EP0082643A2 - An electrode structure for electrolyser cells - Google Patents
An electrode structure for electrolyser cells Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0082643A2 EP0082643A2 EP82306578A EP82306578A EP0082643A2 EP 0082643 A2 EP0082643 A2 EP 0082643A2 EP 82306578 A EP82306578 A EP 82306578A EP 82306578 A EP82306578 A EP 82306578A EP 0082643 A2 EP0082643 A2 EP 0082643A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- electrode
- current
- collector
- electrode structure
- electrolyser
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
- C25B11/02—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by shape or form
- C25B11/03—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by shape or form perforated or foraminous
- C25B11/031—Porous electrodes
Definitions
- This invention relates to an electrode structure for electrolyser cells, more particularly of the unipolar type.
- the voltage of an electrolytic cell is the sum of three major components: the thermodynamic potential required for the overall cell reaction; the electrode overvoltages which result from kinetic limitations; and a resistive contribution to cell voltage.
- the major avenues open for reduction of energy requirements are electrode activation to reduce the overvoltages for the desired reactions, and design improvement to reduce resistive losses.
- Resistive losses are of two types: ionic, reflecting a resistance to the passage of current in the electrolyte; and electronic, reflecting the resistance to the passage of current in current-carrying metallic components of the electrolyser.
- ionic reflecting a resistance to the passage of current in the electrolyte
- electronic reflecting the resistance to the passage of current in current-carrying metallic components of the electrolyser.
- bipolar electrolyser designs the ionic resistance contribution is of overwhelming importance, since current paths through metallic elements are normally very short in length.
- electronic resistance losses can become substantial, as the electronic current is normally removed from each electrode to a current-removal structure.
- Typical pre-electrode forms are perforated plates, expanded-metal sheet, and woven metal cloth. Any suitably-porous structure can be envisaged, including grooved sheets on foam metal.
- Canadian Patent 1,002,476 issued December 28, 1976 discloses the use of a thin corrugated structure, internal to the pre-electrode, to provide a spring effect and improve the compression of anode/separator/cathode array while allowing for flexibility during cell assembly.
- Canadian Patent 1,086,256, issued September 23, 1980 features the use of a similar internal structure for the purpose of providing support to the pre-electrode when a diaphragm material is being deposited on the electrode surfaces under vacuum.
- the internal support structure of these electrodes is not connected to current removal structures and, more importantly, not designed to carry currents in the order of 1000 to 10,000 amperes or more, such as required in industrial unipolar electrolyser cells.
- the pre-electrode elements are often attached to central current-collector structures, for example rods or an equivalent fabricated structure in the unipolar design as disclosed in Canadian Patent 1,041,040, issued October 24, 1978, or a formed bipolar plate in bipolar electrolyser equipment, as disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,379,634, issued April 23, 1968.
- These electrode designs are, however, not adequate for electrolyser cells because they do not allow efficient removal of gases up the electrode.
- electrolyser cells would require a large number of current conductive rods in order for the pre-electrodes to carry currents in the order of 1000 to 10,000 amperes and more, and this would unduly restrict gas circulation between the porous pre-electrodes.
- the electrode structure in accordance with the present invention, comprises a central current-collector structure having high points on at least one side thereof and adapted to be placed vertically in the electrolytic cell, and a porous electrode secured to the high points of the current-collector structure on at least one side thereof so as to form an essentially-planar pre-electrode surface.
- the high points of the current-collector structure are located on the central current-collector so as to allow an unimpeded rise of the evolved gases to the top of the electrode.
- the central current-collector is preferably a plate having vertically oriented corrugations and the pre-electrode is secured to the crest of such corrugations.
- a gas evolving electrode 10 anode or cathode which comprises a central current collector 12 to each side of which is attached a pre-electrode 14. Ionic current flow from the adjacent electrode or electrodes of opposite polarity would flow to the electrode perpendicular to the pre-electrode structures, as shown by arrows A, and current is removed from the pre-electrodes by the current collector 12, as indicated by arrow B.
- the pre-electrodes are normally woven screen, expanded metal, or perforated plate but can be of any other perforated or porous geometry which allows for gas passage through the structure to the interior of the electrode.
- the central current-collector is a solid, formed metal piece which is illustrated as being corrugated, although any structure which could be formed in an economic manner, and which allows for unimpeded rise of the evolved gases to the top of the electrode, would be within the scope of the invention.
- the pre-electrode is attached to the central current collector at the high points of the structure so as to form an essentially-planar pre-electrode surface.
- the attachment may be by a weld, by screws or other mechanical fasteners, or by pressure which is exerted by the composite electrode/separator mass.
- the central current collector must be attached to the elements removing current from the electrode. This attachment may be continuous, through a welded, bolted, or riveted contact, or it may be at several points through connections to suitable conductors. In this latter case, additional current-conducting material may be included in the structure, as indicated by bar 16, to assist current equalization in the vertical direction, to further minimize resistive losses.
- the parameters of the electrode of this invention are established by an optimization which considers the resistive losses in the structure, the cost of the material of construction, and the physical constraints imposed by the detailed electrolyser design on maximum and minimum electrode thickness. It has been surprisingly found that a depth of the corrugations C (Figure 2) as low as 0.16 cm is satisfactory for electrode heights as great as 75 cm, with gas evolution at current densities to 1,000 mA/cm'; no increase in the ionic-resistance factor of the electrolyser was detectible with increasing current density, suggesting that the product gas is being effectively removed to the interior of the electrode structure. However, the depth of corrugations would likely not be less than 0.1 cm. The maximum depth of corrugation would be established by practical constraints on electrolyser size; it would be unlikely that a depth of corrugation greater than 3 cm would be desirable.
- the thickness D ( Figure 2) of the current collector material may be between .04 and 1.5 cm depending on the amount of current to be removed from the electrode.
- the length E ( Figure 2) of the corrugation waves, or the spacing of the high points of equivalent formed structures, will be the minimum consistent with economic forming of the current-collector material. This is necessary to minimize resistance losses in the pre-electrode structure.
- the length of corrugation might be between 0.7 and 15 cm for a current-collector material having a thickness of between 0.04 and 1.5 cm.
- Each of the major electrode parameters can be optimized in this way: thickness of the material from which the current collector is formed, width of the electrode, and, depending on the detailed method being used for current removal, dimensions of the current equalization or removal bar 16 and the electrode height.
- Figures 3 and 4 illustrate a typical optimization, for an electrode from which current is being removed uniformly at the side.
- the anode and cathode are assumed to be of similar design.
- the contribution to cell voltage due to electronic resistance of the current-collector structure diminishes as the thickness of the current-collector material is increased, or as the width of the electrode is reduced.
- Such voltage contributions can be calculated unambiguously by the method described by R.O. Loutfy and R.L. LeRoy in the Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 8 (1978) pages 549-555.
- the results presented assume that the material of construction is 0 mild steel at 70 C, and that the current density on the projected pre-electrode structure is 240 mA/cm 2.
- Figure 4 shows a typical optimization, in this case assuming a current price for mild steel and a power cost of $0.03/kWh.
- the optimum electrode thickness is seen to increase with increasing electrode width.
- the optimum values indicated by calculations such as these will have to be modified based on other considerations related to the overall dimensions of the electrolyser, the method of current removal, etc.
- the formed current-collector structures of this invention are in no way related to formed structures described in the prior art, which have been used for mechanical purposes such as compression of the electrode mass.
- the electrodes of this invention are designed to carry currents of 1,000 to 10,000 amperes and more, and precise specification of the current-removal provisions is essential to achieve an economic result.
- the massive quantities of gas evolved at such current loadings must be free to move unimpeded up the electrode to escape at the top. None of the proposals of the prior art accomplish these two objectives.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Electrodes For Compound Or Non-Metal Manufacture (AREA)
- Electrolytic Production Of Non-Metals, Compounds, Apparatuses Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to an electrode structure for electrolyser cells, more particularly of the unipolar type.
- It is well known that the voltage of an electrolytic cell is the sum of three major components: the thermodynamic potential required for the overall cell reaction; the electrode overvoltages which result from kinetic limitations; and a resistive contribution to cell voltage. For a particular desired process, the major avenues open for reduction of energy requirements are electrode activation to reduce the overvoltages for the desired reactions, and design improvement to reduce resistive losses.
- Resistive losses are of two types: ionic, reflecting a resistance to the passage of current in the electrolyte; and electronic, reflecting the resistance to the passage of current in current-carrying metallic components of the electrolyser. In bipolar electrolyser designs, the ionic resistance contribution is of overwhelming importance, since current paths through metallic elements are normally very short in length. In equipment of the unipolar design, however, electronic resistance losses can become substantial, as the electronic current is normally removed from each electrode to a current-removal structure.
- In designing to control ionic resistance of an electrolyser, two considerations are particularly important: minimization of the distance between the anodic and cathodic electrode elements; and minimization of the quantity of evolved gases which is retained between the electrodes, increasing the effective electrolyte resistivity. This latter requirement can be particularly important in cells having gas separating elements or diaphragms, where gas may accumulate in the separator or on its surface, thus increasing its resistance.
- A design approach directed at satisfying these two requirements for minimizing ionic resistance, which has come into widespread use, is to use a porous pre-electrode structure on which the gas evolves, and which allows passage of the product gases through the structure to a rear area where they can be removed. Typical pre-electrode forms are perforated plates, expanded-metal sheet, and woven metal cloth. Any suitably-porous structure can be envisaged, including grooved sheets on foam metal.
- A number of designs make use of porous pre-electrodes of this type which are fabricated from material which is sufficiently strong to be Used without support, and which can be attached directly to a current-removal structure at the periphery of the electrode. An example is Canadian Patent No. 822,662, issued September 9, 1969. However, these pre-electrodes do not have the current removal capacity which is required for industrial unipolar electrolyser cells.
- Several inventors have recognized the desirability of using a supporting structure as part of the electrode, in order to accomplish desirable mechanical objectives. For example, Canadian Patent 1,002,476 issued December 28, 1976, discloses the use of a thin corrugated structure, internal to the pre-electrode, to provide a spring effect and improve the compression of anode/separator/cathode array while allowing for flexibility during cell assembly. Canadian Patent 1,086,256, issued September 23, 1980, features the use of a similar internal structure for the purpose of providing support to the pre-electrode when a diaphragm material is being deposited on the electrode surfaces under vacuum. However, the internal support structure of these electrodes is not connected to current removal structures and, more importantly, not designed to carry currents in the order of 1000 to 10,000 amperes or more, such as required in industrial unipolar electrolyser cells.
- The pre-electrode elements are often attached to central current-collector structures, for example rods or an equivalent fabricated structure in the unipolar design as disclosed in Canadian Patent 1,041,040, issued October 24, 1978, or a formed bipolar plate in bipolar electrolyser equipment, as disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,379,634, issued April 23, 1968. These electrode designs are, however, not adequate for electrolyser cells because they do not allow efficient removal of gases up the electrode. U.S. Patent 4,008,143 discloses an electrode structure comprising two.spa=ed porous pre-electrodes and a plurality of current conductive rods separately attached to each porous pre-electrode and positioned in the space between the porous pre-ele=trodes in such a way as to leave space for electrolyte to flow upwardly between the porous pre-electrodes. However, electrolyser cells would require a large number of current conductive rods in order for the pre-electrodes to carry currents in the order of 1000 to 10,000 amperes and more, and this would unduly restrict gas circulation between the porous pre-electrodes.
- It is an aim of at least the preferred embodiments of the present invention to provide an electrode for electrolyser cells which has the following characteristics:
- a) Allows efficient removal of gases formed on the outer faces of the electrode surface to the interior of the electrode structure and up the electrode structure under the influence of their natural buoyancy in the electrolyte, thus reducing the ionic contribution to electrolyser voltage.
- b) Allows current to be removed from each electrode while minimizing electronic resistance losses.
- c) Is amenable to fabrication by low-cost techniques such as rolling, stamping and welding, thus providing an economic electrode.
- d) Allows use of low-cost materials of construction having regular surfaces which can be reliably and economically protected from corrosion in the electrolyte by the electroplating of nickel c= other corrosion-resistant coatings.
- e) Has a thin profile, to be ccnsistent with an electrolyser design for minimum size per unit of production capacity.
- The electrode structure, in accordance with the present invention, comprises a central current-collector structure having high points on at least one side thereof and adapted to be placed vertically in the electrolytic cell, and a porous electrode secured to the high points of the current-collector structure on at least one side thereof so as to form an essentially-planar pre-electrode surface. The high points of the current-collector structure are located on the central current-collector so as to allow an unimpeded rise of the evolved gases to the top of the electrode.
- The central current-collector is preferably a plate having vertically oriented corrugations and the pre-electrode is secured to the crest of such corrugations.
- The invention will now be disclosed, by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
- Figure 1 is a perspective view of an electrode in accordance with the invention;
- Figure 2 is a plan view of a portion of the electrode of figure 1; and
- Figures 3 and 4 illustrate typical optimization curves for an electrode from which current is being removed uniformly at the side.
- Referring to figures 1 and 2 of the drawings, there is shown a
gas evolving electrode 10, anode or cathode which comprises a centralcurrent collector 12 to each side of which is attached a pre-electrode 14. Ionic current flow from the adjacent electrode or electrodes of opposite polarity would flow to the electrode perpendicular to the pre-electrode structures, as shown by arrows A, and current is removed from the pre-electrodes by thecurrent collector 12, as indicated by arrow B. - The pre-electrodes are normally woven screen, expanded metal, or perforated plate but can be of any other perforated or porous geometry which allows for gas passage through the structure to the interior of the electrode.
- The central current-collector is a solid, formed metal piece which is illustrated as being corrugated, although any structure which could be formed in an economic manner, and which allows for unimpeded rise of the evolved gases to the top of the electrode, would be within the scope of the invention.
- The pre-electrode is attached to the central current collector at the high points of the structure so as to form an essentially-planar pre-electrode surface. The attachment may be by a weld, by screws or other mechanical fasteners, or by pressure which is exerted by the composite electrode/separator mass.
- The central current collector must be attached to the elements removing current from the electrode. This attachment may be continuous, through a welded, bolted, or riveted contact, or it may be at several points through connections to suitable conductors. In this latter case, additional current-conducting material may be included in the structure, as indicated by
bar 16, to assist current equalization in the vertical direction, to further minimize resistive losses. - In any particular electrolyser design, the parameters of the electrode of this invention are established by an optimization which considers the resistive losses in the structure, the cost of the material of construction, and the physical constraints imposed by the detailed electrolyser design on maximum and minimum electrode thickness. It has been surprisingly found that a depth of the corrugations C (Figure 2) as low as 0.16 cm is satisfactory for electrode heights as great as 75 cm, with gas evolution at current densities to 1,000 mA/cm'; no increase in the ionic-resistance factor of the electrolyser was detectible with increasing current density, suggesting that the product gas is being effectively removed to the interior of the electrode structure. However, the depth of corrugations would likely not be less than 0.1 cm. The maximum depth of corrugation would be established by practical constraints on electrolyser size; it would be unlikely that a depth of corrugation greater than 3 cm would be desirable.
- The thickness D (Figure 2) of the current collector material may be between .04 and 1.5 cm depending on the amount of current to be removed from the electrode. The length E (Figure 2) of the corrugation waves, or the spacing of the high points of equivalent formed structures, will be the minimum consistent with economic forming of the current-collector material. This is necessary to minimize resistance losses in the pre-electrode structure. The length of corrugation might be between 0.7 and 15 cm for a current-collector material having a thickness of between 0.04 and 1.5 cm.
- Other dimensions of the current-collector structure can be established through a detailed optimization to minimize total operating cost, including capital amortization. Each of the major electrode parameters can be optimized in this way: thickness of the material from which the current collector is formed, width of the electrode, and, depending on the detailed method being used for current removal, dimensions of the current equalization or
removal bar 16 and the electrode height. - Figures 3 and 4 illustrate a typical optimization, for an electrode from which current is being removed uniformly at the side. The anode and cathode are assumed to be of similar design. The contribution to cell voltage due to electronic resistance of the current-collector structure (Fig. 3) diminishes as the thickness of the current-collector material is increased, or as the width of the electrode is reduced. Such voltage contributions can be calculated unambiguously by the method described by R.O. Loutfy and R.L. LeRoy in the Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 8 (1978) pages 549-555. The results presented assume that the material of construction is 0 mild steel at 70 C, and that the current density on the projected pre-electrode structure is 240 mA/cm2.
- Figure 4 shows a typical optimization, in this case assuming a current price for mild steel and a power cost of $0.03/kWh. The optimum electrode thickness is seen to increase with increasing electrode width. Of course the optimum values indicated by calculations such as these will have to be modified based on other considerations related to the overall dimensions of the electrolyser, the method of current removal, etc.
- It must be noted that the formed current-collector structures of this invention are in no way related to formed structures described in the prior art, which have been used for mechanical purposes such as compression of the electrode mass. The electrodes of this invention are designed to carry currents of 1,000 to 10,000 amperes and more, and precise specification of the current-removal provisions is essential to achieve an economic result. Similarly, the massive quantities of gas evolved at such current loadings must be free to move unimpeded up the electrode to escape at the top. None of the proposals of the prior art accomplish these two objectives.
Claims (7)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA393106 | 1981-12-23 | ||
CA000393106A CA1171817A (en) | 1981-12-23 | 1981-12-23 | Electrode structure for electrolyser cells |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0082643A2 true EP0082643A2 (en) | 1983-06-29 |
EP0082643A3 EP0082643A3 (en) | 1983-09-14 |
EP0082643B1 EP0082643B1 (en) | 1987-11-04 |
Family
ID=4121691
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP82306578A Expired EP0082643B1 (en) | 1981-12-23 | 1982-12-09 | An electrode structure for electrolyser cells |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0082643B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPS608310B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR8207435A (en) |
CA (1) | CA1171817A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3277587D1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA829414B (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0357143A2 (en) * | 1988-09-02 | 1990-03-07 | Metallgesellschaft Ag | Gas diffusion electrode |
WO2021197787A1 (en) * | 2020-04-01 | 2021-10-07 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Device and method for carbon dioxide electrolysis or carbon monoxide electrolysis |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH08199726A (en) * | 1995-01-31 | 1996-08-06 | Daiwa Danchi Kk | Fitting structure of ceiling panel in wooden building |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CH331199A (en) * | 1955-04-01 | 1958-07-15 | Lonza Ag | Bipolar electrode for pressure electrolysers of the filter press type |
US3925886A (en) * | 1974-01-03 | 1975-12-16 | Hooker Chemicals Plastics Corp | Novel cathode fingers |
US3941675A (en) * | 1971-09-28 | 1976-03-02 | Friedrich Uhde Gmbh | Bipolar multiple electrolytic cell comprising a diaphragm and electrode for same |
DE2632073A1 (en) * | 1976-07-16 | 1978-01-19 | Schlemmer Fa Manfred | Accumulator electrode with support and porous substance - has conductive metal coating hot sprayed on selected surface regions of porous substance |
US4124482A (en) * | 1974-11-22 | 1978-11-07 | Knight Bill J | Method and apparatus for casting anodes |
GB2001347A (en) * | 1977-07-20 | 1979-01-31 | Imp Metal Ind Kynoch Ltd | Electrode and hanger bar therefor |
FR2433592A1 (en) * | 1978-07-27 | 1980-03-14 | Oronzio De Nora Impianti | ELECTROLYSIS CELL AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING HALOGENS |
US4210516A (en) * | 1978-05-19 | 1980-07-01 | Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp. | Electrode element for monopolar electrolysis cells |
-
1981
- 1981-12-23 CA CA000393106A patent/CA1171817A/en not_active Expired
-
1982
- 1982-12-09 DE DE8282306578T patent/DE3277587D1/en not_active Expired
- 1982-12-09 EP EP82306578A patent/EP0082643B1/en not_active Expired
- 1982-12-22 JP JP57225764A patent/JPS608310B2/en not_active Expired
- 1982-12-22 ZA ZA829414A patent/ZA829414B/en unknown
- 1982-12-22 BR BR8207435A patent/BR8207435A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CH331199A (en) * | 1955-04-01 | 1958-07-15 | Lonza Ag | Bipolar electrode for pressure electrolysers of the filter press type |
US3941675A (en) * | 1971-09-28 | 1976-03-02 | Friedrich Uhde Gmbh | Bipolar multiple electrolytic cell comprising a diaphragm and electrode for same |
US3925886A (en) * | 1974-01-03 | 1975-12-16 | Hooker Chemicals Plastics Corp | Novel cathode fingers |
US4124482A (en) * | 1974-11-22 | 1978-11-07 | Knight Bill J | Method and apparatus for casting anodes |
DE2632073A1 (en) * | 1976-07-16 | 1978-01-19 | Schlemmer Fa Manfred | Accumulator electrode with support and porous substance - has conductive metal coating hot sprayed on selected surface regions of porous substance |
GB2001347A (en) * | 1977-07-20 | 1979-01-31 | Imp Metal Ind Kynoch Ltd | Electrode and hanger bar therefor |
US4210516A (en) * | 1978-05-19 | 1980-07-01 | Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp. | Electrode element for monopolar electrolysis cells |
FR2433592A1 (en) * | 1978-07-27 | 1980-03-14 | Oronzio De Nora Impianti | ELECTROLYSIS CELL AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING HALOGENS |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0357143A2 (en) * | 1988-09-02 | 1990-03-07 | Metallgesellschaft Ag | Gas diffusion electrode |
EP0357143A3 (en) * | 1988-09-02 | 1990-05-16 | Metallgesellschaft Ag | Gas diffusion electrode |
WO2021197787A1 (en) * | 2020-04-01 | 2021-10-07 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Device and method for carbon dioxide electrolysis or carbon monoxide electrolysis |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ZA829414B (en) | 1983-10-26 |
JPS608310B2 (en) | 1985-03-01 |
EP0082643B1 (en) | 1987-11-04 |
DE3277587D1 (en) | 1987-12-10 |
EP0082643A3 (en) | 1983-09-14 |
CA1171817A (en) | 1984-07-31 |
BR8207435A (en) | 1983-10-18 |
JPS58151484A (en) | 1983-09-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA1275070A (en) | Monopolar and bipolar electrolyzer and electrodic structure thereof | |
CA1094017A (en) | Hollow bipolar electrolytic cell anode-cathode connecting device | |
US4482448A (en) | Electrode structure for electrolyser cells | |
US4707239A (en) | Electrode assembly for molten metal production from molten electrolytes | |
US4035280A (en) | Contact bar for electrolytic cells | |
US3994798A (en) | Module electrode assembly for electrolytic cells | |
AU612126B2 (en) | Permanent anode for high current density galvanizing processes | |
CA1243630A (en) | Monopolar or bipolar electrochemical terminal unit having a novel electric current transmission element | |
CA1053607A (en) | Electrolytic cell including cathode busbar structure cathode fingers, and anode base | |
CA2053278C (en) | Electrode structure for an electrolytic cell | |
EP0082643B1 (en) | An electrode structure for electrolyser cells | |
US4078986A (en) | Electrolytic diaphragm cells | |
CA1220761A (en) | Double l-shaped electrode for brine electrolysis cell | |
EP1114204B1 (en) | Busbar structure for diaphragm cell | |
US4132622A (en) | Bipolar electrode | |
CA1091187A (en) | Electrolytic cell | |
AU704628B2 (en) | Anode for the electrolytic winning of metals | |
CA1072491A (en) | Diaphragm cell cathode structure | |
CN117203373A (en) | Controlling electrode current density of electrolytic cells | |
US4085027A (en) | Hybrid bipolar electrode | |
EP0235355B1 (en) | Electrolytic cell and anode for brine electrolytes | |
US3969216A (en) | Flotation separation | |
CN85109734A (en) | Wholly fabricated electrochemical cell | |
US4056459A (en) | Anode assembly for an electrolytic cell | |
CA1062660A (en) | Electrode assembly for diaphragm cells |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB IT LI SE |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB IT LI SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19831203 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: THE ELECTROLYSER CORPORATION LTD. Owner name: NORANDA INC. |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: THE ELECTROLYSER CORPORATION LTD. Owner name: ELECTROLYSER INC. |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ELECTROLYSER INC. |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB IT LI SE |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: SOCIETA' ITALIANA BREVETTI S.P.A. |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3277587 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19871210 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Effective date: 19881209 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Effective date: 19891210 |
|
ITTA | It: last paid annual fee | ||
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed |
Ref document number: 82306578.4 Effective date: 19900104 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 19961231 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 19970204 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19971231 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19971231 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19971231 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: ELECTROLYSER INC. Effective date: 19971231 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20011029 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20011219 Year of fee payment: 20 |