US20220027426A1 - System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources - Google Patents
System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20220027426A1 US20220027426A1 US17/493,205 US202117493205A US2022027426A1 US 20220027426 A1 US20220027426 A1 US 20220027426A1 US 202117493205 A US202117493205 A US 202117493205A US 2022027426 A1 US2022027426 A1 US 2022027426A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- data
- data items
- group
- individuals
- employee
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 52
- 230000004931 aggregating effect Effects 0.000 title description 11
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims 4
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 abstract description 19
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 55
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 40
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 33
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 29
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 29
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 25
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 19
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 18
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 16
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006855 networking Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006837 decompression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008676 import Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013515 script Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003813 thumb Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/95—Retrieval from the web
- G06F16/953—Querying, e.g. by the use of web search engines
- G06F16/9535—Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06398—Performance of employee with respect to a job function
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/21—Design, administration or maintenance of databases
- G06F16/215—Improving data quality; Data cleansing, e.g. de-duplication, removing invalid entries or correcting typographical errors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/242—Query formulation
- G06F16/2433—Query languages
- G06F16/244—Grouping and aggregation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/245—Query processing
- G06F16/2457—Query processing with adaptation to user needs
- G06F16/24578—Query processing with adaptation to user needs using ranking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
- G06F16/34—Browsing; Visualisation therefor
- G06F16/345—Summarisation for human users
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates to systems and techniques for data integration and analysis. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to aggregating data from a plurality of data sources and analyzing the aggregated data.
- Data may be stored across various storage systems and/or devices. Data may include different types of information and have various formats.
- the code is further configured to cause the computer system to: transform respective datum from the plurality of data sources into one or more formats usable to generate the statistics.
- a non-transitory computer readable medium comprises instructions for aggregating and analyzing data from a plurality of data sources that cause a computer processor to: access data from a plurality of data sources, each of the plurality of data sources comprising one or more of: email data, system logon data, system logoff data, badge swipe data, employee data, software version data, software license data, remote access data, phone call data, or job processing data associated with a plurality of individuals; detect inconsistencies in formatting of datum from respective data sources; associate respective datum from the plurality of data sources to respective individuals of the plurality of individuals; and provide statistics associated with respective individuals based on data associated with the respective individuals from the plurality of data sources.
- the instructions are further configured to cause the computer processor to: transform respective datum from the plurality of data sources into one or more formats usable to generate the statistics.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of a data analysis system configured to aggregate and analyze data from a plurality of data sources.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating components of the data analysis system of FIG. 1 , according to one embodiment.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of a process for aggregating and analyzing data from a plurality of data sources.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of a process for performing a quality reliability test for determining the reliability of data from one or more of a plurality of data sources.
- FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating examples of types of data that can be aggregated and analyzed for employee efficiency and/or productivity analysis.
- FIG. 6 illustrates an example user interface displaying an output of a data analysis system.
- FIG. 7 illustrates another example user interface displaying an output of a data analysis system.
- FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating a computer system with which certain methods discussed herein may be implemented.
- Organizations and/or companies may generate, collect, and store large amounts of data related to activities of employees. Such data may be stored across various storage systems and/or devices and may have different formats. For example, data of an organization may be stored in different locations (e.g., different cities, countries, etc.) and different types of media (disk storage, tapes, etc.). Data may be available in the form of web services, databases, flat files, log files, etc. Even within the same organization, the format of various data sources can be different (e.g., different identifiers can be used to refer to an employee). Therefore, it may be difficult to query and extract relevant information from vast amounts of data scattered in different data sources. Accordingly, there is a need for aggregating and analyzing data from various data sources in an efficient and effective way in order to obtain meaningful analysis. For example, there is a need for improved analysis of data from multiple data sources in order to track activities of and determine productivity of employees.
- a data analysis system may be configured to aggregate and analyze data from various data sources.
- Such data analysis system may also be referred to as a “data pipeline.”
- the data pipeline can accept data from various data sources, transform and cleanse the data, aggregate and resolve the data, and generate statistics and/or analysis of the data.
- the data analysis system can accept data in different formats and transform or convert them into a format that is compatible for combining with data from other data sources.
- the data analysis system can also resolve the data from different sources and provide useful analysis of the data. Because data from any type or number of data sources can be resolved and combined, the resulting analysis can be robust and provide valuable insight into activities relating to an organization or company. For example, a company can obtain analysis relating to employee email activity, employee efficiency, real estate resource utilization, etc.
- combining of data may refer to associating data items from different data sources without actually combining the data items within a data structure, as well as storing data from multiple data sources together.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of a data analysis system 100 configured to aggregate and analyze data from a plurality of data sources.
- the data sources may provide data in various data formats that are accepted by the data analysis system 100 , such as web services, databases, flat files, log files, etc.
- the data can be in various formats. In some instances, the data may be defined as CSV, in rows and columns, in XML, etc.
- the data analysis system 100 can accept data from multiple data sources and produce statistics and/or analysis related to the data.
- Some examples of types of data sources that the data analysis system 100 can accept as input include employee data, email data, phone log data, email log data, single sign-on (SSO) data, VPN login data, system logon/logoff data, software version data, software license data, remote access data, badge swipe data, etc.
- SSO single sign-on
- the data analysis system 100 can function as a general transform system that can receive different types of data as input and generate an output specified by an organization or company. For example, the data analysis system 100 can accept employee data and email data of an organization and output a list of top 10 email senders or recipients for each employee. The output from the data analysis system 100 may package the aggregated data in a manner that facilitates querying and performing analysis of the data. One type of querying and/or analysis may be operational efficiency analysis.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating components of the data analysis system 100 of FIG. 1 , according to one embodiment.
- the data analysis system 200 of FIG. 2 can be similar to the data analysis system 100 of FIG. 1 .
- the data analysis system 200 can accept data from multiple data sources and output processed data.
- the system 200 can include a data reliability/consistency module 210 , a job orchestration module 220 , an aggregation/cleansing module 230 , and an analysis module 240 .
- the system 200 can include fewer or additional modules or components, depending on the embodiment. One or more modules may be combined or reside on the same computing device, depending on the embodiment. In certain embodiments, functions performed by one module in the system 200 may be performed by another module in the system 200 .
- the data reliability/consistency module 210 may perform quality reliability tests on various data sources.
- the system 200 may have access to information about the format of a data source, and the data reliability/consistency module 210 can detect whether the format of the data from the data source is consistent with the expected format. Performing reliability tests prior to aggregating the data can ensure that the output and analysis generated by the system 200 is reliable. Details relating to quality reliability test are explained further below.
- the job orchestration module 220 may automate jobs for aggregating, cleansing, and/or analyzing the data.
- the job orchestration module 220 can manage steps involved in each process and scheduling the steps.
- the job orchestration module 220 can define and schedule steps for transforming and resolving data from multiple data sources.
- the job orchestration module 220 can define workflows for various processes, e.g., through coordinated sequences of commands, scripts, jobs, etc.
- the system 200 uses open source tools, such as Rundeck, Kettle, etc.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 aggregates and/or cleanses data from various sources.
- “Cleansing” may refer to transforming and resolving the data from various sources so that they can be combined. Data in different sources may not be readily combined although the data may relate to a common entity (e.g., an employee or group of employees) and/or same type of information (e.g., time).
- the IDs used to identify an employee can be different from one data source to another. In such case, the IDs may be mapped so that they can be resolved to specific employees.
- the system 200 may identify a standard identifier that can map two or more employee IDs used by different data sources to a particular employee.
- One example of a standard identifier can be the employee's email address. If both data sources include the corresponding email addresses for employee IDs, the data from the two sources can be associated with an employee associated with the email addresses.
- data sources may include timestamp or time data (e.g., employee badge-in time, employee badge-out time, etc.), but the time information in data received from different sources may have the same time reference and, thus, may not be in local time zone of any particular employee (except those employees that may be in the standard time reference used by the organization).
- timestamps may be represented in UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) or GMT (Greenwich Mean Time) format.
- UTC Coordinatd Universal Time
- GMT Greenwich Mean Time
- the time information may need to be converted or adjusted according to the local time zone. Each employee's timestamp can be shifted or adjusted so that the time information reflects the local time.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may obtain the local time zone information based on the employee's city, state, and country information in order to make the appropriate adjustment. Data for employees related to time (e.g., time arrived at office, time checked-out for lunch, etc.) may then be compared in a more meaningful manner with the time entries converted to represent local times.
- cleansing can include any processing that is performed on the data from multiple sources in order to combine them.
- the data from various data sources can be combined and aggregated. For example, multiple different IDs can be mapped to the same employee (or other entity) based on a common or standard identifier such that data using any of those multiple different IDs can each be associated with the same employee.
- the vast amounts of data can be joined and combined so that they are available for analysis.
- the data can be imported into and aggregated using a distributed computing framework (e.g., Apache Hadoop).
- a distributed computing framework may allow for distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers. Such framework may provide scalability for large amounts of data.
- Data may be cleansed and/or aggregated using a software that facilitates querying and managing of large data sets in distributed storage (e.g., Apache Hive).
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can generate an output from the combined data.
- the output can be defined as appropriate by the organization or company that is requesting the data analysis.
- the output may combine data and provide an intermediate format that is configured for further analysis, such as querying and/or other analysis.
- employee data and email data are aggregated in order to provide an intermediate outcome that may be analyzed to provide insights into employee email activity. For example, an organization may have about 5 billion emails, but querying all emails can be slow and may not yield valuable information.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can aggregate the email data and provide an intermediate output including data such as a list of top email senders, top email recipients, top sender domains, top recipient domains, number of sent emails, number of received emails, etc.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may search for top sender/recipient domains, top email sending employees, top email receiving employees, etc.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can search through the intermediate output (which can include, e.g., top email senders, top email recipients, top sender domains, top recipient domains, number of sent emails, number of received emails, etc. for each employee) in order to produce statistics and/or analysis for the entire organization (e.g., information such as top email sending employees, top email receiving employees, top domains, etc. and/or information output in user interfaces illustrated in FIGS. 6-7 ).
- the data can be analyzed and reduced in a manner that makes it easier for organizations to ask questions about various aspects of their operations or business. For instance, a company may be interested in finding out information on its operational efficiency.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can output the number of emails an employee sends in 15 -minute buckets (e.g., how many emails an employee has sent every 15 minutes). This output can serve as an intermediate output for determining a relationship between the number of emails an employee sends and employee efficiency or productivity.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can generate an output that is not used as an intermediate output for analysis, but that can be directly output to the users (e.g., information output in user interfaces illustrated in FIGS. 6-7 ).
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may provide combined data to the analysis module 240 , and the analysis module 240 may generate the intermediate output.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may resolve and combine the data sets, and the analysis module 240 can generate an intermediate output from the combined data set.
- the analysis module 240 can perform analysis based on the output from the aggregation/cleansing module 230 .
- the analysis module 240 can perform queries for answering specific questions relating to the operations of an organization.
- One example question may be what are the top domains that send emails to employees of an organization.
- the analysis module 240 can search through the top sender domains for all employees and produce a list of top sender domains.
- the analysis module 240 may be an analysis platform that is built to interact with various outputs from the data analysis system 200 , which users from an organization can use to obtain answers to various questions relating to the organization.
- the output from the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may be an intermediate output for facilitating further analysis.
- the output from the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may be a direct output from the cleansing and/or aggregating step that does not involve an intermediate output.
- the system 200 can perform quality reliability tests to determine the reliability of the data from various data sources.
- the data reliability/consistency module 210 of the system 200 can perform the reliability tests.
- the data reliability/consistency module 210 can detect inconsistencies and/or errors in the data from a data source.
- the data reliability/consistency module 210 may have access to information about data from a certain data source, such as the typical size of the data, typical format and/or structure of the data, etc.
- the data reliability/consistency module 210 may refer to the information about a data source in order to detect inconsistencies and/or errors in received data.
- the data reliability/consistency module 210 can flag a variety of issues, including: whether the file size is similar to the file size of previous version of the data, whether the population count is similar to the previously received population count, whether the structure of the data has changed, whether the content or the meaning of the data has changed, etc.
- population count may refer to the number of items to expect, for example, as opposed to their size.
- the data reliability/consistency module 210 can identify that the content or the meaning of a column may have changed if the information used to be numeric but now is text, or if a timestamp used to be in one format but now is in a different format. Large discrepancies or significant deviations in size and/or format can indicate that the data was not properly received or pulled.
- the data reliability/consistency module 210 can run one or more tests on data received from a data source. If the data reliability/consistency module 210 determines that data from a data source is not reliable, the system 200 may attempt to pull or receive the data again and run reliability tests until the data is considered sufficiently reliable. By making sure that the data of a data source is reliable, the system 200 can prevent introducing inaccurate data into the analysis further down the process.
- the data reliability/consistency module 210 may also perform quality reliability tests on aggregated data to make sure that the output from the aggregation/cleansing module 230 does not have errors or inconsistencies.
- the number of unique employees may be known or expected to be around 250,000. However, if the resolved number of unique employees is much more or less than the known or expected number, this may indicate an error with the output. In such case, the data reliability/consistency module 210 can flag issues with the output and prevent introduction of error in later steps of the process.
- the data analysis system 200 aggregates data relating to employees of an organization, such as email activity of the employees. For example, an organization may be interested in finding out about any patterns in employee email activity and employee efficiency.
- the data analysis system 200 accepts data from at least two data sources: one data source that includes employee data and another data source that includes email data.
- the email data may be available in the form of email logs from an email server application (e.g., Microsoft Exchange), for example, and may include information such as sender, recipient, subject, body, attachments, etc.
- the employee data may be accessed in one or more databases, for example, and may include information such as employee ID, employee name, employee email address, etc.
- the data reliability/consistency module 210 can perform quality reliability tests on data received from each of the data sources. For example, the data reliability/consistency module 210 can compare the file size of the employee data against the file size of the previously received version of the employee data, or the data reliability/consistency module 210 can compare the file size against an expected size. The data reliability/consistency module 210 can also check whether the structure of the employee data has changed (e.g., number and/or format of rows and columns). The data reliability/consistency module 210 can also run similar tests for the email data. The data reliability/consistency module 210 can check the file size, structure, etc.
- the system 200 may try to obtain the data again.
- the data reliability/consistency module 210 can run the reliability tests on the newly received data to check whether it is now free of errors and/or inconsistencies. Once all (or selected samplings) of the data from the data sources is determined to be reliable, the system 200 can cleanse and aggregate the data from the data sources.
- the job orchestration module 220 can schedule the steps involved in cleansing and aggregating data from the various sources, such as employee data and email data.
- the job orchestration module 220 can define a series of commands to be performed to import data from multiple data sources and transform the data appropriately for combining.
- the data from the data sources can be imported into a distributed computing framework that can accommodate large amounts of data, such as Hadoop.
- the data can be cleansed and aggregated using the distributed computing framework.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can map the employee data and the email data by using the employee's email address.
- the email data may include emails that have the employee's email address as either the sender or the recipient, and these emails can be resolved to the employee who has the corresponding email address. By mapping the email address to employee ID, the email data can be resolved to unique individuals. After resolving the data to unique individuals, the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can aggregate the data and generate an intermediate output that can be used to perform further analysis (e.g., by the analysis module 240 ).
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may make the amount of data to be analyzed more manageable by aggregating or summarizing the data set. In a specific example, the aggregation/cleansing module 230 generates a list of top email senders and top email recipients for each employee from all of the emails associated with that employee.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can generate an output of top email senders in the format “sender name,” “sender domain,” and “number of emails from sender” (e.g., “John Doe,” “gmail.com,” “10”).
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can extract the domain information from the sender email address to provide the sender domain information.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can generate an output of top email recipients for an employee in a similar manner.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may also extract file extensions for attachments and generate a list of types of attachments and counts of attachments for each employee.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can generate any intermediate output of interest for each employee, and such intermediate output can be used in further analysis by the analysis module 240 .
- the intermediate output may be directly output to the users.
- the system 200 may display in the user interface the list of top senders and top recipients for employees who send and/or receive the most number of emails within the organization.
- the users in an organization can interact with the analysis module 240 in order to obtain information regarding operational efficiency.
- the analysis module 240 may produce a list of employees who send the highest number of emails, employees who receive the highest number of emails, employees who receive the highest number of attachments, top domains for all emails, etc. for the whole organization.
- the final output can be based on the intermediate output for each employee.
- the top domains for all emails can be determined by querying which domains are most common in the top sender domains and top recipient domains for all employees.
- the email activity may be compared with other activities of employees (e.g., loan processing as explained below) to determine whether certain patterns or trends in an employee's email activity affect employee efficiency.
- the analysis module 240 can generate an efficiency indicator for each employee based on the combined and aggregated data from multiple data sources.
- An efficiency indicator can provide information relating to the efficiency of an employee. The efficiency indicator may be based on some or all aspects of employee activity.
- the data analysis system 200 accepts data from data sources relating to loan processing.
- the data analysis system 200 can receive employee data, loan processing data, and other related information in order to analyze employee efficiency in processing loans and factors affecting employee efficiency.
- the data reliability/consistency module 210 can perform any relevant quality reliability tests on each of the data sources.
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can cleanse and combine the data from multiple data sources. Any combination of data can be aggregated.
- the employee data and the loan processing data can be combined with one or more of: software version or upgrade data, employee arrival/departure time data, training platform data, etc.
- the employee data and the loan processing data are combined with software version or upgrade data, and the resulting data may show that employees that have a certain version of the software are more efficient.
- the employee data and the loan processing data are combined with employee arrival time, and the resulting data may show that employees who arrive earlier in the day are more efficient.
- the analysis module 240 may compare a group of individuals who have one or more common characteristics against each other. For example, a group may be defined by the same position, manager, department, location, etc. The members within a group may be compared to analyze trends. The analysis module 240 may also compare one group against another group. For instance, one group may report to one manager, and another group may report to a different manager. A group of individuals that share a common characteristic may be referred to as a “cohort.” Comparison of groups or cohorts may reveal information about why one group is more efficient than another group. For example, the analysis of the resulting data may show that Group A is more efficient than Group B, and the software for Group A was recently upgraded whereas the software for Group B has not been. Such correlation can allow the organization to decide whether and when to proceed with the software upgrade for Group B.
- the data analysis system 200 can accept data relating to real estate resources of an organization.
- the data sources may include information relating to one or more of: real estate resource data, costs associated with various real estate resources, state of various real estate resources, employees assigned to various real estate resources, functions assigned to various real estate resources, etc.
- the data analysis system 200 can accept real estate resource data and employee activity data from multiple data sources. The data from multiple data sources can be combined to analyze whether certain real estate resources can be merged, eliminated, temporarily replace other resources during emergencies, etc. For example, if there are multiple locations of an organization within the same city, it may make sense to merge the offices based on the analysis.
- the analysis module 240 can perform such analysis based on the resulting output from the aggregation/cleansing module 230 .
- the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may produce an intermediate output that can be used by the analysis module 240 .
- employee activity data can be combined and analyzed to detect any security breaches.
- the data analysis system 200 can aggregate employee data relating to badge-in time, badge-out time, system login/logout time, VPN login/logout time, etc. in order to identify inconsistent actions. For example, if an employee badged in at 9:30 am at the office and logged on to the system at 9:32 am, but there is a VPN login at 9:30 am, the data analysis system 200 can identify that the VPN login is probably not by the employee.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of a process 300 for aggregating and analyzing data from a plurality of data sources.
- the process 300 may be implemented by one or more systems described with respect to FIGS. 1-2 and 8 .
- the process 300 is explained below in connection with the system 100 in FIG. 1 .
- Certain details relating to the process 300 are explained in more detail with respect to FIGS. 1-2 and 4-8 .
- the process 300 may include fewer or additional blocks, and the blocks may be performed in an order that is different than illustrated.
- the data analysis system 100 accesses and/or obtains data from a plurality of data sources.
- the data sources can include various data types, including one or more of: email data, system logon data, system logoff data, badge swipe data, employee data, software version data, software license data, remote access data, phone call data, job processing data, etc. associated with a plurality of individuals.
- the type of data source accepted by the system 100 can include a database, a web service, a flat file, a log file, or any other format data source. The data in one data source can have a different format from the data in another data source.
- the system 100 performs a quality reliability test for determining reliability of data from each of the plurality of data sources.
- Quality reliability tests may be based on expected characteristics of data from a particular data source. Each data source may have a different set of expected characteristics.
- the system 100 detects inconsistencies in formatting of data from each of the plurality of data sources.
- the system 100 may perform multiple reliability tests on data from each of the plurality of data sources in order to identify any errors or inconsistences in data received from the data sources. For example, the system 100 can check whether the file size matches expected file size, structure of the data matches expected structure, and/or number of entries matches expected number of entries, among other data quality checks. Any significant deviations may signal problems with a particular data source. Details relating to performing quality reliability tests are further explained in connection with FIG. 4 .
- the system 100 transforms the data into a format that is compatible for combining and/or analysis.
- the data from the data sources may not be in a format that can be combined.
- time information may be available from multiple data sources, but one time data source can use the universal time, and another data source can use local time. In such case, the time data in one of the data sources should be converted to the format of the other data source so that the combined data has the time same reference.
- the system 100 resolves the data from each of the plurality of data sources to unique individuals.
- Unique individuals may be a subset of the plurality of individuals with whom the data from the plurality of data sources is associated.
- some data sources may include information about individuals who are not employees (e.g., consultants), and such data may not be resolved to specific employees.
- the system 100 may resolve the data from each of the plurality of data sources at least partly by mapping a column in one data source to a column in another data source.
- the system 100 generates output data indicating analysis of the resolved data, such as efficiency indicators that are calculated using algorithms that consider data of employees gathered from multiple data sources.
- the system 100 determines an efficiency indicator based at least in part on a comparison of individuals of the unique individuals that have at least one common characteristic.
- the at least one common characteristic can be the same title, same position, same location, same department, same manager or supervisor, etc.
- the system 100 may generate an intermediate output based on the resolved data, and the system 100 can determine an efficiency indicator based on the intermediate output.
- the intermediate output may be a reduced version of the resolved data.
- a reduced version may not contain all of the resolved data, but may include a summary or aggregation of some of the resolved data.
- the reduced version of employee email data does not contain all employee emails, but can include a list of top senders and top recipients for each employee.
- a first data source of the plurality of data sources includes employee data
- a second data source of the plurality of data sources includes email data.
- the system 100 can resolve the data from each of the plurality of data sources by resolving the employee data and the email data to unique employees.
- the efficiency indicator can indicate an efficiency level associated with an employee out of the unique employees.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of a process 400 for performing a quality reliability test for determining the reliability of data from one or more of a plurality of data sources.
- the process 400 may be implemented by one or more systems described with respect to FIGS. 1-2 and 8 .
- the process 400 is explained below in connection with the system 100 in FIG. 1 .
- Certain details relating to the process 400 are explained in more detail with respect to FIGS. 1-3 and 5-8 .
- the process 400 may include fewer or additional blocks, and the blocks may be performed in an order that is different than illustrated.
- the data analysis system 100 accesses information associated with a format of data from a data source.
- the information may specify the structure of data (e.g., number of columns, type of data for each column, etc.), expected size of the data, expected number of entries in the data, etc.
- each data source (or set of data sources) may have a different format.
- the system 100 determines whether data from a data source is consistent with the expected format of data as indicated in the accessed data format information. For example, the system 100 can check if the structure of the data is consistent with the expected format. The system 100 can also check if the size of the data is similar to the expected size of the data.
- the system 100 identifies an inconsistency in the data from the data source. If the system 100 identifies any inconsistencies, the system 100 can output indications of the inconsistency in the data to the user. The system 100 may also attempt to obtain the data from the data source until the data no longer has inconsistencies.
- FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating examples of types of data that can be aggregated and analyzed for employee efficiency and/or productivity analysis.
- the data analysis system 500 accepts email data 510 , building/equipment access data 520 , and/or human resources data 530 . Based on the imported data, the data analysis system 500 can produce an employee productivity report 550 .
- the employee productivity report 550 can be based on any combination of data from multiple data sources.
- the building/equipment access data 520 and human resources data 530 can be cleansed and aggregated to perform security-based analysis (e.g., are there any suspicious system logins or remote access).
- the building/equipment access data 520 and human resources data 530 can also be combined to perform efficiency analysis (e.g., what are the work hour patterns of employees and how efficient are these employees).
- the email data 510 can be combined with human resources data 530 to perform efficiency analysis (e.g., how does employee email activity affect efficiency).
- An organization can aggregate relevant data that can provide answers to specific queries about the organization. Certain details relating to analysis of employee efficiency or email activity is explained in more detail with respect to FIGS. 1-4 and 6-7 .
- the employee productivity report 550 can provide a comparison of an employee to individuals who share common characteristics. Depending on the embodiment, the employee may be compared to individuals who have different characteristics (e.g., supervisors). The comparison can also be between a group to which an employee belongs and a group to which an employee does not belong.
- FIG. 6 illustrates an example user interface 600 displaying an output of a data analysis system.
- the data analysis system can be similar to systems explained in connection with FIGS. 1-2 and 8 .
- the user interface 600 shows an example of results from employee email analysis. As illustrated, the user interface 600 includes a list of top 10 senders 610 , a list of top 10 recipients 620 , a list of attachment count 630 , and a list of top 10 domains 640 .
- the list of top 10 senders 610 can include top 10 employees of an organization who sent the most number of emails in a specific time period.
- the top 10 senders list 610 can show, for each employee in the list, the name of the employee, the email address of the employee, and the total number of emails sent by the employee.
- the time period or span for which the list 610 is generated can vary depending on the requirements of the organization. For instance, the list 610 may include top 10 senders for a specific day, week, month, etc.
- the list of top 10 recipients 620 may be similar to the list of top 10 senders 610 .
- the top 10 recipients list 620 can include top 10 employees of the organization who received the most number of emails in a specific time period.
- the top 10 recipients list 620 can show, for each employee in the list, the name of the employee, the email address of the employee, and the total number of emails received by the employee.
- the time period or span for which the top 10 recipients list 620 is generated can be the same as the time period or span for the top 10 senders list 610 .
- the list of attachment count 630 can list top employees who have sent or received the most number of attachments.
- the attachment list 630 can display the name of the employee and the total number of attachments.
- the attachment list 630 can provide an overview of employees who may potentially use a large percentage of storage resources due to sending and/or receiving of numerous attachments.
- the list of top 10 domains 640 can show the list of common domains from which emails are sent to the employees of the organization or common domains to which the employees send emails.
- the top domains list 640 lists “gmail.com” as the top domain, “yahoo.com” as the second domain, and so forth. Since employees can send many internal emails, the domain for the organization may not be included in the top domain list.
- the data analysis system can provide an analysis of certain aspects of employee behavior.
- the email activity data may be combined and/or aggregated with other types of data in order to examine relationships between employee email activity and other aspects of employee behavior. Such relationships may provide insights into factors that affect employee efficiency.
- FIG. 7 illustrates another example user interface 700 displaying an output of a data analysis system.
- the data analysis system can be similar to systems explained in connection with FIGS. 1-2 and 8 .
- the user interface 700 shows an example of results from employee loan processing analysis.
- the user interface 700 includes columns for the following information: employee name 710 , employee ID 715 , employee position/title 720 , employee location 725 , average badge-in time 730 , average badge-out time 735 , average number of processed jobs 740 , employee efficiency 745 , percentage of total emails sent to applicants 750 , and average percentage of total emails sent to applicants for others with the same title 755 .
- Employee name 710 can refer to the name of an employee, and employee ID 715 can be an identifier that designates a particular employee.
- Position/title 720 can refer to an employee's position or title.
- the user interface 700 shows two different positions: loan processor and loan processing supervisor.
- the location 725 can refer to the office location of an employee.
- the user interface 700 shows three different locations: A, B, and C.
- the average badge-in time 730 can refer to the average time an employee badges in to the office during a period of time.
- the average badge-out time 735 can refer to the average time an employee badges out of the office during a period of time.
- the average can be calculated based on badge-in or badge-out times over a specific period of time, such as several days, a week, several weeks, a month, etc.
- the average number of processed jobs 740 may refer to the number of loan jobs an employee processed over a period of time.
- the period of time can be determined as appropriate by the organization (e.g., a week, several weeks, a month, etc.).
- the time period over which the number of jobs is averaged may match the time period used for determining average badge-in time and badge-out time.
- the employee efficiency 745 may refer to the efficiency level or indicator associated with an employee.
- the values shown in user interface 700 are low, medium, and high, but the efficiency level can be defined as any metric or scale that the organization wants.
- the percentage of total emails sent to applicants 750 may refer to the percentage of emails sent to loan applicants out of all of the emails sent by an employee.
- 80% of Jane Doe's emails are sent to loan applicants, while 95% of John Smith's emails are sent to loan applicants.
- John Doe sends only 50% of his emails to loan applicants, and Jane Smith sends 85% of her emails to loan applicants.
- the average percentage of total emails sent to applicants for other with the same title 755 can refer to the average percentage for employees that have the same position/title.
- the data analysis system can provide a point of comparison with other employees with respect to a specific attribute or property.
- the average percentage column provides a point of comparison for percentage of emails sent to loan applicants with respect to employees having the same title.
- the average percentage for the position of “loan processing supervisor” is 52%, and the average percentage for the position of “loan processor” is 87%.
- This column can provide a point of comparison with other employees that have the same title. For example, John Doe's percentage of emails sent to applicants is very low compared to the average percentage for all employees who are loan processors.
- the user interface 700 also includes a drop-down menu or button 760 that allows the user to change the comparison group.
- the comparison group is other employees that have the same title.
- the comparison group can be changed by selecting a different category from the options provided in the drop-down menu 760 .
- the user can change the comparison group to employees at the same location or employees at the same location with the same title.
- the options in the drop-down menu can be a list of item or checkboxes. Depending on the embodiment, multiple items or checkboxes can be selected or checked.
- the comparison group can be changed by the user as appropriate, and the content displayed in the user interface 700 can be updated accordingly.
- the comparison group can have different attributes from an employee, or can be different from the group to which an employee belongs.
- the comparison group can include employees who have a different position, employees from a different department, etc.
- the efficiency level or indicator 745 can be based on any combination of data that may be available to the data analysis system.
- an efficiency indicator can provide information relating to one or more aspects of an employee's efficiency.
- the efficiency level can be based on the average number of processed jobs and the time spent in the office during a particular period of time.
- the efficiency level can be based on a comparison with other employees.
- the percentage of emails sent to applicants for an employee is compared to the average percentage of emails sent to applicants for employees having the same title.
- the efficiency level may incorporate the comparison to others having the same title. In such case, the efficiency level for John Doe can be very low since his percentage of emails sent to applicants is far below the average percentage for employees with the same title.
- the techniques described herein are implemented by one or more special-purpose computing devices.
- the special-purpose computing devices may be hard-wired to perform the techniques, or may include circuitry or digital electronic devices such as one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) that are persistently programmed to perform the techniques, or may include one or more hardware processors programmed to perform the techniques pursuant to program instructions in firmware, memory, other storage, or a combination.
- ASICs application-specific integrated circuits
- FPGAs field programmable gate arrays
- Such special-purpose computing devices may also combine custom hard-wired logic, ASICs, or FPGAs with custom programming to accomplish the techniques.
- the special-purpose computing devices may be desktop computer systems, server computer systems, portable computer systems, handheld devices, networking devices or any other device or combination of devices that incorporate hard-wired and/or program logic to implement the techniques.
- FIG. 8 is a block diagram that illustrates a computer system 1800 upon which an embodiment may be implemented.
- the computing system 1800 may comprises a server system that accesses law enforcement data and provides user interface data to one or more users (e.g., executives) that allows those users to view their desired executive dashboards and interface with the data.
- users e.g., executives
- Other computing systems discussed herein, such as the user (e.g., executive) may include any portion of the circuitry and/or functionality discussed with reference to system 1800 .
- Computer system 1800 includes a bus 1802 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, and a hardware processor, or multiple processors, 1804 coupled with bus 1802 for processing information.
- Hardware processor(s) 1804 may be, for example, one or more general purpose microprocessors.
- Computer system 1800 also includes a main memory 1806 , such as a random access memory (RAM), cache and/or other dynamic storage devices, coupled to bus 1802 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 1804 .
- Main memory 1806 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed by processor 1804 .
- Such instructions when stored in storage media accessible to processor 1804 , render computer system 1800 into a special-purpose machine that is customized to perform the operations specified in the instructions.
- Computer system 1800 may be coupled via bus 1802 to a display 1812 , such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or LCD display (or touch screen), for displaying information to a computer user.
- a display 1812 such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or LCD display (or touch screen)
- An input device 1814 is coupled to bus 1802 for communicating information and command selections to processor 1804 .
- cursor control 1816 is Another type of user input device, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to processor 1804 and for controlling cursor movement on display 1812 .
- This input device typically has two degrees of freedom in two axes, a first axis (e.g., x) and a second axis (e.g., y), that allows the device to specify positions in a plane.
- a first axis e.g., x
- a second axis e.g., y
- the same direction information and command selections as cursor control may be implemented via receiving touches on a touch screen without a cursor.
- Software modules configured for execution on computing devices may be provided on a computer readable medium, such as a compact disc, digital video disc, flash drive, magnetic disc, or any other tangible medium, or as a digital download (and may be originally stored in a compressed or installable format that requires installation, decompression or decryption prior to execution).
- Such software code may be stored, partially or fully, on a memory device of the executing computing device, for execution by the computing device.
- Software instructions may be embedded in firmware, such as an EPROM.
- hardware modules may be comprised of connected logic units, such as gates and flip-flops, and/or may be comprised of programmable units, such as programmable gate arrays or processors.
- the modules or computing device functionality described herein are preferably implemented as software modules, but may be represented in hardware or firmware. Generally, the modules described herein refer to logical modules that may be combined with other modules or divided into sub-modules despite their physical organization or storage
- Computer system 1800 may implement the techniques described herein using customized hard-wired logic, one or more ASICs or FPGAs, firmware and/or program logic which in combination with the computer system causes or programs computer system 1800 to be a special-purpose machine. According to one embodiment, the techniques herein are performed by computer system 1800 in response to processor(s) 1804 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in main memory 1806 . Such instructions may be read into main memory 1806 from another storage medium, such as storage device 1810 . Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 1806 causes processor(s) 1804 to perform the process steps described herein. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions.
- non-transitory media refers to any media that store data and/or instructions that cause a machine to operate in a specific fashion. Such non-transitory media may comprise non-volatile media and/or volatile media.
- Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as storage device 1810 .
- Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as main memory 1806 .
- non-transitory media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, solid state drive, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic data storage medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical data storage medium, any physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, NVRAM, any other memory chip or cartridge, and networked versions of the same.
- Various forms of media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to processor 1804 for execution.
- the instructions may initially be carried on a magnetic disk or solid state drive of a remote computer.
- the remote computer can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over a telephone line using a modem.
- a modem local to computer system 1800 can receive the data on the telephone line and use an infra-red transmitter to convert the data to an infra-red signal.
- An infra-red detector can receive the data carried in the infra-red signal and appropriate circuitry can place the data on bus 1802 .
- Bus 1802 carries the data to main memory 1806 , from which processor 1804 retrieves and executes the instructions.
- the instructions received by main memory 1806 may retrieves and executes the instructions.
- the instructions received by main memory 1806 may optionally be stored on storage device 1810 either before or after execution by processor 1804 .
- Computer system 1800 also includes a communication interface 1818 coupled to bus 1802 .
- Communication interface 1818 provides a two-way data communication coupling to a network link 1820 that is connected to a local network 1822 .
- communication interface 1818 may be an integrated services digital network (ISDN) card, cable modem, satellite modem, or a modem to provide a data communication connection to a corresponding type of telephone line.
- ISDN integrated services digital network
- communication interface 1818 may be a local area network (LAN) card to provide a data communication connection to a compatible LAN (or WAN component to communicated with a WAN).
- LAN local area network
- Wireless links may also be implemented.
- communication interface 1818 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams representing various types of information.
- Network link 1820 typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other data devices.
- network link 1820 may provide a connection through local network 1822 to a host computer 1824 or to data equipment operated by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 1826 .
- ISP 1826 in turn provides data communication services through the world wide packet data communication network now commonly referred to as the “Internet” 1828 .
- Internet 1828 uses electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams.
- the signals through the various networks and the signals on network link 1820 and through communication interface 1818 which carry the digital data to and from computer system 1800 , are example forms of transmission media.
- Computer system 1800 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), network link 1820 and communication interface 1818 .
- a server 1830 might transmit a requested code for an application program through Internet 1828 , ISP 1826 , local network 1822 and communication interface 1818 .
- the received code may be executed by processor 1804 as it is received, and/or stored in storage device 1810 , or other non-volatile storage for later execution.
- Conditional language such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Abstract
Description
- Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.
- This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/173,408, filed on Oct. 29, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/816,599, filed on Aug. 3, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/304,741, filed Jun. 13, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,105,000, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/914,229, filed Dec. 10, 2013. Each of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
- The present disclosure relates to systems and techniques for data integration and analysis. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to aggregating data from a plurality of data sources and analyzing the aggregated data.
- Organizations and/or companies are producing increasingly large amounts of data. Data may be stored across various storage systems and/or devices. Data may include different types of information and have various formats.
- The systems, methods, and devices described herein each have several aspects, no single one of which is solely responsible for its desirable attributes. Without limiting the scope of this disclosure, several non-limiting features will now be discussed briefly.
- In one embodiment, a computer system configured to aggregate and analyze data from a plurality of data sources comprises: one or more hardware computer processors configured to execute code in order to cause the system to: obtain data from a plurality of data sources, each of the plurality of data sources comprising one or more of: email data, system logon data, system logoff data, badge swipe data, employee data, software version data, software license data, remote access data, phone call data, or job processing data associated with a plurality of individuals; detect inconsistencies in formatting of data from each of the plurality of data sources; transform data from each of the plurality of data sources into a format that is compatible for combining the data from the plurality of data sources; associate the data from each of the plurality of data sources to unique individuals of the plurality of individuals; and determine efficiency indicators for respective individuals based at least in part on a comparison of data associated with the respective individuals and other individuals that have at least one common characteristic.
- In another embodiment, a computer system configured to aggregate and analyze data from a plurality of data sources comprises: one or more hardware computer processors configured to execute code in order to cause the system to: access data from a plurality of data sources, each of the plurality of data sources comprising one or more of: email data, system logon data, system logoff data, badge swipe data, employee data, software version data, software license data, remote access data, phone call data, or job processing data associated with a plurality of individuals; detect inconsistencies in formatting of datum from respective data sources; associate respective datum from the plurality of data sources to respective individuals of the plurality of individuals; and provide statistics associated with respective individuals based on data associated with the respective individuals from the plurality of data sources. In certain embodiments, the code is further configured to cause the computer system to: transform respective datum from the plurality of data sources into one or more formats usable to generate the statistics.
- In yet another embodiment, a non-transitory computer readable medium comprises instructions for aggregating and analyzing data from a plurality of data sources that cause a computer processor to: access data from a plurality of data sources, each of the plurality of data sources comprising one or more of: email data, system logon data, system logoff data, badge swipe data, employee data, software version data, software license data, remote access data, phone call data, or job processing data associated with a plurality of individuals; detect inconsistencies in formatting of datum from respective data sources; associate respective datum from the plurality of data sources to respective individuals of the plurality of individuals; and provide statistics associated with respective individuals based on data associated with the respective individuals from the plurality of data sources. In certain embodiments, the instructions are further configured to cause the computer processor to: transform respective datum from the plurality of data sources into one or more formats usable to generate the statistics.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of a data analysis system configured to aggregate and analyze data from a plurality of data sources. -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating components of the data analysis system ofFIG. 1 , according to one embodiment. -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of a process for aggregating and analyzing data from a plurality of data sources. -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of a process for performing a quality reliability test for determining the reliability of data from one or more of a plurality of data sources. -
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating examples of types of data that can be aggregated and analyzed for employee efficiency and/or productivity analysis. -
FIG. 6 illustrates an example user interface displaying an output of a data analysis system. -
FIG. 7 illustrates another example user interface displaying an output of a data analysis system. -
FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating a computer system with which certain methods discussed herein may be implemented. - Organizations and/or companies may generate, collect, and store large amounts of data related to activities of employees. Such data may be stored across various storage systems and/or devices and may have different formats. For example, data of an organization may be stored in different locations (e.g., different cities, countries, etc.) and different types of media (disk storage, tapes, etc.). Data may be available in the form of web services, databases, flat files, log files, etc. Even within the same organization, the format of various data sources can be different (e.g., different identifiers can be used to refer to an employee). Therefore, it may be difficult to query and extract relevant information from vast amounts of data scattered in different data sources. Accordingly, there is a need for aggregating and analyzing data from various data sources in an efficient and effective way in order to obtain meaningful analysis. For example, there is a need for improved analysis of data from multiple data sources in order to track activities of and determine productivity of employees.
- As disclosed herein, a data analysis system may be configured to aggregate and analyze data from various data sources. Such data analysis system may also be referred to as a “data pipeline.” The data pipeline can accept data from various data sources, transform and cleanse the data, aggregate and resolve the data, and generate statistics and/or analysis of the data. The data analysis system can accept data in different formats and transform or convert them into a format that is compatible for combining with data from other data sources. The data analysis system can also resolve the data from different sources and provide useful analysis of the data. Because data from any type or number of data sources can be resolved and combined, the resulting analysis can be robust and provide valuable insight into activities relating to an organization or company. For example, a company can obtain analysis relating to employee email activity, employee efficiency, real estate resource utilization, etc. As used herein, combining of data may refer to associating data items from different data sources without actually combining the data items within a data structure, as well as storing data from multiple data sources together.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of adata analysis system 100 configured to aggregate and analyze data from a plurality of data sources. The data sources may provide data in various data formats that are accepted by thedata analysis system 100, such as web services, databases, flat files, log files, etc. The data can be in various formats. In some instances, the data may be defined as CSV, in rows and columns, in XML, etc. Thedata analysis system 100 can accept data from multiple data sources and produce statistics and/or analysis related to the data. Some examples of types of data sources that thedata analysis system 100 can accept as input include employee data, email data, phone log data, email log data, single sign-on (SSO) data, VPN login data, system logon/logoff data, software version data, software license data, remote access data, badge swipe data, etc. - The
data analysis system 100 can function as a general transform system that can receive different types of data as input and generate an output specified by an organization or company. For example, thedata analysis system 100 can accept employee data and email data of an organization and output a list of top 10 email senders or recipients for each employee. The output from thedata analysis system 100 may package the aggregated data in a manner that facilitates querying and performing analysis of the data. One type of querying and/or analysis may be operational efficiency analysis. -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating components of thedata analysis system 100 ofFIG. 1 , according to one embodiment. Thedata analysis system 200 ofFIG. 2 can be similar to thedata analysis system 100 ofFIG. 1 . Thedata analysis system 200 can accept data from multiple data sources and output processed data. Thesystem 200 can include a data reliability/consistency module 210, ajob orchestration module 220, an aggregation/cleansing module 230, and ananalysis module 240. Thesystem 200 can include fewer or additional modules or components, depending on the embodiment. One or more modules may be combined or reside on the same computing device, depending on the embodiment. In certain embodiments, functions performed by one module in thesystem 200 may be performed by another module in thesystem 200. - The data reliability/
consistency module 210 may perform quality reliability tests on various data sources. Thesystem 200 may have access to information about the format of a data source, and the data reliability/consistency module 210 can detect whether the format of the data from the data source is consistent with the expected format. Performing reliability tests prior to aggregating the data can ensure that the output and analysis generated by thesystem 200 is reliable. Details relating to quality reliability test are explained further below. - The
job orchestration module 220 may automate jobs for aggregating, cleansing, and/or analyzing the data. Thejob orchestration module 220 can manage steps involved in each process and scheduling the steps. For example, thejob orchestration module 220 can define and schedule steps for transforming and resolving data from multiple data sources. Thejob orchestration module 220 can define workflows for various processes, e.g., through coordinated sequences of commands, scripts, jobs, etc. In some embodiments, thesystem 200 uses open source tools, such as Rundeck, Kettle, etc. - The aggregation/
cleansing module 230 aggregates and/or cleanses data from various sources. “Cleansing” may refer to transforming and resolving the data from various sources so that they can be combined. Data in different sources may not be readily combined although the data may relate to a common entity (e.g., an employee or group of employees) and/or same type of information (e.g., time). For example, the IDs used to identify an employee can be different from one data source to another. In such case, the IDs may be mapped so that they can be resolved to specific employees. Thesystem 200 may identify a standard identifier that can map two or more employee IDs used by different data sources to a particular employee. One example of a standard identifier can be the employee's email address. If both data sources include the corresponding email addresses for employee IDs, the data from the two sources can be associated with an employee associated with the email addresses. - In another example, data sources may include timestamp or time data (e.g., employee badge-in time, employee badge-out time, etc.), but the time information in data received from different sources may have the same time reference and, thus, may not be in local time zone of any particular employee (except those employees that may be in the standard time reference used by the organization). For example, an organization may have locations in various time zones, but all timestamps may be represented in UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) or GMT (Greenwich Mean Time) format. In order to make comparison across different time zones, the time information may need to be converted or adjusted according to the local time zone. Each employee's timestamp can be shifted or adjusted so that the time information reflects the local time. The aggregation/
cleansing module 230 may obtain the local time zone information based on the employee's city, state, and country information in order to make the appropriate adjustment. Data for employees related to time (e.g., time arrived at office, time checked-out for lunch, etc.) may then be compared in a more meaningful manner with the time entries converted to represent local times. The examples above have been explained for illustrative purposes, and cleansing can include any processing that is performed on the data from multiple sources in order to combine them. - Once the data from various data sources are cleansed, they can be combined and aggregated. For example, multiple different IDs can be mapped to the same employee (or other entity) based on a common or standard identifier such that data using any of those multiple different IDs can each be associated with the same employee. The vast amounts of data can be joined and combined so that they are available for analysis.
- In some embodiments, the data can be imported into and aggregated using a distributed computing framework (e.g., Apache Hadoop). A distributed computing framework may allow for distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers. Such framework may provide scalability for large amounts of data. Data may be cleansed and/or aggregated using a software that facilitates querying and managing of large data sets in distributed storage (e.g., Apache Hive).
- The aggregation/
cleansing module 230 can generate an output from the combined data. The output can be defined as appropriate by the organization or company that is requesting the data analysis. The output may combine data and provide an intermediate format that is configured for further analysis, such as querying and/or other analysis. In one example, employee data and email data are aggregated in order to provide an intermediate outcome that may be analyzed to provide insights into employee email activity. For example, an organization may have about 5 billion emails, but querying all emails can be slow and may not yield valuable information. Instead, the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can aggregate the email data and provide an intermediate output including data such as a list of top email senders, top email recipients, top sender domains, top recipient domains, number of sent emails, number of received emails, etc. for each employee. This intermediate output, which is a reduced amount of data, may then be considered in querying. Using the intermediate output, the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may search for top sender/recipient domains, top email sending employees, top email receiving employees, etc. For instance, the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can search through the intermediate output (which can include, e.g., top email senders, top email recipients, top sender domains, top recipient domains, number of sent emails, number of received emails, etc. for each employee) in order to produce statistics and/or analysis for the entire organization (e.g., information such as top email sending employees, top email receiving employees, top domains, etc. and/or information output in user interfaces illustrated inFIGS. 6-7 ). In this manner, the data can be analyzed and reduced in a manner that makes it easier for organizations to ask questions about various aspects of their operations or business. For instance, a company may be interested in finding out information on its operational efficiency. - In another example, the aggregation/
cleansing module 230 can output the number of emails an employee sends in 15-minute buckets (e.g., how many emails an employee has sent every 15 minutes). This output can serve as an intermediate output for determining a relationship between the number of emails an employee sends and employee efficiency or productivity. In other embodiments, the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can generate an output that is not used as an intermediate output for analysis, but that can be directly output to the users (e.g., information output in user interfaces illustrated inFIGS. 6-7 ). In certain embodiments, the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may provide combined data to theanalysis module 240, and theanalysis module 240 may generate the intermediate output. For example, the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may resolve and combine the data sets, and theanalysis module 240 can generate an intermediate output from the combined data set. - The
analysis module 240 can perform analysis based on the output from the aggregation/cleansing module 230. For example, theanalysis module 240 can perform queries for answering specific questions relating to the operations of an organization. One example question may be what are the top domains that send emails to employees of an organization. Theanalysis module 240 can search through the top sender domains for all employees and produce a list of top sender domains. Theanalysis module 240 may be an analysis platform that is built to interact with various outputs from thedata analysis system 200, which users from an organization can use to obtain answers to various questions relating to the organization. In some embodiments, the output from the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may be an intermediate output for facilitating further analysis. In other embodiments, the output from the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may be a direct output from the cleansing and/or aggregating step that does not involve an intermediate output. - As mentioned above, the
system 200 can perform quality reliability tests to determine the reliability of the data from various data sources. The data reliability/consistency module 210 of thesystem 200 can perform the reliability tests. The data reliability/consistency module 210 can detect inconsistencies and/or errors in the data from a data source. The data reliability/consistency module 210 may have access to information about data from a certain data source, such as the typical size of the data, typical format and/or structure of the data, etc. The data reliability/consistency module 210 may refer to the information about a data source in order to detect inconsistencies and/or errors in received data. - The data reliability/
consistency module 210 can flag a variety of issues, including: whether the file size is similar to the file size of previous version of the data, whether the population count is similar to the previously received population count, whether the structure of the data has changed, whether the content or the meaning of the data has changed, etc. In one embodiment, population count may refer to the number of items to expect, for example, as opposed to their size. For example, the data reliability/consistency module 210 can identify that the content or the meaning of a column may have changed if the information used to be numeric but now is text, or if a timestamp used to be in one format but now is in a different format. Large discrepancies or significant deviations in size and/or format can indicate that the data was not properly received or pulled. - The data reliability/
consistency module 210 can run one or more tests on data received from a data source. If the data reliability/consistency module 210 determines that data from a data source is not reliable, thesystem 200 may attempt to pull or receive the data again and run reliability tests until the data is considered sufficiently reliable. By making sure that the data of a data source is reliable, thesystem 200 can prevent introducing inaccurate data into the analysis further down the process. - In some embodiments, the data reliability/
consistency module 210 may also perform quality reliability tests on aggregated data to make sure that the output from the aggregation/cleansing module 230 does not have errors or inconsistencies. In one example, the number of unique employees may be known or expected to be around 250,000. However, if the resolved number of unique employees is much more or less than the known or expected number, this may indicate an error with the output. In such case, the data reliability/consistency module 210 can flag issues with the output and prevent introduction of error in later steps of the process. - In one embodiment, the
data analysis system 200 aggregates data relating to employees of an organization, such as email activity of the employees. For example, an organization may be interested in finding out about any patterns in employee email activity and employee efficiency. Thedata analysis system 200 accepts data from at least two data sources: one data source that includes employee data and another data source that includes email data. The email data may be available in the form of email logs from an email server application (e.g., Microsoft Exchange), for example, and may include information such as sender, recipient, subject, body, attachments, etc. The employee data may be accessed in one or more databases, for example, and may include information such as employee ID, employee name, employee email address, etc. - The data reliability/
consistency module 210 can perform quality reliability tests on data received from each of the data sources. For example, the data reliability/consistency module 210 can compare the file size of the employee data against the file size of the previously received version of the employee data, or the data reliability/consistency module 210 can compare the file size against an expected size. The data reliability/consistency module 210 can also check whether the structure of the employee data has changed (e.g., number and/or format of rows and columns). The data reliability/consistency module 210 can also run similar tests for the email data. The data reliability/consistency module 210 can check the file size, structure, etc. If the data reliability/consistency module 210 determines that the data from a data source has errors or inconsistencies, thesystem 200 may try to obtain the data again. The data reliability/consistency module 210 can run the reliability tests on the newly received data to check whether it is now free of errors and/or inconsistencies. Once all (or selected samplings) of the data from the data sources is determined to be reliable, thesystem 200 can cleanse and aggregate the data from the data sources. - The
job orchestration module 220 can schedule the steps involved in cleansing and aggregating data from the various sources, such as employee data and email data. For example, thejob orchestration module 220 can define a series of commands to be performed to import data from multiple data sources and transform the data appropriately for combining. As explained above, the data from the data sources can be imported into a distributed computing framework that can accommodate large amounts of data, such as Hadoop. The data can be cleansed and aggregated using the distributed computing framework. - The aggregation/
cleansing module 230 can map the employee data and the email data by using the employee's email address. The email data may include emails that have the employee's email address as either the sender or the recipient, and these emails can be resolved to the employee who has the corresponding email address. By mapping the email address to employee ID, the email data can be resolved to unique individuals. After resolving the data to unique individuals, the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can aggregate the data and generate an intermediate output that can be used to perform further analysis (e.g., by the analysis module 240). - Because the size of email data in an organization can be quite large (e.g., 5 billion emails), analyzing all emails after they have been resolved to unique individuals may not be the most efficient way to proceed. Accordingly, the aggregation/
cleansing module 230 may make the amount of data to be analyzed more manageable by aggregating or summarizing the data set. In a specific example, the aggregation/cleansing module 230 generates a list of top email senders and top email recipients for each employee from all of the emails associated with that employee. For instance, the aggregation/cleansing module 230 can generate an output of top email senders in the format “sender name,” “sender domain,” and “number of emails from sender” (e.g., “John Doe,” “gmail.com,” “10”). The aggregation/cleansing module 230 can extract the domain information from the sender email address to provide the sender domain information. The aggregation/cleansing module 230 can generate an output of top email recipients for an employee in a similar manner. The aggregation/cleansing module 230 may also extract file extensions for attachments and generate a list of types of attachments and counts of attachments for each employee. The aggregation/cleansing module 230 can generate any intermediate output of interest for each employee, and such intermediate output can be used in further analysis by theanalysis module 240. In some embodiments, the intermediate output may be directly output to the users. For example, thesystem 200 may display in the user interface the list of top senders and top recipients for employees who send and/or receive the most number of emails within the organization. - The users in an organization can interact with the
analysis module 240 in order to obtain information regarding operational efficiency. In the above example, theanalysis module 240 may produce a list of employees who send the highest number of emails, employees who receive the highest number of emails, employees who receive the highest number of attachments, top domains for all emails, etc. for the whole organization. The final output can be based on the intermediate output for each employee. For example, the top domains for all emails can be determined by querying which domains are most common in the top sender domains and top recipient domains for all employees. - In certain embodiments, the email activity may be compared with other activities of employees (e.g., loan processing as explained below) to determine whether certain patterns or trends in an employee's email activity affect employee efficiency. In some embodiments, the
analysis module 240 can generate an efficiency indicator for each employee based on the combined and aggregated data from multiple data sources. An efficiency indicator can provide information relating to the efficiency of an employee. The efficiency indicator may be based on some or all aspects of employee activity. - In another embodiment, the
data analysis system 200 accepts data from data sources relating to loan processing. For example, thedata analysis system 200 can receive employee data, loan processing data, and other related information in order to analyze employee efficiency in processing loans and factors affecting employee efficiency. The data reliability/consistency module 210 can perform any relevant quality reliability tests on each of the data sources. - The aggregation/
cleansing module 230 can cleanse and combine the data from multiple data sources. Any combination of data can be aggregated. For instance, the employee data and the loan processing data can be combined with one or more of: software version or upgrade data, employee arrival/departure time data, training platform data, etc. In one example, the employee data and the loan processing data are combined with software version or upgrade data, and the resulting data may show that employees that have a certain version of the software are more efficient. In another example, the employee data and the loan processing data are combined with employee arrival time, and the resulting data may show that employees who arrive earlier in the day are more efficient. - The
analysis module 240 may compare a group of individuals who have one or more common characteristics against each other. For example, a group may be defined by the same position, manager, department, location, etc. The members within a group may be compared to analyze trends. Theanalysis module 240 may also compare one group against another group. For instance, one group may report to one manager, and another group may report to a different manager. A group of individuals that share a common characteristic may be referred to as a “cohort.” Comparison of groups or cohorts may reveal information about why one group is more efficient than another group. For example, the analysis of the resulting data may show that Group A is more efficient than Group B, and the software for Group A was recently upgraded whereas the software for Group B has not been. Such correlation can allow the organization to decide whether and when to proceed with the software upgrade for Group B. - In certain embodiments, the
data analysis system 200 can accept data relating to real estate resources of an organization. The data sources may include information relating to one or more of: real estate resource data, costs associated with various real estate resources, state of various real estate resources, employees assigned to various real estate resources, functions assigned to various real estate resources, etc. For example, thedata analysis system 200 can accept real estate resource data and employee activity data from multiple data sources. The data from multiple data sources can be combined to analyze whether certain real estate resources can be merged, eliminated, temporarily replace other resources during emergencies, etc. For example, if there are multiple locations of an organization within the same city, it may make sense to merge the offices based on the analysis. Organizations may also determine which real estate resources can carry on fundamental business processes during emergencies or natural disasters, e.g., as part of business continuity planning. Theanalysis module 240 can perform such analysis based on the resulting output from the aggregation/cleansing module 230. In some embodiments, the aggregation/cleansing module 230 may produce an intermediate output that can be used by theanalysis module 240. - In some embodiments, employee activity data can be combined and analyzed to detect any security breaches. The
data analysis system 200 can aggregate employee data relating to badge-in time, badge-out time, system login/logout time, VPN login/logout time, etc. in order to identify inconsistent actions. For example, if an employee badged in at 9:30 am at the office and logged on to the system at 9:32 am, but there is a VPN login at 9:30 am, thedata analysis system 200 can identify that the VPN login is probably not by the employee. -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of aprocess 300 for aggregating and analyzing data from a plurality of data sources. Theprocess 300 may be implemented by one or more systems described with respect toFIGS. 1-2 and 8 . For illustrative purposes, theprocess 300 is explained below in connection with thesystem 100 inFIG. 1 . Certain details relating to theprocess 300 are explained in more detail with respect toFIGS. 1-2 and 4-8 . Depending on the embodiment, theprocess 300 may include fewer or additional blocks, and the blocks may be performed in an order that is different than illustrated. - At
block 301, thedata analysis system 100 accesses and/or obtains data from a plurality of data sources. In the examples of employee monitoring, the data sources can include various data types, including one or more of: email data, system logon data, system logoff data, badge swipe data, employee data, software version data, software license data, remote access data, phone call data, job processing data, etc. associated with a plurality of individuals. The type of data source accepted by thesystem 100 can include a database, a web service, a flat file, a log file, or any other format data source. The data in one data source can have a different format from the data in another data source. - At
block 302, thesystem 100 performs a quality reliability test for determining reliability of data from each of the plurality of data sources. Quality reliability tests may be based on expected characteristics of data from a particular data source. Each data source may have a different set of expected characteristics. In one embodiment, thesystem 100 detects inconsistencies in formatting of data from each of the plurality of data sources. In one embodiment, thesystem 100 may perform multiple reliability tests on data from each of the plurality of data sources in order to identify any errors or inconsistences in data received from the data sources. For example, thesystem 100 can check whether the file size matches expected file size, structure of the data matches expected structure, and/or number of entries matches expected number of entries, among other data quality checks. Any significant deviations may signal problems with a particular data source. Details relating to performing quality reliability tests are further explained in connection withFIG. 4 . - At
block 303, thesystem 100 transforms the data into a format that is compatible for combining and/or analysis. When the data from different data sources are imported into thesystem 100, the data from the data sources may not be in a format that can be combined. In one example, time information may be available from multiple data sources, but one time data source can use the universal time, and another data source can use local time. In such case, the time data in one of the data sources should be converted to the format of the other data source so that the combined data has the time same reference. - At
block 304, thesystem 100 resolves the data from each of the plurality of data sources to unique individuals. Unique individuals may be a subset of the plurality of individuals with whom the data from the plurality of data sources is associated. For example, some data sources may include information about individuals who are not employees (e.g., consultants), and such data may not be resolved to specific employees. Thesystem 100 may resolve the data from each of the plurality of data sources at least partly by mapping a column in one data source to a column in another data source. - At
block 305, thesystem 100 generates output data indicating analysis of the resolved data, such as efficiency indicators that are calculated using algorithms that consider data of employees gathered from multiple data sources. In one embodiment, thesystem 100 determines an efficiency indicator based at least in part on a comparison of individuals of the unique individuals that have at least one common characteristic. The at least one common characteristic can be the same title, same position, same location, same department, same manager or supervisor, etc. - In certain embodiments, the
system 100 may generate an intermediate output based on the resolved data, and thesystem 100 can determine an efficiency indicator based on the intermediate output. The intermediate output may be a reduced version of the resolved data. A reduced version may not contain all of the resolved data, but may include a summary or aggregation of some of the resolved data. For example, the reduced version of employee email data does not contain all employee emails, but can include a list of top senders and top recipients for each employee. - In one embodiment, a first data source of the plurality of data sources includes employee data, and a second data source of the plurality of data sources includes email data. The
system 100 can resolve the data from each of the plurality of data sources by resolving the employee data and the email data to unique employees. The efficiency indicator can indicate an efficiency level associated with an employee out of the unique employees. -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of aprocess 400 for performing a quality reliability test for determining the reliability of data from one or more of a plurality of data sources. Theprocess 400 may be implemented by one or more systems described with respect toFIGS. 1-2 and 8 . For illustrative purposes, theprocess 400 is explained below in connection with thesystem 100 inFIG. 1 . Certain details relating to theprocess 400 are explained in more detail with respect toFIGS. 1-3 and 5-8 . Depending on the embodiment, theprocess 400 may include fewer or additional blocks, and the blocks may be performed in an order that is different than illustrated. - At
block 401, thedata analysis system 100 accesses information associated with a format of data from a data source. The information may specify the structure of data (e.g., number of columns, type of data for each column, etc.), expected size of the data, expected number of entries in the data, etc. For example, each data source (or set of data sources) may have a different format. - At
block 402, thesystem 100 determines whether data from a data source is consistent with the expected format of data as indicated in the accessed data format information. For example, thesystem 100 can check if the structure of the data is consistent with the expected format. Thesystem 100 can also check if the size of the data is similar to the expected size of the data. - At
block 403, if data from a data source is not consistent with the expected format, size, or other expected characteristic, thesystem 100 identifies an inconsistency in the data from the data source. If thesystem 100 identifies any inconsistencies, thesystem 100 can output indications of the inconsistency in the data to the user. Thesystem 100 may also attempt to obtain the data from the data source until the data no longer has inconsistencies. -
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating examples of types of data that can be aggregated and analyzed for employee efficiency and/or productivity analysis. In one embodiment, thedata analysis system 500 acceptsemail data 510, building/equipment access data 520, and/orhuman resources data 530. Based on the imported data, thedata analysis system 500 can produce anemployee productivity report 550. Theemployee productivity report 550 can be based on any combination of data from multiple data sources. - As explained above, the building/
equipment access data 520 andhuman resources data 530 can be cleansed and aggregated to perform security-based analysis (e.g., are there any suspicious system logins or remote access). The building/equipment access data 520 andhuman resources data 530 can also be combined to perform efficiency analysis (e.g., what are the work hour patterns of employees and how efficient are these employees). In other embodiments, theemail data 510 can be combined withhuman resources data 530 to perform efficiency analysis (e.g., how does employee email activity affect efficiency). An organization can aggregate relevant data that can provide answers to specific queries about the organization. Certain details relating to analysis of employee efficiency or email activity is explained in more detail with respect toFIGS. 1-4 and 6-7 . - The
employee productivity report 550 can provide a comparison of an employee to individuals who share common characteristics. Depending on the embodiment, the employee may be compared to individuals who have different characteristics (e.g., supervisors). The comparison can also be between a group to which an employee belongs and a group to which an employee does not belong. -
FIG. 6 illustrates anexample user interface 600 displaying an output of a data analysis system. The data analysis system can be similar to systems explained in connection withFIGS. 1-2 and 8 . Theuser interface 600 shows an example of results from employee email analysis. As illustrated, theuser interface 600 includes a list of top 10senders 610, a list of top 10recipients 620, a list ofattachment count 630, and a list of top 10domains 640. - The list of top 10
senders 610 can include top 10 employees of an organization who sent the most number of emails in a specific time period. The top 10 senders list 610 can show, for each employee in the list, the name of the employee, the email address of the employee, and the total number of emails sent by the employee. The time period or span for which thelist 610 is generated can vary depending on the requirements of the organization. For instance, thelist 610 may include top 10 senders for a specific day, week, month, etc. - The list of top 10
recipients 620 may be similar to the list of top 10senders 610. The top 10 recipients list 620 can include top 10 employees of the organization who received the most number of emails in a specific time period. The top 10 recipients list 620 can show, for each employee in the list, the name of the employee, the email address of the employee, and the total number of emails received by the employee. The time period or span for which the top 10recipients list 620 is generated can be the same as the time period or span for the top 10senders list 610. - The list of
attachment count 630 can list top employees who have sent or received the most number of attachments. Theattachment list 630 can display the name of the employee and the total number of attachments. Theattachment list 630 can provide an overview of employees who may potentially use a large percentage of storage resources due to sending and/or receiving of numerous attachments. - The list of top 10
domains 640 can show the list of common domains from which emails are sent to the employees of the organization or common domains to which the employees send emails. In the example ofFIG. 6 , the top domains list 640 lists “gmail.com” as the top domain, “yahoo.com” as the second domain, and so forth. Since employees can send many internal emails, the domain for the organization may not be included in the top domain list. - In this manner, the data analysis system can provide an analysis of certain aspects of employee behavior. The email activity data may be combined and/or aggregated with other types of data in order to examine relationships between employee email activity and other aspects of employee behavior. Such relationships may provide insights into factors that affect employee efficiency.
