US3034210A - Inhibition of corrosion of magnesium - Google Patents

Inhibition of corrosion of magnesium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3034210A
US3034210A US837780A US83778059A US3034210A US 3034210 A US3034210 A US 3034210A US 837780 A US837780 A US 837780A US 83778059 A US83778059 A US 83778059A US 3034210 A US3034210 A US 3034210A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
magnesium
percent
corrosion
panel
metal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US837780A
Inventor
Long Herbert K De
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dow Chemical Co
Original Assignee
Dow Chemical Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dow Chemical Co filed Critical Dow Chemical Co
Priority to US837780A priority Critical patent/US3034210A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3034210A publication Critical patent/US3034210A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F13/00Inhibiting corrosion of metals by anodic or cathodic protection
    • C23F13/005Anodic protection
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F11/00Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent
    • C23F11/08Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent in other liquids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F11/00Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent
    • C23F11/08Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent in other liquids
    • C23F11/18Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent in other liquids using inorganic inhibitors
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F11/00Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent
    • C23F11/08Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent in other liquids
    • C23F11/18Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent in other liquids using inorganic inhibitors
    • C23F11/187Mixtures of inorganic inhibitors
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S29/00Metal working
    • Y10S29/034Scaling with other step
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/49Method of mechanical manufacture
    • Y10T29/49826Assembling or joining
    • Y10T29/49885Assembling or joining with coating before or during assembling

Definitions

  • the invention involves an improved method of inhibiting corrosion of magnesium metal and magnesium-base alloys when coupled by or to a less base, Le., more noble metal, and exposed to a corrosive environment.
  • magnesium base alloys is meant herein an alloy containing at least about 65 percent by weight magesium metal. Either magnesium metal or such an alloy thereof are sometimes referred to hereinafater as magnesium.
  • the metal which corrodes during galvanic action is that one which is higher in the electromotve series of the elements, referred to herein as less noble or more base.
  • the less noble metal is sometimes said to be the anode of the galvanic pair and as such continues to give up electrons to the electrolyte and is thereby consumed.
  • magnesium pieces are secured by ymeans of steel, copper or copper-base alloys, or aluminum rivets or bolts, or magnesium plates, sheets, or the like are otherwise in Contact with-steel, aluminum, copper, brass, or bronze plates, studs, conduits, or the like.
  • a particularly effective known method of protecting .magnesium against corrosion by contact with a more noble metal connected thereto by an electrical conductor is the placement of tin metal or a tin-base alloy, containing at least about 40 percent tin, between the contacting surfaces of the metal, Such method is described in my copending application S.N. 718,027, led February 27, 1958.
  • the present invention is a method of suppressing corrosion of magnesium metal or magnesium base alloys due to the galvanic effect produced by a more noble metal coupled thereto in an electrolytic medium which consists essentially of maintaining the magnesium metal or its alloy in the presence of a small but effective amount of a tin compound having a solubility in water of at least 0.05'weight percent at about 20 C.
  • the drawing illustrates, by a series of lign-res, the
  • tin compounds suitable for use in the practice of the invention include organic tin compounds, eg., tributyl tin oxide, dimethyl tin dichloride, stannous octoate', tributyl tin acetate, and inorganic tin compounds, e.g., sodium stannate, potassium stannate, and stannous tluoride.
  • organic tin compounds eg., tributyl tin oxide, dimethyl tin dichloride, stannous octoate', tributyl tin acetate
  • inorganic tin compounds e.g., sodium stannate, potassium stannate, and stannous tluoride.
  • the Itin compound may be added directly to the electrolytic medium or it may be incorporated in a coating which is applied to the surface of either the magnesium metal or of the more noble metal or to both metal surfaces which are in electrical Contact. Any coating material which is satisfactory as a more or less permanent coating to magnesium metal or to the more noble metal may be employed.
  • paints eg., pigments dispersed in a suitable vehicle, eg., zinc chromate, lead sulfate, lead oxide, or iron oxide, or the vehicle alone without the pigment, or a synthetic resin, e.g., a bu'tyral, phenolic, or alkyl type resin, or shellac, a common varnish, enamel, or a rubber or polyvinyl chloride coating in a suitable organic vehicle.
  • a suitable vehicle eg., zinc chromate, lead sulfate, lead oxide, or iron oxide
  • a synthetic resin e.g., a bu'tyral, phenolic, or alkyl type resin, or shellac, a common varnish, enamel, or a rubber or polyvinyl chloride coating in a suitable organic vehicle.
  • the organic tin compound or inorganic tin compound when added directly to the electrolytic medium according to the practice of this invention is employed in an amount of at least about 0.2 weight percent of the electrolyte.
  • the maximum amount employed is not highly critical but in the interest of economy not more than 2 percent by weight of the electrolyte and usually not over 1 percent is recommended.
  • the tin compound is employed according to the invention by incorporating it into a coating material, between 1 and 25 percent by weight of the tin compound based on the weight of the coating material is employed and usually between 2 and 15 percent.
  • the thickness of the coating material is not highly critical and varies with the composition of the material, method of application, and other considerations for determining the thickness of the coating desired.
  • the suppressing eiTect of the tin compound when used according to the invention is enhanced when there is added either to the electrolytic medium or to the coating material, dependent upon the mode of practicing the invention being employed, a soluble nitrate, e.g., an alkali metal or alkaline earth metal nitrate, illustrative of which are magnesium nitrate, calcium nitrate, and lithium nitrate.
  • a soluble nitrate e.g., an alkali metal or alkaline earth metal nitrate, illustrative of which are magnesium nitrate, calcium nitrate, and lithium nitrate.
  • the nitrate is added in an amount between about 0.1 and percent by weight of the electrolyte or coating composition containing the tin compounds. Lithium nitrate is the preferred nitrate to employ.
  • Example 1 A sheet of a magnesium alloy designated AZ31BO, comprising about 3 percent aluminum, about 1 percent zinc, about from 0.15 to 0.20 percent manganese, and balance magnesium was sanded and test panels 1 x 2 x 0.025 inch in size were cut therefrom.
  • AZ31BO a magnesium alloy designated AZ31BO
  • the panel was then removed from the brine, Washed, and dried and found to be severely corroded in the area adjacent to and surrounding the steel bolts.
  • Example 2 Example 2 Example l above was repeated except -that 0.5 percent of LiNO3-3H2O was dissolved in the NaCl and Na2SnO3. SH2() brine solution prior to submergence therein of the magnesium test panel containing the steel bolts. After submergence for 24 hours, the panel was removed, washed, dried, and examined as above. The corrosion of the panel about the steel bolts was even less than that of Example 1. The panel was given a corrosion rating of 9.5.
  • Example 3 The drawing is illustrative of-this example, wherein a magnesium alloy panel is represented by numeral 1; three 1A bolt holes, first drilled in the panel, by numeral 2.; an anodized coating by numeral 3; three additional 1A bolt holes made in the panel subsequent to the anodized coating by numeral 4; a resin-bodied coating, with or without a protective metallic compound suspended therein, by numeral 5; six 1A" bolts positioned in the six bolt holes and tightened rmly against the panel by numeral 6; a second resin-bodied coating, with or without a protective metallic compound therein, by numeral 7; a scraped away or bared portion at lthe junction of the magnesium alloy panel and the steel bolts by numeral 8; the corrosion effects of a salt spray test on the bared magnesium alloy surface, when no tin compound was present in the resin-bodied polymer coating, by numeral 9; a relatively uncorroded bared magnesium panel area, when a tin compound was present in the resin
  • the body of the vehicle consists of resin and shellac dispersed in an organic vehicle.
  • the resin usually is polyvinyl butyral and i-s present in a weight ratio of about 62 parts to 38 parts of shellac.
  • the suitable organic carrier is usually about a 50:50 volume ratio of toluol and isopropyl alcohol.
  • the above test was repeated in exactly the same manner except that the Unichrome AP-lO -bodied primer vehicle employed contained zinc chromate in the ordinary amount used to protect magnesium surfaces.
  • the panel thus coated was subjected to the salt -spray test described above. Examination of the thus treated magnesium panel following removal from the salt spray fog test showed severe corrosion in the area of the magnesium panel adjacent to the steel bolts, similarly as shown in FIGURE 6. The corrosion was of equal severity about each bolt showing that anodizing the interior of the holes had no benecial effect upon the prevention of corrosion about the heads of the bolts. The corrosion, however, was almost, though not quite so severe on the thus ltreated panels as in the test above wherein no zinc chromate was present. The corroded panel was given a relative corrosion rating of 1.
  • FIGURE 7 illustrates the comparative uncorroded area which occurs when the protective coating contains a tin compound in accordance with the invention in contrast to the corroded area which results when the protective coating does not contain a tin compound in accordance with the invention.
  • Example 4 Example 3 was repeated except that 15 percent by volume of stannous octoate instead of the tributyl tin oxide was admixed with the Unichrome AP- clear primer vehicle (no pigment therein) in coating a mag-Y Y 6
  • Example 5 Example 3 was again repeated except that 10 percent i by volume of tributyl tin acetate, instead ofthe 15 percent tin compound there employed was admixed with the Unichrome A13-l0 clear primer in coating the magnesium alloy panel containing the steel bolts.
  • Tributyl tin acetate has a water solubility of about 0.06 weight percent at room'temperature.
  • the magnesium alloy panel thus prepared was subjected to the salt spray fog test as above described. -Examination of the panel containing the bolts showed some corrosion of the panel adjacent to the bolts.
  • the panelV was given a corrosion rating of 8 according to the scale described above.
  • Example 1 To show that the tin compound must possess a minimum degree of solubility in water, Example 1 above was repeated except that 0.1 percent of magnesium stannate hydrate, MgSnOaI-IZO, was admixed with a 3 percent sodium chloride aqueous solution. Magnesium stannate is substantially insoluble in water. After 24 hours of submergcnce in the salt solution, containing the magnesium stannate, the panel was removed, washed, dried, and examined. The examination of the panel which had been thus submerged, showed severe corrosion in the area of the panel adjacent to and surrounding the place of contact with the bolts. The panel was given a corrosionV rating of 0. it is clearly apparent that unless some of the tin compound goes into solution, it does not inhibit the corrosion of the less noble metal of a bimetallic couple subjected to a corrosive environment.
  • MgSnOaI-IZO magnesium stannate hydrate
  • the method of suppressing the corrosion of an article composed of at least 60 percent magnesium metal when electrically coupled to a more noble metal in an electrolytic medium which consists of maintaining said magnesium article in the presence of small, but effective amounts of both a tin compound selected from the class consisting of tributyl tin acetate, tributyl tin oxide, dimethyl tin dichloride, stannous octoate, sodium stannate, potassium stannate, and stannous fluoride, and a metal nitrate.

Description

May 15, 1962 H. K. DE LONG INHIBITION oF coRRosIoN 0F MAGNESIUM Filed sept. 5, 1959 IN VEN TOR. Herben A. De any ATTORNEY v, 3,934,2l Patented May 15, 1962 3,034,210 INITION 0F CRRQSION 0F MAGNESIUM Herbert K. De Long, Clare, Mich., assigner to The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich., a corporation of Delaware Filed Sept. 3, 1959, Ser. No. 837,78) 7 Claims. (Cl. 29-458) The invention involves an improved method of inhibiting corrosion of magnesium metal and magnesium-base alloys when coupled by or to a less base, Le., more noble metal, and exposed to a corrosive environment. By magnesium base alloys is meant herein an alloy containing at least about 65 percent by weight magesium metal. Either magnesium metal or such an alloy thereof are sometimes referred to hereinafater as magnesium.
When dissimilar metals are placed in contact with each other or are coupled by a conductor and allowed to remain in such relationship, without specific protection, whether in the atmosphere, the sea, or the earth, at least one of the metals usually undergoes corrosive deterioration as a result of galvanic action between the dissimilar metals due to the presence of an electrolyte in the ambient contacting medium and the difference in the electropotential of the metals. Moisture and other gases suspended in or composing the air provide an electrolyte in the atmosphere. The Water of the sea and the dis solved salts therein make sea water `an exceptionally good electrolyte. The ground waters carrying dissolved minerals therein, particularly in soils of high organic content and, consequently of an acidic or sour nature, are effective electrolytes.
Metals employed commercially are seldom pure but nearly always contain traces of other metals because the procurement of a pure metal is either uneconomical or practically impossible or because an alloy is preferred due to its superior properties. impure metals and alloys, therefore, as well as assemblies of manifestly dissimilar metals in contact with one another through an electrical conductor, are highly susceptible to galvanic action and the concomitant corrosion of the less noble metal. When dilerent metals are in Contact in a corrosive environment, whether in the same or in different metal pieces, galvanic currents are to be expected.
The metal which corrodes during galvanic action is that one which is higher in the electromotve series of the elements, referred to herein as less noble or more base. The less noble metal is sometimes said to be the anode of the galvanic pair and as such continues to give up electrons to the electrolyte and is thereby consumed.
Attempts to lessen corrosion of a metal due to the galvanic etfect of its being anodic to another to which it is coupled has included the use of sacrificial metal pieces which provide a greater flow of electrons than a metal to be protected and which are thereby consumed in place of the metal sought to be protected. This method is meritorious in a large number of situations but entails the cost, installation, and replacement of the sacrificial metal, such metal being relatively expensive. Other known methods include the application, to the contacting surfaces of the dissimilar metals exposed to galvanic action, of coatings containing such compounds as metal therefore corroded away. A common situation in which magnesium is in contact with a more noble metal in a corrosive environment is ,that wherein magnesium pieces are secured by ymeans of steel, copper or copper-base alloys, or aluminum rivets or bolts, or magnesium plates, sheets, or the like are otherwise in Contact with-steel, aluminum, copper, brass, or bronze plates, studs, conduits, or the like.
A particularly effective known method of protecting .magnesium against corrosion by contact with a more noble metal connected thereto by an electrical conductor is the placement of tin metal or a tin-base alloy, containing at least about 40 percent tin, between the contacting surfaces of the metal, Such method is described in my copending application S.N. 718,027, led February 27, 1958.
Positioning during fabrication, in an assembly comprising magnesium and a more noble metal, a layer or sheet of tin or tin alloy, or inserting between the dissimilar metals after fabrication such tin or tin alloy, is not always practical.
The method described in S.N. 718,027, although representing delinite progress in theart, is not adaptable to conditions where it is not practical to interpose the tin u or tin alloy sheet between the contacting or abutting surfaces of dissimilar metals. Furthermore, the method threin described is not adaptable to protecting against corrosion of the less noblemagnesium due to the presence of more noble impurities contained within the same metal piece.
There is, accordingly, a need for a more convenient method of protecting magnesium metal orL a magnesium base alloy coupled toa more noble metal or contaminated by more noble metal impurities or alloyed with a more noble metal against the corrosive effects induced by the more noble metal which method includes treatment of either the contacting areas or of the electrolyte-containing medium,
The present invention meets this need. The method of practicing theinvention is made clear in the ensuing description and is specifically defined in the appended claims.
The present invention is a method of suppressing corrosion of magnesium metal or magnesium base alloys due to the galvanic effect produced by a more noble metal coupled thereto in an electrolytic medium which consists essentially of maintaining the magnesium metal or its alloy in the presence of a small but effective amount of a tin compound having a solubility in water of at least 0.05'weight percent at about 20 C.
The drawing illustrates, by a series of lign-res, the
eifectiveness of the invention as demonstratedby EX- ample 3 set forth hereinafter.
The tin compounds suitable for use in the practice of the invention include organic tin compounds, eg., tributyl tin oxide, dimethyl tin dichloride, stannous octoate', tributyl tin acetate, and inorganic tin compounds, e.g., sodium stannate, potassium stannate, and stannous tluoride.
The Itin compound may be added directly to the electrolytic medium or it may be incorporated in a coating which is applied to the surface of either the magnesium metal or of the more noble metal or to both metal surfaces which are in electrical Contact. Any coating material which is satisfactory as a more or less permanent coating to magnesium metal or to the more noble metal may be employed. Illustrative of such coatings are various paints, eg., pigments dispersed in a suitable vehicle, eg., zinc chromate, lead sulfate, lead oxide, or iron oxide, or the vehicle alone without the pigment, or a synthetic resin, e.g., a bu'tyral, phenolic, or alkyl type resin, or shellac, a common varnish, enamel, or a rubber or polyvinyl chloride coating in a suitable organic vehicle.
The organic tin compound or inorganic tin compound when added directly to the electrolytic medium according to the practice of this invention is employed in an amount of at least about 0.2 weight percent of the electrolyte. The maximum amount employed is not highly critical but in the interest of economy not more than 2 percent by weight of the electrolyte and usually not over 1 percent is recommended. When the tin compound is employed according to the invention by incorporating it into a coating material, between 1 and 25 percent by weight of the tin compound based on the weight of the coating material is employed and usually between 2 and 15 percent. The thickness of the coating material is not highly critical and varies with the composition of the material, method of application, and other considerations for determining the thickness of the coating desired.
The suppressing eiTect of the tin compound when used according to the invention is enhanced when there is added either to the electrolytic medium or to the coating material, dependent upon the mode of practicing the invention being employed, a soluble nitrate, e.g., an alkali metal or alkaline earth metal nitrate, illustrative of which are magnesium nitrate, calcium nitrate, and lithium nitrate. The nitrate is added in an amount between about 0.1 and percent by weight of the electrolyte or coating composition containing the tin compounds. Lithium nitrate is the preferred nitrate to employ.
The following examples are illustrative of the practice of the invention:
Example 1 A sheet of a magnesium alloy designated AZ31BO, comprising about 3 percent aluminum, about 1 percent zinc, about from 0.15 to 0.20 percent manganese, and balance magnesium was sanded and test panels 1 x 2 x 0.025 inch in size were cut therefrom.
Two holes were drilled in a test panel, thus prepared, of a suitable size to accommodate 'S inch diameter bolts. Threaded, round-headed steel bolts @is inch in diameter and 5% inch long were then inserted into the holes and nuts applied to the threaded end thereof and firmly tightened so that a good electrical contact was made between the steel of the bolts and the magnesium metal of the panel. 250 milliliters of a 1 percent by weight sodium chloride brine was prepared. For comparative purposes, the 4magnesium panel containing the steel bolts was submerged in the brine at room temperature without further treatment of the brine and retained therein for 24 hours.
The panel was then removed from the brine, Washed, and dried and found to be severely corroded in the area adjacent to and surrounding the steel bolts.
An arbitrary scale, ranging in lessening corrosion se- Verity from 0 to l0, was then set up in which the corrosion induced on the magnesium panels containing the steel bolts (when thus submerged in 4the brine without inhibition) was rated 0 and no corrosion was given a rating of 10.
To contrast the corrosive effects of the steel bolts on the panel in the assembly prepared above to such elects, if any, when the invention was practiced, a second assembly was prepared as above and placed in a second solution of NaCl brine as above except that 0.5 percent by weight of sodium stannate hydrate, Na2SnO3-H2O, was admixed with the NaCl brine prior to submerging the magnesium panel-steel bolt assembly therein. Sodium stannate is readily water-soluble. The panel containing the bolts was then submerged in the NaCl brine containing the sodium stannate and maintained therein at room temperature for 24 hours. The panel containing the steel bolts was then removed from the brine, washed, dried, and examined. Very little indication of corrosion could be detected on the panel surface adjacent to the steel bolts. The panel was given a corrosion rating of 9 (10 representing absolutely no corrosion).
Example 2 Example l above was repeated except -that 0.5 percent of LiNO3-3H2O was dissolved in the NaCl and Na2SnO3. SH2() brine solution prior to submergence therein of the magnesium test panel containing the steel bolts. After submergence for 24 hours, the panel was removed, washed, dried, and examined as above. The corrosion of the panel about the steel bolts was even less than that of Example 1. The panel was given a corrosion rating of 9.5.
Example 3 The drawing is illustrative of-this example, wherein a magnesium alloy panel is represented by numeral 1; three 1A bolt holes, first drilled in the panel, by numeral 2.; an anodized coating by numeral 3; three additional 1A bolt holes made in the panel subsequent to the anodized coating by numeral 4; a resin-bodied coating, with or without a protective metallic compound suspended therein, by numeral 5; six 1A" bolts positioned in the six bolt holes and tightened rmly against the panel by numeral 6; a second resin-bodied coating, with or without a protective metallic compound therein, by numeral 7; a scraped away or bared portion at lthe junction of the magnesium alloy panel and the steel bolts by numeral 8; the corrosion effects of a salt spray test on the bared magnesium alloy surface, when no tin compound was present in the resin-bodied polymer coating, by numeral 9; a relatively uncorroded bared magnesium panel area, when a tin compound was present in the resinbodied polymer coating in accordance with the invention, by numeral 10.
An AZ3-1BO panel having a finished sanded size of 4 x 6 x 0.25 inch had a row of three substantially equispaced holes drilled therein to accommodate three 1A x 1 inch bolts, as Ishown in FIGURE 1. The magnesium panel containing the three holes was then given a standard paint base anodizing treatment` designated H.A.E. Anodize according to Military Specification MIL- -C-13335. Thereafter, another row of the three substantially equi-spaced holes, of the same size as the rst three, were drilled in the anodized panel thereby presenting three holes protected by anodize treatment and three holes having the interior thereof unprotected by the anodize treatment as shown in FIGURE 2.
A standard vehicle of the type employed in the preparation of a primer known as Unichrome AP-lO chromate primer, but in this instance without the zinc chromate or other pigment, was obtained. The body of the vehicle consists of resin and shellac dispersed in an organic vehicle. The resin usually is polyvinyl butyral and i-s present in a weight ratio of about 62 parts to 38 parts of shellac. The suitable organic carrier is usually about a 50:50 volume ratio of toluol and isopropyl alcohol. The vehicle thus described was sprayed onto the panel including the interior of the six holes and dried. Thereafter six 1A x 1 inch threaded dat hea-ded steel bolts were inserted into the holes, nuts lscrewed thereon, and the nuts tightened to make a r-m contact between the steel heads of the bolts and the magnesium panel as shown in FIGURE 3. Thereafter a second coat of the Unichrome AP-lO primer, again without pigment therein, was sprayed onto the magnesium panel containing the six steel bolts, as shown in FIGURE 4. The coating was cured by forced air drying at F. for 30 minutes. After drying, the coated surface of the panel containing the bolts was scratched through to bare the magnesium and steel surfaces at their junction, as shown in FIGURE 5. The panel was then subjected to a 20 percent salt spray fog test in accordance with -Method 606.1 of Federal Specication TT-P-l41-B for 85 hours. After this period of exposure to the salt spray, the panel was removed,
dried and examined. Both the exposed magnesium surface adjacent to the steel bolts and the magnesium surface coated with the bodied vehicle containing no zinc chromate or other inhibiting materials,` were severely c or. roded, as shown in FIGURE 6. Both the unscratched and the bared magnesium surfaces were given a corrosion rating of 0.
For further comparative purposes the above test was repeated in exactly the same manner except that the Unichrome AP-lO -bodied primer vehicle employed contained zinc chromate in the ordinary amount used to protect magnesium surfaces. The panel thus coated was subjected to the salt -spray test described above. Examination of the thus treated magnesium panel following removal from the salt spray fog test showed severe corrosion in the area of the magnesium panel adjacent to the steel bolts, similarly as shown in FIGURE 6. The corrosion was of equal severity about each bolt showing that anodizing the interior of the holes had no benecial effect upon the prevention of corrosion about the heads of the bolts. The corrosion, however, was almost, though not quite so severe on the thus ltreated panels as in the test above wherein no zinc chromate was present. The corroded panel was given a relative corrosion rating of 1.
The above test employing the Unichrome AP-l lbodied vehicle without pigment was repeated but, in accordance with the practice of the invention7 there was incorporated into the primer vehicle (which contained no zinc chromate) 15 percent by weight of tributyl tin oxide. Tributyl tin oxide has a water-solubility of about 0.71 percent at room temperature. The thus treated vehicle was sprayed on the magnesium panel both prior to insertion of the bolts and following the insertion of the bolts and dried as above described and illustrated in FIGURES lof the drawing. Thereafter the panel containing the steel bolts was subjected to the salt spray test as above. The panel was then removed, washed, dried, and examined. Some corrosion was -found onthe magnesium panel surfaces adjacent to the steel bolts but it was clearly of definitely less extent than that shown in either of the above comparative tes-ts. FIGURE 7 illustrates the comparative uncorroded area which occurs when the protective coating contains a tin compound in accordance with the invention in contrast to the corroded area which results when the protective coating does not contain a tin compound in accordance with the invention. There was no dierence in the degree of corrosion of the magnesium panels about the steel boltswherein the interior of the bolt holes had been anodized prior to being coated and wherein the bolt holes had not been anodized. The panel was given a corrosion rating of 7.
The tests were repeated employing decreasing percents of tributyl tin oxide. Some benecial effect on inhibiting corrosion was observed `down to l percent by weight of the tin compounds based on the weight of the coating composition. It was found that as much as 25 to 30 percent of the tin compound can be used but between 2 and l5 percent is recommended.
Example 4 Example 3 was repeated except that 15 percent by volume of stannous octoate instead of the tributyl tin oxide was admixed with the Unichrome AP- clear primer vehicle (no pigment therein) in coating a mag-Y Y 6 Example 5 Example 3 was again repeated except that 10 percent i by volume of tributyl tin acetate, instead ofthe 15 percent tin compound there employed was admixed with the Unichrome A13-l0 clear primer in coating the magnesium alloy panel containing the steel bolts. Tributyl tin acetate has a water solubility of about 0.06 weight percent at room'temperature.
The magnesium alloy panel thus prepared was subjected to the salt spray fog test as above described. -Examination of the panel containing the bolts showed some corrosion of the panel adjacent to the bolts. The panelV was given a corrosion rating of 8 according to the scale described above.
To show that the tin compound must possess a minimum degree of solubility in water, Example 1 above was repeated except that 0.1 percent of magnesium stannate hydrate, MgSnOaI-IZO, was admixed with a 3 percent sodium chloride aqueous solution. Magnesium stannate is substantially insoluble in water. After 24 hours of submergcnce in the salt solution, containing the magnesium stannate, the panel was removed, washed, dried, and examined. The examination of the panel which had been thus submerged, showed severe corrosion in the area of the panel adjacent to and surrounding the place of contact with the bolts. The panel was given a corrosionV rating of 0. it is clearly apparent that unless some of the tin compound goes into solution, it does not inhibit the corrosion of the less noble metal of a bimetallic couple subjected to a corrosive environment.
An examination of the examples of the invention and test runs made for comparative purposes shows that a tin compound, having a water solubility of at least 0.05 weight percent, when admixed with an electrolyte in con-i tact with magnesium or its alloy coupled to a more noble metal, markedly suppresses the corrosion of the magnesium due to galvanic action.
rEhe examination Vof such examples and tests further shows that tin compounds, whose water solubility is at least 0.05 weight percent, when admixed with conventional coating compositions accordingto the invention in an amount of 1 percent by weight or more of the coating composition and the composition thus prepared applied to that surface of a magnesium piece or article which is subsequently brought into contact with the more noble metal, also markedly suppress the corrosion of the magnesium due to galvanic action.
The examples and tests also show that the suppression. in accordance with the method of the invention, of corrosion of magnesium when coupled to or in contact with a more noble metal is far superior to such known methods of suppressing as anodizing, applying resin coatings, and applying such resin coatings containing zinc chromate to the surface or" either the magnesium or the more noble metal which may be brought in contact with each other.
Having described the invention what is claimed and desired to be protected by Letters Patent is:
1. The method of suppressing corrosion of magnesium metal when electrically coupled to a more noble metal in an electrolytic medium which consists of maintaining the magnesium metal in the presence of a small but etiective amount of a tin compound having a water-solubility at 20 C. of at least 0.05 weight percent.
2. The method of suppressing corrosion of magnesium metal when electrically coupled to a more noble metal in an electrolytic medium which consists of dissolving in said electrolytic medium a tin compound having a water solubility of at least 0.05 weight percent at 20 C.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the tin compound is present in an amount between 0.2 and 2.0 percent by weight of the electrolytic medium.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein a soluble nitrate is present in said electrolytic medium in an amount between 0.1 and 5.0 percent by weight of said electrolytic medium.
5. The method of suppressing the corrosion of an article composed of at least 60 percent magnesium metal when electrically coupled to a more noble metal in an electrolytic medium which consists of maintaining said magnesium article in the presence of small, but effective amounts of both a tin compound selected from the class consisting of tributyl tin acetate, tributyl tin oxide, dimethyl tin dichloride, stannous octoate, sodium stannate, potassium stannate, and stannous fluoride, and a metal nitrate.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the metal nitrate is lithium nitrate.
7. The method of suppressing corrosion of an article composed of at least 60 percent magnesium when electrically coupled to a more noble metal in an electrolytic medium which consists of incorporating into a film-forming composition a tin compound having a water-solubility at about 20 C. of at least 0.05 weight percent in an amount of at least l percent and a soluble metal nitrate References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,240,021 Rutherford Apr. 29, 1941 2,398,738 Gilbert Apr. 6, 1946 FOREIGN PATENTS 1,062,866 Germany Aug. 6, 1959 OTHER REFERENCES Magnesium (Pidgron et al), published by American Society of Metals (Cleveland, Ohio). (Pages 200, 205,
in an amount of between 0.1 and 5.0 percent, by Weight 20 24@-2440

Claims (1)

  1. 7. THE METHOD OF SUPPRESSING CORROSION OF AN ARTICLE COMPOSED OF AT LEAST 60 PERCENT MAGNESIUM WHEN ELECTRICALLY COUPLED TO A MORE NOBLE METAL IN AN ELECTROLYTIC MEDIUM WHICH CONSISTS OF INCORPORATING INTO A FILM-FORMING COMPOSITION A TIN COMPOUND HAVING A WATER-SOLUBILITY AT ABOUT 20* C. OF AT LEAST 0.05 WEIGHT PERCENT IN AN AMOUNT OF AT LEAST 1 PERCENT AND A SOLUBLE METAL NITRATE IN AN AMOUNT OF BETWEEN 0.1 AND 5.0 PERCENT, BY WEIGHT OF THE FILM-FORMING COMPOSITION, APPLYING SAID COMPOSITION IN AN UNCURED STATE TO AT LEAST ONE OF THE SURFACES OF THE MAGNESIUM METAL ARTICLE AND THE MORE NOBLE METAL WHICH WILL BE IN ELECTRICAL CONTACT WHEN COUPLED TOGETHER, COUPLING THE MAGNESIUM AND MORE NOBLE METAL, AND CURING SAID FILM IN SITU.
US837780A 1959-09-03 1959-09-03 Inhibition of corrosion of magnesium Expired - Lifetime US3034210A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US837780A US3034210A (en) 1959-09-03 1959-09-03 Inhibition of corrosion of magnesium

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US837780A US3034210A (en) 1959-09-03 1959-09-03 Inhibition of corrosion of magnesium

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3034210A true US3034210A (en) 1962-05-15

Family

ID=25275401

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US837780A Expired - Lifetime US3034210A (en) 1959-09-03 1959-09-03 Inhibition of corrosion of magnesium

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3034210A (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3224684A (en) * 1963-04-16 1965-12-21 Hartford Machine Screw Co Fuel injection nozzle
US3252215A (en) * 1961-12-06 1966-05-24 Dow Chemical Co Method of coating a magnesium metal article
US3255974A (en) * 1964-08-17 1966-06-14 Hartford Machine Screw Co Fuel injection nozzle
US3290238A (en) * 1962-03-16 1966-12-06 Reynolds Metals Co Anodizing rack construction
DE1235703B (en) * 1962-05-25 1967-03-02 Celanese Corp Use of organotin derivatives of carboxylic acids as corrosion inhibitors
US3537879A (en) * 1967-01-19 1970-11-03 Wilson Chem Inc Method of coating magnesium metal to prevent corrosion
US3625907A (en) * 1969-12-01 1971-12-07 Us Army Corrosion inhibited paint removing composition

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2240021A (en) * 1935-08-16 1941-04-29 United States Steel Corp Method of preventing wedge and contact corrosion of metals and alloys
US2398738A (en) * 1943-12-28 1946-04-16 Du Pont Process of metal coating light metals
DE1062866B (en) * 1956-11-14 1959-08-06 Unilever Nv Detergents and cleaning agents

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2240021A (en) * 1935-08-16 1941-04-29 United States Steel Corp Method of preventing wedge and contact corrosion of metals and alloys
US2398738A (en) * 1943-12-28 1946-04-16 Du Pont Process of metal coating light metals
DE1062866B (en) * 1956-11-14 1959-08-06 Unilever Nv Detergents and cleaning agents

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3252215A (en) * 1961-12-06 1966-05-24 Dow Chemical Co Method of coating a magnesium metal article
US3290238A (en) * 1962-03-16 1966-12-06 Reynolds Metals Co Anodizing rack construction
DE1235703B (en) * 1962-05-25 1967-03-02 Celanese Corp Use of organotin derivatives of carboxylic acids as corrosion inhibitors
US3224684A (en) * 1963-04-16 1965-12-21 Hartford Machine Screw Co Fuel injection nozzle
US3255974A (en) * 1964-08-17 1966-06-14 Hartford Machine Screw Co Fuel injection nozzle
US3537879A (en) * 1967-01-19 1970-11-03 Wilson Chem Inc Method of coating magnesium metal to prevent corrosion
US3625907A (en) * 1969-12-01 1971-12-07 Us Army Corrosion inhibited paint removing composition

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Chen et al. Microconstituent-induced pitting corrosion in aluminum alloy 2024-T3
US3562124A (en) Composition for corrosion protection
US3151050A (en) Laminated anti-corrosive paint system
US3099083A (en) Method of suppressing bimetallic couple corrosion of magnesium metal articles
US3034210A (en) Inhibition of corrosion of magnesium
US2525107A (en) Coating composition for metals
US4188458A (en) Protective coating on a steel surface
Weisser The de-alloying of copper alloys
JPS5941430A (en) Antifouling metallic material
US1594061A (en) Corrosion-resisting metal
Smith et al. Adhesion failure mechanisms of primers
US3620943A (en) Black antifouling coating compositions
US3033775A (en) Anode for cathodic protection
JPS58219274A (en) Anticorrosive paint for anticorrosive cathode
JP3137771B2 (en) Corrosion protection method for concrete structures by thermal spray coating.
US2935421A (en) Coating iron and its alloys with magnesium
DE3107384C2 (en) Process for the production of a component with an aluminum-zinc alloy coating applied galvanically from an organic electrolyte
JPH0575026B2 (en)
US3756836A (en) Use of cobalt chromates in inhibiting galvanic corrosion
US10662338B2 (en) Passive coatings for bulk aluminum and powder pigments
US3464909A (en) Aluminum alloy galvanic anodes
CA1051692A (en) Anticorrosion zinc based coating material
Wang et al. Corrosion resistance of electroplated Sn-Zn alloy & its improvement
Hildebrand et al. Investigations on Corrosion Protection of Steel in Salt Water by Coatings of Coal-Tar Epoxy or Coal-Tarpitch Epoxy and Cathodic Protection
RU2065894C1 (en) Multilayer coating having corrosion resistance in halide-containing mediums