WO2001040581A1 - Substructure for offshore platform - Google Patents

Substructure for offshore platform Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001040581A1
WO2001040581A1 PCT/GB2000/004581 GB0004581W WO0140581A1 WO 2001040581 A1 WO2001040581 A1 WO 2001040581A1 GB 0004581 W GB0004581 W GB 0004581W WO 0140581 A1 WO0140581 A1 WO 0140581A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
substructure
conductor
seabed
leg
structural component
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2000/004581
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Michael Moroney
Poul-Eric Christiansen
Lauchlan Wallace
Original Assignee
Kvaerner Oil & Gas Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GBGB9928317.8A external-priority patent/GB9928317D0/en
Priority claimed from GB0001896A external-priority patent/GB0001896D0/en
Application filed by Kvaerner Oil & Gas Ltd filed Critical Kvaerner Oil & Gas Ltd
Priority to AU15392/01A priority Critical patent/AU1539201A/en
Publication of WO2001040581A1 publication Critical patent/WO2001040581A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B17/00Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor
    • E02B17/02Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor placed by lowering the supporting construction to the bottom, e.g. with subsequent fixing thereto
    • E02B17/021Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor placed by lowering the supporting construction to the bottom, e.g. with subsequent fixing thereto with relative movement between supporting construction and platform
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B17/00Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor
    • E02B2017/0056Platforms with supporting legs
    • E02B2017/006Platforms with supporting legs with lattice style supporting legs
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B17/00Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor
    • E02B2017/0056Platforms with supporting legs
    • E02B2017/0065Monopile structures
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B17/00Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor
    • E02B2017/0056Platforms with supporting legs
    • E02B2017/0073Details of sea bottom engaging footing
    • E02B2017/0078Suction piles, suction cans
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B17/00Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor
    • E02B2017/0056Platforms with supporting legs
    • E02B2017/0073Details of sea bottom engaging footing
    • E02B2017/0082Spudcans, skirts or extended feet

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a substructure for an offshore platform, and to a method of installation for such a substructure
  • the invention relates to a substructure having pre-loaded foundations
  • Fixed substructures such as steel jackets or concrete gravity base structures, are used for platforms in the development of offshore oil and gas fields These fixed substructures are set on the seabed to support working decks above the highest anticipated waves
  • a fixed substructure is subject to static and environmental loads, which are transferred into the seabed by foundations
  • foundations For jackets, these may be suction foundations known as “buckets” or “caissons”, or mudmats, or vertical or battered piles Massive gravity base foundations may also be used
  • This invention is intended to reduce or remove the need for any tensile capacity to resist up-lift, by adding extra bearing load in the static condition
  • This additional bearing load is created by applying tension to one or more well conductors
  • the conductor In a typical surface well configuration, the conductor extends vertically down into the seabed below the platform The conductor is grouted into the seabed The fixity of the conductor in the seabed provides a significant load carrying capacity
  • the additional load - required to stabilise the substructure against uplift - is a reaction on the substructure resulting from tensioning the well conductor
  • a predetermined tensile load is applied to the well conductor
  • the load is resisted by the substructure, which in turn is supported by the foundations
  • This extra bearing load in the static condition increases the lateral load carrying capacity - i e the lateral load which may be applied to the substructure before up-lift is experienced
  • the foundations are effectively preloaded with extra bearing pressure, to increase the capacity to resist uplift
  • the invention may further require that the device to apply the tensile load should accommodate a significant relative vertical movement between the conductor and the substructure, while maintaining a near constant tensioning force This will allow settlement and/or consolidation of the seabed to take place without an adverse affect on the ability of the foundations to support the platform It will also allow readjustment of the tension in the conductor (or conductors) if required
  • a monotower is shown in our UK Patent Specification No 2,290,334 This monotower has three feet Other monotowers have been constructed with four feet Typically, a pile is driven through each foot into the seabed to fix the monotower to the seabed The piled foundations resist overturning moments arising from wind, wave and current forces
  • a typical jack-up vessel has a buoyant hull and three lattice legs
  • the vessel is floated to its intended location, and the lattice legs are jacked down and spudded-m to the seabed
  • the hull is then jacked vertically up the lattice legs to raise the hull clear of the highest waves anticipated in the intended area of operation
  • the hull forms a fixed deck
  • the hull carries a cantilever which is moveable outwardly from a transom on the hull
  • a drilling derrick is mounted on the cantilever The outward movement (or outreach) of the drilling derrick is limited
  • a jack-up vessel is floated to the intended location, and the hull is jacked up so that the derrick is over the position of installation
  • the monotower is transported upright on a Heavy Lift Vessel (HLV) or transport barge from the yard in which it was fabricated to its intended location
  • HLV or barge is positioned next to the jack-up vessel so that the monotower is directly below the drilling derrick
  • the monotower is lifted from the HLV or barge using the drilling derrick
  • the HLV or barge is removed, and the drilling derrick lowers the monotower to set it on the seabed
  • the drilling derrick is then used to install piles to secure the monotower to the seabed.
  • the monotower is positioned on the seabed so that pile sleeves for two of thepiles lie below the transom of the jack-up vessel. Piles are driven at these positions using the drilling derrick to support a pile driver.
  • the cantilever is extended, and one additional pile is driven on the far side of the leg (for a three footed monotower) or two additional piles (for a four footed monotower).
  • the drilling derrick can then drill a well (or wells) through the leg of the monotower.
  • the cantilever would have to be extended even further from the transom, to lift the deck from an HLV or barge located on the far side of the leg.
  • the need to pile the feet nearest to the transom of the jack-up vessel, means that the jack-up vessel has to be set back from the centre of the base of the monotower. This limits the effective outreach of the drilling derrick to lift the deck.
  • the HLV or barge carrying the deck cannot approach closely to the leg of the monotower (because of the outlying pile or piles).
  • the invention provides a substructure to form part of a fixed offshore platform, the substructure having at least one foundation element adapted to rest in or on the seabed, a structural component configured to extend upwards from the foundation element, provision for at least one conductor to extend downwardly from the structural component into the seabed, and provision for means to apply tension to the conductor, so to increase the bearing (compressive ⁇ load of the foundation element on the seabed to resist any uplift (tensile) load arising from overturning moments which might otherwise tend to cause that foundation element to lift off the seabed.
  • a single leg forming the structural component to extend vertically upward through the sea surface; a base at or near the lower end of the leg and configured to be set on the seabed so that at least three different regions of the base are spaced around the leg in a generally horizontal plane, and in which there is provision for the conductor to extend downwardly from the leg into the seabed.
  • leg is hollow and that the conductor may be located within the leg.
  • the leg is of cylindrical cross section and that the conductor may be concentric within the leg.
  • the base is a cylinder of large diameter as compared with the largest lateral dimension of the leg, the axis of the cylinder is vertical, and the at least three different regions of the base are spaced arcuate portions of the cylinder.
  • the foundation elements are suction or "bucket” or “caisson” foundations; or mudmats; or piles; or regions of a gravity base.
  • the provision for the conductor to extend downwardly from the structural component may lie within a horizontal planform defined by vertical axes passing through the foundation elements, so that compressive loads can be applied to or increased on all of the foundation elements.
  • the arrangement of the conductor relative to the foundation elements may be determined with respect to the weight distribution of topsides to be placed on the substructure, so that the greatest compressive load is applied to the foundation element or elements which carry least weight from the topsides.
  • the means to apply tension to the conductor is adapted to permit relative vertical movement between the conductor and the substructure, while maintaining the applied or increased compressive load on the at least one of the foundation elements.
  • the tension may be created by frictional force between the conductor and the seabed by bonding using grout or similar, or by the self-weight of the conductor, or by a combination of these effects.
  • the structural component is configured to extend from the seabed towards (but not through) the wave effected zone.
  • the structural component is configured to extend from the seabed through the wave effected zone to above the sea surface.
  • the structural component forms the upper part of a substructure having two or more parts, and in which there is provision for means to apply tension to the conductor.
  • the lowest part of the substructure may be a fixed subsea template; or another fixed substructure part; or a gravity base.
  • the invention includes a substructure as described above, in combination with a conductor which extends downwardly from the structural component, and with means to apply tension to that conductor.
  • the invention further includes a substructure in combination with a conductor, when the conductor is tensioned to apply or increase a compressive load on at least one of the foundation elements.
  • the invention also includes a method of stabilising a substructure of the kind described above, including the step of tensioning a conductor extending down from the structural component, so to preload at least one of the foundation elements.
  • the drilling derrick may be used to drill a well within or close to the leg, and the conductor may be tensioned to increase the bearing load on the seabed to be greater than any up-lift load arising from overturning moments which might otherwise cause any part of the substructure to lift off the seabed.
  • Figure 1 is a side elevation of a jack-up vessel installing a monotower
  • Figure 2 is a plan (to an enlarged scale) showing an envelope for the outreach of a cantilever forming part of the jack-up vessel shown in Figure 1 ;
  • Figure 3 is a side elevation of a first monotower substructure according to the invention
  • Figure 4 is a side elevation of a second monotower according to the invention
  • Figure 5 is a side elevation of a third monotower according to the invention.
  • Figure 6 is a diagrammatic side view of a tripod substructure
  • Figure 7 is a plan of that tripod substructure
  • Figure 8 is a diagrammatic side view of a four legged substructure; and Figure 9 is a plan view of the substructure shown in Figure 8.
  • the invention shows particular advantages when applied to monotowers installed by jack-up vessels.
  • FIG. 1 An installation arrangement for a conventional monotower is shown in Figure 1.
  • a jack-up vessel 10 has lattice legs 11 and a hull 12 which forms a fixed deck.
  • a cantilever 14 outstanding from the hull 12 supports a drilling derrick 15.
  • a monotower 16 has been installed on seabed 17 next to the jack-up vessel 10 using the derrick 15.
  • Piles 18 (here shown undriven) are driven into the seabed to secure the monotower to the seabed.
  • the drilling derrick would be used to install a working deck on top of the monotower.
  • a difficulty arises in that the position of the monotower makes it impossible for another HLV or barge - carrying the deck - to approach the jack-up vessel closely beneath the drilling derrick.
  • the working envelope of the ca tilever 14 is shown in Figure 2, in which the transom line of the jack-up vessel is designated 10, and the working envelope of the d ⁇ lling derrick on the cantilever is designated 21 Clearly the outreach required to lift a deck from a barge once the monotower is installed would be beyond the limits of the envelope
  • FIG. 3 shows diagrammatically a monotower substructure 30 exemplifying a first embodiment of the invention
  • the monotower 30 has a hollow cylindrical leg 31 , and a base formed of a skirted foundation 32
  • the skirted foundation 32 is a hollow cylinder of much larger diameter than the leg 31
  • the leg 31 and skirted foundation 32 are disposed about a common vertical axis Bracing 33 connects the skirted foundation 32 to the leg 31
  • Conductors 34 extend down through the leg 31 into seabed 35
  • the monotower 30 is set on the seabed by a jack-up vessel (not shown) After the monotower has been set on the seabed, conductors 34 are drilled into the seabed Following the invention, the conductors are then tensioned The effect of tensioning the conductors is to draw the skirted foundation further down into the seabed
  • the tension is of such a magnitude that when an overturning moment is applied to the monotower by environmental loads, the uplift force on the region of the cylinder nearest to the load is more than compensated for by the compressive load (created by tensioning the conductors) on that region
  • the overturning moment could be applied from any direction, so that the region where the uplift load is more than compensated for could be anywhere on the circumference of the cylinder In the case of a discontinuous cylinder, the minimum number of spaced regions (constituting foundation elements) to support the monotower would be three
  • a working deck 36 (incorporating topsides) is installed on top of the leg 31 Because of the type of foundation (using tensioned conductors to react overturning moments), an HLV or transport barge can approach the monotower closely
  • the deck 36 on the HLV or barge would be within the operating envelope of a drilling derrick supported on a cantilever Thus the deck could be lifted from the HLV or barge by the drilling derrick, and placed on the top of the leg 31 In this case the elimination of the pile on the far side of the monotower from the jack-up vessel allows a close approach by the HLV or barge
  • FIG. 4 shows diagrammatically a monotower substructure 40 exemplifying a second embodiment of the invention
  • the monotower 40 has a hollow cylindrical leg 41 , and a base comprising three feet 42, each formed of a downwardly extending cylinder The axes of the leg
  • the monotower 40 is set on the seabed by a jack-up vessel (not shown) After the monotower has been set on the seabed, the conductor 44 is drilled into the seabed Following the invention, the conductor is then tensioned.
  • the tension is of such a magnitude that when an overturning moment is applied to the monotower, the uplift force on the foot 42 nearest to the load is more than compensated for by the compressive load on that foot (created by tensioning the conductor).
  • the overturning moment could be applied from any direction, so that the tension in the conductor could be applied on any of regions of the base formed by the three feet.
  • a working deck 46 is then installed in the manner described for the first embodiment.
  • Figure 5 shows an offshore platform with topsides 110 supported on a two-part monotower substructure 111.
  • the substructure has a structural component 112 comprising a single water piercing tubular member. This component 112 forms the upper part of the substructure.
  • the lower part of the substructure is formed of a central tubular member 114, bracing members 115, and three foundation elements 116. In this example the foundation elements are suction or "bucket" foundations.
  • the foundation elements of the lower part of the substructure might comprise mudmats (as shown in Figures 6 and 7), or piled foundations (as shown in Figures 8 and 9).
  • the whole base of the substructure could be plated.
  • the lower part of the substructure could be a subsea template or a gravity base.
  • the platform of Figure 5 is shown in an installed condition.
  • the lower part of the substructure 111 (members 114 and 115 and elements 116) is set on seabed 117, and the upper part of the substructure (structural component 112) projects through sea surface 118 to support the topsides 110.
  • the upper and lower parts of the substructure are fixedly connected at a structural joint 119. In some circumstances, the whole of the substructure could be subsea.
  • the platform has a wellhead 120 within the topsides 110.
  • a conductor 121 extends vertically downward from the wellhead 120 through the structural component 112 into the seabed 117 beneath the platform. If the platform is installed on firm soil, the conductor is fixed in the seabed by friction. If the platform is installed on poor soil, the conductor may be held down by its own self-weight.
  • a tensioning device 122 is disposed vertically between the wellhead 120 and the structural component 112. The tensioning device 122 is mounted on top of a floating ring 123. Beneath the floating ring 123 there is an adjustment chock 124.
  • the tensioning device 122 is used to tension the conductor 121 , and so to apply an additional compressive load in the structural component 112. This is reacted by larger bearing loads in the foundation elements 116. In this way the substructure is preloaded against uplift from lateral loads.
  • Figures 6 and 7 show a tripod substructure 130. This has two vertical legs 131 and one inclined leg 132, connected by bracing (shown diagrammatically in single lines).
  • the legs and bracing comprise the structural component of a unitary substructure.
  • At the bases of the legs there are mudmats 133, 134 and 135.
  • the mudmats are horizontal, and constitute foundation elements which rest on seabed 136 to support the substructure.
  • the substructure is designed to support topsides (not shown).
  • Three conductors 137 extend down from wellheads on the topsides into the seabed below the substructure.
  • Tensioning means (not shown) is used to tension the conductors 137, so to apply an additional compressive load in the structural component. This compressive load is reacted by larger bearing loads on the mudmats 133, 134 and 135. Thus the substructure is preloaded against uplift from lateral loads.
  • Figures 8 and 9 show a four-legged substructure 140.
  • This has two vertical legs 141 and two inclined legs 142, connected by bracing (shown diagrammatically in single lines).
  • the legs and bracing comprise the structural component of a unitary substructure.
  • At the base of each of the four legs there are two vertical pile sleeves 143.
  • Piles 144 extend down through the pile sleeves 143 into seabed 146 to fix the substructure to the seabed.
  • the piles 144 constitute foundation elements.
  • the substructure is designed to support topsides (not shown).
  • Ten conductors 147 extend down from wellheads on the topsides into the seabed below the substructure.
  • Tensioning means (not shown) is used to tension at least some of the conductors 147, so to apply an additional compressive load in the structural component. This compressive load is reacted by larger bearing loads in the eight piles 144. Thus the substructure is preloaded against uplift from lateral loads.
  • the order of magnitude of conductor loads may be shown by way of numerical examples.
  • Advantages lie in preloading a conductor to reduce or eliminate tensile (uplift) loads on the foundations of an offshore platform. This can eliminate the need for piles, and, in the case of a monotower, can allow the close approach of a cargo barge to a jack-up vessel, so that its drilling rig can be used to lift and place a deck.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Earth Drilling (AREA)
  • Foundations (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a substructure (111) to form part of a fixed offshore platform, the substructure having at least one foundation element (116) adapted to rest in or on the seabed (117), a structural component (112) configured to extend upwards from the foundation element (116), provision for at least one conductor (121) to extend downwardly from the structural component (112) into the seabed (117), and provision for means (122) to apply tension to the conductor (121), so to increase the bearing (compressive) load of the foundation element (116) on the seabed (117) to resist any uplift (tensile) load arising from overturning moments which might otherwise tend to cause that foundation element (117) to lift off the seabed.

