US9947935B1 - Facile control of pore structure in carbon-supported PGM-based catalysts - Google Patents

Facile control of pore structure in carbon-supported PGM-based catalysts Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US9947935B1
US9947935B1 US15/282,080 US201615282080A US9947935B1 US 9947935 B1 US9947935 B1 US 9947935B1 US 201615282080 A US201615282080 A US 201615282080A US 9947935 B1 US9947935 B1 US 9947935B1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
carbon
supported catalyst
average
carbon supported
surface area
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US15/282,080
Other versions
US20180097238A1 (en
Inventor
Anusorn Kongkanand
Michael K. Carpenter
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
Original Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by GM Global Technology Operations LLC filed Critical GM Global Technology Operations LLC
Priority to US15/282,080 priority Critical patent/US9947935B1/en
Assigned to GM Global Technology Operations LLC reassignment GM Global Technology Operations LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CARPENTER, MICHAEL K., KONGKANAND, ANUSORN
Priority to DE102017122085.2A priority patent/DE102017122085B4/en
Priority to CN201710863986.9A priority patent/CN107887617A/en
Publication of US20180097238A1 publication Critical patent/US20180097238A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US9947935B1 publication Critical patent/US9947935B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M4/00Electrodes
    • H01M4/86Inert electrodes with catalytic activity, e.g. for fuel cells
    • H01M4/88Processes of manufacture
    • H01M4/8878Treatment steps after deposition of the catalytic active composition or after shaping of the electrode being free-standing body
    • H01M4/8882Heat treatment, e.g. drying, baking
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M4/00Electrodes
    • H01M4/86Inert electrodes with catalytic activity, e.g. for fuel cells
    • H01M4/88Processes of manufacture
    • H01M4/8878Treatment steps after deposition of the catalytic active composition or after shaping of the electrode being free-standing body
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M4/00Electrodes
    • H01M4/86Inert electrodes with catalytic activity, e.g. for fuel cells
    • H01M4/90Selection of catalytic material
    • H01M4/9075Catalytic material supported on carriers, e.g. powder carriers
    • H01M4/9083Catalytic material supported on carriers, e.g. powder carriers on carbon or graphite
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M4/00Electrodes
    • H01M4/86Inert electrodes with catalytic activity, e.g. for fuel cells
    • H01M4/90Selection of catalytic material
    • H01M4/92Metals of platinum group
    • H01M4/925Metals of platinum group supported on carriers, e.g. powder carriers
    • H01M4/926Metals of platinum group supported on carriers, e.g. powder carriers on carbon or graphite
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M8/00Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M8/10Fuel cells with solid electrolytes
    • H01M2008/1095Fuel cells with polymeric electrolytes
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/30Hydrogen technology
    • Y02E60/50Fuel cells

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to catalyst materials for fuel cells with improved performance.
  • Fuel cells are used as an electrical power source in many applications. In particular, fuel cells are proposed for use in automobiles to replace internal combustion engines.
  • a commonly used fuel cell design uses a solid polymer electrolyte (“SPE”) membrane or proton exchange membrane (“PEM”) to provide ion transport between the anode and cathode.
  • SPE solid polymer electrolyte
  • PEM proton exchange membrane
  • PEM fuel cells typically have a membrane electrode assembly (“MEA”) in which a solid polymer membrane has an anode catalyst on one face, and a cathode catalyst on the opposite face.
  • MEA membrane electrode assembly
  • the anode and cathode layers of a typical PEM fuel cell are formed of porous conductive materials, such as woven graphite, graphitized sheets, or carbon paper to enable the fuel and oxidant to disperse over the surface of the membrane facing the fuel- and oxidant-supply electrodes, respectively.
  • Each electrode has finely divided catalyst particles (for example, platinum particles) supported on carbon particles to promote oxidation of hydrogen at the anode and reduction of oxygen at the cathode. Protons flow from the anode through the ionically conductive polymer membrane to the cathode where they combine with oxygen to form water which is discharged from the cell.
  • the MEA is sandwiched between a pair of porous gas diffusion layers (“GDL”) which, in turn, are sandwiched between a pair of non-porous, electrically conductive elements or plates.
  • GDL porous gas diffusion layers
  • the plates function as current collectors for the anode and the cathode, and contain appropriate channels and openings formed therein for distributing the fuel cell's gaseous reactants over the surface of respective anode and cathode catalysts.
  • the polymer electrolyte membrane of a PEM fuel cell must be thin, chemically stable, proton transmissive, non-electrically conductive and gas impermeable.
  • fuel cells are provided in arrays of many individual fuel cell stacks in order to provide high levels of electrical power.
  • High surface area carbon black is often used as a support for fuel cell catalysts.
  • High surface area carbon black often contains large quantities of internal micropores ( ⁇ 4 nm) in their constituent particles. Pt nanoparticles deposited in these micropores can have restricted access to reactants and show poor activity. Studies have shown that up to 80% of all Pt particles are deposited inside the micropores. Opening up these micropores to better expose the Pt particles should improve the high power performance of the catalyst.
  • micropores and “pores” are used interchangeably, not to be mistaken with mesopores (pores of 5-15 nm) and macropores (pores >15 nm).
  • Catalyst durability is one of the major challenges facing the development of automotive fuel cell technology.
  • Platinum or platinum-alloy particles lose electrochemical surface area during operation due to dissolution and subsequent Ostwald ripening and to particle migration and coalescence.
  • Electrochemical oxidation of the carbon support enhances this particle migration and subsequent performance loss at high power.
  • Oxidation of carbon support also causes the collapse of the electrode thickness and electrode porosity, hindering reactant transport and subsequent performance loss. Therefore, it is a common practice for those skilled in the art to avoid oxidation of carbon support.
  • the present invention solves one or more problems of the prior art by providing, in at least one embodiment, a method for forming a carbon supported catalyst.
  • the method includes a step of providing a first carbon supported catalyst having a platinum-group metal supported on a first carbon support. Characteristically, the first carbon support has a first average micropore diameter and a first average carbon surface area.
  • the first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about 450° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst, wherein the first carbon support or the second carbon supported catalyst is acid leached.
  • a method for forming a carbon supported catalyst includes a step of providing a first carbon supported catalyst having a platinum-group metal supported on a first carbon support. Characteristically, the first carbon support has a first average micropore diameter and a first average carbon surface area.
  • the first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about 450° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst.
  • the second carbon supported is subsequently contacted with molecular hydrogen to form a third carbon supported catalyst.
  • the third carbon supported catalyst is acid leached to form a fourth carbon supported catalyst having depleted non-noble metal catalyst particles disposed on a carbon support.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic cross section of a fuel cell that incorporates carbon supported catalysts into the anode and/or cathode catalyst layers;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic flow chart illustrating several variations of a method of forming a carbon supported catalyst
  • FIG. 3A provides plots of fuel cell voltage versus current density for variously modified carbon supported catalysts (modified carbon supported catalyst 46 , final carbon supported catalyst 48 , and final carbon supported catalyst 52 ) that have been acid leached before treatment with oxygen and hydrogen;
  • FIG. 3B provides plots of fuel cell voltage versus current density for variously modified carbon supported catalysts (final carbon supported catalyst 48 and final carbon supported catalyst 60 ) that have been acid leached after treatment with oxygen and hydrogen;
  • FIG. 4A provides plots of fuel cell voltage versus the number of cycles for variously modified carbon supported catalysts (modified carbon supported catalyst 46 , final carbon supported catalyst 48 , and final carbon supported catalyst 52 ) that have been acid leached before treatment with oxygen and hydrogen;
  • FIG. 4B provides plots of fuel cell voltage for variously modified carbon supported catalysts (final carbon supported catalyst 48 and final carbon supported catalyst 60 ) that have been acid leached after treatment with oxygen and hydrogen;
  • FIG. 5 is a plot of mass activity versus the number of cycles for modified carbon supported catalyst 46 , final carbon supported catalyst 48 , and final carbon supported catalyst 52 ;
  • FIG. 6 is a plot of oxidation temperature and time for various modified carbon supported catalysts
  • FIG. 7 is a plot of reaction time needed to achieve desired carbon loss and pore opening effect for a given reaction temperature
  • FIG. 8A is a plot of the volume per gram of carbon support of adsorbed gas versus pore size.
  • FIG. 8B is a plot of the volume of adsorbed gas versus treatment time of the carbon supported catalyst with oxygen.
  • percent, “parts of,” and ratio values are by weight; the description of a group or class of materials as suitable or preferred for a given purpose in connection with the invention implies that mixtures of any two or more of the members of the group or class are equally suitable or preferred; description of constituents in chemical terms refers to the constituents at the time of addition to any combination specified in the description and does not necessarily preclude chemical interactions among the constituents of a mixture once mixed; the first definition of an acronym or other abbreviation applies to all subsequent uses herein of the same abbreviation and applies mutatis mutandis to normal grammatical variations of the initially defined abbreviation; and, unless expressly stated to the contrary, measurement of a property is determined by the same technique as previously or later referenced for the same property.
  • BET Brunauer-Emmett-Teller
  • PGM platinum group metal
  • PEM fuel cell 10 includes polymeric ion conducting membrane 12 disposed between cathode electro-catalyst layer 14 and anode electro-catalyst layer 16 .
  • Fuel cell 10 also includes electrically conductive flow field plates 20 , 22 which include gas channels 24 and 26 .
  • Flow field plates 20 , 22 are either bipolar plates (illustrated) or unipolar plates (i.e., end plates).
  • flow field plates 20 , 22 are formed from a metal plate (e.g., stainless steel) optionally coated with a precious metal such as gold or platinum.
  • flow field plates 20 , 22 are formed from conducting polymers which also are optionally coated with a precious metal.
  • Gas diffusion layers 32 and 34 are also interposed between flow field plates and a catalyst layer.
  • Cathode electro-catalyst layer 14 and anode electro-catalyst layer 16 include carbon supported catalysts made by the processes set forth below.
  • the carbon supported catalysts have improved activity and stability anode and cathode electro-catalyst layers.
  • step a catalyst precursor 40 (i.e., a first carbon supported catalyst) is subjected to acid leaching to form an undried de-alloyed catalyst 42 is step a.
  • step b) undried de-alloyed catalyst 42 is dried to form de-alloyed catalyst 44 .
  • De-alloyed catalyst 44 is then contacted with an oxygen-containing gas in step c) to form modified carbon supported catalyst 46 .
  • step d) modified carbon supported catalyst 46 is then contacted with molecular hydrogen to form final carbon supported catalyst 48 .
  • undried de-alloyed catalyst 42 is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas to form modified carbon supported catalyst 50 in step b′.
  • modified carbon supported catalyst 50 is then contacted with molecular hydrogen to form final carbon supported catalyst 52 .
  • catalyst precursor 40 is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas to form modified carbon supported catalyst 54 in step a′′).
  • Modified carbon supported catalyst 54 is then contacted in step b′′) with molecular hydrogen to form carbon supported catalyst 56 .
  • carbon supported catalyst 56 is then acid leached to form final carbon supported catalyst 60 .
  • catalyst precursor 40 includes a platinum-group metal.
  • the platinum-group metal is selected from the group consisting of Pt, Pd, Au, Ru, Ir, Rh, and Os.
  • Pt is found to be particularly useful.
  • the carbon supported catalyst includes a carbon support and a platinum-group metal (PGM) disposed over/supported on the carbon support.
  • PGM platinum-group metal
  • the platinum-group metal is supported on carbon at a loading from about 5 weight percent to about 50 weight percent.
  • the carbon supported catalyst is characterized by a multiscale pore diameters: with micropore and mesopore size of less than 100 angstroms and with macropore size of greater than 100 angstroms.
  • the carbon supported catalyst is also characterized by its average surface area which is greater than 500 m 2 /g.
  • the average carbon surface area is greater than, in increasing order of preference, 500 m 2 /g, 600 m 2 /g, 700 m 2 /g, or 800 m 2 /g.
  • the average carbon surface area is less than, in increasing order of preference, 3000 m 2 /g, 2000 m 2 /g, or 1000 m 2 /g.
  • the carbon supported catalyst has an average pore volume that is less than about 0.6 cm 3 /g.
  • the average pore volume is less than, in increasing order of preference, 1.1 cm 3 /g, 1.0 cm 3 /g, and 0.9 cm 3 /g. In still another refinement, the average pore volume is greater than, in increasing order of preference, 0.2 cm 3 /g, 0.3 cm 3 /g, 0.4 cm 3 /g, or 0.5 cm 3 /g. In a variation, the pore volume, pore diameter and surface area are determined by a BET method.
  • the catalyst precursor 40 includes an alloy that includes the platinum group metal and one or more additional metals.
  • the one or more additional metals include first or second row transition metals.
  • Specific examples of the one or more additional metals include Co, Ni, Fe, Ti, Sc, Cu, Mn, Cr, V, Ru, Zr, Y and W.
  • the carbon support is a carbon powder having a plurality of carbon particles.
  • the carbon particles may have any number of shapes without limiting the invention in any way. Examples of such shapes include, but are not limited to, nano-rods, nanotubes, nano-rafts, non-electrically conducting particles, spherical particles, and the like.
  • the carbon particles are a carbon powder and in particular, a high surface area carbon (HSC) powder typically having an average spatial dimension (e.g., diameter) from about 5 to 500 nanometers.
  • HSC high surface area carbon
  • the carbon powder has an average spatial dimension from about 10 to 300 nanometers.
  • carbon black having an average spatial dimension from about 30 to 300 nanometers is used for the carbon particles.
  • a particularly useful example of carbon black is Ketjen Black.
  • the catalyst precursor 40 has a first average pore volume, a first average pore diameter, and a first average surface area.
  • the first average micropore diameter is less than 70 angstroms
  • the first average carbon surface area is greater than 500 m 2 /g.
  • the first average pore diameter is less than, in increasing order of preference 100 angstroms, 80 angstroms, 70 angstroms and 50 angstroms and greater than in increasing order of preference, 10 angstroms, 20 angstroms, 30 angstroms, and 40 angstroms.
  • the first average carbon surface area is greater than, in increasing order of preference, 400 m 2 /g, 500 m 2 /g, 600 m 2 /g, and 700 m 2 /g and less than, in increasing order of preference, 1200 m 2 /g, 1000 m 2 /g, 800 m 2 /g, and 600 m 2 /g.
  • the first average pore volume is greater than 0.6 cm 3 /g.
  • the first average pore volume is greater than, in increasing order of preference, 0.5 cm 3 /g, 0.6 cm 3 /g, 0.7 cm 3 /g, and 0.8 cm 3 /g.
  • the first average pore volume is less than, in increasing order of preference, 1.5 cm 3 /g, 1.2 cm 3 /g, 1.0 cm 3 /g, or 0.9 cm 3 /g.
  • the pore size of the final carbon supported catalyst that is formed has a pore size that is greater than that of catalyst precursor 40 .
  • each of the carbon supported catalysts formed after the step of contact with an oxygen-containing gas have a larger pore size than catalyst precursor 40 .
  • this larger pore size is characterized by a second average pore volume, a second average pore diameter, and a second average surface area.
  • the second average pore diameter is greater than the first average pore diameter and the second average surface area is less than the first average surface area.
  • the second average micro and mesopore volume is greater than the first average pore volume.
  • the second average micropore diameter is typically greater than 50 angstroms. In a refinement, the second average pore diameter is greater than, in increasing order of preference, 40 angstroms, 50 angstroms, 55 angstroms, 60 angstroms, or 70 angstroms. In another refinement, the second average pore diameter is less than, in increasing order of preference, 150 angstroms, 120 angstroms, 100 angstroms, or 90 angstroms. Typically, the second average carbon surface area is less than 800 m 2 /g.
  • the second average carbon surface area is less than, in increasing order of preference, 1100 m 2 /g, 1000 m 2 /g, 900 m 2 /g, or 750 m 2 /g. In another refinement, the second average carbon surface area is greater than, in increasing order of preference, 300 m 2 /g, 400 m 2 /g, 500 m 2 /g, or 650 m 2 /g.
  • the variations of the method for forming a carbon supported catalyst includes an acid leaching step.
  • leaching is accomplished by contacting the carbon supported catalyst (e.g., catalyst precursor 40 or carbon supported catalyst 56 ) with an aqueous acid.
  • the carbon supported catalyst being acid leach can be contacted with a 1M nitric acid solution for 24 hours at 70° C.
  • Each of the methods set forth above includes a step in which a carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas.
  • oxygen-containing gas include air, pure oxygen, or gaseous mixtures including 1 to 99 percent oxygen and a carrier gas (e.g., N 2 , Argon, etc.).
  • the oxygen-containing gas includes from 0.1 to 100 weight percent molecular oxygen.
  • the oxygen-containing gas includes from 1 to 30 weight percent molecular oxygen.
  • various carbon supported catalysts are contacted with the oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about 450° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst.
  • the first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about 300° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst.
  • the first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about from 150 to 350° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst.
  • the first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about from 200 to 300° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst.
  • the first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than or equal to, in increasing order of preference, 450° C., 300° C., 250° C., 200° C., 180° C., or 150° C., and at a temperature greater than or equal to 50° C., 75° C., 90° C., 100° C., or 120° C.
  • the oxidation of the first carbon supported catalyst typically is performed at around 1 atm.
  • the predetermined time can be from 1 minutes to 24 hours depending on the pore sizes that are desired, the type of carbon, and the temperature at which the carbon supported catalyst is contacted with the oxygen-containing gas.
  • the predetermined time can be from 1 second to 2 minutes. At temperatures from about 200 to 300° C., the predetermined time can be from 1 minute to 24 hours.
  • the platinum group metal catalyst particles serve as oxidation catalyst sites that allow localized corrosion of the micropores in which they reside, resulting in larger pores and improved transport properties.
  • the mild oxidation also preferentially removes some of the less stable amorphous carbon, partially stabilizing the support and thus improving catalyst durability.
  • the average pore diameter of the carbon supported catalyst that is contacted with the oxygen-containing gas is greater than the first average pore diameter and the average surface area of the carbon supported catalyst that is contacted with the oxygen-containing gas is less than the first average surface area.
  • the carbon supported catalysts set forth above are used in an ink composition to form fuel cell catalyst layers by methods known to those skilled in fuel cell technology.
  • the ink composition includes the carbon supported catalysts in an amount of about 1 weight percent to 10 weight percent of the total weight of the ink composition.
  • the ink composition includes ionomers (e.g., a perfluorosulfonic acid polymer such as NAFION®) in an amount from about 5 weight percent to about 40 weight percent of the catalyst composition.
  • the balance of the ink composition is solvent.
  • Useful solvents include, but are not limited to, alcohols (e.g., propanol, ethanol, and methanol), water, or a mixture of water and alcohols. Characteristically, the solvents evaporate at room temperature.
  • FIGS. 3A and 3B provide plots of fuel cell voltage versus current density for variously modified carbon supported catalysts.
  • FIG. 3A compares the fuel cell polarization curves for modified carbon supported catalyst 46 , final carbon supported catalyst 48 , and final carbon supported catalyst 52 from FIG. 2 .
  • FIG. 3B compares the fuel cell polarization curves between catalysts treated before and after the acid leaching step for final carbon supported catalyst 48 compared to final carbon supported catalyst 60 from FIG. 2 . Both catalysts final carbon supported catalyst 48 and final carbon supported catalyst 60 gave comparable performance.
  • FIGS. 4A and 4B provide plots of fuel cell voltage versus the number of cycles for variously modified carbon supported catalysts.
  • FIG. 4A shows the fuel cell performance at 2 A/cm 2 under HighP-wet protocol for cathodes with 0.06 mg Pt/cm 2 loadings before and after voltage-cycling accelerated stability tests (AST) (0.6-1.0 V) for modified carbon supported catalyst 46 , final carbon supported catalyst 48 , and final carbon supported catalyst 52 from FIG. 2 .
  • FIG. 4B compares shows the fuel cell performance for final carbon supported catalyst 48 compared to final carbon supported catalyst 60 from FIG. 2 . All oxidized catalysts showed about 80 mV higher performance compared to the baseline at the beginning of life (BOL). It was found that Catalyst 48 gave best performance at BOL, and that gap maintains throughout the AST, indicating the advantages of the drying and H2 reduction steps.
  • FIG. 5 is a plot of mass activity versus the number of cycles for 46, 48, and 52.
  • the oxygen reduction activity shown in FIG. 5 confirms the advantages of the drying and H 2 reduction steps.
  • FIG. 6 is a plot of oxidation time for various modified carbon supported catalysts.
  • FIG. 6 shows the carbon losses as a function of oxidation time at three different temperatures. Because the reaction was done in excess of reactant oxygen, the linearly proportional of carbon loss to the oxidation time indicates a kinetic-controlled reaction. At higher temperature, less time is needed to achieve the target carbon loss, e.g. the target micropore size. The carbon oxidation kinetic was found to follow the Arrhenius relationship. An activation energy of 121 kJ/mol was determined for this HSC carbon.
  • FIG. 7 is a plot of reaction time versus reaction time for the reaction of carbon supports with oxygen.
  • FIG. 7 also compares the experimental results (circles) to the model (solid line). This data suggests that the temperature can be raised to even further to shorten the reaction time and reduce process cost.
  • FIGS. 8A-B presents gas adsorption data.
  • FIG. 8A is a plot of the volume per gram of carbon support of adsorbed gas versus pore size while FIG. 8B is a plot of the volume of adsorbed gas versus treatment time of the carbon supported catalyst with oxygen.
  • This is a comparison of a control first catalyst 44 with final catalysts 48 treated for different treatment times with oxygen ( 48 a , 48 b , and 48 c ).
  • the gas adsorption analysis shows that there are small amount of carbon mass and surface area losses. Moreover, increasing micropore size suggests improved local oxygen transport. Table 1 provides a summary of the results:

Abstract

A method for forming a carbon supported catalyst includes a step of providing a first carbon supported catalyst having a platinum-group metal supported on a first carbon support. Characteristically, the first carbon support has a first average micropore diameter and a first average carbon surface area. The first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about 450° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst, wherein the first carbon support or the second carbon supported catalyst is acid leached.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD
In at least one aspect, the present invention relates to catalyst materials for fuel cells with improved performance.
BACKGROUND
Fuel cells are used as an electrical power source in many applications. In particular, fuel cells are proposed for use in automobiles to replace internal combustion engines. A commonly used fuel cell design uses a solid polymer electrolyte (“SPE”) membrane or proton exchange membrane (“PEM”) to provide ion transport between the anode and cathode.
In proton exchange membrane type fuel cells, hydrogen is supplied to the anode as fuel and oxygen is supplied to the cathode as the oxidant. The oxygen can either be in pure form (O2) or air (a mixture of O2 and N2). PEM fuel cells typically have a membrane electrode assembly (“MEA”) in which a solid polymer membrane has an anode catalyst on one face, and a cathode catalyst on the opposite face. The anode and cathode layers of a typical PEM fuel cell are formed of porous conductive materials, such as woven graphite, graphitized sheets, or carbon paper to enable the fuel and oxidant to disperse over the surface of the membrane facing the fuel- and oxidant-supply electrodes, respectively. Each electrode has finely divided catalyst particles (for example, platinum particles) supported on carbon particles to promote oxidation of hydrogen at the anode and reduction of oxygen at the cathode. Protons flow from the anode through the ionically conductive polymer membrane to the cathode where they combine with oxygen to form water which is discharged from the cell. The MEA is sandwiched between a pair of porous gas diffusion layers (“GDL”) which, in turn, are sandwiched between a pair of non-porous, electrically conductive elements or plates. The plates function as current collectors for the anode and the cathode, and contain appropriate channels and openings formed therein for distributing the fuel cell's gaseous reactants over the surface of respective anode and cathode catalysts. In order to produce electricity efficiently, the polymer electrolyte membrane of a PEM fuel cell must be thin, chemically stable, proton transmissive, non-electrically conductive and gas impermeable. In typical applications, fuel cells are provided in arrays of many individual fuel cell stacks in order to provide high levels of electrical power.
High surface area carbon black is often used as a support for fuel cell catalysts. High surface area carbon black often contains large quantities of internal micropores (<4 nm) in their constituent particles. Pt nanoparticles deposited in these micropores can have restricted access to reactants and show poor activity. Studies have shown that up to 80% of all Pt particles are deposited inside the micropores. Opening up these micropores to better expose the Pt particles should improve the high power performance of the catalyst. As used herein, the terms “micropores” and “pores” are used interchangeably, not to be mistaken with mesopores (pores of 5-15 nm) and macropores (pores >15 nm).
Catalyst durability, particularly as it relates to the retention of high power performance, is one of the major challenges facing the development of automotive fuel cell technology. Platinum or platinum-alloy particles lose electrochemical surface area during operation due to dissolution and subsequent Ostwald ripening and to particle migration and coalescence. Electrochemical oxidation of the carbon support enhances this particle migration and subsequent performance loss at high power. Oxidation of carbon support also causes the collapse of the electrode thickness and electrode porosity, hindering reactant transport and subsequent performance loss. Therefore, it is a common practice for those skilled in the art to avoid oxidation of carbon support.
On the other hand, in electrodes with small amount of Pt or low Pt surface area, large fuel cell performance loss is observed. This is due to the need to support larger flux of reactant oxygen or hydrogen to the Pt surface. This is particularly difficult for Pt particles that are embedded in carbon particle micropores. Accordingly, there is a need for improved catalyst layers.
SUMMARY
The present invention solves one or more problems of the prior art by providing, in at least one embodiment, a method for forming a carbon supported catalyst. The method includes a step of providing a first carbon supported catalyst having a platinum-group metal supported on a first carbon support. Characteristically, the first carbon support has a first average micropore diameter and a first average carbon surface area. The first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about 450° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst, wherein the first carbon support or the second carbon supported catalyst is acid leached.
A method for forming a carbon supported catalyst is provided. The method includes a step of providing a first carbon supported catalyst having a platinum-group metal supported on a first carbon support. Characteristically, the first carbon support has a first average micropore diameter and a first average carbon surface area. The first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about 450° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst. The second carbon supported is subsequently contacted with molecular hydrogen to form a third carbon supported catalyst. The third carbon supported catalyst is acid leached to form a fourth carbon supported catalyst having depleted non-noble metal catalyst particles disposed on a carbon support.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic cross section of a fuel cell that incorporates carbon supported catalysts into the anode and/or cathode catalyst layers;
FIG. 2 is a schematic flow chart illustrating several variations of a method of forming a carbon supported catalyst;
FIG. 3A provides plots of fuel cell voltage versus current density for variously modified carbon supported catalysts (modified carbon supported catalyst 46, final carbon supported catalyst 48, and final carbon supported catalyst 52) that have been acid leached before treatment with oxygen and hydrogen;
FIG. 3B provides plots of fuel cell voltage versus current density for variously modified carbon supported catalysts (final carbon supported catalyst 48 and final carbon supported catalyst 60) that have been acid leached after treatment with oxygen and hydrogen;
FIG. 4A provides plots of fuel cell voltage versus the number of cycles for variously modified carbon supported catalysts (modified carbon supported catalyst 46, final carbon supported catalyst 48, and final carbon supported catalyst 52) that have been acid leached before treatment with oxygen and hydrogen;
FIG. 4B provides plots of fuel cell voltage for variously modified carbon supported catalysts (final carbon supported catalyst 48 and final carbon supported catalyst 60) that have been acid leached after treatment with oxygen and hydrogen;
FIG. 5 is a plot of mass activity versus the number of cycles for modified carbon supported catalyst 46, final carbon supported catalyst 48, and final carbon supported catalyst 52;
FIG. 6 is a plot of oxidation temperature and time for various modified carbon supported catalysts;
FIG. 7 is a plot of reaction time needed to achieve desired carbon loss and pore opening effect for a given reaction temperature;
FIG. 8A is a plot of the volume per gram of carbon support of adsorbed gas versus pore size; and
FIG. 8B is a plot of the volume of adsorbed gas versus treatment time of the carbon supported catalyst with oxygen.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Reference will now be made in detail to presently preferred compositions, embodiments and methods of the present invention which constitute the best modes of practicing the invention presently known to the inventors. The Figures are not necessarily to scale. However, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. Therefore, specific details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for any aspect of the invention and/or as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
Except in the examples, or where otherwise expressly indicated, all numerical quantities in this description indicating amounts of material or conditions of reaction and/or use are to be understood as modified by the word “about” in describing the broadest scope of the invention. Practice within the numerical limits stated is generally preferred. Also, unless expressly stated to the contrary: percent, “parts of,” and ratio values are by weight; the description of a group or class of materials as suitable or preferred for a given purpose in connection with the invention implies that mixtures of any two or more of the members of the group or class are equally suitable or preferred; description of constituents in chemical terms refers to the constituents at the time of addition to any combination specified in the description and does not necessarily preclude chemical interactions among the constituents of a mixture once mixed; the first definition of an acronym or other abbreviation applies to all subsequent uses herein of the same abbreviation and applies mutatis mutandis to normal grammatical variations of the initially defined abbreviation; and, unless expressly stated to the contrary, measurement of a property is determined by the same technique as previously or later referenced for the same property.
It is also to be understood that this invention is not limited to the specific embodiments and methods described below, as specific components and/or conditions may, of course, vary. Furthermore, the terminology used herein is used only for the purpose of describing particular embodiments of the present invention and is not intended to be limiting in any way.
It must also be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular form “a,” “an,” and “the” comprise plural referents unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. For example, reference to a component in the singular is intended to comprise a plurality of components.
Throughout this application, where publications are referenced, the disclosures of these publications in their entireties are hereby incorporated by reference into this application to more fully describe the state of the art to which this invention pertains.
Abbreviations:
“BET” means Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) theory;
“BOL” means beginning of life;
“PGM” means platinum group metal.
With reference to FIG. 1, a cross sectional view of a fuel cell incorporating the platinum group metal-containing carbon supported catalysts is provided. PEM fuel cell 10 includes polymeric ion conducting membrane 12 disposed between cathode electro-catalyst layer 14 and anode electro-catalyst layer 16. Fuel cell 10 also includes electrically conductive flow field plates 20, 22 which include gas channels 24 and 26. Flow field plates 20, 22 are either bipolar plates (illustrated) or unipolar plates (i.e., end plates). In a refinement, flow field plates 20, 22 are formed from a metal plate (e.g., stainless steel) optionally coated with a precious metal such as gold or platinum. In another refinement, flow field plates 20, 22 are formed from conducting polymers which also are optionally coated with a precious metal. Gas diffusion layers 32 and 34 are also interposed between flow field plates and a catalyst layer. Cathode electro-catalyst layer 14 and anode electro-catalyst layer 16 include carbon supported catalysts made by the processes set forth below. Advantageously, the carbon supported catalysts have improved activity and stability anode and cathode electro-catalyst layers.
With reference to FIG. 2, a schematic flow chart illustrating several variations of a method of forming a carbon supported catalyst is provided. In a first variation, catalyst precursor 40 (i.e., a first carbon supported catalyst) is subjected to acid leaching to form an undried de-alloyed catalyst 42 is step a. In one refinement, in step b) undried de-alloyed catalyst 42 is dried to form de-alloyed catalyst 44. De-alloyed catalyst 44 is then contacted with an oxygen-containing gas in step c) to form modified carbon supported catalyst 46. Finally, in step d) modified carbon supported catalyst 46 is then contacted with molecular hydrogen to form final carbon supported catalyst 48.
Still referring to FIG. 2, undried de-alloyed catalyst 42 is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas to form modified carbon supported catalyst 50 in step b′. In step c′), modified carbon supported catalyst 50 is then contacted with molecular hydrogen to form final carbon supported catalyst 52.
Still referring to FIG. 2, catalyst precursor 40 is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas to form modified carbon supported catalyst 54 in step a″). Modified carbon supported catalyst 54 is then contacted in step b″) with molecular hydrogen to form carbon supported catalyst 56. Finally, in step c″, carbon supported catalyst 56 is then acid leached to form final carbon supported catalyst 60.
In each of the variations of the method set forth above, catalyst precursor 40 includes a platinum-group metal. In particular, the platinum-group metal is selected from the group consisting of Pt, Pd, Au, Ru, Ir, Rh, and Os. In this regard, Pt is found to be particularly useful. In one variation, the carbon supported catalyst includes a carbon support and a platinum-group metal (PGM) disposed over/supported on the carbon support. In a refinement, the platinum-group metal is supported on carbon at a loading from about 5 weight percent to about 50 weight percent. The carbon supported catalyst is characterized by a multiscale pore diameters: with micropore and mesopore size of less than 100 angstroms and with macropore size of greater than 100 angstroms. The carbon supported catalyst is also characterized by its average surface area which is greater than 500 m2/g. In a refinement, the average carbon surface area is greater than, in increasing order of preference, 500 m2/g, 600 m2/g, 700 m2/g, or 800 m2/g. In another refinement, the average carbon surface area is less than, in increasing order of preference, 3000 m2/g, 2000 m2/g, or 1000 m2/g. In a refinement, the carbon supported catalyst has an average pore volume that is less than about 0.6 cm3/g. In another refinement, the average pore volume is less than, in increasing order of preference, 1.1 cm3/g, 1.0 cm3/g, and 0.9 cm3/g. In still another refinement, the average pore volume is greater than, in increasing order of preference, 0.2 cm3/g, 0.3 cm3/g, 0.4 cm3/g, or 0.5 cm3/g. In a variation, the pore volume, pore diameter and surface area are determined by a BET method.
In a refinement, the catalyst precursor 40 includes an alloy that includes the platinum group metal and one or more additional metals. In a refinement, the one or more additional metals include first or second row transition metals. Specific examples of the one or more additional metals include Co, Ni, Fe, Ti, Sc, Cu, Mn, Cr, V, Ru, Zr, Y and W. Typically, the carbon support is a carbon powder having a plurality of carbon particles. The carbon particles may have any number of shapes without limiting the invention in any way. Examples of such shapes include, but are not limited to, nano-rods, nanotubes, nano-rafts, non-electrically conducting particles, spherical particles, and the like. In one variation, the carbon particles are a carbon powder and in particular, a high surface area carbon (HSC) powder typically having an average spatial dimension (e.g., diameter) from about 5 to 500 nanometers. In a refinement, the carbon powder has an average spatial dimension from about 10 to 300 nanometers. In another refinement, carbon black having an average spatial dimension from about 30 to 300 nanometers is used for the carbon particles. A particularly useful example of carbon black is Ketjen Black.
The catalyst precursor 40 has a first average pore volume, a first average pore diameter, and a first average surface area. In a refinement, the first average micropore diameter is less than 70 angstroms, and the first average carbon surface area is greater than 500 m2/g. In a refinement, the first average pore diameter is less than, in increasing order of preference 100 angstroms, 80 angstroms, 70 angstroms and 50 angstroms and greater than in increasing order of preference, 10 angstroms, 20 angstroms, 30 angstroms, and 40 angstroms. In another refinement, the first average carbon surface area is greater than, in increasing order of preference, 400 m2/g, 500 m2/g, 600 m2/g, and 700 m2/g and less than, in increasing order of preference, 1200 m2/g, 1000 m2/g, 800 m2/g, and 600 m2/g. Typically, the first average pore volume is greater than 0.6 cm3/g. In another refinement, the first average pore volume is greater than, in increasing order of preference, 0.5 cm3/g, 0.6 cm3/g, 0.7 cm3/g, and 0.8 cm3/g. In still another refinement, the first average pore volume is less than, in increasing order of preference, 1.5 cm3/g, 1.2 cm3/g, 1.0 cm3/g, or 0.9 cm3/g.
In each of the method variations set forth above, the pore size of the final carbon supported catalyst that is formed has a pore size that is greater than that of catalyst precursor 40. In particular, each of the carbon supported catalysts formed after the step of contact with an oxygen-containing gas have a larger pore size than catalyst precursor 40. In each case, this larger pore size is characterized by a second average pore volume, a second average pore diameter, and a second average surface area. Characteristically, the second average pore diameter is greater than the first average pore diameter and the second average surface area is less than the first average surface area. In a refinement, the second average micro and mesopore volume is greater than the first average pore volume. Details for the second average pore volume, second average pore diameter, and the second average surface area are set forth above. The second average micropore diameter is typically greater than 50 angstroms. In a refinement, the second average pore diameter is greater than, in increasing order of preference, 40 angstroms, 50 angstroms, 55 angstroms, 60 angstroms, or 70 angstroms. In another refinement, the second average pore diameter is less than, in increasing order of preference, 150 angstroms, 120 angstroms, 100 angstroms, or 90 angstroms. Typically, the second average carbon surface area is less than 800 m2/g. In a refinement, the second average carbon surface area is less than, in increasing order of preference, 1100 m2/g, 1000 m2/g, 900 m2/g, or 750 m2/g. In another refinement, the second average carbon surface area is greater than, in increasing order of preference, 300 m2/g, 400 m2/g, 500 m2/g, or 650 m2/g.
As set forth above, the variations of the method for forming a carbon supported catalyst includes an acid leaching step. Typically, leaching is accomplished by contacting the carbon supported catalyst (e.g., catalyst precursor 40 or carbon supported catalyst 56) with an aqueous acid. For example, the carbon supported catalyst being acid leach can be contacted with a 1M nitric acid solution for 24 hours at 70° C.
Each of the methods set forth above includes a step in which a carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas. Examples of oxygen-containing gas include air, pure oxygen, or gaseous mixtures including 1 to 99 percent oxygen and a carrier gas (e.g., N2, Argon, etc.). In a refinement, the oxygen-containing gas includes from 0.1 to 100 weight percent molecular oxygen. In another refinement, the oxygen-containing gas includes from 1 to 30 weight percent molecular oxygen. As set forth above, various carbon supported catalysts are contacted with the oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about 450° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst. In other refinements, the first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about 300° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst. In other refinements, the first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about from 150 to 350° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst. In still other refinements, the first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about from 200 to 300° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst. In another variation, the first carbon supported catalyst is contacted with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than or equal to, in increasing order of preference, 450° C., 300° C., 250° C., 200° C., 180° C., or 150° C., and at a temperature greater than or equal to 50° C., 75° C., 90° C., 100° C., or 120° C. The oxidation of the first carbon supported catalyst typically is performed at around 1 atm. In each case, the predetermined time can be from 1 minutes to 24 hours depending on the pore sizes that are desired, the type of carbon, and the temperature at which the carbon supported catalyst is contacted with the oxygen-containing gas. At high temperatures from about 350 to 450° C., the predetermined time can be from 1 second to 2 minutes. At temperatures from about 200 to 300° C., the predetermined time can be from 1 minute to 24 hours. When a carbon supported PGM catalyst is heated in an oxidizing environment, the platinum group metal catalyst particles serve as oxidation catalyst sites that allow localized corrosion of the micropores in which they reside, resulting in larger pores and improved transport properties. The mild oxidation also preferentially removes some of the less stable amorphous carbon, partially stabilizing the support and thus improving catalyst durability. In a refinement, the average pore diameter of the carbon supported catalyst that is contacted with the oxygen-containing gas is greater than the first average pore diameter and the average surface area of the carbon supported catalyst that is contacted with the oxygen-containing gas is less than the first average surface area.
In another embodiment, the carbon supported catalysts set forth above are used in an ink composition to form fuel cell catalyst layers by methods known to those skilled in fuel cell technology. In a refinement, the ink composition includes the carbon supported catalysts in an amount of about 1 weight percent to 10 weight percent of the total weight of the ink composition. In a refinement, the ink composition includes ionomers (e.g., a perfluorosulfonic acid polymer such as NAFION®) in an amount from about 5 weight percent to about 40 weight percent of the catalyst composition. Typically, the balance of the ink composition is solvent. Useful solvents include, but are not limited to, alcohols (e.g., propanol, ethanol, and methanol), water, or a mixture of water and alcohols. Characteristically, the solvents evaporate at room temperature.
The following examples illustrate the various embodiments of the present invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize many variations that are within the spirit of the present invention and scope of the claims.
FIGS. 3A and 3B provide plots of fuel cell voltage versus current density for variously modified carbon supported catalysts. FIG. 3A compares the fuel cell polarization curves for modified carbon supported catalyst 46, final carbon supported catalyst 48, and final carbon supported catalyst 52 from FIG. 2. FIG. 3B compares the fuel cell polarization curves between catalysts treated before and after the acid leaching step for final carbon supported catalyst 48 compared to final carbon supported catalyst 60 from FIG. 2. Both catalysts final carbon supported catalyst 48 and final carbon supported catalyst 60 gave comparable performance.
FIGS. 4A and 4B provide plots of fuel cell voltage versus the number of cycles for variously modified carbon supported catalysts. FIG. 4A shows the fuel cell performance at 2 A/cm2 under HighP-wet protocol for cathodes with 0.06 mg Pt/cm2 loadings before and after voltage-cycling accelerated stability tests (AST) (0.6-1.0 V) for modified carbon supported catalyst 46, final carbon supported catalyst 48, and final carbon supported catalyst 52 from FIG. 2. FIG. 4B compares shows the fuel cell performance for final carbon supported catalyst 48 compared to final carbon supported catalyst 60 from FIG. 2. All oxidized catalysts showed about 80 mV higher performance compared to the baseline at the beginning of life (BOL). It was found that Catalyst 48 gave best performance at BOL, and that gap maintains throughout the AST, indicating the advantages of the drying and H2 reduction steps.
FIG. 5 is a plot of mass activity versus the number of cycles for 46, 48, and 52. The oxygen reduction activity shown in FIG. 5 confirms the advantages of the drying and H2 reduction steps. FIG. 6 is a plot of oxidation time for various modified carbon supported catalysts. FIG. 6 shows the carbon losses as a function of oxidation time at three different temperatures. Because the reaction was done in excess of reactant oxygen, the linearly proportional of carbon loss to the oxidation time indicates a kinetic-controlled reaction. At higher temperature, less time is needed to achieve the target carbon loss, e.g. the target micropore size. The carbon oxidation kinetic was found to follow the Arrhenius relationship. An activation energy of 121 kJ/mol was determined for this HSC carbon. The carbon oxidation kinetic can be used to estimate the reaction time needed to achieve target carbon loss at a reaction temperature. FIG. 7 is a plot of reaction time versus reaction time for the reaction of carbon supports with oxygen. FIG. 7 also compares the experimental results (circles) to the model (solid line). This data suggests that the temperature can be raised to even further to shorten the reaction time and reduce process cost.
FIGS. 8A-B presents gas adsorption data. FIG. 8A is a plot of the volume per gram of carbon support of adsorbed gas versus pore size while FIG. 8B is a plot of the volume of adsorbed gas versus treatment time of the carbon supported catalyst with oxygen. This is a comparison of a control first catalyst 44 with final catalysts 48 treated for different treatment times with oxygen (48 a, 48 b, and 48 c). The gas adsorption analysis shows that there are small amount of carbon mass and surface area losses. Moreover, increasing micropore size suggests improved local oxygen transport. Table 1 provides a summary of the results:
TABLE 1
Adsorption Properties
BET Carbon Carbon Carbon
surface area surface area wt. loss area loss
Sample (mm2/g) (mm2/gcarbon) (%) (%)
untreated 510 710
48a 501 704 0.8 0.9
48b 488 691 1.5 2.7
48c 452 660 4.2 7.1
While exemplary embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments of the invention.

Claims (19)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for forming a carbon supported catalyst, the method comprising:
a) providing a first carbon supported catalyst having a platinum-group metal supported on a first carbon support, the first carbon support having a first average pore diameter and a first average surface area;
b) contacting the first carbon supported catalyst with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about 450° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst, wherein the first carbon support or the second carbon supported catalyst is acid leached.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first carbon support is acid leached and then contacted with the oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about 300° C. to form the second carbon supported catalyst.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the first carbon supported catalyst is dried prior to being contacted with the oxygen-containing gas.
4. The method of claim 3 further comprising contacting the second carbon supported catalyst with molecular hydrogen.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the first carbon support is contacted with the oxygen-containing gas and then acid leached to form the second carbon supported catalyst.
6. The method of claim 5 further comprising contacting the second carbon supported with molecular hydrogen.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the second carbon supported catalyst includes an altered carbon support having a second average pore diameter and a second average carbon surface area, the second average micropore diameter being greater than the first average micropore diameter and the second average carbon surface area being less than the first average carbon surface area.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein the first average micropore diameter is less than 40 angstroms.
9. The method of claim 7 wherein the second average micropore diameter is greater than 40 angstroms.
10. The carbon supported catalyst of claim 7 wherein the second average carbon surface area is decreased by more than 2% and a second average carbon amount is decreased by more than 1%.
11. The method of claim 7 wherein the first carbon support has a first average pore volume and the altered carbon support has a second average pore volume for pore size in a range of 40-100 angstroms, the second average pore volume being greater than the first average pore volume.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein the platinum-group metal is selected from the group consisting of Pt, Pd, Au, Ru, Ir, Rh, and Os.
13. The method of claim 1 wherein the platinum-group metal is Pt.
14. The method of claim 1 wherein the first carbon support is a carbon powder.
15. A method for forming a carbon supported catalyst, the method comprising:
a) providing a first carbon supported catalyst having a platinum-group metal supported on a first carbon support, the first carbon support having a first average micropore diameter and a first average carbon surface area;
b) contacting the first carbon supported catalyst with an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature less than about 450° C. for a predetermined period of time to form a second carbon supported catalyst;
c) contacting the second carbon supported with molecular hydrogen to form a third carbon supported catalyst; and
d) acid leaching the third carbon supported catalyst to form a fourth carbon supported catalyst having depleted non-noble metal catalyst particles disposed thereon.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein the carbon supported catalyst is dried prior to being contacted with the oxygen-containing gas.
17. The method of claim 15 wherein the second carbon supported catalyst includes an altered carbon support having a second average micropore diameter and a second average carbon surface area, the second average micropore diameter being greater than the first average micropore diameter and the second average carbon surface area being less than the first average carbon surface area.
18. The method of claim 15 wherein the platinum-group metal is selected from the group consisting of Pt, Pd, Au, Ru, Ir, Rh, and Os.
19. The method of claim 15 wherein the platinum-group metal is Pt.
US15/282,080 2016-09-30 2016-09-30 Facile control of pore structure in carbon-supported PGM-based catalysts Active 2036-11-10 US9947935B1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/282,080 US9947935B1 (en) 2016-09-30 2016-09-30 Facile control of pore structure in carbon-supported PGM-based catalysts
DE102017122085.2A DE102017122085B4 (en) 2016-09-30 2017-09-22 Process for forming a carbon-supported catalyst
CN201710863986.9A CN107887617A (en) 2016-09-30 2017-09-22 In the easily-controllable property of carbon load PGM base catalyst central hole structures

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/282,080 US9947935B1 (en) 2016-09-30 2016-09-30 Facile control of pore structure in carbon-supported PGM-based catalysts

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20180097238A1 US20180097238A1 (en) 2018-04-05
US9947935B1 true US9947935B1 (en) 2018-04-17

Family

ID=61623751

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/282,080 Active 2036-11-10 US9947935B1 (en) 2016-09-30 2016-09-30 Facile control of pore structure in carbon-supported PGM-based catalysts

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US9947935B1 (en)
CN (1) CN107887617A (en)
DE (1) DE102017122085B4 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102602407B1 (en) * 2018-04-10 2023-11-14 현대자동차주식회사 The composition for manufacturing electrode of membrane-electrode assembly for fuel cell and method for manufacturing electrode of membrane-electrode assembly for fuel cell using the same
CN110970628B (en) * 2018-09-29 2021-07-16 中国科学院大连化学物理研究所 Nano carbon fiber and metal composite electrode and application thereof
JP7130311B2 (en) * 2019-08-02 2022-09-05 日清紡ホールディングス株式会社 Metal-supported catalysts, battery electrodes and batteries

Citations (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4066699A (en) * 1976-12-27 1978-01-03 Texaco Inc. Process for the hydrogenation of nitrated paraffins using a palladium on carbon catalyst characterized by a low ash and a low halide content
US4122671A (en) * 1962-10-26 1978-10-31 Shell Oil Company Hydrazine decomposition and other reactions
US4185082A (en) * 1975-03-12 1980-01-22 Calgon Corporation Catalytic carbon for oxidation of carbon monoxide in the presence of sulfur dioxide
US4379077A (en) * 1980-10-31 1983-04-05 Diamond Shamrock Corporation Active carbon conditioning process
US4532227A (en) * 1976-12-27 1985-07-30 Texaco Development Corporation Low ash pelleted carbon and process of preparation
US4609636A (en) * 1983-12-22 1986-09-02 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Pd/Re hydrogenation catalyst for making tetrahydrofuran and 1,4-butanediol
US4756898A (en) * 1987-04-30 1988-07-12 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Low density microcellular carbon or catalytically impregnated carbon foams and process for their prepartion
US5061671A (en) * 1985-04-13 1991-10-29 Bp Chemicals Limited Catalyst for the production of alcohols by hydrogenation of carboxylic acids and process for the preparation of the catalyst
US5624547A (en) 1993-09-20 1997-04-29 Texaco Inc. Process for pretreatment of hydrocarbon oil prior to hydrocracking and fluid catalytic cracking
US5876867A (en) * 1996-08-26 1999-03-02 N.E. Chemcat Corporation Platinum skeleton alloy-supported electrocatalyst, electrode using the electrocatalyst, and process for producing the electrocatalyst
US6573212B2 (en) * 2001-04-11 2003-06-03 Meadwestvaco Corporation Method of making shaped activated carbon
US20040248730A1 (en) 2003-06-03 2004-12-09 Korea Institute Of Energy Research Electrocatalyst for fuel cells using support body resistant to carbon monoxide poisoning
US20060073966A1 (en) * 2003-02-13 2006-04-06 Kostantinos Kourtakis Electrocatalysts and processes for producing
US20100099551A1 (en) 2007-01-25 2010-04-22 Nec Corporation Catalyst- supporting carbon nanohorn composite and process for producing same
US20110039184A1 (en) * 2004-11-02 2011-02-17 Samsung Sdi Co., Ltd. Carbon nanosphere with at least one opening, method for preparing the same, carbon nanosphere-impregnated catalyst using the carbon nanosphere, and fuel cell using the catalyst
US20130023406A1 (en) * 2008-05-01 2013-01-24 Monsanto Technology Llc Metal utilization in supported, metal-containing catalysts
US20130085061A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 Uchicago Argonne Llc Bimetallic alloy electrocatalysts with multilayered platinum-skin surfaces
KR20140005723A (en) * 2012-07-06 2014-01-15 울산대학교 산학협력단 Platinum/carbon nanotube catalyst and preparation method thereof
US20140178575A1 (en) * 2011-02-01 2014-06-26 Atsuo IIO Method for producing fine catalyst particles, method for producing carbon-supported fine catalyst particles, method for producing catalyst mix and method for producing electrode

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1698952A (en) * 2004-05-20 2005-11-23 中国石化上海石油化工股份有限公司 Method for preparing supported palladium/carbon catalyst
CN1709571A (en) * 2004-06-18 2005-12-21 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for preparing load type palladium/carbon catalyst

Patent Citations (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4122671A (en) * 1962-10-26 1978-10-31 Shell Oil Company Hydrazine decomposition and other reactions
US4185082A (en) * 1975-03-12 1980-01-22 Calgon Corporation Catalytic carbon for oxidation of carbon monoxide in the presence of sulfur dioxide
US4066699A (en) * 1976-12-27 1978-01-03 Texaco Inc. Process for the hydrogenation of nitrated paraffins using a palladium on carbon catalyst characterized by a low ash and a low halide content
US4532227A (en) * 1976-12-27 1985-07-30 Texaco Development Corporation Low ash pelleted carbon and process of preparation
US4379077A (en) * 1980-10-31 1983-04-05 Diamond Shamrock Corporation Active carbon conditioning process
US4609636A (en) * 1983-12-22 1986-09-02 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Pd/Re hydrogenation catalyst for making tetrahydrofuran and 1,4-butanediol
US5061671A (en) * 1985-04-13 1991-10-29 Bp Chemicals Limited Catalyst for the production of alcohols by hydrogenation of carboxylic acids and process for the preparation of the catalyst
US4756898A (en) * 1987-04-30 1988-07-12 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Low density microcellular carbon or catalytically impregnated carbon foams and process for their prepartion
US5624547A (en) 1993-09-20 1997-04-29 Texaco Inc. Process for pretreatment of hydrocarbon oil prior to hydrocracking and fluid catalytic cracking
US5876867A (en) * 1996-08-26 1999-03-02 N.E. Chemcat Corporation Platinum skeleton alloy-supported electrocatalyst, electrode using the electrocatalyst, and process for producing the electrocatalyst
US6573212B2 (en) * 2001-04-11 2003-06-03 Meadwestvaco Corporation Method of making shaped activated carbon
US20060073966A1 (en) * 2003-02-13 2006-04-06 Kostantinos Kourtakis Electrocatalysts and processes for producing
US20040248730A1 (en) 2003-06-03 2004-12-09 Korea Institute Of Energy Research Electrocatalyst for fuel cells using support body resistant to carbon monoxide poisoning
US20110039184A1 (en) * 2004-11-02 2011-02-17 Samsung Sdi Co., Ltd. Carbon nanosphere with at least one opening, method for preparing the same, carbon nanosphere-impregnated catalyst using the carbon nanosphere, and fuel cell using the catalyst
US20100099551A1 (en) 2007-01-25 2010-04-22 Nec Corporation Catalyst- supporting carbon nanohorn composite and process for producing same
US20130023406A1 (en) * 2008-05-01 2013-01-24 Monsanto Technology Llc Metal utilization in supported, metal-containing catalysts
US20140178575A1 (en) * 2011-02-01 2014-06-26 Atsuo IIO Method for producing fine catalyst particles, method for producing carbon-supported fine catalyst particles, method for producing catalyst mix and method for producing electrode
US20130085061A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 Uchicago Argonne Llc Bimetallic alloy electrocatalysts with multilayered platinum-skin surfaces
KR20140005723A (en) * 2012-07-06 2014-01-15 울산대학교 산학협력단 Platinum/carbon nanotube catalyst and preparation method thereof

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Final Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/815,450, 11 pgs.
Non-final Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/815,450, 6 pgs.
Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 26, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/815,450, 7 pgs.
Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 4, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/815,450, 7 pgs.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20180097238A1 (en) 2018-04-05
DE102017122085B4 (en) 2024-01-18
DE102017122085A1 (en) 2018-04-05
CN107887617A (en) 2018-04-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6387431B2 (en) Carbon supported catalyst
EP2634850B1 (en) Composite, catalyst including the same, fuel cell and lithium air battery including the same
KR20050031017A (en) High concentration carbon impregnated catalyst, method for preparing the same, catalyst electrode using the same and fuel cell having the catalyst electrode
JP2006054165A (en) Polymer fuel electrolyte cell and manufacturing method of polymer electrolyte fuel cell
JP2006260909A (en) Membrane electrode assembly and polymer electrolyte fuel cell using the same
US20150376803A1 (en) Gas Diffusion Electrodes and Methods for Fabricating and Testing Same
US20170033368A1 (en) Oxidative Control of Pore Structure in Carbon-Supported PGM-Based Catalysts
US20170104222A1 (en) Fuel cell catalyst layer, and fuel cell
CN111403756A (en) Novel catalyst layer compositions for improving performance of membrane-assembled electrodes with ionic liquids
US9947935B1 (en) Facile control of pore structure in carbon-supported PGM-based catalysts
JP2009026501A (en) Electrolyte membrane-electrode assembly
US20090068546A1 (en) Particle containing carbon particle, platinum and ruthenium oxide, and method for producing same
US11121379B2 (en) Caged nanoparticle electrocatalyst with high stability and gas transport property
US20110159403A1 (en) Layered Catalyst Assembly and Electrode Assembly Employing the Same
KR20060104821A (en) Catalyst for fuel cell, preparation method thereof, and fuel cell system comprising the same
EP1994590B1 (en) Solid polymer fuel cell and method for producing mea used for solid polymer fuel cell
CN108630955B (en) Method for producing catalyst ink and catalyst composite
US20160104895A1 (en) Templated non-carbon metal oxide catalyst support
US9966609B2 (en) Gas diffusion electrode and process for making same
US20110159400A1 (en) Hybrid Catalyst System and Electrode Assembly Employing the Same
JP2017091639A (en) Catalyst powder for solid polymer fuel cell, manufacturing method thereof, and solid polymer fuel cell arranged by use of catalyst powder
JP2006134629A (en) Electrode structure of solid polymer fuel cell
CN104203408B (en) Film catalyst material for fuel
JP2017076531A (en) Catalyst powder for solid polymer fuel cell, manufacturing method therefor, and solid polymer fuel cell arranged by use of catalyst powder
JP2005222812A (en) Manufacturing method of electrode for fuel cell

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KONGKANAND, ANUSORN;CARPENTER, MICHAEL K.;REEL/FRAME:039912/0945

Effective date: 20160929

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4