CN110656913A - Method for contrast test of well completion effect of perforation process - Google Patents
Method for contrast test of well completion effect of perforation process Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110656913A CN110656913A CN201911035725.3A CN201911035725A CN110656913A CN 110656913 A CN110656913 A CN 110656913A CN 201911035725 A CN201911035725 A CN 201911035725A CN 110656913 A CN110656913 A CN 110656913A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- perforation
- negative pressure
- gun
- vacuum
- dynamic negative
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 89
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 53
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 34
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 claims description 23
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 claims 6
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000009489 vacuum treatment Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000010835 comparative analysis Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004035 construction material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/11—Perforators; Permeators
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/11—Perforators; Permeators
- E21B43/119—Details, e.g. for locating perforating place or direction
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to the technical field of dynamic negative pressure perforation of oil and gas wells, in particular to a method for a contrast test of well completion effect of a perforation process, which comprises conventional perforation, dynamic negative pressure perforation, vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation and data acquisition and analysis, and has the following beneficial effects: the invention carries out comprehensive analysis on the acquisition of well fluid samples and perforation debris solid samples during perforation and the results of test data, and the comparative analysis of various perforation processes including conventional process perforation, dynamic negative pressure perforation, vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation and acquired data, deduces the difference and the quality among various perforation processes by taking test data as a theoretical basis, and provides a theoretical basis for the selection of the perforation process of an oil field.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of negative pressure perforation of oil and gas wells, in particular to a method for a contrast test of well completion effect of a perforation process.
Background
In the development process of an oil-water well, one process before oil testing is to lower a perforating gun to a preset depth, eject a casing and a cement sheath of a target layer by perforation to form a communicating pore passage from a stratum to a shaft so as to facilitate operations such as oil extraction, gas production and the like, and select a proper perforating process according to the characteristics of an oil layer and fluid, the damage condition of the stratum and the production conditions of an oil field, wherein the process can be divided into a positive pressure process and a negative pressure process, and the perforation with the liquid column pressure higher than the stratum pressure is performed by high-density perforating liquid as positive pressure perforation; and reducing the liquid level of the shaft to a certain depth, and forming a perforation which is lower than the formation pressure and establishes proper negative pressure, namely a negative pressure perforation.
However, many negative pressure perforation methods in the market at present lack theoretical summary and summarization of a systematic measurement process method, and in oil and gas well development, aiming at different geology, effective theoretical support is lacked when different perforation processes are implemented.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a method for a contrast test of a well completion effect of a perforation process, which is lack of a theoretical summary and summarization of a systematic measurement process method and an effective theoretical support problem in the development of oil and gas wells aiming at different geology and different perforation processes.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention is realized by the following technical scheme:
the invention provides a method for a contrast test of well completion effect of a perforation process, wherein the method for measuring data of the negative pressure perforation process comprises a conventional perforation part, a dynamic negative pressure perforation part, a vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation part, sample data acquisition and data detection analysis;
the conventional perforation process comprises the following steps: carrying out perforation by utilizing conventional perforation, composite perforation, non-explosive capacity expansion perforation and self-cleaning perforation processes, collecting and sampling well liquid and perforation debris solids in perforated intervals after perforation, carrying out physical and chemical analysis on the well liquid and perforation debris solids samples, and testing the components, the material element content and the composition of the well liquid and the perforation debris solids; comparing the difference and the change among the perforation processes through the sample analysis and calculation result;
the dynamic negative pressure punch part comprises: carrying out perforation by utilizing conventional dynamic negative pressure perforation, composite dynamic negative pressure perforation, non-explosive capacity expansion dynamic negative pressure perforation and self-cleaning dynamic negative pressure perforation processes, collecting and sampling well liquid and perforation debris solids in perforated intervals after perforation, carrying out physical and chemical analysis on the well liquid and perforation debris solids samples, and testing the components, the substance element content and the composition of the well liquid and the perforation debris solids; comparing the difference and the change among the perforation processes through the sample analysis and calculation result;
the vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation part comprises the following steps: perforating the perforated layer sections by utilizing vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation, composite vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation, non-explosive capacity expansion vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation and self-cleaning vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation, collecting and sampling well liquid and perforation debris solids of the perforated layer sections, carrying out physical and chemical analysis on the well liquid and perforation debris solids samples, and testing the components, the substance element content and the composition of the well liquid and the perforation debris solids; comparing the difference and the change among the perforation processes through the sample analysis and calculation result;
data analysis part: performing cross comparison analysis among various perforating processes by using physicochemical analysis results of all collected sample components, and analyzing well fluid components and perforating debris solid components after perforation among various perforating processes and quantitative change results of the components;
collecting Pt data of conventional dynamic negative pressure perforation and vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation by using a pressure tester, drawing corresponding Pt pressure curves, and comparing and analyzing the difference of the negative pressure effect of the vacuum negative pressure gun and the conventional negative pressure gun on the construction well through the collected Pt curves.
Preferably, the conventional perforating equipment comprises 40-50 meters of a 102 type conventional perforating gun and 10-15 gun tails of a 102 type gun head.
Preferably, the composite perforating equipment comprises 40-50 meters of 102 type composite perforating guns and 10-15 gun tails of 102 type gun heads.
Preferably, the non-explosive capacity-expanding perforation equipment comprises 40-50 meters of 102 type non-explosive capacity-expanding perforation guns and 10-15 gun tails of 102 type gun heads.
Preferably, the self-cleaning perforating equipment comprises 40-50 meters of 102 type self-cleaning perforating guns and 10-15 gun tails of 102 type gun heads.
Preferably, the composite dynamic negative pressure perforating device comprises 10-15 delayed negative pressure devices, 10-15 102 type 1m negative pressure guns, 10-15 102 type 3m negative pressure guns and 10-15 gun tails of 102 gun heads, the composite dynamic vacuum negative pressure perforating device comprises 10-15 102 type 4m vacuum negative pressure guns, 10-15 hydraulic delayed negative pressure devices, 10-15 negative pressure cabin opening devices and 10-15 environment-friendly vacuum negative pressure gun tails.
Preferably, the method for measuring the data of the negative pressure perforation process further comprises a pressure time testing device, wherein the pressure time testing device comprises 2 pressure gauge joints, 1 pressure gauge support cylinder, 2 PT instruments, 2-3 liquid sample collecting and metering pools and 400-500 solid sample collecting bags.
Preferably, the sample collection of the conventional processing part, the dynamic negative pressure processing section, the dynamic vacuum processing section, the data comparison section and the data drawing section is at least 5 times.
The invention has the beneficial effects that: the invention carries out comprehensive analysis on the acquisition of well fluid samples and perforation debris solid samples during perforation and the results of test data, and the comparative analysis of various perforation processes including conventional process perforation, dynamic negative pressure perforation, vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation and acquired data, deduces the difference and the quality among various perforation processes by taking test data as a theoretical basis, and provides a theoretical basis for the selection of the perforation process of an oil field.
Detailed Description
The following further describes embodiments of the present invention with reference to examples. The following examples are only for illustrating the technical solutions of the present invention more clearly, and the protection scope of the present invention is not limited thereby.
Example 1
A method for contrast test of well completion effect of perforation process, the data measurement method of negative pressure perforation process includes the conventional perforation part, dynamic negative pressure perforation part, vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation part and sample data acquisition and data detection analysis;
the conventional perforation process comprises the following steps: carrying out perforation by utilizing conventional perforation, composite perforation, non-explosive capacity expansion perforation and self-cleaning perforation processes, collecting and sampling well liquid and perforation debris solids in perforated intervals after perforation, carrying out physical and chemical analysis on the well liquid and perforation debris solids samples, and testing the components, the material element content and the composition of the well liquid and the perforation debris solids; comparing the difference and the change among the perforation processes through the sample analysis and calculation result;
the dynamic negative pressure punch part comprises: carrying out perforation by utilizing conventional dynamic negative pressure perforation, composite dynamic negative pressure perforation, non-explosive capacity expansion dynamic negative pressure perforation and self-cleaning dynamic negative pressure perforation processes, collecting and sampling well liquid and perforation debris solids in perforated intervals after perforation, carrying out physical and chemical analysis on the well liquid and perforation debris solids samples, and testing the components, the substance element content and the composition of the well liquid and the perforation debris solids; comparing the difference and the change among the perforation processes through the sample analysis and calculation result;
the vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation part comprises the following steps: perforating the perforated layer sections by utilizing vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation, composite vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation, non-explosive capacity expansion vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation and self-cleaning vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation, collecting and sampling well liquid and perforation debris solids of the perforated layer sections, carrying out physical and chemical analysis on the well liquid and perforation debris solids samples, and testing the components, the substance element content and the composition of the well liquid and the perforation debris solids; comparing the difference and the change among the perforation processes through the sample analysis and calculation result;
data analysis part: performing cross comparison analysis among various perforating processes by using physicochemical analysis results of all collected sample components, and analyzing well fluid components and perforating debris solid components after perforation among various perforating processes and quantitative change results of the components;
collecting Pt data of conventional dynamic negative pressure perforation and vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation by using a pressure tester, drawing corresponding Pt pressure curves, and comparing and analyzing the difference of the negative pressure effect of the vacuum negative pressure gun and the conventional negative pressure gun on the construction well through the collected Pt curves.
The conventional perforating equipment comprises 40-50 meters of 102 type conventional perforating guns and 10-15 gun tails of 102 type gun heads, the composite perforating equipment comprises 40-50 meters of 102 type composite perforating guns and 10-15 gun tails of 102 type gun heads, the non-explosive capacity-expanding perforating equipment comprises 40-50 meters of 102 type non-explosive capacity-expanding perforating guns and 10-15 gun tails of 102 type gun heads, the self-cleaning perforating equipment comprises 40-50 meters of 102 type self-cleaning perforating guns and 10-15 gun tails of 102 type gun heads, the composite dynamic negative pressure perforating device comprises 10-15 delay negative pressure devices, 10-15 negative pressure guns of 102 type 1m, 10-15 negative pressure guns of 102 type 3m and 10-15 gun tails of 102 type gun heads, the composite dynamic negative pressure perforating device comprises 10-15 vacuum negative pressure guns of 102 type 4m, 10-15 hydraulic delay negative pressure devices, 10-15 negative pressure cabin opening devices, 10-15 environment-friendly vacuum negative pressure gun tails, and the negative pressure process data measuring method further comprises a pressure time testing device, the pressure time testing device comprises 2 pressure gauge joints, 1 pressure gauge supporting cylinder and 2 PT instruments, wherein 2-3 liquid sample collecting and metering pools are arranged, 400-500 solid sample collecting bags are arranged, and the samples collected by a conventional processing part, a dynamic negative pressure processing section, a dynamic vacuum processing section, a data comparison section and a data drawing section are at least 5 times.
Experiment and experimental data and experimental sample collection steps,
1. analyzing the block where the test well is located, the well number of the construction well, the perforation construction material list, the number of the perforating bullets, the composite explosive quantity, the number of the non-explosive dilators and the number of the perforating gun columns, and screening the number of the perforating gun columns meeting the test conditions to be used as the test target gun.
2. And designing and drawing a perforation construction tubular column assembly process diagram.
3. During testing, the test construction equipment is assembled according to the assembly process diagram of the perforation construction tubular column.
4. And recovering the perforating gun and a special acquisition device after perforation, collecting a well liquid sample and a fragment solid sample generated by perforation, packaging the collected sample, and marking clear related information on a collection bag, wherein the information comprises a well number, the depth of a perforation layer, a perforation mode, the length of the perforating gun, the type number of perforating bullets, the number of composite medicine boxes, the number of non-explosive expanding bodies, the number of bullet loading and the like.
5. And when negative pressure perforation is carried out, downloading test data of the PT instrument after the perforation is finished, sorting and storing the test data, and printing a PT curve.
6. During conventional dynamic negative pressure perforation and vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation, after the negative pressure gun is lifted out of a well mouth, the volume or weight of well fluid in the negative pressure gun is measured in time, and meanwhile, measurement data records are made.
7. And (5) finishing and filling test records.
Analyzing a test sample:
1. perforation debris solids test sample gravimetric: and weighing the solid test samples collected by each test gun of each well and filling data records.
2. And performing physical and chemical analysis on the element components of the solid test sample, measuring the component proportion of each element in the sample, and issuing a detection data report according to each test well and each perforating gun.
3. And performing element component physicochemical analysis on the well fluid test sample, determining the component proportion of each element in the sample, and issuing a detection data report once for each test well and each perforating gun.
The method has the specific effects that through comprehensive analysis of test data results of well fluid samples and perforation debris solid sample tests, the difference between various perforation processes is deduced on the basis of the test data as a theoretical basis, and a theoretical basis is provided for selection of the perforation processes of the oil field.
The above description is only for the preferred embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art should be considered to be within the technical scope of the present invention, and the technical solutions and the inventive concepts thereof according to the present invention should be equivalent or changed within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (8)
1. A method for a contrast test of a well completion effect of a perforation process is characterized in that a negative pressure perforation process data measurement method comprises a conventional perforation part, a dynamic negative pressure perforation part, a vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation part, sample data acquisition and data detection analysis;
the conventional perforation process comprises the following steps: carrying out perforation by utilizing conventional perforation, composite perforation, non-explosive capacity expansion perforation and self-cleaning perforation processes, collecting and sampling well liquid and perforation debris solids in perforated intervals after perforation, carrying out physical and chemical analysis on the well liquid and perforation debris solids samples, and testing the components, the material element content and the composition of the well liquid and the perforation debris solids; comparing the difference and the change among the perforation processes through the sample analysis and calculation result;
the dynamic negative pressure punch part comprises: carrying out perforation by utilizing conventional dynamic negative pressure perforation, composite dynamic negative pressure perforation, non-explosive capacity expansion dynamic negative pressure perforation and self-cleaning dynamic negative pressure perforation processes, collecting and sampling well liquid and perforation debris solids in perforated intervals after perforation, carrying out physical and chemical analysis on the well liquid and perforation debris solids samples, and testing the components, the substance element content and the composition of the well liquid and the perforation debris solids; comparing the difference and the change among the perforation processes through the sample analysis and calculation result;
the vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation part comprises the following steps: perforating the perforated layer sections by utilizing vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation, composite vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation, non-explosive capacity expansion vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation and self-cleaning vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation, collecting and sampling well liquid and perforation debris solids of the perforated layer sections, carrying out physical and chemical analysis on the well liquid and perforation debris solids samples, and testing the components, the substance element content and the composition of the well liquid and the perforation debris solids; comparing the difference and the change among the perforation processes through the sample analysis and calculation result;
fourthly, a data analysis part: performing cross comparison analysis among various perforating processes by using physicochemical analysis results of all collected sample components, and analyzing well fluid components and perforating debris solid components after perforation among various perforating processes and quantitative change results of the components;
collecting Pt data of conventional dynamic negative pressure perforation and vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation by using a pressure tester, drawing corresponding Pt pressure curves, and comparing and analyzing the difference of the negative pressure effect of the vacuum negative pressure gun and the conventional negative pressure gun on the construction well through the collected Pt curves.
2. The method for performing comparative tests on the effects of well completion of perforation processes according to claim 1, wherein the conventional perforation equipment comprises 40-50 meters of 102 type conventional perforating guns and 10-15 gun tails of 102 type gun heads.
3. The method for performing comparative tests on the effects of well completion of perforation technologies according to claim 1, wherein the composite perforation equipment comprises 40-50 meters of 102 type composite perforating guns and 10-15 gun tails of 102 type gun heads.
4. The method for performing comparative tests on the effects of well completion of perforation processes according to claim 1, wherein the non-explosive volume-expanding perforation equipment comprises 40-50 meters of type 102 non-explosive volume-expanding perforation guns and 10-15 gun tails of type 102 gun heads.
5. The method for the comparative experiment of the well completion effect of the perforation process according to claim 1, wherein the self-cleaning perforation equipment comprises 40-50 meters of 102 type self-cleaning perforation guns and 10-15 gun tails of 102 type gun heads.
6. The method for the comparative test of the completion effect of the perforation process according to claim 1, wherein the composite dynamic negative pressure perforation devices comprise 10-15 delay negative pressure devices, 10-15 102 type 1m negative pressure guns, 10-15 102 type 3m negative pressure guns and 10-15 gun tails of 102 type gun heads, the composite vacuum dynamic negative pressure perforation devices comprise 10-15 vacuum negative pressure guns with the size of 102 type 4m, 10-15 hydraulic delay negative pressure devices, 10-15 negative pressure cabin opening devices and 10-15 environment-friendly vacuum negative pressure gun tails.
7. The method for performing contrast test on completion effect of perforation process according to claim 1, wherein the method for measuring data of negative pressure perforation process further comprises a pressure time testing device, the pressure time testing device comprises 2 pressure gauge connectors, 1 pressure gauge support barrel, 2 PT instruments, 2-3 liquid sample collecting and metering tanks and 400-500 solid sample collecting bags.
8. The method for performing the comparative testing on the completion effect of the perforation process according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the conventional treatment part, the dynamic negative pressure treatment section, the dynamic vacuum treatment section, the data comparison section and the data plotting section are used for collecting samples at least 5 times.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911035725.3A CN110656913B (en) | 2019-10-29 | 2019-10-29 | Method for contrast test of well completion effect of perforation process |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911035725.3A CN110656913B (en) | 2019-10-29 | 2019-10-29 | Method for contrast test of well completion effect of perforation process |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110656913A true CN110656913A (en) | 2020-01-07 |
| CN110656913B CN110656913B (en) | 2022-05-17 |
Family
ID=69042090
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911035725.3A Active CN110656913B (en) | 2019-10-29 | 2019-10-29 | Method for contrast test of well completion effect of perforation process |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110656913B (en) |
Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20080295678A1 (en) * | 2005-05-16 | 2008-12-04 | Kevin George | Perforation gun with integral debris trap apparatus and method of use |
| CN101344001A (en) * | 2008-08-05 | 2009-01-14 | 中国石化集团华北石油局 | Analytical method of X-ray fluorescence terrigenous clastic rock porosity in petroleum well drilling |
| CN101429864A (en) * | 2008-12-22 | 2009-05-13 | 中国石油集团长城钻探工程有限公司 | Rod throwing type oil gas well perforation testing process method |
| US20090151949A1 (en) * | 2007-12-17 | 2009-06-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Debris-free perforating apparatus and technique |
| CN101914733A (en) * | 2010-08-26 | 2010-12-15 | 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司 | Method for manufacturing low-debris perforating charge shell |
| CN102926720A (en) * | 2012-10-30 | 2013-02-13 | 陕西联盟物流有限公司 | Ultrahigh-pressure perforating gun |
| CN203742568U (en) * | 2014-04-02 | 2014-07-30 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Debris collecting device after perforation of perforator |
| CN205243480U (en) * | 2015-11-11 | 2016-05-18 | 西安物华巨能***器材有限责任公司 | Perforating bullet casing fragmentation collection device |
| CN106198543A (en) * | 2016-07-04 | 2016-12-07 | 中国科学技术大学 | A kind of experimental provision verifying dynamic negative-pressure perforation tunnel cleaning degree |
| CN108166974A (en) * | 2016-12-06 | 2018-06-15 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | The test made with perforation connection samples integrated device |
| CN109025915A (en) * | 2018-08-09 | 2018-12-18 | 张卫华 | A kind of full-bore under across returning combined operation of perforation and testing tubing string and its operating method |
-
2019
- 2019-10-29 CN CN201911035725.3A patent/CN110656913B/en active Active
Patent Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20080295678A1 (en) * | 2005-05-16 | 2008-12-04 | Kevin George | Perforation gun with integral debris trap apparatus and method of use |
| US20090151949A1 (en) * | 2007-12-17 | 2009-06-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Debris-free perforating apparatus and technique |
| CN101344001A (en) * | 2008-08-05 | 2009-01-14 | 中国石化集团华北石油局 | Analytical method of X-ray fluorescence terrigenous clastic rock porosity in petroleum well drilling |
| CN101429864A (en) * | 2008-12-22 | 2009-05-13 | 中国石油集团长城钻探工程有限公司 | Rod throwing type oil gas well perforation testing process method |
| CN101914733A (en) * | 2010-08-26 | 2010-12-15 | 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司 | Method for manufacturing low-debris perforating charge shell |
| CN102926720A (en) * | 2012-10-30 | 2013-02-13 | 陕西联盟物流有限公司 | Ultrahigh-pressure perforating gun |
| CN203742568U (en) * | 2014-04-02 | 2014-07-30 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Debris collecting device after perforation of perforator |
| CN205243480U (en) * | 2015-11-11 | 2016-05-18 | 西安物华巨能***器材有限责任公司 | Perforating bullet casing fragmentation collection device |
| CN106198543A (en) * | 2016-07-04 | 2016-12-07 | 中国科学技术大学 | A kind of experimental provision verifying dynamic negative-pressure perforation tunnel cleaning degree |
| CN108166974A (en) * | 2016-12-06 | 2018-06-15 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | The test made with perforation connection samples integrated device |
| CN109025915A (en) * | 2018-08-09 | 2018-12-18 | 张卫华 | A kind of full-bore under across returning combined operation of perforation and testing tubing string and its operating method |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 曹欣茂 等: "《世界***器材手册》", 31 October 1999, 兵器工业出版社 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN110656913B (en) | 2022-05-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US9989512B2 (en) | High pressure rock core testing | |
| CN107701160A (en) | Simulate hydraulically created fracture and the experimental provision and method of intrinsic fracture extension influence | |
| CN106855566B (en) | A kind of experimental method simulated for high temperature, Overpressure type reservoir evolution | |
| CN106970198B (en) | Oil and gas source determination method and device | |
| CN104949868A (en) | Blasting damaged rock sample preparation and micro-macro combined damage degree determination method | |
| CN104181283A (en) | Method and device for determining radon gas separation in load coal fracture process | |
| CN104075959B (en) | Mud shale profit saturation method for accurate testing | |
| US20090217739A1 (en) | Method for the development and quality control of flow-optimized shaped charges | |
| CN105445161A (en) | Characterizing method for pore volumes of full apertures of shale | |
| CN112727444B (en) | Visual hole sealing material crack plugging performance testing device and method | |
| CN103245735A (en) | Online analysis method for hydrocarbon carbon isotope of light hydrocarbon monomer of pyrolysis product of source rock | |
| CN105891250A (en) | Method for determining original water saturation of tight sandstone reservoir | |
| CN110656913B (en) | Method for contrast test of well completion effect of perforation process | |
| CN209821099U (en) | Multifunctional compact gas reservoir dynamic parameter joint measurement device based on nuclear magnetic resonance | |
| CN112145165A (en) | Dynamic and static permeability conversion method for micro-crack-pore type reservoir | |
| CN110320228B (en) | Shale oil reservoir CO injection 2 Method and device for testing and analyzing oil displacement efficiency by imbibition | |
| CN110231268B (en) | Method for analyzing oil-water occurrence pore size distribution of rock of tight reservoir | |
| CN111241652B (en) | Method and device for determining viscosity of crude oil in stratum | |
| CN107449823A (en) | Original oil-water contact recognition methods and its application in crude oil filling history is rebuild | |
| CN111308043B (en) | Method for distinguishing structurally-ordered dolomite | |
| CN110715890A (en) | Soil cavity gas tracer test device | |
| CN110685678A (en) | Method and device for rapidly evaluating shale gas well productivity | |
| CN110106853A (en) | A method of calculating the compression modulus of clay containing gravel | |
| CN113792932B (en) | Shale gas yield prediction method utilizing microseism-damage-seepage relation | |
| CN117007627A (en) | Analysis method for quantitatively representing shale organic pore porosity by nuclear magnetic resonance technology |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |