CN112599215B - Rule adjustment method, device, equipment and storage medium of automatic auditing system - Google Patents
Rule adjustment method, device, equipment and storage medium of automatic auditing system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112599215B CN112599215B CN202011579369.4A CN202011579369A CN112599215B CN 112599215 B CN112599215 B CN 112599215B CN 202011579369 A CN202011579369 A CN 202011579369A CN 112599215 B CN112599215 B CN 112599215B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- auditing
- rule
- value
- automatic
- current detection
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 177
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 91
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 91
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 45
- 238000012550 audit Methods 0.000 claims description 29
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 24
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000002558 medical inspection Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001900 immune effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004020 luminiscence type Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004949 mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010827 pathological analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000002700 urine Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004904 shortening Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H15/00—ICT specially adapted for medical reports, e.g. generation or transmission thereof
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a rule adjustment method of an automatic auditing system, which comprises the following steps: responding to the automatic auditing instruction, and performing automatic auditing operation on the detection items in the report according to auditing rules preset by the detection system; when the current detection item has the manual modification operation in the automatic auditing operation, acquiring the historical times of the auditing rule hit by the current detection item and acquiring the times of the manual modification operation after the current detection item hits the auditing rule; and adjusting the auditing rule according to the occupation ratio of the times of manual modification operation in the historical times. The invention also discloses a rule adjusting device and equipment of the automatic auditing system and a computer readable storage medium. By adopting the embodiment of the invention, the rule can be automatically and flexibly adjusted, and the efficiency of automatic auditing can be effectively improved.
Description
Technical Field
The present invention relates to the field of medical inspection, and in particular, to a rule adjustment method, apparatus, device, and storage medium for an automatic auditing system.
Background
The automatic auditing is widely applied to medical laboratories, and the electronic system is used for establishing rules according to the thought of manual auditing, so that the electronic system automatically executes the rules on the report, thereby realizing the automatic auditing mode of the report, replacing a large number of manual operations, and achieving the effects of improving efficiency, detecting report errors, shortening reporting time and guaranteeing the reporting quality of the laboratory. The first establishment of the automatic auditing rule is based on the thought of a certain wholesaler, whether the rule contains all approval scenes is unknown, whether the rule has an effect is also unknown, the operation track of each person is recorded through the system, and the full conclusion is provided, so that the automatic auditing rule contains the steps of which the experience of all persons is the most basic. The purpose of automatic auditing is to let the system issue more reports as once as possible, i.e. how to update the rules effectively after initial rule entry, and to let laboratory systems issue more reports more effectively (the issued reports do not need human intervention, the reports of alarms have a very high probability of anomaly prediction, just like fire, too many and too few alarms are unsuitable) currently no prior art in this regard. The prior art is generally based on manual implementation, and the problem of rule is found by a laboratory expert in a manner of man-machine comparison over a period of time. The method has low efficiency, can only report the abnormality for a period of time, needs special verification, is time-consuming and labor-consuming, is not suitable for a long-term method as rule management, and has low auditing efficiency of an automatic auditing system.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the invention aims to provide a rule adjustment method, device, equipment and storage medium of an automatic auditing system, which can automatically and flexibly adjust rules and effectively improve the efficiency of automatic auditing.
In order to achieve the above object, an embodiment of the present invention provides a rule adjustment method for an automatic auditing system, including:
responding to the automatic auditing instruction, and performing automatic auditing operation on the detection items in the report according to auditing rules preset by the detection system;
when the current detection item has the manual modification operation in the automatic auditing operation, acquiring the historical times of the auditing rule hit by the current detection item and acquiring the times of the manual modification operation after the current detection item hits the auditing rule;
and adjusting the auditing rule according to the occupation ratio of the times of manual modification operation in the historical times.
As an improvement of the above solution, the adjusting the audit rule according to the ratio of the number of manual modification operations in the historical number of times includes:
when the duty ratio is larger than or equal to a preset positive rate threshold value, calculating the mean value and standard deviation of other abnormal detection values of the detection item; when the detection item hits the corresponding auditing rule, the detection value of the current detection item is an abnormal detection value, and the other abnormal detection values are other abnormal detection values except the abnormal detection value of the current detection item with the artificial modification operation;
Calculating the sum of the mean value and the standard deviation multiplied by the coefficient as an judgment value;
if the trial value is smaller than the intervention result value, an adjustment suggestion for adjusting the judgment threshold value of the auditing rule to be the trial value is given; the intervention result value is an abnormal detection value of a current detection item with manual modification operation;
and if the judgment value is larger than or equal to the intervention result value, giving a suggestion for reserving a judgment threshold value of the auditing rule.
As an improvement of the above solution, the adjusting the audit rule according to the ratio of the number of manual modification operations in the historical number of times further includes:
and when the duty ratio is smaller than the positive rate threshold, giving a suggestion for deleting the auditing rule.
As an improvement of the above solution, when there is a human modification operation in the automatic auditing operation for the currently detected item, the method further includes:
obtaining an auditing result of the current detection item; the auditing result comprises reporting no abnormality and reporting abnormality, wherein reporting abnormality is displayed when the detecting item hits the corresponding auditing rule, and reporting no abnormality is displayed when the detecting item misses the corresponding auditing rule;
Displaying corresponding bullet frame options in a display interface according to the auditing result; and setting execution reasons related to the manual modification operation in the bullet box options.
As an improvement of the above-described scheme, the execution causes include:
the execution reason is: independent of the existing auditing rules, and the detection system is required to establish corresponding auditing rules according to the current detection project;
the execution reason is as follows: independent of the existing auditing rules, and a detection system is not required to establish corresponding auditing rules according to the current detection project;
the execution causes three: the current detection item hits the existing auditing rule;
when the auditing result is abnormal report, the auditing result correspondingly displays the first execution reason, the second execution reason and the third execution reason in the bullet box option; and when the auditing result is that no abnormality is reported, displaying the first execution reason and the second execution reason in the bullet box options correspondingly.
As an improvement of the above solution, the method further includes:
and when the first execution reason and the second execution reason are selected, generating corresponding auditing rules according to the first execution reason and the second execution reason.
As an improvement of the scheme, the auditing rules are classified into categories in advance when being established, and the categories comprise service rules, execution rules and intervention rules; wherein the service rule is a rule requiring no human intervention, the execution rule is a rule requiring human intervention but requiring no modification of report content, and the intervention rule is a rule requiring human intervention and requiring human modification of report content.
In order to achieve the above object, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a rule adjustment device of an automatic auditing system, including:
the automatic auditing module is used for responding to the automatic auditing instruction and carrying out automatic auditing operation on the detection items in the report according to auditing rules preset by the detection system;
the auditing rule hit number calculation module is used for acquiring the historical number of times that the auditing rule hit by the current detection item is hit when the current detection item has the manual modifying operation in the automatic auditing operation, and acquiring the number of times that the manual modifying operation exists after the current detection item hits the auditing rule;
and the auditing rule adjusting module is used for adjusting the auditing rule according to the occupation ratio of the times of manual modification operation in the historical times.
To achieve the above object, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a rule adjustment device of an automatic auditing system, including a processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the processor, where the processor executes the computer program to implement the rule adjustment method of the automatic auditing system according to any one of the embodiments above.
To achieve the above object, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer readable storage medium, where the computer readable storage medium includes a stored computer program, and when the computer program runs, controls a device where the computer readable storage medium is located to execute the rule adjustment method of the automatic auditing system according to any one of the embodiments.
Compared with the prior art, the rule adjustment method, the device, the equipment and the storage medium of the automatic auditing system disclosed by the embodiment of the invention are characterized in that firstly, in response to an automatic auditing instruction, automatic auditing operation is carried out on detection items in a report according to auditing rules preset by the detection system; then, when the current detection item has the manual modification operation in the automatic auditing operation, acquiring the historical times of the auditing rule hit by the current detection item and acquiring the times of the manual modification operation after the current detection item hits the auditing rule; and finally, adjusting the auditing rule according to the ratio of the times of manual modification operation in the historical times. Because the manual modification operation is considered, the automatic auditing compliance can be improved quickly in a laboratory, namely, the processing result of the computer is consistent with the human as much as possible, the rule can be automatically and flexibly adjusted, and the automatic auditing efficiency is improved effectively.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a rule adjustment method for an automatic auditing system according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a rule adjustment device of an automatic auditing system according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 3 is a block diagram of a rule adjustment device of an automatic auditing system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The following description of the embodiments of the present invention will be made clearly and completely with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which it is apparent that the embodiments described are only some embodiments of the present invention, but not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the invention without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the invention.
Referring to fig. 1, fig. 1 is a flowchart of a rule adjustment method of an automatic auditing system according to an embodiment of the present invention, where the rule adjustment method of the automatic auditing system includes:
s1, responding to an automatic auditing instruction, and performing automatic auditing operation on detection items in a report according to auditing rules preset by a detection system;
s2, when the current detection item has manual modification operation in the automatic auditing operation, acquiring historical times of the auditing rule hit by the current detection item, and acquiring times of the manual modification operation after the auditing rule hit by the current detection item;
S3, adjusting the auditing rule according to the ratio of the times of manual modification operation in the historical times.
It should be noted that, the rule adjustment method of the automatic auditing system in the embodiment of the invention is implemented by the automatic auditing system, and the automatic auditing system is a medical inspection system, and the medical inspection system can be specifically used for physicochemical mass spectrometry inspection, genome inspection, pathological diagnosis, biochemical luminescence inspection, immunological inspection, other comprehensive inspection, and the like. For example, the automatic auditing system is used for verifying a report form of a patient, and the current detection item is a detection item of the patient in the report form, for example, the detection item is blood detection, urine detection and the like. The auditing rules pre-stored in the rule base are used for judging whether the current detection item is normal or not. It is worth to say that, when the system checks all the current detection items, the current detection items are compared with the auditing rules pre-stored in the rule base one by one so as to judge whether the current detection items hit any auditing rule.
The laboratory report processing flow in the automatic auditing system: 1. the method comprises the steps of result input, report submission, verification of input results, avoidance of input errors, report audit (triggering of an automatic audit function) and automatic audit result processing.
After the automatic auditing system is audited, the automatic auditing system has two results of auditing passing (missed auditing rule) and auditing failing (hit auditing rule), and ideally, the auditing passing number A and the auditing failing number B are adopted. In reality, in the passing number A, if C sheets are manually clicked and issued to report, C is the number of sheets (true negative number) with compliance, and the following is the arrangement of computers, namely A-C sheets, and the personnel modify the report although the computer passes the checking, and the A-C sheets are the number of non-compliance (false negative number) of automatic checking. Conversely: in the number B of failed computer audit, D is a manual modification report, D is the number of compliance sheets (true positive number), namely B-D is also reported, and the personnel directly send out the report although the computer audit is failed, and the B-D is the number of automatic audit non-compliance sheets (false positive number).
The automatic auditing system is not good, so that the number of the steps is reduced as much as possible: A-C (false negative) and B-D (false positive), wherein the two numbers are the non-compliance numbers of automatic auditing, and the reduction of A-C (false negative) in the aspect of risk management and control in the two numbers means that the risk is reduced and the priority is higher.
Specifically, in step S1, in response to the automatic auditing instruction, an automatic auditing operation is performed on the detection items in the report according to an auditing rule preset by the detection system. If the report checking result is green, the report is abnormal, if the report is red, the report has data abnormality according to the rule judgment, and the report needs to be manually processed (such as checking sample information, linking clinic, adding other projects and re-detecting)
Optionally, the auditing rules are pre-classified into categories at the time of establishment, wherein the categories comprise service rules, execution rules and intervention rules; wherein the service rule is a rule requiring no human intervention, the execution rule is a rule requiring human intervention but requiring no modification of report content, and the intervention rule is a rule requiring human intervention and requiring human modification of report content. For an example, the categories of audit rules may be found in Table 1. After the rule is established, the category of the auditing rule needs to be determined immediately and is input into a corresponding rule template, and the auditing rule is marked with letters, which has the following significance: only the class I rules need to perform the function of subsequent rule adjustment. Rules of the digital class and O start are not required, which has the advantage that: the functional range is focused, so that a laboratory can more accurately find out which rules need to be updated, and the workload of the laboratory is greatly reduced.
Table 1 class of audit rules
Specifically, in step S2, when there is a manual modification operation in the automatic auditing operation for the current detected item, the historical number of times that the auditing rule hit by the current detected item was hit is obtained, and the number of times that there is a manual modification operation after the auditing rule hit by the current detected item is obtained.
Illustratively, the system automatically counts the number of choices per intervention rule, i.e., how many times (A) in total, and how many times the choice is because the hit is considered to change the report (B), i.e., there is a human modification operation, B/A is the true positive rate. Such as: rule I20091 violates 300 times in total (300 abnormal reports), the effective intervention is 1 (i.e. the person takes 300 actions, 1 because the report was manually modified and the interface was popped up, the choice was the modification due to this rule), and the true positive rate is 1/300.
Specifically, in step S3, the audit rule is adjusted according to the ratio of the number of manual modification operations to the historical number of times, including steps S31 to S35:
s31, calculating the mean value and standard deviation of other abnormal detection values of the detection item when the duty ratio is greater than or equal to a preset positive rate threshold value; when the detection item hits the corresponding auditing rule, the detection value of the current detection item is an abnormal detection value, and the other abnormal detection values are other abnormal detection values except the abnormal detection value of the current detection item with the artificial modification operation;
S32, calculating the sum of the mean value and the standard deviation multiplied by a coefficient to be used as an judgment value;
s33, if the trial value is smaller than the intervention result value, an adjustment suggestion for adjusting the judgment threshold value of the auditing rule to be the trial value is given; the intervention result value is an abnormal detection value of a current detection item with manual modification operation;
s34, if the trial value is greater than or equal to the intervention result value, a suggestion for reserving a judgment threshold value of the auditing rule is given;
and S35, when the duty ratio is smaller than the positive rate threshold, a suggestion for deleting the auditing rule is given.
For example, if the auditing condition set by a certain auditing rule is that the detected value is greater than 160g (decision threshold), and when the detected values of the detected items are 172, 181, 191, 201, 270 (with the result modification), the auditing condition is satisfied, and thus 172, 181, 191, 201, 270 (with the result modification) are all detected abnormal values, wherein the detected abnormal value 270 is a value obtained by manually revising the detected items, that is, the intervention result value, then other abnormal detected values include: 172. 181, 191, 201; the mean +2sd=211 of the values 172, 181, 191, 201 is calculated, that is, the trial value is 270, where 2SD represents the product of the standard deviation and the coefficient, and the coefficient can be set in a custom manner, and is not specifically limited herein. When the duty ratio is larger than or equal to a preset positive rate threshold value, the judgment value (211) is smaller than the intervention result value (270), so that an adjustment suggestion for adjusting the judgment threshold value of the auditing rule to be the judgment value is given, namely, a suggestion for setting the auditing condition of the auditing rule to be a detection value larger than 211g is given at the moment. Further, the system may give the corresponding tag: the "decision threshold for establishing adjustment rule" is xx "," establish retention rule "," establish deletion rule ".
In the embodiment of the invention, the auditing system does not directly adjust the rules, but gives the advice of the adjustment rules, the decision right of the adjustment rules is also in the hands of the staff, the staff can adjust the rules according to the advice given by the auditing system, the staff can know that the setting of the rules is unreasonable and needs to be adjusted, and the staff can pay attention to the rules later.
Further, when the manual modification operation exists in the automatic auditing operation of the current detection item, the method further comprises the steps of S4-S5:
s4, obtaining an auditing result of the current detection item; the auditing result comprises reporting no abnormality and reporting abnormality, wherein reporting abnormality is displayed when the detecting item hits the corresponding auditing rule, and reporting no abnormality is displayed when the detecting item misses the corresponding auditing rule;
s5, displaying corresponding bullet frame options in a display interface according to the auditing result; and setting execution reasons related to the manual modification operation in the bullet box options.
Optionally, the execution reason includes:
the execution reason is: independent of the existing auditing rules, and the detection system is required to establish corresponding auditing rules according to the current detection project; such as: the method has no relation with the existing auditing rules, and the problem is considered to occur frequently or to be important, and the problem can be identified after the automatic auditing is hoped to reduce the risk;
The execution reason is as follows: independent of the existing auditing rules, and a detection system is not required to establish corresponding auditing rules according to the current detection project; such as: the method has no relation with the existing auditing rules, but the modification is sporadic or unimportant, automatic auditing can be omitted, and risk is avoided;
the execution causes three: the current detection item hits the existing auditing rule; such as: modifications caused by the auditing rules (showing the corresponding intervention class rules).
When the auditing result is abnormal report, the auditing result correspondingly displays the first execution reason, the second execution reason and the third execution reason in the bullet box option; and when the auditing result is that no abnormality is reported, displaying the first execution reason and the second execution reason in the bullet box options correspondingly.
Further, the method further comprises step S6:
and when the first execution reason and the second execution reason are selected, generating corresponding auditing rules according to the first execution reason and the second execution reason.
Illustratively, the system automatically generates rules for each selection of a revision of execution cause one and the execution cause two:
if one report A\B\C is 50, 30 and 20 respectively, the sex is male, the age is 25, and after the examination, the interpretation A is added; generating an audit rule: if (a=50, b=30, c=20), set=1, age=25, then a=30, increasing interpretation a;
Subsequent reports may also increase based on other reports:
if (a=80, b=50), set=1, age=25, then a=20 increases the interpretation a
if (a=100, b=30, c=20), set=1, age=32, the a=25 increases by interpretation a
Where a following if is the data before modification, i.e. possibly the data for the first reporting of errors, and a following Then is the data re-determined after the processing of the sample due to the preceding a alarm.
The final system will recommend a rule set-up scheme: if (a=50-100, b=30-50, c=20), set=1, age=25-32, the value of the a result varies, increasing interpretation a.
In the embodiment of the invention, the auditing system records the steps of manual modification as much as possible, what is modified, and finally analyzes the modification result by taking the same modification element as a unit (such as project, explanation and data) to finally obtain a corresponding recommendation rule establishment scheme.
Further, the system automatically records a detection log of the report, wherein the detection log comprises: bar code, post, time, audit results (report exception/report no exception), execution reason (one to three above), handler, report modification content (how much the result of what item changed to, what interpretation was added, what profile changed to what). By recording the detection log, the staff can conveniently review, so that the content of the revision can be known in detail.
Compared with the prior art, the rule adjustment method of the automatic auditing system disclosed by the embodiment of the invention comprises the steps of firstly, responding to an automatic auditing instruction, and performing automatic auditing operation on detection items in a report according to auditing rules preset by a detection system; then, when the current detection item has the manual modification operation in the automatic auditing operation, acquiring the historical times of the auditing rule hit by the current detection item and acquiring the times of the manual modification operation after the current detection item hits the auditing rule; and finally, adjusting the auditing rule according to the ratio of the times of manual modification operation in the historical times. Because the manual modification operation is considered, the automatic auditing compliance can be improved quickly in a laboratory, namely, the processing result of the computer is consistent with the human as much as possible, the rule can be automatically and flexibly adjusted, and the automatic auditing efficiency is improved effectively.
Referring to fig. 2, fig. 2 is a block diagram of a rule adjustment device 10 of an automatic auditing system according to an embodiment of the present invention, where the rule adjustment device 10 of the automatic auditing system includes:
the automatic auditing module 11 is used for responding to the automatic auditing instruction and carrying out automatic auditing operation on the detection items in the report according to auditing rules preset by the detection system;
An audit rule hit number calculation module 12, configured to obtain, when a manual modification operation exists in the automatic audit operation for a current detection item, a historical number of times that an audit rule hit by the current detection item is hit, and a number of times that the manual modification operation exists after the audit rule hit by the current detection item is obtained;
and the auditing rule adjusting module 13 is used for adjusting the auditing rule according to the occupation ratio of the times of manual modification operation in the historical times.
It should be noted that, the rule adjusting device of the automatic auditing system in the embodiment of the invention is an automatic auditing system, and the automatic auditing system is a medical inspection system, and the medical inspection system can be specifically used for physicochemical mass spectrometry inspection, genome inspection, pathological diagnosis, biochemical luminescence inspection, immunological inspection, other comprehensive inspection, and the like. For example, the automatic auditing system is used for verifying a report form of a patient, and the current detection item is a detection item of the patient in the report form, for example, the detection item is blood detection, urine detection and the like. The auditing rules pre-stored in the rule base are used for judging whether the current detection item is normal or not. It is worth to say that, when the system checks all the current detection items, the current detection items are compared with the auditing rules pre-stored in the rule base one by one so as to judge whether the current detection items hit any auditing rule.
Specifically, the automatic auditing module 11 responds to the automatic auditing instruction to perform automatic auditing operation on the detection items in the report according to the auditing rules preset by the detection system. If the report checking result is green, the report is abnormal, if the report is red, the report has data abnormality according to the rule judgment, and the report needs to be manually processed (such as checking sample information, linking clinic, adding other projects and re-detecting)
Optionally, the auditing rules are pre-classified into categories at the time of establishment, wherein the categories comprise service rules, execution rules and intervention rules; wherein the service rule is a rule requiring no human intervention, the execution rule is a rule requiring human intervention but requiring no modification of report content, and the intervention rule is a rule requiring human intervention and requiring human modification of report content. For an example, the categories of audit rules may be found in Table 1. After the rule is established, the category of the auditing rule needs to be determined immediately and is input into a corresponding rule template, and the auditing rule is marked with letters, which has the following significance: only the class I rules need to perform the function of subsequent rule adjustment. Rules of the digital class and O start are not required, which has the advantage that: the functional range is focused, so that a laboratory can more accurately find out which rules need to be updated, and the workload of the laboratory is greatly reduced.
Table 1 class of audit rules
Specifically, when there is a manual modification operation of the current detection item in the automatic audit operation, the audit rule hit number calculation module 12 obtains the historical number of times the audit rule hit by the current detection item was hit, and the number of times there is a manual modification operation after the audit rule hit by the current detection item was obtained.
Illustratively, the system automatically counts the number of choices per intervention rule, i.e., how many times (A) in total, and how many times the choice is because the hit is considered to change the report (B), i.e., there is a human modification operation, B/A is the true positive rate. Such as: rule I20091 violates 300 times in total (300 abnormal reports), the effective intervention is 1 (i.e. the person takes 300 actions, 1 because the report was manually modified and the interface was popped up, the choice was the modification due to this rule), and the true positive rate is 1/300.
Specifically, the audit rule adjustment module 13 is specifically configured to:
when the duty ratio is larger than or equal to a preset positive rate threshold value, calculating the mean value and standard deviation of other abnormal detection values of the detection item; when the detection item hits the corresponding auditing rule, the detection value of the current detection item is an abnormal detection value, and the other abnormal detection values are other abnormal detection values except the abnormal detection value of the current detection item with the artificial modification operation;
Calculating the sum of the mean value and the standard deviation multiplied by the coefficient as an judgment value;
if the trial value is smaller than the intervention result value, an adjustment suggestion for adjusting the judgment threshold value of the auditing rule to be the trial value is given; the intervention result value is an abnormal detection value of a current detection item with manual modification operation;
if the trial value is greater than or equal to the intervention result value, a suggestion for reserving a judgment threshold value of the auditing rule is given;
and when the duty ratio is smaller than the positive rate threshold, giving a suggestion for deleting the auditing rule.
For example, if the auditing condition set by a certain auditing rule is that the detected value is greater than 160g (decision threshold), and when the detected values of the detected items are 172, 181, 191, 201, 270 (with the result modification), the auditing condition is satisfied, and thus 172, 181, 191, 201, 270 (with the result modification) are all detected abnormal values, wherein the detected abnormal value 270 is a value obtained by manually revising the detected items, that is, the intervention result value, then other abnormal detected values include: 172. 181, 191, 201; the mean +2sd=211 of the values 172, 181, 191, 201 is calculated, that is, the trial value is 270, where 2SD represents the product of the standard deviation and the coefficient, and the coefficient can be set in a custom manner, and is not specifically limited herein. When the duty ratio is larger than or equal to a preset positive rate threshold value, the judgment value (211) is smaller than the intervention result value (270), so that an adjustment suggestion for adjusting the judgment threshold value of the auditing rule to be the judgment value is given, namely, a suggestion for setting the auditing condition of the auditing rule to be a detection value larger than 211g is given at the moment. Further, the system may give the corresponding tag: the "decision threshold for establishing adjustment rule" is xx "," establish retention rule "," establish deletion rule ".
In the embodiment of the invention, the auditing system does not directly adjust the rules, but gives the advice of the adjustment rules, the decision right of the adjustment rules is also in the hands of the staff, the staff can adjust the rules according to the advice given by the auditing system, the staff can know that the setting of the rules is unreasonable and needs to be adjusted, and the staff can pay attention to the rules later.
Further, the rule adjusting apparatus 10 of the automatic auditing system further includes:
the auditing result acquisition module is used for acquiring auditing results of the current detection item when the current detection item has manual modification operation in the automatic auditing operation; the auditing result comprises reporting no abnormality and reporting abnormality, wherein reporting abnormality is displayed when the detecting item hits the corresponding auditing rule, and reporting no abnormality is displayed when the detecting item misses the corresponding auditing rule;
the bullet frame option display module is used for displaying corresponding bullet frame options in a display interface according to the auditing result; and setting execution reasons related to the manual modification operation in the bullet box options.
Optionally, the execution reason includes:
The execution reason is: independent of the existing auditing rules, and the detection system is required to establish corresponding auditing rules according to the current detection project; such as: the method has no relation with the existing auditing rules, and the problem is considered to occur frequently or to be important, and the problem can be identified after the automatic auditing is hoped to reduce the risk;
the execution reason is as follows: independent of the existing auditing rules, and a detection system is not required to establish corresponding auditing rules according to the current detection project; such as: the method has no relation with the existing auditing rules, but the modification is sporadic or unimportant, automatic auditing can be omitted, and risk is avoided;
the execution causes three: the current detection item hits the existing auditing rule; such as: modifications caused by the auditing rules (showing the corresponding intervention class rules).
When the auditing result is abnormal report, the auditing result correspondingly displays the first execution reason, the second execution reason and the third execution reason in the bullet box option; and when the auditing result is that no abnormality is reported, displaying the first execution reason and the second execution reason in the bullet box options correspondingly.
Further, the rule adjusting apparatus 10 of the automatic auditing system further includes:
And the auditing rule establishment module is used for generating corresponding auditing rules according to the first execution reason and the second execution reason when the first execution reason and the second execution reason are selected.
Illustratively, the system automatically generates rules for each selection of a revision of execution cause one and the execution cause two:
if one report A\B\C is 50, 30 and 20 respectively, the sex is male, the age is 25, and after the examination, the interpretation A is added; generating an audit rule: if (a=50, b=30, c=20), set=1, age=25, then a=30, increasing interpretation a;
subsequent reports may also increase based on other reports:
if (a=80, b=50), set=1, age=25, then a=20 increases the interpretation a
if (a=100, b=30, c=20), set=1, age=32, the a=25 increases by interpretation a
Where a following if is the data before modification, i.e. possibly the data for the first reporting of errors, and a following Then is the data re-determined after the processing of the sample due to the preceding a alarm.
The final system will recommend a rule set-up scheme: if (a=50-100, b=30-50, c=20), set=1, age=25-32, the value of the a result varies, increasing interpretation a.
In the embodiment of the invention, the auditing system records the steps of manual modification as much as possible, what is modified, and finally analyzes the modification result by taking the same modification element as a unit (such as project, explanation and data) to finally obtain a corresponding recommendation rule establishment scheme.
Further, the rule adjusting apparatus 10 of the automatic auditing system further includes:
the detection log recording module is used for automatically recording the detection log of the report, and the detection log comprises: bar code, post, time, audit results (report exception/report no exception), execution reason (one to three above), handler, report modification content (how much the result of what item changed to, what interpretation was added, what profile changed to what). By recording the detection log, the staff can conveniently review, so that the content of the revision can be known in detail.
Compared with the prior art, the rule adjusting device 10 of the automatic auditing system disclosed by the embodiment of the invention firstly responds to the automatic auditing instruction to automatically audit the detection items in the report according to the auditing rule preset by the detection system; then, when the current detection item has the manual modification operation in the automatic auditing operation, acquiring the historical times of the auditing rule hit by the current detection item and acquiring the times of the manual modification operation after the current detection item hits the auditing rule; and finally, adjusting the auditing rule according to the ratio of the times of manual modification operation in the historical times. Because the manual modification operation is considered, the automatic auditing compliance can be improved quickly in a laboratory, namely, the processing result of the computer is consistent with the human as much as possible, the rule can be automatically and flexibly adjusted, and the automatic auditing efficiency is improved effectively.
Fig. 3 is a block diagram of a rule adjustment device 20 of an automatic auditing system according to an embodiment of the present invention, where the rule adjustment device 20 of the automatic auditing system includes a processor 21, a memory 22, and a computer program, such as a travel control program, stored in the memory and executable on the processor. The processor 21, when executing the computer program, implements the steps of the rule adjustment method embodiment of the automatic auditing system described above, such as steps S1 to S3 shown in fig. 1. Alternatively, the processor may implement the functions of the modules in the above-described device embodiments, such as the automatic auditing module 11, when executing the computer program.
Illustratively, the computer program may be split into one or more modules that are stored in the memory 22 and executed by the processor 21 to complete the present invention. The one or more modules may be a series of computer program instruction segments capable of performing a specific function for describing the execution of the computer program in the rule adjustment device 20 of the automatic auditing system. For example, the computer program may be divided into an automatic auditing module 11, an auditing rule hit count calculation module 12, and an auditing rule adjustment module 13. The working process of each module may refer to the working process of the rule adjusting device 10 of the automatic auditing system described in the above embodiment, and will not be described herein.
The rule adjustment device 20 of the automatic auditing system may be a desktop computer, a notebook, a palmtop computer, a cloud server, or other computing device. The rule adjustment device 20 of the automatic auditing system may include, but is not limited to, a processor 21, a memory 22. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the schematic diagram is merely an example of an image enhancement device and does not constitute a limitation of the rule adjustment device 20 of an automatic auditing system, and may include more or fewer components than illustrated, or may combine certain components, or different components, e.g., the rule adjustment device 20 of the automatic auditing system may also include an input-output device, a network access device, a bus, etc.
The processor 21 may be a central processing unit (Central Processing Unit, CPU), but may also be other general purpose processors, digital signal processors (Digital Signal Processor, DSP), application specific integrated circuits (Application Specific Integrated Circuit, ASIC), off-the-shelf programmable gate arrays (Field-Programmable Gate Array, FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, or the like. The general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like, and the processor 21 is a control center of the rule adjustment device 20 of the automatic auditing system, and connects the various parts of the rule adjustment device 20 of the overall automatic auditing system using various interfaces and lines.
The memory 22 may be used to store the computer program and/or module, and the processor 21 may implement various functions of the rule adjustment device 20 of the automatic auditing system by running or executing the computer program and/or module stored in the memory 22 and invoking data stored in the memory 22. The memory 22 may mainly include a storage program area and a storage data area, wherein the storage program area may store an operating system, an application program (such as a sound playing function, an image playing function, etc.) required for at least one function, and the like; the storage data area may store data (such as audio data, phonebook, etc.) created according to the use of the handset, etc. In addition, the memory 22 may include high-speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as a hard disk, memory, plug-in hard disk, smart Media Card (SMC), secure Digital (SD) Card, flash Card (Flash Card), at least one disk storage device, flash memory device, or other volatile solid-state storage device.
The modules integrated by the rule-adapting device 20 of the automatic auditing system may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium if implemented in the form of software functional units and sold or used as a stand-alone product. Based on such understanding, the present invention may implement all or part of the flow of the method of the above embodiment, or may be implemented by a computer program to instruct related hardware, where the computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the computer program may implement the steps of each of the method embodiments described above. Wherein the computer program comprises computer program code which may be in source code form, object code form, executable file or some intermediate form etc. The computer readable medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying the computer program code, a recording medium, a U disk, a removable hard disk, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a computer Memory, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a random access Memory (RAM, random Access Memory), an electrical carrier signal, a telecommunications signal, a software distribution medium, and so forth.
While the foregoing is directed to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the principles of the invention, such changes and modifications are also intended to be within the scope of the invention.
Claims (7)
1. A method for adjusting rules of an automatic auditing system, comprising:
responding to the automatic auditing instruction, and performing automatic auditing operation on the detection items in the report according to auditing rules preset by the detection system;
when the current detection item has the manual modification operation in the automatic auditing operation, acquiring the historical times of the auditing rule hit by the current detection item and acquiring the times of the manual modification operation after the current detection item hits the auditing rule;
adjusting the auditing rule according to the occupation ratio of the times of manual modification operation in the historical times;
wherein, the adjusting the audit rule according to the ratio of the number of manual modification operations in the historical number of times includes:
when the duty ratio is larger than or equal to a preset positive rate threshold value, calculating the mean value and standard deviation of other abnormal detection values of the detection item; when the detection item hits the corresponding auditing rule, the detection value of the current detection item is an abnormal detection value, and the other abnormal detection values are other abnormal detection values except the abnormal detection value of the current detection item with the artificial modification operation;
Calculating the sum of the mean value and the standard deviation multiplied by the coefficient as an judgment value;
if the trial value is smaller than the intervention result value, an adjustment suggestion for adjusting the judgment threshold value of the auditing rule to be the trial value is given; the intervention result value is an abnormal detection value of a current detection item with manual modification operation;
if the trial value is greater than or equal to the intervention result value, a suggestion for reserving a judgment threshold value of the auditing rule is given;
when there is a human modification operation in the automatic audit operation for the currently detected item, the method further comprises:
obtaining an auditing result of the current detection item; the auditing result comprises reporting no abnormality and reporting abnormality, wherein reporting abnormality is displayed when the detecting item hits the corresponding auditing rule, and reporting no abnormality is displayed when the detecting item misses the corresponding auditing rule;
displaying corresponding bullet frame options in a display interface according to the auditing result; wherein, the bullet frame option is provided with a plurality of execution reasons related to the manual modification operation;
the execution reasons include:
the execution reason is: independent of the existing auditing rules, and the detection system is required to establish corresponding auditing rules according to the current detection project;
The execution reason is as follows: independent of the existing auditing rules, and a detection system is not required to establish corresponding auditing rules according to the current detection project;
the execution causes three: the current detection item hits the existing auditing rule;
when the auditing result is abnormal report, the auditing result correspondingly displays the first execution reason, the second execution reason and the third execution reason in the bullet box option; and when the auditing result is that no abnormality is reported, displaying the first execution reason and the second execution reason in the bullet box options correspondingly.
2. The rule adjustment method for an automatic auditing system of claim 1, wherein said adjusting said auditing rule according to the duty cycle of the number of human modification operations in said historical number of times further comprises:
and when the duty ratio is smaller than the positive rate threshold, giving a suggestion for deleting the auditing rule.
3. The rule-tuning method for an automatic auditing system of claim 2, said method further comprising:
and when the first execution reason and the second execution reason are selected, generating corresponding auditing rules according to the first execution reason and the second execution reason.
4. The rule adjustment method of an automatic auditing system according to claim 1, wherein the auditing rules are pre-categorized into categories at build time, the categories including service rules, execution rules, and intervention rules; wherein the service rule is a rule requiring no human intervention, the execution rule is a rule requiring human intervention but requiring no modification of report content, and the intervention rule is a rule requiring human intervention and requiring human modification of report content.
5. A rule adjustment device for an automatic auditing system, comprising:
the automatic auditing module is used for responding to the automatic auditing instruction and carrying out automatic auditing operation on the detection items in the report according to auditing rules preset by the detection system;
the auditing rule hit number calculation module is used for acquiring the historical number of times that the auditing rule hit by the current detection item is hit when the current detection item has the manual modifying operation in the automatic auditing operation, and acquiring the number of times that the manual modifying operation exists after the current detection item hits the auditing rule;
the auditing rule adjusting module is used for adjusting the auditing rule according to the occupation ratio of the times of manual modification operation in the historical times;
The auditing rule adjusting module is specifically configured to:
when the duty ratio is larger than or equal to a preset positive rate threshold value, calculating the mean value and standard deviation of other abnormal detection values of the detection item; when the detection item hits the corresponding auditing rule, the detection value of the current detection item is an abnormal detection value, and the other abnormal detection values are other abnormal detection values except the abnormal detection value of the current detection item with the artificial modification operation;
calculating the sum of the mean value and the standard deviation multiplied by the coefficient as an judgment value;
if the trial value is smaller than the intervention result value, an adjustment suggestion for adjusting the judgment threshold value of the auditing rule to be the trial value is given; the intervention result value is an abnormal detection value of a current detection item with manual modification operation;
if the trial value is greater than or equal to the intervention result value, a suggestion for reserving a judgment threshold value of the auditing rule is given;
when the duty ratio is smaller than the positive rate threshold, a suggestion for deleting the auditing rule is given;
the auditing result acquisition module is used for acquiring auditing results of the current detection item when the current detection item has manual modification operation in the automatic auditing operation; the auditing result comprises reporting no abnormality and reporting abnormality, wherein reporting abnormality is displayed when the detecting item hits the corresponding auditing rule, and reporting no abnormality is displayed when the detecting item misses the corresponding auditing rule;
The bullet frame option display module is used for displaying corresponding bullet frame options in a display interface according to the auditing result; wherein, the bullet frame option is provided with a plurality of execution reasons related to the manual modification operation;
the execution reasons include:
the execution reason is: independent of the existing auditing rules, and the detection system is required to establish corresponding auditing rules according to the current detection project;
the execution reason is as follows: independent of the existing auditing rules, and a detection system is not required to establish corresponding auditing rules according to the current detection project;
the execution causes three: the current detection item hits the existing auditing rule;
when the auditing result is abnormal report, the auditing result correspondingly displays the first execution reason, the second execution reason and the third execution reason in the bullet box option; and when the auditing result is that no abnormality is reported, displaying the first execution reason and the second execution reason in the bullet box options correspondingly.
6. A rule adjustment device for an automatic auditing system, comprising a processor, a memory and a computer program stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the processor, the processor implementing the rule adjustment method for an automatic auditing system according to any of claims 1 to 4 when executing the computer program.
7. A computer readable storage medium, characterized in that the computer readable storage medium comprises a stored computer program, wherein the computer program, when run, controls a device in which the computer readable storage medium is located to execute the rule adjustment method of the automatic auditing system according to any of claims 1 to 4.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011579369.4A CN112599215B (en) | 2020-12-28 | 2020-12-28 | Rule adjustment method, device, equipment and storage medium of automatic auditing system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011579369.4A CN112599215B (en) | 2020-12-28 | 2020-12-28 | Rule adjustment method, device, equipment and storage medium of automatic auditing system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112599215A CN112599215A (en) | 2021-04-02 |
| CN112599215B true CN112599215B (en) | 2023-12-15 |
Family
ID=75202595
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011579369.4A Active CN112599215B (en) | 2020-12-28 | 2020-12-28 | Rule adjustment method, device, equipment and storage medium of automatic auditing system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112599215B (en) |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106126958A (en) * | 2016-07-06 | 2016-11-16 | 温冬梅 | Health Service Laboratory biochemistry test automatic auditing method and system |
| CN109345200A (en) * | 2018-09-20 | 2019-02-15 | 沈阳金域医学检验所有限公司 | Automatic auditing method and device, computer readable storage medium based on high-volume report |
| CN110458516A (en) * | 2019-07-19 | 2019-11-15 | 沈阳金域医学检验所有限公司 | A kind of rules revision method, device and equipment of automatic auditing system |
| CN110610344A (en) * | 2019-07-29 | 2019-12-24 | 黑龙江金域医学检验所有限公司 | Method, device and equipment for improving auditing speed of automatic auditing system |
| CN110660462A (en) * | 2019-09-26 | 2020-01-07 | 复旦大学附属中山医院 | Inspection report automatic auditing method, system and storage medium based on big data |
| CN111160855A (en) * | 2019-12-19 | 2020-05-15 | 海南金域医学检验中心有限公司 | Report sheet automatic auditing method, device, equipment and storage medium |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA3085179A1 (en) * | 2017-12-06 | 2019-06-13 | Walmart Apollo, Llc | System and method for iterative improvements to pre-count inventory rules |
-
2020
- 2020-12-28 CN CN202011579369.4A patent/CN112599215B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106126958A (en) * | 2016-07-06 | 2016-11-16 | 温冬梅 | Health Service Laboratory biochemistry test automatic auditing method and system |
| CN109345200A (en) * | 2018-09-20 | 2019-02-15 | 沈阳金域医学检验所有限公司 | Automatic auditing method and device, computer readable storage medium based on high-volume report |
| CN110458516A (en) * | 2019-07-19 | 2019-11-15 | 沈阳金域医学检验所有限公司 | A kind of rules revision method, device and equipment of automatic auditing system |
| CN110610344A (en) * | 2019-07-29 | 2019-12-24 | 黑龙江金域医学检验所有限公司 | Method, device and equipment for improving auditing speed of automatic auditing system |
| CN110660462A (en) * | 2019-09-26 | 2020-01-07 | 复旦大学附属中山医院 | Inspection report automatic auditing method, system and storage medium based on big data |
| CN111160855A (en) * | 2019-12-19 | 2020-05-15 | 海南金域医学检验中心有限公司 | Report sheet automatic auditing method, device, equipment and storage medium |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| A screening focusing on aftereffects of alcohol consumption in a student population. A National cross-sectional survey;Hazart, J 等;Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene;第第59卷卷(第第1期期);第E48-E62页 * |
| 临床免疫学检测结果自动审核规则和流程的建立及运用探讨;刘玉霞;杜永昌;丁利霞;张美玲;张美娟;尚牧牧;王莹;陶然;;现代检验医学杂志(第01期);第153-156页 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN112599215A (en) | 2021-04-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Kang | Trial sequential analysis: novel approach for meta-analysis | |
| WO2019100576A1 (en) | Automated test management method and apparatus, terminal device, and storage medium | |
| GB2586105A (en) | Quality review management system | |
| CN108648810B (en) | Data processing method and device for medical audit and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN110660462A (en) | Inspection report automatic auditing method, system and storage medium based on big data | |
| US20210224742A1 (en) | Method for creating underwriting decision tree, computer device and storage medium | |
| US8756071B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for queue-based cluster analysis | |
| CN109242307B (en) | Anti-fraud policy analysis method, server, electronic device and storage medium | |
| CN110851298B (en) | Abnormality analysis and processing method, electronic device and storage medium | |
| CN110278201B (en) | Security policy evaluation method and device, computer readable medium and electronic device | |
| CN109426655B (en) | Data analysis method and device, electronic equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN111160855B (en) | Report automatic auditing method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| DE112018006911T5 (en) | ANOMALY DETECTION DEVICE | |
| US20230040648A1 (en) | String entropy in a data pipeline | |
| WO2020233021A1 (en) | Test result analysis method based on intelligent decision, and related apparatus | |
| CN109544363B (en) | Medical supervision method, device, terminal and medium based on data visualization | |
| US11823086B2 (en) | Membership analyzing method, apparatus, computer device and storage medium | |
| CN112599215B (en) | Rule adjustment method, device, equipment and storage medium of automatic auditing system | |
| CN109639456A (en) | A kind of automation processing platform for the improved method and alarm data that automation alerts | |
| CN115293155A (en) | Diagnostic word normalizing method and device | |
| CN109828902B (en) | Interface parameter determining method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111354441A (en) | System and method for monitoring AI operation result of medical image | |
| CN115659826A (en) | Server failure rate detection method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113127459B (en) | Implementation method and device for data management, readable medium and electronic equipment | |
| CN107403199A (en) | Data processing method and device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information |
Address after: 510000 No. 10, helix 3 Road, International Biological Island, Huangpu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province Applicant after: GUANGZHOU KINGMED CENTER FOR CLINICAL LABORATORY Applicant after: GUANGZHOU MEDICAL University Address before: 510000, No. 2429, Xingang East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Haizhuqu District Applicant before: GUANGZHOU KINGMED CENTER FOR CLINICAL LABORATORY Applicant before: GUANGZHOU MEDICAL University |
|
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |