WO2019115884A1 - Method for dewatering of biological sludge - Google Patents

Method for dewatering of biological sludge Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019115884A1
WO2019115884A1 PCT/FI2018/050924 FI2018050924W WO2019115884A1 WO 2019115884 A1 WO2019115884 A1 WO 2019115884A1 FI 2018050924 W FI2018050924 W FI 2018050924W WO 2019115884 A1 WO2019115884 A1 WO 2019115884A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
polymer
sludge
mol
cationic
dewatering
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/FI2018/050924
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Joonas LIKANDER
Rosa Carceller
Original Assignee
Kemira Oyj
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kemira Oyj filed Critical Kemira Oyj
Publication of WO2019115884A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019115884A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/52Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities
    • C02F1/54Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities using organic material
    • C02F1/56Macromolecular compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D21/00Separation of suspended solid particles from liquids by sedimentation
    • B01D21/01Separation of suspended solid particles from liquids by sedimentation using flocculating agents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F11/00Treatment of sludge; Devices therefor
    • C02F11/12Treatment of sludge; Devices therefor by de-watering, drying or thickening
    • C02F11/14Treatment of sludge; Devices therefor by de-watering, drying or thickening with addition of chemical agents
    • C02F11/147Treatment of sludge; Devices therefor by de-watering, drying or thickening with addition of chemical agents using organic substances

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for dewatering of biological sludge according to preambles of the enclosed independent claim.
  • Biological sludge contains mass of aerobic bacteria and other aquatic organisms, which are suspended and mixed with wastewater in an aerated tank. Excess sludge is removed from the process for post-treatment of sludge. Typically, large quantities of wet sludge are formed, which must be dewatered before it can be disposed. Dewatering can be done by using gravity, filtering, pressing or centrifugal force. The sludge is exposed to various forces, e.g. high shear forces, during the dewatering and other post-treatment steps.
  • Biological sludges are often difficult to dewater.
  • Sludges may be conditioned before dewatering by addition of chemicals, such as inorganic compounds of iron and lime, or organic compounds, such as polymer coagulants and flocculants.
  • the chemicals are added to improve the sludge handling, to coagulate and/or flocculate the suspended matter into larger agglomerates and to increase dewatering effect.
  • the formed floes should resist various forces, e.g. shear forces, without breaking of the floe. This would ensure that high quality water phase with low turbidity is obtained from the dewatering step and that the solids content of the sludge is high after dewatering.
  • An object of this invention is to minimise or even eliminate the disadvantages existing in the prior art.
  • An object is also to provide a polymer composition which provides an effective dewatering of biological sludge.
  • a further object of this invention is to provide a polymer composition which is provides improved sludge performance during dewatering, especially under high- shear conditions.
  • Typical method according to the present invention for dewatering of biological sludge comprises
  • a flocculant to a biological sludge, which comprises an aqueous phase and suspended solid organic material, and flocculating the sludge
  • the flocculant comprises a polymer composition, which comprises
  • a cationic linear first polymer which is obtained by polymerising diaiiyidimethylammonium chloride (DADMAC), and
  • a cationic second polymer which is a copolymer obtained by polymerisation of (meth)acrylamide and at least one cationic monomer, the second cationic polymer being polymerised in presence of the cationic first polymer.
  • the polymer composition which is formed from a combination of the first polymer comprising diailyidimethyi- ammonium chloride (DADMAC) and the second polymer comprising cationic copolymer of (meth)acrylamide and cationic monomer, provides the flocculant with properties, with which an improved dewatering rate, filtrate quality, shear resistance and dry solids content can be achieved for the biological sludge. It is speculated that the polymer composition is able to interact with the solid constituents of the biological sludge in a manner that generates more robust floes and enhances the dewatering performance. Furthermore, the flocculant comprising the defined polymer composition tolerates well process variations.
  • DADMAC diailyidimethyi- ammonium chloride
  • cationic copolymer of (meth)acrylamide and cationic monomer provides the flocculant with properties, with which an improved dewatering rate, filtrate quality, shear resistance and dry solids content can be achieved for the biological s
  • biological sludge denotes a sludge originating from a biological treatment process of wastewater and/or sewage.
  • Biological sludge comprises an aqueous phase and suspended solid organic material, and it is typically rich in material of bacterial origin as well as other aquatic organisms.
  • the biological sludge may have a biological oxygen demand (BOD) > 50 mg/I, and/or a dry solids content in the range of 5 - 80 g/l, preferably 10 - 40 g/l.
  • BOD biological oxygen demand
  • the biological sludge to be dewatered originates from a process treating municipal or agricultural wastewater.
  • the biological sludge may thus be municipal wastewater sludge or agricultural sludge.
  • the biological sludge may originate from an industrial process, especially from wastewater treatment or from food or beverage production or from food or beverage processing.
  • Dewatering of biological sludge comprises an addition of a flocculant to the biological sludge for flocculating the biological sludge before the dewatering of the biological sludge.
  • the flocculant is added immediately before the dewatering.
  • the flocculant is added 30 s, preferably 20 s, more preferably 15 s before start of the dewatering.
  • the flocculant can be added directly to a pipeline or the like where the biological sludge is transported to the dewatering.
  • Dewatering of the biological sludge may be performed by using mechanical dewatering means, such as centrifuge(s), belt press or chamber press, preferably centrifuge(s).
  • the flocculant comprises a polymer composition, which comprises a first polymer, which is obtained by polymerising dia!ly!dimethylammonium chloride, DADMAC.
  • a polymer composition which comprises a first polymer, which is obtained by polymerising dia!ly!dimethylammonium chloride, DADMAC.
  • the first polymer functions as a polymerisation medium for the second polymer, i.e. the monomers of the second polymer are added to a polymer solution of the first polymer and polymerisation of the second polymer is conducted in the presence of the first polymer.
  • the first and second polymers become inseparable from each other without breaking of the polymer chains, i.e.
  • the polymer chains of the first polymer and the second polymer are physically entangled and inseparably entangled in during the polymerisation of the second polymer.
  • the first polymer is preferably free of reactive polymerizable groups, such as double carbon-carbon bonds, in its structure.
  • the monomers of the second polymer when polymerised in the presence of the first polymer, are reacting with each other and not forming covalent bonds with the first polymer, which is present as polymerisation medium.
  • the first polymer is preferably present essentially only as polymerisation medium.
  • Covalent bonds between the first and the second polymer are not requisite for providing the three-dimensional structure to the polymer composition, as the first and second polymer are physically entangled, and their polymer chains are inseparably intertwined or interlaced with each other.
  • the first polymer and the second polymer are fully miscible and compatible with each other.
  • the obtained polymer composition is not in form of an emulsion or dispersion. This means that the obtained polymer composition does not contain two or more phases of different polymers.
  • the polymer composition is also preferably free from polymer particles comprising mostly (>40 %) of only one polymer.
  • the polymer composition is water-soluble.
  • the first polymer is obtained by polymerising diailyldimethylammonium chloride, DADMAC.
  • the first polymer is diailyldimethylammonium chloride (DADMAC) homopolymer.
  • DADMAC diailyldimethylammonium chloride
  • the first polymer comprises a small amount of other second monomers, as long as the second monomers are non-ionic, such as acrylamide, and their total amount is low, preferably ⁇ 10 weigh-%, more preferably ⁇ 5 weight- %, calculated from the weight of monomers used for obtaining the first polymer.
  • the first polymer may have a weight average molecular weight at least 10 000 g/mol, preferably in the range of 10 000 - 750 000 g/mol, more preferably 50 000 - 450 000 g/mol, even more preferably 75 000 - 400 000 g/mol.
  • the first polymer may have a weight average molecular weight in the range of 120 000 - 450 000 g/mol, preferably 125 000 - 400 000 g/mol, more preferably 135 000 - 350 000 g/mol.
  • the first polymer preferably has a molecular weight, which has been observed to improve the performance of the polymer composition and its flocculation ability.
  • the first polymer may preferably be obtained by radical polymerisation.
  • the polymer composition may comprise at least 1 weight-%, preferably 1 - 30 weight-%, more preferably 2 - 20 weight-%, even more preferably 2 - 15 weight-%, of the first polymer, calculated from the total dry polymeric material weight of the composition.
  • the amount of first polymer provides suitable viscosity, when it acts as polymerisation medium for the second polymer while simultaneously providing the final polymer composition with an efficient interaction with the constituents of the biological sludge and good flocculation ability.
  • the polymer composition which is used as flocculant, comprises further a cationic second polymer, which is a copolymer obtained by polymerisation of (meth)acrylamide and at least one cationic monomer.
  • the second cationic polymer is polymerised in presence of the cationic first polymer.
  • the polymerisation medium for the second polymer thus comprises an aqueous, preferably particle- free, solution of the first polymer.
  • the polymerisation medium preferably is free from any oil phase.
  • the polymerisation medium does not comprise high concentration of any inorganic salt, either.
  • the amount of inorganic salt is less than 5 weight-%, preferably less than 2.5 weight-%, more preferably less than 1.5 weight-%. It has been observed that the second polymer improves the robustness of the formed floes.
  • the second polymer is obtained by free radical polymerisation.
  • the second polymer may be obtained by gel polymerisation, e.g. by adiabatic gel polymerisation. It is possible to obtain a polymer composition having a higher polymer content by gel polymerisation, which makes the composition more cost efficient in view of the logistics. A high polymer content has the additional benefit of improved microbial stability.
  • the polymer composition may preferably be in form of a dry powder or particulate material or particulate product, and it is dissolved into the water and diluted to desired appropriate feed concentration before its use.
  • the obtained polymer composition may be dried and optionally milled to a suitable particle size.
  • the dry polymer composition in form of particulate product or particulate material or powder may have a solids content of at least 80 weight-%, preferably at least 85 weight-%, more preferably at least 90 weight-%. Dry particulate polymer composition is easy and cost-efficient to transport and store, it remains stable for long periods of time and is resistant towards microbiological degradation.
  • the cationic monomer for the second polymer may be selected from group consisting of 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate (ADAM), [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (ADAM-CI), 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate benzylchloride, 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate dimethylsulphate, 2- dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (MADAM), [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (MADAM-CI), 2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate dimethylsulphate, [3-(acryloylamino)propyl] trimethylammonium chloride (APTAC), [3-(methacryloylamino)propyl] trimethylammonium chloride (MAPTAC), and diaiiyldimethylammonium chloride (
  • the cationic monomer is [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (ADAM-CI) or diaiiyldimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC).
  • ADAM-CI [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride
  • DMDMAC diaiiyldimethyl ammonium chloride
  • the cationicity is not pH dependent, which is a preferable feature.
  • the second polymer may be obtained by copolymerisation of (meth)acrylamide and at least 10 mol-% of cationic monomer(s), preferably 10 - 90 mol-%, more preferably 20 - 70 mol-%, even more preferably 30 - 60 mol-%, of cationic monomer(s), calculated from amount of monomers used for second polymer.
  • the second polymer may be a linear polymer.
  • the second polymer is a crosslinked copolymer.
  • the crosslinked second polymer may be obtained by polymerising (meth)acrylamide and cationic monomers in the presence of at least one crosslinking agent. It has been observed that when the second polymer is crosslinked, the formed floes of biological sludge are very robust, and resist well high-shear forces.
  • Suitable crosslinking agent may be selected from methylenebis- acrylamide, ethylene glycol divinyl ether, di(ethylene glycol) divinyl ether and tri- (ethylene glycol) divinyl ether. Methylenebisacrylamide is being preferred as crosslinking agent.
  • the amount of crosslinking agent may be, for example, in the range of 0.25 - 100 mg/kg monomers, preferably 0.5 - 10 mg/kg monomers, more preferably 0.75 - 5 mg/kg monomers.
  • the polymer composition which is used as a flocculant for the biological sludge, may have a standard viscosity SV of 3.5 - 5 mPas, preferably 3.8 - 4.8, measured at 0.1 weight-% solids content in an aqueous NaCI solution (1 M), at 25 °C, using Brookfield DVII T viscometer with UL adapter.
  • the flocculant comprising the polymer composition may be added in amount of 1 - 40 kg/ton dry sludge, preferably 2 - 30 kg/ton dry sludge, preferably 4 - 20 kg/ton dry sludge, given as active polymer.
  • composition C1 comprised as first polymer linear homopolymer of dialiyldimethyl- ammonium chloride (DADMAC), having weight average molecular weight ca. 300 000.
  • DMDMAC dialiyldimethyl- ammonium chloride
  • the second polymer which was polymerised in the presence of the first polymer was a copolymer of acrylamide and 30 mol-% of [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (ADAM-CI).
  • the amount of first polymer was 9 weight-%, as active, based on monomers of the second polymer.
  • Composition C2 comprised as first polymer linear homopolymer of dial!y!dimethyl- ammonium chloride (DADMAC), having weight average molecular weight ca. 300 000.
  • the second polymer which was polymerised in the presence of the first polymer was a copolymer of acrylamide and 30 mol-% of [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (ADAM-CI). Methylenebisacrylamide was used as crosslinker in the polymerisation.
  • the amount of first polymer was 9 weight-%, as active, based on monomers of the second polymer.
  • Polymer R1 was used as reference in the Examples. Polymer R1 was a copolymer of acrylamide and 30 mol-% of [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (ADAM-CI). Methods Used in the Examples
  • Table 1 Apparatuses and methods used in sludge dewatering examples.
  • Gravity dewaterability of sludge was tested with Polytest.
  • the sludge samples were filtered with Polytest cylinder of 10 cm diameter using in bottom a wire cloth having air permeability of 5400 m 3 /m 2 h. Treads/cm was 13.0/5.9.
  • the sludge sample amount was 200 - 400 g, but always identical between samples compared.
  • Mixing of the polymer composition was done with motor stirrer in baffled mixing vessel. Mixing speed was 1000 rpm and mixing time was 10 - 30 seconds, but always identical between samples compared.
  • Sludge dry solids content after centrifugation was tested with Heraeus laboratory centrifuge. For this test, sludge sample was taken from Polytest wire after gravity dewaterability testing.
  • Sludge sample of about 6 grams was measured to a 50 mesh plastic filter that was placed on upper part of centrifuge tube. Centrifugation time was 60 seconds and rotation rate 1000 rounds per minute (rpm). After the centrifugation, reject water was collected from bottom of the centrifuge tube and centrifuged sludge from plastic filter.
  • Example simulates dewatering of biological sludge after anaerobic digestion process in a wastewater treatment plant with biological phosphorus removal. Dry solids content of the biological sludge was 29 g/l before dosage of the polymer composition. Polymer compositions were diluted to 0.1 % concentration before dosing to the sludge. Dewatering rate was tested with Polytest as described above. Polymer doses were 5, 6 and 6.5 kg/ton dry sludge. Mixing time was 10 seconds. Amount of drained water was measured after 60 seconds. Turbidity was measured from the drained reject water. Results are presented in Table 2.
  • This example simulates centrifugation of biological sludge after anaerobic digestion process in municipal wastewater treatment plant with biological phosphorus removal. Dry solids content of the biological sludge was 29 g/l before dosage of the polymer composition.
  • Polymer compositions were diluted to 0.1 % concentration before dosing to the sludge.
  • Sludge dry solids after centrifugation was tested with table centrifuge as described above. Polymer doses were 5, 6 and 6.5 kg/ton dry sludge with mixing time 10 seconds and 6, 7 and 8 kg/ton dry sludge with mixing time 20 seconds. Dry solids content of the sludge was measured after 60 second centrifugation at 1000 rpm. Results are presented in Table 3. Table 3 Dry solids content results after centrifugation in Example 2.
  • This example simulates dewatering of biological sludge after anaerobic digestion process in municipal wastewater treatment plant with chemical phosphorus removal. Dry solids content of the biological sludge was 25 g/l before dosage of the polymer composition.
  • Polymer compositions were diluted to 0.1 % concentration before dosing to the sludge. Dewatering rate was tested with Polytest as described above. Polymer doses were 7, 8 and 9 kg/ton dry sludge with mixing time 10 seconds and 9, 10 and 11 kg/ton dry sludge with mixing time 30 seconds. Amount of drained water was measured after 10 seconds. Turbidity was measured from the drained reject water. Results are presented in Table 4. Table 4 Results for drainage and reject water turbidity in Example 4.
  • polymer composition C2 According to the invention provided better performance than the reference polymer R1. Polymer composition C2 produced faster dewatering and better reject water quality than the reference polymer R1. Polymer composition C2 did also have much better shear resistance, which was seen in the experiments with longer mixing time causing more shear forces to the floes. All of these factors are important for economical sludge dewatering.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Separation Of Suspended Particles By Flocculating Agents (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Sludge (AREA)

Abstract

The inventio relates to a method for dewatering of biological sludge. It comprises addition of a flocculant to a biological sludge, which comprises an aqueous phase and suspended solid organic material, flocculating and dewatering the sludge. The flocculant comprises a polymer composition, which comprises a cationic linear first polymer, which is obtained by polymerising DADMAC, and a cationic second polymer, which is a polymer obtained by polymerisation of (meth)acrylamide and cationic monomers, the second cationic polymer being polymerised in presence of the cationic first polymer.

Description

METHOD FOR DEWATERING OF BIOLOGICAL SLUDGE
The present invention relates to a method for dewatering of biological sludge according to preambles of the enclosed independent claim.
Municipal and industrial wastewaters as well as sewage are treated in biological sludge process, where microorganisms degrade organic material and remove nutrients present in the wastewater to produce effluent with high-quality effluent. Biological sludge contains mass of aerobic bacteria and other aquatic organisms, which are suspended and mixed with wastewater in an aerated tank. Excess sludge is removed from the process for post-treatment of sludge. Typically, large quantities of wet sludge are formed, which must be dewatered before it can be disposed. Dewatering can be done by using gravity, filtering, pressing or centrifugal force. The sludge is exposed to various forces, e.g. high shear forces, during the dewatering and other post-treatment steps.
Biological sludges are often difficult to dewater. Sludges may be conditioned before dewatering by addition of chemicals, such as inorganic compounds of iron and lime, or organic compounds, such as polymer coagulants and flocculants. The chemicals are added to improve the sludge handling, to coagulate and/or flocculate the suspended matter into larger agglomerates and to increase dewatering effect. When the biological sludge is flocculated by using chemical addition, the formed floes should resist various forces, e.g. shear forces, without breaking of the floe. This would ensure that high quality water phase with low turbidity is obtained from the dewatering step and that the solids content of the sludge is high after dewatering.
There is a need for new effective flocculants that can be used for dewatering of biological sludge from wastewater purification, especially purification of municipal or agricultural wastewater or wastewater from food or beverage manufacture.
An object of this invention is to minimise or even eliminate the disadvantages existing in the prior art. An object is also to provide a polymer composition which provides an effective dewatering of biological sludge. A further object of this invention is to provide a polymer composition which is provides improved sludge performance during dewatering, especially under high- shear conditions.
These objects are attained with the invention having the characteristics presented below in the characterising parts of the independent claims. Some preferable embodiments are disclosed in the dependent claims.
The features recited in the dependent claims and the embodiments in the description are mutually freely combinable unless otherwise explicitly stated.
The exemplary embodiments presented in this text and their advantages relate by applicable parts to all aspects of the invention, even though this is not always separately mentioned. Typical method according to the present invention for dewatering of biological sludge, comprises
- adding a flocculant to a biological sludge, which comprises an aqueous phase and suspended solid organic material, and flocculating the sludge,
- dewatering the sludge,
wherein the flocculant comprises a polymer composition, which comprises
- a cationic linear first polymer, which is obtained by polymerising diaiiyidimethylammonium chloride (DADMAC), and
- a cationic second polymer, which is a copolymer obtained by polymerisation of (meth)acrylamide and at least one cationic monomer, the second cationic polymer being polymerised in presence of the cationic first polymer. Now it has been surprisingly found out that clear improvements in dewatering of biological sludge are obtained when the flocculant comprises a polymer composition, which is obtained by polymerising a second polymer in the presence of a first polymer. The first polymer thus acts as a host polymer and as a polymerisation medium for the second polymer. The polymer composition, which is formed from a combination of the first polymer comprising diailyidimethyi- ammonium chloride (DADMAC) and the second polymer comprising cationic copolymer of (meth)acrylamide and cationic monomer, provides the flocculant with properties, with which an improved dewatering rate, filtrate quality, shear resistance and dry solids content can be achieved for the biological sludge. It is speculated that the polymer composition is able to interact with the solid constituents of the biological sludge in a manner that generates more robust floes and enhances the dewatering performance. Furthermore, the flocculant comprising the defined polymer composition tolerates well process variations.
In the present context the term“biological sludge” denotes a sludge originating from a biological treatment process of wastewater and/or sewage. Biological sludge comprises an aqueous phase and suspended solid organic material, and it is typically rich in material of bacterial origin as well as other aquatic organisms. The biological sludge may have a biological oxygen demand (BOD) > 50 mg/I, and/or a dry solids content in the range of 5 - 80 g/l, preferably 10 - 40 g/l. According to one preferable embodiment of the present invention the biological sludge to be dewatered originates from a process treating municipal or agricultural wastewater. The biological sludge may thus be municipal wastewater sludge or agricultural sludge. Alternatively, the biological sludge may originate from an industrial process, especially from wastewater treatment or from food or beverage production or from food or beverage processing.
Dewatering of biological sludge comprises an addition of a flocculant to the biological sludge for flocculating the biological sludge before the dewatering of the biological sludge. Preferably the flocculant is added immediately before the dewatering. According to one embodiment the flocculant is added 30 s, preferably 20 s, more preferably 15 s before start of the dewatering. The flocculant can be added directly to a pipeline or the like where the biological sludge is transported to the dewatering. Dewatering of the biological sludge may be performed by using mechanical dewatering means, such as centrifuge(s), belt press or chamber press, preferably centrifuge(s).
The flocculant comprises a polymer composition, which comprises a first polymer, which is obtained by polymerising dia!ly!dimethylammonium chloride, DADMAC. During the production of the polymer composition the first polymer functions as a polymerisation medium for the second polymer, i.e. the monomers of the second polymer are added to a polymer solution of the first polymer and polymerisation of the second polymer is conducted in the presence of the first polymer. This results in physical three-dimensional entanglement of the polymer chains of the first and second polymer. The first and second polymers become inseparable from each other without breaking of the polymer chains, i.e. the polymer chains of the first polymer and the second polymer are physically entangled and inseparably entangled in during the polymerisation of the second polymer. Preferably there is, however, no chemical bonds between the first polymer and the second polymer, but their chains are inseparably intertwined. The first polymer is preferably free of reactive polymerizable groups, such as double carbon-carbon bonds, in its structure. In a preferable embodiment the monomers of the second polymer, when polymerised in the presence of the first polymer, are reacting with each other and not forming covalent bonds with the first polymer, which is present as polymerisation medium. Thus, the first polymer is preferably present essentially only as polymerisation medium. Covalent bonds between the first and the second polymer are not requisite for providing the three-dimensional structure to the polymer composition, as the first and second polymer are physically entangled, and their polymer chains are inseparably intertwined or interlaced with each other.
The first polymer and the second polymer are fully miscible and compatible with each other. The obtained polymer composition is not in form of an emulsion or dispersion. This means that the obtained polymer composition does not contain two or more phases of different polymers. The polymer composition is also preferably free from polymer particles comprising mostly (>40 %) of only one polymer. The polymer composition is water-soluble.
The first polymer is obtained by polymerising diailyldimethylammonium chloride, DADMAC. According to one preferable embodiment the first polymer is diailyldimethylammonium chloride (DADMAC) homopolymer. However, it is possible that the first polymer comprises a small amount of other second monomers, as long as the second monomers are non-ionic, such as acrylamide, and their total amount is low, preferably < 10 weigh-%, more preferably < 5 weight- %, calculated from the weight of monomers used for obtaining the first polymer.
The first polymer may have a weight average molecular weight at least 10 000 g/mol, preferably in the range of 10 000 - 750 000 g/mol, more preferably 50 000 - 450 000 g/mol, even more preferably 75 000 - 400 000 g/mol. According to one embodiment of the invention the first polymer may have a weight average molecular weight in the range of 120 000 - 450 000 g/mol, preferably 125 000 - 400 000 g/mol, more preferably 135 000 - 350 000 g/mol. The first polymer preferably has a molecular weight, which has been observed to improve the performance of the polymer composition and its flocculation ability.
The first polymer may preferably be obtained by radical polymerisation.
According to one embodiment of the invention the polymer composition may comprise at least 1 weight-%, preferably 1 - 30 weight-%, more preferably 2 - 20 weight-%, even more preferably 2 - 15 weight-%, of the first polymer, calculated from the total dry polymeric material weight of the composition. The amount of first polymer provides suitable viscosity, when it acts as polymerisation medium for the second polymer while simultaneously providing the final polymer composition with an efficient interaction with the constituents of the biological sludge and good flocculation ability.
The polymer composition, which is used as flocculant, comprises further a cationic second polymer, which is a copolymer obtained by polymerisation of (meth)acrylamide and at least one cationic monomer. The second cationic polymer is polymerised in presence of the cationic first polymer. The polymerisation medium for the second polymer thus comprises an aqueous, preferably particle- free, solution of the first polymer. The polymerisation medium preferably is free from any oil phase. The polymerisation medium does not comprise high concentration of any inorganic salt, either. Typically, the amount of inorganic salt is less than 5 weight-%, preferably less than 2.5 weight-%, more preferably less than 1.5 weight-%. It has been observed that the second polymer improves the robustness of the formed floes.
The second polymer is obtained by free radical polymerisation. For example, the second polymer may be obtained by gel polymerisation, e.g. by adiabatic gel polymerisation. It is possible to obtain a polymer composition having a higher polymer content by gel polymerisation, which makes the composition more cost efficient in view of the logistics. A high polymer content has the additional benefit of improved microbial stability.
The polymer composition may preferably be in form of a dry powder or particulate material or particulate product, and it is dissolved into the water and diluted to desired appropriate feed concentration before its use. The obtained polymer composition may be dried and optionally milled to a suitable particle size. According to one embodiment the dry polymer composition in form of particulate product or particulate material or powder may have a solids content of at least 80 weight-%, preferably at least 85 weight-%, more preferably at least 90 weight-%. Dry particulate polymer composition is easy and cost-efficient to transport and store, it remains stable for long periods of time and is resistant towards microbiological degradation.
The cationic monomer for the second polymer may be selected from group consisting of 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate (ADAM), [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (ADAM-CI), 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate benzylchloride, 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate dimethylsulphate, 2- dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (MADAM), [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (MADAM-CI), 2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate dimethylsulphate, [3-(acryloylamino)propyl] trimethylammonium chloride (APTAC), [3-(methacryloylamino)propyl] trimethylammonium chloride (MAPTAC), and diaiiyldimethylammonium chloride (DADMAC). Preferably the cationic monomer is [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (ADAM-CI) or diaiiyldimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC). In general, for those of the listed monomers containing quaternary nitrogen in their structure, the cationicity is not pH dependent, which is a preferable feature.
According to one embodiment of the invention the second polymer may be obtained by copolymerisation of (meth)acrylamide and at least 10 mol-% of cationic monomer(s), preferably 10 - 90 mol-%, more preferably 20 - 70 mol-%, even more preferably 30 - 60 mol-%, of cationic monomer(s), calculated from amount of monomers used for second polymer.
According to one embodiment the second polymer may be a linear polymer.
According to another preferable embodiment the second polymer is a crosslinked copolymer. The crosslinked second polymer may be obtained by polymerising (meth)acrylamide and cationic monomers in the presence of at least one crosslinking agent. It has been observed that when the second polymer is crosslinked, the formed floes of biological sludge are very robust, and resist well high-shear forces. Suitable crosslinking agent may be selected from methylenebis- acrylamide, ethylene glycol divinyl ether, di(ethylene glycol) divinyl ether and tri- (ethylene glycol) divinyl ether. Methylenebisacrylamide is being preferred as crosslinking agent. The amount of crosslinking agent may be, for example, in the range of 0.25 - 100 mg/kg monomers, preferably 0.5 - 10 mg/kg monomers, more preferably 0.75 - 5 mg/kg monomers.
The polymer composition, which is used as a flocculant for the biological sludge, may have a standard viscosity SV of 3.5 - 5 mPas, preferably 3.8 - 4.8, measured at 0.1 weight-% solids content in an aqueous NaCI solution (1 M), at 25 °C, using Brookfield DVII T viscometer with UL adapter. The flocculant comprising the polymer composition may be added in amount of 1 - 40 kg/ton dry sludge, preferably 2 - 30 kg/ton dry sludge, preferably 4 - 20 kg/ton dry sludge, given as active polymer.
EXPERIMENTAL
Some embodiments of the invention are described in the following non-limiting examples.
Polymer Compositions Used in the Examples
Two different polymer compositions C1 and C2 were used according to invention in the following sludge dewatering Examples: Composition C1 comprised as first polymer linear homopolymer of dialiyldimethyl- ammonium chloride (DADMAC), having weight average molecular weight ca. 300 000. The second polymer, which was polymerised in the presence of the first polymer was a copolymer of acrylamide and 30 mol-% of [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (ADAM-CI). The amount of first polymer was 9 weight-%, as active, based on monomers of the second polymer.
Composition C2 comprised as first polymer linear homopolymer of dial!y!dimethyl- ammonium chloride (DADMAC), having weight average molecular weight ca. 300 000. The second polymer, which was polymerised in the presence of the first polymer was a copolymer of acrylamide and 30 mol-% of [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (ADAM-CI). Methylenebisacrylamide was used as crosslinker in the polymerisation. The amount of first polymer was 9 weight-%, as active, based on monomers of the second polymer. Polymer R1 was used as reference in the Examples. Polymer R1 was a copolymer of acrylamide and 30 mol-% of [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (ADAM-CI). Methods Used in the Examples
The apparatuses and methods used in sludge dewatering examples are given in Table 1. Table 1 Apparatuses and methods used in sludge dewatering examples.
Figure imgf000010_0001
Gravity dewaterability of sludge was tested with Polytest. The sludge samples were filtered with Polytest cylinder of 10 cm diameter using in bottom a wire cloth having air permeability of 5400 m3/m2h. Treads/cm was 13.0/5.9. The sludge sample amount was 200 - 400 g, but always identical between samples compared. Mixing of the polymer composition was done with motor stirrer in baffled mixing vessel. Mixing speed was 1000 rpm and mixing time was 10 - 30 seconds, but always identical between samples compared. Sludge dry solids content after centrifugation was tested with Heraeus laboratory centrifuge. For this test, sludge sample was taken from Polytest wire after gravity dewaterability testing. Sludge sample of about 6 grams was measured to a 50 mesh plastic filter that was placed on upper part of centrifuge tube. Centrifugation time was 60 seconds and rotation rate 1000 rounds per minute (rpm). After the centrifugation, reject water was collected from bottom of the centrifuge tube and centrifuged sludge from plastic filter.
Sludge Dewatering Example 1
Example simulates dewatering of biological sludge after anaerobic digestion process in a wastewater treatment plant with biological phosphorus removal. Dry solids content of the biological sludge was 29 g/l before dosage of the polymer composition. Polymer compositions were diluted to 0.1 % concentration before dosing to the sludge. Dewatering rate was tested with Polytest as described above. Polymer doses were 5, 6 and 6.5 kg/ton dry sludge. Mixing time was 10 seconds. Amount of drained water was measured after 60 seconds. Turbidity was measured from the drained reject water. Results are presented in Table 2.
It can be seen from the results of Table 2 that use of the polymer composition C1 according to the invention provides better performance than reference polymer R1. Polymer composition C1 produces faster dewatering and better reject water quality than the reference polymer R1 with all the tested doses. All of these factors are important for economical dewatering of biological sludge.
Table 2 Results of Example 1 for drainage and reject water turbidity.
Figure imgf000011_0001
Sludge dewatering example 2
This example simulates centrifugation of biological sludge after anaerobic digestion process in municipal wastewater treatment plant with biological phosphorus removal. Dry solids content of the biological sludge was 29 g/l before dosage of the polymer composition.
Polymer compositions were diluted to 0.1 % concentration before dosing to the sludge. Sludge dry solids after centrifugation was tested with table centrifuge as described above. Polymer doses were 5, 6 and 6.5 kg/ton dry sludge with mixing time 10 seconds and 6, 7 and 8 kg/ton dry sludge with mixing time 20 seconds. Dry solids content of the sludge was measured after 60 second centrifugation at 1000 rpm. Results are presented in Table 3. Table 3 Dry solids content results after centrifugation in Example 2.
Figure imgf000012_0001
It can be seen for results of Table 3 that the use of polymer composition C1 according to the invention provided better performance than the reference polymer R1. Polymer composition C1 produced higher dry solids content after centrifugation with 10 second and 20 second mixing than the reference polymer R1 with all the tested doses. Changing the mixing time from 10 seconds to 20 seconds represents increasing share forces which is required for efficient centrifugation. All of these factors are important for economical dewatering of biological sludge.
Sludge dewatering example 3
This example simulates dewatering of biological sludge after anaerobic digestion process in municipal wastewater treatment plant with chemical phosphorus removal. Dry solids content of the biological sludge was 25 g/l before dosage of the polymer composition.
Polymer compositions were diluted to 0.1 % concentration before dosing to the sludge. Dewatering rate was tested with Polytest as described above. Polymer doses were 7, 8 and 9 kg/ton dry sludge with mixing time 10 seconds and 9, 10 and 11 kg/ton dry sludge with mixing time 30 seconds. Amount of drained water was measured after 10 seconds. Turbidity was measured from the drained reject water. Results are presented in Table 4. Table 4 Results for drainage and reject water turbidity in Example 4.
Figure imgf000013_0001
It can be seen from the results of Table 4 that the use of polymer composition C2 according to the invention provided better performance than the reference polymer R1. Polymer composition C2 produced faster dewatering and better reject water quality than the reference polymer R1. Polymer composition C2 did also have much better shear resistance, which was seen in the experiments with longer mixing time causing more shear forces to the floes. All of these factors are important for economical sludge dewatering.
Even if the invention was described with reference to what at present seems to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is appreciated that the invention shall not be limited to the embodiments described above, but the invention is intended to cover also different modifications and equivalent technical solutions within the scope of the enclosed claims.

Claims

1. Method for dewatering of biological sludge, comprising
- adding a flocculant to a biological sludge, which comprises an aqueous phase and suspended solid organic material, and flocculating the sludge,
- dewatering the sludge,
characterised in that
the flocculant comprises a polymer composition, which comprises
- a cationic linear first polymer, which is obtained by polymerising dia!iyldimethylammonium chloride (DADMAC), and
- a cationic second polymer, which is a copolymer obtained by polymerisation of (meth)acrylamide and at least one cationic monomer, the second cationic polymer being polymerised in presence of the cationic first polymer.
2. Method according to claim 1 , characterised in that the first polymer and the second polymer are miscible with each other.
3. Method according to claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the polymer chains of the first polymer and second polymer are physically and inseparably entangled in during the polymerisation of the second polymer.
4. Method according to claim 1 , 2 or 3, characterised in that the polymer composition comprises at least 1 weight-%, preferably 1 - 30 weight-%, more preferably 2 - 20 weight-%, even more preferably 2 - 15 weight-%, of the first polymer.
5. Method according to any of claims 1 - 4, characterised in that the first polymer is dia!lyldimethylammonium chloride (DADMAC) homopolymer.
6. Method according to any of claims 1 - 5, characterised in that the first polymer has a weight average molecular weight at least 10 000 g/mol, preferably in the range of 10 000 - 750 000 g/mol, more preferably 50 000 - 450 000 g/mol, even more preferably 75 000 - 400 000 g/mol.
7. Method according to any of claims 1 - 5, characterised in that the first polymer has a weight average molecular weight in the range of 120 000 - 450 000 g/mol, preferably 125 000 - 400 000 g/mol, more preferably 135 000 - 350 000 g/mol.
8. Method according to any of claims 1 - 7, characterised in that the second polymer is obtained by copolymerisation of (meth)acrylamide and at least 10 mol- % of cationic monomer, preferably 10 - 90 mol-%, more preferably 20 - 70 mol-%, even more preferably 30 - 60 mol-%, of cationic monomer, calculated from amount of monomers used for second polymer.
9. Method according to any of claims 1 - 8, characterised in that the cationic monomer for the second polymer is selected from group consisting of 2- (dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate (ADAM), [2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (ADAM-CI), 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate benzylchloride, 2- (dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate dimethylsulphate, 2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (MADAM), [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride (MADAM-CI), 2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate dimethylsulphate, [3- (acryloylamino)propyl] trimethylammonium chloride (APTAC), [3- (methacryloylamino)propyl] trimethylammonium chloride (MAPTAC), and dialiyldimethylammonium chloride (DADMAC).
10. Method according to any of claims 1 - 9, characterised in that the second polymer is a crosslinked copolymer, obtained by polymerising (meth)acrylamide and cationic monomers in the presence of at least one crosslinking agent.
11. Method according to claim 10, characterised in that the amount of crosslinking agent is in the range of 0.25 - 100 mg/kg monomers, preferably 0.5 - 10 mg/kg monomers, more preferably 0.75 - 5 mg/kg monomers.
12. Method according to any of claims 1 - 9, characterised in that the second polymer is a linear polymer.
13. Method according to any of claims 1 - 12, characterised in that the polymer composition has a standard viscosity SV of 3.5 - 5 mPas, preferably 3.8 - 4.8, measured at 0.1 weight-% solids content in an aqueous NaCI solution (1 M), at 25 °C, using Brookfield DVII T viscometer with UL adapter.
14. Method according to any of claims 1 - 13, characterised in that the flocculant comprising the polymer composition is added in amount of 1 - 40 kg/ton dry sludge, preferably 2 - 30 kg/ton dry sludge, preferably 4 - 20 kg/ton dry sludge.
15. Method according to any of claims 1 - 14, characterised in that the biological sludge is municipal wastewater sludge or agricultural sludge.
16. Method according to any of claims 1 - 15, characterised in that the biological sludge has a biological oxygen demand (BOD) > 50 mg/I and/or a dry solids content in the range of 5 - 80 g/l.
PCT/FI2018/050924 2017-12-15 2018-12-14 Method for dewatering of biological sludge WO2019115884A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI20176123 2017-12-15
FI20176123 2017-12-15

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019115884A1 true WO2019115884A1 (en) 2019-06-20

Family

ID=64949318

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/FI2018/050924 WO2019115884A1 (en) 2017-12-15 2018-12-14 Method for dewatering of biological sludge

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2019115884A1 (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0479616A1 (en) * 1990-10-04 1992-04-08 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited Dewatering compositions and processes
WO2002081384A2 (en) * 2001-04-05 2002-10-17 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited Process for flocculating suspensions
US20070187330A1 (en) * 2004-03-12 2007-08-16 Tony Whittaker Dewatering process
WO2017142827A2 (en) * 2016-02-18 2017-08-24 General Electric Company Stillage solids concentration

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0479616A1 (en) * 1990-10-04 1992-04-08 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited Dewatering compositions and processes
WO2002081384A2 (en) * 2001-04-05 2002-10-17 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited Process for flocculating suspensions
US20070187330A1 (en) * 2004-03-12 2007-08-16 Tony Whittaker Dewatering process
WO2017142827A2 (en) * 2016-02-18 2017-08-24 General Electric Company Stillage solids concentration

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Huang et al. Dual functionality of a graft starch flocculant: Flocculation and antibacterial performance
Cai et al. Efficient flocculation of an anionic dye from aqueous solutions using a cellulose-based flocculant
KR20060127189A (en) Dewatering process
JP2004529761A (en) Suspension processing
JP4857170B2 (en) Cationic polymer flocculant and sludge treatment method using the same
Zemmouri et al. Chitosan use in chemical conditioning for dewatering municipal-activated sludge
CN110713240A (en) Composite flocculant and method for treating sewage or sludge by using same
AU712556B2 (en) High performance polymer flocculating agents
US5807489A (en) High performance polymer flocculating agents
US11525022B2 (en) Method for dewatering of biological sludge using a polymeric flocculant
JP2009039653A (en) Sludge dewatering method
WO2019115884A1 (en) Method for dewatering of biological sludge
EP3555007B1 (en) Method for dewatering of sludge from a pulp, paper or board making process
Jabin et al. Role of Polyelectrolytes in the Treatment of Water and Wastewater
JP2017000914A (en) Polymer flocculant, method for production thereof, and dewatering method for sludge using the flocculant
JP2017100111A (en) Cross-linking type polymer coagulant, manufacturing method of the same and waste water treating method using the same
JP2011062634A (en) Flocculant for service water and method for treating raw water for service water
JP2019111496A (en) Method and apparatus for treating water to be treated
JP7190642B2 (en) Composition for sludge control
CA2817377C (en) Use of water soluble block copolymers to improve membrane bioreactor systems in water treatment
JP6612630B2 (en) Polymer flocculant composition, method for producing the same, and sludge dewatering method using the polymer flocculant composition
JPH0122804B2 (en)
JP2015217343A (en) Coagulation treatment agent, and dewatering method of sludge using the same
CA2235006A1 (en) High performance polymer flocculating agents
JP2021194573A (en) Sludge dewatering method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18829892

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 18829892

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1