WO1982000719A1 - Energy collector - Google Patents
Energy collector Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1982000719A1 WO1982000719A1 PCT/AU1981/000114 AU8100114W WO8200719A1 WO 1982000719 A1 WO1982000719 A1 WO 1982000719A1 AU 8100114 W AU8100114 W AU 8100114W WO 8200719 A1 WO8200719 A1 WO 8200719A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- main reflector
- azimuth
- paraboloid
- support frame
- collector according
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000010411 cooking Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000003925 fat Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000011389 fruit/vegetable juice Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000005030 aluminium foil Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 230000005670 electromagnetic radiation Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 229910001209 Low-carbon steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 206010052904 Musculoskeletal stiffness Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 239000004411 aluminium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000005388 cross polarization Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 2
- JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]=O JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000012827 research and development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003466 welding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229920002799 BoPET Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005041 Mylar™ Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000826860 Trapezium Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007769 metal material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S20/00—Solar heat collectors specially adapted for particular uses or environments
- F24S20/30—Solar heat collectors for heating objects, e.g. solar cookers or solar furnaces
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S23/00—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors
- F24S23/70—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors with reflectors
- F24S23/71—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors with reflectors with parabolic reflective surfaces
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S23/00—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors
- F24S23/70—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors with reflectors
- F24S23/79—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors with reflectors with spaced and opposed interacting reflective surfaces
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S30/00—Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules
- F24S30/40—Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules for rotary movement
- F24S30/45—Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules for rotary movement with two rotation axes
- F24S30/452—Vertical primary axis
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S30/00—Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules
- F24S2030/10—Special components
- F24S2030/13—Transmissions
- F24S2030/131—Transmissions in the form of articulated bars
- F24S2030/132—Transmissions in the form of articulated bars in the form of compasses, scissors or parallelograms
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S30/00—Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules
- F24S2030/10—Special components
- F24S2030/13—Transmissions
- F24S2030/135—Transmissions in the form of threaded elements
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S30/00—Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules
- F24S2030/10—Special components
- F24S2030/14—Movement guiding means
- F24S2030/145—Tracks
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02B—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO BUILDINGS, e.g. HOUSING, HOUSE APPLIANCES OR RELATED END-USER APPLICATIONS
- Y02B40/00—Technologies aiming at improving the efficiency of home appliances, e.g. induction cooking or efficient technologies for refrigerators, freezers or dish washers
- Y02B40/18—Technologies aiming at improving the efficiency of home appliances, e.g. induction cooking or efficient technologies for refrigerators, freezers or dish washers using renewables, e.g. solar cooking stoves, furnaces or solar heating
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
- Y02E10/40—Solar thermal energy, e.g. solar towers
- Y02E10/47—Mountings or tracking
Definitions
- This invention relates to energy collectors, and more particularly to collectors which may be used to focus electro-magnetic radiation and/or solar energy.
- the impetus for research and development in antennas, radiometers and transmission equipment operating at millimetre (mm) wavelengths was provided by post-1969 astronomy and the ever-increasing need for communication channels.
- the present invention is mainly directed to antennas of such equipment and in particular to the design and construction of antennas utilizing off-set paraboloids as main reflectors which are capable of operating at mm wave-lengths.
- the invention is described in relation to antennas utilizing reflecting surfaces, mainly because of the losses arising from lenses having large bandwidths and reasonable sizes at mm wavelengths.
- off-set reflectors have not been generally used because: (i) the georaetric-optics (g.o.) cross-polarization level of an off-set paraboloid is relatively higher than that of an idealized conventional paraboloid where there is no obstruction of the incoming energy; and (ii) antenna mounting and driving arrangements particularly suitable for off-set paraboloids have not yet been proposed.
- off-set paraboloids can have negligible g.o. cross-polarization
- their symmetrical counterparts have cross-polarization levels which depend on the geometry of the blocking structures.
- the maximum size of the telescope is such that resolutions between 12" and 14" are attainable when commonly used materials are considered. Furthermore, the above resolution is not wavelength dependent. Recent research and development into materials, has resulted in the evolution of composite materials having near zero coefficients of expansion, high rigidity and light weight.
- the altitude over azimuth mounting and driving arrangement illustrated in figure 1(a)
- the antenna is usually preferred when the antenna is to operate at mm wavelengths. This is because the gravitational deflections which tend to deform the reflector's surface are dependent only on the altitude angle. Any corrections applied to the telescope can, therefore, conveniently depend on one parameter only.
- the same deflections are dependent on the altitude and azimuth angles when an equatorial mounting and driving arrangement (as illustrated in figure 1(b)) is utilized.
- the altitude over azimuth antenna mounting and driving arrangement has the following features.
- main reflector It provides a three point support for the main reflector (two points are provided by the elevation bearings and the third point is preferably at a distance approximately D/3 from the rim of the main reflector) .
- a symmetrical reflector is supported at one point by a conventional altitude over azimuth mounting and driving arrangement, and the overhand is D/2.
- the mounting and driving arrangement therefore reduces gravitational deformations. Additionally it is a low cost solution because it is closer to the ground and no counter -weights or elevation gears are required.
- an energy collector having a support frame on which is mounted a main reflector adapted to be directed towards the source of energy, the main reflector being an off-axis portion of a paraboloid of revolution and operative to reflect the energy from the source towards the focus of the paraboloid, and, a second reflector between the main reflector and the focus of the paraboloid arranged to reflect the energy from the main reflector to a receiving station which does not overlay the main reflector.
- the support frame is mounted on an azimuth-over-elevation drive which may be adjusted so that the main reflector is correctly positioned with respect to the source in order to achieve maximum efficiency.
- the invention may be adapted to operate as a barbeque cooker, in which case the receiving station constitutes a cooking zone which is readily accessible to the cook and which is so separated from the main reflector that hot fats and juices falling therefrom do not impair the efficiency of the main reflector.
- Figure 2 is a side elevational view of energy collector according to one embodiment of the invention
- Figure 3 is a view taken along lines A-A of
- Figure 2 is a view of the main reflector taken along lines B-B of Figure 2
- Figure 5 is an end view of the elevation lifting device shown in Figures 2 and 3
- Figure 6 is a schematic side elevational view of an electro-magnetic telescope incorporating modified altitude over azimuth antenna mounting and driving arrangement, particularly suitable for off-set paraboloids,
- Figure 7 is a view taken along lines A-A of
- Figure 6 is a paraboloid surface
- (c) is an approximation of a small portion of a curve, having a radius of curvature, , by a straight line,
- (d) is a schematic arrangement method of supporting the flats to approximate the paraboloid, and,
- FIG 9 is a perspective view of a stiff back-up structure for an electro-magnetic telescope operating at mm wavelengths.
- the solar energy collector of this embodiment of the invention includes a main frame 10 which is connected by spaced bearings 11 to an azimuth frame 12 supported by azimuth wheels 13 and rotatable about an azimuth bearing 14 in a central stand 15.
- the main frame 10 supports a plurality of ribs 16, 17 (see Figure 3) which provide a support for the main reflector 18 which, in this instance, is a 90° sector of a paraboloid of revolution which is offset from the axis of the paraboloid.
- the main frame 10 is raised and lowered by a lifting arrangement upon rotation of the handle 19 of the shaft 30 which is supported by bearings 25.
- the elevation lifting device consists of two legs 33 and 34 supported at two ball joints 26 on the azimuth support and at hinge joint 28, 29 on the back of the frame 10.
- One end of the shaft 30 has a right handed thread 31 while the other end has a left-handed thread 32.
- the shaft 30 can be moved by handle 19 or with the aid of motor.
- the main reflector 18 directs the sun's rays towards the focus F of the paraboloid as shown in Figure 2.
- a second reflector 20 is positioned between the main reflector 18 and the focus F to direct the reflected rays to a receiving or heating station 21 which may have a base 22 of corrugated metal on which food to be cooked may be placed.
- An overlying grid may also be provided.
- the base 22 is adjustably supported by the member 23 of the main from 10 so that the base 22 may be kept horizontal when the main frame is adjusted by the handle 20.
- a tube 24 is provided on the main frame as a means of indicating that the main reflector is directed with respect to the sun for maximum efficiency.
- the elevation drive is used to minimize the shadow of the tube and then the azimuth position is changed so that the same shadow is further minimized.
- a circle of sunlight is seen on the ground. Whilst cooking, the elevation and azimuth of the main reflector are manually adjusted so that the light circle is always visible on the ground.
- Figure 4 illustrates a section of the main reflector; its collecting area, assuming 100% efficiency, is 3.6m 2 .
- the reflecting material is aluminium deposited on a 0.004" thi ⁇ h MYLAR.
- the ratio of the focal distance to the diameter of the paraboloid is 0.4 and the ribs 16 and 17 are accurately cut from wood and glued onto the base 10 of the parabola.
- the main reflector is shown as a 90° section, it could be of any convenient shape, such as a 60° sector or even a 120° sector, the dimensions being so adjusted to give the djesired reflecting area.
- FIG. 6 is substantially similar to Figure 2 and this like numerals represent like parts.
- the main reflector 18 is raised and lowered by the lifting mechanism shown schematically at 40.
- the second reflector 20 is a curved reflector and the receiving station 21 is a feed-horn.
- any curve can be by approximated at a point A (see Figure 8 (c) ) by a circle, the radius of which is equal to the radius of curvature of the curve at A, it can be shown that
- the angle in equations (1) and (2) can be defined as
- the reflection surface can be realized by utilizing light gauge perforated sheet metal.
- the method of attaching the reflecting surface onto the back-up structure is important; if 3 or 4 adjustable bolts are for instance required per flat, then the total number of bolts required is unmanageable.
- An ideal arrangement is one where one bolt adjusts the height of one flat.
- the left hand side of figure 8 (d) illustrates a method of approximating the ideal arrangement where each adjustable bolt 43 supports the tips of four flats. Thus the flats are securely held on to the back-up structure and some curving of the flats is expected. If the adjustable bolts are normal to the surface of the paraboloid then the expected curving will improve the approximation of the resulting paraboloid to the ideal.
- the flats are arranged so that the deviations from the ideal paraboloid are not systematic. With this arrangement the magnitude of the sidelobes away from the main beam are minimized.
- the same metal/composite material should be used for both the back-up structure and the reflecting surface in order to minimise the differential expansion, between them. For the reasons discussed below mild steel is preferred to aluminium when a low-cost design is required. If the budget of the telescope is considerable, composite materials should be considered. 3oth the Cassegrain and Gregorian versions of off-set paraboloids can be used.
- the back-up structure of a paraboloid consists of a number of radial ribs and a number of inter-rib supports which form concentric circles. At cm wavelengths the maximum allowable deflections are such that both the radial-ribs and their inter-rib supports can have relatively small dimensions, so rigidity is achieved by realizing a space-dome type back-up structure.
- the back-up structure for reflectors capable of operating at mm wavelengths require ribs having rectangular sections of considerable dimensions [100 mm in depth for instance for a 6 m off-set paraboloid operating at 7 mm and 50 mm wide (normal max. wind loading conditions)].
- inter-rib supports 51 can be rolled to the required parabolic shape approximately; for the inter-rib supports 51, I-sections could be selected (having the same depths) and they could be attached to the ribs 50 at spacings partly dictated by the considerations outlined above (some inter-rib supports 51 can be used to accommodate the adjustable bolts 52 required to fix the reflection surface) .
- the inter-rib supports may be welded onto the ribs. Such a structure minimizes the need for a space-dome structure, especially when the depth of both the above sections is considerable. As welding introduces distortions, it is convenient to weld end plates 53 onto the I-sections 51 before attaching them on to the ribs 50 with the aid of bolts 52.
- depth and thickness of the ribs can be calculated by considering the distributed weight of the telescope and assuming that wind loading at this position is negligible (this is especially true when the antenna mounting and driving arrangement of the invention is used) .
- the maximum wind loading becomes the dominant load on the structure. It is instructive to consider whether the proposed mounting and driving arrangement is useable for symmetric paraboloids. Such an arrangement would require the elevation axis to be at the rim of the paraboloid, a position which has the least stiffness. This proposition, though not attractive, does illustrate the point that the elevation axis of the new antenna mounting and driving arrangement is at a point of maximum stiffness only when an off-set paraboloid is used.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Sustainable Development (AREA)
- Sustainable Energy (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aerials With Secondary Devices (AREA)
Abstract
The energy collector which utilises an off-access portion of a paraboloid of revolution (18) may be used to focus electromagnetic radiation and/or solar energy. A main reflector (18) is mounted on a support frame (10) pivotally connected by elevation bearing (11)to a support stand (15). An azimuth support (12)is rotatable about an azimuth bearing (14) and the support frame (10) is mounted on the azimuth frame (12) by legs (33, 34) which have a single point of connection (28, 29) to the support frame (10) and spaced points of connection (26, 27) to the azimuth frame (12). The connections (26, 27) are moveable towards or away from one another to vary the elevation of the support frame (10).
Description
ENERGY COLLECTOR
This invention relates to energy collectors, and more particularly to collectors which may be used to focus electro-magnetic radiation and/or solar energy. The impetus for research and development in antennas, radiometers and transmission equipment operating at millimetre (mm) wavelengths was provided by post-1969 astronomy and the ever-increasing need for communication channels. The present invention is mainly directed to antennas of such equipment and in particular to the design and construction of antennas utilizing off-set paraboloids as main reflectors which are capable of operating at mm wave-lengths. The invention is described in relation to antennas utilizing reflecting surfaces, mainly because of the losses arising from lenses having large bandwidths and reasonable sizes at mm wavelengths. Many pertinent characteristics of reflectors depend on their geometry and thus it is appropriate to consider the characteristics of commonly used reflector geometries before the constraints imposed by operation at mm wavelengths are examined. Symmetrical paraboloid reflectors have been used for focussing electro-magnetic radiation onto the phase centres of suitable feed horns for a long time. Despite their many attractive features which are due to their symmetry, these reflectors have a number of disadvantages. Off-set paraboloids on the other hand possess the following attractive features when compared to their symmetrical counterparts: (a) No obstruction of the incoming radiation results in:
( i) a decre ase of the s idelobe leve l , typically by 10 dB; and
(ii) a considerable improvement of the instrumental profile of the telescope. (Obstructed radiation in symmetrical reflectors reaches the radiometer input after multiple reflections; the effect of these multiple reflections on the frequency-versus-antenna temperature instrumental profile ultimately determines the SNR of some astronomical observations. These effects are minimized when off-set reflectors are used. )
(b) The input reflection coefficient of off-set reflectors is up to 20 dB lower than that of their symmetrical counterparts; and
(c) Possible multiple beam operation; several independent antenna beams are realizable conventionally. Again all the feed-horns used, are not obstructing the incoming radiation.
Other features of this telescope geometry are discussed below.
Unconventional multiple antenna beams can be formed when a circular array of N off-set antennas is placed on a fully steerable structure. With this arrangement, M antenna beams are formed at the I.F. of the telescope and where M = N2/2 (N is even) . Despite their many attractive features, off-set reflectors have not been generally used because: (i) the georaetric-optics (g.o.) cross-polarization level of an off-set paraboloid is relatively higher than that of an idealized conventional paraboloid where there is no obstruction of the incoming energy; and
(ii) antenna mounting and driving arrangements particularly suitable for off-set paraboloids have not yet been proposed.
Whereas off-set paraboloids can have negligible g.o. cross-polarization, their symmetrical counterparts have cross-polarization levels which depend on the geometry of the blocking structures.
One of the most serious problems encountered in the realization of telescopes operating at mm wavelengths is meeting the required surface tolerance. If the /16 criterion is adopted, then the r.m.s. surface error of the reflector of the telescope operating at, say 1 mm, should be 0.0625 mm. If a dual reflector system is used (and the advantages opf such systems are considerable) the tolerance on the main reflector should be even less. Accurately shaped panels are usually manufactured and then fixed onto a stiff back-up structure, with the aid of adjustable bolts; these operations are costly and time-consuming. It has been shown that the maximum size of telescopes operating at mm wavelengths is limited by the temperature differentials between the component parts. More specifically, the maximum size of the telescope is such that resolutions between 12" and 14" are attainable when commonly used materials are considered. Furthermore, the above resolution is not wavelength dependent. Recent research and development into materials, has resulted in the evolution of composite materials having near zero coefficients of expansion, high rigidity and light weight.
Of the two antenna mounting and driving arrangements used for astonomical applications, the altitude over azimuth mounting and driving arrangement, illustrated in figure 1(a) , is usually preferred when the antenna is to
operate at mm wavelengths. This is because the gravitational deflections which tend to deform the reflector's surface are dependent only on the altitude angle. Any corrections applied to the telescope can, therefore, conveniently depend on one parameter only. By contrast, the same deflections are dependent on the altitude and azimuth angles when an equatorial mounting and driving arrangement (as illustrated in figure 1(b)) is utilized. It is often convenient to characterize antenna mounting and driving arrangements in terms of the direction of their primary axis (the orientation of which remains unchanged) for this direction defines the gimbal - lock zone of the telescope. It is, however, more appropriate to characterize the altitude over azimuth mounting and driving arrangement illustrated in figure 1(a) in terms of the height of its elevation axis. For symmetrical paraboloids, the height of the elevation axis is at least equal to the projected radius of the telescope. This constraint is not applicable to the off-set paraboloids, hence the elevation axis of a mounting and driving arrangement particularly suitable for off-set paraboloids can be conveniently close to the ground. The altitude over azimuth antenna mounting and driving arrangement according to the invention has the following features. It provides a three point support for the main reflector (two points are provided by the elevation bearings and the third point is preferably at a distance approximately D/3 from the rim of the main reflector) . By contrast, a symmetrical reflector is supported at one point by a conventional altitude over azimuth mounting and driving arrangement, and the overhand is D/2. The mounting and driving arrangement
therefore reduces gravitational deformations. Additionally it is a low cost solution because it is closer to the ground and no counter -weights or elevation gears are required. According to the invention, there is provided an energy collector having a support frame on which is mounted a main reflector adapted to be directed towards the source of energy, the main reflector being an off-axis portion of a paraboloid of revolution and operative to reflect the energy from the source towards the focus of the paraboloid, and, a second reflector between the main reflector and the focus of the paraboloid arranged to reflect the energy from the main reflector to a receiving station which does not overlay the main reflector.
Preferably, the support frame is mounted on an azimuth-over-elevation drive which may be adjusted so that the main reflector is correctly positioned with respect to the source in order to achieve maximum efficiency. The invention may be adapted to operate as a barbeque cooker, in which case the receiving station constitutes a cooking zone which is readily accessible to the cook and which is so separated from the main reflector that hot fats and juices falling therefrom do not impair the efficiency of the main reflector.
In order that the invention may be more readily understood and put into practical effect, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which :-
Figure 2 is a side elevational view of energy collector according to one embodiment of the invention, Figure 3 is a view taken along lines A-A of
Figure 2, Figure 4 is a view of the main reflector taken
along lines B-B of Figure 2,
Figure 5 is an end view of the elevation lifting device shown in Figures 2 and 3, Figure 6 is a schematic side elevational view of an electro-magnetic telescope incorporating modified altitude over azimuth antenna mounting and driving arrangement, particularly suitable for off-set paraboloids,
Figure 7 is a view taken along lines A-A of
Figure 6, Figure 8 (a) is a paraboloid surface,
(b) is a flat approximating a small portion of the paraboloid surface,
(c) is an approximation of a small portion of a curve, having a radius of curvature, , by a straight line,
(d) is a schematic arrangement method of supporting the flats to approximate the paraboloid, and,
Figure 9 is a perspective view of a stiff back-up structure for an electro-magnetic telescope operating at mm wavelengths. For the sake of simplicity, the invention will be first described in relation to a solar energy collector which is adapted for use as a cooker. However, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto. As shown in Figure 2, the solar energy collector of this embodiment of the invention includes a main frame 10 which is connected by spaced bearings 11 to an azimuth frame 12 supported by azimuth wheels 13 and rotatable about an azimuth bearing 14 in a central stand 15. The main frame 10 supports a plurality of ribs 16, 17 (see
Figure 3) which provide a support for the main reflector 18 which, in this instance, is a 90° sector of a paraboloid of revolution which is offset from the axis of the paraboloid. The main frame 10 is raised and lowered by a lifting arrangement upon rotation of the handle 19 of the shaft 30 which is supported by bearings 25. The elevation lifting device consists of two legs 33 and 34 supported at two ball joints 26 on the azimuth support and at hinge joint 28, 29 on the back of the frame 10. The two joints 26 at which the lifting device is connected onto the azimuth support by nuts 27 which are threaded on a shaft 30. One end of the shaft 30 has a right handed thread 31 while the other end has a left-handed thread 32. The shaft 30 can be moved by handle 19 or with the aid of motor.
The main reflector 18 directs the sun's rays towards the focus F of the paraboloid as shown in Figure 2. A second reflector 20 is positioned between the main reflector 18 and the focus F to direct the reflected rays to a receiving or heating station 21 which may have a base 22 of corrugated metal on which food to be cooked may be placed. An overlying grid may also be provided. The base 22 is adjustably supported by the member 23 of the main from 10 so that the base 22 may be kept horizontal when the main frame is adjusted by the handle 20.
A tube 24 is provided on the main frame as a means of indicating that the main reflector is directed with respect to the sun for maximum efficiency. Initially, the elevation drive is used to minimize the shadow of the tube and then the azimuth position is changed so that the same shadow is further minimized. When the main reflector is correctly pointed toward the sun, a circle
of sunlight is seen on the ground. Whilst cooking, the elevation and azimuth of the main reflector are manually adjusted so that the light circle is always visible on the ground. Figure 4 illustrates a section of the main reflector; its collecting area, assuming 100% efficiency, is 3.6m2. The reflecting material is aluminium deposited on a 0.004" thiσh MYLAR. The ratio of the focal distance to the diameter of the paraboloid is 0.4 and the ribs 16 and 17 are accurately cut from wood and glued onto the base 10 of the parabola. Although the main reflector is shown as a 90° section, it could be of any convenient shape, such as a 60° sector or even a 120° sector, the dimensions being so adjusted to give the djesired reflecting area.
Turning now to Figures 6 to 9, the invention will be described in relation to an electro-magnetic telescope. Figure 6 is substantially similar to Figure 2 and this like numerals represent like parts. The main reflector 18 is raised and lowered by the lifting mechanism shown schematically at 40. In this instance the second reflector 20 is a curved reflector and the receiving station 21 is a feed-horn.
It is convenient and economical to construct a stiff back-up structure 41 for the main reflector 10 and then attach the reflecting panels onto it with the aid of adjustable bolts. The back-up structure approximates the paraboloid so it can be readily constructed at reasonable costs. The manufacture of curved reflecting panels is usually expensive because many expensive operations are involved in producing doubly-curved panels to the required tolerance and in checking their accuracy. In an alternative approach, the double curved surface of the reflector is approximated by a number of flat or planar
members hereinafter called "flats". However, this is inexpensive, for the operations involved in producing and checking the accuracy of flats are relatively straightforward. If a very large number of flats is required however, the proposed alternative can also be expensive. For this reason it is now appropriate to calculate the size of the required flats for telescopes capable of operating at mm wavelengths. Since the surface of a paraboloid illustrated in Figure 8 (a) is doubly curved, it can be approximated by flats the sizes of which are related to the principal radii of curvature. At any point of the parabola the flat 42 will have the shape of a trapezium see Figure 8 (b) ; its height h being determined by the radius of curvature of the parabolic curve and its side W by the radius of curvature of the curve defined by the intersection of the paraboloid -and the plane parallel to the OZ axis and normal to the tangent plane (see Figure 8 (a)).
respectively. As any curve can be by approximated at a point A (see Figure 8 (c) ) by a circle, the radius of which is equal to the radius of curvature of the curve at A, it can be shown that
where k is the required tolerance. Equations (3) and (4) are deducted by stipulating that h or MC is such that AN = k. The angle
in equations (1) and (2) can be defined as
When the angle
is equal to zero then
= 2F: as increases, both
increase from the value of 2F at different rates. It is clear that the region near the vertex of a paraboloid is a region of maximum curvature hence the area of flats approximating the paraboloid is small (many flats are required) . Eor symmetrical paraboloids the illumination of the near the vertex region is considerable (almost equal to one) whereas the illumination of the same area for an off-set paraboloid is minimum (typically -10 to -15 dB) .
If an off-set and a symmetrical paraboloid have the same F/D then the area of a flat near the extreme rim of the former is twice that of a flat near the rim of the latter. This is a considerable advantage for off-set paraboloids. h and w1 for an off-set paraboloid equal to 236 and 211 mm respectively when F = rmax = 5000 mm and k = 0.5mm; the minimum values of h and w1 are 200mm. The dimensions of the above flats are considerable.
Depending on the upper frequency of operation the reflection surface can be realized by utilizing light gauge perforated sheet metal. The method of attaching
the reflecting surface onto the back-up structure is important; if 3 or 4 adjustable bolts are for instance required per flat, then the total number of bolts required is unmanageable. An ideal arrangement is one where one bolt adjusts the height of one flat. The left hand side of figure 8 (d) illustrates a method of approximating the ideal arrangement where each adjustable bolt 43 supports the tips of four flats. Thus the flats are securely held on to the back-up structure and some curving of the flats is expected. If the adjustable bolts are normal to the surface of the paraboloid then the expected curving will improve the approximation of the resulting paraboloid to the ideal. In the right hand side of figure 8 (d) the flats are arranged so that the deviations from the ideal paraboloid are not systematic. With this arrangement the magnitude of the sidelobes away from the main beam are minimized.
The same metal/composite material should be used for both the back-up structure and the reflecting surface in order to minimise the differential expansion, between them. For the reasons discussed below mild steel is preferred to aluminium when a low-cost design is required. If the budget of the telescope is considerable, composite materials should be considered. 3oth the Cassegrain and Gregorian versions of off-set paraboloids can be used.
The considerations outlined in relation to the back-up structure for paraboloids capable of operating at mm wavelengths are necessarily of a heuristic nature. This is because there are no unique solutions to the problems of realizing back-up structures for paraboloids, even when the budget, maximum frequency of operation, telescope diameter, F/D ratio and wind loading are known. These general considerations however are
necessary before a detailed design is undertaken.
Comparisons between stainless steel and aluminium indicate that the ratio of the modulus of elasticity over density over the coefficient of expansion for the former metal is 2.125 higher than that of the latter. Since mild-steel has similar properties to stainless steel and the former metal is cheaper than the latter, mild steel especially treated against rust is preferred for the back-up structure of the main reflector. An additional advantage of mild steel over aluminium is the ease of welding. The reflecting surface should be chosen to be perforated mild steel also treated against rust.
It is now appropriate to consider the back-up structure in some detail. Normally the back-up structure of a paraboloid consists of a number of radial ribs and a number of inter-rib supports which form concentric circles. At cm wavelengths the maximum allowable deflections are such that both the radial-ribs and their inter-rib supports can have relatively small dimensions, so rigidity is achieved by realizing a space-dome type back-up structure. The back-up structure for reflectors capable of operating at mm wavelengths require ribs having rectangular sections of considerable dimensions [100 mm in depth for instance for a 6 m off-set paraboloid operating at 7 mm and 50 mm wide (normal max. wind loading conditions)]. These ribs 50, illustrated in figure 9, can be rolled to the required parabolic shape approximately; for the inter-rib supports 51, I-sections could be selected (having the same depths) and they could be attached to the ribs 50 at spacings partly dictated by the considerations outlined above (some inter-rib supports 51 can be used to accommodate the adjustable bolts 52 required to fix the reflection surface) . The inter-rib supports may be welded onto the ribs. Such a
structure minimizes the need for a space-dome structure, especially when the depth of both the above sections is considerable. As welding introduces distortions, it is convenient to weld end plates 53 onto the I-sections 51 before attaching them on to the ribs 50 with the aid of bolts 52. When the reflector 10 is pointed toward the zenith the width, depth and thickness of the ribs can be calculated by considering the distributed weight of the telescope and assuming that wind loading at this position is negligible (this is especially true when the antenna mounting and driving arrangement of the invention is used) . When the reflector is pointed toward the local horizon, the maximum wind loading becomes the dominant load on the structure. It is instructive to consider whether the proposed mounting and driving arrangement is useable for symmetric paraboloids. Such an arrangement would require the elevation axis to be at the rim of the paraboloid, a position which has the least stiffness. This proposition, though not attractive, does illustrate the point that the elevation axis of the new antenna mounting and driving arrangement is at a point of maximum stiffness only when an off-set paraboloid is used.
Claims
1. An energy collector comprising a support frame on which is mounted a main reflector adapted to be directed towards the source of energy, the main reflector being an off-axis portion of a paraboloid of revolution and operative to reflect the energy from the source towards the focus of the paraboloid, and, a second reflector between the main reflector and the focus of the paraboloid arranged to reflect the energy from the main reflector to a receiving station which does not overlay the main reflector.
2. A collector according to claim 1 wherein the support frame is mounted on an azimuth-over-elevation drive which is adjustable so that the main reflector may be correctly positioned with respect to the source of energy.
3. A collector according to claim 2 wherein the support frame is pivotally mounted on an elevation bearing of a stand for the collector which has an azimuth frame extending therefrom, the azimuth frame being rotatable about an azimuth bearing of the stand and wherein the azimuth-over-elevation drive comprises a pair of legs having a common connection to the support frame and spaced connections to the azimuth frame.
4. A collector according to claim 3 wherein the common connection comprises a hinge joint and the spaced connections comprise ball joints movable toward and away from each other.
5. A collector according to claim 4 wherein each ball joint is mounted on a shaft by means of a nut which engages a threaded portion of the shaft, each threaded portion being oppositely threaded to the other so that rotation of the shaft will either move the nuts towards or away from each other.
6. A collector according to claim 1 wherein the main reflector has a reflecting surface of aluminium foil and the receiving station constitutes a cooking zone which is so separated from the main reflector that hot fats and juices falling therefrom do not impair the efficiency of the main reflector.
7. A collector according to claim 1 wherein the support frame is comprised of a plurality of radial ribs inter-connected by inter-rib supports so spaced that they define a series trapezoidal spaces between adjacent radial ribs.
8. A collector according to claim 7 wherein each trapezoidal space is closed by a reflecting flat member, the height (h) and width (W) of each flat being defined by: h = 2 (2rlK)1/2 and W = 2 (2r2K)1/2 wherein: r1 is the radius of curvature of the parabolic curve, r2 is the radius of curvature of the curve defined by the intersection of the paraboloid and the plane parellel to the OZ axis and normal to the tangent plane, K is the predetermined tolerance.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU74582/81A AU7458281A (en) | 1980-08-13 | 1981-08-13 | Energy collector |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU5006/80800813 | 1980-08-13 | ||
AU500680 | 1980-08-13 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1982000719A1 true WO1982000719A1 (en) | 1982-03-04 |
Family
ID=3695458
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU1981/000114 WO1982000719A1 (en) | 1980-08-13 | 1981-08-13 | Energy collector |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0057705A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1982000719A1 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2754592A1 (en) * | 1996-10-10 | 1998-04-17 | Soleil Et Vapeur | Solar energy collector |
WO2001090662A3 (en) * | 2000-05-22 | 2002-08-01 | Andreas Noehrig | Concentrating solar energy system |
EP1691145A2 (en) * | 2005-02-09 | 2006-08-16 | Vincente Fernandez Manso | Apparatus for automatic positioning of solar panels |
WO2011094485A1 (en) * | 2010-01-28 | 2011-08-04 | Coolearth Solar | Structure and articulation system for solar collectors |
ES2395179A1 (en) * | 2011-08-11 | 2013-02-08 | Soltec Energias Renovables, S.L. | Solar Tracker |
WO2013021078A1 (en) * | 2011-08-11 | 2013-02-14 | Soltec Energias Renovables, Sl | Solar tracker |
CN105823237A (en) * | 2016-05-17 | 2016-08-03 | 吴国栋 | Reflecting mirror mechanism special for solar light condensation device |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3817605A (en) * | 1973-03-12 | 1974-06-18 | Spector G | Behind mirror focus light gathering device |
AU1541576A (en) * | 1976-06-29 | 1978-01-05 | D. M Arthur | Solar radiation collector |
AU2094276A (en) * | 1976-12-24 | 1978-06-29 | La Pauly | Solar furnace |
AU2157277A (en) * | 1976-01-29 | 1978-08-03 | National Aeronautics And Space Administration - Nasa | Solar tracking mount |
AU2568577A (en) * | 1977-06-01 | 1978-12-07 | W. Orrison William | Solar energy collector |
AU4594879A (en) * | 1978-04-10 | 1979-10-18 | Saint-Gobain Industries | Mirrors |
US4270844A (en) * | 1979-10-09 | 1981-06-02 | Cobble Milan H | Omni-directional compound paraboloid-hyperboloid radiation device |
AU785261B2 (en) * | 2000-10-18 | 2006-12-14 | Sony Corporation | Optical recording medium and optical recording method |
-
1981
- 1981-08-13 EP EP81902265A patent/EP0057705A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1981-08-13 WO PCT/AU1981/000114 patent/WO1982000719A1/en unknown
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3817605A (en) * | 1973-03-12 | 1974-06-18 | Spector G | Behind mirror focus light gathering device |
AU2157277A (en) * | 1976-01-29 | 1978-08-03 | National Aeronautics And Space Administration - Nasa | Solar tracking mount |
AU1541576A (en) * | 1976-06-29 | 1978-01-05 | D. M Arthur | Solar radiation collector |
AU2094276A (en) * | 1976-12-24 | 1978-06-29 | La Pauly | Solar furnace |
AU2568577A (en) * | 1977-06-01 | 1978-12-07 | W. Orrison William | Solar energy collector |
AU4594879A (en) * | 1978-04-10 | 1979-10-18 | Saint-Gobain Industries | Mirrors |
US4270844A (en) * | 1979-10-09 | 1981-06-02 | Cobble Milan H | Omni-directional compound paraboloid-hyperboloid radiation device |
AU785261B2 (en) * | 2000-10-18 | 2006-12-14 | Sony Corporation | Optical recording medium and optical recording method |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2754592A1 (en) * | 1996-10-10 | 1998-04-17 | Soleil Et Vapeur | Solar energy collector |
WO2001090662A3 (en) * | 2000-05-22 | 2002-08-01 | Andreas Noehrig | Concentrating solar energy system |
US6953038B1 (en) | 2000-05-22 | 2005-10-11 | Andreas Nohrig | Concentrating solar energy system |
EP1691145A2 (en) * | 2005-02-09 | 2006-08-16 | Vincente Fernandez Manso | Apparatus for automatic positioning of solar panels |
EP1691145A3 (en) * | 2005-02-09 | 2008-07-16 | Vincente Fernandez Manso | Apparatus for automatic positioning of solar panels |
US9285139B2 (en) | 2010-01-28 | 2016-03-15 | Coolearth Solar | Structure and articulation system for solar collectors |
WO2011094485A1 (en) * | 2010-01-28 | 2011-08-04 | Coolearth Solar | Structure and articulation system for solar collectors |
ES2395179A1 (en) * | 2011-08-11 | 2013-02-08 | Soltec Energias Renovables, S.L. | Solar Tracker |
WO2013021078A1 (en) * | 2011-08-11 | 2013-02-14 | Soltec Energias Renovables, Sl | Solar tracker |
EP2743605A1 (en) * | 2011-08-11 | 2014-06-18 | Soltec Energías Renovables, SL | Solar tracker |
CN103930738A (en) * | 2011-08-11 | 2014-07-16 | 尚德可再生能源有限公司 | Solar tracker |
EP2743605A4 (en) * | 2011-08-11 | 2015-04-01 | Soltec Energías Renovables Sl | Solar tracker |
US9166525B2 (en) | 2011-08-11 | 2015-10-20 | Soltec Energias Renov Ables, S.L. | Solar tracker |
AU2012293559A9 (en) * | 2011-08-11 | 2017-05-04 | Soltec Energias Renovables, Sl | Solar tracker |
AU2012293559B2 (en) * | 2011-08-11 | 2017-06-01 | Soltec Energias Renovables, Sl | Solar tracker |
CN105823237A (en) * | 2016-05-17 | 2016-08-03 | 吴国栋 | Reflecting mirror mechanism special for solar light condensation device |
CN105823237B (en) * | 2016-05-17 | 2017-11-10 | 吴国栋 | It is exclusively used in the mirror body of solar-energy light collector |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0057705A1 (en) | 1982-08-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5512913A (en) | Flat plate antenna, scaler collector and supporting structure | |
US4298877A (en) | Offset-fed multi-beam tracking antenna system utilizing especially shaped reflector surfaces | |
CN100499112C (en) | Concentrating solar energy receiver | |
US20100051016A1 (en) | Modular fresnel solar energy collection system | |
US20040134531A1 (en) | Solar concentrator | |
US4347834A (en) | Variable entropy solar energy harvester | |
EP3001120A1 (en) | Solar concentrator configuration with improved manufacturability and efficiency | |
US4281900A (en) | Frontal reflector bracing | |
US4788555A (en) | Combined solar and signal receptor device | |
von Hoerner et al. | Gravitational deformation and astigmatism of tiltable radio telescopes | |
AU2006343171B2 (en) | Hyperbolic solar trough field system | |
US8702251B2 (en) | Light-collecting heliostat using flat mirrors | |
WO1982000719A1 (en) | Energy collector | |
US8030605B2 (en) | Method and device for the utilization of solar energy | |
WO1996002797A1 (en) | Improved solar collectors | |
GB2611943A (en) | Multisegment array-fed ring-focus reflector antenna for wide-angle scanning | |
GB2098806A (en) | Multiple reflector antenna | |
US4595929A (en) | Scheme for aberration correction in scanning or multiple beam confocal antenna system | |
US20210381724A1 (en) | Solar concentrator | |
Lawrence et al. | Reduction of ground spillover in the Owens Valley 5.5-m telescope | |
US3076964A (en) | Microwave antenna with adjustable reflector shape and automatically regulated focal distance spacing of radiation element | |
EP4047286B1 (en) | Solar concentrator facet, solar concentrator comprising said facet and method of installation thereof | |
US7804464B2 (en) | Adjustable paneling system for a phasing structure | |
von Hoerner | Radio telescopes for millimeter wavelength | |
CN2156591Y (en) | Plane plate shape microwave antenna reflector |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Designated state(s): AU JP US |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB |