EP0569420A1 - A method and an equipment for classifying a gas-solids flow coming from a counterjet pulverizer. - Google Patents

A method and an equipment for classifying a gas-solids flow coming from a counterjet pulverizer.

Info

Publication number
EP0569420A1
EP0569420A1 EP92903563A EP92903563A EP0569420A1 EP 0569420 A1 EP0569420 A1 EP 0569420A1 EP 92903563 A EP92903563 A EP 92903563A EP 92903563 A EP92903563 A EP 92903563A EP 0569420 A1 EP0569420 A1 EP 0569420A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
gas
fraction
classifier
additional
led
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP92903563A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0569420B1 (en
Inventor
Jouko Niemi
Tuomo Kauramaeki
Jukka Lehtimaeki
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mikropulva Ltd Oy
Original Assignee
Finnpulva Oy AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Finnpulva Oy AB filed Critical Finnpulva Oy AB
Publication of EP0569420A1 publication Critical patent/EP0569420A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0569420B1 publication Critical patent/EP0569420B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B02CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
    • B02CCRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
    • B02C19/00Other disintegrating devices or methods
    • B02C19/06Jet mills
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B02CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
    • B02CCRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
    • B02C23/00Auxiliary methods or auxiliary devices or accessories specially adapted for crushing or disintegrating not provided for in preceding groups or not specially adapted to apparatus covered by a single preceding group
    • B02C23/18Adding fluid, other than for crushing or disintegrating by fluid energy
    • B02C23/20Adding fluid, other than for crushing or disintegrating by fluid energy after crushing or disintegrating
    • B02C23/22Adding fluid, other than for crushing or disintegrating by fluid energy after crushing or disintegrating with recirculation of material to crushing or disintegrating zone
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B02CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
    • B02CCRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
    • B02C23/00Auxiliary methods or auxiliary devices or accessories specially adapted for crushing or disintegrating not provided for in preceding groups or not specially adapted to apparatus covered by a single preceding group
    • B02C23/18Adding fluid, other than for crushing or disintegrating by fluid energy
    • B02C23/24Passing gas through crushing or disintegrating zone
    • B02C23/32Passing gas through crushing or disintegrating zone with return of oversize material to crushing or disintegrating zone

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and an equipment for classifying a gas-solids flow coming from a counterjet pulverizer, in which the gas-solids flow accelerated by an additional gas flow is led to a first, mainly a cent ⁇ rifugal-force based classification phase, from which a coarse fraction is returned to the pulverization and a fine fraction is led, supported by the gas flow, to a second classification phase.
  • the counterjet pulverizer technique developed by the in ⁇ ventors is mainly connected with a static or dynamic classifier.
  • the operation of these classifier types is described e.g. in an earlier Finnish patent publication 81732 and in an international publication WO 90/06179.
  • the classi ⁇ bombs may be of a static or dynamic type or their com ⁇ binations.
  • a static classifier refers to a classifier, which contains no moving parts, but the classification effect is achieved only by means of a centrifugal force caused by the speed of the gas-solids flow.
  • the classifier has, for intensifying the classification effect, a winged rotor rotating at a high speed and surrounding a fine-fraction outlet opening.
  • the coarse fraction of a second and possibly a next clas ⁇ sifier is usually recovered as such depending on the pro ⁇ duct or returned directly to a feeding funnel of the counterjet pulverizer e.g. by means of a separate feed screw.
  • the last-mentioned solution stresses the counter ⁇ jet pulverizer to an unnecessary large extent, since part of the coarse fraction of the second classifier comprises e.g. of easily decomposing fiber bundles, the decomposi ⁇ tion of which does not require an additional pulverizati ⁇ on in the jet pulverizer.
  • the object of the present invention is to eliminate the above-disadvantages, which has been achieved by means of a method, which is characterized in that the coarse frac ⁇ tion produced in the second classification phase is mixed in a vigorous additional gas flow and the additional gas- solids mixture produced is led to the feed of the first classification phase such that large speed differences occur therein, and the fine fraction is led, supported by the gas flow, to the next treatment phase.
  • the particle bundles possibly present in the coarse fraction of the second classifier may be rea ⁇ dily decomposed by the action of shear forces caused by the additional or accelerating gas flowing at a high speed below the removal device of the classifier.
  • a simi ⁇ lar positive effect is achieved at the point of a connec- ting pipe between the counterjet pulverizer and the first classifier, where the additional or accelerating gas pipe terminates.
  • Fig. 1 shows as an example a first embodiment of the in ⁇ ventive equipment seen from one side
  • Fig. 2 shows a second embodiment of the invention
  • Fig. 3 shows a third embodiment of the invention.
  • new material to be pulverized is brought by means of a feed screw 1 to a feeding device 2 of the pulverizer, which device 2 represents a so-cal ⁇ led valve feeding type.
  • the ma- terial drops to a pressurized balancing reservoir 2b, from which it is transferred as a uniform feed by means of a screw conveoyr to a fluidization chamber 3 of the equipment, in which a working gas is fed among the mate ⁇ rial for achieving a gas-solids suspension.
  • the gas-so- lids suspension thus formed flows at a high speed as a uniform flow via a dividing device 4 to accelerating nozzles 5a of the counterjet pulverizer 5, which are di ⁇ rected to a common point, in which the gas-solids jets impact against each other, whereby the solid particles are pulverized into an ultrafine form.
  • the pulverized gas-solids suspension flows via a connecting pipe 6 to a first, mainly centri ⁇ fugal-force based classifier 7, into which the gas-solids suspension flows at a high speed mainly tangentially.
  • additional or accelerating gas is led from an additional gas source 9 into the connecting pipe 6 via an additional gas pipe 8, which terminates at the connecting pipe 6 at a distance from the classifier 7, mainly parallel with the remaining part of the connecting pipe 6.
  • an additional gas pipe 8 which terminates at the connecting pipe 6 at a distance from the classifier 7, mainly parallel with the remaining part of the connecting pipe 6.
  • On the peripheral surface of the classifier 7 is located a removal pocket 7a for the coarse fraction at a distance from the inlet opening of the classifier 7.
  • the bottom section of the removal pocket 7a is provided with a closing device 10, preferably a rotor closing device, by means of which the coarse fraction is removed periodi ⁇ cally from the removal pocket 7 and returned to a feeding funnel 2a of the counterjet pulverizer.
  • the second classifier 12 may possibly be of the same type as the first classifier 7 or possibly a classifier of a cyclone type.
  • the solution according to this invention is characterized in that a removal device 13 for the coarse fraction of the classifier 12 terminates at the addi- tional or accelerating gas pipe 8, in which the coarse fraction is mixed at a high speed with the flowing addi ⁇ tional or accelerating gas, and the additional gas-solids mixture thus formed is led into the connecting pipe 6 such that large speed differences occur locally therein, by means of which shear forces are achieved, which break the particle bundles possible contained in the feed flow of the connecting pipe 6.
  • the fine fraction of the second classifier 12 is led, supported by the gas flow, via a removal pipe 14 to the next treatment phase.
  • new material to be pulverized may be led by means of the screw conveyor 1 and a gate feeder 15 to the gas flowing in the additional or accelerating gas pipe 8, whereby the material to be pulverized is once classified already before the pulverization, so the ult- rafine fraction present in the feed is removed therefrom before it enters into the counterjet pulverizer.
  • the fine fraction of the third classifier 15 is led via a fine-fraction removal pipe 17 e.g. into a storage silo or to a next treatment phase.
  • a fine-fraction removal pipe 17 e.g. into a storage silo or to a next treatment phase.
  • pure additional gas may be led into it as a flushing gas from the flushing air nozzle located at the removal pocket 7a of the classifier 7. Additional gas into this flushing air nozzle is led from the addi ⁇ tional or accelerating gas source 9 via a branch pipe 18.
  • a dyna ⁇ mic classifier is used in at least one classification phase, i.e. a classifier, which is provided with a rotor preventing the removal of overcoarse particles at the inlet opening of the fine-fraction removal pipe 11 of the classifier 7.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Combined Means For Separation Of Solids (AREA)
  • Separation By Low-Temperature Treatments (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
  • Separating Particles In Gases By Inertia (AREA)
  • Disintegrating Or Milling (AREA)
  • Electrical Discharge Machining, Electrochemical Machining, And Combined Machining (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a method and an equipment for classifying a gas-solids flow coming from a counterjet pulverizer (5), in which the gas-solids flow accelerated by an additional gas flow is led to a first, mainly a centrifugal-force based classification phase (7), from which a coarse fraction is returned to the pulverization and a fine fraction is led, supported by the gas flow, to a second classification phase. The invention is characterized in that the coarse fraction produced in the second classification phase (12) is mixed in a vigorous additional gas flow and the additional gas-solids mixture produced is led to the feed of the first classification phase (7) such that large speed differences occur therein, and the fine fraction is led, supported by the gas flow, to the next treatment phase.

