WO2011135289A2 - Composite metal - Google Patents

Composite metal Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2011135289A2
WO2011135289A2 PCT/GB2011/000640 GB2011000640W WO2011135289A2 WO 2011135289 A2 WO2011135289 A2 WO 2011135289A2 GB 2011000640 W GB2011000640 W GB 2011000640W WO 2011135289 A2 WO2011135289 A2 WO 2011135289A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
aluminium
metal composite
alloy
ceramic particles
particles
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2011/000640
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2011135289A3 (en
Inventor
Andrew David Tarrant
Jonathan Richard Silk
Original Assignee
Aerospace Metal Composites Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Aerospace Metal Composites Limited filed Critical Aerospace Metal Composites Limited
Priority to US13/643,578 priority Critical patent/US20130133482A1/en
Priority to EP11724698A priority patent/EP2563941A2/en
Publication of WO2011135289A2 publication Critical patent/WO2011135289A2/en
Publication of WO2011135289A3 publication Critical patent/WO2011135289A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C30/00Alloys containing less than 50% by weight of each constituent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C1/00Making non-ferrous alloys
    • C22C1/10Alloys containing non-metals
    • C22C1/1084Alloys containing non-metals by mechanical alloying (blending, milling)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C21/00Alloys based on aluminium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C32/00Non-ferrous alloys containing at least 5% by weight but less than 50% by weight of oxides, carbides, borides, nitrides, silicides or other metal compounds, e.g. oxynitrides, sulfides, whether added as such or formed in situ
    • C22C32/0047Non-ferrous alloys containing at least 5% by weight but less than 50% by weight of oxides, carbides, borides, nitrides, silicides or other metal compounds, e.g. oxynitrides, sulfides, whether added as such or formed in situ with carbides, nitrides, borides or silicides as the main non-metallic constituents
    • C22C32/0052Non-ferrous alloys containing at least 5% by weight but less than 50% by weight of oxides, carbides, borides, nitrides, silicides or other metal compounds, e.g. oxynitrides, sulfides, whether added as such or formed in situ with carbides, nitrides, borides or silicides as the main non-metallic constituents only carbides
    • C22C32/0063Non-ferrous alloys containing at least 5% by weight but less than 50% by weight of oxides, carbides, borides, nitrides, silicides or other metal compounds, e.g. oxynitrides, sulfides, whether added as such or formed in situ with carbides, nitrides, borides or silicides as the main non-metallic constituents only carbides based on SiC
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F2998/00Supplementary information concerning processes or compositions relating to powder metallurgy

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a composite metal. It is known that metal alloys exhibit differing properties in accordance with the different constitution of the alloys. Further it is known that non-metallic constituents can have significant effects. Small amounts of carbon changes soft iron into strong and tough steel, although we believe that the mechanism in the case of steel is different from that of the present invention.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide metal composite.
  • a metal composite comprising a milled and compacted mixture of powdered aluminium or aluminium alloy and ceramic particles, wherein the ceramic particles are of an average size of between ⁇ . ⁇ and 0.5 ⁇ .
  • the particles will be between 0.85 ⁇ and ⁇ . ⁇ and in particularly between 0.75 ⁇ and 0.65 ⁇ .
  • the single most preferred particle size is 0.7 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ .
  • the invention will be operable with pure aluminium and with aluminium alloys having single or joint alloy additions of Cu, Mg, Mn, Li, Zn, Si, Zr, Cr, Fe, Ni, Ti.
  • medium strength alloys in particular aluminium alloys including Cu, Mg, Mn.
  • enhanced corrosion resistance achieved by limiting Cu content
  • enhanced ductility is required, as with relatively high ceramic particle loading
  • low strength alloys in particular aluminium alloys including Mg, Si some copper.
  • the invention will be operable with silicon carbide, boron carbide, aluminium oxide and other ceramics based on metal carbides, oxides or nitrides. Silicon carbide is our preferred ceramic on economic grounds. Again, we anticipate that the invention will be operable for volume percentage loading of ceramic in the aluminium or aluminium alloy of between 15% and 50% and preferably 18% and 40%. The most preferred volume percentages are 18%, 25% and 40%. Where we specify a ceramic by diameter, we expect that in accordance with industry standards, the size distribution will be Gaussian with upper and lower quartiles at 125% and 75% of the quoted particle size. .
  • Figure 1 is a chart showing our exi sting and proposed loadings and the loading that would be expected if the same correlation were to be applied to use of ceramic particles sized in accordance with the invention
  • Figure 2 are stress-strain plots for the matrix alloy without any reinforcement, our conventional 3.0 ⁇ ceramic particle loaded aluminium alloy composite and 0.7 ⁇ ceramic particle loaded metal composite;
  • Figure 3 is a plot of elongation to failure against ceramic particle loading in volume %.
  • Our new aluminium alloy composite preferably uses 0.7 ⁇ particles.
  • the two composite metals behave similarly, but in the plastic region, whilst the shapes of the curves are similar, the 0.7 ⁇ ceramic particles deforms at higher stress corresponding to the 30%
  • the density, Young's modulus, strain to fail, yield strength and ultimate strengths of plain alloy and the 3.0 ⁇ and 0.7 ⁇ , at 18 and 25 volume % loaded composite aluminium alloys are as follows in Table 2 for as-compacted billet: Table 2 - Comparison of Properties of Existing and Improved Metal Composites - as compacted billet.
  • the properties of the 0.7 ⁇ particle composites alloys are for each of the properties not only greatly improved over the plain alloy (with the exception of the expected decrease in strain to failure) but also either the same as or improved with respect to the properties of the 3.0 ⁇ particle composites alloys.
  • Table 3 shows the same or improved properties through use of 0.7 ⁇ particle size.

Abstract

A metal composite comprising a milled and compacted mixture of powdered aluminium or aluminium alloy and ceramic particles, wherein the ceramic particles are of an average size of between 1.0μm and 0.5μm.

Description

COMPOSITE METAL
The present invention relates to a composite metal. It is known that metal alloys exhibit differing properties in accordance with the different constitution of the alloys. Further it is known that non-metallic constituents can have significant effects. Small amounts of carbon changes soft iron into strong and tough steel, although we believe that the mechanism in the case of steel is different from that of the present invention.
We have combined much larger quantities and sizes of ceramic particles, compared with carbon inclusions in steel, into aluminium alloys and achieved significant increases in strength, without compromise to ductility and machinability. Our method of forming our composite aluminium alloys is essentially as described and claimed in US Patent No 4,749,545, namely preparing metal matrix composites comprising a hard material selected from silicon carbides, silicon nitrides, silicon oxides, boron carbides, boron nitrides and boron oxides, and a lightweight component selected from aluminium, magnesium and alloys of either, the method comprising:
• intimately mixing using a high energy milling technique a powder of the hard material and either aluminium or magnesium in its powder form to produce a uniform powder mixture and
• compacting the powder mixture at elevated temperatures.
Broadly we load aluminium alloy with 3μπι, i.e. 3micron or 3micrometre, particles of silicon carbide, normally at 25% or 40% by volume. We achieve good strength to weight ratios whilst retaining machinability and ductility, which enables forging of parts from our composite aluminium alloys.
As recorded in US Patent No. 6,398,843, we have also proposed the use of ceramic particles an order of magnitude smaller, that is of up to 0.4μπι. However we experience difficulty with loadings higher than 10% in that it is difficult to distribute the ceramic particles evenly throughout the aluminium. Further, the particles tend to agglomerate, resulting in weak spots in the finished composite metal.
We have now unexpectedly discovered that we can load aluminium alloys with particles not much larger than 0.4μπι to at least some of the same loadings that we use with 3μηι particles.
The object of the present invention is to provide metal composite. According to the invention there is provided a metal composite comprising a milled and compacted mixture of powdered aluminium or aluminium alloy and ceramic particles, wherein the ceramic particles are of an average size of between Ι .Ομιη and 0.5μηι. Preferably the particles will be between 0.85μιη and Ο.όμηι and in particularly between 0.75μιη and 0.65μη . The single most preferred particle size is 0.7μηι.
We anticipate that the invention will be operable with pure aluminium and with aluminium alloys having single or joint alloy additions of Cu, Mg, Mn, Li, Zn, Si, Zr, Cr, Fe, Ni, Ti. We prefer to use medium strength alloys, in particular aluminium alloys including Cu, Mg, Mn. Where enhanced corrosion resistance (achieved by limiting Cu content) and/or enhanced ductility is required, as with relatively high ceramic particle loading, we prefer to use low strength alloys, in particular aluminium alloys including Mg, Si some copper.
In particular we prefer AA2124 as such a medium strength matrix alloy and AA6061 as such a low strength matrix alloy. These have the compositions shown in the following Table 1 : Table 1 - Preferred Matrix Alloy Compositions
(Weight %) AA2124 AA6061
Cu 3.6 - 4.9 0.15 - 0.40
Mg 1.2 - 1.8 0.8 - 1.2 Si 0.20 max 0.4 - 0.8
Fe 0.30 max 0.70 max
Zn 0.25 max -
Mn 0.4 - 0.9 -
Cr 0.1 0.04 - 0.35
Further we anticipate that the invention will be operable with silicon carbide, boron carbide, aluminium oxide and other ceramics based on metal carbides, oxides or nitrides. Silicon carbide is our preferred ceramic on economic grounds. Again, we anticipate that the invention will be operable for volume percentage loading of ceramic in the aluminium or aluminium alloy of between 15% and 50% and preferably 18% and 40%. The most preferred volume percentages are 18%, 25% and 40%. Where we specify a ceramic by diameter, we expect that in accordance with industry standards, the size distribution will be Gaussian with upper and lower quartiles at 125% and 75% of the quoted particle size. .
To help understanding of the invention, a specific embodiment thereof will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a chart showing our exi sting and proposed loadings and the loading that would be expected if the same correlation were to be applied to use of ceramic particles sized in accordance with the invention;
Figure 2 are stress-strain plots for the matrix alloy without any reinforcement, our conventional 3.0μπι ceramic particle loaded aluminium alloy composite and 0.7μιη ceramic particle loaded metal composite;
Figure 3 is a plot of elongation to failure against ceramic particle loading in volume %.
Referring to referring to Figure 1 , our current aluminium alloy composites use from 18% to 40% by volume of 3μπι particles. This is shown at I in Figure 1. We have also proposed use of up to 0.4μπι particles and have been able to produce composites with good ceramic distribution and without agglomerations, but in practice we have to limit the ceramic content to no more than 10% silicon-carbide by volume. This is shown at II in Figure 1. Our experience suggests that loading with more than 10% of 0.4μπι particles leads to lack of homogeneity and performance degradation, in particular to occurrence of unpredictable weak spots in the alloy.
Our new aluminium alloy composite preferably uses 0.7μηι particles.
Assuming a straight line correlation, we would have expected to have been able to use only up to 13.5% of such particles, as shown at III. In fact we have been able to use 40%, shown at IV, which is unexpected. Indeed it appears that we can use the same loadings by volume as with particles, despite the particle size being much closer to 0.4μηι with it loading limitation than 3μηι.
Referring to Figure 2, the stress/strain curve are shown for:
1. Our preferred matrix alloy AA2124 alone,
2. The same matrix alloy loaded conventionally with 25% of 3.0μηι ceramic
particles,
3. The same matrix alloy with the improved loading of 25% of 0.7 μηι ceramic
particles.
Not only is the improved composite metal much stronger than the matrix alloy alone, but also it has 30% improvement in yield strength Y, or elastic limit, just past the limit of proportionality, compared with our conventional composite metal for the same loading of larger particles.
In the greater portion of the elastic region, the two composite metals behave similarly, but in the plastic region, whilst the shapes of the curves are similar, the 0.7μπι ceramic particles deforms at higher stress corresponding to the 30%
improvement in yield strength.
The density, Young's modulus, strain to fail, yield strength and ultimate strengths of plain alloy and the 3.0μιη and 0.7μπι, at 18 and 25 volume % loaded composite aluminium alloys are as follows in Table 2 for as-compacted billet: Table 2 - Comparison of Properties of Existing and Improved Metal Composites - as compacted billet.
Figure imgf000006_0001
From Table 2, it will be noted that the properties of the 0.7μπι particle composites alloys are for each of the properties not only greatly improved over the plain alloy (with the exception of the expected decrease in strain to failure) but also either the same as or improved with respect to the properties of the 3.0μπι particle composites alloys.
Again the density, Young's modulus, strain to fail, yield strength and ultimate strengths of of plain alloy and the 3.0μηι and 0.7μπι, at 18 % loaded composite aluminium alloys are as follows in Table 3 for extruded bar:
Table 3 - Comparison of Properties of Existing and Improved Metal Composites - as extruded.
Baseline Alloy
3.0μιη SiC - 18% 0.7μπι SiC - 18% vol % vol %
Property Comparison 2124 2124/SiC/18p 2124/SiC/18p
(T4) Extrusion (T4) Extrusion (T4)
Density (g cc) 2.77 2.85 2.85 Tensile Modulus (GPa) 72 100 100
Strain to Failure (%) 12 7 7
0.2%Yield Strength (MPa) 325 420 480
Ultimate Tensile Strength (Mpa) 470 620 680
Again Table 3 shows the same or improved properties through use of 0.7μιη particle size.
Looked at differently, from Table 2Table-2 and Table 3Table 3 it can be seen that there is a significant advantage to strength using in the 0.7μπι ceramic
reinforcement and that this is achieved without the detriment to the strain to failure, as might be expected.
Turning to Figure 3, the strain to failure or elongation is shown as a function of loading of the matrix metal with different sizes of ceramic particles. The plots 4,5 for 3.0μηι and 0.7μιη are very similar and distinct from the 0.4μηι particle size plot 6. It is surprising in view of the distinction between the 3.0μιτι and 0.4μηι plots that the 0.7μπι plot tracks 3.0μιη plot so closely.
It is our experience that our composite aluminium alloys having the mechanical properties shown in Figure 2 are readily machinable, but tool wear may be evident and increase the cost of manufacture. Therefore we expect the composites of the invention to be more readily machinable with less tool wear offering a significant economic advantage.
In summary of the properties of the specific aluminium alloy composites described above, use of 0.7μπι silicon carbide particle reinforcement directly in place of 3.0μηι reinforcement in AA2124 achieves enhanced results, which is surprising in view of your earlier experience with 0.4μπι silicon carbide particle reinforcement.

Claims

CLAIMS:
I . A metal composite comprising a milled and compacted mixture of powdered aluminium or aluminium alloy and ceramic particles, wherein the ceramic particles are of an average size of between 1.Ομπι and 0.5μηι.
2. A metal composite as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ceramic particles are of an average size of between 0.85μηι and 0.6μηι.
3. A metal composite as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the ceramic particles are of an average size of between 0.75μηι and 0.65μιη.
4. A metal composite as claimed in claim 1 , claim 2 or claim 3, wherein the ceramic particles are of 0.7μηι in size.
5. A metal composite as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the aluminium is pure aluminium
6. A metal composite as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the aluminium alloy is one having single or joint alloy additions of Cu, Mg, Mn, Li, Zn, Si, Zr, Cr, Fe, Ni, Ti.
7. A metal composite as claimed in claim 6, wherein the aluminium alloy is a medium strength alloy including Cu, Mg and Mn.
8. A metal composite as claimed in claim 7, wherein the medium strength alloy is AA2124
9. A metal composite as claimed in claim 6, wherein the aluminium alloy is a low strength alloy including Mg, Si and Cu.
10. A metal composite as claimed in claim 6, wherein the low strength alloy is AA6061.
I I . A metal composite as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the ceramic particles of silicon carbide, boron carbide or aluminium oxide.
12. A metal composite as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the volume percentage loading of ceramic particles in the aluminium or aluminium alloy is between 15% and 50%.
13. A metal composite as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the volume percentage loading of ceramic particles in the aluminium or aluminium alloy is between 18% and 40%.
14. A metal composite as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the volume percentage loading of ceramic particles in the aluminium or aluminium alloy is 18%, 25% or 40%.
PCT/GB2011/000640 2010-04-27 2011-04-26 Composite metal WO2011135289A2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/643,578 US20130133482A1 (en) 2010-04-27 2011-04-26 Composite Metal
EP11724698A EP2563941A2 (en) 2010-04-27 2011-04-26 Metal matrix composite

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB1007041.5A GB201007041D0 (en) 2010-04-27 2010-04-27 Composite metal
GB1007041.5 2010-04-27

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2011135289A2 true WO2011135289A2 (en) 2011-11-03
WO2011135289A3 WO2011135289A3 (en) 2012-04-26

Family

ID=42270920

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2011/000640 WO2011135289A2 (en) 2010-04-27 2011-04-26 Composite metal

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20130133482A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2563941A2 (en)
GB (1) GB201007041D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2011135289A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016149531A1 (en) * 2015-03-17 2016-09-22 Materion Corporation Lightweight, robust, wear resistant components comprising an aluminum matrix composite

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160273080A1 (en) * 2015-03-17 2016-09-22 Materion Corporation Metal matrix composite
WO2023215868A1 (en) * 2022-05-06 2023-11-09 Materion Corporation Reinforced alloy for bracket
CN114836661A (en) * 2022-06-09 2022-08-02 湖南金天铝业高科技股份有限公司 Double-scale ceramic particle reinforced aluminum-based composite material and preparation method thereof

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4749545A (en) 1986-04-02 1988-06-07 British Petroleum Co. P.L.C. Preparation of composites
US6398843B1 (en) 1997-06-10 2002-06-04 Qinetiq Limited Dispersion-strengthened aluminium alloy

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6365045A (en) * 1986-09-04 1988-03-23 Showa Alum Corp Grain dispersion-type al-base composite material and its production
FR2607741B1 (en) * 1986-12-04 1990-01-05 Cegedur PROCESS FOR OBTAINING COMPOSITE MATERIALS, PARTICULARLY WITH AN ALUMINUM ALLOY MATRIX, BY POWDER METALLURGY
GB2209345A (en) * 1987-09-03 1989-05-10 Alcan Int Ltd Making aluminium metal-refractory powder composite by milling
US5702542A (en) * 1993-03-26 1997-12-30 Brown; Alexander M. Machinable metal-matrix composite
US5917157A (en) * 1994-12-12 1999-06-29 Remsburg; Ralph Multilayer wiring board laminate with enhanced thermal dissipation to dielectric substrate laminate
DE4447130A1 (en) * 1994-12-29 1996-07-04 Nils Claussen Production of an aluminum-containing ceramic molded body
US6051045A (en) * 1996-01-16 2000-04-18 Ford Global Technologies, Inc. Metal-matrix composites
JP3207841B1 (en) * 2000-07-12 2001-09-10 三菱重工業株式会社 Aluminum composite powder and method for producing the same, aluminum composite material, spent fuel storage member and method for producing the same
CA2386334A1 (en) * 2002-05-14 2003-11-14 Houshang Darvishi Alamdari Grain refininf agent for cast magnesium products
CN100478474C (en) * 2002-07-31 2009-04-15 北京有色金属研究总院 Particle reinforced aluminium-based composite material and workpiece therefrom and its forming process

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4749545A (en) 1986-04-02 1988-06-07 British Petroleum Co. P.L.C. Preparation of composites
US6398843B1 (en) 1997-06-10 2002-06-04 Qinetiq Limited Dispersion-strengthened aluminium alloy

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016149531A1 (en) * 2015-03-17 2016-09-22 Materion Corporation Lightweight, robust, wear resistant components comprising an aluminum matrix composite

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2011135289A3 (en) 2012-04-26
GB201007041D0 (en) 2010-06-09
EP2563941A2 (en) 2013-03-06
US20130133482A1 (en) 2013-05-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Shen et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-7075/B4C composites fabricated by plasma activated sintering
US9869006B2 (en) Intermetallic compound ultrafine particle reinforced metal-based composite material and preparation method thereof
Nagaral et al. Mechanical characterization of ceramic nano B4C-Al2618 alloy composites synthesized by semi solid state processing
Paramsothy et al. Enhancing tensile/compressive response of magnesium alloy AZ31 by integrating with Al2O3 nanoparticles
Paramsothy et al. Solidification processed Mg/Al bimetal macrocomposite: Microstructure and mechanical properties
Sankaranarayanan et al. Effect of individual and combined addition of micro/nano-sized metallic elements on the microstructure and mechanical properties of pure Mg
Paramsothy et al. Simultaneous enhancement of tensile/compressive strength and ductility of magnesium alloy AZ31 using carbon nanotubes
Paramsothy et al. The synergistic ability of Al2O3 nanoparticles to enhance mechanical response of hybrid alloy AZ31/AZ91
Chen et al. Effect of initial Ti powders size on the microstructures and mechanical properties of Al3Ti/2024 Al composites prepared by ultrasonic assisted in-situ casting
Afifeh et al. Nanostructured copper matrix composite with extraordinary strength and high electrical conductivity produced by asymmetric cryorolling
Meignanamoorthy et al. Synthesis, properties and microstructure of sintered and hot extruded boron carbide reinforced AA8079 (Al-Cu-Fe-Si-Zn) matrix composites
Hassan et al. Magnesium–nickel composite: Preparation, microstructure and mechanical properties
WO2015025805A1 (en) Aluminum composite material and method for manufacturing same
US20170355020A1 (en) Reinforced magnesium composite and a method of producing thereof
Lu et al. Effect of reinforcements on strength of Mg9% Al composites
EP2563941A2 (en) Metal matrix composite
Paramsothy et al. Adding carbon nanotubes and integrating with AA5052 aluminium alloy core to simultaneously enhance stiffness, strength and failure strain of AZ31 magnesium alloy
NIE et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of TiC nanoparticle-reinforced Mg− Zn− Ca matrix nanocomposites processed by combining multidirectional forging and extrusion
Feldshtein et al. Synergy effect of ultrafine tungsten, silicon carbides, and graphite microadditives on the Fe-based MMCs properties using the simplex lattice design
Wu et al. Strength and ductility synergy of Nb-alloyed Ni0. 6CoFe1. 4 alloys
Paramsothy et al. TiC nanoparticle addition to enhance the mechanical response of hybrid magnesium alloy
Mimoto et al. Mechanical properties and strengthening mechanism of pure Ti powder composite material reinforced with carbon nano particles
Leparoux et al. Solid state processing of aluminum matrix composites reinforced with nanoparticulate materials
Bhaskar Raju et al. Mechanical and Tribological Behaviour of Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites using Powder Metallurgy Technique—A Review.
Alrasheedi Facile synthesis and characterization of aluminum/graphene nanosheets composites

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
DPE1 Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
REEP Request for entry into the european phase

Ref document number: 2011724698

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2011724698

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 13643578

Country of ref document: US