CN109784568A - A method of lake water quality model prediction is carried out by multiple target analysis of uncertainty - Google Patents

A method of lake water quality model prediction is carried out by multiple target analysis of uncertainty Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109784568A
CN109784568A CN201910060156.1A CN201910060156A CN109784568A CN 109784568 A CN109784568 A CN 109784568A CN 201910060156 A CN201910060156 A CN 201910060156A CN 109784568 A CN109784568 A CN 109784568A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
parameter
model
water quality
uncertainty
group
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201910060156.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN109784568B (en
Inventor
王玉琳
何成达
程吉林
程浩淼
汪靓
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yangzhou University
Original Assignee
Yangzhou University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yangzhou University filed Critical Yangzhou University
Priority to CN201910060156.1A priority Critical patent/CN109784568B/en
Publication of CN109784568A publication Critical patent/CN109784568A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN109784568B publication Critical patent/CN109784568B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A20/00Water conservation; Efficient water supply; Efficient water use
    • Y02A20/152Water filtration

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of methods for carrying out lake water quality model prediction by multiple target analysis of uncertainty, comprising the following steps: (1) determines the model and its parameter for carrying out water quality prediction;(2) value range and distribution characteristics of model parameter are determined;(3) the multiple objective functions for carrying out parameter uncertainty analysis are determined;(4) value of objective function in corresponding situation is determined;(5) compare the corresponding parameter set that is dominant of Pareto set obtained under objective function;(6) carry out two-parameter analysis of uncertainty: (7) are using kernel function estimation and draw each parameter in the Density Distribution of concentration that is dominant, and the corresponding value of probability density highest point is parameter rating of the model result;(8) parameter for collecting boundary condition needed for predicting and calibration substitutes into model together, carries out water quality prediction.The present invention can give simultaneously the uncertainty and parameter calibration of water quality model parameter, and be predicted, the time required for model use can greatly be saved, and provide reference information and foundation for lake water quality management.

Description

A method of lake water quality model prediction is carried out by multiple target analysis of uncertainty
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of methods for carrying out lake water quality model prediction by multiple target analysis of uncertainty, belong to lake Moor water quality management field.
Background technique
It is influenced by industrial or agricultural disposal of pollutants, China's major part lake water quality situation aggravates, and pollution problem is frequent.For Protection lake water quality and ecological safety, carrying out pollution prediction with lake water quality model is a kind of necessary means.It is using During lake water quality model is predicted, analysis of uncertainty is carried out to the parameter of model and calibration is extremely important step Suddenly.Currently, the analysis of uncertainty of water quality model is mostly but target analysis of uncertainty is not enough to reflect lake water quality and life The diversity of state;And existing multiple target analysis of uncertainty is analyzed due to needing to be translated into single goal by weight, because The selection of this weight is very subjective random.In addition, the calibration of water quality model parameter and parameter uncertainty analysis mutually divide at present From, also needed after completing analysis of uncertainty to parameter calibration optimize, this greatly increase model application be calculated as This, greatly hinders the promotion and application of model prediction.
Summary of the invention
It is an object of the invention in view of the above problems, in order to overcome the deficiencies in the prior art, provide A method of lake water quality model prediction is carried out by multiple target analysis of uncertainty.This method can be objectively to water quality mould The parameter of type carries out multiple target analysis of uncertainty, and is completed at the same time the calibration work of parameter, to greatly reduce Lake Water The amount of calculation of matter model prediction.
The object of the present invention is achieved like this, and one kind is pre- by multiple target analysis of uncertainty progress lake water quality model The method of survey, which comprises the following steps:
(1) lake for the water quality predicted and its monitoring data of boundary river are collected, determine the mould for carrying out water quality prediction Type and its parameter;
(2) value range and distribution characteristics of model parameter are determined, and according to respective distribution characteristics in value range M group parameter value is extracted, m is greater than or equal to 10000;
(3) determine that n objective function for carrying out model parameter uncertainty analysis, n are greater than or equal to 2;
(4) monitoring data of the value of m group model parameter, the monitoring data of boundary river and lake itself are substituted into water quality Model is calculated, and determines the m group value of objective function;
(5) compare the corresponding parameter set that is dominant of Pareto set obtained under objective function, parameter is dominant the parameter group of concentration Number d is not less than 500;Increase the parameter group number m extracted in step (2) if d is less than 500, and repeats step (2)- (4);
(6) the two-parameter joint probability density function for drawing the parameter set that is dominant, carries out two-parameter analysis of uncertainty;
(7) using kernel function estimation and each parameter is drawn in the probability density distribution of concentration that is dominant, probability density is most The corresponding value of eminence is as parameter rating of the model result;
(8) monitoring data of boundary river needed for predicting are collected and the model parameter of calibration substitutes into water quality mould together Type carries out water quality prediction.
In the step (1):
A. the lake for the water quality predicted collected and its monitoring data of boundary river are 2 months at least continuous, at least flat 1 times a week, monitoring data include the water monitoring data in predicted lake, lake boundary river water monitoring data and The data on flows of boundary river;
B. referred to according to the water quality for including in the lake for the water quality predicted and its monitoring data of boundary river collected Mark and the index predicted determine the model for predicting lake water quality, and the ginseng of the model is determined according to its model structure Number.
The step (2) specifically includes the following steps:
A. the value range and its distribution of model parameter are determined, it will be assumed that model parameter is in its respective value range It is uniformly distributed;
B. in the respective value range of each parameter according to its distribution form, with random number generator generate m with Machine number, m need to be more than or equal to 10000;
C. the stochastic parameter value of generation is grouped according to model needs, it is ensured that each parameter has and only has in every group 1 value, forming m group altogether can be used for the parameter group of driving model.
The step (3) specifically includes the following steps:
A. water quality prediction is required to analyze;
B. according to analysis requirement result, determine that n objective function for carrying out parameter uncertainty analysis, n are greater than or equal to 2;Objective function can for varying environment index pattern die analog values S and monitor value O average relative error RE and they Root-mean-square error RMSE is specifically shown in following two formula:
Wherein OiIt is i-th of monitor value, SiIt is and OiCorresponding pattern die analog values, T are monitor value sums.
The step (4) specifically includes the following steps:
A. the value of m group model parameter, the monitoring data of corresponding boundary river are substituted into water quality model and calculated, really Determine the analogue value S of each environmental index of m groupi, i=1,2,3...T;
B. the monitoring data O in lake itself is combinedi, i=1,2,3...T, calculate the value of every group of objective function, total m group.
The step (5) specifically includes the following steps:
A. distinguish objective function property, be classified as that the bigger representative simulation result of objective function is better and objective function more The small better two major classes of representative simulation result;Negative sign will be added before a kind of objective function that objective function is the bigger the better, makes two classifications It is better that scalar functions are unified for the smaller representative simulation result of objective function;
If b. defining the corresponding n objective function of parameter group u is both greater than the corresponding n objective function of parameter group v;Then think Parameter group u is dominant by parameter group v;
C. compare the corresponding objective function of m group parameter, will wherein it is all under above-mentioned steps b definition by certain any group parameter The parameter group removal being dominant;The collection of remaining d group target function value is collectively referred to as Pareto set, and d is not less than 500;
D. the corresponding parameter group of Pareto set is extracted, d group parameter is obtained and forms the parameter set that is dominant;
E. increase the parameter group number m extracted in step (2) if d is less than 500, and repeat step (2)-(4).
The step (6) specifically includes the following steps:
A. the two-parameter joint probability density function for the parameter set that is dominant is drawn;
B. carry out two-parameter analysis of uncertainty with ocular estimate: the big local parameter uncertainty of probability density is small, probability The small local parameter uncertainty of density is big.
The step (7) specifically includes the following steps:
A. using kernel function estimation and each parameter is drawn in the probability density distribution of concentration that is dominant;Its Kernel Function is adopted Use gaussian kernel function;
B. the corresponding value of select probability density highest point is as parameter rating of the model result;
The step (8) specifically includes the following steps:
A. the model parameter that calibration is completed is arranged;
B. the monitoring data of boundary river needed for predicting are collected and the model parameter of calibration substitutes into water quality model together, Carry out water quality prediction.
In the present invention, a method of lake water quality model prediction is carried out by multiple target analysis of uncertainty, passes through fortune The multiple target that lake water quality model parameter can objectively be provided with the concept of Pareto set is uncertain, and uncertain in analysis The result of parameter rating of the model is provided while property.The following steps are included: (1) collects the lake and its boundary for the water quality predicted The monitoring data in river determine the model and its major parameter for carrying out water quality prediction;(2) empirically determined major parameter takes It is worth range and distribution characteristics, and extracts multiple groups parameter value according to respective distribution characteristics in value range;(3) it determines and carries out Multiple objective functions of parameter uncertainty analysis;(4) by the monitoring number of the value of each group parameter, boundary condition and water body itself It is calculated according to Eutrophication Model is substituted into, determines the value of objective function in corresponding situation;(5) compare and obtain under objective function The corresponding parameter set that is dominant of Pareto set;(6) the two-parameter joint probability density function for the parameter set that is dominant is drawn, is carried out double Parameter uncertainty analysis: (7) are using kernel function estimation and draw each parameter in the Density Distribution of concentration that is dominant, and probability is close Spending the corresponding value of highest point is parameter rating of the model result;(8) parameter one of boundary condition and calibration needed for predicting is collected It rises and substitutes into model, carry out water quality prediction.The present invention can give the uncertainty and parameter calibration of water quality model parameter simultaneously, and It is predicted, the time required for model use can greatly be saved, provide reference information and foundation for lake water quality management.
The utility model has the advantages that a kind of method for carrying out lake water quality model prediction by multiple target analysis of uncertainty, Neng Gouke The multiple target analysis of uncertainty for providing lake water quality model parameter seen as a result, and provide the knot of parameter rating of the model at the same time Fruit greatly reduces subjectivity and arbitrariness in lake water quality model parameter multiple target analysis of uncertainty, and reduces utilization Model huge calculation amount required for being predicted.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is flow chart of the invention.
The two-parameter joint probability density and respective kernel function estimation probability density figure that Fig. 2 is KTB and BMR.
The two-parameter joint probability density and respective kernel function estimation probability density figure that Fig. 3 is PM and KESS.
Fig. 4 is model prediction result.
Specific embodiment
The present invention will be further explained with the actual conditions in east China lake with reference to the accompanying drawing.
(1) according to flow chart shown in Fig. 1, step (1) includes:
A. the lake year website first arrival in July has been collected by the end of September, average cyanobacteria 1 times a week, ammonia nitrogenNitrate nitrogenAnd phosphoric acidMonitor value, totally 11 groups of monitor values.The lake is obtained simultaneously The flow within the period in main 8 rivers of Bo Huanhu and their cyanobacteria, ammonia nitrogenNitrate nitrogenAnd phosphoric acidEtc. main environments index monitoring data, these data will as boundary condition participate in model It calculates;
B. according to the water quality indicator and major prognostic blue alga biomass this case collected, use environment hydrodynamic force is determined Code (Environmental Fluid dynamic Code, EFDC) this model is predicted.The parameter of the model is 4 A, concrete meaning see the table below:
(2) according to shown in flow chart, step (2) includes:
A. the value range according to determining major parameter is as shown in the table, it is assumed that they uniformly divide in respective range Cloth;
B. according to its distribution form in the respective value range of each parameter, 11000 are generated with random number generator A random number;
C. the stochastic parameter value of generation is grouped according to model needs, it is ensured that each parameter has and only has in every group 1 value, forms 11000 groups of parameters altogether.
(3) according to shown in flow chart, step (3) includes:
A. require to analyze to water quality prediction: the main target of this prediction is blue alga biomass;
B. according to analysis requirement result, determine that the objective function for carrying out parameter uncertainty analysis is cyanobacteria, ammonia nitrogenNitrate nitrogenAnd phosphoric acidThe relative error RE of analog result, is calculated using following formula:
Wherein OiIt is i-th of monitor value, SiIt is and OiCorresponding pattern die analog values, T are monitor value sums, are equal to herein 11。
(4) according to shown in flow chart, step (4) includes:
A. the value of 11000 groups of parameters, corresponding boundary condition are substituted into Eutrophication Model and calculated, determined 11000 groups of cyanobacterias, ammonia nitrogensNitrate nitrogenAnd phosphoric acidCalculated value Si, i=1,2, 3...T;
B. the monitoring data O of water body itself is combinedi, i=1,2,3...T, calculate the value of 11000 groups of relative errors.
(5) according to shown in flow chart, step (5) includes:
A. distinguish objective function property, be classified as that the bigger representative simulation result of objective function is better and objective function more The small better two major classes of representative simulation result;Negative sign will be added before a kind of objective function that objective function is the bigger the better, makes two classifications It is better that scalar functions are unified for the smaller representative simulation result of objective function;
In this calculating, the smaller representative simulation result of relative error is better, therefore does not need to be converted.
If b. defining corresponding 4 relative errors of parameter group u is both greater than corresponding 4 relative errors of parameter group v;Then think Parameter group u is dominant by parameter group v;
C. compare the corresponding objective function of 11000 groups of parameters, will wherein it is all above-mentioned steps b definition under certain group parameter groups The parameter group removal being dominant;The collection of remaining more than 600 group relative error is collectively referred to as Pareto set;
D. the corresponding parameter group of Pareto set is extracted, more than 600 group parameters is obtained and forms the parameter set that is dominant.
(6) according to shown in flow chart, step (6) includes:
A. the two-parameter joint probability density function for the parameter set that is dominant is drawn;As a result see Fig. 2 and Fig. 3;
B. carry out two-parameter analysis of uncertainty with ocular estimate: the big local parameter uncertainty of probability density is small, probability The small local parameter uncertainty of density is big.It can be seen from the figure that 4 parameters are being worth relatively large local probability density Greatly, i.e., herein uncertainty is small;And uncertainty is smaller at remaining distribution.
(7) according to shown in flow chart, step (7) includes:
A. using kernel function estimation and each parameter is drawn in the probability density distribution of concentration that is dominant;Its Kernel Function is adopted Use gaussian kernel function;As a result see Fig. 2 and Fig. 3;
B. the corresponding value of select probability density highest point is as parameter rating of the model as a result, as a result see the table below:
(8) according to shown in flow chart, step (8) includes:
A. the model parameter that calibration is completed is arranged;
B. it collects boundary condition needed for predicting and the parameter of calibration substitutes into model together, carry out water quality prediction.Cyanobacteria Biomass prediction result is shown in Fig. 4.

Claims (9)

1. it is a kind of by multiple target analysis of uncertainty carry out lake water quality model prediction method, which is characterized in that including with Lower step:
(1) collect the water quality predicted lake and its boundary river monitoring data, determine progress water quality prediction model and Its model parameter;
(2) value range and distribution characteristics of model parameter are determined, and extracts m according to respective distribution characteristics in value range Group parameter value, m are greater than or equal to 10000;
(3) determine that n objective function for carrying out model parameter uncertainty analysis, n are greater than or equal to 2;
(4) monitoring data of the value of m group model parameter, the monitoring data of boundary river and lake itself are substituted into water quality model It is calculated, determines the m group value of objective function;
(5) compare the corresponding parameter set that is dominant of Pareto set obtained under objective function, parameter is dominant the parameter group number d of concentration Not less than 500;Increase the parameter group number m extracted in step (2) if d is less than 500, and repeats step (2)-(4);
(6) the two-parameter joint probability density function for drawing the parameter set that is dominant, carries out two-parameter analysis of uncertainty;
(7) using kernel function estimation and each parameter is drawn in the probability density distribution of concentration that is dominant, probability density highest point Corresponding value is as parameter rating of the model result;
(8) monitoring data of boundary river needed for predicting are collected and the model parameter of calibration substitutes into water quality model together, into Row water quality prediction.
2. a kind of side for carrying out lake water quality model prediction by multiple target analysis of uncertainty according to claim 1 Method, which is characterized in that in the step (1):
A. the lake for the water quality predicted collected and its monitoring data of boundary river are 2 months at least continuous, at least average every Week 1 time, monitoring data include the water monitoring data in predicted lake, the water monitoring data of lake boundary river and boundary The data on flows in river;
B. according to the water quality indicator for including in the lake for the water quality predicted collected and its monitoring data of boundary river and The index predicted determines the model for predicting lake water quality, and the parameter of the model is determined according to its model structure.
3. a kind of side for carrying out lake water quality model prediction by multiple target analysis of uncertainty according to claim 1 Method, which is characterized in that the step (2) specifically includes the following steps:
A. the value range and its distribution of model parameter are determined, it can be assumed that model parameter is equal in its respective value range Even distribution;
B. according to its distribution form in the respective value range of each parameter, m random number is generated with random number generator, M need to be more than or equal to 10000;
C. the stochastic parameter value of generation is grouped according to model needs, it is ensured that each parameter has and only 1 in every group Value, forming m group altogether can be used for the parameter group of driving model.
4. a kind of side for carrying out lake water quality model prediction by multiple target analysis of uncertainty according to claim 1 Method, which is characterized in that the step (3) specifically includes the following steps:
A. water quality prediction is required to analyze;
B. according to analysis requirement result, determine that n objective function for carrying out parameter uncertainty analysis, n are greater than or equal to 2;Mesh Scalar functions can be the average relative error RE of the pattern die analog values S and monitor value O of varying environment index and theirs is square Root error RMSE, is specifically shown in following two formula:
Wherein OiIt is i-th of monitor value, SiIt is and OiCorresponding pattern die analog values, T are monitor value sums.
5. a kind of side for carrying out lake water quality model prediction by multiple target analysis of uncertainty according to claim 1 Method, which is characterized in that the step (4) specifically includes the following steps:
A. the value of m group model parameter, the monitoring data of corresponding boundary river are substituted into water quality model and calculated, determine m The analogue value S of each environmental index of groupi, i=1,2,3...T;
B. the monitoring data O in lake itself is combinedi, i=1,2,3...T, calculate the value of every group of objective function, total m group.
6. a kind of side for carrying out lake water quality model prediction by multiple target analysis of uncertainty according to claim 1 Method, which is characterized in that the step (5) specifically includes the following steps:
A. objective function property is distinguished, is classified as that the bigger representative simulation result of objective function is better and objective function smaller generation The better two major classes of table simulation result;Negative sign will be added before a kind of objective function that objective function is the bigger the better, makes the two classification offers of tender It is better that number is unified for the smaller representative simulation result of objective function;
If b. defining the corresponding n objective function of parameter group u is both greater than the corresponding n objective function of parameter group v;Then think parameter Group u is dominant by parameter group v;
C. compare the corresponding objective function of m group parameter, wherein all define in above-mentioned steps b lower is dominant by arbitrarily group parameter Parameter group removal;The collection of remaining d group target function value is collectively referred to as Pareto set, and d is not less than 500;
D. the corresponding parameter group of Pareto set is extracted, d group parameter is obtained and forms the parameter set that is dominant;
E. increase the parameter group number m extracted in step (2) if d is less than 500, and repeat step (2)-(4).
7. a kind of side for carrying out lake water quality model prediction by multiple target analysis of uncertainty according to claim 1 Method, which is characterized in that the step (6) specifically includes the following steps:
A. the two-parameter joint probability density function for the parameter set that is dominant is drawn;
B. carry out two-parameter analysis of uncertainty with ocular estimate: the big local parameter uncertainty of probability density is small, probability density Small local parameter uncertainty is big.
8. a kind of side for carrying out lake water quality model prediction by multiple target analysis of uncertainty according to claim 1 Method, which is characterized in that the step (7) specifically includes the following steps:
A. using kernel function estimation and each parameter is drawn in the probability density distribution of concentration that is dominant;Its Kernel Function is using high This kernel function;
B. the corresponding value of select probability density highest point is as parameter rating of the model result.
9. a kind of side for carrying out lake water quality model prediction by multiple target analysis of uncertainty according to claim 1 Method, which is characterized in that the step (8) specifically includes the following steps:
A. the model parameter that calibration is completed is arranged;
B. the monitoring data of boundary river needed for predicting are collected and the model parameter of calibration substitutes into water quality model together, are carried out Water quality prediction.
CN201910060156.1A 2019-01-22 2019-01-22 Method for predicting lake water quality model through multi-target uncertainty analysis Active CN109784568B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910060156.1A CN109784568B (en) 2019-01-22 2019-01-22 Method for predicting lake water quality model through multi-target uncertainty analysis

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910060156.1A CN109784568B (en) 2019-01-22 2019-01-22 Method for predicting lake water quality model through multi-target uncertainty analysis

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109784568A true CN109784568A (en) 2019-05-21
CN109784568B CN109784568B (en) 2023-01-03

Family

ID=66502041

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910060156.1A Active CN109784568B (en) 2019-01-22 2019-01-22 Method for predicting lake water quality model through multi-target uncertainty analysis

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109784568B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114169242A (en) * 2021-12-10 2022-03-11 浙江嘉科新能源科技有限公司 Intelligent control algorithm for analyzing ecological oxygenation of river channel based on parameter uncertainty

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103914586A (en) * 2014-01-27 2014-07-09 首都师范大学 Water quality simulation method based on GLUE multi-target water quality model calibration
US20160145977A1 (en) * 2014-11-24 2016-05-26 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods for adaptive optimization of enhanced oil recovery performance under uncertainty
CN105930670A (en) * 2016-04-29 2016-09-07 浙江大学 Model parameter uncertainty-based dynamic prediction method for river emergency pollution accident

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103914586A (en) * 2014-01-27 2014-07-09 首都师范大学 Water quality simulation method based on GLUE multi-target water quality model calibration
US20160145977A1 (en) * 2014-11-24 2016-05-26 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods for adaptive optimization of enhanced oil recovery performance under uncertainty
CN105930670A (en) * 2016-04-29 2016-09-07 浙江大学 Model parameter uncertainty-based dynamic prediction method for river emergency pollution accident

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
曹虎: "基于多目标GLUE算法的新安江模型参数不确定性研究", 《黑龙江水利科技》 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114169242A (en) * 2021-12-10 2022-03-11 浙江嘉科新能源科技有限公司 Intelligent control algorithm for analyzing ecological oxygenation of river channel based on parameter uncertainty

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN109784568B (en) 2023-01-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2022151890A1 (en) Method for establishing power generating capacity evaluation and micro-siting model for wind farms
CN106874582B (en) A kind of electro spindle life test time design method
CN105136449B (en) A kind of abrasion random process test Forecasting Methodology of the automobile-used transmission device based on abrasion mechanism
CN109636171A (en) A kind of comprehensive diagnos and risk evaluating method that regional vegetation restores
CN104318482A (en) Comprehensive assessment system and method of smart distribution network
Asadi et al. Wind farm site selection considering turbulence intensity
CN102737148B (en) Method for reducing road spectrum into Block Cycle
CN102063375A (en) Software reliability assessment method and device based on hybrid testing
CN106446478A (en) System and method for optimizing cutting process
CN102411339A (en) Method for evaluating performance reliability of numerical control equipment
CN104218571B (en) A kind of running status appraisal procedure of wind power plant
CN105975797A (en) Product early-fault root cause recognition method based on fuzzy data processing
CN105930900A (en) Method and system for predicting hybrid wind power generation
CN106021724A (en) Energy efficiency evaluation method of machine tool product manufacturing system based on AHM and entropy method
CN111199298A (en) Flood forecasting method and system based on neural network
CN109784568A (en) A method of lake water quality model prediction is carried out by multiple target analysis of uncertainty
CN113343601A (en) Dynamic simulation method for water level and pollutant migration of complex water system lake
CN109034636A (en) Power changes continuously and healthily lower-pilot person's human reliability analysis method and apparatus
CN108537581A (en) Based on the GMDH energy consumption Time Series Forecasting Methods selectively combined and device
CN105303056B (en) A kind of wind speed real-time change speed depicting method
CN104679633B (en) Effectiveness evaluation method of multi-aircraft parallel test process
Li et al. Impact of port trade on regional economic development based on system dynamics
CN107957944A (en) The automatic example generation method of user oriented data cover rate
CN103778263A (en) Subway vehicle data collecting processing device and method
CN105205589A (en) Evaluation method of boiler efficiency of thermal generator set under different loads

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant