CN106802435A - The method of testing of two large categaries - Google Patents

The method of testing of two large categaries Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN106802435A
CN106802435A CN201710033814.9A CN201710033814A CN106802435A CN 106802435 A CN106802435 A CN 106802435A CN 201710033814 A CN201710033814 A CN 201710033814A CN 106802435 A CN106802435 A CN 106802435A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
categaries
testing
scope
seismic
electromagnetic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201710033814.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
尹尚先
刘德明
李见波
连会青
段晓平
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
North China Institute of Science and Technology
Original Assignee
North China Institute of Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by North China Institute of Science and Technology filed Critical North China Institute of Science and Technology
Priority to CN201710033814.9A priority Critical patent/CN106802435A/en
Publication of CN106802435A publication Critical patent/CN106802435A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V11/00Prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of method of testing of two large categaries.The method of testing is comprised the following steps:First, predicting the outcome for two large categaries is calculated by two large categaries formula;Secondly, the scope of research area's two large categaries is primarily determined that using electromagnetic method, 3-D seismic method, micro seismic monitoring method or seismic CT method;Again, the scope of fixed point two large categaries is further determined that using water filling pressure measuring system, borehole television system or drilling fluid observation system;Finally, by physical simulation or the scope of Simulation two large categaries.The method of testing of the two large categaries belongs to a kind of efficient detection assembled scheme, after caving zone and leaking crevice belt scope can on the whole be determined, defined boundaries using with targetedly detection method, the exact position in line of demarcation in checking small range, improve precision of prediction, it is to avoid the redundancy of technical resource and waste.

Description

The method of testing of two large categaries
Technical field
The present invention relates to mine safety exploitation field, more particularly to a kind of method of testing of two large categaries.
Background technology
At present, during most scholars are using former Ministry of Coal Industry " under three " exploitation code when overburden rock damage is studied, " two bands " the development height estimating formula for proposing, by corresponding calculating, draws overlying strata maximal destruction highly." two bands " (two bands Referring to caving zone and leaking crevice belt) high computational formula is as follows:
1) caving zone is highly
In view of the difference of roof physico-mechanical properties, different lithology can be calculated (table 1) by different formulas.
The empirical equation of the caving zone high computational of table 1
∑ M in each formula of upper table is cumulative thickness, and individual layer working thickness is no more than 1~3m, and cumulative thickness is no more than 15m。
2) height of the water conductive fracture zone
If roof for it is hard, in hard, weak and dead-soft incompetent beds or alternating layers when, leaking crevice belt maximum height can be pressed Empirical equation is estimated in statistical form 2.
The computing formula of the level of table 2, low-angle dip and middle inclined seam height of the water conductive fracture zone
The empirical value of the two large categaries of also with good grounds national recent statistics, medium-hard overburden rocks may be referred to medium-hard overburden rocks water guide and split Seamed belt height is reciprocal and adopts thick inverse regression equation:
But existing computational methods have certain deficiency, because the complex geologic conditions of engineering site, various regions lithology is poor Very not big, the formula that former Ministry of Coal Industry is given generally can not accurately obtain two large categaries data by simple classification.And The only formula computational methods of two large categaries Forecasting Methodology at this stage are written with code, emerging other method such as physical prospecting, simulation It is intended only as supplementary means and is used with probing etc., a not planning for entirety.What is had in various methods can reach Identical detects purpose, and reusable result not only wasting manpower and material resources can also influence precision of prediction, be brought to safety in production Hidden danger.
The information for being disclosed in the background section is merely intended to increase the understanding to general background of the invention, without answering In being considered as recognizing or imply in any form that the information structure has been the prior art well known to persons skilled in the art.
The content of the invention
It is an object of the invention to provide a kind of method of testing of simple and reasonable two large categaries, the two large categaries Method of testing belongs to a kind of efficient detection assembled scheme, after can on the whole determining caving zone and leaking crevice belt scope, Defined boundaries using with targetedly detection method, the exact position in line of demarcation, improves precision of prediction in checking small range, Avoid redundancy and the waste of technical resource.
To achieve the above object, the invention provides a kind of method of testing of two large categaries, comprise the following steps:First, Predicting the outcome for two large categaries is calculated by two large categaries formula;Secondly, supervised using electromagnetic method, 3-D seismic method, microseism Survey method or seismic CT method primarily determine that the scope of research area's two large categaries;Again, using water filling pressure measuring system, borehole television system System or drilling fluid observation system further determine that the scope of fixed point two large categaries;Finally, by physical simulation or number It is worth the scope of simplation verification two large categaries.
Preferably, in above-mentioned technical proposal, electromagnetic method includes:High Density Resistivity, EH4 magnetotelluric methods and transient electrical Magnetic method.
Preferably, in above-mentioned technical proposal, electromagnetic method determines that water guide is broken by the change of mining overburden apparent resistivity Band height.
Preferably, in above-mentioned technical proposal, geophysical prospecting method needs are with the result of calculation of two large categaries formula Basic emphasis observes the change of critical zone.
Compared with prior art, the present invention has the advantages that:The method of testing of the two large categaries belongs to a kind of high The detection assembled scheme of effect, after can on the whole determining caving zone and leaking crevice belt scope, using with targetedly visiting Survey method defines boundaries, and the exact position in line of demarcation, improves precision of prediction in checking small range, it is to avoid technical resource it is superfluous Remaining and waste.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the flow chart of the method for testing of two large categaries of the invention.
Specific embodiment
Below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, specific embodiment of the invention is described in detail, it is to be understood that guarantor of the invention Shield scope is not limited by specific embodiment.
Explicitly indicated that unless otherwise other, otherwise in entire disclosure and claims, term " including " or its change Change such as "comprising" or " including " etc. and will be understood to comprise stated element or part, and do not exclude other units Part or other parts.
As shown in figure 1, the method for testing of the two large categaries according to the specific embodiment of the invention specifically includes following steps:
First, predicting the outcome for two large categaries is calculated by two large categaries formula;
Data are collected, the qualitative analysis of the geological conditions of engineering site is carried out, acquired results is arranged and is sorted out, and will correspondence Parameter substitutes into two large categaries computing formula according to different condition, draws predicting the outcome for two large categaries.
Secondly, applied geophysics detection method primarily determines that the scope of research area's two large categaries;
Wherein, geophysical prospecting method includes:Electromagnetic method, 3-D seismic method, micro seismic monitoring method and seismic CT method, with Emphasis observes the change of critical zone based on formula result of calculation.Electromagnetic method mainly by the change of mining overburden apparent resistivity come Determine that water conducted zone highly, mainly includes:High Density Resistivity, EH4 magnetotelluric methods and transient electromagnetic method.Using the earth During physical detecting method:Electromagnetic exploration has larger bulk effect, therefore more difficult to accurately determine water conducted zone critical Summit, seismic CT method does not exist bulk effect, as long as wave detector distance lays reasonable, raising longitudinal frame, its detection knot Fruit is more accurate than electromagnetic method.But the method is difficult to infer caving zone height and fractured situation on the whole.Transient electromagnetic method is anti- Should be sensitive, exploring equipment is higher for the requirement of working environment, and source strong reaction is disturbed to less ten, it is impossible to large-scale extensive Be applied to underground physical prospecting, but for the prediction of two large categaries, work well.Various methods set forth above respectively have excellent lacking Point, it is different to different environmental condition adaptability, can be replaced according to different situations, range of application it is wider be transient electrical Magnetic method.
Again, fixed point is further determined that using water filling pressure measuring system, borehole television system or drilling fluid observation system The scope of two large categaries;
Wherein, drilling fluid observation system observation bore leaking liquid, pressure change with time, in hydrofracturing stress Some Characteristic pressures points in measurement process, such as fracture pressure Pb, reopening pressure Pr, closing presure Ps and rock stress have Close.Inevitable different in two band (caving zone and leaking crevice belt) bore leaking liquid, frac pressure can also be changed, and two are judged with this Approximate range with height.The method test is with strong points, but the parameter of the selection that drills sometimes is not representative, it is all can not The conclusion in region is drawn on the whole.This is the shortcoming of the method.
And borehole television system is that the waterproof camera probe of an automatic light source is put into earth drilling, can be live to drilling The various features and slight change real-time monitored of middle geologic body, monitoring and record.Using by surface drilling, drilled by observing The integrality of interior roof overlying strata rock stratum, the development characteristics of initial fissure, the crack hair by rock stratum in mining rock slit band Educate width, connection situation, rock crushing situation and be caving sillar situation, most direct basis can be provided for Overburden Rock Failure point band, this Method is most intuitively observation procedure.The authenticity of the substantially data of analysis overburden rock damage institute distribution.The method can The method that detection accuracy is improved as a small range.Same the method test is with strong points, but the selection that drills sometimes parameter simultaneously Without representativeness, all conclusions that can not on the whole draw region.This is the shortcoming of the method.
Finally, by physical simulation or the scope of Simulation two large categaries.
Physical simulation to refer to and carry out research supplement by indoor physical simulation, and the method is difficult simulated groundwater Ambient conditions, as lithology migration rule inquire into compensation process, the result.Rear overlying strata can be adopted from overall situation observation Changing Pattern determines two large categaries variation characteristic at different conditions.With intuitive, there is meaning to the extraction of rule Justice.
Numerical simulation refers to that, by the setting of parameter, a kind of numerical software of selection is simulated such as FLAC, UDEC, PFC, RFPA Simulated etc. overlying strata rule under the conditions of adopting is carried out.Advantage is the method easy to operate, it is easy to simulate the rule under different condition, is lacked Point is to think that factor is too many, it is difficult to the conclusion Instructing manufacture for determining.
When the two band prediction in mining area is produced, researcher often can judge overlying strata by the region experience of itself Destruction height, contrast equation result of calculation accomplishes to know what's what for the approximate range of parameter, reduces the model of physical prospecting and probing Enclose, improve detection accuracy.In the predicting means of existing all Overburden Rock Failure maximum heights, based on code computing formula Under guide for method, using means optimum organizations such as most emerging probing, physical prospecting and simulations, a set of more accurate detection is drawn Method, is integrated into a set of forecasting system, is very meaningful and necessary.
To sum up, the method for testing of the two large categaries belongs to a kind of efficient detection assembled scheme, can determine on the whole After caving zone and leaking crevice belt scope, defined boundaries using with targetedly detection method, demarcated in checking small range The exact position of line, improves precision of prediction, it is to avoid the redundancy of technical resource and waste.
The foregoing description to specific illustrative embodiment of the invention be in order to illustrate and illustration purpose.These descriptions It is not wishing to limit the invention to disclosed precise forms, and it will be apparent that according to above-mentioned teaching, can be much changed And change.The purpose of selecting and describing the exemplary embodiment is that explaining that certain principles of the invention and its reality should With so that those skilled in the art can realize and using a variety of exemplaries of the invention and A variety of selections and change.The scope of the present invention is intended to be limited by claims and its equivalents.

Claims (4)

1. a kind of method of testing of two large categaries, it is characterised in that comprise the following steps:
First, predicting the outcome for two large categaries is calculated by two large categaries formula;
Secondly, research area's two large categaries are primarily determined that using electromagnetic method, 3-D seismic method, micro seismic monitoring method or seismic CT method Scope;
Again, two bands of fixed point are further determined that using water filling pressure measuring system, borehole television system or drilling fluid observation system The scope of height;
Finally, by physical simulation or the scope of Simulation two large categaries.
2. the method for testing of two large categaries according to claim 1, it is characterised in that the electromagnetic method includes:High density Resistivity method, EH4 magnetotelluric methods and transient electromagnetic method.
3. the method for testing of two large categaries according to claim 2, it is characterised in that the electromagnetic method passes through mining overburden The change of apparent resistivity determines the water conducted zone highly.
4. the method for testing of two large categaries according to claim 2, it is characterised in that the geophysical prospecting method is needed Will based on the result of calculation of two large categaries formula emphasis observe critical zone change.
CN201710033814.9A 2017-01-18 2017-01-18 The method of testing of two large categaries Pending CN106802435A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710033814.9A CN106802435A (en) 2017-01-18 2017-01-18 The method of testing of two large categaries

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710033814.9A CN106802435A (en) 2017-01-18 2017-01-18 The method of testing of two large categaries

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN106802435A true CN106802435A (en) 2017-06-06

Family

ID=58984481

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201710033814.9A Pending CN106802435A (en) 2017-01-18 2017-01-18 The method of testing of two large categaries

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN106802435A (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5887657A (en) * 1995-02-09 1999-03-30 Baker Hughes Incorporated Pressure test method for permanent downhole wells and apparatus therefore
CN202520304U (en) * 2012-04-01 2012-11-07 贵州航天凯山石油仪器有限公司 Integral structure of plug type pressure gauge double-channel sensor
CN103867188A (en) * 2014-03-14 2014-06-18 山东石大油田技术服务股份有限公司 Decision method used for profile control of oil-field water injection well

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5887657A (en) * 1995-02-09 1999-03-30 Baker Hughes Incorporated Pressure test method for permanent downhole wells and apparatus therefore
CN202520304U (en) * 2012-04-01 2012-11-07 贵州航天凯山石油仪器有限公司 Integral structure of plug type pressure gauge double-channel sensor
CN103867188A (en) * 2014-03-14 2014-06-18 山东石大油田技术服务股份有限公司 Decision method used for profile control of oil-field water injection well

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ZHIXIN WANG 等: "The Research on the Height of the ‘Two zones’ in Xiegou Mine Areas, Shanxi, China", 《2014 CHINA UNIVERSITY OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY PRESS》 *
国家煤矿安全监察局: "《煤矿防治水规定释义》", 31 December 2009, 中国矿业出版社 *
樊运策 等: "《综合机械化放顶煤开采技术》", 30 April 2003, 煤炭工业出版社 *
郭惟嘉 等: "《矿井特殊开采》", 30 September 2008, 煤炭工业出版社 *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11156743B2 (en) Lateral placement and completion design for improved well performance of unconventional reservoirs
Ghosh et al. Application of underground microseismic monitoring for ground failure and secure longwall coal mining operation: A case study in an Indian mine
RU2561114C2 (en) System and method of well production intensification
US10605060B2 (en) System and method for performing stimulation operations
Méndez et al. Fracture characterization and modeling of karsted carbonate reservoirs: A case study in Tahe oilfield, Tarim Basin (western China)
US20150204174A1 (en) System and method for performing stimulation operations
Guo et al. An integrated approach to study of strata behaviour and gas flow dynamics and its application
CN103649463A (en) System and method for performing wellbore stimulation operations
CN101581234A (en) Comprehensive underground test method for deformation and damage of terranes of mining top plate and mining bottom plate of coal bed
Tang et al. A microseismic-based fracture properties characterization and visualization model for the selection of infill wells in shale reservoirs
US11789170B2 (en) Induced seismicity
CA2873816C (en) Systems and methods for processing geophysical data
US20180112525A1 (en) Method of Determination of Parameters of the Fracture Near Wellbore Zone Filled with Electrically Conductive Proppant Using Electromagnetic Logging
CN103615238A (en) Scaling-down cavernous formation dual laterolog physical simulation device and experimental method
Tang et al. Investigation of multiple hydraulic fractures evolution and well performance in lacustrine shale oil reservoirs considering stress heterogeneity
AU2013286817A1 (en) A method of, and a system for, drilling to a position relative to a geological boundary
Wang et al. An ultrasonic-based method for longwall top-coal cavability assessment
CN102182437B (en) Method for determining and eliminating hydraulic fracture stress boundary of coal mine underground drilling
CN103487843B (en) Underwater amount measuring method based on resistivity imaging technology
Liang et al. Accelerating development optimization in the Bakken using an integrated fracture diagnostic pilot
US20180119532A1 (en) Improved fracture matching for completion operations
Cipolla et al. Observation Lateral Project: Direct Measurement of Far-Field Drainage in the Bakken
Peng et al. Multi-scale multivariate detection method for the effective impact range of hydraulic fracturing in coal seam
CN113703053A (en) Dynamic monitoring method and system for water damage microseismic on working face
CN106772681A (en) The method of testing of caving zone and height of the water conductive fracture zone

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20170606