WO1993004783A1 - Processing of ores - Google Patents

Processing of ores Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1993004783A1
WO1993004783A1 PCT/AU1992/000450 AU9200450W WO9304783A1 WO 1993004783 A1 WO1993004783 A1 WO 1993004783A1 AU 9200450 W AU9200450 W AU 9200450W WO 9304783 A1 WO9304783 A1 WO 9304783A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
process according
ore
collector
sulphide
pentlandite
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/AU1992/000450
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Geoffrey David Senior
William John Trahar
Leanne Kathleen Smith
Peter John Guy
Original Assignee
Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation filed Critical Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation
Priority to AU24911/92A priority Critical patent/AU661714B2/en
Publication of WO1993004783A1 publication Critical patent/WO1993004783A1/en
Priority to FI940892A priority patent/FI940892A0/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/02Froth-flotation processes
    • B03D1/06Froth-flotation processes differential
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/001Flotation agents
    • B03D1/002Inorganic compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/001Flotation agents
    • B03D1/004Organic compounds
    • B03D1/012Organic compounds containing sulfur
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/02Froth-flotation processes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2201/00Specified effects produced by the flotation agents
    • B03D2201/007Modifying reagents for adjusting pH or conductivity
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2201/00Specified effects produced by the flotation agents
    • B03D2201/02Collectors
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2203/00Specified materials treated by the flotation agents; specified applications
    • B03D2203/02Ores

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the processing of nickel deposits, particularly those deposits where the nickel occurs
  • N-ckel occur, in a variety of minerals of which the most economically important is the sulphide mineral pentlandite (Fe,Ni) 9 ⁇ x S 8 .
  • Deposits containing pentlandite usually also contain other sulphides such as pyrrhotite (Fe 1-X S), chalcopyrite (CuFeS 2 ) and pyrite (FeS 2 ) and various non-sulphides including magnesium bearing silicates such as talc.
  • the processing of sulphide nickel deposits currently involves grinding to liberate the nickel sulphides followed by flotation in which gangue minerals are rejected. It is particularly important to reject nearly all of the minerals that contain magnesium because the more MgO there is in a nickel concentrate the higher the temperature for subsequent smelting, owing to the effect whrch magnesia has on slag viscosity. Any increase in smelt-ng temperature increases energy costs and reduces tne llfe of furnace refractories.
  • the approach usually used in flotation is to arrange the chem-cal conditions to be as favourable as possible for the flotation of nickel sulphides and as unfavourable as possible for recovery of magnesium bearing minerals particularly those minerals such as talc which are naturally strongly floatable.
  • copper suiphate is often used to increase the rate of flotation of nickel minerals while polysaccharides such as starches or guar gums are added to suppress the floatability of talc.
  • This strategy produces a highly efficient separation of nickel from non-sulphide minerals with a minimum concomitant loss of nickel.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a flotation process for the selective rejection of pyrrhotite and optionally for the selective rejection of magnesium bearing minerals from nickel sulphide ores with minimum concomitant loss of nickel recovery.
  • the present invention provides a method for effecting the concentration of pentlandite from a sulphide ore containing pentlandite and pyrrhotite, the method comprising the steps of:
  • the improvement is not the result of any change in particle size distribution, but rather is a consequence of a change in the grinding chemistry which greatly reduces the floatability of pyrrhotite but not that of pentlandite.
  • Stainless steel is far more resistant to corrosion than is mild steel and conditions in mills made of stainless steel are much more oxidising that those in mild steel mills. As a consequence, it is the sulphides rather than the grinding media that oxidise in a stainless steel mill. Mineral-mineral interactions are therefore greatly enhanced compared to those in a mild steel mill and we presume that some such interaction is the reason pyrrhotite floats less strongly.
  • steels that are not highly reactive may be used.
  • An oxygen containing gas such as air may be supplied during grinding to ensure that conditions are not strongly reducing.
  • a mild steel mill with mild steel grinding media and having ports permitting access of air during grinding may be used.
  • a rubber lined mill charged with corrosion resistant steel grinding media could be used.
  • the pH of most nickel flotation pulps ranges from slightly acidic to slightly alkaline and at such pH values sulphides usually float rapidly with collector alone in the absence of any interference from minerals such as talc.
  • the rate of flotation of the sulphides can be increased still further by adding copper sulphate before the collector but once copper sulphate is added it is not possible to select between pentlandite and pyrrhotite.
  • the present invention provides a process for the concentration of pentlandite from a sulphide ore containing petitlandite and pyrrhotite, the process comprising the steps of:
  • the adjustement of the pH to a value greater than about 9 may occur before or after treating the pulp with the collector.
  • the ground are should have an 80 percent passing size less than about 250 ⁇ m.
  • the relatively coarse fraction has a size greater than about 75 ⁇ m.
  • the pulped ore may contain about 20% to 65% solids.
  • alkalis and collectors While many types of alkalis and collectors may be used, soda ash is particularly preferred as the pH modifier and the preferred collector is n-amyl xanthate. Sodium carbonate or lime may also be used as the pH modifier however lime may lead to some loss of selectivity between the sulphides. A mixture of alkalis and of collectors may be used. The water used in this step should have little dissolved copper.
  • the amount of collector and the proportion of the collector added to the coarse fraction need to be determined for each ore, but generally speaking more than half of the collector should preferably be added to the coarse fraction. In our laboratory tests three quarters of the collector was added to the coarse fraction and the other quarter to the fine fraction. This proportion may be varied but it is important that most of the collector is added to the coarse size.
  • the split size for conditioning and the conditioning time need to determined for each particular ore.
  • pulps were wet screened over a 75 ⁇ m sieve and each size fraction was conditioned with collector for 5 minutes.
  • a cyclone or a cylinder-cyclone could be used to classify the pulp.
  • Two stages of classification might also be used to ensure a precise size split. A few minutes of conditioning would probably be sufficient in most cases.
  • a gangue depressant can also be added either during or after split conditioning but such a reagent must be used judiciously because some nickel can be lost if too much is added.
  • a talc depressant such as guar gum may be used, again judiciously. It has been found that the addition of small amounts of Guartec diminishes the extent to which talc slows down the rate of pentlandite flotation. Preferably most of the talc depressant, if used, is added to the fine fraction
  • frother may be used in the flotation step, for example Propylene Glycol.
  • the rate of pentlandite flotation after split conditioning is not quite as rapid as that in the presence of copper sulphate and collector and a longer time is required for flotation. in laboratory tests, flotation times have been up to 16 minutes.
  • a further rejection of non-sulphides in a second stage may be necessary before the concentrate produced by the process of the second aspect is acceptable for smelting.
  • This can be accomplished readily using a method which is in principle very similar to that used in conventional processing.
  • an activator such as copper sulphate and a collector
  • the sulphides can be floated very rapidly while the floatability of the non-sulphides can be suppressed using a suitable depressant.
  • concentrates assaying only about 2 percent MgO can be produced without much additional loss of nickel. Smelters usually require that concentrates assay less than about 4 percent MgO.
  • the invention provides a process in accordance with the second aspect comprising the further step of treating the concentrate produced by process of the second aspect with a collector for sulphides, an activator and optionally a depressant for non-sulphides and subjecting the treated product to froth flotation to produce a sulphide-containing froth.
  • the activator may be copper sulphate. We emphasise here again that while copper sulphate increases the rate of flotation of pentlandite, once it has been added no further selection between pentlandite and pyrrhotite is possible. This is why copper sulphate is not used until after much of the pyrrhotite has been rejected.
  • the depressent may be a talc depressant such as guargum.
  • the amounts of copper sulphate, collector and talc depressant needed are much the same as for conventional processing. In laboratory tests, we have achieved excellent results using 250 g/t of copper sulphate, 150 g/t of amyl xanthate and 550 g/t of the talc depressant Guartec. Other collectors and gangue depressants may also be used. Lowering the pH for the second stage might be advantageous in some circumstances. Sulphuric acid may be a suitable acid to use.
  • the present invention provides a process for the recovery of pentlandite from a sulphide ore containing pentlandite and pyrrhotite wherein the ore is comminuted and subjected to froth flotation in the absence of a collector to produce a talc-containing froth and a sulphide-containing tailing and thereafter subjecting the tailing to one or more sulphide flotation step.
  • the sulphide-containing tailing produced by the process of the fourth aspect may be used as the feed for the processes of the invention in its first, second and third aspects.
  • a second option for handling the talc concentrate is to recycle it to a final stage which is in accordance with the fourth aspect of the present invention where sulphides are floated from talc. Recycling the concentrate in such a manner would provide an opportunity for any floatable nickel to be removed whilst ensuring that the feed to the pyrrhotite rejection stage contains little fast floating talc.
  • a third option is to reject part of the talc concentrate and recycle the rest in the manner just described.
  • treatment is by reverse flotation of cleaned talc concentrate so as to produce a talc product-unfloated fraction-that can be rejected and a sulphide concentrate that can be recycled to the final stage; reagents, and minerals contacted with reagents must be removed from the pre-float circuit.
  • the activator, collector and depressant for non-sulphides used in the final stage may be added in the reverse cleaner instead of being added to the final stage.
  • a pre-float might not be necessary; the floatability of such minerals might be suppressed readily by adding a suitable depressant during sulphide flotation.
  • the ore subjected to the process in accordance with the invention is ground and/or classified so as to minimise particles of a size less than about 10 ⁇ m.
  • the particle size dependence of flotation should be known for each of the ores to be treated. This size dependence can be established by careful sizing of flotation products. Data from such sizings allow the optimum size range for flotation to be determined (see, for example Figure 5).
  • Figure 1 is a general flowsheet showing one arrangement of steps in a process in accordance with the invention
  • Figure 2 is a general flowsheet showing a second arrangement of steps in a process in accordance with the invention.
  • Figure 3 is a general flowsheet showing a third arrangement of steps in a process in accordance with the invention.
  • Figure 4 is a general flowsheet showing a third arrangement of steps in a process in accordance with the invention.
  • Figure 5 is a graph showing recovery-size dependance for one ore using a flotation method in accordance with the invention.
  • N/P/S is a measure of pyrrhotite behaviour and NSG is a measure of the behaviour of all the non-sulphide gangue minerals including talc.
  • Figure 6 is a graph showing Nickel- N/P/S selectivity curves (ratio of average constants) for flotation of an ore ground in an open mild steel mill (test 1) and in a closed stainless stell mill (test 2 ) .
  • Figure 7 is a graph showing Nickel-MgO selectivity curves (ratio of average rate constants) for flotation of an ore ground in an open mild steel mill (test 1) and in a closed steel mill (test 2).
  • FIG. 1 A scheme including the talc pre-float and the first sulphide flotation stage of the second aspect of the invention is shown in Figure 1.
  • the feed ore which has preferably been ground under substantially non-reducing conditions, is supplied to a talc pre-float rougher which may be, for example, a series of Agitair cells.
  • a talc pre-float rougher which may be, for example, a series of Agitair cells.
  • the talc recovered from the pre-float is discarded whilst the sulphide-containing tailings are subjected to split conditioning, that is, the sulphide-containing tailing is separated into a relatively coarse fraction and relatively fine fraction and both fractions are conditioned with potassium n-amyl xanthate, the major proportion of the xanthate being used to treat the coarse fraction, and then the two conditioned fractions are recombined.
  • the conditioned sulphide concentrate is treated in two stages, stage 1 being the first stage of sulphide flotation and stage 2 the second.
  • stage 1 being the first stage of sulphide flotation and stage 2 the second.
  • the conditioned sulphide concentrate is first treated in a stage 1 rougher at pH 9 in the absence of copper sulphate to selectively reject some of the pyrrhotite and recover a pentlandite-containing concentrate.
  • the pentlandite-containing concentrate is then subjected to conventional sulphide flotation in a second stage rougher-cleaner arrangement in the presence of copper sulphate, potassium n-amyl xanthate and a talc depressant such as guartec to produce a final nickel concentrate and tailing streams which are rejected.
  • the tailings from both sulphide flotation stages would be re-cycled or subject to further treatment so as to maximise nickel recovery.
  • the most appropriate place to recycle such streams and the best methods of further treatment need to be determined on a case-by-case basis. For example, for ores that are difficult to grind or v/hich are finely disseminated much of the pentlandite in the tailings might be locked with other minerals. Regrinding of composite particles would therefore be necessary before a further stage of flotation to recover the nickel.
  • Figure 2 illustrates an alternative arrangement of stages in which the talc-containing concentrate floated in the pre-float rougher is subjected to cleaning in a pre-float cleaner and where the tailings are returned to the pre-float rougher and the talc rejected.
  • Figure 3 illustrates another possible arrangement wherein the talc-containing concentrate from the talc pre-float rougher is combined with the sulphide-containing concentrate floated from the stage 1 rougher.
  • Figure 4 illustrates a further possible arrangement in accordance with the invention wherein part of the talc concentrate is rejected in a "reverse cleaner" and the rest is recyced to the final stage of the process where talc is rejected from the sulphides.
  • the sample used was from a nickel deposit containing 2 .38% Ni , 14.5% MgO, 6. 79% S and 13 . 5% Fe .
  • the principal magnesium bearing minerals were talc, magnesite and silicates of the chlorite group. Microprobe analyses showed that none of the gangue minerals contained more than about 0.5% nickel and that most contained much less.
  • Laboratory ball mills constructed of either stainless steel or of mild steel with media of similar type were used to grind the ore. Changing from one mill to the other produced little change in the particle size distribution after grinding. Products from grinding were 80 percent by weight passing about 75 ⁇ m. The ore was ground in 500 gram lots at 67 percent solids using distilled water.
  • a modified Denver laboratory cell was used for flotation Owing to the presence of talc, tests included a 2 minute pre-float in which the only reagent added was a frother. The tailing from this pre-float was then wet-screened over a 75 ⁇ m sieve and the two size fractions separately conditioned with collector before flotation.
  • KnaX potassium n-amyl xanthate
  • KeX potassium ethyl xanthate
  • the frother was polypropylene glycol (Cyanamid Aerofroth 65) made up as a 0.25 percent solution. An initial dose of 2ml of frother solution was added before the talc pre-float and thereafter 2ml per minute was added from an automatic pump to maintain an active froth column.
  • the flotation gas was bottled air (a synthetic mixture of O 2 and N 2 ) and was supplied at a flow rate of 8 litres/minute.
  • the pH was adjusted to 9 and controlled automatically at this value using a dilute sodium hydroxide solution. All water was distilled. Concentrates and tailings were sampled in a standard manner and assayed for Ni, S and MgO.
  • results from the tests are given in Table 1.
  • a and R refer to the cumulative concentrate assay and to the cumulative recovery of each species named. These values include losses to the talc pre-float.
  • the behaviour of the non-pentlandite sulphur (N/P/S) minerals was calculated assuming that pentlandite contains 33.0 percent nickel and 33.0 percent sulphur.
  • pyrrhotite was the predominant sulphide gangue mineral and it is therefore assumed that non-pentlandite sulphur is mostly pyrrhotitic sulphur although it is known that the ore contains some pyrite.
  • the floatability of coarse nickel at pH 9 can be raised by using split conditioning.
  • the collector was divided between two parallel conditioning stages and flotation carried out for 16 minutes.
  • the split conditioning approach was compared with the conventional process using copper stilphate and ethyl xanthate and the results are shown in table 2.
  • Example 2 The first test of Example 1 was repeated but this time a second stage of sulphide flotation was added to reject non-sulphides from the concentrate. This second stage included both roughing and cleaning. The flotation time for the rougher was 8 minutes and for cleaning the time of flotation was 6 minutes. Pulps were conditioned before both the rougher and the cleaner and the order of addition of reagents was as follows:

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)

Abstract

This invention relates to a process for the treatment of a sulphide ore containing pentlandite, pyrrhotite and possibly talc. The ore is first ground preferably under substantially non-reducing conditions and then the ground ore is subjected to a talc pre-float wherein fast floating talc can be recovered in a preliminary stage of flotation without an excessive loss of nickel. The sulphide-containing tailing from the talc pre-float is then subject to split conditioning followed by flotation in the absence of copper sulphate so as to selectively float pentlandite from pyrrhotite. The pentlandite float product may then be subjected to a conventional sulphide flotation treatment in the presence of an activator such as copper sulphate to selectively float the sulphides in the concentrates.

Description

PROCESSING OF ORES Technical Field
This invention relates to the processing of nickel deposits, particularly those deposits where the nickel occurs
predominantly in the sulphide mineral pentlandite
Background Art
N-ckel occur, in a variety of minerals of which the most economically important is the sulphide mineral pentlandite (Fe,Ni)9±xS8. Deposits containing pentlandite usually also contain other sulphides such as pyrrhotite (Fe1-XS), chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) and pyrite (FeS2) and various non-sulphides including magnesium bearing silicates such as talc.
The processing of sulphide nickel deposits currently involves grinding to liberate the nickel sulphides followed by flotation in which gangue minerals are rejected. It is particularly important to reject nearly all of the minerals that contain magnesium because the more MgO there is in a nickel concentrate the higher the temperature for subsequent smelting, owing to the effect whrch magnesia has on slag viscosity. Any increase in smelt-ng temperature increases energy costs and reduces tne llfe of furnace refractories.
The approach usually used in flotation is to arrange the chem-cal conditions to be as favourable as possible for the flotation of nickel sulphides and as unfavourable as possible for recovery of magnesium bearing minerals particularly those minerals such as talc which are naturally strongly floatable. For example, copper suiphate is often used to increase the rate of flotation of nickel minerals while polysaccharides such as starches or guar gums are added to suppress the floatability of talc. This strategy produces a highly efficient separation of nickel from non-sulphide minerals with a minimum concomitant loss of nickel. However, there is almost no selective rejection of those sulphides that contain little or no nickel.
Until recently there was little incentive to reject gangue sulphides such as pyrrhotite. Indeed, the presence of such sulphides in concentrates was often considered desirable because of the small amount of nickel they sometimes contain and because their reaction with oxygen produces a great deal of heat and less fuel is therefore needed for smelting. The only real penalty for recovering the gangue sulphides was the cost of transporting them to the smelter. That the smelting of such concentrates produced large amounts of sulphur dioxide was rarely considered a real problem.
Over the last few years this situation has changed dramatically. High sulphur dioxide emissions are now no longer environmentally acceptable and more and more stringent restrictions are being imposed on the amount of sulphur that smelters can emit. As a result, much research has been directed towards developing a flotation method that allows the selective rejection of gangue sulphides and of magnesium bearing minerals. By rejecting as much of the gangue sulphides as possible before smelting, nickel production for a given emission of sulphur can be maximised.
Disclosure of the Invention
An object of the present invention is to provide a flotation process for the selective rejection of pyrrhotite and optionally for the selective rejection of magnesium bearing minerals from nickel sulphide ores with minimum concomitant loss of nickel recovery.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention provides a method for effecting the concentration of pentlandite from a sulphide ore containing pentlandite and pyrrhotite, the method comprising the steps of:
grinding the sulphide ore under substantially non-reducing conditions;
forming a pulp comprising the ground ore and a collector for pentlandite; and
subjecting the pulp to froth flotation to form a froth containing pentlandite.
We have found that interactions occur between sulphides as soon as the minerals begin to oxidise and that the chemistry of the grinding environment can make or mar any subsequent flotation separation. In particular, we have found that grinding some ores in a mill constructed of stainless steel rather than in a mill constructed of mild steel improves the subsequent separation of pentlandite from pyrrhotite without any real change in the separation from non-sulphide minerals.
The improvement is not the result of any change in particle size distribution, but rather is a consequence of a change in the grinding chemistry which greatly reduces the floatability of pyrrhotite but not that of pentlandite.
Stainless steel is far more resistant to corrosion than is mild steel and conditions in mills made of stainless steel are much more oxidising that those in mild steel mills. As a consequence, it is the sulphides rather than the grinding media that oxidise in a stainless steel mill. Mineral-mineral interactions are therefore greatly enhanced compared to those in a mild steel mill and we presume that some such interaction is the reason pyrrhotite floats less strongly.
Where it is not practical to use stainless steels in industrial grinding mills, steels that are not highly reactive may be used. An oxygen containing gas such as air may be supplied during grinding to ensure that conditions are not strongly reducing. A mild steel mill with mild steel grinding media and having ports permitting access of air during grinding may be used. A rubber lined mill charged with corrosion resistant steel grinding media could be used.
The pH of most nickel flotation pulps ranges from slightly acidic to slightly alkaline and at such pH values sulphides usually float rapidly with collector alone in the absence of any interference from minerals such as talc. The rate of flotation of the sulphides can be increased still further by adding copper sulphate before the collector but once copper sulphate is added it is not possible to select between pentlandite and pyrrhotite.
If instead of adding copper sulphate, alkali is added to raise the pH to a value of not less than about 9, pyrrhotite floats much less strongly and there is some decrease in the recovery of pentlandite. By analysing products from tests done under such conditions we have discovered that nearly all of the nickel that is lost is of a size greater than 75 μm while the decrease in recovery of pyrrhotite results mostly from a decrease in the rate of flotation of particles of intermediate size (10 to 75 μm). Recognising this, we have applied a technique known as split conditioning, which was developed earlier in our laboratory (Anthony, Kelsall and Trahar, 1975; Trahar, 1981), to optimise the chemical conditions for different: sizes of particles in the pulp.
Accordingly in a second aspect the present invention provides a process for the concentration of pentlandite from a sulphide ore containing petitlandite and pyrrhotite, the process comprising the steps of:
grinding the ore to an appropriate size range and forming a pulp of the ground ore;
separating the pulped ore into a relatively coarse fraction and a relatively fine fraction;
contacting each fraction with a collector, the major proportion of the collector being added to the course fraction and thereafter combining the fractions to form a collector treated pulp;
adjusting the pH of the pulp to a value not less than about 8, more preferably about 9; and
subjecting the pulp to froth flotation to produce a froth product containing pentlandite.
The adjustement of the pH to a value greater than about 9 may occur before or after treating the pulp with the collector.
Using the method of the second aspect of the invention we have achieved nickel recoveries similar to those achieved when copper sulphate is used but with much better rejection of pyrrhotite.
Preferably the ground are should have an 80 percent passing size less than about 250μm. For ores that are finely disseminated, however, finer grinding or re-grinding of selected streams would be necessary to liberate the pentlandits for flotation. Preferably the relatively coarse fraction has a size greater than about 75 μm.
The pulped ore may contain about 20% to 65% solids.
While many types of alkalis and collectors may be used, soda ash is particularly preferred as the pH modifier and the preferred collector is n-amyl xanthate. Sodium carbonate or lime may also be used as the pH modifier however lime may lead to some loss of selectivity between the sulphides. A mixture of alkalis and of collectors may be used. The water used in this step should have little dissolved copper.
The amount of collector and the proportion of the collector added to the coarse fraction need to be determined for each ore, but generally speaking more than half of the collector should preferably be added to the coarse fraction. In our laboratory tests three quarters of the collector was added to the coarse fraction and the other quarter to the fine fraction. This proportion may be varied but it is important that most of the collector is added to the coarse size.
The split size for conditioning and the conditioning time need to determined for each particular ore. In our tests, pulps were wet screened over a 75 μm sieve and each size fraction was conditioned with collector for 5 minutes. In practice a cyclone or a cylinder-cyclone could be used to classify the pulp. Two stages of classification might also be used to ensure a precise size split. A few minutes of conditioning would probably be sufficient in most cases.
A gangue depressant can also be added either during or after split conditioning but such a reagent must be used judiciously because some nickel can be lost if too much is added.
A talc depressant such as guar gum may be used, again judiciously. It has been found that the addition of small amounts of Guartec diminishes the extent to which talc slows down the rate of pentlandite flotation. Preferably most of the talc depressant, if used, is added to the fine fraction
Any suitable frother may be used in the flotation step, for example Propylene Glycol. The type and amount of frother if any, need to be determined for each ore. For some ores, a frother might not be needed at all, or the Plant water available at the site may produce strong frothing obviating the need to use a frothing agent.
The rate of pentlandite flotation after split conditioning is not quite as rapid as that in the presence of copper sulphate and collector and a longer time is required for flotation. in laboratory tests, flotation times have been up to 16 minutes.
A further rejection of non-sulphides in a second stage may be necessary before the concentrate produced by the process of the second aspect is acceptable for smelting. This can be accomplished readily using a method which is in principle very similar to that used in conventional processing. By adding an activator such as copper sulphate and a collector to the concentrate produced by the process in accordance with the second aspect, the sulphides can be floated very rapidly while the floatability of the non-sulphides can be suppressed using a suitable depressant. By including such a stage, concentrates assaying only about 2 percent MgO can be produced without much additional loss of nickel. Smelters usually require that concentrates assay less than about 4 percent MgO.
Thus in yet a third aspect the invention provides a process in accordance with the second aspect comprising the further step of treating the concentrate produced by process of the second aspect with a collector for sulphides, an activator and optionally a depressant for non-sulphides and subjecting the treated product to froth flotation to produce a sulphide-containing froth.
The activator may be copper sulphate. We emphasise here again that while copper sulphate increases the rate of flotation of pentlandite, once it has been added no further selection between pentlandite and pyrrhotite is possible. This is why copper sulphate is not used until after much of the pyrrhotite has been rejected. The depressent may be a talc depressant such as guargum.
The amounts of copper sulphate, collector and talc depressant needed are much the same as for conventional processing. In laboratory tests, we have achieved excellent results using 250 g/t of copper sulphate, 150 g/t of amyl xanthate and 550 g/t of the talc depressant Guartec. Other collectors and gangue depressants may also be used. Lowering the pH for the second stage might be advantageous in some circumstances. Sulphuric acid may be a suitable acid to use.
Particularly good results can be achieved by operating the second stage in a rougher-cleaner configuration. It is important to minimise the recovery of water in cleaning because rejection of the non-sulphides is ultimately limited by entrainment. Pneumatic cells such as column cells are reported to give lower water recoveries and to be particularly efficient for cleaning and might therefore be better suited than conventional cells for the cleaning of concentrates.
We have also found that the presence of large amounts of talc in nickel ores significantly reduces the rate of flotation of the sulphides, particularly when copper sulphate is not added. This problem can be overcome by allowing the talc to float without collector before sulphide flotation. Talc is naturally strongly floatable and the only reagent needed for such a pre-float is a frother. Frothers that give brittle froths, such as methylisobutylcarbinol (MIBC), are preferred. It may even be possible to pre-float without a frother.
Thus in yet a fourth aspect the present invention provides a process for the recovery of pentlandite from a sulphide ore containing pentlandite and pyrrhotite wherein the ore is comminuted and subjected to froth flotation in the absence of a collector to produce a talc-containing froth and a sulphide-containing tailing and thereafter subjecting the tailing to one or more sulphide flotation step.
The sulphide-containing tailing produced by the process of the fourth aspect may be used as the feed for the processes of the invention in its first, second and third aspects.
A small amount of nickel is recovered to the talc concentrate owing to the non-selective contribution which entrainment makes to the recovery of all minerals However, this loss can be kept to a minimum by cleaning the talc concentrate and by minimising the amount of water recovered during flotation. Control of water recove be achieved by keeping pulp level and aeration rate low in the cleaning step. Additionally the use of froth modifiers such as tri-butyl phosphate may be considered although as such modifiers can sometimes adversely affect flotation, they should be tested beforehand in a laboratory preferably using talc from the plant.
Column cells might again be suited more than conventional cells for cleaning.
A second option for handling the talc concentrate is to recycle it to a final stage which is in accordance with the fourth aspect of the present invention where sulphides are floated from talc. Recycling the concentrate in such a manner would provide an opportunity for any floatable nickel to be removed whilst ensuring that the feed to the pyrrhotite rejection stage contains little fast floating talc.
A third option is to reject part of the talc concentrate and recycle the rest in the manner just described. In this instance treatment is by reverse flotation of cleaned talc concentrate so as to produce a talc product-unfloated fraction-that can be rejected and a sulphide concentrate that can be recycled to the final stage; reagents, and minerals contacted with reagents must be removed from the pre-float circuit. The activator, collector and depressant for non-sulphides used in the final stage may be added in the reverse cleaner instead of being added to the final stage.
For ores that contain small amounts of talc or that contain only poorly floatable non-sulphides a pre-float might not be necessary; the floatability of such minerals might be suppressed readily by adding a suitable depressant during sulphide flotation. In a preferred aspect the ore subjected to the process in accordance with the invention is ground and/or classified so as to minimise particles of a size less than about 10μm.
An important finding from our research is that poor floatability of fine (-10 μm) nickel places a very real limitation on the nickel recovery ultimately attainable. This limitation exists in our new process (more than half of the nickel we fail to recover in our laboratory tests is less than 10 μm in size) just as it does in standard laboratory tests using convention methods and in all of the plants for which we have recovery-size data.
We recognise the limitation imposed by the difficulty of selectively recovering fine nickel and seek to handle the problem by excellence in both grinding and classification. By efficient and precise grinding and classification and by careful regrinding of selected size fractions of selected streams the amount, of nickel ground to very fine sizes can be minimised.
To apply the present invention most efficiently the particle size dependence of flotation should be known for each of the ores to be treated. This size dependence can be established by careful sizing of flotation products. Data from such sizings allow the optimum size range for flotation to be determined (see, for example Figure 5).
Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 is a general flowsheet showing one arrangement of steps in a process in accordance with the invention Figure 2 is a general flowsheet showing a second arrangement of steps in a process in accordance with the invention.
Figure 3 is a general flowsheet showing a third arrangement of steps in a process in accordance with the invention.
Figure 4 is a general flowsheet showing a third arrangement of steps in a process in accordance with the invention.
Figure 5 is a graph showing recovery-size dependance for one ore using a flotation method in accordance with the invention. N/P/S is a measure of pyrrhotite behaviour and NSG is a measure of the behaviour of all the non-sulphide gangue minerals including talc.
Figure 6 is a graph showing Nickel- N/P/S selectivity curves (ratio of average constants) for flotation of an ore ground in an open mild steel mill (test 1) and in a closed stainless stell mill (test 2 ) .
Figure 7 is a graph showing Nickel-MgO selectivity curves (ratio of average rate constants) for flotation of an ore ground in an open mild steel mill (test 1) and in a closed steel mill (test 2).
Modes for Using the Invention
A scheme including the talc pre-float and the first sulphide flotation stage of the second aspect of the invention is shown in Figure 1.
Referring to Figure 1, the feed ore, which has preferably been ground under substantially non-reducing conditions, is supplied to a talc pre-float rougher which may be, for example, a series of Agitair cells. In this particular arrangement, the talc recovered from the pre-float is discarded whilst the sulphide-containing tailings are subjected to split conditioning, that is, the sulphide-containing tailing is separated into a relatively coarse fraction and relatively fine fraction and both fractions are conditioned with potassium n-amyl xanthate, the major proportion of the xanthate being used to treat the coarse fraction, and then the two conditioned fractions are recombined.
The conditioned sulphide concentrate is treated in two stages, stage 1 being the first stage of sulphide flotation and stage 2 the second. The conditioned sulphide concentrate is first treated in a stage 1 rougher at pH 9 in the absence of copper sulphate to selectively reject some of the pyrrhotite and recover a pentlandite-containing concentrate. The pentlandite-containing concentrate is then subjected to conventional sulphide flotation in a second stage rougher-cleaner arrangement in the presence of copper sulphate, potassium n-amyl xanthate and a talc depressant such as guartec to produce a final nickel concentrate and tailing streams which are rejected.
In practice, the tailings from both sulphide flotation stages (streams a, b and c in Figure 1) would be re-cycled or subject to further treatment so as to maximise nickel recovery. The most appropriate place to recycle such streams and the best methods of further treatment need to be determined on a case-by-case basis. For example, for ores that are difficult to grind or v/hich are finely disseminated much of the pentlandite in the tailings might be locked with other minerals. Regrinding of composite particles would therefore be necessary before a further stage of flotation to recover the nickel.
Figure 2 illustrates an alternative arrangement of stages in which the talc-containing concentrate floated in the pre-float rougher is subjected to cleaning in a pre-float cleaner and where the tailings are returned to the pre-float rougher and the talc rejected.
Figure 3 illustrates another possible arrangement wherein the talc-containing concentrate from the talc pre-float rougher is combined with the sulphide-containing concentrate floated from the stage 1 rougher.
Figure 4 illustrates a further possible arrangement in accordance with the invention wherein part of the talc concentrate is rejected in a "reverse cleaner" and the rest is recyced to the final stage of the process where talc is rejected from the sulphides.
In order that the invention might be understood more readily the following non-limiting examples are provided.
Example 1 Effect on Sulphide Flotation Stage 1
Results of Grinding in Mills
Constructed of Different Steels
The sample used was from a nickel deposit containing 2 .38% Ni , 14.5% MgO, 6. 79% S and 13 . 5% Fe . Mineralogical analyses indicated that the nickel occurred almost exclusively as pentlandite and that pyrrhotite was the predominant sulphide gangue mineral. The principal magnesium bearing minerals were talc, magnesite and silicates of the chlorite group. Microprobe analyses showed that none of the gangue minerals contained more than about 0.5% nickel and that most contained much less.
Laboratory ball mills constructed of either stainless steel or of mild steel with media of similar type were used to grind the ore. Changing from one mill to the other produced little change in the particle size distribution after grinding. Products from grinding were 80 percent by weight passing about 75 μm. The ore was ground in 500 gram lots at 67 percent solids using distilled water.
A modified Denver laboratory cell was used for flotation Owing to the presence of talc, tests included a 2 minute pre-float in which the only reagent added was a frother. The tailing from this pre-float was then wet-screened over a 75 μm sieve and the two size fractions separately conditioned with collector before flotation.
Either potassium n-amyl xanthate (KnaX) or potassium ethyl xanthate (KeX) was used as collector. Three quarters of the collector was added to the sieve over-size and the remaining quarter was added to the under-size.
The frother was polypropylene glycol (Cyanamid Aerofroth 65) made up as a 0.25 percent solution. An initial dose of 2ml of frother solution was added before the talc pre-float and thereafter 2ml per minute was added from an automatic pump to maintain an active froth column.
The flotation gas was bottled air (a synthetic mixture of O2 and N2) and was supplied at a flow rate of 8 litres/minute. The pH was adjusted to 9 and controlled automatically at this value using a dilute sodium hydroxide solution. All water was distilled. Concentrates and tailings were sampled in a standard manner and assayed for Ni, S and MgO.
Results from the tests are given in Table 1. In this table the letters A and R refer to the cumulative concentrate assay and to the cumulative recovery of each species named. These values include losses to the talc pre-float. The behaviour of the non-pentlandite sulphur (N/P/S) minerals was calculated assuming that pentlandite contains 33.0 percent nickel and 33.0 percent sulphur. As has already been indicated, pyrrhotite was the predominant sulphide gangue mineral and it is therefore assumed that non-pentlandite sulphur is mostly pyrrhotitic sulphur although it is known that the ore contains some pyrite.
Comparing tests 1 and 2 in Table 1 shows that the pyrrhotite floated less strongly from ore ground in the stainless steel mill than from ore ground in the mild steel mill after the addition of n-amyl xanthate. The change in floatability was substantial with the N/P/S recovery being lowered by more than 13 percent. When ethyl xanthate rather than n-amyl xanthate was added, the pyrrhotite again floated less strongly from ore ground in the stainless steel mill (compare tests 3 and 4 in Table
1).
The improvement in the selectivity of separation of nickel from pyrrhotite when the stainless steel mill is substituted for the mild steel mill can be seen clearly when the rate data for test 1 (mild steel mill grind) and for test 2 (stainless steel mill grind) are plotted in the form of selectivity curves (Figure 6). Assuming first order kinetics, the slope of the lines is the ratio of the average rate constants for the flotation of the nickel mineral and for the N/P/S minerals. A line of 45° indicates no selectivity; a line down the ordinate (the vertical axis) indicates perfect selectivity between Ni and N/P/S.
Plotting nickel-MgO selectivity curves for the same tests (Figure 7) shows that there is little or no change in the selectivity of separation of pentlandite from magnesium bearing minerals.
Table 1 - Stage 1 Sulphide Flotation Results after
Grinding in a Steel Mill and after
Grinding in a Stainless Steel Mill.
Figure imgf000019_0001
Example 2 Split Conditioning
The floatability of coarse nickel at pH 9 can be raised by using split conditioning. In this example the collector was divided between two parallel conditioning stages and flotation carried out for 16 minutes. The split conditioning approach was compared with the conventional process using copper stilphate and ethyl xanthate and the results are shown in table 2.
Table 2 A comparison between the Efficiency of Split
Conditioning and of adding CuSO4 for the separation of Nickel from N/P/S (16 min results)
Ni N/P/S MgO N/S/G H2 0
Figure imgf000020_0001
It will be seen from Table 2 that for equivalent Nickel recovery the split conditioning examples (35 and 27) recover less pyrrhotite as compared to the the conventional method (37) for the same level of pentlandite recovery.
Example 3 Results from a Laboratory Test using
the Invention. The first test of Example 1 was repeated but this time a second stage of sulphide flotation was added to reject non-sulphides from the concentrate. This second stage included both roughing and cleaning. The flotation time for the rougher was 8 minutes and for cleaning the time of flotation was 6 minutes. Pulps were conditioned before both the rougher and the cleaner and the order of addition of reagents was as follows:
Rougher:
- pH of the pulp adjusted to 7 using sulphuric acid
- 100 mg of CuSO45H2O conditioned for 2 minutes
- 20 mg of KnaX conditioned for 2 minutes
- 150 mg of Guartec conditioned for 2 minutes
Cleaner:
- 10 mg KnaX conditioned for 2 minutes - 15 mg Guartec conditioned for 2 minutes
Additions of 20 mg of KnaX and 50 mg of Guartec were also made after 2 and 4 minutes of rougher flotation while additions of 10 mg of KnaX and 5 mg of Guartec were made after 2 and 4 minutes of cleaner flotation. Frother was added as required during both roughing and cleaning.
A particular effort was made to minimise entrainment in cleaning. To reduce the water recovery the pulp level was lowered, a minimum of frother was added and the froth scraping rate was decreased from every 5 seconds to every 10 seconds.
The results for each stage of the test are as follows:
Figure imgf000022_0001
Of the nickel originally in the sample, 81% was recovered to the final (stage 2 cleaner) concentrate at a grade of 16.5%. This is a particularly good result for this ore and by way of comparison, standard laboratory flotation methods produce concentrates assaying only about 9% nickel at 80% recovery.
It should also be recognised that:
(a) none of the tailings were recycled, that is, the nickel which reported to the rougher tailings and the cleaner tailings were treated as a loss, and (b) we used only a single stage of grinding without classification. As a consequence about 20% of the nickel was ground to less than 10 μm in size and of this we recovered less than half.
With further treatment and with recycling of products it is not unreasonable to expect that the result can be improved still further , particularly when the limitations imposed by the poor floatability of the fine nickel are addressed as outlined in step 5 of our Disclosure of the Invention.
References
Anthony, R.M., Kelsall, D.F., and Trahar, W.J., 1975. The effect of particle size on the activation and flotation of sphalerite. Proc. Australas, Inst.Min.Metall., Vol.254, pp.47-58.
Trahar, W.J., 1981. A rational interpretation of the role of particle size in flotation. Int. J. Miner. Process., Vol.8, pp.289-327.

Claims

C L A I M S
1. A process for effecting the concentration of pentlandite from a sulphide ore containing pentlandite and pyrrhotite, the process comprising the steps of:
grinding the sulphide ore under substantially non-reducing conditions;
forming a pulp comprising the ground ore and a collector for pentlandite; and
subjecting the pulp to froth flotation to form a float product containing pentlandite.
2. A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein grinding is carried out in a mill wherein the grinding media is steel which is not highly reactive.
3. A process according to claim 2 wherein the steel is stainless steel.
4. A process according to claim 2 wherein the grinding is carried out in a rubber lined mill charged with corrosion resistant steel grinding media.
5. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein grinding is carried out in the presence of an oxygen-containing gas.
6. A process according to claim 5 wherein the oxygen-containing gas is air.
7. A process according to claim 6 wherein the grinding media is mild steel.
8. A process for the concentration of pentlandite from a sulphide ore containing pentlandite and pyrrhotite, the process comprising the steps of:
grinding the ore to an appropriate size range to form a pulp of the ground ore;
separating the pulped ore into a relatively coarse fraction and a relatively fine fraction;
contacting each fraction with a collector, the major proportion of the collector being contacted with the coarse fraction and thereafter combining the fractions to form a collector treated pulp;
adjusting the pH of the collector treated pulp to not less than about 8; and
subjecting the pulp from the preceding step to froth flotation to produce a froth product containing pentlandite.
9. A process according to claim 8 wherein the pH of the collector treated pulp is adjusted to about 9.
10. A process according to claim 8 wherein pH adjustment occurs before treating the pulp with the collector.
11. A process according to claim 8 or 9 wherein the collector is a xanthate, preferably potassium n-amyl xanthate.
12. A process according to any one of claims 8 - 11 wherein the coarse fraction has a particle size greater than about 75μm.
13. A process according to any one of claims 8 - 12 wherein a gangue depressant is added before or after forming the collector treated pulp.
14. A process according to any one of claims 8 - 13 including the further step of treating the froth product with a collector for sulphides, an activator and optionally a depressant for non-sulphides and subjecting the treated product to froth flotation to produce a sulphide-containing froth.
15. A process according to claim 14 wherein the activator is copper sulphate.
16. A process according to claim 14 or 15 wherein the collector is a xanthate.
17. A process according to any one of claims 14-16 wherein the depressant is a depressant for talc.
18. A process according to any one of claims 8-17 wherein the ore is ground under substantially non-reducing conditions.
19. A process in accordance with claim 18 wherein grinding is carried out in a mill wherein the grinding media is steel which is not highly reactive.
20. A process according to claim 19 wherein the steel is stainless steel.
21. A process according to claim 19 wherein the grinding is carried out in a rubber lined mill charged with corrosion resistant steel grinding media.
22. A process according to any one of claims 18 to 21 wherein grinding is carried out in the presence of an oxygen-containing gas.
23. A process according to claim 22 wherein the oxygen-containing gas is air.
24. A process according to claim 23 wherein the grinding media is mild steel.
25. A process according to any one of claims 8 to 24 wherein the sulphide-containing ore is first subjected to a talc pre-float to remove talc.
26. A process according to claim 25 wherein the ore is comminuted and then subjected to froth flotation in the absence of a collector to produce a talc-containing froth concentrate and a sulphide-containing tailing.
27. A process according to claim 26 wherein the talc-containing concentrate is combined with the froth product of the further step of claim 14.
28. A process according to claim 27 wherein part of the talc-containing concentrate is combined with the sulphide-containing concentrate.
29. A process for the recovery of pentlandite from a sulphide ore containing pentlandite and pyrrhotite wherein the ore is comminuted and subjected to froth flotation in the absence of a collector to produce a talc-containing froth and a sulphide-containing tailing and thereafter subjecting the tailing to one or more sulphide flotation steps.
PCT/AU1992/000450 1991-08-28 1992-08-25 Processing of ores WO1993004783A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU24911/92A AU661714B2 (en) 1991-08-28 1992-08-25 Processing of ores
FI940892A FI940892A0 (en) 1991-08-28 1994-02-25 Ore processing

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPK800491 1991-08-28
AUPK8004 1991-08-28

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1993004783A1 true WO1993004783A1 (en) 1993-03-18

Family

ID=3775651

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/AU1992/000450 WO1993004783A1 (en) 1991-08-28 1992-08-25 Processing of ores

Country Status (3)

Country Link
CA (1) CA2116322A1 (en)
FI (1) FI940892A0 (en)
WO (1) WO1993004783A1 (en)

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5795466A (en) * 1995-06-08 1998-08-18 Falconbridge Limited Process for improved separation of sulphide minerals or middlings associated with pyrrhotite
WO2000015346A1 (en) * 1998-09-15 2000-03-23 M.I.M. Holdings Limited Collectorless flotation
WO2003026801A1 (en) * 2001-09-27 2003-04-03 Outokumpu Oyj A method of controlling feed variation in a valuable mineral flotation circuit
EP1370362A1 (en) * 2001-02-28 2003-12-17 WMC Resources Ltd Ph adjustment in the flotation of sulphide minerals
US6945407B2 (en) * 1999-11-30 2005-09-20 Wmc Resources Ltd. Flotation of sulphide minerals
EP1622724A1 (en) * 2003-03-17 2006-02-08 Outokumpu Technology Oy A separate size flotation device
AU2002233051B2 (en) * 2001-02-28 2007-03-29 Bhp Billiton Ssm Indonesia Holdings Pty Ltd PH adjustment in the flotation of sulphide minerals
US7314139B2 (en) * 2001-04-12 2008-01-01 Wmc Resources Limited Process for sulphide concentration
AU2005202587B2 (en) * 1999-11-30 2008-07-10 Bhp Billiton Ssm Indonesia Holdings Pty Ltd Improved flotation of sulphide minerals
WO2009086607A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2009-07-16 Bhp Billiton Ssm Development Pty Ltd Processing nickel bearing sulphides
CN101850296A (en) * 2010-06-03 2010-10-06 广西现代职业技术学院 Copper-separating process of high-sulfur copper ore containing higher silicate minerals of speckstone and like
CN104138793A (en) * 2014-08-06 2014-11-12 广西龙胜华美滑石开发有限公司 Reselection impurity removal method for talcum ore containing ferrous sulfide
US9028782B2 (en) 2008-01-09 2015-05-12 Bhp Billiton Ssm Development Pty Ltd. Processing nickel bearing sulphides
US9885095B2 (en) 2014-01-31 2018-02-06 Goldcorp Inc. Process for separation of at least one metal sulfide from a mixed sulfide ore or concentrate
CN107670843A (en) * 2017-10-20 2018-02-09 中国恩菲工程技术有限公司 The method for handling the nickel ores containing magnetic iron ore
CN110624698A (en) * 2019-08-15 2019-12-31 葫芦岛八家矿业股份有限公司 Method for recovering pyrrhotite from magnetic concentrate
CN115090426A (en) * 2022-05-05 2022-09-23 中国矿业大学(北京) Method for flotation separation of tin-lead-zinc polymetallic ore based on novel inhibitor

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3309029A (en) * 1963-09-09 1967-03-14 Int Nickel Co Activation of sulfide ores for froth flotation
AU2660371A (en) * 1970-03-03 1972-09-21 Western Mining Corporation Limited Improved method forthe concentration of base metal ores containing water soluble metal values
US4256227A (en) * 1979-04-23 1981-03-17 Vojislav Petrovich Froth flotation method for recovering metal values from their ores by thiourea or substituted thiourea
CA1104274A (en) * 1978-12-04 1981-06-30 Gordon E. Agar Separation of sulfides by selective oxidation
GB2086768A (en) * 1980-03-21 1982-05-19 Inco Ltd Selective flotation of nickel sulphide ores
WO1986006983A1 (en) * 1985-05-31 1986-12-04 The Dow Chemical Company Novel collectors for the selective froth flotation of sulfide minerals
WO1989000457A1 (en) * 1987-07-14 1989-01-26 The Lubrizol Corporation Process for beneficiation of sulfide ores by froth flotation

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3309029A (en) * 1963-09-09 1967-03-14 Int Nickel Co Activation of sulfide ores for froth flotation
AU2660371A (en) * 1970-03-03 1972-09-21 Western Mining Corporation Limited Improved method forthe concentration of base metal ores containing water soluble metal values
CA1104274A (en) * 1978-12-04 1981-06-30 Gordon E. Agar Separation of sulfides by selective oxidation
US4256227A (en) * 1979-04-23 1981-03-17 Vojislav Petrovich Froth flotation method for recovering metal values from their ores by thiourea or substituted thiourea
GB2086768A (en) * 1980-03-21 1982-05-19 Inco Ltd Selective flotation of nickel sulphide ores
WO1986006983A1 (en) * 1985-05-31 1986-12-04 The Dow Chemical Company Novel collectors for the selective froth flotation of sulfide minerals
WO1989000457A1 (en) * 1987-07-14 1989-01-26 The Lubrizol Corporation Process for beneficiation of sulfide ores by froth flotation

Cited By (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5795466A (en) * 1995-06-08 1998-08-18 Falconbridge Limited Process for improved separation of sulphide minerals or middlings associated with pyrrhotite
US6889844B1 (en) 1998-09-15 2005-05-10 Mim Holdings Limited Collectorless flotation
WO2000015346A1 (en) * 1998-09-15 2000-03-23 M.I.M. Holdings Limited Collectorless flotation
AU2005202587B2 (en) * 1999-11-30 2008-07-10 Bhp Billiton Ssm Indonesia Holdings Pty Ltd Improved flotation of sulphide minerals
US6945407B2 (en) * 1999-11-30 2005-09-20 Wmc Resources Ltd. Flotation of sulphide minerals
EP1370362A1 (en) * 2001-02-28 2003-12-17 WMC Resources Ltd Ph adjustment in the flotation of sulphide minerals
EP1370362A4 (en) * 2001-02-28 2004-09-22 Wmc Resources Ltd Ph adjustment in the flotation of sulphide minerals
US7028845B2 (en) * 2001-02-28 2006-04-18 Wmc Resources Limited PH adjustment in the flotation of sulphide minerals
AU2002233051B2 (en) * 2001-02-28 2007-03-29 Bhp Billiton Ssm Indonesia Holdings Pty Ltd PH adjustment in the flotation of sulphide minerals
US7314139B2 (en) * 2001-04-12 2008-01-01 Wmc Resources Limited Process for sulphide concentration
WO2003026801A1 (en) * 2001-09-27 2003-04-03 Outokumpu Oyj A method of controlling feed variation in a valuable mineral flotation circuit
EP1622724A1 (en) * 2003-03-17 2006-02-08 Outokumpu Technology Oy A separate size flotation device
EP1622724B1 (en) * 2003-03-17 2011-06-01 Outotec Oyj A separate size flotation device
WO2009086607A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2009-07-16 Bhp Billiton Ssm Development Pty Ltd Processing nickel bearing sulphides
US9028782B2 (en) 2008-01-09 2015-05-12 Bhp Billiton Ssm Development Pty Ltd. Processing nickel bearing sulphides
AU2009203904B2 (en) * 2008-01-09 2013-06-20 Bhp Billiton Ssm Development Pty Ltd Processing nickel bearing sulphides
EA018909B1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2013-11-29 БиЭйчПи БИЛЛИТОН ЭсЭсЭм ДИВЕЛОПМЕНТ ПТИ ЛТД. Method of separating nickel bearing sulphides from mined ores
US8753593B2 (en) 2008-01-09 2014-06-17 Bhp Billiton Ssm Development Pty Ltd. Processing nickel bearing sulphides
CN101850296A (en) * 2010-06-03 2010-10-06 广西现代职业技术学院 Copper-separating process of high-sulfur copper ore containing higher silicate minerals of speckstone and like
US9885095B2 (en) 2014-01-31 2018-02-06 Goldcorp Inc. Process for separation of at least one metal sulfide from a mixed sulfide ore or concentrate
US10370739B2 (en) 2014-01-31 2019-08-06 Goldcorp, Inc. Stabilization process for an arsenic solution
US11124857B2 (en) 2014-01-31 2021-09-21 Goldcorp Inc. Process for separation of antimony and arsenic from a leach solution
CN104138793A (en) * 2014-08-06 2014-11-12 广西龙胜华美滑石开发有限公司 Reselection impurity removal method for talcum ore containing ferrous sulfide
CN107670843A (en) * 2017-10-20 2018-02-09 中国恩菲工程技术有限公司 The method for handling the nickel ores containing magnetic iron ore
CN110624698A (en) * 2019-08-15 2019-12-31 葫芦岛八家矿业股份有限公司 Method for recovering pyrrhotite from magnetic concentrate
CN115090426A (en) * 2022-05-05 2022-09-23 中国矿业大学(北京) Method for flotation separation of tin-lead-zinc polymetallic ore based on novel inhibitor
CN115090426B (en) * 2022-05-05 2023-08-08 中国矿业大学(北京) Novel inhibitor-based tin-lead-zinc polymetallic ore flotation separation method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2116322A1 (en) 1993-03-18
FI940892A (en) 1994-02-25
FI940892A0 (en) 1994-02-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2151316C (en) Process for improved separation of sulphide minerals or middlings associated with pyrrhotite
US4283017A (en) Selective flotation of cubanite and chalcopyrite from copper/nickel mineralized rock
CN105903552B (en) Beneficiation method for efficiently recovering micro-fine particle molybdenum ore
US9475067B2 (en) Chalcopyrite ore beneficiation process and method
AU2012379708B2 (en) Method and apparatus for separation of molybdenite from pyrite containing copper-molybdenum ores
WO1993004783A1 (en) Processing of ores
CN111495788B (en) Method for intelligently and preferentially selecting copper-blue-containing copper sulfide ore by X-ray
Bulatovic et al. Selection and evaluation of different depressants systems for flotation of complex sulphide ores
US4229287A (en) Tin flotation
Agar Flotation of chalcopyrite, pentlandite, pyrrhotite ores
Senior et al. The selective flotation of pentlandite from a nickel ore
US7028845B2 (en) PH adjustment in the flotation of sulphide minerals
CA2725135C (en) Processing nickel bearing sulphides
JPH05255773A (en) Ore dressing method for intricate sulfide ore
CA2725223C (en) Processing nickel bearing sulphides
US3827557A (en) Method of copper sulfide ore flotation
CA2107963A1 (en) Tailings retreatment
AU661714B2 (en) Processing of ores
US3847357A (en) Separation of copper minerals from pyrite
US4515688A (en) Process for the selective separation of base metal sulfides and oxides contained in an ore
Bulatovic et al. Development and application of new technology for the treatment of complex massive sulphide ores case study—Faro lead/zinc concentrator—Yukon
US1951326A (en) Process for recovering manganese from ore
US4650569A (en) Process for the selective separation of base metal sulfides and oxides contained in an ore
US3780860A (en) Flotation of copper sulfide ores
Kazmi et al. ? FLOTATION CHARACTERISTICS OF LEAD-ZINC ORE FROM BESHAM, DISTRICT SWAT, NWFP, PAKISTAN

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU CA FI RU

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2116322

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 940892

Country of ref document: FI