CN114742522B - Method, system, device and storage medium for automatically comparing survey design drawings - Google Patents
Method, system, device and storage medium for automatically comparing survey design drawings Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114742522B CN114742522B CN202210332405.XA CN202210332405A CN114742522B CN 114742522 B CN114742522 B CN 114742522B CN 202210332405 A CN202210332405 A CN 202210332405A CN 114742522 B CN114742522 B CN 114742522B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- processing
- data
- review
- opinions
- design drawing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/10—Text processing
- G06F40/103—Formatting, i.e. changing of presentation of documents
- G06F40/117—Tagging; Marking up; Designating a block; Setting of attributes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/10—Text processing
- G06F40/194—Calculation of difference between files
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The application relates to a method, a system, a device and a storage medium for automatically comparing a reconnaissance design drawing, which relate to the technical field of design drawing verification, wherein the method comprises the steps of receiving review data information, wherein the review data information comprises design drawing data; acquiring historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data according to the design drawing data; if historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data is obtained, calling difference characteristic data; and pushing the difference characteristic data to an intelligent terminal of the user. The method and the device have the effect that the examiner can determine the drawing change point more conveniently.
Description
Technical Field
The present application relates to the field of design drawing verification technologies, and in particular, to a method, a system, an apparatus, and a storage medium for automatically comparing a survey design drawing.
Background
The construction drawing design file examination refers to examination of the content of construction drawing related to public interests, public safety and mandatory engineering construction standards according to relevant laws and regulations by a construction drawing examination organization identified by a construction administration department.
The related technology can refer to Chinese patent with publication number CN103530762A, which discloses an electronic examination system and examination method of construction drawing, the system comprises a management terminal server, a peripheral terminal server and a wireless communication transmitter/receiver, wherein the management terminal server is internally provided with an original data database, an examination reference database, an examiner expert talent database, and six subsystems such as a file system, a statistical report, online communication, internal management, system setting, system management and the like.
With respect to the related art among the above, the inventors consider that the following drawbacks exist: when the examiner examines the unqualified design drawing again, the examiner needs to manually compare the drawings before and after the change to find the change content of the design drawing, and then repeatedly examine the change point of the drawing, so that the defect that the process of manually determining the change point of the drawing is inconvenient exists.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to enable examiners to determine drawing change points more conveniently, the application provides an automatic reconnaissance design drawing comparison method, system, device and storage medium.
In a first aspect, the present application provides an automatic comparison method for a survey design drawing, which adopts the following technical scheme:
an automatic comparison method for a survey design drawing comprises the following steps:
receiving review data information, wherein the review data information comprises design drawing data;
acquiring historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data according to the design drawing data;
if historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data are obtained, calling differential characteristic data;
and pushing the difference characteristic data to an intelligent terminal of a user.
By adopting the technical scheme, the design unit resubmits the revised engineering design drawing to the comparison system, the comparison system carries out data comparison on the design drawing submitted this time and the design drawing submitted last time, the comparison system learns the change point of the design unit to the drawing through the difference of two design drawings before and after determining, the comparison system pushes the determined change point of the drawing to the intelligent terminal of the user, the user can more conveniently determine the change point of the drawing when reviewing again, and then the change point of the drawing can be directly reviewed.
Optionally, before the step of pushing the difference feature data to the intelligent terminal of the user, the method further includes:
obtaining a review treatment opinion corresponding to the historical drawing data according to the historical drawing data, wherein the review treatment opinion comprises processing point data and a review opinion explanation corresponding to the processing point data;
acquiring missing processing data according to the processing point data and the difference characteristic data;
if the missed processing data is obtained, calling the missed examination opinions corresponding to the missed processing data according to the examination processing opinions;
and pushing the missed processing data and the called missed examination opinions to an intelligent terminal of a user.
By adopting the technical scheme, the comparison system compares modification points of the newly-modified design drawing, judges whether the modified design drawing correspondingly modifies all problems pointed out by the examiner, determines the omitted processing point data and pushes the omitted processing data and the corresponding omitted examination opinions to the intelligent terminal of the user.
Optionally, after the step of obtaining the review processing opinions corresponding to the historical drawing data, the method further includes:
generating a historical review opinion template according to the processing point data and the processing opinion description;
and generating and executing a quick review instruction according to the historical review opinion template, wherein the quick review instruction is used for quickly calling the historical review opinion template.
By adopting the technical scheme, when the user examines the design drawing, the comparison system automatically records the historical examination opinions input by the user, and when the user subsequently examines similar problems, the user can directly call the previous examination opinions, so that the quick calling process of the examination opinions is realized.
Optionally, after the step of receiving review data information, the method further includes:
calling a recommended processing point according to the design drawing data and the processing point data;
determining a recommended processing opinion corresponding to the recommended processing point according to the recommended processing point;
and pushing the recommendation processing point and the determined recommendation processing opinion to an intelligent terminal of a user.
By adopting the technical scheme, after the comparison system receives the design drawing, the comparison system automatically analyzes and determines the recommended processing point and the recommended processing opinion corresponding to the point by comparing the current design drawing data with the processing point data input by the conventional examiner, and automatically generates the processing advice for the user, thereby reducing the examination pressure of the user.
Optionally, after the step of pushing the recommendation processing point and the determined recommendation processing opinion to the intelligent terminal of the user, the method further includes:
receiving processing opinions corresponding to the recommended processing points according to the recommended processing points, wherein the processing opinions comprise complete adoption processing, complete rejection processing and partial rejection processing;
and if the processing opinion is partial rejection processing, receiving examiner opinion information corresponding to the recommended processing point according to the recommended processing point.
By adopting the technical scheme, the user checks the recommended processing point pushed by the comparison system, and decides whether to adopt the processing suggestion of the comparison system after analysis, when the processing suggestion input by the user is partially rejected, the problem exists in the current processing point, but the specific processing suggestion comes and goes, and the comparison system receives the processing suggestion input by the user, so that the examination process of the current processing point is completed.
Optionally, after the step of obtaining the processing opinion corresponding to the recommended processing point, the method further includes:
and if the processing opinion is complete rejection processing, generating a processing point deleting instruction and executing, wherein the processing point deleting instruction is used for deleting the recommended processing point.
By adopting the technical scheme, when the processing opinion input by the user is completely rejected processing, which indicates that the user thinks that the current processing point has no problem, the comparison system generates a processing point deleting instruction and deletes the current processing point.
Optionally, after the step of receiving review data information, the method further includes:
acquiring union and inspection information corresponding to the design drawing data according to the design drawing data, wherein the union and inspection information comprises fire control inspection opinions, people defense inspection opinions and device defense inspection opinions;
and if the fire control examination opinions, the civil air defense examination opinions and the civil air defense examination opinions corresponding to the design drawing data are obtained, generating examination processing opinions according to the union examination information.
By adopting the technical scheme, after the comparison system receives design drawing data, examiners in the system need to write and input the fire-fighting examination opinions, the civil air defense examination opinions and the civil air defense examination opinions respectively, and after the three examinations are finished, the comparison system generates examination processing opinions according to the union and examination information input by the examiners, so that the comprehensive examination process of the design drawing is realized.
In a second aspect, the present application provides an automatic contrast system for a survey design drawing, which adopts the following technical solutions:
an automatic reconnaissance plan comparison system comprising:
the review data information receiving module is used for receiving review data information, and the review data information comprises design drawing data;
the historical drawing data acquisition module is used for acquiring historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data according to the design drawing data;
the difference characteristic data calling module is used for calling difference characteristic data if historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data is obtained;
and the difference characteristic data pushing module is used for pushing the difference characteristic data to an intelligent terminal of a user.
In a third aspect, the present application provides an intelligent terminal, which adopts the following technical solution:
an intelligent terminal comprising a memory and a processor, the memory having stored thereon a computer program capable of being loaded by the processor and executing any of the above described methods for automatically comparing survey design drawings.
In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, which adopts the following technical solutions:
a computer readable storage medium storing a computer program capable of being loaded by a processor and executing any of the above methods for automatically comparing a survey design drawing.
In summary, the present application includes at least one of the following beneficial technical effects:
the design unit resubmits the engineering design drawing after modifying to the comparison system, the comparison system carries out data comparison with the design drawing that once submitted before this design drawing that the comparison system will submit, the comparison system learns the change point of design unit to the drawing through the difference of two design drawings before and after confirming, the comparison system with the drawing change point propelling movement of confirming to user's intelligent terminal, make the user when going on reviewing once more, can be more convenient definite drawing change point, and then can directly review to the change point of drawing.
And the comparison system compares modification points of the newly changed design drawing, judges whether the changed design drawing correspondingly changes all the problems pointed out by the examiner, determines the missed processing point data and pushes the missed processing data and the corresponding missed examination opinions to the intelligent terminal of the user.
And the user checks the recommended processing point pushed by the comparison system, and decides whether to adopt the processing suggestion of the comparison system after analysis, when the processing suggestion input by the user is partially rejected, the problem exists in the current processing point, but the specific processing suggestion comes and goes, and the comparison system receives the processing suggestion input by the user, thereby finishing the examination process of the current processing point.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic flowchart of an automatic comparison method for a survey design drawing according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Fig. 2 is a schematic flow chart of pushing missing processing data and the called missing review comments to the intelligent terminal of the user in the embodiment of the application.
Fig. 3 is a schematic flowchart of acquiring the association and review information corresponding to the design drawing data in the embodiment of the present application.
Fig. 4 is a schematic flow chart illustrating the generation and execution of a shortcut review instruction in the embodiment of the present application.
Fig. 5 is a schematic flow chart of determining recommendation processing opinions corresponding to recommendation processing points in the embodiment of the present application.
Fig. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a process of receiving a processing opinion corresponding to a recommended processing point in an embodiment of the present application.
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an automatic comparison system for a survey design drawing according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Description of reference numerals: 1. a review data information receiving module; 2. a historical drawing data acquisition module; 3. a difference characteristic data calling module; 4. and a difference characteristic data pushing module.
Detailed Description
The present application is described in further detail below with reference to figures 1-7.
The embodiment of the application discloses a method, a system and a device for automatically comparing a survey design drawing and a storage medium.
Referring to fig. 1, an automatic comparison method of a survey plan includes:
s101, receiving review data information.
Specifically, the design unit uploads the reconnaissance design drawing to the comparison system, and the comparison system receives review data information sent by the design unit, wherein the review data information comprises design drawing data. And the comparison system subsequently analyzes the image data of the reconnaissance design drawing according to the design drawing data.
S102, historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data is obtained.
Specifically, the comparison system acquires historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data according to the design drawing data. And after receiving review data information sent by a design unit, the comparison system acquires historical drawing data corresponding to the current design drawing data.
The historical drawing data is corresponding to the current design drawing data in the past submission. And if the design paper needs to be returned to the design unit for changing, the comparison system stores the historical drawing data of the design paper, wherein the historical drawing data obtained here specifically refers to the drawing data corresponding to the current design paper data submitted last time.
And S103, if historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data is acquired, calling the difference characteristic data.
Specifically, if the comparison system obtains historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data, it indicates that the current design drawing is not submitted to the comparison system for the first time. At the moment, the comparison system compares the design paper submitted this time with the design paper submitted last time, and the comparison system searches the difference between the two design papers before and after comparison to call the difference characteristic data.
And S104, pushing the difference characteristic data to an intelligent terminal of the user.
Specifically, the design unit resubmits the modified engineering design drawing into the comparison system, and the comparison system compares the design drawing submitted this time with the design drawing submitted last time, so as to determine the difference between the two previous and next design drawings, and obtain the change point of the design unit on the drawing.
The comparison system pushes the determined drawing change point to the intelligent terminal of the user, so that the user can more conveniently determine the drawing change point when reviewing again, and further can directly review the drawing change point again.
Referring to fig. 2, before S104, missing processing data is generated according to the review processing opinion, which specifically includes the following steps:
s201, obtaining the review treatment opinions corresponding to the historical drawing data.
Specifically, the comparison system acquires review processing opinions corresponding to the historical drawing data according to the historical drawing data, wherein the review processing opinions comprise processing point data and review opinion descriptions corresponding to the processing point data.
After the comparison system acquires the historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data, the review processing opinions corresponding to the historical drawing data are continuously acquired, wherein the review processing opinions are used for reflecting the review opinions which are provided by the reviewer for the current design drawing before.
S202, missing processing data is obtained.
Specifically, the comparison system obtains the missing processing data according to the processing point data and the difference characteristic data. The comparison system compares the processing point data with the processing points contained in the difference characteristic data one by one, and then searches and determines the processing point data without corresponding difference characteristic data, namely the processing omission data.
And S203, if the missing processing data is acquired, calling the missing review opinions corresponding to the missing processing data.
Specifically, if the comparison system obtains the omission processing data, it indicates that the processing point changed in the design drawing at this time does not correspond to the change point that needs to be changed and proposed by the examiner, and the change omission phenomenon may exist in the current design drawing.
At this time, the comparison system calls the missed review opinions corresponding to the missed review data based on the review processing opinions. And when the user carries out the review operation on the design drawing again, the user can analyze the change omission reason of the current omission point by referring to the omission review opinions.
And S204, pushing the missing processing data and the called missing review opinions to an intelligent terminal of the user.
Specifically, the comparison system compares modification points of the newly modified design drawing, and determines whether the modified design drawing is modified correspondingly for all problem points indicated by the examiner. The comparison system pushes the analyzed omission processing data and the corresponding omission review opinions to the intelligent terminal of the user, so that the user can conveniently carry out subsequent review work.
Referring to fig. 3, after S101, a review processing opinion is generated according to the union review information, which specifically includes the following steps:
and S301, acquiring union and review information corresponding to the design drawing data.
Specifically, the comparison system acquires union and inspection information corresponding to the design drawing data according to the design drawing data, wherein the union and inspection information comprises fire control inspection opinions, people defense inspection opinions and people defense inspection opinions.
And S302, if the fire control examination opinions, the people 'S air defense examination opinions and the device' S air defense examination opinions corresponding to the design drawing data are obtained, examination processing opinions are generated.
Specifically, the examiner examines a plurality of aspects of the design drawing respectively, and if the comparison system obtains fire control examination opinions, people defense examination opinions and device defense examination opinions corresponding to the design drawing data, it is indicated that examination in each field is completed. And the comparison system collects the examination opinions of all the fields according to the union and examination information to generate examination processing opinions.
Referring to fig. 4, after S201, a historical review comment template is generated according to the processing point data, which specifically includes the following steps:
s401, generating a historical review opinion template.
Specifically, when the examiner examines the design drawing, the examiner provides a change suggestion for the design unit by marking a processing point and a processing suggestion on the design drawing. In the process, the comparison system generates a historical review comment template according to the processing point data and the processing comment specification input by the examiner.
And S402, generating and executing a shortcut examination instruction.
Specifically, the comparison system generates and executes a quick review instruction according to the historical review opinion template, wherein the quick review instruction is used for quickly calling the historical review opinion template. When a user reviews the design drawing, the comparison system automatically records the historical review opinions input by the user, and when the user reviews the similar problems later, the user can generate a quick review instruction through the comparison system, directly call the previously input review opinions, and further realize the quick call input process of the review opinions.
Referring to fig. 5, after S101, the method further generates a recommendation processing opinion according to the recommendation processing point, and specifically includes the following steps:
and S501, calling a recommended processing point.
Specifically, the comparison system calls the recommended processing point according to the design drawing data and the processing point data. After the comparison system receives the design drawing, the recommended processing point is automatically analyzed and determined by comparing the current design drawing data with the historical processing point data input by the examiner in the past.
The recommended processing point is a processing point which is relatively similar to the current design drawing data and the historical processing point data, and the comparison system automatically determines the recommended processing point which may have a design problem according to the past inspection experience.
And S502, determining recommendation processing opinions corresponding to the recommendation processing points.
Specifically, the comparison system determines a recommended processing opinion corresponding to the recommended processing point according to the recommended processing point. After the comparison system determines the recommended processing point, the conventional review history is queried to determine the recommended processing opinions corresponding to the recommended processing point. Thereby providing more detailed review suggestions for the reviewers.
S503, pushing the recommendation processing point and the determined recommendation processing opinion to an intelligent terminal of the user.
Specifically, after receiving the design drawing, the comparison system automatically analyzes and calls similar image data by comparing the current design drawing data with the processing point data input by the past examiner, and further determines the recommended processing point and the recommended processing opinion corresponding to the point.
Before the review work is carried out, the comparison system automatically pushes the recommendation processing points and the determined recommendation processing suggestions to an intelligent terminal of a user, review processing suggestions are provided for the user, the user can review the design drawing in a targeted mode, and then review pressure of the user is reduced.
Referring to fig. 6, after S503, a processing point deleting instruction is further generated according to the processing opinion, which specifically includes the following steps:
s601, receiving a processing opinion corresponding to the recommended processing point.
Specifically, the comparison system receives processing opinions corresponding to the recommended processing points respectively according to the determined recommended processing points, wherein the processing opinions comprise complete adoption processing, complete rejection processing and partial rejection processing.
And the user inputs the processing opinions corresponding to the recommended processing points into the comparison system by browsing the recommended processing points and the recommended processing opinions pushed by the comparison system. Wherein, the complete adoption processing indicates that the current processing point and the recommendation processing opinion are correct; the complete rejection processing shows that the current processing point and the recommendation processing opinion are wrong; the partial veto process indicates that the current treatment point and the recommendation treatment opinion are correct.
And S602, if the processing opinion is that the processing is completely adopted, generating a processing point saving instruction and executing.
Specifically, when the processing opinions received by the comparison system are completely adopted, the user considers that the marking position of the current processing point and the recommended processing opinions are correct and do not need to change, and at the moment, the comparison system generates a processing point storage instruction and stores the current processing point and the processing opinions.
And S603, if the processing opinion is complete rejection processing, generating a processing point deleting instruction and executing.
Specifically, when the processing opinion received by the comparison system is completely rejected, it indicates that the user considers that the marking position of the current processing point and the recommended processing opinion are both wrong, and actually there is no problem in the current processing point. And the comparison system generates and executes a processing point deleting instruction, and the processing point deleting instruction is used for deleting the recommended processing point, so that data deleting operation is carried out on the recommended processing point without problems.
And S604, if the processing opinion is partial rejection processing, receiving examiner opinion information corresponding to the recommended processing point.
Specifically, if the processing opinion is a partial rejection processing, the reviewer opinion information corresponding to the recommended processing point is received according to the recommended processing point. Wherein, the auditor opinion information is generated by the user according to the specific situation input of the recommended processing point.
When the processing opinions input by the user are partial rejection processing, the problem of the current processing point is shown, but the specific processing opinions are different from the processing opinions recommended by the comparison system, the user changes the processing opinions, the comparison system receives the processing opinions input by the user, and the examination process of the current processing point is completed.
The implementation principle of the automatic comparison method for the survey design drawing in the embodiment of the application is as follows: the design unit resubmits the engineering design drawing after modifying to the comparison system, the comparison system carries out data comparison with the design drawing that once submitted before this design drawing that the comparison system will submit, the comparison system learns the change point of design unit to the drawing through the difference of two design drawings before and after confirming, the comparison system with the drawing change point propelling movement of confirming to user's intelligent terminal, make the user when going on reviewing once more, can be more convenient definite drawing change point, and then can directly review to the change point of drawing.
Based on the method, the embodiment of the application also discloses an automatic comparison system for the survey design drawing. Referring to fig. 7, an automatic comparison system for a survey plan comprises:
the review data information receiving module 1 is used for receiving review data information, and the review data information comprises design drawing data.
The historical drawing data acquisition module 2 is used for acquiring historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data according to the design drawing data by the historical drawing data acquisition module 2.
The difference characteristic data calling module 3 is used for calling the difference characteristic data if the historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data is obtained.
The difference characteristic data pushing module 4 is used for pushing the difference characteristic data to an intelligent terminal of a user.
The embodiment of the application also discloses an intelligent terminal which comprises a memory and a processor, wherein the memory is stored with a computer program which can be loaded by the processor and can execute the automatic reconnaissance design drawing comparison method.
The embodiment of the application also discloses a computer readable storage medium. The computer readable storage medium has stored therein a computer program capable of being loaded by a processor and executing an automatic contrast method for a survey plan as described above, and the computer readable storage medium includes, for example: a U-disk, a removable hard disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a magnetic disk, an optical disk, or other various media capable of storing program codes.
The above examples are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, and do not limit the scope of the present invention. It is to be understood that the described embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention, and not restrictive of the full scope of the invention. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from these embodiments without making any inventive step, fall within the scope of the present invention. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the above embodiments, those skilled in the art may still make various combinations, additions, deletions or other modifications of the features of the embodiments of the present invention according to the situation without conflict, so as to obtain different technical solutions without substantially departing from the spirit of the present invention, and these technical solutions also fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (9)
1. An automatic comparison method for a survey design drawing is characterized by comprising the following steps:
receiving review data information, wherein the review data information comprises design drawing data;
acquiring historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data according to the design drawing data;
if historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data are obtained, calling differential characteristic data;
acquiring a review treatment opinion corresponding to the historical drawing data according to the historical drawing data, wherein the review treatment opinion comprises processing point data and a review opinion explanation corresponding to the processing point data;
acquiring missing processing data according to the processing point data and the difference characteristic data;
if the missed processing data is obtained, calling the missed examination opinions corresponding to the missed processing data according to the examination processing opinions;
and pushing the difference characteristic data, the omission processing data and the called omission examination opinions to an intelligent terminal of a user.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein after said step of obtaining review processing comments corresponding to said historical drawing data, further comprising:
generating a historical examination opinion template according to the processing point data and the processing opinion description;
and generating and executing a quick review instruction according to the historical review opinion template, wherein the quick review instruction is used for quickly calling the historical review opinion template.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising, after the step of receiving review material information:
calling a recommended processing point according to the design drawing data and the processing point data;
determining a recommended processing opinion corresponding to the recommended processing point according to the recommended processing point;
and pushing the recommendation processing point and the determined recommendation processing opinion to an intelligent terminal of a user.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein after the step of pushing the recommended processing point and the determined recommended processing opinion to the user's intelligent terminal, the method further comprises:
receiving processing opinions corresponding to the recommended processing points according to the recommended processing points, wherein the processing opinions comprise complete adoption processing, complete rejection processing and partial rejection processing;
and if the processing opinion is partial rejection processing, receiving examiner opinion information corresponding to the recommended processing point according to the recommended processing point.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein after the step of obtaining the processing opinion corresponding to the recommended processing point, the method further comprises:
and if the processing opinion is complete rejection processing, generating a processing point deleting instruction and executing, wherein the processing point deleting instruction is used for deleting the recommended processing point.
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising, after the step of receiving review material information:
acquiring union and inspection information corresponding to the design drawing data according to the design drawing data, wherein the union and inspection information comprises fire control inspection opinions, people defense inspection opinions and device defense inspection opinions;
and if the fire control examination opinions, the civil air defense examination opinions and the civil air defense examination opinions corresponding to the design drawing data are obtained, generating examination processing opinions according to the union examination information.
7. An automatic contrast system for a survey design drawing, comprising:
the review data information receiving module (1) is used for receiving review data information, and the review data information comprises design drawing data;
the historical drawing data acquisition module (2) is used for acquiring historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data according to the design drawing data;
the difference characteristic data calling module (3) is used for calling difference characteristic data if historical drawing data corresponding to the design drawing data is obtained;
the missed processing data and missed review comment acquisition module is used for acquiring review processing comments corresponding to the historical drawing data according to the historical drawing data, wherein the review processing comments comprise processing point data and review comment descriptions corresponding to the processing point data; acquiring missing processing data according to the processing point data and the difference characteristic data;
if the missed processing data is obtained, calling the missed examination opinions corresponding to the missed processing data according to the examination processing opinions; and the difference characteristic data pushing module (4) is used for pushing the difference characteristic data, the omission processing data and the called omission review opinions to an intelligent terminal of a user.
8. The utility model provides an intelligent terminal which characterized in that: comprising a memory and a processor, said memory having stored thereon a computer program which can be loaded by the processor and which performs the method of any of claims 1 to 6.
9. A computer-readable storage medium characterized by: a computer program which can be loaded by a processor and which executes the method according to any of claims 1 to 6.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210332405.XA CN114742522B (en) | 2022-03-31 | 2022-03-31 | Method, system, device and storage medium for automatically comparing survey design drawings |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210332405.XA CN114742522B (en) | 2022-03-31 | 2022-03-31 | Method, system, device and storage medium for automatically comparing survey design drawings |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114742522A CN114742522A (en) | 2022-07-12 |
| CN114742522B true CN114742522B (en) | 2022-11-01 |
Family
ID=82278530
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210332405.XA Active CN114742522B (en) | 2022-03-31 | 2022-03-31 | Method, system, device and storage medium for automatically comparing survey design drawings |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114742522B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116071356B (en) * | 2023-03-06 | 2023-06-16 | 中国市政工程西南设计研究总院有限公司 | Intelligent inspection platform and inspection method for defects of design drawing of design enterprise |
Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102609687A (en) * | 2012-01-31 | 2012-07-25 | 华中科技大学 | Subway construction drawing and engineering parameter automatic identification method |
| CN103853734A (en) * | 2012-11-30 | 2014-06-11 | 苏州利驰电子商务有限公司 | Drawing content difference comparison method and system |
| CN105721504A (en) * | 2016-04-15 | 2016-06-29 | 北京恒华伟业科技股份有限公司 | Online evaluation method and system, and server |
| CN109086735A (en) * | 2018-08-17 | 2018-12-25 | 四川网道科技发展有限公司 | A kind of drawing examination system based on big data |
| CN109753710A (en) * | 2018-12-27 | 2019-05-14 | 中民筑友科技投资有限公司 | A kind of check of drawings method, apparatus, system and the readable storage medium storing program for executing of component design drawing |
| CN110599131A (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2019-12-20 | 国网重庆市电力公司电力科学研究院 | Electric drawing identification and examination method, device and readable storage medium |
| CN111563429A (en) * | 2020-04-23 | 2020-08-21 | 广东博智林机器人有限公司 | Drawing verification method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN111832449A (en) * | 2020-06-30 | 2020-10-27 | 万翼科技有限公司 | Engineering drawing display method and related device |
| CN112464317A (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2021-03-09 | 金蝶云科技有限公司 | Drawing modification method, product management system and computer storage medium |
| CN113282999A (en) * | 2021-06-25 | 2021-08-20 | 广东都市建筑规划设计有限公司 | Automatic modification generation method and device for electrical lighting drawing and computer equipment |
| CN113361842A (en) * | 2020-03-06 | 2021-09-07 | 横河电机株式会社 | Drawing management device, drawing management system, and drawing management method |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109190146B (en) * | 2018-07-13 | 2023-08-01 | 广州市市政工程设计研究总院有限公司 | BIM model information checking method, system, terminal and storage medium |
| CN112001025B (en) * | 2020-09-03 | 2021-05-14 | 山东合联互联网科技有限公司 | Multi-file format engineering drawing on-line examination method and system |
| CN112433713A (en) * | 2020-11-30 | 2021-03-02 | 建信金融科技有限责任公司 | Application program design graph processing method and device |
-
2022
- 2022-03-31 CN CN202210332405.XA patent/CN114742522B/en active Active
Patent Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102609687A (en) * | 2012-01-31 | 2012-07-25 | 华中科技大学 | Subway construction drawing and engineering parameter automatic identification method |
| CN103853734A (en) * | 2012-11-30 | 2014-06-11 | 苏州利驰电子商务有限公司 | Drawing content difference comparison method and system |
| CN105721504A (en) * | 2016-04-15 | 2016-06-29 | 北京恒华伟业科技股份有限公司 | Online evaluation method and system, and server |
| CN109086735A (en) * | 2018-08-17 | 2018-12-25 | 四川网道科技发展有限公司 | A kind of drawing examination system based on big data |
| CN109753710A (en) * | 2018-12-27 | 2019-05-14 | 中民筑友科技投资有限公司 | A kind of check of drawings method, apparatus, system and the readable storage medium storing program for executing of component design drawing |
| CN110599131A (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2019-12-20 | 国网重庆市电力公司电力科学研究院 | Electric drawing identification and examination method, device and readable storage medium |
| CN113361842A (en) * | 2020-03-06 | 2021-09-07 | 横河电机株式会社 | Drawing management device, drawing management system, and drawing management method |
| CN111563429A (en) * | 2020-04-23 | 2020-08-21 | 广东博智林机器人有限公司 | Drawing verification method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN111832449A (en) * | 2020-06-30 | 2020-10-27 | 万翼科技有限公司 | Engineering drawing display method and related device |
| CN112464317A (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2021-03-09 | 金蝶云科技有限公司 | Drawing modification method, product management system and computer storage medium |
| CN113282999A (en) * | 2021-06-25 | 2021-08-20 | 广东都市建筑规划设计有限公司 | Automatic modification generation method and device for electrical lighting drawing and computer equipment |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| CAD图纸自动比对算法研究;谭裴等;《电子技术研发》;20110811;全文 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN114742522A (en) | 2022-07-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN111582169A (en) | Image recognition data error correction method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| WO2020006878A1 (en) | Voice recognition test method and apparatus, computer device and storage medium | |
| CN111723870B (en) | Artificial intelligence-based data set acquisition method, apparatus, device and medium | |
| CN111553137B (en) | Report generation method and device, storage medium and computer equipment | |
| CN114742522B (en) | Method, system, device and storage medium for automatically comparing survey design drawings | |
| CN115438984A (en) | AI-based big data processing method and server | |
| CN113254624B (en) | Intelligent question-answering processing method, device, equipment and medium based on artificial intelligence | |
| CN109299473B (en) | Developer portrait-based software engineering task recommendation method | |
| KR102244704B1 (en) | Method for automatically providing customized work guide to worker of crowdsourcing based projects for artificial intelligence training data generation | |
| CN112231385B (en) | Data collection method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113822907A (en) | Image processing method and device | |
| CN111261166B (en) | Voice recognition method and device | |
| KR102232880B1 (en) | Method for evaluating inspector of crowdsourcing based projects for collecting image or video for artificial intelligence training data generation | |
| CN116775639A (en) | Data processing method, storage medium and electronic device | |
| WO2023159778A1 (en) | Bidding document acquisition method and apparatus combining rpa and ai | |
| US8051026B2 (en) | Rules collector system and method with user interaction | |
| KR102215417B1 (en) | Method for automatically creating work guide of crowdsourcing based projects for artificial intelligence training data generation | |
| CN111767214B (en) | Automatic testing method and device for software UI | |
| CN111291042B (en) | Power data processing system and method for power supply service | |
| CN114372479A (en) | Text recognition method and device, electronic equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN113900935A (en) | Automatic defect identification method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN109992505B (en) | Application program testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112949262B (en) | Method, device, computer equipment and storage medium for processing review sheets | |
| CN112990030B (en) | Student emotion analysis system based on expression images | |
| CN112286986B (en) | Property right analysis management system based on enterprise genealogy |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |