CA2718336A1 - Wear monitoring system, cable operated transportation system and a method for monitoring wear-prone parts therein - Google Patents
Wear monitoring system, cable operated transportation system and a method for monitoring wear-prone parts therein Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2718336A1 CA2718336A1 CA2718336A CA2718336A CA2718336A1 CA 2718336 A1 CA2718336 A1 CA 2718336A1 CA 2718336 A CA2718336 A CA 2718336A CA 2718336 A CA2718336 A CA 2718336A CA 2718336 A1 CA2718336 A1 CA 2718336A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- parameter
- accordance
- wear
- cable
- state
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 88
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 47
- 238000005299 abrasion Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 117
- 230000036962 time dependent Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 claims description 53
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 108010053481 Antifreeze Proteins Proteins 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000002528 anti-freeze Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920002994 synthetic fiber Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 41
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 22
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 17
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 17
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229920001875 Ebonite Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920001971 elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003534 oscillatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010073 coating (rubber) Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000806 elastomer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009420 retrofitting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61B—RAILWAY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT THEREFOR NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B61B12/00—Component parts, details or accessories not provided for in groups B61B7/00 - B61B11/00
- B61B12/06—Safety devices or measures against cable fracture
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Transportation (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Length Measuring Devices With Unspecified Measuring Means (AREA)
- Braking Arrangements (AREA)
- Control Of Conveyors (AREA)
Abstract
In order to increase the operational reliability of a cable operated transportation system, there is proposed a wear monitoring system (38) for monitoring the wear and/or abrasion of at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) of a cable operated transportation system comprising a support cable and/or a traction cable and/or a hoisting cable (12) and also at least one drive unit (16, 106) wherein said system component is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner, including a parameter measuring device for measuring an actual value and/or a time-dependent actual value function of at least one electrical and/or mechanical parameter of the at least one system component and/or the drive unit and also including an evaluating device (70) for determining a parameter deviation of the actual value from a desired value in dependence on time or a time interval and/or of the actual value function from a time-dependent desired value function of the at least one parameter, which parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component.
Description
Wear monitoring system, cable operated transportation system and a method for monitoring wear-prone parts therein The present invention relates to a wear monitoring system for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of at least one system component of a cable operated transportation system comprising a support cable and/or a traction cable and/or a hoisting cable and also at least one drive unit, wherein said system component is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner.
Moreover, the present invention relates to a cable operated transportation system consisting of at least one cable, at least one drive unit for moving the at least one cable and at least one system component which is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner and is used for driving and/or guiding the at least one cable or other components of the transportation system.
Finally, the present invention also relates to a method for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of at least one system component of a cable operated transportation system comprising a support cable and/or a traction cable and/or a hoisting cable and also at least one drive unit, wherein said system component is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner.
In cable operated transportation systems such as aerial ropeways in the form of chair lifts or gondola cars for example, the support-, traction- and/or hoisting cables of the transportation system are guided over revolving and/or rotationally mounted system components such as cable pulleys or guide pulleys and also driving pulleys for example. The cable pulleys in particular are generally arranged on support masts in the open countryside, wherein a plurality of cable pulleys together can form a pulley assembly. It is not just the cable pulleys that are subject to wear and abrasion, but basically, so too especially are e.g. all the moving components in the system which cooperate directly or indirectly with the at least one cable such as transportation devices for accommodating people and/or goods which are fixed permanently or temporarily to the cable such as chairs or gondolas and in particular gondola cabins for example. Wear can occur especially in the form of binding up to the complete seizure of the bearings of the revolving and/or rotationally mounted system components. Wear and/or abrasion can also arise in particular in the air-filled friction wheels which are utilised in order to accelerate the transportation devices, such as the gondola cars of a cable-car system and the chairs of a chair lift system that are e.g. only temporarily fixed to the cable, up to the speed of the cable or for braking them for the purposes of loading them or for permitting people to climb in or out of them. Thus, in the case of air-filled friction wheels for example, a loss of pressure can reduce or prevent the traction thereof. Moreover, system components which are mounted in a rotating and/or circulating manner in the form of transmission belts, for example drive belts for driving pulleys or friction wheels, can be subjected to wear or abrasion. This manifests itself by slippage or overstretching thereof, whereby, for example, the traction of friction wheels which are driven by the transmission belts can likewise be reduced or prevented.
The unwanted consequence of the practically unavoidable wear and/or abrasion is that, in dependence on the type and extent of the wear or the abrasion, the operational reliability of the cable operated transportation system cannot be ensured over a long period of time.
Consequently, the object of the present invention is to propose a method and a device or a system with the aid of which the operational reliability of a cable operated transportation system can be increased, and thus to improve such a transportation system accordingly.
In accordance with the invention, this object is achieved by a wear monitoring system of the type described hereinabove which comprises a parameter measuring device for measuring an actual value and/or a time-dependent actual value function of at least one electrical and/or mechanical parameter of the at least one system component and/or the drive unit, and also an evaluating device for detecting a parameter deviation of the actual value in dependence on time or a time interval from a desired value and/or of the actual value function from a time-dependent desired value function of the at least one parameter, which parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component.
In principle, it is possible to establish in a simple manner how severely the functioning of each system component that is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner is being impaired by abrasion and/or wear particularly over the course of time with the aid of such a wear monitoring system. If an actual value for the parameter is determined, then this actual value can be detected in time-dependent manner, whereby its deviation from a desired value in dependence on time will become larger and larger, the greater the abrasion and/or the wear of the system component. Furthermore, the size and form of the parameter deviation of the actual value in dependence on time, or, of the actual value function relative to the time-dependent desired value function enables the type of wear and abrasion to be determined. For example, in the case where the rotation of a cable pulley is being monitored, damage to the pulley bearing will lead to a decrease in the rotational speed until it finally stops and thus to a large, above average, deviation of the parameter. Unbalances of a system component being monitored can be ascertained from oscillatory deviations of the parameter in the course of time correlated to the rotation cycles for example. The proposed wear monitoring system is of very simple construction, because it only requires the monitoring of a mechanical parameter of the system component and/or of an electrical or mechanical parameter of the at least one drive unit for example. A change in the friction wheels or the transmission belts can be ascertained indirectly from the current waveform of the drive current for the at least one drive unit for example. Slippage of the belts leads to a reduced level of traction and thus to the need for less torque from the drive means with the consequence of a reduction in power consumption. The wear monitoring system is exceptionally well-suited to the task of retro--fitting pre-existing cable operated transportation facilities at low cost. The wear monitoring system results in an increase in the operational reliability of the cable operated transportation system since the detected deviation of a parameter can also be used, in particular, to have an effect upon the operation of the system such as for example, to lower the operational speed or completely shut down the system in the event that, the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of at least one of the system components being monitored becomes so great that the operational reliability of the transportation system or parts thereof can no longer be ensured. Furthermore, the invention makes it possible for the parameter measuring devices such as proximity switches or other sensor devices for example, to be mounted on e.g. cable masts where they can be protected from lightning strikes since the parameter measuring devices do not have to be arranged directly in the proximity of the cable, but can, in particular, be located underneath it such that they are spaced from the current path formed as a result of a lightning strike.
It is expedient, if the parameter measuring device comprises a movement magnitude device for measuring the actual value and/or the actual value function of at least one first movement magnitude of the at least one system component which defines a mechanical parameter. For example, the rotational speeds, the speeds, the angular speeds or the accelerations of the system component can be determined in a simple manner with the aid of the movement magnitude measuring device and the wear and/or abrasion can then be deduced from the time-dependent pattern thereof.
The construction of the wear monitoring system can be simplified in a simple manner if the movement magnitude measuring device is configured to measure the actual value and/or the actual value function of at least one second movement magnitude, which defines a mechanical parameter, of at least one reference component of the transportation system which is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner. In particular, the actual value and/or the actual value function of the at least one second movement magnitude can be used respectively as a time-dependent desired value or as a desired value function. In other words, this means that. actual values or actual value functions of the first movement magnitude of the at least one system component that is to be monitored can be compared respectively with those time-dependent actual values or the actual value function defining a desired value or a desired value function of the second movement magnitude of the reference component of the transportation system. For example, the system component that is to be monitored can be a cable pulley, the reference component an identical cable pulley. If the hoisting cable or the traction cable of the transportation system is running over the cable pulley and the reference pulley at the same speed, then, under identical loadings, the ratio between the actual values or the ac~ual value functions of the parameter that have been determined from the two components would have to develop in the same way over time. If, however, in the course of time, there are increasing deviations from one another, then one can immediately conclude that abrasion has occurred in or on one of the two components, for example, based on an increase in the rotational speed that has occurred in the course of time, one can conclude therefrom that there is abrasion of the cable pulley as a result of a decrease in the diameter thereof.
Preferably, an additional system component which is also mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner can be used as a reference component, for example, a reference pulley which is driven by the cable although it is not necessary for the actual operation of the transportation system and runs separately therefrom. It is expedient for the reference component not to be affected by excessive cable forces so that it can be driven substantially unloaded and, insofar as possible, without appreciable slippage by the moving cable.
It is advantageous, if the evaluating device is configured to determine a parameter-deviation-defining movement magnitude deviation of the actual value and/or the actual value function of the at least one first movement magnitude and of the at least one second movement magnitude from one another. In consequence, the evaluating device is suitable for directly comparing the detected values of the first. and second movement magnitude with one another and thus for determining the parameter deviation that is to be used for assigning the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear.
Preferably, the evaluating device is configured to determine a change of the parameter deviation in dependence on the period of operation or an operating interval of the transportation system, which change of the parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component in dependence on the period of operation or the operating interval. In other words, it is expedient if it is not just the parameter deviation itself that is determined, but (also) the time-dependent profile thereof. The greater the deviation of the parameter over the course of time, so the more obvious it will be that there is increasing abrasion or increasing wear of the monitored system component.
The construction of the wear monitoring system is particularly simple and it can be equipped with commercially available parameter measuring devices, if the latter comprise a torque measuring device, a rotational speed and/or angular speed measuring device for measuring the mechanical parameter in the form of a torque, a rotational speed or an angular speed. Thus, for example, the abrasion of individual system components can be determined by comparing the rotational speed of two system components in time-dependent: manner, e.g. a system component that is to be monitored and a reference component. For example, the reference component can be a cable pulley which is arranged on a pulley assembly comprising several cable pulleys in such a way that a cable force and in particular a transverse force on the cable pulley that is exerted as a result of external side forces such as wind forces for example that are effective on the cable is minimal. Coming into question in particular here, are the inner cable pulleys of a pulley assembly where the abrasion is usually particularly low since they are shielded by the run-in and run-out pulleys and possibly also by further neighbouring pulleys. For the purposes of monitoring the operational reliability state, it is advantageous for the run-in and run-out pulleys of a plurality of pulley assemblies that comprise cable pulleys to be monitored, since transverse forces on these cable pulleys arising especially due to wind, cause an over-proportionately large amount of abrasion. In other words, this means that the run-in and run-out pulleys are abraded to the greatest extent so that it makes sense to determine the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of these pulleys and then assess the operational reliability state of the transportation system in dependence on the detected state of abrasion and/or state of wear of the run-in and run-out pulleys.
In particular, the construction of the wear monitoring system can be simplified if the parameter measuring device comprises a current and/or voltage measuring device for measuring at least one parameter in the form of a drive current and/or a drive voltage of the drive unit. The system components which are driven directly or indirectly by the at least one drive unit have a direct or indirect influence on the current and/or voltage waveforms of the drive unit in dependence on the time.
For example, an electrical parameter can be determined more easily from a drive unit associated with a friction wheel assembly used for the purposes of accelerating and braking the gondola cars of the transportation system in order to synchronize them with the rotational speed of a circulating cable because abrasion in a friction wheel leads to a change in the power being drawn by the at least one drive unit and thus to a change in the current and/or voltage waveform of the drive unit. In addition, a correlation or a redundancy measurement can also be achieved by additionally detecting a mechanical parameter of one or more friction wheels of the friction wheel assembly for example.
Advantageously, the at least one system component is in the form of a cable pulley, a cable sheave, a friction wheel or a drive belt. In principle, it is possible to monitor every moveable component in the system and thereby establish the wear or abrasion at any point in the transportation system.
The construction of the wear monitoring system is particularly simple if the at least one reference component is in the form of a cable pulley, a cable sheave, a friction wheel or a drive belt. In this way, the same parameter measuring devices can be used in order to detect the actual values of the parameters of the system component and the reference component, whereby each component of the transportation system that is used as a reference component can itself also be a system component that is to be monitored.
It is expedient, if the cable sheave is in the form of a deflection sheave or a drive sheave. Cable sheaves of this type are employed, in particular, in cable car systems and lift systems. They have the advantage that they have a significantly greater diameter in comparison with the cable pulley assemblies on the masts of the transportation system and thus have a significantly lower rotational speed during the operation of the transportation system. Thus, in particular, the abrasion of drive or deflection sheaves is significantly lower than that of cable pulleys. Consequently, cable sheaves of large diameter in particular are outstandingly suitable as reference components.
It is advantageous, if a state of abrasion determining device is provided for determining the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component in dependence on the parameter deviation and/or the change of the parameter deviation. The state of abrasion and/or the state of wear can thus be detected directly by the state of abrasion determining device.
Moreover, it is advantageous, if an operational reliability state determining device is provided for determining the operational reliability state of the transportation system in dependence on the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component. By using this device in particular, one can detect as to whether or not the operational reliability state of the transportation system is such that it can continue to be used safely.
Preferably the operational reliability state determining device is configured so that an operational reliability state of the transportation system can be associated with the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component determined by the state of abrasion determining device. Then, for example, if the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of a system component exceeds a certain value, an operational reliability state can be associated with or assigned to the transportation system for indicating that safe operation of the transportation system can no longer be ensured. Self evidently, it is also possible to provide the data regarding the operational reliability state in a gradated form i.e. for example on a scale from 0 to 10, upon which for example, a state of high operational reliability is or will be indicated by 10 whereas a state of minimum operational reliability is denoted by 0. Self evidently, the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of a plurality of the system components can be used for the determination of the operational reliability state. The larger the number of system components being monitored, so the greater the precision with which a fault diagnosis of the transportation system can be accomplished. Thus, the position of a fault in the system can be located with particular accuracy by appropriate correlation of the actual values or actual value functions that have been detected at different system components. Accordingly, appropriate counter measures can then be taken such as those of shutting down the system and displaying a message identifying the defective system component for example.
In order to allow the operating personnel to be made aware of the operational reliability state, it is expedient to provide a comparison scale for quantifying the operational reliability state, and for an operational reliability state signal generating device to be provided for producing an operational reliability state signal which corresponds to a value of the operational reliability state on the comparison scale that is associated with the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component. The comparison scale can be designed in a variety of ways, for example, in the form of a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10 or the like, but it could also be a corresponding scale of colours wherein an operational reliability state which permits safe operation of the transportation system is indicated particularly in green, but wherein an operational reliability state in which the transportation system should not be operated at all is indicated in red.
In order to enable a high level of redundancy and certainty to be achieved in the process of determining the operational reliability state, it is advantageous for the operational reliability state signal generating device to be formed in such a manner that the parameter deviations derived from at least two system components can be processed for the purposes of producing the operational reliability state signal. The process for determining the operational reliability state will be so much more precise and more efficient, the greater the number of system components that are being monitored for determining the parameters thereof.
In order to enable that system component showing the greatest amount of abrasion to be filtered out, it is advantageous for the operational reliability state signal generating device to comprise a maximum value detecting unit with which there can be determined a maximum value of at least two detected parameter deviations and/or changes therein. This has the especial advantage that the largest overall deviation of a parameter or change thereof can be determined in this way, since the doubt is not as to whether the system components that are being monitored are abrading evenly, but rather, in finding out where the largest amount of abrasion and the largest amount of wear is occurring, because the operational reliability of the transportation system may already be in question due to corresponding damage or stoppage of just a single component in the system. The detection of this system component is simplified significantly by the use of the maximum value detecting unit.
In order to enable the operating personnel of the transportation system to establish in a simple and certain manner as to whether the system can continue to be used or whether it would be better to shut it down, it is expedient to provide an optical and/or acoustic indicator device for displaying the operational reliability state signal. For example, this can be in the form of a monitor and/or a loudspeaker so that the comparison scale and also the detected operating state can be displayed or signalled acoustically.
In order to signal to the operating personnel directly that an operational reliability state has reached a critical value which would sensibly entail a reduction in the operating speed or shut down of the transportation system, it is advantageous for an alarm device to be provided for producing an alarm and/or a shut down signal if the value of the operational reliability state signal exceeds at least one limiting value.
In order to enable the sensitivity of the system to be adjusted in a simple manner, it is advantageous for the at least one limiting value to be settable at a fixed value and/or to be alterable individually. Furthermore, the limiting value can also serve to define the corresponding response time for the system. Hereby, it can be expedient for the limiting value to be set in such a way that fluctuations, which may possibly be occurring in the actual values or actual value functions that are being detected by the parameter measuring device, are determined over a time interval and averaged if necessary in order to prevent unwanted errors, i.e. in particular, the production of shut down signals which are only being produced because of operation-dependent fluctuations in the transportation system, but not however because of abrasion or wear in the individual system components that are actually to be monitored.
In order for the operating personnel to know immediately that the transportation system has reached a critical operational reliability state or that it would be best for it to be shut down immediately, it is expedient to provide an optical and/or acoustic alarm signal display device for indicating the alarm and/or shut down signal. This, for example, can be in the form of a warning lamp or a flashing lamp and could also be formed by an appropriate loudspeaker or loudspeaker system.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, provision may be made for the alarm system to cooperate with a control and/or regulating device for the at least one drive unit of the transportation system and to be configured so that the drive speed of the transportation system can be reduced and/or the at least one drive unit of the transportation system can be switched off as a result of the production of the alarm or shut down signal. The control of the transportation system can be completely automated in this way. The operation of the transportation system can thus be stopped immediately should a critical operating situation be established by the wear monitoring system irrespective of whether the operating personnel take notice of the alarm or shut down signal.
In order to enable the actual value and the desired value to be directly compared with one another for example, it is expedient for the parameter measuring device to be configured so that two or more electrical and/or mechanical parameters can be determined simultaneously. In particular in the case where the desired values or the desired value functions are determined by detecting the actual values and the actual value functions at the reference components, a parameter deviation can then be detected directly, for example, by forming the difference between the detected values directly.
Preferably, the parameter measuring device is configured that the actual value of the at least one parameter can be determined in time-dependent manner. Changes in the deviations of the parameter in the course of the operation of the transportation system and/or over a given time interval can thus be determined in a simple and certain manner.
The sensitivity of the wear monitoring system can be set, in particular, by virtue of the fact that the duration of the time interval can be preset and/or variable. The time interval can also be selected as an integral multiple of the operating cycles of the at least one system component or a reference component, and in particular, a certain number of rotations of a cable pulley or a cable sheave for example. A certain response time of the wear monitoring system can also be preset by the duration of the time interval if the values are determined and processed as average values over the time interval.
It is expedient for the parameter measuring device to be configured for the contactless measurement of the at least one parameter. Additional wear caused by the process of taking measurements of the parameters of the system components can thus be prevented in a simple and certain manner.
The construction of the parameter measuring device is particularly simple if it comprises a clock pulse emitting member which is connectable in mutually non-rotatable manner to the at least one system component for which the mechanical movement magnitude is to be determined, and at least one sensor for detecting the rotation of the clock pulse emitting member.
Both the rotational speed and the angular speed of the at least one system component can be determined in a simple and certain manner if the clock pulse emitting member is in the form of a timing disc having a multiplicity of clock members arranged regularly around the periphery of the timing disc, whereby the movement thereof can be detected in a simple and certain manner by appropriate sensors.
The construction of the timing disc is particularly simple if the clock members are in the form of radially outwardly or radially inwardly protruding projections which form a regular toothing. Preferably, the toothing can thus be in the form of an external or internal set of teeth. In addition, a timing disc formed in such a manner can ensure the operational reliability of the parameter measuring device.
In order to enable the parameter to be measured in a simple and certain manner with the aid of proximity sensors for example, it is advantageous for the clock pulse emitting member to be at least partly made of a metal.
In order to ensure the operational reliability of the parameter measuring device even when it is exposed to the effects of the weather, it is advantageous for the clock pulse emitting member to be provided with an anti-freeze layer. The clock pulse emitting member can thus be prevented from becoming iced up in which case the determination of a mechanical parameter of the at least one system component, the magnitude of a movement thereof for example, could no longer be ensured.
The construction of the timing disc is particularly simple and economical if the anti-freeze layer is made of a synthetic material.
The movement magnitude of the at least one system component or reference component can be measured in a simple and certain manner if the sensor is an inductive or a capacitive proximity sensor or a Hall sensor. With the aid of the latter in particular, pulses can be produced due to the movement of the clock members past the sensor so that the rotational speed or the angular speed of the timing disc and hence too the speed of the at least one system component or that of the reference component for example can be derived therefrom.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, provision may be made for the at least one reference component and the at least one system component to be configured so that, in the starting state occurring when the system is started-up for example, the value of the first movement magnitude is smaller than that of the at least one second movement magnitude.
Thus, for example, a ratio of the first and second movement magnitudes relative to one another can be determined which will have a value significantly smaller than 1 or a value significantly larger than 1 in dependence on the way in which the ratio of the two magnitudes is formed. The rotational speeds of system components and reference components could be mentioned as examples. If a deflection sheave or a cable sheave having a very large diameter is provided as a reference component, then, in the case where the cable speed is the same, this will have a significantly lower value of rotational speed than a cable pulley of comparatively significantly smaller diameter. In consequence, the actual value function of the reference component will change to a significantly lesser extent over the course of time than the actual value function of the system component that is to be monitored.
Expediently, a radius of the at least one reference component is greater than a radius of the at least one system component. The smaller the radius of the system component, then the greater the abrasion thereof in the course of time at a constant cable speed compared with a system component of larger radius. The latter is therefore particularly well suited as a reference component having a significantly more constant waveform for the actual value of its measured parameter over the course of time.
Furthermore, the object stated hereinabove is also achieved by the use of one of the wear monitoring systems described above for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of a system component of a cable operated transportation system comprising a support cable and/or a traction cable and/or a hoisting cable and also at least one drive unit, wherein said system component is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner.
Moreover, in accordance with the invention, the object set out above is also achieved in the case of a cable operated transportation system of the type described above by a wear monitoring system for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of the at least one system component that is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner, wherein the wear monitoring system comprises a parameter measuring device for measuring an actual value and/or a time-dependent actual value function of at least one electrical and/or mechanical parameter of the at least one system component and/or the drive unit, and also comprises an evaluating device for determining a parameter deviation of the actual value in dependence on time or a time interval from a desired value and/or of the actual value function from a time-dependent desired value function of the at least one parameter, which parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component.
In dependence on the design of the wear monitoring system, a cable operated transportation system equipped with such a wear monitoring system provides the opportunity to specifically monitor individual system components for wear and/or abrasion and thus obtain in good time an indication as to when it would be logical to maintain or replace the particular system component in order to prevent damage to the transportation system and ensure the operational reliability of the transportation system over a long period.
Preferably, the wear monitoring system is in the form of one of the wear monitoring systems described above and is constructed in correspondence with the previously described further developments thereof and thus it also exhibits the advantages that have already been described above.
Moreover, in accordance with the invention, the object specified above is also achieved by a method for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of at least one system component which is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner and forms part of a cable operated transportation system comprising a support cable and/or a traction cable and/or a hoisting cable and also at least one drive unit, wherein an actual value and/or a time-dependent actual value function of at least one electrical and/or mechanical parameter of the at least one system component and/or the drive unit is measured and wherein a parameter deviation of the actual value from a desired value in dependence on time or a time interval and/or a deviation of the actual value function from a time-dependent desired value function of the at least one parameter is determined, which parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component.
The method proposed in accordance with the invention is simple to carry out and concentrates on determining the deviation of a parameter either at the system component itself or indirectly, by determining such a deviation in at least one drive unit of the transportation system, whereby the wear and/or abrasion of the at least one system component can be determined directly or indirectly. The state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the particular system component that has been detected in this way can also be used, in particular, for taking appropriate measures in order to ensure the operational reliability of the transportation system, for example, by maintaining or repairing the system component or decreasing the speed of circulation of the transportation system or even shutting it down.
It is expedient, if the actual value and/or the actual value function of at least one mechanical-parameter-defining first movement magnitude of the at least one system component is measured. The advantages of this arrangement are immediately apparent, as too are the advantages of all the further embodiments of the method that are described in the following, from the above description of the advantages of the wear monitoring system that has been proposed in accordance with the invention.
It is advantageous, if the actual value and/or the actual value function of at least one mechanical-parameter-defining second movement magnitude of at least one reference component of the transportation system which is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner is measured.
Expediently, a parameter-deviation-defining movement magnitude deviation of the actual value and/or the actual value function of the at least one movement magnitude and of the at least one second movement magnitude from one another is determined.
In accordance with a special variant of the method proposed in accordance with the invention, provision may be made for a change of the parameter deviation in dependence on the period of operation or an operating interval of the transportation system to be determined, which change of the parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component in dependence on the period of operation or the operating interval.
The method can be carried out in a particularly simple manner if the mechanical parameter is measured in the form of a torque, a rotational speed or an angular speed.
Preferably, the at least one parameter is measured in the form of a drive current and/or a drive voltage of the at least one drive unit. These parameters enable a conclusion to be drawn indirectly as to the wear and/or abrasion of the at least one system component.
Advantageously, the at least one parameter is measured at a cable pulley, a cable sheave, a deflection sheave, a drive sheave, a friction wheel or a drive belt. In this way in particular, a desired value or a desired value function can also be measured directly at one of the abovementioned parts of the transportation system and then compared with the parameter of the system component that is to be monitored whereby a parameter deviation can thus be determined.
It is advantageous, if the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component is determined in dependence on the parameter deviation and/or the change of the parameter deviation.
It is expedient, if an operational reliability state of the transportation system is determined in dependence on the state of abrasion and/or state of wear of the at least one system component.
In order to receive a direct indication as to the operational reliability state, it is expedient if the ascertained state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component is associated with the operational reliability state of the transportation system.
Preferably, there is produced an operational reliability state signal which corresponds to a value of the operational reliability state on a comparison scale which is associated with a state of abrasion and/or a state of wear of the at least one system component.
In order to increase the quality of the process of evaluating the operational reliability state of the transportation system, it is expedient if the parameter deviations derived from at least two system components are processed for the purposes of producing the operational reliability state signal.
Since the operational reliability of a transportation system can be called into question even if there is a breakdown of or damage to just one system component, it is advantageous if the maximum value of at least two detected parameter deviations and/or changes therein is determined. In this way one can avoid the problem that in certain circumstances it will only be the average value of the state of wear or the state of abrasion that is determined, even though this value does not necessarily take into consideration that a particular one or more of the system components has already been damaged to such an extent that the operational reliability of the transportation system as a whole can no longer be ensured.
Expediently, the operational reliability state signal is indicated optically and/or acoustically.
Preferably, an alarm and/or a shut down signal is generated if the value of the operational reliability state signal exceeds at --east one limiting value. Several limiting values for the operational reliability state signal could also be preset, whereby differing levels for the operational reliability state of the transportation system can be predefined. For example, a first limiting value could indicate that maintenance of a particular one or more system components would make good sense, effectively a reminder in regard to an operationally dependent maintenance interval. A next limiting value could, for example, indicate that a system component is exhibiting maximum abrasion or maximum wear and must be replaced immediately in order to ensure the operation of the transportation system in the light of the current safety regulations. Furthermore, another limiting value could be selected in such a way that when it is exceeded, an indication is given that the transportation system is to be shut down immediately or is shut down immediately.
In order to preset the response times for the monitoring of the transportation system individually and also to enable the sensitivity of the wear monitoring system to be set and adjusted in accordance with the particular requirements, it is advantageous for the at least one limiting value to be settable at a fixed value and/or for it to be alterable individually.
Advantageously, the alarm and/or shut down signal is indicated optically and/or acoustically.
Furthermore, it can be expedient if, following the generation of the alarm signal and/or shut down signal, the drive speed of the transportation system is reduced and/or the at least one drive unit of the transportation system is switched off.
Preferably, two or more electrical and/or mechanical parameters are determined at the same time. This makes it possible for the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of individual system components to be detected practically in real time and to be used for the control and/or regulation of the transportation system accordingly.
In order to enable the variation over time of the parameter deviation to be determined, it is advantageous for the actual value of the at least one parameter to be measured in time-dependent manner.
Expediently, the duration of the time interval is preset at a fixed amount and/or is variable as required in order to predefine the response time and the sensitivity of the method.
Advantageously, the at least one parameter is measured in contactless manner.
Moreover, it can be expedient for the at least one reference component and the at least one system component to be selected in such a way that, in the starting state occurring when the transportation system is started-up, the first movement magnitude has a smaller value than the at least one second movement magnitude.
The following description of preferred embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the drawings serves to provide a more detailed explanation. Therein:
Figure 1: shows a schematic illustration of two support masts and the pulley assemblies of an aerial ropeway under a light load;
Figure 2: a schematic illustration of two support masts and the pulley assemblies of an aerial ropeway under a heavier load;
Figure 3: a plan view of a pulley assembly wherein transverse forces are effective on the cable;
Figure 4: a sectional view through a cable pulley over which a cable is being guided without any effective transverse forces;
Figure 5: a sectional view of a timing disc;
Figure 6: a schematic illustration of a wear monitoring system of a cable operated transportation system;
Figure 7: a schematic illustration of a friction wheel assembly of the transportation system for decelerating / accelerating a gondola car, Figure 8: a schematic illustration of a decelerating friction wheel assembly with a damaged friction wheel;
Figure 9: a schematic illustration of a decelerating friction wheel assembly wherein a transmission belt is overstretched;
Figure 10: a schematic illustration of a friction wheel assembly forming part of an acceleration stretch wherein a transmission belt is overstretched, dirty or covered with dew;
Figure 11: a schematic illustration of a part of a transportation system; and Figure 12: a flow chart for a method of monitoring wear in the system components of a cable operated transportation system.
A cable operated transportation system in the form of an aerial ropeway bearing the general reference symbol 10 is schematically illustrated at least in part in the Figures. It comprises a circulating, driven cable 12 having e.g. chairs or gondola cars 14a for the transportation of people or load-carrying gondola cars 14b for the transportation of goods arranged thereon such that they are either fixed to the cable 12 or are only connected thereto temporarily in order to temporarily release the gondola cars 14a for the transportation of people in particular from the cable and thereby make it easier for a number of people to get into or out of them. A first drive unit in the form of a drive means 16 is formed and arranged in such a manner that the cable 12, which is preferably an endless one, can be moved so as to move the gondola cars 14a or 14b in a circulatory manner through the transportation system 10.
Pulley assemblies 18 which are held on the support masts 20 are provided for the guidance of the cable 12. The pulley assemblies 18, which are also referred to as roller-groups, comprise a plurality of cable pulleys 22. In the exemplary embodiment of a transportation system 10 illustrated in the Figures, each pulley assembly 18 comprises four cable pulleys 22. These form the rotationally mounted system components subject to wear and/or abrasion in the sense of the Claims. In each case, two cable pulleys 22 are arranged together in a rocker member 24 on which they are rotatably mounted, the rocker member being mounted such that it is pivotal relative to a cross beam 26 at a free end of the support mast 20. The rocker members 24 are inclined relative to the cross beams 26 to a greater or lesser extent in dependence on the size of the load on the cable 20 that is produced by the gondola cars 14a or 14b In a span 28 between two pulley assemblies 18. The larger the load on the cable 12 produced by the gondola cars 14a or 14b in the span 28, the greater the inclination as is illustrated in exemplary manner in Figures 1 and 2.
The pulley assemblies 18 can be in the form of supporting pulley assemblies, i.e. the cable 12 rests upon the cable pulleys 22 of the pulley assembly 18 in pulley assemblies 8 of this type, as is illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. Alternatively, the pulley assemblies 18 could also be in the form of holding down pulley assemblies, i.e. the cable 12 is held down by the pulley assembly 18 and presses against the pulleys 22 in a direction opposed to the force of gravity. For example, the schematic illustration in Figure 3 corresponds to a view of a pulley assembly 18 in the form of a holding down pulley assembly from below.
The cable pulleys 22 are provided with a peripheral radially outwardly open cable guide groove 30 in the form of a guide slot which defines a cross section in the form of a segment of a circular arc. The cable pulley 22 is usually made with a metal core which is provided with a layer of synthetic material consisting of hard rubber and/or an elastomer for example, which surrounds the cable pulley 22 in the circumferential direction and is of sufficient thickness as to enable the cable guide groove 30 to be easily worked into the hard rubber layer. Since the cable 12 is usually made of a metal, this results in the cable 12 and the cable pulley 22 having different abrasion properties here, whereby the wear and/or abrasion of the cable pulley 22 is usually greater than that of the cable 12. If there are no externally effective side forces acting on the cable 12, then, as illustrated in Figure 4, the cable 12 lies in the cable guide groove 30 such that it is symmetrical relative to a central plane which extends perpendicularly relative to the axis of rotation 32 about which the cable pulley 22 is rotatably mounted. The effective radius of the cable pulley 22 is defined by the distance r between the axis of rotation 32 and a tangent 34 to the cable guide groove 30 which is parallel to the axis of rotation 32.
Abrasion and/or wear of the cable pulley 22 can occur due to the wind particularly in a storm, and also due to the swaying of the gondola cars 14a or 14b, whereby transverse forces ~~ such as are illustrated in Figure 3 can occur and these can deflect the cable from the described rest position which is illustrated in Figure 4. This is schematically illustrated in Figures 3 and 6.
In essence, a deflection of the cable 12 from its rest position is manifested by the cable 12 being pushed up laterally onto an inner surface 36 of the cable guide groove 30 so that the distance of the cable 12 from the axis of rotation 32 changes.
This results in the cable 12 having a larger effective radius, i.e. r+pr, in the deflected state thereof. This radius is defined by the distance between a not illustrated point where the cable 12 touches the inner surface 36 of the cable guide groove 30 taken with reference to the axis of rotation 32. This touching point is defined by a further tangent to the cable guide groove 30. The larger the transverse force ' effective on the cable 12, the further the cable 12 is deflected from the rest position. In the worst case, the cable 12 completely leaves the cable guide groove 30, and jumps off the cable pulley 22. The danger of such a cable dislodgement becomes the greater, the larger the transverse forces ' that are effective on the cable 12. The position of the cable 12 in the cable guide groove 30 is determined on the one hand by the transverse force and, by the restoring force F applied by the cable roller 22 on the other. In dependence in each case on the effective transverse force V", an equilibrium sets in and thus there is an effective radius r + Ar. The effective radius r +
Ar as increased by the deflection of the cable 12 from the rest position acts in direct opposition to a decrease of radius resulting from abrasion of the cable pulley. Consequently, when determining the parameter deviation for the purposes of detecting the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the cable pulley, one should preferably also take into consideration as to whether a change of the rotational speed of the cable pulley 22 due to abrasion for example has possibly been completely or partially compensated by a change in the position of the cable 12 in the pulley due to transverse forces. A
change in the position of a cable therefore represents a disturbance variable.
The largest deflection of the cable 12 from the rest position is apparent at those cable pulleys 22 of the pulley assemblies 18 which define the run-in pulleys 40 and the run-out pulleys 42.
The run-in pulley 40 is formed by that cable pulley 22 onto which the cable 12 runs-in from the span 28 in the direction of movement 44, the run-out pulley 42 is defined by the cable pulley 22 from which the cable 12 runs into the span 28 in the direction of movement 44. Common to the run-in pulley 40 and the run-out pulley 42 of the pulley assembly is that neighbouring them, there is arranged just one further cable pulley 22 in each case. The two other cable pulleys 22 of the pulley assembly 18 form so-called inner pulleys which are also referred to hereinafter as reference pulleys 46 and can be defined as reference components in the sense of the Claims. The inner pulleys are defined in such a way that they are arranged between two neighbouring cable pulleys 22, in the present exemplary embodiment of the roller assembly 18, between the run-in pulley 40 and a cable pulley 22 or between a cable pulley 22 and the run-out pulley 42.
In the transportation system 10, wear of the cable pulleys 22 can occur not only in the form of abrasion of an outer rubber layer for example, but also for example, from jamming of the bearings of the cable pulleys 22. The consequence of this in the worst case is that the cable pulley 22 no longer rotates and the cable 12 is pulled over the cable pulley 22, whereby the cable guide groove 30 does not wear out evenly, but is abraded on only one side. The consequence of this is that the effective radius r of the cable pulley 22 does not remain constant around the periphery thereof but rather, varies in dependence on the angle of rotation. A further form of wear is to be seen in the fact that the outer rubber coating of the cable pulley 22 separates in its entirety from the cable pulley in an undesirable manner.
In the transportation system 10 however, wear can also occur at a cable sheave 48, namely, both in the case of a drive sheave that is being driven by the drive means 16 and in the case of a non-driven deflection sheave which serve to change the direction of travel of the cable 12 through 180 for instance at the ends of the transportation system 10. Wear can also occur at the cable sheaves 48 either due to the cable sheave 48 sticking or due to abrasion of an outer layer of the cable sheave 48 which, in principle, is constructed in analogous manner to that illustrated in Figure 4, i.e. it likewise comprises a cable guide groove for securely guiding the cable 12.
Common to all the types of wear and abrasion described thus far, is that the effective radius of the cable pulleys 22 or the cable sheaves 48 alters in the course of time, namely in particular, it is reduced with the consequence that the rotational speed of the cable pulleys 22 gradually increases for a constant speed of the cable. In the case of cable sheaves 48, their effective radius r likewise becomes smaller due to abrasion, but here however, the consequence is that the cable speed slowly decreases when the angular speed of the drive remains constant.
For the purposes of determining the abrasion and/or wear of individual rotating and/or circulating system components, there serves a wear monitoring system 38 which is schematically illustrated in Figure 6. It comprises at least one parameter measuring device 50 which is assigned to a cable pulley 22 or a cable sheave 48. In the exemplary embodiment illustrated in Figure 6, a parameter measuring device 50 is assigned to each cable pulley 22, whilst a further parameter measuring device 50 is optionally also assigned to each cable sheave 48. Each one of the parameter measuring devices 50, which form the movement magnitude measuring devices in the sense of the Claims, comprises a clock pulse emitting member 52 in the form of a timing disc which is connected in mutually non-rotatable manner to the respective cable pulley 22 or cable sheave 48, and also a sensor 54 such as a capacitive or inductive proximity sensor or a Hall sensor for example, with which a rotational movement of the clock pulse emitting member can be detected. However, encapsulated incremental or absolute position-measuring systems can also be utilised as the parameter measuring devices 50. The timing disc is in the form of a flat metallic annulus 56 which is provided at the outer edge thereof with a toothing 60 comprising a plurality of clock members in the form of projections forming teeth 58. The annulus 56 illustrated schematically in Figure 5 for example is provided with a central circular through hole 62 in which there is formed a recess 64 of square cross section that points in the direction of the centre of the through hole 62, and engaging in said recess there is a not illustrated, corresponding projection of a bearing shaft of the respective cable pulley 22 or cable sheave 48 which causes the clock pulse emitting member 52 to rotate at the same rotational speed as the cable pulley 22 to which it is assigned.
Alternatively, the timing disc could also be stuck firmly to the cable pulley 22 or the cable sheave 48 or it could be completely Lntegrated therein, i.e. form a complete entity therewith.
The annulus 56 provided with the toothing 60 is provided with an anti-freeze layer 66 in the form of a coating of synthetic material which prevents any possible formation of ice on the clock pulse emitting member 52.
The sensors 54 are attached to the pulley assembly 18 in such a manner that they can detect a movement of the teeth 58. They produce a clock pulse signal which is fed over signal lines 68 to an evaluating device 70. The evaluating device 70 can be arranged in the vicinity of the pulley assembly 18, on a support mast 20 for example. As an option, the evaluating device 70 could also be arranged in a control post 72 of the transportation system 10 as is illustrated in exemplary manner in Figure 6. Optionally, a converter unit 74 can be connected between the sensor 54 and the evaluating device 70 for converting the signal generated by the sensor 54 into a rotational speed signal and supplying it to the evaluating device 70.
A movement magnitude of the respective cable pulley 22 such as the rotational speed or angular speed thereof for example can be determined with the aid of the parameter measuring device 50.
The parameter measuring device 50 then forms either a rotational speed measuring device or an angular speed measuring device.
The evaluating device 70 is configured so that the detected parameters can be compared therein and then, for example, a difference therebetween can be determined, namely, in the form of a parameter deviation, for example of the respective actual values of a cable pulley 22 in comparison with a reference pulley 46 or just a parameter deviation of an individual cable pulley 22 in dependence on the period of operation or a time interval. If, as a reference pulley 46, use is made of a cable pulley 22 which is subject to only a small amount of wear compared with other cable pulleys 22 due to its position in the transportation system 10, then for example, the parameter deviation could be determined in the form of a difference in rotational speed or a difference in angular speed between a cable pulley 22 that is to be monitored and the reference pulley 46. The more advanced the wear on the two pulleys, the smaller the effective radius r thereof, whereby the reduction in radius of the cable pulley 22 that is to be monitored and is subjected to a greater amount of abrasion will be larger than for the reference pulley. The consequence of this is that, in the course of time, there will be an increase in the detected difference in rotational speeds of the two pulleys. The actual value of the rotational speed of the reference pulley 46 can, for example, serve as the desired value for a cable pulley 22 the wear of which is to be monitored. If, for example, the effective radii r of the cable pulley 22 immediately after installation of the transportation system 10 and after it has been subjected to the greatest possible amount of abrasion are known, then the state of abrasion or state of wear of the respective cable pulley 22 can be determined directly from the parameter deviation.
Types of abrasion or wear can be determined directly from the detected parameter deviation. If the parameter deviation decreases continuously in the course of time for example, then one can assume that this is due to a normal, even amount of wear or an even amount of abrasion. If, however, the parameter difference suddenly increases, one can assume with a high degree of probability that one of the two cable pulleys 22, namely, the one which is actually being monitored or the reference pulley 46 is no longer rotating because it is blocked by an extraneous effect or as a result of bearing failure for example. Uneven abrasion of the cable pulleys 22, which leads to the effective radius r varying over the peripheral extent of the cable pulley 22, can be recognized as a superimposed oscillatory function in the representation of the parameter deviation in dependence on time.
A radius r varying over the peripheral extent can also be due for example, to flexing of the inner layers of the outer tire body of the cable pulley 22 which is built up of different layers and materials. The plastic deformation of the tyre body resulting from the flexing can occur, in particular, during the starting motion and braking of the cable 12.
Instead of the actual and desired values, actual value functions and desired value functions can also be specified or predefined, especially functions over certain preset or individually settable time intervals. This also enables the actual and desired value functions to be compared with one another if necessary in order to purposefully average out or not take into consideration large changes of parameter at individual cable pulleys which occur in isolation but are limited in time such as, for example, the accelerations and decelerations occurring in the case of the above described entry and departure of the gondola cars 14a and 14b from the span 28, this being something which leads to a pivotal movement of the rocker members 24 and thus to a short term acceleration or deceleration of the respective cable pulleys 22. For the purposes of such a time-dependent comparison, it is expedient to provide an averaging unit 75 with the aid of which actual and desired values can be compared in time-dependent manner, or, actual and desired value functions which are time-dependent can be compared so that time-dependent average values can be formed.
The parameter deviation that has been determined in this way corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component such as the cable pulley 22 or the cable sheave 48. It can also be used however, in order to indicate the operational reliability state of the transportation system 10. It would of course be conceivable and possible to individually indicate the state of abrasion of individual system components in an optical and/or acoustic manner, however, as safe operation of the transportation system 10 can only be ensured if the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of all the system components lies in an appropriate range, it is more logical to directly determine and indicate the operational reliability state. For this purpose for example, an operational reliability state determining device 76 can be provided in the control station 72 which can also optionally include the evaluating device 70. The operational reliability state of the -:ransportation system 10 can be determined in dependence on at Least one detected parameter deviation with the aid of the operational reliability state determining device 76. To this end, a comparison scale 80 is preferably stored in a memory 78 of the operational reliability state determining device 76. The comparison scale 80 serves the purpose of enabling a value for the operational reliability state to be assigned to a particular detected value of a parameter deviation. Serving for this purpose, there is an operational reliability state signal generating device 82 with the aid of which an operational ---eliability state signal is produced which corresponds to the value of the operational reliability state on the comparison scale that is assigned to one or more of the detected parameter deviation(s).
An indicator device 84 serves for the optical and/or acoustic indication of the operational reliability state signal. The indicator device 84 can be in the form of a monitor and/or a loudspeaker for example.
Furthermore, the operational reliability state determining device 76 comprises an alarm device 86 for producing an alarm or shut down signal if the value of the operational reliability state signal exceeds a given limiting value which can be stored in the memory 78 for example. Furthermore, an alarm signal display device 88 can be provided for displaying the alarm signal. This could, in particular, also form part of a unit incorporating the indicator device 84. The alarm signal display device 88 serves to indicate the detected alarm and/or shut down signal optically and/or acoustically.
The alarm and shut down signal can be passed on by the operational reliability state determining device 76 to a control and/or regulating device 90 of the transportation system 10 which exerts an effect on the drive means 16 of the transportation system 10 in dependence on the value of the alarm and/or shut down signal, for example, by causing the speed to be reduced or by causing the drive means 16 or the transportation system 10 to be completely shut down in order to prevent a cable from being dislodged with the associated negative effects especially on the passengers for example.
Furthermore, the operational reliability state determining device 76 can comprise a cable position detecting device 92 for determining the position of the at least one cable pulley 22. A
cable position detecting device 92 of this type is described in the German patent application 10 2007 006316.6 for example, this hereby being incorporated into the present application together with its entire published content.
Furthermore, the parameter measuring devices 50 are optionally formed in such a manner that the parameters of the cable pulleys 22 with which they are associated can preferably be detected therewith at the same time. Optionally, the operational reliability state signal generating device 82 can be formed in such a manner that the first and second parameters are determinable in time-dependent manner with the aid of the parameter measuring devices 50 and that the evaluating device 70 is formed in such a manner that an average deviation of the first parameter from the second parameter is determinable over a predefined time interval. This time interval can, in principle, be freely selected by the operator of the transportation system 10. For example, the time interval can be selected to lie within a range of 0.5 seconds up to 5 seconds. As a result of the average deviation of the parameter having being determined over a certain interval of time with the aid of the averaging unit 75 for example, fluctuations having a negligible effect upon any possible abrasion or wear can be averaged out so that an unnecessary reduction in speed or shut down of the transportation system 10 can be avoided in such cases.
Furthermore, a maximum value detecting device 114 can be provided and with its aid the largest detected parameter deviation occurring at different system components of the transportation system 10 can be established. This process of detecting the largest parameter deviation permits action to be taken on the transportation system at precisely that moment when any particular system component is so damaged or worn-out that the operational reliability of the transportation system 10 can no longer be ensured.
Moreover, the operational reliability state device 76 can, furthermore, also comprise a data-processing system especially in the form of a computer for example, said computer being capable of embracing the functions of the evaluating device 70, the operational reliability state signal generating device 82, the averaging unit 75, the maximum value detecting unit 114, the alarm signal generating device 88 and also the cable position detecting device 92. An appropriate input device such as a keyboard for example, can be provided for entering the data.
Furthermore, the data-processing system can be configured so that it is suitable for implementing the running of a computer program in order to implement any of the above described processes for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of at --east one system component of the transportation system that is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner or a method such as is claimed in the corresponding method Claims. In particular, the computer program can be stored on a computer-readable medium and may comprise program code means which are suitable for implementing any of the processes described above or any of the claimed methods when the computer program is running on the data-processing system of the wear monitoring system 38. The computer-readable medium can, for example, be in the form of a data carrier in the form of a CD ROM, a diskette or a memory card for example.
In a cable operated transportation system 10 wherein the gondola cars 14a or 14b are not permanently connected to the cable 12, these gondola cars must be accelerated and/or decelerated to the running speed of the cable for the purpose of connecting them to the cable or for releasing them from the cable. Serving to this end are the friction wheel assemblies 96 incorporating a plurality of friction wheels 98 which are schematically illustrated in Figure 7 and are connected one behind the other and driven by means of transmission belts 100 which form circulating system components that are subjected to wear or abrasion. Particularly suitable transmission belts 100 are drive belts which are guided over belt pulleys 102 and 104 that are firmly connected to the respective friction wheels 98. The driving process effected by means of the transmission belts 100 is of the type wherein successive friction wheels 98 have a bigger or smaller rotational speed in dependence on whether the friction wheels 96 are intended to form an acceleration or a deceleration stretch. Accordingly, step-up or step-down transmission ratios are formed by the arrangement of the transmission belts 100 in conjunction with the belt pulleys 102 and 104. Here, a transmission belt 100 coupling two friction wheels 98 runs over a small belt pulley 102 on the one friction wheel 98 and over a larger belt pulley 104 on the coupled friction wheel 98. Each friction wheel preferably has a small and a larger belt pulley 102, 104.
Problems in a friction wheel assembly 96 can occur if, for example, one of the friction wheels 98 shows a reduction of air pressure in the case of air-filled friction wheels, or if it is covered with dew or hoarfrost for example. The consequence of this is that the driving power of the friction wheel 98 can only be transferred to the gondola car 14a to a reduced extent. As a result, the forces and torques in the entire drive chain are also reduced whilst the gondola car 14a is passing this friction wheel 98. The friction wheel assembly 96 is preferably driven by a separate drive unit 106 which propels a drive wheel 108 that is coupled by means of a belt 110 to a first friction wheel 98a of the friction wheel assembly 96. Alternatively, it is also possible to dispense with the drive unit 106 and let the friction wheel assembly be driven by the drive means 16 of the cable 12, for example, by means of cardan shafts or belts. The effect of an impaired friction wheel 98c on the drive current I
can, in particular, be detected in a parameter measuring device `~0 in the form of a current measuring device for example, due to the middle friction wheel 98c transferring only a reduced amount of drive power to the gondola car 14a. As a result of the larger amount of slippage of the friction wheel 98c, the rotational speed thereof increases when the gondola car 14a is passing over the friction wheel 98c whereby the motor current I
increases or decreases i.e. a parameter deviation occurs which can be directly associated with the state of abrasion and/or state of wear of the respective friction wheel, in the present case, the friction wheel 98c. Alternatively, the rotational speed or the speed of revolution J(.`~ of the friction wheel 98f furthest from the drive unit could also be determined with the aid of a suitable parameter measuring device. The functionally impaired friction wheel 98c then causes the speed profile V(`-) to alter relative to a desired curve in dependence on the position x of the gondola car 14a in the region of the friction wheel assembly 96. This deviation from the illustrated dotted desired curve of the speed profile I~\"! is illustrated in the lower part of Figure 8 and is apparent from the decrease in the speed of revolution of the friction wheel 98f which is depicted by the solid-line and occurs at the precise moment when the gondola car 14a is passing the friction wheel 98c.
Transmission belts 100 are also subject to wear and/or abrasion, for example, by virtue of being overstretched or due to them slipping such as can occur as a result of soiling or the formation of dew. In the case of a deceleration stretch such as is illustrated in exemplary manner in Figure 9 wherein a middle i.e. the transmission belt 100b is defective, the rotational speed of the drive unit 106 increases when the gondola car 14a reaches the friction wheel 98c which is no longer being driven ideally by the defective transmission belt 100b. This thus results in a rotational speed or speed of revolution V(-') of the fiction wheel 98f which is dependent on the position of the gondola car 14a in the region of the friction wheel assembly 96.
After passing the defective transmission belt 100b, the actual rotational speed (depicted by the solid line) of the friction wheel 98f lies continuously above the expected desired curve (depicted by the dotted lines), namely, due to the interrupted drive chain.
The detected movement magnitude deviation, i.e. the deviation of the desired curve from the actual curve, which is illustrated below the friction wheel assemblies 96 for the respective examples shown in Figures 8 to 10, does not just arise temporarily in the case of a defective transmission belt 100, __.e. whilst passing the transmission belt, as was the case for the defective friction wheel 98c that was described in conjunction with Figure 8, but rather it takes place over a larger or longer section of the friction wheel assembly 96.
Here, there is also a deviation in the motor current I of the drive unit 106 which is directly detectable with the aid of the parameter measuring device 50. Self evidently, a parameter deviation could also be effected directly by a measurement of the rotational speed of a plurality or all of the friction wheels 98, whereby one would come to the same conclusions which would enable redundancy of the system. In all, due to the respective impairment, there can be established a deviation of the actual values or actual value functions, which are illustrated in Figures 8 to 10 by the solid lines, from the desired values or the desired value function, which are illustrated in the Figures by the dotted lines.
For the sake of completeness yet another example of an acceleration stretch is illustrated schematically in Figure 10.
As a result of increased slippage of the middle transmission belt 100c, the rotational speed or the speed of revolution ~(`) of the most distant friction wheel from the drive unit 98a, which is illustrated in Figure 10 in dependence on the position of the gondola car 14a within the friction wheel assembly 96, is below the dotted desired curve. As a consequence thereof, the gondola car 14a is not accelerated as much as desired. It is only after the gondola car 14a has passed the worn section containing the defective transmission belt 100c that the desired level of acceleration occurs, one being able to recognise this from the coincidence of the preferred and actual curves. Here too, it is possible for the defect to be detected directly from the drive current I of the drive unit 106 using the parameter measuring device 50.
In all three of the cases described, the location of the malfunctioning section can be detected by means of a temporal or spatial correlation between the entry of the gondola car 14a into the acceleration or deceleration region and the measured rotational speed or speed deviation at the friction wheel 98f or 98a which is furthest from the drive unit or a change in the level of the operating current. One can distinguish between an individual defect in a friction wheel 98 and a defect in a transmission belt 100 from the differing shapes of the signal.
Optionally, instead of the rotational speed and the motor current measurements, measurements could also be made of the torque at the friction wheels 98 in order to determine the wanted parameter deviation.
An example of a possible operational sequence for determining the operational reliability state of the transportation system is schematically illustrated in Figure 12.
Once the transportation system 10 has started operating, at least one first parameter, such as the rotational speed(s) of the run-in pulley 40 or the run-out pulley 42 or of a friction wheel 98 or the motor current I of the drive unit 106 for example, is (are) determined with the aid of the parameter measuring device(s) 50. Optionally, a second parameter such as the rotational speed of a reference pulley 46 for example can be determined with the aid of a further parameter measuring device 50. A measurement that is particularly well suited for this purpose, is the measurement of the rotational speed of a cable sheave 48 which, due to its larger diameter, rotates at a significantly lower and altogether more constant rotational speed over the period of operation than the individual small cable pulleys 22. Preferably, the first and second parameters are measured at the same time. The parameter deviation between the first and second parameters is determined with the aid of the evaluating device 70. The second parameter could also be a given parameter in the form of a desired value or a desired value function. The parameter of the system component that is to be monitored can be measured as a time-dependent actual value or as an actual value function.
The thus determined parameter deviation corresponds to the state of wear or state of abrasion of the respectively monitored system component and this can be determined and indicated with the aid of a state of abrasion determining device 112.
In the next step, an operational reliability state signal is generated in dependence on the detected parameter deviation. If a plurality of parameter deviations have been determined, then the actual operational reliability state will be influenced to the greatest extent by the most severely damaged one of the system components being monitored. Optionally, the operational reliability state signal can be indicated optically and/or acoustically with the aid of the indicator device 84. This can be done in such a manner that a text message indicating the operational reliability state e.g. "no malfunction" or "high abrasion" is displayed on a monitor for example. Self evidently, the indicator could also display the operational reliability state signal in the form of a bar line display which, additionally, could be in colour such as for example, a green display for representing an operational reliability state in which nothing is malfunctioning, a yellow display in the case where there is a minimal danger of a malfunction and a red display in the case of severe abrasion or heavy wear. The operational reliability state signal is produced using an appropriate association with the assistance of the comparison scale on the basis of the measured parameter deviation.
In order to produce an effect on the operation of the transportation system 10, the operational reliability state signal is compared with a presettable limiting value. If the operational reliability state signal is smaller than the limiting value, then operation of the system continues unchanged, i.e. the first and/or the second and any further parameters continue to be measured as described above.
However, if the comparison of the operational reliability state signal with the limiting value indicates that the limiting value has been exceeded, then an alarm signal is preferably generated by the alarm device and is indicated optically and/or acoustically with the aid of the alarm signal display device 88 for example. The indication could, in particular, be in the form of a full text display showing data such as "reduce speed"
or "switch off the drive" or "shut down the system" for example.
In dependence on the amount by which the limiting value was exceeded, either the speed of the system can be reduced until the operational reliability state signal falls back below the limiting value whereupon the system can continue to be operated at the originally wanted speed, or the system can be immediately shut down automatically in order to prevent a cable coming off the monitored and defective cable pulley 22 for example.
It is not absolutely essential for the first parameter and the second parameter to be determined at the same pulley assembly 18. It is also possible to provide just one reference pulley 46 for the entire transportation system 10 and otherwise, monitor the other cable pulleys 22 and determine a parameter of the other cable pulleys 22 with the aid of the parameter measuring device 50. As already explained, a cable sheave 48 is particularly suitable as a reference component. Since, however, the cable 12 is not pulled continuously over a pulley assembly 18, but rather the amount by which it dips in the span 28 can alter in load-dependent manner, this will lead without doubt to a discontinuity in the speed of the cable at different pulley assemblies 18. If, for the purposes of monitoring a cable pulley 22, a reference pulley 46 in the same pulley assembly 18 is selected, then speed components produced as a result of variations in the load or varying accelerations of the cable will be compensated in the process of determining the parameter deviation.
As an alternative, encapsulated incremental or absolute position measuring systems could also be utilised as parameter measuring devices 50 in dependence on the type of parameter that is to be measured.
If the individual measured parameters are supplied to the evaluating device 70 in the control post 72, then transmission and measuring errors can be detected and plausibility checks made using a correlation of the individual measured values at each pulley assembly 18 or at various different pulley assemblies 18. This applies in analogously corresponding manner to all the moving components in the system. If excessive differences arise thereby, then this may be due to a breakdown of the entire wear monitoring system 38 or of parts thereof for example, and in particular, could also be the result of the derailment of a cable. In each case, safer operation of the transportation system 10 can be ensured due to these redundantly determined measured values.
Preferably, parameter measuring devices 50 of different type of construction and transmission mode are used in order not to generate systematic errors in the operation of the wear monitoring system 38.
The described wear monitoring system 38 has the great advantage that it is completely independent of the type and the construction of the system components of the transportation system 10 that are being used and monitored. In particular, it does not depend on the cable lay or the type of construction of the cable 12.
Moreover, the present invention relates to a cable operated transportation system consisting of at least one cable, at least one drive unit for moving the at least one cable and at least one system component which is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner and is used for driving and/or guiding the at least one cable or other components of the transportation system.
Finally, the present invention also relates to a method for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of at least one system component of a cable operated transportation system comprising a support cable and/or a traction cable and/or a hoisting cable and also at least one drive unit, wherein said system component is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner.
In cable operated transportation systems such as aerial ropeways in the form of chair lifts or gondola cars for example, the support-, traction- and/or hoisting cables of the transportation system are guided over revolving and/or rotationally mounted system components such as cable pulleys or guide pulleys and also driving pulleys for example. The cable pulleys in particular are generally arranged on support masts in the open countryside, wherein a plurality of cable pulleys together can form a pulley assembly. It is not just the cable pulleys that are subject to wear and abrasion, but basically, so too especially are e.g. all the moving components in the system which cooperate directly or indirectly with the at least one cable such as transportation devices for accommodating people and/or goods which are fixed permanently or temporarily to the cable such as chairs or gondolas and in particular gondola cabins for example. Wear can occur especially in the form of binding up to the complete seizure of the bearings of the revolving and/or rotationally mounted system components. Wear and/or abrasion can also arise in particular in the air-filled friction wheels which are utilised in order to accelerate the transportation devices, such as the gondola cars of a cable-car system and the chairs of a chair lift system that are e.g. only temporarily fixed to the cable, up to the speed of the cable or for braking them for the purposes of loading them or for permitting people to climb in or out of them. Thus, in the case of air-filled friction wheels for example, a loss of pressure can reduce or prevent the traction thereof. Moreover, system components which are mounted in a rotating and/or circulating manner in the form of transmission belts, for example drive belts for driving pulleys or friction wheels, can be subjected to wear or abrasion. This manifests itself by slippage or overstretching thereof, whereby, for example, the traction of friction wheels which are driven by the transmission belts can likewise be reduced or prevented.
The unwanted consequence of the practically unavoidable wear and/or abrasion is that, in dependence on the type and extent of the wear or the abrasion, the operational reliability of the cable operated transportation system cannot be ensured over a long period of time.
Consequently, the object of the present invention is to propose a method and a device or a system with the aid of which the operational reliability of a cable operated transportation system can be increased, and thus to improve such a transportation system accordingly.
In accordance with the invention, this object is achieved by a wear monitoring system of the type described hereinabove which comprises a parameter measuring device for measuring an actual value and/or a time-dependent actual value function of at least one electrical and/or mechanical parameter of the at least one system component and/or the drive unit, and also an evaluating device for detecting a parameter deviation of the actual value in dependence on time or a time interval from a desired value and/or of the actual value function from a time-dependent desired value function of the at least one parameter, which parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component.
In principle, it is possible to establish in a simple manner how severely the functioning of each system component that is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner is being impaired by abrasion and/or wear particularly over the course of time with the aid of such a wear monitoring system. If an actual value for the parameter is determined, then this actual value can be detected in time-dependent manner, whereby its deviation from a desired value in dependence on time will become larger and larger, the greater the abrasion and/or the wear of the system component. Furthermore, the size and form of the parameter deviation of the actual value in dependence on time, or, of the actual value function relative to the time-dependent desired value function enables the type of wear and abrasion to be determined. For example, in the case where the rotation of a cable pulley is being monitored, damage to the pulley bearing will lead to a decrease in the rotational speed until it finally stops and thus to a large, above average, deviation of the parameter. Unbalances of a system component being monitored can be ascertained from oscillatory deviations of the parameter in the course of time correlated to the rotation cycles for example. The proposed wear monitoring system is of very simple construction, because it only requires the monitoring of a mechanical parameter of the system component and/or of an electrical or mechanical parameter of the at least one drive unit for example. A change in the friction wheels or the transmission belts can be ascertained indirectly from the current waveform of the drive current for the at least one drive unit for example. Slippage of the belts leads to a reduced level of traction and thus to the need for less torque from the drive means with the consequence of a reduction in power consumption. The wear monitoring system is exceptionally well-suited to the task of retro--fitting pre-existing cable operated transportation facilities at low cost. The wear monitoring system results in an increase in the operational reliability of the cable operated transportation system since the detected deviation of a parameter can also be used, in particular, to have an effect upon the operation of the system such as for example, to lower the operational speed or completely shut down the system in the event that, the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of at least one of the system components being monitored becomes so great that the operational reliability of the transportation system or parts thereof can no longer be ensured. Furthermore, the invention makes it possible for the parameter measuring devices such as proximity switches or other sensor devices for example, to be mounted on e.g. cable masts where they can be protected from lightning strikes since the parameter measuring devices do not have to be arranged directly in the proximity of the cable, but can, in particular, be located underneath it such that they are spaced from the current path formed as a result of a lightning strike.
It is expedient, if the parameter measuring device comprises a movement magnitude device for measuring the actual value and/or the actual value function of at least one first movement magnitude of the at least one system component which defines a mechanical parameter. For example, the rotational speeds, the speeds, the angular speeds or the accelerations of the system component can be determined in a simple manner with the aid of the movement magnitude measuring device and the wear and/or abrasion can then be deduced from the time-dependent pattern thereof.
The construction of the wear monitoring system can be simplified in a simple manner if the movement magnitude measuring device is configured to measure the actual value and/or the actual value function of at least one second movement magnitude, which defines a mechanical parameter, of at least one reference component of the transportation system which is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner. In particular, the actual value and/or the actual value function of the at least one second movement magnitude can be used respectively as a time-dependent desired value or as a desired value function. In other words, this means that. actual values or actual value functions of the first movement magnitude of the at least one system component that is to be monitored can be compared respectively with those time-dependent actual values or the actual value function defining a desired value or a desired value function of the second movement magnitude of the reference component of the transportation system. For example, the system component that is to be monitored can be a cable pulley, the reference component an identical cable pulley. If the hoisting cable or the traction cable of the transportation system is running over the cable pulley and the reference pulley at the same speed, then, under identical loadings, the ratio between the actual values or the ac~ual value functions of the parameter that have been determined from the two components would have to develop in the same way over time. If, however, in the course of time, there are increasing deviations from one another, then one can immediately conclude that abrasion has occurred in or on one of the two components, for example, based on an increase in the rotational speed that has occurred in the course of time, one can conclude therefrom that there is abrasion of the cable pulley as a result of a decrease in the diameter thereof.
Preferably, an additional system component which is also mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner can be used as a reference component, for example, a reference pulley which is driven by the cable although it is not necessary for the actual operation of the transportation system and runs separately therefrom. It is expedient for the reference component not to be affected by excessive cable forces so that it can be driven substantially unloaded and, insofar as possible, without appreciable slippage by the moving cable.
It is advantageous, if the evaluating device is configured to determine a parameter-deviation-defining movement magnitude deviation of the actual value and/or the actual value function of the at least one first movement magnitude and of the at least one second movement magnitude from one another. In consequence, the evaluating device is suitable for directly comparing the detected values of the first. and second movement magnitude with one another and thus for determining the parameter deviation that is to be used for assigning the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear.
Preferably, the evaluating device is configured to determine a change of the parameter deviation in dependence on the period of operation or an operating interval of the transportation system, which change of the parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component in dependence on the period of operation or the operating interval. In other words, it is expedient if it is not just the parameter deviation itself that is determined, but (also) the time-dependent profile thereof. The greater the deviation of the parameter over the course of time, so the more obvious it will be that there is increasing abrasion or increasing wear of the monitored system component.
The construction of the wear monitoring system is particularly simple and it can be equipped with commercially available parameter measuring devices, if the latter comprise a torque measuring device, a rotational speed and/or angular speed measuring device for measuring the mechanical parameter in the form of a torque, a rotational speed or an angular speed. Thus, for example, the abrasion of individual system components can be determined by comparing the rotational speed of two system components in time-dependent: manner, e.g. a system component that is to be monitored and a reference component. For example, the reference component can be a cable pulley which is arranged on a pulley assembly comprising several cable pulleys in such a way that a cable force and in particular a transverse force on the cable pulley that is exerted as a result of external side forces such as wind forces for example that are effective on the cable is minimal. Coming into question in particular here, are the inner cable pulleys of a pulley assembly where the abrasion is usually particularly low since they are shielded by the run-in and run-out pulleys and possibly also by further neighbouring pulleys. For the purposes of monitoring the operational reliability state, it is advantageous for the run-in and run-out pulleys of a plurality of pulley assemblies that comprise cable pulleys to be monitored, since transverse forces on these cable pulleys arising especially due to wind, cause an over-proportionately large amount of abrasion. In other words, this means that the run-in and run-out pulleys are abraded to the greatest extent so that it makes sense to determine the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of these pulleys and then assess the operational reliability state of the transportation system in dependence on the detected state of abrasion and/or state of wear of the run-in and run-out pulleys.
In particular, the construction of the wear monitoring system can be simplified if the parameter measuring device comprises a current and/or voltage measuring device for measuring at least one parameter in the form of a drive current and/or a drive voltage of the drive unit. The system components which are driven directly or indirectly by the at least one drive unit have a direct or indirect influence on the current and/or voltage waveforms of the drive unit in dependence on the time.
For example, an electrical parameter can be determined more easily from a drive unit associated with a friction wheel assembly used for the purposes of accelerating and braking the gondola cars of the transportation system in order to synchronize them with the rotational speed of a circulating cable because abrasion in a friction wheel leads to a change in the power being drawn by the at least one drive unit and thus to a change in the current and/or voltage waveform of the drive unit. In addition, a correlation or a redundancy measurement can also be achieved by additionally detecting a mechanical parameter of one or more friction wheels of the friction wheel assembly for example.
Advantageously, the at least one system component is in the form of a cable pulley, a cable sheave, a friction wheel or a drive belt. In principle, it is possible to monitor every moveable component in the system and thereby establish the wear or abrasion at any point in the transportation system.
The construction of the wear monitoring system is particularly simple if the at least one reference component is in the form of a cable pulley, a cable sheave, a friction wheel or a drive belt. In this way, the same parameter measuring devices can be used in order to detect the actual values of the parameters of the system component and the reference component, whereby each component of the transportation system that is used as a reference component can itself also be a system component that is to be monitored.
It is expedient, if the cable sheave is in the form of a deflection sheave or a drive sheave. Cable sheaves of this type are employed, in particular, in cable car systems and lift systems. They have the advantage that they have a significantly greater diameter in comparison with the cable pulley assemblies on the masts of the transportation system and thus have a significantly lower rotational speed during the operation of the transportation system. Thus, in particular, the abrasion of drive or deflection sheaves is significantly lower than that of cable pulleys. Consequently, cable sheaves of large diameter in particular are outstandingly suitable as reference components.
It is advantageous, if a state of abrasion determining device is provided for determining the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component in dependence on the parameter deviation and/or the change of the parameter deviation. The state of abrasion and/or the state of wear can thus be detected directly by the state of abrasion determining device.
Moreover, it is advantageous, if an operational reliability state determining device is provided for determining the operational reliability state of the transportation system in dependence on the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component. By using this device in particular, one can detect as to whether or not the operational reliability state of the transportation system is such that it can continue to be used safely.
Preferably the operational reliability state determining device is configured so that an operational reliability state of the transportation system can be associated with the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component determined by the state of abrasion determining device. Then, for example, if the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of a system component exceeds a certain value, an operational reliability state can be associated with or assigned to the transportation system for indicating that safe operation of the transportation system can no longer be ensured. Self evidently, it is also possible to provide the data regarding the operational reliability state in a gradated form i.e. for example on a scale from 0 to 10, upon which for example, a state of high operational reliability is or will be indicated by 10 whereas a state of minimum operational reliability is denoted by 0. Self evidently, the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of a plurality of the system components can be used for the determination of the operational reliability state. The larger the number of system components being monitored, so the greater the precision with which a fault diagnosis of the transportation system can be accomplished. Thus, the position of a fault in the system can be located with particular accuracy by appropriate correlation of the actual values or actual value functions that have been detected at different system components. Accordingly, appropriate counter measures can then be taken such as those of shutting down the system and displaying a message identifying the defective system component for example.
In order to allow the operating personnel to be made aware of the operational reliability state, it is expedient to provide a comparison scale for quantifying the operational reliability state, and for an operational reliability state signal generating device to be provided for producing an operational reliability state signal which corresponds to a value of the operational reliability state on the comparison scale that is associated with the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component. The comparison scale can be designed in a variety of ways, for example, in the form of a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10 or the like, but it could also be a corresponding scale of colours wherein an operational reliability state which permits safe operation of the transportation system is indicated particularly in green, but wherein an operational reliability state in which the transportation system should not be operated at all is indicated in red.
In order to enable a high level of redundancy and certainty to be achieved in the process of determining the operational reliability state, it is advantageous for the operational reliability state signal generating device to be formed in such a manner that the parameter deviations derived from at least two system components can be processed for the purposes of producing the operational reliability state signal. The process for determining the operational reliability state will be so much more precise and more efficient, the greater the number of system components that are being monitored for determining the parameters thereof.
In order to enable that system component showing the greatest amount of abrasion to be filtered out, it is advantageous for the operational reliability state signal generating device to comprise a maximum value detecting unit with which there can be determined a maximum value of at least two detected parameter deviations and/or changes therein. This has the especial advantage that the largest overall deviation of a parameter or change thereof can be determined in this way, since the doubt is not as to whether the system components that are being monitored are abrading evenly, but rather, in finding out where the largest amount of abrasion and the largest amount of wear is occurring, because the operational reliability of the transportation system may already be in question due to corresponding damage or stoppage of just a single component in the system. The detection of this system component is simplified significantly by the use of the maximum value detecting unit.
In order to enable the operating personnel of the transportation system to establish in a simple and certain manner as to whether the system can continue to be used or whether it would be better to shut it down, it is expedient to provide an optical and/or acoustic indicator device for displaying the operational reliability state signal. For example, this can be in the form of a monitor and/or a loudspeaker so that the comparison scale and also the detected operating state can be displayed or signalled acoustically.
In order to signal to the operating personnel directly that an operational reliability state has reached a critical value which would sensibly entail a reduction in the operating speed or shut down of the transportation system, it is advantageous for an alarm device to be provided for producing an alarm and/or a shut down signal if the value of the operational reliability state signal exceeds at least one limiting value.
In order to enable the sensitivity of the system to be adjusted in a simple manner, it is advantageous for the at least one limiting value to be settable at a fixed value and/or to be alterable individually. Furthermore, the limiting value can also serve to define the corresponding response time for the system. Hereby, it can be expedient for the limiting value to be set in such a way that fluctuations, which may possibly be occurring in the actual values or actual value functions that are being detected by the parameter measuring device, are determined over a time interval and averaged if necessary in order to prevent unwanted errors, i.e. in particular, the production of shut down signals which are only being produced because of operation-dependent fluctuations in the transportation system, but not however because of abrasion or wear in the individual system components that are actually to be monitored.
In order for the operating personnel to know immediately that the transportation system has reached a critical operational reliability state or that it would be best for it to be shut down immediately, it is expedient to provide an optical and/or acoustic alarm signal display device for indicating the alarm and/or shut down signal. This, for example, can be in the form of a warning lamp or a flashing lamp and could also be formed by an appropriate loudspeaker or loudspeaker system.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, provision may be made for the alarm system to cooperate with a control and/or regulating device for the at least one drive unit of the transportation system and to be configured so that the drive speed of the transportation system can be reduced and/or the at least one drive unit of the transportation system can be switched off as a result of the production of the alarm or shut down signal. The control of the transportation system can be completely automated in this way. The operation of the transportation system can thus be stopped immediately should a critical operating situation be established by the wear monitoring system irrespective of whether the operating personnel take notice of the alarm or shut down signal.
In order to enable the actual value and the desired value to be directly compared with one another for example, it is expedient for the parameter measuring device to be configured so that two or more electrical and/or mechanical parameters can be determined simultaneously. In particular in the case where the desired values or the desired value functions are determined by detecting the actual values and the actual value functions at the reference components, a parameter deviation can then be detected directly, for example, by forming the difference between the detected values directly.
Preferably, the parameter measuring device is configured that the actual value of the at least one parameter can be determined in time-dependent manner. Changes in the deviations of the parameter in the course of the operation of the transportation system and/or over a given time interval can thus be determined in a simple and certain manner.
The sensitivity of the wear monitoring system can be set, in particular, by virtue of the fact that the duration of the time interval can be preset and/or variable. The time interval can also be selected as an integral multiple of the operating cycles of the at least one system component or a reference component, and in particular, a certain number of rotations of a cable pulley or a cable sheave for example. A certain response time of the wear monitoring system can also be preset by the duration of the time interval if the values are determined and processed as average values over the time interval.
It is expedient for the parameter measuring device to be configured for the contactless measurement of the at least one parameter. Additional wear caused by the process of taking measurements of the parameters of the system components can thus be prevented in a simple and certain manner.
The construction of the parameter measuring device is particularly simple if it comprises a clock pulse emitting member which is connectable in mutually non-rotatable manner to the at least one system component for which the mechanical movement magnitude is to be determined, and at least one sensor for detecting the rotation of the clock pulse emitting member.
Both the rotational speed and the angular speed of the at least one system component can be determined in a simple and certain manner if the clock pulse emitting member is in the form of a timing disc having a multiplicity of clock members arranged regularly around the periphery of the timing disc, whereby the movement thereof can be detected in a simple and certain manner by appropriate sensors.
The construction of the timing disc is particularly simple if the clock members are in the form of radially outwardly or radially inwardly protruding projections which form a regular toothing. Preferably, the toothing can thus be in the form of an external or internal set of teeth. In addition, a timing disc formed in such a manner can ensure the operational reliability of the parameter measuring device.
In order to enable the parameter to be measured in a simple and certain manner with the aid of proximity sensors for example, it is advantageous for the clock pulse emitting member to be at least partly made of a metal.
In order to ensure the operational reliability of the parameter measuring device even when it is exposed to the effects of the weather, it is advantageous for the clock pulse emitting member to be provided with an anti-freeze layer. The clock pulse emitting member can thus be prevented from becoming iced up in which case the determination of a mechanical parameter of the at least one system component, the magnitude of a movement thereof for example, could no longer be ensured.
The construction of the timing disc is particularly simple and economical if the anti-freeze layer is made of a synthetic material.
The movement magnitude of the at least one system component or reference component can be measured in a simple and certain manner if the sensor is an inductive or a capacitive proximity sensor or a Hall sensor. With the aid of the latter in particular, pulses can be produced due to the movement of the clock members past the sensor so that the rotational speed or the angular speed of the timing disc and hence too the speed of the at least one system component or that of the reference component for example can be derived therefrom.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, provision may be made for the at least one reference component and the at least one system component to be configured so that, in the starting state occurring when the system is started-up for example, the value of the first movement magnitude is smaller than that of the at least one second movement magnitude.
Thus, for example, a ratio of the first and second movement magnitudes relative to one another can be determined which will have a value significantly smaller than 1 or a value significantly larger than 1 in dependence on the way in which the ratio of the two magnitudes is formed. The rotational speeds of system components and reference components could be mentioned as examples. If a deflection sheave or a cable sheave having a very large diameter is provided as a reference component, then, in the case where the cable speed is the same, this will have a significantly lower value of rotational speed than a cable pulley of comparatively significantly smaller diameter. In consequence, the actual value function of the reference component will change to a significantly lesser extent over the course of time than the actual value function of the system component that is to be monitored.
Expediently, a radius of the at least one reference component is greater than a radius of the at least one system component. The smaller the radius of the system component, then the greater the abrasion thereof in the course of time at a constant cable speed compared with a system component of larger radius. The latter is therefore particularly well suited as a reference component having a significantly more constant waveform for the actual value of its measured parameter over the course of time.
Furthermore, the object stated hereinabove is also achieved by the use of one of the wear monitoring systems described above for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of a system component of a cable operated transportation system comprising a support cable and/or a traction cable and/or a hoisting cable and also at least one drive unit, wherein said system component is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner.
Moreover, in accordance with the invention, the object set out above is also achieved in the case of a cable operated transportation system of the type described above by a wear monitoring system for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of the at least one system component that is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner, wherein the wear monitoring system comprises a parameter measuring device for measuring an actual value and/or a time-dependent actual value function of at least one electrical and/or mechanical parameter of the at least one system component and/or the drive unit, and also comprises an evaluating device for determining a parameter deviation of the actual value in dependence on time or a time interval from a desired value and/or of the actual value function from a time-dependent desired value function of the at least one parameter, which parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component.
In dependence on the design of the wear monitoring system, a cable operated transportation system equipped with such a wear monitoring system provides the opportunity to specifically monitor individual system components for wear and/or abrasion and thus obtain in good time an indication as to when it would be logical to maintain or replace the particular system component in order to prevent damage to the transportation system and ensure the operational reliability of the transportation system over a long period.
Preferably, the wear monitoring system is in the form of one of the wear monitoring systems described above and is constructed in correspondence with the previously described further developments thereof and thus it also exhibits the advantages that have already been described above.
Moreover, in accordance with the invention, the object specified above is also achieved by a method for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of at least one system component which is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner and forms part of a cable operated transportation system comprising a support cable and/or a traction cable and/or a hoisting cable and also at least one drive unit, wherein an actual value and/or a time-dependent actual value function of at least one electrical and/or mechanical parameter of the at least one system component and/or the drive unit is measured and wherein a parameter deviation of the actual value from a desired value in dependence on time or a time interval and/or a deviation of the actual value function from a time-dependent desired value function of the at least one parameter is determined, which parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component.
The method proposed in accordance with the invention is simple to carry out and concentrates on determining the deviation of a parameter either at the system component itself or indirectly, by determining such a deviation in at least one drive unit of the transportation system, whereby the wear and/or abrasion of the at least one system component can be determined directly or indirectly. The state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the particular system component that has been detected in this way can also be used, in particular, for taking appropriate measures in order to ensure the operational reliability of the transportation system, for example, by maintaining or repairing the system component or decreasing the speed of circulation of the transportation system or even shutting it down.
It is expedient, if the actual value and/or the actual value function of at least one mechanical-parameter-defining first movement magnitude of the at least one system component is measured. The advantages of this arrangement are immediately apparent, as too are the advantages of all the further embodiments of the method that are described in the following, from the above description of the advantages of the wear monitoring system that has been proposed in accordance with the invention.
It is advantageous, if the actual value and/or the actual value function of at least one mechanical-parameter-defining second movement magnitude of at least one reference component of the transportation system which is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner is measured.
Expediently, a parameter-deviation-defining movement magnitude deviation of the actual value and/or the actual value function of the at least one movement magnitude and of the at least one second movement magnitude from one another is determined.
In accordance with a special variant of the method proposed in accordance with the invention, provision may be made for a change of the parameter deviation in dependence on the period of operation or an operating interval of the transportation system to be determined, which change of the parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component in dependence on the period of operation or the operating interval.
The method can be carried out in a particularly simple manner if the mechanical parameter is measured in the form of a torque, a rotational speed or an angular speed.
Preferably, the at least one parameter is measured in the form of a drive current and/or a drive voltage of the at least one drive unit. These parameters enable a conclusion to be drawn indirectly as to the wear and/or abrasion of the at least one system component.
Advantageously, the at least one parameter is measured at a cable pulley, a cable sheave, a deflection sheave, a drive sheave, a friction wheel or a drive belt. In this way in particular, a desired value or a desired value function can also be measured directly at one of the abovementioned parts of the transportation system and then compared with the parameter of the system component that is to be monitored whereby a parameter deviation can thus be determined.
It is advantageous, if the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component is determined in dependence on the parameter deviation and/or the change of the parameter deviation.
It is expedient, if an operational reliability state of the transportation system is determined in dependence on the state of abrasion and/or state of wear of the at least one system component.
In order to receive a direct indication as to the operational reliability state, it is expedient if the ascertained state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component is associated with the operational reliability state of the transportation system.
Preferably, there is produced an operational reliability state signal which corresponds to a value of the operational reliability state on a comparison scale which is associated with a state of abrasion and/or a state of wear of the at least one system component.
In order to increase the quality of the process of evaluating the operational reliability state of the transportation system, it is expedient if the parameter deviations derived from at least two system components are processed for the purposes of producing the operational reliability state signal.
Since the operational reliability of a transportation system can be called into question even if there is a breakdown of or damage to just one system component, it is advantageous if the maximum value of at least two detected parameter deviations and/or changes therein is determined. In this way one can avoid the problem that in certain circumstances it will only be the average value of the state of wear or the state of abrasion that is determined, even though this value does not necessarily take into consideration that a particular one or more of the system components has already been damaged to such an extent that the operational reliability of the transportation system as a whole can no longer be ensured.
Expediently, the operational reliability state signal is indicated optically and/or acoustically.
Preferably, an alarm and/or a shut down signal is generated if the value of the operational reliability state signal exceeds at --east one limiting value. Several limiting values for the operational reliability state signal could also be preset, whereby differing levels for the operational reliability state of the transportation system can be predefined. For example, a first limiting value could indicate that maintenance of a particular one or more system components would make good sense, effectively a reminder in regard to an operationally dependent maintenance interval. A next limiting value could, for example, indicate that a system component is exhibiting maximum abrasion or maximum wear and must be replaced immediately in order to ensure the operation of the transportation system in the light of the current safety regulations. Furthermore, another limiting value could be selected in such a way that when it is exceeded, an indication is given that the transportation system is to be shut down immediately or is shut down immediately.
In order to preset the response times for the monitoring of the transportation system individually and also to enable the sensitivity of the wear monitoring system to be set and adjusted in accordance with the particular requirements, it is advantageous for the at least one limiting value to be settable at a fixed value and/or for it to be alterable individually.
Advantageously, the alarm and/or shut down signal is indicated optically and/or acoustically.
Furthermore, it can be expedient if, following the generation of the alarm signal and/or shut down signal, the drive speed of the transportation system is reduced and/or the at least one drive unit of the transportation system is switched off.
Preferably, two or more electrical and/or mechanical parameters are determined at the same time. This makes it possible for the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of individual system components to be detected practically in real time and to be used for the control and/or regulation of the transportation system accordingly.
In order to enable the variation over time of the parameter deviation to be determined, it is advantageous for the actual value of the at least one parameter to be measured in time-dependent manner.
Expediently, the duration of the time interval is preset at a fixed amount and/or is variable as required in order to predefine the response time and the sensitivity of the method.
Advantageously, the at least one parameter is measured in contactless manner.
Moreover, it can be expedient for the at least one reference component and the at least one system component to be selected in such a way that, in the starting state occurring when the transportation system is started-up, the first movement magnitude has a smaller value than the at least one second movement magnitude.
The following description of preferred embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the drawings serves to provide a more detailed explanation. Therein:
Figure 1: shows a schematic illustration of two support masts and the pulley assemblies of an aerial ropeway under a light load;
Figure 2: a schematic illustration of two support masts and the pulley assemblies of an aerial ropeway under a heavier load;
Figure 3: a plan view of a pulley assembly wherein transverse forces are effective on the cable;
Figure 4: a sectional view through a cable pulley over which a cable is being guided without any effective transverse forces;
Figure 5: a sectional view of a timing disc;
Figure 6: a schematic illustration of a wear monitoring system of a cable operated transportation system;
Figure 7: a schematic illustration of a friction wheel assembly of the transportation system for decelerating / accelerating a gondola car, Figure 8: a schematic illustration of a decelerating friction wheel assembly with a damaged friction wheel;
Figure 9: a schematic illustration of a decelerating friction wheel assembly wherein a transmission belt is overstretched;
Figure 10: a schematic illustration of a friction wheel assembly forming part of an acceleration stretch wherein a transmission belt is overstretched, dirty or covered with dew;
Figure 11: a schematic illustration of a part of a transportation system; and Figure 12: a flow chart for a method of monitoring wear in the system components of a cable operated transportation system.
A cable operated transportation system in the form of an aerial ropeway bearing the general reference symbol 10 is schematically illustrated at least in part in the Figures. It comprises a circulating, driven cable 12 having e.g. chairs or gondola cars 14a for the transportation of people or load-carrying gondola cars 14b for the transportation of goods arranged thereon such that they are either fixed to the cable 12 or are only connected thereto temporarily in order to temporarily release the gondola cars 14a for the transportation of people in particular from the cable and thereby make it easier for a number of people to get into or out of them. A first drive unit in the form of a drive means 16 is formed and arranged in such a manner that the cable 12, which is preferably an endless one, can be moved so as to move the gondola cars 14a or 14b in a circulatory manner through the transportation system 10.
Pulley assemblies 18 which are held on the support masts 20 are provided for the guidance of the cable 12. The pulley assemblies 18, which are also referred to as roller-groups, comprise a plurality of cable pulleys 22. In the exemplary embodiment of a transportation system 10 illustrated in the Figures, each pulley assembly 18 comprises four cable pulleys 22. These form the rotationally mounted system components subject to wear and/or abrasion in the sense of the Claims. In each case, two cable pulleys 22 are arranged together in a rocker member 24 on which they are rotatably mounted, the rocker member being mounted such that it is pivotal relative to a cross beam 26 at a free end of the support mast 20. The rocker members 24 are inclined relative to the cross beams 26 to a greater or lesser extent in dependence on the size of the load on the cable 20 that is produced by the gondola cars 14a or 14b In a span 28 between two pulley assemblies 18. The larger the load on the cable 12 produced by the gondola cars 14a or 14b in the span 28, the greater the inclination as is illustrated in exemplary manner in Figures 1 and 2.
The pulley assemblies 18 can be in the form of supporting pulley assemblies, i.e. the cable 12 rests upon the cable pulleys 22 of the pulley assembly 18 in pulley assemblies 8 of this type, as is illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. Alternatively, the pulley assemblies 18 could also be in the form of holding down pulley assemblies, i.e. the cable 12 is held down by the pulley assembly 18 and presses against the pulleys 22 in a direction opposed to the force of gravity. For example, the schematic illustration in Figure 3 corresponds to a view of a pulley assembly 18 in the form of a holding down pulley assembly from below.
The cable pulleys 22 are provided with a peripheral radially outwardly open cable guide groove 30 in the form of a guide slot which defines a cross section in the form of a segment of a circular arc. The cable pulley 22 is usually made with a metal core which is provided with a layer of synthetic material consisting of hard rubber and/or an elastomer for example, which surrounds the cable pulley 22 in the circumferential direction and is of sufficient thickness as to enable the cable guide groove 30 to be easily worked into the hard rubber layer. Since the cable 12 is usually made of a metal, this results in the cable 12 and the cable pulley 22 having different abrasion properties here, whereby the wear and/or abrasion of the cable pulley 22 is usually greater than that of the cable 12. If there are no externally effective side forces acting on the cable 12, then, as illustrated in Figure 4, the cable 12 lies in the cable guide groove 30 such that it is symmetrical relative to a central plane which extends perpendicularly relative to the axis of rotation 32 about which the cable pulley 22 is rotatably mounted. The effective radius of the cable pulley 22 is defined by the distance r between the axis of rotation 32 and a tangent 34 to the cable guide groove 30 which is parallel to the axis of rotation 32.
Abrasion and/or wear of the cable pulley 22 can occur due to the wind particularly in a storm, and also due to the swaying of the gondola cars 14a or 14b, whereby transverse forces ~~ such as are illustrated in Figure 3 can occur and these can deflect the cable from the described rest position which is illustrated in Figure 4. This is schematically illustrated in Figures 3 and 6.
In essence, a deflection of the cable 12 from its rest position is manifested by the cable 12 being pushed up laterally onto an inner surface 36 of the cable guide groove 30 so that the distance of the cable 12 from the axis of rotation 32 changes.
This results in the cable 12 having a larger effective radius, i.e. r+pr, in the deflected state thereof. This radius is defined by the distance between a not illustrated point where the cable 12 touches the inner surface 36 of the cable guide groove 30 taken with reference to the axis of rotation 32. This touching point is defined by a further tangent to the cable guide groove 30. The larger the transverse force ' effective on the cable 12, the further the cable 12 is deflected from the rest position. In the worst case, the cable 12 completely leaves the cable guide groove 30, and jumps off the cable pulley 22. The danger of such a cable dislodgement becomes the greater, the larger the transverse forces ' that are effective on the cable 12. The position of the cable 12 in the cable guide groove 30 is determined on the one hand by the transverse force and, by the restoring force F applied by the cable roller 22 on the other. In dependence in each case on the effective transverse force V", an equilibrium sets in and thus there is an effective radius r + Ar. The effective radius r +
Ar as increased by the deflection of the cable 12 from the rest position acts in direct opposition to a decrease of radius resulting from abrasion of the cable pulley. Consequently, when determining the parameter deviation for the purposes of detecting the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the cable pulley, one should preferably also take into consideration as to whether a change of the rotational speed of the cable pulley 22 due to abrasion for example has possibly been completely or partially compensated by a change in the position of the cable 12 in the pulley due to transverse forces. A
change in the position of a cable therefore represents a disturbance variable.
The largest deflection of the cable 12 from the rest position is apparent at those cable pulleys 22 of the pulley assemblies 18 which define the run-in pulleys 40 and the run-out pulleys 42.
The run-in pulley 40 is formed by that cable pulley 22 onto which the cable 12 runs-in from the span 28 in the direction of movement 44, the run-out pulley 42 is defined by the cable pulley 22 from which the cable 12 runs into the span 28 in the direction of movement 44. Common to the run-in pulley 40 and the run-out pulley 42 of the pulley assembly is that neighbouring them, there is arranged just one further cable pulley 22 in each case. The two other cable pulleys 22 of the pulley assembly 18 form so-called inner pulleys which are also referred to hereinafter as reference pulleys 46 and can be defined as reference components in the sense of the Claims. The inner pulleys are defined in such a way that they are arranged between two neighbouring cable pulleys 22, in the present exemplary embodiment of the roller assembly 18, between the run-in pulley 40 and a cable pulley 22 or between a cable pulley 22 and the run-out pulley 42.
In the transportation system 10, wear of the cable pulleys 22 can occur not only in the form of abrasion of an outer rubber layer for example, but also for example, from jamming of the bearings of the cable pulleys 22. The consequence of this in the worst case is that the cable pulley 22 no longer rotates and the cable 12 is pulled over the cable pulley 22, whereby the cable guide groove 30 does not wear out evenly, but is abraded on only one side. The consequence of this is that the effective radius r of the cable pulley 22 does not remain constant around the periphery thereof but rather, varies in dependence on the angle of rotation. A further form of wear is to be seen in the fact that the outer rubber coating of the cable pulley 22 separates in its entirety from the cable pulley in an undesirable manner.
In the transportation system 10 however, wear can also occur at a cable sheave 48, namely, both in the case of a drive sheave that is being driven by the drive means 16 and in the case of a non-driven deflection sheave which serve to change the direction of travel of the cable 12 through 180 for instance at the ends of the transportation system 10. Wear can also occur at the cable sheaves 48 either due to the cable sheave 48 sticking or due to abrasion of an outer layer of the cable sheave 48 which, in principle, is constructed in analogous manner to that illustrated in Figure 4, i.e. it likewise comprises a cable guide groove for securely guiding the cable 12.
Common to all the types of wear and abrasion described thus far, is that the effective radius of the cable pulleys 22 or the cable sheaves 48 alters in the course of time, namely in particular, it is reduced with the consequence that the rotational speed of the cable pulleys 22 gradually increases for a constant speed of the cable. In the case of cable sheaves 48, their effective radius r likewise becomes smaller due to abrasion, but here however, the consequence is that the cable speed slowly decreases when the angular speed of the drive remains constant.
For the purposes of determining the abrasion and/or wear of individual rotating and/or circulating system components, there serves a wear monitoring system 38 which is schematically illustrated in Figure 6. It comprises at least one parameter measuring device 50 which is assigned to a cable pulley 22 or a cable sheave 48. In the exemplary embodiment illustrated in Figure 6, a parameter measuring device 50 is assigned to each cable pulley 22, whilst a further parameter measuring device 50 is optionally also assigned to each cable sheave 48. Each one of the parameter measuring devices 50, which form the movement magnitude measuring devices in the sense of the Claims, comprises a clock pulse emitting member 52 in the form of a timing disc which is connected in mutually non-rotatable manner to the respective cable pulley 22 or cable sheave 48, and also a sensor 54 such as a capacitive or inductive proximity sensor or a Hall sensor for example, with which a rotational movement of the clock pulse emitting member can be detected. However, encapsulated incremental or absolute position-measuring systems can also be utilised as the parameter measuring devices 50. The timing disc is in the form of a flat metallic annulus 56 which is provided at the outer edge thereof with a toothing 60 comprising a plurality of clock members in the form of projections forming teeth 58. The annulus 56 illustrated schematically in Figure 5 for example is provided with a central circular through hole 62 in which there is formed a recess 64 of square cross section that points in the direction of the centre of the through hole 62, and engaging in said recess there is a not illustrated, corresponding projection of a bearing shaft of the respective cable pulley 22 or cable sheave 48 which causes the clock pulse emitting member 52 to rotate at the same rotational speed as the cable pulley 22 to which it is assigned.
Alternatively, the timing disc could also be stuck firmly to the cable pulley 22 or the cable sheave 48 or it could be completely Lntegrated therein, i.e. form a complete entity therewith.
The annulus 56 provided with the toothing 60 is provided with an anti-freeze layer 66 in the form of a coating of synthetic material which prevents any possible formation of ice on the clock pulse emitting member 52.
The sensors 54 are attached to the pulley assembly 18 in such a manner that they can detect a movement of the teeth 58. They produce a clock pulse signal which is fed over signal lines 68 to an evaluating device 70. The evaluating device 70 can be arranged in the vicinity of the pulley assembly 18, on a support mast 20 for example. As an option, the evaluating device 70 could also be arranged in a control post 72 of the transportation system 10 as is illustrated in exemplary manner in Figure 6. Optionally, a converter unit 74 can be connected between the sensor 54 and the evaluating device 70 for converting the signal generated by the sensor 54 into a rotational speed signal and supplying it to the evaluating device 70.
A movement magnitude of the respective cable pulley 22 such as the rotational speed or angular speed thereof for example can be determined with the aid of the parameter measuring device 50.
The parameter measuring device 50 then forms either a rotational speed measuring device or an angular speed measuring device.
The evaluating device 70 is configured so that the detected parameters can be compared therein and then, for example, a difference therebetween can be determined, namely, in the form of a parameter deviation, for example of the respective actual values of a cable pulley 22 in comparison with a reference pulley 46 or just a parameter deviation of an individual cable pulley 22 in dependence on the period of operation or a time interval. If, as a reference pulley 46, use is made of a cable pulley 22 which is subject to only a small amount of wear compared with other cable pulleys 22 due to its position in the transportation system 10, then for example, the parameter deviation could be determined in the form of a difference in rotational speed or a difference in angular speed between a cable pulley 22 that is to be monitored and the reference pulley 46. The more advanced the wear on the two pulleys, the smaller the effective radius r thereof, whereby the reduction in radius of the cable pulley 22 that is to be monitored and is subjected to a greater amount of abrasion will be larger than for the reference pulley. The consequence of this is that, in the course of time, there will be an increase in the detected difference in rotational speeds of the two pulleys. The actual value of the rotational speed of the reference pulley 46 can, for example, serve as the desired value for a cable pulley 22 the wear of which is to be monitored. If, for example, the effective radii r of the cable pulley 22 immediately after installation of the transportation system 10 and after it has been subjected to the greatest possible amount of abrasion are known, then the state of abrasion or state of wear of the respective cable pulley 22 can be determined directly from the parameter deviation.
Types of abrasion or wear can be determined directly from the detected parameter deviation. If the parameter deviation decreases continuously in the course of time for example, then one can assume that this is due to a normal, even amount of wear or an even amount of abrasion. If, however, the parameter difference suddenly increases, one can assume with a high degree of probability that one of the two cable pulleys 22, namely, the one which is actually being monitored or the reference pulley 46 is no longer rotating because it is blocked by an extraneous effect or as a result of bearing failure for example. Uneven abrasion of the cable pulleys 22, which leads to the effective radius r varying over the peripheral extent of the cable pulley 22, can be recognized as a superimposed oscillatory function in the representation of the parameter deviation in dependence on time.
A radius r varying over the peripheral extent can also be due for example, to flexing of the inner layers of the outer tire body of the cable pulley 22 which is built up of different layers and materials. The plastic deformation of the tyre body resulting from the flexing can occur, in particular, during the starting motion and braking of the cable 12.
Instead of the actual and desired values, actual value functions and desired value functions can also be specified or predefined, especially functions over certain preset or individually settable time intervals. This also enables the actual and desired value functions to be compared with one another if necessary in order to purposefully average out or not take into consideration large changes of parameter at individual cable pulleys which occur in isolation but are limited in time such as, for example, the accelerations and decelerations occurring in the case of the above described entry and departure of the gondola cars 14a and 14b from the span 28, this being something which leads to a pivotal movement of the rocker members 24 and thus to a short term acceleration or deceleration of the respective cable pulleys 22. For the purposes of such a time-dependent comparison, it is expedient to provide an averaging unit 75 with the aid of which actual and desired values can be compared in time-dependent manner, or, actual and desired value functions which are time-dependent can be compared so that time-dependent average values can be formed.
The parameter deviation that has been determined in this way corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component such as the cable pulley 22 or the cable sheave 48. It can also be used however, in order to indicate the operational reliability state of the transportation system 10. It would of course be conceivable and possible to individually indicate the state of abrasion of individual system components in an optical and/or acoustic manner, however, as safe operation of the transportation system 10 can only be ensured if the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of all the system components lies in an appropriate range, it is more logical to directly determine and indicate the operational reliability state. For this purpose for example, an operational reliability state determining device 76 can be provided in the control station 72 which can also optionally include the evaluating device 70. The operational reliability state of the -:ransportation system 10 can be determined in dependence on at Least one detected parameter deviation with the aid of the operational reliability state determining device 76. To this end, a comparison scale 80 is preferably stored in a memory 78 of the operational reliability state determining device 76. The comparison scale 80 serves the purpose of enabling a value for the operational reliability state to be assigned to a particular detected value of a parameter deviation. Serving for this purpose, there is an operational reliability state signal generating device 82 with the aid of which an operational ---eliability state signal is produced which corresponds to the value of the operational reliability state on the comparison scale that is assigned to one or more of the detected parameter deviation(s).
An indicator device 84 serves for the optical and/or acoustic indication of the operational reliability state signal. The indicator device 84 can be in the form of a monitor and/or a loudspeaker for example.
Furthermore, the operational reliability state determining device 76 comprises an alarm device 86 for producing an alarm or shut down signal if the value of the operational reliability state signal exceeds a given limiting value which can be stored in the memory 78 for example. Furthermore, an alarm signal display device 88 can be provided for displaying the alarm signal. This could, in particular, also form part of a unit incorporating the indicator device 84. The alarm signal display device 88 serves to indicate the detected alarm and/or shut down signal optically and/or acoustically.
The alarm and shut down signal can be passed on by the operational reliability state determining device 76 to a control and/or regulating device 90 of the transportation system 10 which exerts an effect on the drive means 16 of the transportation system 10 in dependence on the value of the alarm and/or shut down signal, for example, by causing the speed to be reduced or by causing the drive means 16 or the transportation system 10 to be completely shut down in order to prevent a cable from being dislodged with the associated negative effects especially on the passengers for example.
Furthermore, the operational reliability state determining device 76 can comprise a cable position detecting device 92 for determining the position of the at least one cable pulley 22. A
cable position detecting device 92 of this type is described in the German patent application 10 2007 006316.6 for example, this hereby being incorporated into the present application together with its entire published content.
Furthermore, the parameter measuring devices 50 are optionally formed in such a manner that the parameters of the cable pulleys 22 with which they are associated can preferably be detected therewith at the same time. Optionally, the operational reliability state signal generating device 82 can be formed in such a manner that the first and second parameters are determinable in time-dependent manner with the aid of the parameter measuring devices 50 and that the evaluating device 70 is formed in such a manner that an average deviation of the first parameter from the second parameter is determinable over a predefined time interval. This time interval can, in principle, be freely selected by the operator of the transportation system 10. For example, the time interval can be selected to lie within a range of 0.5 seconds up to 5 seconds. As a result of the average deviation of the parameter having being determined over a certain interval of time with the aid of the averaging unit 75 for example, fluctuations having a negligible effect upon any possible abrasion or wear can be averaged out so that an unnecessary reduction in speed or shut down of the transportation system 10 can be avoided in such cases.
Furthermore, a maximum value detecting device 114 can be provided and with its aid the largest detected parameter deviation occurring at different system components of the transportation system 10 can be established. This process of detecting the largest parameter deviation permits action to be taken on the transportation system at precisely that moment when any particular system component is so damaged or worn-out that the operational reliability of the transportation system 10 can no longer be ensured.
Moreover, the operational reliability state device 76 can, furthermore, also comprise a data-processing system especially in the form of a computer for example, said computer being capable of embracing the functions of the evaluating device 70, the operational reliability state signal generating device 82, the averaging unit 75, the maximum value detecting unit 114, the alarm signal generating device 88 and also the cable position detecting device 92. An appropriate input device such as a keyboard for example, can be provided for entering the data.
Furthermore, the data-processing system can be configured so that it is suitable for implementing the running of a computer program in order to implement any of the above described processes for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of at --east one system component of the transportation system that is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner or a method such as is claimed in the corresponding method Claims. In particular, the computer program can be stored on a computer-readable medium and may comprise program code means which are suitable for implementing any of the processes described above or any of the claimed methods when the computer program is running on the data-processing system of the wear monitoring system 38. The computer-readable medium can, for example, be in the form of a data carrier in the form of a CD ROM, a diskette or a memory card for example.
In a cable operated transportation system 10 wherein the gondola cars 14a or 14b are not permanently connected to the cable 12, these gondola cars must be accelerated and/or decelerated to the running speed of the cable for the purpose of connecting them to the cable or for releasing them from the cable. Serving to this end are the friction wheel assemblies 96 incorporating a plurality of friction wheels 98 which are schematically illustrated in Figure 7 and are connected one behind the other and driven by means of transmission belts 100 which form circulating system components that are subjected to wear or abrasion. Particularly suitable transmission belts 100 are drive belts which are guided over belt pulleys 102 and 104 that are firmly connected to the respective friction wheels 98. The driving process effected by means of the transmission belts 100 is of the type wherein successive friction wheels 98 have a bigger or smaller rotational speed in dependence on whether the friction wheels 96 are intended to form an acceleration or a deceleration stretch. Accordingly, step-up or step-down transmission ratios are formed by the arrangement of the transmission belts 100 in conjunction with the belt pulleys 102 and 104. Here, a transmission belt 100 coupling two friction wheels 98 runs over a small belt pulley 102 on the one friction wheel 98 and over a larger belt pulley 104 on the coupled friction wheel 98. Each friction wheel preferably has a small and a larger belt pulley 102, 104.
Problems in a friction wheel assembly 96 can occur if, for example, one of the friction wheels 98 shows a reduction of air pressure in the case of air-filled friction wheels, or if it is covered with dew or hoarfrost for example. The consequence of this is that the driving power of the friction wheel 98 can only be transferred to the gondola car 14a to a reduced extent. As a result, the forces and torques in the entire drive chain are also reduced whilst the gondola car 14a is passing this friction wheel 98. The friction wheel assembly 96 is preferably driven by a separate drive unit 106 which propels a drive wheel 108 that is coupled by means of a belt 110 to a first friction wheel 98a of the friction wheel assembly 96. Alternatively, it is also possible to dispense with the drive unit 106 and let the friction wheel assembly be driven by the drive means 16 of the cable 12, for example, by means of cardan shafts or belts. The effect of an impaired friction wheel 98c on the drive current I
can, in particular, be detected in a parameter measuring device `~0 in the form of a current measuring device for example, due to the middle friction wheel 98c transferring only a reduced amount of drive power to the gondola car 14a. As a result of the larger amount of slippage of the friction wheel 98c, the rotational speed thereof increases when the gondola car 14a is passing over the friction wheel 98c whereby the motor current I
increases or decreases i.e. a parameter deviation occurs which can be directly associated with the state of abrasion and/or state of wear of the respective friction wheel, in the present case, the friction wheel 98c. Alternatively, the rotational speed or the speed of revolution J(.`~ of the friction wheel 98f furthest from the drive unit could also be determined with the aid of a suitable parameter measuring device. The functionally impaired friction wheel 98c then causes the speed profile V(`-) to alter relative to a desired curve in dependence on the position x of the gondola car 14a in the region of the friction wheel assembly 96. This deviation from the illustrated dotted desired curve of the speed profile I~\"! is illustrated in the lower part of Figure 8 and is apparent from the decrease in the speed of revolution of the friction wheel 98f which is depicted by the solid-line and occurs at the precise moment when the gondola car 14a is passing the friction wheel 98c.
Transmission belts 100 are also subject to wear and/or abrasion, for example, by virtue of being overstretched or due to them slipping such as can occur as a result of soiling or the formation of dew. In the case of a deceleration stretch such as is illustrated in exemplary manner in Figure 9 wherein a middle i.e. the transmission belt 100b is defective, the rotational speed of the drive unit 106 increases when the gondola car 14a reaches the friction wheel 98c which is no longer being driven ideally by the defective transmission belt 100b. This thus results in a rotational speed or speed of revolution V(-') of the fiction wheel 98f which is dependent on the position of the gondola car 14a in the region of the friction wheel assembly 96.
After passing the defective transmission belt 100b, the actual rotational speed (depicted by the solid line) of the friction wheel 98f lies continuously above the expected desired curve (depicted by the dotted lines), namely, due to the interrupted drive chain.
The detected movement magnitude deviation, i.e. the deviation of the desired curve from the actual curve, which is illustrated below the friction wheel assemblies 96 for the respective examples shown in Figures 8 to 10, does not just arise temporarily in the case of a defective transmission belt 100, __.e. whilst passing the transmission belt, as was the case for the defective friction wheel 98c that was described in conjunction with Figure 8, but rather it takes place over a larger or longer section of the friction wheel assembly 96.
Here, there is also a deviation in the motor current I of the drive unit 106 which is directly detectable with the aid of the parameter measuring device 50. Self evidently, a parameter deviation could also be effected directly by a measurement of the rotational speed of a plurality or all of the friction wheels 98, whereby one would come to the same conclusions which would enable redundancy of the system. In all, due to the respective impairment, there can be established a deviation of the actual values or actual value functions, which are illustrated in Figures 8 to 10 by the solid lines, from the desired values or the desired value function, which are illustrated in the Figures by the dotted lines.
For the sake of completeness yet another example of an acceleration stretch is illustrated schematically in Figure 10.
As a result of increased slippage of the middle transmission belt 100c, the rotational speed or the speed of revolution ~(`) of the most distant friction wheel from the drive unit 98a, which is illustrated in Figure 10 in dependence on the position of the gondola car 14a within the friction wheel assembly 96, is below the dotted desired curve. As a consequence thereof, the gondola car 14a is not accelerated as much as desired. It is only after the gondola car 14a has passed the worn section containing the defective transmission belt 100c that the desired level of acceleration occurs, one being able to recognise this from the coincidence of the preferred and actual curves. Here too, it is possible for the defect to be detected directly from the drive current I of the drive unit 106 using the parameter measuring device 50.
In all three of the cases described, the location of the malfunctioning section can be detected by means of a temporal or spatial correlation between the entry of the gondola car 14a into the acceleration or deceleration region and the measured rotational speed or speed deviation at the friction wheel 98f or 98a which is furthest from the drive unit or a change in the level of the operating current. One can distinguish between an individual defect in a friction wheel 98 and a defect in a transmission belt 100 from the differing shapes of the signal.
Optionally, instead of the rotational speed and the motor current measurements, measurements could also be made of the torque at the friction wheels 98 in order to determine the wanted parameter deviation.
An example of a possible operational sequence for determining the operational reliability state of the transportation system is schematically illustrated in Figure 12.
Once the transportation system 10 has started operating, at least one first parameter, such as the rotational speed(s) of the run-in pulley 40 or the run-out pulley 42 or of a friction wheel 98 or the motor current I of the drive unit 106 for example, is (are) determined with the aid of the parameter measuring device(s) 50. Optionally, a second parameter such as the rotational speed of a reference pulley 46 for example can be determined with the aid of a further parameter measuring device 50. A measurement that is particularly well suited for this purpose, is the measurement of the rotational speed of a cable sheave 48 which, due to its larger diameter, rotates at a significantly lower and altogether more constant rotational speed over the period of operation than the individual small cable pulleys 22. Preferably, the first and second parameters are measured at the same time. The parameter deviation between the first and second parameters is determined with the aid of the evaluating device 70. The second parameter could also be a given parameter in the form of a desired value or a desired value function. The parameter of the system component that is to be monitored can be measured as a time-dependent actual value or as an actual value function.
The thus determined parameter deviation corresponds to the state of wear or state of abrasion of the respectively monitored system component and this can be determined and indicated with the aid of a state of abrasion determining device 112.
In the next step, an operational reliability state signal is generated in dependence on the detected parameter deviation. If a plurality of parameter deviations have been determined, then the actual operational reliability state will be influenced to the greatest extent by the most severely damaged one of the system components being monitored. Optionally, the operational reliability state signal can be indicated optically and/or acoustically with the aid of the indicator device 84. This can be done in such a manner that a text message indicating the operational reliability state e.g. "no malfunction" or "high abrasion" is displayed on a monitor for example. Self evidently, the indicator could also display the operational reliability state signal in the form of a bar line display which, additionally, could be in colour such as for example, a green display for representing an operational reliability state in which nothing is malfunctioning, a yellow display in the case where there is a minimal danger of a malfunction and a red display in the case of severe abrasion or heavy wear. The operational reliability state signal is produced using an appropriate association with the assistance of the comparison scale on the basis of the measured parameter deviation.
In order to produce an effect on the operation of the transportation system 10, the operational reliability state signal is compared with a presettable limiting value. If the operational reliability state signal is smaller than the limiting value, then operation of the system continues unchanged, i.e. the first and/or the second and any further parameters continue to be measured as described above.
However, if the comparison of the operational reliability state signal with the limiting value indicates that the limiting value has been exceeded, then an alarm signal is preferably generated by the alarm device and is indicated optically and/or acoustically with the aid of the alarm signal display device 88 for example. The indication could, in particular, be in the form of a full text display showing data such as "reduce speed"
or "switch off the drive" or "shut down the system" for example.
In dependence on the amount by which the limiting value was exceeded, either the speed of the system can be reduced until the operational reliability state signal falls back below the limiting value whereupon the system can continue to be operated at the originally wanted speed, or the system can be immediately shut down automatically in order to prevent a cable coming off the monitored and defective cable pulley 22 for example.
It is not absolutely essential for the first parameter and the second parameter to be determined at the same pulley assembly 18. It is also possible to provide just one reference pulley 46 for the entire transportation system 10 and otherwise, monitor the other cable pulleys 22 and determine a parameter of the other cable pulleys 22 with the aid of the parameter measuring device 50. As already explained, a cable sheave 48 is particularly suitable as a reference component. Since, however, the cable 12 is not pulled continuously over a pulley assembly 18, but rather the amount by which it dips in the span 28 can alter in load-dependent manner, this will lead without doubt to a discontinuity in the speed of the cable at different pulley assemblies 18. If, for the purposes of monitoring a cable pulley 22, a reference pulley 46 in the same pulley assembly 18 is selected, then speed components produced as a result of variations in the load or varying accelerations of the cable will be compensated in the process of determining the parameter deviation.
As an alternative, encapsulated incremental or absolute position measuring systems could also be utilised as parameter measuring devices 50 in dependence on the type of parameter that is to be measured.
If the individual measured parameters are supplied to the evaluating device 70 in the control post 72, then transmission and measuring errors can be detected and plausibility checks made using a correlation of the individual measured values at each pulley assembly 18 or at various different pulley assemblies 18. This applies in analogously corresponding manner to all the moving components in the system. If excessive differences arise thereby, then this may be due to a breakdown of the entire wear monitoring system 38 or of parts thereof for example, and in particular, could also be the result of the derailment of a cable. In each case, safer operation of the transportation system 10 can be ensured due to these redundantly determined measured values.
Preferably, parameter measuring devices 50 of different type of construction and transmission mode are used in order not to generate systematic errors in the operation of the wear monitoring system 38.
The described wear monitoring system 38 has the great advantage that it is completely independent of the type and the construction of the system components of the transportation system 10 that are being used and monitored. In particular, it does not depend on the cable lay or the type of construction of the cable 12.
Claims (61)
1. A wear monitoring system (38) for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) of a cable operated transportation system (10) comprising a support cable and/or a traction cable and/or a hoisting cable (12) and also at least one drive unit (16, 106) wherein said system component is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner, including a parameter measuring device (50) for measuring an actual value and/or a time-dependent actual value function of at least one electrical and/or mechanical parameter of the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) and/or the drive unit (16, 106) and also including an evaluating device (70) for determining a parameter deviation of the actual value from a desired value in dependence on time or a time interval and/or of the actual value function from a time-dependent desired value function of the at least one parameter, which parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100).
2. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 1, characterized in that the parameter measuring device (50) comprises a magnitude of movement measuring device (50) for measuring the actual value and/or the actual value function of at least one first movement magnitude of the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) which defines a mechanical parameter.
3. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 2, characterized in that the magnitude of movement measuring device (50) is configured to measure the actual value and/or the actual value function of at least one mechanical-parameter-defining second movement magnitude of at least one reference component (46, 48) of the transportation system (10) which is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner.
4. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 3, characterized in that the evaluating device (70) is configured to determine a parameter-deviation-defining movement magnitude deviation of the actual value and/or the actual value function of the at least one first movement magnitude and of the at least one second movement magnitude from one another.
5. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the preceding Claims, characterized in that the evaluating device (70) is configured to determine a change of the parameter deviation in dependence on the period of operation or an operating interval of the transportation system (10), which change of the parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) in dependence on the period of operation or the operating interval.
6. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the preceding Claims, characterized in that the parameter measuring device (50) comprises a torque measuring device, a rotational speed measuring device and/or an angular speed measuring device for measuring the mechanical parameter in the form of a torque, a rotational speed or an angular speed.
7. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the preceding Claims, characterized in that the parameter measuring device (50) comprises a current and/or voltage measuring device for measuring at least one parameter in the form of a drive current and/or a drive voltage of the drive unit (106).
8. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the preceding Claims, characterized in that the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) is in the form of a cable pulley (22), a cable sheave (48), a friction wheel (98) or a drive belt (100).
9. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the Claims 3 to 8, characterized in that the at least one reference component (22, 48, 98, 100) is in the form of a cable pulley (22), a cable sheave (48), a friction wheel (98) or a drive belt (100)
10. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 8 or 9, characterized in that the cable sheave (48) is in the form of a deflection sheave or a drive sheave.
11. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the preceding Claims, characterized by a state of abrasion determining device (112) for determining the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) in dependence on the parameter deviation and/or the change of the parameter deviation.
12. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the preceding Claims, characterized by an operational reliability state determining device (76) for determining the operational reliability state of the transportation system (10) in dependence on the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100).
13. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 12, characterized in that the operational reliability state determining device (76) is configured in such a manner that an operational reliability state of the transportation system (10) can be associated with the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) determined by the state of abrasion determining device (112).
14. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 13, characterized by a comparison scale (80) for the operational reliability state and by an operational reliability state signal generating device (82) for producing an operational reliability state signal which corresponds to a value of the operational reliability state on the comparison scale (80) which is associated with a state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100).
15. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 14, characterized in that the operational reliability state signal generating device (82) is configured so that the parameter deviations derived from at least two system components (22, 48, 98, 100) are processable for the purposes of producing the operational reliability state signal.
16. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 15, characterized in that the operational reliability state signal generating device (82) comprises a maximum value detecting unit (114) with which a maximum value of at least two detected parameter deviations and/or changes thereof is determinable.
17. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the Claims 14 to 16, characterized by an optical and/or acoustic indicator device (84) for displaying the operational reliability state signal.
18. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the Claims 14 to 17, characterized by an alarm device (86) for producing an alarm signal and/or a shut down signal if the value of the operational reliability state signal exceeds at least one limiting value.
19. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 18, characterized in that the at least one limiting value is settable at a fixed value and/or is alterable individually.
20. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 18 or 19, characterized by an optical and/or acoustic alarm signal display device (88) for indicating the alarm and/or shut down signal.
21. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the Claims 14 to 16, characterized in that the alarm system (86) cooperates with a control and/or regulating device (90) for the at least one drive unit (16, 106) of the transportation system (10) and is so configured that a drive speed of the transportation system (10) can be reduced and/or the at least one drive unit (16, 106) of the transportation system (10) can be switched off as a result of the production of the alarm or shut down signal.
22. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the preceding Claims, characterized in that the parameter measuring device (50) is configured so that two or more electrical and/or mechanical parameters can be determined simultaneously.
23. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the preceding Claims, characterized in that the parameter measuring device (50) is configured so that the actual value of the at least one parameter can be determined in time-dependent manner.
24. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the preceding Claims, characterized in that the duration of the time interval can be preset and/or variable.
25. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the preceding Claims, characterized in that the parameter measuring device (50) is configured for the contactless measurement of the at least one parameter.
26. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the preceding Claims, characterized in that the parameter measuring device (50) comprises a clock pulse emitting member (52) which is connectable in mutually non-rotatable manner to the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) for which the mechanical movement magnitude is to be determined, and at least one sensor (54) for detecting a rotation of the clock pulse emitting member (52).
27. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 26, characterized in that the clock pulse emitting member (52) is in the form of a timing disc having a multiplicity of clock members (58) arranged regularly around the periphery of the timing disc.
28. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 27, characterized in that the clock members (58) are in the form of radially outwardly or radially inwardly protruding projections (58) which form a regular toothing (60).
29. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the Claims 26 to 28, characterized in that the clock pulse emitting member (52) is at least partly made of a metal.
30. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the Claims 26 to 29, characterized in that the clock pulse emitting member (52) is provided with an anti-freeze layer (66).
31. A wear monitoring system in accordance with Claim 30, characterized in that the anti-freeze layer (66) is made of a synthetic material.
32. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the Claims 26 to 31, characterized in that the sensor (54) is an inductive or capacitive proximity sensor or a Hall sensor.
33. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the Claims 3 to 32, characterized in that the at least one reference component (22, 46, 48, 98, 100) and the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) are configured so that, in a starting state occurring when the system (38) is started-up, the value of the first movement magnitude is small than that of the at least one second movement magnitude.
34. A wear monitoring system in accordance with any of the Claims 3 to 33, characterized in that a radius of the at least one reference component (22, 46, 48, 98, 100) is greater than a radius of the at least one system component (22 48, 98, 100).
35. Use of a wear monitoring system (38) in accordance with any of the preceding Claims for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of a system component (22, 48, 98, 100) of a cable operated transportation system (10) comprising a support cable and/or a traction cable and/or a hoisting cable (12) and also at least one drive unit (16, 106, wherein said system component is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner.
36. A cable operated transportation system (10) comprising a cable (12), at least one drive unit (16, 106) for moving the cable (12) and at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) which is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner for driving and/or guiding the cable (12) or other components (14a, 14b) of the transportation system (10), characterised by a wear monitoring system (38) for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) which is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner, which wear monitoring system (38) comprises a parameter measuring device (50) for measuring an actual value and/or a time-dependent actual value function of at least one electrical and/or mechanical parameter of the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100) and/or the drive unit (16, 106) and also comprises an evaluating device for determining a parameter deviation of the actual value from a desired value in dependence on time or a time interval and/or a deviation of the actual value function from a time-dependent desired value function of the at least one parameter, which parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component (22, 48, 98, 100).
37. A cable operated transportation system in accordance with Claim 36, characterized in that the wear monitoring system (38) is a wear monitoring system (38) in accordance with any of the Claims 2 to 34.
38. A method for monitoring the wear and/or the abrasion of at least one system component which is subjected to wear and/or abrasion and is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner and forms part of a cable operated transportation system comprising a support cable and/or a traction cable and/or a hoisting cable and also at least one drive unit, wherein an actual value and/or a time-dependent actual value function of at least one electrical and/or mechanical parameter of the at least one system component and/or the drive unit is measured and wherein there is determined a parameter deviation of the actual value from a desired value in dependence on time or a time interval and/or a deviation of the actual value function from a time-dependent desired value function of the at least one parameter, which parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component.
39. A method in accordance with Claim 38, characterized in that there is measured the actual value and/or the actual value function of at least one mechanical-parameter-defining first movement magnitude of the at least one system component.
40. A method in accordance with Claim 39, characterized in that there is measured the actual value and/or the actual value function of at least one mechanical-parameter-defining second movement magnitude of at least one reference component of the transportation system that is mounted in rotating and/or circulating manner.
41. A method in accordance with Claim 40, characterized in that there is determined the deviation from one another of the parameter-deviation-defining movement magnitude deviations of the actual value and/or the actual value function of the at least one first movement magnitude and of the at least one second movement magnitude.
42. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 38 to 41, characterized in that there is determined a change of the parameter deviation in dependence on the period of operation or an operating interval of the transportation system, which change of the parameter deviation corresponds to the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component in dependence on the period of operation or the operating interval.
43. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 38 to 42, characterized in that the mechanical parameter is measured in the form of a torque, a rotational speed or an angular speed.
44. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 38 to 43, characterized in that, as the at least one parameter, there is measured a drive current and/or a drive voltage of the at least one drive unit.
45. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 38 to 44, characterized in that the at least one parameter is measured at a cable pulley, a cable sheave, a deflection sheave, a drive sheave, a friction wheel or a drive belt.
46. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 38 to 45, characterized in that the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component is determined in dependence on the parameter deviation and/or the change of the parameter deviation.
47. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 38 to 46, characterized in that the operational reliability state of the transportation system is determined in dependence on the state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component.
48. A method in accordance with Claim 47, characterized in that the detected state of abrasion and/or the state of wear of the at least one system component is associated with the operational reliability state of the transportation system.
49. A method in accordance with Claim 47 or 48, characterized in that an operational reliability state signal is produced, said signal corresponding to a value of the operational reliability state on a comparison scale which is associated with a state of abrasion and/or a state of wear of the at least one system component.
50. A method in accordance with Claim 49, characterized in that parameter deviations determined from at least two system components are processed for the purposes of producing the operational reliability state signal.
51. A method in accordance with Claim 50, characterized in that there is determined a maximum value of at least two detected parameter deviations and/or changes thereof.
52. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 49 to 51, characterized in that the operational reliability state signal is indicated optically and/or acoustically.
53. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 49 to 52, characterized in that an alarm and/or a shut down signal is produced if the value of the operational reliability state signal exceeds at least one limiting value.
54. A method in accordance with Claim 18, characterized in that the at least one limiting value is set at a fixed value and/or is alterable individually.
55. A method in accordance with Claim 53 or 54, characterized in that the alarm and/or shut down signal is indicated optically and/or acoustically.
56. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 53 to 55, characterized in that, as a result of the generation of the alarm signal or shut down signal, the drive speed of the transportation system is reduced and/or the at least one drive unit of the transportation system is switched off.
57. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 38 to 56, characterized in that two or more electrical and/or mechanical parameters are determined at the same time.
58. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 38 to 57, characterized in that the actual value of the at least one parameter is measured in time-dependent manner.
59. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 38 to 58, characterized in that the duration of the time interval is preset and/or is variable.
60. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 38 to 59, characterized in that the at least one parameter is measured in contactless manner.
61. A method in accordance with any of the Claims 40 to 60, characterized in that the at least one reference component and the at least one system component are selected in such a way that, in the starting state occurring when the transportation system is started-up, the first movement magnitude has a smaller value than the at least one second movement magnitude.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102008015035A DE102008015035A1 (en) | 2008-03-13 | 2008-03-13 | Wear monitoring system, cable-operated transport system and method for monitoring wear parts thereof |
DE102008015035.5 | 2008-03-13 | ||
PCT/EP2009/052956 WO2009112564A1 (en) | 2008-03-13 | 2009-03-13 | Wear monitoring system, cable-operated transport equipment and method for monitoring wear parts thereof |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2718336A1 true CA2718336A1 (en) | 2009-09-17 |
Family
ID=40690538
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2718336A Abandoned CA2718336A1 (en) | 2008-03-13 | 2009-03-13 | Wear monitoring system, cable operated transportation system and a method for monitoring wear-prone parts therein |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8166886B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2254784A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2718336A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102008015035A1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2493989C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009112564A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2696927A1 (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2010-07-02 | Jean-Michel Ouellet | Tac 1400 |
JP6662659B2 (en) * | 2016-02-25 | 2020-03-11 | 日本ケーブル株式会社 | Cable condition management device for recirculating cableway |
FR3050425B1 (en) * | 2016-04-22 | 2019-06-28 | Poma | CABLE TRANSPORTATION INSTALLATION |
FR3057524B1 (en) * | 2016-10-17 | 2018-11-23 | Poma | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR REPOSITIONING THE CARRIER CABLE OF A CABLE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. |
DE102016224372B3 (en) * | 2016-12-07 | 2018-02-08 | Wakeparx GmbH | Wassersportzuganlage |
EP3375686A1 (en) * | 2017-03-16 | 2018-09-19 | Bartholet Maschinenbau AG | Device and method for monitoring a cable car system |
DE102017108574A1 (en) * | 2017-04-21 | 2018-07-05 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Method for monitoring the function of an elevator installation |
MX2019014799A (en) * | 2017-06-13 | 2020-08-03 | Innova Patent Gmbh | Method for operating a cableway. |
DE102017217830A1 (en) | 2017-10-06 | 2019-04-11 | Zf Friedrichshafen Ag | Wear monitoring system and method for monitoring state variables of a cable-operated transport system |
AT520445B1 (en) * | 2017-10-19 | 2019-04-15 | Innova Patent Gmbh | Tire conveyor for means of transport |
RU2741381C1 (en) * | 2018-04-20 | 2021-01-25 | Общество С Ограниченной Ответственностью "Корум Груп" | System for diagnostics of traction sheave lining wear of multirope hoisting machine |
EP3620340B1 (en) * | 2018-09-10 | 2022-10-12 | Bartholet Maschinenbau AG | Aerial cableway system, method for operating an aerial cableway system and pulley for an aerial cableway system |
CN109374461B (en) * | 2018-11-05 | 2021-02-23 | 江西省美满生活用品有限公司 | Wear resistance testing device of baby diaper |
FR3093490B1 (en) * | 2019-03-05 | 2021-03-12 | Poma | Cable vehicle transport installation and method of measuring information relating to such an installation |
AT522584B1 (en) * | 2019-05-28 | 2020-12-15 | Innova Patent Gmbh | Method for detecting wear on a pulley of a cable car system |
CN112557189B (en) * | 2020-11-24 | 2022-09-09 | 安徽康泰电气有限公司 | Method for detecting load-bearing retraction performance of photoelectric composite cable |
CN112520064B (en) * | 2020-12-04 | 2022-09-20 | 中国航空工业集团公司成都飞机设计研究所 | Automatic damage identification method based on strain monitoring |
CN113466075B (en) * | 2021-07-19 | 2023-05-30 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Cable wear resistance detection device and application method thereof |
Family Cites Families (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4003314A (en) | 1975-04-25 | 1977-01-18 | Pearson William F | Ski lift monitoring |
US4019002A (en) | 1975-06-18 | 1977-04-19 | Lift Engineering & Mfg., Inc. | Positive cable derailment sensing apparatus |
US3991413A (en) | 1975-06-23 | 1976-11-09 | Berger Philip H | Constant current detector system |
AT364102B (en) | 1979-10-22 | 1981-09-25 | Voest Alpine Ag | DEVICE FOR LOCATING ROLLS WITH AN INCREASED TURNING RESISTANCE IN A ROLLER COVER |
US4363945A (en) | 1980-11-17 | 1982-12-14 | Kunczynski Jan K | Cable derailment responsive apparatus |
DE3528001C1 (en) * | 1985-08-03 | 1986-12-11 | G. Düsterloh GmbH, 4322 Sprockhövel | Method and device for monitoring and for reworking the cable groove lining of a friction pulley for a cable car |
US4671187A (en) | 1985-09-20 | 1987-06-09 | Kunczynski Jan K | Deropement sensor apparatus with gravity-biased, falling, magnetic member |
FR2644740A1 (en) * | 1989-03-22 | 1990-09-28 | Mareau Dominique | Cable jump-off guard for a pylon of a single-cable cableway |
FR2672542B1 (en) | 1991-02-11 | 1994-02-11 | Komori Chambon Sa | DEVICE FOR DETECTING, IN A MACHINE, THE CONTACT POSITION OF TWO PARALLEL AXIS CYLINDERS. |
WO1993011015A1 (en) * | 1991-11-29 | 1993-06-10 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Displacement in transfer apparatus and driving controller of transfer member |
US5528219A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1996-06-18 | Konrad Doppelmayr & Sohn | Ropeway safety monitoring system |
DE19620065C2 (en) | 1996-05-20 | 2001-03-01 | Ifm Electronic Gmbh | Circuit arrangement for monitoring the fault-free and / or for recognizing a faulty state of a system |
EP0809361B1 (en) | 1996-05-20 | 2005-03-30 | i f m electronic gmbh | Electronic switching device and circuit arrangement for monitoring a technical installation |
US5721533A (en) | 1996-07-12 | 1998-02-24 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Cable deployment monitoring arrangement |
DE19752362A1 (en) | 1997-11-26 | 1999-06-17 | Doppelmayr Seilbahn Produktion | Circuit arrangement for monitoring the fault-free and / or for recognizing a faulty state of a system |
US5959272A (en) | 1997-12-23 | 1999-09-28 | Otis Elevator Company | Fail safe roller switch |
DE602004026260D1 (en) | 2003-11-06 | 2010-05-12 | Optosys Ag | Cable position sensor |
DE102006014131B3 (en) * | 2006-03-28 | 2007-06-14 | Tsg Technische Service Gesellschaft Mbh | Traction sheave`s drivability determining method for use in e.g. load elevator, involves determining drivability from grip angle, grip limiting angle, rope force on cabin side and on counter balance side based on specified formula |
DE102006036251A1 (en) * | 2006-08-03 | 2008-02-07 | TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH | Lift system`s driving efficiency or load condition examining device, has measuring units for respectively measuring pair of signals, where one of signals characterises slippage and/or loading between Bowden cable and traction sheave |
DE102007006316B3 (en) | 2007-01-30 | 2008-04-10 | Hima Paul Hildebrandt Gmbh + Co Kg | Cable e.g. winding cable, position monitoring device for e.g. cableway, has evaluation device comparing movement parameters and determining movement parameter difference corresponding to operational reliability condition of transport system |
-
2008
- 2008-03-13 DE DE102008015035A patent/DE102008015035A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2009
- 2009-03-13 CA CA2718336A patent/CA2718336A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2009-03-13 EP EP09720504A patent/EP2254784A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2009-03-13 RU RU2010141335/11A patent/RU2493989C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2009-03-13 WO PCT/EP2009/052956 patent/WO2009112564A1/en active Application Filing
-
2010
- 2010-09-13 US US12/807,747 patent/US8166886B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
RU2493989C2 (en) | 2013-09-27 |
RU2010141335A (en) | 2012-04-20 |
US8166886B2 (en) | 2012-05-01 |
EP2254784A1 (en) | 2010-12-01 |
WO2009112564A1 (en) | 2009-09-17 |
US20110073000A1 (en) | 2011-03-31 |
DE102008015035A1 (en) | 2009-09-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8166886B2 (en) | Wear monitoring system, cable operated transportation system and a method for monitoring wear-prone parts therein | |
US7880633B2 (en) | Device and method for monitoring the position of a cable in a cable operated transportation system and a cable operated transportation system | |
US7857106B2 (en) | Vertical position detection of a suspended elevator car | |
JP5050362B2 (en) | elevator | |
EP2834627B1 (en) | Calibration of wear detection system | |
US20090133965A1 (en) | Method and system for detecting and stopping uncontrolled movement of an elevator car in an elevator | |
US11242220B2 (en) | Safety braking systems for elevators | |
CN105992939B (en) | The deterioration detecting and detecting system and driving car of running vehicle wheel | |
JP6449376B2 (en) | elevator | |
US20170355560A1 (en) | System and method for monitoring elevator brake capability | |
CN107522056B (en) | Method and system for monitoring traction capacity of elevator system | |
US5886308A (en) | Rope speed monitoring assembly and method | |
CN105438907A (en) | Detection method for traction force of elevator | |
CN104555643A (en) | Stall condition detection | |
EP3560873B1 (en) | Prognostic failure detection of elevator roller guide wheel | |
CN207192524U (en) | Displacement detector and traction capacity detecting system for elevator device | |
CN211169381U (en) | Elevator wire rope jumping and disengaging detection device | |
CN106660765B (en) | Detect the method and lifting device of the abrasion chain link in chain | |
WO2020178354A1 (en) | Determining a malfunction of a centrifugal brake of an elevator traction device | |
CN213536910U (en) | Speed measuring device based on twin elevator and twin elevator | |
CN112125088A (en) | Speed measuring device based on twin elevator, twin elevator and monitoring method of twin elevator | |
CN116081422A (en) | Elevator detention working condition detection device | |
CN113104751A (en) | Detection apparatus for stabilize hoist engine wire rope and promote |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20140221 |
|
FZDE | Discontinued |
Effective date: 20160810 |