AU712142B2 - Composition for desensitizing teeth - Google Patents

Description

S F Ref: 276745D1

AUSTRALIA

PATENTS ACT 1990 COMPLETE SPECFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT

ORIGINAL

Name and Address of Applicant: Actual Inventor(s): Address for Service: Invention Title: Gillette Canada Inc.

16700 Trans Canada Kirkland Quebec H9H 4Y8

CANADA

Samuel S. Turesky and Jean L. Spencer Spruson Ferguson, Patent Attorneys Level 33 St Martins Tower, 31 Market Street Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia Composition for Desensitizing Teeth The following statement Is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us:- 5845 1 COMPOSITION FOR DESENSITIZING

TEETH

The invention relates to desensitizing teeth.

The dentin layer in a tooth generally 5 contains channels, or tubules, extending from the pulpal surface to the peripheral surface located interior to the enamel and cementum.

Exposure of these tubules in the dentin may occur through the loss of enamel and/or gingival 10 recession accompanied by a loss of cementum. It has been theorized that these exposed tubules are in part responsible for the hypersensitivity to external stimuli, such as hot or cold fluids, or applied mechanical pressures often exhibited by teeth.

The problem of hypersensitive teeth is well-recognized, and various treatments have been proposed in the art. Pashley et al., U.S.

Patent No. 4,057,021, describes desensitizing hypersensitive teeth by applying an aqueous solution of alkali metal salts and ammonium oxalate to the surface of the teeth. Kim, U.S.

Patent Nos. 4,631,185 and 4,751,072, describe desensitizing teeth by treatment with potassium salts. Neirinckx, U.S. 4,990,327, describes desensitizing teeth with strontium ion and fluoride ion. Mason, U.S. 4,992,258, describes 2 desensitizing teeth by applying a dentifrice including a montmorillonite clay. Lutz, U.S.

Pat. No. 4,011,309, describes a desensitizing dentifrice composition that includes citric acid, sodium citrate, and non-ionic polyol surfactant. Mlkvy et al., U.S. Patent Nos.

3,888,976 and 3,772,431 describe using a zinc or strontium ion containing astringentdesensitizing agent in an effervescent mouthwash tablet. Hodosh, U.S. Patent No. 3,863,006, describes desensitizing teeth with a nitrate salt. Svajda, U.S. Patent No. 3,689,636, describes desensitizing teeth with solutions of chloride salts. Rosenthal, U.S. Patent No.

15 3,122,483, describes desensitizing teeth with strontium ions. Scheller, U.S. Patent Nos.

"4,634,589 and 4,710,372, describe a dentifrice containing apatite particles for treating hypersensitive teeth.

20 It is known that dentifrices may include particles which thicken or color the dentifrice, or which make the dentifrice abrasive. For example, in Scheller '589 and '372, the apatite particles are included in the 25 dentifrice to roughen the surface of the teeth.

See also, Thuersson et al., U.S. Patent No.

3,226,297 col. 4, lines 34-43); Blunt, U.S. Patent No. 3,475,369 col. 12, lines 27-34); Patino et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,007,259 col. 1, line 30); Bossard, U.S. Patent No.

2,994,642 col. 4, lines 40-60); La Follette, U.S. Patent No. 3,357,950 col.

1, lines 50-61); Adams, U.S. Patent No.

3,357,951 col. 1, lines 49-61); Muhler, U.S. Patent No. 3,450,813; Watson, U.S. Patent No. 3,934,001; Naumann et al., U.S. Patent No.

3,978,206 col. i, lines 39-57); Davis, -3- U.S. Patent No. 4,102,992; and Humphries et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,963,347.

Jernberg, U.S. Patent No. 4,685,883, describes using biodegradable microspheres to deliver chemotherapeutic agents to lesions in the gums.

Dichter et al., U.S. Patent No. 3,956,480 describes treating teeth with anionic polymers complexed with a cationic germicide, such as chlorhexidine.

It is an object of the present invention to overcome or ameliorate some of the disadvantages of the prior art, or at least to provide a useful alternative.

Accordingly, in a first aspect, the invention provides a composition for desensitising a hypersensitive tooth, comprising an effective amount of charged polymeric particles which are microspheres in a preparation when the preparation is applied to the surface of said tooth, causing desensitisation of said tooth.

In a second aspect, the invention provides a method of desensitising a hypersensitive tooth, comprising applying a composition as defined in the first aspect of the invention to the surface of said tooth to cause desensitisation of said tooth.

The present invention further preferably provides a method of treating a hypersensitive tooth that has exposed tubules in the dentin layer of the tooth. The method includes applying a sufficient amount of charged polymeric particles to the surface of the tooth to block the tubules.

0 The preferred particles preferably have an average size of between 0.01 micron 20 to 3 microns, more preferably between 0.2 micron to 0.6 micron, and an average surface charge density of greater than 4 jtC/cm 2 The more preferred particles are microspheres, such as the polystyrene microspheres. The more preferred particles, optionally, may have an antimicrobial chlorhexidine) an analgesic compound barbitol), or other therapeutic substance anti-calculus agent or anti-caries agent), adsorbed on their surface. In a preferred method, the surface of the hypersensitive tooth is polished, and a dispersion of the particles is applied to the polished surface for at least one minute. A preferred method of applying the particles is by brushing the teeth with a toothbrush having bristles which include the particles.

[R:\LIBLL]08277.doc:KEH -4- The invention, in a preferred embodiment preferably provides a method of treating hypersensitive teeth by applying charged polymeric microspheres to the surface of the tooth.

The invention, yet further preferably provides a dentifrice including charged polymeric microspheres.

The invention further preferably provides an effective, straightforward way to desensitize teeth. Without being bound to any theory, it is believed that the invention is effective at least in part because the charged particles cling to the surface of the teeth, blocking the tubules, and making it more difficult for external stimuli like hot or cold temperatures to affect the nerve in the pulp. When some of the particles blocking the tubules eventually wash out of the tubules, they are easily replenished by an additional application of particles.

Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description of the preferred embodiment thereof, and from the claims.

15 Fig. 1 is an electron micrograph of a *o o [R:\LIBLL]08277.doc:KEH 5 dentin surface prior to exposure to the particles of the invention.

Fig. 2 is an electron micrograph of the surface of Fig. 1 after exposure to the particles of the invention.

The charged particles preferably have an average diameter of less than 0.6 micron.

Larger particles may not fit as well in the dentin tubules.

The more preferred particles are positively charged polystyrene microspheres having an average diameter of about 0.5 micron.

The microspheres were supplied by Interfacial Dynamics Corp. of Portland, Oregon (Catalog No.

15 10-43-57). It is believed that to provide the benefits of the invention a sufficient quantity of charged particles should be applied to the surface of a hypersensitive region of the tooth so that the charged particles clog the exposed 20 tubules in the dentin. This application can be performed in a variety of ways; for example, the tooth surface can be washed with a concentrated aqueous dispersion of the particles. Generally, the more concentrated the dispersion of particles, the less time the surface of the tooth needs to be washed. The following are examples of typical procedures that can be used to apply the particles.

The tooth surface initially is polished. The surface is then exposed to an aqueous dispersion of the more preferred microspheres (1.6 X 1010 particles/ml, pH A preferred dispersion is formed by diluting 916 4l of the preferred microsphere dispersion (Catalog No. 10-43-57, Interfacial Dynamics) to a volume of 40 ml with water which has been filtered, double distilled, and adjusted to pH 6 4. The dispersion is then agitated against the tooth surface for 5 minutes. Alternatively, the surface is exposed to a pressurized jet of the aqueous dispersion at a pressure of about 30 psi for about 20 seconds, or the surface is brushed with bristles that are saturated with microspheres, for 3 minutes. Each of these procedures, when performed on a tooth that had been removed from the mouth, was effective at blocking the exposed tubules in the dentin of the tooth with the microspheres, as confirmed by scanning electron microscope. Figs 1 and 2 show the dentin surface, before and after, respectively, a 5 minute exposure to a latex 15 particle dispersion of 0.489 pm positively charged polystyrene microspheres. Prior to exposure to the dispersion, the exposed tubules in the dentin are empty; after exposure they are substantially filled with the particles present 20 in the dispersion. (Figs. 1 and 2 were both taken at 5000x magnification.) An alternative procedure for applying the particles to the tooth is to soak a cotton pellet with an aqueous dispersion of the particles, and then rub the cotton pellet over the polished surface of the tooth, preferably for one minute or less.

Other embodiments are within the claims. For example, other types of charged microspheres can be used in place of the polystyrene microspheres. Moreover, the microspheres can be included in a dentifrice (toothpaste) or a mouthwash; when the dentifrice or mouthwash contacts the surface of a tooth the microspheres will fill in the tubules. This approach can be used, in particular, to replenish microspheres that were previously 7 blocking a tubule but have, to some extent, washed out of the tubule over time. If a mouthwash is used, it may be applied under pressure, using any commercially available water-jet appliance. The microspheres can also be applied, for example, by including them on the bristles of toothbrushes or on dental floss.

While the times, pressures and other conditions given above were preferred in a laboratory setting, these conditions may be varied as desired to adapt them to a clinical setting, provided the time, pressure etc., is adequate to block the tubules. Effective conditions may be .readily determined by those skilled in the art,

S

15 e.g. by determining whether a patient's tooth is still sensitive after the treatment.

In addition, the particles may have an antimicrobial, analgesic or other therapeutic substance adsorbed on their surface. These 20 particles provide both a desensitization benefit of this invention and an anti-microbial benefit or other benefit provided by the therapeutic agent selected.

Claims (15)

1. A composition for desensitising a hypersensitive tooth, comprising an effective amount of charged polymeric particles which are microspheres in a preparation when the preparation is applied to the surface of said tooth, causing desensitisation of said tooth.

2. A composition according to claim 1, wherein said particles have an average diameter of 0.01 micron to 3 microns.

3. A composition according to claim 2, wherein said particles have an average diameter of 0.2 micron to 0.6 micron.

4. A composition according to claim 1, wherein said particles have an average surface charged density of greater than 4 /C/cm 2 A composition according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said microspheres comprise polystyrene.

6. A composition according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein 15 said particles are positively charged.

7. A composition according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said particles comprise a therapeutic agent adsorbed on their surface. 00*000 o 08. A composition according to claim 7, wherein said therapeutic agent comprises an antimicrobial.

9. A composition according to claim 7, wherein said therapeutic agent 0 o "•comprises an analgesic.

10. A composition according to claim 1, wherein said particles are in the o000 form of an aqueous dispersion.

11. A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 10, comprising a dentifrice.

12. A method of desensitising a hypersensitive tooth, comprising applying a composition as defined in any one of claims 1 to 11 to the surface of said tooth to cause desensitisation of said tooth. [R:\LIBLL]08277.doc:KEH -9-

13. A method according to claim 12, further comprising polishing said surface of said tooth prior to applying said aqueous dispersion.

14. A method according to claim 12, wherein said particles are applied to said surface for less than about one minute.

15. A method according to claim 12, wherein said particles are applied by brushing the tooth with a toothbrush having bristles which include the particles.

16. A method according to any one of claims 12 to 15, said tooth comprising an exposed tubule in the dentin layer of said tooth, said method comprising applying said surface of said tooth a sufficient amount of charged polymeric particles to block said tubule. ci 17. A composition for desensitising a hypersensitive tooth, as defined in claim 1 and substantially as described herein.

18. A method of desensitising a hypersensitive tooth, substantially as 0***o described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings. is Dated 15 April 1997 ~Gillette Canada Inc. oboe 00.0 W Oo Patent Attorneys for the Applicant/Nominated Person SPRUSON FERGUSON [N:\LIBHH]00565:JED