US3464215A - Foundation systems - Google Patents

Foundation systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3464215A
US3464215A US705652A US3464215DA US3464215A US 3464215 A US3464215 A US 3464215A US 705652 A US705652 A US 705652A US 3464215D A US3464215D A US 3464215DA US 3464215 A US3464215 A US 3464215A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
void
grout
casing
hole
concrete
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US705652A
Inventor
Milan Spanovich
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ENG MECHANICS Inc
Original Assignee
ENG MECHANICS Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ENG MECHANICS Inc filed Critical ENG MECHANICS Inc
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3464215A publication Critical patent/US3464215A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D5/00Bulkheads, piles, or other structural elements specially adapted to foundation engineering
    • E02D5/22Piles
    • E02D5/34Concrete or concrete-like piles cast in position ; Apparatus for making same
    • E02D5/38Concrete or concrete-like piles cast in position ; Apparatus for making same making by use of mould-pipes or other moulds
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D5/00Bulkheads, piles, or other structural elements specially adapted to foundation engineering
    • E02D5/22Piles
    • E02D5/34Concrete or concrete-like piles cast in position ; Apparatus for making same
    • E02D5/46Concrete or concrete-like piles cast in position ; Apparatus for making same making in situ by forcing bonding agents into gravel fillings or the soil

Definitions

  • ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A method of forming a foundation system over a void including the steps of drilling a hole to the bottom of the void, inserting a casing to the base of the drilled hole extending through the void and into the roof of the void, filling the casing with high compressive strength concrete, pouring a lean cement grout into the remainder of the hole under pressure as required to fill any intermediate voids and installing footings over the area treated.
  • the structure was either placed on concrete-filled caissons founded below the base of the void; or the voids themselves were filled with a cement grout.
  • the caisson support system is normally economically feasible to depths of 30 to 40 feet.
  • this scheme requires a reinforced concrete grade beam system to transfer building loads to the caissons, further increasing the cost.
  • the grout support scheme usually requires drilling a series of six-inch diameter holes on a grid pattern spaced from to feet on centers over the area included by projecting the plan of the structure on an angle of draw of degrees to the void level.
  • the grout is inserted by either of the two methods: local grout columns; or complete grouting of the voids.
  • Complete grouting of the voids in a mine is very costly and, because of this, it is rarely used.
  • local grout columns installed at 10- to 15-foot centers are common, but have certain disadvantagesthe major of which is the lack of positive control in placing the aggregate prior to grouting.
  • This scheme entails dumping of coarse aggregate into the sixinch diameter holes to the roof of the mine forming a truncated cone shape.
  • Basi- Cally the system of my invention entails the drilling of a normal caisson hole to the floor of the void where a steel casing is installedbut only to the height of the void plus three feet. That is, the steel pipe projects about three feet into the roof of the void while its base is seated positively into the floor beneath the void.
  • Standard concrete is poured into the steel shell to about three feet above the roof of the void and permitted to set overnight.
  • a high slump cement is then poured into the shaft and permitted to disperse into the fissures in the rock overburden to strengthen the rock structure and provide a bond between the rock overburden and the concrete shaft.
  • the method of my invention comprises the steps of drilling a hole to the bottom of the void, inserting a casing to the base of the drilled hole extending through the void and a substantial distance into the roof of the void, filling the casing with high compressive strength concrete and permitting the same to set at least partially, pouring a lean cement grout into the remainder of the hole under pressure as required to fill any remaining voids and installing footings at grade over the area so treated.
  • Ihe casing is preferably a steel cylinder of substantially the same diameter as the hole.
  • the casing extends into the roof of the void at least three feet and is filled with a 3000 pound per inch or higher concrete which is permitted to set overnight before the lean cement grout is pumped into the hole.
  • the lean cement grout is preferably added at a minimum pressure of ten pounds per square inch and up to 40 pounds per square inch or the maximum head or grout whichever is lower.
  • FIGURE ⁇ is a fragmentary section showing a hole drilled through a void according to my invention.
  • FIGURE 2 is a fragmentary section showing the casing and concrete in position according to my invention
  • FIGURE 3 is a fragmentary section showing the casing, concrete and grout in position in the earth according to my invention
  • FIGURE 4 is a fragmentary section showing a conventional footing installed to complete the foundation according to my invention.
  • FIGURE 5 is a top plan view of a foundation grid according to my invention. 7
  • a hole 15 is drilled through the overburden 13 and into bottom 11 to form a base 16 on which is placed a steel casing 17.
  • the casing 17 extends above roof 12 three feet or more to a point 18.
  • the casing 17 is filled with high compressive strength concrete 19 which is permitted to set overnight.
  • the remainder of hole 15 is filled with lean grout 20 which is forced into the surrounding voids 14 so that overburden and grout become one structure supported on the concrete column extending through the void.
  • the conventional building footing 21 is placed on the area over the grout in usual manner.
  • the method of my invention can be practiced at costs which are about fifty percent less than the prior art caisson system and about twenty percent less than the prior art grout system and with savings in time of about a like magnitude.
  • the system of this invention is relatively simple yet far superior to any system heretofore available to solve the problems inherent in fissured and undermined areas.
  • a method of forming a foundation system for building over subterranean void such as fissures, mine shaft, caves, and the like comprising the steps of drilling a hole to the bottom of the principal void, inserting a casing to the base of the drilled hole extending through the void and a substantial distance into the roof of the void, filling the casing with high compressive strength concrete, permitting the concrete to set at least partially, pouring a lean cement grout into the remainder of the hole under pressure as required to fill any intermediate voids and installing footings at grade over the hole and area treated.
  • a method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the concrete filling in the casing is a 3000 pound per square inch or greater concrete.
  • a method as claimed in claim 1 wherein a series of holes are drilled in a grid pattern over an area to be covered by a building.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Paleontology (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Foundations (AREA)

Description

Sept. 2, 969 M. SPANOVICH FOUNDATION SYSTEMS 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 Filed Feb. 15' 1968 Milan Spanoriclz Y INVENTOR.
Sept. 2, 1965 M. SPANOVICH FOUNDAT I ON SYSTEMS 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 Filed Feb 15, 1968 INVENTOR Afilan sound it United States Patent 3,464,215 FOUNDATION SYSTEMS Milan Spanovich, Penn Hills Township, Allegheny County, Pa. Engineering Mechanics, Inc., 3 Gateway Center, Pittsburgh, Pa. 15220) Filed Feb. 15, 1968, Ser. No. 705,652 Int. Cl. E02d 5/34 US. Cl. 6153.52 5 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A method of forming a foundation system over a void including the steps of drilling a hole to the bottom of the void, inserting a casing to the base of the drilled hole extending through the void and into the roof of the void, filling the casing with high compressive strength concrete, pouring a lean cement grout into the remainder of the hole under pressure as required to fill any intermediate voids and installing footings over the area treated.
This invention relates to foundation systems and particularly to foundations for buildings placed over areas having subterranean faults, mine shafts, caves and the like which would furnish questionable support for the structure to be built.
As the population of the land increases, the demand for increased utilization of the land surface for dwelling and commercial construction has dictated the use of more and more of what was formerly considered unusable land for construction purposes. There has as a result been a notable increase in construction in areas which overlie voids produced by mining activity as in the bituminous mining areas of western Pennsylvania or natural leaching as in the cavernous limestone areas of central and eastern Pennsylvania.
In the past, two basic systems have been employed to facilitate construction in such areas: the structure was either placed on concrete-filled caissons founded below the base of the void; or the voids themselves were filled with a cement grout. For low-rise structures such as dwellings or commercial buildings, the caisson support system is normally economically feasible to depths of 30 to 40 feet. In order to prevent bonding between the rock overburden and the caisson it is necessary to install a steel shell for the entire length of the caisson hole which adds substantially to the cost of the installation. In addition, this scheme requires a reinforced concrete grade beam system to transfer building loads to the caissons, further increasing the cost.
The grout support scheme usually requires drilling a series of six-inch diameter holes on a grid pattern spaced from to feet on centers over the area included by projecting the plan of the structure on an angle of draw of degrees to the void level. The grout is inserted by either of the two methods: local grout columns; or complete grouting of the voids. Complete grouting of the voids in a mine is very costly and, because of this, it is rarely used. However, local grout columns installed at 10- to 15-foot centers are common, but have certain disadvantagesthe major of which is the lack of positive control in placing the aggregate prior to grouting. This scheme entails dumping of coarse aggregate into the sixinch diameter holes to the roof of the mine forming a truncated cone shape. Obviously, the contact area at the roof of the mine cannot be more than six inches. A small diameter pipe is then lowered into the cone and cement grout is forced into the aggregate under gravity pressure. With this scheme conventional foundations are constructed at grade. Another disadvantage of this grouting method is the lack of assurance that full contact is being achieved at the roof of the mine. This system becomes competitive with caissons at depths exceeding 40 feet, where casing costs become excessive.
The present invention overcomes the disadvantages of both of these systems and provides a system which is far superior to either the caisson or the grout system. Basi- Cally the system of my invention entails the drilling of a normal caisson hole to the floor of the void where a steel casing is installedbut only to the height of the void plus three feet. That is, the steel pipe projects about three feet into the roof of the void while its base is seated positively into the floor beneath the void. Standard concrete is poured into the steel shell to about three feet above the roof of the void and permitted to set overnight. A high slump cement is then poured into the shaft and permitted to disperse into the fissures in the rock overburden to strengthen the rock structure and provide a bond between the rock overburden and the concrete shaft. Grouting is continued to ground surface. The caisson portion acts as support for the loads imposed by the overburden while the grout provides bonding between the shaft and rock while strengthening the rock by injection. At the completion of the installation of the Groutcase system, the structure can be supported conventionally at grade with no abnormal provisions. The merits of this system over the others is that it retains the positive control of the caisson system with the economic advantage of the grout system.
Preferably the method of my invention comprises the steps of drilling a hole to the bottom of the void, inserting a casing to the base of the drilled hole extending through the void and a substantial distance into the roof of the void, filling the casing with high compressive strength concrete and permitting the same to set at least partially, pouring a lean cement grout into the remainder of the hole under pressure as required to fill any remaining voids and installing footings at grade over the area so treated. Preferably I drill holes and fill them according to my invention over a grid pattern corresponding to the outline of the foundation to be installed. Ihe casing is preferably a steel cylinder of substantially the same diameter as the hole. Preferably the casing extends into the roof of the void at least three feet and is filled with a 3000 pound per inch or higher concrete which is permitted to set overnight before the lean cement grout is pumped into the hole. The lean cement grout is preferably added at a minimum pressure of ten pounds per square inch and up to 40 pounds per square inch or the maximum head or grout whichever is lower.
In the foregoing general description of my invention I have set out certain objects, purposes and advantages of my invention. Other objects, purposes and advantages of the invention will be apparent from a consideration of the following description and the accompanying drawings in which:
FIGURE} is a fragmentary section showing a hole drilled through a void according to my invention;
FIGURE 2 is a fragmentary section showing the casing and concrete in position according to my invention;
FIGURE 3 is a fragmentary section showing the casing, concrete and grout in position in the earth according to my invention;
FIGURE 4 is a fragmentary section showing a conventional footing installed to complete the foundation according to my invention; and
FIGURE 5 is a top plan view of a foundation grid according to my invention. 7
Referring to the drawings, I have illustrated a void 10 having a bottom 11 and roof 12 covered by an earthy overburden 13 having smaller voids 14. A hole 15 is drilled through the overburden 13 and into bottom 11 to form a base 16 on which is placed a steel casing 17. The casing 17 extends above roof 12 three feet or more to a point 18. The casing 17 is filled with high compressive strength concrete 19 which is permitted to set overnight. The remainder of hole 15 is filled with lean grout 20 which is forced into the surrounding voids 14 so that overburden and grout become one structure supported on the concrete column extending through the void. The conventional building footing 21 is placed on the area over the grout in usual manner.
The method of my invention can be practiced at costs which are about fifty percent less than the prior art caisson system and about twenty percent less than the prior art grout system and with savings in time of about a like magnitude.
The system of this invention is relatively simple yet far superior to any system heretofore available to solve the problems inherent in fissured and undermined areas.
I claim:
1. A method of forming a foundation system for building over subterranean void such as fissures, mine shaft, caves, and the like comprising the steps of drilling a hole to the bottom of the principal void, inserting a casing to the base of the drilled hole extending through the void and a substantial distance into the roof of the void, filling the casing with high compressive strength concrete, permitting the concrete to set at least partially, pouring a lean cement grout into the remainder of the hole under pressure as required to fill any intermediate voids and installing footings at grade over the hole and area treated.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the pressure applied to the cement grout is in the range of about 10 to 40 pounds per square inch.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the concrete filling in the casing is a 3000 pound per square inch or greater concrete.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the steel casing extends into the roof of the void at least three feet.
5. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein a series of holes are drilled in a grid pattern over an area to be covered by a building.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,741,910 4/1956 Thornley 52294 X 2,853,858 9/1958 Mintz 52--742 X 2,875,584 3/1959 Turzillo 61-5O 3,395,625 8/1968 Blanchette et a1. 52169 X FRANK L. ABBOTT, Primary Examiner P. C. FAW, 111., Assistant Examiner U.S. Cl. X.R.
US705652A 1968-02-15 1968-02-15 Foundation systems Expired - Lifetime US3464215A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US70565268A 1968-02-15 1968-02-15

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3464215A true US3464215A (en) 1969-09-02

Family

ID=24834384

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US705652A Expired - Lifetime US3464215A (en) 1968-02-15 1968-02-15 Foundation systems

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3464215A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4126007A (en) * 1977-01-03 1978-11-21 L.B. Foster Company Compaction of soil
US4355927A (en) * 1980-07-28 1982-10-26 Karl Stephan Piling structure and methods
US5070672A (en) * 1986-01-30 1991-12-10 Roger Bullivant Of Texas, Inc. Supports for building structures
US6659691B1 (en) * 2002-07-08 2003-12-09 Richard M. Berry Pile array assembly system for reduced soil liquefaction

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2741910A (en) * 1954-07-26 1956-04-17 Joseph H Thornley Building foundation
US2853858A (en) * 1953-07-16 1958-09-30 Philip S Mintz Method of stabilizing foundations
US2875584A (en) * 1955-08-12 1959-03-03 Intrusion Prepakt Inc Method for making structural foundations
US3395625A (en) * 1966-03-04 1968-08-06 Monsanto Co Anchored synthetic turf

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2853858A (en) * 1953-07-16 1958-09-30 Philip S Mintz Method of stabilizing foundations
US2741910A (en) * 1954-07-26 1956-04-17 Joseph H Thornley Building foundation
US2875584A (en) * 1955-08-12 1959-03-03 Intrusion Prepakt Inc Method for making structural foundations
US3395625A (en) * 1966-03-04 1968-08-06 Monsanto Co Anchored synthetic turf

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4126007A (en) * 1977-01-03 1978-11-21 L.B. Foster Company Compaction of soil
US4355927A (en) * 1980-07-28 1982-10-26 Karl Stephan Piling structure and methods
US5070672A (en) * 1986-01-30 1991-12-10 Roger Bullivant Of Texas, Inc. Supports for building structures
US6659691B1 (en) * 2002-07-08 2003-12-09 Richard M. Berry Pile array assembly system for reduced soil liquefaction

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104612695A (en) Repairing and reinforcing method for vertical shaft wall collapsed fiercely
Kijanka et al. Inclined buildings–Some reasons and solutions
CN216239904U (en) Existing building underpins and consolidates connection structure
CN105155602A (en) Multi-support foundation strengthening comprehensive controlling method
CN106065628B (en) Based on the major diameter running water pipe security protection construction method faced forever with reference to theory
CN113863706B (en) Construction method and application device of existing building low-clearance lower rotary-jet static pressure composite pile
US2381014A (en) Foundation and method of forming the same
CN107165173A (en) A kind of foundation pit supporting system and its construction method
US3464215A (en) Foundation systems
CN113235638A (en) Construction method of composite pile foundation with long pile and short pile integrated
CN111576479A (en) Retaining structure of filling slope and construction method
CN111706366A (en) Tunnel lining structure penetrating through large full-filling karst cave and construction method
CN211816394U (en) Retaining wall structure without drainage in bedrock area
Edens et al. Foundation retrofit of three structures utilizing micropiles
Lizzi ‘Pali radice’structures
Dellaria et al. Combining multiple techniques to complete an urban deep excavation
Gray et al. Mine subsidence and support methods in Pittsburgh area
Khomyakov et al. Methods of restoration of deformed retaining walls in seismic conditions
Zargar et al. Top-Down Construction Method: A Case Study of Commercial Building in Tehran
Cherney et al. Strengthening technologies of different types of foundations in buildings
Igba et al. Strengthening and underpinning of a sinking two storey building in Lagos State Nigeria
CN210343358U (en) Plug-in type floor of coal mining tunnel
Ho et al. Jet grouting for the mitigation of excavation wall movements in glacial silts
CN218880866U (en) Lifting foot supporting system under condition of broken bedrock of soil-rock binary foundation pit
Sandene et al. Use of jet grouted columns for deepening of basements and underpinning existing structures at Valkyrien in Oslo