Description

SUBSTRUCTURE FOR OFFSHORE PLATFORM
Technical Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a substructure for an offshore platform, and to a method of installation for such a substructure
In particular, the invention relates to a substructure having pre-loaded foundations
Background of the Invention
Fixed substructures, such as steel jackets or concrete gravity base structures, are used for platforms in the development of offshore oil and gas fields These fixed substructures are set on the seabed to support working decks above the highest anticipated waves
A fixed substructure is subject to static and environmental loads, which are transferred into the seabed by foundations For jackets, these may be suction foundations known as "buckets" or "caissons", or mudmats, or vertical or battered piles Massive gravity base foundations may also be used
Under static load conditions, the self-weight of a platform (i e substructure plus topsides) is supported by the seabed The weight is distπbuted between supporting legs and their foundations (or across a gravity base foundation) When environmental forces - due to wind, waves or current - act on the platform, a lateral load component is introduced This lateral load component changes the distribution of loads in the legs from their static load distribution The lateral load is often enough to create a theoretical up-lift on one or more of the legs, i e to tend to overturn the platform To counteract the up-lift force, two expedients are available Either the foundations must have some tensile capacity, or extra weight must be added to the platform In most circumstances, the addition of extra weight is undesirable
This invention is intended to reduce or remove the need for any tensile capacity to resist up-lift, by adding extra bearing load in the static condition This additional bearing load is created by applying tension to one or more well conductors In a typical surface well configuration, the conductor extends vertically down into the seabed below the platform The conductor is grouted into the seabed The fixity of the conductor in the seabed provides a significant load carrying capacity
The additional load - required to stabilise the substructure against uplift - is a reaction on the substructure resulting from tensioning the well conductor A predetermined tensile load is applied to the well conductor The load is resisted by the substructure, which in turn is supported by the foundations In effect the tensile load applied to the conductor applies additional bearing load to the foundations This extra bearing load in the static condition increases the lateral load carrying capacity - i e the lateral load which may be applied to the substructure before up-lift is experienced The foundations are effectively preloaded with extra bearing pressure, to increase the capacity to resist uplift
The invention may further require that the device to apply the tensile load should accommodate a significant relative vertical movement between the conductor and the substructure, while maintaining a near constant tensioning force This will allow settlement and/or consolidation of the seabed to take place without an adverse affect on the ability of the foundations to support the platform It will also allow readjustment of the tension in the conductor (or conductors) if required
In relatively shallow waters - for instance in the southern North Sea - offshore oil or gas fields have been developed using fixed platforms having only six (or fewer) oil or gas wells In the case of such platforms, it has been possible to use single leg substructures to support wellheads for the oil or gas wells Single leg substructures are frequently known as
"monotowers" This invention shows particular advantages when applied to monotowers
One example of a monotower is shown in our UK Patent Specification No 2,290,334 This monotower has three feet Other monotowers have been constructed with four feet Typically, a pile is driven through each foot into the seabed to fix the monotower to the seabed The piled foundations resist overturning moments arising from wind, wave and current forces
In the past, monotowers have been installed using jack-up vessels A typical jack-up vessel has a buoyant hull and three lattice legs The vessel is floated to its intended location, and the lattice legs are jacked down and spudded-m to the seabed The hull is then jacked vertically up the lattice legs to raise the hull clear of the highest waves anticipated in the intended area of operation In its raised position, the hull forms a fixed deck The hull carries a cantilever which is moveable outwardly from a transom on the hull A drilling derrick is mounted on the cantilever The outward movement (or outreach) of the drilling derrick is limited
To install a monotower, a jack-up vessel is floated to the intended location, and the hull is jacked up so that the derrick is over the position of installation
The monotower is transported upright on a Heavy Lift Vessel (HLV) or transport barge from the yard in which it was fabricated to its intended location The HLV or barge is positioned next to the jack-up vessel so that the monotower is directly below the drilling derrick The monotower is lifted from the HLV or barge using the drilling derrick The HLV or barge is removed, and the drilling derrick lowers the monotower to set it on the seabed The drilling derrick is then used to install piles to secure the monotower to the seabed.
The monotower is positioned on the seabed so that pile sleeves for two of thepiles lie below the transom of the jack-up vessel. Piles are driven at these positions using the drilling derrick to support a pile driver. The cantilever is extended, and one additional pile is driven on the far side of the leg (for a three footed monotower) or two additional piles (for a four footed monotower).
The drilling derrick can then drill a well (or wells) through the leg of the monotower.
If a working deck were to be placed on top of the leg by the drilling derrick of the same jack-up vessel, the cantilever would have to be extended even further from the transom, to lift the deck from an HLV or barge located on the far side of the leg. The need to pile the feet nearest to the transom of the jack-up vessel, means that the jack-up vessel has to be set back from the centre of the base of the monotower. This limits the effective outreach of the drilling derrick to lift the deck. The HLV or barge carrying the deck cannot approach closely to the leg of the monotower (because of the outlying pile or piles).
For these reasons, the use of a drilling derrick to lift a working deck from an HLV or barge, and then to place it on top of a monotower, becomes problematical.
Disclosure of the Invention
The invention provides a substructure to form part of a fixed offshore platform, the substructure having at least one foundation element adapted to rest in or on the seabed, a structural component configured to extend upwards from the foundation element, provision for at least one conductor to extend downwardly from the structural component into the seabed, and provision for means to apply tension to the conductor, so to increase the bearing (compressive^ load of the foundation element on the seabed to resist any uplift (tensile) load arising from overturning moments which might otherwise tend to cause that foundation element to lift off the seabed.
It is preferred that there is a single leg forming the structural component to extend vertically upward through the sea surface; a base at or near the lower end of the leg and configured to be set on the seabed so that at least three different regions of the base are spaced around the leg in a generally horizontal plane, and in which there is provision for the conductor to extend downwardly from the leg into the seabed.
It is further preferred that the leg is hollow and that the conductor may be located within the leg.
It is still further preferred that the leg is of cylindrical cross section and that the conductor may be concentric within the leg. ln one form the base is a cylinder of large diameter as compared with the largest lateral dimension of the leg, the axis of the cylinder is vertical, and the at least three different regions of the base are spaced arcuate portions of the cylinder.
In another form there are at least three discrete foundation elements. In this last mentioned form, the foundation elements are suction or "bucket" or "caisson" foundations; or mudmats; or piles; or regions of a gravity base.
If the foundations are discrete, the provision for the conductor to extend downwardly from the structural component may lie within a horizontal planform defined by vertical axes passing through the foundation elements, so that compressive loads can be applied to or increased on all of the foundation elements.
The arrangement of the conductor relative to the foundation elements may be determined with respect to the weight distribution of topsides to be placed on the substructure, so that the greatest compressive load is applied to the foundation element or elements which carry least weight from the topsides. It is preferred that the means to apply tension to the conductor is adapted to permit relative vertical movement between the conductor and the substructure, while maintaining the applied or increased compressive load on the at least one of the foundation elements. (The tension may be created by frictional force between the conductor and the seabed by bonding using grout or similar, or by the self-weight of the conductor, or by a combination of these effects.) In one form the structural component is configured to extend from the seabed towards (but not through) the wave effected zone.
In another form the structural component is configured to extend from the seabed through the wave effected zone to above the sea surface.
In yet another form the structural component forms the upper part of a substructure having two or more parts, and in which there is provision for means to apply tension to the conductor. The lowest part of the substructure may be a fixed subsea template; or another fixed substructure part; or a gravity base.
The invention includes a substructure as described above, in combination with a conductor which extends downwardly from the structural component, and with means to apply tension to that conductor.
The invention further includes a substructure in combination with a conductor, when the conductor is tensioned to apply or increase a compressive load on at least one of the foundation elements.
The invention also includes a method of stabilising a substructure of the kind described above, including the step of tensioning a conductor extending down from the structural component, so to preload at least one of the foundation elements. ln the case of a monotower substructure in which the leg and the base are set on the seabed using the drilling derrick of a jack-up vessel, the drilling derrick may be used to drill a well within or close to the leg, and the conductor may be tensioned to increase the bearing load on the seabed to be greater than any up-lift load arising from overturning moments which might otherwise cause any part of the substructure to lift off the seabed.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Five specific embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:-
Figure 1 is a side elevation of a jack-up vessel installing a monotower;
Figure 2 is a plan (to an enlarged scale) showing an envelope for the outreach of a cantilever forming part of the jack-up vessel shown in Figure 1 ;
Figure 3 is a side elevation of a first monotower substructure according to the invention; Figure 4 is a side elevation of a second monotower according to the invention;
Figure 5 is a side elevation of a third monotower according to the invention;
Figure 6 is a diagrammatic side view of a tripod substructure;
Figure 7 is a plan of that tripod substructure;
Figure 8 is a diagrammatic side view of a four legged substructure; and Figure 9 is a plan view of the substructure shown in Figure 8.
Description of the Specific Embodiments
The invention shows particular advantages when applied to monotowers installed by jack-up vessels.
An installation arrangement for a conventional monotower is shown in Figure 1. A jack-up vessel 10 has lattice legs 11 and a hull 12 which forms a fixed deck. A cantilever 14 outstanding from the hull 12 supports a drilling derrick 15. A monotower 16 has been installed on seabed 17 next to the jack-up vessel 10 using the derrick 15. Piles 18 (here shown undriven) are driven into the seabed to secure the monotower to the seabed.
Advantageously, the drilling derrick would be used to install a working deck on top of the monotower. However, a difficulty arises in that the position of the monotower makes it impossible for another HLV or barge - carrying the deck - to approach the jack-up vessel closely beneath the drilling derrick. The working envelope of the ca tilever 14 is shown in Figure 2, in which the transom line of the jack-up vessel is designated 10, and the working envelope of the dπlling derrick on the cantilever is designated 21 Clearly the outreach required to lift a deck from a barge once the monotower is installed would be beyond the limits of the envelope
Figure 3 shows diagrammatically a monotower substructure 30 exemplifying a first embodiment of the invention The monotower 30 has a hollow cylindrical leg 31 , and a base formed of a skirted foundation 32 The skirted foundation 32 is a hollow cylinder of much larger diameter than the leg 31 The leg 31 and skirted foundation 32 are disposed about a common vertical axis Bracing 33 connects the skirted foundation 32 to the leg 31 Conductors 34 extend down through the leg 31 into seabed 35
Installation of this monotower will now be described The monotower 30 is set on the seabed by a jack-up vessel (not shown) After the monotower has been set on the seabed, conductors 34 are drilled into the seabed Following the invention, the conductors are then tensioned The effect of tensioning the conductors is to draw the skirted foundation further down into the seabed The tension is of such a magnitude that when an overturning moment is applied to the monotower by environmental loads, the uplift force on the region of the cylinder nearest to the load is more than compensated for by the compressive load (created by tensioning the conductors) on that region It will be understood that the overturning moment could be applied from any direction, so that the region where the uplift load is more than compensated for could be anywhere on the circumference of the cylinder In the case of a discontinuous cylinder, the minimum number of spaced regions (constituting foundation elements) to support the monotower would be three
A working deck 36 (incorporating topsides) is installed on top of the leg 31 Because of the type of foundation (using tensioned conductors to react overturning moments), an HLV or transport barge can approach the monotower closely The deck 36 on the HLV or barge would be within the operating envelope of a drilling derrick supported on a cantilever Thus the deck could be lifted from the HLV or barge by the drilling derrick, and placed on the top of the leg 31 In this case the elimination of the pile on the far side of the monotower from the jack-up vessel allows a close approach by the HLV or barge
Figure 4 shows diagrammatically a monotower substructure 40 exemplifying a second embodiment of the invention The monotower 40 has a hollow cylindrical leg 41 , and a base comprising three feet 42, each formed of a downwardly extending cylinder The axes of the leg
41 and the feet 42 are vertical Bracing 43 connects the feet 42 to the leg 41 The feet are spaced apart in plan to form the apices of an equilateral triangle The feet form individual regions of the base Conductor 44 extends down through the leg 41 into seabed 45
Installation of this monotower will now be described. The monotower 40 is set on the seabed by a jack-up vessel (not shown) After the monotower has been set on the seabed, the conductor 44 is drilled into the seabed Following the invention, the conductor is then tensioned. The tension is of such a magnitude that when an overturning moment is applied to the monotower, the uplift force on the foot 42 nearest to the load is more than compensated for by the compressive load on that foot (created by tensioning the conductor). The overturning moment could be applied from any direction, so that the tension in the conductor could be applied on any of regions of the base formed by the three feet. A working deck 46 is then installed in the manner described for the first embodiment. Figure 5 shows an offshore platform with topsides 110 supported on a two-part monotower substructure 111. The substructure has a structural component 112 comprising a single water piercing tubular member. This component 112 forms the upper part of the substructure. The lower part of the substructure is formed of a central tubular member 114, bracing members 115, and three foundation elements 116. In this example the foundation elements are suction or "bucket" foundations.
However, the foundation elements of the lower part of the substructure might comprise mudmats (as shown in Figures 6 and 7), or piled foundations (as shown in Figures 8 and 9). In some circumstances, the whole base of the substructure could be plated. In other embodiments (not shown) the lower part of the substructure could be a subsea template or a gravity base.
The platform of Figure 5 is shown in an installed condition. The lower part of the substructure 111 (members 114 and 115 and elements 116) is set on seabed 117, and the upper part of the substructure (structural component 112) projects through sea surface 118 to support the topsides 110. The upper and lower parts of the substructure are fixedly connected at a structural joint 119. In some circumstances, the whole of the substructure could be subsea.
The platform has a wellhead 120 within the topsides 110. A conductor 121 extends vertically downward from the wellhead 120 through the structural component 112 into the seabed 117 beneath the platform. If the platform is installed on firm soil, the conductor is fixed in the seabed by friction. If the platform is installed on poor soil, the conductor may be held down by its own self-weight. A tensioning device 122 is disposed vertically between the wellhead 120 and the structural component 112. The tensioning device 122 is mounted on top of a floating ring 123. Beneath the floating ring 123 there is an adjustment chock 124.
When the platform has been installed, the tensioning device 122 is used to tension the conductor 121 , and so to apply an additional compressive load in the structural component 112. This is reacted by larger bearing loads in the foundation elements 116. In this way the substructure is preloaded against uplift from lateral loads.
Figures 6 and 7 show a tripod substructure 130. This has two vertical legs 131 and one inclined leg 132, connected by bracing (shown diagrammatically in single lines). The legs and bracing comprise the structural component of a unitary substructure. At the bases of the legs there are mudmats 133, 134 and 135. The mudmats are horizontal, and constitute foundation elements which rest on seabed 136 to support the substructure. The substructure is designed to support topsides (not shown). Three conductors 137 extend down from wellheads on the topsides into the seabed below the substructure.
Tensioning means (not shown) is used to tension the conductors 137, so to apply an additional compressive load in the structural component. This compressive load is reacted by larger bearing loads on the mudmats 133, 134 and 135. Thus the substructure is preloaded against uplift from lateral loads.
Figures 8 and 9 show a four-legged substructure 140. This has two vertical legs 141 and two inclined legs 142, connected by bracing (shown diagrammatically in single lines). The legs and bracing comprise the structural component of a unitary substructure. At the base of each of the four legs there are two vertical pile sleeves 143. Piles 144 extend down through the pile sleeves 143 into seabed 146 to fix the substructure to the seabed. The piles 144 constitute foundation elements. The substructure is designed to support topsides (not shown). Ten conductors 147 extend down from wellheads on the topsides into the seabed below the substructure.
Tensioning means (not shown) is used to tension at least some of the conductors 147, so to apply an additional compressive load in the structural component. This compressive load is reacted by larger bearing loads in the eight piles 144. Thus the substructure is preloaded against uplift from lateral loads. The order of magnitude of conductor loads may be shown by way of numerical examples.
(These numerical examples are not specifically related to any of the substructures illustrated in the Figures 3 to 9.)
If a jacket in 110mw.d. had a square base of 33m sides, the maximum up-lift force on any corner due to environmental loads might be 13,000kN. The total additional bearing load to counteract this force (if shared equally between four corners) would be 52,000kN. If ten conductors were to be tensioned, the tensile force required in each conductor would be 5,200kN. Alternatively, tensioning just two conductors up to 26,000kN could generate the required additional bearing load.
If a three footed monotower in 32m w.d. had a base dimension of 23m, the maximum up- lift force on any one foot due to environmental loads might be 2,400kN. The total additional bearing load to counteract this force would be 7,200kN. If six conductors were to be tensioned, the tensile force required in each conductor would be 1 ,200kN. Alternatively, tensioning just one conductor up to 7,200kN could generate the required additional bearing load. Advantages of the Invention
Advantages lie in preloading a conductor to reduce or eliminate tensile (uplift) loads on the foundations of an offshore platform. This can eliminate the need for piles, and, in the case of a monotower, can allow the close approach of a cargo barge to a jack-up vessel, so that its drilling rig can be used to lift and place a deck.

Claims

Claims
1/ A substructure to form part of a fixed offshore platform, the substructure having at least one foundation element adapted to rest in or on the seabed, a structural component configured to extend upwards from the foundation element, provision for at least one conductor to extend downwardly from the structural component into the seabed, and provision for means to apply tension to the conductor, so to increase the bearing (compressive) load of the foundation element on the seabed to resist any uplift (tensile) load arising from overturning moments which might otherwise tend to cause that foundation element to lift off the seabed.
2/ A substructure as claimed in claim 1 , and comprising a single leg forming the structural component to extend vertically upward through the sea surface; a base at or near the lower end of the leg and configured to be set on the seabed so that at least three different regions of the base are spaced around the leg in a generally horizontal plane, and in which there is provision for the conductor to extend downwardly from the leg into the seabed.
3/ A substructure as claimed in claim 2, in which the leg is hollow and theconductor may be located within the leg.
4/ A substructure as claimed in claim 3, in which the leg is of cylindrical cross section and the conductor may be concentric within the leg.
5/ A substructure as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 4, in which the base is a cylinder of large diameter as compared with the largest lateral dimension of the leg, the axis of the cylinder is vertical, and the at least three different regions of the base are spacedarcuate portions of the cylinder.
6/ A substructure as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, in which there are at least three discrete foundation elements.
7/ A substructure as claimed in claim 6, in which the foundation elements are suction or "bucket" or "caisson" foundations.
8/ A substructure as claimed in claim 6, in which the foundation elements are mudmats.
9/ A substructure as claimed in claim 6, in which the foundation elements are piles. 10/ A substructure as claimed in claim 6, in which the foundation elements are regions of a gravity base.
11/ A substructure as claimed in any one of claims 6 to 10, in which the provision for the conductor to extend downwardly from the structural component lies within a horizontal planform defined by vertical axes passing through the foundation elements, so that compressive loads can be applied to or increased on all of the foundation elements.
12/ A substructure as claimed in any one of claims 6 to 11 , in which the arrangement of the conductor relative to the foundation elements is determined with respect to the weight distribution of topsides to be placed on the substructure, so that the greatest compressive load is applied to the foundation element or elements which carry least weight from the topsides.
13/ A substructure as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which the means to apply tension to the conductor is adapted to permit relative vertical movement between the conductor and the substructure, while maintaining the applied or increased compressive load on the at least one of the foundation elements.
14/ A substructure as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which the structural component is configured to extend from the seabed towards (but not through) the wave effected zone.
15/ A substructure as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 13, in which the structural component is configured to extend from the seabed through the wave effected zone to above the sea surface.
16/ A substructure as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 13, in which the structural component forms the upper part of a substructure having two or more parts, and in which there is provision for means to apply tension to the conductor.
17/ A substructure as claimed in claim 16, in which the lowest part of the substructure is a fixed subsea template,
18/ A substructure as claimed in claim 16, in which the lowest part of the substructure is another fixed substructure part. 19/ A substructure as claimed in claim 16, in which the lowest part of the substructure is a gravity base.
20/ A substructure as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in combination with a conductor which extends downwardly from the structural component, and with means to apply tension to that conductor.
21/ A substructure as claimed in claim 20, when the conductor is tensioned to apply or increase a compressive load on at least one of the foundation elements.
22/ A method of stabilising a substructure of the kind claimed in any one of the preceding claims 1 to 19, including the step of tensioning a conductor extending down from the structural component, so to preload at least one of the foundation elements.
23/ A method of installing a monotower substructure of the kind claimed in any one of the preceding claims 1 to 19, in which the leg and the base are set on the seabed using the drilling derrick of a jack-up vessel, the drilling derrick is used to drill a well within or close to the leg, and the conductor is tensioned to increase the bearing load on the seabed to be greater than any up-lift load arising from overturning moments which might otherwise cause any part of the substructure to lift off the seabed
AMENDED CLAIMS
[received by the International Bureau on 7 May 2001 (07.05.01); original claims 1 , 20, 22 and 23 amended; remaining claims unchanged (2 pages)]
1/ A substructure to form part of a fixed offshore platform, the substructure having at least one foundation element adapted to rest in or on the seabed, a structural component configured to extend upwards from the foundation element, provision for at least one well conductor to extend downwardly from the structural component into the seabed, and provision for means to apply tension to the conductor, so to increase the bearing (compressive) load of the foundation element on the seabed to resist any uplift (tensile) load arising from overturning moments which might otherwise tend to cause that foundation element to lift off the seabed.
2/ A substructure as claimed in claim 1 , and comprising a single leg forming the structural component to extend vertically upward through the sea surface; a base at or near the lower end of the leg and configured to be set on the seabed so that at least three different regions of the base are spaced around the leg in a generally horizontal plane, and in which there is provision for the conductor to extend downwardly from the leg into the seabed.
3/ A substructure as claimed in claim 2, in which the leg is hollow and theconductor may be located within the leg.
4/ A substructure as claimed in claim 3, in which the leg is of cylindrical cross section and the conductor may be concentric within the leg.
5/ A substructure as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 4, in which the base is a cylinder of large diameter as compared with the largest lateral dimension of the leg, the axis of the cylinder is vertical, and the at least three different regions of the base are spacedarcuate portions of the cylinder.
6/ A substructure as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, in which there are at least three discrete foundation elements.
11 A substructure as claimed in claim 6, in which the foundation elements are suction or "bucket" or "caisson" foundations.
8/ A substructure as claimed in claim 6, in which the foundation elements are mudmats.
9/ A substructure as claimed in claim 6, in which the foundation elements are piles. 19/ A substructure as claimed in claim 16, in which the lowest part of the substructure is a gravity base.
20/ A substructure as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in combination with a well conductor which extends downwardly from the structural component, and with means to apply tension to that conductor.
21/ A substructure as claimed in claim 20, when the conductor is tensioned to apply or increase a compressive load on at least one of the foundation elements.
22/ A method of stabilising a substructure of the kind claimed in any one of the preceding claims 1 to 19, including the step of tensioning a well conductor extending down from the structural component, so to preload at least one of the foundation elements.
23/ A method of installing a monotower substructure of the kind claimed in any one of the preceding claims 1 to 19, in which the leg and the base are set on the seabed using the drilling derrick of a jack-up vessel, the drilling derrick is used to drill a well within or close to the leg, and a well conductor is tensioned to increase the bearing load on the seabed to be greater than any up-lift load arising from overturning moments which might otherwise cause any part of the substructure to lift off the seabed
PCT/GB2000/004581 1999-11-30 2000-11-30 Substructure for offshore platform WO2001040581A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU15392/01A AU1539201A (en) 1999-11-30 2000-11-30 Substructure for offshore platform

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB9928317.8A GB9928317D0 (en) 1999-11-30 1999-11-30 Offshore monotower
GB9928317.8 1999-11-30
GB0001896.0 2000-01-27
GB0001896A GB0001896D0 (en) 2000-01-27 2000-01-27 Substructure for offshore platform

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001040581A1 true WO2001040581A1 (en) 2001-06-07

Family

ID=26243497

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2000/004581 WO2001040581A1 (en) 1999-11-30 2000-11-30 Substructure for offshore platform

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (1) AU1539201A (en)
GB (1) GB2357309B (en)
WO (1) WO2001040581A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004020745A1 (en) * 2002-08-22 2004-03-11 Stump Spezialtiefbau Gmbh Foundation for water structures
US7674073B2 (en) 2007-04-19 2010-03-09 Conocophillips Company Modular concrete substructures

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4687062A (en) * 1983-04-18 1987-08-18 Technomare S.P.A. Undersea template for the drilling of wells for the exploitation of hydrocarbon pools under the sea
US4704051A (en) * 1984-03-28 1987-11-03 Ellingvag Nils A Offshore multi-stay platform structure
US4968180A (en) * 1986-10-24 1990-11-06 Doris Engineering Oscillating marine platform connected via a shear device to a rigid base
GB2290334A (en) 1994-06-14 1995-12-20 Kvaerner Earl & Wright Offshore platform and method of installation
US5498107A (en) * 1994-11-21 1996-03-12 Schatzle, Jr.; Conrad J. Apparatus and method for installing cabled guyed caissons
WO1999042666A2 (en) * 1998-02-20 1999-08-26 Stuck In The Mud Limited Partnership Mudmats for offshore platform support

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB880468A (en) * 1959-04-22 1961-10-25 Mueller Ludwig A method of and arrangement for making subaqueous foundations
NO164426C (en) * 1986-09-30 1990-10-03 Aker Eng As DEVICE BY AN OFFSHORE PLATFORM AND PROCEDURE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SUCH A DEVICE.
US5118221A (en) * 1991-03-28 1992-06-02 Copple Robert W Deep water platform with buoyant flexible piles

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4687062A (en) * 1983-04-18 1987-08-18 Technomare S.P.A. Undersea template for the drilling of wells for the exploitation of hydrocarbon pools under the sea
US4704051A (en) * 1984-03-28 1987-11-03 Ellingvag Nils A Offshore multi-stay platform structure
US4968180A (en) * 1986-10-24 1990-11-06 Doris Engineering Oscillating marine platform connected via a shear device to a rigid base
GB2290334A (en) 1994-06-14 1995-12-20 Kvaerner Earl & Wright Offshore platform and method of installation
US5498107A (en) * 1994-11-21 1996-03-12 Schatzle, Jr.; Conrad J. Apparatus and method for installing cabled guyed caissons
WO1999042666A2 (en) * 1998-02-20 1999-08-26 Stuck In The Mud Limited Partnership Mudmats for offshore platform support

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004020745A1 (en) * 2002-08-22 2004-03-11 Stump Spezialtiefbau Gmbh Foundation for water structures
US7674073B2 (en) 2007-04-19 2010-03-09 Conocophillips Company Modular concrete substructures

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB0029242D0 (en) 2001-01-17
GB2357309B (en) 2003-03-26
AU1539201A (en) 2001-06-12
GB2357309A (en) 2001-06-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8523491B2 (en) Mobile, year-round arctic drilling system
US4733993A (en) Subsea foundation element and applications thereof
US4723875A (en) Deep water support assembly for a jack-up type platform
EP2643210B1 (en) Floating marine structure
US4265568A (en) Gravity base, jack-up platform - method and apparatus
US4266887A (en) Self-elevating fixed platform
US4417831A (en) Mooring and supporting apparatus and methods for a guyed marine structure
US5383748A (en) Offshore structure and installation method
EP0039590A2 (en) Offshore platform and method of constructing, erecting and dismantling same
US5051036A (en) Method of installing lean-to well protector
US4784526A (en) Arctic offshore structure and installation method therefor
US4045968A (en) Offshore platform and method for its installation
CA1173260A (en) Sliding leg tower
US6783305B2 (en) Offshore structure support
AU669204B2 (en) Offshore tower structure with widened base
WO1985004437A1 (en) Offshore multi-stay platform structure
GB2292406A (en) Offshore structures for the support of jack-up rigs.
US11867149B2 (en) Offshore column tension leg platform
USRE32119E (en) Mooring and supporting apparatus and methods for a guyed marine structure
US5899639A (en) Offshore structure for extreme water depth
WO2001040581A1 (en) Substructure for offshore platform
US20100054863A1 (en) Flex-Leg Offshore Structure
US20020067958A1 (en) Methods of installing offshore platforms
US20100166503A1 (en) Flex-leg Offshore Structure
US20240140566A1 (en) Offshore platform with vertical column assembly

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AU BB BG BR BZ CA CN CR CU DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD ID IL IN IS JP KP KR LC LK LR LT LV MA MG MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SE SG TR TT UA UG US VN ZA

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP