with a circumferential rib B which establishes an instep cavity C which permits sole deformation to simulate running in the sand, a key feature of the invention of this patent as discussed with regard to Fig. 4 and at col. 8, lines 39-44.
  • a normal barefoot running motion which approximately includes a 7° inversion and a 7° eversion motion, does not occur with shod feet, where a 30° inversion and eversion is common.
  • Such a normal barefoot motion is geometrically unattainable because the average running shoe heel is approximately 60% larger than the width of the human heel.
  • the shoe heel and the human heel cannot pivot together in a natural manner; rather, the human heel has to pivot within the shoe but is resisted from doing so by the shoe heel counter, motion control devices, and the lacing and binding of the shoe upper, as well as various types of anatomical supports interior to the shoe.
  • the present invention achieves these objects by providing a shoe sole including a bottom sole, a midsole which is softer than the bottom sole, and a heel lift.
  • the sole inner surface includes a portion that is convexly rounded relative to a section of the shoe sole located directly adjacent to the convexly rounded portion, and the sole outer surface includes an uppermost portion which extends to at least the height of the lowest point of the inner surface, both as viewed in a frontal plane cross-section when the shoe sole is in an upright, unloaded condition.
  • the sole outer surface includes at least one concavely rounded portion which extends down a sole side to at least proximate a lowest point of the shoe sole side, the concavity being determined relative to an inner section of the sole located directly adjacent to the concavely rounded portion, also as viewed in a frontal plane cross-section when the shoe sole is in an upright, unloaded condition.
  • the concavely rounded portion of the sole outer surface includes midsole thereby providing improved stability.
  • the midsole part of the concavely rounded portion of the outer surface extends below a sidemost extent of the shoe sole side.
  • FIG. 1 A perspective view of an athletic shoe, such as a typical running shoe, according to the prior art, is shown in Fig. 1 wherein a running shoe 20 includes an upper 21 and a sole 22.
  • a sole typically, such a sole includes a truncated outwardly flared construction of the type best seen in Fig. 2 wherein the lower portion 22a of the sole heel is significantly wider than the upper portion 22b where the sole 22 joins the upper 21.
  • a number of alternative sole designs are known to the art, including the design shown in U.S. Patent No. 4,449,306 to Cavanagh wherein an outer portion of the sole of the running shoe includes a rounded portion having a radius of curvature of about 20mm.
  • the rounded portion lies along approximately the rear-half of the length of the outer side of the midsole and heel edge areas wherein the remaining border area is provided with a conventional flaring with the exception of a transition zone.
  • the U.S. Patent to Misevich, No. 4,557,059 also shows an athletic shoe having a contoured sole bottom in the region of the first foot strike, in a shoe which otherwise uses an inverted flared sole.
  • the typical design attempts to achieve stability by flaring the heel as shown in Figs. 2A and 2B to a width of, for example, 3 to 3-1/2 inches on the lower portion 22a of the sole heel of the average male shoe size (10D).
  • the width of the corresponding human heel foot print, housed in the upper 21, is only about 2.25 in. for the average foot. Therefore, a mismatch occurs in that the heel is locked by the design into a firm shoe heel counter which supports the human heel by holding it tightly and which may also be reinforced by motion control devices to stabilize the heel.
  • Fig. 2A illustrates the impossibility of pivoting about the center edge of the human heel as would be conventional for barefoot support about a point 23 defined by a line 23a perpendicular to the heel and intersecting the bottom edge of upper 21 at a point 24.
  • the lever arm force moment of the flared sole is at a maximum at 0° and only slightly less at a normal 7° inversion or eversion and thus strongly resists such a natural motion as is illustrated in Figs. 2A and 2B.
  • Fig. 2A illustrates the impossibility of pivoting about the center edge of the human heel as would be conventional for barefoot support about a point 23 defined by a line 23a perpendicular to the heel and intersecting the bottom edge of upper 21 at a point 24.
  • the lever arm force moment of the flared sole is at a maximum at 0° and only slightly less at a normal 7° inversion or eversion and thus strongly resists such a natural motion as is illustrated in Figs. 2A and 2
  • Fig. 2A illustrates that normal natural motion of the shoe is inefficient in that the center of gravity of the shoe, and the shod foot, is forced upwardly, as discussed later in connection with Fig. 12.
  • a narrow rectangular shoe sole design of heel width approximating human heel width is also known and is shown in Figs. 2C and 2D. It appears to be more efficient than the conventional flared sole shown in Figs. 2A and 2B. Since the shoe sole width is the same as human sole width, the shoe can pivot naturally with the normal 7° inversion/eversion motion of the running barefoot. In such a design, the lever arm length and the vertical motion of the center of gravity are approximately half that of the flared sole at a normal 7° inversion/eversion running motion. However, the narrow, human heel width rectangular shoe design is extremely unstable and therefore prone to ankle sprain, so that it has not been well received. Thus, neither of these wide or narrow designs is satisfactory.
  • the shoe sole thickness is defined as the shortest distance (s) between any point on the inner surface 30 of the shoe sole 28 and the outer surface 31 (Figs. 17 and 18 will discuss measurement methods more fully).
  • Fig. 3 thus contrasts in frontal plane cross section the conventional flared sole 22 shown in phantom outline and illustrated in Fig. 2 with the contoured shoe sole 28 according to the invention.
  • Fig. 4 is suitable for analyzing the shoe sole design according to the applicant's invention by contrasting the neutral situation shown in Fig. 4A with the extreme situations shown in Figs. 4B and 4C.
  • the effect of the applicant's invention having a naturally contoured side 28a is totally neutral allowing the shod foot to react naturally with the ground 43, in either an inversion or eversion mode. This occurs in part because of the unvarying thickness along the shoe sole edge which keeps the foot sole equidistant from the ground in a preferred case.
  • any point 40 on the surface of the shoe sole 30b closest to ground lies at a distance (s) from the ground surface 43. That distance (s) remains constant even for extreme situations as seen in Figs. 4B and 4C.
  • the theoretically ideal plane of stability is where the stability plane is defined as sole thickness which is constant under all load-bearing points of the foot sole for any amount from 0° to 90° rotation of the sole to either side or front and back.
  • the stability plane is defined as sole thickness which is constant under all load-bearing points of the foot sole for any amount from 0° to 90° rotation of the sole to either side or front and back.
  • the foot will remain stable because the sole thickness (s) between the foot and the ground always remain constant because of the exactly contoured quadrant sides.
  • the stable shoe By remaining a constant distance from the ground, the stable shoe allows the foot to react to the ground as if the foot were bare while allowing the foot to be protected and cushioned by the shoe.
  • the new naturally contoured sides will effectively position and hold the foot onto the load-bearing foot print section of the shoe sole, reducing or eliminating the need for heel counters and other relatively rigid motion control devices.
  • Fig. 5A illustrates how the inner edge 30a of the naturally contoured sole side 28a is maintained at a constant distance (s) from the ground through various degrees of rotation of the edge 31a of the shoe sole such as is shown in Fig. 4.
  • Figure 5B shows how a conventional shoe sole pivots around its lower edge 42, which is its center of rotation, instead of around the upper edge 41, which, as a result, is not maintained at constant distance (s) from the ground, as with the invention, but is lowered to .7(s) at 45° rotation and to zero at 90° rotation.
  • Fig. 6 shows typical conventional sagittal plane shoe sole thickness variations, such as heel lifts or wedges 38, or toe taper 38a, or full sole taper 38b, in Figs. 6A-6E and how the naturally contoured sides 28a equal and therefore vary with those varying thicknesses.
  • heel lift 38 has a thickness (s 1 ) in the heel area to increase the sole thickness to (s + s 1 ).
  • heel lift 38 has a decreased thickness (s 2 ).
