CN109946385A - A kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage - Google Patents

A kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109946385A
CN109946385A CN201910256800.2A CN201910256800A CN109946385A CN 109946385 A CN109946385 A CN 109946385A CN 201910256800 A CN201910256800 A CN 201910256800A CN 109946385 A CN109946385 A CN 109946385A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
longitudinal wave
critical refraction
damage
voussoir
refraction longitudinal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201910256800.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
罗忠兵
林莉
王新禹
孟亦圆
金士杰
马志远
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dalian University of Technology
Original Assignee
Dalian University of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dalian University of Technology filed Critical Dalian University of Technology
Priority to CN201910256800.2A priority Critical patent/CN109946385A/en
Publication of CN109946385A publication Critical patent/CN109946385A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Abstract

A kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage belongs to mechanical damage evaluation and technical field of nondestructive testing.Method includes the following steps: measuring the longitudinal wave velocity of tested material and voussoir material respectively, calculating critical refraction longitudinal wave wedge angle and determining geometric dimension;Specimen surface excitation, reception critical refraction longitudinal wave, preferably ultrasonic probe frequency and voussoir spacing are not damaged in tested material using one debit's formula of hair;It acquires tested material and does not damage sample, damage specimen surface critical refraction longitudinal wave, and critical refraction longitudinal wave amplitude is normalized;Establish the corresponding relationship between normalization amplitude and mechanical damage parameter.This method is small to the fluctuation of same sample multiple measurement results, has better stability and repeatability compared with ultrasonic pulse reflection method, evaluation material early stage mechanical damage result is more reliable.

Description

A kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of ultrasonic methods for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage, belong to mechanical damage evaluation and lossless inspection Survey technology field.
Background technique
Engineering component, due to a variety of energy field reciprocations such as heat, power, unavoidably occurs one during manufacture, being on active service Fixed mechanical damage reduces load-carrying properties.The surface of component/sub-surface geometric position is special, defect and the normal shape herein of damage Core directly or indirectly promotes the formation and extension of macroscopic cracking, destroys the structural intergrity of component.Therefore, in mechanical damage morning It is to improve component manufacture and military service quality, the important means for preventing disaster that phase, which carries out effective evaluation to it,.
In recent years, the fault in material based on ultrasonic method and damage NDT and NDE are concerned.Macroscopic view is lacked It falls into for detection, mainly the scattering process of ultrasonic wave is carried out using defect, as pulse reflection method detects macroscopic cracking. For earlier damage, evaluation method differs widely, and reason is that microdefect (dislocation etc.) does not cause significantly to scatter letter Number, but microdefect group is embodied in the uptake and accumulation of acoustic propagation, therefore, acoustic characteristic variation is relied primarily on to reflect early stage The evolution of damage, including the relevant velocity of sound of elastic properties of materials and the relevant acoustic attenuation of acoustic propagation energy[1,2].Dislocation is engineering knot Structure material plasticity deformation carrier, acoustic characteristic change major embodiment dislocation damping, therefore acoustic attenuation to earlier damage more Sensitivity, using also more extensive[3,4].But it is more that influence factor is tested in acoustic attenuation[5,6], by taking pulse reflection method as an example, locating for sample The relativeness of position and probe near field, far field, pressing a variety of operation factors such as dynamics of probe in coupling process all can be to survey Test result impacts;Meanwhile characterize acoustic attenuation acoustic attenuation coefficient measurement must using component thickness as prior information, for Inside/outside rough surface, closed component are very unobtainable.Therefore, how accurate reliable measurements acoustic attenuation is early stage mechanics damage Hurt the critical issue of acoustic assessment.
Critical refraction longitudinal wave is longitudinal wave that is incident with first critical angle, propagating in specimen surface/sub-surface.Study table It is bright[7-9]: the about several wavelength of critical refraction longitudinal wave penetration depth in sample, it is insensitive to features such as surface roughnesses, it is suitable for Engineering component on-site test.In addition, critical refraction longitudinal wave spread speed is sensitive to residual stress, validity is in aluminium alloy, steel Be verified in equal multiple materials, but measurement accuracy when characterization result is very dependent on propagation sound, when to sound calculation method and Alignment requirements are higher.For critical refraction longitudinal wave acoustic attenuation, due to avoiding the rigors of sound transit-time measurement, critical folding is only needed Penetrating longitudinal wave amplitude information can be realized, and operation ease and reliability greatly enhance.Currently, being based on critical refraction longitudinal wave acoustic attenuation Metallic material components early stage mechanical damage evaluation there is not been reported.
Therefore, the present invention proposes a kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage, is based on critical refraction longitudinal wave energy Amount decaying evaluation metal material early stage mechanical damage degree, and with conventional pulse-echo method comparative analysis, improve acoustical attenuation measurement As a result stability, while the rigors of sound transit-time measurement in critical refraction longitudinal wave velocity of sound characterization are avoided, operation ease is improved, It is suitable for engineering component on-site test, for research metal material earlier damage mechanism, develops component earlier damage evaluation method All it is of great significance.
Bibliography:
[1]Granato A.,Lucke K.Theory of mechanical damping due to dislocations[J].Journal of Applied Physics,1956,27(6):583-593.
[2]Granato A.,Hikata A.,Lücke K.Recovery of damping and modulus changes following plastic deformation[J].Acta Metallurgica,1958,6(7):470-480.
[3]Hirao M.,Ogi H.,Suzuki N.,Ohtani T.Ultrasonic attenuation peak during fatigue of polycrystalline copper[J].Acta Materialia,2000,48(2):517- 524.
[4]Ogi H.,Hamaguchi T.,Hirao M.In-situ monitoring of ultrasonic attenuation during rotating bending fatigue of carbon steel with electromagnetic acoustic resonance[J].Journal of Alloys and Compounds,2000, 310(1-2):436-439.
[5]Pal Barnana.Pulse-echo method cannot measure wave attenuation accurately[J].Ultrasonics,2015,61:6-9.
[6] Zhang Zhao holds high up, Sun Chungui, the development and prospect [J] nondestructive inspection of Li Yibing attenuation coefficient measuring technique, 2015,39(06):38-40.
[7]Langenberg Kj,Fellinger P,Marklein R.On the nature of the so- called subsurface longitudinal wave and/or the surface longitudinal“creeping” wave[J].Research in Nondestructive Evaluation,1990,2(2):59-81.
[8]Bray D.E.,Tang W.Subsurface stress evaluation in steel plates and bars using the LCR ultrasonic wave[J].Nuclear Engineering and Design,2001,207 (2):231-240.
[9] supersonic detection method [J] of Xu Chunguang, Song Wentao, Pan Qinxue, Li Xiao, Jin Xin, Liu Haiyang residual stress without Damage detection, 2014, (07): 25-31.
Summary of the invention
The present invention proposes a kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage.Acoustic attenuation is repeatedly surveyed using this method Amount result fluctuation is small, and material early stage mechanical damage evaluation result is more reliable.
The technical solution adopted by the present invention is that: a kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage is measured by sample The longitudinal wave velocity of material and voussoir material calculates critical refraction longitudinal wave wedge angle and determines geometric dimension;Using one debit of hair Formula does not damage specimen surface excitation, reception critical refraction longitudinal wave, preferably ultrasonic probe frequency and voussoir spacing in tested material;It adopts Collect tested material and do not damage sample, damage specimen surface critical refraction longitudinal wave, and critical refraction longitudinal wave amplitude is normalized Processing;Establish the corresponding relationship between normalization amplitude and mechanical damage parameter;Specific step is as follows:
(1) the longitudinal wave velocity v of tested material and voussoir material is measured respectively according to GB/T 239001And v2
(2) critical refraction longitudinal wave wedge angle is calculated according to formula one, does not damage specimen surface size with reference to tested material Voussoir geometric dimension is determined with shape, to guarantee that voussoir and its surface acoustical coupling are good;
Formula one is
(3) based on voussoir in step (2), use the identical ultrasonic probe of frequency with one debit's formula of hair tested material not It damages specimen surface excitation, receive critical refraction longitudinal wave, according to critical refraction longitudinal wave amplitude, preferably ultrasonic probe frequency and voussoir Spacing;
(4) parameter determined using step (3), acquires that tested material does not damage sample, sample is corresponding faces for damage respectively Boundary's refracted longitudinal wave;
(5) critical refraction longitudinal wave amplitude in step (4) is normalized according to formula two, amplitude will be normalized AnorAs acoustic assessment parameter;
Formula two is
(6) normalization amplitude A is establishednorWith the relationship between tested mechanics of materials impairment parameter.
The beneficial effects of the present invention are: the acoustic attenuation based on critical refraction longitudinal wave characterization sample, multiple measurement results fluctuation Small, test sample thickness effect is small, and it is unstable and then cause material early to overcome ultrasonic pulse echo technique acoustic attenuation test result The phase insecure problem of mechanical damage evaluation result;Avoid simultaneously the critical refraction longitudinal wave velocity of sound characterize in sound transit-time measurement harshness It is required that improving operation ease, it is suitable for engineering component on-site test, for research metal material earlier damage mechanism, hair Exhibition component earlier damage evaluation method is all of great significance.
Detailed description of the invention
Present invention will be further explained below with reference to the attached drawings and examples.
Fig. 1 is pure iron fatigue testing specimen scale diagrams (unit: mm).
Fig. 2 is that pure iron critical refraction longitudinal wave tests voussoir size (unit: mm) used.
Fig. 3 is the ultrasonic tesint waveform under pure iron difference mechanical damage state: CYCLIC LOADING 0 week (a), critical refraction longitudinal wave Waveform;(b) CYCLIC LOADING 100 weeks, critical refraction longitudinal wave waveform;(c) CYCLIC LOADING 0 week, pulse echo method waveform;(d) it recycles Load 100 weeks, pulse echo method waveform.
Fig. 4 is pure iron critical refraction longitudinal wave compared with pulse echo method stability of waveform.
Fig. 5 is pure iron critical refraction longitudinal wave normalization amplitude compared with pulse echo method acoustic attenuation coefficient.
Specific embodiment
(1) the longitudinal wave velocity v of pure iron and organic glass is measured according to GB/T 239001And v2, respectively 5930m/s and 2730m/s;
(2) calculating critical refraction longitudinal wave wedge angle α according to formula one is 27.4 °, and testing fatigue is used for reference to shown in Fig. 1 Pure iron plane plate specimen, thickness 5mm, parallel-segment width 10mm.Therefore, machining α be 27.4 °, width 18mm, probe spiral shell The organic glass voussoir that hole is M6mm, bottom surface is plane is a pair of, as shown in Figure 2;
(3) based on voussoir in step (2), each pair ultrasonic probe that frequency is 2.25MHz and 5MHz is respectively adopted, with one It sends out debit's formula excitation of pure iron specimen surface, reception critical refraction longitudinal wave, probe diameter 6mm in (2) and compares different probes Frequency, voussoir spacing lower critical refracted longitudinal wave amplitude, determine frequency probe between 2.25MHz, voussoir according to amplitude highest situation Away from for 6mm;
(4) use MTS Landmark hydraulic servo test macro to pure iron sample in Fig. 2 under room temperature and air environment It carries out CYCLIC LOADING 100 weeks, R ratio is -1, maximum stress 160MPa, loading frequency 0.1Hz, and control waveform is triangular wave;
(5) parameter determined using step (3) is acquired pure iron respectively and is not damaged sample (CYCLIC LOADING 0 week), damage sample (CYCLIC LOADING 100 weeks) corresponding critical refraction longitudinal wave, same sample measures 6 times respectively, as shown in a and b in Fig. 3, not homogeneous Difference very little between measurement gained waveform, essentially coincides together.Corresponding pulse echo method waveform also c shown in Figure 3 together And d.To further describe the small differences between waveform, root-mean-square-deviation value RMSD is introduced to characterize, such as formula three:
Formula three is
Wherein y1,iAnd y2,iThe amplitude of reference waveform and target waveform is respectively indicated, n indicates the length of zoning.Work as ginseng Examine waveform and target waveform RMSD numerical result it is larger when, illustrate that measured deviation is larger.Fig. 4 be pure iron critical refraction longitudinal wave with Pulse echo method stability of waveform comparison result, the former RMSD maximum value is only 1.5 × 10-5, and the latter's RMSD maximum value is 9.7 ×10-4, compared with the former high about 2 magnitudes, illustrate that critical refraction longitudinal wave test result is more stable reliable;
(6) critical refraction longitudinal wave amplitude in step (5) is normalized, calculates pure iron CYCLIC LOADING 0 week, 100 The normalization amplitude A in weeknor, as shown in figure 5, respectively 1 and 0.33, absolute error is 10-5Magnitude;Respective pulses echo method sound Attenuation factor value is respectively 0.272 ± 0.009dB/mm and 0.366 ± 0.01dB/mm, and absolute error and relative error are obviously high In the former, illustrate that critical refraction longitudinal wave method fluctuates small, A to same sample acoustic attenuation multiple measurement resultsnorWith preferably steady It is qualitative and repeated;
(7) A is established respectivelynorIt is the corresponding relationship between 1,0.33, with CYCLIC LOADING cycle 0,100.

Claims (1)

1. a kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage, it is characterized in that: measuring the vertical of tested material and voussoir material Wave sound speed calculates critical refraction longitudinal wave wedge angle and determines geometric dimension;It is not damaged using one debit's formula of hair in tested material Hurt specimen surface excitation, receive critical refraction longitudinal wave, preferably ultrasonic probe frequency and voussoir spacing;Tested material is acquired not damage Sample, damage specimen surface critical refraction longitudinal wave, and critical refraction longitudinal wave amplitude is normalized;Establish normalization width Corresponding relationship between value and mechanical damage parameter;Specific step is as follows:
(1) the longitudinal wave velocity v of tested material and voussoir material is measured respectively according to GB/T239001And v2
(2) critical refraction longitudinal wave wedge angle is calculated according to formula one, does not damage specimen surface size and shape with reference to tested material Shape determines voussoir geometric dimension and processes, to guarantee that voussoir and its surface acoustical coupling are good;
Formula one is
(3) based on voussoir in step (2), the identical ultrasonic probe of frequency is used not damage with one debit's formula of hair in tested material Specimen surface excitation receives critical refraction longitudinal wave, according to critical refraction longitudinal wave amplitude, preferably between ultrasonic probe frequency and voussoir Away from;
(4) parameter determined using step (3) is acquired tested material respectively and is not damaged sample, the corresponding critical folding of damage sample Penetrate longitudinal wave;
(5) critical refraction longitudinal wave amplitude in step (4) is normalized according to formula two, amplitude A will be normalizednorMake For acoustic assessment parameter;
Formula two is
(6) normalization amplitude A is establishednorWith the relationship between tested mechanics of materials impairment parameter.
CN201910256800.2A 2019-04-01 2019-04-01 A kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage Pending CN109946385A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910256800.2A CN109946385A (en) 2019-04-01 2019-04-01 A kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910256800.2A CN109946385A (en) 2019-04-01 2019-04-01 A kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109946385A true CN109946385A (en) 2019-06-28

Family

ID=67013208

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910256800.2A Pending CN109946385A (en) 2019-04-01 2019-04-01 A kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109946385A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112798688A (en) * 2021-01-08 2021-05-14 大连理工大学 Method for improving detection sensitivity of critical refraction longitudinal wave of material damage
CN114460172A (en) * 2022-01-27 2022-05-10 重庆工业职业技术学院 Second harmonic detection method for early damage of periodic composite material

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6477473B2 (en) * 1998-07-30 2002-11-05 Don E. Bray Ultrasonic stress measurement using the critically refracted longitudinal (LCR) ultrasonic technique
US7089795B2 (en) * 2003-10-06 2006-08-15 Bray Don E Ultrasonic characterization of polymeric containers
CN101806778A (en) * 2010-03-05 2010-08-18 北京工业大学 Method for non-linear ultrasonic online detection of early fatigue damage to metal material
CN103808805A (en) * 2014-03-12 2014-05-21 北京理工大学 Ultrasonic non-destructive testing method for residual stress of inner and outer roller paths of roller bearing
CN103901106A (en) * 2014-03-12 2014-07-02 江苏科技大学 Nondestructive evaluation method of stress of cladding layer based on critical refraction longitudinal wave
CN104048786A (en) * 2014-06-09 2014-09-17 中国航空工业集团公司北京航空材料研究院 Method for nondestructive measurement of residual stress field in metal plate through ultrasonic waves

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6477473B2 (en) * 1998-07-30 2002-11-05 Don E. Bray Ultrasonic stress measurement using the critically refracted longitudinal (LCR) ultrasonic technique
US7089795B2 (en) * 2003-10-06 2006-08-15 Bray Don E Ultrasonic characterization of polymeric containers
CN101806778A (en) * 2010-03-05 2010-08-18 北京工业大学 Method for non-linear ultrasonic online detection of early fatigue damage to metal material
CN103808805A (en) * 2014-03-12 2014-05-21 北京理工大学 Ultrasonic non-destructive testing method for residual stress of inner and outer roller paths of roller bearing
CN103901106A (en) * 2014-03-12 2014-07-02 江苏科技大学 Nondestructive evaluation method of stress of cladding layer based on critical refraction longitudinal wave
CN104048786A (en) * 2014-06-09 2014-09-17 中国航空工业集团公司北京航空材料研究院 Method for nondestructive measurement of residual stress field in metal plate through ultrasonic waves

Non-Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DON E. BRAY: "EVALUATION OF LOAD DAMAGE IN STEEL USING THE LCR ULTRASONIC TECHNIQUE", 《2007 ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING DIVISION CONFERENCE》 *
MD. NURUL ISLAM等: "Ultrasonic back reflection evaluation of crack growth from PSBs in low-cycle fatigue of stainless steel under constant load amplitude", 《MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A》 *
WAHIBA DJERIR等: "Characterization of the Critically Refracted Longitudinal (LCR) Waves and Their Use in Defect Detection", 《RESEARCH IN NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION》 *
于凤云: "《铁磁性材料早期损伤无损检测新技术》", 30 June 2006, 哈尔滨工程大学出版社 *
格辛格: "《粉末高温合金》", 31 December 2017, 冶金工业出版社 *
罗忠兵等: "铸造奥氏体不锈钢中铁素体与奥氏***向关系及其对声衰减的影响", 《物理学报》 *
苟国庆等: "《高速列车中的残余应力》", 31 December 2015, 西南交通大学出版社 *
虞付进等: "轧辊表面残余应力测试方法的对比试验研究", 《表面技术》 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112798688A (en) * 2021-01-08 2021-05-14 大连理工大学 Method for improving detection sensitivity of critical refraction longitudinal wave of material damage
CN112798688B (en) * 2021-01-08 2022-02-11 大连理工大学 Method for improving detection sensitivity of critical refraction longitudinal wave of material damage
CN114460172A (en) * 2022-01-27 2022-05-10 重庆工业职业技术学院 Second harmonic detection method for early damage of periodic composite material

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2020233359A1 (en) Non-linear lamb wave mixing method for measuring distribution of stress in thin metal plate
CN102435674B (en) Novel method for detecting crack and corrosion defects of metal part base material inner wall
Sen et al. Ultrasonic thickness measurement for aluminum alloy irregular surface parts based on spectral analysis
CN112326786B (en) Metal plate stress detection method based on electromagnetic ultrasonic Lamb wave S1 modal group velocity
US4265120A (en) Fatigue detection utilizing acoustic harmonics
CN109946385A (en) A kind of ultrasonic method for evaluating material early stage mechanical damage
Belahcene et al. Determination of residual stress using critically refracted longitudinal waves and immersion mode
CN110849962A (en) Device and method for evaluating trend and depth of metal crack by utilizing electromagnetic ultrasonic principle
CN104458915B (en) A kind of wind tower weld seam non-linear ultrasonic detection method
Vinogradov et al. New magnetostrictive transducers and applications for SHM of pipes and vessels
Murav’eva et al. Comparative sensitivity of informative parameters of electromagnetic-acoustic mirror-shadow multiple reflections method during bar stock testing
Zhu et al. The potential of ultrasonic non-destructive measurement of residual stresses by modal frequency spacing using leaky lamb waves
Yu et al. Evaluation of cathode quality and damage of aluminium electrolytic cell based on non-destructive technology
Quan et al. Near surface residual stress detection of metallic materials using the high order ultrasonic nonlinear coefficient
Donskoy et al. N-scan: New vibromodulation system for detection and monitoring of cracks and other contact-type defects
Weikert-Müller et al. Condition monitoring system for cyclically loaded components using electromagnetic acoustic transducers-EMUS-4-STRESS
Veile et al. Condition monitoring system for cyclically loaded components using electromagnetic acoustic transducers-EMUS-4-STRESS
CN116908304B (en) Polycrystalline material grain size assessment method based on ultrasonic wake average power attenuation
Mao et al. Non-linear property analysis of deformed metallic components using a longitudinal critically refracted wave
CN111650283B (en) Method for positioning residual stress peak value based on acoustic emission technology
Pan et al. Study on Propagation Characteristics of Refracted Longitudinal Waves in Carbon Fiber Composites
Tzelepi Sample Size Effects on Ultrasonic Measurements of Elastic Moduli—Experimental and Theoretical Investigations
Nanekar et al. Nondestructive Evaluation of Corrosion: Case Studies I
Jimmy et al. Identifying discontinuities of 6״ carbon steel pipe using advanced ultrasonic techniques
Saha Non-Destructive Evaluation of Residual Stresses in Welding

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20190628

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication