WO2012087892A2 - Method for controlling the downhole temperature during fluid injection into oilfield wells - Google Patents
Method for controlling the downhole temperature during fluid injection into oilfield wells Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2012087892A2 WO2012087892A2 PCT/US2011/065760 US2011065760W WO2012087892A2 WO 2012087892 A2 WO2012087892 A2 WO 2012087892A2 US 2011065760 W US2011065760 W US 2011065760W WO 2012087892 A2 WO2012087892 A2 WO 2012087892A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- fluid
- temperature
- pump
- controlling
- signal
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/16—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/16—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
- E21B43/166—Injecting a gaseous medium; Injecting a gaseous medium and a liquid medium
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/06—Measuring temperature or pressure
- E21B47/07—Temperature
Definitions
- the application relates to methods to control the delivery of fluids for use in oilfield applications for subterranean formations. More particularly, the application relates to controlling the fluid temperature.
- This application relates to fluids used in treating a subterranean formation.
- the pumping of treatment fluids such as acids or other types of fluids and chemicals is routinely conducted in oil and gas production wells and in water injection wells to enhance either hydrocarbon production or water injection.
- the fluids flow down the wellbore and reach the target geological zones at a certain downhole injection temperature which depends on many factors such as the surface temperature, the initial geothermal profile between the surface and downhole, the pump rate, the geometry of the wellbore and the thermal properties of the fluids, completion materials, and rocks in the subterranean formations. Control of the downhole injection temperature is desirable to efficiently tailor the effectiveness and other parameters of the treatment.
- Embodiments of the application provide methods and apparatus for using a fluid within a subterranean formation comprising forming a fluid comprising a fluid additive, introducing the fluid to a formation, observing a temperature, and controlling a rate of fluid introduction using the observed temperature, wherein the observed temperature is lower than if no observing and controlling occurred.
- Embodiments of the application provide methods and apparatus to deliver fluid to a subterranean formation comprising a pump configured to deliver fluid to a wellbore, a flow path configured to receive fluid from the pump, a bottom hole assembly comprising a fluid outlet and a temperature sensor and configured to receive fluid from the flow path, and a controller configured to accept information from the temperature sensor and to send a signal.
- Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of surface equipment and a bottom hole assembly.
- Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of details of a bottom hole assembly.
- Figure 3 is a flow diagram of a process of embodiments of the application.
- Figure 4 is a plot of the Joules Thompson coefficient as a function of pressure and temperature for carbon dioxide.
- Figure 5 is a plot of temperature variation in the gas phase as a function of pressure and temperature for carbon dioxide.
- Figure 6 is a plot of temperature variation of the mixture during the JT effect as a function of pressure and temperature for carbon dioxide.
- Figure 7 is a plot of the temperature in the gas phase as a function of pressure and temperature for carbon dioxide.
- Figure 8 is a plot of temperature variation of the mixture during the JT effect as a function of pressure and temperature for carbon dioxide.
- Figure 9 is a plot of the temperature in the gas phase as a function of pressure and temperature for carbon dioxide.
- Figure 10 is a plot of temperature variation of the mixture during the JT effect as a function of pressure and temperature for carbon dioxide.
- Temperature control along a surface of a subterranean formation is important when acid is injected into the reservoir rock around the wellbore to increase production rate.
- the acid efficiency depends on the acid temperature and it may be desirable to decrease the downhole injection temperature to ensure better acid performance.
- Another example is the determination of the geological zones that are accepting the injected fluid and those that are not which may be achieved by using distributed temperature sensors (DTS). If the downhole injection temperature is sufficiently low/high, then zones of higher injectivity will show larger warmback/cooldown times if the well is shut in after the treatment.
- the warmback/cooldown time is the time it takes during the shut-in for the temperature of a given zone to come back to its original value before treatment. The measure of the warmback/cooldown time becomes more accurate if the downhole injection temperature is lower/higher than otherwise achieved.
- One means of changing the downhole injection temperature is to expose the fluid to a pressure drop caused by fluid expansion.
- the laws of thermodynamics predict that, under such a process, fluids may either reduce or increase their temperature through an effect named the Joule Thomson (JT) effect.
- JT Joule Thomson
- Embodiments of the application relate to a method of controlling downhole injection temperature by taking advantage of this effect through the combined use of pump rate, a bottom hole assembly (BHA), additives to the fluids and downhole temperature sensors.
- BHA bottom hole assembly
- the functionality and the performance of the injected fluid may depend on the downhole injection temperature. In other types of applications, it may be desirable to modify the downhole injection temperature in such a way that some downhole measurements used for interpreting the treatment fluid performance may be optimized.
- a method changes the temperature of the fluid in the wellbore using the JT effect of a gas that would change the temperature of a heat exchanger.
- the wellbore fluid flowing in contact with the heat exchanger would have its temperature changed by heat transfer between the heat exchanger and the wellbore fluid.
- the method proposed here is significantly different as it uses the JT effect of the injected fluid itself and therefore does not require a heat exchanger.
- Historical methods do not deal with changing the downhole injection temperature to control the functionality of the injected fluid and only measure its properties.
- the JT effect can occur during the production of a gas when the later experiences a significant pressure drop when going from the reservoir rock into the well. In most situations, the gas will experience a temperature drop during the pressure drop. This temperature drop may be detected by downhole temperature gages, such as those on production logging tools or distributed temperature sensors and may help an engineer identify the regions along the wellbore from which gas is being produced. Additionally, as the gas moves up to the surface production facility, its pressure will decrease and the JT effect will often result in a reduced gas temperature.
- Additional embodiments of the application control a temperature change during injection, into the well through the JT effect.
- Methods comprise using a tool and a control process which can be used for changing the downhole injection temperature through the JT effect during the pumping of a fluid treatment in a well.
- the fluid being pumped for a specific purpose such as reservoir stimulation, chemical treatment, and enhanced oil recovery
- placing a device along its flow path will cause a pressure drop in the fluid.
- This pressure drop will change the downhole injection temperature through the JT effect.
- the down hole injection temperature may be adjusted to the required temperature.
- the down hole injection temperature response to the pump rate may also be enhanced by introducing fluid additives, such as gases, to the pumped fluid.
- the method has two parts:
- the Tool The physical device and products that cause a change in the down hole injection temperature
- a down hole injection temperature change may be achieved by three means:
- the fluid may be pumped from the surface through a tubing or coiled-tubing at the end of which a bottom hole assembly may be placed.
- a temperature sensor On the bottom hole assembly, a temperature sensor may be mounted.
- the ensemble formed by the pump, the flow path, typically the drill pipe or coiled tubing, the bottom hole assembly, the temperature sensor, and the fluid additives, is referred as the tool and is used as part of the method.
- the bottom hole assembly of the tool may have some remotely controlled flow devices or orifices which, for a given pump rate, may control the pressure drop that the fluid will undergo when leaving the bottom hole assembly into the wellbore before flowing into the reservoir.
- the down hole injection temperature may also be monitored using downhole temperature sensors not mounted on the bottom hole assembly.
- the down hole injection temperature may be measured using down hole temperature sensors deployed in the wellbore before or during the pumping.
- the down hole injection temperature may be predicted using a mathematical model capable of solving the relevant thermodynamics problem for the treatment fluid undergoing expansion through the controlled flow devices or orifices.
- the controlled flow devices may be valves which can be closed or open to increase or reduce the pressure drop.
- the fluid additive may be a gas that is pumped with the fluid to optimize the value of the JT coefficient of the gas-fluid mixture. Alternatively, gas on its own may be pumped towards the end of the treatment for further control on the down hole injection temperature through increased JT effect.
- Error! Reference source not found. 1 illustrates one embodiment of the mechanical equipment that may be used.
- the pumping is performed using a fluid pump 101 on surface 102.
- the treatment fluid and the fluid additive are stored in their own fluid tanks 103 and 104 and flow through the pump 101 at a rate and proportion controlled by the engineer.
- the mixture, formed by the treatment fluid and the fluid additive then flows through surface lines 105 and then down into the wellbore 107 through a flow path 106, typically production tubing, the casing, a drill pipe, or coiled tubing.
- the fluid enters the bottom hole assembly 108.
- the bottom hole assembly 108 has multiple orifices 109 that may be closed or open remotely by the engineer.
- the fluid undergoes a pressure drop. The extent of the pressure drop is controlled by the following.
- the pressure drop causes the fluid to undergo a change in down hole injection temperature as it leaves the bottom hole assembly 108 and flows into the reservoir 11 1.
- This change in down hole injection temperature may be monitored at the surface by using the temperature reading from temperature sensors 110 through wireline communication or fiber optic cable.
- the down hole injection temperature may be obtained by other down hole temperature sensors (not shown) such as a distributed temperature sensors or be predicted by a mathematical model.
- controller 1 12 may receive a signal from or send a signal to the bottom hole assembly, temperature sensor, pump, additive or fluid tanks, or lines connecting the tanks, pump, flow path, or assembly.
- the engineer may change some of the above three parameters to optimize the down hole injection temperature.
- Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of details of a bottom hole assembly 108 in a wellbore 107.
- the fluid flows through the flow path 106 to the assembly 108 with a pressure drop illustrated by flow lines 201.
- Figure 2 shows flow lines 201 are present on open valves 202, but not on closed valves 203. Temperature sensors may also be placed across the surface of or embedded in or suspended near the assembly 108.
- the down hole injection temperature must be controlled for the accuracy of the down hole temperature-based interpretation of the treatment performance
- another fluid may be pumped at some stages in order to achieve the required down hole injection temperature for some time and to allow more accurate interpretation.
- a gas may be pumped after the acids to achieve a larger change on the down hole injection temperature. This larger change on the down hole injection temperature will allow a more accurate interpretation concerning the event associated with the gas injection, which may be a direct consequence of the treatment performance.
- the inflow profile along the well is what determines the acid treatment performance.
- Pumping a gas after the acid, with an optimum down hole injection temperature will reveal the inflow profile during gas injection.
- the inflow profile during gas injection being a consequence of the performance of the acid, the acid performance may be estimated.
- the pump rate is set to zero and the well is shut-in while a distributed temperature sensor is logged. Looking at how fast the down hole temperature at a given depth warms back to the temperature before the treatment reveals how much was injected.
- the position of a gas slug, with a lower down hole injection temperature along the well may be monitored by distributed temperature sensors revealing which zones are accepting fluid during the pumping.
- the use of temperature logging such as distributed temperature sensors or a down hole temperature on a moving tool as a means to identify injectivity profiles based on a down hole injection temperature significantly different from the reservoir temperature is important to some embodiments.
- thermodynamic calculations may be performed to determine the down hole injection temperature as a function of the above three parameters. These calculations validate the concept of the use of the JT effect and may be used as a means of predicting the down hole injection temperature change with the pressure drop.
- the value of the pressure drop that the fluid will undergo when flowing through the orifices can be determined using Equation (1) and Equation (2):
- a d is the surface flow area formed by all n c open orifices (m 2 )
- F is the treatment fluid Joule-Thomson coefficient (K/Pa)
- BHP is the DH pressure in the wellbore (Pa)
- the final value of the down hole injection temperature of the mixture formed by the treatment fluid and the gas can be determined using Equation (7).
- DHIT is the DH Injection Temperature (K)
- Ti is the initial temperature of the mixture in the BHA, before flowing through the orifices (K)
- the physical and thermodynamic properties of the treatment fluid and the gas, PF,, PG, CpG, C P F, CpG , ⁇ ,, ⁇ , are functions of the temperature and pressure. It is possible to determine those properties from an equation of state.
- An equation of state links the value of the fluid density, fluid temperature and pressure together.
- the determination of an equation of state for a given fluid or gas has been the subject of a vast amount of literature. For instance, an equation of state such as the one from R. Span and W. Wagner, "A New Equation of State for carbon Dioxide Covering the Fluid Region from the Triple-Point to HOOK at Pressures up to 800 MPa", J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 25(6), 1996 may be used for carbon dioxide.
- the down hole injection temperature may be determined using Equations (1) to (7) and by using an equation of state for CO2 as follows.
- the treatment fluid, 15 % HCl being a liquid
- Equation (9) to (13) This may be done using numerical approximations as described by Equations (9) to (13) as, typically, the equation of state is a too complex formula to allow the integration in Equation (6) to be done by hand.
- Equations (9) to (13) can be solved using a large value for N.
- This large value N may be determined by solving Equations (9) to (13) with increasing values of N until the result does not change significantly when N becomes larger.
- T ⁇ . ⁇ ⁇ 1 ⁇ ⁇ (14)
- p N BHP (15)
- VQ from the values of p and T G requires solving a nonlinear equation. This may be done easily by using conventional optimization algorithms such as the Newton method or the dichotomy method.
- Figure 4 plots the value of the JT coefficient ⁇ for C02 as a function of pressure and temperature.
- Figure 5 plots the DTQ for C02 for various initial temperature Ti and pressure after JT effect (BHP) with a PD equal to -1000 PSI. Data truncated between - 5K and +5K.
- Figure 6 is a plot of DTQF for C02 for various initial temperature Ti and pressure after JT effect (BHP) with a PD equal to -1000 PSI. Data truncated between - 5K and +5K.
- Figure 7 is a plot of DTQ for C02 for various initial temperature Ti and pressure after JT effect (BHP) with a PD equal to -2000 PSI.
- Figure 8 is a plot of Data truncated between -5K and +5K.
- Figure 8 plots DTQF for C02 for various initial temperature Ti and pressure after JT effect (BHP) with a PD equal to -2000 PSI. Data truncated between -5K and +5K.
- Figure 9 is a plot of DTQ for C02 for various initial temperature Ti and pressure after JT effect (BHP) with a PD equal to -100 PSI. Data truncated between -5K and +5K.
- Figure 10 is a plot of DT G F for C02 for various initial temperature Ti and pressure after JT effect (BHP) with a PD equal to—100 PSI. Data truncated between -5K and +5K
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2011349555A AU2011349555B2 (en) | 2010-12-23 | 2011-12-19 | Method for controlling the downhole temperature during fluid injection into oilfield wells |
EP11851517.0A EP2663736A4 (en) | 2010-12-23 | 2011-12-19 | Method for controlling the downhole temperature during fluid injection into oilfield wells |
MX2013007404A MX347488B (en) | 2010-12-23 | 2011-12-19 | Method for controlling the downhole temperature during fluid injection into oilfield wells. |
PCT/US2011/065760 WO2012087892A2 (en) | 2010-12-23 | 2011-12-19 | Method for controlling the downhole temperature during fluid injection into oilfield wells |
CA2822756A CA2822756C (en) | 2010-12-23 | 2011-12-19 | Method for controlling the downhole temperature during fluid injection into oilfield wells |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
USNONE | 2006-12-21 | ||
PCT/US2011/065760 WO2012087892A2 (en) | 2010-12-23 | 2011-12-19 | Method for controlling the downhole temperature during fluid injection into oilfield wells |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2012087892A2 true WO2012087892A2 (en) | 2012-06-28 |
WO2012087892A3 WO2012087892A3 (en) | 2013-01-31 |
Family
ID=46314795
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/065760 WO2012087892A2 (en) | 2010-12-23 | 2011-12-19 | Method for controlling the downhole temperature during fluid injection into oilfield wells |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2663736A4 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012087892A2 (en) |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6281489B1 (en) * | 1997-05-02 | 2001-08-28 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Monitoring of downhole parameters and tools utilizing fiber optics |
US6789621B2 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2004-09-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Intelligent well system and method |
US20060196659A1 (en) * | 2002-08-15 | 2006-09-07 | Virginia Jee | Use of distributed temperature sensors during wellbore treatments |
US20090023614A1 (en) * | 2007-07-17 | 2009-01-22 | Sullivan Philip F | Polymer Delivery in Well Treatment Applications |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7398680B2 (en) * | 2006-04-05 | 2008-07-15 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Tracking fluid displacement along a wellbore using real time temperature measurements |
-
2011
- 2011-12-19 EP EP11851517.0A patent/EP2663736A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2011-12-19 WO PCT/US2011/065760 patent/WO2012087892A2/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6281489B1 (en) * | 1997-05-02 | 2001-08-28 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Monitoring of downhole parameters and tools utilizing fiber optics |
US6789621B2 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2004-09-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Intelligent well system and method |
US20060196659A1 (en) * | 2002-08-15 | 2006-09-07 | Virginia Jee | Use of distributed temperature sensors during wellbore treatments |
US20090023614A1 (en) * | 2007-07-17 | 2009-01-22 | Sullivan Philip F | Polymer Delivery in Well Treatment Applications |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2663736A2 (en) | 2013-11-20 |
EP2663736A4 (en) | 2018-05-23 |
WO2012087892A3 (en) | 2013-01-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2656330C (en) | Methods and systems for determination of fluid invasion in reservoir zones | |
US8788251B2 (en) | Method for interpretation of distributed temperature sensors during wellbore treatment | |
US8910714B2 (en) | Method for controlling the downhole temperature during fluid injection into oilfield wells | |
US8613313B2 (en) | System and method for reservoir characterization | |
US20080264162A1 (en) | Tracking fluid displacement along a wellbore using real time temperature measurements | |
US20110264373A1 (en) | Method For The Management of Oilfields Undergoing Solvent Injection | |
AU2014226471A1 (en) | Modeling acid distribution for acid stimulation of a formation | |
Wang et al. | Calculation of temperature in fracture for carbon dioxide fracturing | |
Tabatabaei et al. | A new method to predict performance of horizontal and multilateral wells | |
WO2018084992A1 (en) | Prediction of methane hydrate production parameters | |
Xu et al. | Analytical modelling of temperature profiles during deepwater drilling operation | |
Li et al. | Partial-SAGD applications in the Jackfish SAGD project | |
CA2644596A1 (en) | Method for determining a steam dryness factor | |
Tardy et al. | Determining matrix treatment performance from downhole pressure and temperature distribution: a model | |
Lu et al. | Predicting the fracture initiation pressure for perforated water injection wells in fossil energy development | |
AU2018274699A1 (en) | Improvements in or relating to injection wells | |
Denney | Dts technology: Improving acid placement | |
Hu et al. | Experimental investigation of hydraulically induced fracture properties in enhanced geothermal reservoir stimulation | |
AU2011349555B2 (en) | Method for controlling the downhole temperature during fluid injection into oilfield wells | |
WO2012087892A2 (en) | Method for controlling the downhole temperature during fluid injection into oilfield wells | |
Goodarzi et al. | Coupled Fluid Flow Modeling in the Wellbore and Reservoir for CO2 Injection at the CaMI Field Research Station | |
Kaipov et al. | CO2 Injectivity Test Proves the Concept of CCUS Field Development | |
Mowery et al. | Novel Application of Hydraulic Jet Pumps for Mitigating Subsurface Freezing During Production of High-CO2 Fluids in EOR: Field Learnings and Design Considerations | |
US11840915B2 (en) | Modeling acid flow in a formation | |
Dou et al. | MODElInG thE nOn-IsOthErMal FlOW anD thE InFlUEnCInG FaCtOrs In CarbOn DIOxIDE InjECtIOn WElls |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 11851517 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A2 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2011851517 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2822756 Country of ref document: CA |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: MX/A/2013/007404 Country of ref document: MX |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2011349555 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20111219 Kind code of ref document: A |