  • Fig. 7 illustrates an embodiment of the invention which utilizes varying portions of the theoretically ideal stability plane 51 in the naturally contoured sides 28a in order to reduce the weight and bulk of the sole, while accepting a sacrifice in some stability of the shoe.
  • Fig. 7A illustrates the preferred embodiment wherein the outer edge 31a of the naturally contoured sides 28a follows a theoretically ideal stability plane 51.
  • the outer edge 31 a and the outer surface of the sole 31b lie along the theoretically ideal stability plane 51.
  • the theoretically ideal stability plane 51 is defined as the plane of the outer surface 31 of the shoe sole 28, wherein the shoe sole conforms to the natural shape of the foot, particularly the sides, and has a constant thickness in frontal plane cross sections. As shown in Fig.
  • an engineering trade-off results in an abbreviation within the theoretically ideal stability plane 51 by forming a naturally contoured upper side surface 53a approximating the natural contour of the foot (or more geometrically regular, which is less preferred) at an angle relative to the upper plane of the shoe sole 28 so that only a smaller portion of the contoured side 28a defined by the constant thickness lying along the surface 31a is coplanar with the theoretically ideal stability plane 51.
  • Figs. 7C and 7D show similar embodiments wherein each engineering trade-off shown results in progressively smaller portions of contoured side 28a, which lies along the theoretically ideal stability plane 51. The portion of the surface 31a merges into the upper side surface 53a of the naturally contoured side.
  • Fig. 7 may be desirable for portions of the shoe sole which are less frequently used so that the additional part of the side is used less frequently.
  • a shoe may typically roll out laterally, in an inversion mode, to about 20° on the order of 100 times for each single time it rolls out to 40°.
  • Fig. 7B the extra stability is needed.
  • the added shoe weight to cover that infrequently experienced range of motion is about equivalent to covering the frequently encountered range. Since, in a racing shoe this weight might not be desirable, an engineering trade-off of the type shown in Fig. 7D is possible.
  • a typical running/jogging shoe is shown in Fig. 7C.
  • the range of possible variations is limitless.
  • Fig. 8 shows the theoretically ideal stability plane 51 in defining embodiments of the shoe sole having differing tread or cleat patterns.
  • Fig. 8 illustrates that the invention is applicable to shoe soles having conventional bottom treads.
  • Fig. 8A is similar to Fig. 7B further including a tread portion 60
  • Fig. 8B is also similar to Fig. 7B wherein the sole includes a cleated portion 61.
  • the surface 63 to which the cleat bases are affixed should preferably be on the same plane and parallel the theoretically ideal stability plane 51, since in soft ground that surface rather than the cleats become load-bearing.
  • the embodiment in Fig. 8C is similar to Fig. 7C showing still an alternative tread construction 62. In each case, the load-bearing outer surface of the tread or cleat pattern 60-62 lies along the theoretically ideal stability plane 51.
  • Fig. 9 shows, in a rear cross sectional view, the application of the invention to a shoe to produce an aesthetically pleasing and functionally effective design.
  • a practical design of a shoe incorporating the invention is feasible, even when applied to shoes incorporating heel lifts 38 and a combined midsole and outersole 39.
  • use of a sole surface and sole outer contour which track the theoretically ideal stability plane does not detract from the commercial appeal of shoes incorporating the invention.
  • Fig. 10 shows a fully contoured shoe sole design that follows the natural contour of all of the foot, the bottom as well as the sides.
  • the fully contoured shoe sole assumes that the resulting slightly rounded bottom when unloaded will deform under load and flatten just as the human foot bottom is slightly rounded unloaded but flattens under load; therefore, shoe sole material must be of such composition as to allow the natural deformation following that of the foot.
  • the design applies particularly to the heel, but to the rest of the shoe sole as well.
  • the fully contoured design allows the foot to function as naturally as possible. Under load, Fig. 10 would deform by flattening to look essentially like Fig. 9. Seen in this light, the naturally contoured side design in Fig.
  • Fig. 9 is a more conventional, conservative design that is a special case of the more general fully contoured design in Fig. 10, which is the closest to the natural form of the foot, but the least conventional.
  • the amount of deformation flattening used in the Fig. 9 design, which obviously varies under different loads, is not an essential element of the applicant's invention.
  • Figs. 9 and 10 both show in frontal plane cross section the essential concept underlying this invention, the theoretically ideal stability plane, which is also theoretically ideal for efficient natural motion of all kinds, including running, jogging or walking.
  • Fig. 10 shows the most general case of the invention, the fully contoured design, which conforms to the natural shape of the unloaded foot.
  • the theoretically ideal stability plane 51 is determined, first, by the desired shoe sole thickness (s) in a frontal plane cross section, and, second, by the natural shape of the individual's foot surface 29.
  • the theoretically ideal stability plane for any particular individual is determined, first, by the given frontal plane cross section shoe sole thickness (s); second, by the natural shape of the individual's foot; and, third, by the frontal plane cross section width of the individual's load-bearing footprint, which is defined as the upper surface of the shoe sole that is in physical contact with and supports the human foot sole.
  • the theoretically ideal stability plane for the special case is composed conceptually of two parts. Shown in Fig. 9, the first part is a line segment 31b of equal length and parallel to 30b at a constant distance (s) equal to shoe sole thickness. This corresponds to a conventional shoe sole directly underneath the human foot, and also corresponds to the flattened portion of the bottom of the load-bearing foot sole 28b.
  • the second part is the naturally contoured stability side outer edge 31a located at each side of the first part, line segment 31b. Each point on the contoured side outer edge 31a is located at a distance which is exactly shoe sole thickness (s) from the closest point on the contoured side inner edge 30a.
  • Fig. 11 illustrates in a curve 70 the range of side to side inversion/eversion motion of the ankle center of gravity 71 from the shoe according to the invention shown in frontal plane cross section at the ankle.
  • the locus of points of motion for the center of gravity 71 thus defines the curve 70 wherein the center of gravity 71 maintains a steady level motion with no vertical component through 40° of inversion or eversion.
  • the shoe sole stability equilibrium point is at 28° (at point 74) and in no case is there a pivoting edge to define a rotation point as in the case of Fig. 2.
  • the inherently superior side to side stability of the design provides pronation control (or eversion), as well as lateral (or inversion) control.
  • pronation control or eversion
  • lateral or inversion
  • Fig. 12 thus compares the range of motion of the center of gravity for the invention, as shown in curve 70, in comparison to curve 80 for the conventional wide heel flare and a curve 82 for a narrow rectangle the width of a human heel. Since the shoe stability limit is 28° in the inverted mode, the shoe sole is stable at the 20° approximate barefoot inversion limit. That factor, and the broad base of support rather than the sharp bottom edge of the prior art, make the contour design stable even in the most extreme case as shown in progressions 16A-16C and permit the inherent stability of the barefoot to dominate without interference, unlike existing designs, by providing constant, unvarying shoe sole thickness in frontal plane cross sections.
  • the stability superiority of the contoured side design is thus clear when observing how much flatter its center of gravity curve 70 is than in existing popular wide flare design 80.
  • the curve 70 demonstrates that the contoured side design has significantly more efficient natural 7° inversion/eversion motion than the narrow rectangle design 82 the width of a human heel, and very much more efficient than the conventional wide flare design 80; at the same time, the contoured side design is more stable in extremis than either conventional design because of the absence of destabilizing torque.
  • Fig. 13A illustrates, in a pictorial fashion, a comparison of a cross section at the ankle joint of a conventional shoe with a cross section of a shoe according to the invention when engaging a heel.
  • the heel of the foot 27 of the wearer engages an upper surface of the shoe sole 22
  • the shape of the foot heel and the shoe sole is such that the conventional shoe sole 22 conforms to the contour of the ground 43 and not to the contour of the sides of the foot 27.
  • the conventional shoe sole 22 cannot follow the natural 7° inversion/eversion motion of the foot, and that normal motion is resisted by the shoe upper 21, especially when strongly reinforced by firm heel counters and motion control devices. This interference with natural motion represents the fundamental misconception of the currently available designs.
  • the new design illustrates a correct conception of the shoe sole 28 as a part of the foot and an extension of the foot, with shoe sole sides contoured exactly like those of the foot, and with the frontal plane thickness of the shoe sole between the foot and the ground always the same and therefore completely neutral to the natural motion of the foot.
  • the shoe can move naturally with the foot, instead of restraining it, so both natural stability and natural efficient motion coexist in the same shoe, with no inherent contradiction in design goals.
  • the contoured shoe design of the invention brings together in one shoe design the cushioning and protection typical of modem shoes, with the freedom from injury and functional efficiency, meaning speed, and/or endurance, typical of barefoot stability and natural freedom of motion.
  • Significant speed and endurance improvements are anticipated, based on both improved efficiency and on the ability of a user to train harder without injury.
  • Figs. 14A-D illustrate, in frontal plane cross sections, the naturally contoured sides design extended to the other natural contours underneath the load-bearing foot, such as the main longitudinal arch, the metatarsal (or forefoot) arch, and the ridge between the heads of the metatarsals (forefoot) and the heads of the distal phalanges (toes).
  • the shoe sole thickness remains constant as the contour of the shoe sole follows that of the sides and bottom of the load-bearing foot.
  • Fig. 14E shows a sagittal plane cross section of the shoe sole conforming to the contour of the bottom of the load-bearing foot, with thickness varying according to the heel lift 38.
  • Fig. 14A-D illustrate, in frontal plane cross sections, the naturally contoured sides design extended to the other natural contours underneath the load-bearing foot, such as the main longitudinal arch, the metatarsal (or forefoot) arch, and the ridge between the heads of the metatarsals (forefoot) and
  • FIG. 14F shows a horizontal plane top view of the left foot that shows the areas 85 of the shoe sole that correspond to the flattened portions of the foot sole that are in contact with the ground when load-bearing.
  • Contour lines 86 and 87 show approximately the relative height of the shoe sole contours above the flattened load-bearing areas 85 but within roughly the peripheral extent 35 of the upper surface 30 of sole 28.
  • a horizontal plane bottom view (not shown) of Fig. 14F would be the exact reciprocal or converse of Fig. 14F (i.e. peaks and valleys contours would be exactly reversed).
  • Figs. 15A-D show, in frontal plane cross sections, the fully contoured shoe sole design extended to the bottom of the entire non-load-bearing foot 27.
  • Fig. 15C shows that in the midtarsal area, the sole 28 may include a concavely rounded outer surface portion on only one of the lateral and medial sole sides which does not extend to the middle portion of the sole 28.
  • Fig. 15E shows a sagittal plane cross section.
  • the shoe sole contours underneath the foot 27 are the same as Figs. 14A-E except that there are no flattened areas 85 corresponding to the flattened areas of the load-bearing foot 27.
  • the exclusively rounded contours of the shoe sole follow those of the unloaded foot 27.
  • a heel lift 38 the same as that of Fig. 14, is incorporated in this embodiment, but is not shown in Fig. 15.
  • Fig. 16 shows the horizontal plane top view of the left foot corresponding to the fully contoured design described in Figs. 15A-E, but abbreviated along the sides to only essential structural support and propulsion elements.
  • Shoe sole material density can be increased in the unabbreviated essential elements to compensate for increased pressure loading there.
  • the essential structural support elements are the base and lateral tuberosity of the calcaneus 95, the heads of the first and fifth metatarsals 96, and the base of the fifth metatarsal 97. They must be supported both underneath and to the outside for stability.
  • the essential propulsion element is the head of first distal phalange 98. As shown in Figs.
  • the sole 28 can include concavely rounded portions 95a, 95b, 95c and 95d at the base and lateral tuberosity of the calcaneus 95, concavely rounded portions 96c, 96d, 96e and 96g at the heads of the first and fifth metatarsals 96, and concavely rounded portions 98, 98a at the head of the first distal phalange 98.
  • the sole 28 can include an indentation 96h in the middle portion of the forefoot area as well as an indentation 96f in the forefoot area.
  • the thickness of the sole (28) at the concavely rounded portions 95b, 95c, 96d, 96e and 98 decreases gradually, as viewed in a horizontal plane, to form areas of lesser sole thickness 95e, 95f, 96a, 96b, 97a and 98a.
  • the concavely rounded portions of the shoe sole 28 may extend to the front 44 and the rear 45 of the shoe sole 28.
  • shoe sole 28 may also include concavely rounded portions, as viewed in a sagittal plane cross-section and one concavely rounded portion may extend through a lowermost heel area 28". Also, the thickness of shoe sole 28 may remain constant from the lowermost heel area 28" to a rearmost heel extent 34 and then decrease gradually and continuously at an upper rear heel portion 46, all as viewed in a sagittal plane cross-section.
  • Fig. 16 The medial (inside) and lateral (outside) sides supporting the base of the calcaneus are shown in Fig. 16 oriented roughly along either side of the horizontal plane subtalar ankle joint axis, but can be located also more conventionally along the longitudinal axis of the shoe sole.
  • Fig. 16 shows that the naturally contoured stability sides need not be used except in the identified essential areas. Weight savings and flexibility improvements can be made by omitting the non-essential stability sides.
  • Contour lines 86 through 89 show approximately the relative height of the shoe sole contours within roughly the peripheral extent 35 of the undeformed inner surface 30 of shoe sole 28.
  • a horizontal plane bottom view (not shown) of Fig. 16 would be the exact reciprocal or converse of Fig. 16 (i.e. peaks and valleys contours would be exactly reversed).
  • Fig. 17 shows a method of measuring shoe sole thickness to be used to construct the theoretically ideal stability plane of the naturally contoured side design.
  • the constant shoe sole thickness of this design is measured at any point p1, p2 on the contoured sides along a line that, first, is perpendicular to a line tangent to that point on the surface of the naturally contoured side of the foot sole and, second, that passes through the same foot sole surface point.
  • Fig. 18 illustrates another approach to constructing the theoretically ideal stability plane, and one that is easier to use, the circle radius method.
  • the pivot point (circle center) of a compass is placed at the beginning of the foot sole's natural side contour (frontal plane cross section) and roughly a 90° arc (or much less, if estimated accurately) of a circle of radius equal to (s) or shoe sole thickness is drawn describing the area farthest away from the foot sole contour. That process is repeated all along the foot sole's natural side contour at very small intervals (the smaller, the more accurate).
  • Fig. 19A shows a frontal plane cross section of a design wherein the sole material in areas 107 is so relatively soft that it deforms easily to the contour of shoe sole 28 of the proposed invention.
  • the heel cross section includes a sole upper surface 101 and a bottom sole edge surface 102 following when deformed an inset theoretically ideal stability plane 51.
  • the sole edge surface 102 terminates in a laterally extending portion 103 joined to the heel of the sole 28.
  • the laterally-extending portion 103 is made from a flexible material and structured to cause its lower surface 102 to terminate during deformation to parallel the inset theoretically ideal stability plane 51. Sole material in specific areas 107 is extremely soft to allow sufficient deformation. Thus, in a dynamic case, the outer edge contour assumes approximately the theoretically ideal stability shape described above as a result of the deformation of the portion 103.
  • the top surface 101 similarly deforms to approximately parallel the natural contour of the foot as described by surfaces 30a and 30b.
  • the controlled or programmed deformation can be provided by either of two techniques.
  • the shoe sole sides, at especially the midsole can be cut in a tapered fashion or grooved so that the bottom sole bends inwardly under pressure to the correct contour.
  • the second uses an easily deformable material 107 in a tapered manner on the sides to deform under pressure to the correct contour. While such techniques produce stability and natural motion results which are a significant improvement over conventional designs, they are inherently inferior to contours produced by simple geometric shaping.
  • the actual deformation must be produced by pressure which is unnatural and does not occur with a bare foot and second, only approximations are possible by deformation, even with sophisticated design and manufacturing techniques, given an individual's particular running gait or body weight. Thus, the deformation process is limited to a minor effort to correct the contours from surfaces approximating the ideal curve in the first instance.
  • the theoretically ideal stability plane can also be approximated by a plurality of line segments 110, such as tangents, chords, or other lines, as shown in Fig. 20.
  • line segments 110 such as tangents, chords, or other lines
  • Both the upper surface of the shoe sole 28, which coincides with the side of the foot 30a, and the bottom surface 31a of the naturally contoured side can be approximated.
  • a single flat plane 110 approximation may correct many of the biomechanical problems occurring with existing designs, because it can provide a gross approximation of the both natural contour of the foot and the theoretically ideal stability plane 51
  • the single plane approximation is presently not preferred, since it is the least optimal.
  • the curve By increasing the number of flat planar surfaces formed, the curve more closely approximates the ideal exact design contours, as previously described.
  • Single and double plane approximations are shown as line segments in the cross section illustrated in Fig. 20.
  • Fig. 21 shows a shoe sole design that allows for unobstructed natural inversion/eversion motion of the calcaneus by providing maximum shoe sole flexibility particularly between the base of the calcaneus 125 (heel) and the metatarsal heads 126 (forefoot) along an axis 120.
  • An unnatural torsion occurs about that axis if flexibility is insufficient so that a conventional shoe sole interferes with the inversion/eversion motion by restraining it.
  • the object of the design is to allow the relatively more mobile (in eversion and inversion) calcaneus to articulate freely and independently from the relatively more fixed forefoot, instead of the fixed or fused structure or lack of stable structure between the two in conventional designs.
  • the forefoot can be subdivided (not shown) into its component essential structural support and propulsion elements, the individual heads of the metatarsal and the heads of the distal phalanges, so that each major articulating joint set of the foot is paralleled by a freely articulating shoe sole support propulsion element, an anthropomorphic design; various aggregations of the subdivisions are also possible.
  • An added benefit of the design is to provide better flexibility along axis 122 for the forefoot during the toe-off propulsive phase of the running stride, even in the absence of any other embodiments of the applicant's invention; that is, the benefit exists for conventional shoe sole designs.
  • Fig. 21A shows in sagittal plane cross section a specific design maximizing flexibility, with large non-essential sections removed for flexibility and connected by only a top layer (horizontal plane) of non-stretching fabric 123 like Dacron polyester or Kevlar.
  • Fig. 21B shows another specific design with a thin top sole layer 124 instead of fabric and a different structure for the flexibility sections: a design variation that provides greater structural support, but less flexibility, though still much more than conventional designs.
  • Fig. 21C shows a bottom view (horizontal plane) of the inversion/eversion flexibility design.
  • the controlled or programmed deformation can be provided by either of two techniques.
  • the shoe sole sides, at especially the midsole can be cut in a tapered fashion or grooved so that the bottom sole bends inwardly under pressure to the correct contour.
  • the second uses an easily deformable material in a tapered manner on the sides to deform under pressure to the correct contour. While such techniques produce stability and natural motion results which are a significant improvement over conventional designs, they are inherently inferior to contours produced by simple geometric shaping.
  • the actual deformation must be produced by pressure which is unnatural and does not occur with a bare foot and second, only approximations are possible by deformation, even with sophisticated design and manufacturing techniques, given an individual's particular running gait or body weight. Thus, the deformation process is limited to a minor effort to correct the contours from surfaces approximating the ideal curve in the first instance.
  • Fig. 22 shows a non-optimal but interim or low cost approach to shoe sole construction, whereby the midsole and heel lift 127 are produced conventionally, or nearly so (at least leaving the midsole bottom surface flat, though the sides can be contoured), while the bottom or outer sole 128 includes most or all of the special contours 25 of the new design which, as shown in Fig. 22A, extend to a lowest point (28') of a lowermost side section of the outer surface 31.
  • the uppermost section 54 of midsole 127 extends to and above the height of a lowest point 30' of the same sole side to an uppermost extent 54' of midsole 127.
  • the contours on the sides form a concavely rounded portion of the outer surface 31, the concavity being relative to an inner section of the sole 28 directly adjacent to the concavely rounded portion, and a convexly rounded portion of inner surface 30, the convexity being determined relative to a section of the sole 28 directly adjacent to the convexly rounded portion of the inner surface 30.
  • the portion of sole 28 bounded by the convexly rounded inner surface portion and the concavely rounded outer surface portion is concavely rounded relative to an intended wearer's foot location inside the shoe, all as shown in Fig. 22A.
  • the shoe sole 28 includes a sidemost lateral section 58 located outside a vertical line 59 at the sidemost extent 30" of the lateral side of the inner surface 30 of the shoe sole 28, and a sidemost medial section 48 located outside a vertical line 49 of the sidemost extent 30" of the medial side of the inner surface 30 of the shoe sole 28.
  • the midsole 127 extends into the sidemost lateral and medial sections 58, 48, as shown.
  • Fig. 22B shows in a quadrant side design the concept applied to conventional street shoe heels, which are usually separated from the forefoot by a hollow instep area under the main longitudinal arch.
  • Fig. 22C shows in frontal plane cross section the concept applied to the quadrant sided or single plane design and indicating in Fig. 22D in the shaded area 129 of the bottom sole 128 that portion which should be honeycombed (axis on the horizontal plane) to reduce the density of the relatively hard outer sole 128 to that of the midsole material to provide for relatively uniform shoe density.
  • Fig. 22B shows in a quadrant side design the concept applied to conventional street shoe heels, which are usually separated from the forefoot by a hollow instep area under the main longitudinal arch.
  • Fig. 22C shows in frontal plane cross section the concept applied to the quadrant sided or single plane design and indicating in Fig. 22D in the shaded area 129 of the bottom sole 128 that portion which should be honeycombed (axis on the horizontal plane) to reduce the density of the relatively
  • FIG. 22E shows in bottom view the outline 36 of a bottom sole 128 made from flat material which can be conformed topologically to a contoured midsole of either the one or two plane designs by limiting the side areas to be mated to the essential support areas discussed in Fig. 16; by that method, the contoured midsole and flat bottom sole surfaces can be made to join satisfactorily by coinciding closely, which would be topologically impossible if all of the side areas were retained on the bottom sole 128.
  • Figs. 23A-23C frontal plane cross sections, illustrate the inner shoe sole stability sides enhancement.
  • the enhancement positions and stabilizes the foot relative to the shoe sole 28, and maintains the constant shoe sole thickness (s) of the naturally contoured sides 28a design, as shown in Figs. 23B and 23C;
  • Fig. 23A shows a conventional design.
  • the inner shoe sole stability sides 131 conform to the natural contour of the foot sides 29, which determine the theoretically ideal stability plane 51 for the shoe sole thickness (s).

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physical Education & Sports Medicine (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Footwear And Its Accessory, Manufacturing Method And Apparatuses (AREA)
  • Handling Of Sheets (AREA)
  • Acyclic And Carbocyclic Compounds In Medicinal Compositions (AREA)

Claims (29)

  1. Semelle de chaussure (28) pour une chaussure, comprenant,:
    une semelle inférieure (128);
    une semelle intermédiaire (127) plus molle que la semelle inférieure (128);
    un sous-bout (127) de talon (127);
    une surface intérieure (30) comprenant au moins une partie arrondie de manière convexe par rapport à une portion de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, qui est située directement au voisinage de la partie arrondie de manière convexe de la surface intérieure (30), lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans un plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité;
    une surface extérieure (31) comportant une partie extrême supérieure (53a') qui s'étend au moins jusqu'à la hauteur du point le plus bas (30') de la surface intérieure (30), lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans un plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité; caractérisée en ce que :
    la surface extérieure (31) comprend au moins une partie arrondie de manière concave qui s'étend vers le bas le long d'un côté au moins de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, au moins jusqu'à proximité du point le plus bas (28') du côté de la semelle de la chaussure, la concavité de la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) étant déterminée par rapport à une partie intérieure de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, située directement au voisinage de la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31), lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans un plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité; et
    en ce que la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) du côté de la semelle (28) de la chaussure comprend une portion formée par la semelle intermédiaire (127), la portion de semelle intermédiaire de la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) s'étendant au-dessous d'une zone de côté extrême (28a') du côté de la semelle de la chaussure afin que la partie arrondie de celui-ci se déforme pour s'aplatir facilement sous la charge du poids du corps d'un utilisateur au cours d'un mouvement de côté de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, pour ainsi assurer une meilleure stabilité latérale.
  2. Semelle de chaussure (28) telle que définie dans la revendication 1, dans laquelle chaque partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) est située au niveau d'un ou de plusieurs emplacements de la semelle (28) de la chaussure proches des emplacements d'une ou de plusieurs des parties suivantes du pied d'un utilisateur potentiel, lorsqu'il est placé à l'intérieur de la chaussure : la base du calcanéum (95), la tubérosité latérale du calcanéum (95), la base du cinquième métatarsien (97), la tête du cinquième métatarsien (96), la tête du premier métatarsien (96), et la tête de la première phalange distale (98).
  3. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans laquelle :
       la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) s'étend vers le haut le long d'un côté au moins de la semelle de la chaussure jusqu'à un emplacement du côté de la semelle de la chaussure, proche d'une zone de côté extrême (28a') de celui-ci, lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans un plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  4. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans laquelle :
       la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) s'étend vers le haut le long d'un côté au moins de la semelle de la chaussure jusqu'au bout d'une zone de côté extrême (28a') du côté de la semelle de la chaussure, lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans un plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  5. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, dans laquelle :
       au moins une portion extrême inférieure de la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) est formés par la semelle inférieure (128).
  6. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 5, dans laquelle :
       au moins une portion d'une surface inférieure de la semelle intermédiaire (127) et au moins une portion d'une surface supérieure de la semelle inférieure (128) sont sensiblement planes, lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans le plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  7. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6, dans laquelle :
       la portion de semelle intermédiaire arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) est située au moins au niveau d'un emplacement de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, proche de l'emplacement de la base du calcanéum (95) du pied d'un utilisateur potentiel, lorsqu'il est placé à l'intérieur de la chaussure.
  8. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7, dans laquelle :
       la portion de semelle intermédiaire arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) est située au moins au niveau d'un emplacement de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, proche de l'emplacement de la tubérosité latérale du calcanéum (95) du pied d'un utilisateur potentiel, lorsqu'il est placé à l'intérieur de la chaussure.
  9. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 8, dans laquelle :
       la portion de semelle intermédiaire arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) est située au moins au niveau d'un emplacement de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, proche de l'emplacement de la base du cinquième métatarsien (97) du pied d'un utilisateur potentiel, lorsqu'il est placé à l'intérieur de la chaussure.
  10. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 9, dans laquelle :
       la portion de semelle intermédiaire arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) est située au moins au niveau d'un emplacement de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, proche de l'emplacement de la tête du cinquième métatarsien (96) du pied d'un utilisateur potentiel, lorsqu'il est placé à l'intérieur de la chaussure.
  11. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 10, dans laquelle :
       la portion de semelle intermédiaire arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) est située au moins au niveau d'un emplacement de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, proche de l'emplacement de la tête du premier métatarsien (96) du pied d'un utilisateur potentiel, lorsqu'il est placé à l'intérieur de la chaussure.
  12. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 11, dans laquelle :
       la portion de semelle intermédiaire arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) est située au moins au niveau d'un emplacement de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, proche de l'emplacement de la tête de la première phalange distale (98) du pied d'un utilisateur potentiel, lorsqu'il est placé à l'intérieur de la chaussure.
  13. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 12, dans laquelle la semelle (28) de la chaussure comprend au moins deux parties arrondies de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) comprenant chacune la semelle intermédiaire (127) et situées sur des côtés opposés de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans un plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  14. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6 et la revendication 13, lorsqu'elle est dépendante de l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6, dans laquelle la coupe transversale en plan frontal est située dans la zone du talon.
  15. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 14, dans laquelle l'épaisseur de la semelle (28) de la chaussure diminue progressivement d'une épaisseur de semelle au niveau de l'une au moins des parties arrondies de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) de la semelle (28) de la chaussure à une épaisseur de semelle inférieure du côté de la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31), lorsqu'on la considère dans un plan horizontal, pour ainsi assurer une souplesse en torsion et un allégement de la semelle (28) de la chaussure.
  16. Semelle de chaussure (28) telle que définie dans la revendication 15, dans laquelle l'épaisseur de la semelle (28) de la chaussure diminue progressivement des deux côtés de la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31), lorsqu'on la considère dans un plan horizontal.
  17. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 16, dans laquelle :
       la surface supérieure d'une partie de côté de la semelle inférieure (128) est sensiblement plane, lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans un plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  18. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 17, comprenant une semelle intermédiaire et un sous-bout combinés (127), et dans laquelle l'épaisseur de la semelle intermédiaire et du sous-bout combinés (127) d'une partie de la semelle (28) de la chaussure présentant une surface extérieure (31) arrondie de manière concave, mesurée dans une première coupe transversale en plan frontal, lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure est dans un état droit et non sollicité, est supérieure à l'épaisseur de la semelle intermédiaire et du sous-bout combinés (127) d'une partie différente de la semelle ne présentant pas une surface extérieure arrondie de manière concave, mesurée dans une seconde coupe transversale en plan frontal, lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  19. Semelle de chaussure (28) telle que définie dans la revendication 18, dans laquelle l'épaisseur de la semelle intermédiaire et du sous-bout combinés (127) est définie comme la distance entre un point quelconque d'une surface supérieure de la semelle intermédiaire et du sous-bout combinés (127) et le point le plus proche d'une surface inférieure de la semelle intermédiaire et du sous-bout combinés (127), lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans un plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  20. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon la revendication 18 ou 19, dans laquelle le sous-bout est un sous-bout de talon.
  21. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 20, dans laquelle chaque partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) est également arrondie de manière concave par rapport à une portion intérieure de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, située directement au voisinage de la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31), lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée dans un plan horizontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  22. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 21, dans laquelle la partie de la semelle (28) de la chaussure pourvue d'une surface extérieure arrondie de manière concave (31) a une épaisseur qui diminue progressivement d'un bout à l'autre de coupes transversales en plan frontal adjacentes successives pour ainsi augmenter la souplesse en torsion de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  23. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 22, dans laquelle la portion extrême supérieure (53a') de chaque partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) forme un arc de plus de 90° degrés, lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans un plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  24. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 23, dans laquelle la partie de la semelle (28) de la chaussure qui présente une surface extérieure (31) arrondie de manière concave comprend également une zone de densité de matière accrue pour former un élément de support structural ou de propulsion pour le pied (27) d'un utilisateur potentiel.
  25. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 24, dans laquelle la portion de semelle intermédiaire de la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) comprend une portion supérieure (53a') de la surface extérieure (31), lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans un plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  26. Semelle de chaussure (28) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 25, dans laquelle la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) est située uniquement sur une portion de côté de la semelle (28) de la chaussure, lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans un plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  27. Semelle de chaussure (28) telle que définie dans l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 26, dans laquelle une portion au moins de la partie arrondie de manière concave de la surface extérieure (31) de la semelle (28) de la chaussure est formée par plusieurs segments de ligne sensiblement droits qui, pris collectivement, se rapprochent d'une partie de surface arrondie de manière concave, lorsque la semelle (28) de la chaussure, considérée en coupe transversale dans un plan frontal, est dans un état droit et non sollicité.
  28. Semelle de chaussure (28) telle que définie dans l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 27, dans laquelle une zone de talon de la semelle (28) de la chaussure a une épaisseur supérieure à l'épaisseur de la semelle (28) de la chaussure dans une zone d'avant-pied.
  29. Semelle de chaussure (28) telle que définie dans l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 28, comprenant une configuration en relief (60, 62) sur une portion au moins de la surface extérieure (31) de la semelle (28) de la chaussure.
EP97250029A 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure avec semelle à contour naturel Expired - Lifetime EP0811330B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP01204088A EP1199001A1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure avec semelle à contour naturel
EP00201348A EP1034714A3 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Côtés d'une semelle intermédiaire
EP00200095A EP1038457B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Coté arrondi du milieu d'une semelle avec une épaisseur plus grande
EP00204038A EP1104658A1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure avec semelle à contour naturel
EP99204164A EP0983734B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Structures de semelles de chaussures avec une épaisseur de profil conique dans un plan horizontal

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US21938788A 1988-07-15 1988-07-15
US219387 1988-07-15
US23966788A 1988-09-02 1988-09-02
US239667 1988-09-02
PCT/US1989/003076 WO1990000358A1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure a semelle profilee naturellement
EP89909337A EP0424471B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure a semelle profilee naturellement

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP89909337A Division EP0424471B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure a semelle profilee naturellement
EP89909337.1 Division 1990-01-30

Related Child Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00200095A Division EP1038457B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Coté arrondi du milieu d'une semelle avec une épaisseur plus grande
EP00204038A Division EP1104658A1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure avec semelle à contour naturel
EP99204164A Division EP0983734B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Structures de semelles de chaussures avec une épaisseur de profil conique dans un plan horizontal
EP00201348A Division EP1034714A3 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Côtés d'une semelle intermédiaire

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0811330A2 EP0811330A2 (fr) 1997-12-10
EP0811330A3 EP0811330A3 (fr) 1999-06-16
EP0811330B1 true EP0811330B1 (fr) 2001-10-17

Family

ID=26913838

Family Applications (7)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00200095A Expired - Lifetime EP1038457B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Coté arrondi du milieu d'une semelle avec une épaisseur plus grande
EP00204038A Withdrawn EP1104658A1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure avec semelle à contour naturel
EP89909337A Expired - Lifetime EP0424471B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure a semelle profilee naturellement
EP00201348A Withdrawn EP1034714A3 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Côtés d'une semelle intermédiaire
EP01204088A Withdrawn EP1199001A1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure avec semelle à contour naturel
EP97250029A Expired - Lifetime EP0811330B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure avec semelle à contour naturel
EP99204164A Revoked EP0983734B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Structures de semelles de chaussures avec une épaisseur de profil conique dans un plan horizontal

Family Applications Before (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00200095A Expired - Lifetime EP1038457B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Coté arrondi du milieu d'une semelle avec une épaisseur plus grande
EP00204038A Withdrawn EP1104658A1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure avec semelle à contour naturel
EP89909337A Expired - Lifetime EP0424471B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure a semelle profilee naturellement
EP00201348A Withdrawn EP1034714A3 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Côtés d'une semelle intermédiaire
EP01204088A Withdrawn EP1199001A1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Chaussure avec semelle à contour naturel

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP99204164A Revoked EP0983734B1 (fr) 1988-07-15 1989-07-14 Structures de semelles de chaussures avec une épaisseur de profil conique dans un plan horizontal

Country Status (11)

Country Link
EP (7) EP1038457B1 (fr)
JP (4) JP3138770B2 (fr)
KR (1) KR900701188A (fr)
AT (4) ATE207316T1 (fr)
AU (1) AU641126B2 (fr)
CA (2) CA1341238C (fr)
DE (4) DE68929338T2 (fr)
ES (1) ES2166631T3 (fr)
HK (2) HK1028939A1 (fr)
NZ (1) NZ229949A (fr)
WO (1) WO1990000358A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014130835A1 (fr) * 2013-02-22 2014-08-28 Kenney Sport, Llc Semelle de chaussure imitant un sabot

Families Citing this family (32)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DK0593441T3 (da) * 1989-10-03 2001-05-07 Anatomic Res Inc Korrigerende skosålsstruktur, der anvender en kontur større end det teoretisk ideelle stabilitetsplan
EP0594579B1 (fr) * 1990-01-10 2001-02-14 Anatomic Research, Inc. Structure de semelle
AU7324591A (en) * 1990-02-08 1991-09-03 Frampton E. Ellis Iii Shoe sole structures with deformation sipes
CH681947A5 (fr) * 1990-10-16 1993-06-30 Bernhard Georg Prof Dr M Weber
US6266897B1 (en) * 1994-10-21 2001-07-31 Adidas International B.V. Ground-contacting systems having 3D deformation elements for use in footwear
AU6290796A (en) 1995-06-26 1997-01-30 Frampton Erroll Ellis III Shoe sole structures
FR2749485B1 (fr) * 1996-06-11 1998-08-07 Lefebvre Deterpigny Therese Chaussure avec une semelle conformee
US5893221A (en) * 1997-10-16 1999-04-13 Forest Footwear L.L.C. Footwear having a protuberance
US6411838B1 (en) 1998-12-23 2002-06-25 Medispectra, Inc. Systems and methods for optical examination of samples
US7334350B2 (en) 1999-03-16 2008-02-26 Anatomic Research, Inc Removable rounded midsole structures and chambers with computer processor-controlled variable pressure
US7010869B1 (en) 1999-04-26 2006-03-14 Frampton E. Ellis, III Shoe sole orthotic structures and computer controlled compartments
EP1196054A1 (fr) 1999-04-26 2002-04-17 Ellis, Frampton E. III Structures orthopediques de semelles de chaussures et compartiments regles par ordinateur
US6519875B1 (en) * 1999-12-17 2003-02-18 Piloti Inc. Driving and walking shoe
AU5560101A (en) 2000-04-26 2001-11-07 Anatomic Res Inc Removable midsole structures and chambers with controlled variable pressure
AU7807401A (en) 2000-07-28 2002-02-13 Frampton E Ellis Iii Shoe sole orthotic structures and computer controlled compartments
US7100307B2 (en) 2001-08-15 2006-09-05 Barefoot Science Technologies Inc. Footwear to enhance natural gait
JP4733957B2 (ja) * 2004-10-08 2011-07-27 高橋 毅 靴用インソール
US8256147B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2012-09-04 Frampton E. Eliis Devices with internal flexibility sipes, including siped chambers for footwear
JP4958505B2 (ja) * 2006-02-10 2012-06-20 ヨネックス株式会社 スポーツシューズ
JP2008178570A (ja) 2007-01-25 2008-08-07 Ykk Corp バックル
US8125796B2 (en) 2007-11-21 2012-02-28 Frampton E. Ellis Devices with faraday cages and internal flexibility sipes
HUP0800101A2 (en) * 2008-02-18 2011-11-28 Laszlo Solymosi Shoes with unstable sole construction
KR101075789B1 (ko) 2011-01-06 2011-10-21 (주)지원에프알에스 발 폭의 조절이 가능한 신발창
JP4916586B1 (ja) * 2011-08-24 2012-04-11 要次 平松 靴
US10226103B2 (en) 2015-01-05 2019-03-12 Markforged, Inc. Footwear fabrication by composite filament 3D printing
US10448705B2 (en) 2015-03-23 2019-10-22 Asics Corporation Shoe sole with improved grip capacity
JP6162784B2 (ja) 2015-12-24 2017-07-12 美津濃株式会社 シューズ用アウトソール構造およびそれを用いたクリーツシューズ
US10617174B1 (en) * 2018-12-21 2020-04-14 Nike, Inc. Footwear article with doffing ledge
US10455898B1 (en) 2018-12-21 2019-10-29 Nike, Inc. Footwear article with tongue reinforcer
US11344077B2 (en) 2018-12-28 2022-05-31 Nike, Inc. Footwear article with collar elevator
US10721994B2 (en) 2018-12-28 2020-07-28 Nike, Inc. Heel structure with locating pegs and method of manufacturing an article of footwear
CA3210210C (fr) * 2021-12-31 2024-05-14 Marc CORMIER Structure de semelle interieure auxiliaire ou integree pour article chaussant

Family Cites Families (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE23257C (de) * 1900-01-01 J. FARMER in Salford (England) Schlägerwerk zur Düngerpulverbereitung unter Anwendung von Wasserdampf
US288127A (en) * 1883-11-06 Zfew jeeset
US1289106A (en) * 1916-10-24 1918-12-31 Converse Rubber Shoe Company Sole.
FR602501A (fr) * 1925-08-26 1926-03-20 Procédé de fabrication de semelles pour chaussures et produits en résultant
FR1004472A (fr) * 1947-04-28 1952-03-31 Le Caoutchouc S I T Perfectionnements aux bottes en caoutchouc
DE1290844B (de) * 1962-08-29 1969-03-13 Continental Gummi Werke Ag Formsohle fuer Schuhwerk
US3308560A (en) * 1965-06-28 1967-03-14 Endicott Johnson Corp Rubber boot with fibreglass instep guard
US4128951A (en) * 1975-05-07 1978-12-12 Falk Construction, Inc. Custom-formed insert
IN145239B (fr) * 1975-05-16 1978-09-16 M Delport
CH611140A5 (fr) * 1975-06-09 1979-05-31 Dassler Puma Sportschuh
DE2613312A1 (de) * 1976-03-29 1977-10-13 Dassler Puma Sportschuh In einer form hergestellte profilierte laufsohle fuer schuhwerk, insbesondere sportschuhe
DE2737765A1 (de) * 1977-08-22 1979-03-08 Dassler Puma Sportschuh Aus gummi oder einem anderen material mit gummielastischen eigenschaften bestehende schalenfoermige laufsohle fuer sportschuhe
DE2836793A1 (de) * 1978-08-23 1980-03-06 Continental Gummi Werke Ag Schalensohle
US4305212A (en) * 1978-09-08 1981-12-15 Coomer Sven O Orthotically dynamic footwear
US4272899A (en) * 1979-10-15 1981-06-16 Brooks Jeffrey S Footwear
DE3037108A1 (de) * 1980-10-01 1982-05-13 Herbert Dr.-Ing. 8032 Lochham Funck Polstersohle mit orthopaedischen eigenschaften
CA1176458A (fr) * 1982-04-13 1984-10-23 Denys Gardner Article chaussant antiderapant
US4449306A (en) * 1982-10-13 1984-05-22 Puma-Sportschuhfabriken Rudolf Dassler Kg Running shoe sole construction
CA1213139A (fr) * 1983-01-17 1986-10-28 Norbert Hamy Chaussure de sport
US4557059A (en) * 1983-02-08 1985-12-10 Colgate-Palmolive Company Athletic running shoe
US4578882A (en) * 1984-07-31 1986-04-01 Talarico Ii Louis C Forefoot compensated footwear
DE3471870D1 (en) * 1984-12-19 1988-07-14 Funck Herbert Shoe sole of plastic material or rubber
US4694591A (en) * 1985-04-15 1987-09-22 Wolverine World Wide, Inc. Toe off athletic shoe
AT388488B (de) * 1985-06-18 1989-06-26 Hartjes Rudolf Golfschuh
DE3527938A1 (de) * 1985-08-03 1987-02-12 Paul Ganter Schuh- oder laufsohle
US4689898A (en) * 1985-09-11 1987-09-01 Fahey Brian W Running shoe
DE3629245A1 (de) * 1986-08-28 1988-03-03 Dassler Puma Sportschuh Laufsohle fuer sportschuhe, insbesondere fuer hallensportarten
AU586049B2 (en) * 1986-09-19 1989-06-29 Malcolm G. Blissett Parabola-flex sole
US4747220A (en) * 1987-01-20 1988-05-31 Autry Industries, Inc. Cleated sole for activewear shoe
US4748753A (en) * 1987-03-06 1988-06-07 Ju Chang N Golf shoes

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014130835A1 (fr) * 2013-02-22 2014-08-28 Kenney Sport, Llc Semelle de chaussure imitant un sabot
CN104994760B (zh) * 2013-02-22 2017-03-29 肯尼运动有限公司 用于鞋子的鞋底以及踩踏面
US9687043B2 (en) 2013-02-22 2017-06-27 Kenney Sport, Llc. Shoe sole simulating a hoof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0983734B1 (fr) 2001-10-24
DE68929338D1 (de) 2001-11-29
EP0424471B1 (fr) 1997-09-24
DE68929335D1 (de) 2001-11-22
AU4060989A (en) 1990-02-05
ATE206884T1 (de) 2001-11-15
HK1028939A1 (en) 2001-03-16
JP2002101905A (ja) 2002-04-09
JP3248151B2 (ja) 2002-01-21
EP0983734A1 (fr) 2000-03-08
WO1990000358A1 (fr) 1990-01-25
ATE207316T1 (de) 2001-11-15
EP1038457B1 (fr) 2001-12-05
ATE209867T1 (de) 2001-12-15
NZ229949A (en) 1992-12-23
DE68928347D1 (de) 1997-10-30
EP1104658A1 (fr) 2001-06-06
EP1034714A2 (fr) 2000-09-13
KR900701188A (ko) 1990-12-01
DE68929355D1 (de) 2002-01-17
DE68928347T2 (de) 1998-01-29
DE68929338T2 (de) 2002-09-12
CA1341238C (fr) 2001-05-22
JP3312340B2 (ja) 2002-08-05
EP0424471A1 (fr) 1991-05-02
EP0811330A2 (fr) 1997-12-10
EP1034714A3 (fr) 2001-05-30
EP0424471A4 (en) 1991-10-16
DE68929335T2 (de) 2002-07-04
DE68929355T2 (de) 2002-10-17
EP1199001A1 (fr) 2002-04-24
EP0811330A3 (fr) 1999-06-16
JP2000023705A (ja) 2000-01-25
ES2166631T3 (es) 2002-04-16
JP3079182B2 (ja) 2000-08-21
JPH04500615A (ja) 1992-02-06
EP1038457A1 (fr) 2000-09-27
ATE158479T1 (de) 1997-10-15
HK1031178A1 (en) 2001-06-08
JP2000000102A (ja) 2000-01-07
AU641126B2 (en) 1993-09-16
CA1340997C (fr) 2000-05-16
JP3138770B2 (ja) 2001-02-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0811330B1 (fr) Chaussure avec semelle à contour naturel
US6629376B1 (en) Shoe sole with a concavely rounded sole portion
US6115941A (en) Shoe with naturally contoured sole
US6708424B1 (en) Shoe with naturally contoured sole
US6314662B1 (en) Shoe sole with rounded inner and outer side surfaces
US4989349A (en) Shoe with contoured sole
US7127834B2 (en) Shoe sole structures using a theoretically ideal stability plane
US6729046B2 (en) Shoe sole structures
US6308439B1 (en) Shoe sole structures
US7225564B1 (en) Shoe outsole
US20010049887A1 (en) Shoe sole with rounded inner and outer surfaces
US6789331B1 (en) Shoes sole structures
US20020007572A1 (en) Shoe sole structure having midsole sides
US20020116841A1 (en) Shoe soles with midsole sides of increased thickness
CA1341350C (fr) Chaussure dotee d'une semelle epousant le profil du pied

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19970210

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 424471

Country of ref document: EP

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: ANATOMIC RESEARCH, INC.

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: ANATOMIC RESEARCH, INC.

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: ELLIS, FRAMPTON E. III

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20000816

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 424471

Country of ref document: EP

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 206884

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 20011115

Kind code of ref document: T

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 68929335

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20011122

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: OK PAT AG PATENTE MARKEN LIZENZEN

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020714

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20020812

Year of fee payment: 14

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: ADIDAS INTERNATIONAL B.V.

Effective date: 20020621

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20020821

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20020828

Year of fee payment: 14

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20020829

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20020830

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20020831

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20020919

Year of fee payment: 14

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: ADIDAS INTERNATIONAL B.V.

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20021113

Year of fee payment: 14

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030714

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030715

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030731

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030731

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030731

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *ANATOMIC RESEARCH INC.

Effective date: 20030731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040203

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20030714

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040331

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20040201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20040214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050714