WO2002025577A2 - Wireless handwriting system - Google Patents

Wireless handwriting system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2002025577A2
WO2002025577A2 PCT/US2001/029693 US0129693W WO0225577A2 WO 2002025577 A2 WO2002025577 A2 WO 2002025577A2 US 0129693 W US0129693 W US 0129693W WO 0225577 A2 WO0225577 A2 WO 0225577A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
transmitter
pulses
location
receivers
planar area
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2001/029693
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2002025577A3 (en
Inventor
Jianping Xu
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Intel Corporation filed Critical Intel Corporation
Priority to GB0303837A priority Critical patent/GB2381640B/en
Priority to DE10196652T priority patent/DE10196652T1/en
Priority to AU2001289143A priority patent/AU2001289143A1/en
Publication of WO2002025577A2 publication Critical patent/WO2002025577A2/en
Publication of WO2002025577A3 publication Critical patent/WO2002025577A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/03Arrangements for converting the position or the displacement of a member into a coded form
    • G06F3/041Digitisers, e.g. for touch screens or touch pads, characterised by the transducing means
    • G06F3/043Digitisers, e.g. for touch screens or touch pads, characterised by the transducing means using propagating acoustic waves
    • G06F3/0433Digitisers, e.g. for touch screens or touch pads, characterised by the transducing means using propagating acoustic waves in which the acoustic waves are either generated by a movable member and propagated within a surface layer or propagated within a surface layer and captured by a movable member
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/03Arrangements for converting the position or the displacement of a member into a coded form
    • G06F3/033Pointing devices displaced or positioned by the user, e.g. mice, trackballs, pens or joysticks; Accessories therefor
    • G06F3/0354Pointing devices displaced or positioned by the user, e.g. mice, trackballs, pens or joysticks; Accessories therefor with detection of 2D relative movements between the device, or an operating part thereof, and a plane or surface, e.g. 2D mice, trackballs, pens or pucks
    • G06F3/03545Pens or stylus

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to electronic handwriting schemes, and, more particularly, wireless electronic handwriting schemes.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram that illustrates a prior embodiment of a wireless electronic handwriting system.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram that illustrates another prior embodiment of a wireless electronic handwriting system.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram that illustrates an embodiment of a wireless electronic handwriting system in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram that illustrates an embodiment of an ultrasonic transmitter in accordance with the invention that may be employed, for example, by the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3.
  • wireless pen systems While embodiments of such wireless pen systems currently exist, these systems may have certain disadvantages. For example, as previously discussed, such systems may experience skipping or errors due to natural writing movements, such as rotation of a writing device employed in such an embodiment. Such systems may also experience various undesirable "dead zones", which will be discussed in more detail hereafter. Additionally, such systems typically employ multiple transmission/reception techniques such as, for example, one for synchronization and another for location determination.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram that illustrates a current embodiment, 100, of a wireless pen system.
  • a writing device, 150 comprises a transmitter, 160.
  • Such a transmitter may contain multiple elements capable of transmitting, respectively, for example, infrared (IR) signals and unidirectional ultrasonic, or sonic, pulses.
  • IR infrared
  • RF radio frequency
  • a sensor/receiver apparatus such as 110 may comprise sensors 170, which may be employed for receiving such IR signals, and separate sensors 140, which may be employed for receiving such sonic pulses.
  • Such an apparatus may also contain an interface, such as cable 120, to couple such an apparatus with a computing device to, at least in part, capture handwritten information in electronic form.
  • signals and pulses would typically be generated at some substantially predetermined frequency for both IR signals and ultrasonic pulses in order to facilitate the capture of handwritten information by employing techniques such as those discussed herein.
  • the timing relationship of such received IR signals and sonic pulses may be employed in determining the location of such a writing device.
  • IR signals travel at speeds approaching the speed of light, such IR signals will arrive at sensors 170 substantially simultaneously regardless of the location transmitter 160 relative to such sensors.
  • transmitter 160 would typically be in reasonable proximity to sensors 170 so as to allow such IR signals and ultrasonic pulses related to handwritten information to be received by, for example, sensors 170 and receivers 140, as is desirable. This distance would typically be on the order of no more than several feet away and typically confined to a writing surface, such as 130.
  • a relative distance of transmitter 160 from each sensor may be determined by employing velocity equations. Such equations are well-known to those of skill in the art and the invention is not limited in scope to any particular technique for determining such distances. Such relative distances may then be employed to determine a location for transmitter 160 with respect to receivers 140.
  • triangulation computations may be employed based, at least in part, on receiver proximity and the relative distances of the transmitter from the receivers. Such triangulation computations are welLknown by those of skill in the art and the invention is not limited to any particular technique.
  • transmitter 160 comprises a unidirectional transmitter
  • the orientation of writing device 150 in such embodiments may determine whether or not IR signals and sonic pulses are received by, for example, sensors 170 and receivers 140. Therefore, a user of such a system may be restricted in writing motion by such a configuration.
  • This may be disadvantageous, as it may not be compatible with natural movements associated with handwritten information, such as rotation and tilting of such a writing device. Such rotation or tilting may result in skipping, discontinuities or extraneous information in the captured handwritten information because of the altered orientation of sensor 160 relative to sensors 140.
  • Such embodiments may also experience multiple dead zones due to various factors.
  • the typical configuration of receivers, such as 140, and sensors, such as 170 limits the angle at which they may be capable of receiving sonic pulses or IR signals. Outside this angle or scope, handwritten information may not be collected, even though it is within the bounds of writing surface 130. This is disadvantageous as it reduces the usable writing area a user may employ with such a system. Dead zones may also result, for example, from the configuration of a transmitter, such as 160. Though not illustrated in FIG. 1, such a dead zone may be due, at least in part, to the distance that transmitter 160 is from sensors 140 when it is desired to collect handwritten information.
  • Such transmitters typically have relatively large acoustic impedance as compare with air, large reflections of a sonic pulse may occur, resulting in significant attenuation of such a pulse.
  • Such reflections due to impedance mismatches are well known to those skill in the art and are analogous to signal reflections in transmission lines due to electrical impedance mismatches.
  • This attenuation due to such mismatches may, in turn, limit the radius from such receivers a user may employ in collecting handwritten information with such an embodiment. That is, a dead zone may exist outside such a radius.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates another current embodiment of a wireless pen system that is typically employed in conjunction with a dry erase board.
  • FIG. 2 contains two views of such an embodiment, a side view, 200, and a top view, 205.
  • writing device 250 comprises an infrared (IR) transmitter, 260, and an ultrasonic transmitter, 270.
  • IR transmitter 260 may be used in conjunction with IR sensors 230 to provide a substantially similar synchronization function as was previously described.
  • the sensor/receiver apparatus, 210 comprises IR sensors 230, receivers 240 and deflector 220.
  • ultrasonic pulses would be deflected by deflector 220 and then received by receivers 240.
  • a dead zone may, however, still depend, at least in part, on the particular deflector configuration being used. Additionally, since IR sensors in such embodiments typically have similar reception angles as have been previously discussed, a dead zone may, therefore, also exist due to the limitation of these sensors and their ability to receive synchronization signals outside certain angles or outside a certain scope.
  • a mounting apparatus, 290 which may comprise suction devices, may be employed.
  • cable 285 may be employed to couple such a receiver apparatus to a computing device to facilitate electronic collection of handwritten information on for example, writing surface 280.
  • a sensor apparatus has the previously discussed disadvantages associated with employing multiple sensors.
  • employing IR sensors 230 and receivers 240 may reduce the mobility of such a device as well as increase the cost of such an embodiment.
  • an ultrasonic transmitter such as 270
  • such embodiments may also experience skipping, rotation errors and dead zones due to transmitter distance from sensors 240, as were all previously discussed. Therefore, alternative embodiments of wireless pen systems may be desirable.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a wireless pen system in accordance with the invention that addresses at least some of the foregoing disadvantages.
  • writing device 350 comprises an omni-directional cylindrical ultrasonic transmitter.
  • receiver apparatus 310 comprises semi-cylindrical receivers 330.
  • receivers 330 may comprise a capacitive piezo polymer film, such as polarized polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), for example.
  • PVDF polarized polyvinylidene fluoride
  • Such films are well known to those of skill in the art and may be obtained from, for example, Measurement Specialties, Inc., Sensor Products Division, 950 Forge Avenue - Bldg. B, Norristown, PA 19403.
  • PVDF polarized polyvinylidene fluoride
  • such a receiver configuration may reduce the size of a dead zone that may exist with state of the art approaches, as was previously described.
  • such receivers may be capable of receiving pulses or signals over a substantially 180 degree range, or a substantially planar area.
  • a dead zone for such an embodiment may be defined, at least in part, by the angle at which one sensor would be in the direct path from a transmitter to a second sensor.
  • the first sensor may interfere with the pulse from the transmitter, which may affect its ability to reach the second sensor.
  • employing such an embodiment may nonetheless, reduce the size of the dead zone area.
  • an RF signal may be generated by an electronic pulse used to excite ultrasonic transmitter 360.
  • a pulse may be generated, for example, by a transducer located in the barrel of pen 350.
  • excitation pulses are well known to those of skill in the art and are one way of initiating sonic pulses in ultrasonic transmitters, such as 360.
  • a pulse may be generated, for example, by a transducer or by discharging a resistive capacitive (RC) circuit.
  • RC resistive capacitive
  • Such an RF signal may then be received substantially simultaneously by receivers 330 and be employed in determining the relative distances of the transmitter from the receivers, in a similar manner as has been previously described.
  • the mobility of such embodiments may be improved due, at least in part, to reductions in size of such embodiments. Additionally, for example, the cost or such embodiments may be reduced.
  • rotation of a writing device, such as 350 comprising such a transmitter would not substantially affect the ultrasonic pulse characteristics at receivers 330 generated by such a transmitter. Due, at least in part, to this aspect, rotation of a writing device, such as 350, may not substantially affect an accurate determination of the location of such a writing device. Additionally, because of the cylindrical configuration of such an omni-directional transmitter, it may be located relatively close to the tip of a writing device, such as 350.
  • This aspect may be advantageous as it may reduce adverse effects, such as, for example, extraneous information that may result from tilting such a writing device.
  • placing the transmitter closer to the tip of the pen reduces the radius of an arc along which the transmitter would travel during such tilting. This reduced radius may, therefore, reduce the total distance a transmitter would travel along such an arc and, in turn, reduce the amount of extraneous information.
  • receiver apparatus 310 is coupled to computing device 370 via cable 320. This may allow computing device 370 to receive electronic information from receiver apparatus 310.
  • the invention is, of course, not limited in scope in this respect and alternative embodiments exist.
  • sensors 330 may be included in computing device 370 as opposed to such a receiver apparatus 310 being coupled to such a computing device via cable 320.
  • electronic information communicated via cable 320 may be as is discussed in further detail hereinafter.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of an omni-directional transmitter, 400, in accordance with the invention that may reduce the dead-zone related to acoustic impedance mismatch, as was previously discussed.
  • Such a transmitter may be employed as transmitter 360 in writing device 350, as was previously discussed.
  • transmitter 400 may comprise a cylindrical epoxy resin base, 400, and a matrix comprising piezo electric rods, such as 420.
  • acoustic impedance of such a transmitter may be reduced by approximately one order of magnitude.
  • Such a reduction in acoustic impedance of such a transmitter may, in turn, improve the impedance mismatch with air and increase the radius outside which the previous discussed dead zone occurs, which is desirable.
  • Method embodiments in accordance with the invention may employ the embodiment of a wireless pen system, as illustrated in FIG. 3. While such a method may be embodied as instructions on a storage medium, which may be executed by a computing device, such as 370, the invention is, of course, not so limited. Such a method embodiment may also employ techniques for determining writing device location as have been previously discussed. For example, an embodiment of such a method may comprise generating a synchronization signal, such as may be generated as a result of an excitation pulse. Such a method embodiment may further comprise generating an ultrasonic pulse and then determining relative distance from a plurality of sensors based on the timing relationships of the synchronization signal and the ultrasonic pulse.
  • Such a method may also further comprise determining the location of a writing device by employing triangulation calculations, the result of such calculations being based, at least in part, on the proximity of receivers, such as 330, and the relative distances determined by the timing relationships.
  • the synchronization signal and ultrasonic pulses which are typically analog, may be converted to digital representations of those signals/pulses. These digital representations may then, in turn, be employed in determining relative distances and location of a writing device relative to receivers, such as 330.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Position Input By Displaying (AREA)
  • Length Measuring Devices Characterised By Use Of Acoustic Means (AREA)

Abstract

A system for tracking motion of a writing device in accordance with the invention includes a substantially omni-directional transmitter attached to the writing device adn a plurality of semi-cylindrical receivers capable of receiving, over a substantially planar area, one or more pulses generated by the substantially omni-directional transmitter.

Description

WIRELESS HANDWRITING SCHEME
RELATED APPLICATION
This patent application is related to pending U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/507,078, entitled "Ultrasonic Wireless Pen Position Determination System and Method", by J. Xu, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, and herein incorporated by reference.
BACKGROUND 1. Field
The present disclosure relates to electronic handwriting schemes, and, more particularly, wireless electronic handwriting schemes. 2. Background Information
As computing devices become more mobile, such as with personal data assistants (PDAs), laptop computers, and handheld computers, for example, it may be desirable to input data into such devices in various ways. Traditional methods of inputting information into such computing devices include, as some examples, keyboards and pointing devices. Typically, such traditional data input methods are substantially accomplished by employing electrical signals to communicate information. In certain situations, it may be desirable to input handwritten information into such computing devices. Current methods for inputting such handwritten information include, for example, wireless pen systems. Current wireless pen systems, however, typically have certain disadvantages. These disadvantages may include, for example, skipping and rotation errors. Skipping, in this context, may occur if, for example, a unidirectional signal from a wireless pen is not properly oriented. This improper orientation may result in undesired discontinuities in handwritten information. Likewise, in this context, in systems employing such a unidirectional transmitter, rotation errors may result from the natural tendency of a writer to rotate a pen when writing. This rotation may result in extraneous information being captured. One example of such extraneous information may occur as a result of rotating the pen barrel with the pen's tip in a substantially stationary position with respect to the receivers in such a system. This rotation may, in turn, result in the system interpreting, for example, an arc, which is undesirable. Additionally, state of the art approaches to communicate this information may employ a synchronization mechanism, which may add, for example, cost, complexity and power consumption to such wireless pen systems. Such synchronization mechanisms may also be disadvantageous for the mobility of such systems as such mechanisms may add additional components and, therefore, increase the size of such a system. Alternative wireless pen schemes that address at least some of the foregoing concerns may, therefore, be desirable.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. The invention, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with features and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings in which: FIG. 1 is a diagram that illustrates a prior embodiment of a wireless electronic handwriting system.
FIG. 2 is a diagram that illustrates another prior embodiment of a wireless electronic handwriting system.
FIG. 3 is a diagram that illustrates an embodiment of a wireless electronic handwriting system in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 4 is a diagram that illustrates an embodiment of an ultrasonic transmitter in accordance with the invention that may be employed, for example, by the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present invention.
As was previously indicated, techniques for entering information into a computing device, other than traditional techniques, may be desirable. As was also previously indicated, one such alternative technique may be accomplished by employing a wireless pen system. While embodiments of such wireless pen systems currently exist, these systems may have certain disadvantages. For example, as previously discussed, such systems may experience skipping or errors due to natural writing movements, such as rotation of a writing device employed in such an embodiment. Such systems may also experience various undesirable "dead zones", which will be discussed in more detail hereafter. Additionally, such systems typically employ multiple transmission/reception techniques such as, for example, one for synchronization and another for location determination. Employing such multiple techniques may reduce the mobility of such embodiments due to addition of, for example, components for synchronization in addition to adding cost, complexity and power consumption to such systems, which is undesirable. In this regard, FIG. 1 is a diagram that illustrates a current embodiment, 100, of a wireless pen system. For this embodiment, a writing device, 150, comprises a transmitter, 160. Such a transmitter may contain multiple elements capable of transmitting, respectively, for example, infrared (IR) signals and unidirectional ultrasonic, or sonic, pulses. In alternative embodiments, a separate radio frequency (RF) transmitter may be employed in place of, for example, an IR transmitter. As is described in more detail hereinafter, these signals and pulses may then be employed, respectively, for synchronization and location determination. However, in this respect, a sensor/receiver apparatus, such as 110, may comprise sensors 170, which may be employed for receiving such IR signals, and separate sensors 140, which may be employed for receiving such sonic pulses. Such an apparatus may also contain an interface, such as cable 120, to couple such an apparatus with a computing device to, at least in part, capture handwritten information in electronic form. Such signals and pulses would typically be generated at some substantially predetermined frequency for both IR signals and ultrasonic pulses in order to facilitate the capture of handwritten information by employing techniques such as those discussed herein.
Since the proximity of sensors 170 and receivers 140 to one another is substantially fixed, the timing relationship of such received IR signals and sonic pulses may be employed in determining the location of such a writing device. In this regard, because IR signals travel at speeds approaching the speed of light, such IR signals will arrive at sensors 170 substantially simultaneously regardless of the location transmitter 160 relative to such sensors. In this context, transmitter 160 would typically be in reasonable proximity to sensors 170 so as to allow such IR signals and ultrasonic pulses related to handwritten information to be received by, for example, sensors 170 and receivers 140, as is desirable. This distance would typically be on the order of no more than several feet away and typically confined to a writing surface, such as 130.
As opposed to such IR signals, because sonic pulses travel at a speed on the order of the speed of sound, some determinable delay between arrival at one of receivers 140 and the other receiver will typically exist. Such a delay may be based, at least in part, on the location of a transmitter employed to generate sonic pulses relative to such receivers. Based on the timing relationships of the received IR signal and the received sonic pulse at the respective sensors or receivers, a relative distance of transmitter 160 from each sensor may be determined by employing velocity equations. Such equations are well-known to those of skill in the art and the invention is not limited in scope to any particular technique for determining such distances. Such relative distances may then be employed to determine a location for transmitter 160 with respect to receivers 140. Because the proximity of such receivers is substantially fixed, as was previously discussed, triangulation computations may be employed based, at least in part, on receiver proximity and the relative distances of the transmitter from the receivers. Such triangulation computations are welLknown by those of skill in the art and the invention is not limited to any particular technique.
The embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, however, has some disadvantages, which are related, at least, to the transmitter and receiver configurations. In this respect, because transmitter 160 comprises a unidirectional transmitter, the orientation of writing device 150 in such embodiments may determine whether or not IR signals and sonic pulses are received by, for example, sensors 170 and receivers 140. Therefore, a user of such a system may be restricted in writing motion by such a configuration. This may be disadvantageous, as it may not be compatible with natural movements associated with handwritten information, such as rotation and tilting of such a writing device. Such rotation or tilting may result in skipping, discontinuities or extraneous information in the captured handwritten information because of the altered orientation of sensor 160 relative to sensors 140. Such embodiments may also experience multiple dead zones due to various factors. In this regard, for example, as is illustrated in FIG. 1, the typical configuration of receivers, such as 140, and sensors, such as 170, limits the angle at which they may be capable of receiving sonic pulses or IR signals. Outside this angle or scope, handwritten information may not be collected, even though it is within the bounds of writing surface 130. This is disadvantageous as it reduces the usable writing area a user may employ with such a system. Dead zones may also result, for example, from the configuration of a transmitter, such as 160. Though not illustrated in FIG. 1, such a dead zone may be due, at least in part, to the distance that transmitter 160 is from sensors 140 when it is desired to collect handwritten information. Because such transmitters typically have relatively large acoustic impedance as compare with air, large reflections of a sonic pulse may occur, resulting in significant attenuation of such a pulse. Such reflections due to impedance mismatches are well known to those skill in the art and are analogous to signal reflections in transmission lines due to electrical impedance mismatches. This attenuation due to such mismatches may, in turn, limit the radius from such receivers a user may employ in collecting handwritten information with such an embodiment. That is, a dead zone may exist outside such a radius.
Also, as was previously indicated, employing both sensors 140 and receivers 170 may be undesirable as it may result in added cost for such an embodiment. Such a configuration typically exists due, at least in part, to the capability of such sensor and receivers to receive, respectively, IR signals or sonic pulses. Such increases in cost are typically undesirable.
FIG. 2 illustrates another current embodiment of a wireless pen system that is typically employed in conjunction with a dry erase board. FIG. 2 contains two views of such an embodiment, a side view, 200, and a top view, 205. For this embodiment, writing device 250 comprises an infrared (IR) transmitter, 260, and an ultrasonic transmitter, 270. In this respect, IR transmitter 260 may be used in conjunction with IR sensors 230 to provide a substantially similar synchronization function as was previously described. For this embodiment, the sensor/receiver apparatus, 210, comprises IR sensors 230, receivers 240 and deflector 220. For this embodiment, ultrasonic pulses would be deflected by deflector 220 and then received by receivers 240. While this configuration may result in some improvement in the size of a dead zone due to the angles at which the signal may be received, the size of such a dead zone may, however, still depend, at least in part, on the particular deflector configuration being used. Additionally, since IR sensors in such embodiments typically have similar reception angles as have been previously discussed, a dead zone may, therefore, also exist due to the limitation of these sensors and their ability to receive synchronization signals outside certain angles or outside a certain scope.
As was previously indicated, such an embodiment is typically used in conjunction with a dry erase board to electronically capture handwritten information. In this regard, a mounting apparatus, 290, which may comprise suction devices, may be employed. Additionally, cable 285 may be employed to couple such a receiver apparatus to a computing device to facilitate electronic collection of handwritten information on for example, writing surface 280. However, such a sensor apparatus has the previously discussed disadvantages associated with employing multiple sensors. For this embodiment, employing IR sensors 230 and receivers 240 may reduce the mobility of such a device as well as increase the cost of such an embodiment. Additionally, depending on the particular configuration of an ultrasonic transmitter, such as 270, such embodiments may also experience skipping, rotation errors and dead zones due to transmitter distance from sensors 240, as were all previously discussed. Therefore, alternative embodiments of wireless pen systems may be desirable.
FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a wireless pen system in accordance with the invention that addresses at least some of the foregoing disadvantages. For this particular embodiment, though the invention is not limited in scope in this respect, writing device 350 comprises an omni-directional cylindrical ultrasonic transmitter. Also for this embodiment, receiver apparatus 310 comprises semi-cylindrical receivers 330. Though the invention is not limited in this respect, receivers 330 may comprise a capacitive piezo polymer film, such as polarized polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), for example. Such films are well known to those of skill in the art and may be obtained from, for example, Measurement Specialties, Inc., Sensor Products Division, 950 Forge Avenue - Bldg. B, Norristown, PA 19403. Such receivers may be advantageous in a number of respects.
For example, as is illustrated in FIG. 3, such a receiver configuration may reduce the size of a dead zone that may exist with state of the art approaches, as was previously described. In this respect, due, at least in part to their semi-cylindrical configuration, such receivers may be capable of receiving pulses or signals over a substantially 180 degree range, or a substantially planar area. As is shown in FIG. 3, a dead zone for such an embodiment may be defined, at least in part, by the angle at which one sensor would be in the direct path from a transmitter to a second sensor. In this situation, the first sensor may interfere with the pulse from the transmitter, which may affect its ability to reach the second sensor. However, in comparison to FIG. 1, employing such an embodiment may nonetheless, reduce the size of the dead zone area.
Another potential advantage of such a configuration may result from employing such receivers in conjunction with both a synchronization signal and a location pulse, as has been previously described. In this regard, an RF signal may be generated by an electronic pulse used to excite ultrasonic transmitter 360. Such a pulse may be generated, for example, by a transducer located in the barrel of pen 350. Such excitation pulses are well known to those of skill in the art and are one way of initiating sonic pulses in ultrasonic transmitters, such as 360. Such a pulse may be generated, for example, by a transducer or by discharging a resistive capacitive (RC) circuit. Other techniques for generating such an excitation exist and the invention is, of course, not limited to the foregoing. Such an RF signal may then be received substantially simultaneously by receivers 330 and be employed in determining the relative distances of the transmitter from the receivers, in a similar manner as has been previously described. In such an embodiment, because a second set of sensors/receivers is not employed to receive a synchronization signal, the mobility of such embodiments may be improved due, at least in part, to reductions in size of such embodiments. Additionally, for example, the cost or such embodiments may be reduced.
As another example, due, at least in part, to the omni-directional configuration of transmitter 360, the previously discussed disadvantage of rotation errors may also be reduced since such rotation errors frequently occur due, at least in part, to the directional nature of transmitters employed in previous embodiments. For this embodiment, rotation of a writing device, such as 350, comprising such a transmitter would not substantially affect the ultrasonic pulse characteristics at receivers 330 generated by such a transmitter. Due, at least in part, to this aspect, rotation of a writing device, such as 350, may not substantially affect an accurate determination of the location of such a writing device. Additionally, because of the cylindrical configuration of such an omni-directional transmitter, it may be located relatively close to the tip of a writing device, such as 350. This aspect may be advantageous as it may reduce adverse effects, such as, for example, extraneous information that may result from tilting such a writing device. In this respect, placing the transmitter closer to the tip of the pen reduces the radius of an arc along which the transmitter would travel during such tilting. This reduced radius may, therefore, reduce the total distance a transmitter would travel along such an arc and, in turn, reduce the amount of extraneous information.
For this particular embodiment, receiver apparatus 310 is coupled to computing device 370 via cable 320. This may allow computing device 370 to receive electronic information from receiver apparatus 310. The invention is, of course, not limited in scope in this respect and alternative embodiments exist. For example, sensors 330 may be included in computing device 370 as opposed to such a receiver apparatus 310 being coupled to such a computing device via cable 320. However, for this particular embodiment, electronic information communicated via cable 320 may be as is discussed in further detail hereinafter. FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of an omni-directional transmitter, 400, in accordance with the invention that may reduce the dead-zone related to acoustic impedance mismatch, as was previously discussed. Such a transmitter may be employed as transmitter 360 in writing device 350, as was previously discussed. While the invention is not limited in scope to this, or any particular configuration, transmitter 400 may comprise a cylindrical epoxy resin base, 400, and a matrix comprising piezo electric rods, such as 420. Such a configuration may result in lower acoustic in comparison with state of the art apparatuses. In this respect, acoustic impedance of such a transmitter may be reduced by approximately one order of magnitude. Such a reduction in acoustic impedance of such a transmitter may, in turn, improve the impedance mismatch with air and increase the radius outside which the previous discussed dead zone occurs, which is desirable.
Method embodiments in accordance with the invention may employ the embodiment of a wireless pen system, as illustrated in FIG. 3. While such a method may be embodied as instructions on a storage medium, which may be executed by a computing device, such as 370, the invention is, of course, not so limited. Such a method embodiment may also employ techniques for determining writing device location as have been previously discussed. For example, an embodiment of such a method may comprise generating a synchronization signal, such as may be generated as a result of an excitation pulse. Such a method embodiment may further comprise generating an ultrasonic pulse and then determining relative distance from a plurality of sensors based on the timing relationships of the synchronization signal and the ultrasonic pulse. Such a method may also further comprise determining the location of a writing device by employing triangulation calculations, the result of such calculations being based, at least in part, on the proximity of receivers, such as 330, and the relative distances determined by the timing relationships. Though the invention is not so limited, the synchronization signal and ultrasonic pulses,, which are typically analog, may be converted to digital representations of those signals/pulses. These digital representations may then, in turn, be employed in determining relative distances and location of a writing device relative to receivers, such as 330.
While certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications, substitutions, changes and equivalents will now occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A system for tracking motion of a writing device comprising: a substantially omni-directional transmitter attached to said writing device; and a plurality of semi-cylindrical receivers capable of receiving, over a substantially planar area, one or more pulses generated by said substantially omni-directional transmitter.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein said substantially omni-directional transmitter comprises an ultrasonic transmitter.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein said substantially omni-directional transmitter comprises a substantially cylindrical transmitter.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein said cylindrical ultrasonic transmitter comprises a base material and a piezoelectric material.
5. The system of claim 4, wherein said piezoelectric material comprises a plurality of rods distributed in said base material.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein said receivers comprise a piezo polymer film.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein said plurality of receivers are arranged at known relative positions such that a location of said transmitter is substantially determinable based, at least in part, on relative arrival times of said one or more pulses.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein said receivers are further capable of receiving a substantially simultaneous synchronization signal as a reference for determining said relative arrival times.
9. The system of claim 8, wherein said synchronization signal is based, at least in part, on an excitation pulse for said substantially omni-directional transmitter.
10. The system of claim 8, wherein said plurality of receivers are coupled, via an interface, to a processor, said processor being capable of determining said location of said writing device by employing triangulation calculations based, at least in part, on said relative arrival times.
11. The system of claim 10, wherein said processor is included in a computing device.
12. The system of claim 11, wherein said computing device comprises a computing device consisting essentially of at least one of the following: a personal computer, a personal data assistant, and an internet tablet.
13. A method of electronically recording information generated using a writing device comprising: generating a substantially omni-directional one or more pulses from a transmitter; receiving said one or more pulses over a substantially planar area; and determining a location of said transmitter based, at least in part, on relative arrival times of said one or more pulses at various points on said substantially planar area.
14. The method of claim 13 further comprising: generating a synchronization signal; receiving said synchronization signal substantially simultaneously at said various points on said substantially planar area, wherein determining said relative arrival times is based, at least in part, on said synchronization signal.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein said synchronization signal is based, at least in part, on an excitation pulse for said transmitter.
16. The method of claim 14, wherein determining said location of said transmitter comprises: determining distances of said transmitter to various points on said substantially planar area based, at least in part, on said relative arrival times; and calculating said location of said transmitter based, at least in part, on said distances.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein calculating said location employs triangulation formulas.
18. An article comprising: a storage medium having stored thereon instructions that, when executed, result in a computing device having the capability to: receive one or more synchronization signals; receive a substantially omni-directional one or more pulses at various points on a substantially planar area; and determine a location of a transmitter based, at least in part, on a timing relationship between said one or more synchronization signals and said one or more pulses.
19. The article of claim 18, wherein said one or more synchronization signals are received substantially simultaneously at said various points on said substantially planar area.
20. The article of claim 19, wherein said instructions, that when executed, result in a computing device having the further capability to: determine respective distances of said transmitter to said various points on said substantially planar area based, at least in part, on relative arrival times of said one or more pulses at said various points on said substantially planar area; and determine said location of said transmitter by employing said respective distances.
PCT/US2001/029693 2000-09-20 2001-09-20 Wireless handwriting system WO2002025577A2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0303837A GB2381640B (en) 2000-09-20 2001-09-20 Wireless handwriting scheme
DE10196652T DE10196652T1 (en) 2000-09-20 2001-09-20 Handwritten image transmitted wirelessly
AU2001289143A AU2001289143A1 (en) 2000-09-20 2001-09-20 Wireless handwriting system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US66636300A 2000-09-20 2000-09-20
US09/666,363 2000-09-20

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2002025577A2 true WO2002025577A2 (en) 2002-03-28
WO2002025577A3 WO2002025577A3 (en) 2003-03-13

Family

ID=24673877

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2001/029693 WO2002025577A2 (en) 2000-09-20 2001-09-20 Wireless handwriting system

Country Status (5)

Country Link
CN (1) CN1493057A (en)
AU (1) AU2001289143A1 (en)
DE (1) DE10196652T1 (en)
GB (1) GB2381640B (en)
WO (1) WO2002025577A2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2388077A (en) * 2002-02-08 2003-11-05 Virtual Ink Corp Recording writing performed on a surface
WO2009143911A1 (en) * 2008-05-29 2009-12-03 Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab Wireless touch screen pen
CN102375624A (en) * 2010-08-27 2012-03-14 刘中华 Ultrasonic handwriting board of flat plate structure
WO2020070009A1 (en) 2018-10-02 2020-04-09 Novozymes A/S Endonuclease 1 ribonucleases for cleaning

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4012588A (en) * 1975-08-29 1977-03-15 Science Accessories Corporation Position determining apparatus and transducer therefor
US4758691A (en) * 1986-01-23 1988-07-19 Zellweger Uster Ltd. Apparatus for determining the position of a movable object
EP0312481A2 (en) * 1987-09-16 1989-04-19 José Manuel Ezquerra Perez Method to determine the position and the state of an object using ultrasonics
FR2698191A1 (en) * 1992-11-17 1994-05-20 Lectra Systemes Sa Acquisition and processing of graphic data
EP0753723A2 (en) * 1995-07-05 1997-01-15 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Coordinate input device
WO2000023939A1 (en) * 1998-10-21 2000-04-27 Electronics For Imaging, Inc. Piezoelectric transducer for data entry device
EP1128320A1 (en) * 2000-02-21 2001-08-29 Oki Data Corporation Electronic-form preparation system

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09501247A (en) * 1992-11-17 1997-02-04 レクトラ、システム Graphic information collection and processing method and apparatus for implementing the method
WO1995014286A1 (en) * 1993-11-17 1995-05-26 Microsoft Corporation Wireless pen computer input system

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4012588A (en) * 1975-08-29 1977-03-15 Science Accessories Corporation Position determining apparatus and transducer therefor
US4758691A (en) * 1986-01-23 1988-07-19 Zellweger Uster Ltd. Apparatus for determining the position of a movable object
EP0312481A2 (en) * 1987-09-16 1989-04-19 José Manuel Ezquerra Perez Method to determine the position and the state of an object using ultrasonics
FR2698191A1 (en) * 1992-11-17 1994-05-20 Lectra Systemes Sa Acquisition and processing of graphic data
EP0753723A2 (en) * 1995-07-05 1997-01-15 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Coordinate input device
WO2000023939A1 (en) * 1998-10-21 2000-04-27 Electronics For Imaging, Inc. Piezoelectric transducer for data entry device
EP1128320A1 (en) * 2000-02-21 2001-08-29 Oki Data Corporation Electronic-form preparation system

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2388077A (en) * 2002-02-08 2003-11-05 Virtual Ink Corp Recording writing performed on a surface
US7109979B2 (en) 2002-02-08 2006-09-19 Virtual Ink Corporation System and method for recording writing performed on a surface
WO2009143911A1 (en) * 2008-05-29 2009-12-03 Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab Wireless touch screen pen
CN102375624A (en) * 2010-08-27 2012-03-14 刘中华 Ultrasonic handwriting board of flat plate structure
WO2020070009A1 (en) 2018-10-02 2020-04-09 Novozymes A/S Endonuclease 1 ribonucleases for cleaning

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2002025577A3 (en) 2003-03-13
CN1493057A (en) 2004-04-28
GB0303837D0 (en) 2003-03-26
GB2381640A (en) 2003-05-07
GB2381640B (en) 2005-02-23
DE10196652T1 (en) 2003-08-07
AU2001289143A1 (en) 2002-04-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4390582B2 (en) Electronic stylus and method for determining position of tip of stylus
US6731270B2 (en) Piezoelectric transducer for data entry device
US4654648A (en) Wireless cursor control system
KR100729495B1 (en) Contact sensitive device
US8169404B1 (en) Method and device for planary sensory detection
US20100220078A1 (en) Digital pen system, transmitter devices, receiving devices, and methods of manufacturing and using the same
JPH0836456A (en) Stylus location digitizer using sound wave
Dahl et al. Applications of airborne ultrasound in human–computer interaction
US20130021271A1 (en) Touch mouse
WO1999036883A1 (en) Improved pen positioning system
JP2000513124A (en) Display board digitizer system
JPH06502509A (en) Ultrasonic positioning method and device
CN102495700A (en) Method for recognizing touch points by using acoustic wave touch screen
EP3640775B1 (en) Touch sensing method, touch chip, electronic device, and touch system
US10712444B1 (en) Ultrasonic input device
US10949030B2 (en) Shear-poled curved piezoelectric material
WO2002025577A2 (en) Wireless handwriting system
US8487915B1 (en) Mobile device incorporating projector and pen-location transcription system
US11392250B1 (en) Ultrasonic touch sensing parasitic wave rejection
JP4552345B2 (en) Digitizer and electronic blackboard equipped with it
WO2002091289A1 (en) Piezoelectric data entry device
JP4068366B2 (en) Coordinate input device
CN110362238B (en) Active ultrasonic input device
KR100900978B1 (en) Apparatus for inputting virtual data and method therefor
JPH02135520A (en) Coordinates input device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

ENP Entry into the national phase in:

Ref document number: 0303837

Country of ref document: GB

Kind code of ref document: A

Free format text: PCT FILING DATE = 20010920

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 018159044

Country of ref document: CN

RET De translation (de og part 6b)

Ref document number: 10196652

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20030807

Kind code of ref document: P

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10196652

Country of ref document: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: JP