-
FIG. 7 illustrates another example user interface 700 displaying an output of a data analysis system. The data analysis system can be similar to systems explained in connection withFIGS. 1-2 and 8 . The user interface 700 shows an example of results from employee loan processing analysis. As illustrated, the user interface 700 includes columns for the following information:employee name 710,employee ID 715, employee position/title 720,employee location 725, average badge-intime 730, average badge-outtime 735, average number of processedjobs 740,employee efficiency 745, percentage of total emails sent toapplicants 750, and average percentage of total emails sent to applicants for others with thesame title 755. -
Employee name 710 can refer to the name of an employee, andemployee ID 715 can be an identifier that designates a particular employee. Position/title 720 can refer to an employee's position or title. The user interface 700 shows two different positions: loan processor and loan processing supervisor. Thelocation 725 can refer to the office location of an employee. The user interface 700 shows three different locations: A, B, and C. - The average badge-in
time 730 can refer to the average time an employee badges in to the office during a period of time. The average badge-outtime 735 can refer to the average time an employee badges out of the office during a period of time. The average can be calculated based on badge-in or badge-out times over a specific period of time, such as several days, a week, several weeks, a month, etc. - The average number of processed
jobs 740 may refer to the number of loan jobs an employee processed over a period of time. The period of time can be determined as appropriate by the organization (e.g., a week, several weeks, a month, etc.). The time period over which the number of jobs is averaged may match the time period used for determining average badge-in time and badge-out time. - The
employee efficiency 745 may refer to the efficiency level or indicator associated with an employee. The values shown in user interface 700 are low, medium, and high, but the efficiency level can be defined as any metric or scale that the organization wants. - The percentage of total emails sent to
applicants 750 may refer to the percentage of emails sent to loan applicants out of all of the emails sent by an employee. In theuser interface 700, 80% of Jane Doe's emails are sent to loan applicants, while 95% of John Smith's emails are sent to loan applicants. John Doe sends only 50% of his emails to loan applicants, and Jane Smith sends 85% of her emails to loan applicants. - The average percentage of total emails sent to applicants for other with the
same title 755 can refer to the average percentage for employees that have the same position/title. The data analysis system can provide a point of comparison with other employees with respect to a specific attribute or property. In the example ofFIG. 7 , the average percentage column provides a point of comparison for percentage of emails sent to loan applicants with respect to employees having the same title. The average percentage for the position of “loan processing supervisor” is 52%, and the average percentage for the position of “loan processor” is 87%. This column can provide a point of comparison with other employees that have the same title. For example, John Doe's percentage of emails sent to applicants is very low compared to the average percentage for all employees who are loan processors. - The user interface 700 also includes a drop-down menu or
button 760 that allows the user to change the comparison group. In the example ofFIG. 7 , the comparison group is other employees that have the same title. The comparison group can be changed by selecting a different category from the options provided in the drop-down menu 760. For example, the user can change the comparison group to employees at the same location or employees at the same location with the same title. The options in the drop-down menu can be a list of item or checkboxes. Depending on the embodiment, multiple items or checkboxes can be selected or checked. The comparison group can be changed by the user as appropriate, and the content displayed in the user interface 700 can be updated accordingly. In some embodiments, the comparison group can have different attributes from an employee, or can be different from the group to which an employee belongs. For example, the comparison group can include employees who have a different position, employees from a different department, etc. - The efficiency level or
indicator 745 can be based on any combination of data that may be available to the data analysis system. As explained above, an efficiency indicator can provide information relating to one or more aspects of an employee's efficiency. In one example, the efficiency level can be based on the average number of processed jobs and the time spent in the office during a particular period of time. In another example, the efficiency level can be based on a comparison with other employees. InFIG. 7 , the percentage of emails sent to applicants for an employee is compared to the average percentage of emails sent to applicants for employees having the same title. The efficiency level may incorporate the comparison to others having the same title. In such case, the efficiency level for John Doe can be very low since his percentage of emails sent to applicants is far below the average percentage for employees with the same title. - According to one embodiment, the techniques described herein are implemented by one or more special-purpose computing devices. The special-purpose computing devices may be hard-wired to perform the techniques, or may include circuitry or digital electronic devices such as one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) that are persistently programmed to perform the techniques, or may include one or more hardware processors programmed to perform the techniques pursuant to program instructions in firmware, memory, other storage, or a combination. Such special-purpose computing devices may also combine custom hard-wired logic, ASICs, or FPGAs with custom programming to accomplish the techniques. The special-purpose computing devices may be desktop computer systems, server computer systems, portable computer systems, handheld devices, networking devices or any other device or combination of devices that incorporate hard-wired and/or program logic to implement the techniques.
- Computing device(s) are generally controlled and coordinated by operating system software, such as iOS, Android, Chrome OS, Windows XP, Windows Vista,
Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Server, Windows CE, Unix, Linux, SunOS, Solaris, iOS, Blackberry OS, VxWorks, or other compatible operating systems. In other embodiments, the computing device may be controlled by a proprietary operating system. Conventional operating systems control and schedule computer processes for execution, perform memory management, provide file system, networking, I/O services, and provide a user interface functionality, such as a graphical user interface (“GUI”), among other things. - For example,
FIG. 8 is a block diagram that illustrates acomputer system 1800 upon which an embodiment may be implemented. For example, thecomputing system 1800 may comprises a server system that accesses law enforcement data and provides user interface data to one or more users (e.g., executives) that allows those users to view their desired executive dashboards and interface with the data. Other computing systems discussed herein, such as the user (e.g., executive), may include any portion of the circuitry and/or functionality discussed with reference tosystem 1800. -
Computer system 1800 includes a bus 1802 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, and a hardware processor, or multiple processors, 1804 coupled with bus 1802 for processing information. Hardware processor(s) 1804 may be, for example, one or more general purpose microprocessors. -
Computer system 1800 also includes amain memory 1806, such as a random access memory (RAM), cache and/or other dynamic storage devices, coupled to bus 1802 for storing information and instructions to be executed byprocessor 1804.Main memory 1806 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed byprocessor 1804. Such instructions, when stored in storage media accessible toprocessor 1804, rendercomputer system 1800 into a special-purpose machine that is customized to perform the operations specified in the instructions. -
Computer system 1800 further includes a read only memory (ROM) 808 or other static storage device coupled to bus 1802 for storing static information and instructions forprocessor 1804. Astorage device 1810, such as a magnetic disk, optical disk, or USB thumb drive (Flash drive), etc., is provided and coupled to bus 1802 for storing information and instructions. -
Computer system 1800 may be coupled via bus 1802 to adisplay 1812, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or LCD display (or touch screen), for displaying information to a computer user. An input device 1814, including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to bus 1802 for communicating information and command selections toprocessor 1804. Another type of user input device iscursor control 1816, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections toprocessor 1804 and for controlling cursor movement ondisplay 1812. This input device typically has two degrees of freedom in two axes, a first axis (e.g., x) and a second axis (e.g., y), that allows the device to specify positions in a plane. In some embodiments, the same direction information and command selections as cursor control may be implemented via receiving touches on a touch screen without a cursor. -
Computing system 1800 may include a user interface module to implement a GUI that may be stored in a mass storage device as executable software codes that are executed by the computing device(s). This and other modules may include, by way of example, components, such as software components, object-oriented software components, class components and task components, processes, functions, attributes, procedures, subroutines, segments of program code, drivers, firmware, microcode, circuitry, data, databases, data structures, tables, arrays, and variables. - In general, the word “module,” as used herein, refers to logic embodied in hardware or firmware, or to a collection of software instructions, possibly having entry and exit points, written in a programming language, such as, for example, Java, Lua, C or C++. A software module may be compiled and linked into an executable program, installed in a dynamic link library, or may be written in an interpreted programming language such as, for example, BASIC, Perl, or Python. It will be appreciated that software modules may be callable from other modules or from themselves, and/or may be invoked in response to detected events or interrupts. Software modules configured for execution on computing devices may be provided on a computer readable medium, such as a compact disc, digital video disc, flash drive, magnetic disc, or any other tangible medium, or as a digital download (and may be originally stored in a compressed or installable format that requires installation, decompression or decryption prior to execution). Such software code may be stored, partially or fully, on a memory device of the executing computing device, for execution by the computing device. Software instructions may be embedded in firmware, such as an EPROM. It will be further appreciated that hardware modules may be comprised of connected logic units, such as gates and flip-flops, and/or may be comprised of programmable units, such as programmable gate arrays or processors. The modules or computing device functionality described herein are preferably implemented as software modules, but may be represented in hardware or firmware. Generally, the modules described herein refer to logical modules that may be combined with other modules or divided into sub-modules despite their physical organization or storage
-
Computer system 1800 may implement the techniques described herein using customized hard-wired logic, one or more ASICs or FPGAs, firmware and/or program logic which in combination with the computer system causes orprograms computer system 1800 to be a special-purpose machine. According to one embodiment, the techniques herein are performed bycomputer system 1800 in response to processor(s) 1804 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained inmain memory 1806. Such instructions may be read intomain memory 1806 from another storage medium, such asstorage device 1810. Execution of the sequences of instructions contained inmain memory 1806 causes processor(s) 1804 to perform the process steps described herein. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions. - The term “non-transitory media,” and similar terms, as used herein refers to any media that store data and/or instructions that cause a machine to operate in a specific fashion. Such non-transitory media may comprise non-volatile media and/or volatile media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as
storage device 1810. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such asmain memory 1806. Common forms of non-transitory media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, solid state drive, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic data storage medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical data storage medium, any physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, NVRAM, any other memory chip or cartridge, and networked versions of the same. - Non-transitory media is distinct from but may be used in conjunction with transmission media. Transmission media participates in transferring information between nontransitory media. For example, transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, including the wires that comprise bus 1802. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio-wave and infra-red data communications.
- Various forms of media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to
processor 1804 for execution. For example, the instructions may initially be carried on a magnetic disk or solid state drive of a remote computer. The remote computer can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over a telephone line using a modem. A modem local tocomputer system 1800 can receive the data on the telephone line and use an infra-red transmitter to convert the data to an infra-red signal. An infra-red detector can receive the data carried in the infra-red signal and appropriate circuitry can place the data on bus 1802. Bus 1802 carries the data tomain memory 1806, from whichprocessor 1804 retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received bymain memory 1806 may retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received bymain memory 1806 may optionally be stored onstorage device 1810 either before or after execution byprocessor 1804. -
Computer system 1800 also includes acommunication interface 1818 coupled to bus 1802.Communication interface 1818 provides a two-way data communication coupling to anetwork link 1820 that is connected to alocal network 1822. For example,communication interface 1818 may be an integrated services digital network (ISDN) card, cable modem, satellite modem, or a modem to provide a data communication connection to a corresponding type of telephone line. As another example,communication interface 1818 may be a local area network (LAN) card to provide a data communication connection to a compatible LAN (or WAN component to communicated with a WAN). Wireless links may also be implemented. In any such implementation,communication interface 1818 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams representing various types of information. -
Network link 1820 typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other data devices. For example,network link 1820 may provide a connection throughlocal network 1822 to ahost computer 1824 or to data equipment operated by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 1826.ISP 1826 in turn provides data communication services through the world wide packet data communication network now commonly referred to as the “Internet” 1828.Local network 1822 andInternet 1828 both use electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams. The signals through the various networks and the signals onnetwork link 1820 and throughcommunication interface 1818, which carry the digital data to and fromcomputer system 1800, are example forms of transmission media. -
Computer system 1800 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s),network link 1820 andcommunication interface 1818. In the Internet example, aserver 1830 might transmit a requested code for an application program throughInternet 1828,ISP 1826,local network 1822 andcommunication interface 1818. - The received code may be executed by
processor 1804 as it is received, and/or stored instorage device 1810, or other non-volatile storage for later execution. - Each of the processes, methods, and algorithms described in the preceding sections may be embodied in, and fully or partially automated by, code modules executed by one or more computer systems or computer processors comprising computer hardware. The processes and algorithms may be implemented partially or wholly in application-specific circuitry.
- The various features and processes described above may be used independently of one another, or may be combined in various ways. All possible combinations and subcombinations are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure. In addition, certain method or process blocks may be omitted in some implementations. The methods and processes described herein are also not limited to any particular sequence, and the blocks or states relating thereto can be performed in other sequences that are appropriate. For example, described blocks or states may be performed in an order other than that specifically disclosed, or multiple blocks or states may be combined in a single block or state. The example blocks or states may be performed in serial, in parallel, or in some other manner. Blocks or states may be added to or removed from the disclosed example embodiments. The example systems and components described herein may be configured differently than described. For example, elements may be added to, removed from, or rearranged compared to the disclosed example embodiments.
- Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
- Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art.
- It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure. The foregoing description details certain embodiments of the invention. It will be appreciated, however, that no matter how detailed the foregoing appears in text, the invention can be practiced in many ways. As is also stated above, it should be noted that the use of particular terminology when describing certain features or aspects of the invention should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being re-defined herein to be restricted to including any specific characteristics of the features or aspects of the invention with which that terminology is associated. The scope of the invention should therefore be construed in accordance with the appended claims and any equivalents thereof.
Claims (18)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17/493,205 US20220027426A1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2021-10-04 | System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201361914229P | 2013-12-10 | 2013-12-10 | |
US14/304,741 US9105000B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2014-06-13 | Aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
US14/816,599 US10198515B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2015-08-03 | System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
US16/173,408 US11138279B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2018-10-29 | System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
US17/493,205 US20220027426A1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2021-10-04 | System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/173,408 Continuation US11138279B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2018-10-29 | System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20220027426A1 true US20220027426A1 (en) | 2022-01-27 |
Family
ID=53763296
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/304,741 Active US9105000B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2014-06-13 | Aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
US14/816,599 Active US10198515B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2015-08-03 | System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
US16/173,408 Active 2035-03-06 US11138279B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2018-10-29 | System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
US17/493,205 Abandoned US20220027426A1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2021-10-04 | System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/304,741 Active US9105000B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2014-06-13 | Aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
US14/816,599 Active US10198515B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2015-08-03 | System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
US16/173,408 Active 2035-03-06 US11138279B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2018-10-29 | System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US9105000B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (107)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8688749B1 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2014-04-01 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Cross-ontology multi-master replication |
US8554719B2 (en) | 2007-10-18 | 2013-10-08 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Resolving database entity information |
US8429194B2 (en) | 2008-09-15 | 2013-04-23 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Document-based workflows |
US9092482B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-07-28 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Fair scheduling for mixed-query loads |
US8732574B2 (en) | 2011-08-25 | 2014-05-20 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method for parameterizing documents for automatic workflow generation |
US8504542B2 (en) | 2011-09-02 | 2013-08-06 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Multi-row transactions |
US8560494B1 (en) | 2011-09-30 | 2013-10-15 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Visual data importer |
US8782004B2 (en) | 2012-01-23 | 2014-07-15 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Cross-ACL multi-master replication |
US9378526B2 (en) | 2012-03-02 | 2016-06-28 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method for accessing data objects via remote references |
US9348677B2 (en) | 2012-10-22 | 2016-05-24 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for batch evaluation programs |
US9471370B2 (en) | 2012-10-22 | 2016-10-18 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method for stack-based batch evaluation of program instructions |
US10140664B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-11-27 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Resolving similar entities from a transaction database |
US9367463B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-06-14 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method utilizing a shared cache to provide zero copy memory mapped database |
US9740369B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-08-22 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a tagging interface for external content |
US9898167B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-02-20 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a tagging interface for external content |
US8903717B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-12-02 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Method and system for generating a parser and parsing complex data |
US8909656B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-12-09 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Filter chains with associated multipath views for exploring large data sets |
US8924388B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-12-30 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Computer-implemented systems and methods for comparing and associating objects |
US8868486B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-10-21 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Time-sensitive cube |
US8886601B1 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2014-11-11 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method for incrementally replicating investigative analysis data |
US8601326B1 (en) | 2013-07-05 | 2013-12-03 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Data quality monitors |
US8938686B1 (en) | 2013-10-03 | 2015-01-20 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing performance of an entity |
US9105000B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2015-08-11 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
US10579647B1 (en) | 2013-12-16 | 2020-03-03 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Methods and systems for analyzing entity performance |
US9384028B1 (en) * | 2013-12-19 | 2016-07-05 | Amdocs Software Systems Limited | System, method, and computer program for preserving service continuity in a network function virtualization (NFV) based communication network |
US8924429B1 (en) | 2014-03-18 | 2014-12-30 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Determining and extracting changed data from a data source |
US9836580B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2017-12-05 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Provider portal |
US10380135B2 (en) * | 2014-06-19 | 2019-08-13 | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Data aggregation and reporting environment for data center infrastructure management |
US20160026923A1 (en) | 2014-07-22 | 2016-01-28 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for determining a propensity of entity to take a specified action |
US9680761B2 (en) * | 2014-08-14 | 2017-06-13 | Dropbox, Inc. | Consolidating messages in a message queue |
JP5959072B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2016-08-02 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーションInternational Business Machines Corporation | Method for displaying conversion candidates associated with input character string, electronic device and server computer thereof, program for electronic device and program for server computer |
US9483546B2 (en) | 2014-12-15 | 2016-11-01 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for associating related records to common entities across multiple lists |
US11302426B1 (en) | 2015-01-02 | 2022-04-12 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Unified data interface and system |
US10007682B2 (en) * | 2015-03-30 | 2018-06-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamically maintaining data structures driven by heterogeneous clients in a distributed data collection system |
US9953070B1 (en) | 2015-04-05 | 2018-04-24 | Simply Data Now Inc. | Enterprise resource planning (ERP) system data extraction, loading, and directing |
US10103953B1 (en) | 2015-05-12 | 2018-10-16 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Methods and systems for analyzing entity performance |
US10740292B2 (en) | 2015-05-18 | 2020-08-11 | Interactive Data Pricing And Reference Data Llc | Data conversion and distribution systems |
US10628834B1 (en) | 2015-06-16 | 2020-04-21 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Fraud lead detection system for efficiently processing database-stored data and automatically generating natural language explanatory information of system results for display in interactive user interfaces |
US9418337B1 (en) | 2015-07-21 | 2016-08-16 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and models for data analytics |
US9392008B1 (en) | 2015-07-23 | 2016-07-12 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying information related to payment card breaches |
US10127289B2 (en) | 2015-08-19 | 2018-11-13 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for automatic clustering and canonical designation of related data in various data structures |
US9514205B1 (en) | 2015-09-04 | 2016-12-06 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for importing data from electronic data files |
US9984428B2 (en) | 2015-09-04 | 2018-05-29 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for structuring data from unstructured electronic data files |
US10558339B1 (en) | 2015-09-11 | 2020-02-11 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for analyzing electronic communications and a collaborative electronic communications user interface |
US9772934B2 (en) | 2015-09-14 | 2017-09-26 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Pluggable fault detection tests for data pipelines |
US10327095B2 (en) * | 2015-11-18 | 2019-06-18 | Interactive Intelligence Group, Inc. | System and method for dynamically generated reports |
US9760556B1 (en) | 2015-12-11 | 2017-09-12 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for annotating and linking electronic documents |
US9514414B1 (en) | 2015-12-11 | 2016-12-06 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying and categorizing electronic documents through machine learning |
EP3398088A4 (en) * | 2015-12-28 | 2019-08-21 | Sixgill Ltd. | Dark web monitoring, analysis and alert system and method |
US9652510B1 (en) | 2015-12-29 | 2017-05-16 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for data analysis including artificial intelligence algorithms for generating optimized packages of data items |
US10554516B1 (en) | 2016-06-09 | 2020-02-04 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System to collect and visualize software usage metrics |
US9678850B1 (en) | 2016-06-10 | 2017-06-13 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Data pipeline monitoring |
US10621314B2 (en) | 2016-08-01 | 2020-04-14 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Secure deployment of a software package |
US10133782B2 (en) | 2016-08-01 | 2018-11-20 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Techniques for data extraction |
US11256762B1 (en) | 2016-08-04 | 2022-02-22 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for efficiently determining and displaying optimal packages of data items |
US11106692B1 (en) | 2016-08-04 | 2021-08-31 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Data record resolution and correlation system |
US10552531B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2020-02-04 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Collaborative spreadsheet data validation and integration |
US10373078B1 (en) | 2016-08-15 | 2019-08-06 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Vector generation for distributed data sets |
EP3282374A1 (en) | 2016-08-17 | 2018-02-14 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | User interface data sample transformer |
US10831743B2 (en) | 2016-09-02 | 2020-11-10 | PFFA Acquisition LLC | Database and system architecture for analyzing multiparty interactions |
US10650086B1 (en) | 2016-09-27 | 2020-05-12 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems, methods, and framework for associating supporting data in word processing |
US10133588B1 (en) | 2016-10-20 | 2018-11-20 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Transforming instructions for collaborative updates |
US10372720B2 (en) * | 2016-10-31 | 2019-08-06 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Matching entities across multiple data sources |
US10152306B2 (en) | 2016-11-07 | 2018-12-11 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Framework for developing and deploying applications |
US11720553B2 (en) | 2016-11-11 | 2023-08-08 | Sap Se | Schema with methods specifying data rules, and method of use |
US10452628B2 (en) * | 2016-11-11 | 2019-10-22 | Sap Se | Data analysis schema and method of use in parallel processing of check methods |
US10785328B2 (en) | 2016-11-15 | 2020-09-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Efficient collaborations in global enterprise environment |
US10261763B2 (en) | 2016-12-13 | 2019-04-16 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Extensible data transformation authoring and validation system |
US11157951B1 (en) | 2016-12-16 | 2021-10-26 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for determining and displaying an optimal assignment of data items |
US10509844B1 (en) | 2017-01-19 | 2019-12-17 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Network graph parser |
US10180934B2 (en) | 2017-03-02 | 2019-01-15 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Automatic translation of spreadsheets into scripts |
US10572576B1 (en) | 2017-04-06 | 2020-02-25 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for facilitating data object extraction from unstructured documents |
US11074277B1 (en) | 2017-05-01 | 2021-07-27 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Secure resolution of canonical entities |
US10824604B1 (en) | 2017-05-17 | 2020-11-03 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for data entry |
US10534595B1 (en) | 2017-06-30 | 2020-01-14 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Techniques for configuring and validating a data pipeline deployment |
US10204119B1 (en) | 2017-07-20 | 2019-02-12 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Inferring a dataset schema from input files |
US10754820B2 (en) | 2017-08-14 | 2020-08-25 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Customizable pipeline for integrating data |
US11016936B1 (en) | 2017-09-05 | 2021-05-25 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Validating data for integration |
US11379525B1 (en) | 2017-11-22 | 2022-07-05 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Continuous builds of derived datasets in response to other dataset updates |
US10235533B1 (en) | 2017-12-01 | 2019-03-19 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Multi-user access controls in electronic simultaneously editable document editor |
US10552524B1 (en) | 2017-12-07 | 2020-02-04 | Palantir Technolgies Inc. | Systems and methods for in-line document tagging and object based data synchronization |
US10360252B1 (en) | 2017-12-08 | 2019-07-23 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Detection and enrichment of missing data or metadata for large data sets |
US11176116B2 (en) | 2017-12-13 | 2021-11-16 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for annotating datasets |
US11061874B1 (en) | 2017-12-14 | 2021-07-13 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for resolving entity data across various data structures |
US10838987B1 (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2020-11-17 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Adaptive and transparent entity screening |
US10853352B1 (en) | 2017-12-21 | 2020-12-01 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Structured data collection, presentation, validation and workflow management |
GB201800595D0 (en) | 2018-01-15 | 2018-02-28 | Palantir Technologies Inc | Management of software bugs in a data processing system |
US10599762B1 (en) | 2018-01-16 | 2020-03-24 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for creating a dynamic electronic form |
US10885021B1 (en) | 2018-05-02 | 2021-01-05 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Interactive interpreter and graphical user interface |
US11263263B2 (en) | 2018-05-30 | 2022-03-01 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Data propagation and mapping system |
US11061542B1 (en) | 2018-06-01 | 2021-07-13 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for determining and displaying optimal associations of data items |
US10795909B1 (en) | 2018-06-14 | 2020-10-06 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Minimized and collapsed resource dependency path |
US10628180B1 (en) * | 2018-08-20 | 2020-04-21 | C/Hca, Inc. | Disparate data aggregation for user interface customization |
US20200074562A1 (en) * | 2018-08-28 | 2020-03-05 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Systems and methods for generating product-merchant data links |
WO2020076964A1 (en) | 2018-10-09 | 2020-04-16 | iDiscovery Solutions, Inc. | System and method of data transformation |
US11468508B2 (en) * | 2019-03-13 | 2022-10-11 | Invensense, Inc. | Capturable code for automatically formatting and addressing a text message to apply for an offer |
US10860984B1 (en) * | 2019-06-18 | 2020-12-08 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Out of office email detection system |
US10891041B1 (en) * | 2019-08-14 | 2021-01-12 | Tableau Software, Inc. | Data preparation user interface for aggregate comparison of datasets at different nodes in a process flow |
WO2021042028A1 (en) * | 2019-08-29 | 2021-03-04 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Systems, methods, and devices for quantum computing error mitigation |
FR3105847B1 (en) * | 2019-12-27 | 2023-01-06 | Bull Sas | DATA FLOW MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND SYSTEM FOR THE UNIFIED GOVERNANCE OF A NUMBER OF INTENSIVE COMPUTING SOLUTIONS |
US11381591B2 (en) | 2020-01-29 | 2022-07-05 | Bank Of America Corporation | Information security system based on multidimensional disparate user data |
US11257090B2 (en) | 2020-02-20 | 2022-02-22 | Bank Of America Corporation | Message processing platform for automated phish detection |
US11461357B2 (en) | 2020-07-23 | 2022-10-04 | Bank Of America Corporation | Data conversion bulk validation automated framework |
CN112000312B (en) * | 2020-07-24 | 2022-04-29 | 湖北地信科技集团股份有限公司 | Space big data automatic parallel processing method and system based on Kettle and GeoTools |
US11687442B2 (en) * | 2021-08-06 | 2023-06-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic resource provisioning for use cases |
US11928100B2 (en) | 2021-12-07 | 2024-03-12 | HCL America Inc. | Method and system for creating a unified data repository |
US11893008B1 (en) * | 2022-07-14 | 2024-02-06 | Fractal Analytics Private Limited | System and method for automated data harmonization |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050099288A1 (en) * | 2002-04-18 | 2005-05-12 | Computer Associates Think, Inc | Integrated visualization of security information for an individual |
US20070094716A1 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2007-04-26 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Unified network and physical premises access control server |
US20100125911A1 (en) * | 2008-11-17 | 2010-05-20 | Prakash Bhaskaran | Risk Scoring Based On Endpoint User Activities |
US20140282877A1 (en) * | 2013-03-13 | 2014-09-18 | Lookout, Inc. | System and method for changing security behavior of a device based on proximity to another device |
US10719799B1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2020-07-21 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Virtual management systems and methods |
Family Cites Families (1067)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5109399A (en) | 1989-08-18 | 1992-04-28 | Alamo City Technologies, Inc. | Emergency call locating system |
US5241625A (en) | 1990-11-27 | 1993-08-31 | Farallon Computing, Inc. | Screen image sharing among heterogeneous computers |
DE69126795T2 (en) | 1991-03-12 | 1998-02-19 | Wang Laboratories | FILE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH GRAPHIC USER INTERFACE FOR QUESTIONS |
US5426747A (en) | 1991-03-22 | 1995-06-20 | Object Design, Inc. | Method and apparatus for virtual memory mapping and transaction management in an object-oriented database system |
US5414838A (en) | 1991-06-11 | 1995-05-09 | Logical Information Machine | System for extracting historical market information with condition and attributed windows |
US5428737A (en) | 1991-10-16 | 1995-06-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Comprehensive bilateral translation between SQL and graphically depicted queries |
FR2684214B1 (en) | 1991-11-22 | 1997-04-04 | Sepro Robotique | INDEXING CARD FOR GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM AND SYSTEM INCLUDING APPLICATION. |
JP3374977B2 (en) | 1992-01-24 | 2003-02-10 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Time series information search method and search system |
JPH0689307A (en) | 1992-05-04 | 1994-03-29 | Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> | Device and method for displaying information in database |
JPH05342191A (en) | 1992-06-08 | 1993-12-24 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | System for predicting and analyzing economic time sequential data |
US5819226A (en) | 1992-09-08 | 1998-10-06 | Hnc Software Inc. | Fraud detection using predictive modeling |
JP3259928B2 (en) * | 1993-02-23 | 2002-02-25 | 富士通株式会社 | Business specification handling equipment |
US5454104A (en) | 1993-02-25 | 1995-09-26 | Steidlmayer Software, Inc. | Financial data event flow analysis system with study conductor display |
JP2710548B2 (en) | 1993-03-17 | 1998-02-10 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション | Method for retrieving data and converting between Boolean algebraic and graphic representations |
US5794228A (en) | 1993-04-16 | 1998-08-11 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with buffer manager providing per page native data compression and decompression |
US5918225A (en) | 1993-04-16 | 1999-06-29 | Sybase, Inc. | SQL-based database system with improved indexing methodology |
US5794229A (en) | 1993-04-16 | 1998-08-11 | Sybase, Inc. | Database system with methodology for storing a database table by vertically partitioning all columns of the table |
US5608899A (en) | 1993-06-04 | 1997-03-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for searching a database by interactively modifying a database query |
US5911138A (en) | 1993-06-04 | 1999-06-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Database search facility having improved user interface |
US5613105A (en) | 1993-06-30 | 1997-03-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Efficient storage of objects in a file system |
JP3385657B2 (en) | 1993-08-10 | 2003-03-10 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Car navigation system |
US5632009A (en) | 1993-09-17 | 1997-05-20 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for producing a table image showing indirect data representations |
US5670987A (en) | 1993-09-21 | 1997-09-23 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Virtual manipulating apparatus and method |
US5437032A (en) | 1993-11-04 | 1995-07-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Task scheduler for a miltiprocessor system |
US6877137B1 (en) | 1998-04-09 | 2005-04-05 | Rose Blush Software Llc | System, method and computer program product for mediating notes and note sub-notes linked or otherwise associated with stored or networked web pages |
US5742806A (en) | 1994-01-31 | 1998-04-21 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for decomposing database queries for database management system including multiprocessor digital data processing system |
US5560005A (en) | 1994-02-25 | 1996-09-24 | Actamed Corp. | Methods and systems for object-based relational distributed databases |
WO1995030955A1 (en) | 1994-05-10 | 1995-11-16 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Data management system for a real-time system |
US5542089A (en) | 1994-07-26 | 1996-07-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for estimating the number of occurrences of frequent values in a data set |
US5892900A (en) | 1996-08-30 | 1999-04-06 | Intertrust Technologies Corp. | Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection |
US5777549A (en) | 1995-03-29 | 1998-07-07 | Cabletron Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for policy-based alarm notification in a distributed network management environment |
US5999911A (en) | 1995-06-02 | 1999-12-07 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | Method and system for managing workflow |
US6012042A (en) | 1995-08-16 | 2000-01-04 | Window On Wallstreet Inc | Security analysis system |
US5872973A (en) | 1995-10-26 | 1999-02-16 | Viewsoft, Inc. | Method for managing dynamic relations between objects in dynamic object-oriented languages |
US6366933B1 (en) | 1995-10-27 | 2002-04-02 | At&T Corp. | Method and apparatus for tracking and viewing changes on the web |
US5832218A (en) | 1995-12-14 | 1998-11-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Client/server electronic mail system for providng off-line client utilization and seamless server resynchronization |
US5819238A (en) | 1996-12-13 | 1998-10-06 | Enhanced Investment Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and accompanying methods for automatically modifying a financial portfolio through dynamic re-weighting based on a non-constant function of current capitalization weights |
JP3410271B2 (en) | 1995-12-28 | 2003-05-26 | アルパイン株式会社 | Navigation device |
US6006242A (en) | 1996-04-05 | 1999-12-21 | Bankers Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for dynamically creating a document |
MY123789A (en) | 1996-05-01 | 2006-06-30 | Casio Computer Co Ltd | Document output apparatus |
US8725493B2 (en) | 2004-01-06 | 2014-05-13 | Neuric Llc | Natural language parsing method to provide conceptual flow |
US5845300A (en) | 1996-06-05 | 1998-12-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for suggesting completions for a partially entered data item based on previously-entered, associated data items |
US6094643A (en) | 1996-06-14 | 2000-07-25 | Card Alert Services, Inc. | System for detecting counterfeit financial card fraud |
US6321274B1 (en) | 1996-06-28 | 2001-11-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Multiple procedure calls in a single request |
US5897636A (en) | 1996-07-11 | 1999-04-27 | Tandem Corporation Incorporated | Distributed object computer system with hierarchical name space versioning |
US5878434A (en) | 1996-07-18 | 1999-03-02 | Novell, Inc | Transaction clash management in a disconnectable computer and network |
US5798769A (en) | 1996-08-15 | 1998-08-25 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for maintaining links between graphic objects in a free-form graphics display system |
US5819255A (en) | 1996-08-23 | 1998-10-06 | Tandem Computers, Inc. | System and method for database query optimization |
US5826021A (en) | 1996-09-17 | 1998-10-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Disconnected write authorization in a client/server computing system |
US6072942A (en) | 1996-09-18 | 2000-06-06 | Secure Computing Corporation | System and method of electronic mail filtering using interconnected nodes |
CA2187704C (en) | 1996-10-11 | 1999-05-04 | Darcy Kim Rossmo | Expert system method of performing crime site analysis |
US5870559A (en) | 1996-10-15 | 1999-02-09 | Mercury Interactive | Software system and associated methods for facilitating the analysis and management of web sites |
US5974572A (en) | 1996-10-15 | 1999-10-26 | Mercury Interactive Corporation | Software system and methods for generating a load test using a server access log |
US7711598B2 (en) | 1996-10-25 | 2010-05-04 | Ipf, Inc. | Web-based consumer product marketing communication network for managing and delivering consumer product marketing communications to consumers along e-commerce (EC) enabled web sites on the world wide web (WWW), using multi-mode virtual kiosks (MMVKS) driven by server=side components embodying consumer product identifiers and driven by consumer product information (CPI) links managed by product manufacturer team members and/or their agents |
CA2190043C (en) | 1996-11-12 | 2001-10-16 | Don E. Hameluck | Buffered screen capturing software tool usability testing of computer applications |
US6430305B1 (en) | 1996-12-20 | 2002-08-06 | Synaptics, Incorporated | Identity verification methods |
US5845530A (en) | 1996-12-30 | 1998-12-08 | The Boeing Company | Cam and roller overcenter handle mechanism |
US6065026A (en) | 1997-01-09 | 2000-05-16 | Document.Com, Inc. | Multi-user electronic document authoring system with prompted updating of shared language |
US5966706A (en) | 1997-02-19 | 1999-10-12 | At&T Corp | Local logging in a distributed database management computer system |
US5857329A (en) | 1997-03-14 | 1999-01-12 | Deere & Company | One-piece combined muffler exhaust outlet and exhaust gas deflector |
US6084510A (en) | 1997-04-18 | 2000-07-04 | Lemelson; Jerome H. | Danger warning and emergency response system and method |
US6026233A (en) | 1997-05-27 | 2000-02-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for presenting and selecting options to modify a programming language statement |
US6091956A (en) | 1997-06-12 | 2000-07-18 | Hollenberg; Dennis D. | Situation information system |
US6104401A (en) | 1997-06-12 | 2000-08-15 | Netscape Communications Corporation | Link filters |
US6208985B1 (en) | 1997-07-09 | 2001-03-27 | Caseventure Llc | Data refinery: a direct manipulation user interface for data querying with integrated qualitative and quantitative graphical representations of query construction and query result presentation |
US7403922B1 (en) | 1997-07-28 | 2008-07-22 | Cybersource Corporation | Method and apparatus for evaluating fraud risk in an electronic commerce transaction |
US6463404B1 (en) | 1997-08-08 | 2002-10-08 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Translation |
US20020138390A1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2002-09-26 | R. Raymond May | Systems, methods and computer program products for subject-based addressing in an electronic trading system |
US6236994B1 (en) | 1997-10-21 | 2001-05-22 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for the integration of information and knowledge |
US6094650A (en) | 1997-12-15 | 2000-07-25 | Manning & Napier Information Services | Database analysis using a probabilistic ontology |
JP3636272B2 (en) | 1998-02-09 | 2005-04-06 | 富士通株式会社 | Icon display method, apparatus thereof, and recording medium |
US6247019B1 (en) | 1998-03-17 | 2001-06-12 | Prc Public Sector, Inc. | Object-based geographic information system (GIS) |
US6134582A (en) | 1998-05-26 | 2000-10-17 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for managing electronic mail messages using a client-based database |
US7168039B2 (en) | 1998-06-02 | 2007-01-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for reducing the horizontal space required for displaying a column containing text data |
US6742003B2 (en) | 2001-04-30 | 2004-05-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Apparatus and accompanying methods for visualizing clusters of data and hierarchical cluster classifications |
US6243706B1 (en) | 1998-07-24 | 2001-06-05 | Avid Technology, Inc. | System and method for managing the creation and production of computer generated works |
US6577304B1 (en) | 1998-08-14 | 2003-06-10 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | System and method for visually representing a supply chain |
US6189005B1 (en) | 1998-08-21 | 2001-02-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for mining surprising temporal patterns |
US6243717B1 (en) | 1998-09-01 | 2001-06-05 | Camstar Systems, Inc. | System and method for implementing revision management of linked data entities and user dependent terminology |
US6532449B1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2003-03-11 | Ben Goertzel | Method of numerical times series prediction based on non-numerical time series |
US6161098A (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2000-12-12 | Folio (Fn), Inc. | Method and apparatus for enabling small investors with a portfolio of securities to manage taxable events within the portfolio |
US6232971B1 (en) | 1998-09-23 | 2001-05-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Variable modality child windows |
US6313833B1 (en) | 1998-10-16 | 2001-11-06 | Prophet Financial Systems | Graphical data collection and retrieval interface |
US7213030B1 (en) | 1998-10-16 | 2007-05-01 | Jenkins Steven R | Web-enabled transaction and collaborative management system |
US6178519B1 (en) | 1998-12-10 | 2001-01-23 | Mci Worldcom, Inc. | Cluster-wide database system |
US6279018B1 (en) | 1998-12-21 | 2001-08-21 | Kudrollis Software Inventions Pvt. Ltd. | Abbreviating and compacting text to cope with display space constraint in computer software |
US6957191B1 (en) | 1999-02-05 | 2005-10-18 | Babcock & Brown Lp | Automated financial scenario modeling and analysis tool having an intelligent graphical user interface |
US6513019B2 (en) | 1999-02-16 | 2003-01-28 | Financial Technologies International, Inc. | Financial consolidation and communication platform |
US7111231B1 (en) | 1999-02-24 | 2006-09-19 | Intellisync Corporation | System and methodology for dynamic application environment employing runtime execution templates |
US7353194B1 (en) | 1999-03-02 | 2008-04-01 | Alticor Investments, Inc. | System and method for managing recurring orders in a computer network |
KR100313198B1 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2001-11-05 | 윤덕용 | Multi-dimensional Selectivity Estimation Using Compressed Histogram Information |
US7418399B2 (en) * | 1999-03-10 | 2008-08-26 | Illinois Institute Of Technology | Methods and kits for managing diagnosis and therapeutics of bacterial infections |
US6631496B1 (en) | 1999-03-22 | 2003-10-07 | Nec Corporation | System for personalizing, organizing and managing web information |
US6748481B1 (en) | 1999-04-06 | 2004-06-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Streaming information appliance with circular buffer for receiving and selectively reading blocks of streaming information |
US6369835B1 (en) | 1999-05-18 | 2002-04-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for generating a movie file from a slide show presentation |
US6714936B1 (en) | 1999-05-25 | 2004-03-30 | Nevin, Iii Rocky Harry W. | Method and apparatus for displaying data stored in linked nodes |
AU5377900A (en) | 1999-06-02 | 2000-12-28 | Algorithmics International Corp. | Risk management system, distributed framework and method |
JP2000349646A (en) | 1999-06-02 | 2000-12-15 | Japan Science & Technology Corp | Time series estimation method and its device using wavelet system sequence |
US6307573B1 (en) | 1999-07-22 | 2001-10-23 | Barbara L. Barros | Graphic-information flow method and system for visually analyzing patterns and relationships |
US7039863B1 (en) | 1999-07-23 | 2006-05-02 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Computer generation of documents using layout elements and content elements |
US7373592B2 (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2008-05-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Modeless child windows for application programs |
US6560620B1 (en) | 1999-08-03 | 2003-05-06 | Aplix Research, Inc. | Hierarchical document comparison system and method |
US6976210B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2005-12-13 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for web-site-independent personalization from multiple sites having user-determined extraction functionality |
US6560774B1 (en) | 1999-09-01 | 2003-05-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Verifier to check intermediate language |
US6523019B1 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2003-02-18 | Choicemaker Technologies, Inc. | Probabilistic record linkage model derived from training data |
WO2001022285A2 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2001-03-29 | Borthwick Andrew E | A probabilistic record linkage model derived from training data |
US6519627B1 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2003-02-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for conducting disconnected transactions with service contracts for pervasive computing devices |
US6990238B1 (en) | 1999-09-30 | 2006-01-24 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Data processing, analysis, and visualization system for use with disparate data types |
US20020174201A1 (en) | 1999-09-30 | 2002-11-21 | Ramer Jon E. | Dynamic configuration of context-sensitive personal sites and membership channels |
WO2001025906A1 (en) | 1999-10-01 | 2001-04-12 | Global Graphics Software Limited | Method and system for arranging a workflow using graphical user interface |
US7246090B1 (en) | 1999-10-25 | 2007-07-17 | Measuredmarkets Inc. | Method for detecting aberrant behavior of a financial instrument |
US6674434B1 (en) | 1999-10-25 | 2004-01-06 | Navigation Technologies Corp. | Method and system for automatic generation of shape and curvature data for a geographic database |
US6876981B1 (en) | 1999-10-26 | 2005-04-05 | Philippe E. Berckmans | Method and system for analyzing and comparing financial investments |
US7831494B2 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2010-11-09 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Automated financial portfolio coaching and risk management system |
US6370538B1 (en) | 1999-11-22 | 2002-04-09 | Xerox Corporation | Direct manipulation interface for document properties |
US7716077B1 (en) | 1999-11-22 | 2010-05-11 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Scheduling and planning maintenance and service in a network-based supply chain environment |
FR2806183B1 (en) | 1999-12-01 | 2006-09-01 | Cartesis S A | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR INSTANT CONSOLIDATION, ENRICHMENT AND "REPORTING" OR BACKGROUND OF INFORMATION IN A MULTIDIMENSIONAL DATABASE |
US6944821B1 (en) | 1999-12-07 | 2005-09-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Copy/paste mechanism and paste buffer that includes source information for copied data |
US7194680B1 (en) | 1999-12-07 | 2007-03-20 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Formatting content by example |
EP1109116A1 (en) | 1999-12-14 | 2001-06-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method for visually filtering a database |
US7043449B1 (en) | 1999-12-17 | 2006-05-09 | Prosticks.Com Limited | Method for charting financial market activities |
KR100344530B1 (en) | 1999-12-20 | 2002-07-24 | 한국과학기술원 | A Subsequence matching method using duality in constructing windows in time-series databases |
US20040117387A1 (en) | 2000-02-25 | 2004-06-17 | Vincent Civetta | Database sizing and diagnostic utility |
US20020032677A1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2002-03-14 | Jeff Morgenthaler | Methods for creating, editing, and updating searchable graphical database and databases of graphical images and information and displaying graphical images from a searchable graphical database or databases in a sequential or slide show format |
US6859909B1 (en) | 2000-03-07 | 2005-02-22 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for annotating web-based documents |
JP2001283120A (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2001-10-12 | Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd | Transaction supporting system |
US7562042B2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2009-07-14 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Data processor for implementing forecasting algorithms |
US6456997B1 (en) | 2000-04-12 | 2002-09-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for dynamically generating an invisible hierarchy in a planning system |
US6745382B1 (en) | 2000-04-13 | 2004-06-01 | Worldcom, Inc. | CORBA wrappers for rules automation technology |
JP4325075B2 (en) | 2000-04-21 | 2009-09-02 | ソニー株式会社 | Data object management device |
US7356504B2 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2008-04-08 | The Olsen Group | Methods for determining value at risk |
US6642945B1 (en) | 2000-05-04 | 2003-11-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for optimizing a visual display for handheld computer systems |
US6915289B1 (en) | 2000-05-04 | 2005-07-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Using an index to access a subject multi-dimensional database |
US7269786B1 (en) | 2000-05-04 | 2007-09-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Navigating an index to access a subject multi-dimensional database |
AU2001261282A1 (en) | 2000-05-09 | 2001-11-20 | Roger Alcaly | A method and system for generating an index of investment returns |
AU2001256612A1 (en) | 2000-05-16 | 2001-11-26 | Garrett O'carroll | A document processing system and method |
US8386945B1 (en) | 2000-05-17 | 2013-02-26 | Eastman Kodak Company | System and method for implementing compound documents in a production printing workflow |
FR2809514A1 (en) | 2000-05-25 | 2001-11-30 | Ibm Corp Internat Business Mac | Method and system for recording and managing stock market data so that it can be used with automated candlestick charting techniques to predict stock trends and help inform investment decisions |
US6594672B1 (en) | 2000-06-01 | 2003-07-15 | Hyperion Solutions Corporation | Generating multidimensional output using meta-models and meta-outlines |
AU2001270038A1 (en) | 2000-06-22 | 2002-01-02 | Stock Decision Software Co., Inc. | Apparatus and method for displaying trading trends |
US7877312B2 (en) | 2000-06-22 | 2011-01-25 | Wgal, Llp | Apparatus and method for displaying trading trends |
US20020059126A1 (en) | 2000-06-27 | 2002-05-16 | John Ricciardi | System and method for a selecting an investment item |
US6839745B1 (en) | 2000-07-19 | 2005-01-04 | Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. | System and method for generating reports in a telecommunication system |
US7278105B1 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2007-10-02 | Vignette Corporation | Visualization and analysis of user clickpaths |
GB2366498A (en) | 2000-08-25 | 2002-03-06 | Copyn Ltd | Method of bookmarking a section of a web-page and storing said bookmarks |
US6795868B1 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2004-09-21 | Data Junction Corp. | System and method for event-driven data transformation |
US7861174B2 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2010-12-28 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for assembling concurrently-generated content |
TWI244617B (en) | 2000-09-16 | 2005-12-01 | Ibm | A client/server-based data processing system for performing transactions between clients and a server and a method of performing the transactions |
US20020065708A1 (en) | 2000-09-22 | 2002-05-30 | Hikmet Senay | Method and system for interactive visual analyses of organizational interactions |
AUPR033800A0 (en) | 2000-09-25 | 2000-10-19 | Telstra R & D Management Pty Ltd | A document categorisation system |
US6640231B1 (en) | 2000-10-06 | 2003-10-28 | Ontology Works, Inc. | Ontology for database design and application development |
US6829621B2 (en) | 2000-10-06 | 2004-12-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic determination of OLAP cube dimensions |
US8117281B2 (en) | 2006-11-02 | 2012-02-14 | Addnclick, Inc. | Using internet content as a means to establish live social networks by linking internet users to each other who are simultaneously engaged in the same and/or similar content |
US8707185B2 (en) | 2000-10-10 | 2014-04-22 | Addnclick, Inc. | Dynamic information management system and method for content delivery and sharing in content-, metadata- and viewer-based, live social networking among users concurrently engaged in the same and/or similar content |
US7185065B1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2007-02-27 | Buzzmetrics Ltd | System and method for scoring electronic messages |
US6976024B1 (en) | 2000-10-12 | 2005-12-13 | International Buisness Machines Corporation | Batch submission API |
JP2002123530A (en) | 2000-10-12 | 2002-04-26 | Hitachi Ltd | Method and device for visualizing multidimensional data |
US6754640B2 (en) | 2000-10-30 | 2004-06-22 | William O. Bozeman | Universal positive pay match, authentication, authorization, settlement and clearing system |
US6857120B1 (en) | 2000-11-01 | 2005-02-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for characterizing program execution by periodic call stack inspection |
US20020087570A1 (en) | 2000-11-02 | 2002-07-04 | Jacquez Geoffrey M. | Space and time information system and method |
US6738770B2 (en) | 2000-11-04 | 2004-05-18 | Deep Sky Software, Inc. | System and method for filtering and sorting data |
US6978419B1 (en) | 2000-11-15 | 2005-12-20 | Justsystem Corporation | Method and apparatus for efficient identification of duplicate and near-duplicate documents and text spans using high-discriminability text fragments |
US7370040B1 (en) | 2000-11-21 | 2008-05-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Searching with adaptively configurable user interface and extensible query language |
US7058648B1 (en) | 2000-12-01 | 2006-06-06 | Oracle International Corporation | Hierarchy-based secured document repository |
US20020103705A1 (en) | 2000-12-06 | 2002-08-01 | Forecourt Communication Group | Method and apparatus for using prior purchases to select activities to present to a customer |
US7114162B2 (en) | 2000-12-06 | 2006-09-26 | Microsoft Corporation | System and methods for generating and managing filter strings in a filter graph |
US6961943B2 (en) | 2000-12-06 | 2005-11-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Multimedia processing system parsing multimedia content from a single source to minimize instances of source files |
US20040205644A1 (en) | 2000-12-29 | 2004-10-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for allowing in place editing of office documents in a place |
US7529698B2 (en) | 2001-01-16 | 2009-05-05 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Apparatus and method for providing transaction history information, account history information, and/or charge-back information |
US20030187761A1 (en) | 2001-01-17 | 2003-10-02 | Olsen Richard M. | Method and system for storing and processing high-frequency data |
US7536332B2 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2009-05-19 | Rhee Thomas A | Real life implementation of modern portfolio theory (MPT) for financial planning and portfolio management |
US9053222B2 (en) | 2002-05-17 | 2015-06-09 | Lawrence A. Lynn | Patient safety processor |
WO2002063535A2 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2002-08-15 | Exalt Solutions, Inc. | Intelligent multimedia e-catalog |
AUPR313301A0 (en) | 2001-02-15 | 2001-03-08 | Topshop Holdings Pty Ltd | Method & system for avoiding channel conflict in electronic commerce |
US6516268B2 (en) | 2001-02-16 | 2003-02-04 | Wizeguides.Com Inc. | Bundled map guide |
US20100057622A1 (en) | 2001-02-27 | 2010-03-04 | Faith Patrick L | Distributed Quantum Encrypted Pattern Generation And Scoring |
US7809650B2 (en) | 2003-07-01 | 2010-10-05 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Method and system for providing risk information in connection with transaction processing |
US20060265397A1 (en) | 2001-03-06 | 2006-11-23 | Knowledge Vector, Inc. | Methods, systems, and computer program products for extensible, profile-and context-based information correlation, routing and distribution |
US6985950B1 (en) | 2001-03-06 | 2006-01-10 | Microsoft Corporation | System for creating a space-efficient document categorizer for training and testing of automatic categorization engines |
US7043702B2 (en) | 2001-03-15 | 2006-05-09 | Xerox Corporation | Method for visualizing user path through a web site and a path's associated information scent |
US20030078827A1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2003-04-24 | Hoffman George Harry | System, method and computer program product for strategic supply chain data collection |
US7818224B2 (en) | 2001-03-22 | 2010-10-19 | Boerner Sean T | Method and system to identify discrete trends in time series |
US20030074206A1 (en) * | 2001-03-23 | 2003-04-17 | Restaurant Services, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for utilizing market demand information for generating revenue |
US9256356B2 (en) | 2001-03-29 | 2016-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for providing feedback for docking a content pane in a host window |
US6775675B1 (en) | 2001-04-04 | 2004-08-10 | Sagemetrics Corporation | Methods for abstracting data from various data structures and managing the presentation of the data |
US6920453B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2005-07-19 | Nokia Corporation | Method and system for finding a query-subset of events within a master-set of events |
US7499922B1 (en) | 2001-04-26 | 2009-03-03 | Dakota Software Corp. | Information retrieval system and method |
CN1509433A (en) | 2001-05-11 | 2004-06-30 | ���������˼�빫˾ | Method and system for transforming legacy software application into modern object-oriented system |
US6980984B1 (en) | 2001-05-16 | 2005-12-27 | Kanisa, Inc. | Content provider systems and methods using structured data |
US6907426B2 (en) | 2001-05-17 | 2005-06-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for identifying and counting instances of temporal patterns |
US6496774B1 (en) | 2001-05-24 | 2002-12-17 | Prc Inc. | Automatic vehicle routing and recommendation system |
US7877421B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2011-01-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for mapping enterprise data assets to a semantic information model |
US7865427B2 (en) | 2001-05-30 | 2011-01-04 | Cybersource Corporation | Method and apparatus for evaluating fraud risk in an electronic commerce transaction |
US6828920B2 (en) | 2001-06-04 | 2004-12-07 | Lockheed Martin Orincon Corporation | System and method for classifying vehicles |
US6665683B1 (en) | 2001-06-22 | 2003-12-16 | E. Intelligence, Inc. | System and method for adjusting a value within a multidimensional aggregation tree |
US8001465B2 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2011-08-16 | Kudrollis Software Inventions Pvt. Ltd. | Compacting an information array display to cope with two dimensional display space constraint |
US7100147B2 (en) | 2001-06-28 | 2006-08-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for generating a workflow |
US7155728B1 (en) | 2001-06-28 | 2006-12-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Remoting features |
US6643613B2 (en) | 2001-07-03 | 2003-11-04 | Altaworks Corporation | System and method for monitoring performance metrics |
US7133409B1 (en) | 2001-07-19 | 2006-11-07 | Richard Willardson | Programmable packet filtering in a prioritized chain |
US20040205492A1 (en) | 2001-07-26 | 2004-10-14 | Newsome Mark R. | Content clipping service |
US20030023620A1 (en) | 2001-07-30 | 2003-01-30 | Nicholas Trotta | Creation of media-interaction profiles |
US20030039948A1 (en) | 2001-08-09 | 2003-02-27 | Donahue Steven J. | Voice enabled tutorial system and method |
US7028223B1 (en) | 2001-08-13 | 2006-04-11 | Parasoft Corporation | System and method for testing of web services |
CA2403699C (en) | 2001-09-17 | 2014-12-02 | Recognia Inc. | Technical analysis formation recognition using pivot points |
CA2404288A1 (en) | 2001-09-17 | 2003-03-17 | Recognia Inc. | A method for categorizing pivot points in technical analysis |
US7636680B2 (en) | 2001-10-03 | 2009-12-22 | Starmine Corporation | Methods and systems for measuring performance of a security analyst |
US20030172021A1 (en) | 2001-10-03 | 2003-09-11 | Chih-Wei Huang | System and method using trading value for weighting instruments in an index |
JP3521194B2 (en) | 2001-10-11 | 2004-04-19 | 有限会社増田経済研究所 | Stock chart |
EP1435058A4 (en) | 2001-10-11 | 2005-12-07 | Visualsciences Llc | System, method, and computer program product for processing and visualization of information |
US6877136B2 (en) | 2001-10-26 | 2005-04-05 | United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) | System and method of providing electronic access to one or more documents |
US6876996B2 (en) | 2001-11-14 | 2005-04-05 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for using a shared library mechanism to facilitate sharing of metadata |
NO316480B1 (en) | 2001-11-15 | 2004-01-26 | Forinnova As | Method and system for textual examination and discovery |
US7089541B2 (en) | 2001-11-30 | 2006-08-08 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Modular parser architecture with mini parsers |
US7165101B2 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2007-01-16 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Transparent optimization of network traffic in distributed systems |
US7469238B2 (en) | 2001-12-11 | 2008-12-23 | Recognia Incorporated | Method of rule constrained statistical price formation recognition |
US7611602B2 (en) | 2001-12-13 | 2009-11-03 | Urban Mapping, Llc | Method of producing maps and other objects configured for presentation of spatially-related layers of data |
US7970240B1 (en) | 2001-12-17 | 2011-06-28 | Google Inc. | Method and apparatus for archiving and visualizing digital images |
US20070203771A1 (en) | 2001-12-17 | 2007-08-30 | Caballero Richard J | System and method for processing complex orders |
CA2414620C (en) | 2001-12-17 | 2011-04-19 | Recognia Inc. | A method for chart markup and annotation in technical analysis |
US7475242B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2009-01-06 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Controlling the distribution of information |
US20030130996A1 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2003-07-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Interactive mining of time series data |
US7454466B2 (en) | 2002-01-16 | 2008-11-18 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for flexible workflow management |
US7174377B2 (en) | 2002-01-16 | 2007-02-06 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for collaborative document versioning of networked documents |
US7139800B2 (en) | 2002-01-16 | 2006-11-21 | Xerox Corporation | User interface for a message-based system having embedded information management capabilities |
US7640173B2 (en) | 2002-01-17 | 2009-12-29 | Applied Medical Software, Inc. | Method and system for evaluating a physician's economic performance and gainsharing of physician services |
US7546245B2 (en) | 2002-01-17 | 2009-06-09 | Amsapplied Medical Software, Inc. | Method and system for gainsharing of physician services |
US7305444B2 (en) | 2002-01-23 | 2007-12-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for controlling delivery of information in a forum |
US7146000B2 (en) | 2002-01-25 | 2006-12-05 | Level (3) Communications | Routing engine for telecommunications network |
CA2473589A1 (en) | 2002-01-25 | 2003-12-04 | Bdellium Inc. | Method of analyzing investments using overlapping periods |
US7225183B2 (en) | 2002-01-28 | 2007-05-29 | Ipxl, Inc. | Ontology-based information management system and method |
US20050075966A1 (en) | 2002-01-29 | 2005-04-07 | Andrey Duka | Method of processing, displaying and trading financial instruments and an electronic trading system therefor |
US7369984B2 (en) | 2002-02-01 | 2008-05-06 | John Fairweather | Platform-independent real-time interface translation by token mapping without modification of application code |
US7519589B2 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2009-04-14 | Cataphora, Inc. | Method and apparatus for sociological data analysis |
JP3946057B2 (en) * | 2002-03-01 | 2007-07-18 | 富士通株式会社 | Consistency inspection support method and consistency inspection support system |
US7406435B2 (en) | 2002-03-18 | 2008-07-29 | Demantra Ltd. | Computer implemented method and system for computing and evaluating demand information |
US6993539B2 (en) | 2002-03-19 | 2006-01-31 | Network Appliance, Inc. | System and method for determining changes in two snapshots and for transmitting changes to destination snapshot |
WO2003081376A2 (en) | 2002-03-20 | 2003-10-02 | Catalina Marketing International Inc. | Targeted incentives based upon predicted behavior |
US20030182177A1 (en) | 2002-03-25 | 2003-09-25 | Gallagher March S. | Collective hierarchical decision making system |
US20050021397A1 (en) | 2003-07-22 | 2005-01-27 | Cui Yingwei Claire | Content-targeted advertising using collected user behavior data |
US7284204B2 (en) | 2002-03-29 | 2007-10-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | System, method, and visual user interface for evaluating and selecting suppliers for enterprise procurement |
US7587352B2 (en) | 2002-04-10 | 2009-09-08 | Research Affiliates, Llc | Method and apparatus for managing a virtual portfolio of investment objects |
US7747502B2 (en) | 2002-06-03 | 2010-06-29 | Research Affiliates, Llc | Using accounting data based indexing to create a portfolio of assets |
US7533026B2 (en) | 2002-04-12 | 2009-05-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Facilitating management of service elements usable in providing information technology service offerings |
US7162475B2 (en) | 2002-04-17 | 2007-01-09 | Ackerman David M | Method for user verification and authentication and multimedia processing for interactive database management and method for viewing the multimedia |
US7171427B2 (en) | 2002-04-26 | 2007-01-30 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods of navigating a cube that is implemented as a relational object |
US20040012633A1 (en) | 2002-04-26 | 2004-01-22 | Affymetrix, Inc., A Corporation Organized Under The Laws Of Delaware | System, method, and computer program product for dynamic display, and analysis of biological sequence data |
US20040126840A1 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2004-07-01 | Affymetrix, Inc. | Method, system and computer software for providing genomic ontological data |
US7237192B1 (en) | 2002-04-30 | 2007-06-26 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods and systems for naming and indexing children in a hierarchical nodal structure |
US7426559B2 (en) | 2002-05-09 | 2008-09-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for sequential coordination of external database application events with asynchronous internal database events |
US7127467B2 (en) | 2002-05-10 | 2006-10-24 | Oracle International Corporation | Managing expressions in a database system |
US7539680B2 (en) | 2002-05-10 | 2009-05-26 | Lsi Corporation | Revision control for database of evolved design |
US7703021B1 (en) | 2002-05-24 | 2010-04-20 | Sparta Systems, Inc. | Defining user access in highly-configurable systems |
JP2003345810A (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2003-12-05 | Hitachi Ltd | Method and system for document retrieval and document retrieval result display system |
US20030229848A1 (en) | 2002-06-05 | 2003-12-11 | Udo Arend | Table filtering in a computer user interface |
WO2004006046A2 (en) | 2002-06-24 | 2004-01-15 | Xymphonic Systems As | Method for data-centric collaboration |
US7103854B2 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2006-09-05 | Tele Atlas North America, Inc. | System and method for associating text and graphical views of map information |
US6996583B2 (en) | 2002-07-01 | 2006-02-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real-time database update transaction with disconnected relational database clients |
JP2004038428A (en) | 2002-07-02 | 2004-02-05 | Yamatake Corp | Method for generating model to be controlled, method for adjusting control parameter, program for generating the model, and program for adjusting the parameter |
US20040006523A1 (en) | 2002-07-08 | 2004-01-08 | Coker Don W. | System and method for preventing financial fraud |
US8244895B2 (en) | 2002-07-15 | 2012-08-14 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and apparatus for applying receiving attributes using constraints |
WO2004010359A1 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2004-01-29 | Tamaru International Inc. | Stock-jobbing support device and stock-jobbing support system |
US7461158B2 (en) | 2002-08-07 | 2008-12-02 | Intelliden, Inc. | System and method for controlling access rights to network resources |
US7076508B2 (en) | 2002-08-12 | 2006-07-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for merging log entries from multiple recovery log files |
EP1535203A1 (en) | 2002-08-13 | 2005-06-01 | Highdeal | Editor and method for editing formulae for calculating the price of a service and system for automatic costing of a service |
CA2398103A1 (en) | 2002-08-14 | 2004-02-14 | March Networks Corporation | Multi-dimensional table filtering system |
US7945846B2 (en) | 2002-09-06 | 2011-05-17 | Oracle International Corporation | Application-specific personalization for data display |
GB0221257D0 (en) | 2002-09-13 | 2002-10-23 | Ibm | Automated testing |
US7383513B2 (en) | 2002-09-25 | 2008-06-03 | Oracle International Corporation | Graphical condition builder for facilitating database queries |
US7127352B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2006-10-24 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | System and method for providing accurate local maps for a central service |
AU2003284118A1 (en) | 2002-10-14 | 2004-05-04 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Information reservoir |
US20040078251A1 (en) | 2002-10-16 | 2004-04-22 | Demarcken Carl G. | Dividing a travel query into sub-queries |
US20040143602A1 (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2004-07-22 | Antonio Ruiz | Apparatus, system and method for automated and adaptive digital image/video surveillance for events and configurations using a rich multimedia relational database |
US20040083466A1 (en) | 2002-10-29 | 2004-04-29 | Dapp Michael C. | Hardware parser accelerator |
US20040085318A1 (en) | 2002-10-31 | 2004-05-06 | Philipp Hassler | Graphics generation and integration |
US20040088177A1 (en) * | 2002-11-04 | 2004-05-06 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Employee performance management method and system |
CN1757188A (en) | 2002-11-06 | 2006-04-05 | 国际商业机器公司 | Confidential data sharing and anonymous entity resolution |
US10242028B2 (en) | 2002-11-11 | 2019-03-26 | Transparensee Systems, Inc. | User interface for search method and system |
EP1567929A2 (en) | 2002-11-15 | 2005-08-31 | Creo Inc. | Methods and systems for sharing data |
US7546607B2 (en) | 2002-11-19 | 2009-06-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Native code exposing virtual machine managed object |
US7162501B2 (en) | 2002-11-26 | 2007-01-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Hierarchical differential document representative of changes between versions of hierarchical document |
US7243093B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2007-07-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Federated query management |
AU2003293132A1 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2004-06-23 | Sra International, Inc. | Integration of gene expression data and non-gene data |
US20040111480A1 (en) | 2002-12-09 | 2004-06-10 | Yue Jonathan Zhanjun | Message screening system and method |
AU2003303250A1 (en) | 2002-12-20 | 2004-07-14 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Quantification of operational risks |
US8589273B2 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2013-11-19 | Ge Corporate Financial Services, Inc. | Methods and systems for managing risk management information |
US20080177994A1 (en) | 2003-01-12 | 2008-07-24 | Yaron Mayer | System and method for improving the efficiency, comfort, and/or reliability in Operating Systems, such as for example Windows |
US7752117B2 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2010-07-06 | Trading Technologies International, Inc. | System and method for money management in electronic trading environment |
US7912842B1 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2011-03-22 | Lexisnexis Risk Data Management Inc. | Method and system for processing and linking data records |
US7403942B1 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2008-07-22 | Seisint, Inc. | Method and system for processing data records |
US20040153418A1 (en) | 2003-02-05 | 2004-08-05 | Hanweck Gerald Alfred | System and method for providing access to data from proprietary tools |
US20060259524A1 (en) | 2003-03-17 | 2006-11-16 | Horton D T | Systems and methods for document project management, conversion, and filing |
US7627552B2 (en) | 2003-03-27 | 2009-12-01 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for filtering and organizing items based on common elements |
US7099888B2 (en) | 2003-03-26 | 2006-08-29 | Oracle International Corporation | Accessing a remotely located nested object |
US7493614B2 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2009-02-17 | Microsoft Corporation | System architecture and related methods for dynamically adding software components to extend functionality of system processes |
US7280038B2 (en) | 2003-04-09 | 2007-10-09 | John Robinson | Emergency response data transmission system |
US7086028B1 (en) | 2003-04-09 | 2006-08-01 | Autodesk, Inc. | Simplified generation of design change information on a drawing in a computer aided design (CAD) environment |
KR100996029B1 (en) | 2003-04-29 | 2010-11-22 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for coding of low density parity check code |
US9607092B2 (en) | 2003-05-20 | 2017-03-28 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | Mapping method and system |
US20050027705A1 (en) | 2003-05-20 | 2005-02-03 | Pasha Sadri | Mapping method and system |
US7369912B2 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2008-05-06 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Batch execution engine with independent batch execution processes |
US7437728B2 (en) | 2003-06-12 | 2008-10-14 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for CPU bandwidth allocation |
US7620648B2 (en) | 2003-06-20 | 2009-11-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Universal annotation configuration and deployment |
US20040267746A1 (en) | 2003-06-26 | 2004-12-30 | Cezary Marcjan | User interface for controlling access to computer objects |
FI118102B (en) | 2003-07-04 | 2007-06-29 | Medicel Oy | Information control system for controlling the workflow |
US8412566B2 (en) | 2003-07-08 | 2013-04-02 | Yt Acquisition Corporation | High-precision customer-based targeting by individual usage statistics |
US7055110B2 (en) | 2003-07-28 | 2006-05-30 | Sig G Kupka | Common on-screen zone for menu activation and stroke input |
US7216133B2 (en) | 2003-07-29 | 2007-05-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Synchronizing logical views independent of physical storage representations |
US20050027632A1 (en) | 2003-07-31 | 2005-02-03 | Ubs Financial Services, Inc. | Financial investment advice system and method |
AU2003903994A0 (en) | 2003-07-31 | 2003-08-14 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Collaborative editing with automatic layout |
US7363581B2 (en) | 2003-08-12 | 2008-04-22 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Presentation generator |
US20060143075A1 (en) | 2003-09-22 | 2006-06-29 | Ryan Carr | Assumed demographics, predicted behaviour, and targeted incentives |
US7516086B2 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2009-04-07 | Idearc Media Corp. | Business rating placement heuristic |
US7334195B2 (en) | 2003-10-14 | 2008-02-19 | Microsoft Corporation | System and process for presenting search results in a histogram/cluster format |
US7584172B2 (en) | 2003-10-16 | 2009-09-01 | Sap Ag | Control for selecting data query and visual configuration |
US7966246B2 (en) | 2003-10-23 | 2011-06-21 | Alphacet, Inc. | User interface for correlation of analysis systems |
US7441182B2 (en) | 2003-10-23 | 2008-10-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Digital negatives |
US20050091186A1 (en) | 2003-10-24 | 2005-04-28 | Alon Elish | Integrated method and apparatus for capture, storage, and retrieval of information |
US8627489B2 (en) | 2003-10-31 | 2014-01-07 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Distributed document version control |
EP1751745B1 (en) | 2003-11-14 | 2019-07-10 | Western Digital Technologies, Inc. | Managed peer-to-peer applications, systems and methods for distributed data access and storage |
US20050131935A1 (en) | 2003-11-18 | 2005-06-16 | O'leary Paul J. | Sector content mining system using a modular knowledge base |
US20050125715A1 (en) | 2003-12-04 | 2005-06-09 | Fabrizio Di Franco | Method of saving data in a graphical user interface |
US7818658B2 (en) | 2003-12-09 | 2010-10-19 | Yi-Chih Chen | Multimedia presentation system |
US8433703B1 (en) | 2003-12-22 | 2013-04-30 | Google Inc. | Recording user actions |
US6948656B2 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2005-09-27 | First Data Corporation | System with GPS to manage risk of financial transactions |
US7917376B2 (en) | 2003-12-29 | 2011-03-29 | Montefiore Medical Center | System and method for monitoring patient care |
US20050154628A1 (en) | 2004-01-13 | 2005-07-14 | Illumen, Inc. | Automated management of business performance information |
US20050154769A1 (en) | 2004-01-13 | 2005-07-14 | Llumen, Inc. | Systems and methods for benchmarking business performance data against aggregated business performance data |
EP1709589B1 (en) | 2004-01-15 | 2013-01-16 | Algotec Systems Ltd. | Vessel centerline determination |
US20050166144A1 (en) | 2004-01-22 | 2005-07-28 | Mathcom Inventions Ltd. | Method and system for assigning a background to a document and document having a background made according to the method and system |
US7872669B2 (en) | 2004-01-22 | 2011-01-18 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Photo-based mobile deixis system and related techniques |
GB2410575A (en) | 2004-01-30 | 2005-08-03 | Nomura Internat Plc | Analysing and displaying associated financial data |
US7343552B2 (en) | 2004-02-12 | 2008-03-11 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for freeform annotations |
US20060053097A1 (en) | 2004-04-01 | 2006-03-09 | King Martin T | Searching and accessing documents on private networks for use with captures from rendered documents |
US20050180330A1 (en) | 2004-02-17 | 2005-08-18 | Touchgraph Llc | Method of animating transitions and stabilizing node motion during dynamic graph navigation |
US20050182793A1 (en) | 2004-02-18 | 2005-08-18 | Keenan Viktor M. | Map structure and method for producing |
US7085890B2 (en) | 2004-02-19 | 2006-08-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Memory mapping to reduce cache conflicts in multiprocessor systems |
US7596285B2 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2009-09-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Providing a portion of an electronic mail message at a reduced resolution |
US7853533B2 (en) | 2004-03-02 | 2010-12-14 | The 41St Parameter, Inc. | Method and system for identifying users and detecting fraud by use of the internet |
US20050210409A1 (en) | 2004-03-19 | 2005-09-22 | Kenny Jou | Systems and methods for class designation in a computerized social network application |
US7865301B2 (en) | 2004-03-23 | 2011-01-04 | Google Inc. | Secondary map in digital mapping system |
CN103398718B (en) | 2004-03-23 | 2017-04-12 | 咕果公司 | Digital mapping system |
US7599790B2 (en) | 2004-03-23 | 2009-10-06 | Google Inc. | Generating and serving tiles in a digital mapping system |
US20060026120A1 (en) | 2004-03-24 | 2006-02-02 | Update Publications Lp | Method and system for collecting, processing, and distributing residential property data |
US7269801B2 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2007-09-11 | Autodesk, Inc. | System for managing the navigational usability of an interactive map |
US20050226473A1 (en) | 2004-04-07 | 2005-10-13 | Subramanyan Ramesh | Electronic Documents Signing and Compliance Monitoring Invention |
US20060031779A1 (en) | 2004-04-15 | 2006-02-09 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Selectively sharing screen data |
CA2564754A1 (en) | 2004-04-26 | 2005-11-10 | Right90, Inc. | Forecasting data with real-time updates |
US20050246327A1 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-03 | Yeung Simon D | User interfaces and methods of using the same |
US8041701B2 (en) | 2004-05-04 | 2011-10-18 | DG FastChannel, Inc | Enhanced graphical interfaces for displaying visual data |
US7689601B2 (en) | 2004-05-06 | 2010-03-30 | Oracle International Corporation | Achieving web documents using unique document locators |
US20050251786A1 (en) | 2004-05-07 | 2005-11-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for dynamic software installation instructions |
US8108429B2 (en) | 2004-05-07 | 2012-01-31 | Quest Software, Inc. | System for moving real-time data events across a plurality of devices in a network for simultaneous data protection, replication, and access services |
US7542934B2 (en) | 2004-05-14 | 2009-06-02 | Omnicharts, Llc | System and method for analyzing a waveform to detect specified patterns |
US7587721B2 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2009-09-08 | Sap Ag | Sharing objects in runtime systems |
US7415704B2 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2008-08-19 | Sap Ag | Sharing objects in runtime systems |
US20050262057A1 (en) | 2004-05-24 | 2005-11-24 | Lesh Neal B | Intelligent data summarization and visualization |
US8037144B2 (en) | 2004-05-25 | 2011-10-11 | Google Inc. | Electronic message source reputation information system |
WO2005116887A1 (en) * | 2004-05-25 | 2005-12-08 | Arion Human Capital Limited | Data analysis and flow control system |
US20080040250A1 (en) | 2004-06-01 | 2008-02-14 | Transcon Securities Pty Ltd., A Corporation | System and Method for Analysing Risk Associated with an Investment Portfolio |
US8055672B2 (en) | 2004-06-10 | 2011-11-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic graphical database query and data mining interface |
GB2415317B (en) | 2004-06-15 | 2007-08-15 | Orange Personal Comm Serv Ltd | Provision of group services in a telecommunications network |
FR2872653B1 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2006-12-29 | Skyrecon Systems Sa | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR SECURING COMPUTER STATIONS AND / OR COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS |
US7599867B1 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2009-10-06 | Trading Technologies International, Inc. | System and method for chart pattern recognition and analysis in an electronic trading environment |
US20060010130A1 (en) | 2004-07-09 | 2006-01-12 | Avraham Leff | Method and apparatus for synchronizing client transactions executed by an autonomous client |
WO2006012645A2 (en) | 2004-07-28 | 2006-02-02 | Sarnoff Corporation | Method and apparatus for total situational awareness and monitoring |
US7870487B2 (en) | 2004-07-29 | 2011-01-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Inserting into a document a screen image of a computer software application |
US7552116B2 (en) | 2004-08-06 | 2009-06-23 | The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois | Method and system for extracting web query interfaces |
WO2006018843A2 (en) | 2004-08-16 | 2006-02-23 | Beinsync Ltd. | A system and method for the synchronization of data across multiple computing devices |
JP2006058976A (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2006-03-02 | Fujitsu Ltd | Optimization analysis apparatus, optimization analysis method and optimization analysis program |
US7603229B2 (en) | 2004-08-25 | 2009-10-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Efficiently finding shortest paths using landmarks for computing lower-bound distance estimates |
US7290698B2 (en) | 2004-08-25 | 2007-11-06 | Sony Corporation | Progress bar with multiple portions |
US20060047590A1 (en) | 2004-08-26 | 2006-03-02 | Timothy Anderson | Real-time risk management trading system for professional equity traders with adaptive contingency notification |
US7617232B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2009-11-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Centralized terminology and glossary development |
US7493333B2 (en) | 2004-09-03 | 2009-02-17 | Biowisdom Limited | System and method for parsing and/or exporting data from one or more multi-relational ontologies |
US20060059423A1 (en) | 2004-09-13 | 2006-03-16 | Stefan Lehmann | Apparatus, system, and method for creating customized workflow documentation |
WO2006031952A2 (en) | 2004-09-14 | 2006-03-23 | Ameritrade Ip Company, Inc. | Pattern matcher |
US7406592B1 (en) | 2004-09-23 | 2008-07-29 | American Megatrends, Inc. | Method, system, and apparatus for efficient evaluation of boolean expressions |
US7933862B2 (en) | 2004-09-27 | 2011-04-26 | Microsoft Corporation | One click conditional formatting method and system for software programs |
US7512738B2 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2009-03-31 | Intel Corporation | Allocating call stack frame entries at different memory levels to functions in a program |
US7712049B2 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2010-05-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Two-dimensional radial user interface for computer software applications |
US7788589B2 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2010-08-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for improved electronic task flagging and management |
US8170901B2 (en) | 2004-10-01 | 2012-05-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Extensible framework for designing workflows |
US20060074881A1 (en) | 2004-10-02 | 2006-04-06 | Adventnet, Inc. | Structure independent searching in disparate databases |
US7366723B2 (en) | 2004-10-05 | 2008-04-29 | Sap Ag | Visual query modeling for configurable patterns |
US7284198B2 (en) | 2004-10-07 | 2007-10-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for document draft reminder based on inactivity |
US20060080316A1 (en) | 2004-10-08 | 2006-04-13 | Meridio Ltd | Multiple indexing of an electronic document to selectively permit access to the content and metadata thereof |
US8892571B2 (en) | 2004-10-12 | 2014-11-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems for associating records in healthcare database with individuals |
US20060080616A1 (en) | 2004-10-13 | 2006-04-13 | Xerox Corporation | Systems, methods and user interfaces for document workflow construction |
GB0422750D0 (en) | 2004-10-13 | 2004-11-17 | Ciphergrid Ltd | Remote database technique |
CA2484694A1 (en) | 2004-10-14 | 2006-04-14 | Alcatel | Database ram cache |
US7757220B2 (en) | 2004-10-21 | 2010-07-13 | Discovery Machine, Inc. | Computer interchange of knowledge hierarchies |
US7904913B2 (en) | 2004-11-02 | 2011-03-08 | Bakbone Software, Inc. | Management interface for a system that provides automated, real-time, continuous data protection |
US7574409B2 (en) | 2004-11-04 | 2009-08-11 | Vericept Corporation | Method, apparatus, and system for clustering and classification |
US20060129992A1 (en) | 2004-11-10 | 2006-06-15 | Oberholtzer Brian K | Software test and performance monitoring system |
US7797197B2 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2010-09-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for analyzing the performance of affiliate sites |
US7529734B2 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2009-05-05 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and apparatus for facilitating a database query using a query criteria template |
US20060116943A1 (en) | 2004-11-30 | 2006-06-01 | Pascal Willain | Method to determine price inflections of securities |
US7620628B2 (en) | 2004-12-06 | 2009-11-17 | Yahoo! Inc. | Search processing with automatic categorization of queries |
US20060129746A1 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2006-06-15 | Ithink, Inc. | Method and graphic interface for storing, moving, sending or printing electronic data to two or more locations, in two or more formats with a single save function |
US7849395B2 (en) | 2004-12-15 | 2010-12-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Filter and sort by color |
US7451397B2 (en) | 2004-12-15 | 2008-11-11 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for automatically completing spreadsheet formulas |
US9020887B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2015-04-28 | Proofpoint, Inc. | Managing the status of documents in a distributed storage system |
US8700414B2 (en) | 2004-12-29 | 2014-04-15 | Sap Ag | System supported optimization of event resolution |
US20060143079A1 (en) | 2004-12-29 | 2006-06-29 | Jayanta Basak | Cross-channel customer matching |
US7660823B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2010-02-09 | Sas Institute Inc. | Computer-implemented system and method for visualizing OLAP and multidimensional data in a calendar format |
US7783679B2 (en) | 2005-01-12 | 2010-08-24 | Computer Associates Think, Inc. | Efficient processing of time series data |
US9436945B2 (en) | 2005-02-01 | 2016-09-06 | Redfin Corporation | Interactive map-based search and advertising |
JP3981387B2 (en) | 2005-02-04 | 2007-09-26 | 有限会社増田経済研究所 | Stock index display |
US8271436B2 (en) | 2005-02-07 | 2012-09-18 | Mimosa Systems, Inc. | Retro-fitting synthetic full copies of data |
US7614006B2 (en) | 2005-02-11 | 2009-11-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods and apparatus for implementing inline controls for transposing rows and columns of computer-based tables |
US8646080B2 (en) | 2005-09-16 | 2014-02-04 | Avg Technologies Cy Limited | Method and apparatus for removing harmful software |
US20080249957A1 (en) | 2005-03-07 | 2008-10-09 | Hiroaki Masuyama | Stock Portfolio Selection Device, Stock Portfolio Selection Method and Medium Storing Stock Portfolio Selection Program |
US20060242630A1 (en) | 2005-03-09 | 2006-10-26 | Maxis Co., Ltd. | Process for preparing design procedure document and apparatus for the same |
US8091784B1 (en) | 2005-03-09 | 2012-01-10 | Diebold, Incorporated | Banking system controlled responsive to data bearing records |
US7483028B2 (en) | 2005-03-15 | 2009-01-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Providing 1D and 2D connectors in a connected diagram |
US7630931B1 (en) | 2005-03-17 | 2009-12-08 | Finanalytica, Inc. | System and method for the valuation of derivatives |
WO2006102270A2 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2006-09-28 | Cooper Kim A | Performance motivation systems and methods for contact centers |
US7725728B2 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2010-05-25 | Business Objects Data Integration, Inc. | Apparatus and method for dynamically auditing data migration to produce metadata |
US7676845B2 (en) | 2005-03-24 | 2010-03-09 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method of selectively scanning a file on a computing device for malware |
US20060218491A1 (en) | 2005-03-25 | 2006-09-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | System, method and program product for community review of documents |
US7596528B1 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2009-09-29 | Trading Technologies International, Inc. | System and method for dynamically regulating order entry in an electronic trading environment |
US7369961B2 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2008-05-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for structural clustering of time sequences |
US7426654B2 (en) | 2005-04-14 | 2008-09-16 | Verizon Business Global Llc | Method and system for providing customer controlled notifications in a managed network services system |
US20060235786A1 (en) | 2005-04-14 | 2006-10-19 | Disalvo Dean | System and method for securities liquidity flow tracking, display and trading |
US20080183639A1 (en) | 2005-04-14 | 2008-07-31 | Disalvo Dean F | System and Method for Securities Liquidity Flow Tracking, Display and Trading |
US7525422B2 (en) | 2005-04-14 | 2009-04-28 | Verizon Business Global Llc | Method and system for providing alarm reporting in a managed network services environment |
US20060242040A1 (en) | 2005-04-20 | 2006-10-26 | Aim Holdings Llc | Method and system for conducting sentiment analysis for securities research |
US8639757B1 (en) | 2011-08-12 | 2014-01-28 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | User localization using friend location information |
US20060241856A1 (en) | 2005-04-25 | 2006-10-26 | The Boeing Company | Geo-infosphere as applied to dynamic routing system |
US8082172B2 (en) | 2005-04-26 | 2011-12-20 | The Advisory Board Company | System and method for peer-profiling individual performance |
US8145686B2 (en) | 2005-05-06 | 2012-03-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Maintenance of link level consistency between database and file system |
US7958120B2 (en) | 2005-05-10 | 2011-06-07 | Netseer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for distributed community finding |
US7672968B2 (en) | 2005-05-12 | 2010-03-02 | Apple Inc. | Displaying a tooltip associated with a concurrently displayed database object |
US20060265311A1 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2006-11-23 | Whitney Education Group | Threshold trading method |
US8024778B2 (en) | 2005-05-24 | 2011-09-20 | CRIF Corporation | System and method for defining attributes, decision rules, or both, for remote execution, claim set I |
US8020110B2 (en) | 2005-05-26 | 2011-09-13 | Weisermazars Llp | Methods for defining queries, generating query results and displaying same |
US8825370B2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2014-09-02 | Yahoo! Inc. | Interactive map-based travel guide |
US7962842B2 (en) | 2005-05-30 | 2011-06-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and systems for accessing data by spelling discrimination letters of link names |
US8578500B2 (en) | 2005-05-31 | 2013-11-05 | Kurt James Long | System and method of fraud and misuse detection |
US8161122B2 (en) * | 2005-06-03 | 2012-04-17 | Messagemind, Inc. | System and method of dynamically prioritized electronic mail graphical user interface, and measuring email productivity and collaboration trends |
US20060277460A1 (en) | 2005-06-03 | 2006-12-07 | Scott Forstall | Webview applications |
EP1732034A1 (en) | 2005-06-06 | 2006-12-13 | First Data Corporation | System and method for authorizing electronic payment transactions |
US8341259B2 (en) | 2005-06-06 | 2012-12-25 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | ASP for web analytics including a real-time segmentation workbench |
US7571192B2 (en) | 2005-06-15 | 2009-08-04 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods and apparatus for maintaining consistency during analysis of large data sets |
US20070005582A1 (en) | 2005-06-17 | 2007-01-04 | Honeywell International Inc. | Building of database queries from graphical operations |
US8042110B1 (en) | 2005-06-24 | 2011-10-18 | Oracle America, Inc. | Dynamic grouping of application components |
US7761379B2 (en) | 2005-06-24 | 2010-07-20 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Mass compromise/point of compromise analytic detection and compromised card portfolio management system |
US20100199167A1 (en) | 2005-06-24 | 2010-08-05 | Justsystems Corporation | Document processing apparatus |
US7565318B2 (en) | 2005-06-28 | 2009-07-21 | Trading Technologies International, Inc. | System and method for calculating and displaying volume to identify buying and selling in an electronic trading environment |
US8200676B2 (en) | 2005-06-28 | 2012-06-12 | Nokia Corporation | User interface for geographic search |
US8429527B1 (en) | 2005-07-12 | 2013-04-23 | Open Text S.A. | Complex data merging, such as in a workflow application |
US8560413B1 (en) | 2005-07-14 | 2013-10-15 | John S. Quarterman | Method and system for detecting distributed internet crime |
US20070016363A1 (en) | 2005-07-15 | 2007-01-18 | Oracle International Corporation | Interactive map-based user interface for transportation planning |
WO2007052285A2 (en) | 2005-07-22 | 2007-05-10 | Yogesh Chunilal Rathod | Universal knowledge management and desktop search system |
US20070178501A1 (en) * | 2005-12-06 | 2007-08-02 | Matthew Rabinowitz | System and method for integrating and validating genotypic, phenotypic and medical information into a database according to a standardized ontology |
JP3989527B2 (en) | 2005-08-04 | 2007-10-10 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Search article estimation apparatus and method, and search article estimation apparatus server |
US7421429B2 (en) | 2005-08-04 | 2008-09-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Generate blog context ranking using track-back weight, context weight and, cumulative comment weight |
CN1913441A (en) | 2005-08-09 | 2007-02-14 | 张永敏 | Continuous changed data set transmission and updating method |
US7529726B2 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2009-05-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | XML sub-document versioning method in XML databases using record storages |
US7376516B2 (en) | 2005-08-23 | 2008-05-20 | R.A. Smith National | High accuracy survey grade GIS system |
US7917841B2 (en) | 2005-08-29 | 2011-03-29 | Edgar Online, Inc. | System and method for rendering data |
JP2007079641A (en) | 2005-09-09 | 2007-03-29 | Canon Inc | Information processor and processing method, program, and storage medium |
US8095866B2 (en) | 2005-09-09 | 2012-01-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Filtering user interface for a data summary table |
CN101882395A (en) | 2005-09-12 | 2010-11-10 | 松下电器产业株式会社 | Map display |
US7958147B1 (en) | 2005-09-13 | 2011-06-07 | James Luke Turner | Method for providing customized and automated security assistance, a document marking regime, and central tracking and control for sensitive or classified documents in electronic format |
US8468441B2 (en) | 2005-09-15 | 2013-06-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Cross-application support of charts |
AU2006292344B2 (en) | 2005-09-16 | 2012-02-02 | Pankaj B. Dalal | Financial decision systems |
US8065606B1 (en) | 2005-09-16 | 2011-11-22 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for automating document generation |
US7672833B2 (en) | 2005-09-22 | 2010-03-02 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Method and apparatus for automatic entity disambiguation |
US20070094248A1 (en) | 2005-09-26 | 2007-04-26 | Bea Systems, Inc. | System and method for managing content by workflows |
US7716226B2 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2010-05-11 | Patentratings, Llc | Method and system for probabilistically quantifying and visualizing relevance between two or more citationally or contextually related data objects |
US20070078832A1 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-05 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method and system for using smart tags and a recommendation engine using smart tags |
US7870493B2 (en) | 2005-10-03 | 2011-01-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Distributed clipboard |
WO2007041709A1 (en) | 2005-10-04 | 2007-04-12 | Basepoint Analytics Llc | System and method of detecting fraud |
US7574428B2 (en) | 2005-10-11 | 2009-08-11 | Telmap Ltd | Geometry-based search engine for navigation systems |
US7933897B2 (en) | 2005-10-12 | 2011-04-26 | Google Inc. | Entity display priority in a distributed geographic information system |
US7487139B2 (en) | 2005-10-12 | 2009-02-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for filtering a table |
US8666780B2 (en) | 2005-10-18 | 2014-03-04 | Walgreen Co. | System for separating and distributing pharmacy order processing |
US20070094389A1 (en) | 2005-10-23 | 2007-04-26 | Bill Nussey | Provision of rss feeds based on classification of content |
US7627812B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2009-12-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Variable formatting of cells |
US20090168163A1 (en) | 2005-11-01 | 2009-07-02 | Global Bionic Optics Pty Ltd. | Optical lens systems |
US7716227B1 (en) | 2005-11-03 | 2010-05-11 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Visually representing series data sets in accordance with importance values |
WO2007057008A1 (en) | 2005-11-21 | 2007-05-24 | Saxo Bank A/S | A financial trading system |
US20100198858A1 (en) | 2005-11-21 | 2010-08-05 | Anti-Gang Enforcement Networking Technology, Inc. | System and Methods for Linking Multiple Events Involving Firearms and Gang Related Activities |
US20070118527A1 (en) | 2005-11-22 | 2007-05-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Security and data filtering |
US7730109B2 (en) | 2005-12-12 | 2010-06-01 | Google, Inc. | Message catalogs for remote modules |
US8185819B2 (en) | 2005-12-12 | 2012-05-22 | Google Inc. | Module specification for a module to be incorporated into a container document |
US7730082B2 (en) | 2005-12-12 | 2010-06-01 | Google Inc. | Remote module incorporation into a container document |
US7725530B2 (en) | 2005-12-12 | 2010-05-25 | Google Inc. | Proxy server collection of data for module incorporation into a container document |
US20070136115A1 (en) | 2005-12-13 | 2007-06-14 | Deniz Senturk Doganaksoy | Statistical pattern recognition and analysis |
US7606844B2 (en) | 2005-12-19 | 2009-10-20 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing replication copy storage operations |
US8726144B2 (en) | 2005-12-23 | 2014-05-13 | Xerox Corporation | Interactive learning-based document annotation |
US20070150369A1 (en) | 2005-12-28 | 2007-06-28 | Zivin Michael A | Method and system for determining the optimal travel route by which customers can purchase local goods at the lowest total cost |
US7870512B2 (en) | 2005-12-28 | 2011-01-11 | Sap Ag | User interface (UI) prototype using UI taxonomy |
US7801912B2 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2010-09-21 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for a searchable data service |
US8712828B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2014-04-29 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Churn prediction and management system |
US7831917B1 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2010-11-09 | Google Inc. | Method, system, and graphical user interface for identifying and communicating with meeting spots |
CN100481077C (en) | 2006-01-12 | 2009-04-22 | 国际商业机器公司 | Visual method and device for strengthening search result guide |
US20070168269A1 (en) | 2006-01-17 | 2007-07-19 | Kuo-Yu Chuo | Method for analyzing financial stock market trend |
US7657478B2 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2010-02-02 | Standard & Poor's Financial Services Llc | Method for estimating expected cash flow of an investment instrument |
US7634717B2 (en) | 2006-01-23 | 2009-12-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Multiple conditional formatting |
US8018322B2 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2011-09-13 | Oracle International Corporation | Graphical interface for RFID edge server |
US20070192281A1 (en) | 2006-02-02 | 2007-08-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods and apparatus for displaying real-time search trends in graphical search specification and result interfaces |
US20070185867A1 (en) | 2006-02-03 | 2007-08-09 | Matteo Maga | Statistical modeling methods for determining customer distribution by churn probability within a customer population |
US7818291B2 (en) | 2006-02-03 | 2010-10-19 | The General Electric Company | Data object access system and method using dedicated task object |
US8769127B2 (en) | 2006-02-10 | 2014-07-01 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Cross-domain solution (CDS) collaborate-access-browse (CAB) and assured file transfer (AFT) |
US7770100B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2010-08-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Dynamic thresholds for conditional formats |
WO2007100298A1 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2007-09-07 | Donya Research Ab | Creation and rendering of hierarchical digital multimedia data |
US7579965B2 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2009-08-25 | Andrew Bucholz | Vehicle data collection and processing system |
US20070208498A1 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2007-09-06 | Inrix, Inc. | Displaying road traffic condition information and user controls |
US7899611B2 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2011-03-01 | Inrix, Inc. | Detecting anomalous road traffic conditions |
US20080052142A1 (en) | 2006-03-13 | 2008-02-28 | Bailey Maurice G T | System and method for real-time display of emergencies, resources and personnel |
US7512578B2 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2009-03-31 | Emc Corporation | Smart containers |
DE602006002873D1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2008-11-06 | Research In Motion Ltd | A user interface method and apparatus for controlling the visual display of maps with selectable map elements in mobile communication devices |
WO2007117518A2 (en) | 2006-04-03 | 2007-10-18 | Secure64 Software Corporation | Method and system for data-structure management |
US8060391B2 (en) | 2006-04-07 | 2011-11-15 | The University Of Utah Research Foundation | Analogy based workflow identification |
US20070240062A1 (en) | 2006-04-07 | 2007-10-11 | Christena Jennifer Y | Method and System for Restricting User Operations in a Graphical User Inerface Window |
US7490298B2 (en) | 2006-04-12 | 2009-02-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Creating documentation screenshots on demand |
US8739278B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2014-05-27 | Oracle International Corporation | Techniques for fraud monitoring and detection using application fingerprinting |
US7853573B2 (en) | 2006-05-03 | 2010-12-14 | Oracle International Corporation | Efficient replication of XML data in a relational database management system |
US20070260582A1 (en) | 2006-05-05 | 2007-11-08 | Inetsoft Technology | Method and System for Visual Query Construction and Representation |
US7756843B1 (en) | 2006-05-25 | 2010-07-13 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Identifying and processing confidential information on network endpoints |
US9195985B2 (en) | 2006-06-08 | 2015-11-24 | Iii Holdings 1, Llc | Method, system, and computer program product for customer-level data verification |
US7657626B1 (en) | 2006-09-19 | 2010-02-02 | Enquisite, Inc. | Click fraud detection |
US7468662B2 (en) | 2006-06-16 | 2008-12-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for spatio-temporal event detection using composite definitions for camera systems |
US7720789B2 (en) | 2006-06-23 | 2010-05-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method of member unique names |
US20080010440A1 (en) | 2006-07-05 | 2008-01-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Means for supporting and tracking a large number of in-flight stores in an out-of-order processor |
US7933955B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2011-04-26 | Igor Khalatian | One-click universal screen sharing |
US8290943B2 (en) | 2006-07-14 | 2012-10-16 | Raytheon Company | Geographical information display system and method |
US7571109B2 (en) | 2006-07-14 | 2009-08-04 | Fawls Robert A | System and method for assessing operational process risk and quality by calculating operational value at risk |
US20080278311A1 (en) | 2006-08-10 | 2008-11-13 | Loma Linda University Medical Center | Advanced Emergency Geographical Information System |
US20130150004A1 (en) | 2006-08-11 | 2013-06-13 | Michael Rosen | Method and apparatus for reducing mobile phone usage while driving |
US20080040684A1 (en) | 2006-08-14 | 2008-02-14 | Richard Crump | Intelligent Pop-Up Window Method and Apparatus |
US7747562B2 (en) | 2006-08-15 | 2010-06-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Virtual multidimensional datasets for enterprise software systems |
US20080077597A1 (en) | 2006-08-24 | 2008-03-27 | Lance Butler | Systems and methods for photograph mapping |
US20080051989A1 (en) | 2006-08-25 | 2008-02-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Filtering of data layered on mapping applications |
US8230332B2 (en) | 2006-08-30 | 2012-07-24 | Compsci Resources, Llc | Interactive user interface for converting unstructured documents |
JP4778865B2 (en) | 2006-08-30 | 2011-09-21 | 株式会社ソニー・コンピュータエンタテインメント | Image viewer, image display method and program |
US7725547B2 (en) | 2006-09-06 | 2010-05-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Informing a user of gestures made by others out of the user's line of sight |
US8271429B2 (en) | 2006-09-11 | 2012-09-18 | Wiredset Llc | System and method for collecting and processing data |
US8054756B2 (en) | 2006-09-18 | 2011-11-08 | Yahoo! Inc. | Path discovery and analytics for network data |
US20080082486A1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Yahoo! Inc. | Platform for user discovery experience |
WO2008043082A2 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2008-04-10 | Splunk Inc. | Time series search engine |
US9183321B2 (en) | 2006-10-16 | 2015-11-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Managing compound XML documents in a repository |
US20080103798A1 (en) | 2006-10-25 | 2008-05-01 | Domenikos Steven D | Identity Protection |
US7698336B2 (en) | 2006-10-26 | 2010-04-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Associating geographic-related information with objects |
US20080148398A1 (en) | 2006-10-31 | 2008-06-19 | Derek John Mezack | System and Method for Definition and Automated Analysis of Computer Security Threat Models |
US7792353B2 (en) | 2006-10-31 | 2010-09-07 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Retraining a machine-learning classifier using re-labeled training samples |
US8943332B2 (en) | 2006-10-31 | 2015-01-27 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Audit-log integrity using redactable signatures |
US8229902B2 (en) | 2006-11-01 | 2012-07-24 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing storage of individually accessible data units |
US20080109714A1 (en) | 2006-11-03 | 2008-05-08 | Sap Ag | Capturing screen information |
US8027871B2 (en) | 2006-11-03 | 2011-09-27 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for scoring sales leads |
US7657497B2 (en) | 2006-11-07 | 2010-02-02 | Ebay Inc. | Online fraud prevention using genetic algorithm solution |
US7792868B2 (en) | 2006-11-10 | 2010-09-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Data object linking and browsing tool |
US7962495B2 (en) | 2006-11-20 | 2011-06-14 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Creating data in a data store using a dynamic ontology |
US7853614B2 (en) * | 2006-11-27 | 2010-12-14 | Rapleaf, Inc. | Hierarchical, traceable, and association reputation assessment of email domains |
US20080133310A1 (en) | 2006-12-01 | 2008-06-05 | Edward Kim | Methods and systems for forecasting product demand for slow moving products |
US8036632B1 (en) | 2007-02-02 | 2011-10-11 | Resource Consortium Limited | Access of information using a situational network |
US8126848B2 (en) | 2006-12-07 | 2012-02-28 | Robert Edward Wagner | Automated method for identifying and repairing logical data discrepancies between database replicas in a database cluster |
US8117022B2 (en) | 2006-12-07 | 2012-02-14 | Linker Sheldon O | Method and system for machine understanding, knowledge, and conversation |
US7680939B2 (en) | 2006-12-20 | 2010-03-16 | Yahoo! Inc. | Graphical user interface to manipulate syndication data feeds |
US7809703B2 (en) | 2006-12-22 | 2010-10-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Usage of development context in search operations |
US8290838B1 (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2012-10-16 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Indicating irregularities in online financial transactions |
US20080162616A1 (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2008-07-03 | Sap Ag | Skip relation pattern for graph structures |
US8799871B2 (en) | 2007-01-08 | 2014-08-05 | The Mathworks, Inc. | Computation of elementwise expression in parallel |
US20080177782A1 (en) | 2007-01-10 | 2008-07-24 | Pado Metaware Ab | Method and system for facilitating the production of documents |
US7900142B2 (en) | 2007-01-15 | 2011-03-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Selective undo of editing operations performed on data objects |
US10621203B2 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2020-04-14 | Information Resources, Inc. | Cross-category view of a dataset using an analytic platform |
US8171418B2 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2012-05-01 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Method and system for presenting a visual representation of the portion of the sets of data that a query is expected to return |
US8368695B2 (en) | 2007-02-08 | 2013-02-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Transforming offline maps into interactive online maps |
CN101246486B (en) | 2007-02-13 | 2012-02-01 | 国际商业机器公司 | Method and apparatus for improved process of expressions |
US7920963B2 (en) | 2007-02-22 | 2011-04-05 | Iac Search & Media, Inc. | Map interface with a movable marker |
US7873557B2 (en) | 2007-02-28 | 2011-01-18 | Aaron Guidotti | Information, document, and compliance management for financial professionals, clients, and supervisors |
US20080208820A1 (en) | 2007-02-28 | 2008-08-28 | Psydex Corporation | Systems and methods for performing semantic analysis of information over time and space |
US7689624B2 (en) | 2007-03-01 | 2010-03-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Graph-based search leveraging sentiment analysis of user comments |
US8352881B2 (en) | 2007-03-08 | 2013-01-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, apparatus and program storage device for providing customizable, immediate and radiating menus for accessing applications and actions |
US8180717B2 (en) | 2007-03-20 | 2012-05-15 | President And Fellows Of Harvard College | System for estimating a distribution of message content categories in source data |
JP5268274B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2013-08-21 | キヤノン株式会社 | Search device, method, and program |
US8036971B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2011-10-11 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Generating dynamic date sets that represent market conditions |
US20080243799A1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2008-10-02 | Innography, Inc. | System and method of generating a set of search results |
US8229458B2 (en) | 2007-04-08 | 2012-07-24 | Enhanced Geographic Llc | Systems and methods to determine the name of a location visited by a user of a wireless device |
US20080255973A1 (en) | 2007-04-10 | 2008-10-16 | Robert El Wade | Sales transaction analysis tool and associated method of use |
US8959448B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2015-02-17 | Emd Millipore Corporation | Graphical user interface for analysis and comparison of location-specific multiparameter data sets |
US20090164387A1 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2009-06-25 | Semandex Networks Inc. | Systems and methods for providing semantically enhanced financial information |
US8312546B2 (en) | 2007-04-23 | 2012-11-13 | Mcafee, Inc. | Systems, apparatus, and methods for detecting malware |
US20080267107A1 (en) | 2007-04-27 | 2008-10-30 | Outland Research, Llc | Attraction wait-time inquiry apparatus, system and method |
US20090024915A1 (en) | 2007-04-27 | 2009-01-22 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Web based application constructor using objects as pages |
US7880921B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2011-02-01 | Michael Joseph Dattilo | Method and apparatus to digitally whiteout mistakes on a printed form |
DE102008010419A1 (en) | 2007-05-03 | 2008-11-13 | Navigon Ag | Apparatus and method for creating a text object |
US7962904B2 (en) | 2007-05-10 | 2011-06-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Dynamic parser |
US8090603B2 (en) | 2007-05-11 | 2012-01-03 | Fansnap, Inc. | System and method for selecting event tickets |
US20080288471A1 (en) | 2007-05-18 | 2008-11-20 | Business Objects, S.A. | Apparatus and method for providing a data marketplace |
US8010507B2 (en) | 2007-05-24 | 2011-08-30 | Pado Metaware Ab | Method and system for harmonization of variants of a sequential file |
US8515207B2 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2013-08-20 | Google Inc. | Annotations in panoramic images, and applications thereof |
WO2009038822A2 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2009-03-26 | The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York | Spectral clustering for multi-type relational data |
US8739123B2 (en) | 2007-05-28 | 2014-05-27 | Google Inc. | Incorporating gadget functionality on webpages |
US7809785B2 (en) | 2007-05-28 | 2010-10-05 | Google Inc. | System using router in a web browser for inter-domain communication |
WO2008151098A1 (en) | 2007-05-30 | 2008-12-11 | Credit Suisse Securities (Usa) Llc | Simulating machine and method for determining sensitivity of a system output to changes in underlying system parameters |
US7840456B2 (en) | 2007-05-30 | 2010-11-23 | Intuit Inc. | System and method for categorizing credit card transaction data |
US20080301559A1 (en) | 2007-05-31 | 2008-12-04 | Microsoft Corporation | User Interface That Uses a Task Respository |
EP2012261A1 (en) | 2007-06-13 | 2009-01-07 | Sap Ag | Processing and exchanging data of collaborative tasks |
US7930547B2 (en) | 2007-06-15 | 2011-04-19 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | High accuracy bloom filter using partitioned hashing |
US20090006150A1 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2009-01-01 | Sap Ag | Coherent multi-dimensional business process model |
US8386996B2 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2013-02-26 | Sap Ag | Process extension wizard for coherent multi-dimensional business process models |
US7991672B2 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2011-08-02 | William Rory Crowder | System and method of visual illustration of stock market performance |
WO2009009623A1 (en) | 2007-07-09 | 2009-01-15 | Tailwalker Technologies, Inc. | Integrating a methodology management system with project tasks in a project management system |
US20090027418A1 (en) | 2007-07-24 | 2009-01-29 | Maru Nimit H | Map-based interfaces for storing and locating information about geographical areas |
US8234298B2 (en) | 2007-07-25 | 2012-07-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for determining driving factor in a data cube |
US8600872B1 (en) | 2007-07-27 | 2013-12-03 | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | System and method for detecting account compromises |
US8549520B2 (en) | 2007-07-31 | 2013-10-01 | Sap Ag | Distributed task handling |
US10762080B2 (en) | 2007-08-14 | 2020-09-01 | John Nicholas and Kristin Gross Trust | Temporal document sorter and method |
US20090055251A1 (en) | 2007-08-20 | 2009-02-26 | Weblistic, Inc., A California Corporation | Directed online advertising system and method |
US7761525B2 (en) * | 2007-08-23 | 2010-07-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for providing improved time references in documents |
US8631015B2 (en) | 2007-09-06 | 2014-01-14 | Linkedin Corporation | Detecting associates |
US20090083275A1 (en) | 2007-09-24 | 2009-03-26 | Nokia Corporation | Method, Apparatus and Computer Program Product for Performing a Visual Search Using Grid-Based Feature Organization |
US8494941B2 (en) | 2007-09-25 | 2013-07-23 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Feature-based similarity measure for market instruments |
EP2051173A3 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2009-08-12 | Magix Ag | System and method for dynamic content insertion from the internet into a multimedia work |
US20090088964A1 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Dave Schaaf | Map scrolling method and apparatus for navigation system for selectively displaying icons |
US8849728B2 (en) | 2007-10-01 | 2014-09-30 | Purdue Research Foundation | Visual analytics law enforcement tools |
US8484115B2 (en) | 2007-10-03 | 2013-07-09 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Object-oriented time series generator |
US20090138307A1 (en) | 2007-10-09 | 2009-05-28 | Babcock & Brown Lp, A Delaware Limited Partnership | Automated financial scenario modeling and analysis tool having an intelligent graphical user interface |
US8060421B1 (en) | 2007-10-17 | 2011-11-15 | The Mathworks, Inc. | Object oriented financial analysis tool |
US20090106308A1 (en) | 2007-10-18 | 2009-04-23 | Christopher Killian | Complexity estimation of data objects |
US8554719B2 (en) | 2007-10-18 | 2013-10-08 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Resolving database entity information |
JP2009099073A (en) | 2007-10-19 | 2009-05-07 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Document processing history management system, document processing history management device and program |
US8214308B2 (en) | 2007-10-23 | 2012-07-03 | Sas Institute Inc. | Computer-implemented systems and methods for updating predictive models |
US20090125369A1 (en) | 2007-10-26 | 2009-05-14 | Crowe Horwath Llp | System and method for analyzing and dispositioning money laundering suspicious activity alerts |
US20090112678A1 (en) | 2007-10-26 | 2009-04-30 | Ingram Micro Inc. | System and method for knowledge management |
US7650310B2 (en) | 2007-10-30 | 2010-01-19 | Intuit Inc. | Technique for reducing phishing |
US8510743B2 (en) | 2007-10-31 | 2013-08-13 | Google Inc. | Terminating computer applications |
US8140549B2 (en) | 2007-10-31 | 2012-03-20 | Juan Carlos Barinaga | Methods and arrangements of processing and presenting information |
US8200618B2 (en) | 2007-11-02 | 2012-06-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for analyzing data in a report |
EP2220457B1 (en) | 2007-11-09 | 2016-06-22 | TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. | Points-of-interest panning on a displayed map with a persistent search on a wireless phone |
US20090126020A1 (en) | 2007-11-09 | 2009-05-14 | Norton Richard Elliott | Engine for rule based content filtering |
US8626618B2 (en) | 2007-11-14 | 2014-01-07 | Panjiva, Inc. | Using non-public shipper records to facilitate rating an entity based on public records of supply transactions |
US9898767B2 (en) | 2007-11-14 | 2018-02-20 | Panjiva, Inc. | Transaction facilitating marketplace platform |
US8423425B2 (en) | 2007-11-14 | 2013-04-16 | Panjiva, Inc. | Evaluating public records of supply transactions for financial investment decisions |
US20090132953A1 (en) | 2007-11-16 | 2009-05-21 | Iac Search & Media, Inc. | User interface and method in local search system with vertical search results and an interactive map |
KR20090050577A (en) | 2007-11-16 | 2009-05-20 | 삼성전자주식회사 | User interface for displaying and playing multimedia contents and apparatus comprising the same and control method thereof |
US8145703B2 (en) | 2007-11-16 | 2012-03-27 | Iac Search & Media, Inc. | User interface and method in a local search system with related search results |
WO2009073637A2 (en) | 2007-11-29 | 2009-06-11 | Iqzone | Systems and methods for personal information management and contact picture synchronization and distribution |
US20090144262A1 (en) | 2007-12-04 | 2009-06-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Search query transformation using direct manipulation |
US20090150868A1 (en) | 2007-12-10 | 2009-06-11 | Al Chakra | Method and System for Capturing Movie Shots at the Time of an Automated Graphical User Interface Test Failure |
US8417715B1 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2013-04-09 | Tilmann Bruckhaus | Platform independent plug-in methods and systems for data mining and analytics |
US20090161147A1 (en) | 2007-12-20 | 2009-06-25 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Personal document container |
US8001482B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2011-08-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of displaying tab titles |
US8230333B2 (en) | 2007-12-26 | 2012-07-24 | Vistracks, Inc. | Analysis of time-based geospatial mashups using AD HOC visual queries |
US7865308B2 (en) | 2007-12-28 | 2011-01-04 | Yahoo! Inc. | User-generated activity maps |
US20090172674A1 (en) | 2007-12-28 | 2009-07-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing the computer collection of information in an information technology environment |
US8010886B2 (en) | 2008-01-04 | 2011-08-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Intelligently representing files in a view |
US8055633B2 (en) | 2008-01-21 | 2011-11-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and computer program product for duplicate detection |
KR100915295B1 (en) | 2008-01-22 | 2009-09-03 | 성균관대학교산학협력단 | System and method for search service having a function of automatic classification of search results |
US7877367B2 (en) | 2008-01-22 | 2011-01-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computer method and apparatus for graphical inquiry specification with progressive summary |
US8239245B2 (en) | 2008-01-22 | 2012-08-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for end-to-end retail store site optimization |
US8856182B2 (en) | 2008-01-25 | 2014-10-07 | Avaya Inc. | Report database dependency tracing through business intelligence metadata |
US20090193012A1 (en) | 2008-01-29 | 2009-07-30 | James Charles Williams | Inheritance in a Search Index |
US20090199047A1 (en) | 2008-01-31 | 2009-08-06 | Yahoo! Inc. | Executing software performance test jobs in a clustered system |
US20090199106A1 (en) | 2008-02-05 | 2009-08-06 | Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab | Communication terminal including graphical bookmark manager |
US7805457B1 (en) | 2008-02-14 | 2010-09-28 | Securus Technologies, Inc. | System and method for identifying members of a gang or security threat group |
WO2009115921A2 (en) | 2008-02-22 | 2009-09-24 | Ipath Technologies Private Limited | Techniques for enterprise resource mobilization |
US8606807B2 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2013-12-10 | Red Hat, Inc. | Integration of triple tags into a tagging tool and text browsing |
US20090222760A1 (en) | 2008-02-29 | 2009-09-03 | Halverson Steven G | Method, System and Computer Program Product for Automating the Selection and Ordering of Column Data in a Table for a User |
WO2009111581A1 (en) | 2008-03-04 | 2009-09-11 | Nextbio | Categorization and filtering of scientific data |
US8191766B2 (en) | 2008-03-04 | 2012-06-05 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Methods and systems for managing merchant identifiers |
US20090234720A1 (en) | 2008-03-15 | 2009-09-17 | Gridbyte | Method and System for Tracking and Coaching Service Professionals |
US9830366B2 (en) | 2008-03-22 | 2017-11-28 | Thomson Reuters Global Resources | Online analytic processing cube with time stamping |
US20110238495A1 (en) | 2008-03-24 | 2011-09-29 | Min Soo Kang | Keyword-advertisement method using meta-information related to digital contents and system thereof |
US9274923B2 (en) | 2008-03-25 | 2016-03-01 | Wind River Systems, Inc. | System and method for stack crawl testing and caching |
US8856088B2 (en) | 2008-04-01 | 2014-10-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Application-managed file versioning |
US20090254970A1 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2009-10-08 | Avaya Inc. | Multi-tier security event correlation and mitigation |
US20090292626A1 (en) | 2008-04-22 | 2009-11-26 | Oxford J Craig | System and method for interactive map, database, and social networking engine |
US8121962B2 (en) | 2008-04-25 | 2012-02-21 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Automated entity identification for efficient profiling in an event probability prediction system |
US20090282068A1 (en) | 2008-05-12 | 2009-11-12 | Shockro John J | Semantic packager |
US8620641B2 (en) | 2008-05-16 | 2013-12-31 | Blackberry Limited | Intelligent elision |
US20090307049A1 (en) | 2008-06-05 | 2009-12-10 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Soft Co-Clustering of Data |
US8301593B2 (en) | 2008-06-12 | 2012-10-30 | Gravic, Inc. | Mixed mode synchronous and asynchronous replication system |
US8412707B1 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2013-04-02 | Ustringer LLC | Method and apparatus for distributing content |
US8341163B2 (en) | 2008-06-17 | 2012-12-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Techniques for filter sharing |
US8860754B2 (en) | 2008-06-22 | 2014-10-14 | Tableau Software, Inc. | Methods and systems of automatically generating marks in a graphical view |
US8499287B2 (en) | 2008-06-23 | 2013-07-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Analysis of thread synchronization events |
US8301904B1 (en) | 2008-06-24 | 2012-10-30 | Mcafee, Inc. | System, method, and computer program product for automatically identifying potentially unwanted data as unwanted |
US7908521B2 (en) | 2008-06-25 | 2011-03-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Process reflection |
EP2308024A4 (en) | 2008-07-02 | 2016-03-30 | Pacific Knowledge Systems Pty Ltd | Method and system for generating text |
WO2010006334A1 (en) | 2008-07-11 | 2010-01-14 | Videosurf, Inc. | Apparatus and software system for and method of performing a visual-relevance-rank subsequent search |
US20100011282A1 (en) | 2008-07-11 | 2010-01-14 | iCyte Pty Ltd. | Annotation system and method |
US8301464B1 (en) | 2008-07-18 | 2012-10-30 | Cave Consulting Group, Inc. | Method and system for producing statistical analysis of medical care information |
US20110131082A1 (en) * | 2008-07-21 | 2011-06-02 | Michael Manser | System and method for tracking employee performance |
US8554709B2 (en) | 2008-08-04 | 2013-10-08 | Quid, Inc. | Entity performance analysis engines |
US8010545B2 (en) | 2008-08-28 | 2011-08-30 | Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated | System and method for providing a topic-directed search |
US20110078055A1 (en) | 2008-09-05 | 2011-03-31 | Claude Faribault | Methods and systems for facilitating selecting and/or purchasing of items |
US20100070426A1 (en) | 2008-09-15 | 2010-03-18 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Object modeling for exploring large data sets |
US8041714B2 (en) | 2008-09-15 | 2011-10-18 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Filter chains with associated views for exploring large data sets |
US8429194B2 (en) | 2008-09-15 | 2013-04-23 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Document-based workflows |
US20100070427A1 (en) | 2008-09-15 | 2010-03-18 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic indexing |
US20100070845A1 (en) | 2008-09-17 | 2010-03-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Shared web 2.0 annotations linked to content segments of web documents |
KR101495132B1 (en) | 2008-09-24 | 2015-02-25 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Mobile terminal and method for displaying data thereof |
CN101685449B (en) * | 2008-09-26 | 2012-07-11 | 国际商业机器公司 | Method and system for connecting tables in a plurality of heterogeneous distributed databases |
US8214361B1 (en) | 2008-09-30 | 2012-07-03 | Google Inc. | Organizing search results in a topic hierarchy |
US8108138B2 (en) | 2008-10-02 | 2012-01-31 | The Boeing Company | Optimal vehicle router with energy management system |
US8554579B2 (en) | 2008-10-13 | 2013-10-08 | Fht, Inc. | Management, reporting and benchmarking of medication preparation |
US20100114887A1 (en) | 2008-10-17 | 2010-05-06 | Google Inc. | Textual Disambiguation Using Social Connections |
US8391584B2 (en) | 2008-10-20 | 2013-03-05 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Method and system for duplicate check detection |
US8108933B2 (en) | 2008-10-21 | 2012-01-31 | Lookout, Inc. | System and method for attack and malware prevention |
US9032254B2 (en) | 2008-10-29 | 2015-05-12 | Aternity Information Systems Ltd. | Real time monitoring of computer for determining speed and energy consumption of various processes |
US8306947B2 (en) | 2008-10-30 | 2012-11-06 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Replication of operations on objects distributed in a storage system |
US7974943B2 (en) | 2008-10-30 | 2011-07-05 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Building a synchronized target database |
US8103962B2 (en) | 2008-11-04 | 2012-01-24 | Brigham Young University | Form-based ontology creation and information harvesting |
US20100131502A1 (en) | 2008-11-25 | 2010-05-27 | Fordham Bradley S | Cohort group generation and automatic updating |
US20100131457A1 (en) | 2008-11-26 | 2010-05-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Flattening multi-dimensional data sets into de-normalized form |
US8805861B2 (en) | 2008-12-09 | 2014-08-12 | Google Inc. | Methods and systems to train models to extract and integrate information from data sources |
US8204859B2 (en) | 2008-12-10 | 2012-06-19 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing replicated database data |
US8312038B2 (en) | 2008-12-18 | 2012-11-13 | Oracle International Corporation | Criteria builder for query builder |
US8762869B2 (en) | 2008-12-23 | 2014-06-24 | Intel Corporation | Reduced complexity user interface |
US8712453B2 (en) | 2008-12-23 | 2014-04-29 | Telecommunication Systems, Inc. | Login security with short messaging |
US8719350B2 (en) | 2008-12-23 | 2014-05-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Email addressee verification |
US20100169376A1 (en) | 2008-12-29 | 2010-07-01 | Yahoo! Inc. | Visual search engine for personal dating |
US10115153B2 (en) | 2008-12-31 | 2018-10-30 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Detection of compromise of merchants, ATMS, and networks |
US20100262688A1 (en) | 2009-01-21 | 2010-10-14 | Daniar Hussain | Systems, methods, and devices for detecting security vulnerabilities in ip networks |
US20100191563A1 (en) | 2009-01-23 | 2010-07-29 | Doctors' Administrative Solutions, Llc | Physician Practice Optimization Tracking |
US20110213655A1 (en) | 2009-01-24 | 2011-09-01 | Kontera Technologies, Inc. | Hybrid contextual advertising and related content analysis and display techniques |
US8745191B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-06-03 | Headwater Partners I Llc | System and method for providing user notifications |
US8601401B2 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2013-12-03 | Navico Holding As | Method, apparatus and computer program product for synchronizing cursor events |
US9357384B2 (en) | 2009-02-09 | 2016-05-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method to support identity theft protection as part of a distributed service oriented ecosystem |
US20100205108A1 (en) | 2009-02-11 | 2010-08-12 | Mun Johnathan C | Credit and market risk evaluation method |
US8073857B2 (en) | 2009-02-17 | 2011-12-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Semantics-based data transformation over a wire in mashups |
US20100223267A1 (en) * | 2009-02-27 | 2010-09-02 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Matching tools for use in attribute-based performance systems |
US9177264B2 (en) | 2009-03-06 | 2015-11-03 | Chiaramail, Corp. | Managing message categories in a network |
US8473454B2 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2013-06-25 | Xerox Corporation | System and method of on-demand document processing |
US20100235915A1 (en) | 2009-03-12 | 2010-09-16 | Nasir Memon | Using host symptoms, host roles, and/or host reputation for detection of host infection |
US8447722B1 (en) | 2009-03-25 | 2013-05-21 | Mcafee, Inc. | System and method for data mining and security policy management |
IL197961A0 (en) | 2009-04-05 | 2009-12-24 | Guy Shaked | Methods for effective processing of time series |
US9767427B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2017-09-19 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Modeling multi-dimensional sequence data over streams |
US8719249B2 (en) | 2009-05-12 | 2014-05-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Query classification |
US8484549B2 (en) | 2009-05-26 | 2013-07-09 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Visualizing data model sensitivity to variations in parameter values |
US20100306285A1 (en) | 2009-05-28 | 2010-12-02 | Arcsight, Inc. | Specifying a Parser Using a Properties File |
US8856691B2 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2014-10-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Gesture tool |
US8495151B2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2013-07-23 | Chandra Bodapati | Methods and systems for determining email addresses |
US9268761B2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2016-02-23 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | In-line dynamic text with variable formatting |
US20100313239A1 (en) | 2009-06-09 | 2010-12-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated access control for rendered output |
US20100321399A1 (en) | 2009-06-18 | 2010-12-23 | Patrik Ellren | Maps from Sparse Geospatial Data Tiles |
KR101076887B1 (en) | 2009-06-26 | 2011-10-25 | 주식회사 하이닉스반도체 | Method of fabricating landing plug in semiconductor device |
US8554742B2 (en) | 2009-07-06 | 2013-10-08 | Intelligent Medical Objects, Inc. | System and process for record duplication analysis |
WO2011015222A1 (en) | 2009-07-15 | 2011-02-10 | Proviciel - Mlstate | System and method for creating a parser generator and associated computer program |
EP2457180A4 (en) | 2009-07-20 | 2016-09-07 | Google Inc | Search result plusbox including restricted results |
US9104695B1 (en) | 2009-07-27 | 2015-08-11 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Geotagging structured data |
US8572084B2 (en) | 2009-07-28 | 2013-10-29 | Fti Consulting, Inc. | System and method for displaying relationships between electronically stored information to provide classification suggestions via nearest neighbor |
US8606804B2 (en) | 2009-08-05 | 2013-12-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Runtime-defined dynamic queries |
WO2011020101A2 (en) | 2009-08-14 | 2011-02-17 | Telogis, Inc. | Real time map rendering with data clustering and expansion and overlay |
US8560548B2 (en) | 2009-08-19 | 2013-10-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | System, method, and apparatus for multidimensional exploration of content items in a content store |
CN101996215B (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2013-07-24 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Information matching method and system applied to e-commerce website |
US8334773B2 (en) | 2009-08-28 | 2012-12-18 | Deal Magic, Inc. | Asset monitoring and tracking system |
JP5431235B2 (en) | 2009-08-28 | 2014-03-05 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Equipment condition monitoring method and apparatus |
US20110066933A1 (en) | 2009-09-02 | 2011-03-17 | Ludwig Lester F | Value-driven visualization primitives for spreadsheets, tabular data, and advanced spreadsheet visualization |
US10242540B2 (en) | 2009-09-02 | 2019-03-26 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Visualization for payment card transaction fraud analysis |
US9280777B2 (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2016-03-08 | Target Brands, Inc. | Operations dashboard |
US20110066497A1 (en) * | 2009-09-14 | 2011-03-17 | Choicestream, Inc. | Personalized advertising and recommendation |
US8214490B1 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2012-07-03 | Symantec Corporation | Compact input compensating reputation data tracking mechanism |
US8756489B2 (en) | 2009-09-17 | 2014-06-17 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Method and system for dynamic assembly of form fragments |
US20110074811A1 (en) | 2009-09-25 | 2011-03-31 | Apple Inc. | Map Layout for Print Production |
CN102549390B (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2015-06-24 | 录象射流技术公司 | Thermal ink jet ink composition |
US20110078173A1 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2011-03-31 | Avaya Inc. | Social Network User Interface |
US8595058B2 (en) | 2009-10-15 | 2013-11-26 | Visa U.S.A. | Systems and methods to match identifiers |
US8554699B2 (en) | 2009-10-20 | 2013-10-08 | Google Inc. | Method and system for detecting anomalies in time series data |
US9158816B2 (en) | 2009-10-21 | 2015-10-13 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Event processing with XML query based on reusable XML query template |
US8321360B2 (en) | 2009-10-22 | 2012-11-27 | Symantec Corporation | Method and system for weighting transactions in a fraud detection system |
US20110099048A1 (en) | 2009-10-23 | 2011-04-28 | Cadio, Inc. | Performing studies of consumer behavior determined using electronically-captured consumer location data |
CN102054015B (en) | 2009-10-28 | 2014-05-07 | 财团法人工业技术研究院 | System and method of organizing community intelligent information by using organic matter data model |
US20110112995A1 (en) | 2009-10-28 | 2011-05-12 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Systems and methods for organizing collective social intelligence information using an organic object data model |
US8312367B2 (en) | 2009-10-30 | 2012-11-13 | Synopsys, Inc. | Technique for dynamically sizing columns in a table |
US8417409B2 (en) | 2009-11-11 | 2013-04-09 | Google Inc. | Transit routing system for public transportation trip planning |
US9232040B2 (en) | 2009-11-13 | 2016-01-05 | Zoll Medical Corporation | Community-based response system |
US11122009B2 (en) | 2009-12-01 | 2021-09-14 | Apple Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying geographic locations of social media content collected over social networks |
US20110131130A1 (en) | 2009-12-01 | 2011-06-02 | Bank Of America Corporation | Integrated risk assessment and management system |
US20110131547A1 (en) | 2009-12-01 | 2011-06-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system defining and interchanging diagrams of graphical modeling languages |
US8645478B2 (en) | 2009-12-10 | 2014-02-04 | Mcafee, Inc. | System and method for monitoring social engineering in a computer network environment |
GB2476121A (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2011-06-15 | Colin Westlake | Linking interactions using a reference for an internet user's web session |
US20110153384A1 (en) | 2009-12-17 | 2011-06-23 | Matthew Donald Horne | Visual comps builder |
US8676597B2 (en) | 2009-12-28 | 2014-03-18 | General Electric Company | Methods and systems for mapping healthcare services analytics for volume and trends |
US8564596B2 (en) | 2010-01-12 | 2013-10-22 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Techniques for density mapping |
US8271461B2 (en) | 2010-01-18 | 2012-09-18 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Storing and managing information artifacts collected by information analysts using a computing device |
US9026552B2 (en) | 2010-01-18 | 2015-05-05 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | System and method for linking contact records to company locations |
US8290926B2 (en) | 2010-01-21 | 2012-10-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Scalable topical aggregation of data feeds |
US8683363B2 (en) | 2010-01-26 | 2014-03-25 | Apple Inc. | Device, method, and graphical user interface for managing user interface content and user interface elements |
US8291472B2 (en) | 2010-01-28 | 2012-10-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real-time adjustments to authentication conditions |
US20110208822A1 (en) * | 2010-02-22 | 2011-08-25 | Yogesh Chunilal Rathod | Method and system for customized, contextual, dynamic and unified communication, zero click advertisement and prospective customers search engine |
US20110208565A1 (en) | 2010-02-23 | 2011-08-25 | Michael Ross | complex process management |
US20110218934A1 (en) | 2010-03-03 | 2011-09-08 | Jeremy Elser | System and methods for comparing real properties for purchase and for generating heat maps to aid in identifying price anomalies of such real properties |
US8478709B2 (en) | 2010-03-08 | 2013-07-02 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Evaluation of client status for likelihood of churn |
US8863279B2 (en) | 2010-03-08 | 2014-10-14 | Raytheon Company | System and method for malware detection |
US8752054B2 (en) | 2010-03-11 | 2014-06-10 | Avaya Inc. | Intelligent merging of transactions based on a variety of criteria |
US20110225482A1 (en) | 2010-03-15 | 2011-09-15 | Wizpatent Pte Ltd | Managing and generating citations in scholarly work |
US20110231296A1 (en) | 2010-03-16 | 2011-09-22 | UberMedia, Inc. | Systems and methods for interacting with messages, authors, and followers |
US20110231305A1 (en) | 2010-03-19 | 2011-09-22 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Systems and Methods to Identify Spending Patterns |
US8577911B1 (en) | 2010-03-23 | 2013-11-05 | Google Inc. | Presenting search term refinements |
US8739118B2 (en) * | 2010-04-08 | 2014-05-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Pragmatic mapping specification, compilation and validation |
US8306846B2 (en) | 2010-04-12 | 2012-11-06 | First Data Corporation | Transaction location analytics systems and methods |
US20110251951A1 (en) | 2010-04-13 | 2011-10-13 | Dan Kolkowitz | Anti-fraud event correlation |
US8572023B2 (en) | 2010-04-14 | 2013-10-29 | Bank Of America Corporation | Data services framework workflow processing |
US8584124B2 (en) | 2010-04-20 | 2013-11-12 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Methods and systems for batch processing in an on-demand service environment |
US20110258216A1 (en) | 2010-04-20 | 2011-10-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Usability enhancements for bookmarks of browsers |
US8255399B2 (en) | 2010-04-28 | 2012-08-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Data classifier |
US8874432B2 (en) | 2010-04-28 | 2014-10-28 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | Systems and methods for semi-supervised relationship extraction |
US8489331B2 (en) | 2010-04-29 | 2013-07-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Destination maps user interface |
US8799812B2 (en) | 2010-04-29 | 2014-08-05 | Cheryl Parker | System and method for geographic based data visualization and extraction |
US8626770B2 (en) | 2010-05-03 | 2014-01-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Iceberg query evaluation implementing a compressed bitmap index |
US8473415B2 (en) | 2010-05-04 | 2013-06-25 | Kevin Paul Siegel | System and method for identifying a point of compromise in a payment transaction processing system |
US8595234B2 (en) | 2010-05-17 | 2013-11-26 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | Processing data feeds |
US20110289407A1 (en) | 2010-05-18 | 2011-11-24 | Naik Devang K | Font recommendation engine |
JP5161267B2 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2013-03-13 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Screen customization support system, screen customization support method, and screen customization support program |
US20110289397A1 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2011-11-24 | Mauricio Eastmond | Displaying Table Data in a Limited Display Area |
US8723679B2 (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2014-05-13 | Public Engines, Inc. | Systems and methods for transmitting alert messages relating to events that occur within a pre-defined area |
US20110295649A1 (en) | 2010-05-31 | 2011-12-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic churn prediction |
US8799867B1 (en) | 2010-06-08 | 2014-08-05 | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | Methods, systems, and articles of manufacture for synchronizing software verification flows |
US8756224B2 (en) | 2010-06-16 | 2014-06-17 | Rallyverse, Inc. | Methods, systems, and media for content ranking using real-time data |
US20110310005A1 (en) | 2010-06-17 | 2011-12-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for contactless gesture recognition |
US8380719B2 (en) | 2010-06-18 | 2013-02-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Semantic content searching |
US8352908B2 (en) | 2010-06-28 | 2013-01-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multi-modal conversion tool for form-type applications |
US8364642B1 (en) | 2010-07-07 | 2013-01-29 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Managing disconnected investigations |
US8489641B1 (en) | 2010-07-08 | 2013-07-16 | Google Inc. | Displaying layers of search results on a map |
WO2012004933A1 (en) | 2010-07-09 | 2012-01-12 | パナソニック株式会社 | Object mapping device, method of mapping object, program and recording medium |
US8407341B2 (en) | 2010-07-09 | 2013-03-26 | Bank Of America Corporation | Monitoring communications |
CA2707916C (en) | 2010-07-14 | 2015-12-01 | Ibm Canada Limited - Ibm Canada Limitee | Intelligent timesheet assistance |
US8935284B1 (en) * | 2010-07-15 | 2015-01-13 | Symantec Corporation | Systems and methods for associating website browsing behavior with a spam mailing list |
US20120019559A1 (en) | 2010-07-20 | 2012-01-26 | Siler Lucas C | Methods and Apparatus for Interactive Display of Images and Measurements |
US9298768B2 (en) | 2010-07-21 | 2016-03-29 | Sqream Technologies Ltd | System and method for the parallel execution of database queries over CPUs and multi core processors |
US8554653B2 (en) | 2010-07-22 | 2013-10-08 | Visa International Service Association | Systems and methods to identify payment accounts having business spending activities |
DE102010036906A1 (en) | 2010-08-06 | 2012-02-09 | Tavendo Gmbh | Configurable pie menu |
US20120036013A1 (en) | 2010-08-09 | 2012-02-09 | Brent Lee Neuhaus | System and method for determining a consumer's location code from payment transaction data |
US20120050293A1 (en) | 2010-08-25 | 2012-03-01 | Apple, Inc. | Dynamically smoothing a curve |
US8775530B2 (en) | 2010-08-25 | 2014-07-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Communication management method and system |
US20120066166A1 (en) | 2010-09-10 | 2012-03-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Predictive Analytics for Semi-Structured Case Oriented Processes |
US8661335B2 (en) | 2010-09-20 | 2014-02-25 | Blackberry Limited | Methods and systems for identifying content elements |
US9747270B2 (en) | 2011-01-07 | 2017-08-29 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Natural input for spreadsheet actions |
US20130218974A1 (en) * | 2010-09-21 | 2013-08-22 | Nokia Corporation | Method and apparatus for collaborative context recognition |
US20120078595A1 (en) | 2010-09-24 | 2012-03-29 | Nokia Corporation | Method and apparatus for ontology matching |
US20120084118A1 (en) | 2010-09-30 | 2012-04-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Sales predication for a new store based on on-site market survey data and high resolution geographical information |
US8549004B2 (en) | 2010-09-30 | 2013-10-01 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Estimation of unique database values |
US8463036B1 (en) | 2010-09-30 | 2013-06-11 | A9.Com, Inc. | Shape-based search of a collection of content |
EP2444134A1 (en) | 2010-10-19 | 2012-04-25 | Travian Games GmbH | Methods, server system and browser clients for providing a game map of a browser-based online multi-player game |
US8666861B2 (en) | 2010-10-21 | 2014-03-04 | Visa International Service Association | Software and methods for risk and fraud mitigation |
US8719252B2 (en) | 2010-10-22 | 2014-05-06 | Daniel Paul Miranker | Accessing relational databases as resource description framework databases |
US8781169B2 (en) | 2010-11-03 | 2014-07-15 | Endeavoring, Llc | Vehicle tracking and locating system |
US8316030B2 (en) | 2010-11-05 | 2012-11-20 | Nextgen Datacom, Inc. | Method and system for document classification or search using discrete words |
JP5706137B2 (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2015-04-22 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーションInternational Business Machines Corporation | Method and computer program for displaying a plurality of posts (groups of data) on a computer screen in real time along a plurality of axes |
US8543694B2 (en) | 2010-11-24 | 2013-09-24 | Logrhythm, Inc. | Scalable analytical processing of structured data |
SG190383A1 (en) | 2010-11-26 | 2013-06-28 | Agency Science Tech & Res | Method for creating a report from radiological images using electronic report templates |
US20120137235A1 (en) | 2010-11-29 | 2012-05-31 | Sabarish T S | Dynamic user interface generation |
US20120136804A1 (en) | 2010-11-30 | 2012-05-31 | Raymond J. Lucia, SR. | Wealth Management System and Method |
US8839133B2 (en) | 2010-12-02 | 2014-09-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Data visualizations including interactive time line representations |
CN102546446A (en) | 2010-12-13 | 2012-07-04 | 太仓市浏河镇亿网行网络技术服务部 | Email device |
US20120159449A1 (en) | 2010-12-15 | 2012-06-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Call Stack Inspection For A Thread Of Execution |
US9141405B2 (en) | 2010-12-15 | 2015-09-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | User interface construction |
US8676817B2 (en) | 2010-12-15 | 2014-03-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Rendering selected and unselected lists of an item set |
US8719166B2 (en) | 2010-12-16 | 2014-05-06 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Iterative processing of transaction information to detect fraud |
US9378294B2 (en) | 2010-12-17 | 2016-06-28 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Presenting source regions of rendered source web pages in target regions of target web pages |
US20120159399A1 (en) | 2010-12-17 | 2012-06-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for organizing and navigating data within a table |
US9881257B2 (en) | 2010-12-29 | 2018-01-30 | Tickr, Inc. | Multi-dimensional visualization of temporal information |
US20120173381A1 (en) | 2011-01-03 | 2012-07-05 | Stanley Benjamin Smith | Process and system for pricing and processing weighted data in a federated or subscription based data source |
US8510154B2 (en) | 2011-01-27 | 2013-08-13 | Leroy Robinson | Method and system for searching for, and monitoring assessment of, original content creators and the original content thereof |
US8437731B2 (en) | 2011-01-28 | 2013-05-07 | Don Reich | Emergency call analysis system |
US8447263B2 (en) | 2011-01-28 | 2013-05-21 | Don Reich | Emergency call analysis system |
IL211163A0 (en) | 2011-02-10 | 2011-04-28 | Univ Ben Gurion | A method for generating a randomized data structure for representing sets, based on bloom filters |
EP2678774A4 (en) | 2011-02-24 | 2015-04-08 | Lexisnexis Division Of Reed Elsevier Inc | Methods for electronic document searching and graphically representing electronic document searches |
US8682764B2 (en) | 2011-03-01 | 2014-03-25 | Early Warning Services, Llc | System and method for suspect entity detection and mitigation |
US20120246148A1 (en) | 2011-03-22 | 2012-09-27 | Intergraph Technologies Company | Contextual Display and Scrolling of Search Results in Graphical Environment |
EP2689384A1 (en) | 2011-03-23 | 2014-01-29 | Detica Patent Limited | An automated fraud detection method and system |
US9449010B2 (en) | 2011-04-02 | 2016-09-20 | Open Invention Network, Llc | System and method for managing sensitive data using intelligent mobile agents on a network |
US20120278249A1 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2012-11-01 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Generating an Identity Theft Score |
US8966486B2 (en) | 2011-05-03 | 2015-02-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Distributed multi-phase batch job processing |
US10185932B2 (en) | 2011-05-06 | 2019-01-22 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Setting permissions for links forwarded in electronic messages |
JP5516550B2 (en) | 2011-05-09 | 2014-06-11 | 株式会社デンソー | Vehicle navigation device |
US20130231862A1 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2013-09-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Customizable route planning |
EP3439267A1 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2019-02-06 | UC Group Limited | Systems and methods for managing chargeback requests |
US9104765B2 (en) | 2011-06-17 | 2015-08-11 | Robert Osann, Jr. | Automatic webpage characterization and search results annotation |
US9092482B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-07-28 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Fair scheduling for mixed-query loads |
US8640246B2 (en) | 2011-06-27 | 2014-01-28 | Raytheon Company | Distributed malware detection |
US8725307B2 (en) | 2011-06-28 | 2014-05-13 | Schneider Electric It Corporation | System and method for measurement aided prediction of temperature and airflow values in a data center |
US20130006725A1 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2013-01-03 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Tolling integration technology |
WO2013006341A1 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2013-01-10 | Truecar, Inc. | Method and system for selection, filtering or presentation of available sales outlets |
US9026944B2 (en) | 2011-07-14 | 2015-05-05 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Managing content through actions on context based menus |
US8982130B2 (en) | 2011-07-15 | 2015-03-17 | Green Charge Networks | Cluster mapping to highlight areas of electrical congestion |
US8751399B2 (en) | 2011-07-15 | 2014-06-10 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | Multi-channel data driven, real-time anti-money laundering system for electronic payment cards |
US8726379B1 (en) | 2011-07-15 | 2014-05-13 | Norse Corporation | Systems and methods for dynamic protection from electronic attacks |
US20130024268A1 (en) | 2011-07-22 | 2013-01-24 | Ebay Inc. | Incentivizing the linking of internet content to products for sale |
US8666919B2 (en) | 2011-07-29 | 2014-03-04 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Data quality management for profiling, linking, cleansing and migrating data |
US9280532B2 (en) | 2011-08-02 | 2016-03-08 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method for accessing rich objects via spreadsheets |
US9996807B2 (en) * | 2011-08-17 | 2018-06-12 | Roundhouse One Llc | Multidimensional digital platform for building integration and analysis |
US20130046635A1 (en) | 2011-08-19 | 2013-02-21 | Bank Of America Corporation | Triggering offers based on detected location of a mobile point of sale device |
EP2560134A1 (en) | 2011-08-19 | 2013-02-20 | Agor Services BVBA | A platform and method enabling collaboration between value chain partners |
US20130054551A1 (en) | 2011-08-24 | 2013-02-28 | Sap Ag | Global product database |
US8732574B2 (en) | 2011-08-25 | 2014-05-20 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method for parameterizing documents for automatic workflow generation |
GB201115083D0 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2011-10-19 | Data Connection Ltd | Identifying data items |
US8630892B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2014-01-14 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Churn analysis system |
US8533204B2 (en) | 2011-09-02 | 2013-09-10 | Xerox Corporation | Text-based searching of image data |
US10031646B2 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2018-07-24 | Mcafee, Llc | Computer system security dashboard |
US8949164B1 (en) | 2011-09-08 | 2015-02-03 | George O. Mohler | Event forecasting system |
US10140620B2 (en) | 2011-09-15 | 2018-11-27 | Stephan HEATH | Mobile device system and method providing combined delivery system using 3D geo-target location-based mobile commerce searching/purchases, discounts/coupons products, goods, and services, or service providers-geomapping-company/local and socially-conscious information/social networking (“PS-GM-C/LandSC/I-SN”) |
WO2013044141A2 (en) | 2011-09-22 | 2013-03-28 | Capgemini U.S. Llc | Process transformation and transitioning apparatuses, methods and systems |
CA2791350C (en) | 2011-09-26 | 2019-10-01 | Solacom Technologies Inc. | Answering or releasing emergency calls from a map display for an emergency services platform |
US8433702B1 (en) | 2011-09-28 | 2013-04-30 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Horizon histogram optimizations |
US8560494B1 (en) | 2011-09-30 | 2013-10-15 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Visual data importer |
US20130086482A1 (en) | 2011-09-30 | 2013-04-04 | Cbs Interactive, Inc. | Displaying plurality of content items in window |
WO2013052872A2 (en) | 2011-10-05 | 2013-04-11 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Nomination engine |
US20130097482A1 (en) | 2011-10-13 | 2013-04-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Search result entry truncation using pixel-based approximation |
US8849776B2 (en) | 2011-10-17 | 2014-09-30 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method and system for resolving data inconsistency |
US8626545B2 (en) * | 2011-10-17 | 2014-01-07 | CrowdFlower, Inc. | Predicting future performance of multiple workers on crowdsourcing tasks and selecting repeated crowdsourcing workers |
US20130101159A1 (en) | 2011-10-21 | 2013-04-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Image and video based pedestrian traffic estimation |
WO2013063088A2 (en) | 2011-10-26 | 2013-05-02 | Google Inc. | Indicating location status |
US8918424B2 (en) | 2011-10-31 | 2014-12-23 | Advanced Community Services | Managing homeowner association messages |
US9411797B2 (en) | 2011-10-31 | 2016-08-09 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Slicer elements for filtering tabular data |
US8843421B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2014-09-23 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Identification of entities likely to engage in a behavior |
US9053083B2 (en) | 2011-11-04 | 2015-06-09 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Interaction between web gadgets and spreadsheets |
US20130124193A1 (en) | 2011-11-15 | 2013-05-16 | Business Objects Software Limited | System and Method Implementing a Text Analysis Service |
US8498984B1 (en) | 2011-11-21 | 2013-07-30 | Google Inc. | Categorization of search results |
US9159024B2 (en) | 2011-12-07 | 2015-10-13 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | Real-time predictive intelligence platform |
CN103167093A (en) | 2011-12-08 | 2013-06-19 | 青岛海信移动通信技术股份有限公司 | Filling method of mobile phone email address |
US20130151305A1 (en) | 2011-12-09 | 2013-06-13 | Sap Ag | Method and Apparatus for Business Drivers and Outcomes to Enable Scenario Planning and Simulation |
US9026364B2 (en) | 2011-12-12 | 2015-05-05 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Place affinity estimation |
US20130151388A1 (en) | 2011-12-12 | 2013-06-13 | Visa International Service Association | Systems and methods to identify affluence levels of accounts |
US20130157234A1 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2013-06-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Storyline visualization |
US9026480B2 (en) | 2011-12-21 | 2015-05-05 | Telenav, Inc. | Navigation system with point of interest classification mechanism and method of operation thereof |
US20130166550A1 (en) | 2011-12-21 | 2013-06-27 | Sap Ag | Integration of Tags and Object Data |
US8880420B2 (en) | 2011-12-27 | 2014-11-04 | Grubhub, Inc. | Utility for creating heatmaps for the study of competitive advantage in the restaurant marketplace |
US9189556B2 (en) | 2012-01-06 | 2015-11-17 | Google Inc. | System and method for displaying information local to a selected area |
WO2013102892A1 (en) | 2012-01-06 | 2013-07-11 | Technologies Of Voice Interface Ltd | A system and method for generating personalized sensor-based activation of software |
US9116994B2 (en) | 2012-01-09 | 2015-08-25 | Brightedge Technologies, Inc. | Search engine optimization for category specific search results |
US8843431B2 (en) | 2012-01-16 | 2014-09-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Social network analysis for churn prediction |
US8909648B2 (en) | 2012-01-18 | 2014-12-09 | Technion Research & Development Foundation Limited | Methods and systems of supervised learning of semantic relatedness |
US20140143025A1 (en) * | 2012-02-21 | 2014-05-22 | Maritz Holdings Inc. | System and method for managing customer experience when purchasing a product or service |
US8965422B2 (en) | 2012-02-23 | 2015-02-24 | Blackberry Limited | Tagging instant message content for retrieval using mobile communication devices |
US20130226944A1 (en) * | 2012-02-24 | 2013-08-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Format independent data transformation |
EP2805224A4 (en) | 2012-02-24 | 2016-06-22 | Jerry Wolfe | System and method for providing flavor advisement and enhancement |
EP2820574A1 (en) | 2012-02-29 | 2015-01-07 | Google, Inc. | Interactive query completion templates |
US9378526B2 (en) | 2012-03-02 | 2016-06-28 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method for accessing data objects via remote references |
US20130232045A1 (en) | 2012-03-04 | 2013-09-05 | Oracle International Corporation | Automatic Detection Of Fraud And Error Using A Vector-Cluster Model |
US8620963B2 (en) | 2012-03-08 | 2013-12-31 | eBizprise Inc. | Large-scale data processing system, method, and non-transitory tangible machine-readable medium thereof |
JP2013191187A (en) | 2012-03-15 | 2013-09-26 | Fujitsu Ltd | Processing device, program and processing system |
US8787939B2 (en) | 2012-03-27 | 2014-07-22 | Facebook, Inc. | Dynamic geographic beacons for geographic-positioning-capable devices |
US10616782B2 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2020-04-07 | Mgage, Llc | Cross-channel user tracking systems, methods and devices |
US20130262328A1 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2013-10-03 | CSRSI, Inc. | System and method for automated data breach compliance |
US20130263019A1 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2013-10-03 | Maria G. Castellanos | Analyzing social media |
US8738665B2 (en) | 2012-04-02 | 2014-05-27 | Apple Inc. | Smart progress indicator |
US8983936B2 (en) | 2012-04-04 | 2015-03-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Incremental visualization for structured data in an enterprise-level data store |
US9071653B2 (en) | 2012-04-05 | 2015-06-30 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Reducing cellular network traffic |
US8792677B2 (en) | 2012-04-19 | 2014-07-29 | Intelligence Based Integrated Security Systems, Inc. | Large venue security method |
US9298856B2 (en) | 2012-04-23 | 2016-03-29 | Sap Se | Interactive data exploration and visualization tool |
US8798354B1 (en) | 2012-04-25 | 2014-08-05 | Intuit Inc. | Method and system for automatic correlation of check-based payments to customer accounts and/or invoices |
US9043710B2 (en) | 2012-04-26 | 2015-05-26 | Sap Se | Switch control in report generation |
US8742934B1 (en) | 2012-04-29 | 2014-06-03 | Intel-Based Solutions, LLC | System and method for facilitating the execution of law enforcement duties and enhancing anti-terrorism and counter-terrorism capabilities |
US10304036B2 (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2019-05-28 | Nasdaq, Inc. | Social media profiling for one or more authors using one or more social media platforms |
EP2662782A1 (en) | 2012-05-10 | 2013-11-13 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and system for storing data in a database |
US8788471B2 (en) | 2012-05-30 | 2014-07-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Matching transactions in multi-level records |
US20140032506A1 (en) | 2012-06-12 | 2014-01-30 | Quality Attributes Software, Inc. | System and methods for real-time detection, correction, and transformation of time series data |
US9032531B1 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2015-05-12 | Middlegate, Inc. | Identification breach detection |
US8966441B2 (en) | 2012-07-12 | 2015-02-24 | Oracle International Corporation | Dynamic scripts to extend static applications |
US8836788B2 (en) | 2012-08-06 | 2014-09-16 | Cloudparc, Inc. | Controlling use of parking spaces and restricted locations using multiple cameras |
US20140047319A1 (en) | 2012-08-13 | 2014-02-13 | Sap Ag | Context injection and extraction in xml documents based on common sparse templates |
US8554875B1 (en) | 2012-08-13 | 2013-10-08 | Ribbon Labs, Inc. | Communicating future locations in a social network |
US8645332B1 (en) * | 2012-08-20 | 2014-02-04 | Sap Ag | Systems and methods for capturing data refinement actions based on visualized search of information |
US10311062B2 (en) | 2012-08-21 | 2019-06-04 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Filtering structured data using inexact, culture-dependent terms |
US8676857B1 (en) | 2012-08-23 | 2014-03-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Context-based search for a data store related to a graph node |
US10163158B2 (en) | 2012-08-27 | 2018-12-25 | Yuh-Shen Song | Transactional monitoring system |
JP5904909B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2016-04-20 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Supplier search device and supplier search program |
US20140068487A1 (en) | 2012-09-05 | 2014-03-06 | Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. | Computer Implemented Methods For Visualizing Correlations Between Blood Glucose Data And Events And Apparatuses Thereof |
US9798768B2 (en) | 2012-09-10 | 2017-10-24 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Search around visual queries |
US20140074855A1 (en) | 2012-09-13 | 2014-03-13 | Verance Corporation | Multimedia content tags |
US20140081685A1 (en) | 2012-09-17 | 2014-03-20 | Salesforce.com. inc. | Computer implemented methods and apparatus for universal task management |
AU2013323618B2 (en) | 2012-09-25 | 2019-04-04 | Mx Technologies Inc. | Aggregation source routing |
US20140095273A1 (en) | 2012-09-28 | 2014-04-03 | Catalina Marketing Corporation | Basket aggregator and locator |
US20140095509A1 (en) | 2012-10-02 | 2014-04-03 | Banjo, Inc. | Method of tagging content lacking geotags with a location |
US9501208B2 (en) | 2012-10-08 | 2016-11-22 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for managing process control configuration |
US9104786B2 (en) | 2012-10-12 | 2015-08-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Iterative refinement of cohorts using visual exploration and data analytics |
US8688573B1 (en) | 2012-10-16 | 2014-04-01 | Intuit Inc. | Method and system for identifying a merchant payee associated with a cash transaction |
US20140108068A1 (en) | 2012-10-17 | 2014-04-17 | Jonathan A. Williams | System and Method for Scheduling Tee Time |
US9348677B2 (en) | 2012-10-22 | 2016-05-24 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for batch evaluation programs |
US9471370B2 (en) | 2012-10-22 | 2016-10-18 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method for stack-based batch evaluation of program instructions |
US8914886B2 (en) | 2012-10-29 | 2014-12-16 | Mcafee, Inc. | Dynamic quarantining for malware detection |
US9501761B2 (en) | 2012-11-05 | 2016-11-22 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method for sharing investigation results |
US9501799B2 (en) | 2012-11-08 | 2016-11-22 | Hartford Fire Insurance Company | System and method for determination of insurance classification of entities |
US9378030B2 (en) | 2013-10-01 | 2016-06-28 | Aetherpal, Inc. | Method and apparatus for interactive mobile device guidance |
US10504127B2 (en) | 2012-11-15 | 2019-12-10 | Home Depot Product Authority, Llc | System and method for classifying relevant competitors |
US20140143009A1 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2014-05-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Risk reward estimation for company-country pairs |
US9146969B2 (en) | 2012-11-26 | 2015-09-29 | The Boeing Company | System and method of reduction of irrelevant information during search |
US20140156527A1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2014-06-05 | Bank Of America Corporation | Pre-payment authorization categorization |
US20140157172A1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2014-06-05 | Drillmap | Geographic layout of petroleum drilling data and methods for processing data |
US10672008B2 (en) | 2012-12-06 | 2020-06-02 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for data analytics |
US9497289B2 (en) | 2012-12-07 | 2016-11-15 | Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. | System and method for social message classification based on influence |
US10108668B2 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2018-10-23 | Sap Se | Column smart mechanism for column based database |
US9195506B2 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2015-11-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Processor provisioning by a middleware processing system for a plurality of logical processor partitions |
US9294576B2 (en) | 2013-01-02 | 2016-03-22 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Social media impact assessment |
US20140195515A1 (en) | 2013-01-10 | 2014-07-10 | I3 Analytics | Methods and systems for querying and displaying data using interactive three-dimensional representations |
US8639552B1 (en) * | 2013-01-24 | 2014-01-28 | Broadvision, Inc. | Systems and methods for creating and sharing tasks |
US9805407B2 (en) | 2013-01-25 | 2017-10-31 | Illumina, Inc. | Methods and systems for using a cloud computing environment to configure and sell a biological sample preparation cartridge and share related data |
US9892026B2 (en) | 2013-02-01 | 2018-02-13 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Data records selection |
US20140222521A1 (en) | 2013-02-07 | 2014-08-07 | Ibms, Llc | Intelligent management and compliance verification in distributed work flow environments |
US20140222793A1 (en) | 2013-02-07 | 2014-08-07 | Parlance Corporation | System and Method for Automatically Importing, Refreshing, Maintaining, and Merging Contact Sets |
US9264393B2 (en) | 2013-02-13 | 2016-02-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Mail server-based dynamic workflow management |
US8744890B1 (en) | 2013-02-14 | 2014-06-03 | Aktana, Inc. | System and method for managing system-level workflow strategy and individual workflow activity |
US20140244388A1 (en) | 2013-02-28 | 2014-08-28 | MetroStar Systems, Inc. | Social Content Synchronization |
US8763078B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2014-06-24 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method for monitoring authentication attempts |
US10140664B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-11-27 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Resolving similar entities from a transaction database |
US9367463B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-06-14 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | System and method utilizing a shared cache to provide zero copy memory mapped database |
US9740369B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-08-22 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a tagging interface for external content |
US8917274B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-12-23 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Event matrix based on integrated data |
GB2513721A (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-11-05 | Palantir Technologies Inc | Computer-implemented systems and methods for comparing and associating objects |
US8924388B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-12-30 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Computer-implemented systems and methods for comparing and associating objects |
US8818892B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-08-26 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Prioritizing data clusters with customizable scoring strategies |
US8909656B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-12-09 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Filter chains with associated multipath views for exploring large data sets |
US8903717B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-12-02 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Method and system for generating a parser and parsing complex data |
US8855999B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-10-07 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Method and system for generating a parser and parsing complex data |
US9501202B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-11-22 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Computer graphical user interface with genomic workflow |
GB2513720A (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-11-05 | Palantir Technologies Inc | Computer-implemented systems and methods for comparing and associating objects |
US8868486B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-10-21 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Time-sensitive cube |
US9898167B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-02-20 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a tagging interface for external content |
US8937619B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-01-20 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Generating an object time series from data objects |
US9372929B2 (en) | 2013-03-20 | 2016-06-21 | Securboration, Inc. | Methods and systems for node and link identification |
US20140310266A1 (en) | 2013-04-10 | 2014-10-16 | Google Inc. | Systems and Methods for Suggesting Places for Persons to Meet |
GB2516155B (en) | 2013-05-07 | 2017-01-18 | Palantir Technologies Inc | Interactive geospatial map |
US8799799B1 (en) | 2013-05-07 | 2014-08-05 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Interactive geospatial map |
US20140358789A1 (en) | 2013-05-30 | 2014-12-04 | B. Scott Boding | Acquirer facing fraud management system and method |
US9576248B2 (en) | 2013-06-01 | 2017-02-21 | Adam M. Hurwitz | Record linkage sharing using labeled comparison vectors and a machine learning domain classification trainer |
GB2517582A (en) | 2013-07-05 | 2015-02-25 | Palantir Technologies Inc | Data quality monitors |
US8601326B1 (en) | 2013-07-05 | 2013-12-03 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Data quality monitors |
US20150019394A1 (en) | 2013-07-11 | 2015-01-15 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Merchant information correction through transaction history or detail |
US8620790B2 (en) | 2013-07-11 | 2013-12-31 | Scvngr | Systems and methods for dynamic transaction-payment routing |
US9565152B2 (en) | 2013-08-08 | 2017-02-07 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Cable reader labeling |
GB2518745A (en) | 2013-08-08 | 2015-04-01 | Palantir Technologies Inc | Template system for custom document generation |
US9223773B2 (en) | 2013-08-08 | 2015-12-29 | Palatir Technologies Inc. | Template system for custom document generation |
US9335897B2 (en) | 2013-08-08 | 2016-05-10 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Long click display of a context menu |
US9477372B2 (en) | 2013-08-08 | 2016-10-25 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Cable reader snippets and postboard |
US8713467B1 (en) | 2013-08-09 | 2014-04-29 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Context-sensitive views |
US8689108B1 (en) | 2013-09-24 | 2014-04-01 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Presentation and analysis of user interaction data |
US9785317B2 (en) | 2013-09-24 | 2017-10-10 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Presentation and analysis of user interaction data |
US8938686B1 (en) | 2013-10-03 | 2015-01-20 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing performance of an entity |
US8812960B1 (en) | 2013-10-07 | 2014-08-19 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Cohort-based presentation of user interaction data |
US9116975B2 (en) | 2013-10-18 | 2015-08-25 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for dynamic and interactive simultaneous querying of multiple data stores |
US9792194B2 (en) | 2013-10-18 | 2017-10-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Performance regression manager for large scale systems |
US8924872B1 (en) | 2013-10-18 | 2014-12-30 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Overview user interface of emergency call data of a law enforcement agency |
US8786605B1 (en) | 2013-10-24 | 2014-07-22 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for distance and congestion-aware resource deployment |
US9021384B1 (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2015-04-28 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Interactive vehicle information map |
US8832594B1 (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2014-09-09 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Space-optimized display of multi-column tables with selective text truncation based on a combined text width |
US8868537B1 (en) | 2013-11-11 | 2014-10-21 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Simple web search |
US9235638B2 (en) | 2013-11-12 | 2016-01-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Document retrieval using internal dictionary-hierarchies to adjust per-subject match results |
US10586234B2 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2020-03-10 | Mastercard International Incorporated | System and method for detecting fraudulent network events |
US9356937B2 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2016-05-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Disambiguating conflicting content filter rules |
US20150161611A1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2015-06-11 | Sas Institute Inc. | Systems and Methods for Self-Similarity Measure |
US9105000B1 (en) | 2013-12-10 | 2015-08-11 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Aggregating data from a plurality of data sources |
EP2884441A1 (en) | 2013-12-16 | 2015-06-17 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Methods and systems for analyzing entity performance |
US9727622B2 (en) | 2013-12-16 | 2017-08-08 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Methods and systems for analyzing entity performance |
US20150178825A1 (en) | 2013-12-23 | 2015-06-25 | Citibank, N.A. | Methods and Apparatus for Quantitative Assessment of Behavior in Financial Entities and Transactions |
US10356032B2 (en) | 2013-12-26 | 2019-07-16 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for detecting confidential information emails |
US20150186821A1 (en) | 2014-01-02 | 2015-07-02 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Computer-implemented methods and systems for analyzing healthcare data |
US8832832B1 (en) | 2014-01-03 | 2014-09-09 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | IP reputation |
US9043696B1 (en) | 2014-01-03 | 2015-05-26 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for visual definition of data associations |
US9483162B2 (en) | 2014-02-20 | 2016-11-01 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Relationship visualizations |
US9009827B1 (en) | 2014-02-20 | 2015-04-14 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Security sharing system |
US8924429B1 (en) | 2014-03-18 | 2014-12-30 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Determining and extracting changed data from a data source |
US9971771B2 (en) | 2014-03-29 | 2018-05-15 | Camelot Uk Bidco Limited | Method, system and software for searching, identifying, retrieving and presenting electronic documents |
US9857958B2 (en) | 2014-04-28 | 2018-01-02 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for dynamic and interactive access of, investigation of, and analysis of data objects stored in one or more databases |
US9009171B1 (en) | 2014-05-02 | 2015-04-14 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Systems and methods for active column filtering |
US20150324868A1 (en) | 2014-05-12 | 2015-11-12 | Quixey, Inc. | Query Categorizer |
US9129219B1 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2015-09-08 | Palantir Technologies, Inc. | Crime risk forecasting |
US9021260B1 (en) | 2014-07-03 | 2015-04-28 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Malware data item analysis |
US9256664B2 (en) | 2014-07-03 | 2016-02-09 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for news events detection and visualization |
US20160026923A1 (en) | 2014-07-22 | 2016-01-28 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | System and method for determining a propensity of entity to take a specified action |
US9043894B1 (en) | 2014-11-06 | 2015-05-26 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Malicious software detection in a computing system |
-
2014
- 2014-06-13 US US14/304,741 patent/US9105000B1/en active Active
-
2015
- 2015-08-03 US US14/816,599 patent/US10198515B1/en active Active
-
2018
- 2018-10-29 US US16/173,408 patent/US11138279B1/en active Active
-
2021
- 2021-10-04 US US17/493,205 patent/US20220027426A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050099288A1 (en) * | 2002-04-18 | 2005-05-12 | Computer Associates Think, Inc | Integrated visualization of security information for an individual |
US20070094716A1 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2007-04-26 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Unified network and physical premises access control server |
US20100125911A1 (en) * | 2008-11-17 | 2010-05-20 | Prakash Bhaskaran | Risk Scoring Based On Endpoint User Activities |
US20140282877A1 (en) * | 2013-03-13 | 2014-09-18 | Lookout, Inc. | System and method for changing security behavior of a device based on proximity to another device |
US9432361B2 (en) * | 2013-03-13 | 2016-08-30 | Lookout, Inc. | System and method for changing security behavior of a device based on proximity to another device |
US10719799B1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2020-07-21 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Virtual management systems and methods |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US11138279B1 (en) | 2021-10-05 |
US10198515B1 (en) | 2019-02-05 |
US9105000B1 (en) | 2015-08-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20220027426A1 (en) | System and method for aggregating data from a plurality of data sources | |
US11675484B2 (en) | Integrated data authentication system with an interactive user interface | |
US10970114B2 (en) | Systems and methods for task scheduling | |
US10552994B2 (en) | Systems and interactive user interfaces for dynamic retrieval, analysis, and triage of data items | |
US20160275436A1 (en) | Integrated resource tracking system | |
US20120029977A1 (en) | Self-Extending Monitoring Models that Learn Based on Arrival of New Data | |
US9691105B2 (en) | Analyzing calendar to generate financial information | |
US10043156B2 (en) | System and method for cross enterprise collaboration | |
US20060136461A1 (en) | Method and system for data quality management | |
US10915638B2 (en) | Electronic security evaluator | |
US11249958B2 (en) | Issue tracking systems and methods | |
US11537496B2 (en) | Audit logging database system and user interface | |
US11526604B2 (en) | System for event detection, data integration, and data visualization | |
US20220350806A1 (en) | System and method for implementing a reporting engine framework | |
US20070271157A1 (en) | Method and system for providing a transaction browser | |
US11797339B2 (en) | Systems and methods for maintaining data objects to manage asynchronous workflows | |
US9569416B1 (en) | Structured and unstructured data annotations to user interfaces and data objects | |
US20190347838A1 (en) | Passing system with an interactive user interface | |
Tsai et al. | Designing a framework for data quality validation of meteorological data system | |
US11663613B2 (en) | Approaches for analyzing entity relationships | |
US10810640B1 (en) | Automated time tracking of events in a calendar and use of the same to generate invoices | |
Rodríguez et al. | Computing Uncertain Key Indicators from Uncertain Data. | |
US11816112B1 (en) | Systems and methods for automated process discovery | |
US11632442B2 (en) | Interactive production alerts dashboard | |
US20220382580A1 (en) | System and method for digital automation governance |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC., COLORADO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WHITE, NICHOLAS;BINGHAM, ELI;URAL, ENGIN;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20140612 TO 20140707;REEL/FRAME:057695/0434 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., NORTH CAROLINA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.;REEL/FRAME:060572/0506 Effective date: 20220701 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO PAY ISSUE FEE |