CN116796920A - Coke evaluation method, device, equipment and readable storage medium - Google Patents

Coke evaluation method, device, equipment and readable storage medium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN116796920A
CN116796920A CN202310193476.0A CN202310193476A CN116796920A CN 116796920 A CN116796920 A CN 116796920A CN 202310193476 A CN202310193476 A CN 202310193476A CN 116796920 A CN116796920 A CN 116796920A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
coke
size range
sub
target
fraction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202310193476.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
代鑫
李朋
李东涛
刘胜涛
于东声
赵鹏
刘洋
郭德英
齐二辉
李玉清
闫立强
赵满祥
余晓波
刘磊
徐荣广
马超
魏永林
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Qian'an Iron And Steel Co Of Shougang Corp
Shougang Group Co Ltd
Beijing Shougang Co Ltd
Shougang Jingtang United Iron and Steel Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Qian'an Iron And Steel Co Of Shougang Corp
Shougang Group Co Ltd
Beijing Shougang Co Ltd
Shougang Jingtang United Iron and Steel Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Qian'an Iron And Steel Co Of Shougang Corp, Shougang Group Co Ltd, Beijing Shougang Co Ltd, Shougang Jingtang United Iron and Steel Co Ltd filed Critical Qian'an Iron And Steel Co Of Shougang Corp
Priority to CN202310193476.0A priority Critical patent/CN116796920A/en
Publication of CN116796920A publication Critical patent/CN116796920A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/02Agriculture; Fishing; Forestry; Mining

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Marine Sciences & Fisheries (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Coke Industry (AREA)

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention provides a coke evaluation method, a coke evaluation device, coke evaluation equipment and a readable storage medium. And selecting target coke from the cokes to be evaluated based on the preset sampling weight, and dividing the target coke into one or more coke particle fractions according to the preset coke size range. And then, determining a charging index of target coke based on the coke weight corresponding to each coke particle size, and finally, determining charging quality of coke to be evaluated according to the charging index, so that not only can the charging coke suitable for the blast furnace be screened, but also the coking and coal blending process can be optimized, and the coal blending structure can be adjusted in a targeted manner, thereby ensuring smooth and stable production of the blast furnace.

Description

Coke evaluation method, device, equipment and readable storage medium
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of metallurgy, in particular to a coke evaluation method, a coke evaluation device, coke evaluation equipment and a readable storage medium.
Background
With the gradual advancement of the large-scale blast furnace, the effect of metallurgical coke in the blast furnace ironmaking process is becoming more and more irreplaceable, and the block size and the particle size distribution of the coke are important factors for ensuring the air permeability of the blast furnace and the stability of a swirl zone of a blast furnace tuyere.
The conventional coke quality evaluation of blast furnace charging only considers the crushing strength, wear resistance, coke reactivity, strength after reaction and average coke granularity, and the coke granularity distribution can not be accurately evaluated, and long-term production practice finds that the granularity distribution uniformity of the coke has very important effect on ensuring the air permeability of the blast furnace.
The current method for controlling the uniformity of the granularity of the coke is complex in calculation of uniformity and is not intuitive and accurate enough, so that a certain difficulty still exists in accurately evaluating the granularity distribution of the coke. For efficient and stable production of blast furnaces, it is important how to accurately evaluate the particle size distribution of coke.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the invention solves the technical problems of lower accuracy and more complexity in evaluating the charging performance of blast furnace coke at present by providing a coke evaluating method, a coke evaluating device, coke evaluating equipment and a readable storage medium.
In a first aspect, the present invention provides a coke evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present invention, including: selecting target coke from the coke to be evaluated based on a preset sampling weight, and dividing the target coke into one or more coke particle fractions according to a preset coke size range; determining a charging index of the target coke based on the coke weight corresponding to each coke particle size; and determining the charging quality of the coke to be evaluated according to the charging index.
Optionally, the coke size range includes a plurality of sub-size ranges, each of the sub-size ranges corresponding to one of the coke fractions; the method for dividing target coke into one or more coke particle fractions according to a preset coke size range comprises the following steps: and dividing the target coke in the target sub-size range into coke particle sizes corresponding to the target sub-size range.
Optionally, the coke size range includes a first sub-size range, a second sub-size range, and a third sub-size range, and the coke size fraction includes a first coke size fraction, a second coke size fraction, and a third coke size fraction; wherein the upper limit of the first sub-size range is less than or equal to the lower limit of the second sub-size range, and the lower limit of the first sub-size range is greater than or equal to the upper limit of the third sub-size range; the first sub-size range corresponds to the first coke fraction, the second sub-size range corresponds to the second coke fraction, and the third sub-size range corresponds to the third coke fraction; the determining the charging index of the target coke based on the coke weight corresponding to each coke particle size comprises the following steps: and determining the charging index based on the coke weight corresponding to the first coke grade, the sum of the coke weight corresponding to the second coke grade and the coke weight corresponding to the third coke grade.
Optionally, the lower limit value of the first sub-size range is greater than or equal to 40mm, the upper limit value of the first sub-size range is less than or equal to 80mm, the lower limit value of the second sub-size range is greater than 80mm, and the upper limit value of the third sub-size range is less than 40mm.
Optionally, after determining the charging quality of the coke to be evaluated according to the charging performance index, the method further comprises: determining charging coke configuration information applied to the target furnace based on charging quality of each evaluated coke; and selecting the coke required by the target blast furnace according to the coke configuration information.
In a second aspect, the present invention provides a coke evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention, comprising:
the coke classification unit is used for selecting target coke from the coke to be evaluated based on a preset sampling weight and classifying the target coke into one or more coke particle fractions according to a preset coke size range;
and the calculation unit is used for determining the charging index of the target coke based on the coke weight corresponding to each coke particle size, and determining the charging quality of the coke to be evaluated according to the charging index.
Optionally, the coke size range includes a plurality of sub-size ranges, each of the sub-size ranges corresponding to one of the coke fractions; the computing unit is specifically configured to: and dividing the target coke in the target sub-size range into coke particle sizes corresponding to the target sub-size range.
Optionally, the coke size range includes a first sub-size range, a second sub-size range, and a third sub-size range, and the coke size fraction includes a first coke size fraction, a second coke size fraction, and a third coke size fraction; wherein the upper limit of the first sub-size range is less than or equal to the lower limit of the second sub-size range, and the lower limit of the first sub-size range is greater than or equal to the upper limit of the third sub-size range; the first sub-size range corresponds to the first coke fraction, the second sub-size range corresponds to the second coke fraction, and the third sub-size range corresponds to the third coke fraction; the computing unit is specifically further configured to: and determining the charging index based on the coke weight corresponding to the first coke grade, the sum of the coke weight corresponding to the second coke grade and the coke weight corresponding to the third coke grade.
In a third aspect, the present invention provides, by way of example, a coke evaluation apparatus comprising a memory, a processor, and code stored on the memory and executable on the processor, the processor implementing any of the embodiments of the first aspect when executing the code.
In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides, by way of example of the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements any of the embodiments of the first aspect.
One or more technical solutions provided in the embodiments of the present invention at least have the following technical effects or advantages:
the method comprises the steps of firstly selecting target coke from cokes to be evaluated based on preset sampling weight, and dividing the target coke into one or more coke particle fractions according to a preset coke size range. And then, determining a charging index of target coke based on the coke weight corresponding to each coke particle size, and finally, determining charging quality of coke to be evaluated according to the charging index, so that not only can the charging coke suitable for the blast furnace be screened, but also the coking and coal blending process can be optimized, and the coal blending structure can be adjusted in a targeted manner, thereby ensuring smooth and stable production of the blast furnace.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings required for the description of the embodiments will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are some embodiments of the present invention, and other drawings may be obtained according to these drawings without inventive effort for a person skilled in the art.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for evaluating coke in an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a coke evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a coke evaluating apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a computer-readable storage medium structure in an embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description
The embodiment of the invention solves the technical problems of lower accuracy and more complexity in evaluating the charging performance of blast furnace coke at present by providing a coke evaluating method, a coke evaluating device, coke evaluating equipment and a readable storage medium.
The technical scheme provided by the embodiment of the invention aims to solve the technical problems, and the overall thought is as follows:
the method comprises the steps of firstly selecting target coke from cokes to be evaluated based on preset sampling weight, and dividing the target coke into one or more coke particle fractions according to a preset coke size range. And then, determining a charging index of the target coke based on the coke weight corresponding to each coke size fraction, and finally, determining the charging quality of the coke to be evaluated according to the charging index.
In order to better understand the above technical solutions, the following detailed description will refer to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.
First, the term "and/or" appearing herein is merely an association relationship describing associated objects, meaning that there may be three relationships, e.g., a and/or B, may represent: a exists alone, A and B exist together, and B exists alone. In addition, the character "/" herein generally indicates that the front and rear associated objects are an "or" relationship.
It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and the claims of the present invention and the above figures are used for distinguishing between similar objects and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used may be interchanged where appropriate such that the embodiments of the invention described herein may be capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or otherwise described.
In a first aspect, the present invention provides a coke evaluation method, which can evaluate the charging performance of coke, so as to screen suitable charging coke for a target furnace.
Referring to fig. 1, the coke evaluation method may include the steps of:
step S101: and selecting target coke from the cokes to be evaluated based on the preset sampling weight, and dividing the target coke into one or more coke particle fractions according to the preset coke size range.
Specifically, the preset sampling weight can be set according to actual conditions, and the larger the preset sampling weight is, the more accurate the coke evaluation is obtained later. In an alternative embodiment, the preset sample weight may be set to 200kg.
In the specific implementation process, 200kg of coke with a weight can be randomly selected from the cokes to be evaluated as target cokes, and the target cokes are screened by a mechanical screening machine.
Specifically, the coke size range may include a plurality of sub-size ranges, each sub-size range corresponding to one coke grade.
For how to divide the target coke, specifically, the target coke in the target sub-size range may be divided into coke grades corresponding to the target sub-size range.
In particular implementations, the coke size range can include a first sub-size range, a second sub-size range, and a third sub-size range, and the coke size fraction can include a first coke size fraction, a second coke size fraction, and a third coke size fraction.
Wherein the upper limit of the first sub-size range is less than or equal to the lower limit of the second sub-size range, and the lower limit of the first sub-size range is greater than or equal to the upper limit of the third sub-size range; the first sub-size range corresponds to a first coke fraction, the second sub-size range corresponds to a second coke fraction, and the third sub-size range corresponds to a third coke fraction.
In an alternative embodiment, the lower limit of the first sub-size range is greater than or equal to 40mm, the upper limit of the first sub-size range is less than or equal to 80mm, the lower limit of the second sub-size range is greater than 80mm, and the upper limit of the third sub-size range is less than 40mm.
For example, the first sub-size range may be [40mm,80mm ]; the second sub-size range may be (80 mm,120 mm); the third sub-size range may be (25 mm,40 mm).
Step S102: determining a target coke charging index based on the coke weight corresponding to each coke size fraction; and determining the charging quality of the coke to be evaluated according to the charging performance index.
Specifically, after the target coke is classified into coke grades, the coke grade corresponds to the classified weight, and the charging and discharging index can be determined based on the sum of the coke weight corresponding to the first coke grade, the coke weight corresponding to the second coke grade, and the coke weight corresponding to the third coke grade.
In the specific implementation process, the charging index of the coke to be evaluated can be obtained through calculation according to the following formula:
CFI=m 1 /(m 2 +m 3 )
wherein CFI is the charging index, m 1 For the coke weight, m, corresponding to the first coke fraction 2 The coke weight corresponding to the second coke fraction; m is m 3 The weight of coke corresponding to the third coke grain grade.
The greater the charging index of the coke to be evaluated, the better the charging quality of the coke to be evaluated.
As an alternative implementation, after determining the charging quality of the coke to be evaluated according to the charging performance index, charging coke configuration information applied to the target furnace can also be determined based on the charging quality of each evaluated coke; and selecting the coke required by the target furnace according to the configuration information of the coke entering the furnace.
In the specific implementation process, the operation parameters of the target blast furnace can be analyzed, and the charging coke configuration information of the target blast furnace can be determined by combining the charging performance index of the evaluated coke, so that the coke suitable for the target blast furnace is screened.
The operating parameters of the target furnace can include furnace permeability index, blast furnace pressure difference and the like. The in-furnace coke configuration information may include coke type, weight ratio of each coke, and the like.
For better understanding of the technical solution provided by the embodiments of the present invention, the following examples are only used for simple explanation:
200kg representative samples of a coke were randomly selected from the coke transfer station as the first target coke and 200kg representative samples of B coke were randomly selected as the second target coke. And then, screening the first target coke and the second target coke by a mechanical screening machine, wherein the size ranges of the screened cokes are respectively more than 80mm, 60 mm-80 mm,40 mm-60 mm, 25 mm-40 mm and less than 25mm.
Wherein, if the coke with the size ranging from 40mm to 80mm corresponds to the first coke fraction, and the first coke fraction corresponds to the cokeThe weight of the carbon is m 1 The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the The coke with the size range larger than 80mm corresponds to a second coke size fraction, and the second coke size fraction corresponds to the weight of the coke being m 2 The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the The coke with the size ranging from 25mm to 40mm corresponds to the third coke particle grade, and the weight of the third coke particle grade corresponding to the coke is m 3
With the above step 102, the charging index of the first target coke and the charging index of the second target coke may be calculated, respectively. In an alternative embodiment, the charging index of the first target coke and the charging index of the second target coke can be seen as shown in table 1 below:
TABLE 1 charging index of two cokes
As can be seen from table 1, the charging index calculated by the coke evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the invention is higher, and the operation condition of the corresponding blast furnace is better.
Further, after comparing the charging indexes of the two cokes, the charging coke configuration information of the furnace type blast furnace is determined by analyzing the furnace permeability index and the middle pressure difference of the blast furnace, so that the cokes suitable for the blast furnace are screened.
In an alternative embodiment, the coke types may include coking coal, fat coal, and 1/3 coking coal in the in-furnace coke configuration information. It is necessary to control the moisture content of these cokes to not more than 10% and the bulk density to not more than 0.85kg/m 3 The coal loading temperature is 770 ℃, the center temperature of the coke cake is controlled to 1015-1030 ℃, and the coking time is 20h. After the coke is discharged, dry quenching is used, and then the coke is sieved according to the embodiment of step 101.
Next, the charging indexes of these cokes were calculated according to the formula of step 102, respectively, as shown in table 2 below:
TABLE 2 Coke, fat coal and 1/3 Coke charging index under one embodiment
Finally, the charging index of each single coal is compared, and the charging index of 1/3 coking coal is found to be higher than that of coking coal and fat coal, so that on the premise of ensuring stable coke granularity, 1/3 coking coal is adopted to replace part of coking coal, the charging index of coke obtained by blending coal for coking can be improved, and the target blast furnace can work more efficiently and stably.
For example, the configuration information of the charged coke of the target blast furnace can be seen as shown in the following table 3:
TABLE 3 schematic representation of coke placement in one embodiment
From the data in table 3 above, it can be seen that: by adopting the coke configuration provided in the embodiment 1, the charging index of the coke entering the target blast furnace can be improved, namely the coke particle size distribution is more uniform, and the pressure difference and the air permeability index in the target furnace can be improved more effectively.
In a second aspect, according to the same inventive concept, according to an embodiment of the present invention, a coke evaluation apparatus is provided, which can evaluate the charging performance of coke, so as to screen suitable charging coke for a target furnace.
Referring to fig. 2, the coke evaluation apparatus may include:
a coke classification unit 201 for selecting a target coke from among the cokes to be evaluated based on a preset sampling weight, and classifying the target coke into one or more coke fractions according to a preset coke size range;
the calculating unit 202 is configured to determine a charging index of the target coke based on the coke weight corresponding to each coke size, and determine a charging quality of the coke to be evaluated according to the charging index.
As an alternative embodiment, the coke size range includes a plurality of sub-size ranges, each sub-size range corresponding to one coke grade; the computing unit 202 is specifically configured to: and dividing the target coke in the target sub-size range into coke grain grades corresponding to the target sub-size range.
As an alternative embodiment, the coke size range includes a first sub-size range, a second sub-size range, and a third sub-size range, and the coke fraction includes a first coke fraction, a second coke fraction, and a third coke fraction.
Wherein the upper limit of the first sub-size range is less than or equal to the lower limit of the second sub-size range, and the lower limit of the first sub-size range is greater than or equal to the upper limit of the third sub-size range; the first sub-size range corresponds to a first coke fraction, the second sub-size range corresponds to a second coke fraction, and the third sub-size range corresponds to a third coke fraction.
The lower limit of the first sub-size range is greater than or equal to 40mm, the upper limit of the first sub-size range is less than or equal to 80mm, the lower limit of the second sub-size range is greater than 80mm, and the upper limit of the third sub-size range is less than 40mm.
The computing unit 202 is specifically further configured to: the in-out furnace performance index is determined based on the coke weight corresponding to the first coke grade and the sum of the coke weight corresponding to the second coke grade and the coke weight corresponding to the third coke grade.
As an alternative embodiment, the coke evaluation apparatus may further include:
a charging coke determining unit 203 for determining charging coke configuration information applied to the target furnace based on the charging quality of each of the evaluated cokes after determining the charging quality of the coke to be evaluated according to the charging performance index; and selecting the coke required by the target furnace according to the configuration information of the coke entering the furnace.
Since the coke evaluation apparatus described in this embodiment is an electronic device for implementing the coke evaluation method in this embodiment, based on the coke evaluation method described in this embodiment, those skilled in the art will be able to understand the specific implementation of the electronic device and various modifications thereof, so how the method in this embodiment is implemented in this electronic device will not be described in detail herein. Any electronic device used by those skilled in the art to implement the method for evaluating coke in the embodiment of the present invention is within the scope of the present invention.
In a third aspect, based on the same inventive concept, an embodiment of the present invention provides a coke evaluation apparatus, as shown in fig. 3, including: memory 301, processor 302, and code stored on the memory and executable on processor 302, when executing the code, implements any of the embodiments of the coke evaluation methods described above.
Where in FIG. 3 a bus architecture (represented by bus 300), bus 300 may comprise any number of interconnected buses and bridges, with bus 300 linking together various circuits, including one or more processors, represented by processor 302, and memory, represented by memory 301. Bus 300 may also link together various other circuits such as peripheral devices, voltage regulators, power management circuits, etc., as are well known in the art and, therefore, will not be described further herein. The bus interface 303 provides an interface between the bus 300 and the receiver 303 and the transmitter 304. The receiver 303 and the transmitter 304 may be the same element, i.e. a transceiver, providing a unit for communicating with various other apparatus over a transmission medium. The processor 302 is responsible for managing the bus 300 and general processing, while the memory 301 may be used to store data used by the processor 302 in performing operations.
In a fourth aspect, as shown in fig. 4, based on the same inventive concept, the present invention provides, by way of example, a computer-readable storage medium 500 having stored thereon a computer program 501, which when executed by a processor, implements any of the embodiments of the foregoing coke evaluation methods.
The technical scheme provided by the embodiment of the invention at least has the following technical effects or advantages:
and selecting target coke from the cokes to be evaluated based on the preset sampling weight, and dividing the target coke into one or more coke particle fractions according to the preset coke size range. And then, determining a charging index of target coke based on the coke weight corresponding to each coke particle size, and finally, determining charging quality of coke to be evaluated according to the charging index, so that not only can the charging coke suitable for the blast furnace be screened, but also the coking and coal blending process can be optimized, and the coal blending structure can be adjusted in a targeted manner, thereby ensuring smooth and stable production of the blast furnace.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that embodiments of the invention may be provided as a method, system, or computer product. Accordingly, the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the invention may take the form of a computer product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable code embodied therein.
The present invention is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of flows and/or blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer instructions. These computer instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described, additional variations and modifications in those embodiments may occur to those skilled in the art once they learn of the basic inventive concepts. It is therefore intended that the following claims be interpreted as including the preferred embodiments and all such alterations and modifications as fall within the scope of the invention.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention also include such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.

Claims (10)

1. A coke evaluation method, comprising:
selecting target coke from the coke to be evaluated based on a preset sampling weight, and dividing the target coke into one or more coke particle fractions according to a preset coke size range;
determining a charging index of the target coke based on the coke weight corresponding to each coke particle size;
and determining the charging quality of the coke to be evaluated according to the charging index.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said coke size range comprises a plurality of sub-size ranges, each of said sub-size ranges corresponding to one of said coke fractions; the method for dividing target coke into one or more coke particle fractions according to a preset coke size range comprises the following steps:
and dividing the target coke in the target sub-size range into coke particle sizes corresponding to the target sub-size range.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the coke size range comprises a first sub-size range, a second sub-size range, and a third sub-size range, the coke fraction comprising a first coke fraction, a second coke fraction, and a third coke fraction; wherein the upper limit of the first sub-size range is less than or equal to the lower limit of the second sub-size range, and the lower limit of the first sub-size range is greater than or equal to the upper limit of the third sub-size range; the first sub-size range corresponds to the first coke fraction, the second sub-size range corresponds to the second coke fraction, and the third sub-size range corresponds to the third coke fraction;
the determining the charging index of the target coke based on the coke weight corresponding to each coke particle size comprises the following steps: and determining the charging index based on the coke weight corresponding to the first coke grade, the sum of the coke weight corresponding to the second coke grade and the coke weight corresponding to the third coke grade.
4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the lower limit of the first sub-size range is greater than or equal to 40mm, the upper limit of the first sub-size range is less than or equal to 80mm, the lower limit of the second sub-size range is greater than 80mm, and the upper limit of the third sub-size range is less than 40mm.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising, after said determining a charge quality of said coke to be evaluated based on said charge index:
determining charging coke configuration information applied to the target furnace based on charging quality of each evaluated coke;
and selecting the coke required by the target blast furnace according to the coke configuration information.
6. A coke evaluation apparatus, comprising:
the coke classification unit is used for selecting target coke from the coke to be evaluated based on a preset sampling weight and classifying the target coke into one or more coke particle fractions according to a preset coke size range;
and the calculation unit is used for determining the charging index of the target coke based on the coke weight corresponding to each coke particle size, and determining the charging quality of the coke to be evaluated according to the charging index.
7. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein said coke size range comprises a plurality of sub-size ranges, each of said sub-size ranges corresponding to one of said coke fractions;
the computing unit is specifically configured to: and dividing the target coke in the target sub-size range into coke particle sizes corresponding to the target sub-size range.
8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the coke size range comprises a first sub-size range, a second sub-size range, and a third sub-size range, the coke fraction comprising a first coke fraction, a second coke fraction, and a third coke fraction; wherein the upper limit of the first sub-size range is less than or equal to the lower limit of the second sub-size range, and the lower limit of the first sub-size range is greater than or equal to the upper limit of the third sub-size range; the first sub-size range corresponds to the first coke fraction, the second sub-size range corresponds to the second coke fraction, and the third sub-size range corresponds to the third coke fraction;
the computing unit is specifically further configured to: and determining the charging index based on the coke weight corresponding to the first coke grade, the sum of the coke weight corresponding to the second coke grade and the coke weight corresponding to the third coke grade.
9. A coke evaluation apparatus comprising a memory, a processor and code stored on the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements the method of any of claims 1-5 when executing the code.
10. A computer readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, characterized in that the computer program, when being executed by a processor, implements the method of any of claims 1-5.
CN202310193476.0A 2023-02-23 2023-02-23 Coke evaluation method, device, equipment and readable storage medium Pending CN116796920A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310193476.0A CN116796920A (en) 2023-02-23 2023-02-23 Coke evaluation method, device, equipment and readable storage medium

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310193476.0A CN116796920A (en) 2023-02-23 2023-02-23 Coke evaluation method, device, equipment and readable storage medium

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN116796920A true CN116796920A (en) 2023-09-22

Family

ID=88040949

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202310193476.0A Pending CN116796920A (en) 2023-02-23 2023-02-23 Coke evaluation method, device, equipment and readable storage medium

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN116796920A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117470721A (en) * 2023-12-28 2024-01-30 山西建龙实业有限公司 Method for measuring and evaluating high-temperature degradation strength and granularity degradation behavior of metallurgical coke

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117470721A (en) * 2023-12-28 2024-01-30 山西建龙实业有限公司 Method for measuring and evaluating high-temperature degradation strength and granularity degradation behavior of metallurgical coke
CN117470721B (en) * 2023-12-28 2024-03-26 山西建龙实业有限公司 Method for measuring and evaluating high-temperature degradation strength and granularity degradation behavior of metallurgical coke

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN116796920A (en) Coke evaluation method, device, equipment and readable storage medium
Buen Abad Najar et al. Coverage-dependent bias creates the appearance of binary splicing in single cells
CN113626976A (en) NSGA-II algorithm-based sintering material multi-objective optimization method, device and equipment
CN108427643B (en) Binary program fuzzy test method based on multi-population genetic algorithm
CN113160899A (en) NSGA-II algorithm-based sintering material multi-objective optimization method
CN104296851B (en) Charging of shaft furnace control method and control device
CN110491454A (en) A kind of blast furnace process cost management method, system and computer can storage mediums
Kaseniit et al. Strategies to minimize false positives and interpret novel microdeletions based on maternal copy-number variants in 87,000 noninvasive prenatal screens
CN114692434B (en) Grading method and device for preheating scrap steel, electronic equipment and storage medium
JP6907663B2 (en) Extrusion load predictor for coke oven, extrusion load prediction method, computer program and computer readable storage medium
JP6874553B2 (en) Carbon adhesion state analyzer, carbon adhesion state analysis method, computer program and computer-readable recording medium
Haverland et al. Determination of importance of ore raw materials evaluation criteria
CN104774986B (en) A kind of coke deteriorates the evaluation method of behavior in lumpy zone in blast furnace
CN109913598B (en) Processing method, processing device and processing terminal for supplementing clean coke for blast furnace
CN114881492B (en) Method and device for automatically extracting blast furnace performance operating standard and electronic equipment
CN112347153A (en) Blast furnace wall internal type judging method, terminal equipment and storage medium
CN113774174B (en) Blast furnace coke matching control method and device
CN112884294A (en) Fine powder resource evaluation method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN110795251A (en) Method and equipment for determining terminal operation parameters
CN116087460A (en) Coke evaluation method, device, equipment and readable storage medium
CN113151620A (en) Smelting method and device for titanium-containing furnace burden
CN111625560A (en) Information processing method, device, medium and electronic equipment
CN113418749B (en) Method and device for sampling metal concentrate powder, computer equipment and storage medium
JP2005107940A (en) Hot metal temperature prediction apparatus, hot metal temperature prediction method, computer program, and computer readable recording medium
CN117093845A (en) Model training method, data processing method, device, equipment, medium and product

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination