WO2024068884A1 - A method for automatically selecting a polishing process for a lens - Google Patents
A method for automatically selecting a polishing process for a lens Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2024068884A1 WO2024068884A1 PCT/EP2023/076974 EP2023076974W WO2024068884A1 WO 2024068884 A1 WO2024068884 A1 WO 2024068884A1 EP 2023076974 W EP2023076974 W EP 2023076974W WO 2024068884 A1 WO2024068884 A1 WO 2024068884A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- lens
- frame
- selecting
- polishing process
- embedded
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000007517 polishing process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 30
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 29
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000700 radioactive tracer Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005498 polishing Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007688 edging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003116 impacting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B1/00—Processes of grinding or polishing; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such processes
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B13/00—Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor
- B24B13/06—Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor grinding of lenses, the tool or work being controlled by information-carrying means, e.g. patterns, punched tapes, magnetic tapes
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B51/00—Arrangements for automatic control of a series of individual steps in grinding a workpiece
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame.
- the polishing step In the field of edging technology for ophthalmic lenses, the polishing step is often regarded as a bottleneck, because this is the most impacting step in terms of equipment productivity. Indeed, even if only around 30 percent of eyeglass orders request polishing, the polishing step is a huge contributor to productivity savings.
- An object of the present disclosure is to overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks of the prior art.
- the present disclosure provides a method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame, remarkable in that it comprises: determining in an automated manner whether the lens is embedded in the frame; if the lens is embedded in the frame, selecting a soft polishing process; if the lens is not embedded in the frame, selecting a standard polishing process.
- the method according to the disclosure makes it possible to automatically decide whether the polishing process to be implemented should be a soft one or a standard one, without any human intervention. As a result, productivity is greatly improved.
- the determining step is carried out by a calculation engine.
- the determining step comprises comparing in an automated manner the maximum edge thickness of the lens with the frame thickness.
- the frame thickness is provided by a tracer.
- the frame thickness is extracted from a frame shape file.
- the maximum edge thickness is obtained by comparing edge thicknesses of the lens at predetermined radii provided by a predetermined model of the lens and selecting the highest value among these edge thicknesses as the maximum edge thickness.
- the present disclosure also provides a computer program product, remarkable in that it comprises one or more sequences of instructions that are accessible to a processor and that, when executed by that processor, cause that processor to implement a method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame, comprising: determining in an automated manner whether the lens is embedded in the frame; if the lens is embedded in the frame, selecting a soft polishing process; if the lens is not embedded in the frame, selecting a standard polishing process.
- the present disclosure further provides a non-transitory information storage medium, remarkable in that it stores one or more sequences of instructions that are accessible to a processor and that, when executed by that processor, cause that processor to implement a method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame, comprising: determining in an automated manner whether the lens is embedded in the frame; if the lens is embedded in the frame, selecting a soft polishing process; if the lens is not embedded in the frame, selecting a standard polishing process.
- the computer program product is advantageously configured for executing the method in any of its execution modes.
- FIG. 1 is a flow diagram showing steps of a method according to the present disclosure, in a particular embodiment.
- a method, or a step in a method that “comprises”, “has”, “contains”, or “includes” one or more steps or elements possesses those one or more steps or elements, but is not limited to possessing only those one or more steps or elements.
- Figure 1 shows steps of a method according to the present disclosure for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame, in a particular embodiment.
- a first step 10 of the method comprises determining in automated manner whether the lens is embedded in the frame.
- a lens is considered to be embedded in a frame when no edge part of the lens is visible from the outside part of the frame.
- it means, as a basic rule, that the maximum edge thickness of the lens is lower than the minimum thickness of the frame.
- As an optimized rule it means that the edge thickness of the lens is lower than the frame thickness at every angle of a predetermined value, for example every 10°.
- This step may be carried out by a calculation engine.
- Step 10 may for example comprise, in an embodiment where the above- mentioned basic rule is applied, comparing in an automated manner, for example in the calculation engine, the maximum edge thickness of the lens with the thickness of the frame.
- the thickness of the frame may be provided by a tracer. It may be extracted from a frame shape file storing values of thicknesses for a plurality of frames having various shapes.
- the maximum edge thickness of the lens may be obtained by using a predetermined model of the lens, defined as a full description of the tridimensional lens, comprising the front surface of the lens, the back surface of the lens and the center thickness of the lens, in a same referential.
- the lens model will provide the values of the edge thickness of the lens at predetermined radii. Then, the highest value among these edge thickness values will be selected as the maximum edge thickness.
- step 12 which consists in selecting a soft polishing process for the lens fitted and embedded in the frame. Soft polishing is well known per se and will thus not be described in detail here.
- step 14 which consists in selecting a standard polishing process for the lens fitted, but not embedded, in the frame. Standard polishing is well known per se and will thus not be described in detail here.
- Standard polishing makes it possible to obtain a shiny lens edge, whereas soft polishing is faster on the equipment and provides a lens edge that is not as shiny as the one obtained thanks to standard polishing.
- a preliminary step may be performed, consisting of checking whether the order from the ECP or customer includes a request for polishing the edged lens fitted in the frame.
- a computer program product comprises one or more sequences of instructions that are accessible to a processor and that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to carry out steps of the method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame.
- the processor is configured for carrying out steps 10, 12 and 14 as described above.
- the software may be hosted for example remotely in a cloud, or locally in a computer.
- sequence(s) of instructions may be stored in one or several non- transitory computer-readable storage medium/media, including a predetermined location in a cloud.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Grinding And Polishing Of Tertiary Curved Surfaces And Surfaces With Complex Shapes (AREA)
Abstract
This method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame comprises: determining (10) in an automated manner whether the lens is embedded in the frame; if the lens is embedded in the frame, selecting (12) a soft polishing process; if the lens is not embedded in the frame, selecting (14) a standard polishing process.
Description
A METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY SELECTING A POLISHING PROCESS FOR A LENS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the field of edging technology for ophthalmic lenses, the polishing step is often regarded as a bottleneck, because this is the most impacting step in terms of equipment productivity. Indeed, even if only around 30 percent of eyeglass orders request polishing, the polishing step is a huge contributor to productivity savings.
No satisfying solution is provided in the state of the art for improving industrial performance in this respect.
Thus, there is a need for managing a new way of determining the polishing process to be implemented for an edged lens fitted in a frame, so as to increase productivity.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present disclosure is to overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks of the prior art.
To that end, the present disclosure provides a method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame, remarkable in that it comprises: determining in an automated manner whether the lens is embedded in the frame; if the lens is embedded in the frame, selecting a soft polishing process; if the lens is not embedded in the frame, selecting a standard polishing process.
Thus, the method according to the disclosure makes it possible to automatically decide whether the polishing process to be implemented should be a
soft one or a standard one, without any human intervention. As a result, productivity is greatly improved.
In an embodiment, the determining step is carried out by a calculation engine.
In an embodiment, the determining step comprises comparing in an automated manner the maximum edge thickness of the lens with the frame thickness.
In an embodiment, the frame thickness is provided by a tracer.
In an embodiment, the frame thickness is extracted from a frame shape file.
In an embodiment, the maximum edge thickness is obtained by comparing edge thicknesses of the lens at predetermined radii provided by a predetermined model of the lens and selecting the highest value among these edge thicknesses as the maximum edge thickness.
To the same end as mentioned above, the present disclosure also provides a computer program product, remarkable in that it comprises one or more sequences of instructions that are accessible to a processor and that, when executed by that processor, cause that processor to implement a method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame, comprising: determining in an automated manner whether the lens is embedded in the frame; if the lens is embedded in the frame, selecting a soft polishing process; if the lens is not embedded in the frame, selecting a standard polishing process.
To the same end as mentioned above, the present disclosure further provides a non-transitory information storage medium, remarkable in that it stores one or more sequences of instructions that are accessible to a processor and that, when executed by that processor, cause that processor to implement a method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame, comprising: determining in an automated manner whether the lens is embedded in the frame;
if the lens is embedded in the frame, selecting a soft polishing process; if the lens is not embedded in the frame, selecting a standard polishing process.
As particular features and advantages of the computer program product and information storage medium are similar to those of the method, they are not repeated here.
The computer program product is advantageously configured for executing the method in any of its execution modes.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a more complete understanding of the description provided herein and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the brief descriptions below, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings and detailed description, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts.
FIG. 1 is a flow diagram showing steps of a method according to the present disclosure, in a particular embodiment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
In the description which follows, the drawing figures are not necessarily to scale and certain features may be shown in generalized or schematic form in the interest of clarity and conciseness or for informational purposes. In addition, although making and using various embodiments are discussed in detail below, it should be appreciated that as described herein are provided many inventive concepts that may embodied in a wide variety of contexts. Embodiments discussed herein are merely representative and do not limit the scope of the invention. It will also be obvious to one skilled in the art that all the technical features that are defined relative to a process can be transposed, individually or in combination, to a device and conversely, all the technical features relative to a device can be transposed, individually or in combination, to a process.
The terms “comprise” (and any grammatical variation thereof, such as “comprises” and “comprising”), “have” (and any grammatical variation thereof, such as “has” and “having”), “contain” (and any grammatical variation thereof, such as
“contains” and “containing”), and “include” (and any grammatical variation thereof such as “includes” and “including”) are open-ended linking verbs. They are used to specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps or components or groups thereof, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps or components or groups thereof. As a result, a method, or a step in a method, that “comprises”, “has”, “contains”, or “includes” one or more steps or elements possesses those one or more steps or elements, but is not limited to possessing only those one or more steps or elements.
Figure 1 shows steps of a method according to the present disclosure for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame, in a particular embodiment.
A first step 10 of the method comprises determining in automated manner whether the lens is embedded in the frame. A lens is considered to be embedded in a frame when no edge part of the lens is visible from the outside part of the frame. In terms of calculation, it means, as a basic rule, that the maximum edge thickness of the lens is lower than the minimum thickness of the frame. As an optimized rule, it means that the edge thickness of the lens is lower than the frame thickness at every angle of a predetermined value, for example every 10°.
This step may be carried out by a calculation engine.
Step 10 may for example comprise, in an embodiment where the above- mentioned basic rule is applied, comparing in an automated manner, for example in the calculation engine, the maximum edge thickness of the lens with the thickness of the frame.
The thickness of the frame may be provided by a tracer. It may be extracted from a frame shape file storing values of thicknesses for a plurality of frames having various shapes.
The maximum edge thickness of the lens may be obtained by using a predetermined model of the lens, defined as a full description of the tridimensional lens, comprising the front surface of the lens, the back surface of the lens and the center thickness of the lens, in a same referential.
The lens model will provide the values of the edge thickness of the lens at predetermined radii. Then, the highest value among these edge thickness values will be selected as the maximum edge thickness.
If it is determined at step 10 that the lens is embedded in the frame, the following step is step 12, which consists in selecting a soft polishing process for the lens fitted and embedded in the frame. Soft polishing is well known per se and will thus not be described in detail here.
Otherwise, if it is determined at step 10 that the lens is not embedded in the frame, the following step is step 14, which consists in selecting a standard polishing process for the lens fitted, but not embedded, in the frame. Standard polishing is well known per se and will thus not be described in detail here.
Standard polishing makes it possible to obtain a shiny lens edge, whereas soft polishing is faster on the equipment and provides a lens edge that is not as shiny as the one obtained thanks to standard polishing.
Of course, in case polishing is not requested in the order from the Eye Care Professional (ECP) or customer, no polishing step is carried out and it is not necessary to apply the method according to the present disclosure. Therefore, optionally, before step 10, a preliminary step may be performed, consisting of checking whether the order from the ECP or customer includes a request for polishing the edged lens fitted in the frame.
In a particular embodiment, the method according to the disclosure is computer-implemented. Namely, a computer program product comprises one or more sequences of instructions that are accessible to a processor and that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to carry out steps of the method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame. The processor is configured for carrying out steps 10, 12 and 14 as described above.
The software may be hosted for example remotely in a cloud, or locally in a computer.
The sequence(s) of instructions may be stored in one or several non- transitory computer-readable storage medium/media, including a predetermined location in a cloud.
Although representative methods and devices have been described in detail herein, those skilled in the art will recognize that various substitutions and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of what is described and defined by the appended claims.
Claims
1 . A method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame, characterized in that it comprises: determining (10) in an automated manner whether said lens is embedded in said frame; if said lens is embedded in said frame, selecting (12) a soft polishing process; if said lens is not embedded in said frame, selecting (14) a standard polishing process.
2. A method according to claim 1 , characterized in that said determining (10) is carried out by a calculation engine.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that said determining (10) comprises comparing in an automated manner the maximum edge thickness of said lens with the frame thickness.
4. A method according to claim 3, characterized in that said frame thickness is provided by a tracer.
5. A method according to claim 3 or 4, characterized in that said frame thickness is extracted from a frame shape file.
6. A method according to claim 3, 4 or 5, characterized in that said maximum edge thickness is obtained by comparing edge thicknesses of said lens at predetermined radii provided by a predetermined model of said lens and selecting the highest value among said edge thicknesses as the maximum edge thickness.
7. A computer program product, characterized in that it comprises one or more sequences of instructions that are accessible to a processor and that, when executed by said processor, cause said processor to implement a method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame, comprising: determining (10) in an automated manner whether said lens is embedded
in said frame; if said lens is embedded in said frame, selecting (12) a soft polishing process; if said lens is not embedded in said frame, selecting (14) a standard polishing process.
8. A non-transitory information storage medium, characterized in that it stores one or more sequences of instructions that are accessible to a processor and that, when executed by said processor, cause said processor to implement a method for selecting in an automated manner a polishing process for an edged lens fitted in a frame, comprising: determining (10) in an automated manner whether said lens is embedded in said frame; if said lens is embedded in said frame, selecting (12) a soft polishing process; if said lens is not embedded in said frame, selecting (14) a standard polishing process.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP22306444.5 | 2022-09-29 | ||
EP22306444.5A EP4344821A1 (en) | 2022-09-29 | 2022-09-29 | A method for automatically selecting a polishing process for a lens |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2024068884A1 true WO2024068884A1 (en) | 2024-04-04 |
Family
ID=83691723
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2023/076974 WO2024068884A1 (en) | 2022-09-29 | 2023-09-28 | A method for automatically selecting a polishing process for a lens |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP4344821A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2024068884A1 (en) |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0999011A1 (en) * | 1998-10-05 | 2000-05-10 | Hoya Corporation | Eyeglass lens end face machining method |
US20040209547A1 (en) * | 2003-04-16 | 2004-10-21 | Kabushiki Kaisha Topcon | Method for processing chamfering of eyeglass lens and apparatus for processing the same |
WO2016108063A1 (en) * | 2014-12-31 | 2016-07-07 | Essilor International (Compagnie Generale D'optique) | Ophthalmic lens edging process by calculation |
US20180284728A1 (en) * | 2015-10-09 | 2018-10-04 | Essilor International | Method for generating settings for machining an optical lens |
WO2019106399A1 (en) * | 2017-11-29 | 2019-06-06 | Carl Zeiss Vision International Gmbh | Manufacturing method for manufacturing a spectacle lens, spectacle lens, and lens design method |
US20190265683A1 (en) * | 2016-05-25 | 2019-08-29 | Schneider Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method and system for processing optical lenses |
-
2022
- 2022-09-29 EP EP22306444.5A patent/EP4344821A1/en active Pending
-
2023
- 2023-09-28 WO PCT/EP2023/076974 patent/WO2024068884A1/en unknown
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0999011A1 (en) * | 1998-10-05 | 2000-05-10 | Hoya Corporation | Eyeglass lens end face machining method |
US20040209547A1 (en) * | 2003-04-16 | 2004-10-21 | Kabushiki Kaisha Topcon | Method for processing chamfering of eyeglass lens and apparatus for processing the same |
WO2016108063A1 (en) * | 2014-12-31 | 2016-07-07 | Essilor International (Compagnie Generale D'optique) | Ophthalmic lens edging process by calculation |
US20180284728A1 (en) * | 2015-10-09 | 2018-10-04 | Essilor International | Method for generating settings for machining an optical lens |
US20190265683A1 (en) * | 2016-05-25 | 2019-08-29 | Schneider Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method and system for processing optical lenses |
WO2019106399A1 (en) * | 2017-11-29 | 2019-06-06 | Carl Zeiss Vision International Gmbh | Manufacturing method for manufacturing a spectacle lens, spectacle lens, and lens design method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP4344821A1 (en) | 2024-04-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN109840477B (en) | Method and device for recognizing shielded face based on feature transformation | |
US9996607B2 (en) | Entity resolution between datasets | |
US10359644B2 (en) | Method for optimizing the position of an optical lens in a lens blank | |
US10216004B2 (en) | System for providing an opthalmic lens | |
CN107977504B (en) | Asymmetric reactor core fuel management calculation method and device and terminal equipment | |
US20180203944A1 (en) | Graph databases | |
CN102753305B (en) | For determining the method for the edge contour that does not cut eyeglass | |
EP4344821A1 (en) | A method for automatically selecting a polishing process for a lens | |
CN114463551A (en) | Image processing method, image processing device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
CN113642710A (en) | Network model quantification method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
CN110955712A (en) | Development API processing method and device based on multiple data sources | |
US20160091733A1 (en) | Method Of Locally Thickening An Ophthalmic Lens | |
CN104755998A (en) | Method for providing an optical lens | |
US11531664B2 (en) | Stand in tables | |
CN108229071A (en) | Cutting performance degradation assessment method and system based on AR models Yu SVDD algorithms | |
CN115328917A (en) | Query method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
US20180107712A1 (en) | Adaptive query row selection | |
CN110008911B (en) | Image processing method, image processing device, electronic equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
JP2018206074A (en) | Histogram generation method, histogram generation device, and histogram generation program | |
US10371963B2 (en) | Method of manufacturing an ophthalmic lens | |
CN112215778A (en) | Image restoration method based on three-level region division | |
CN111179060A (en) | Transaction path selection method and device in transfer processing process | |
US10417259B2 (en) | Representing search results via a three-dimensional matrix | |
EP4227910A1 (en) | Computer implemented method for determining a similarity score between a reference eyeglasses frame and a plurality of model eyeglasses frames | |
US11989181B2 (en) | Optimal query scheduling for resource utilization optimization |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 23782527 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |