CA1289337C - Process for removing gaseous sulfur compounds, such as sulfur dioxide, from the flue gases of a furnace - Google Patents

Process for removing gaseous sulfur compounds, such as sulfur dioxide, from the flue gases of a furnace

Info

Publication number
CA1289337C
CA1289337C CA000494921A CA494921A CA1289337C CA 1289337 C CA1289337 C CA 1289337C CA 000494921 A CA000494921 A CA 000494921A CA 494921 A CA494921 A CA 494921A CA 1289337 C CA1289337 C CA 1289337C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
furnace
oxide
flue gas
sulfur
flue gases
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
CA000494921A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Sirpa Hamala
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ivo Power Engineering Oy
Original Assignee
Tampella Oy AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=26157679&utm_source=***_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=CA1289337(C) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority claimed from FI844411A external-priority patent/FI844411A/en
Application filed by Tampella Oy AB filed Critical Tampella Oy AB
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1289337C publication Critical patent/CA1289337C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/50Sulfur oxides
    • B01D53/501Sulfur oxides by treating the gases with a solution or a suspension of an alkali or earth-alkali or ammonium compound
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/50Sulfur oxides
    • B01D53/508Sulfur oxides by treating the gases with solids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01FCOMPOUNDS OF THE METALS BERYLLIUM, MAGNESIUM, ALUMINIUM, CALCIUM, STRONTIUM, BARIUM, RADIUM, THORIUM, OR OF THE RARE-EARTH METALS
    • C01F11/00Compounds of calcium, strontium, or barium
    • C01F11/46Sulfates
    • C01F11/464Sulfates of Ca from gases containing sulfur oxides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01FCOMPOUNDS OF THE METALS BERYLLIUM, MAGNESIUM, ALUMINIUM, CALCIUM, STRONTIUM, BARIUM, RADIUM, THORIUM, OR OF THE RARE-EARTH METALS
    • C01F5/00Compounds of magnesium
    • C01F5/40Magnesium sulfates
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J15/00Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes
    • F23J15/003Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes for supplying chemicals to fumes, e.g. using injection devices
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J7/00Arrangement of devices for supplying chemicals to fire

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Treating Waste Gases (AREA)

Abstract

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
The invention relates to a process for removing sulfur dioxide from the flue gases of a furnace. In a way deviating from prior known processes, in addition to a sulfur-containing fuel and an oxygen-containing gas, a pulverous oxide or carbonate of calcium or magnesium is fed into the furnace in excess in proportion to the sulfur dioxide gas formed in the combustion chamber, and water is sprayed separately into the calcium oxide bearing or magnesium oxide bearing flue gases in a stage separate from the combustion chamber. Alternatively, the pulverous oxide can be fed directly into the flue gases leaving the furnace.

Description

~8~;~37 A process for removing gaseous sulfur compounds, such as sulfur dioxide, from the flue gases of a furnace The present invention relates to a process for removing gaseous sulfur compounds, such as sulfur dioxide, from the flue gases of a furnace which burns sulfur-containing fuel, coal or oil.

It is previously known to decrease the sulfur dioxide content of the flue gases of a furnace by feeding calcium oxide, calcium carbonate or some other alkaline compound into the combustion chamber of the furnace. In a fluidized-bed furnace with a circul-ating bed it is possible by means of a calcium addition to de-crease the sulfur dioxide content of the flue gases by as much as 90 ~ when the furnace is operating within the temperature range which is optimal for the chemical reactions, i.e. 800-1000 C.
The sulfur dioxide thus absorbed leaves the furnace in the form of gypsum, along with the fly ash.

In other furnaces, in which it is necessary to use temperatures higher than those mentioned above and in which the retention of the additive is short due to the nature of the combustion, it is expected that the decrease in the sulfur dioxide content of the flue gases stays substantially lower, about 50 % or less, and therefore this process has not been applied on an industrial scale to such furnaces.

On the other hand, it is known that the sulfur dioxide content of flue gases can be decreased by various absorption processes out-side the furnace. One such process, known per se, is the so-called spray or semidry process, in which the flue gas leaving the furnace is led into a separate reactor, into which an aqueous slurry of calcium hydroxide is sprayed in the form of small droplets through specific nozzles. The reactor is typically a rather large vessel, in which the ve]ocity of the flue gases is allowed to decrease and the aqueous slurry is sprayed downwards from above, from the upper part of the vessel. The temperature of the reactor is at this time about 50-80C, and the control of the spraying of the aqueous slurry of calcium hydroxide is very important, since drops which are too large will remain as liquid on the bottom of the reactor. The thickness of the aqueous slurry of calcium hydroxide should be maintained at such level that the heat content in the flue gases would evaporate the water entering the reactor, so that adsorption product can be recovered in the form of dry powder. By this process it is possible to remove as much as 90 % of the sulfur dioxide. The disadvantages of the process include the tendency of the nozzle to become clogged, an extra preparing and batching apparatus for the aqueous slurry of calcium hydroxide, which raises the investment costs, and problems of controlling the drop size during the spraying.
The goal of the present invention is to provide a process for remov-ing gaseous sulfur compounds, such as sulfur dioxide, from the flue gases of a furnace, a process by which the gaseous sulfur compounds can be converted to solid sulfur compounds which can easily be separated from the gases and thereby effectively removed from the flue gases of the furnace in a simple and economical manner.
According to the present invention there is provided a process for removing a gaseous sulfur compound, from a furnace flue gas, which comprises a) feeding a pulverous alkali metal oxide or alkaline earth metal or a compound which converts to an oxide under the conditions in the furnace, into a furnace in addition to the sulfur-containing flue gas to be burned and an '7 oxygen-containing gas, or feeding said oxide into the sulfur containing flue gas which leaves the furnace, b) separately spraying water or steam into the furnace or into the flue gas to convert the oxide to a hydroxide which reacts with sulfur dioxide and finally c) separating a solid which contains alkali metal or alkaline earth metal sulfate, obtained as a reaction product, from the gas.
Preferably the pulverous compound fed into the furnace is calcium carbonate, calcium-magnesium carbonate or a corresponding oxide thereof.
In the process according to the present invention, a material which reacts with gaseous sulfur compounds, and particularly with sulfur dioxide, and water are fed into the process separately, whereby the problems of pre-paring, handling and feeding in a slurry are avoided, in the following manner:
a) a pulverous alkali metal oxide and/or alkaline earth metal oxide and/or a respective compound which can be converted to oxide in the furnace, such as carbonate, is fed into the furnace in addition to the sulfur-containing mater-ial to be burned and an oxygen-containing gas, or the said oxide powder is fed into the sulfur dioxide bearing flue gases which emerge from the furnace, b) water and/or steam is fed separately into the furnace and/or into the flue gases in order to convert the oxide to a hydroxide which reacts with the sulfur dioxide, and finally c) solid particles which contain the sulfate and possibly sulfite of the alkali metal or the alkaline earth metal are separated from the gases.
The basic idea of the invention is thus that the calcium and magnesium oxides which are inactive from the viewpoint of the removal of sulfur dioxide are activated only in situ in the flue gases by means of water and/or steam, whereby they are converted to the respective hydroxides and react with ~ 3,~ 3 ~

sulfur di.oxide, forming a solid sulfate/slllfite mixture which can thereafter be removed effect;vely from the flue gases by physical separation methods.
A pulverous oxide and/or carbonate is fed into the combustion chamber of the furnace i.n a~cordance with the sulfur content of the fuel in such a way that the amount of alkali and/or alkaline earth metals is at least the amount equivalent to the sulfur in the molar proportion according to the reaction formula, but preferably higher than the amount required for the reaction. By feeding the oxide and/or carbonate in the form of powder separa-tely into the combustion chamber, or the oxide directly into the flue gas ducts, it need not be fed in the form of a slurry through nozzles, whereby nozzle clogging and the use of extra preparation and batching devices for the aqueous slurry are .

~ ~39337 omitted. On the contrary, the feeding of water and steam through nozzles is uncomplicated and easy.

The feeding of water or steam into the flue gases is in practice carried out at a temperature of 50-800 C, preferebly within the temperature range 90-200 C. If it is desired to recover the absorption product substantialLy in the form of dry powder, water is used in only such an amount that the thermal energy and the heat of reaction of the flue gases suffice to vaporize it, or a small amount of energy introduced from outside the system is used as an addition to the heat of reaction.

The invention is described below in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawing, which depicts diagrammatically an apparatus suitable for carrying out the process according to the present invention.

In the drawing, the furnace in general is indicated by reference numeral 1. A sulfur-containing fuel for combusting 4, usually preheated, an oxygen-bearing gas 5, and calcium and/or magnesium oxide 6' and/or carbonate 6, preferebly in excess in proportion to the amount of the sulfur dioxide gas forming in the combustion chamber, are fed into the combustion chamber of the furnace 1. By the expression "in excess" is meant in this context that the amount of calcium, magnesium, or calcium and magnesium present in the calcium and/or magnesium oxide and/or carbonate is greater than would in theory, according to the reaction formula, be required to react with all of the sulfur fed into the combustion chamber.

The carbonate fed into the furnace breaks down in the furnace into oxide and carbon dioxide. The oxide, for its part, can react with the sulfur dioxide, forming first sulfite and thereafter, upon oxidation, sulfate. Owing to the short retention time in the . , .

~139~37 furnace, only part of the oxide has time to react with the sulfur dioxide at a temperature sufficiently high for the reaction, and for this reason calcium oxide bearing and/or magnesium oxide bearing flue gases 8 which contain combustion residue and also unabsorbed sulfur dioxide leave the combustion chamber of the furnace through the flue gas conduit 7. Additionally or alterna-tively, pulverous oxide 6' can be fed directly into the flue gas conduit 7 or into a subsequent reactor 2.

In practice the temperature of the flue gases 8 is so low that the reaction between the calcium and/or magnesium oxide and sulfur dioxide is relatively weak, and the oxides can under these condi-tions be regarded as relatively inactive in terms of sulfur re-moval. However, the flue gases 8 can be used in the heat exchanger 12 to heat the air 5 fed into the furnace 1.

The calcium and/or magnesium oxide bearing and sulfur dioxide containing flue gases 8 which emerge from the combustion chamber of the furnace 1 are thereafter directed into a reactor, which is generally indicated by reference numeral 2. In order to activate the calcium and/or magnesium, water 9 or steam is sprayed into the flue gases in the reactor 2, and this water or steam reacts with the calcium and/or magnesium oxide, thereby forming the res-pective hydroxide. The hydroxide for its part reacts with the re-maining sulfur dioxide in the flue gases 8, thereby forming the respective sulfite, which, in the presence of oxygen, at least in part further oxidizes to the respective sulfate.

The amount of water 9 fed into the reactor 2 is adjusted to so low a value that the heat of the flue gases 8 suffices to evapo-rate the water fed into the reactor 2. Thereupon the dry, fly ash-like reaction product can be removed, in the same manner as the other fly ash, in a conventional fly ash separator 3, from which the flue gases 11 are directed further into the flue 13 and the , ' '.

separated fly ash 12 and reaction product are possibly directed to a further treatment.

The order in which the water or steam and the pulverous oxide are added is in no way critical. Thus, for example, the water or steam can be fed into the furnace and the pulverous oxide only at a point subsequent to the furnace, either into the flue gas con-duit or into the subsequent reactor. The additional advantages of the process according to the present invention include the fact that the process can be applied to a furnace provided with any type of burner. The size of the furnace is not a restricting factor, and it is not necessary to circulate the calcium and/or magnesium oxide in the combustion chamber, whereby the expensive circulating-bed alternative with the complicated recirculating devices and at the same time the excessive dust which is a dis-advantage of the recirculating-bed alternative due to its prin-ciple of operation, as well as the separation of the dust, are avoided. Compared with the prior known spray process, the spray-ing of water or steam into the reactor 2 is, furthermore, con-siderably less complicated and easier to implement than when using slurry which clogs the nozzles and is difficult to mix. It is an additional advantage that the carbonate can be economically burned in the combustion chamber of the furnace itself.

The invention is described below in greater detail with the aid of examples.

Example l Coal having a sulfur content of 1.4 ~ is fed at a rate of 70 t/h into a pulverized-coal furnace having a thermal output of 600 MW, the furnace being operated at full capacity. An excess of combus-tion air is fed in , so that the oxygen content in the flue gases is 4 ~. Calcium, which may be for example calcium carbonate, dolomite or calcium oxide, is fed into the furnace. For example, ~1.?~ 37 calcium carbonate having a calcium carbonate content of 90 ~ is fed into the furnace at a certain varying proportion to the sulfur amount entering the furnace in the fuel. The theoretical equivalent amount is about 3.4 t/h calcium carbonate.

The calcium carbonate decomposes (1) CaCO ~ CaO + CO

in the furnace at a high temperature to calcium oxide and carbon dioxide, which leave the furnace along with the flue gases. Part of the calcium oxide in the furnace reacts with the oxides of sulfur present in the flue gases, thereby forming calcium sulfate or calsium sulfite.
(2) Cao + SO + 1/2 O ---> CaSO

or CaO + SO ---> CaSO

CaS03 + 1/2 O ---> CaSO

Water and/or steam is sprayed into the flue gases either in the furnace or in the flue gas conduit, or in a separate reactor sub-sequent to the flue gas duct.

In terms of energy economy it is most economical to increase the moisture content of the flue gases by spraying water into them in a separate reactor, at a point after all heat recovery surfaces.

The increased moisture content of the flue gases enables a highly reactive calcium hydroxide to form in the furnace from the un-reacted calcium oxide, 12~ 7 ~3) Cao ~ H2O ---> Ca(OH) Ca(OH) ~ SO ---~ CaSO + H O

which rapidly reacts with the oxides of sulfur present in the flue gases. The higher the moisture content of the flue gases upon their leaving, the more effectively the sulfur dioxide is removed from t'ne flue gases. In terms of energy economy it is, however, advantageous to proceed in such a manner that the heat released in the chemical reactions suffices to evaporate the water amount added. If it is desired to increase the final tempe-rature of the flue gases, this is done either by using external heat or by means of a warm flue gas flow.

It is essential that the compound arriving in the reaction zone, derived from calcium carbonate or dolomite, is in the form of oxide.

The results are presented in the table below, which shows in per-cent how much sulfur dioxide was removed from the flue gases when varying amounts of calcium carbonate were fed into the furnace in accordance with the present invention, the amounts of the calcium carbonate being reported as molar ratios of the calcium content of the pulverous calcium carbonate to the sulfur content of the fuel fed into the furnace. The temperatures of the flue gases were measured at a point immediately prior to the feeding point of the water or steam, except at 800 C, at which the water or steam was fed directly into the furnace.

.
3~

Table 1 B) Ca/S Flue gas Flue gas SO
temperature temperature reduction S w o A) o 0.48 800 C 108 C 42 %
0.52 50C 65C 56 ~
o o 1.52 202 C 74 C 77 ~
o o 1.56 90 C 68 C 82 %
2.20 200 C 72C 87 %
2.22 120C 62C 96 %
o o 2.3 110 C 68 C 93 %
o o 2.5 90 C 66 C 97 %
o o 4.1 800 C 110 C 72 %
o o 4.0 120 C 68 C 98 %

A) water or steam fed into the furnace B) at a point immediately prior to the feeding point of water Example 2 Dolomite which contained 45 % calcium carbonate (CaCO ), 45 %
magnesium carbonate (MgCO ) and 10 % impurities was fed into a pulverized-coal furnace according to Example 1, using the same operating values. On the basis of equivalence, the amount of dolomite required in proportion to the sulfur amount fed in is about 6.8 tn/h.

The calcium and magnesium carbonates contained in the dolomite break down in the furnace into calcium oxide, magnesium oxide and carbon dioxide, which leave the furnace along with the flue gases.
Part of the oxides in the furnace reacts with the oxides of sulfur present in the flue gases, thereby forming sulfate or sulfite.

Water and/or steam is sprayed into the flue gases either in the furnace or in the flue gas duct, or in a separate reactor situated 39;~37 at a point subsequent to the flue conduit, whereupon the oxides which have not reacted in the furnace can, due to the increased moisture, ~orm hydroxide. The hydroxide for its part reacts with the oxides of sulfur present in the flue gases, thereby forming a pulverous reaction product.

When dolomite is used, the highly reactive calcium hydroxide reacts before the reacting of the slower magnesium hydroxide, which, when the calcium amount is sufficient, passes through the reactor almost unreacted. By designing the process so as to be carried out only on the basis of the calcium present in the dolo-mite, the equivalent amount presented above is arrived at. When the molar ratio of calcium to sulfur is at least 1, the results of the process are substantially in compliance with the corres-ponding values in Table 1.

Example 3 Calcium oxide which contains impurities 10 % is fed into a furnace according to Example 1, using the corresponding operating values. In terms of the reaction, the theoretical equivalent amount of calcium oxide in proportion to the sulfur amount enter-ing the furnace in the fuel is about 1.9 tn/h.

Part of the calcium oxide reacts in the furnace with the oxides of sulfur present in the flue gases, thereby forming calcium sulfate or sulfite.

Water and/or steam is spra~ed into the flue gases either in the furnace or in the flue gas duct, or in a separate reactor located at a point after the flue gas conduit.

Due to the increase in moisture, the calcium oxide forms highly reactive calcium hydroxide, which reacts rapidly with the oxides of sulfur still present in the flue gases. The higher the moisture content in the flue gases upon leaving, the more effectively the sulfur dioxide is removed from the flue gases. In terms of energy economy it is, however, advantageous to operate in such a way that the heat released in the chemical reaction will suffice to evaporate the water amount added.

When the calcium fed in, in calcium oxide, is calculated in a molar ratio to the sulfur, the results are in accordance with those shown in Table 1 of Example 1.

Claims (8)

1. A process for removing a gaseous sulfur compound, from a furnace flue gas which comprises a) feeding a pulverous alkali metal oxide or alkaline earth metal oxide or a compound which converts to an oxide under the conditions in the furnace, into a furnace in addition to the sulfur-containing flue gas to be burned and an oxygen-containing gas, or feeding said oxide into the sulfur containing flue gas which leaves the furnace, b) separately spraying water or steam into the furnace or into the flue gas to convert the oxide to a hydroxide which reacts with sulfur dioxide and finally c) separating a solid which contains alkali metal or alkaline earth metal sulfate, obtained as a reaction product, from the gas.
2. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the gaseous sulfur compound to be removed is sulfur dioxide and the compound which converts to an oxide is a carbonate.
3. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the pulverous compound is fed in excess in proportion to the sulfur present in the flue gas.
4. A process according to Claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein spraying of the water or steam is carried out when the temperature of the flue gas is 50-800°C.
5. A process according to Claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein spraying of the water or steam is carried out when the temperature of the flue gas is 90-200°C.
6. A process according to Claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein water is sprayed into the flue gas in an amount which does not exceed the amount which can be evaporated by the thermal energy produced by the flue gas and the reactions in the furnace.
7, A process according to Claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein a small amount of additional energy is introduced into the reactor from the outside before the flue gas is directed to the separation of the solids.
8. A process according to Claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the pulverous com-pound fed into the furnace is calcium carbonate, calcium-magnesium carbonate, or a corresponding oxide thereof.
CA000494921A 1984-11-09 1985-11-08 Process for removing gaseous sulfur compounds, such as sulfur dioxide, from the flue gases of a furnace Expired - Lifetime CA1289337C (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI844411A FI844411A (en) 1984-11-09 1984-11-09 FOERFARANDE FOER AVLAEGSNING AV SVAVELDIOXID FRAON ROEKGASERNA AV EN VAERMEPANNA.
FI844411 1984-11-09
FI851622A FI78845B (en) 1984-11-09 1985-04-24 FOERFARANDE FOER AVLAEGSNANDE AV GASFORMIGA SVAVELFOERENINGAR, SAOSOM SVAVELDIOXID FRAON ROEKGASERNA FRAON EN PANNA.
FI851622 1985-04-24

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1289337C true CA1289337C (en) 1991-09-24

Family

ID=26157679

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA000494921A Expired - Lifetime CA1289337C (en) 1984-11-09 1985-11-08 Process for removing gaseous sulfur compounds, such as sulfur dioxide, from the flue gases of a furnace

Country Status (9)

Country Link
AU (1) AU579901B2 (en)
BG (1) BG60232B1 (en)
CA (1) CA1289337C (en)
FI (1) FI78845B (en)
GB (1) GB2169887B (en)
IT (1) IT1237362B (en)
NL (1) NL8503082A (en)
NZ (1) NZ213857A (en)
SE (1) SE461957B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2011156906A2 (en) * 2010-06-15 2011-12-22 Et-Energy Corp. Process for treating a flue gas

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1989003241A1 (en) * 1987-10-16 1989-04-20 Reinhard Fischer Process for disposal of waste by combustion with oxygen
US5376354A (en) * 1987-10-16 1994-12-27 Noell Abfall-Und Energietechnik Gmbh Process for disposal of waste by combustion with oxygen
FI83166B (en) * 1989-02-15 1991-02-28 Imatran Voima Oy RENINGSMETOD FOER ROEKGASER OCH ANLAEGGNING FOER RENING AV ROEKGASER.

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU419407B2 (en) * 1970-09-10 1971-11-30 The Golden Cycle Corporation Process for the entrapment of sulfur dioxide gas
US3687613A (en) * 1970-10-27 1972-08-29 Combustion Eng Method and apparatus for preparing an additive for introduction to a gas scrubber
AU455051B2 (en) * 1971-05-31 1974-10-29 Chemical Construction Corporation Process forthe recovery of sulfur dioxide
JPS5079477A (en) * 1973-11-08 1975-06-27
SE418152B (en) * 1974-06-12 1981-05-11 Ceskoslovenska Akademie Ved SET FOR EXHAUSTABILITY OF GASES, IN PARTICULAR NITROGEN AND SULFUR OXIDES, WITH THE HELP OF CARBONATES
FR2279443A1 (en) * 1974-07-25 1976-02-20 Asahi Fiber Cy Ltd PROCESS FOR PURIFYING RESIDUAL GAS CONTAINING A FLUORINE COMPOUND
GB1504688A (en) * 1975-04-11 1978-03-22 Exxon Research Engineering Co Mitigating or preventing environmental pollution by sulphur oxides in the treatment of sulphur-containing substance
GB1551357A (en) * 1975-05-06 1979-08-30 Hoelter H Purification of gas
US3976747A (en) * 1975-06-06 1976-08-24 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Energy Research And Development Administration Modified dry limestone process for control of sulfur dioxide emissions
BR8103078A (en) * 1980-05-24 1982-02-09 Hoelter H PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR THE DISPOSAL OF Sulfurous Anhydride AND OTHER HARMFUL SUBSTANCES OF SMOKE GAS
CA1152294A (en) * 1980-10-08 1983-08-23 Xuan T. Nguyen Fluidized bed sulfur dioxide removal
DE3106580A1 (en) * 1981-02-21 1982-09-02 L. & C. Steinmüller GmbH, 5270 Gummersbach METHOD FOR MINIMIZING EMISSIONS FROM POLLUTION PLANTS
DE3235341A1 (en) * 1982-09-24 1984-03-29 Deutsche Babcock Anlagen Ag, 4200 Oberhausen METHOD FOR PURIFYING EXHAUST GASES

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2011156906A2 (en) * 2010-06-15 2011-12-22 Et-Energy Corp. Process for treating a flue gas
WO2011156906A3 (en) * 2010-06-15 2012-02-09 Et-Energy Corp. Process for treating a flue gas
US8758710B2 (en) 2010-06-15 2014-06-24 E.T. Energy Corp. Process for treating a flue gas

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IT1237362B (en) 1993-05-31
SE8505269L (en) 1986-10-25
IT8567942A0 (en) 1985-11-08
AU579901B2 (en) 1988-12-15
FI851622L (en) 1986-05-10
GB8527454D0 (en) 1985-12-11
FI851622A0 (en) 1985-04-24
BG60232B2 (en) 1994-01-18
BG60232B1 (en) 1994-01-24
NL8503082A (en) 1986-06-02
GB2169887A (en) 1986-07-23
GB2169887B (en) 1988-11-23
FI78845B (en) 1989-06-30
AU4907685A (en) 1986-10-30
NZ213857A (en) 1989-07-27
SE461957B (en) 1990-04-23
SE8505269D0 (en) 1985-11-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1289335C (en) Process and an apparatus for causing the gaseous sulfur compounds offlue gases to react to form solid compounds which can be separated from the flue gases
US4279873A (en) Process for flue gas desulfurization
US5173279A (en) Method and composition for treating flue or exhaust gases utilizing modified calcium hydroxide
CA1289336C (en) Process for removing gaseous sulfur compounds and sulfur dioxide fromthe flue gases of a furnace
US4555996A (en) Method for reduction of sulfur products in the exhaust gases of a combustion chamber
US5002743A (en) Process for the removal of sulfur dioxide from hot flue gases
US4595576A (en) Process for flue gas desulfurization
US4848995A (en) Removal of sulfur oxides from flue gas
CA1289337C (en) Process for removing gaseous sulfur compounds, such as sulfur dioxide, from the flue gases of a furnace
US4666690A (en) Method for removing sulfur dioxide from flue gases
US4490341A (en) Flue gas desulfurization process
WO1988004196A1 (en) Flue gas purifying procedure
JPH02110193A (en) Method for reducing so2 and/or nox generation in combustion process
HU202423B (en) Method for removing gaseous sulfur compounds from flue gas of boilers
CA1339241C (en) Continuous process of dry slaking lime
US4891194A (en) Method for scrubbing flue gases from a firing unit
JPH10118450A (en) Desulfurization of coal combustion stoker furnace
DE3530421C2 (en)
WO2003004136A1 (en) Flue gas purification process
WO1991001174A1 (en) A process for the purification of flue gases, and an apparatus for it
JPS5828206B2 (en) Gypsum recovery method in flue gas desulfurization method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKLA Lapsed