WO2000004780A1 - Pesticide formulation - Google Patents
Pesticide formulation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2000004780A1 WO2000004780A1 PCT/AU1998/000581 AU9800581W WO0004780A1 WO 2000004780 A1 WO2000004780 A1 WO 2000004780A1 AU 9800581 W AU9800581 W AU 9800581W WO 0004780 A1 WO0004780 A1 WO 0004780A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- extract
- treated
- termites
- blocks
- pesticide
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N65/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing material from algae, lichens, bryophyta, multi-cellular fungi or plants, or extracts thereof
- A01N65/06—Coniferophyta [gymnosperms], e.g. cypress
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N65/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing material from algae, lichens, bryophyta, multi-cellular fungi or plants, or extracts thereof
Definitions
- THIS INVENTION relates to pesticides. In particular, it is directed, but not limited, to a
- pesticidal composition for use in the protection of buildings, fences and other timber
- employed to control these pests generally spray a liquid pesticide formulation onto the soil
- emulsifiers etc. dry out. the active pesticide remaining in the soil as a termite barrier.
- pesticide particularly as a termiticide, and which can be manufactured from a
- Cypress pine at least those components which are toxic or
- the Cypress pine is white Cypress pine (Callitris columellaris F.
- the solvent is selected from the group consisting of hydrocarbon,
- the hydrocarbon is an alkane
- the substituted hydrocarbon is an alkane
- alkoxyalkane and the ester is an alkylester.
- the alkane is n-hexane
- the alkoxyalkane is diethylether
- alkylester is ethylacetate.
- Cypress pine extract of the present invention is N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethyl-N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethyl-N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethyl-N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethyl-N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoe
- the extracts of the present invention may also include a carrier,
- carrier or diluent denotes an
- This carrier or diluent is generally inert.
- adjuvant has the usual meaning in the art to describe a material which aids the
- the extracts A to E were diluted using their respective solvents to concentrations
- treated filter papers were placed in a fume cupboard for more than 24 hours to
- Washed river sand 40 g was placed in Petri dishes (90 mm diameter), and de-
- acinaciformis was added to each Petri dish.
- the bioassay was conducted in a
- the moisture content was 80% in the mound material.
- M Percentage mortality
- C Consumption rate
- MA Moderate attack
- SA Slight attack
- NA No attack
- TN Termite nibble
- TV termite visit
- White cypress pine extracts were prepared by extracting white cypress pine with
- the blocks of radiata pine were 20 x 20 x 5 mm, with the
- treatment schedule was 30 min vacuum at 95 kPa, introduction of solution under
- test block was placed in a separate glass jar ( 100ml) containing C.
- acinaciformis mound material (lOg) moistened to 80% moisture content.
- the experimental units were stored in an insectary at 26 °C and 70% R.H for eight
- test specimens were cleaned and weighed after
- test arena units were five perspex dishes 145 mm in diameter. Each test arena
- the experimental units were stored in an insectary at 26 °C and 70% R.H for eight
- the diethyl ether extract was less successful at protecting P. radiata from
- the hexane extract shows potential as a termiticide as unleached blocks treated
- Termite mortality was relatively low in jars containing the water and solvent treated
- hexane extracts also reduced termite damage compared to the controls, although in
- preservatives is to vacuum oven dry blocks before and after bioassay, to enable
- Vacuum oven diying also provides accelerated ageing that
- drying may also at least
- UnL unleached blocks.
- Leach Leached blocks.
- T.C. Termite Choice: order of preference for blocks, from highest to lowest termite numbers on blocks (water, hexane, diethyl ether, ethyl acetate and peraiethrin).
- White cypress pine extracts were prepared by extracting white cypress pine with either ethyl acetate, diethyl ether or hexane and the solvent then removed to provide the 100% active ingredients or pure extracts.
- Extracts were first diluted with the appropriate solvent to 5% (50,000ppm) concentrations and then further diluted to 3000, 6000, 12000 and 24000 ppm using deionised water. The resulting emulsions were shaken vigorously before sand treatments. Clilorpyrifos at 500 ppm concentration was used for comparison. Soil barrier treatment
- Washed river sand (pH 7) that contained no organic matter and had a moisture content of 20-25% was used as the treatment substrate.
- Treatment solutions were applied to a 40mm thick bed of about 800 g moist sand in a lunch-box container (210 x 135 x 75mm). Sand was also treated with diethyl ether, ethyl acetate or hexane to provide solvent controls. A further control was sand treated with deionised water. Solutions were applied at a rate similar to that used in commercial practice (5 1/m 2 ). The treated sand was placed in a fume cupboard to air dry for one week and then on the laboratory bench for a further week.
- Termites were able to tunnel through the sands treated with either water, diethyl ether, ethyl acetate or hexane. Full penetration was achieved within 2 - 3 days and termites were able to attack the wood bait blocks at the top of the test cylinders (Tables 8-10). Termite mortalities in the control cylinders were low, ranging from just 10 to 20% (Tables 8-10).
- Termites were unable to penetrate completely (i.e., the 80 mm treated layers) any of the ethyl acetate extract treated sands (Table 8). While there was some tunnelling by the termites into the 3000 ppm treated sand (up to 25mm), the 6000 ppm treated sand (up to 16mm), and the 12000 ppm treated sand (up to 3mm), there was no penetration of the 24000 ppm treated sand. None of the termites were able to reach the wood bait blocks near the top of the test units. Most termites died within two weeks. For each ethyl acetate concentration, mean mortality was over 90% (Table 8).
- Termites were unable to penetrate complete (i.e., the 80 mm treated layers) any of the hexane extract treated sands (Table 9). However, there was some limited tunnelling into sand treated with each concentration. Termite tunnelling was up to 24mm for the 3000 ppm treated sand, 20 mm for the 6000 ppm treated sand, 12mm for the 12000 ppm treated sand, and 13 mm for the 24000 ppm treated sand. None of the termites were able to reach the wood bait blocks at the top of the test units. The mean mortality after two weeks was over 85% for each concentration of hexane (Table 9). Diethyl ether extract
- Termites were unable to penetrate completely (i.e., the 80mm treated layers) any of the diethyl ether extract treated sands (Table 10). However, there was some limited tunnelling into sand treated with each concentration. Termite tunnelling was up to 35 mm for the 3000 ppm treated sand, 40 mm for the 6000 ppm treated sand, 22 mm for the 12000 ppm treated sand and 38 mm for the 24000 ppm treated sand. None of the termites were able to reach die wood bait blocks at the top of the test units. The mean termite mortality after two weeks was 75% or more for each concentration of diethyl ether (Table 10).
- Table 8 Laboratory evaluation of ethyl acetate extract of white cypress pine as a soil chemical barrier against C. acinaciformis within two weeks of exposure.
- Table 9 Laboratory evaluation of hexane extract of white cypress pine as a soil chemical barrier against C. acinaciformis within two weeks of exposure .
- Table 10 Laboratory evaluation of diethyl ether extract of white cypress pine as a soil chemical barrier against C. acinaciformis within two weeks of exposure .
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Mycology (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU84258/98A AU8425898A (en) | 1998-07-22 | 1998-07-22 | Pesticide formulation |
JP2000560784A JP2002521314A (en) | 1998-07-22 | 1998-07-22 | Insecticide |
PCT/AU1998/000581 WO2000004780A1 (en) | 1998-07-22 | 1998-07-22 | Pesticide formulation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU1998/000581 WO2000004780A1 (en) | 1998-07-22 | 1998-07-22 | Pesticide formulation |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2000004780A1 true WO2000004780A1 (en) | 2000-02-03 |
Family
ID=3764530
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU1998/000581 WO2000004780A1 (en) | 1998-07-22 | 1998-07-22 | Pesticide formulation |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP2002521314A (en) |
AU (1) | AU8425898A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2000004780A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2014006626A2 (en) | 2012-07-05 | 2014-01-09 | Eden Shield Ltd. | Novel pest repellents from plant extracts |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA1168578A (en) * | 1981-08-20 | 1984-06-05 | Willem W. Nijholt | Protecting timber and wood products against insects |
JPS63104905A (en) * | 1986-10-22 | 1988-05-10 | Yoshiko Morimoto | Substance preventing and exterminating acarid living in house, containing compound of terpenes |
JPS63264510A (en) * | 1987-04-20 | 1988-11-01 | Nittec Co Ltd | Termite exterminating agent |
US4891222A (en) * | 1987-02-24 | 1990-01-02 | Eichhoefer Gerald W | Pine oil fire ant insecticide |
-
1998
- 1998-07-22 JP JP2000560784A patent/JP2002521314A/en active Pending
- 1998-07-22 AU AU84258/98A patent/AU8425898A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-07-22 WO PCT/AU1998/000581 patent/WO2000004780A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA1168578A (en) * | 1981-08-20 | 1984-06-05 | Willem W. Nijholt | Protecting timber and wood products against insects |
JPS63104905A (en) * | 1986-10-22 | 1988-05-10 | Yoshiko Morimoto | Substance preventing and exterminating acarid living in house, containing compound of terpenes |
US4891222A (en) * | 1987-02-24 | 1990-01-02 | Eichhoefer Gerald W | Pine oil fire ant insecticide |
JPS63264510A (en) * | 1987-04-20 | 1988-11-01 | Nittec Co Ltd | Termite exterminating agent |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
DATABASE WPI Derwent World Patents Index; Class A82, AN 1988-351237/49 * |
DATABASE WPI Derwent World Patents Index; Class A97, AN 1988-165717/24 * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2014006626A2 (en) | 2012-07-05 | 2014-01-09 | Eden Shield Ltd. | Novel pest repellents from plant extracts |
US9370190B2 (en) | 2012-07-05 | 2016-06-21 | Eden Shield Ltd. | Pest repellents from plant extracts |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU8425898A (en) | 2000-02-14 |
JP2002521314A (en) | 2002-07-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6841570B2 (en) | Materials and methods for controlling wood-boring insects | |
US4085251A (en) | High retention wood preservative composition | |
US4143010A (en) | High retention wood preservative composition | |
AU709959B2 (en) | Pesticide formulation | |
WO2000004780A1 (en) | Pesticide formulation | |
WO1993009672A1 (en) | Insect pest control | |
Grace et al. | Simulation of remedial borate treatments intended to reduce attack on Douglas-fir lumber by the Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) | |
Howick et al. | The development of a standard laboratory bio‐assay technique with Mastotermes darwiniensis Froggatt (Isoptera: Mastotermitidae) | |
KR100544605B1 (en) | Arylpyrrole for Protection of Wood, Wood Products and Wood Structures from Insect Attacks | |
Cornelius et al. | Interspecific interactions between Coptotermes formosanus and Reticulitermes flavipes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in laboratory bioassays | |
US3249492A (en) | Controlling termites with a fungus | |
MXPA04010719A (en) | Naphthalenic compounds as termite bait toxicants. | |
Shiday et al. | The efficacy of flufenoxuron as potential bait toxicant against termites | |
Weslien | Biological Control of the Spruce Coneworm Dioryatria abietella: Spraying with Bacillus thuringiensis Reduced Damage in a Seed Orchard | |
EP1409212A1 (en) | Wood preservative compositions | |
Logan et al. | Subterranean termite control in buildings | |
KR101261359B1 (en) | A composition of a selective termite repellent containing natural vegetable material | |
US6077863A (en) | 2-aryl-4-halo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyrrole-3-carbonitriles for the protection of wood, wood products and wooden structures from insect attack | |
Roszaini et al. | Durability of mangrove timber against termites | |
Mo et al. | Toxicity of acetamiprid to workers of Reticulitermes flaviceps (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) and Odontotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Termitidae) | |
EP0895717B1 (en) | Arylpyrroles for subterranean termite control | |
AU666888C (en) | Insect pest control | |
CZ37506U1 (en) | A preparation that reduces the damage to hop plants by the feeding of the hop flea beetle | |
AU666888B2 (en) | Insect pest control | |
JPH11217310A (en) | Preservative for timber |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP Ref document number: 2000 560784 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 09744325 Country of ref document: US |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: CA |