WO2002098254A1

WO2002098254A1 - Article of footwear, binding assembly and article of footwear-binding assembly combination

Info

Publication number: WO2002098254A1
Application number: PCT/NO2002/000197
Authority: WO
Inventors: Hans Ola Pedersen; Sigurd Bros
Original assignee: Linken Binding As
Priority date: 2001-06-05
Filing date: 2002-06-04
Publication date: 2002-12-12
Also published as: NO20012753D0; NO20012753L; WO2002098254B1; US20050115116A1; NO315639B1

Abstract

The present invention relates to an article of footwear which consists of a forward portion and a rear portion which are articulated to one another about an axis that is almost coincident with the metatarsophangeal joint in the hallux when the foot is located in the article of footwear, a binding assembly for releasable attchment of the article of footwear, in particular a ski boot, to asports device, in particular a ski, under the toe portion of the article of footwear about an essentially horizontal axis almost perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of the article of footwear which, after fastening, permits a rotational movement about the axis where none of the elements in the unit have faces which rotate directly in contact with elements in the article of footwear, and an article of footwear-binding assembly combination which comprises an article of footwear and a binding assembly.

Description

Article of footwear, binding assembly and article of footwear-binding assembly combination

The present application relates to an article of footwear having a hinged joint.

In many sports, as for instance, cross-country skiing, as much force as possible is to be transferred between the human body and a surface with a view to generating speed. Basically, the magnitude of the forces is determined by the physical capacity of the human body, but at high speed the surface may produce reactive forces which exceed the man-generated forces. The body's main task will then be to resist these forces. In any event, technique and equipment determine how great a portion of the forces is transmitted.

Thus, body-equipment-surface create a three-part system. This system will be explained in more detail with reference to cross-country skiing, although the principle will also apply to other activities. In the following explanation, ski poles and clothing will be disregarded.

The equipment for cross-country skiing traditionally consists of boots, bindings and skis. In order for these components to perform their force transfer task optimally, two requirements must be met:

- materials must be as rigid as possible if force is not to be lost in undesirable deformations.

- form, materials selection and mechanisms must be selected so that the two other main components in the system, body and surface, can behave as normally or as effectively as possible.

Requirements A and B are often conflicting, and optimal compromises must be made. Let us take the surface as a specific example first. It is advantageous that the snow should not subjected to large, local deformations. A curved, but completely rigid ski will transfer greatest forces in the front end and the tail of the ski on kick or push-off, with the result that these parts become buried in the snow. A ski which distributes force evenly along its whole length is more expedient. There is general agreement on the following fundamental design choices in order to obtain such a ski: - relatively thick, rigid central part of the ski for transferring great force

(requirement A); similar rigid material, but gradually thinner and thus flexible in the front end and the tail of the ski to distribute the force (requirement B); and the rest of the equipment rotates, via a mechanism, relative to the ski to allow the body and the surface to come into position for momentum exchange (requirement B).

If we approach the equipment from the body instead, flexion of toe joints is an essential movement in cross-country skiing. This flexion is advantageous because, in particular in the classical diagonal technique, it gives a force transfer sequence which is physiologically correct and normal, not so very different from the force transfer sequence in running. Therefore, up until now it is the solution from running that designers have chosen to copy when designing cross-country skiing boots, namely to form boots in flexible materials which allow the degree of flexion required.

However, cross-country skiing has more in common with other skiing disciplines than with running because running is fundamentally different as regards one essential point: the boots forms the interface with the surface. An important degree of freedom in ski design is the possibility of shaping tr - " ^{" J} τlying surface" of the boot, namely the top surface of the ski. This possibility d xist in running. Therefore, in addition to

1) transferring force, a running shoe must also 2) cushion and distribute forces to avoid unwanted deformations of the foot, and 3) provide information about the position of the foot relative to the underlying surface. The last point is essential for body control and balance.

