US20230249250A1 - Infiltrated ferrous materials - Google Patents

Infiltrated ferrous materials Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20230249250A1
US20230249250A1 US18/194,368 US202318194368A US2023249250A1 US 20230249250 A1 US20230249250 A1 US 20230249250A1 US 202318194368 A US202318194368 A US 202318194368A US 2023249250 A1 US2023249250 A1 US 2023249250A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
binder
layer
parts
metallic
skeleton
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
US18/194,368
Inventor
Charles D. Tuffile
Harald Lemke
Patrick E. Mack
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
MacLean Fogg Co
Original Assignee
MacLean Fogg Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by MacLean Fogg Co filed Critical MacLean Fogg Co
Priority to US18/194,368 priority Critical patent/US20230249250A1/en
Publication of US20230249250A1 publication Critical patent/US20230249250A1/en
Assigned to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT reassignment BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MAC LEAN-FOGG COMPANY
Assigned to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT reassignment BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT NOTICE OF GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Assignors: MAC LEAN-FOGG COMPANY
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F3/00Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the manner of compacting or sintering; Apparatus specially adapted therefor ; Presses and furnaces
    • B22F3/24After-treatment of workpieces or articles
    • B22F3/26Impregnating
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F1/00Metallic powder; Treatment of metallic powder, e.g. to facilitate working or to improve properties
    • B22F1/10Metallic powder containing lubricating or binding agents; Metallic powder containing organic material
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F10/00Additive manufacturing of workpieces or articles from metallic powder
    • B22F10/10Formation of a green body
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F10/00Additive manufacturing of workpieces or articles from metallic powder
    • B22F10/10Formation of a green body
    • B22F10/14Formation of a green body by jetting of binder onto a bed of metal powder
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33YADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y10/00Processes of additive manufacturing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33YADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y70/00Materials specially adapted for additive manufacturing
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
    • C22C33/0257Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements
    • C22C33/0278Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements with at least one alloying element having a minimum content above 5%
    • C22C33/0285Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements with at least one alloying element having a minimum content above 5% with Cr, Co, or Ni having a minimum content higher than 5%
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/02Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/04Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/22Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with molybdenum or tungsten
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/32Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with boron
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/34Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with more than 1.5% by weight of silicon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/36Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with more than 1.7% by weight of carbon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/38Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with more than 1.5% by weight of manganese
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F2998/00Supplementary information concerning processes or compositions relating to powder metallurgy
    • B22F2998/10Processes characterised by the sequence of their steps
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33YADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y80/00Products made by additive manufacturing
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/25Process efficiency

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to alloys and methods for the preparation of free-standing metallic materials in a layerwise manner.
  • Layerwise construction can be understood herein as a process where layers of a material are built up, or laid down, layer by layer to fabricate a component.
  • layerwise construction include powder bed fusion with a laser or electron-beam energy source, directed energy deposition, binder jetting, sheet lamination, material extrusion, material jetting, and vat photopolymerization.
  • the primary layerwise construction processes used with metal include powder bed fusion, directed energy deposition and binder jetting.
  • the focus of this invention is in the area of binder jetting including infiltration of binder jet parts.
  • the binder jetting process is a layerwise construction process that has excellent capability to construct net shape parts by jetting (or printing) a binder onto a bed of powder, curing the binder, depositing a new layer of powder, and repeating.
  • This process has been commercially used to produce parts from sand, ceramics, and various metals including Type 316 stainless steel and Type 420 stainless steel, hereinafter referred to by their UNS designations S31600 and S42000, respectively.
  • green bonded metal parts typically have porosity greater than or equal to 40%. Sintering of the green bonded parts increases the robustness of the parts by creating metallurgical bonds between the particles and also decreasing the porosity. Long sintering times can be used to reduce the porosity by more than 5%, however, this also results in part shrinkage and distortion of the parts, and can negatively affect the material structure. Therefore, the goal of sintering of green-bonded binder jet parts is to increase part strength by creating inter-particle metallurgical bonds but also minimize distortion and shrinkage by minimizing the reduction in porosity. Sintering shrinkage is typically in the 1-5% range for binder jet parts, with a similar reduction in porosity, which results in sintered parts with more than 35% porosity.
  • Porosity in sintered parts negatively affects the part’s mechanical properties, thus it is desired to further reduce the porosity of sintered parts.
  • Infiltration via capillary action is a process used to reduce porosity by filling the voids in a sintered part with another material that is in a liquid phase.
  • Part infiltration is used with sintered binder jet parts, as well as with many powder metallurgy processes and is thus well known.
  • the primary issues that can be encountered with infiltration include poor wettability between the sintered skeleton and infiltrant leading to incomplete infiltration, material interactions between the sintered skeleton and the infiltrant such as dissolution erosion of the sintered skeleton and new phase formation, and internal stresses that can develop due to mismatched material properties.
  • the two metal material systems that exist for binder jetting of industrial products are (1) S31600 infiltrated with 90-10 bronze, and (2) S42000 infiltrated with 90-10 bronze.
  • the S31600 alloy has the following composition in weight percent: 16 ⁇ Cr ⁇ 18; 10 ⁇ Ni ⁇ 14; 2.0 ⁇ Mo ⁇ 3.0; Mn ⁇ 2.0; Si ⁇ 1.0; C ⁇ 0.08, balance Fe.
  • S31600 is not hardenable by a heat treatment, and it is soft and has low wear resistance in the as-infiltrated condition. Hence, bronze infiltrated S31600 is not a suitable material for high wear resistant parts.
  • the S42000 alloy has the following composition in weight percent: 12 ⁇ Cr ⁇ 14; Mn ⁇ 1.0; Si ⁇ 1.0; C>0.15, balance Fe.
  • S42000 is hardenable via a quench and temper process, and is thus use as the wear resistant material for binder jet parts requiring wear resistance.
  • the process used for infiltrating binder-jet S42000 parts includes burying the parts in a particulate ceramic material that acts as a support structure to support the parts and resist part deformation during the sintering and infiltration processes. Encasing the binder-jet parts in the ceramic also facilitates homogenization of heat within the part, which reduces thermal gradients and potential for part distortion and cracking from the gradients.
  • S42000 is dependent on a relatively high quench rate from the infiltration temperature to convert the austenitic structure to the martensitic structure that provides high hardness and wear resistance.
  • S42000 is considered an air hardenable alloy, however, it is highly recommended that parts be quenched in oil to ensure that the cooling rate is sufficient throughout the part thickness to convert all austenite to martensite.
  • oil quenching has a typical quench rate of greater than 20° C./sec, whereas the air quench rate is approximately 5° C./sec.
  • the present disclosure relates to both a product and method wherein layer-by-layer construction is applied to metallic alloys to produce a high wear resistant free-standing material that is stable at high temperatures.
  • the wear resistance values are an order of magnitude greater than those of the commercially available bronze infiltrated S42000 material produced using the layer-by-layer construction process of the present invention.
  • the wear resistance of the material results in a volume loss of less than or equal to 130 mm3 as measured by ASTM G65-10-04(2010) Procedure A.
  • the structures that enable high wear resistance are preferably achieved without the need for post-treating of the layer-by-layer build up with a thermal hardening process, such as by quenching and tempering or solutionizing and ageing, and the structures remain stable at relatively high temperatures.
  • the layer-by-layer construction allows for the formation of metallic components that may be utilized in applications such as injection molding dies, pumps, and bearings.
  • FIG. 1 shows the microstructure of the ferrous alloy A1 powder.
  • FIG. 2 shows the microstructure of a bronze infiltrated ferrous A1 alloy skeleton of the present invention.
  • the infiltrated bronze is seen in the upper right quadrant and the ferrous skeleton makes up the rest of the micrograph.
  • the present invention relates to a method of constructing free-standing and relatively hard and wear-resistant iron-based metallic materials via a layer-by-layer build-up of successive metal layers followed by sintering and infiltration of the metallic structure.
  • Reference to a free-standing metallic material is therefore to be understood herein as that situation where the layer-by-layer build-up is employed to form a given built structure which is then sintered and infiltrated with another material.
  • the infiltrated structure may then serve as a metallic part component in a variety of applications such as injection molding dies and pump and bearing parts.
  • binder jetting where a liquid binder is selectively printed on a bed of powder, the binder is dried, a new layer of powder is spread over the prior layer, the binder is selectively printed on the powder and dried, and this process repeats until the part is fully constructed.
  • the binder can be any liquid that can be selectively printed through a print head, and when dried acts to bond the powder particles such that additional layers can be subsequently built on top of the present layer, and when cured produces a bond between the particles that enables the part to be handled without damaging the part (“green bond”).
  • the binder must also be able to be burned off in a furnace such that it does not interfere with sintering of the powder particles in the part.
  • An example of a binder that is suitable for binder jetting is a solution of ethylene glycol monomethyl ether and diethylene glycol. In each layer the binder is dried, after it is printed, with a heating source that heats the powder surface in the range of 30-100° C.
  • the binder in the part can be cured in an oven at a temperature in the range of 100-300° C., and more preferably in the range of 150-200° C.
  • the time at temperature for curing is in the range of 2-20 hr, and more preferably in the range of 6-10 hr.
  • the layer-by-layer procedure herein contemplates a build-up of individual layers each having a thickness in the range of 0.010-0.300 mm, and more preferably in the range of 0.070-0.130 mm.
  • the layer-by-layer procedure may then provide for a built up construction with an overall height in the range of 0.010 mm to greater than 100 mm, and more typically greater than 300 mm. Accordingly, a suitable range of thickness for the built-up layers is 0.010 mm and higher. More commonly, however, the thickness ranges are from 0.100-300 mm.
  • the packing of solid particles in the layer-by-layer procedure results in printed and cured parts with an inter-particle porosity in the range of 20-60%, and more particularly in the range of 40-50%.
  • the metal powders used to produce the sintered ferrous skeleton have a generally spherical shape and a particle size distribution in the range of 0.005-0.300 mm, and more preferably in the range of 0.010-0.100 mm, and even more preferably in the range of 0.015-0.045 mm.
  • the relatively high hardness and wear resistance of the iron based alloy powders, which are used to produce the steel skeleton, is contemplated to be the result of the relatively fine scale microstructures and phases present in the iron-based alloy when processed in a liquid phase atomization process that is utilized to produce the powder.
  • the iron-based alloys herein are such that when formed into the liquid phase at elevated temperatures and allowed to cool and solidify into powder particles, the structure preferably consists of a relatively high volume fraction of homogeneously distributed hard carbide phases such as borocarbides, molybdenum carbides, niobium carbides, chromium carbides, and complex carbides in an Fe-rich matrix, where the carbide phases range in size from about 10-10,000 nm.
  • FIG. 1 shows the structures in an example of the ferrous alloy (A1) powder of the present invention.
  • An exemplary ferrous alloy comprises at least 50 atomic% Fe and at least one element selected from the group consisting of Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo, Mn, W, Al, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu; and at least one element selected from the group consisting of B, C, N, O, P, and S.
  • the alloy will have a composition represented by the formula Fe(100-x-y)M(x)B(y) (atomic percent) wherein M represents at least one element selected from Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Mo, Ta, Cr, W, and Mn, wherein 30 ⁇ x ⁇ 4, wherein 25 ⁇ y ⁇ 0, and wherein 45 ⁇ (x+y) ⁇ 7.
  • the alloy can further contain X (Si, Ge, P, Ga, etc.) and/or T (Au, Co, Ni, etc.).
  • alloys have a relatively high susceptibility to cracking and are typically employed as coatings that contain a relatively high level of cracking. Accordingly, such alloys were not expected to be useful for the layer-by-layer procedure as described herein, and unexpectedly provided metallic components with unexpected hardness and wear properties.
  • the sintering process is a multistage thermal process conducted in a furnace with a controlled atmosphere.
  • the sintering process stages include binder burn-off, sintering, and cool down and are each defined by a specific temperature and time, as well as a ramp rate between prescribed temperatures.
  • the temperature and time for removal of binder e.g. binder burn off
  • Sintering is performed at a temperature and time sufficient to cause inter-particle necks to form, while also minimizing part shrinkage.
  • Sintering is performed in a temperature range of 800-1200° C., and more preferably in the range of 950-1100° C.
  • the sintering time that the entire part is at the sintering temperature is in the range of 1-120 min.
  • Sintering results in a reduction of porosity in the range of 0.1-5% from the cured binder state which has a porosity in the range of 20-60%. Accordingly sintered parts may have a porosity in the range of 15-59.1%.
  • the parts may be either cooled following sintering then reheated in a furnace and infiltrated with another material, or infiltration with another material may follow sintering as an additional step within the sintering furnace cycle.
  • the infiltrant in a liquid phase, is drawn into the part via capillary action to fill the voids surrounding the steel skeleton.
  • the final volume ratio of infiltrant to steel skeleton is in the range of 15/85 to 60/40.
  • the infiltrant is solidified by reducing the furnace temperature below the solidus temperature of the infiltrant.
  • Residual porosity following infiltration is in the range of 0-20%, and more particularly in the range of 0-5%.
  • the furnace and parts are then cooled to room temperature.
  • the steel alloys of the present invention have a low dependency on cooling rate, and as such can be cooled at a slow rate to reduce the potential for distortion, cracking, and residual stresses during cooling, yet maintain high hardness and wear resistance. Cooling rates of less than 5° C./min, and more particularly less than 2° C./min, can be used to reduce distortion, cracking, and residual stresses.
  • the nano-scale structures in the steel alloys of the present invention that are contemplated to provide high hardness and wear resistance are initially developed via rapid solidification when the steel powder is produced.
  • the structures transform to create a uniform equiaxed structure with a scale in the nano-scale realm. Once the structure has transformed to the equiaxed structure it is largely stable throughout the sintering and infiltration temperatures and as such the scale of the structures is retained throughout the furnace cycle enabling the ability to slowly cool the parts.
  • the scale of the structures can be seen in FIGS. 1 and 2 , which show an example of the structures in the ferrous alloy (A1) powder and in the steel skeleton after sintering, infiltration, and cooling. Slow cooling reduces distortion thereby enabling high dimensional control and reduced post-production machining to meet the dimensional requirements.
  • a variety of materials may be used as infiltrants including various metal alloys and polymer resins, such as epoxy resins, which provide a crosslinked polymer structure within the metallic skeleton structure.
  • Metal alloys that are preferably used as infiltrants include copper and various bronze alloys. Bronze is reference to alloys of copper and tin where copper is the primary component (>70%) and tin and/or other metals such as aluminum, manganese, nickel, zinc, iron, manganese, silicon or lead.
  • One preferred criteria for the infiltrant is that it has a liquidus temperature below that of the sintered skeleton and it preferably wets the surface of the sintered skeleton.
  • the primary issues that can be encountered with infiltration include residual porosity, material reactions, and residual stresses.
  • Residual porosity is typically due to one or more of: poor wettability between the sintered skeleton and infiltrant, insufficient time for complete infiltration, or insufficient infiltration temperature resulting in a high viscosity of the infiltrant. Material reactions can occur between the sintered skeleton and the infiltrant such as dissolution erosion of the sintered skeleton and intermetallic formation. Residual stresses can also develop due to mismatched material properties.
  • suitable infiltrants for infiltrating the steel skeleton of the present invention are metallic materials such as copper and bronze.
  • Copper (Cu) and bronze are good infiltrants with the steel skeleton because Cu, by itself or in the bronze alloy, preferably wets the iron (Fe) in the steel.
  • the tin (Sn) in bronze preferably depresses the liquidus temperature below that of copper by up to 385° C. depending on Sn concentration, which preferably enables superheating of the bronze to reduce the viscosity, and both Cu and Sn have low solubility in Fe at the superheat temperature. At 1083° C.
  • bronze alloys including an alloy which has a chemistry of 90 wt% Cu and 10 wt% Sn, hereinafter referred to as Cu10Sn.
  • the wear resistance is contemplated to be largely provided by the skeleton in the structure.
  • Hardness is commonly used as a proxy for wear resistance of a material; however, it is not necessarily a good indicator in composite materials.
  • the high load and depth of penetration of macrohardness measurements results in a measurement of the composite material, i.e. a blended mix of the hardnesses of both components, whereas microhardness measurements can be made individually in the infiltrant and in the skeleton areas.
  • the macrohardness of the bulk composite material and the microhardness of the infiltrant and skeleton materials in the bulk composite material for various infiltrated ferrous alloys are shown in Table 1.
  • the A1 and A2 alloys are exemplary ferrous alloys of the present invention.
  • the A1 alloy has the following composition in weight percent: 17.0 ⁇ Cr ⁇ 22.0; 8.0 ⁇ Mo ⁇ 12.0; 2.0 ⁇ B ⁇ 5.0; 3.0 ⁇ W ⁇ 7.0; 0.5 ⁇ C ⁇ 2.0; 1.0 ⁇ Mn ⁇ 4.0, 1.0 ⁇ Si ⁇ 3.0, balance Fe.
  • Alloy A2 has the following composition in weight percent: 12.0 ⁇ Cr ⁇ 17.0; 2.0 ⁇ B ⁇ 6.0; 1.0 ⁇ Nb ⁇ 5.0; 0.5 ⁇ C ⁇ 2.0; Mn ⁇ 2.0; Si ⁇ 2.0, balance Fe. Accordingly, the presence of Mn and Si in the latter formulation are optional.
  • the S42000 alloy has the following composition in weight percent: 12 ⁇ Cr ⁇ 14; Mn ⁇ 1.0; Si ⁇ 1.0; C>0.15, balance Fe. While the macrohardness of the bulk materials and the microhardness of the bronze infiltrant in each material system have similar values, and the microhardness of the steel skeletons of S42000 and the A1 and A2 alloys in the material systems are all within a high-hardness range, the wear resistance is quite different.
  • the order of magnitude difference in wear resistance is contemplated to be the result of the non-optimal hardening conditions of the S42000, and the high volume fraction of the homogeneously distributed small carbide phases present in the steel skeleton of the present invention. It is important to note that the non-optimal hardening of the bronze infiltrated S42000 is an inherent process limitation due to the insufficient cooling rate of the infiltration process to fully transform the austenite in the structure to martensite.
  • the volume loss in wear of the alloys herein are, as noted, orders of magnitude lower than S42000-Cu10Sn. It is therefore well within the context of the present invention with respect to the alloys disclosed herein that the volume loss in wear resistance as measured by ASTM G65-04(2010) is less than or equal to 130 mm3. More preferably, the volume loss in wear resistance herein is such that it falls in the range of 30 mm3 to 130 mm3, including all values and increments therein, such as 30 mm3, 35 mm3, 40 mm3, 45 mm3, etc. up to 130 mm3.
  • the maximum operating temperature for a stable structure of a S42000 is 500° C.
  • the high temperature stability of the steel skeleton in the infiltrated parts enables a high operating temperature up to 1000° C.
  • infiltrated ferrous alloys are compelling for steel requiring fast thermal cycling such as injection molding dies.
  • the thermal conductivity in bronze infiltrated ferrous alloys is contemplated to be much higher than typical injection molding steels such as the P20 grade due to the nearly order of magnitude higher thermal conductivity of bronze over ferrous alloys.
  • the high thermal conductivity of infiltrated ferrous alloy dies enables high heating and cooling rates through the material.
  • Infiltrated steel parts of the present invention are contemplated to have a low thermal expansion due to the low thermal expansion of the steel skeleton which facilitates dimensional control in applications that require thermal cycling such as injection mold dies.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Composite Materials (AREA)

Abstract

Metallic alloys and methods for the preparation of free-standing metallic materials in a layerwise manner. The resulting layerwise construction provides a metallic skeleton of selected porosity which may be infiltrated with a second metal to provide a free-standing material that has a volume loss of less than or equal to 130 mm3 as measured according to ASTM G65-04(2010).

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. Application Serial No. 15/014,637 filed Feb. 3, 2016, which, in turn, claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Pat. Application Serial No. 62/111,395 filed Feb. 3, 2015, which are fully incorporated herein their reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to alloys and methods for the preparation of free-standing metallic materials in a layerwise manner.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Many applications, such as those found in tooling, dies, drilling, pumping, agriculture, and mining, require parts with high wear resistance to increase the durability and life expectancy of the parts before they must be changed or refurbished. Materials have been designed to provide high wear resistance to parts by either providing a bulk material with high wear resistance, or providing a composite material consisting of a low wear resistance matrix containing high wear resistance particles throughout the matrix. Many of these materials require a hardening heat treatment such as a quench and temper treatment to obtain the structures that provide wear resistance. While the hardening treatments are effective in increasing the wear resistance of the materials, they can have a deleterious effect on the dimensional control and integrity of parts subjected to the hardening treatment due to part distortions and cracking from thermally induced stresses.
  • Layerwise construction can be understood herein as a process where layers of a material are built up, or laid down, layer by layer to fabricate a component. Examples of layerwise construction include powder bed fusion with a laser or electron-beam energy source, directed energy deposition, binder jetting, sheet lamination, material extrusion, material jetting, and vat photopolymerization. The primary layerwise construction processes used with metal include powder bed fusion, directed energy deposition and binder jetting. The focus of this invention is in the area of binder jetting including infiltration of binder jet parts.
  • The binder jetting process is a layerwise construction process that has excellent capability to construct net shape parts by jetting (or printing) a binder onto a bed of powder, curing the binder, depositing a new layer of powder, and repeating. This process has been commercially used to produce parts from sand, ceramics, and various metals including Type 316 stainless steel and Type 420 stainless steel, hereinafter referred to by their UNS designations S31600 and S42000, respectively.
  • Due to the nature of the bed of powder in a solid-state binder jetting process, parts produced in this method inherently have significant porosity. After curing the printed binder, “green bonded” metal parts typically have porosity greater than or equal to 40%. Sintering of the green bonded parts increases the robustness of the parts by creating metallurgical bonds between the particles and also decreasing the porosity. Long sintering times can be used to reduce the porosity by more than 5%, however, this also results in part shrinkage and distortion of the parts, and can negatively affect the material structure. Therefore, the goal of sintering of green-bonded binder jet parts is to increase part strength by creating inter-particle metallurgical bonds but also minimize distortion and shrinkage by minimizing the reduction in porosity. Sintering shrinkage is typically in the 1-5% range for binder jet parts, with a similar reduction in porosity, which results in sintered parts with more than 35% porosity.
  • Porosity in sintered parts negatively affects the part’s mechanical properties, thus it is desired to further reduce the porosity of sintered parts. Infiltration via capillary action is a process used to reduce porosity by filling the voids in a sintered part with another material that is in a liquid phase. Part infiltration is used with sintered binder jet parts, as well as with many powder metallurgy processes and is thus well known. The primary issues that can be encountered with infiltration include poor wettability between the sintered skeleton and infiltrant leading to incomplete infiltration, material interactions between the sintered skeleton and the infiltrant such as dissolution erosion of the sintered skeleton and new phase formation, and internal stresses that can develop due to mismatched material properties.
  • Attempts at developing new material systems have been made for the binder jetting and infiltration process, however, due to the issues defined above, very few have been able to be commercialized. The two metal material systems that exist for binder jetting of industrial products are (1) S31600 infiltrated with 90-10 bronze, and (2) S42000 infiltrated with 90-10 bronze. The S31600 alloy has the following composition in weight percent: 16<Cr<18; 10<Ni<14; 2.0<Mo<3.0; Mn<2.0; Si<1.0; C<0.08, balance Fe. S31600 is not hardenable by a heat treatment, and it is soft and has low wear resistance in the as-infiltrated condition. Hence, bronze infiltrated S31600 is not a suitable material for high wear resistant parts. The S42000 alloy has the following composition in weight percent: 12<Cr<14; Mn<1.0; Si<1.0; C>0.15, balance Fe. S42000 is hardenable via a quench and temper process, and is thus use as the wear resistant material for binder jet parts requiring wear resistance.
  • The process used for infiltrating binder-jet S42000 parts includes burying the parts in a particulate ceramic material that acts as a support structure to support the parts and resist part deformation during the sintering and infiltration processes. Encasing the binder-jet parts in the ceramic also facilitates homogenization of heat within the part, which reduces thermal gradients and potential for part distortion and cracking from the gradients. S42000 is dependent on a relatively high quench rate from the infiltration temperature to convert the austenitic structure to the martensitic structure that provides high hardness and wear resistance. S42000 is considered an air hardenable alloy, however, it is highly recommended that parts be quenched in oil to ensure that the cooling rate is sufficient throughout the part thickness to convert all austenite to martensite. When quenching from the infiltration temperature for 90-10 bronze, oil quenching has a typical quench rate of greater than 20° C./sec, whereas the air quench rate is approximately 5° C./sec. The combination of the quenching capabilities of the infiltration furnace and ceramic layer around the binder-jet parts, which acts as a thermal barrier in quenching, limits the quench rate that is achievable for the parts and thus the hardness of the parts.
  • It is therefore desired to produce net shaped parts via binder jetting and infiltration that have high wear resistance and can be used in applications requiring such.
  • SUMMARY
  • The present disclosure relates to both a product and method wherein layer-by-layer construction is applied to metallic alloys to produce a high wear resistant free-standing material that is stable at high temperatures. The wear resistance values are an order of magnitude greater than those of the commercially available bronze infiltrated S42000 material produced using the layer-by-layer construction process of the present invention. For example, the wear resistance of the material results in a volume loss of less than or equal to 130 mm3 as measured by ASTM G65-10-04(2010) Procedure A. The structures that enable high wear resistance are preferably achieved without the need for post-treating of the layer-by-layer build up with a thermal hardening process, such as by quenching and tempering or solutionizing and ageing, and the structures remain stable at relatively high temperatures. The layer-by-layer construction allows for the formation of metallic components that may be utilized in applications such as injection molding dies, pumps, and bearings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows the microstructure of the ferrous alloy A1 powder.
  • FIG. 2 shows the microstructure of a bronze infiltrated ferrous A1 alloy skeleton of the present invention. The infiltrated bronze is seen in the upper right quadrant and the ferrous skeleton makes up the rest of the micrograph.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The present invention relates to a method of constructing free-standing and relatively hard and wear-resistant iron-based metallic materials via a layer-by-layer build-up of successive metal layers followed by sintering and infiltration of the metallic structure. Reference to a free-standing metallic material is therefore to be understood herein as that situation where the layer-by-layer build-up is employed to form a given built structure which is then sintered and infiltrated with another material. The infiltrated structure may then serve as a metallic part component in a variety of applications such as injection molding dies and pump and bearing parts.
  • The layer-by-layer procedure described herein is commonly known as binder jetting where a liquid binder is selectively printed on a bed of powder, the binder is dried, a new layer of powder is spread over the prior layer, the binder is selectively printed on the powder and dried, and this process repeats until the part is fully constructed.
  • The binder can be any liquid that can be selectively printed through a print head, and when dried acts to bond the powder particles such that additional layers can be subsequently built on top of the present layer, and when cured produces a bond between the particles that enables the part to be handled without damaging the part (“green bond”). The binder must also be able to be burned off in a furnace such that it does not interfere with sintering of the powder particles in the part. An example of a binder that is suitable for binder jetting is a solution of ethylene glycol monomethyl ether and diethylene glycol. In each layer the binder is dried, after it is printed, with a heating source that heats the powder surface in the range of 30-100° C. When the part is completely built the binder in the part can be cured in an oven at a temperature in the range of 100-300° C., and more preferably in the range of 150-200° C. The time at temperature for curing is in the range of 2-20 hr, and more preferably in the range of 6-10 hr.
  • The layer-by-layer procedure herein contemplates a build-up of individual layers each having a thickness in the range of 0.010-0.300 mm, and more preferably in the range of 0.070-0.130 mm. The layer-by-layer procedure may then provide for a built up construction with an overall height in the range of 0.010 mm to greater than 100 mm, and more typically greater than 300 mm. Accordingly, a suitable range of thickness for the built-up layers is 0.010 mm and higher. More commonly, however, the thickness ranges are from 0.100-300 mm. The packing of solid particles in the layer-by-layer procedure results in printed and cured parts with an inter-particle porosity in the range of 20-60%, and more particularly in the range of 40-50%.
  • During powder layer spreading, spherical shaped particles flow more easily than non-spherical shaped particles as they have more freedom to roll and less potential to agglomerate due to irregular shapes catching onto one another. The metal powders used to produce the sintered ferrous skeleton have a generally spherical shape and a particle size distribution in the range of 0.005-0.300 mm, and more preferably in the range of 0.010-0.100 mm, and even more preferably in the range of 0.015-0.045 mm.
  • The relatively high hardness and wear resistance of the iron based alloy powders, which are used to produce the steel skeleton, is contemplated to be the result of the relatively fine scale microstructures and phases present in the iron-based alloy when processed in a liquid phase atomization process that is utilized to produce the powder. More specifically, the iron-based alloys herein are such that when formed into the liquid phase at elevated temperatures and allowed to cool and solidify into powder particles, the structure preferably consists of a relatively high volume fraction of homogeneously distributed hard carbide phases such as borocarbides, molybdenum carbides, niobium carbides, chromium carbides, and complex carbides in an Fe-rich matrix, where the carbide phases range in size from about 10-10,000 nm. FIG. 1 shows the structures in an example of the ferrous alloy (A1) powder of the present invention.
  • An exemplary ferrous alloy comprises at least 50 atomic% Fe and at least one element selected from the group consisting of Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo, Mn, W, Al, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu; and at least one element selected from the group consisting of B, C, N, O, P, and S. In particular aspects of the present invention, the alloy will have a composition represented by the formula Fe(100-x-y)M(x)B(y) (atomic percent) wherein M represents at least one element selected from Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Mo, Ta, Cr, W, and Mn, wherein 30≥x≥4, wherein 25≥y≥0, and wherein 45≥(x+y)≥7. The alloy can further contain X (Si, Ge, P, Ga, etc.) and/or T (Au, Co, Ni, etc.).
  • It is worth noting that the above alloys have a relatively high susceptibility to cracking and are typically employed as coatings that contain a relatively high level of cracking. Accordingly, such alloys were not expected to be useful for the layer-by-layer procedure as described herein, and unexpectedly provided metallic components with unexpected hardness and wear properties.
  • Cured parts produced with the layer-by-layer procedure must be sintered to increase the part strength by developing metallurgical bonds between the particles. The sintering process is a multistage thermal process conducted in a furnace with a controlled atmosphere. The sintering process stages include binder burn-off, sintering, and cool down and are each defined by a specific temperature and time, as well as a ramp rate between prescribed temperatures. The temperature and time for removal of binder (e.g. binder burn off) depends on the binder and part size, with a typical range of temperatures and times for burn off between 300° C. and 800° C. and 30 min to 240 min. Sintering is performed at a temperature and time sufficient to cause inter-particle necks to form, while also minimizing part shrinkage. Sintering is performed in a temperature range of 800-1200° C., and more preferably in the range of 950-1100° C. The sintering time that the entire part is at the sintering temperature is in the range of 1-120 min. Sintering results in a reduction of porosity in the range of 0.1-5% from the cured binder state which has a porosity in the range of 20-60%. Accordingly sintered parts may have a porosity in the range of 15-59.1%.
  • To reduce porosity in sintered parts produced with the layer-by-layer procedure the parts may be either cooled following sintering then reheated in a furnace and infiltrated with another material, or infiltration with another material may follow sintering as an additional step within the sintering furnace cycle. In the infiltration process, the infiltrant, in a liquid phase, is drawn into the part via capillary action to fill the voids surrounding the steel skeleton. The final volume ratio of infiltrant to steel skeleton is in the range of 15/85 to 60/40. Following infiltration the infiltrant is solidified by reducing the furnace temperature below the solidus temperature of the infiltrant. Residual porosity following infiltration is in the range of 0-20%, and more particularly in the range of 0-5%. The furnace and parts are then cooled to room temperature. Unlike hardenable steel alloys, the steel alloys of the present invention have a low dependency on cooling rate, and as such can be cooled at a slow rate to reduce the potential for distortion, cracking, and residual stresses during cooling, yet maintain high hardness and wear resistance. Cooling rates of less than 5° C./min, and more particularly less than 2° C./min, can be used to reduce distortion, cracking, and residual stresses. The nano-scale structures in the steel alloys of the present invention that are contemplated to provide high hardness and wear resistance are initially developed via rapid solidification when the steel powder is produced. In the sintering and infiltration furnace cycle, the structures transform to create a uniform equiaxed structure with a scale in the nano-scale realm. Once the structure has transformed to the equiaxed structure it is largely stable throughout the sintering and infiltration temperatures and as such the scale of the structures is retained throughout the furnace cycle enabling the ability to slowly cool the parts. The scale of the structures can be seen in FIGS. 1 and 2 , which show an example of the structures in the ferrous alloy (A1) powder and in the steel skeleton after sintering, infiltration, and cooling. Slow cooling reduces distortion thereby enabling high dimensional control and reduced post-production machining to meet the dimensional requirements.
  • A variety of materials may be used as infiltrants including various metal alloys and polymer resins, such as epoxy resins, which provide a crosslinked polymer structure within the metallic skeleton structure.. Metal alloys that are preferably used as infiltrants include copper and various bronze alloys. Bronze is reference to alloys of copper and tin where copper is the primary component (>70%) and tin and/or other metals such as aluminum, manganese, nickel, zinc, iron, manganese, silicon or lead. One preferred criteria for the infiltrant is that it has a liquidus temperature below that of the sintered skeleton and it preferably wets the surface of the sintered skeleton. The primary issues that can be encountered with infiltration include residual porosity, material reactions, and residual stresses. Residual porosity is typically due to one or more of: poor wettability between the sintered skeleton and infiltrant, insufficient time for complete infiltration, or insufficient infiltration temperature resulting in a high viscosity of the infiltrant. Material reactions can occur between the sintered skeleton and the infiltrant such as dissolution erosion of the sintered skeleton and intermetallic formation. Residual stresses can also develop due to mismatched material properties.
  • It is important to take into consideration the primary criteria and issues when selecting an appropriate infiltrant. Examples of suitable infiltrants for infiltrating the steel skeleton of the present invention are metallic materials such as copper and bronze. Copper (Cu) and bronze are good infiltrants with the steel skeleton because Cu, by itself or in the bronze alloy, preferably wets the iron (Fe) in the steel. The tin (Sn) in bronze preferably depresses the liquidus temperature below that of copper by up to 385° C. depending on Sn concentration, which preferably enables superheating of the bronze to reduce the viscosity, and both Cu and Sn have low solubility in Fe at the superheat temperature. At 1083° C. the solubilities of Cu in Fe, Fe in Cu, Sn in Fe, and Fe in Sn are only 3.2, 7.5, 8.4, and 9.0 atomic percent, respectively. Various bronze alloys may preferably be used including an alloy which has a chemistry of 90 wt% Cu and 10 wt% Sn, hereinafter referred to as Cu10Sn.
  • While the composite structure of an infiltrated material gains its bulk properties from a combination of the skeleton material and infiltrant, the wear resistance is contemplated to be largely provided by the skeleton in the structure. Hardness is commonly used as a proxy for wear resistance of a material; however, it is not necessarily a good indicator in composite materials. The high load and depth of penetration of macrohardness measurements results in a measurement of the composite material, i.e. a blended mix of the hardnesses of both components, whereas microhardness measurements can be made individually in the infiltrant and in the skeleton areas. The macrohardness of the bulk composite material and the microhardness of the infiltrant and skeleton materials in the bulk composite material for various infiltrated ferrous alloys are shown in Table 1. The wear resistance of these materials, as measured by the ASTM G65-04(2010) Procedure A method, is also shown in Table 1. The A1 and A2 alloys are exemplary ferrous alloys of the present invention. The A1 alloy has the following composition in weight percent: 17.0<Cr<22.0; 8.0<Mo<12.0; 2.0<B<5.0; 3.0<W<7.0; 0.5<C<2.0; 1.0<Mn<4.0, 1.0<Si<3.0, balance Fe. Alloy A2 has the following composition in weight percent: 12.0<Cr< 17.0; 2.0<B<6.0; 1.0<Nb<5.0; 0.5<C<2.0; Mn<2.0; Si<2.0, balance Fe. Accordingly, the presence of Mn and Si in the latter formulation are optional. The S42000 alloy has the following composition in weight percent: 12<Cr<14; Mn<1.0; Si<1.0; C>0.15, balance Fe. While the macrohardness of the bulk materials and the microhardness of the bronze infiltrant in each material system have similar values, and the microhardness of the steel skeletons of S42000 and the A1 and A2 alloys in the material systems are all within a high-hardness range, the wear resistance is quite different. The order of magnitude difference in wear resistance is contemplated to be the result of the non-optimal hardening conditions of the S42000, and the high volume fraction of the homogeneously distributed small carbide phases present in the steel skeleton of the present invention. It is important to note that the non-optimal hardening of the bronze infiltrated S42000 is an inherent process limitation due to the insufficient cooling rate of the infiltration process to fully transform the austenite in the structure to martensite.
  • TABLE 1
    Hardness and Wear Resistance of Bronze Infiltrated Ferrous Alloys
    Material System (Skeleton-Infiltrant) Macrohardness [HRC] Microhardness [HV] Volume Loss in Wear [mm3] ASTM G65-04(2010
    Skeleton Infiltrant
    S42000-Cu10Sn 21 524 117 366
    A1-Cu10Sn 28 810 140 36
    A2-Cu10Sn 18 971 116 37
  • As can be seen from the above, the volume loss in wear of the alloys herein are, as noted, orders of magnitude lower than S42000-Cu10Sn. It is therefore well within the context of the present invention with respect to the alloys disclosed herein that the volume loss in wear resistance as measured by ASTM G65-04(2010) is less than or equal to 130 mm3. More preferably, the volume loss in wear resistance herein is such that it falls in the range of 30 mm3 to 130 mm3, including all values and increments therein, such as 30 mm3, 35 mm3, 40 mm3, 45 mm3, etc. up to 130 mm3.
  • Many hardenable metals have a relatively low maximum operating temperature capability above which the materials soften or embrittle due to phase transformations. For example, the maximum operating temperature for a stable structure of a S42000 is 500° C. In the present invention the high temperature stability of the steel skeleton in the infiltrated parts enables a high operating temperature up to 1000° C.
  • The thermal properties of infiltrated ferrous alloys are compelling for steel requiring fast thermal cycling such as injection molding dies. The thermal conductivity in bronze infiltrated ferrous alloys is contemplated to be much higher than typical injection molding steels such as the P20 grade due to the nearly order of magnitude higher thermal conductivity of bronze over ferrous alloys. The high thermal conductivity of infiltrated ferrous alloy dies enables high heating and cooling rates through the material. Infiltrated steel parts of the present invention are contemplated to have a low thermal expansion due to the low thermal expansion of the steel skeleton which facilitates dimensional control in applications that require thermal cycling such as injection mold dies. While both the high thermal conductivity, and the low thermal expansion, of the infiltrated ferrous alloys of the present invention result in increased material performance in applications requiring high thermal cycling, the combination of these properties is contemplated to result in materials that offer high productivity and high dimensional control, a combination that is unexpected since as one of these attributes is increased it is normally at the expense of the other.

Claims (1)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for layer-by-layer formation of a free-standing metallic part comprising:
supplying metallic alloy particles comprising, in weight percent:
17.0<Cr<22.0;
8.0<Mo<12.0;
2.0<B<5.0;
3.0<W<7.0;
0.5<C<2.0;
1.0<Mn<4.0;
1.0<Si<3.0; and
balance Fe;
mixing the metallic alloy particles with a binder wherein the binder bonds the powder particles and forming a layer of the free-standing metallic part wherein the layer has a porosity of in the range of 20% - 60%;
heating the metallic alloy powder and the binder and forming a bond between the particle;
sintering the metallic alloy powder and the binder by heating and removing the binder and cooling and forming a porous metallic skeleton; and
infiltrating the porous metallic skeleton with a second material and forming the free-standing metallic part wherein the part has a volume loss of less than or equal to 130 mm3 as measured according to ASTM G65-04(2010).
US18/194,368 2015-02-03 2023-03-31 Infiltrated ferrous materials Pending US20230249250A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18/194,368 US20230249250A1 (en) 2015-02-03 2023-03-31 Infiltrated ferrous materials

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201562111395P 2015-02-03 2015-02-03
US15/014,637 US11628493B2 (en) 2015-02-03 2016-02-03 Infiltrated ferrous materials
US18/194,368 US20230249250A1 (en) 2015-02-03 2023-03-31 Infiltrated ferrous materials

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/014,637 Continuation US11628493B2 (en) 2015-02-03 2016-02-03 Infiltrated ferrous materials

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20230249250A1 true US20230249250A1 (en) 2023-08-10

Family

ID=56553735

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/014,637 Active 2036-10-15 US11628493B2 (en) 2015-02-03 2016-02-03 Infiltrated ferrous materials
US18/194,368 Pending US20230249250A1 (en) 2015-02-03 2023-03-31 Infiltrated ferrous materials

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/014,637 Active 2036-10-15 US11628493B2 (en) 2015-02-03 2016-02-03 Infiltrated ferrous materials

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (2) US11628493B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3253516B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6875294B2 (en)
KR (1) KR20170113588A (en)
CN (1) CN107427924B (en)
AU (1) AU2016215334A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2983062C (en)
ES (1) ES2902957T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2016126814A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA201705843B (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2018536097A (en) * 2015-09-21 2018-12-06 ザ・ナノスティール・カンパニー・インコーポレーテッド Permeated iron material
US10953465B2 (en) 2016-11-01 2021-03-23 The Nanosteel Company, Inc. 3D printable hard ferrous metallic alloys for powder bed fusion
WO2018085332A1 (en) 2016-11-01 2018-05-11 The Nanosteel Company, Inc. 3d printable hard ferrous metallic alloys for powder bed fusion
US20190160541A1 (en) * 2017-11-29 2019-05-30 Lincoln Global, Inc. Methods and compositions for making a near net shape article
US11833749B2 (en) * 2017-12-19 2023-12-05 Stratasys, Inc. Method for producing a treated, 3D printed object
US11325206B2 (en) * 2018-04-20 2022-05-10 Ut-Battelle, Llc Additive manufactured interpenetrating phase composite
WO2020222759A1 (en) * 2019-04-29 2020-11-05 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Determining liquid agent amounts in 3d printing
WO2021146634A1 (en) * 2020-01-16 2021-07-22 Entegris, Inc. Porous sintered metal bodies and methods of preparing porous sintered metal bodies
CN113967743B (en) * 2021-03-05 2023-08-18 暨南大学 Structure-shape complex and abrasion-resistant 316 stainless steel part and preparation method and application thereof
CN112792352B (en) * 2021-03-31 2021-06-29 陕西斯瑞新材料股份有限公司 Method for 3D printing of copper infiltrated on tungsten blank by using tungsten powder fuse wire spraying

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040140078A1 (en) * 2002-08-20 2004-07-22 Jianxin Liu Novel casting process and articles for performing same
CN102286702A (en) * 2011-08-15 2011-12-21 奥美合金材料科技(北京)有限公司 Iron-based powder and parts prepared from same
US20150069649A1 (en) * 2007-04-04 2015-03-12 The Exone Company Powder Particle Layerwise Three-Dimensional Printing Process
WO2016099390A1 (en) * 2014-12-17 2016-06-23 Uddeholms Ab A wear resistant alloy

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4710223A (en) * 1986-03-21 1987-12-01 Rockwell International Corporation Infiltrated sintered articles
US5204055A (en) 1989-12-08 1993-04-20 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Three-dimensional printing techniques
JPH04183840A (en) * 1990-11-19 1992-06-30 Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd Production of sintered compact of fe-co-si alloy soft-magnetic material
DE4104832A1 (en) 1991-02-16 1992-08-20 Castolin Sa METAL DEVICE FOR CLOSING COOKING OVENS AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF
US5775402A (en) 1995-10-31 1998-07-07 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Enhancement of thermal properties of tooling made by solid free form fabrication techniques
JPH07216411A (en) 1994-02-04 1995-08-15 Chuo Hatsumei Kenkyusho:Kk Sliding member and method for improving frictional characteristic of sliding member
US5819154A (en) 1995-12-08 1998-10-06 Hitachi Powdered Metal Co., Ltd. Manufacturing process of sintered iron alloy improved in machinability, mixed powder for manufacturing, modification of iron alloy and iron alloy product
US6709739B1 (en) * 1999-06-03 2004-03-23 Case Western Reserve University Closed cell metal composites
US6719948B2 (en) 2000-05-22 2004-04-13 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Techniques for infiltration of a powder metal skeleton by a similar alloy with melting point depressed
US7250134B2 (en) 2003-11-26 2007-07-31 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Infiltrating a powder metal skeleton by a similar alloy with depressed melting point exploiting a persistent liquid phase at equilibrium, suitable for fabricating steel parts
CA2649379C (en) 2006-04-21 2016-08-23 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Heating systems and methods using high strength alloys
US20080199720A1 (en) * 2007-02-21 2008-08-21 Depuy Products, Inc. Porous metal foam structures and methods
PL2139630T3 (en) * 2007-03-21 2013-10-31 Hoeganaes Ab Publ Powder metal polymer composites
CN101812657A (en) 2009-02-25 2010-08-25 中国科学院金属研究所 Method for preparing ultrahard erosion-resistant amorphous steel coating
CA2779308C (en) * 2009-10-30 2019-01-29 The Nanosteel Company, Inc. Glass forming hardbanding material
US20130078448A1 (en) 2010-04-09 2013-03-28 The Regents Of The University Of California Method of making electrochemical device with porous metal layer
US8808870B2 (en) * 2011-11-28 2014-08-19 Kennametal Inc. Functionally graded coating
US20130167965A1 (en) * 2011-12-30 2013-07-04 Justin Lee Cheney Coating compositions, applications thereof, and methods of forming
US9346101B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2016-05-24 Kennametal Inc. Cladded articles and methods of making the same
EP3838593A1 (en) * 2013-07-11 2021-06-23 Tundra Composites, LLC Surface modified particulate and sintered or injection molded products
JP6391154B2 (en) * 2013-09-20 2018-09-19 アイエヌジ商事株式会社 Iron-base alloy and alloy welding method
CN107527702B (en) * 2017-09-08 2020-05-05 中国舰船研究设计中心 Iron-based amorphous alloy powder and preparation method and application thereof

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040140078A1 (en) * 2002-08-20 2004-07-22 Jianxin Liu Novel casting process and articles for performing same
US20150069649A1 (en) * 2007-04-04 2015-03-12 The Exone Company Powder Particle Layerwise Three-Dimensional Printing Process
CN102286702A (en) * 2011-08-15 2011-12-21 奥美合金材料科技(北京)有限公司 Iron-based powder and parts prepared from same
WO2016099390A1 (en) * 2014-12-17 2016-06-23 Uddeholms Ab A wear resistant alloy

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Allen and Sachs. Three-Dimensional Printing of Metal Parts for Tooling and Other Applications. Metals and Materials, Vo. 6, No. 6 (2000), pp. 589-594. (Year: 2000) *
CN 102286702 machine translation (Year: 2011) *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN107427924B (en) 2020-03-20
AU2016215334A1 (en) 2017-08-17
ZA201705843B (en) 2019-07-31
US11628493B2 (en) 2023-04-18
EP3253516A4 (en) 2018-09-05
US20160221083A1 (en) 2016-08-04
CA2983062C (en) 2022-06-14
WO2016126814A1 (en) 2016-08-11
CA2983062A1 (en) 2016-08-11
CN107427924A (en) 2017-12-01
ES2902957T3 (en) 2022-03-30
JP6875294B2 (en) 2021-05-19
KR20170113588A (en) 2017-10-12
JP2018510267A (en) 2018-04-12
EP3253516B1 (en) 2021-09-22
EP3253516A1 (en) 2017-12-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20230249250A1 (en) Infiltrated ferrous materials
US20170080497A1 (en) Infiltrated Segregated Ferrous Materials
CN110462073B (en) Ni-based alloy layered molded body, heat treatment method therefor, and production method therefor
JP2024019397A (en) Low temperature hardenable steels with excellent machinability
JP6040163B2 (en) Iron powder for powder injection molding
JP2019505674A (en) Long-term durable high performance steel for structural, mechanical and tool applications
JP6623177B2 (en) Layered composition of metal-containing materials
CN115066510B (en) Cobalt chromium alloy powder
JP6305136B2 (en) Precipitation hardening type stainless steel powder and sintered body thereof
KR101981893B1 (en) Manufacturing method for metal composite and metal composite manufacrured by the same
US11465209B2 (en) Binder jetting and supersolidus sintering of ferrous powder metal components
KR20200081813A (en) Iron-based powder for powder metallurgy and method for producing same
DE102005059429B4 (en) Process for producing wear-resistant laminates with Fe-based coating materials containing hard material
CN112996614B (en) Method for forming object by spraying
JP2018076582A (en) Powder high speed tool steel having fine carbide particle and manufacturing method therefor
Oh et al. Novel Technique to Produce Hybrid P/M Components Using Dissimilar Ferrous Alloys
KR20230011757A (en) Metal powder for 3d printer
JP2022176862A (en) HIGH HARDNESS Co-FREE MARAGING STEEL

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

AS Assignment

Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, NORTH CAROLINA

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MAC LEAN-FOGG COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:067337/0156

Effective date: 20240507

AS Assignment

Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: NOTICE OF GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:MAC LEAN-FOGG COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:067455/0802

Effective date: 20240507