WO2012148041A1 - Method of alarming abnormal state of automated manufacturing system based on plc signal pattern - Google Patents
Method of alarming abnormal state of automated manufacturing system based on plc signal pattern Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2012148041A1 WO2012148041A1 PCT/KR2011/005429 KR2011005429W WO2012148041A1 WO 2012148041 A1 WO2012148041 A1 WO 2012148041A1 KR 2011005429 W KR2011005429 W KR 2011005429W WO 2012148041 A1 WO2012148041 A1 WO 2012148041A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- plc
- line
- reference sequence
- change
- plc signals
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
- G05B19/05—Programmable logic controllers, e.g. simulating logic interconnections of signals according to ladder diagrams or function charts
- G05B19/058—Safety, monitoring
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
- G05B19/05—Programmable logic controllers, e.g. simulating logic interconnections of signals according to ladder diagrams or function charts
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
- G05B19/048—Monitoring; Safety
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B21/00—Alarms responsive to a single specified undesired or abnormal condition and not otherwise provided for
- G08B21/18—Status alarms
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/10—Plc systems
- G05B2219/14—Plc safety
- G05B2219/14054—Self test
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/10—Plc systems
- G05B2219/14—Plc safety
- G05B2219/14057—Compare response time, time interval with reference response time, interval
Definitions
- the following description relates to a method of alarming an abnormal state of a line of an automated manufacturing system based on a programmable logic controller (PLC) signal pattern, and more particularly, to a method of detecting an abnormal operation of a line of an automated manufacturing system based on a PLC signal for use in control of the automated manufacturing system and automatically alarming the abnormal state.
- PLC programmable logic controller
- Programmable logic controller is an industrial computer that is programmed in a low level language for use in control of an automated system.
- a PLC program as an internal logic of a PLC controls an automated system through Boolean operation.
- ladder logic diagram as shown in an example illustrated in FIG. 1 is known as a typical language generally used in a PLC program.
- a PLC program designed under a general manufacturing process may be verified and if the accuracy of the program is achieved, the program is used to control an automated system in practice.
- a general automated manufacturing system consists of a number of robots and automated conveying devices.
- the robots and conveying devices perform a variety of tasks such as welding and transport according to logic of a PLC program.
- a recent automated manufacturing system employs large-scale automated manufacturing lines with high complexity, and hence contains diverse causes of task failure such as errors in the own system due to the complexity and errors due to external causes such as intervention in a movement range of a robot.
- a delay due to a task failure during the process may cost an enormous economic loss which is caused by error detection and an increase in set-up time.
- a code for diagnosis is added in a PLC program that controls processes and distribution flow, thereby monitoring an automated manufacturing system.
- a PLC program is monitored through an error display module that shows predicted errors, as shown in FIG. 2. That is, the conventional monitoring method predicts areas of a high probability of occurrence of an error, and establishes and adds codes for error diagnosis target objects as shown in FIG. 2, and thus not all signals can be monitored. Therefore, the conventional method monitors only a limited range of processes, and thus has limitation as a monitoring method to detect gradual error. In other words, it is difficult to handle beforehand a task failure due to gradual degradation of devices or accessories.
- the following description relates to a method of alarming an abnormal state of a line of an automated manufacturing system based on a programmable logic controller (PLC) signal pattern, wherein the method is capable of detecting a gradual error in a monitoring target that is not limited to a part of the line of the automated manufacturing system.
- PLC programmable logic controller
- a method of alarming an abnormal state of a line of an automated manufacturing system using a programmable logic controller (PLC) signal pattern including: obtaining a plurality of change sequences of a plurality of PLC signals for control of the line in a normal operating system by repeating a cycle for which the line is sequentially controlled by the PLC signals that are transmitted and received between a PLC and the line according to an operation of PLC internal logic; acquiring a reference sequence from a plurality of the change sequences, wherein the reference sequence indicates an order of change of a plurality of the PLC signals for control of the line in a normal operating state; and determining whether the line is in a normal operating state or an abnormal operating system based on whether or not the reference sequence is matched with a change sequence of a plurality of PLC signals for control of the line in use after the acquisition of the reference sequence, and outputting a determination result.
- PLC programmable logic controller
- the acquiring of the reference sequence may include arranging each of a plurality of the change sequences according to time, that is, along a time axis and extracting a common region as the reference sequence from the arranged change sequences.
- the determining of whether the line is in a normal operating state or an abnormal operating system may be further based on whether or not a time interval between a plurality of PLC signals forming the reference sequence is matched with a time interval between a plurality of PLC signals forming the change sequence for control of the line in use after the acquisition of the reference signal.
- the time interval between a plurality of the PLC signal forming the reference sequence may be a time interval between a plurality of PLC signals extracted as common from a plurality of PLC signals that form a plurality of the change sequences and are arranged according to time.
- the time interval between a plurality of the PLC signals forming the reference sequence may be obtained by adding an allowable time set by a user to a time interval between a plurality of PLC signals which are extracted as common from a plurality of the PLC signals that form a plurality of the change sequences and are arranged according to time.
- a plurality of change sequences of multiple PLC signals for control of the line in a normal operating system are obtained to infer a reference sequence for determining an abnormal state of the line.
- the reference sequence is compared with a change sequence of a plurality of PLC signals for control of the line in use, and based on the comparison result, an abnormal state of the line is determined.
- targets to be monitored are not necessarily limited to some lines of the automated manufacturing system, and errors occurring gradually in the targets to be monitored may be enabled to be detected.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of a ladder logic diagram (LD).
- LD ladder logic diagram
- FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of an error display module for monitoring a programmable logic controller (PLC) program.
- PLC programmable logic controller
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a method of alarming an abnormal state of a line of an automated manufacturing system based on a PLC signal pattern according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating change in three PLC signals S1, S2, and S3 over time.
- FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of a reference sequence formed by extracting a common region from multiple change sequences, each of which is arranged according to time.
- FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of comparison between the reference sequence and a change sequence of a plurality of PLC signals for control of the line in use after the acquisition of the reference sequence.
- FIGS. 7 and 8 are diagrams illustrating an example of comparison between time intervals of a plurality of PLC signals for determining an abnormal state of the line.
- a method of alarming an abnormal state of a line of an automated manufacturing system using a programmable logic controller (PLC) signal pattern may be prerequisite.
- a memory value in a PLC of an actually driven line may be extracted suing, for example, object linking and embedding (OLE) for process control (OPC) technique.
- OLE object linking and embedding
- OPC process control
- OPC is a technique to be widely used for communication and interface in industrial control areas.
- OPC servers are primarily categorized into vendor-dedicated OPC servers for data access by a particular vendor PLC and universal PLC servers designed for interfacing with various PLC vendor products.
- the method of alarming an abnormal state of a line of an automated manufacturing system based on a PLC signal pattern in accordance with the exemplary embodiment reads an internal memory value of a hardware PLC through the OPC.
- the method may be a program that is implemented in a predefined programming language and thus can be run by a personal computer (PC)-based system, but the implementation of the method may not be limited thereto.
- PC personal computer
- an OPC technique is mainly used for communications of a human machine interface (HMI) that is a control panel for manufacturing site control.
- the HMI panel may read out a PLC output signal from the PLC, and deliver to the PLC a characteristic signal that is manipulated by a manufacturing engineer as an input signal. That is, the PLC output signal is received and an input signal is delivered to the PLC.
- the method according the exemplary embodiment reads only input/output signals inside the PLC, focusing on a pattern of the input/output signals, without generating any signal for changing a state of the PLC.
- the method according to the exemplary embodiment recognizes and notifies an abnormal state of a line of an automated manufacturing system by reading input/output signals from the PLC.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a flowchart of an example of a method of alarming an abnormal state of a line of an automated manufacturing system based on a PLC signal pattern.
- the method shown in the example illustrated in FIG. 3 may be performed by a PC-based system or by any other systems.
- the PLC signals transmitted and received between the line and the PLC may be at least one of a PLC output signal which is generated by the PLC to be transmitted to the line and a PLC input signal which is generated by the line to be transmitted to the PLC.
- FIG. 4 An example of change sequences of a plurality of the PLC signals for control of the line of a normal operating state is shown in FIG. 4.
- the example illustrated in FIG. 4 shows change in three PLC signals S1, S2, and S3 over time.
- initial PLC signal patterns may be defined, respectively, as S1(1), S2(0), and S3(0).
- the PLC signal S2 changes from 0 to 1.
- it is possible to define the PLC signal patterns as S1(1), S2(1), and S3(0) when t 10.
- the PCL signal patterns do not change at all.
- information for forming a change sequence of a plurality of the PLC signals only information of a region where the PLC signal pattern has changed can be used.
- the change in each PLC signal with time may be evaluated.
- the change in the PLC signals S1, S2, and S3 shown in the example illustrated in FIG. 4 may be represented as below.
- Ev.1 t 0 : S1(1), S2(0), S3(0).
- Ev.2 t 10 : S1(1), S2(1), S3(0).
- Ev.3 t 140 : S1(1), S2(1), S3(1).
- the acquired change sequence of the PLC signals may be inferred from the change in the PLC signals, for one cycle, which are transmitted and received between the PLC and the line in a normal operating state in which the line is sequentially controlled according to an operation of the PLC internal logic.
- a reference sequence for monitoring an abnormal state of the line may be acquired based on a plurality of the PLC signals for control of the line which is in normal operating state during one cycle, for more stable monitoring of the abnormal state of the line, it is required to repeat a procedure for acquiring a change sequence of the PLC signals for a number of times.
- a procedure for acquiring a change sequence of a plurality of the PLC signals may be repeated a number of times to obtain multiple change sequences of the PLC signals.
- a reference sequence of an order of change of the PLC signals for control of the line in a normal operating state is obtained (S2).
- the reference sequence may be obtained by extracting a common region from the multiple change sequences, each of which is arranged according to time, that is, each of which is arranged along a time axis (t).
- An example of the arranged change sequences is shown in FIG. 5.
- An axis intersecting the time axis (t) may be an axis that represents a magnitude of an electrical quantity (voltage or current) of each PLC signal.
- each of four change sequences 1, 2, 3, and 4 is arranged along the time axis, and a common region therebetween may be extracted as a reference sequence 5.
- the line may be determined that the line is in a normal operating system if the reference sequence is matched with a change sequence of a plurality of PLC signals that are used for control of the line in use after the acquisition of the reference sequence, and otherwise, it may be determined that the line is in an abnormal operating system.
- a normal state or an abnormal state of the line may be determined based on whether or not a reference sequence is matched with a change sequence of a plurality of PLC signals for control of the line in use after the acquisition of the reference sequence.
- the normal state or the abnormal state of the line may be determined further based on whether or not a time interval between a plurality of PLC signals forming the reference sequence is matched with a time interval between a plurality of PLC signals forming the change sequence for control of the line in use after the acquisition of the reference signal.
- FIGS. 7 and 8 Examples of the above determination of a normal state or an abnormal state of the line based on whether or not the time intervals are matched between the reference sequence and the change sequence are shown in FIGS. 7 and 8.
- a PLC signal B follows a PLC signal A after a time interval of t
- a change sequence 10 of a plurality of PLC signals for control of the line in use after the acquisition of the reference sequence the PLC signal B does not follow the PLC signal A after a time interval of t.
- the reference sequence 9 and the change sequence 10 are not matched together, it can be determined that the line is in an abnormal operating state.
- a time interval between a plurality of PLC signals forming the reference sequence is matched with a time interval between a plurality of PLC signals forming the change sequence for control of the line in use after the acquisition of the reference sequence, it may be determined that the line is in a normal operating state, and otherwise, it may be determined that the line is in an abnormal operating state.
- the time interval of a plurality of the PLC signals which forming the reference sequence may be the time interval of a plurality of the PLC signals formed by extracting a common region from a plurality of change sequences that are arranged according to time, as shown in the example illustrated in FIG. 5.
- a PLC signal B follows a PLC signal A after a time interval of t
- the PLC signal B does not follow the PLC signal A after the time interval of t.
- the time interval between the PLC signals forming the reference sequence may be lengthened by an allowable time t that is set by a user. Consequently, the time interval is extended by t, and if the PLC signal B follows the PLC signal A within the extended time interval, it may be determined that the line is in an abnormal state.
- the time interval between the PLC signals forming the reference sequence as a determination criterion may be obtained by adding the allowable time t to a time interval t between a plurality of PLC signals obtained by extracting common regions from multiple PLC signals which, respectively, form a plurality of change sequences, as shown in the example illustrated in FIG. 5.
- a plurality of change sequences of multiple PLC signals for control of the line in a normal operating system are obtained to infer a reference sequence for determining an abnormal state of the line.
- the reference sequence is compared with a change sequence of a plurality of PLC signals for control of the line in use, and based on the comparison result, an abnormal state of the line is determined.
- targets to be monitored are not necessarily limited to some lines of the automated manufacturing system, and errors occurring gradually in the targets to be monitored may be enabled to be detected.
- this invention can be used in the field of automated manufacturing system using PLC signal.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Emergency Management (AREA)
- Programmable Controllers (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (5)
- A method of alarming an abnormal state of a line of an automated manufacturing system using a programmable logic controller (PLC) signal pattern, the method comprising:obtaining a plurality of change sequences of a plurality of PLC signals for control of the line in a normal operating system by repeating a cycle for which the line is sequentially controlled by the PLC signals that are transmitted and received between a PLC and the line according to an operation of PLC internal logic;acquiring a reference sequence from a plurality of the change sequences, wherein the reference sequence indicates an order of change of a plurality of the PLC signals for control of the line in a normal operating state; anddetermining whether the line is in a normal operating state or an abnormal operating system based on whether or not the reference sequence is matched with a change sequence of a plurality of PLC signals for control of the line in use after the acquisition of the reference sequence, and outputting a determination result.
- The method of claim 1, wherein the acquiring of the reference sequence comprises arranging each of a plurality of the change sequences according to time, that is, along a time axis and extracting a common region as the reference sequence from the arranged change sequences.
- The method of claim 3, wherein the determining of whether the line is in a normal operating state or an abnormal operating system is further based on whether or not a time interval between a plurality of PLC signals forming the reference sequence is matched with a time interval between a plurality of PLC signals forming the change sequence for control of the line in use after the acquisition of the reference signal.
- The method of one of claims 2 and 3, wherein the time interval between a plurality of the PLC signal forming the reference sequence is a time interval between a plurality of PLC signals extracted as common from a plurality of PLC signals that form a plurality of the change sequences and are arranged according to time.
- The method of claim 4, wherein the time interval between a plurality of the PLC signals forming the reference sequence is obtained by adding an allowable time set by a user to a time interval between a plurality of PLC signals which are extracted as common from a plurality of the PLC signals that form a plurality of the change sequences and are arranged according to time.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/114,444 US20140055273A1 (en) | 2011-04-28 | 2011-07-22 | Method of alarming abnormal state of automated manufacturing system based on plc signal pattern |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR10-2011-0040103 | 2011-04-28 | ||
KR1020110040103A KR101178186B1 (en) | 2011-04-28 | 2011-04-28 | Method of alarming abnormal situation of plc based manufacturing system using plc signal pattern in pc based system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2012148041A1 true WO2012148041A1 (en) | 2012-11-01 |
Family
ID=46888027
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/KR2011/005429 WO2012148041A1 (en) | 2011-04-28 | 2011-07-22 | Method of alarming abnormal state of automated manufacturing system based on plc signal pattern |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20140055273A1 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101178186B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012148041A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6287018B2 (en) * | 2013-10-04 | 2018-03-07 | 富士通株式会社 | Visualization method, display method, information processing apparatus, visualization program, and display program |
KR101566355B1 (en) * | 2014-07-28 | 2015-11-06 | 주식회사 유디엠텍 | Master pattern generation method and apparatus for checking normal operation of plc based manufacturing system |
CN106647358B (en) * | 2016-11-15 | 2019-05-31 | 国电南瑞科技股份有限公司 | The switch changed position reason recognition methods of grid equipment state and event-order serie relationship |
KR101909836B1 (en) * | 2017-12-04 | 2018-10-18 | 김정석 | HMI system for industrial process automation control, Process automation monitoring method based on the same |
KR102097354B1 (en) * | 2018-07-11 | 2020-04-06 | 정윤철 | Monitoring device for automated system |
CN109739169A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2019-05-10 | 湖南三德科技股份有限公司 | A kind of sample preparation robot PLC fault locating analysis method and system |
KR102316469B1 (en) * | 2019-06-25 | 2021-10-22 | (주)아이티공간 | Detecting the health index of a device through multiple control output signals |
KR102316483B1 (en) * | 2019-06-25 | 2021-10-22 | (주)아이티공간 | Method for maintaining the predictive value of the device of multiple control output signals |
CN115903650B (en) * | 2023-02-24 | 2023-05-05 | 深圳华龙讯达信息技术股份有限公司 | Method and system for distributed acquisition of PLC signals |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0922308A (en) * | 1995-07-07 | 1997-01-21 | Matsushita Electric Works Ltd | Abnormal operation detecting method for facility |
JPH0926805A (en) * | 1995-07-07 | 1997-01-28 | Matsushita Electric Works Ltd | Facility failure diagnostic device |
JP2008226006A (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2008-09-25 | Omron Corp | Facility equipment diagnostic device and program |
JP2009251790A (en) * | 2008-04-03 | 2009-10-29 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Device for monitoring automatic machine |
Family Cites Families (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS53105684A (en) * | 1977-02-25 | 1978-09-13 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Down diagnostic method in sequence controlling |
US5870693A (en) * | 1996-03-01 | 1999-02-09 | Sony Display Device (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Apparatus and method for diagnosis of abnormality in processing equipment |
DE69813790D1 (en) * | 1998-07-29 | 2003-05-28 | Cegelec Acec S A | Redundant process control system |
WO2006114871A1 (en) * | 2005-04-20 | 2006-11-02 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Data collection device and gateway device |
US8161362B2 (en) * | 2005-06-10 | 2012-04-17 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Task management control apparatus and method, having redundant processing comparison |
EP1783569B1 (en) * | 2005-10-21 | 2018-08-29 | Omron Corporation | Data collection system |
US7308327B2 (en) * | 2006-05-12 | 2007-12-11 | Ford Motor Company | Method of application protocol monitoring for programmable logic controllers |
JP5348499B2 (en) * | 2009-03-12 | 2013-11-20 | オムロン株式会社 | I / O unit and industrial controller |
DE112010006057T5 (en) * | 2010-12-09 | 2013-10-10 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp. | Industrial device for automatic diagnosis |
KR101132358B1 (en) * | 2011-03-31 | 2012-04-03 | 주식회사 유디엠텍 | Multiple plc simulation system |
-
2011
- 2011-04-28 KR KR1020110040103A patent/KR101178186B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2011-07-22 US US14/114,444 patent/US20140055273A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-07-22 WO PCT/KR2011/005429 patent/WO2012148041A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0922308A (en) * | 1995-07-07 | 1997-01-21 | Matsushita Electric Works Ltd | Abnormal operation detecting method for facility |
JPH0926805A (en) * | 1995-07-07 | 1997-01-28 | Matsushita Electric Works Ltd | Facility failure diagnostic device |
JP2008226006A (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2008-09-25 | Omron Corp | Facility equipment diagnostic device and program |
JP2009251790A (en) * | 2008-04-03 | 2009-10-29 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Device for monitoring automatic machine |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR101178186B1 (en) | 2012-08-29 |
US20140055273A1 (en) | 2014-02-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2012148041A1 (en) | Method of alarming abnormal state of automated manufacturing system based on plc signal pattern | |
CN101111822B (en) | Information processing apparatus and information processing method | |
CN106919162B (en) | Control device having learning function for detecting cause of noise generation | |
CN110832416B (en) | Integrity monitoring in an automation system | |
WO2012134101A2 (en) | Multiple plc simulation system | |
CN104468256B (en) | Method and apparatus for the failure in isolation controller LAN | |
CN101111824A (en) | Information processing apparatus and information processing method | |
WO2019146849A1 (en) | Equipment diagnosis method using equipment diagnosis system | |
WO2006133308A1 (en) | Multi-protocol field device interface with automatic bus detection | |
CN105911377B (en) | A kind of test method of input/output port | |
US20230367296A1 (en) | Industrial system, abnormality detection system, and abnormality detection method | |
CN110120935A (en) | For identifying the abnormal method and apparatus in data flow in a communication network | |
CN109964182A (en) | Method and system for vehicle analysis | |
US8072889B2 (en) | Programmable controller | |
CN113767407A (en) | Information processing device, information processing method, information processing program, and recording medium | |
EP2613474A1 (en) | Method and system for control system redundancy | |
US11775468B2 (en) | Method for data transmission between a peripheral device and a data acquisition unit, peripheral device and data acquisition unit | |
JP2006139634A (en) | Equipment management device, communication channel diagnosis device, and equipment management method | |
WO2021182698A1 (en) | Method for monitoring abnormality detection of machine tool | |
US20210046712A1 (en) | Multipoint controllers for power delivery to multiple probes in ultrasonic welding systems | |
CN103430110B (en) | Programmable logic controller (PLC) | |
KR100768126B1 (en) | Sequence of event system for plant | |
CN206489445U (en) | A kind of electronic jacquard machine data transfer closed loop detecting system | |
US10599117B2 (en) | Safety-oriented automation system | |
WO2022157988A1 (en) | Work estimation device, control method for work estimation device, information processing program, and recording medium |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 11864538 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 14114444 Country of ref document: US |
|
32PN | Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established |
Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 112(1) EPC (EPO FORM 1205A DATED 09.04.14) |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 11864538 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |