US3727572A - Marine fin stabilizer control circuit - Google Patents

Marine fin stabilizer control circuit Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3727572A
US3727572A US00191676A US3727572DA US3727572A US 3727572 A US3727572 A US 3727572A US 00191676 A US00191676 A US 00191676A US 3727572D A US3727572D A US 3727572DA US 3727572 A US3727572 A US 3727572A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
signal
lift
signals
roll
gain
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US00191676A
Inventor
L Nelson
C Wesner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Litton Marine Systems Inc
Original Assignee
Sperry Rand Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sperry Rand Corp filed Critical Sperry Rand Corp
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3727572A publication Critical patent/US3727572A/en
Assigned to SP-MARINE, INC. reassignment SP-MARINE, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: SPERRY CORPORATION, SPERRY HOLDING COMPANY, INC.,, SPERRY RAND CORPORATION
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B39/00Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude
    • B63B39/06Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude to decrease vessel movements by using foils acting on ambient water
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05DSYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
    • G05D1/00Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
    • G05D1/08Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw
    • G05D1/0875Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw specially adapted to water vehicles

Definitions

  • WV N.% 51.55 : mm M Z imam I] 2 Z V+ 2 W W 51 ⁇ A NNN d/MNN kNN r CH BY 1 MARINE FIN STABILIZER CONTROL CIRCUIT BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION adjustable fins projecting from either side of the vessels hull.
  • a selector switch 33 permits operation in the automatic mode or the manual mode.
  • the switch 33 has been illustrated as a simple mechanical switch, it will be understood that the switch ordinarily would be constructed from a network of solid state switching devices.
  • a voltage selecting network shown as a potentiometer 35 for use in the manual mode of operation provides operator selected voltages having magnitudes comparable to those available from the automatic mode section of the circuit.
  • the stroke order signal may be used to operate a servo which controls the flow rate of a hydraulic pump by positioning a stroke shaft. The output of the pump then controls the speed and position of the fins used to stabilize the ship.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)
  • Fluid-Pressure Circuits (AREA)

Abstract

A fin stabilizer control circuit accepts signals from a roll angle sensor, a roll rate sensor and a ship''s speed sensor. The signals are first processed in a lift order computer which includes an automatic gain control circuit in which the port and starboard lift orders are compared with the square of the ship''s speed so as to vary the sensitivity of the control circuits with changes in ship speed and ship residual roll motion. The output signals from the lift order computer are applied to a stroke order computer along with feedback signals representing fin angle and lift. Either feedback signal may be selected for summing with the signal from the lift order computer to produce a stroke order signal that determines the rate of deflection of the stabilizing fins. Limiting circuits in the stroke order computer restrict the stroke order signal in accordance with the larger of the two feedback signals.

Description

Nelson et al.
[ 1 MARINE F 1N STABILHZER CONTROL CHRCUIT [75] Inventors: Louis W. Nelson, Upper Marlboro; Charles R. Wesner, Crozet, both of Va.
[73] Assignee: Sperry Rand Corporation, New
' York, N.Y.
[22] Filed: Oct. 22, 1971 [21] App1.No.: 191,676
[52] US. Cl. ..ll4/126, 114/122, 244/77 E, 318/585 [51] Int. Cl. ..B63b 39/06 [58] Field of Search ..114/122, 126; 244/77 R, 77 E; 318/489, 585, 588
[56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,890,673 6/1959 Chadwick, Jr ..114/122 2,960,959 11/1960 Chadwick, Jr. et a1... ..1 14/126 2,979,010 4/1961 Braddon et al. ..l14/126 1 Apr. 17, 1973 Primary Examiner-Milton Buchler Assistant Examiner-Stephen G. Kunin Att0rneyHoward P. Terry [57] ABSTRACT A fin stabilizer control circuit accepts signals from a roll angle sensor, a roll rate sensor and a ships speed sensor. The signals are first processed in a lift order computer which includes an automatic gain control circuit in which the port and starboard lift orders are compared with the square of the ships speed so as to vary the sensitivity of the control circuits with changes in ship speed and ship residual roll motion. The output signals from the lift order computer are applied to a stroke order computer along with feedback signals representing fin angle and lift. Either feedback signal may be selected for summing with the signal from the lift order computer to produce a stroke order signal that determines the rate of deflection of the stabilizing fins. Limiting circuits in the stroke order computer restrict the stroke order signal in accordance with the larger of the two feedback signals.
8 Claims, 3 Drawing Figures ORDER COM PUTER FEEDBACK ROLL ANGLE 12 ROLL RATE LIFT ORDER LIFT V2 F3 COMPUTER STROKE ORDER 131- FEEDBACK STARBOARD F [N TIL m PATENTEDAPR 1 7 191a SHEET 3 0F 3 n m o aw? 4 Gill 1| um. V53 M i fi I/VVE/VTO/FS LOU/S W. NELSON LES R. WES/V59 D MWRJAL ATTORNEY mm n W W M NQN. WV N.% 51.55:: mm M Z imam I] 2 Z V+ 2 W W 51 \A NNN d/MNN kNN r CH BY 1 MARINE FIN STABILIZER CONTROL CIRCUIT BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION adjustable fins projecting from either side of the vessels hull.
2. Description of the Prior Art Fin stabilizers for roll stabilization are well known in the art. U.S. Pat. No. 2,979,010 issued to F. D. Brad-' don et al. on Apr. 1 l, 1961 and assigned to the present assignee, for instance, concerns a fin stabilization system in which the fins arepositioned in accordance with a lift order command signal. Typically, the lift order command signal actuates a hydraulic system through a servo mechanism.
In prior art systems, the servo operates through a slip clutch. Large command signals drive the servo'to its limit stops whereupon the slip clutch prevents further motion in the hydraulic stroke control system. In previous systems, the limit stops are manually adjusted to 100 percent stroke. The slip clutches in such systems,
and a signal representing the square of the ship s speed. The lift order signal and the signal representing the, square of ships speed is applied to a stroke order computer. Signals from the stroke order computer are applied to the port and starboard fin actuating mechanisms 11 and 13 respectively. Feedback signals from the fin actuating mechanisms are all applied to the stroke order computer. The structure and mode of operation of the lift order computer and the stroke order computer will be described in detail. The fin actuating mechanisms 11 and 13 are conventional devices. They may, for instance, be hydraulic devices similar to those illustrated in the aforementioned Braddon et al. patent. Feedback signals representing the instantaneous fin angles as well as the vertical forces or lift to which the fins are being subjected may be however, may experience excessive wear. Furthermore, in prior art systems, mechanical off-stroking is typically used for maximum fin angles only. The limits cannot be programmed to meet changing requirements.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The fin stabilizer circuit of the present invention receives signals representing the ships roll angle, roll rate, and speed. The roll acceleration is computed from the roll rate signal and speed squared is computed from the ships speed. By modifying the lift orders in accordance with the speed squared and the comparative value of the various signals, the circuit compensates for changes in fin activity caused by changes in ships speed and weather, and permits the fins to be used as resonance dampers in severe seas.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a sketch illustrating the operation of a fin stabilizer device using the principles of the invention, and
FIGS. 2a and 2b are schematic representations of a circuit useful in practicing the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT FIG 1 represents a transverse section through a ship employing a fin stabilizing system and illustrates the environment .in which the invention is intended to operate. Port and starboard stabilizing fins project laterally from the sides of the vessel and function in a manner analogous to ailerons in an aircraft. Sensors detect the roll angle, roll rate and speed of the ship. Various types of sensors are known in the art. In many applications, a rate gyro may be used to detect roll rate. This value may then be integrated to derive the value of roll angle and differentiated to derive the value of roll acceleration. Signals from the various sensors are applied to a lift order computer which processes the signals from the sensors to provide a lift order signal derived in a straightforward manner. Fin angle transducers are well known in the art. Lift transducers are described in detail in the aforementioned Braddon et al. patent.
FIG. 2a represents, in functional form, the lift order computer and the associated components necessary to produce the lift order signals. The computer pre-amplifier receives the various signals from the sensors and converts these signals into voltages that may be accepted by the lift order computer itself. Typically, the roll angle signal may be an ac. signal having a frequency of 400 Hertz and an amplitude of millivolts per degree of roll. This a.c. signal may be first passed through a demodulator l5 and a calibrating network 17 adjusted to produce a dc. roll angle output signal from the signal pre-arnplifier having a magnitude of 500 millivolts per degree. The roll rate signal may typically be a dc. signal having an amplitude of 3 volts per degree per second. This roll rate signal may be calibrated in a calibrating unit 19 to produce a roll rate output signal typically in the range of 2 volts per degree per second. The signal representing ships speed is also calibrated in a calibrating unit 21. The output of the calibrating unit 21 is then applied to a conventional squaring circuit 23 so as to derive a signal representing the square of a ships speed. The calibrating unit 21 is adjusted to provide signals having magnitudes that can be accepted by the remaining components in the system.
The roll angle and roll rate signals from the computer pre-amplifier are applied to the lift order computer. The lift order computer derives a first signal representing roll rate and a second signal representing roll angle, plus roll rate, plus acceleration. These signals are summed in a lift order limiter so as to provide port and starboard lift order output signals. The amplitudes of the signals from the lift order computer are modified by a lift order automatic gain control circuit as will be described.
The automatic gain control circuit and the lift order limiter cooperate with the lift order computer to combine the various control signals for optimum performance. It is known in the art to combine angle signals, acceleration, and rate signals for specific purposes. If a ship is displaced about its roll axis by a momentary torque, the ship will heel over to a maximum displacement; then return to a level position. In returning to the level position, the ship may oscillate several times before finally coming to rest. Stabilization circuits may be used not only to minimize the maximum displacement of the ship, but also to eliminate the oscillations by proper damping. Roll stabilization might be used by applying a stabilizing torque which is exactly equal to and opposite the instantaneous displacement of the ship. It is known in the prior art, however, that by introducing control components corresponding to the acceleration and the rate of displacement, superior stabilization may be realized.
A typical damped displacement curve is a singlepeaked curve somewhat resembling a normal distribution curve. The corresponding rate curve rises from zero in the same direction as the displacement curve, passes through a maximum before the maximum of the displacement curve, then decreases through zero to a negative maximum near the end of the displacement curve, whereupon the rate curve again approaches zero, from the opposite direction of the displacement curve. The corresponding acceleration curve rises from zero in the same direction as the displacement curve, quickly approaches a maximum, then decreases through zero at a time corresponding to the maximum of the rate curve and proceeds to a negative maximum at a time corresponding to the positive maximum of the displacement curve. The acceleration curve then proceeds through zero to a secondary maximum near the end of the displacement curve and finally approaches zero from the same direction as the displacement curve.
The more a control is responsive to acceleration, and to a lesser extent, the more the control is responsive to rate, the nearer the control will approach the ideal of completely neutralizing the disturbance. As was mentioned previously, the rate curve is opposite in sense to the displacement curve near the end of the recovery period. For this reason, the rate control is valuable for its positive damping effect. It will also be remembered that the'ac'celeration control reaches a maximum before either the displacement or rate curves. For this reason, the acceleration control is valuable for its anticipatory effect in reducing displacement. The automatic gain control circuit, the lift order limiter, and the lift ordercomputer circuits of the present invention make use of these observations to pr ovide optimum stabilization regardless of ship speed or weather conditions. v
in the automatic gain control circuit, the port and starboard signals from the lift order limiter are compared with a positive signal representing the square of the ships speed in the comparator. amplifiers 25 and 27. The amplifier 25 supplies a positive input signal to the integrator 29 when the port lift order is negative and greater in magnitude than the positive speed squared signal. Similarly, amplifier 27 supplies a positive input to the'integrator29 when the starboard lift order is negative andgreater-in magnitude than the positive speed squared signal. A- mixing network 31 is adjusted to produce a voltage at the output of the integrator that is positive if the output of either amplifier 25 or 27 is positive and negative if both amplifier outputs are negative. The lift order signals are applied to the automatic gain control circuit in a negative feedback fashion. If the magnitude of the speed squared reference exceeds both lift orders, the output of the integrator 29 increases which acts to increase the gain of the amplifiers in the lift order computer and thereby to increase the magnitude of the lift order signals. If either lift order becomes more negative than the speed squared reference is positive, the integrator 29 output decreases so as to decrease the magnitude of the lift order signals. In general, the average input to the integrator 29 is zero only when the integrator output raises the gain of the lift order computer to the point at which the absolute value of the lift order exceeds the speed squared signal for more than 50 percent of the time. Since the amplifiers 25 and 27 constantly compare the lift order signals to the speed squared signal, the sensitivity of the system varies with the changes in the ships speed and ship residual roll motion.
A selector switch 33 permits operation in the automatic mode or the manual mode. Although the switch 33 has been illustrated as a simple mechanical switch, it will be understood that the switch ordinarily would be constructed from a network of solid state switching devices. A voltage selecting network shown as a potentiometer 35 for use in the manual mode of operation provides operator selected voltages having magnitudes comparable to those available from the automatic mode section of the circuit.
Signals from the selector switch are applied through a signal level-adjusting circuit, functionally represented as a potentiometer 37, to gain control amplifiers 39 and 41.
The amplifier 39 provides an output signal that'is used in controlling the gain of an amplifier in the roll rate channel of the lift order computer. Similarly, the amplifier 41 provides an output signal that is used in controlling the gain of an amplifier in the roll angle, plus acceleration, plus roll rate channel of the lift order computer. The amplifiers 39 and 41 are constructed so that the gain of amplifier 39 is larger than the gain of the amplifier 41. Thus, when an increasing voltage is applied to the amplifiers 39 and 41, the gain of the amplifier in the roll rate channel of the lift order computer will reach a maximum before the gain of the. corresponding amplifier in the roll angle plus roll rate, plus roll acceleration channel. Conversely, when the voltage applied to the amplifiers 39 and 41 is decreasing, the gain control acts to first reduce the roll angle and roll acceleration'components in the lift order before the roll rate component is reduced. Since the primary.
signal for stabilization is roll rate, better stabilization in rough seas is obtained than would be possible if all signals were reduced proportionately. Thus, in severe seas, fin activity can be reduced by using the fins as resonance dampers while retaining full stabilization capability for milder weather.
It will also be noted that the same shaping of the gain curve is present-whether the device is-being operated in the manual or automatic gain control mode.
The lift order computer receives the calibrated roll angle signal and calibrated roll rate signals from thecomputer preamplifier. The roll rate signal is applied to a potentiometer 43 and through a capacitor 45 to a selector switch 47. These components permit the module to be matched to the ship at installation by allowing cancellation of an unwanted acceleration signal that may be generated due to mounting the roll angle sensor above or below the center of roll.
The roll rate signal is applied to an amplifier 49. The output of the amplifier 49 is applied to a potentiometer 51 which is adjusted in accordance with the natural period of roll of the vessel. The output of the potentiometer 51 is applied through a multiplier 53 whose gain is controlled by the automatic gain control circuit previously described. The output of the multiplier 53 constitutes the roll rate signal to be applied to the lift order limiter.
The output of the amplifier 49 is also applied to a differentiating circuit 55. The output of the differentiating circuit represents the roll acceleration signal.
As explained previously, the potentiometer 43, together with the capacitor 45, and the switch 47 are used to match the module to the ship at installation. The potentiometer 43 is adjusted to compensate for the magnitude of the unwanted acceleration signal. The switch 47 is thrown to the left as indicated when the sensor is mounted below the center of roll of the ship. In this position the switch causes the signals from the potentiometer 43 to pass through the inverting amplifier 57 in the roll angle plus rate, plus acceleration channel. When the sensor is mounted above the center of roll of the ship, the switch 47 is thrown to the right so that the signal from the potentiometer is applied directly to an amplifier 59 in the same channel. The roll rate signal from the amplifier 49 is applied to the roll angle plus rate, plus acceleration channel'through the resistor 63. Thus the signal at the input to the amplifier 57 represents the sum of the roll angle and the roll rate. This signal is applied to the'amplifier 59 whose'output passes through a potentiometer. 61 which may be adjusted in accordance with the period of roll of the ship. The signal from the potentiometer 61 is addedto the acceleration signal from the differentiating circuit 55 and applied to an amplifier 64. The signal from the amplifier 64 is applied to the multiplier amplifier 65 whose gain is controlled by the automatic gain control circuit represents a roll angle plus roll rate, plus roll acceleration signal which is applied to the lift order limiter.
Thus the signals from the lift order computer represent roll rate and a combination of roll angle, roll rate, and acceleration having relative magnitudes determined by the lift order automatic gain control circuit. v
The signals from the lift order computer are applied to the lift order limiter where they are summed in a summing network'67 and applied to an amplifier 69 whose output represents the port lift order signal. The output of the amplifier 69 is also applied to an inverter 71 whose output constitutes the starboard lift order signal. The output of the inverter 71 is applied to a calibrating circuit functionally illustrated as a potentiometer 73. The output signal from the potentiometer 73 is integrated in an integrator 75 and fed back to the amplifier 69 through the resistor network. The integrator reduces the continuous d.c. offset at the output of the amplifier 71 to zero. Such d.c. offset could result from a permanent list of the ship or from any circuitry between the sensors and the lift order output that might provide an undesired bias.
The lift order limiter also receives the speed squared signal from the computer pre-amplifier. The speed squared signal is applied to a first amplifier 77 and then to a second amplifier 79 arranged in a resistor network as previously described. The output of the multiplier'65 i such that first andsecond diodes 81 and 83 are backthe amplifier 69 is limited in accordance with the back bias applied to the diodes 81 and 83 which in turn is a function of the speed of the vessel.
Each of the port and starboard lift order signals from the lift order limiter is applied to a stroke order computer. A typical stroke order computer is illustrated in FIG. 2b of the drawings. The stroke order computer receives the appropriate lift order signal from the lift order limiter on a terminal 85 and the signal representing the speed squared on a terminal 87. A first feedback signal representative of the instantaneous angle of deflection of the fins is applied to the angle feedback terminal 89. A second feedback signal representative of the vertical forces or lift being experienced by the fins is applied to a lift feedback terminal 91. The lift and angle feedback signals are applied to amplifiers 93 and 95 respectively which provide scaling and offset compensation for the various feedback signals. The
particular feedback signal desired is chosen by means the speed squared signal received at the terminal 87.
The signal from the amplifier 103 passes through a second summing network 107 which is also connected to receive a signal from the switch 99. The switch 99, however, is connected to ground when the lift feedback signal is to be received. Thus, the output of the summing network 107 is equal to the output of the amplifier 103. This output is applied in turn to an amplifier 109 whose output represents the stroke order signal.
If angle feedback is selected, the switches 97 and 99 are thrown to their lower positions as illustrated in FIG. 2b. Under these conditions, the output of the summing means 101 is equal to the lift order signal; and the angle feedback signal, after passing through the amplifier 95, is applied directly to the summing means 107. Thus the signal applied to the amplifier 109 from the summing network 107 represents the sum of the signals from the amplifier 103 and the angle feedback signal as modified by the amplifier 95. The output signal from the summing means 107 is again amplified in amplifier 109 whose output again constitutes the stroke order signal.
A diode network 111 connected across the amplifier 109 provides fixed limits restricting the maximum swing of the stroke order signal.
In addition, variable limits are established by means of a limiting circuit 113 connected in shunt with the diode circuit 111 and responding to the lift and angle feedback signals so as to limit maximum swing of the stroke order in accordance with thelarger of the two feedback signals. The fixed and variable limit circuits operate so that the variable limit circuit restricts the stroke order signal to values within the range permitted by the fixed limit circuit 1 1 l.
The angle feedback signal from the amplifier 95 is applied directly to the variable limit circuit 113. The
limit circuit 113 applies the larger of the feedback signals to the amplifier 119 or the amplifier 121 depending upon the polarity of the feedback signal. The output signals from the amplifiers 119 and 121 are applied to a resistance network 123 and a pair-of limiting diodes 12S and 127. In summary, the fixed limit circuit 1 11 and the variable limit circuit 1 l3 cooperate to provide a limiting signal which restricts the stroke order signal to a value determined by the smaller of the fixed and variable limits.
In accordance with conventional practice, the stroke order signal may be used to operate a servo which controls the flow rate of a hydraulic pump by positioning a stroke shaft. The output of the pump then controls the speed and position of the fins used to stabilize the ship.
The circuit of the present invention generates a stroke order signal in which all gain changes are completed prior to the signals entry into the stroke servo. The circuit also provides fixed and variable limits on the stroke order signal wherein the variable limits are set by either the lift or angle feedback.
. While the invention has been described in its preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the words which have been used are words of description rather than limitation and that changes within the purview of the appended claims may bemade without departing from the true scope and spirit of the invention in its broader aspects.
we claim:
1. A marine roll stabilization system of the type employing adjustable attitu'de fin stabilizers, said system comprising means to provide electrical signals representative of the roll angle, roll rate, and speed of the vessel; means to derive an electrical signal representative of the speed squared from said speed signal and an electrical signal representative of the roll acceleration from said roll rate signal; a lift order computer having a first channel for modifying said roll rate signal and a second channel for combining and modifying said roll angle, roll rate, and acceleration signals, each of said channels including an adjustable gain amplifier for varying the amplitude of the signal in that channel; summing means for adding the signals from said first and second channels; means responsive to the output of said summing means for producing direct and inverted lift order signals; comparator means for comparing the magnitudes of each of said lift order signals with said speed squared signals; circuit means responsive to the output of the comparator means for adjusting the gain of said adjustable gain amplifiers; said circuit means being constructed to increase the. gain of said amplifiers when the magnitude of the speed squared signal exceeds the magnitude of both lift order signals and to decrease the gain of said amplifiers when the magnitude of either lift order signal exceeds the magnitude of the speed squared signal; and stroke order computer means for driving said adjustable attitude fin stabilizers in response to said lift order signals.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein said circuit means of said comparator means may be applied to the adjustable gain amplifiersthrougkh said integrating means. 3. The system of claim 2 w erem the output of said integrating means is applied to the adjustable gain amplifiers in said first and second channels through first and second gain control amplifiers respectively, said first gain control amplifier having a gain greater than said second gain control amplifier so that said roll rate signal in said first channel reaches a maximum before the corresponding signal in said second channel in response to an increasing voltage from said integrating means and remains at a maximum level longer than the signal in said second channel in response to a decreasing voltage from said integrating means.
4. The system of claim 3 further including means to provide lift feedback signals indicative of the instantaneous lift being provided by said stabilizing fins and means to provide angle feedback signals indicative of the instantaneous deflection angle of said stabilizing fins, said stroke order computer means including means to combine either of said feedback signals with said lift order signals in a negative feedback relationship.
5. The system of claim 4 in which said stroke order computer means includes diode limiting means arranged so that the output signal from the stroke order computer means is restricted to fixed maximum positive and negative values.
6. The system of claim 5 in which said stroke order computer means further includes variable limiting means responisve to the value of said feedback signals, said variable limiting means being adjusted to further restrict the output signal from said stroke order computer means to values within the range of said fixed values.
7. The system of claim 6 in which said variable limiting means responds to the larger of said feedback signals.
8. The system of claim 7 in which the stroke order computer means further includes a varaible gain amplifier connected to amplify the applied lift order signal by a gain factor which is a function of said speed squared signal.

Claims (8)

1. A marine roll stabilization system of the type employing adjustable attitude fin stabilizers, said system comprising means to provide electrical signals representative of the roll angle, roll rate, and speed of the vessel; means to derive an electrical signal representative of the speed squared from said speed signal and an electrical signal representative of the roll acceleration from said roll rate signal; a lift order computer having a first channel for modifying said roll rate signal and a second channel for combining and modifying said roll angle, roll rate, and acceleration signals, each of said channels incLuding an adjustable gain amplifier for varying the amplitude of the signal in that channel; summing means for adding the signals from said first and second channels; means responsive to the output of said summing means for producing direct and inverted lift order signals; comparator means for comparing the magnitudes of each of said lift order signals with said speed squared signals; circuit means responsive to the output of the comparator means for adjusting the gain of said adjustable gain amplifiers; said circuit means being constructed to increase the gain of said amplifiers when the magnitude of the speed squared signal exceeds the magnitude of both lift order signals and to decrease the gain of said amplifiers when the magnitude of either lift order signal exceeds the magnitude of the speed squared signal; and stroke order computer means for driving said adjustable attitude fin stabilizers in response to said lift order signals.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein said circuit means includes integrating means arranged so that the output of said comparator means may be applied to the adjustable gain amplifiers through said integrating means.
3. The system of claim 2 wherein the output of said integrating means is applied to the adjustable gain amplifiers in said first and second channels through first and second gain control amplifiers respectively, said first gain control amplifier having a gain greater than said second gain control amplifier so that said roll rate signal in said first channel reaches a maximum before the corresponding signal in said second channel in response to an increasing voltage from said integrating means and remains at a maximum level longer than the signal in said second channel in response to a decreasing voltage from said integrating means.
4. The system of claim 3 further including means to provide lift feedback signals indicative of the instantaneous lift being provided by said stabilizing fins and means to provide angle feedback signals indicative of the instantaneous deflection angle of said stabilizing fins, said stroke order computer means including means to combine either of said feedback signals with said lift order signals in a negative feedback relationship.
5. The system of claim 4 in which said stroke order computer means includes diode limiting means arranged so that the output signal from the stroke order computer means is restricted to fixed maximum positive and negative values.
6. The system of claim 5 in which said stroke order computer means further includes variable limiting means responisve to the value of said feedback signals, said variable limiting means being adjusted to further restrict the output signal from said stroke order computer means to values within the range of said fixed values.
7. The system of claim 6 in which said variable limiting means responds to the larger of said feedback signals.
8. The system of claim 7 in which the stroke order computer means further includes a varaible gain amplifier connected to amplify the applied lift order signal by a gain factor which is a function of said speed squared signal.
US00191676A 1971-10-22 1971-10-22 Marine fin stabilizer control circuit Expired - Lifetime US3727572A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US19167671A 1971-10-22 1971-10-22

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3727572A true US3727572A (en) 1973-04-17

Family

ID=22706467

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US00191676A Expired - Lifetime US3727572A (en) 1971-10-22 1971-10-22 Marine fin stabilizer control circuit

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US3727572A (en)
JP (1) JPS5522318B2 (en)
DE (1) DE2251941C2 (en)
GB (1) GB1347450A (en)
IT (1) IT966417B (en)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3847348A (en) * 1973-11-14 1974-11-12 Us Navy Roll computer
US4074648A (en) * 1976-10-18 1978-02-21 Sperry Rand Corporation Adaptive autopilot for marine vessels
US4261278A (en) * 1979-12-17 1981-04-14 Gaudin George C Gyro-controlled pitch stabilizing system
US4388889A (en) * 1981-03-31 1983-06-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Electrical actuator for ship roll stabilization
EP0129287A1 (en) * 1983-06-10 1984-12-27 Van Rietschoten & Houwens Elektrotechnische Maatschappij B.V. Control system
US4647928A (en) * 1984-02-06 1987-03-03 Marine Partners Stability indicator for marine vessel
GB2235662A (en) * 1989-09-08 1991-03-13 Daiichi Electric Kabushiki Kai Attitude control for aircraft or marine vessels
US5121702A (en) * 1988-07-07 1992-06-16 Gec-Marconi Limited Underwater vehicle
WO1993000255A2 (en) * 1991-06-26 1993-01-07 Vickers Plc Ship stabilizer automatic gain control system
US5511504A (en) * 1995-08-09 1996-04-30 Martin; John R. Computer controlled fins for improving seakeeping in marine vessels
WO1999005022A1 (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-02-04 Benny Gaber Watercraft stabilization apparatus
US7006905B2 (en) * 2002-05-20 2006-02-28 Kawasaki Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Method and device for allocating thrust
US9120546B1 (en) * 2013-09-17 2015-09-01 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Actively controlled curvature robotic pectoral fin
CN109625205A (en) * 2019-01-09 2019-04-16 哈尔滨理工大学 A kind of stabilizer feeds back the substep fusion method of lift signal more
CN114036633A (en) * 2021-11-04 2022-02-11 哈尔滨工程大学 Fusion method for calculating dynamic lift of fin

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5828958Y2 (en) * 1978-11-16 1983-06-24 三菱重工業株式会社 High-speed boat sway reduction device
DE102009002107A1 (en) * 2009-04-01 2010-10-14 Zf Friedrichshafen Ag Method for controlling a ship and control arrangement

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2890673A (en) * 1954-03-11 1959-06-16 Jr Joseph H Chadwick Control system for stabilizing fins
US2960959A (en) * 1956-09-17 1960-11-22 Sperry Rand Corp Roll stabilization system for marine vessels
US2979010A (en) * 1955-06-20 1961-04-11 Sperry Rand Corp Ship stabilization system

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3020869A (en) * 1959-08-12 1962-02-13 Sperry Rand Corp Activated fin ship stabilizer

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2890673A (en) * 1954-03-11 1959-06-16 Jr Joseph H Chadwick Control system for stabilizing fins
US2979010A (en) * 1955-06-20 1961-04-11 Sperry Rand Corp Ship stabilization system
US2960959A (en) * 1956-09-17 1960-11-22 Sperry Rand Corp Roll stabilization system for marine vessels

Cited By (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3847348A (en) * 1973-11-14 1974-11-12 Us Navy Roll computer
US4074648A (en) * 1976-10-18 1978-02-21 Sperry Rand Corporation Adaptive autopilot for marine vessels
US4261278A (en) * 1979-12-17 1981-04-14 Gaudin George C Gyro-controlled pitch stabilizing system
US4388889A (en) * 1981-03-31 1983-06-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Electrical actuator for ship roll stabilization
EP0129287A1 (en) * 1983-06-10 1984-12-27 Van Rietschoten & Houwens Elektrotechnische Maatschappij B.V. Control system
US4647928A (en) * 1984-02-06 1987-03-03 Marine Partners Stability indicator for marine vessel
US5121702A (en) * 1988-07-07 1992-06-16 Gec-Marconi Limited Underwater vehicle
GB2235662B (en) * 1989-09-08 1993-07-07 Daiichi Electric Kabushiki Kai Attitude control device for air-sea traffic transportation means such as air craft.
GB2235662A (en) * 1989-09-08 1991-03-13 Daiichi Electric Kabushiki Kai Attitude control for aircraft or marine vessels
WO1993000255A2 (en) * 1991-06-26 1993-01-07 Vickers Plc Ship stabilizer automatic gain control system
WO1993000255A3 (en) * 1991-06-26 1993-02-18 Vickers Plc Ship stabilizer automatic gain control system
US5452674A (en) * 1991-06-26 1995-09-26 Vickers Plc. Ship stabiliser automatic gain control system
US5511504A (en) * 1995-08-09 1996-04-30 Martin; John R. Computer controlled fins for improving seakeeping in marine vessels
WO1999005022A1 (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-02-04 Benny Gaber Watercraft stabilization apparatus
AU728158B2 (en) * 1997-07-25 2001-01-04 Benny Gaber Watercraft stabilization apparatus
US6240869B1 (en) 1997-07-25 2001-06-05 Benny Gaber Watercraft stabilization apparatus
US7006905B2 (en) * 2002-05-20 2006-02-28 Kawasaki Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Method and device for allocating thrust
US9120546B1 (en) * 2013-09-17 2015-09-01 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Actively controlled curvature robotic pectoral fin
CN109625205A (en) * 2019-01-09 2019-04-16 哈尔滨理工大学 A kind of stabilizer feeds back the substep fusion method of lift signal more
CN114036633A (en) * 2021-11-04 2022-02-11 哈尔滨工程大学 Fusion method for calculating dynamic lift of fin

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB1347450A (en) 1974-02-27
JPS4850495A (en) 1973-07-16
DE2251941A1 (en) 1973-04-26
IT966417B (en) 1974-02-11
DE2251941C2 (en) 1981-12-24
JPS5522318B2 (en) 1980-06-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3727572A (en) Marine fin stabilizer control circuit
US4213584A (en) Helicopter hover stability and cruise gust effect alleviation
US4035705A (en) Fail-safe dual channel automatic pilot with maneuver limiting
US3604907A (en) Steering command computer for navigable craft
US3156209A (en) Autopilot for hydrofoil craft
US3715571A (en) Ship's turn rate control system
US3656043A (en) Steering system with automatic increase of rate time
US5112009A (en) Pitch control system for aircraft
GB1568694A (en) Automatic piloting system
US4298833A (en) Apparatus for damping operator induced oscillations of a controlled system
US4178871A (en) Automatic control system for hydrofoil craft
US3191567A (en) Control for hydrofoil craft
US3604386A (en) Automatic installation for the transversal balancing of a ship
US6386485B1 (en) Arrangement and method for regulating the steering force in a mechanical steering system for an aircraft
US3149601A (en) Self-adaptive control system
US3169501A (en) Ship stabilization apparatus
US4485446A (en) Aircraft lift control system with acceleration and attitude limiting
US3241027A (en) Aerospace vehicle attitude control system
JPS60277B2 (en) Marine automatic steering system
US4159690A (en) Automatic landing system for hydrofoil craft
US2960959A (en) Roll stabilization system for marine vessels
US3624364A (en) Parallel speed stabilization system
US4524710A (en) Automatic trim system for hydrofoil craft
US3379396A (en) Control apparatus
US3738304A (en) Ship stabilization apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SP-MARINE, INC., MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SPERRY CORPORATION;SPERRY RAND CORPORATION;SPERRY HOLDING COMPANY, INC.,;REEL/FRAME:004748/0320

Effective date: 19861112

Owner name: SP-MARINE, INC., ONE BURROUGHS PLACE, DETROIT, MI

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS RECITED;ASSIGNORS:SPERRY CORPORATION;SPERRY RAND CORPORATION;SPERRY HOLDING COMPANY, INC.,;REEL/FRAME:004748/0320

Effective date: 19861112