WO2014030018A1 - Tissu de renfort - Google Patents

Tissu de renfort Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014030018A1
WO2014030018A1 PCT/GB2013/052238 GB2013052238W WO2014030018A1 WO 2014030018 A1 WO2014030018 A1 WO 2014030018A1 GB 2013052238 W GB2013052238 W GB 2013052238W WO 2014030018 A1 WO2014030018 A1 WO 2014030018A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
inlay
fabric
reinforcing fabric
yarns
fabric according
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2013/052238
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
David Peter TOUGH
Original Assignee
Scott & Fyfe Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Scott & Fyfe Limited filed Critical Scott & Fyfe Limited
Publication of WO2014030018A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014030018A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04—BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04B—KNITTING
    • D04B21/00—Warp knitting processes for the production of fabrics or articles not dependent on the use of particular machines; Fabrics or articles defined by such processes
    • D04B21/14—Fabrics characterised by the incorporation by knitting, in one or more thread, fleece, or fabric layers, of reinforcing, binding, or decorative threads; Fabrics incorporating small auxiliary elements, e.g. for decorative purposes
    • D04B21/16—Fabrics characterised by the incorporation by knitting, in one or more thread, fleece, or fabric layers, of reinforcing, binding, or decorative threads; Fabrics incorporating small auxiliary elements, e.g. for decorative purposes incorporating synthetic threads
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D10—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B2101/00—Inorganic fibres
    • D10B2101/02—Inorganic fibres based on oxides or oxide ceramics, e.g. silicates
    • D10B2101/06—Glass
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D10—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B2403/00—Details of fabric structure established in the fabric forming process
    • D10B2403/02—Cross-sectional features
    • D10B2403/024—Fabric incorporating additional compounds
    • D10B2403/0241—Fabric incorporating additional compounds enhancing mechanical properties
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D10—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B2505/00—Industrial
    • D10B2505/02—Reinforcing materials; Prepregs
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16L—PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16L11/00—Hoses, i.e. flexible pipes
    • F16L11/04—Hoses, i.e. flexible pipes made of rubber or flexible plastics
    • F16L11/08—Hoses, i.e. flexible pipes made of rubber or flexible plastics with reinforcements embedded in the wall
    • F16L11/085—Hoses, i.e. flexible pipes made of rubber or flexible plastics with reinforcements embedded in the wall comprising one or more braided layers

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a reinforcing fabric. More specifically, it relates to a reinforcing fabric for use in the fabrication of hoses, pipes, other coupling pieces, and the like. It is expected to find particular application in high temperature and high pressure environments, for example in pipes that are to carry hot, pressurised fluids.
  • Elastomeric and rubber materials are in widespread use, their inherent flexibility associated with a mature processing technology having seen their incorporation in many products. It has long been known that elastomeric or rubber materials can be strengthened by inclusion of a reinforcing fabric. In high-pressure applications such as hose products, such reinforcement is essential to prevent excessive longitudinal and radial expansions when the hoses are subjected to high internal pressures.
  • reinforced hoses are often required to assume convoluted paths, particularly when used in the restricted space of an engine compartment, and, in some instances, couple components having differently-sized inlets and outlets. It is for these reasons that reinforced hoses are often hand fabricated using a mandrel system in order to ensure that the necessary geometric requirements are met.
  • a woven material has interleaved warp and weft yarns, which results in a construction that is more resistant to expansion. It can therefore provide the hose with a higher resistance to both radial and longitudinal expansion.
  • the relative stiffness of woven reinforcing fabrics can often cause the hose construction to distort during the fabrication process. It can also make the product less easy to manipulate, with the result that the act of releasing the final hose construction from the mandrel used in fabrication is difficult, sometimes to the extent that the hose may be damaged. The consequent requirement to repair or even to dispose of the hose can prove costly.
  • the yarns in a knitted material are more mobile and so the use of a knitted reinforcing fabric overcomes some of the distortion and release issues associated with a woven reinforcing fabric. It is more commonly selected therefore for applications in which the form of the hose is expected to change during its manufacture. Conversely however, the lower stiffness of the knitted reinforcing fabric offers less resistance to excessive longitudinal and radial expansions, making rupture more likely.
  • Knitted fabric is widely used as a standard reinforcement for hoses within an automotive engine. Such fabrics are conformable to allow the hoses to be fabricated with specific geometries and, where necessary, to link parts of different diameter. These fabrics are at the same time sufficiently strong to withstand the high pressures and temperatures within the engine
  • a reinforcing fabric comprising two or more sets of inlaid yarns and a knitted yarn.
  • Each set of inlaid yarns has paths extending to one and then another side of an axis that is generally parallel to a machine direction of the fabric, the paths comprising first and second generally linear regions, with respectively constant positive or constant negative cross-directional components and reversal regions in which orientation of the path with respect to a cross direction of the fabric is reversed.
  • the stitches of the knitted yarn interlink with the inlaid yarns.
  • the "machine” direction of a fabric refers to the direction parallel to the direction of movement followed by the fabric during a machine manufacturing process. As the vast majority of technical textiles are machine-made the terminology is adopted herein, regardless of whether the fabric under consideration has actually been manufactured by machine or otherwise.
  • the "cross direction” is the direction perpendicular to the machine direction. In a woven fabric, machine and cross directions correspond to the warp and weft directions respectively.
  • a reinforcing fabric in accordance with this invention essentially separates the desired characteristics of strength and conformability such that overall fabric performance is less of a compromise than in the prior art.
  • the inlaid yarns are responsible for the strength of the reinforcing fabric and they are held in place by knitted yarns that offer the potential for good conformability. With this arrangement, the strength of the inlay yarn can be adjusted with minimal effect on the conform ability of the knitted yarn. Conversely, the conformability of the knitted yarn can be adjusted with minimal effect on the strength of the inlay yarn. The benefits of this are considerable. It offers the potential for better-performing fabrics to be manufactured at reduced cost.
  • This design has an inherent adaptability in design parameters, far exceeding the flexibility afforded by prior art woven or knitted materials. This adaptability enables fabrics to be constructed with properties that are tailored to a particular application.
  • the reversal regions of the inlaid yarn paths comprise at least three short linear inlay sections, each short linear inlay section being oriented at an angle to the previous section such that, overall, a total reversal angle between constant positive and constant negative cross-directional components is described.
  • the angle between adjacent short linear inlay sections is preferably less than 45° and, more preferably, between 2° and 30°. In this manner a total reversal angle of between 90° and 130° may be achieved.
  • the inlaid yarns may be laid in an Atlas-type arrangement such that the paths follow a zigzag pattern about the machine direction.
  • the zigzag pattern however includes a single sharp bend, rather than a distribution of the total bend among shallower components.
  • Sharp bends are known to be a source of weakness in some yarn materials, in particular glass, under dynamic loading. A distributed angular arrangement therefore improves the durability of the fabric, particularly if glass is used as an inlay yarn.
  • each set of inlaid yarns preferably have a repeating unit that is replicated in the machine direction, each unit having forwards and reverse cross directional components. Further, the paths of a first set of the at least two sets of inlaid yarns preferably overlay and are offset in the machine direction from the paths of a second set of inlaid yarns.
  • the inlaid yarns at some point, extend crosswise at an angle to the axis parallel to the machine direction. Due to the adaptability of the design of fabric in accordance with this invention, the angle between yarn direction and machine direction can be varied simply by adjusting the stitch length of the knitted yarns that interlink with the inlay. A longer stitch length results in a more acute angle. Preferably, a substantial section of the paths followed by the inlaid yarns makes an angle of between 25° and 45°, and ideally around 35° with the machine direction.
  • a cylindrical product such as a hose, when subject to internal pressures is strained both longitudinally and radially.
  • the resulting expansions are referred to as axial and hoop expansions respectively.
  • a fabric with the inlaid yarns extending at a 35° angle to the machine direction is ideally oriented to be included in a cylindrical product in order to balance the hoop and axial expansions.
  • the fabric may also include a third, fourth, fifth and even a sixth set of inlaid yarns, each of which overlays and is offset in the machine direction from each of the other sets.
  • the knitted yarn comprises a plurality of yarn chains, each chain having a plurality of linked stitches and extending generally parallel to the machine direction.
  • the yarn material can also be varied.
  • the inlaid yarns which give the fabric its strength, are preferably of one or more materials selected from glass, aramid, polyester, polypropylene, nylon, rayon, cotton, basalt, metals, PEEK (polyester ester ketones) and dyneema, depending on application requirements.
  • the inlaid yarns are glass. Glass is a far stiffer material than aramid and so is clearly better suited for providing the reinforcing fabric with its integrity at elevated temperatures.
  • Aramid yarn is almost universally used for high- temperature applications that require conformability.
  • the knitted yarn is preferably aramid, which has the required characteristics for stitching. It could however, for specific applications, also be polyester, polypropylene, nylon, rayon, cotton, metals, PEEK (polyester ester ketones) or dyneema.
  • the interlinked yarns may have an elastomeric coating.
  • the elastomeric coating is preferably of silicone or fluorosilicone.
  • the present invention also provides a hose, pipe or pressure vessel comprising a liner about which is wrapped a reinforcing fabric as described above, the fabric being wrapped such that its machine direction extends circumferentially about the liner.
  • Hoses, pipes and pressure vessels generally have a cylindrical geometry and so a design of reinforcing fabric for use in these fields requires consideration of behaviour under both hoop and axial stresses.
  • a reinforcing fabric in accordance with this invention allows ready balancing of stress responses by, for example, changing the orientation of the inlay through the fabric. .
  • these products also require a reinforcing fabric to have both high strength and good conformability, both of which are provided by a fabric in accordance with this invention.
  • the present invention provides a method of forming a fabric for use as a reinforcing material, the method comprising the steps of:
  • the multi-bar warp knitting machine may also be preset to operate the two or more remaining guidebars to create a plurality of tricot-type and, optionally, pillar-type inlays in the inlay pattern. These inlay types are arranged to align at shallow angles and thereby to effect a total reversal angle, being the sum of all shallow angles, in the inlay pattern.
  • This presetting step may also include presetting the machine to operate the two or more remaining guidebars to create a plurality of Atlas-type inlays, extending between the other inlay types, in a repetitive inlay pattern.
  • Figure 1 is a plan view of a known woven reinforcing fabric
  • Figures 2 and 2a are plan views of known knitted reinforcing fabrics, of different structures
  • Figure 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating the construction of a hose product that incorporates a reinforcing fabric
  • Figure 4 is an illustration of a hose product flexing under (a) hoop and (b) radial pressure
  • Figure 5 is a schematic representation of a reinforcing fabric in accordance with a first embodiment of this invention.
  • Figure 6 is a schematic representation of a reinforcing fabric showing a variation of the embodiment shown in Figure 5;
  • Figure 7 is a schematic representation of a reinforcing fabric in accordance with a further embodiment of this invention.
  • Figure 8 is a schematic representation of a reinforcing fabric showing a variation of the embodiment shown in Figure 7.
  • Figure 1 illustrates schematically the structure of a known woven reinforcing fabric 2 suitable for incorporation in a hose, pipe or similar product.
  • the woven fabric 2 comprises a plurality of substantially parallel longitudinal or warp yarns 4 that extend in a machine direction.
  • a plurality of lateral or weft yarns 6 extend in a cross direction and are interleaved with the warp yarns.
  • the warp 4 and weft 6 yarns intersect at right angles and the weft yarn 6 passes above and below alternate warp yarns 4.
  • This example is for illustrative purposes only, in order to bring out the essential differences between knitted and woven fabric structures.
  • more complex weaving patterns can be used in many, including reinforcing, fabrics.
  • the reinforcement should be twice that of the axial reinforcement.
  • the angle a at which this is achieved is 54.735°. This is known as the critical balanced angle for fibre wound pressure vessels. It corresponds to the situation in which fibres are inclined just enough towards the circumferential direction to make the vessel twice as strong circumferentially as it is axially.
  • fibres that are not held in the hose at the critical balanced angle will, when subject to hoop and axial stresses as the hose is pressurised, try to align along this balanced direction.
  • the warp threads are predominantly responsible for the fabric's resistance to expansion. These should therefore not be aligned circumferentially to form a cylindrical hose, but tilted from the circumferential direction by an angle 35.265°.
  • a reinforcing woven fabric is aligned such that the warp threads 4 form an angle (a) approximately 55° to the
  • a dashed line 8 indicates the position of the longitudinal axis of the cylindrical hose, with its alignment at angle a to the warp direction.
  • polyester and nylon yarns are commonly used for the reinforcement fabric. These materials are however only suitable for lower- temperature applications as they are unstable at high temperatures. If it is to be subject to more extreme conditions therefore the woven yarn is most typically aramid. Glass fibre may alternatively be used but, although stiffer than aramid when straight, it is fragile when subject to a tight bend. This limits its application in reinforcement fabrics.
  • Figure 2a shows a structure 10 formed from a warp knitted chain or pillar stitch.
  • Each yarn 12 forms chains of stitches, each stitch 14a being linked to those above 14b and below 14c.
  • a chain stitch knit there are no lateral connections between the wales and so a fabric as such is not created, only chains of disconnected wales. It is therefore not normally used alone but in combination with other stitch types to create a more complex fabric.
  • FIG. 2b Such a fabric is shown in Figure 2b.
  • This structure 16 is an example of a prior art knitted fabric that is used to reinforce pipes and the like.
  • Two yarns 17a, 17b are used to form interlinked chain stitches 18 that define a honeycomb structure.
  • This structure 16 includes many open regions 20a, 20b, which are responsible for the fabric having good conformability and linked chain stitches 18 that contribute to its strength.
  • a knitted fabric comprises a plurality of interlinked loops or stitches 14, 20. Each loop 14, 20 is relatively loosely held, which gives a more open structure 10, 16 than a woven fabric 2. This results in increased flexibility and therefore conformability of knitted fabrics 10, 16, which can be advantageous in some applications.
  • Silicone is advantageous for high temperature applications as it maintains its physical properties over a wide temperature range.
  • the coating process presents its own difficulties.
  • the generally dense or tight arrangement of the yarns tends to inhibit penetration of the coating material, making complete coverage difficult.
  • the woven fabric 2 requires pre-treatment in order to ensure effective adhesion of the elastomeric coating.
  • Such a pre- treatment process can be costly.
  • pre-treatment may similarly be required prior to the coating process.
  • a current standard reinforcement material is an aramid knit in which chain stitches are formed into a linked honeycomb structure, such as shown in Figure 2b. It is fast becoming apparent however that this material has a number of shortcomings. Although the honeycomb structure is open, which gives the fabric its high conformability, the small chain stitches used to form it are not. The small stitching involves the yarn looping round many corners, each of which stresses the aramid yarn and so represents a potential source of fabric weakness. Moreover the structure is not sufficiently open to allow efficient coating with the elastomer. Effective adhesion of elastomer may only be achieved following a pre-treatment process . Most significantly, in its established commercially-viable form, the fabric fails to perform to the level set by the Euro 6 standard.
  • a hose may be required to withstand high temperatures and pressures, often conveying hot gases or oil. It may further be required to assume a convoluted path to straddle engine components and sometimes to connect with inlets and outlets of different diameters.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of the structural layers of a hose product that incorporates a reinforcing fabric.
  • a liner 28 is first applied to a mandrel or arbor 30.
  • the mandrel 30 shown in Figure 3 is to construct a simple straight hose, but it could be in any of a number of geometries.
  • the liner 28 may be an extruded elastomer tube or a calendered elastomer sheet wrapped around the mandrel to form a tube.
  • the liner 28 provides impermeability, chemical and heat resistance to the interior of the hose and so the particular liner material used will depend to a large degree on application. For example, fluorosilicone may be selected for use in a high- temperature environment because it remains chemically stable over a wide temperature range.
  • An elastomer-coated reinforcing fabric is then wrapped around the liner layer 28.
  • the fabric may be wrapped once, twice or many times around the liner 28, depending on the performance requirements (primarily burst strength) of the finished product.
  • first 32 and second 34 layers of the wrapped fabric are shown for clarity.
  • the elastomer coated layers 32, 34 may, for example, be woven or knitted as described above and / or as shown in figures 1 , 2a or 2b.
  • a typical, prior art, material is woven aramid coated with silicone. It is generally preferred that axial and hoop expansions are balanced.
  • the mandrel and layers 28, 32, 34 are then wrapped tightly with a binder tape such as, for example, a polyester film tape.
  • the binder tape is very tightly wound so as to exert a pressure on the layered structure beneath.
  • the whole construction is then heated to a high temperature in order to vulcanise the elastomeric materials within.
  • the finished hose product is then removed from the mandrel by means of a blast of pressurised air. If the hose material is stiff however or the mandrel shape is very convoluted then this removal process may not be successful. The hose may therefore need to be prised off mechanically.
  • FIG. 4 shows an end of a corner-shaped hose piece 38 secured to a pipe 40 by means of a retainer 42.
  • the hose 38 is subject to hoop stress.
  • the result is an expansion and contraction of the hose walls as indicated by arrows 44 and dotted lines 45. It can be seen that movement is concentrated in the vicinity of the retainer 42. The hose material in this region is therefore subject to the greatest stress as radial movement is countered by the retainer 42.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates, by means of a binding diagram, a first exemplary embodiment of a reinforcing fabric 50 in accordance with this invention.
  • a binding diagram as is well known in the knitting field, is a symbolic representation of the movements of the guide bars of a knitting machine as it creates the fabric. From this, a skilled operator can recreate the fabric with a suitably configured machine.
  • Each dot 51 represents one needle head at one point in time.
  • Each horizontal row of dots represents a series of needles during one stitch forming process. That is, one row or course of the fabric.
  • the rows of dots from bottom to top represent a succession of stitch-forming processes.
  • the vertical direction on the page thus corresponds with the machine direction and the horizontal axis with the cross direction, as shown by axes 52.
  • the guide bars first form the stitch itself by wrapping the yarn around the front of the needle (the overlap) and drawing it through the previously-formed stitch. They may then move the yarn laterally across the back of the needles to form the underlap. In the binding diagram, the path followed by the guide bars is drawn in front of and behind the needles.
  • the fabric 50 comprises a first plurality of inlaid yarns 54a - 54f arranged as a 9 row Atlas-type inlay.
  • An Atlas-type inlay is one in which the yarn moves continually one needle across the course of the fabric for each successive stitch. After moving 9 needles (taking therefore 9 rows) across the course, the lateral movement is reversed and the Atlas-type inlay proceeds at a reverse angle. The result is that the first plurality 54a - 54f of inlaid yarns follow a sharply alternating course generally proceeding along the machine direction of the reinforcing fabric 50.
  • the first inlaid yarns 54a - 54f follow a zigzag path: they proceed upwards (in the figure) at an angle of around 35° clockwise to the machine direction for a length L (9 rows), they then turn sharply (through about 1 10°) to proceed again generally vertically but at an angle of around 35° anticlockwise to the machine direction again for length L, where another turn is executed and the pattern is repeated. That is, a pattern of triangular symmetry of length 2L and internal angle about 1 10° is repeated along the machine direction of the fabric 50 by the first inlaid yarns 54a - 54f.
  • this Figure 5 for clarity, only six inlaid yarns of the first plurality 54a - 54f of yarns are shown. In reality, the first plurality of yarns extends across the width of the fabric. Only a small selection of such yarns are however illustrated in order to avoid obscuring further details shown in the Figure.
  • the 35° angle is intended to correspond so far as possible with the critical balanced angle that is used in fibre-wound hoses to equalise hoop and axial extension. As the inlay moves one needle laterally for each row stitched, this angle is achieved by appropriate selection of needle spacing (gauge) and stitch length.
  • a second plurality (six shown for exemplary purposes) of inlaid yarns 56a - 56f overlays the first plurality of inlaid yarns 54a - 54f extending across the width of the fabric and also arranged as a 9 row Atlas-type inlay.
  • the second inlaid yarns 56a - 56f therefore also form a pattern of triangular symmetry of length 2L (18 rows) and internal angle 1 10° that is repeated to form a zigzag path generally along the machine direction of the reinforcing fabric 50.
  • the pattern followed by the second plurality 56a - 56f of inlaid yarns is offset from that of the first plurality by a distance of 2/3L (6 rows) in the machine direction.
  • a third plurality (six shown again in this example) of 9 row Atlas-type inlaid yarns 58a - 58f overlays the first 54a - 54f and second 56a - 56f plurality of inlaid yarns and follows a similarly zigzag path generally along the machine direction of the reinforcing fabric 50. That is, the third inlaid yarns 58a - 58f also form a pattern of triangular symmetry of length 2L and internal angle 1 10° that is repeated along the machine direction of the fabric. The pattern followed by the third plurality 58a - 58f of inlaid yarns is further offset from that of the second plurality by a distance of 2/3L (6 rows) in the machine direction.
  • the inlaid yarns are interlinked with warp-knitted chain or open lap pillar stitches.
  • Columns 60, 62 of chain stitching are indicated using standard notation in the Figure 5 binding diagram.
  • the chains of stitches 60, 62 extend along the machine direction, each stitch 64 being linked to those above and below (in the figure) it in the column. That is, the stitched columns 60, 62 each form essentially a one-dimensional chain of knitted fabric.
  • Each stitch 64 loops round one or more of the inlaid yarns 54, 56, 58.
  • the columns are repeated laterally across the width of the fabric. That is, parallel chains of knitted yarn 60, 62 bind and are interlinked with zigzag arrangements of inlaid yarns 54, 56, 58 across the extent of the fabric.
  • interlinked fabric structure of inlaid yarns 54, 56, 58 and knitted chains 60, 62 is coated with an elastomer or other resinous material to form a reinforcement fabric for use in a product, such as that shown in Figure 3.
  • a fabric structure in accordance with this invention exhibits numerous advantages over the prior art. Fundamentally, it replicates the desirable properties of both the prior art woven 2 and knitted 8 fabrics.
  • the reinforcing fabric 50 can exhibit very good hoop stability, that is resistance to radial expansion, when pressurised and good conformability when relaxed. This is achieved by inlaid yarns 54, 56, 58, which mimic the stiffness of a woven fabric, but these are supported not by forming them into a weave, but by interlinking them with conformable parallel chains 60, 62 of stitches.
  • This advantage over the prior art is notable in itself but fabric constructed in accordance with the present invention is also remarkably adaptable. It has an inherent capacity for structural variation that is reflected in the finished fabric performance capabilities. That is, the basic structure is readily adapted to produce different fabric structures, each with a specified set of characteristics.
  • the inlaid yarns 54, 56, 58 are aligned to form an angle of 35° (or as close to the critically balanced angle as possible) with the machine direction.
  • the reinforcement fabric can be simply wrapped round the liner circumferentially in the machine direction.
  • the strong inlaid yarns 54, 56, 58 are aligned such that in the product assembled in this straightforward manner, they are tilted from the circumferential direction by an angle of around 35°. This is the ideal alignment to equalise hoop and axial expansion and so to form a more efficient pressure vessel product.
  • Another benefit of the reinforcing fabric 50 in accordance with this invention is that its structure has been found to provide excellent adhesion to an elastomer coating. That is, known coating processes have been found to work well without the need for pre-treatment.
  • the inlaid yarns 54, 56, 58 are glass fibre yarns and the chains of knitted stitches 60, 62 are formed from aramid yarn.
  • the weight of yarn can be selected from the standard range depending on application, typically 68 Tex glass fibre and 33 Tex aramid are used. Glass fibre yarns are very stiff when lying straight, as they are along the majority of the length of the fabric in the orientation of the critical balanced angle.
  • Aramid yarn is highly flexible and able to conform readily to define the loops within a knitted structure, without significantly weakening. Both are suitable for the anticipated high- temperature requirements.
  • the preferred elastomeric coating is, as in the prior art, silicone for high-temperature applications because of its physical stability over a wide temperature range. Other materials can of course also be used, depending on application and cost considerations, but this particular combination satisfies a number of requirements for automotive applications as will be described in more detail below.
  • aramid yarn knitted into a honeycomb structure As stated previously, a standard reinforcement material for automotive applications in which hot fluids have to be carried under pressure through convoluted pipe work pathways is aramid yarn knitted into a honeycomb structure. This has the necessary conformability and strength to satisfy present requirements. Aramid is almost universally used in fabrics for high- temperature applications that require conformability. Glass has not previously been successfully incorporated in a knitted structure.
  • the present invention permits the use of glass fibre inlays. Indeed, this is very much the preferred embodiment for many applications.
  • the glass inlay is straight along the majority of its length. Glass fibre is far stiffer than aramid when straight. Each bend however is a potential source of weakness. It is known that glass fibre yarn is susceptible to fracture under dynamic loading conditions, particularly when subject to tight angles.
  • the glass is subject to a 1 10° bend at point a.
  • the reinforcement strength is increased (in comparison with aramid).
  • hoop and axial expansion are balanced, which means less strain on the material arising from fibre realignment when pressurised.
  • Glass fibre yarns possess two principal benefits in comparison with aramid. First, they are around eight or more times stiffer, which significantly improves the performance of glass-reinforced fabrics. Secondly, aramid costs 5 to 6 times more than glass for the same weight of material. Although therefore aramid yarns can be strengthened if necessary by increasing the Tex of the material used, this significantly increases the cost. A cheaper, stronger reinforcement fabric can be obtained if using glass inlays in a fabric structure in accordance with the present invention. A stronger fabric clearly allows a given structure to have a higher burst strength or, equivalently, allows the same burst strength but with fewer layers of reinforcing fabric.
  • the inlay yarn takes the bulk of any applied load.
  • the stitching yarn primarily functions as a carrier and takes very little load. It is however highly conformable, which allows the fabric to adapt to different shapes.
  • the weaker, more conformable, aramid yarn is therefore a preferred choice for the knitted yarn, despite its increased cost relative to glass fibre.
  • the coating of silicone, or other elastomer is also beneficial to the performance of glass inlays 54, 56, 58.
  • the coating is found to add support to the glass inlays 54, 56, 58 and to reduce the strain experienced under dynamic loading conditions, particularly at the weakened bend.
  • the alignment at 35.265° is the theoretical ideal for balancing hoop and axial expansion. Practically however, for many applications, the two expansions are close enough through a range of orientation angles. It is anticipated that the desirable benefits of the reinforcing fabric 50 can be obtained, to a large extent, if the alignment angle is within the range of 25° to 45°.
  • the angle 35° is specified for the embodiments described herein, although it is to be understood that this encompasses a range of angles that, in a number of applications, have a sufficiently equivalent effect.
  • a four bar, single needle-bed, 12 gauge warp knitting machine is used. Beams carrying the required endage of glass yarns are loaded into shaft positions 2, 3 and 4. Beams carrying the required endage of aramid yarns are loaded into shaft position 1. Shafts 2, 3 and 4 feed guide bars 2, 3 and 4, which form the Atlas- type inlays both over and in opposition to one another. Shaft 1 feeds guide bar 1 , which creates an open lap chain or pillar stitch that holds the inlays in place. All four guide bars are operated simultaneously to build up the fabric structure row by row, moving from the bottom to the top of Figure 5.
  • the inlay design represented in Figure 5 is created using 3 bars, each of which lays its yarn in a 9 row Atlas-type inlay. That is, each bar moves the yarn laterally one needle position per row over nine rows. The direction of lateral movement is then reversed so the yarn moves back one needle position over nine rows to its original position. This movement continues for a further nine rows before the direction of lateral movement is again reversed, and so on.
  • the three inlay bars are offset such that the inlay patterns overlap and cover the fabric area, as shown in Figure 5.
  • the fourth bar creates the chain stitch that holds the inlays in place.
  • an alternative embodiment of an inlay design 68 in accordance with this invention is indicated by the representation of Figure 6.
  • Figure 6 and indeed in Figures 7 and 8, the knitted chain or open lap pillar stitch is not represented. This is for clarity only, to avoid cluttering these diagrams in which the inlay yarns are shown extending across a greater width than in Figure 5.
  • an additional bar creates the chain stitch that holds the inlays in place across the width of the fabric. It is only the inlay design that is varied between the various embodiments shown in the figures and this is seen more clearly in the absence of the chain stitch representation, although the chain stitching will of course be present in the finished fabric.
  • four guide bars are used to create four respective inlays 70, 72, 74, 76.
  • each inlay is a 12 row Atlas-type inlay.
  • the number of bars used to form respective inlays is not limited to 3 or 4, despite the fact that this is what is shown in the diagrams. Increasing the number of bars generally results in longer lengths of straight glass inlay between corners. For example, 9 rows in the 3-bar embodiment of Figure 5 compared with 12 rows in the 4-bar embodiment of Figure 6. Reducing the number of corners reduces the potential sources of weakness, making the fabric more stable. On the other hand, increasing the number of bars makes the fabric more complicated and therefore more costly to fabricate.
  • the preferred range is 3 - 6 bars or sets of inlay yarns. It is further noted that an even number of inlay yarns will distort the stitch to a lesser degree.
  • the orientation of the inlays with respect to the machine direction affects the balance between resistance to hoop expansion and resistance to axial expansion. These parameters are balanced when the angle at point a is 35.625°. Decreasing the angle aligns the inlays more with the machine direction resulting in increased resistance to hoop expansion (at the cost of increased axial expansion) in a product reinforced by wrapping the fabric circumferentially. Conversely, increasing the angle increases resistance to axial expansion (at the cost of increased hoop expansion).
  • the stitch length of the chain knit is adjusted. If therefore an application demands a reduction in product hoop expansion, then the stitch length is increased in order to reduce the orientation angle. If on the other hand a product requires more resistance to axial expansion, shorter stitches are used. Number of knitting machine bars
  • One bar of the machine is assigned to knit the binding chain or pillar stitching. Some or all of the remainder may each be used to include an inlay. An even number of inlay bars results in more balanced stress on the knitted chains; an odd number is more likely to pull them into a zigzag formation. Number of rows in the repeat (2L)
  • the gauge may be adjusted. Increasing the gauge increases the density of the fabric, with the result that it is stronger but may be more difficult to coat. Yarn weight
  • Varying the yarn weight offers another mechanism by which to adjust the strength of the inlay yarns and hence of the fabric.
  • Yarn weight is measured in Tex (g km "1 ). Yarns however are available commercially only at certain Tex values, which limits the scope for adjustment.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic representation of a second exemplary embodiment 80 of a reinforcing fabric in accordance with the invention. Similar to the first 50 exemplary embodiment of the reinforcing fabric, this reinforcing fabric 80 comprises first 82a - 82d, second 84a - 84d and third 86a - 86d sets of inlaid yarns positioned on top of each other and arranged offset from each other in the lengthwise or the machine direction of the reinforcing fabric 80.
  • each group 82a - 82d, 84a - 84d, 86a - 86d of inlaid yarns consists of a number of yarns, extending across the fabric, that are arranged to follow a repeating pattern at distances of 2L in the machine direction.
  • the repeat pattern is not a triangular zigzag but a more curved variation.
  • curved it is meant that the transition angle of the zigzag (Point a in Figure 5) is not so acute.
  • the inlay yarns do not follow a curved path, as such, as they are still constrained to discrete needle positions by the manufacturing process. As in previous embodiments of reinforcing fabrics, it is necessary to reverse the direction of the angle made by the inlay yarn along a straight part of its length with the machine direction.
  • the zigzag
  • embodiments achieve this reversal with a single angular change (for example 1 10° at Point a).
  • the angular adjustment is not localised at one stitch position, but is distributed over several successive stitch positions.
  • the inlay path therefore, strictly, over a region in which alignment is reversed, is a series 87a, 87b, 87c of short, straight linear sections, the orientation of each linear section being rotated a small, shallow angle from adjacent sections. That is, reversal of the angle to the machine direction is achieved by means of multiple small angular adjustments, distributed across successive stitches 87a, 87b, 87c.
  • a substantial part of the inlaid yarns 82, 84, 86 of Figure 7 extends along the fabric at around the preferred angle of 35° (shown in Figure 7 by axes 88 defining angle a).
  • the generally curved path is not therefore sinusoidal, but that is not to say that a sinusoidal variation could not be used.
  • the apices of the triangles of the inlay patterns of the first 50 embodiment that have been rounded in this 80 embodiment.
  • the inlaid yarns 82, 84, 86 are interlinked throughout the fabric by parallel columns (not shown) of knitted chain or open lap pillar stitches.
  • each bend in a glass yarn is substantially weaker than a straight yarn.
  • Glass yarns when subject to dynamic or transient loading for example in a pressurised reinforced hose, are therefore susceptible to fracture at regions with a high degree of bending.
  • the use of generally curved inlays means that any dynamic loads that are applied to the inlaid yarns 82, 84, 86 are distributed over a greater length of yarn by virtue of the gradual angles to which the yarns 82, 84, 86 are subjected.
  • the reinforced fabric 80 provides the additional benefit of reducing the likelihood of fractures arising at areas of high stress concentrations, when compared with the reinforcing fabric 50 illustrated in Figure 5.
  • the fabric represented in Figure 7 is fabricated using the same machine as used for the Figure 5 representation. That is, a four bar, single needle-bed, 12 gauge warp knitting machine, although other machine configurations can alternatively be used.
  • the first guide bar carries aramid yarn and creates an open lap chain or pillar stitch that holds the inlays in place.
  • Guide bars 2, 3 and 4 each form a generally curved glass inlay both over and in opposition to one another.
  • the curved inlay is more complex to create than the 9 row Atlas-type inlay for the fabric of Figure 5.
  • guide bar movement that can create a curved inlay is the following sequence:
  • the inlay is first laid in this sequence with the lateral movement across the needles from left to right, it is then repeated with lateral movement from right to left. This creates a more gradual curve with repeat half-length L of 9 rows, of the type shown in Figure 7.
  • the four guide bars are operated simultaneously to build up the fabric structure row by row, moving from the bottom to the top of Figure 7.
  • the properties of the generally curved-inlay embodiment can, like those of the first embodiment, be tuned by varying characteristics of the pattern. Chain stitch length, number of bars, repeat length, machine gauge, yarn thickness and material can all be varied as described previously in relation to the Figure 5 embodiment.
  • Figure 8 is a schematic representation of a variation 90 of the embodiment 80 of Figure 7.
  • a fabric constructed according to this representation 90 of Figure 6 four guide bars are used to create four respective inlays 92, 94, 96, 98.
  • the inlay in this fabric also has a length of 12 rows between lateral reversals.
  • the novel yarn structures described in relation to Figures 5 to 8 are coated with an elastomeric material to form a reinforcing fabric.
  • Such fabrics are incorporated in hoses, connectors and the like using processes such as that described in relation to Figure 3. Such novel hose structures therefore are also part of this invention.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Knitting Of Fabric (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention porte sur un tissu de renfort, lequel tissu comprend au moins deux ensembles de fils incrustés (82, 84) constitués par un matériau relativement robuste, tel que le verre, entrelacés avec un fil tricoté réalisé en un matériau plus conformable, tel que l'aramide. Les fils incrustés suivent à travers le tissu des trajectoires qui s'étendent vers un côté, puis vers un autre côté, d'un axe qui est globalement parallèle à un sens machine du tissu. Les fils incrustés contribuent à la résistance du tissu et le fil tricoté à sa conformabilité, chaque facteur étant ajustable avec plus d'indépendance que ce qui est connu dans l'état antérieur. Le degré de souplesse d'adaptation des caractéristiques de performances des tissus de renfort permet la personnalisation pour une gamme de produits, en particulier des tuyaux, des tuyaux souples et des récipients de pression. Dans un mode de réalisation, particulièrement bénéfique pour des incrustations de verre, des changements de direction du fil incrusté sont accomplis par des rotations graduelles de courts segments d'incrustation successifs (87a, 87b, 87c).
PCT/GB2013/052238 2012-08-23 2013-08-23 Tissu de renfort WO2014030018A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1215043.9 2012-08-23
GBGB1215043.9A GB201215043D0 (en) 2012-08-23 2012-08-23 Reinforcing fabric

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014030018A1 true WO2014030018A1 (fr) 2014-02-27

Family

ID=47045293

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2013/052238 WO2014030018A1 (fr) 2012-08-23 2013-08-23 Tissu de renfort

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (1) GB201215043D0 (fr)
WO (1) WO2014030018A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109208170A (zh) * 2017-07-05 2019-01-15 吴宗容 编织布面
EP3659924A1 (fr) * 2018-11-27 2020-06-03 Airbus Defence and Space Dispositif de transport de carburant dans un aéronef et engin spatial

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2005740A (en) * 1977-09-29 1979-04-25 Halstenbach & Co Elastic warp knitted fabric
FR2522027A1 (fr) * 1982-02-22 1983-08-26 Saint Chamond Manuf Reunies Support textile applicable notamment a la fabrication de materiaux composites ou stratifies, et les materiaux ou produits incorporant ce support
EP0425099A2 (fr) * 1989-09-28 1991-05-02 Milliken Europe N.V. Draps stabilisés
WO1999063141A1 (fr) * 1998-05-15 1999-12-09 Eng-Tex Ab Non tisse de fils par liant

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2005740A (en) * 1977-09-29 1979-04-25 Halstenbach & Co Elastic warp knitted fabric
FR2522027A1 (fr) * 1982-02-22 1983-08-26 Saint Chamond Manuf Reunies Support textile applicable notamment a la fabrication de materiaux composites ou stratifies, et les materiaux ou produits incorporant ce support
EP0425099A2 (fr) * 1989-09-28 1991-05-02 Milliken Europe N.V. Draps stabilisés
WO1999063141A1 (fr) * 1998-05-15 1999-12-09 Eng-Tex Ab Non tisse de fils par liant

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109208170A (zh) * 2017-07-05 2019-01-15 吴宗容 编织布面
EP3659924A1 (fr) * 2018-11-27 2020-06-03 Airbus Defence and Space Dispositif de transport de carburant dans un aéronef et engin spatial
US11493171B2 (en) 2018-11-27 2022-11-08 Airbus Defence and Space GmbH Device for carrying fuel in an aircraft and spacecraft

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB201215043D0 (en) 2012-10-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9022077B2 (en) Composite tube for fluid delivery system
JP6150870B2 (ja) 織式プリフォーム、繊維強化コンポジット、及びそれらの製造方法
US11053615B2 (en) Metal alloy knit fabric for high temperature insulating materials
EP3346033B1 (fr) Tricot à base de céramique à couche unique pour joints boudins à haute température
US20210071330A1 (en) Braided structures of complex geometry
EP2598680B1 (fr) Structure de tuyau souple à renfort entrelacé
AU732003B2 (en) Reinforced flexible hose
CN102985738B (zh) 具有编织加强结构的柔性软管和其制造方法
EP3230507B1 (fr) Tissu de renforcement tricoté
EP2530197A2 (fr) Procédé pour tricoter une étoffe et étoffe tricotée
KR20120112431A (ko) 섬유 프리폼, 섬유 강화 복합재 및 이의 제조방법
US9111665B2 (en) Conductive mesh for composite tube for fluid delivery system
US9366365B2 (en) Reinforcement methods for composite tube for fluid delivery system
WO2014030018A1 (fr) Tissu de renfort
US20190277438A1 (en) Material for use in lining large-diameter pipes and a method of making same
Liu et al. Advanced fibrous architectures for composites in aerospace engineering
WO2014204688A1 (fr) Procédés de renforcement de tube composite pour système de distribution de fluide
US11613833B1 (en) Braided structures of complex geometry
CN112779662B (zh) 异形编织物及其编织方法
JP2018059612A (ja) 布巻ホース及び布巻ホース製造方法
AU2012101840A4 (en) Flexible Hose Structure with a Interlaced Reinforcement
ITPD20090161A1 (it) Procedimento per la realizzazione di un tubo flessibile con rinforzo magliato
CN117626511A (zh) 编织方法
US20070261781A1 (en) Flexible fluid-transport duct presenting reinforcement
WO2014204690A1 (fr) Treillis conducteur pour tube composite pour système de distribution de fluides

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 13756666

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 13756666

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1