US3358694A - Method of reducing irritants in tobacco by gamma irradiation - Google Patents

Method of reducing irritants in tobacco by gamma irradiation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3358694A
US3358694A US455019A US45501965A US3358694A US 3358694 A US3358694 A US 3358694A US 455019 A US455019 A US 455019A US 45501965 A US45501965 A US 45501965A US 3358694 A US3358694 A US 3358694A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
tobacco
smoke
irradiated
irritants
reducing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US455019A
Inventor
Herman V Boenig
Wingate A Lambertson
Walter J Braun
Homer S Myers
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US455019A priority Critical patent/US3358694A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3358694A publication Critical patent/US3358694A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A24TOBACCO; CIGARS; CIGARETTES; SIMULATED SMOKING DEVICES; SMOKERS' REQUISITES
    • A24BMANUFACTURE OR PREPARATION OF TOBACCO FOR SMOKING OR CHEWING; TOBACCO; SNUFF
    • A24B3/00Preparing tobacco in the factory
    • A24B3/18Other treatment of leaves, e.g. puffing, crimpling, cleaning
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A24TOBACCO; CIGARS; CIGARETTES; SIMULATED SMOKING DEVICES; SMOKERS' REQUISITES
    • A24BMANUFACTURE OR PREPARATION OF TOBACCO FOR SMOKING OR CHEWING; TOBACCO; SNUFF
    • A24B15/00Chemical features or treatment of tobacco; Tobacco substitutes, e.g. in liquid form
    • A24B15/18Treatment of tobacco products or tobacco substitutes
    • A24B15/22Treatment of tobacco products or tobacco substitutes by application of electric or wave energy or particle radiation

Definitions

  • Our invention relates to a method of treating tobacco to reduce the amount of irritants formed when it is burned.
  • Fresh tobacco smoke contains substances which are irritating and harmful to body tissue. Attempts to remove these substances based on a step of filtering the smoke have had varying degrees of success. Filters which are highly eflicient in removing tars make undesirable changes in the taste of the smoke, and yet do not remove some irritants.
  • fresh smoke from burned tobacco contains a significant number of free radicals.
  • free radicals are highly reactive, and, consequently, their presence in tobacco smoke is undesirable since they may combine with other particles in the smoke to form harmful substances, or they may react directly with body tissue. It is desirable to reduce the number of free radicals in fresh tobacco smoke.
  • a method of treating tobacco comprising exposing said tobacco to at least one megarad of gamma radiation.
  • Tobacco treated in accordance with our invention burns to produce smoke containing 25-30 percent less tar, about 50 percent less toluene, and about 50 percent fewer free radicals than smoke from untreated tobacco.
  • the figure is an infrared analysis of the fraction of smoke condensate distilling above 150 C. from non-irradiated and irradiated cigarettes. As can be seen by comparing the curve for the smoke from the irradiated cigarette with the curve for the smoke from the non-irradiated cigarette, irradiation has decreased significantly the amount of tar produced upon burning tobacco.
  • the products formed from irradiated tobacco are less irritating to body tissue than are the products formed from non-irradiated tobacco.
  • the tobacco may be irradiated at any time in its processing from harvestinguntil after packaging for sale to the consumer.
  • a rad is a measure of the energy absorbed per unit weight and is equal to 100 ergs per gram.
  • a megarad is equal to 10 rads.
  • the irradiation may be carried out to over 100 megarads, at this level the taste of the smoke produced on burning is adversely affected, and the dosage should be kept below 100 megarads, preferably from 5 to megarads.
  • the optimum dose is from 10 to 25 megarads.
  • the rate of irradiation is not critical and may be carried out from rates of less than 0.1 to greater than 10 megarads per hour.
  • the limitations of the radiation facility employed will normally fix the irradiation rate.
  • Example I Cigarettes irradiated to a level of 10 megarads by irradiating for 10 hours at a rate of 1 megarad per hour and non-irradiated control cigarettes were placed in a smoking machine designed to smoke 15 cigarettes simultaneously. Each cigarette was smoked in turn, once each minute. A puff consisted of a 35-milliliter intake of air over a Z-second period. The smoke was collected in a cold trap cooled with Dry Ice and propylene glycol. The collected smoke was washed from the trap twice with trichlorotrifluoroethane and three times with methylene chloride. The collected solutions were vacuum-distilled and the following fractions were collected:
  • Example II Cigarettes irradiated to a level of 10' megarads and nonirradiated control cigarettes were smoked in the smoking machine of Example 1. Each cigarette was smoked at a rate of four puffs per minute and milliliters of air was taken per putf. he smoke was trapped as in Example I, the condensate was dissolved in benzene and examined in an electron spin resonance spectrometer within 15 minutes of collection. The relative signal intensities per milligram of condensate were 2.24- for the irradiated tobacco and 5.10 for the non-irradiated tobacco. This shows that the smoke from irradiated tobacco contained less than 50 percent as many free radicals as the smoke from non-irradiated tobacco.
  • a process of treating harvested tobacco for the pnrposeof reducingvtars and free radicals comprising exposing it to at least one megarad of gamma radiation.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing Of Cigar And Cigarette Tobacco (AREA)

Description

Dec. 19, 1967 r H. v. BOENIG ETAL 3,353,694
METHOD OF REDUCING IRRITANTS IN TOBACCO BY GAMMA IRRADIATION Filed May 11, 1965 i 3 I I '2 a I 1 l E N l 2 l n: E
2 g \\J I; i D O :2 *5 S I 2 O I v 2 l I a E i WAVELENGTH Herman .V. Boenig Winqafe A. Lambertson- Walter J. Braun Homer 5. Myers ATTORNE,
(%) HDNVilIWSNVHi United States Patent 3,358,694 METHOD OF REDUCING IRRITANTS IN TOBACCO BY GAMMA IRRADIATION Herman V. Boenig, Wingate A. Lambertson, Walter J. Braun, and Homer S. Myers, Lexington, Ky., assignors to the United States of America as United States Atomic Energy Commission Filed May 11, 1965, Scr. No. 455,019 3 Claims. (Cl. 131-121) ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A method modifying tobacco to produce less irritants when burned comprising exposing it to at least one megarad of gamma radiation.
Our invention relates to a method of treating tobacco to reduce the amount of irritants formed when it is burned.
Fresh tobacco smoke contains substances which are irritating and harmful to body tissue. Attempts to remove these substances based on a step of filtering the smoke have had varying degrees of success. Filters which are highly eflicient in removing tars make undesirable changes in the taste of the smoke, and yet do not remove some irritants.
It has been discovered that fresh smoke from burned tobacco contains a significant number of free radicals. As is well-known, free radicals are highly reactive, and, consequently, their presence in tobacco smoke is undesirable since they may combine with other particles in the smoke to form harmful substances, or they may react directly with body tissue. It is desirable to reduce the number of free radicals in fresh tobacco smoke.
It is one object of our invention to provide a method of treating tobacco to reduce the amount of irritants formed when the tobacco is burned.
It is another object to provide a method of treating tobacco to change the substances produced during burning without making undesirable changes in the taste of the smoke.
It is another object to provide a method of reducing the number of free radicals in fresh tobacco smoke.
Other objects of our invention will be apparent from the following detailed description and the appended claims.
In accordance with our invention we have provided a method of treating tobacco comprising exposing said tobacco to at least one megarad of gamma radiation.
Tobacco treated in accordance with our invention burns to produce smoke containing 25-30 percent less tar, about 50 percent less toluene, and about 50 percent fewer free radicals than smoke from untreated tobacco.
The figure is an infrared analysis of the fraction of smoke condensate distilling above 150 C. from non-irradiated and irradiated cigarettes. As can be seen by comparing the curve for the smoke from the irradiated cigarette with the curve for the smoke from the non-irradiated cigarette, irradiation has decreased significantly the amount of tar produced upon burning tobacco.
While the mechanism by which irradiation of tobacco reduces the quantity of tars, toluene, and free radicals produced upon subsequent burning is not known, and we do not therefore wish to be bound by any theory, it is believed that gamma radiation breaks some of the complex molecules into fragments which either remain in that form or combine with other molecules or fragments. The result in either case is that the product con-.
tains dilferent particles than did the untreated tobacco. These new particles, being different, upon burning produce reaction products which difier from those produced by represented by the burning non-irradiated tobacco. Unexpectedly, the products formed from irradiated tobacco are less irritating to body tissue than are the products formed from non-irradiated tobacco.
In carrying out our process the tobacco may be irradiated at any time in its processing from harvestinguntil after packaging for sale to the consumer.
The quantity of radiation absorbed must exceed one megarad. A rad is a measure of the energy absorbed per unit weight and is equal to 100 ergs per gram. A megarad is equal to 10 rads.
While the irradiation may be carried out to over 100 megarads, at this level the taste of the smoke produced on burning is adversely affected, and the dosage should be kept below 100 megarads, preferably from 5 to megarads. The optimum dose is from 10 to 25 megarads.
The rate of irradiation is not critical and may be carried out from rates of less than 0.1 to greater than 10 megarads per hour. The limitations of the radiation facility employed will normally fix the irradiation rate.
Having thus described our invention, the following examples are offered to illustrate it in more detail.
Example I Cigarettes irradiated to a level of 10 megarads by irradiating for 10 hours at a rate of 1 megarad per hour and non-irradiated control cigarettes were placed in a smoking machine designed to smoke 15 cigarettes simultaneously. Each cigarette was smoked in turn, once each minute. A puff consisted of a 35-milliliter intake of air over a Z-second period. The smoke was collected in a cold trap cooled with Dry Ice and propylene glycol. The collected smoke was washed from the trap twice with trichlorotrifluoroethane and three times with methylene chloride. The collected solutions were vacuum-distilled and the following fractions were collected:
Fraction Vacuum Temperature 33 mm. Hg Room temperature to 50 C. 1 mm. Hg 50 C. to 150 C. Remaining residu Infrared analyses performed on these fractions showed that (1) in fraction 1 there were several compounds present in the smoke from non-irradiated tobacco which were absent in smoke from irradiated tobacco; (2) there was little difference between the samples in the second fraction; and (3) the smoke from irradiated tobacco showed a substantially smaller amount of all components in the third fraction, i.e., the tars, compared to the smoke of non-irradiated tobacco. The infrared analysis of the third fraction is given in the figure. As can be seen from this figure the amount of tar in the smoke from the irradiated tobacco is from 15% to 25% less than the amount in the smoke from the non-irradiated tobacco.
Example II Cigarettes irradiated to a level of 10' megarads and nonirradiated control cigarettes were smoked in the smoking machine of Example 1. Each cigarette was smoked at a rate of four puffs per minute and milliliters of air was taken per putf. he smoke was trapped as in Example I, the condensate was dissolved in benzene and examined in an electron spin resonance spectrometer within 15 minutes of collection. The relative signal intensities per milligram of condensate were 2.24- for the irradiated tobacco and 5.10 for the non-irradiated tobacco. This shows that the smoke from irradiated tobacco contained less than 50 percent as many free radicals as the smoke from non-irradiated tobacco.
The above. examples are offered to illustrate and not to limit our invention. Modifications such as changes in irradiation time and dose may be made Without departing from our invention.
Having thus clescribedour invention, we claim:
1. A process of treating harvested tobacco for the pnrposeof reducingvtars and free radicals comprising exposing it to at least one megarad of gamma radiation.
2: The process, of claim 1 wherein the tobacco is itradiated'to a level of: 5 to 75 megarads.
References Cited 5 UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,926,035 9/1933 Chesley 3,142,759 7/1964 Jefferson et a1.
RALPH G. NELSON, Primary, Examiner. w A. B. CROFT, Assistant Examiner.

Claims (1)

1. A PROCESS OF TREATING HARVESTED TOBACCO FOR THE PURPOSE OF REDUCING TARS AND FREE RADICALS COMPRISING EXPOSING IT TO AT LEAST ONE MEGARAD OF GAMMA RADIATION.
US455019A 1965-05-11 1965-05-11 Method of reducing irritants in tobacco by gamma irradiation Expired - Lifetime US3358694A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US455019A US3358694A (en) 1965-05-11 1965-05-11 Method of reducing irritants in tobacco by gamma irradiation

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US455019A US3358694A (en) 1965-05-11 1965-05-11 Method of reducing irritants in tobacco by gamma irradiation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3358694A true US3358694A (en) 1967-12-19

Family

ID=23807034

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US455019A Expired - Lifetime US3358694A (en) 1965-05-11 1965-05-11 Method of reducing irritants in tobacco by gamma irradiation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3358694A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3589374A (en) * 1967-11-01 1971-06-29 Tomizo Aoki Method of and container for treating tobacco to reduce alkaloid and tar content thereof
US6311695B1 (en) * 1996-06-28 2001-11-06 Regent Court Technologies Method of treating tobacco to reduce nitrosamine content, and products produced thereby
EP0991329A4 (en) * 1997-06-20 2006-06-14 Regent Court Technologies Method of treating tobacco to reduce nitrosamine content, and products produced thereby
WO2010053580A2 (en) * 2008-11-10 2010-05-14 Nicure B.V. Reducing the risk of smoke-related disease
CN110214971A (en) * 2019-07-11 2019-09-10 中国烟草总公司郑州烟草研究院 A method of promoting discarded tobacco leaf organoleptic quality

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1926035A (en) * 1930-02-21 1933-09-12 American Tobacco Co Method of treating tobacco
US3142759A (en) * 1960-01-20 1964-07-28 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Monorail package irradiation plant

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1926035A (en) * 1930-02-21 1933-09-12 American Tobacco Co Method of treating tobacco
US3142759A (en) * 1960-01-20 1964-07-28 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Monorail package irradiation plant

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3589374A (en) * 1967-11-01 1971-06-29 Tomizo Aoki Method of and container for treating tobacco to reduce alkaloid and tar content thereof
US6311695B1 (en) * 1996-06-28 2001-11-06 Regent Court Technologies Method of treating tobacco to reduce nitrosamine content, and products produced thereby
EP0991329A4 (en) * 1997-06-20 2006-06-14 Regent Court Technologies Method of treating tobacco to reduce nitrosamine content, and products produced thereby
WO2010053580A2 (en) * 2008-11-10 2010-05-14 Nicure B.V. Reducing the risk of smoke-related disease
WO2010053580A3 (en) * 2008-11-10 2010-08-05 Nicure B.V. Reducing the risk of smoke-related disease
CN110214971A (en) * 2019-07-11 2019-09-10 中国烟草总公司郑州烟草研究院 A method of promoting discarded tobacco leaf organoleptic quality
CN110214971B (en) * 2019-07-11 2021-12-17 中国烟草总公司郑州烟草研究院 Method for improving sensory quality of inferior tobacco leaves

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1160029A (en) Process for the preparation of aroma substances i
JP3996958B2 (en) Tobacco treatment method for reducing nitrosamine content and product produced thereby
US3358694A (en) Method of reducing irritants in tobacco by gamma irradiation
Siegel et al. The inactivation of the infectious centers of tobacco mosaic virus by ultraviolet light
RU2010545C1 (en) Cigarette filter
EA004911B1 (en) Method for the qualitative improvement of the products of the tobacco plant
Batista et al. Indole alkaloids from Rauwolfia sellowii
US3472237A (en) Irradiated tobacco process and product
CN104799433A (en) Method for treating tea stems to prepare filter stick flavor increasing particles by microwave expansion technology
US3096773A (en) Process for treating tobacco and tobacco obtained by said process
Sen et al. Further studies on the formation of nitrosamines in cured pork products packaged in elastic rubber nettings
US5085994A (en) Process for the accelerated ageing and treatment of iris rhizomes
US2048624A (en) Manufacture of denicotinized tobacco products
Lerner Marihuana: tetrahydrocannabinol and related compounds
US3240212A (en) Methods of treating smoking tobacco
Haynes et al. The effect of reactor irradiation on the thermal decomposition of silver oxalate
DE2233278A1 (en) METHOD FOR INCREASING THE CAPACITY OF TOBACCO
Wang et al. Studies on flavor components of roasted barley: Part II. The major volatile carbonyl compounds
US4307120A (en) Coconut method and product
Rice et al. Isolation of leucogenenol from bovine and human liver
Lindsey The composition of cigarette smoke: studies on stubs and tips
CN114317113A (en) Momordica grosvenori solid spice and preparation method and application thereof
US3575177A (en) Smoking product of cellulosic material subjected to a nitrogen dioxide oxidation and a mild oxidation with peroxide
US3093489A (en) Prevention of off-flavors in radiationsterilized beef
US2534222A (en) Methods of detoxifying poisonous compounds