AU648641B2

AU648641B2 - Selectable time for assigning elevator car to call

Info

Publication number: AU648641B2
Application number: AU11095/92A
Authority: AU
Inventors: Zuhair S. Bahjat; Joseph Bittar
Original assignee: Otis Elevator Co
Current assignee: Otis Elevator Co
Priority date: 1991-04-10
Filing date: 1992-02-19
Publication date: 1994-04-28
Anticipated expiration: 2012-02-19
Also published as: CA2061829C; EP0508438B1; DE69200936T2; DE69200936D1; JP3444605B2; EP0508438A1; ZA921293B; AU1109592A; JPH0597335A; CA2061829A1; US5271484A

Description

648641 1

AUSTRALIA

PATENTS ACT 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT ORIG I N AL Name of Applicant: Actual Inventors: Address for Service: Invention Title: OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY Zuhair S. Bahjat and Joseph Bittar SHELSTON WATERS Clarence Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 "SELECTABLE TIME FOR ASSIGNING ELEVATOR CAR TO

CALL"

The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to us:la SELECTABLE NOTIFICATION TIME INDICATING ELEVATOR CAR ARRIVAL BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Technical Field The present invention is directed to notifying a user of an arriving elevator car.

More particularly, the present invention is directed to notifying a user as to which elevator car will be responding to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a selectable amount of time before the elevator car arrives.

S As used herein, notifying a user means energizing, sounding and/or S 10 illuminating, a hall lantern located at or near the elevator car which will be responding to the i. hall call, thereby indicating to the user which elevator car will be arriving.

Background Information In a building having a plurality of floors, each floor typically has a set of buttons located in the hallway at or near the elevators. These buttons, commonly referred to as hall 15 call buttons, enable users request elevator car service in a predetermined direction, i.e., up and/or down. Additionally, the interior of an elevator car is generally equipped with a plurality of buttons, commonly referred to as car call buttons, which enable users to request service to specific floors.

In simplified terms, an elevator control system, also refeired to in the art as an 20 elevator dispatching system, monitors the status of the hall call buttons at the floors and car call buttons in the elevator cars, assigning elevator cars to the floors in response to hall calls registered at the floors and/or car calls registered in the elevator car.

Several dispatching techniques are known in the art, dispatching based on static or dynamic sectors, peak-period dispatching up-peak, down-peak and noontime) and dispatching based on bonuses and/or penalties, the Relative System Response (RSR) methodology proprietary to the assignee of the present invention.

2 Typically, a user is notified as to which elevator car will be responding to the hall call in one of two ways: immediately or at the last possible moment, when the elevator car commits to stop at the floor registering the hall call.

In Japan, users typically want to be informed as to which elevator car will be responding to the hall call almost immediately upon hall call registration. In this way, the users can wait near the door of the elevator car which will be responding to the hall call.

Thus, in dispatching systems commonly referred to as having instantaneous car assignment, the hall lantern is energized at the time of initial elevator car assignment, which occurs about the time the hall call is registered.

In RSR systems which employ instantaneous car assignment, since the hall lantern is energized at the time of initial elevator car assignment, the system attempts to maintain the integrity of the initial assignment, by heavily favoring the initial elevator car assignment. In practice, the elevator car which receives the initial assignment is usually the .elevator car which responds to the hall call.

15 In the other types of systems, herein referred to as conventional systems, the hall lantern is energized when the elevator car commits to stop at the floor registering the hall call. As used herein, an elevator car commits when it begins to decelerate so as to come into position and stop at the floor registering the hall call.

The point in time at which the elevator car commits is herein referred to as the stop control point (SCP). The SCP varies since it is dependent upon several factors including S" the speed of the elevator car, its deceleration rate and its position with respect to the floor.

Typically, however, the SCP occurs about 3 to 5 seconds before the elevator car arrives at the floor.

In conventional systems which employ RSR dispatching, the system initially assigns an elevator car to respond to the hall call at the time the hall call is registered.

Subsequently, however, th ystem can reassign a different elevator car to respond to the hall call if the subsequent assignment will provide faster response or improved system performance. In order to improve RSR dispatching efficiency, the decision regarding possible reassignment occurs often, on the order of every second. Since the hall lantern is energized at the time the assigned elevator car commits to the fl: reassignment is transparent to the user.

3 To improve system efficiency, the elevator car door begins to open before the car fully stops at the floor so that the door is almost completely open when the car stops. Regardless of which dispatchi:,g technique is used, the door will typically remain open a fixed time in response to a hall call about 4 seconds) or a fixed time in response to a car call about 2 seconds) In conventional systems where notification occurs about 3 to 5 seconds before car arrival, the waiting users have a relatively short amount of time _j walk over to and fully board the elevator car before its door begins to close. There are situations where this fixed amount of time might not be satisfactory to accommodate all users wishing to board the elevator car before the door begins to close.

For example, where a rather large number of users are in the hallway, boarding time will increase. Also, if the waiting area where users congregate is relatirely large, and a user is stationed relatively far away from the elevator car, this fixed time may not be long enough S"to accommodate the user. This is especially true in cross-traffic conditions and/or where the user is only S:partially ambulatory, due to an injury, a handicap •25 or old age.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to notify a user of an arriving elevator car in o.

response to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a selectable amount of time before the elevator car arrives, thereby providing the user with the selectable amount of time in which the user may move towards the arriving elevator car door.

It is also an object of the present invention to notify a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call a selectable amount of time before the elevator car arrives, wherein the selectable amount of 4 time is independent of both the time corresponding to the SCP and the time the hall call is registered.

In accordance with these and other objects, the present invention provides in an elevator system for controlling the dispatching of a plurality of elevator cars to various floors in a building, a specific floor having a hall lantern corresponding to each elevator car door to indicate at which door to expect the eventual arrival of the respective elevator car, a method of notifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user at a specific floor, said method comprising the steps of: assigning an elevator car to the specific floor to service the registered hall call; determining arrival time of the assigned elevator car to the specific floor; comparing the determined arrival time to a Othreshold time value; and energizing the hall lantern corresponding to the 20 assigned elevator car if the determined arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value.

In the preferred embodiment, an elevator car is assigned to a floor response to a hall call. The amount of time required for the assigned elevator car to 25 arrive at the floor is determined and compared with the threshold time value.

If the arrival time is greater than the threshold time value, the system reexamines assignment, possibly reassigning a different elevator car to respond to the hall call. The arrival time of th-i r isigned (or newly assigned) elevator car is again determined, and this process continues until the arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value.

When the arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value, the hall lantern at the door of the assigned elevator car is energized, illuminated and/or sounded. Additionally, the hall call is removed from further consideration regarding reassignment to 1. lu 0Y another elevator car, thereby fixing the elevator car assignment.

In the preferred eb~odiment, the threshold time value can be a constant value determined by, the building manager. Alternatively, the threshold time value can be variable by the system, based on the intensity of the traffic as measu-ed by user waiting time or user boarding and/or deboarding rates, whether actual or predicted.

By notifying a user of an arriving elevator car a selectable amount of time before car arrival, based on the value of the threshold time value, the present invention provides earlier notification for users to position themselves at the arriving elevator car door, relative to conventional prior art dispatching systems.

Further, the present: invention enables the dispatching system to be more efficient, relative to prior art dispatching systems utilizing instantaneous car assignment, since the car assignment may be optimally 20 selected until the elevator car is the threshold time value away from the floor, as opposed to the time of hall oo o call was registered.

o BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 25 Figure 1 depicts an exemplary elevator control system.

Figure 2 illustrates a preferred embodiment for notifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a predetermined amount of time before the elevator car arrives.

Figure 3 illustrates a preferred embodimeat for varying the predetermined amount of time based on user waiting time.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S) The dispatching and operation of the elevator car Ais controlled by an elevator control system, preferably 5a as described in EP 0,239,662B1 to Auer et al., published 7 October 1987 (corresponding to US Patent Number 5,202,540, filed March 23, 1987), herein incorporated by reference, and shown with reference to Figure 1. It is to be understood, however, that the present invention can be used with any other elevator control system, including but not limited to US 4,363,381 to Bittar, herein incorporated by reference.

Turning now to Figure 1, an exemplary elevator control system is shown. Each elevator car has operation control subsystem (OCSS) 101 which communicates to every other OCSS in a ring communication system via lines 102, 103. It is to be understood that each OCSS has various circuitry connected thereto. However, for the sake of simplicity, the circuitry associated with only one OCSS will be described.

Hall call buttons and their associated lights and circuitry (not shown) are connected to an OCSS via remote station 104, remote serial communication link 105 and switch-over module 106. Cai outtons and their associated lights and circuitry (not shown) are connected to an OCSS via remote station 107 and remote serial communication link 108. Hall lanterns, indicating e.g. the direction of travel of the car which is to stop and/or which set of 25 doors will be opened to accommodate the elevator car which is to stop, and their associated lights and circuitry (not shown) are connected to an OCSS via remote station 109 and remote serial communication link 110.

The operation of the elevator car door is 30 controlled by door control subsystem (DCSS) 111. The movement of the elevator car is controlled by motion control subsystem (MCSS) 112, which operates in conjunction with drive and brake subsystem (DBSS) 112A.

Dispatching is determined and executed by the OCSS with additional inputs generated by advanced dispatching subsystem (ADSS) 113, which can be housed, in computer 115, communicating via information control t 5b subsystem (ICSS) 114.

The DCSS preferably determines the load of the elevator car, the load being converted into user boarding and/or deboarding rates by the MCSS. This information can be sent to the ADSS for recordation and prediction of traffic flow in order to increase the efficiency of elevator service. Alternatively, user boarding and/or deboarding rates can be determined by a people sensing/counting arrangement as shown, in US 4,799,243 issued to Zepke, hereby incorporated by reference.

Turning now to Figure 2, a preferred embodiment for notifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user is illustrated. In the g 9* *fot *:i 6 preferred embodiment, the method of Figure 2 is performed for each hall call on a periodic basis, every second.

At step 202, the elevator control system assigns an elevator car in response to a hall call registered by a user. Several dispatching techniques are known in the art, e.g., dispatching based on static or dynamic sectors, peak-period dispatching up-peak, down-peak and noon-time) and dispatching based on bonuses and/or penalties, the Relative System Response (RSR) methodology proprietary to the assignee of the present invention. The present invention is equally applicable regardless of which dispatching technique is employed. The elevator control system, however, preferably employs the RSR system as disclosed in US 4,815,568 or US 4,363,381, both issued to Bittar and herein incorporated by reference.

At step 204, the time required for the assigned elevator car to arrive at the floor registering the hall call is determined. As known in the art, the arrival time is a function of •several factors, including but not limited to the speed of the elevator car, its acceleration and 15 deceleration rates, its current position relative to the floor registering the hall call and the number of hall and/or car calls previously assigned thereto.

At step 206, the arrival time is compared with a threshold time value (TTV). The threshold time value can have a constant value or a variable value.

In the preferred embodiment, the threshold time value is a constant value determined by, a person in charge of elevator or building maintenance. The threshold time value preferably has a value between about 4 and about 15 seconds, and more preferably about 9 seconds.

However, the range and the preferred value for TTV is an empirical quantity which is preferably a function of the desires of the building manager and the specific building 25 configuration and its traffic patterns. As used herein, building configuration means the physical attributes of the building which impact traffic flow therethrough, including but not limited to number of floors, number of elevators, elevator speed, location of express zone(s), location of lobby level and/or parking level(s), total building population, and distribution of the population per floor.

Alternatively, the threshold time value can be variable by the system. As discussed in more detail with reference to Figure 3, the threshold time value can be varied by the 7 system, based on the intensity of the traffic as measured by user waiting time or user boarding and/or deboarding rates, whether actual or predicted.

At step 206, if the time required for the assigned elevator car to arrive at the floor registering the hall call is less than or equal to dithe threshold time value, then at step 208 the system energizes, illuminates and/or sounds, the hall lantern associated with the assigned elevator car. Additionally, at step 210, the system removes the hall call from further consideration regarding reassignment to another elevator car, thereby fixing the elevator car assignment.

In the event the assigned elevator car is precluded from responding to the hall call, the system reassigns another elevator car to respond to the hall call. An elevator car can be precluded from responding to a hall call, because it is taken out of service due to a malfunction or the elevator car reaches full capacity before responding to the hall call.

At step 206, if the arrival time of the assigned elevator car is greater than the threshold time value, step 204 is repeated given the assigned elevator car's current position, 15 speed, and the like. This process continues until the arrival time is Ir;ss than or equal to the threshold time value.

Turning now to Figure 3, a preferred embodiment for varying the threshold time value, based on user waiting time, is illustrated.

At step 302, the response time for each hall call is determined. The response time is preferably the time between when the hall call was registered and when the assigned elevator car commits to the floor registering the hall call. Other response time determinations will be obvious to those in the art.

At step 304, the response time for each hall call is cumulated, and at step 306 the number of hall calls comprising the cumulated response time is cumulated. This process continues until the end of each period (step 308). In the preferred embodiment, eac n perir is, 3 to 5 minutes. Other periodic rates, based on the specific building configuration and its traffic patterns, will be obvious to those skilled in the art.

At step 310, the average waiting time (AWT) for the period is determined. In the preferred embodiment, the average waiti.,g time is equal to the cumulated response times (of step 304) divided by the cumulated number of hall calls (of step 306). Alternatively, average waiting time for the period can be determined by dividing the period by the number of hall calls to which an elevator car responded during the period.

8 At step 312, the absolute value of the differe.\, e between average waiting time of the period which just ended, AWT i and the average waiting time of the period previous thereto, AWT i_ is determined.

If the absolute value of this difference is less than or equal to predetermined tolerance x, threshold time value TTV of step 206 (Figure is not varied by the system. However, if the absolute value of this difference is greater than predetermined tolerance x, threshold time value TTV is varied.

At step 314, if AWT i is greater than AWTi_, then users during the period which just ended are waiting longer than they waited during the period previous thereto. Thus, at step 316, threshold time value TTV is decreased by At. In this way, the dispatching system finalizes its elevator car assignment later, increasing the efficiency of the dispatching system to lower user waiting time.

e *At step 314, if AWT. is less than or equal to too* 20 AWT. 1 then users during the period which just ended are waiting less time than they waited during the period previous thereto. Thus, at step 318, threshold Lime value TTV is increased by At. Thus, the user will be notified of an arriving elevator car at an earlier time.

25 Earlier notification will appear, at least psychologically, that the user is obtaining faster response. Earlier notification should not greatly affect system performance, since a lower average waiting time corresponds to high system efficiency and/or relatively So 30 low traffic volume.

In the preferred embodiment, the initial value of threshold time value TTV is between about 4 and about seconds, and more preferably about 9 seconds. The value of predetermined tolerance x is between about 5 and about 10 seconds, more preferably about 5 seconds. The value of At is between about 0.5 and about 5 seconds, more preferably about 1 second. However, the ranges and the preferred values for the threshold time value, i

L*

8a predetermined tolerance x and At are empirical quantities which are preferably a function of the specific building configuration and its traffic patterns.

In another embodiment, the threshold time value can be varied based user boarding and/or deboarding rates, whether actual or predicted. Determining actual and/or predicted boarding and/or deboarding rates is known in the art. See, US Patent No. 5,022,497, filed 3 March 1989, and US Patent No. 5,024,2)5, filed 3 March 1989, both to Thangavelu, and both owned by the same assignee as the present invention and herein incorporated by reference.

4 0 9 Where the threshold time value is varied based on actual and/o: predicted user boarding and/or deboarding rates, step 312 can be modified to compare the boarding and/or deboarding rates for two consecutive periods. The values of predetermined tolerance x and At (steps 312 through 318) arr preferably empirical quantities based on the specific building configuration, its traffic patterns and/or a percentage of the building population.

By notifying a user of an arriving elevator car a selectable amount of time before car arrival, based on the value of the threshold time value, the present invention provides earlier notification for users to position themselves at the arriving elevator car door, relative to conventional prior art dispatching systems. Further, the present invention enables the dispatching system to be more efficient, relative to prior art dispatching systems utilizing instantaneous car assignment, since the car assignment may be optimally selected until the elevator car is the threshold time value away from the floor, as opposed to the time of hall call was registered.

Although illustrative embodiments of the present invention have been described in 15 detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments. Various changes or modifications may be effected therein by one skilled in the ai, without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.

e.* ee** *eeOfoo

Claims

1. In an elevator system for controlling the dispatching of a plurality of elevator cars to various floors in a building, a specific floor having a hall lantern corresponding to each elevator car door to indicate at which door to expect the eventual arrival of the respective elevator car, a method of notifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user at a specific floor, said method comprising the steps of: assigning an elevator car to the specific floor to service the registered hall call; determining arrival time of the assigned elevator car to the specific floor; comparing the determined arrival time to a threshold time value; and energizing the hall lantern corresponding to the assigned elevator car if the determined arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value. oooo

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of assigning an elevator car to the specific floor comprises the steps of: determining an RSR value for each elevator car relative to the specific floor registering the hall call; determining which elevator car has the most 25 favourable RSR value; and .Po: assigning the elevator car to the specific floor to service the registered hall call, based on the determination of which elevator car has the most favourable RSR value.

3. The method of claim 2, said method further comprising the steps of: assigning a different elevator car to respond to the registered hall call if and only if the assigned elevator car is subsequently precluded from responding to the registered hall call; and repeating steps through I C C C a. cC CCC. C C CC C 11

4. The method of any one of the preceding claims, said method further comprising the step of fixing the elevator car assignment if the determined arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value.

5. The method of any one of claims 1 to 3, said method further comprising the step of: repeating steps through if the determined arrival time is greater than the threshold time value.

6. The method of any one of the preceding claims, said method further comprising the step of varying the threshold time value based on waiting time of the user.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein said step of varying the threshold time value based on waiting time of the user comprises the steps of: determining average waiting time of the users for a first predetermined time period; determining average waiting time of the users for a second predetermined time period; comparing the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period with the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period; and varying the threshold time value based on the comparison. 25 8. The method of claim 7, said method further comprising the step of decreasing the value of the threshold time value if the determined average waiting time for the second predetermined time period is less than the determined average waiting time for the first predetermined time period.

9. The method of claim 7, said method further comprising the step of increasing the value of the threshold time value if the determined airerage waiting time for the second predetermined time period is greater than the determined average waiting time for the first S predetermined time period. 0. The method of claim 1, said method further ~comprising the step of varying the threshold time value 12 based on an actual number of users which boarded and/or deboarded the elevator cars during a predetermined period of time.

11. The method of claim 1, said method further comprising the step of varying the threshold time value based on a predicted number of users which will be boarding and/or deboarding the elevator cars during a predetermined period of time.

12. A method of notifying a user of an arriving elevator car substantially as herein described with reference to Figures 2 or 3 of the accompanying drawings. DATED this 26th day of November 1993 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY Attorney: PETER HEATHCOTE Fellow Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia of SHELSTON WATERS 13 ABSTRACT The present invention is directed to notifying a user of an arriving elevator car in response to a hall call registered by the user, wherein notification occurs a threshold time value before elevator car arrival. In the preferred embodiment, an elevator car is assigned (202) to a floor in response to a hall call. The amount of time required for the assigned elevator car to arrive at the floor is determined (204) and compared with the threshold time value (206). If the arrival time is greater than the threshold time value, the system reexamines assignment, possibly reassigning a different elevator car to respond to the hall call. The arrival time of the assigned (or newly assigned) elevator car is again determined, and this process continues until the 15 arrival time is less than or equal to the threshold time value. When the arrival time is less than or equal to th- threshold time value, the hall lantern at the door of the assigned elevator car is energized (208), e.g., illuminated and/or sounded. Additionally, the hall call is removed from further consideration regarding reassignment to another elevator car, thereby fixing the elevator car assignment (210). In the preferred embodirrent, the tireshold time value can be a constant value determined by, the building manager. S 25 Alternatively, the threshold time value can be variable by the system, based on the intensity of the traffic as measured by user waiting time or user boarding and/or deboarding rates, whether actual or predicted. ~R4a.