The same requirements apply in the case of the equipment in cross-country skiing, but here tasks 2 and 3 can and should primarily be performed by the ski, because it forms the interface with the surface. As mentioned before, the front end and the tail of the ski must be flexible in order to satisfy point 2 above (described in more detail in the figures below). However, points 1 and 3 are best met if the central part of the ski, the binding and the boot form a rigid unit.

The explanation for this is that in most cross-country skiing techniques, in both skating and classical styles, force will seldom be distributed evenly across the ski when it is to be transferred from the surface. More force will pass through one of the edges. This is always the case in skating, on hard snow in particular (described in more details in the figures below). Even in the classical diagonal technique, variables such as track direction, lateral inclination of the track and an uneven snow consistency will contribute to a large degree of unpredictability. Therefore, in classical style too, the ski will often be subjected to a torque which is not taken up by the torsional twisting in the front end and tail of the ski.

A rigid boot, in combination with a rigid fastening to the ski, can transfer a large torque to the foot, which can rapidly fine-adjust its position to reestablish necessary balance and control. A soft boot, on the other hand, will when subjected to some load be pressed together between the most loaded ski edge and the corresponding side of the foot (described in more detail in the figures below). This compression and tensile strain will in addition be supplemented by a torsional strain, because most of the force is as a rule transferred through the rear part of the foot, whilst the boot is only held in place at the front by the fastening.

Thus, two important requirements for the design of cross-country skiing equipment can be formulated: choice of dimensions and materials which transfer great force, and adjustment to the body and its movements - with particular emphasis on allowing flexion of toe joints. The manner in which attempts are made to meet this last requirement in today's solutions doer ^~ " ^ ^ιrϊ! the first requirement in a satisfactory manner, because the equipment is in _^ ttly deformed. This in turn results in undesirable movements of the body. In the following it will also be shown that inhibition of some desirable movements is also a consequence.

There is less flexion of the toe joint in the skating technique than in the classical skiing technique. Therefore, more rigid boot soles have gradually come into use in skating on the grounds that the soles are "torsion-proof.

The reason that "torsion-proof is written in inverted commas here is that a completely torsion-proof plate, e.g., a boot sole, which cannot be twisted, can never be bent either. So the existing boot soles are by no means torsion-proof. The same is true of the form around the heel. And even if this were in fact completely torsion-proof per se, it could still be twisted relative to the boot's point of attachment, i.e., the binding, via the non torsion-proof sole.

Nor does a short, bendable segment under the toe joint, in an otherwise rigid plate, give complete torsional rigidity of the sole. The torsional rigidity could be increased by allowing the length of this segment to be close to zero, but then another problem arises: the sole will not be able to elongate. Since the sole of the foot becomes longer on flexion of the toe joint, the foot will then either move upwards in the boot and lose contact with the sole, or be pressed against the toe and heel cap and be deformed in an undesirable manner.

Torsional rigidity, bending rigidity and compressive/tensile rigidity are all inter- dependent factors in a solid body, and together they have nine components in the three spatial directions. However, in this problem description we have concentrated on the lack of torsional rigidity in the longitudinal direction, because this is most disadvantageous and can be seen to be a provoking cause of related problems. We shall briefly mention two: - Lateral bending rigidity in the boot is reduced, i.e., the heel can be pressed far out to the side of the ski. A groove under the boot and a corresponding ridge on the ski remedies this problem in most cases, but when a skier encounters large reactive forces on skiing downhill, he must actively press his heel down to avoid the problem. Lateral rigidity will increase if the flexible segment under the toe joint is shortened, but as mentioned this is detrimental to the bending properties around the toe axis.

Longitudinal bending rigidity '^{c r}"^A^^.ed. This is a problem today because the boot is produced with an arcl fields to the pressure from the arch of the foot instead of transferring the force in this part. In particular in skating, a great deal of force is to be transferred here. The problem can probably be remedied to a certain extent by making the boot more solid under the arch of the foot.

Together, the lack of torsional, bending and compressive/tensile rigidity in today's boot means that the boot is not able to give the foot the necessary support below the ankle. Thus, it is more difficult to balance, especially in skating. Today this is compensated for by making ski boots higher than ankle-height, or by hinging a supporting cuff coaxial with the upper ankle joint (talar). Such solutions give better balance, but will be detrimental to mobility and /or force transfer in cross-country skiing: either the supporting cuff is so rigid that it inhibits rotation about the axis of the lower ankle joint (subtalar). It is this rotation that turns the sole of the foot, the boot ands the ski outwards and upwards to perform edging. This axis has an entirely different location and orientation than the talar axis, which is approximately horizontal and perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the ski.

- or the cuff is so flexible that a large part of the force transferred from the foot at the level of the cuff will be lost in the deformation of the cuff. This part will then not contribute to the active force between the boot and the ski, but will instead replace it.

To sum up, the binding systems (boot and binding) for cross-country skiing that are used today have the following weaknesses: - they are not able to transfer sufficient force because the components are deformed long before they are subjected to maximum load in most skiing techniques; they thus subject the sole of the foot and the ankle to unnecessary strains because the foot either follows the deformation of the boot and ends up in physiologically undesirable positions, or tries to maintain desired positions by compensating for the lack of support and control by static muscular action; and they inhibit dynamic muscular action in the ankle.

All three problems can be traced back to the flexible boot as the basic main solution. The choice of part-solutions will determine which of the last two problems occur most.

If materials and/or dimensions of a t ^{" ^ ~}' ^_1l are selected so that the shell is non- deformable, the behaviour of the she »e controlled by means of mechanisms. A rigid shell with mechanical joints will only move in the directions and distances and with the resistance allowed by the joints.

The right choice of location, orientation and number of degrees of freedom and the degree of resistance for each joint is essential if the shell, at all times and optimally, is to follow the desired movement of the foot - to help the desired movement of the foot to prevent undesirable movements.

If loss of friction in the joints and micro-deformations of the foot are not taken into account, this type of footwear will in theory be able to transfer all force between the body and the surface.

If the article of footwear is to be locked mechanically to other equipment, it may be seen as an extension of the body. The same principles for efficient movement and joint design apply.

The weaknesses of today's systems listed above are remedied according to the invention which relates to an article of footwear, characterised in that it consists of a forward portion and a rear portion which are articulated to each other about an axis which is almost coincidental with the metatarsophalangeal joint in the hallux when the foot is located in the article of footwear.

Preferred features of the present invention are set forth in dependent claims 2-5, 7 and 9-13.

The invention will be described in more detail with reference to the attached figures, wherein:

Figure 1 illustrates the functioning mechanism of the ski boot; Figure 2 shows examples of the locking principle for the binding mechanism; Figure 3 shows the principle of the set-up for rotation of a locked binding mechanism; Figure 4 shows a resilient metal band as a resistance element; Figure 5 shows how the binding assembly can transfer large torsional forces from a rigid shoe;

Figure 6 shows a roller skate accord^'"" ^{*~ i} e invention; Figure 7 shows a skate according to ntion.

Figure 1 describes the main components of which the present invention consists, where a forward portion (2) of an article of footwear and a rear portion (3) of an article of footwear are permanently locked together through an axis (2b) and together form a boot shell. The sports device (1) is locked to (2) via a hinged joint (lb) during use. The lowermost part of (3), the whole of (2) and the part of (1) with which (2) and (3) are in contact, are made of completely rigid materials which are not deformed by forces of the magnitude involved in cross-country skiing activities.

If the heel is pressed down and (3) is in contact with (1) (a turn of 0° in (2b) and (lb)), the mechanism will also be locked in all other directions, because (2) and the parts of (1) and (3) that are in contact are completely rigid and non-deformable. For extra secure sideways locking between (1) and (3), the cross-sections of these components have vertical shapes which complement each other in this position (as in today's flexible solutions).

When the turns in (lb) and (2b) are greater than 0°, both (1) and (3) will only move relative to (2) in one-axis rotation. Components and joints must therefore be designed so that the joint turns in (lb) and (2b) can be at least as great as is natural for the foot, and natural in relation to the surface. (2b) must be located and oriented coincident with the bending axis of the toe joint, so that this largest movement in the sole of the foot is allowed to be made as normal inside the shell. The movements of the boot shell are thus controlled by this movement in a predictable manner. Other movements in the sole of the foot are so small that they are taken up by the flexibility of a soft inner boot, (lb) must be located and oriented so that (1) via (2) and (3) moves in an expedient manner when the foot makes a normal kick or push-off movement for the skiing technique in question.

The rigid boot shell transfers all force between the foot and the underlying surface. This gives greater force utilisation than today and thus contributes directly to greater speed.

It also gives static support to the sole of the foot in all other direction than about the axes of rotation (lb) and (2b), i.e., it helps to prevent undesirably large turns in twisting and side movements of the sole of the foot, and helps to relieve joints and muscles which attempt to prevent such turns. The shell therefore contributes indirectly to higher speed because the body is spared fro force unnecessarily. Any force saved can instead be used in the kick.

In addition to the shell providing static support, the elastic part of the resistance in (2b) and (lb) will give dynamic assistance to the foot movements in that some of the force in the working phase of the movements (kick) is stored in the articulation and is given back to the foot or ski in the quite phase (recovering foot and ski).

To permit (lb) to be opened and the components (1) and (2) to be separated, the system must comprise a locking mechanism consisting of several elements. Some of these must be allocated to (2), whilst the others can either be incorporated directly into (1), or into a separate binding housing component (4) which is fixed to (1).

Figure 2 shows two examples of how an article of footwear (2, 3) may be fastened to a sports device (1) in that one or more elements A in one of the main components is moved and is brought together with one or more elements B in the other. A and B are so configured that they constitute a fixed unit AB when they are brought together. Figure 3 shows that different allocation of A and B gives the same basic result.

Either element A or B has an external cylindrically symmetric surface and can rotate relative to a closed, cylindrical cavity in one of the main components. Since the other main component is fixed to this element via the unit AB, this main component and AB rotate together. The axis of rotation (lb) will thus be defined by the centre axis of the cylindrically symmetric surface. The most optimal orientation of (lb) is not necessarily horizontal and perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the ski, but probably quite close to this.

Desired rotational motion between boot and ski is obtained by incorporating one or more resistance elements M (Figure 4) into one or both of the main components. Resistance is produced when these elements are deformed on rotation of the unit AB. M can either be built in around, through or outside (lb), and the elements can offer either torsional, bending, compressive or tensile resistance. Both springs (torsion springs, bending springs or coil springs) and flexible materials can be used.

Rotational resistance can in principle be adjusted in two ways: by replacing M with resistance elements having different resistance characteristics or by adjusting the pretension in M. One or both ways can be used in the system. The design of elements to be replaced or pretensioned will d^or"*" ^nr the resistance principle selected, see the preceding paragraph. In principle, s tianisms do not need to be allocated to the same main component as M.

Simple solutions with stepless adjustment of pretensioning are recommended because this does not require replaceable parts, and can be done often, e.g., if different snow conditions, style or distance require different resistance in the same ski.

To avoid undesirable deformations of the foot, the correct position of the joint axis (height above sole of foot, length from toe) and its orientation in space (angle to the horizontal axis and perpendicular axis of the ski) are important. In principle, the axis should be coincident with the axis of the toe joint, but certain considerations and reservations are identified and discussed in the following.

The location is of course dependent first and foremost on foot size, so it should be located further back and further up for each boot size. However, the orientation of the toe joint axis varies more unpredictably than, e.g., the axis of the upper ankle joint from person to person. From inside to outside, it appears as a rule to be angled backwards at about 10° and slightly downwards when a person stands on the whole foot. Two factors make it difficult to determine an average orientation of the toe joint axis, and thus the joint axis of the boot accurately. Firstly, it is a simplification to say that the toe joint axis is one axis, since it passes through all the toes and is surrounded by many small bones and muscles. Thus, it is dynamic and changes orientation relative to the surrounding parts of the sole of the foot. However, the axis can be said to twist upwards and slightly forwards on the outside in the course of a typical bending motion (in running a "typical bending motion" means that 80% of the force passes through the hallux). So, in any case, an average axis for this movement must be chosen. Moreover, there must always be room for the toes during the whole kick movement, so the finest adjustments of the foot's position must be taken up in a soft inner boot (this will be discussed in more detail below).

Secondly, the orientation of the joint must also be seen in connection with the orientation of the fastening, since the rigid forward portion of the boot is a part of both. The movement path of the ski relative to the rear portion of the boot - and thus the force-producing parts of the leg - will be a complex function of the movements in the two joints.

In skating the location and orientation of the fastening axis will probably have limited importance because the boot is only rotated slightly towards the ski, and then after the kick has been made. In the classical diagonal stride, however, we can observe that the knee describes a path that is almost in the vertical plane through the ski axis, whilst the ski is held flat against the surface. This suggests that there should not be much deviation from horizontal axes which are perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the ski.

The most important change that has been made in relation to today's systems is that the location of the fastening axis has been drawn further back. This is an entirely necessary consequence of the rigid forward portion of the boot, because the last exertion of force in the kick cannot take place via a gradual bending up of the boot sole; the whole of the forward portion of boot will leave the ski at the same time. It is difficult to state when this happens, but the bending will be counteracted by a torque about the fastening axis. It is advantageous that the foot should maintain the large force transfer surfaces in contact as long as possible, but to ensure that this is not too long, we have drawn the fastening axis to the ski quite a lot further back than in today's systems. Thus the torque is smaller and the direction of force transfer after commenced rotation will be more favourable. In addition, the axis of rotation has been drawn far down, because it will then be possible to transfer force over a larger cylindrical area in the fit between forward part of the boot and ski.

No resistance has been incorporated into (2b) other than the resistance which bending an inner boot, boot sole and a flexible material across the instep gives. In (lb) two resistance elements are incorporated to control resistance.

The rear rigid shell comes up to about the point at which the foot beings to slope inwards. It will therefore prevent sideways movements. A shell of a softer plastic is moulded within this shell. One object of this shell is that it will make allow the boot to be put on by bending the shell out from the foot, but a tightening and closing strap ensures that the shell nonetheless when closed constitutes a closed, relatively torsion- proof form which presses the foot down in the boot. Thus, good support around the whole sole of the foot is obtained.

It is very important that the shell giv but at the same time flexible support under the malleoli. We have solved this by terminating the shell slightly lower and inserting a solid rubber material which moulds to the ankle joint from below. This support is especially important on the outside, because, together with the upper edge of the shell just in front, it gives increasing support and control for the lower ankle joint when it is rotated outwards to perform edging.

The rubber material under the malleoli is a part of a sheath which also passes behind the Achilles' tendon. The sheath is made a little tight so that it must be pulled backwards when the boot is to be put on. Thus, support from behind is also ensured.

With all the rigid support around the lower part of the foot and a completely rigid sole, we have the possibility of doing two important things: the boot can be built higher than today's boots because it transfers the torque of the ski to the foot and enables it to control the torque and thus balance more easily. The advantage of a higher boot is that it is easier to edge the ski because of a longer torque arm when edging is to be performed, and that the sole of the foot does not need to be rotated so many degrees outwards about the lower ankle axis (subtalar) before the edge comes further in under the foot. rigid support above the ankle can be dispensed with completely. Support for the lower part of the foot only, but fully rigid and reliable support is better than deformable and unreliable support all the way up. We cannot ignore the fact that an ankle support may improve the concept further, but it should be made and articulated following the same principle as the rest of the boot: so stiff that most of the extra force it allows in the kick is transferred, and at the same time shaped so that the subtalar flexion is allowed. A combined hinge/slide joint may be a suitable solution.

The boot must have a flexible inside for two reasons: on a microlevel, optimal pressure distribution in all the positions of the foot is obtained either by a perfect fit or mechanisms. A material which yields to small movements and advantages is expedient. The rigid shell must be so shaped that its stops these movements in appropriate outer positions - cross-country skiing is a winter sport practised in temperatures as low as minus

20°C, at the same time as most of the competitions take place over a long time and with an active use of the ^le nf the foot which requires good blood circulation. A rigid shell ale I never provide this. It may therefore be appropriate to overdimension the thickness of the pressure distribution layer because of the gains a warmer foot gives.

A rigid boot shell has one drawback in comparison with a flexible boot: interior measurements must be dimensioned according to the largest foot measurements among users having the same boot size. The fit will therefore initially be poorer for many. An optimal inner boot solution would be moulding in a foam material as in alpine skiing. A simpler but good alternative which is used in this prototype is to use a standard inner boot in thick warming neoprene, and an individually fitted sole in a harder material which ensures optimal fit and stability under the whole sole of the foot.

The rigid boot according to the invention will give torsional forces on the fastening to the ski which are many times greater than in today's solutions, because none of the forces are lost in longitudinal deformation of the boot sole when the heel is pressed out to the side. A basic principle in the design of the binding part has therefore been to consistently choose solutions and dimensions which are stronger than today's bindings in order to transfer the forces to the ski. The following points show the measures that have been taken. The diameter of the rotating element has been quadrupled in relation to today's solutions, i.e., increased to 20 mm. On the sides the binding has large vertical fit faces towards the boot transverse to the axis of rotation, see the hatched area in Figure 5. The large diameter means that the forces between the rotating element and the stationary part having a long torque arms and are distributed and transferred across a large cylindrical surface, and the forces between the binding and the boot will be distributed across the large vertical side faces. Thus large concentrated forces which give possible deformation are avoided.

- The fundamental novelty of the present solution is the functional allocation. We do not allow both locking elements to be a part of the rotation mechanism and have contact faces which rotate towards one another. We have chosen the solution at the top left-hand side of Figure II. Thus we obtain a situation where forces which counter the locking mechanism do not arise during use. Both the rotating fit surfaces have a closed, permanently cylindrical shape, and only torsional forces act against them, see Figure 5

The outer rotation face in tod c solution is not a fully closed cylinder and moreover it is separable because one of the faces is also a part of a moving locking element. In our concept, such a solution, with today's dimensions and because of the increased torsional forces would result in either movement of the rotation pin and locking element or deformation of one of them, depending upon whether the locking force is greater or smaller than the force producing deformation.

Figures 6 and 7 show other embodiments of the invention where the article is a roller skate or an ice skate. In these cases there will not be an axis (lb).

Claims

P a t e n t c l a i m s

1.

An article of footwear, characterised in that it consists of a forward portion (2) and a rear portion (3) which are articulated to one another about an axis (2b) which is almost coincident with the metatarsophalangeal joint in the hallux when the foot is located in the article of footwear.

2. An article of footwear according to claim 1 , characterised in that the toe portion under the forward portion (2) of the article footwear is designed for articulation with a sports device (1) about an essentially horizontal axis (lb) almost perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of the article of footwear.

3.

An article of footwear according to claims 1-2, characterised in that the article of footwear is a ski boot and the sports ^∞"^»'* s a ski.

4. An article of footwear according to claim 1 , characterised in that the article of footwear is a skate or roller skate.

5.

An article of footwear according to claims 1-2, characterised in that the article of footwear is made of a torsion-proof material that is not deformed during use.

6.

An article of footwear according to claim 2, characterised in that the elements in the articulation with the sports device, during use, rotate about faces which are both located in the binding.

7.

An article of footwear according to claim 2, characterised in that the elements in the articulation with the sports device, during use, rotate about faces which are both located in the article of footwear.

8.

An article of footwear according to claim 2, characterised in that the horizontal axis (lb) is located in the area between the front edge of the article of footwear and the axis (2b).