CN109687801B - Dead-beat current control method for permanent magnet synchronous linear motor - Google Patents
Dead-beat current control method for permanent magnet synchronous linear motor Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109687801B CN109687801B CN201910129447.1A CN201910129447A CN109687801B CN 109687801 B CN109687801 B CN 109687801B CN 201910129447 A CN201910129447 A CN 201910129447A CN 109687801 B CN109687801 B CN 109687801B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- current
- motor
- axis
- observer
- extended state
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 23
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract 4
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011217 control strategy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000452 restraining effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P23/00—Arrangements or methods for the control of AC motors characterised by a control method other than vector control
- H02P23/12—Observer control, e.g. using Luenberger observers or Kalman filters
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P25/00—Arrangements or methods for the control of AC motors characterised by the kind of AC motor or by structural details
- H02P25/02—Arrangements or methods for the control of AC motors characterised by the kind of AC motor or by structural details characterised by the kind of motor
- H02P25/06—Linear motors
- H02P25/064—Linear motors of the synchronous type
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Control Of Ac Motors In General (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a dead-beat current control method for a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor, which comprises the following steps: obtaining a next sampleReference current command i of time motor q axisq *Reference current command i of (k +1) and d axesd *(k + 1); acquiring the actual current of the motor at the current sampling moment, and converting the actual current into d-axis current i under a dq coordinate systemd(k) And q-axis current iq(k) (ii) a I to be acquiredd(k)、iq(k) And the actual voltage u of the current sampling moment of the motord(k)、uq(k) Transmitting to an improved extended state observer to obtain an observed value of the parameter disturbance quantity at the current sampling momentfq(k) (ii) a I to be acquiredd(k)、iq(k),fq(k) And iq *(k+1)、id *(k +1) is transmitted to a dead-beat prediction controller to obtain a reference command u of a control voltaged *(k)、uq *(k) (ii) a U to be acquiredd *(k)、uq *(k) Through coordinate conversion, the result obtained through conversion is output through an SVPWM control inverter, and the control of the motor is realized.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of motor control, in particular to a dead-beat current control method for a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor.
Background art:
the accurate thrust control is the basis for realizing the high tracking accuracy of the permanent magnet synchronous linear motor, and the permanent magnet synchronous linear motor system indirectly controls the output thrust by adjusting the motor current, so the quality of the motor output thrust is determined by the performance of a current control method in a current closed-loop system. The dead-beat current predictive control has good dynamic performance and decoupling capability, and is very suitable for a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor digital control system. However, dead-beat predictive control relies entirely on accurate permanent magnet synchronous linear motor models, which means that model parameter perturbations can cause the calculated voltage to deviate from its expected value. Therefore, the parameter disturbance compensation method is very necessary for the dead-beat current prediction control system of the permanent magnet synchronous linear motor, and the parameter disturbance of the motor inductance, resistance, flux linkage and the like can be well observed by applying the parameter disturbance method of the Extended State Observer (ESO), so that the dependence of the dead-beat current prediction algorithm on a precise motor model is reduced. However, the conventional Extended State Observer (ESO) controls the observer to observe the disturbance amount through the error of the current amount, does not conform to the error control principle, affects the convergence speed of the observer, and affects the dynamic response capability of the motor current. Meanwhile, an Extended State Observer (ESO) is a high-gain observer, and the high gain can cause the problem of overlarge peak value at the initial moment, so that the phenomenon of overlarge overshoot and even oscillation of the motor current occurs. Therefore, there is a need to develop an improved Extended State Observer (ESO) to overcome the above-mentioned problems, so as to provide high-quality thrust for the permanent magnet synchronous linear motor, and achieve fast dynamic response and high tracking accuracy of the motor.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a deadbeat current control method for a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor, which aims to solve one of the defects caused by the prior art.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention is realized by adopting the following technical scheme:
a dead beat current control method for a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor comprises the following steps:
Step2, setting the expected speed v of the motor rotor*(k) Inputting the difference between the actual speed v (k) of the motor and the actual speed v (k) of the motor into a PI controller, and outputting a reference current command i of the next sampling time k +1 of a q axis by the PI controllerq *The reference current command of the next sampling time k +1 of the (k +1) and d axes is id *(k+1);
Step 4, the current i at the current sampling time k is measuredd(k)、iq(k) And the actual voltage quantity ud(k)、uq(k) Inputting the measured values into an improved extended state observer to obtain observed values of the parameter disturbance quantity at the k momentfq(k);
Step 5, the current i at the k moment is measuredd(k)、iq(k) And disturbance amount observed valuefq(k) Together with the current i at the time k +1q *(k+1)、id *(k +1) are input into the dead-beat prediction controller together to obtain a reference command u of the required control voltaged *(k)、uq *(k);
Step 6, mixing ud *(k)、uq *(k) After coordinate transformation, the output of the inverter is controlled through SVPWM, and the control of the motor is realized.
The invention has the advantages that:
1. according to the invention, the parameter disturbance quantity is observed by the improved extended state observer and is used for compensating the dead-beat prediction control system, so that the method has stronger robustness on disturbance caused by system parameter deviation, and the problems of current static error and instability caused by parameter disturbance are avoided;
2. the invention designs the improved extended state observer, and the observer is controlled to observe the disturbance quantity by using the disturbance quantity error, so that the convergence speed of the observer is improved, and the dynamic response speed of the motor current is improved. Meanwhile, the problem of overlarge peak value of an observed value of the extended state observer at the initial moment is restrained by using a variable gain mode, so that the problem of overlarge overshoot of the motor current is restrained. Therefore, the tracking speed and the anti-interference capability of the current are effectively improved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a system block diagram of a control method according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a comparison graph of current tracking waveforms for a given inductance of 2.5L in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a waveform diagram of current tracking without ESO for a given inductance of 2.5L in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a waveform diagram of current tracking under conventional ESO given an inductance of 2.5L in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a waveform of current tracking at improved ESO given an inductance of 2.5L in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 6 shows a given flux linkage according to an embodiment of the present inventionComparing the time current tracking waveform;
FIG. 7 shows a given flux linkage according to an embodiment of the present inventionCurrent tracking oscillogram under the ESO condition is not existed;
FIG. 8 shows a given flux linkage according to an embodiment of the present inventionCurrent tracking oscillogram under the conventional ESO;
FIG. 9 shows a given flux linkage according to an embodiment of the present inventionImproving a current tracking waveform diagram under ESO;
FIG. 10 is a comparison graph of current tracking waveforms for a given resistance of 0.2R in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 11 is a graph of current tracking waveforms without ESO given a resistance of 0.2R in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 12 is a graph of current tracking waveforms for conventional ESO given a resistance of 0.2R in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 13 is a graph of current tracking waveforms for improved ESO given a resistance of 0.2R in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 14 is a velocity waveform tracking comparison graph with difference deviation according to an embodiment of the present invention.
In the figure: v. of*(k) Is the desired velocity at the previous sampling instant k, v is the actual velocity at the previous sampling instant k, iq *(k +1) is a reference current command at the next sampling time of the q-axis, id *(k +1) is a reference current command for the next sampling instant of the d-axisa(k),ib(k),ic(k) For measured actual three-phase currents, id(k)、iq(k) Is the actual current of the dq axis,fq(k) observed value of disturbance amount of dq axis, ud *(k)、uq *(k) The voltage reference command is controlled for the dq axis.
Detailed Description
In order to make the technical means, the creation characteristics, the achievement purposes and the effects of the invention easy to understand, the invention is further described with the specific embodiments.
The invention provides a dead-beat current control method for a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor, which is characterized in that an improved extended state observer is designed as shown in figures 1-14, the information of disturbance quantity errors is extracted from current quantity errors, the disturbance quantity errors are used for adjusting disturbance quantity observed values according to an error control principle, the tracking speed of the observer is accelerated, and time-varying gains are designed for restraining the problem of overlarge current peak values. The disturbance quantity observed value is observed at the current sampling moment kfq(k) And sampling the obtained actual current i at the current sampling moment kd(k)、iq(k) Together with the reference current command i at the time k +1q *(k+1)、id *(k +1) are input into the dead-beat prediction controller together to obtain a reference command u of the required control voltaged *(k)、uq *(k) In that respect The dead-beat predictive controller obtained by the method of the invention is used for system parameterThe disturbance caused by the number deviation has stronger robustness, the current tracking speed is improved, and the current peak value at the initial moment is effectively restrained.
A dead beat current control method for a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor comprises the following steps:
step2, setting the expected speed v of the motor rotor*(k) Inputting the difference between the actual speed v (k) of the motor and the actual speed v (k) of the motor into a PI controller, and outputting a reference current command i of the next sampling time k +1 of a q axis by the PI controllerq *The reference current command of the next sampling time k +1 of the (k +1) and d axes is id *(k+1);
Step 4, the current i at the current sampling time k is measuredd(k)、iq(k) And the actual voltage quantity ud(k)、uq(k) Inputting the measured values into an improved extended state observer to obtain observed values of the parameter disturbance quantity at the k momentfq(k);
Step 5, the current i at the k moment is measuredd(k)、iq(k) And disturbance amount observed valuefq(k) Together with the current i at the time k +1q *(k+1)、id *(k +1) are input into the dead-beat prediction controller together to obtain a reference command u of the required control voltaged *(k)、uq *(k);
Step 6, mixing ud *(k)、uq *(k) Warp beamAfter coordinate transformation, the output of the inverter is controlled through SVPWM, and the control of the motor is realized.
In the present embodiment, the PI controller functions as a speed controller; actual voltage value u at current sampling time kd(k)、uq(k) Control voltage reference command u equal to the last sampling instant k-1 respectivelyd *(k-1)、uq *(k-1). In this embodiment, the improved extended state observer comprises the following design steps:
in formula (1): r is the primary resistance, tau is the secondary pole distance,is a secondary permanent magnet flux linkage, Ld、LqD-axis and q-axis inductance components respectively, and can be L-shaped due to the surface-mounted structured=Lq=L。ud、uqPrimary d and q axis voltages, id、iqPrimary d-axis current and q-axis current respectively, and v is primary motion speed.
Step2, taking the current equation when the actual parameter and the nominal parameter have deviation into consideration, and modeling the disturbance quantity of the system parameter;
the current equation can be obtained by equation (1) with parameter deviations taken into account:
Let fd、fqF can be obtained as d and q axis parameter disturbances respectivelyd、fqThe expression is as follows:
3.1, describing a state space of the q-axis current and a parameter disturbance quantity thereof:
in formula (4): x ═ x1 x2]T=[iq fq]TIs a state variable matrix; u is the input quantity uq;Is a state transition matrix; b ═ 1/L0 0]TIs a control matrix; e ═ 01]TIs an interference matrix;
3.2, constructing a traditional extended state observer according to the current error:
in the formula:is a matrix of the observations of which,is to iqThe observed value is obtained by observing the measured value,is to fqObserving the value; e ═ e1 e2]T=[z1-x1 z2-x2]TIs the error value of the observer; e.g. of the type1Is the error between the observed and actual values of the current, e2Is q-axis parameter disturbance quantity error, namely the error between the observed value and the actual value of the parameter disturbance quantity,for observer gain matrix,/1、l2Is the gain of the observer, and1、l2the performance of the observer is controlled by adjusting the gain as a constant; x is the number of1Is the actual value x of the current detected by the current detection2Is a disturbance value; z is a radical of1、z2Is the observed value of the observer.
And Step 4, extracting the disturbance quantity error from the current quantity error information, and observing the disturbance quantity by using the disturbance quantity error, so that the convergence speed of the observer is increased. Meanwhile, aiming at the problem that the current peak value of the motor at the initial moment is too large due to high gain of the traditional extended state observer, the gain of the observer is set to be a proportional function, a smaller gain is set at the initial moment to inhibit the problem that the current peak value is too large, and the current peak value is gradually increased to a constant value. Finally forming an improved extended state observer;
4.1, subtracting the equation (5) and the equation (4) to obtain a system parameter disturbance quantity error:
4.2, the disturbance quantity error is used for realizing the observation of the disturbance quantity, the observer gain is set to be a proportional function, and the traditional extended state observer with the formula (5) is changed into an improved extended state observer:
in formula (7):for observer gain matrix,/1(t)、l2(t) is the observer gain value; l1(t) and l2(t) is a scaling function that increases with time, gradually increasing from a constant value that is smaller at an initial instant to another constant value with a fixed scaling factor and remaining constant. The problem that the peak value of the observer is too large can be restrained because the gain is small at the initial moment, and the convergence performance of the observer can be guaranteed to be good because the gain is gradually increased to another constant value. Let l1(t) and l2(t) a proportional function ofWherein: gamma rayiIs a constant value at the initial moment; etaiConstant value which is finally kept unchanged; k is a radical ofiIs a proportionality coefficient; t is tiIs time, i ═ 1, 2; k is a radical ofitiRepresenting a gain that increases in direct proportion to time.
Step 5, carrying out forward Euler discretization on a state space equation of the current and the disturbance quantity thereof and the improved extended state observer, subtracting the discretized state space equation from the extended state observer to obtain an error state equation, and finally carrying out stability analysis on the improved extended state observer through the error state equation;
the discretized state space equation and the modified extended state observer are:
x(k+1)=A1x(k)+B1u(k)+E1h(k) (8)
z(k+1)=A1z(k)+B1u(k)-L2(k)e(k) (9)
in formulae (8) and (9): the state transition matrix becomes A1TA + I; control matrix becomes B1TB; interference matrix becomes E1TE; observer gain matrix becomes L2=TL1(ii) a T is a sampling period; and I is an identity matrix.
Subtracting the equation (8) and the equation (9) to obtain an error state equation, assuming that the sampling period T is small enough and the perturbation is almost constant in two sampling periods, h (k) in the error state equation can be ignored:
and (3) performing linear transformation on the error state equation to obtain an equation (11), thereby calculating a characteristic equation of the error state of the observer:
|λI-M|=λ2+[T(l2(k)+l1(k))+2]λ+T(l2(k)+l1(k))+T2l1(k)l2(k)+1=0
(12)
In formula (12): because the gains of the extended state observers are all larger than 0, the characteristic roots are all negative real parts, namely the observer error finally tends to 0, and the observer is stable.
Step 6, obtaining a d-axis improved extended state observer in the same way, and performing stability analysis;
the improved extended state observer of the d axis is as follows:
c(k+1)=A1z(k)+B1ud(k)-L2(k)(k) (13)
in the formula:is an observed value matrix of a d-axis modified extended observer;is for d-axis current idIs detected by the measured values of (a) and (b),is a disturbance of d-axis fdThe observed value of (a);is the error between the observed and actual values of the d-axis current,2is the error between the observed value and the actual value of the disturbance quantity of the d-axis parameter.
The d-axis modified extended state observer can be calculated to have the same characteristic equation of error state as the q-axis modified extended state observer:
|λI-M|=λ2+[T(l2(k)+l1(k))+2]λ+T(l2(k)+l1(k))+T2l1(k)l2(k)+1=0 (14)
in formula (14): because the gains of the extended state observers are all larger than 0, the characteristic roots are all negative real parts, namely the observer error finally tends to 0, and the observer is stable.
In this embodiment, the dead-beat prediction controller includes the following design steps:
Equation (15) is a conventional dead-beat predictive control algorithm, where: f. ofd(k)、fq(k) Can not be directly measured and calculated, so the calculated ud *(k)、uq *(k) It will be inaccurate.
Step2, obtaining the parameter disturbance quantity f which can not be directly measured and calculated in the traditional dead beat prediction control algorithmd(k)、fq(k) Observed value of disturbance quantity at current sampling moment k observed by improved extended state observerfq(k) Instead, a dq-axis voltage reference command u is obtained by calculationd *(k)、uq *(k) Namely, the dead beat prediction control algorithm after parameter disturbance compensation:
in the present embodiment, the inverter is a three-phase two-level voltage inverter.
In order to verify the effectiveness of the designed current prediction control algorithm, a traditional extended state observer and an improved extended state observer are respectively utilized to carry out a motor current tracking test and a speed tracking test. The parameters of the motor are as follows: inductance L is 0.0134H, resistance R is 1.3 Ω, pole pitch τ is 0.032m, flux linkage Ψ is 0.11Wb, damping coefficient is 0.2N · s/m, and sampling period is 100 μ s. The gain and time parameters of the modified extended state observer are set to: gamma ray1=3,η1=6,t1=4ms,γ2=400,η2=600,t24 ms. The traditional extended state observer gain parameters are: l1=4,l2600. Firstly, the given parameters of inductance, flux linkage and resistance in the controller are respectively set2.5L of,0.2R, using idControl strategy of 0 and given current iq2A. As shown in fig. 2-5, when the given value of the inductance is 2.5L, the harmonic content of the dead-beat predictive control system without the extended state observer gradually increases, instability occurs, and the current response speed is slow; 6-9, when the flux linkage given value is 0.5 psi, the system without extended state observer, iqDeviation exists and gradually increases; as shown in FIGS. 10 to 13, when the given value of the resistance is 0.2R, iqThere is a constant deviation; the control method of the traditional extended state observer and the control method of the improved extended state observer can inhibit the problems caused by parameter disturbance, but the improved extended state observer can better inhibit the current peak value, and the current tracking speed is higher.
When comparing the speed tracking performance, the given motor speed is 100mm/s, the applied load force is 300N, and the given values of the parameters of inductance, flux linkage, resistance and the like in the controller are set as 2.5L,0.2R, fig. 14 shows that the corresponding speed tracking waveform comparison, the dead beat prediction control of the improved extended state observer is applied, the motor speed fluctuation is smaller during starting, the speed is more stable after starting, and the peak value is higher and oscillation occurs at the initial time under the compensation of the traditional extended state observer. The experimental result shows that the current control algorithm provided by the invention has a low peak value at the initial moment and a high response speed, and avoids the problems of current static error and instability caused by parameter disturbance.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The embodiments disclosed above are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. All changes which come within the scope of or equivalence to the invention are intended to be embraced therein.
Claims (6)
1. A dead beat current control method for a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring the actual speed v (k) of the motor at the current sampling moment;
obtaining a reference current instruction i of a motor q axis at the next sampling momentq *(k +1) and reference current command i of motor d shaft at next sampling momentd *(k+1);
Obtaining the actual current i of the motor at the current sampling momenta(k),ib(k),ic(k) And converting it into d-axis current i in dq coordinate systemd(k) And q-axis current i in dq coordinate systemq(k);
I to be acquiredd(k)、iq(k) And the actual voltage u of the current sampling moment of the motord(k)、uq(k) Transmitting to an improved extended state observer to obtain an observed value of the parameter disturbance quantity at the current sampling moment
I to be acquiredd(k)、iq(k),And iq *(k+1)、id *(k +1) is transmitted to a dead-beat prediction controller to obtain a reference command u of a control voltaged *(k)、uq *(k);
U to be acquiredd *(k)、uq *(k) After coordinate conversion, the result obtained by conversion is output through an SVPWM control inverter to control a motor;
the improved extended state observer comprises the following design steps:
step 1, establishing a voltage equation of the permanent magnet synchronous linear motor under a dq coordinate system, wherein the equation is as follows:
wherein R is the primary resistance, tau is the secondary pole distance,is a secondary permanent magnet flux linkage, Ld、LqD and q axis inductance components, Ld=Lq=L,ud、uqPrimary d and q axis voltages, id、iqPrimary d-axis current and q-axis current respectively, and v is a primary motion speed;
step2, constructing a current equation, and modeling the disturbance quantity of system parameters;
the current equation can be obtained by adding the parameter deviation to the equation (1), and the current equation is:
wherein: r0、L0、Respectively are the nominal parameters of the motor resistance, the inductance and the flux linkage;
ΔR、ΔL、parameter deviations of motor resistance, inductance and flux linkage respectively, wherein Delta R is R-R0,ΔL=L-L0,
Let fd、fqAs d and q axis parameter disturbance respectively to obtain fd、fqThe expression is as follows:
step 3, constructing a traditional extended state observer;
3.1, describing a state space of the q-axis current and a parameter disturbance quantity thereof:
wherein: x ═ x1 x2]T=[iq fq]TIs a state variable matrix; u is the input quantity uq;Is a state transition matrix; b ═ 1/L0 0]TIs a control matrix; e ═ 01]TIs an interference matrix;
3.2, constructing the traditional extended state observer according to the error between the current observed value and the actual value:
wherein:in order to be a matrix of the observations,is to iqThe observed value is obtained by observing the measured value,is to fqObserving the value; e ═ e1e2]T=[z1-x1 z2-x2]TIs the error value of the observer; e.g. of the type1Is the error between the observed and actual values of the current, e2Is the error of the disturbance quantity of the parameter,for observer gain matrix,/1、l2Is the gain of the observer, and1、l2is a constant;
step 4, obtaining an improved extended state observer;
4.1, acquiring system parameter disturbance quantity error e2:
4.2, obtaining an improved extended state observer:
step 5, forward Euler discretization is carried out on a state space equation of the current and the disturbance quantity of the current and the improved extended state observer, the discretized state space equation is subtracted from the extended state observer to obtain an error state equation, and stability analysis is carried out on the improved extended state observer through the error state equation;
and 6, acquiring the d-axis improved extended state observer in the modes of the steps 1 to 5, and analyzing the stability of the extended state observer.
2. The deadbeat current control method of a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor according to claim 1, wherein said deadbeat predictive controller comprises the design steps of:
step 1, carrying out forward Euler discretization on a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor voltage equation under a dq coordinate system, and calculating a dq axis voltage reference instruction u according to the discretized equationd *(k)、uq *(k) Namely, the traditional dead beat prediction control algorithm;
3. The deadbeat current control method for a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor of claim 1 wherein desired speed v of motor mover is adjusted*(k) The difference between the actual speed v (k) of the motor and the actual speed v (k) of the motor is input into a PI controller, and the PI controller outputs iq *(k +1) and id *(k+1)。
4. The deadbeat current control method of a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor according to claim 3, wherein said PI controller is a speed controller.
5. The deadbeat current control method of claim 1 wherein said actual voltage magnitude u at said current sample time k isd(k)、uq(k) Equal to the last sampling instant k-1, respectivelyControl voltage reference command ud *(k-1)、uq *(k-1)。
6. The deadbeat current control method for a permanent magnet synchronous linear motor of claim 1 wherein said inverter is a three-phase two-level voltage inverter.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910129447.1A CN109687801B (en) | 2019-02-21 | 2019-02-21 | Dead-beat current control method for permanent magnet synchronous linear motor |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910129447.1A CN109687801B (en) | 2019-02-21 | 2019-02-21 | Dead-beat current control method for permanent magnet synchronous linear motor |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN109687801A CN109687801A (en) | 2019-04-26 |
CN109687801B true CN109687801B (en) | 2020-11-13 |
Family
ID=66196851
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910129447.1A Active CN109687801B (en) | 2019-02-21 | 2019-02-21 | Dead-beat current control method for permanent magnet synchronous linear motor |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN109687801B (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110190765B (en) * | 2019-06-02 | 2021-03-26 | 河南师范大学 | Novel three-phase voltage type PWM converter disturbance-rejection method based on dead-beat control |
CN111416559A (en) * | 2020-04-24 | 2020-07-14 | 镇江市高等专科学校 | Equivalent sliding mode control method for open winding of primary permanent magnet type linear motor |
CN112422002B (en) * | 2020-10-09 | 2022-02-01 | 北京理工大学 | Robust permanent magnet synchronous motor single current sensor prediction control method |
CN113746392A (en) * | 2021-09-17 | 2021-12-03 | 广州市香港科大***研究院 | Servo motor current control method and control system based on two-dimensional system |
CN114489010A (en) * | 2022-01-25 | 2022-05-13 | 佛山智能装备技术研究院 | ADRC extended observer state observation error real-time prediction method and system |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104283478A (en) * | 2014-10-28 | 2015-01-14 | 山东大学 | System and method for controlling current of permanent magnet synchronous motor for electric vehicle |
-
2019
- 2019-02-21 CN CN201910129447.1A patent/CN109687801B/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104283478A (en) * | 2014-10-28 | 2015-01-14 | 山东大学 | System and method for controlling current of permanent magnet synchronous motor for electric vehicle |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN109687801A (en) | 2019-04-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN109687801B (en) | Dead-beat current control method for permanent magnet synchronous linear motor | |
CN111555680B (en) | Dead-beat prediction current control method for permanent magnet synchronous motor | |
JP4685509B2 (en) | AC motor drive control device and drive control method | |
CN109873586B (en) | Motor mechanical parameter identification method and system based on high-order sliding-mode observer | |
CN112422004B (en) | Disturbance suppression method for permanent magnet synchronous motor in weak magnetic control mode | |
CN112072981B (en) | PMSM current prediction control method based on SD-MPM | |
JP5327700B2 (en) | Induction motor control device and control method thereof | |
CN110504880B (en) | Feedforward compensation control method for interference observation of flux switching permanent magnet linear motor | |
CN105811840B (en) | A kind of dead beat current control method of permanent magnet synchronous servo motor | |
KR101965499B1 (en) | Apparatus and Method for Compensating Scale and/or Offset Error of a Current Sensor | |
CN112701968A (en) | Method for improving prediction control robustness performance of permanent magnet synchronous motor model | |
CN104205614A (en) | Control device for three-phase ac induction motor and control method for three-phase ac induction motor | |
CN113258833A (en) | Dead-beat direct torque control and realization method based on sliding mode strategy | |
CN112953335A (en) | Finite time self-adaptive composite control method and system for permanent magnet synchronous motor | |
CN116317792A (en) | Permanent magnet synchronous motor prediction current control method and system considering parameter mismatch | |
CN116526919A (en) | Permanent magnet synchronous motor servo system and current prediction control method and device thereof | |
CN110112980B (en) | Control method and system for closed-loop iterative learning based on fractional calculus | |
CN108306566B (en) | Linear induction motor secondary flux linkage estimation method based on extended state observer | |
CN106712629B (en) | A kind of current control method of permanent magnet synchronous motor | |
CN113794419A (en) | Deadbeat current prediction robust control method based on incremental motor model | |
KR20200033478A (en) | Automated torque ripple reduction apparatus of motor | |
JP7324630B2 (en) | Motor magnet temperature estimation method and magnet temperature estimation device | |
Kandoussi et al. | Luenberger observer based sensorless Indirect FOC with stator resistance adaptation | |
JP6966978B2 (en) | Machine tool motor drive | |
JP2943377B2 (en) | Vector controller for induction motor |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
EE01 | Entry into force of recordation of patent licensing contract |
Application publication date: 20190426 Assignee: Nanjing Dingbo controller Co.,Ltd. Assignor: NANJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Contract record no.: X2024980002011 Denomination of invention: A method of zero beat current control for permanent magnet synchronous linear motor Granted publication date: 20201113 License type: Common License Record date: 20240206 |
|
EE01 | Entry into force of recordation of patent licensing contract |