Description

A method and an equipment for classifying a gas-solids flow coming from a counterjet pulverizer
The invention relates to a method and an equipment for classifying a gas-solids flow coming from a counterjet pulverizer, in which the gas-solids flow accelerated by an additional gas flow is led to a first, mainly a cent¬ rifugal-force based classification phase, from which a coarse fraction is returned to the pulverization and a fine fraction is led, supported by the gas flow, to a second classification phase.
The counterjet pulverizer technique developed by the in¬ ventors is mainly connected with a static or dynamic classifier. The operation of these classifier types is described e.g. in an earlier Finnish patent publication 81732 and in an international publication WO 90/06179.
If the number of over-coarse granules of the finished product is accurately limited, it is necessary to use a double or even triple series classification. The classi¬ fiers may be of a static or dynamic type or their com¬ binations. A static classifier refers to a classifier, which contains no moving parts, but the classification effect is achieved only by means of a centrifugal force caused by the speed of the gas-solids flow. In a dynamic classifier, the classifier has, for intensifying the classification effect, a winged rotor rotating at a high speed and surrounding a fine-fraction outlet opening.
The coarse fraction of a second and possibly a next clas¬ sifier is usually recovered as such depending on the pro¬ duct or returned directly to a feeding funnel of the counterjet pulverizer e.g. by means of a separate feed screw. The last-mentioned solution stresses the counter¬ jet pulverizer to an unnecessary large extent, since part of the coarse fraction of the second classifier comprises e.g. of easily decomposing fiber bundles, the decomposi¬ tion of which does not require an additional pulverizati¬ on in the jet pulverizer.
The object of the present invention is to eliminate the above-disadvantages, which has been achieved by means of a method, which is characterized in that the coarse frac¬ tion produced in the second classification phase is mixed in a vigorous additional gas flow and the additional gas- solids mixture produced is led to the feed of the first classification phase such that large speed differences occur therein, and the fine fraction is led, supported by the gas flow, to the next treatment phase. By means of this solution, the particle bundles possibly present in the coarse fraction of the second classifier may be rea¬ dily decomposed by the action of shear forces caused by the additional or accelerating gas flowing at a high speed below the removal device of the classifier. A simi¬ lar positive effect is achieved at the point of a connec- ting pipe between the counterjet pulverizer and the first classifier, where the additional or accelerating gas pipe terminates.
The other characteristics of the invention appear from the enclosed patent claims 2-10.
The invention is next described in more detail with refe¬ rence to the accompanying drawing, in which
Fig. 1 shows as an example a first embodiment of the in¬ ventive equipment seen from one side,
Fig. 2 shows a second embodiment of the invention, and
Fig. 3 shows a third embodiment of the invention. In the solution of Fig. 1, new material to be pulverized is brought by means of a feed screw 1 to a feeding device 2 of the pulverizer, which device 2 represents a so-cal¬ led valve feeding type. From the valve feeder 2, the ma- terial drops to a pressurized balancing reservoir 2b, from which it is transferred as a uniform feed by means of a screw conveoyr to a fluidization chamber 3 of the equipment, in which a working gas is fed among the mate¬ rial for achieving a gas-solids suspension. The gas-so- lids suspension thus formed flows at a high speed as a uniform flow via a dividing device 4 to accelerating nozzles 5a of the counterjet pulverizer 5, which are di¬ rected to a common point, in which the gas-solids jets impact against each other, whereby the solid particles are pulverized into an ultrafine form. From the counter¬ jet pulverizer 5 the pulverized gas-solids suspension flows via a connecting pipe 6 to a first, mainly centri¬ fugal-force based classifier 7, into which the gas-solids suspension flows at a high speed mainly tangentially. For reaching an inlet speed as high as possible and an opti¬ mal solids ratio, additional or accelerating gas is led from an additional gas source 9 into the connecting pipe 6 via an additional gas pipe 8, which terminates at the connecting pipe 6 at a distance from the classifier 7, mainly parallel with the remaining part of the connecting pipe 6. On the peripheral surface of the classifier 7 is located a removal pocket 7a for the coarse fraction at a distance from the inlet opening of the classifier 7. The bottom section of the removal pocket 7a is provided with a closing device 10, preferably a rotor closing device, by means of which the coarse fraction is removed periodi¬ cally from the removal pocket 7 and returned to a feeding funnel 2a of the counterjet pulverizer. On the other end surface of the classifier 7 is mainly centrally posi- tioned a removal pipe 11 for the fine fraction, which terminates mainly tangentially at a second classifier 12. The second classifier 12 may possibly be of the same type as the first classifier 7 or possibly a classifier of a cyclone type. The solution according to this invention is characterized in that a removal device 13 for the coarse fraction of the classifier 12 terminates at the addi- tional or accelerating gas pipe 8, in which the coarse fraction is mixed at a high speed with the flowing addi¬ tional or accelerating gas, and the additional gas-solids mixture thus formed is led into the connecting pipe 6 such that large speed differences occur locally therein, by means of which shear forces are achieved, which break the particle bundles possible contained in the feed flow of the connecting pipe 6. The fine fraction of the second classifier 12 is led, supported by the gas flow, via a removal pipe 14 to the next treatment phase.
If the material to be pulverized is from the beginning dry or nearly dry, new material to be pulverized may be led by means of the screw conveyor 1 and a gate feeder 15 to the gas flowing in the additional or accelerating gas pipe 8, whereby the material to be pulverized is once classified already before the pulverization, so the ult- rafine fraction present in the feed is removed therefrom before it enters into the counterjet pulverizer.
If the number of over-coarse particles of the finished product is accurately limited, it is sometimes necessary to use a double or even triple series classification. In this case, the removal pipe 14 of the second classifier
12 for the fine fraction terminates tangentially at a third classifier 15, whose removal device 16 for the coarse fraction terminates at the same additional or ac¬ celerating gas pipe 8 as the corresponding removal device
13 of the second classifier 12. The fine fraction of the third classifier 15 is led via a fine-fraction removal pipe 17 e.g. into a storage silo or to a next treatment phase. For intensifying the classification occurring in the first classifier 7, pure additional gas may be led into it as a flushing gas from the flushing air nozzle located at the removal pocket 7a of the classifier 7. Additional gas into this flushing air nozzle is led from the addi¬ tional or accelerating gas source 9 via a branch pipe 18.
For achieving a classification effect as effective as possible in the inventive classification system, a dyna¬ mic classifier is used in at least one classification phase, i.e. a classifier, which is provided with a rotor preventing the removal of overcoarse particles at the inlet opening of the fine-fraction removal pipe 11 of the classifier 7.

Claims

Claims
1. A method for classifying a gas-solids flow coming from a counterjet pulverizer (5), in which the gas-solids flow accelerated by an additional gas flow is led to a first, mainly a centrifugal-force based classification phase (7), from which a coarse fraction is returned to the pul¬ verization and a fine fraction is led, supported by the gas flow, to a second classification phase (12), charac- terized in that the coarse fraction produced in the se¬ cond classification phase (12) is mixed in a vigorous additional gas flow and the additional gas-solids mixture produced is led to the feed of the first classification phase (7) such that large speed differences occur the- rein, and the fine fraction is led, supported by the gas flow, to the next treatment phase.
2. A method according to Claim 1, characterized in that also new dry or by its properties corresponding material to be pulverized is fed into the additional gas flow.
3. A method according to Claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the fine fraction of the second classification phase (12) is led, supported by the gas, also to a third clas- sification phase (15), whose coarse fraction is mixed in the same additional gas flow as the coarse fraction of the second classification phase (12), and its fine frac¬ tion is led to the next treatment phase or to a storage silo.
4. A method according to any of the preceding Claims, characterized in that pure additional gas is led as a flushing gas into the first classification phase (7) at a removal pocket (7a) for the coarse fraction.
5. A classification system of a counterjet pulverizer, which comprises a first, mainly centrifugal-force based classifier (7) connected to a connecting pipe (6) of the pulverizing chamber (5), an additional or accelerating gas pipe (8) terminating at this connecting pipe (6), a coarse-fraction removal pocket (7a) located on the pe- ripheral surface of the first classifier (7) and periodi¬ cally emptying into a feeding funnel (2a) of the counter¬ jet pulverizer (5) and a fine-fraction removal pipe (11) positioned mainly centrally on its other end surface, which removal pipe (11) terminates mainly tangentially at the second classifier (12), characterized in that a coar¬ se-fraction removal device (13) of the second classifier (12) terminates at the additional or accelerating gas pipe (8) and its fine-fraction removal pipe (14) ter¬ minates at the next treatment phase.
6. A classification system according to Claim 5, charac¬ terized in that the feeding screw (1) for a new material to be pulverized terminates at the feeding funnel (2a) of the counterjet pulverizer.
7. A classification system according to Claim 5, charac¬ terized in that the feeding devices (1, 15) for a new dry material to be pulverized terminate at the additional or accelerating gas pipe (8).
8. A classification system according to Claim 6 or 7, characterized in that the fine-fraction removal pipe (14) of the second classifier (12) terminates tangentially at a third classifier (15), whose coarse-fraction removal device (16) terminates at the same additional or accele¬ rating gas pipe (8) as the coarse-fraction removal device (13) of the second classifier, and its fine-fraction re¬ moval pipe (17) terminates at the next treatment device or a storage silo.
9. A classification system according to any of the prece¬ ding Claims, characterized in that from the additional or accelerating gas source (9) is drawn a separate branch pipe (18) to a flushing air nozzle in the first classi¬ fier (7).
10. A classification system according to any of the
Claims 5-9, characterized in that at least one classifier (7) is of a dynamic type.
EP92903563A 1991-01-29 1992-01-29 A method and an equipment for classifying a gas-solids flow coming from a counterjet pulverizer Expired - Lifetime EP0569420B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI910418A FI910418A (en) 1991-01-29 1991-01-29 FOERFARANDE OCH ANLAEGGNING FOER KLASSIFICERING AV GAS-FASTSUBSTANSSTROEMMEN FRAON EN MOTSTRAOLSKVARN.
FI910418 1991-01-29
PCT/FI1992/000023 WO1992012795A1 (en) 1991-01-29 1992-01-29 A method and an equipment for classifying a gas-solids flow coming from a counterjet pulverizer

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0569420A1 true EP0569420A1 (en) 1993-11-18
EP0569420B1 EP0569420B1 (en) 1996-10-16

Family

ID=8531806

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP92903563A Expired - Lifetime EP0569420B1 (en) 1991-01-29 1992-01-29 A method and an equipment for classifying a gas-solids flow coming from a counterjet pulverizer

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0569420B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH06507111A (en)
AT (1) ATE144165T1 (en)
AU (1) AU1183392A (en)
DE (1) DE69214629D1 (en)
FI (1) FI910418A (en)
WO (1) WO1992012795A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9819398D0 (en) 1998-09-04 1998-10-28 Garfield Int Invest Ltd Pulveriser and method of pulverising
US6517015B2 (en) * 2000-03-21 2003-02-11 Frank F. Rowley, Jr. Two-stage comminuting and dehydrating system and method
US7429008B2 (en) 2001-02-26 2008-09-30 Power Technologies Investment Ltd. System and method for pulverizing and extracting moisture
US7040557B2 (en) 2001-02-26 2006-05-09 Power Technologies Investment Ltd. System and method for pulverizing and extracting moisture
US7059550B2 (en) 2001-02-26 2006-06-13 Power Technologies Investment Ltd. System and method for pulverizing and extracting moisture
GB0326233D0 (en) * 2003-11-11 2003-12-17 Power Technologies Invest Ltd System and method for pulverising and extracting mositure
US8057739B2 (en) 2003-11-12 2011-11-15 Pulverdryer Usa, Inc. Liquid purification system
DK2568821T3 (en) 2010-05-10 2021-04-06 Shockwave Tech Holding Llc Eggshell-membrane separation procedure
US9180463B1 (en) 2014-08-29 2015-11-10 Joseph R. Fitzgerald Method for fractionation of dry material using accelerators
CN104896496B (en) * 2015-05-22 2017-07-11 东方电气集团东方锅炉股份有限公司 Adjust the device and method of each tube cell powder amount deviation of unit pulverized-coal system
CN111318356A (en) * 2020-04-09 2020-06-23 文山市华信三七科技有限公司 Panax notoginseng medicinal material crushing system and use method thereof

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0328516A1 (en) * 1986-09-10 1989-08-23 Larox Oy Method and equipment for the production of particularly finely divided dry powders
FI84032C (en) * 1988-11-28 1991-10-10 Finnpulva Ab Oy Procedure and plant for the classification of extremely finely divided material

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9212795A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0569420B1 (en) 1996-10-16
JPH06507111A (en) 1994-08-11
DE69214629D1 (en) 1996-11-21
AU1183392A (en) 1992-08-27
WO1992012795A1 (en) 1992-08-06
ATE144165T1 (en) 1996-11-15
FI910418A (en) 1992-07-30
FI910418A0 (en) 1991-01-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4538764A (en) Method and apparatus for providing finely divided powder
EP0569420A1 (en) A method and an equipment for classifying a gas-solids flow coming from a counterjet pulverizer.
US5024754A (en) Separator
CA3007583A1 (en) Method for operating a multi-cyclone for the separation of fine and very fine grain as well as a multi-cyclone
DE102020006008B3 (en) Fluidized bed opposed jet mill for the production of finest particles from feed material of low bulk density and method therefor
FI84032C (en) Procedure and plant for the classification of extremely finely divided material
JP5497443B2 (en) Material particle size selection and / or drying equipment
JP2010510468A5 (en)
US4979684A (en) Dispersion, comminution or deagglomeration and classification of solids
US1621571A (en) Pulverizer
US4131239A (en) Fluid energy mill for large particulate materials
AU584489B2 (en) Method and apparatus for improving the grinding result of a pressure chamber grinder
EP0211117A2 (en) Method and apparatus for providing finely divided powder
US4606739A (en) Method of increasing the separating efficiency of a cyclone separator and a cyclone for carrying out the method
ES2003950A6 (en) Method and equipment for the production of particularly finely divided dry powders.
SU865430A1 (en) Apparatus for aerodynamic classification of loose materials
US3550868A (en) Fluid energy milling solid granular material
US6045069A (en) Rotary mill
JPH01502802A (en) Method and device for improving the crushing efficiency of pressure chamber crushers
JP3091281B2 (en) Collision type air crusher
JP3091289B2 (en) Collision type air crusher
JPH01317555A (en) Air-blast crushed material classifying apparatus
TW514562B (en) Method and device for controlling the degree of whiteness of a bulk material of comminuted paper fractions
JPS6268577A (en) Sorter for powdered body
JP2967304B2 (en) Classification crusher

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19930827

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19941216

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19961016

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19961016

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19961016

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19961016

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19961016

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19961016

Ref country code: DK

Effective date: 19961016

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19961016

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19961016

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19961016

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 144165

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19961115

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69214629

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19961121

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: MIKROPULVA LTD OY

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19970116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19970117

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19970129

NLT2 Nl: modifications (of names), taken from the european patent patent bulletin

Owner name: MIKROPULVA LTD OY

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
EN Fr: translation not filed
EN Fr: translation not filed

Free format text: CORRECTIONS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19970129

26N No opposition filed