US5484464A - Methods and compositions for increasing the benefits of rhizobium inoculation to legume crop productivity - Google Patents
Methods and compositions for increasing the benefits of rhizobium inoculation to legume crop productivity Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US5484464A US5484464A US08/174,335 US17433593A US5484464A US 5484464 A US5484464 A US 5484464A US 17433593 A US17433593 A US 17433593A US 5484464 A US5484464 A US 5484464A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- rhizobium
- bilaii
- legume
- inoculated
- seeds
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 235000021374 legumes Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 90
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 70
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 43
- 241000589180 Rhizobium Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 41
- 238000011081 inoculation Methods 0.000 title description 54
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 title description 5
- 241000228143 Penicillium Species 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 239000002054 inoculum Substances 0.000 claims description 82
- 240000004713 Pisum sativum Species 0.000 claims description 57
- 235000010582 Pisum sativum Nutrition 0.000 claims description 50
- 241000589187 Rhizobium sp. Species 0.000 claims description 35
- 241000589194 Rhizobium leguminosarum Species 0.000 claims description 29
- 239000003415 peat Substances 0.000 claims description 29
- 241000219823 Medicago Species 0.000 claims description 27
- 235000017587 Medicago sativa ssp. sativa Nutrition 0.000 claims description 25
- 241000589196 Sinorhizobium meliloti Species 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 claims description 17
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 241000589174 Bradyrhizobium japonicum Species 0.000 claims description 11
- 244000068988 Glycine max Species 0.000 claims description 9
- 235000010469 Glycine max Nutrition 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 241000219745 Lupinus Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 241000589173 Bradyrhizobium Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000589126 Rhizobium phaseoli Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000219793 Trifolium Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000001332 colony forming effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 244000043158 Lens esculenta Species 0.000 claims 1
- 235000010666 Lens esculenta Nutrition 0.000 claims 1
- 241000219833 Phaseolus Species 0.000 claims 1
- 241000219843 Pisum Species 0.000 claims 1
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 73
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 abstract description 57
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K phosphate Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])([O-])=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 abstract description 55
- 239000010452 phosphate Substances 0.000 abstract description 55
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 abstract description 49
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 abstract description 36
- 230000024121 nodulation Effects 0.000 abstract description 24
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 abstract description 16
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 4
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000011574 phosphorus Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000012272 crop production Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 235000021317 phosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 55
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 55
- 241000589191 Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae Species 0.000 description 54
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 47
- 241000589157 Rhizobiales Species 0.000 description 36
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 29
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 19
- 230000000153 supplemental effect Effects 0.000 description 18
- 239000002686 phosphate fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 14
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 12
- 235000013339 cereals Nutrition 0.000 description 10
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000002538 fungal effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000002426 superphosphate Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000031068 symbiosis, encompassing mutualism through parasitism Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000003337 fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 5
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008635 plant growth Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 5
- AZFKQCNGMSSWDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N MCPA-thioethyl Chemical compound CCSC(=O)COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1C AZFKQCNGMSSWDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004382 potting Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000001954 sterilising effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004659 sterilization and disinfection Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 4
- 235000014647 Lens culinaris subsp culinaris Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 244000046052 Phaseolus vulgaris Species 0.000 description 3
- 235000016815 Pisum sativum var arvense Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 3
- FHVDTGUDJYJELY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 6-{[2-carboxy-4,5-dihydroxy-6-(phosphanyloxy)oxan-3-yl]oxy}-4,5-dihydroxy-3-phosphanyloxane-2-carboxylic acid Chemical compound O1C(C(O)=O)C(P)C(O)C(O)C1OC1C(C(O)=O)OC(OP)C(O)C1O FHVDTGUDJYJELY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 244000215068 Acacia senegal Species 0.000 description 2
- 244000068687 Amelanchier alnifolia Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000009027 Amelanchier alnifolia Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 244000105624 Arachis hypogaea Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000014698 Brassica juncea var multisecta Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000006008 Brassica napus var napus Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 240000000385 Brassica napus var. napus Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000006618 Brassica rapa subsp oleifera Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000004977 Brassica sinapistrum Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- PTFJIKYUEPWBMS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethalfluralin Chemical compound CC(=C)CN(CC)C1=C([N+]([O-])=O)C=C(C(F)(F)F)C=C1[N+]([O-])=O PTFJIKYUEPWBMS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920000084 Gum arabic Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 241000219739 Lens Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000000205 acacia gum Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000010489 acacia gum Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229940072056 alginate Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 235000010443 alginic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229920000615 alginic acid Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- YPHMISFOHDHNIV-FSZOTQKASA-N cycloheximide Chemical compound C1[C@@H](C)C[C@H](C)C(=O)[C@@H]1[C@H](O)CC1CC(=O)NC(=O)C1 YPHMISFOHDHNIV-FSZOTQKASA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004459 forage Substances 0.000 description 2
- WQYVRQLZKVEZGA-UHFFFAOYSA-N hypochlorite Chemical compound Cl[O-] WQYVRQLZKVEZGA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000594 mannitol Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920000609 methyl cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000001923 methylcellulose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000010981 methylcellulose Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229920000136 polysorbate Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003044 randomized block design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002791 soaking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000010777 Arachis hypogaea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000228212 Aspergillus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000193830 Bacillus <bacterium> Species 0.000 description 1
- UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 244000045195 Cicer arietinum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010523 Cicer arietinum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- FBPFZTCFMRRESA-KVTDHHQDSA-N D-Mannitol Chemical compound OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)CO FBPFZTCFMRRESA-KVTDHHQDSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229910004861 K2 HPO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 240000004322 Lens culinaris Species 0.000 description 1
- 229930195725 Mannitol Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010020943 Nitrogenase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000228168 Penicillium sp. Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010627 Phaseolus vulgaris Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium Chemical compound [K] ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M Potassium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[K+] KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 241000589516 Pseudomonas Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000187747 Streptomyces Species 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010042618 Surgical procedure repeated Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000223259 Trichoderma Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000021307 Triticum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000098338 Triticum aestivum Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000219873 Vicia Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002096 Vicia faba var. equina Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003042 antagnostic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004178 biological nitrogen fixation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001110 calcium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001628 calcium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229940041514 candida albicans extract Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000010261 cell growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- IQFVPQOLBLOTPF-HKXUKFGYSA-L congo red Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].C1=CC=CC2=C(N)C(/N=N/C3=CC=C(C=C3)C3=CC=C(C=C3)/N=N/C3=C(C4=CC=CC=C4C(=C3)S([O-])(=O)=O)N)=CC(S([O-])(=O)=O)=C21 IQFVPQOLBLOTPF-HKXUKFGYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 238000003967 crop rotation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910003460 diamond Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010432 diamond Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003467 diminishing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910001873 dinitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000005489 dwarf bean Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000013123 dwarf bean Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010439 graphite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910002804 graphite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000122 growth hormone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009036 growth inhibition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004209 hair Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000004009 herbicide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000012907 honey Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000052637 human pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000010355 mannitol Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011785 micronutrient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013369 micronutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000618 nitrogen fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011824 nuclear material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010899 nucleation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035764 nutrition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000007524 organic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000005985 organic acids Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000020232 peanut Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002367 phosphate rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003013 phosphoric acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000004962 physiological condition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 244000000003 plant pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 229940072033 potash Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- BWHMMNNQKKPAPP-UHFFFAOYSA-L potassium carbonate Substances [K+].[K+].[O-]C([O-])=O BWHMMNNQKKPAPP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 235000015320 potassium carbonate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000001965 potato dextrose agar Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007727 pp-medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010076 replication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000020183 skimmed milk Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000000000 soil microbiome Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000007928 solubilization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005063 solubilization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003381 solubilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012956 testing procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- QORWJWZARLRLPR-UHFFFAOYSA-H tricalcium bis(phosphate) Chemical compound [Ca+2].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O.[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O QORWJWZARLRLPR-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 description 1
- 239000012138 yeast extract Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01C—PLANTING; SOWING; FERTILISING
- A01C1/00—Apparatus, or methods of use thereof, for testing or treating seed, roots, or the like, prior to sowing or planting
- A01C1/06—Coating or dressing seed
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C05—FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
- C05F—ORGANIC FERTILISERS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C05B, C05C, e.g. FERTILISERS FROM WASTE OR REFUSE
- C05F11/00—Other organic fertilisers
- C05F11/08—Organic fertilisers containing added bacterial cultures, mycelia or the like
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S435/00—Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
- Y10S435/8215—Microorganisms
- Y10S435/822—Microorganisms using bacteria or actinomycetales
- Y10S435/878—Rhizobium
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S435/00—Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
- Y10S435/8215—Microorganisms
- Y10S435/911—Microorganisms using fungi
- Y10S435/933—Penicillium
Definitions
- This invention relates to methods and compositions for increasing nodulation, nitrogen fixation, plant growth and productivity in legumes by inoculation of legumes with Rhizobium spp.
- Biological nitrogen fixation is the consequence of a complex and unique symbiosis between Rhizobium bacteria and legume host plants.
- the first stage in this process is the formation of nodules which occurs by the penetration of the host root hairs by rhizobial bacteria, followed by the formation of a rhizobial infection thread which moves into the host plant's root cortex, after which the rhizobial bacteria are encased in specialized plant cells and then undergo rapid multiplication. Subsequently, the rhizobial bacteria become pleomorphic, their nuclear material degenerates and the resulting bacteroids develop the enzyme complexes, particularly nitrogenase, required for nitrogen fixation (Paul, E. A. and F. E.
- the amounts of nitrogen fixed by legume:Rhizobium symbioses are significant and, in agricultural situations, can be used to supplement or replace nitrogen fertilizer applications.
- a typical rate of nitrogen fixation by nodulated alfalfa is up to 250 kg/hectare/year (Atlas, R. M. and R. Bartha, 1981, Microbial Ecology: Fundamentals and Applications, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Reading. pp. 364-365) and up to 450 kg/ha/yr by nodulated soybeans (Peoples, M. B. and E. T. Craswell, 1992, Plant Soil 141: 13-39). Consequently, legume crops have become an integral component of most field crop rotations used in agriculture around the world.
- Rhizobium inoculant carriers are commonly used when planting legume crops to ensure that sufficient rhizobial bacteria are present to establish effective nitrogen-fixing systems.
- Various types of commercial Rhizobium inoculant carriers, compositions and preparations are known including liquids, powders and granules (Thompson, J. A., 1991, IN Report of the Expert Consulation on Legume Inoculant Production and Quality Control (J. A. Thompson, Ed.) Food and Agriculture Association of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 15-32).
- peat is the carrier of choice for the rhizobial inoculant industry (van Elsas, J. D. and C. E. Heijnen, 1990, Biol. Fertil. Soils 10: 127-133). Peat carriers may or may not be sterilized prior to inoculation with rhizobial cells. However, major concerns about the use of non-sterilized peat carriers include potential dissemination of human, animal or plant pathogens (Catroux, G. and No Amarger, 1992, IN Release of Genetically Engineered & Other Micro-organisms (J. C. Fry and M. J. Day) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 1-13).
- Rhizobial titers in contaminated peat-based inoculants are significantly lower than the rhizobial titers in presterilized peat (Date, R. A. and R. J. Roughley, 1977, IN A Treatise on Dinitrogen Fixation (R. W. F. Hardy and A. H. Gibson (Eds.) John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 243-275).
- the reduction of rhizobial titre in unsterilized peat is sometimes due to the presence of contaminating microorganisms which inhibit the growth, or are otherwise antagonistic to the desired rhizobia (Olsen, P. E., W. A. Rice and M. M. Colins submitted to Soil Biol.
- soil microbial populations include a wide variety of bacterial and fungal species, each of which specifically interact with and affect the growth of all the other species by competing for nutrients and through the production of stimulatory or inhibitory compounds (Curl, E. A. and B. Truelove, 1986, The Rhizophere, Springer-Verlag, pp. 140-141).
- two types of interactions occur between soil microorganisms, i.e., growth promotion or growth inhibition. It is clear that these types of interactions are most intense in habitats which contain high levels of nutrients, such as root regions.
- VAM do not dissolve solid native or precipitated phosphates (Harley, J. L. and S. E. Smith, 1983, Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, London. pp. 84-86).
- rhizobial bacteria are weakly competitive within soil microbial populations and, consequently, tend to be negatively affected by the presence of antibiotic-producing microorganisms. It appears that the most common antibiotic-synthesizing microorganisms are most abundant in the root regions of cultivated plants, and generally are species of Penicillium, Streptomyces, Trichoderma, Aspergillus, Bacillus and Pseudomonas (Curl, E. A. and B. Truelove, 1986, The Rhizophere, Springer-Verlag, p. 153-154).
- Penicillium bilaii increases the availability of soluble phosphate for plant uptake by dissolving solid forms of phosphate (Kucey, R. M. N., U.S. Pat. No. 5,026,417 issued Jun. 25, 1991).
- P. bilaii does not penetrate into plant roots but rather, colonizes root surfaces and the immediate rhizosphere.
- This organism is registered under the Canadian Fertilizers Act (Reg. Nos. 900025A, 920064A) as a fertilizer supplement for use to increase phosphate availability to wheat, canola, pea and lentil.
- Kucey Korean (Kucey, R., 1987, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53:2699-2703) found that dual-inoculation of field beans with P.bilaii and R.phaseoli did not have statistically significant effects on phosphate uptake or bean plant dry weights, when grown in autoclaved soil in a greenhouse trial.
- An object of the present invention is to enable legume crops to fix nitrogen at high rates in order to improve crop yields.
- Another object of the invention is to improve the property of Rhizobium spp.. to assist legumes in the fixing of nitrogen for use by the plants.
- Yet another object of the invention is to provide a treatment for legume seeds to enable plants grown from the seeds to fix nitrogen at a high rate.
- Yet another object of the invention is to make insoluble phosphate more readily available for uptake by legume plants while infected with Rhizobium spp. without diminishing the beneficial effects of the Rhizobium spp.
- Still another object of the invention is to provide a method and treatment for increasing nodulation, nitrogen fixation, plant growth and productivity in legumes.
- This invention is based on the discovery of methods of increasing the nodulation, nitrogen fixation, growth and productivity of legume crops by increasing the availability of soluble phosphate for plant uptake by co-inoculating the crops prior to planting with a phosphate-solubilizing soil fungus, Penicillium bilaii , and an appropriate Rhizobium spp.
- one aspect of this invention provides a method for co-inoculating legumes with a phosphate-solubilizing soil fungus and a selected Rhizobium sp.
- This invention is also based on the discovery of a method for reliably and consistently producing unique biological inoculant compositions which are microbially pure and contain high titers of a phosphate-solubilizing soil fungus, i.e., Penicillium bilaii and a selected Rhizobium sp.
- a phosphate-solubilizing soil fungus i.e., Penicillium bilaii and a selected Rhizobium sp.
- another aspect of this invention is the disclosure of methods of preparing microbially pure inoculant compositions containing a selected soil fungus and a selected Rhizobium sp. by inoculating the two cultures into a sterile carrier and then curing the formulated inoculant under defined conditions.
- This invention also relates to inocula prepared according to the method of the present invention and to seeds precoated with the inocula as well as to the inoculation of soil with the inocula.
- Rhizobium spp. refers to all microorganisms present in the genus Rhizobium and in the genus Bradyrhizobium.
- appropriate Rhizobium spp.” we mean a Rhizobium spp. that is appropriate for the particular legume being subjected to the invention.
- Rhizobium spp. appropriate for particular legumes are well known to persons skilled in this art.
- Various suitable rhizobial strains can be obtained from the following sources: (1) The American Type Culture Collection, 12301 Parklawn Drive, Rockeville, Maryland, USA 20852; (2) Dr. W. Rice, Agriculture Canada Research Section, P.O. Box 29, Beaverlodge, Alberta, Canada, TOH OCO; and (3) Yellowstone Valley Chemicals Inc., 2341 1st Avenue North, Billings, Mont., USA 59101.
- Penicillium bilaii refers to all phosphate-solubilizing soil fungal strains belonging to this specific taxonomic classification. Known strains of this microorganism have been previously deposited at the American Type Culture Collection in Rockville, Md., USA under the deposit numbers ATCC 18309, 20851, and 22348. The fungus P. bilaii is also fully described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,026,417 mentioned earlier (the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference). In the Kucey patent and in some scientific publications, Pencillium bilaii is referred to as Penicillium bilaii , but the former term is used throughout this disclosure.
- Penicillium bilaii are commercially available from Philom Bios Inc., 318-111 Research Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada in products sold under the trademarks "PROVIDE” and "PB-50". Further effective strains can be found by following the testing procedures in the Examples of the Kucey patent.
- colony-forming units formed on agar media by microorganisms.
- Co-inoculation of legume seeds with P. bilaii and a rhizobial bacteria and the resulting benefits to the legume:Rhizobium symbiosis are not limited to a particular inoculant carrier type, a particular inoculation process, or to a particular legume:Rhizobium symbiosis but rather, can be accomplished in a variety of ways including first inoculating selected legume seeds with a suspension of P. bilaii spores, allowing the seeds to dry and then inoculating the seeds with a slurry of a peat-based rhizobial inoculant containing an appropriate Rhizobium sp.
- the inoculant can then be applied directly to legume seeds that have previously been inoculated with P. bilaii .
- a liquid rhizobial inoculant can be applied directly to legume seeds which were pre-inoculated with P. bilaii .
- the P. bilaii spores can be mixed with the rhizobial inoculant and water into a slurry which is then applied to the legume seeds.
- a range of 1 ⁇ 10 2 to 1 ⁇ 10 4 cfu of P. bilaii be applied to each legume seed. It is also preferred that legumes with small seeds e.g., alfalfa, receive a range of 1 ⁇ 10 3 to 1 ⁇ 10 5 cfu/seed of the appropriate Rhizobium sp., legumes with medium-sized seeds, e.g. lentils, receive a range of 1 ⁇ 10 4 to 1 ⁇ 10 6 cfu/seed of the appropriate Rhizobium sp., while legumes with large seeds e.g., peas, receive a range of 1 ⁇ 10 5 to 1 ⁇ 10 7 cfu/seed of the appropriate Rhizobium sp.
- Co-inoculated legume seeds are handled and planted in the same manner as legume seeds inoculated only with rhizobial inoculants. We have found that P. bilaii does not affect the number of rhizobial cells coated onto legume seeds during the co-inoculation process.
- co-inoculated legumes When grown under field conditions where phosphate fertilizer applications are required for optimal plant productivity, co-inoculated legumes typically can produce about 200 kg more grain per hectare, i.e., 3 bushels/acre more, than plants inoculated only with the Rhizobium sp.
- Forage legumes typically produce 750 kg/ha, i.e., 670 lbs/ac more hay than plants inoculated only with the Rhizobium sp.
- the present invention discloses methods for preparing microbially pure inoculant compositions containing P. bilaii and a Rhizobium sp.
- the compositions containing P. bilaii and a Rhizobium sp. are defined in this document as “tandem" compositions.
- a "tandem" inoculant composition can be typically prepared as follows.
- Powdered peat with a moisture content range of 6% to 20%, with or without a sticker is packaged in plastic bags and then sterilized in a manner that ensures the complete absence of contaminating microorganisms.
- stickers which can be blended with peat include alginate, graphite, gum arabic and methyl cellulose.
- An example of a suitable sterilization process is exposing the packaged peat to 5.5 megarads of gamma irradiation. Using aseptic technique, a suspension of P.
- bilaii spores is transferred into the sterilized bags of peat such that the final concentration of spores after the composition step is completed is in the range of 1 ⁇ 10 4 to 1 ⁇ 10 7 cfu/g (i.e., Log 4 to Log 7 cfu/g) but preferably 3.3 ⁇ 10 5 cfu/g (i.e., Log 5.52). Then, a suspension of Rhizobium sp.
- Rhizobium cells is added using aseptic technique, to the peat composition so that the titre of Rhizobium cells after the composition step is completed is in the range of 1 ⁇ 10 5 to 1 ⁇ 10 8 cfu/g (i.e., Log 5 to Log 8 cfu/g) but preferably 1.8 ⁇ 10 7 cfu/g (i.e., Log 7.25 cfu/g).
- the total volume of P. bilaii spore suspension and Rhizobium sp. suspension added to each bag is such that the final moisture content of the "tandem" composition will not exceed 50%.
- the preferred moisture content range of the formulated "tandem" inoculant compositions is in the range of 40% to 45%.
- the bags are cured at a temperature range of 20° C. to 30° C. for a period of 14-35 days, depending on the rhizobial strain, prior to storage.
- the target titre for P. bilaii is equal to or greater than 1 ⁇ 10 7 cfu/g (i.e., Log 7.00) while the target titre for Rhizobium cells is equal to or greater than 5 ⁇ 10 8 cfu/g (i.e., Log 8.69 cfu/g).
- the "tandem" inoculant compositions should be cured for up to five weeks before storage.
- the present invention also relates to methods for the use of microbially pure "tandem" inoculant compositions containing P. bilaii and a Rhizobium sp. If a sticker is incorporated into the peat carrier prior to sterilization, the "tandem" inoculant composition can be directly applied to the appropriate legume seeds or, alternatively, the seeds can be dampened prior to the inoculation step. This formulation can also be processed into a slurry and then applied onto seeds. If a sticker is not incorporated into the "tandem" inoculant composition, then the "tandem" inoculant composition can be made into a slurry by adding the composition plus a sticking agent to a volume of water and mixing well before inoculating seeds.
- stickers which can be added to inoculant slurries include alginate, gum arabic, honey, methyl cellulose, skim milk and wallpaper paste.
- Legume seeds inoculated with "tandem" inoculant compositions are handled and planted in the same manner as legume seeds inoculated only with rhizobial inoculants.
- the appropriate amount of each inoculant was added to the seed and mixed vigorously until even coverage of the seed was obtained.
- the inoculants P. bilaii (ATCC Strain No. 20851) and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae (USDA Strain No. 2449) were supplied by Philom Bios Inc., Saskatoon, Canada. Each seed treatment was replicated three times.
- Standard plate count methods were used to enumerate the numbers of colony-forming-units of P. bilaii and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae.
- Five-gram samples of inoculated seed were placed in 50 ml of a 0.1% TWEEN (Trademark) solution, sonicated for 2 minutes, then vortexed for 1 minute.
- TWEEN Trademark
- ten-fold dilutions (10 3 -10 4 ) were prepared using a 0.1% TWEEN solution. Dilution tubes were vortexed between transfers. Two samples from each of the three seed treatment replicates and 2 duplicates from each sample were plated for a total of 12 plates for each treatment dilution.
- the standard potato dextrose agar (PDA-PP) medium used to plate P. bilaii treatments contained precipitated phosphate (5 g K 2 HPO 4 L -1 and CaCl 2 O L -1 ). to aid in the identification of P. bilaii colonies.
- the standard yeast extract mannitol (YEM-CR) medium used to plate R. leguminosarum bv. viceae treatments contained 0.04 g L -1 cycloheximide to inhibit fungal growth and 2.5 ml L -1 congo red (1%) to aid in the identification of R. leguminosarum bv. viceae colonies. Dilutions of the P. bilaii plus R. leguminosarum bv. viceae treatment were plated on both PDA-PP and YEM-CR media to obtain separate counts of P. bilaii and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae, respectively.
- Colonies of P. bilaii were counted after PDA-PP plates were incubated at room temperature (22° C.) for 6 to 7 days, while colonies of R. leguminosarum bv. viceae were counted after YEM-CR plates were incubated at 30° C. for 4 to 5 days. Analysis of variance and LSD values for the data were calculated. The remainder of the inoculated seed was stored at room temperature (22° C.) for 1 week, and the entire procedure repeated. The data are reported in Tables 2 and 3.
- Co-inoculation of pea seed with P. bilaii and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae did not affect the population of P. bilaii on pea seed when compared to inoculation with P. bilaii alone at time 0 or 1 week after inoculation (Table 2).
- Co-inoculation of pea seed with P. bilaii and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae did not affect the population of R. leguminosarum bv. viceae on pea seed when compared to inoculation with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae alone at time 0 or 1 week after inoculation (Table 3).
- the population of R. leguminosarum bv. viceae on pea seed, inoculated with or without P. bilaii decreased after seed was stored for 1 week at room temperature.
- bilaii treatment segments were placed on PDA-PP medium and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae treatment segments were placed on YEM-CR medium.
- Medium compositions were as described in Example 1. Twenty tubes of the P. bilaii plus R. leguminosarum bv. viceae treatment were planted to allow 10 roots to be plated on PDAPP medium for p. bilaii counts, and 10 on YEM-CR medium for R. leguminosarum bv. viceae counts.
- PDA-PP plates were incubated for 6 to 7 days at room temperature (22° C.), and YEM-CR plates were incubated at 30° C. for 4 to 5 days.
- Rhizosphere colonization by P. bilaii was not affected by storing inoculated seed for 1 week at room temperature.
- Co-inoculation of pea seed with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae resulted in 95 to 97% colonization of pea root rhizosphere by R. leguminosarum bv. viceae, when inoculated singly or in combination with P. bilaii at time zero (Table 5).
- Rhizosphere colonization by R. leguminosarum bv. viceae declined after inoculated seed was stored for one week at room temperature, but still was not affected by co-inoculation with P. bilaii .
- a growth-chamber study was conducted with field pea (Pisum sativum cv "Trapper") to assess the effects of 4 inoculant treatments i.e., uninoculated control, P. bilaii , R. leguminosarum bv. viceae, and co-inoculated P. bilaii and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae, on nodulation, nitrogen fixation, phosphate assimilation and plant growth.
- the P. bilaii strain was ATCC Strain No. 20851 in all cases.
- the effects of supplemental phosphate on the inoculant performance were assessed by planting inoculated seed in soils containing 2 phosphate fertilizer treatments i.e., unfertilized control and 10 mg phosphate/kg -1 soil.
- the growth chamber conditions were set to simulate average temperature and light level increases which occur during outdoor conditions in central Saskatchewan for the months of mid-May through mid-July.
- a dawn-dusk feature brought the lighting system to full-on or full-off positions gradually.
- Maximum light intensity of 425 W m -2 was reached by midday.
- Initial photoperiod was 17 hours of light, followed by 18 hours, and finishing again at 17 hours of light by the end of the experiment.
- minimum (night) and maximum (day) temperatures were 5° C. and 17.2° C., respectively.
- the minimum and maximum temperatures were gradually increased to 16° C. and 21° C., respectively, by the end of the experiment.
- Roots were gently teased apart in a shallow tray of water and nodulation per plant was rated using a 1 to 10 scale.
- the rating scale for inactive nodules was as follows: 1, no nodules; 2, fewer than 25 inactive nodules; and 3, greater than 25 inactive nodules. Pink to red colored nodules were considered active.
- the rating scale for active nodules was as follows: 4, less than 50 active nodules; 5, 50 to 99 active nodules; 6, 100 to 149 active nodules; 7, 150 to 199 active nodules; 8, 200 to 249 active nodules; 9, 250 to 299 active nodules; and 10, greater than 300 active nodules.
- the roots were then dried, weighed, and ground.
- the research sites selected generally had low levels of soil phosphate and nitrogen, and had never been cropped with pea or lentil.
- basal treatments of nitrogen, potassium, or sulfur were broadcast at each field site according to soil test recommendations to ensure adequate nutrient supply and to highlight crop response to phosphate.
- Ethalfluralin was applied at each field site for weed control, by cross-incorporation to a depth of 8 cm with a tandem disc followed with diamond tooth harrows.
- the research trials were arranged in a split-plot experimental design with 5 replications.
- Four seed inoculant sub-plot treatments i.e., uninoculated control, P. bilaii (ATCC No. 20851), R. leguminosarum bv. viceae, co-inoculated P. bilaii plus R. leguminosarum by. viceae, were imposed over 2 phosphate fertilizer mainplot regimes i.e., 0 and 20 kg phosphate ha -1 applied as seed-placed triple-super-phosphate (0-45-0).
- the trials were seeded with a small-plot double disc seed drill specially constructed to minimize contamination between seed inoculant treatments.
- Pea seed was planted at depths ranging from 2.5 to 5.0 cm, depending upon soil moisture at each location. Each plot consisted of 6 treatment rows 15-cm apart bordered by 2 guard rows of triazine-tolerant canola to eliminate edge effects. Each trial was bordered by untreated plots of pea, also to eliminate edge effects. The trials were sprayed during the growing season with foliar herbicides or hand weeded as necessary to remove weeds not eliminated by the ethalfluralin.
- each plot Prior to harvesting, the ends of each plot were trimmed to remove edge effects. The remainder of each plot was then harvested with a small plot combine to measure grain yield. Harvested grain was cleaned, weighed, and the percent moisture of each sample measured. Grain yields adjusted for a constant 16.0% seed moisture were calculated and used in the data analysis.
- plots planted with co-inoculated pea produced 6.6% more grain than plots planted with pea inoculated only with R. leguminosarum by. viceae.
- This yield increase is equivalent to 3 bu/ac more produced by the co-inoculated pea compared to those inoculated only with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae.
- meliloti NRG-185 were imposed over 2 phosphate fertilizer mainplot regimes i.e., 0 and 10 kg ha l , applied as seed-placed triple-super-phosphate (0-45-0).
- the treatment rows were 20 feet long and were arranged in a complete-randomized-block design. Each treatment was replicated 6 times.
- Microbially pure peat-based inoculants containing P. bilaii (Strain ATCC 20851) and R. meliloti strain NRG-34 were prepared as follows. Powdered peat (6% moisture content) packaged in heat-sealed plastic bags (28 g/bag) was sterilized by gamma irradiation at a dosage rate of 5.5 mega-rads. R. meliloti strain NRG-34 was grown for 48 h at 30° C. in a 4-L fermenter containing yeast-extract-mannitol broth. P. bilaii was grown for 72 h at 30° C. in a 100-ml erlenmeyer flask containing potato-dexrose broth.
- the number of colony-forming-units of R. meliloti and P. bilaii per gram of inoculant were determining by plate counts after 10, 165 and 260 days of storage.
- the ability of the rhizobial strain to form nodules was confirmed with a nodulation assay using alfalfa seeds to determine the "most-probable-number" (MPN) of rhizobia per gram of inoculant based on the number of nodules formed on alfalfa roots.
- MPN most-probable-number
- a microbially pure peat-based "tandem" composition containing P. bilaii (Strain ATCC 20851) and Bradyrhizobium japonicum was prepared as disclosed in Example 6 with the following changes. Fifty three grams of powdered peat were dispensed into the plastic bags prior to sterilization by gamma irradiation. The total volume of P. bilaii plus B. japonicum added to each bag was 27 ml. P. bilaii was added at a rate of 3.3 ⁇ 10 5 cfu/g (i.e., Log 5.52 cfu/g) while B.
- joponicum was added at a rate of 1.8 ⁇ 10 7 cfu/g (i.e., Log 7.25 cfu/g).
- the bags were cured at 30° C. for 21 days.
- the viability of each organism inoculated into the bags was determined with the plate count assay 7, 14, and 21 days after inoculation.
- the target titre after curing for P. bilaii was 1 ⁇ 10 7 cfu/g (i.e., Log 7.00) and for B. japonicum was 5 ⁇ 10 8 cfu/g (i.e., Log 8.69 cfu/g).
- the data in Table 12 demonstrates that the titre of both organisms at the end of the curing period exceeded the targets.
- the soybean "tandem" composition was assessed for the nodulation and root colonization performance by B. japonicum and P. bilaii respectively.
- dampened soybean seeds were inoculated with the composition and then planted in 50-ml tubes containing pre-moistened growing mix (1 seed/tube). The tubes were placed on a growth table and the plants harvested 3 weeks after emergence. Intact root systems were removed from each tube, excess potting mix gently shaken off, and checked for the presence of nodules. Root colonization by P. bilaii was determined as disclosed in Example 2. The data in Table 13 indicate that all test soybean plants were nodulated and that 91% of the roots were colonized by P. bilaii .
- a microbially pure peat-based "tandem" composition containing P. bilaii (Strain ATCC 20851) and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae was prepared as disclosed in Example 8 with the following changes. Fifty three grams of powdered peat were dispensed into the plastic bags prior to sterilization by gamma irradiation. The total volume of P. bilaii plus R. leguminosarum bv. viceae added to each bag was 27 ml. P. bilaii was added at a rate of 3.3 ⁇ 10 5 cfu/g (i.e., Log 5.52 cfu/g) while R.
- leguminosarum was added at a rate of 1.8 ⁇ 10 7 cfu/g (i.e., Log 7.25 cfu/g).
- the bags were cured at 30° C. for 21 days and then stored at room temperature i.e., 22° C.
- the viability of each organism inoculated into the bags was determined with the plate count assay after the curing period was completed and then after 1 month and 3 months of storage.
- the target titre after curing for P. bilaii was 1 ⁇ 10 7 cfu/g (i.e., Log 7.00) and for R. leguminosarum bv. viceae was 5 ⁇ 10 8 cfu/g (i.e., Log 8.69 cfu/g).
- Table 14 demonstrates that the titre of both organisms at the end of the curing period exceeded the targets, and were maintained during the 3-month storage period.
- the pea "tandem" composition was assessed for the nodulation and root colonization performance by R. leguminosarum bv. viceae and P. bilaii respectively.
- dampened pea seeds were inoculated with the composition and then planted in 50-ml tubes containing pre-moistened growing mix (1 seed/tube).
- the tubes were placed on a growth table and the plants harvested 3 weeks after emergence.
- Intact root systems were removed from each tube, excess potting mix gently shaken off, and checked for the presence of nodules.
- Root colonization by P. bilaii was determined as disclosed in Example 2. The data presented in Table 15 indicate that all pea roots were nodulated and that 91% of the roots were colonized by P. bilaii .
- Hay production data was generated by harvesting each treatment row twice during the 1993 growing season (June and September), determining the dry weight of hay produced/row, and then extrapolating the data to estimate hay production/hectare.
- the hay production data for treatments in the year after the trials were planted, are presented in Table 16.
Abstract
Methods and compositions for increasing the availability of soluble phosphate and fixed nitrogen for legume:Rhizobium symbioses involving co-inoculating legume seeds with a phosphate-solubilizing soil fungus, Penicillium bilaii, and Rhizobium spp. prior to planting. The two types of microorganisms do not appear to compete for nutrients in the rhizosphere of legumes and the P. bilaii provides a source of available phosphorus for use by the plant without adversely affecting the nitrogen fixation ability of the Rhizobium spp.; and indeed such ability is enhanced. The invention is used to increase the efficiencies of nodulation, nitrogen fixation and legume crop production.
Description
I. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to methods and compositions for increasing nodulation, nitrogen fixation, plant growth and productivity in legumes by inoculation of legumes with Rhizobium spp.
II. Description of the Prior Art
Biological nitrogen fixation is the consequence of a complex and unique symbiosis between Rhizobium bacteria and legume host plants. The first stage in this process is the formation of nodules which occurs by the penetration of the host root hairs by rhizobial bacteria, followed by the formation of a rhizobial infection thread which moves into the host plant's root cortex, after which the rhizobial bacteria are encased in specialized plant cells and then undergo rapid multiplication. Subsequently, the rhizobial bacteria become pleomorphic, their nuclear material degenerates and the resulting bacteroids develop the enzyme complexes, particularly nitrogenase, required for nitrogen fixation (Paul, E. A. and F. E. Clark, 1989, Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press Inc. San Diego. pp. 182-192). The environmental, nutritional and physiological conditions required for rhizobial cell growth and the successful establishment of efficient nitrogen-fixing symbioses are known (Trinick, M. J., 1982, IN W. J. Broughton (Ed.), Nitrogen Fixation Vol. 2, Clarendon Press, Oxford. pp. 76-146).
The amounts of nitrogen fixed by legume:Rhizobium symbioses are significant and, in agricultural situations, can be used to supplement or replace nitrogen fertilizer applications. For example, a typical rate of nitrogen fixation by nodulated alfalfa is up to 250 kg/hectare/year (Atlas, R. M. and R. Bartha, 1981, Microbial Ecology: Fundamentals and Applications, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Reading. pp. 364-365) and up to 450 kg/ha/yr by nodulated soybeans (Peoples, M. B. and E. T. Craswell, 1992, Plant Soil 141: 13-39). Consequently, legume crops have become an integral component of most field crop rotations used in agriculture around the world.
Commercial inoculant compositions are commonly used when planting legume crops to ensure that sufficient rhizobial bacteria are present to establish effective nitrogen-fixing systems. Various types of commercial Rhizobium inoculant carriers, compositions and preparations are known including liquids, powders and granules (Thompson, J. A., 1991, IN Report of the Expert Consulation on Legume Inoculant Production and Quality Control (J. A. Thompson, Ed.) Food and Agriculture Association of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 15-32).
It appears that peat is the carrier of choice for the rhizobial inoculant industry (van Elsas, J. D. and C. E. Heijnen, 1990, Biol. Fertil. Soils 10: 127-133). Peat carriers may or may not be sterilized prior to inoculation with rhizobial cells. However, major concerns about the use of non-sterilized peat carriers include potential dissemination of human, animal or plant pathogens (Catroux, G. and No Amarger, 1992, IN Release of Genetically Engineered & Other Micro-organisms (J. C. Fry and M. J. Day) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 1-13). It is known that the highest quality, the most stable and most efficacious rhizobial inoculants are manufactured in sterile carriers and are microbially pure (Day, J. M., 1991, IN Report of the Expert Consulation on Legume Inoculant Production and Quality control (J.A. Thompson, Ed.) Food and Agriculture Association of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 75-85). For these reasons, numerous international regulatory agencies are imposing strict limits on the presence, or the number, of contaminating microorganisms that can be tolerated in commercial rhizobial inoculants (Day, J. M., 1991, IN Report of the Expert Consulation on Legume Inoculant Production and Quality Control (J.A. Thompson, Ed.) Food and Agriculture Association of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 75-85).
Rhizobial titers in contaminated peat-based inoculants are significantly lower than the rhizobial titers in presterilized peat (Date, R. A. and R. J. Roughley, 1977, IN A Treatise on Dinitrogen Fixation (R. W. F. Hardy and A. H. Gibson (Eds.) John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 243-275). The reduction of rhizobial titre in unsterilized peat is sometimes due to the presence of contaminating microorganisms which inhibit the growth, or are otherwise antagonistic to the desired rhizobia (Olsen, P. E., W. A. Rice and M. M. Colins submitted to Soil Biol. Biochem. for publication). In particular, fungal contamination of peat can be a primary factor in reducing the quality and stability of rhizobial inoculants, and the impairing of their nodulation performance (Day, J. M., 1991, IN Report of the Expert Consulation on Legume Inoculant Production and Quality Control (J. A. Thompson, Ed.) Food and Agriculture Association of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 75-85; Sparrow, Jr., S. D. and G. E. Ham, 1983, Agron. J. 75:181-184). Consequently, some commercial rhizobial inoculant production processes have the objectives of eliminating all microbial contamination, including the presence of fungal organisms, from the inoculant carrier substrates prior to inoculation with rhizobial cultures, and then maintaining microbial purity until these products are used to inoculate legume seeds just prior to planting (Day, J. M., 1991, IN Report of the Expert Consulation on Legume Inoculant Production and Quality Control (J. A. Thompson, Ed.) Food and Agriculture Association of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 75-85).
It is known that optimal rhizobial culture performance, and optimal nodulation and nitrogen-fixation processes in legume:Rhizobium symbioses require significant energy expenditures and benefit considerably from supplemental phosphate inputs (Beck, D. P. and D. N. Munns, 1984, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47:278-282; Israel, D. W., 1987, Plant Physiol. 84: 835-840). Optimizing the phosphate nutrition of legume crops, i.e. increasing the availability of soluble phosphate for plant uptake, will maximize nitrogen fixation and productivity of legume crops (Adu-Gyamfi, J. J., K. Fujita and S. Ogata, 1989, Plant Soil 119: 315-324; Griffeth, W. K., 1986, IN Phosphorus for Agriculture; A Situation Analysis. Potash & Phosphate Institute, Atlanta. pp. 57-62; Keyser, H. H. and F. Li., 1992, Plant Soil 141: 119-135).
It is known that soil microbial populations include a wide variety of bacterial and fungal species, each of which specifically interact with and affect the growth of all the other species by competing for nutrients and through the production of stimulatory or inhibitory compounds (Curl, E. A. and B. Truelove, 1986, The Rhizophere, Springer-Verlag, pp. 140-141). Generally, two types of interactions occur between soil microorganisms, i.e., growth promotion or growth inhibition. It is clear that these types of interactions are most intense in habitats which contain high levels of nutrients, such as root regions.
It is known that some soil bacteria, primarily Gramnegative strains, are capable of stimulating nodulation by rhizobial bacteria, and are referred to as "nodulation-promoting rhizobacteria" (Polonenko, D. R., J. W. Kloepper and F. M. Scher, European patent application Serial No. 863093498 published July 1st, 1987 under publication no. 0 227 336 A1). However, the mechanisms by which nodulation-promoting rhizobacteria stimulate nodulation have not been discovered.
It is also known that a variety of soil microorganisms are capable of increasing the availability of phosphate for plant uptake (Kucey, R. M. N., H. H. Janzen and M. E. Leggett, 1989, Adv. Agron. 42: 199-228). Several studies have assessed the beneficial effects of "phospho-bacteria" on nodulation and nitrogen fixation in beans (Grimes, H. D. and M. S. Mount, 1984, Soil Biol. Biochem. 16: 27-30) and chickpea (Alagawadi, A. R. and A. C. Gaur, 1988, Plant Soil 105:241-246). In these studies, however, it has not been determined whether the benefits are due to increased phosphate availability or to microbial production of plant growth hormones (Alagawadi, A. R. and A. C. Gaur, 1988, Plant Soil 105:241-246; Grimes, H. D. and M.S. Mount, 1984, Soil Biol. Biochem. 16: 27-30). Furthermore, Badr El-Din et. al. (Badr El-Din, S. M. S., M. A. Khalafallah, and H. Moawad, 1986, Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenk. 149:130-135) found that dual inoculation of "phospho-bacteria" and Rhizobium japonicum (also known as Bradyrhizobium japonicum) had no effect on nodule dry weight or nitrogen uptake of soybeans in a field experiment.
A unique sub-group of soil fungi which establish symbiotic relationships with plants by penetrating the roots and then forming specialized fungal structures within the host plant root systems, i.e. vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae (VAM), can also significantly improve nodulation and nitrogen fixation by increasing phosphate availability to mycorrhizal legumes (Barea, J. M. and C. Azcon-Aguilar, 1983, Adv. Agron. 36:1-54). VAM absorb soluble phosphate from the soil solution into their mycelia, and then translocate the phosphate to within the plant roots (Harley, J. L. and S. E. Smith, 1983, Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, London. pp. 78-84). VAM do not dissolve solid native or precipitated phosphates (Harley, J. L. and S. E. Smith, 1983, Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, London. pp. 84-86).
On the other hand, rhizobial bacteria are weakly competitive within soil microbial populations and, consequently, tend to be negatively affected by the presence of antibiotic-producing microorganisms. It appears that the most common antibiotic-synthesizing microorganisms are most abundant in the root regions of cultivated plants, and generally are species of Penicillium, Streptomyces, Trichoderma, Aspergillus, Bacillus and Pseudomonas (Curl, E. A. and B. Truelove, 1986, The Rhizophere, Springer-Verlag, p. 153-154). A study with a forage legume demonstrated that certain antibiotic-producing fungi species, particularly in the genus Penicillium, inhibited the activity of rhizobial bacteria and the formation of nodules (Holland, A. A. and C. A. Parker, 1966, Plant Soil 25: 329-340). Furthermore, a study with a grain legume found that a Penicillium sp. significantly reduced nitrogen fixation (Downey, J. and C. van Kessel, 1990, Biol. Fertil. Soils 10:194-196). They hypothesized that the Penicillium produced organic acids which acidified the rhizosphere and thus interfered with the rhizobial performance.
It has been clearly demonstrated that the soil fungus Penicillium bilaii increases the availability of soluble phosphate for plant uptake by dissolving solid forms of phosphate (Kucey, R. M. N., U.S. Pat. No. 5,026,417 issued Jun. 25, 1991). P. bilaii does not penetrate into plant roots but rather, colonizes root surfaces and the immediate rhizosphere. This organism is registered under the Canadian Fertilizers Act (Reg. Nos. 900025A, 920064A) as a fertilizer supplement for use to increase phosphate availability to wheat, canola, pea and lentil. Kucey (Kucey, R., 1987, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53:2699-2703) found that dual-inoculation of field beans with P.bilaii and R.phaseoli did not have statistically significant effects on phosphate uptake or bean plant dry weights, when grown in autoclaved soil in a greenhouse trial.
Moreover, Downey and van Kessel (Downey, J. and C. van Kessel, 1990, Biol. Fertil. Soils 10:90-194-196) demonstrated that in greenhouse trials, nitrogen fixation and assimilation were significantly reduced in pea plants that were "dual-inoculated" with P. bilaii and Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae when compared to peas inoculated with R. leguminsarum bv. viceae alone.
An object of the present invention is to enable legume crops to fix nitrogen at high rates in order to improve crop yields.
Another object of the invention is to improve the property of Rhizobium spp.. to assist legumes in the fixing of nitrogen for use by the plants.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide a treatment for legume seeds to enable plants grown from the seeds to fix nitrogen at a high rate.
Yet another object of the invention is to make insoluble phosphate more readily available for uptake by legume plants while infected with Rhizobium spp. without diminishing the beneficial effects of the Rhizobium spp.
Still another object of the invention is to provide a method and treatment for increasing nodulation, nitrogen fixation, plant growth and productivity in legumes.
This invention is based on the discovery of methods of increasing the nodulation, nitrogen fixation, growth and productivity of legume crops by increasing the availability of soluble phosphate for plant uptake by co-inoculating the crops prior to planting with a phosphate-solubilizing soil fungus, Penicillium bilaii , and an appropriate Rhizobium spp.
Thus, one aspect of this invention provides a method for co-inoculating legumes with a phosphate-solubilizing soil fungus and a selected Rhizobium sp.
This invention is also based on the discovery of a method for reliably and consistently producing unique biological inoculant compositions which are microbially pure and contain high titers of a phosphate-solubilizing soil fungus, i.e., Penicillium bilaii and a selected Rhizobium sp.
Thus, another aspect of this invention is the disclosure of methods of preparing microbially pure inoculant compositions containing a selected soil fungus and a selected Rhizobium sp. by inoculating the two cultures into a sterile carrier and then curing the formulated inoculant under defined conditions.
This invention also relates to inocula prepared according to the method of the present invention and to seeds precoated with the inocula as well as to the inoculation of soil with the inocula.
As used herein, the term "Rhizobium spp." refers to all microorganisms present in the genus Rhizobium and in the genus Bradyrhizobium. By the term "appropriate Rhizobium spp." we mean a Rhizobium spp. that is appropriate for the particular legume being subjected to the invention. Rhizobium spp. appropriate for particular legumes are well known to persons skilled in this art. Various suitable rhizobial strains can be obtained from the following sources: (1) The American Type Culture Collection, 12301 Parklawn Drive, Rockeville, Maryland, USA 20852; (2) Dr. W. Rice, Agriculture Canada Research Section, P.O. Box 29, Beaverlodge, Alberta, Canada, TOH OCO; and (3) Yellowstone Valley Chemicals Inc., 2341 1st Avenue North, Billings, Mont., USA 59101.
As used herein, the term "Penicillium bilaii " refers to all phosphate-solubilizing soil fungal strains belonging to this specific taxonomic classification. Known strains of this microorganism have been previously deposited at the American Type Culture Collection in Rockville, Md., USA under the deposit numbers ATCC 18309, 20851, and 22348. The fungus P. bilaii is also fully described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,026,417 mentioned earlier (the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference). In the Kucey patent and in some scientific publications, Pencillium bilaii is referred to as Penicillium bilaii , but the former term is used throughout this disclosure. Suitable strains of Penicillium bilaii are commercially available from Philom Bios Inc., 318-111 Research Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada in products sold under the trademarks "PROVIDE" and "PB-50". Further effective strains can be found by following the testing procedures in the Examples of the Kucey patent.
As used herein, the term "cfu" refers to colony-forming units formed on agar media by microorganisms.
Despite the conclusions by Downey and van Kessel referred to earlier, we have surprisingly discovered that co-inoculating legume seeds with a phosphate-solubilizing soil fungus, Penicillium bilaii , and an appropriate Rhizobium sp. enhances the nodulation and nitrogen assimilation processes in the co-inoculated legume plants compared to uninoculated legumes or legumes inoculated only with the Rhizobium sp., and that the co-inoculation also increases legume crop productivities.
The nodulation and nitrogen fixation processes in legume:Rhizobium symbioses require substantial energy expenditures by the plant host and, therefore, considerable soluble phosphate is required to ensure that these processes proceed at optimal rates. Since P. bilaii has the properties of solubilizing insoluble phosphate from native and applied solid forms, e.g. precipitated calcium phosphate, rock phosphate, and various types of phosphate fertilizers, the essence of the present invention relates to increased availability of soluble phosphate and fixed nitrogen to legume:Rhizobium symbioses as a consequence of P. bilaii activity, such that the rhizobial benefits to legume nitrogen fixation, plant growth and productivity are maximized.
Co-inoculation of legume seeds with P. bilaii and a rhizobial bacteria and the resulting benefits to the legume:Rhizobium symbiosis are not limited to a particular inoculant carrier type, a particular inoculation process, or to a particular legume:Rhizobium symbiosis but rather, can be accomplished in a variety of ways including first inoculating selected legume seeds with a suspension of P. bilaii spores, allowing the seeds to dry and then inoculating the seeds with a slurry of a peat-based rhizobial inoculant containing an appropriate Rhizobium sp.
Alternatively, if the peat-based rhizobial inoculant contains a sticking agent, the inoculant can then be applied directly to legume seeds that have previously been inoculated with P. bilaii . A liquid rhizobial inoculant can be applied directly to legume seeds which were pre-inoculated with P. bilaii . In addition, the P. bilaii spores can be mixed with the rhizobial inoculant and water into a slurry which is then applied to the legume seeds.
It is preferred that a range of 1×102 to 1×104 cfu of P. bilaii be applied to each legume seed. It is also preferred that legumes with small seeds e.g., alfalfa, receive a range of 1×103 to 1×105 cfu/seed of the appropriate Rhizobium sp., legumes with medium-sized seeds, e.g. lentils, receive a range of 1×104 to 1×106 cfu/seed of the appropriate Rhizobium sp., while legumes with large seeds e.g., peas, receive a range of 1×105 to 1×107 cfu/seed of the appropriate Rhizobium sp. Co-inoculated legume seeds are handled and planted in the same manner as legume seeds inoculated only with rhizobial inoculants. We have found that P. bilaii does not affect the number of rhizobial cells coated onto legume seeds during the co-inoculation process.
Examples of legume seeds that can be co-inoculated with P. bilaii plus the appropriate Rhizobium sp. are listed in Table 1 below.
TABLE 1
______________________________________
Legume inoculation groups
Plant Host
Common Name
Scientific Name
Rhizobium Spp.
______________________________________
Alfalfas Medicago spp.
Rhizobium meliloti
Clovers Trifolium spp.
Rhizobium trifolii
Peas Pisum spp. Rhizobium leguminosarum
Lentils Lens culinaris
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Beans Phaseolus spp.
Rhizobium phaseoli
Soybeans Glycine max Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Vetches Vicea spp. Rhizobium leguminosarum
Lupines Lupinus spp. Rhizobium lupinus
______________________________________
It should be noted, however, that the process of the invention described herein is not restricted to the legume crops listed in Table 1 but rather, is applicable to any legume:Rhizobium symbiosis resulting from the deliberate coating of a legume seed with the appropriate Rhizobium sp. prior to planting (e.g., peanuts, i.e., Arachis hypogaea, inoculated with a "cowpea-type" Rhizobium spp.).
Surprisingly, we have found that neither P. bilaii nor Rhizobium spp. interfere with each other's viability or performance on various legume seeds. Typically, all co-inoculated legumes form nodules and more than 90% of their roots are colonized by P. bilaii . Furthermore, the nodule ratings of co-inoculated legumes are considerably higher than those of plants inoculated only with a Rhizobium sp. Co-inoculation of legumes with the two organisms typically increases the dry weights of nodules formed up to 100% more than the dry weights of nodules formed by legumes inoculated only with the Rhizobium spp. We also found that co-inoculated legumes fix and assimilate significantly more nitrogen compared to legumes inoculated only with a Rhizobium sp.
When grown under field conditions where phosphate fertilizer applications are required for optimal plant productivity, co-inoculated legumes typically can produce about 200 kg more grain per hectare, i.e., 3 bushels/acre more, than plants inoculated only with the Rhizobium sp. Forage legumes typically produce 750 kg/ha, i.e., 670 lbs/ac more hay than plants inoculated only with the Rhizobium sp.
It has been found that supplementing co-inoculated legume seeds with commercial phosphate fertilizers ensures a source of solid phosphate for solubilization by P. bilaii and, consequently, consistently increases legume crop productivity in soils where supplemental phosphate applications are recommended by the results of soil testing. Alternatively, if the soil test results indicate that supplemental phosphate applications are not required, co-inoculating legume seeds with P. bilaii and the appropriate Rhizobium sp. will ensure that adequate levels of soluble phosphate are available for legume plant uptake throughout the growing season.
We have also surprisingly found that microbially pure inoculant compositions containing both P. bilaii and a single strain of Rhizobium sp. can be prepared and stored for extended periods of time without adversely affecting the viability, stability and performance of either organism, or without affecting the quality of the inoculant composition.
The present invention discloses methods for preparing microbially pure inoculant compositions containing P. bilaii and a Rhizobium sp. For clarity, the compositions containing P. bilaii and a Rhizobium sp. are defined in this document as "tandem" compositions. A "tandem" inoculant composition can be typically prepared as follows.
Powdered peat with a moisture content range of 6% to 20%, with or without a sticker, is packaged in plastic bags and then sterilized in a manner that ensures the complete absence of contaminating microorganisms. Examples of stickers which can be blended with peat include alginate, graphite, gum arabic and methyl cellulose. An example of a suitable sterilization process is exposing the packaged peat to 5.5 megarads of gamma irradiation. Using aseptic technique, a suspension of P. bilaii spores is transferred into the sterilized bags of peat such that the final concentration of spores after the composition step is completed is in the range of 1×104 to 1×107 cfu/g (i.e., Log 4 to Log 7 cfu/g) but preferably 3.3×105 cfu/g (i.e., Log 5.52). Then, a suspension of Rhizobium sp. cells is added using aseptic technique, to the peat composition so that the titre of Rhizobium cells after the composition step is completed is in the range of 1×105 to 1×108 cfu/g (i.e., Log 5 to Log 8 cfu/g) but preferably 1.8×107 cfu/g (i.e., Log 7.25 cfu/g). The total volume of P. bilaii spore suspension and Rhizobium sp. suspension added to each bag is such that the final moisture content of the "tandem" composition will not exceed 50%. The preferred moisture content range of the formulated "tandem" inoculant compositions is in the range of 40% to 45%.
After the two microbial suspensions are well-mixed with the peat carrier by massaging the bags, the bags are cured at a temperature range of 20° C. to 30° C. for a period of 14-35 days, depending on the rhizobial strain, prior to storage. After the "tandem" composition is cured, the target titre for P. bilaii is equal to or greater than 1×107 cfu/g (i.e., Log 7.00) while the target titre for Rhizobium cells is equal to or greater than 5×108 cfu/g (i.e., Log 8.69 cfu/g). For slower-growing Rhizobium or Bradyrhizobium strains, the "tandem" inoculant compositions should be cured for up to five weeks before storage.
The present invention also relates to methods for the use of microbially pure "tandem" inoculant compositions containing P. bilaii and a Rhizobium sp. If a sticker is incorporated into the peat carrier prior to sterilization, the "tandem" inoculant composition can be directly applied to the appropriate legume seeds or, alternatively, the seeds can be dampened prior to the inoculation step. This formulation can also be processed into a slurry and then applied onto seeds. If a sticker is not incorporated into the "tandem" inoculant composition, then the "tandem" inoculant composition can be made into a slurry by adding the composition plus a sticking agent to a volume of water and mixing well before inoculating seeds. Examples of stickers which can be added to inoculant slurries include alginate, gum arabic, honey, methyl cellulose, skim milk and wallpaper paste. Legume seeds inoculated with "tandem" inoculant compositions are handled and planted in the same manner as legume seeds inoculated only with rhizobial inoculants.
Further specific embodiments of this invention are illustrated by the following non-limiting Examples.
A study of the effects of co-inoculating P. bilaii and Rhizobium spp. on on-seed inoculant population dynamics was conducted using seeds of the pea cultivar Trapper. The seeds were surface-sterilized by soaking each 500g lot of seed in 95% ethanol for 30 seconds, followed by soaking in 1.5% hypochlorite for 5 minutes. The seeds were then rinsed 5 times with sterile distilled water. Three seed inoculant treatments, P. bilaii , R. leguminosarum by. viceae, and P. bilaii plus R. leguminosarum bv. viceae were used. The 500g lots of seed were placed in heavy plastic bags. The appropriate amount of each inoculant was added to the seed and mixed vigorously until even coverage of the seed was obtained. The inoculants P. bilaii (ATCC Strain No. 20851) and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae (USDA Strain No. 2449) were supplied by Philom Bios Inc., Saskatoon, Canada. Each seed treatment was replicated three times.
Standard plate count methods were used to enumerate the numbers of colony-forming-units of P. bilaii and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae. Five-gram samples of inoculated seed were placed in 50 ml of a 0.1% TWEEN (Trademark) solution, sonicated for 2 minutes, then vortexed for 1 minute. For each sample, ten-fold dilutions (103 -104) were prepared using a 0.1% TWEEN solution. Dilution tubes were vortexed between transfers. Two samples from each of the three seed treatment replicates and 2 duplicates from each sample were plated for a total of 12 plates for each treatment dilution.
The standard potato dextrose agar (PDA-PP) medium used to plate P. bilaii treatments contained precipitated phosphate (5 g K2 HPO4 L-1 and CaCl2 O L-1). to aid in the identification of P. bilaii colonies. The standard yeast extract mannitol (YEM-CR) medium used to plate R. leguminosarum bv. viceae treatments contained 0.04 g L-1 cycloheximide to inhibit fungal growth and 2.5 ml L-1 congo red (1%) to aid in the identification of R. leguminosarum bv. viceae colonies. Dilutions of the P. bilaii plus R. leguminosarum bv. viceae treatment were plated on both PDA-PP and YEM-CR media to obtain separate counts of P. bilaii and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae, respectively.
Colonies of P. bilaii were counted after PDA-PP plates were incubated at room temperature (22° C.) for 6 to 7 days, while colonies of R. leguminosarum bv. viceae were counted after YEM-CR plates were incubated at 30° C. for 4 to 5 days. Analysis of variance and LSD values for the data were calculated. The remainder of the inoculated seed was stored at room temperature (22° C.) for 1 week, and the entire procedure repeated. The data are reported in Tables 2 and 3.
TABLE 2
______________________________________
Effect of inoculation with P. bilaii or R. leguminosarum bv.
viceae, singly or in combination, on the population of P. bilaii
on pea seed at time 0 and 1 week after inoculation.
P. bilaii seed population
(×10.sup.3 cfu/g seed)
Inoculant Treatment*
Time Zero One Week
______________________________________
P. bilaii 54.6 5
P. bilaii plus 125 6.8
R. legminosarum
LSD (P ≦ 0.05)
129.5 11.9
______________________________________
*P. bilaii applied to seed at 2 × 10.sup.5 cfu/g seed.
Co-inoculation of pea seed with P. bilaii and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae did not affect the population of P. bilaii on pea seed when compared to inoculation with P. bilaii alone at time 0 or 1 week after inoculation (Table 2). The population of P. bilaii on pea seed inoculated with or without R. leguminosarum bv. viceae decreased after inoculated seed was stored for 1 week at room temperature.
TABLE 3
______________________________________
Effect of inoculation with P. bilaii or R. leguminosarum bv.
viceae, singly or in combination, on the population of
R. leguminosarum bv. viceae on pea seed at time 0 and 1 week
after inoculation.
R. leguminosarum seed
population (×10.sup.3 cfu/g seed)
Inoculant Treatment*
Time Zero One Week
______________________________________
R. leguminosarum
143.3 13.5
R. leguminosarum
153.3 17.4
plus P. bilaii
LSD (P ≦ 0.05)
30.6 4.6
______________________________________
*R. leguminosarum applied at 7 × 10.sup.5 cfu/g seed.
Co-inoculation of pea seed with P. bilaii and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae did not affect the population of R. leguminosarum bv. viceae on pea seed when compared to inoculation with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae alone at time 0 or 1 week after inoculation (Table 3). The population of R. leguminosarum bv. viceae on pea seed, inoculated with or without P. bilaii decreased after seed was stored for 1 week at room temperature.
The effects of P. bilaii and Rhizobium spp. on their population dynamics in legume roots were assessed with pea plants using the inoculant treatments prepared for Example 1. One pea seed from each inoculant treatment was placed into 50-ml plastic tubes filled with sterile potting mix which was pre-soaked with sterile distilled water. Each treatment was replicated 10 times. The tubes were placed on a growth table and the plants harvested 1 week after emergence. Intact root systems were removed from each tube, excess potting mix gently shaken off, and the main tap root was cut into 10 equal-length segments. Starting with the segment closest to the cotyledon, segments were placed on media plates in a clockwise fashion finishing with the bottom segment. P. bilaii treatment segments were placed on PDA-PP medium and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae treatment segments were placed on YEM-CR medium. Medium compositions were as described in Example 1. Twenty tubes of the P. bilaii plus R. leguminosarum bv. viceae treatment were planted to allow 10 roots to be plated on PDAPP medium for p. bilaii counts, and 10 on YEM-CR medium for R. leguminosarum bv. viceae counts.
PDA-PP plates were incubated for 6 to 7 days at room temperature (22° C.), and YEM-CR plates were incubated at 30° C. for 4 to 5 days. The number of root segments on each plate colonized with the appropriate organism, P. bilaii or R. leguminosarum bv. viceae, were counted to obtain percent of root colonized for each treatment replicate. Analysis of variance and LSD values for the data were calculated. The entire experiment was repeated using inoculated seed stored for 1 week at room temperature (22° C.) from the seed population dynamics study.
Inoculation of pea seed with P. bilaii resulted in 90 to 91% colonization of pea root rhizospheres by P. bilaii , whether inoculated singly or in combination with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae at time 0 (Table 4). Rhizosphere colonization by P. bilaii was not affected by storing inoculated seed for 1 week at room temperature.
TABLE 4
______________________________________
Effect of inoculation with P. bilaii or R. leguminosarum bv.
viceae, singly or in combination, on the colonization of pea root
rhizosphere by P. bilaii with seed planted at time 0 and 1 week
after inoculation.
P. bilaii rhizosphere colonization
(% of root colonized)
Inoculant Treatment
Time Zero One Week
______________________________________
P. bilaii 91 88
P. bilaii plus 90 89
R. leguminosarum
LSD (P ≦ 0.05)
8 11
______________________________________
Co-inoculation of pea seed with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae resulted in 95 to 97% colonization of pea root rhizosphere by R. leguminosarum bv. viceae, when inoculated singly or in combination with P. bilaii at time zero (Table 5). Rhizosphere colonization by R. leguminosarum bv. viceae declined after inoculated seed was stored for one week at room temperature, but still was not affected by co-inoculation with P. bilaii .
TABLE 5
______________________________________
Effect of inoculation with P. bilaii or R. leguminosarum bv.
viceae, singly or in combination, on the colonization of pea root
rhizosphere by R. leguminosarum bv. viceae with seed planted
at time 0 and 1 week after inoculation.
R. leguminosarum rhizosphere
colonization (% of root colonized)
Inoculant Treatment
Time Zero One Week
______________________________________
P. bilaii 95 78
R. leguminosarum
97 79
plus P. bilaii
LSD (P ≦ 0.05)
8 11
______________________________________
A growth-chamber study was conducted with field pea (Pisum sativum cv "Trapper") to assess the effects of 4 inoculant treatments i.e., uninoculated control, P. bilaii , R. leguminosarum bv. viceae, and co-inoculated P. bilaii and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae, on nodulation, nitrogen fixation, phosphate assimilation and plant growth. The P. bilaii strain was ATCC Strain No. 20851 in all cases. The effects of supplemental phosphate on the inoculant performance were assessed by planting inoculated seed in soils containing 2 phosphate fertilizer treatments i.e., unfertilized control and 10 mg phosphate/kg-1 soil.
Three hundred grams of washed gravel were placed in the bottom of each 15-cm pot followed by 800 g of soil. Supplemental phosphate, where used, was applied as a suspension of Ca(H2 PO4)2 (triple-super-phosphate) in distilled water. Ten millilitres of the phosphate suspension were applied evenly across the surface of the first 800-g layer of soil. An additional 700 g of soil was then placed into each pot. Pots were watered to 80% field capacity by weight and allowed to equilibrate for 2 days. Six pea seeds with the appropriate inoculant treatment were planted in each pot. Each treatment was replicated 7 times. Pots were transferred to a Conviron PGV36/M10 growth chamber at the University of Saskatchewan Phytotron Centre and were arranged in a randomized complete block design.
The growth chamber conditions were set to simulate average temperature and light level increases which occur during outdoor conditions in central Saskatchewan for the months of mid-May through mid-July. A dawn-dusk feature brought the lighting system to full-on or full-off positions gradually. Maximum light intensity of 425 W m-2 was reached by midday. Initial photoperiod was 17 hours of light, followed by 18 hours, and finishing again at 17 hours of light by the end of the experiment. At the start of the experiment, minimum (night) and maximum (day) temperatures were 5° C. and 17.2° C., respectively. The minimum and maximum temperatures were gradually increased to 16° C. and 21° C., respectively, by the end of the experiment.
Two weeks after emergence, seedlings were thinned to 1 plant per pot. Pots were initially allowed to drop to one-third field capacity before watering by weight to two-thirds field capacity. Pots were maintained between one-half and three-quarters field capacity from 4 weeks after emergence until harvest. A micronutrient solution was applied to each pot every 2 weeks until harvest. Supplemental phosphate or nitrogen was not applied. Each pea plant was harvested as the first flower bud opened. Days to harvest ranged from 41 to 51 days after planting. Plant shoots were harvested, dried, weighed, and ground. Roots were gently washed to remove soil, placed in plastic bags, and frozen. Nodulation was rated once all the pots were harvested. Roots were gently teased apart in a shallow tray of water and nodulation per plant was rated using a 1 to 10 scale. The rating scale for inactive nodules was as follows: 1, no nodules; 2, fewer than 25 inactive nodules; and 3, greater than 25 inactive nodules. Pink to red colored nodules were considered active. The rating scale for active nodules was as follows: 4, less than 50 active nodules; 5, 50 to 99 active nodules; 6, 100 to 149 active nodules; 7, 150 to 199 active nodules; 8, 200 to 249 active nodules; 9, 250 to 299 active nodules; and 10, greater than 300 active nodules. The roots were then dried, weighed, and ground. Subsamples of the ground tissue were analyzed for total nitrogen and phosphate concentration, and the uptakes were determined. Analysis of variance and single degree of freedom contrasts of the data were performed using the General Linear Model procedure of the Statistical Analysis Systems package (SAS Institute Inc., 1988). The effects of the inoculant treatments on nodulation and nitrogen assimilation are recorded in Table 6.
TABLE 6
______________________________________
Effect of inoculation with Penicillium bilaii or Rhizobium
leguminosarum bv. viceae, singly or in combination at two
phosphate levels, on nodulation and nitrogen assimilation by
field pea in a growth chamber experiment.
Nodule
Nitrogen assimilation
rating
mg plant.sup.-1
Treatment 1-10 Shoot Root Total
______________________________________
Unfertilized
Control 1.4 43.6 32.5 76.1
R. leguminosarum
6.1 53.9 60.5 114.3
P. bilaii 1.7 47.1 70.9 118.0
Co-inoculation
8.1 60.0 79.7 139.7
10 mg P/kg.sup.-1 soil
Control 2.1 46.5 68.6 115.1
R. leguminosarum
7.7 60.4 76.7 137.1
P. bilaii 2.1 48.1 74.7 122.7
Co-inoculation
8.1 64.7 82.6 147.4
LSD (P ≦ 0.05)
1.2 10.3 9.3 13.4
______________________________________
The data demonstrates that when supplemental phosphate was not applied, pea receiving the co-inoculation treatment had a 32% higher nodule rating and assimilated 22% more nitrogen than plants inoculated only with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae. These observations contradict those made by Downey and van Kessel who found that pea "dual-inoculated" with P. bilaii and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae fixed 26% less nitrogen than plants inoculated only with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae (Downey, J. and C. van Kessel, 1990, Biol. Fertil. Soils 10:194-196).
When supplemental phosphate was supplied, the nodule rating in co-inoculated plants was 5% higher than that for the plants inoculated with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae. Pea receiving the co-inoculation treatment and grown in soil supplemented with triple-super-phosphate assimilated 7.5% more nitrogen than pea inoculated with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae only. These observations also contradict those of Downey and van Kessel who found a 14% decrease in nitrogen fixation in co-inoculated pea that received phosphate fertilizer compared to fertilized pea that were inoculated only with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae.
The effects of the inoculant treatments on phosphate assimilation are recorded in Table 7. When grown without supplemental phosphate, co-inoculated pea assimilated 24% more total phosphate than pea inoculated with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae. When supplemental phosphate was added to the inoculant treatments, co-inoculated plants contained 7.5% more total phosphate than those inoculated with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae only.
TABLE 7
______________________________________
Effect of inoculation with P. bilaii or R. leguminosarum bv.
viceae, singly or in combination at two phosphate levels, on
phosphate uptake of pea in a growth chamber experiment.
Phosphate uptake mg plant.sup.-1
Treatment Shoot Root Total
______________________________________
Unfertilized
Control 7.1 2.5 9.6
R. leguminosarum
7.5 4.5 12.0
P. bilaii 8.0 5.2 13.3
Co-inoculation
9.2 5.7 14.9
10 mg P/kg.sup.-1 soil
Control 8.0 5.5 13.5
R. leguminosarum
9.2 6.0 15.2
P. bilaii 9.5 6.5 15.9
Co-inoculation
9.8 7.6 17.4
LSD (P ≦ 0.05)
1.3 1.3 1.8
______________________________________
The effects of the inoculant treatments on tissue dry weights are recorded in Table 8. In the absence of supplemental phosphate, the increase in shoot dry weight of co-inoculated pea compared to pea inoculated with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae alone, was 20% while the increase in the dry weight of root tissues was 39%. When supplemental phosphate was added to the inoculant treatments, the increases in shoot and root dry weights of co-inoculated plants compared to the R. leguminosarum bv. viceae were 7% and 13% respectively.
TABLE 8
______________________________________
Effect of inoculation with P. bilaii or R. leguminosarum bv.
viceae, singly or in combination at two phosphate levels, on
pea dry tissue weight in a growth chamber experiment.
Dry tissue weight mg plant.sup.-1
Treatment Shoot Root Total
______________________________________
Unfertilized
Control 3.21 1.49 4.70
R. leguminosarum
3.48 2.60 6.08
P. bilaii 3.51 3.45 6.96
Co-inoculation
4.21 3.62 7.83
10 mg P/kg.sup.-1 soil
Control 3.74 3.06 6.80
R. leguminosarum
4.23 3.00 7.23
P. bilaii 4.13 3.50 7.63
Co-inoculation
4.53 3.40 7.93
LSD (P ≦ 0.05)
0.37 0.54 0.67
______________________________________
Field trials with field pea (Pisum sativum cv "Trapper") were planted at 6 locations in Saskatchewan and Manitoba in 1989. The locations of the sites were identified as follows (legal description in brackets):
1. Rural Municipality #284, Outlook, Saskatchewan (NW16-29-8-W3) ,
2. Rural Municipality #347, Biggar, Saskatchewan (NE6-37-14-W3),
3. Rural Municipality #373, Aberdeen, Saskatchewan (NW7-40-2-W3) ,
4. Rural Municipality #367, Quill Lake, Saskatchewan (SE28-37-15-W2),
5. Rural Municipality #368, Watson, Saskatchewan (SE2-39-17-W2) ,
6. Rural Municipality of Roland, Homewood, Manitoba (NW31-5-3-W1) .
The research sites selected generally had low levels of soil phosphate and nitrogen, and had never been cropped with pea or lentil. Prior to seeding, basal treatments of nitrogen, potassium, or sulfur were broadcast at each field site according to soil test recommendations to ensure adequate nutrient supply and to highlight crop response to phosphate. Ethalfluralin was applied at each field site for weed control, by cross-incorporation to a depth of 8 cm with a tandem disc followed with diamond tooth harrows.
The research trials were arranged in a split-plot experimental design with 5 replications. Four seed inoculant sub-plot treatments i.e., uninoculated control, P. bilaii (ATCC No. 20851), R. leguminosarum bv. viceae, co-inoculated P. bilaii plus R. leguminosarum by. viceae, were imposed over 2 phosphate fertilizer mainplot regimes i.e., 0 and 20 kg phosphate ha-1 applied as seed-placed triple-super-phosphate (0-45-0). The trials were seeded with a small-plot double disc seed drill specially constructed to minimize contamination between seed inoculant treatments. Pea seed was planted at depths ranging from 2.5 to 5.0 cm, depending upon soil moisture at each location. Each plot consisted of 6 treatment rows 15-cm apart bordered by 2 guard rows of triazine-tolerant canola to eliminate edge effects. Each trial was bordered by untreated plots of pea, also to eliminate edge effects. The trials were sprayed during the growing season with foliar herbicides or hand weeded as necessary to remove weeds not eliminated by the ethalfluralin.
Prior to harvesting, the ends of each plot were trimmed to remove edge effects. The remainder of each plot was then harvested with a small plot combine to measure grain yield. Harvested grain was cleaned, weighed, and the percent moisture of each sample measured. Grain yields adjusted for a constant 16.0% seed moisture were calculated and used in the data analysis.
The overall effects of the inoculant treatments on pea grain yields in the 1989 field research trials are summarized in Table 9.
TABLE 9
______________________________________
Effect of inoculation with P. bilaii or R. leguminosarum bv.
viceae, singly or in combination at two phosphate levels, on
pea grain yields in Western Canada in 1989.
Grain yield
Treatment (kg ha.sup.-1)
______________________________________
Unfertilized
Control 2754
R. leguminosarum 2999
P. bilaii 2662
Co-inoculation 3197
20 kg phosphate fertilizer ha.sup.-1
Control 3027
R. leguminosarum 3135
P. bilaii 2934
Co-inoculation 3405
LSD (P ≦ 0.05)
Phosphate fertilizer
216
Inoculant 120
______________________________________
When supplemental phosphate was not applied to the inoculant treatments, plots planted with co-inoculated pea produced 6.6% more grain than plots planted with pea inoculated only with R. leguminosarum by. viceae. This yield increase is equivalent to 3 bu/ac more produced by the co-inoculated pea compared to those inoculated only with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae.
In plots receiving 20 kg phosphate ha-1 as triple-superphosphate fertilizer, co-inoculated pea yielded 8.6% more grain than pea inoculated only with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae. This yield increase is equivalent to 4 bu/ac more produced by the co-inoculated pea compared to those inoculated only with R. leguminosarum bv. viceae.
A field trial with alfalfa was planted at a location in Alberta in 1989 to assess the effects of P. bilaii (strain ATCC 20851) and R. meliloti strain NRG-185 treatments on nodulation and hay production by alfalfa. The site was located in the County of Grande Prairie at the Agriculture Canada Research Station in Beaverlodge (legal description is NW36-71-10-W6). Alfalfa seed inoculated with 1 of 4 seed inoculant treatments i.e., uninoculated control, R. meliloti strain NRG-185, P. bilaii , co-inoculation with P. bilaii plus R. meliloti NRG-185, were imposed over 2 phosphate fertilizer mainplot regimes i.e., 0 and 10 kg hal, applied as seed-placed triple-super-phosphate (0-45-0). The treatment rows were 20 feet long and were arranged in a complete-randomized-block design. Each treatment was replicated 6 times.
The effects of the inoculants on hay production in the second year after planting are presented in Table 10. When grown without supplemental phosphate, co-inoculated alfalfa produced 19% more hay than alfalfa inoculated with R. meliloti strain NRG-185. This yield increase is equivalent to 667 lbs/ac more than the amount of hay produced by alfalfa inoculated only with R. meliloti .
When 10 kg/ha of supplemental phosphate fertilizer was applied, co-inoculated alfalfa produced 7.6% more hay than alfalfa inoculated only with R. meliloti NRG-185. This yield increase is equivalent to 312 lbs/ac more than the amount of hay produced by alfalfa inoculated only with R. meliloti .
TABLE 10
______________________________________
Effect of inoculation with Penicillium bilaii or Rhizobium
meliloti strain NRG-185, singly or in combination at two
phosphate levels, on hay production. Data collected during
the second growing season.
Hay production kg ha.sup.-1
Treatment First cut Second cut
Total
______________________________________
Unfertilized
Control 1912 1952 3864
R. meliloti NRG-185
1912 1984 3896
P. bilaii 1624 1788 3412
Co-inoculation
2283 2361 4644
10 mg P/kg.sup.-1 soil
Control 2312 2166 4478
R. meliloti NRG-185
2160 2437 4597
P. bilaii 1863 2105 3968
Co-inoculation
2401 2546 4947
SED
Phosphate fertilizer
189 166
Inoculant 219 136
______________________________________
Microbially pure peat-based inoculants containing P. bilaii (Strain ATCC 20851) and R. meliloti strain NRG-34 were prepared as follows. Powdered peat (6% moisture content) packaged in heat-sealed plastic bags (28 g/bag) was sterilized by gamma irradiation at a dosage rate of 5.5 mega-rads. R. meliloti strain NRG-34 was grown for 48 h at 30° C. in a 4-L fermenter containing yeast-extract-mannitol broth. P. bilaii was grown for 72 h at 30° C. in a 100-ml erlenmeyer flask containing potato-dexrose broth. Mixtures of the 2 cultures were then prepared so that different ratios of the 2 organisms, ranging from 14:0 to 7:7 (Rhizobium:P.bilaii), could be asceptically injected into the pre-sterilized bags of peat. The total volume of inoculum injected into each bag was 14 ml. The inocula were well-mixed into the peat carriers by carefully massaging each bag after which, the bags were cured, i.e., the titers of the inoculated cultures were increased, by holding the bags at room temperature for 24 h after inoculation and followed by further incubation at 30° C. for 96 h. The cured bags were then stored at 4° C. The number of colony-forming-units of R. meliloti and P. bilaii per gram of inoculant were determining by plate counts after 10, 165 and 260 days of storage. The ability of the rhizobial strain to form nodules was confirmed with a nodulation assay using alfalfa seeds to determine the "most-probable-number" (MPN) of rhizobia per gram of inoculant based on the number of nodules formed on alfalfa roots.
The results in Table 11 clearly indicate that P. bilaii and R. meliloti strain NRG-34 were compatible in a peat composition for a period of at least 8 months with no negative effects on each other. Plate counts (i.e., viable cfu) for each organism were unchanged after 165 and 260 days of storage. The MPN assay confirmed the nodulation performance of the rhizobial strain after 165 days of storage (the MPN assay was not performed at 260 days).
TABLE 11
______________________________________
Numbers (cfu/g) of R. meliloti NRG-34 and P. bilaii in
"tandem" inoculant compositions prepared with different
starting ratios of the two organisms.
Plate count MPN
Ratio of NRG-34 to
NRG-34 P. bilaii
NRG-34
P. bilaii (×10.sup.9)
(×10.sup.7)
(×10.sup.9)
______________________________________
10 days of storage
14:0 6.8 0 3.0
11:3 5.8 0.8 3.0
10.4 5.2 2.0 2.5
9:5 5.9 0.8 0.6
8:6 3.9 2.3 2.5
7:7 7.7 1.3 3.5
165 days of storage
14:0 9.6 0 1.1
11:3 9.4 0.6 4.4
10.4 9.2 1.0 5.9
9:5 7.4 1.0 16.0
8:6 8.9 3.1 16.0
7:7 8.6 2.7 20.0
260 days of storage
14:0 6.5 0 nd*
11:3 4.6 0.5 nd
10.4 7.4 0.6 nd
9:5 5.9 0.8 nd
8:6 7.3 1.6 nd
7:7 6.1 1.1 nd
______________________________________
*Not determined.
A microbially pure peat-based "tandem" composition containing P. bilaii (Strain ATCC 20851) and Bradyrhizobium japonicum was prepared as disclosed in Example 6 with the following changes. Fifty three grams of powdered peat were dispensed into the plastic bags prior to sterilization by gamma irradiation. The total volume of P. bilaii plus B. japonicum added to each bag was 27 ml. P. bilaii was added at a rate of 3.3×105 cfu/g (i.e., Log 5.52 cfu/g) while B. joponicum was added at a rate of 1.8×107 cfu/g (i.e., Log 7.25 cfu/g). After the cultures were well-mixed with the peat carrier by massaging the bags, the bags were cured at 30° C. for 21 days. The viability of each organism inoculated into the bags was determined with the plate count assay 7, 14, and 21 days after inoculation. The target titre after curing for P. bilaii was 1×107 cfu/g (i.e., Log 7.00) and for B. japonicum was 5×108 cfu/g (i.e., Log 8.69 cfu/g). The data in Table 12 demonstrates that the titre of both organisms at the end of the curing period exceeded the targets.
TABLE 12
______________________________________
Numbers (cfu/g) of B. japonicum and P. bilaii in a
"tandem" inoculant composition prepared for soybeans.
B. japonicum
P. bilaii
Curing time (cfu/g)* (cfu/g)*
______________________________________
7 days 7.64 5.11
14 days 8.71 7.59
21 days 9.29 8.12
______________________________________
*Data expressed as "logs of means"-
The soybean "tandem" composition was assessed for the nodulation and root colonization performance by B. japonicum and P. bilaii respectively. At the end of the curing period, dampened soybean seeds were inoculated with the composition and then planted in 50-ml tubes containing pre-moistened growing mix (1 seed/tube). The tubes were placed on a growth table and the plants harvested 3 weeks after emergence. Intact root systems were removed from each tube, excess potting mix gently shaken off, and checked for the presence of nodules. Root colonization by P. bilaii was determined as disclosed in Example 2. The data in Table 13 indicate that all test soybean plants were nodulated and that 91% of the roots were colonized by P. bilaii .
TABLE 13 ______________________________________ Effects of the "tandem" composition on root colonization by P. bilaii and nodulation by B. japonicum. % of roots % root colonization with nodules by P. bilaii ______________________________________ 100 91.3 ______________________________________
A microbially pure peat-based "tandem" composition containing P. bilaii (Strain ATCC 20851) and R. leguminosarum bv. viceae was prepared as disclosed in Example 8 with the following changes. Fifty three grams of powdered peat were dispensed into the plastic bags prior to sterilization by gamma irradiation. The total volume of P. bilaii plus R. leguminosarum bv. viceae added to each bag was 27 ml. P. bilaii was added at a rate of 3.3×105 cfu/g (i.e., Log 5.52 cfu/g) while R. leguminosarum was added at a rate of 1.8×107 cfu/g (i.e., Log 7.25 cfu/g). After the cultures were well mixed with the peat carrier by massaging the bags, the bags were cured at 30° C. for 21 days and then stored at room temperature i.e., 22° C. The viability of each organism inoculated into the bags was determined with the plate count assay after the curing period was completed and then after 1 month and 3 months of storage. The target titre after curing for P. bilaii was 1×107 cfu/g (i.e., Log 7.00) and for R. leguminosarum bv. viceae was 5×108 cfu/g (i.e., Log 8.69 cfu/g).
The data in Table 14 demonstrates that the titre of both organisms at the end of the curing period exceeded the targets, and were maintained during the 3-month storage period.
TABLE 14
______________________________________
Numbers (cfu/g) of R. leguminosarum bv. viceae and P. bilaii
in a "tandem" inoculant composition prepared for pea.
R. leguminosarum
P. bilaii
Storage time (cfu/g)* (cfu/g)*
______________________________________
After cure completed
9.46 7.48
1 month 9.31 8.01
3 months 8.82 7.80
______________________________________
*Data expressed as "logs of means"-
The pea "tandem" composition was assessed for the nodulation and root colonization performance by R. leguminosarum bv. viceae and P. bilaii respectively. At the end of the 3-month storage period, dampened pea seeds were inoculated with the composition and then planted in 50-ml tubes containing pre-moistened growing mix (1 seed/tube). The tubes were placed on a growth table and the plants harvested 3 weeks after emergence. Intact root systems were removed from each tube, excess potting mix gently shaken off, and checked for the presence of nodules. Root colonization by P. bilaii was determined as disclosed in Example 2. The data presented in Table 15 indicate that all pea roots were nodulated and that 91% of the roots were colonized by P. bilaii .
TABLE 15 ______________________________________ Effects of the "tandem" composition on root colonization by P. bilaii and nodulation by R. leguminosarum. % of roots % root colonization with nodules by P. bilaii ______________________________________ 100 91.3 ______________________________________
Field trials with alfalfa were planted at three locations in Alberta in 1992 to compare the performance of alfalfa inoculated with the "tandem" inoculant composition containing P. bilaii (Strain ATCC 20851) and R. meliloti with co-inoculated alfalfa, i.e., alfalfa that was inoculated with the two microorganisms prepared as a slurry just prior to use. The sites were located in the County of Grande Prairie and were identified as follows (legal description in brackets):
Toews, West; (NW9-71-11-W6)
Toews, East; (NW10-71-11-W6)
Hegland; (SW18-72-10-W6)
Five seed inoculant treatments i.e., uninoculated control, R. meliloti strain NRG-34, P. bilaii , P. bilaii plus R. meliloti NRG-34 prepared as a slurry, and a "tandem" composition containing both microorganisms, were imposed over 3 phosphate fertilizer mainplot regimes i.e., 0, 10 and 20 kg ha-1 , applied as seed-placed triple-super-phosphate (0-45-0) The treatment rows were 20 feet long and were arranged in a complete-randomized-block design. Each treatment was replicated 6 times at each site. Hay production data was generated by harvesting each treatment row twice during the 1993 growing season (June and September), determining the dry weight of hay produced/row, and then extrapolating the data to estimate hay production/hectare. The hay production data for treatments in the year after the trials were planted, are presented in Table 16.
TABLE 16
______________________________________
Comparison of hay production by alfalfa culated with the
P. bilaii plus R. meliloti strain NRG-34 "Tandem"
composition with alfalfa co-inoculated with the microorganisms
prepared as a slurry just prior to inoculation. Data collected
during the second growing season.
Hay production kg ha.sup.-1
Treatment First cut Second cut Total
______________________________________
Unfertilized
Control 1744 2426 4170
"Slurry" inoculum
1995 2455 4450
"Tandem" composition
1990 2506 4496
10 mg P/kg.sup.-1 soil
Control 1864 2371 4235
"Slurry" inoculum
2116 2446 4562
"Tandem" composition
2099 2414 4513
20 mg P/kg.sup.-1 soil
Control 1988 2293 4281
"Slurry" inoculum
2358 2439 4797
"Tandem" composition
2255 2385 4640
SED
Phosphate fertilizer
293 207
Inoculant 189 208
______________________________________
In the treatments that did not receive supplemental phosphate fertilizer, the total hay production by alfalfa inoculated with the "tandem" composition the previous year was 7.8% greater than in the uninoculated controls. In treatments receiving 10 kg/ha of supplemental phosphate fertilizer, alfalfa inoculated with the "tandem" composition produced 6.5% more hay than the uninoculated controls, while in treatments receiving 20 kg/ha of supplemental phosphate fertilizer, alfalfa inoculated with the "tandem" composition 8.3% more hay than the uninoculated controls. Inoculation of alfalfa with the "tandem" composition did not affect hay production when compared to alfalfa co-inoculated with a slurry prepared with both microorganisms just prior to inoculation.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that various changes and modifications may be practised within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (29)
1. A method of improving growth and productivity of a legume crop by co-inoculating seeds of said legume with the fungus Penicillium bilaii and a Rhizobium sp. known to infect and form nitrogen-fixing nodules on said legume and growing said inoculated seeds; said growth and productivity being improved in comparison with an identical legume crop grown under identical conditions from uninoculated seeds or seeds inoculated with said Rhizobium sp. alone.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein said P. bilaii is applied to said seeds in the form of a coating.
3. A method according to claim 2 wherein said coating of P. bilaii contains about 1×102 to 1×104 colony-forming units per seed.
4. A method according to claim 2 wherein said P. bilaii is a strain selected from the group consisting of a strain identified as ATCC 18309, a strain identified as ATCC 20851 and a strain identified as ATCC 22348.
5. A method according to claim 2 wherein the P. bilaii is a strain identified as ATCC number 20851.
6. A method according to claim 1 wherein the Rhizobium sp. is applied to said seeds in the form of a coating.
7. A method according to claim 6 wherein said coating of said Rhizobium sp. contains about 1×103 to 1×105 colony-forming-units per seed.
8. A method according to claim 6 wherein said coating of the Rhizobium sp. contains about 1×104 to 1×106 colony-forming-units per seed.
9. A method according to claim 6 wherein said coating of the Rhizobium sp. contains about 1×105 to 1×107 colony-forming-units per seed.
10. A method according to claim 1 wherein the legume seed is sequentially inoculated with said fungus P. bilaii and then with an inoculant composition comprising a carrier substrate and said Rhizobium sp.
11. A method according to claim 10 wherein said Rhizobium inoculant carrier substrate comprises a powder.
12. A method according to claim 11 wherein said Rhizobium inoculant carrier substrate comprises a peat powder.
13. A method according to claim 10 wherein said Rhizobium inoculant carrier substrate comprises a powder blended with a sticking agent.
14. A method according to claim 10 wherein said Rhizobium inoculant carrier substrate comprises a liquid.
15. A method according to claim 1 wherein said legume seed are inoculated with a slurry comprising P. bilaii blended with a Rhizobium inoculant composition and water.
16. A method according to claim 15 wherein a sticking agent is present in said slurry.
17. A method according to claim 1 wherein the legume seed is inoculated with a composition comprising said P. bilaii and said Rhizobium sp. blended together with a carrier substrate.
18. A method according to claim 1 wherein said legume and said Rhizobium sp. are selected from the group of combinations consisting of:
Medicago spp. and Rhizobium meliloti;
Trifolium spp. and Rhizobium trifolii;
Pisum spp. and Rhizobium leguminosarum ;
Lens culinaris and Rhizobium leguminosarum ;
Phaseolus spp. and Rhizobium phaseoli;
Glycine max and Bradyrhizobium Donicum;
Vicea spp. and Rhizobium leguminosarum ; and
Lupinus spp. Rhizobium lupinus
19. A composition for co-inoculating legume seeds comprising a fungus p. bilaii, a Rhizobium spp. and a carrier substrate.
20. A composition according to claim 19 which is microbially pure.
21. A composition according to claim 19 wherein said P. bilaii is a strain selected from the group consisting of a strain identified as ATCC 18309, a strain identified as ATCC 20851 and a strain identified as ATCC 22348.
22. A composition according to claim 19 wherein said P. bilaii is a strain identified as ATCC 20851.
23. A composition according to claim 19 wherein said P. bilaii has a titre equal to or greater than 1×107 cfu/gram.
24. A composition according to claim 19 wherein said Rhizobium sp. has a titre equal to or greater than 5×108 cfu/gram.
25. A composition according to claim 19 wherein said carrier substrate is a powder.
26. A composition according to claim 19 wherein said carrier substrate is a peat powder.
27. A composition according to claim 19 wherein said carrier substrate contains a sticking agent.
28. A composition according to claim 19 wherein said carrier substrate is a liquid.
29. A method of improving growth and productivity of a legume crop by co-inoculating seeds of said legume with the gungus Penicillium bilaii and a Rhizobium sp. known to infect and form nitrogen-fixing nodules on said legume and growing said inoculated seeds; said growth and productivity being improved in comparison with an identical legume crop grown under identical conditions from uninoculated seeds or seeds inoculated with said Rhizobium sp. alone; wherein said penicillium bilaii is a strain ATCC 20851, and wherein said Rhizobium sp. and said legume are selected from the following combinations: Rhizobium leguminosarum and peas; Rhizobium meliloti and alfalfa; and Bradyrhizobium japonicum and soybeans.
Priority Applications (5)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/174,335 US5484464A (en) | 1993-12-29 | 1993-12-29 | Methods and compositions for increasing the benefits of rhizobium inoculation to legume crop productivity |
| CA002178601A CA2178601C (en) | 1993-12-29 | 1994-12-28 | Methods and compositions for increasing the benefits of rhizobium inoculation to legume crop productivity |
| AU13785/95A AU702488B2 (en) | 1993-12-29 | 1994-12-28 | Methods and compositions for increasing the benefits of Rhizobium inoculation to legume crop productivity |
| PCT/CA1994/000720 WO1995017806A1 (en) | 1993-12-29 | 1994-12-28 | Methods and compositions for increasing the benefits of rhizobium inoculation to legume crop productivity |
| US08/453,257 US5586411A (en) | 1993-12-29 | 1995-05-30 | Method of preparing a seed treatment composition |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/174,335 US5484464A (en) | 1993-12-29 | 1993-12-29 | Methods and compositions for increasing the benefits of rhizobium inoculation to legume crop productivity |
Related Child Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/453,257 Division US5586411A (en) | 1993-12-29 | 1995-05-30 | Method of preparing a seed treatment composition |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US5484464A true US5484464A (en) | 1996-01-16 |
Family
ID=22635798
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/174,335 Expired - Lifetime US5484464A (en) | 1993-12-29 | 1993-12-29 | Methods and compositions for increasing the benefits of rhizobium inoculation to legume crop productivity |
| US08/453,257 Expired - Lifetime US5586411A (en) | 1993-12-29 | 1995-05-30 | Method of preparing a seed treatment composition |
Family Applications After (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/453,257 Expired - Lifetime US5586411A (en) | 1993-12-29 | 1995-05-30 | Method of preparing a seed treatment composition |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US5484464A (en) |
| AU (1) | AU702488B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2178601C (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1995017806A1 (en) |
Cited By (38)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5586411A (en) * | 1993-12-29 | 1996-12-24 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada | Method of preparing a seed treatment composition |
| US5916029A (en) * | 1996-06-26 | 1999-06-29 | Liphatech, Inc. | Process for producing seeds coated with a microbial composition |
| US6228136B1 (en) | 1999-02-04 | 2001-05-08 | Engineering Technology, Incorporated | Cyanobacterial inoculants for land reclamation |
| WO2002020431A1 (en) | 2000-09-05 | 2002-03-14 | Ultra Biotech Limited | A biological fertilizer based on yeasts |
| US20040152596A1 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2004-08-05 | Jari Peltonen | Coated seed and process for coating a seed |
| US20060029576A1 (en) * | 2004-08-04 | 2006-02-09 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, The Minister Of Agriculture And Agri-Food | Biological control of pythium disease in crops |
| US20060258534A1 (en) * | 2005-05-16 | 2006-11-16 | Hill James D | Rhizobium leguminosarum strain and use thereof as plant inoculant |
| US20100154299A1 (en) * | 2005-09-16 | 2010-06-24 | Takeshi Kobayashi | Seed Coated with Antagonistic Microorganism, Method for Producing the Seed, and Disease Control Method for Crop |
| US20140082770A1 (en) * | 2011-03-17 | 2014-03-20 | Biodiscovery New Zealand Limited | Screening methods |
| WO2014078647A1 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2014-05-22 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Microbial strains, compositions, and methods for increasing available phosphate for plants |
| KR101400897B1 (en) | 2011-10-19 | 2014-05-29 | 한국생명공학연구원 | Halotolerant Rhizobium sp. isolated from root nodule of Vicia villosa Roth |
| WO2014160827A1 (en) | 2013-03-28 | 2014-10-02 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Compositions and methods for enhancing microbial stability |
| US20140342904A1 (en) * | 2011-09-14 | 2014-11-20 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Use of lipochito oligosaccharides and/or chito oligosaccharides in combination with phosphate solubilizing microorganisms to enhance plant growth |
| US9101088B2 (en) | 2008-10-01 | 2015-08-11 | Novozymes Biologicals Limited | Methods and compositions for increasing the amounts of phosphorus available for plant uptake from soils |
| CN105638219A (en) * | 2016-01-28 | 2016-06-08 | 山西省农业科学院高寒区作物研究所 | Cultivation method for increasing yield of alfalfa by means of biological inoculation agent |
| CN105660108A (en) * | 2016-01-08 | 2016-06-15 | 山西省农业科学院高寒区作物研究所 | High-yield cultivation method for alfalfa in semi-arid region |
| EP3072384A1 (en) * | 2015-03-24 | 2016-09-28 | Jouffray Drillaud | Method for growing annual crops on a plot |
| WO2017044473A1 (en) | 2015-09-11 | 2017-03-16 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| WO2017116846A1 (en) | 2015-12-28 | 2017-07-06 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| WO2017116837A1 (en) | 2015-12-28 | 2017-07-06 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| WO2017210163A1 (en) | 2016-05-31 | 2017-12-07 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| WO2017210166A1 (en) | 2016-05-31 | 2017-12-07 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable liquid inoculant compositions and coated plant propagation materials comprising same |
| WO2018118740A1 (en) | 2016-12-20 | 2018-06-28 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| WO2018129018A1 (en) | 2017-01-05 | 2018-07-12 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Lysinibacillus isolates and uses thereof |
| WO2018129016A1 (en) | 2017-01-04 | 2018-07-12 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Bacillus isolates and uses thereof |
| US20180320242A1 (en) * | 2015-11-06 | 2018-11-08 | University Of Copenhagen | Microbe associations that have new or improved characteristics |
| WO2018218035A1 (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2018-11-29 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions comprising methylated plant oils |
| WO2018218008A1 (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2018-11-29 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable liquid inoculant compositions comprising dodecane |
| WO2018218016A1 (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2018-11-29 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions comprising paraffin oils/waxes |
| WO2019217255A1 (en) | 2018-05-07 | 2019-11-14 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Microbacterium isolates and uses thereof |
| WO2020263734A1 (en) | 2019-06-24 | 2020-12-30 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Erwinia isolates and uses thereof |
| WO2021086695A1 (en) | 2019-10-29 | 2021-05-06 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Microbacterium isolates and uses thereof |
| WO2021101949A1 (en) | 2019-11-22 | 2021-05-27 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Paenibacillus isolates and uses thereof |
| WO2021101937A1 (en) | 2019-11-20 | 2021-05-27 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Pseudomonas isolates and uses thereof |
| US11259526B2 (en) | 2016-01-28 | 2022-03-01 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Phosphate-solubilzing fungal strains |
| US11452295B2 (en) | 2015-11-20 | 2022-09-27 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Composition and methods for reducing corn-on-corn yield penalty |
| US11466266B2 (en) | 2012-09-19 | 2022-10-11 | Bioconsortia, Inc. | Accelerated directed evolution of microbial consortia for the development of desirable plant phenotypic traits |
| US11560340B2 (en) | 2011-09-08 | 2023-01-24 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Seed treatment methods and compositions |
Families Citing this family (112)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT406324B (en) * | 1998-12-01 | 2000-04-25 | Mbt Technology Center Establis | Plant-growth-promoting solution and process for its preparation |
| AR025644A1 (en) * | 2000-09-12 | 2002-12-04 | Sintesis Quimica S A I C | A WATERPROOF BASED COMPOSITION FOR SEEDS, AND A METHOD FOR PRESERVING COMPOSITION. |
| US6787150B2 (en) * | 2002-07-22 | 2004-09-07 | Kes Associates | Seed coating for bypassing the ruminant digestive tract |
| AR039365A1 (en) * | 2002-11-08 | 2005-02-16 | Magri Federico German | A METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION OF A CONCENTRATED INOCULANT AND CONCENTRATED INOCULATING COMPOSITION OBTAINED WITH SUCH METHOD |
| US7836630B2 (en) * | 2002-12-03 | 2010-11-23 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Method of protecting seeds treated with a phytotoxic agent |
| EP2001821B1 (en) * | 2006-03-22 | 2016-09-07 | Adjuvants Plus Inc. | The production and use of endophytes as novel inoculants for promoting enhanced plant vigor, health, growth, yield reducing environmental stress and for reducing dependency on chemical pesticides for pest control |
| DK2473034T3 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2021-02-08 | Fbsciences Holdings Inc | Seed treatment compositions and method |
| EP2482638A4 (en) | 2009-09-28 | 2013-08-07 | Fbsciences Holdings Inc | Methods of reducing plant stress |
| WO2011114280A2 (en) * | 2010-03-18 | 2011-09-22 | Basf Se | Fungicidal compositions comprising comprising a phosphate solubilizing microorganism and a fungicidally active compound |
| CA2805115A1 (en) | 2010-07-15 | 2012-01-19 | Fbsciences Holdings, Inc. | Microorganism compositions and methods |
| KR101729123B1 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2017-05-02 | 노보자임스 바이오로지컬스 인코포레이티드 | Competitive and effective bradyrhizobium japonicum strains |
| US9055746B2 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2015-06-16 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Chitooligosaccharides and methods for use in enhancing plant growth |
| WO2013044214A1 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2013-03-28 | Novozymes Biologicals Holdings A/S | Combinations of lipo-chitooligosaccharides and methods for use in enhancing plant growth |
| US8946119B2 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2015-02-03 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Chitooligosaccharides and methods for use in enhancing soybean growth |
| AU2012312006B2 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2015-10-29 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Chitooligosaccharides and methods for use in enhancing corn growth |
| RU2479974C1 (en) * | 2011-11-24 | 2013-04-27 | Федеральное государственное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования КАБАРДИНО-БАЛКАРСКАЯ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННАЯ СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННАЯ АКАДЕМИЯ ИМЕНИ В.М. КОКОВА | Method of presowing treatment of alfalfa seeds |
| MX2014006808A (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2014-10-24 | Novozymes Bioag As | Bradyrhizobium strains. |
| AU2013207818B2 (en) | 2012-01-12 | 2017-02-02 | Fbsciences Holdings, Inc. | Modulation of plant biology |
| CN102690763B (en) * | 2012-02-23 | 2014-01-01 | 西北大学 | Enterobacter agglomerans with phosphate-solubilizing capacity, and application thereof |
| WO2014147528A1 (en) | 2013-03-20 | 2014-09-25 | Basf Corporation | Synergistic compositions comprising a bacillus subtilis strain and a biopesticide |
| EP2962568A1 (en) | 2014-07-01 | 2016-01-06 | Basf Se | Mixtures comprising a bacillus amyliquefaciens ssp. plantarum strain and a pesticide |
| EP2952506A1 (en) | 2014-06-06 | 2015-12-09 | Basf Se | Substituted [1,2,4]triazole and imidazole compounds |
| EP2952512A1 (en) | 2014-06-06 | 2015-12-09 | Basf Se | Substituted [1,2,4]triazole compounds |
| EP2952507A1 (en) | 2014-06-06 | 2015-12-09 | Basf Se | Substituted [1,2,4]triazole compounds |
| EP2962567A1 (en) | 2014-07-01 | 2016-01-06 | Basf Se | Ternary mixtures comprising biopesticides and at least two chemical insecticides |
| JP2017538860A (en) | 2014-10-24 | 2017-12-28 | ビーエーエスエフ ソシエタス・ヨーロピアＢａｓｆ Ｓｅ | Non-amphoteric quaternizable water-soluble polymer for modifying the surface charge of solid particles |
| WO2016128239A1 (en) | 2015-02-11 | 2016-08-18 | Basf Se | Pesticidal mixture comprising a pyrazole compound and a biopesticide |
| MX2017011682A (en) | 2015-03-11 | 2018-02-09 | Basf Agrochemical Products Bv | Pesticidal mixture comprising a carboxamide compound and a biopesticide. |
| CN107592790B (en) | 2015-03-11 | 2022-03-25 | 巴斯夫农业化学品有限公司 | Pesticidal mixtures comprising carboxamide compounds and biopesticides |
| EP3310172A1 (en) | 2015-06-16 | 2018-04-25 | BASF Agrochemical Products B.V. | Method for managing flea beetles of the family chrysomelidae in brassica crops |
| EP3111763A1 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2017-01-04 | BASF Agro B.V. | Pesticidal compositions comprising a triazole compound |
| CN113303339A (en) | 2015-11-30 | 2021-08-27 | 巴斯夫欧洲公司 | Mixture of cis-jasmone and bacillus amyloliquefaciens |
| EP3205209A1 (en) | 2016-02-09 | 2017-08-16 | Basf Se | Mixtures and compositions comprising paenibacillus strains or metabolites thereof and other biopesticides |
| CN105950520B (en) * | 2016-07-18 | 2019-05-10 | 武汉市农业科学技术研究院作物科学研究所 | A kind of rhizobium of efficient phosphate-solubilizing and its application |
| US20190200612A1 (en) | 2016-09-13 | 2019-07-04 | Basf Se | Fungicidal mixtures i comprising quinoline fungicides |
| WO2018149754A1 (en) | 2017-02-16 | 2018-08-23 | Basf Se | Pyridine compounds |
| CN110506038B (en) | 2017-03-28 | 2023-11-24 | 巴斯夫欧洲公司 | Pesticidal compounds |
| WO2018184882A1 (en) | 2017-04-06 | 2018-10-11 | Basf Se | Pyridine compounds |
| RU2019136972A (en) | 2017-04-26 | 2021-05-26 | Басф Се | SUBSTITUTED SUCCINIMIDE DERIVATIVES AS PESTICIDES |
| JP2020519607A (en) | 2017-05-10 | 2020-07-02 | ビーエーエスエフ ソシエタス・ヨーロピアＢａｓｆ Ｓｅ | Bicyclic pesticide compounds |
| AU2018278714B2 (en) | 2017-05-30 | 2022-06-02 | Basf Se | Pyridine and pyrazine compounds |
| BR112019025331A2 (en) | 2017-06-16 | 2020-06-23 | Basf Se | COMPOUNDS OF FORMULA (I), COMPOSITION, METHODS OF PROTECTION OF CROPS AND COMBAT, NON-THERAPEUTIC METHOD OF TREATMENT, SEED, USE OF COMPOUNDS AND USE OF COMPOUND |
| CN110678469B (en) | 2017-06-19 | 2023-03-03 | 巴斯夫欧洲公司 | Substituted pyrimidinium compounds and derivatives for combating animal pests |
| WO2018234488A1 (en) | 2017-06-23 | 2018-12-27 | Basf Se | Substituted cyclopropyl derivatives |
| EP3453706A1 (en) | 2017-09-08 | 2019-03-13 | Basf Se | Pesticidal imidazole compounds |
| WO2019057660A1 (en) | 2017-09-25 | 2019-03-28 | Basf Se | Indole and azaindole compounds with substituted 6-membered aryl and heteroaryl rings as agrochemical fungicides |
| BR112020006037A2 (en) | 2017-10-13 | 2020-10-06 | Basf Se | compounds, pesticide mixtures, agrochemical composition, methods to control invertebrate pests, to protect plants and to protect plant propagation material, seed and use of compounds of formula (i) |
| WO2019121143A1 (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2019-06-27 | Basf Se | Substituted cyclopropyl derivatives |
| BR112020012566B1 (en) | 2017-12-21 | 2024-03-05 | Basf Se | COMPOUND OF FORMULA I, COMPOSITION, METHOD OF COMBAT OR CONTROL OF INVERTEBRATE PESTS, METHOD OF PROTECTING GROWING PLANTS AGAINST ATTACK OR INFESTATION BY INVERTEBRATE PESTS, COATED SEED, AND USES OF A COMPOUND OF FORMULA I |
| KR20200108007A (en) | 2018-01-09 | 2020-09-16 | 바스프 에스이 | Silylethynyl Hetaryl Compound as Nitrification Inhibitor |
| WO2019137995A1 (en) | 2018-01-11 | 2019-07-18 | Basf Se | Novel pyridazine compounds for controlling invertebrate pests |
| WO2019142199A1 (en) * | 2018-01-21 | 2019-07-25 | Grace Breeding Nitrogen Fixation Technologies Ltd. | Compositions containing combinations of nitrogen-fixing bacteria and additional agents and their use in fixing nitrogen in plant species |
| CN111683529B (en) | 2018-02-28 | 2022-10-14 | 巴斯夫欧洲公司 | Use of alkoxypyrazoles as nitrification inhibitors |
| EP3758491A1 (en) | 2018-02-28 | 2021-01-06 | Basf Se | Use of pyrazole propargyl ethers as nitrification inhibitors |
| JP7444780B2 (en) | 2018-02-28 | 2024-03-06 | ビーエーエスエフ ソシエタス・ヨーロピア | Use of N-functionalized alkoxypyrazole compounds as nitrification inhibitors |
| WO2019175712A1 (en) | 2018-03-14 | 2019-09-19 | Basf Corporation | New uses for catechol molecules as inhibitors to glutathione s-transferase metabolic pathways |
| WO2019175713A1 (en) | 2018-03-14 | 2019-09-19 | Basf Corporation | New catechol molecules and their use as inhibitors to p450 related metabolic pathways |
| WO2019224092A1 (en) | 2018-05-22 | 2019-11-28 | Basf Se | Pesticidally active c15-derivatives of ginkgolides |
| WO2020002472A1 (en) | 2018-06-28 | 2020-01-02 | Basf Se | Use of alkynylthiophenes as nitrification inhibitors |
| EP3826983B1 (en) | 2018-07-23 | 2024-05-15 | Basf Se | Use of substituted 2-thiazolines as nitrification inhibitors |
| PL3826982T3 (en) | 2018-07-23 | 2024-04-02 | Basf Se | Use of a substituted thiazolidine compound as nitrification inhibitor |
| EP3613736A1 (en) | 2018-08-22 | 2020-02-26 | Basf Se | Substituted glutarimide derivatives |
| EP3628158A1 (en) | 2018-09-28 | 2020-04-01 | Basf Se | Pesticidal mixture comprising a mesoionic compound and a biopesticide |
| EP3643705A1 (en) | 2018-10-24 | 2020-04-29 | Basf Se | Pesticidal compounds |
| BR112021008491A2 (en) | 2018-11-28 | 2021-08-03 | Basf Se | compound of formula I, composition, method of combating or controlling invertebrate pests, method of protecting growing plants, seed, use of compound of formula I and method of treating or protecting animals |
| EP3670501A1 (en) | 2018-12-17 | 2020-06-24 | Basf Se | Substituted [1,2,4]triazole compounds as fungicides |
| BR112021009395A2 (en) | 2018-12-18 | 2021-08-10 | Basf Se | substituted pyrimidinium compounds, compounds of formula (I), methods for protecting crops, for combating, controlling, preventing or protecting, non-therapeutic method for treating animals, seed and uses of compounds of formula (i) |
| EP3696177A1 (en) | 2019-02-12 | 2020-08-19 | Basf Se | Heterocyclic compounds for the control of invertebrate pests |
| EP3730489A1 (en) | 2019-04-25 | 2020-10-28 | Basf Se | Heteroaryl compounds as agrochemical fungicides |
| EP3769623A1 (en) | 2019-07-22 | 2021-01-27 | Basf Se | Mesoionic imidazolium compounds and derivatives for combating animal pests |
| US20220202017A1 (en) | 2019-05-29 | 2022-06-30 | Basf Se | Mesoionic imidazolium compounds and derivatives for combating animal pests |
| EP3766879A1 (en) | 2019-07-19 | 2021-01-20 | Basf Se | Pesticidal pyrazole derivatives |
| US20230106291A1 (en) | 2020-02-28 | 2023-04-06 | BASF Agro B.V. | Methods and uses of a mixture comprising alpha-cypermethrin and dinotefuran for controlling invertebrate pests in t |
| EP3903584A1 (en) | 2020-04-28 | 2021-11-03 | Basf Se | Use of strobilurin type compounds for combating phytopathogenic fungi containing an amino acid substitution f129l in the mitochondrial cytochrome b protein conferring resistance to qo inhibitors iv |
| EP3903582A1 (en) | 2020-04-28 | 2021-11-03 | Basf Se | Use of strobilurin type compounds for combating phytopathogenic fungi containing an amino acid substitution f129l in the mitochondrial cytochrome b protein conferring resistance to qo inhibitors ii |
| WO2021219513A1 (en) | 2020-04-28 | 2021-11-04 | Basf Se | Pesticidal compounds |
| EP3903581A1 (en) | 2020-04-28 | 2021-11-03 | Basf Se | Use of strobilurin type compounds for combating phytopathogenic fungi containing an amino acid substitution f129l in the mitochondrial cytochrome b protein conferring resistance to qo inhibitors i |
| EP3903583A1 (en) | 2020-04-28 | 2021-11-03 | Basf Se | Use of strobilurin type compounds for combating phytopathogenic fungi containing an amino acid substitution f129l in the mitochondrial cytochrome b protein conferring resistance to qo inhibitors iii |
| EP3909950A1 (en) | 2020-05-13 | 2021-11-17 | Basf Se | Heterocyclic compounds for the control of invertebrate pests |
| WO2021249800A1 (en) | 2020-06-10 | 2021-12-16 | Basf Se | Substituted [1,2,4]triazole compounds as fungicides |
| EP3945089A1 (en) | 2020-07-31 | 2022-02-02 | Basf Se | Use of strobilurin type compounds for combating phytopathogenic fungi containing an amino acid substitution f129l in the mitochondrial cytochrome b protein conferring resistance to qo inhibitors v |
| EP3939961A1 (en) | 2020-07-16 | 2022-01-19 | Basf Se | Strobilurin type compounds and their use for combating phytopathogenic fungi |
| WO2022017836A1 (en) | 2020-07-20 | 2022-01-27 | BASF Agro B.V. | Fungicidal compositions comprising (r)-2-[4-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1- (1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)propan-2-ol |
| EP3970494A1 (en) | 2020-09-21 | 2022-03-23 | Basf Se | Use of strobilurin type compounds for combating phytopathogenic fungi containing an amino acid substitution f129l in the mitochondrial cytochrome b protein conferring resistance to qo inhibitors viii |
| WO2022089969A1 (en) | 2020-10-27 | 2022-05-05 | BASF Agro B.V. | Compositions comprising mefentrifluconazole |
| WO2022090069A1 (en) | 2020-11-02 | 2022-05-05 | Basf Se | Compositions comprising mefenpyr-diethyl |
| WO2022106304A1 (en) | 2020-11-23 | 2022-05-27 | BASF Agro B.V. | Compositions comprising mefentrifluconazole |
| EP4011208A1 (en) | 2020-12-08 | 2022-06-15 | BASF Corporation | Microparticle compositions comprising fluopyram |
| CN116669555A (en) | 2020-12-17 | 2023-08-29 | 巴斯夫欧洲公司 | Spore composition, its production and use |
| US20240101496A1 (en) | 2021-02-02 | 2024-03-28 | Basf Se | Synergistic action of dcd and alkoxypyrazoles as nitrification inhibitors |
| EP4043444A1 (en) | 2021-02-11 | 2022-08-17 | Basf Se | Substituted isoxazoline derivatives |
| KR20240008856A (en) | 2021-05-18 | 2024-01-19 | 바스프 에스이 | Novel substituted pyridines as fungicides |
| EP4341257A1 (en) | 2021-05-18 | 2024-03-27 | Basf Se | New substituted quinolines as fungicides |
| CN117355518A (en) | 2021-05-18 | 2024-01-05 | 巴斯夫欧洲公司 | Novel substituted pyridines as fungicides |
| CA3219128A1 (en) | 2021-05-21 | 2022-11-24 | Barbara Nave | Use of an n-functionalized alkoxy pyrazole compound as nitrification inhibitor |
| CA3219022A1 (en) | 2021-05-21 | 2022-11-24 | Barbara Nave | Use of ethynylpyridine compounds as nitrification inhibitors |
| CA3223077A1 (en) | 2021-06-21 | 2022-12-29 | Barbara Nave | Metal-organic frameworks with pyrazole-based building blocks |
| EP4119547A1 (en) | 2021-07-12 | 2023-01-18 | Basf Se | Triazole compounds for the control of invertebrate pests |
| AU2022321882A1 (en) | 2021-08-02 | 2024-02-15 | Basf Se | (3-pirydyl)-quinazoline |
| EP4140986A1 (en) | 2021-08-23 | 2023-03-01 | Basf Se | Pyrazine compounds for the control of invertebrate pests |
| EP4140995A1 (en) | 2021-08-27 | 2023-03-01 | Basf Se | Pyrazine compounds for the control of invertebrate pests |
| EP4151631A1 (en) | 2021-09-20 | 2023-03-22 | Basf Se | Heterocyclic compounds for the control of invertebrate pests |
| WO2023072670A1 (en) | 2021-10-28 | 2023-05-04 | Basf Se | Use of strobilurin type compounds for combating phytopathogenic fungi containing an amino acid substitution f129l in the mitochondrial cytochrome b protein conferring resistance to qo inhibitors x |
| WO2023072671A1 (en) | 2021-10-28 | 2023-05-04 | Basf Se | Use of strobilurin type compounds for combating phytopathogenic fungi containing an amino acid substitution f129l in the mitochondrial cytochrome b protein conferring resistance to qo inhibitors ix |
| EP4194453A1 (en) | 2021-12-08 | 2023-06-14 | Basf Se | Pyrazine compounds for the control of invertebrate pests |
| EP4198033A1 (en) | 2021-12-14 | 2023-06-21 | Basf Se | Heterocyclic compounds for the control of invertebrate pests |
| EP4198023A1 (en) | 2021-12-16 | 2023-06-21 | Basf Se | Pesticidally active thiosemicarbazone compounds |
| EP4238971A1 (en) | 2022-03-02 | 2023-09-06 | Basf Se | Substituted isoxazoline derivatives |
| WO2023203066A1 (en) | 2022-04-21 | 2023-10-26 | Basf Se | Synergistic action as nitrification inhibitors of dcd oligomers with alkoxypyrazole and its oligomers |
| WO2024028243A1 (en) | 2022-08-02 | 2024-02-08 | Basf Se | Pyrazolo pesticidal compounds |
| EP4342885A1 (en) | 2022-09-20 | 2024-03-27 | Basf Se | N-(3-(aminomethyl)-phenyl)-5-(4-phenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydroisoxazol-3-amine derivatives and similar compounds as pesticides |
| EP4361126A1 (en) | 2022-10-24 | 2024-05-01 | Basf Se | Use of strobilurin type compounds for combating phytopathogenic fungi containing an amino acid substitution f129l in the mitochondrial cytochrome b protein conferring resistance to qo inhibitors xv |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB2080669A (en) * | 1980-07-28 | 1982-02-10 | Coated Seed | The use of microorganisms in conjunction with seeds |
| EP0227336A2 (en) * | 1985-12-02 | 1987-07-01 | Imperial Oil Limited | Nodulation promoting bacteria and use thereof |
| US5026417A (en) * | 1987-03-17 | 1991-06-25 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of Agriculture | Methods and compositions for increasing the amounts of phosphorus and/or micronutrients available for plant uptake from soils |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5484464A (en) * | 1993-12-29 | 1996-01-16 | Philom Bios, Inc.. | Methods and compositions for increasing the benefits of rhizobium inoculation to legume crop productivity |
-
1993
- 1993-12-29 US US08/174,335 patent/US5484464A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1994
- 1994-12-28 CA CA002178601A patent/CA2178601C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-12-28 WO PCT/CA1994/000720 patent/WO1995017806A1/en active Application Filing
- 1994-12-28 AU AU13785/95A patent/AU702488B2/en not_active Expired
-
1995
- 1995-05-30 US US08/453,257 patent/US5586411A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB2080669A (en) * | 1980-07-28 | 1982-02-10 | Coated Seed | The use of microorganisms in conjunction with seeds |
| EP0227336A2 (en) * | 1985-12-02 | 1987-07-01 | Imperial Oil Limited | Nodulation promoting bacteria and use thereof |
| US5026417A (en) * | 1987-03-17 | 1991-06-25 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of Agriculture | Methods and compositions for increasing the amounts of phosphorus and/or micronutrients available for plant uptake from soils |
Non-Patent Citations (42)
| Title |
|---|
| Adu Gyamfi et al Phosphorus absorpiton and utilization efficiency of pigeon pea . . . Plant and Soil, 119, pp. 315 324 (1989). * |
| Adu-Gyamfi et al "Phosphorus absorpiton and utilization efficiency of pigeon pea . . . " Plant and Soil, 119, pp. 315-324 (1989). |
| Alagawadi et al "Associative effect of rhizobium and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria . . . " Plant and Soil 105, pp. 241-247 (1988). |
| Alagawadi et al Associative effect of rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria . . . Plant and Soil 105, pp. 241 247 (1988). * |
| Anusuya, D. et al., "Interaction Between Rhizobium and Three Soil Fungi", Trop. Agric., vol. 62, No. 1, 1985, pp. 13-14. |
| Anusuya, D. et al., Interaction Between Rhizobium and Three Soil Fungi , Trop. Agric., vol. 62, No. 1, 1985, pp. 13 14. * |
| Badr El Din et al Response of Soybean to dual Inoculation . . . Z. Pflanzenernaehr.Bodenk. 149, pp. 130 135 (1986). * |
| Badr El-Din et al "Response of Soybean to dual Inoculation . . . " Z. Pflanzenernaehr.Bodenk. 149, pp. 130-135 (1986). |
| Beck et al "Phosphate Nutrition of Rhizobium spp." Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Feb. 1984, pp. 278-282. |
| Beck et al Phosphate Nutrition of Rhizobium spp. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Feb. 1984, pp. 278 282. * |
| Catroux et al "Rhizobia as soil inoculants in agriculture". |
| Catroux et al Rhizobia as soil inoculants in agriculture . * |
| Curl et al "The Rhizosphere"-pp. 141-155. |
| Curl et al The Rhizosphere pp. 141 155. * |
| Date et al "Preparation of Legume Seed Inoculants"-pp. 243-275 1977. |
| Date et al Preparation of Legume Seed Inoculants pp. 243 275 1977. * |
| Day, J. M. "Inoculant production in the UK"-pp. 75-85. |
| Day, J. M. Inoculant production in the UK pp. 75 85. * |
| Downey et al "Dual Inoculation of Pisum sativum with Rhizobium . . . " Biol Fertil Soils (1990) 10:194-196. |
| Downey et al Dual Inoculation of Pisum sativum with Rhizobium . . . Biol Fertil Soils (1990) 10:194 196. * |
| Griffith, W. K. "Effects of Phosphorus and Potassium on Nitrogen Fixation" IN Phosphorus for Agriculture; A Situation Analysis 1986 pp. 57-62. |
| Griffith, W. K. Effects of Phosphorus and Potassium on Nitrogen Fixation IN Phosphorus for Agriculture; A Situation Analysis 1986 pp. 57 62. * |
| Grimes et al "Influence of Pseudomonas Putida on Nodulation . . . " Soil Biol. Biochem. vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 27-30 1984. |
| Grimes et al Influence of Pseudomonas Putida on Nodulation . . . Soil Biol. Biochem. vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 27 30 1984. * |
| Halder, A. K. et al., "Solubilization of Inorganic Phosphate By Rhizobium", Folia Microbiologica, vol. 38, 1993. |
| Halder, A. K. et al., Solubilization of Inorganic Phosphate By Rhizobium , Folia Microbiologica, vol. 38, 1993. * |
| Holland et al "Studies on microbil antagonism in the establishment of clover pasture" Plant and Soil XXV, No. 3, 1966, pp. 329-340. |
| Holland et al Studies on microbil antagonism in the establishment of clover pasture Plant and Soil XXV, No. 3, 1966, pp. 329 340. * |
| Kucey "Increased Phosphorus Uptake by Wheat and Field Beans . . . " Applied and Env. Micro., Dec. 1987 pp. 2699-2703. |
| Kucey Increased Phosphorus Uptake by Wheat and Field Beans . . . Applied and Env. Micro., Dec. 1987 pp. 2699 2703. * |
| Olsen et al "Biological Contaminants in North American Rhizobial Legume Inoculants" Agric. Canada Research Station, Alberta pp. 1-12. |
| Olsen et al Biological Contaminants in North American Rhizobial Legume Inoculants Agric. Canada Research Station, Alberta pp. 1 12. * |
| Sethi, R. P. et al., "Effect of Fungi on Nodulation and Nitrogen Fixation in Pisum Sativum", Mysore, J. Agric. Sci. 9, 1975, pp. 81-86. |
| Sethi, R. P. et al., Effect of Fungi on Nodulation and Nitrogen Fixation in Pisum Sativum , Mysore, J. Agric. Sci. 9, 1975, pp. 81 86. * |
| Sparrow et al "Survival of Rhizobium phaseoli in Six Carrier Materials" Agronomy Journal, vol. 75, Mar./Apr. 1983 pp. 181-184. |
| Sparrow et al Survival of Rhizobium phaseoli in Six Carrier Materials Agronomy Journal, vol. 75, Mar./Apr. 1983 pp. 181 184. * |
| Thompson, J. A. "Legume inoculant production and quality control" IN Report of the Expert Consultation-Food and Agr. Assoc. of the UN pp. 15-32. |
| Thompson, J. A. Legume inoculant production and quality control IN Report of the Expert Consultation Food and Agr. Assoc. of the UN pp. 15 32. * |
| Trinick "Biology" Nitrogen Fixation vol. 2, Rhizobium 1982 pp. 114-116. |
| Trinick Biology Nitrogen Fixation vol. 2, Rhizobium 1982 pp. 114 116. * |
| Van Elsas et al "Methods for the introduction of bacteria into soil" Biol. Fertil Soils (1990) 10: pp. 127-133. |
| Van Elsas et al Methods for the introduction of bacteria into soil Biol. Fertil Soils (1990) 10: pp. 127 133. * |
Cited By (59)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5586411A (en) * | 1993-12-29 | 1996-12-24 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada | Method of preparing a seed treatment composition |
| US5916029A (en) * | 1996-06-26 | 1999-06-29 | Liphatech, Inc. | Process for producing seeds coated with a microbial composition |
| US6228136B1 (en) | 1999-02-04 | 2001-05-08 | Engineering Technology, Incorporated | Cyanobacterial inoculants for land reclamation |
| WO2002020431A1 (en) | 2000-09-05 | 2002-03-14 | Ultra Biotech Limited | A biological fertilizer based on yeasts |
| US20040152596A1 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2004-08-05 | Jari Peltonen | Coated seed and process for coating a seed |
| US20060029576A1 (en) * | 2004-08-04 | 2006-02-09 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, The Minister Of Agriculture And Agri-Food | Biological control of pythium disease in crops |
| US20060258534A1 (en) * | 2005-05-16 | 2006-11-16 | Hill James D | Rhizobium leguminosarum strain and use thereof as plant inoculant |
| US20100154299A1 (en) * | 2005-09-16 | 2010-06-24 | Takeshi Kobayashi | Seed Coated with Antagonistic Microorganism, Method for Producing the Seed, and Disease Control Method for Crop |
| US10308561B2 (en) | 2008-10-01 | 2019-06-04 | Novozymes Biologicals Limited | Methods and compositions for increasing the amounts of phosphorus available for plant uptake from soils |
| US9732007B2 (en) | 2008-10-01 | 2017-08-15 | Novozymes Biologicals Limited | Methods and compositions for increasing the amounts of phosphorus available for plant uptake from soils |
| US11059759B2 (en) | 2008-10-01 | 2021-07-13 | Novozymes Biologicals Limited | Methods and compositions for increasing the amounts of phosphorus available for plant uptake from soils |
| US9101088B2 (en) | 2008-10-01 | 2015-08-11 | Novozymes Biologicals Limited | Methods and compositions for increasing the amounts of phosphorus available for plant uptake from soils |
| US10035735B2 (en) | 2008-10-01 | 2018-07-31 | Novozymes Biologicals Limited | Methods and compositions for increasing the amounts of phosphorus available for plant uptake from soils |
| US20140082770A1 (en) * | 2011-03-17 | 2014-03-20 | Biodiscovery New Zealand Limited | Screening methods |
| US11560340B2 (en) | 2011-09-08 | 2023-01-24 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Seed treatment methods and compositions |
| AU2012308443B2 (en) * | 2011-09-14 | 2017-05-04 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Use of lipochito-oligosaccharides and/or chito oligosaccharides in combination with phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms to enhance plant growth |
| US20140342904A1 (en) * | 2011-09-14 | 2014-11-20 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Use of lipochito oligosaccharides and/or chito oligosaccharides in combination with phosphate solubilizing microorganisms to enhance plant growth |
| KR101400897B1 (en) | 2011-10-19 | 2014-05-29 | 한국생명공학연구원 | Halotolerant Rhizobium sp. isolated from root nodule of Vicia villosa Roth |
| US11466266B2 (en) | 2012-09-19 | 2022-10-11 | Bioconsortia, Inc. | Accelerated directed evolution of microbial consortia for the development of desirable plant phenotypic traits |
| US11866698B2 (en) | 2012-09-19 | 2024-01-09 | Bioconsortia, Inc. | Accelerated directed evolution of microbial consortia for the development of desirable plant phenotypic traits |
| US9365464B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2016-06-14 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Microbial strains, compositions, and methods for increasing available phosphate for plants |
| US9758438B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2017-09-12 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Microbial strains, compositions, and methods for increasing available phosphate for plants |
| EP3611251A1 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2020-02-19 | Novozymes BioAG A/S | Microbial strains, compositions, and methods for increasing available phosphate for plants |
| US10450237B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2019-10-22 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Microbial strains, compositions, and methods for increasing available phosphate for plants |
| WO2014078647A1 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2014-05-22 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Microbial strains, compositions, and methods for increasing available phosphate for plants |
| RU2668832C2 (en) * | 2012-11-16 | 2018-10-02 | Новозимс Биоаг А/С | Microbial strains, compositions and methods of increasing available phosphate for plants |
| US11369110B2 (en) | 2013-03-28 | 2022-06-28 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Compositions and methods for enhancing microbial stability |
| WO2014160827A1 (en) | 2013-03-28 | 2014-10-02 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Compositions and methods for enhancing microbial stability |
| US9986735B2 (en) | 2013-03-28 | 2018-06-05 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Compositions and methods for enhancing microbial stability |
| FR3033978A1 (en) * | 2015-03-24 | 2016-09-30 | Jouffray Drillaud | METHOD FOR CULTIVATION ON A PLOT OF ANNUAL CULTIVATION PLANTS, ADVANTAGESALLY A CULTIVATION OF SALES OR A CULTURE OF PENSION |
| EP3072384A1 (en) * | 2015-03-24 | 2016-09-28 | Jouffray Drillaud | Method for growing annual crops on a plot |
| US10820594B2 (en) | 2015-09-11 | 2020-11-03 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| WO2017044545A1 (en) | 2015-09-11 | 2017-03-16 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| US11472981B2 (en) | 2015-09-11 | 2022-10-18 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| WO2017044473A1 (en) | 2015-09-11 | 2017-03-16 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| US20180320242A1 (en) * | 2015-11-06 | 2018-11-08 | University Of Copenhagen | Microbe associations that have new or improved characteristics |
| US11452295B2 (en) | 2015-11-20 | 2022-09-27 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Composition and methods for reducing corn-on-corn yield penalty |
| US11076603B2 (en) | 2015-12-28 | 2021-08-03 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| WO2017116846A1 (en) | 2015-12-28 | 2017-07-06 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| WO2017116837A1 (en) | 2015-12-28 | 2017-07-06 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| US10856552B2 (en) | 2015-12-28 | 2020-12-08 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| US10874109B2 (en) | 2015-12-28 | 2020-12-29 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| CN105660108A (en) * | 2016-01-08 | 2016-06-15 | 山西省农业科学院高寒区作物研究所 | High-yield cultivation method for alfalfa in semi-arid region |
| CN105638219A (en) * | 2016-01-28 | 2016-06-08 | 山西省农业科学院高寒区作物研究所 | Cultivation method for increasing yield of alfalfa by means of biological inoculation agent |
| US11259526B2 (en) | 2016-01-28 | 2022-03-01 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Phosphate-solubilzing fungal strains |
| WO2017210163A1 (en) | 2016-05-31 | 2017-12-07 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| WO2017210166A1 (en) | 2016-05-31 | 2017-12-07 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable liquid inoculant compositions and coated plant propagation materials comprising same |
| WO2018118740A1 (en) | 2016-12-20 | 2018-06-28 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions and methods for producing same |
| US11618879B2 (en) | 2017-01-04 | 2023-04-04 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Bacillus isolates and uses thereof |
| WO2018129016A1 (en) | 2017-01-04 | 2018-07-12 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Bacillus isolates and uses thereof |
| WO2018129018A1 (en) | 2017-01-05 | 2018-07-12 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Lysinibacillus isolates and uses thereof |
| WO2018218008A1 (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2018-11-29 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable liquid inoculant compositions comprising dodecane |
| WO2018218016A1 (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2018-11-29 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions comprising paraffin oils/waxes |
| WO2018218035A1 (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2018-11-29 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Stable inoculant compositions comprising methylated plant oils |
| WO2019217255A1 (en) | 2018-05-07 | 2019-11-14 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Microbacterium isolates and uses thereof |
| WO2020263734A1 (en) | 2019-06-24 | 2020-12-30 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Erwinia isolates and uses thereof |
| WO2021086695A1 (en) | 2019-10-29 | 2021-05-06 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Microbacterium isolates and uses thereof |
| WO2021101937A1 (en) | 2019-11-20 | 2021-05-27 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Pseudomonas isolates and uses thereof |
| WO2021101949A1 (en) | 2019-11-22 | 2021-05-27 | Novozymes Bioag A/S | Paenibacillus isolates and uses thereof |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2178601C (en) | 1999-10-05 |
| WO1995017806A1 (en) | 1995-07-06 |
| US5586411A (en) | 1996-12-24 |
| CA2178601A1 (en) | 1995-07-06 |
| AU1378595A (en) | 1995-07-17 |
| AU702488B2 (en) | 1999-02-25 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5484464A (en) | Methods and compositions for increasing the benefits of rhizobium inoculation to legume crop productivity | |
| US11059759B2 (en) | Methods and compositions for increasing the amounts of phosphorus available for plant uptake from soils | |
| AU2002227228B2 (en) | Bacterial inoculants for enhancing plant growth | |
| Kucey | Increased phosphorus uptake by wheat and field beans inoculated with a phosphorus-solubilizing Penicillium bilaji strain and with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi | |
| EP2233458B1 (en) | Microorganisms for the treatment of soil and process for obtaining them | |
| AU2002227228A1 (en) | Bacterial inoculants for enhancing plant growth | |
| WO2010109436A1 (en) | Microbial formulation for widespread uesd in agricultural practices | |
| Vargas et al. | Cultivar and pH effects on competition for nodule sites between isolates of Rhizobium in beans | |
| WO1999009834A2 (en) | Method for improving soil microorganism population | |
| AU2016250852A1 (en) | Plant yield benefits by microbials | |
| JPH06133763A (en) | Novel microorganism and blight control agent | |
| KR930009509B1 (en) | Composition of rhizobium sp for soybean nodules | |
| EP0380649B1 (en) | Biological inoculant effective against aphanomyces | |
| JPH0142641B2 (en) | ||
| RU2035507C1 (en) | Strain of bacillus polymyxa bacteria for production of sugar beet growth stimulant | |
| JP2872317B2 (en) | Effective biological inoculum for Aphanomyces | |
| SIVAKUMAR et al. | COMPLEMENTARY EFFECTS OF GLOMUS FASCICULATUM AND PHOSPHATE SOLUBILIZING MICROORGANISMS ALONG WITH RHIZOBIUM LEGUMINOSARUM ON BLACK GRAM (VIGNA MUNGO L.) |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PHILOM BIOS, INC. Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GLEDDIE, SANFORD CHRISTOPHER;LEGGETT, MARY ELIZABETH;RICE, WENDEL ALFRED;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:006878/0455 Effective date: 19940128 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PHILOM BIOS, INC., CANADA Free format text: TO CORRECT ASSIGNEE DATA RECORDED AT REEL 6878 FRAME 455-7;ASSIGNORS:GLEDDIE, SANFORD CHRISTOPHER;LEGGETT, MARY ELIZABETH;RICE, WENDELL ALFRED;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:006949/0601;SIGNING DATES FROM 19940128 TO 19940210 Owner name: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA AS REPRES Free format text: TO CORRECT ASSIGNEE DATA RECORDED AT REEL 6878 FRAME 455-7;ASSIGNORS:GLEDDIE, SANFORD CHRISTOPHER;LEGGETT, MARY ELIZABETH;RICE, WENDELL ALFRED;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:006949/0601;SIGNING DATES FROM 19940128 TO 19940210 |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |