US20190139909A1 - Physical Unclonable Functions in Integrated Circuit Chip Packaging for Security - Google Patents
Physical Unclonable Functions in Integrated Circuit Chip Packaging for Security Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20190139909A1 US20190139909A1 US15/808,573 US201715808573A US2019139909A1 US 20190139909 A1 US20190139909 A1 US 20190139909A1 US 201715808573 A US201715808573 A US 201715808573A US 2019139909 A1 US2019139909 A1 US 2019139909A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- magnetized particles
- integrated circuit
- circuit chip
- particles
- substrate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L23/00—Details of semiconductor or other solid state devices
- H01L23/57—Protection from inspection, reverse engineering or tampering
- H01L23/573—Protection from inspection, reverse engineering or tampering using passive means
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L23/00—Details of semiconductor or other solid state devices
- H01L23/57—Protection from inspection, reverse engineering or tampering
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L23/00—Details of semiconductor or other solid state devices
- H01L23/28—Encapsulations, e.g. encapsulating layers, coatings, e.g. for protection
- H01L23/29—Encapsulations, e.g. encapsulating layers, coatings, e.g. for protection characterised by the material, e.g. carbon
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L23/00—Details of semiconductor or other solid state devices
- H01L23/28—Encapsulations, e.g. encapsulating layers, coatings, e.g. for protection
- H01L23/29—Encapsulations, e.g. encapsulating layers, coatings, e.g. for protection characterised by the material, e.g. carbon
- H01L23/293—Organic, e.g. plastic
- H01L23/295—Organic, e.g. plastic containing a filler
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L23/00—Details of semiconductor or other solid state devices
- H01L23/28—Encapsulations, e.g. encapsulating layers, coatings, e.g. for protection
- H01L23/31—Encapsulations, e.g. encapsulating layers, coatings, e.g. for protection characterised by the arrangement or shape
- H01L23/3107—Encapsulations, e.g. encapsulating layers, coatings, e.g. for protection characterised by the arrangement or shape the device being completely enclosed
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L23/00—Details of semiconductor or other solid state devices
- H01L23/28—Encapsulations, e.g. encapsulating layers, coatings, e.g. for protection
- H01L23/31—Encapsulations, e.g. encapsulating layers, coatings, e.g. for protection characterised by the arrangement or shape
- H01L23/3107—Encapsulations, e.g. encapsulating layers, coatings, e.g. for protection characterised by the arrangement or shape the device being completely enclosed
- H01L23/3135—Double encapsulation or coating and encapsulation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L23/00—Details of semiconductor or other solid state devices
- H01L23/544—Marks applied to semiconductor devices or parts, e.g. registration marks, alignment structures, wafer maps
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/32—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials
- H04L9/3271—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials using challenge-response
- H04L9/3278—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials using challenge-response using physically unclonable functions [PUF]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L2223/00—Details relating to semiconductor or other solid state devices covered by the group H01L23/00
- H01L2223/544—Marks applied to semiconductor devices or parts
- H01L2223/54433—Marks applied to semiconductor devices or parts containing identification or tracking information
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L2223/00—Details relating to semiconductor or other solid state devices covered by the group H01L23/00
- H01L2223/544—Marks applied to semiconductor devices or parts
- H01L2223/54473—Marks applied to semiconductor devices or parts for use after dicing
- H01L2223/54486—Located on package parts, e.g. encapsulation, leads, package substrate
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L2224/00—Indexing scheme for arrangements for connecting or disconnecting semiconductor or solid-state bodies and methods related thereto as covered by H01L24/00
- H01L2224/01—Means for bonding being attached to, or being formed on, the surface to be connected, e.g. chip-to-package, die-attach, "first-level" interconnects; Manufacturing methods related thereto
- H01L2224/02—Bonding areas; Manufacturing methods related thereto
- H01L2224/04—Structure, shape, material or disposition of the bonding areas prior to the connecting process
- H01L2224/04042—Bonding areas specifically adapted for wire connectors, e.g. wirebond pads
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L2224/00—Indexing scheme for arrangements for connecting or disconnecting semiconductor or solid-state bodies and methods related thereto as covered by H01L24/00
- H01L2224/01—Means for bonding being attached to, or being formed on, the surface to be connected, e.g. chip-to-package, die-attach, "first-level" interconnects; Manufacturing methods related thereto
- H01L2224/42—Wire connectors; Manufacturing methods related thereto
- H01L2224/47—Structure, shape, material or disposition of the wire connectors after the connecting process
- H01L2224/48—Structure, shape, material or disposition of the wire connectors after the connecting process of an individual wire connector
- H01L2224/481—Disposition
- H01L2224/48151—Connecting between a semiconductor or solid-state body and an item not being a semiconductor or solid-state body, e.g. chip-to-substrate, chip-to-passive
- H01L2224/48221—Connecting between a semiconductor or solid-state body and an item not being a semiconductor or solid-state body, e.g. chip-to-substrate, chip-to-passive the body and the item being stacked
- H01L2224/48245—Connecting between a semiconductor or solid-state body and an item not being a semiconductor or solid-state body, e.g. chip-to-substrate, chip-to-passive the body and the item being stacked the item being metallic
- H01L2224/48247—Connecting between a semiconductor or solid-state body and an item not being a semiconductor or solid-state body, e.g. chip-to-substrate, chip-to-passive the body and the item being stacked the item being metallic connecting the wire to a bond pad of the item
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L23/00—Details of semiconductor or other solid state devices
- H01L23/48—Arrangements for conducting electric current to or from the solid state body in operation, e.g. leads, terminal arrangements ; Selection of materials therefor
- H01L23/488—Arrangements for conducting electric current to or from the solid state body in operation, e.g. leads, terminal arrangements ; Selection of materials therefor consisting of soldered or bonded constructions
- H01L23/495—Lead-frames or other flat leads
- H01L23/49541—Geometry of the lead-frame
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L24/00—Arrangements for connecting or disconnecting semiconductor or solid-state bodies; Methods or apparatus related thereto
- H01L24/01—Means for bonding being attached to, or being formed on, the surface to be connected, e.g. chip-to-package, die-attach, "first-level" interconnects; Manufacturing methods related thereto
- H01L24/02—Bonding areas ; Manufacturing methods related thereto
- H01L24/04—Structure, shape, material or disposition of the bonding areas prior to the connecting process
- H01L24/06—Structure, shape, material or disposition of the bonding areas prior to the connecting process of a plurality of bonding areas
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L24/00—Arrangements for connecting or disconnecting semiconductor or solid-state bodies; Methods or apparatus related thereto
- H01L24/01—Means for bonding being attached to, or being formed on, the surface to be connected, e.g. chip-to-package, die-attach, "first-level" interconnects; Manufacturing methods related thereto
- H01L24/42—Wire connectors; Manufacturing methods related thereto
- H01L24/44—Structure, shape, material or disposition of the wire connectors prior to the connecting process
- H01L24/46—Structure, shape, material or disposition of the wire connectors prior to the connecting process of a plurality of wire connectors
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates generally to anti-counterfeit systems and more particularly to physical unclonable functions.
- ICCs Counterfeit integrated circuit chips
- Such counterfeit ICCs are impacting many industrial sectors, including computers, printing, telecommunications, automotive electronics, medical, banking, energy/smart-grid, aerospace, and military systems.
- the consequences can be dramatic when critical systems begin to fail or act maliciously due to the use of counterfeit or low-quality components causing minor, major, or mission failures, including health or safety concerns.
- NDAA National Defense Authorization Act
- Hardware intrinsic security is a mechanism that can provide security based on inherent properties of an electronic device.
- a physical unclonable function (“PUF”) belongs to the realm of hardware intrinsic security.
- counterfeit printer supplies including ICCs are a problem for consumers. Counterfeit supplies may perform poorly and may damage printers. Printer manufacturers use authentication systems to deter counterfeiters. PUFs are a type of authentication system that implements a physical one-way function. Ideally, a PUF cannot be identically replicated and thus is difficult to counterfeit. Incorporating a PUF in electronic device packaging, including ICCs, deters counterfeiters.
- magnetic field characteristics of randomly placed magnetized particles are exploited by using the magnetic field fluctuations produced by the particles as measured by a sensor, such as a Hall-effect sensor, or an array of such sensors.
- the invention consists of an ICC encased in or over-molded by a substrate that contains magnetic particles.
- the magnetized particles generate a complex magnetic field near the surface of the ICC that can be used as a “fingerprint.”
- the positioning and orientation of the magnetized particles is an uncontrolled process, and thus the interaction between the sensor and the particles is complex. Thus, it is difficult to duplicate the device such that the same magnetic pattern and particle physical location pattern will arise.
- the randomness of the magnetic field magnitude and direction near the surface of the material containing the magnetic particles can be used to obtain a unique identifier for an item such as an integrated circuit chip carrying the PUF. Further, the placement of the device in the top layer of an integrated circuit chip protects the underlying circuits from being inspected by an attacker, e.g., for reverse engineering. When a counterfeiter attempts to remove all or a portion of the coating, the magnetic field distribution must change, thus destroying the original unique identifier.
- the invention in one form thereof, is directed to an integrated circuit chip overlain or encapsulated by a PUF comprising randomly placed magnetic particles.
- the invention in another form thereof, is directed to an integrated circuit chip used in a printer or printer supply component, such as a toner cartridge, that is overlain or encapsulated by a PUF comprising randomly placed magnetic particles.
- the invention in yet another form thereof, is directed to an EMV (Europay, Mastercard, Visa) transaction chip or embedded microchip on a bank card overlain by a PUF comprising randomly placed magnetic particles.
- EMV Europay, Mastercard, Visa
- the invention in yet another form thereof, is directed to an apparatus having an EMV transaction chip mounted on substrate that forms the body of a bank card, where a plurality of magnetized particles are dispersed in the substrate to form a PUF.
- FIG. 1 is a view of an integrated chip.
- FIG. 2 is a view of an integrated chip with magnetized particles molded into the housing.
- FIG. 3 is a view of an integrated chip with an array of sensors formed above the chip with magnetized particles molded into the housing.
- FIG. 4 is an orthogonal view of a substrate containing magnetic and non-magnetic particles.
- FIG. 5 is a side view of a PUF and PUF readers.
- FIG. 6 is a view of the front of a bank card with an EMV transaction chip.
- FIG. 7 is a view of the back of a bank card with a magnetic strip.
- FIG. 8 is a bank card chip reader device.
- FIG. 9 is an end view of the bank card chip reader device.
- FIG. 10 is a flowchart of a method of making a secure device.
- FIG. 11 is a magnetic field profile along a defined path.
- FIGS. 12 a , 12 b , and 12 c are three-dimensional representations of the magnetic flux density measured across the area resolved into three coordinate components, B x , B y , and B z .
- an ICC 1001 when manufactured, it is typically packaged by being attached to a metal lead frame 1008 that is connected to solder pads 1002 and 1003 by a wire bonds 1004 and 1005 , and then enclosed in an encapsulant 1006 which is then cured. The encapsulated chip is then molded into a plastic housing 1007 .
- the molded plastic housing 1007 is replaced with the molded plastic housing or substrate 2007 where dispersed in the substrate is a plurality of magnetized particles 4014 .
- the particles are distributed randomly such that it is extremely difficult to reproduce the exact distribution and alignment of particles.
- the particles are magnetized before dispersion in the substrate to add further randomness to the resulting magnetic field profile.
- the substrate 2007 and the particles 4014 form a physical unclonable function out of the molded plastic housing.
- the magnetic field profile near the surface of the ICC may be measured by an external magneto-resistive sensor (not shown), a Hall-effect sensor (not shown), or an array of such sensors, in close proximity to the top surface of the ICC. Since the sensing elements are typically around 0.3-0.5 mm below the surface of the sensing device, the average particle size diameter using Hall-effect sensor or magneto-resistive sensor is preferably greater than 0.1 mm. Note that the diameter of a non-spherical particle is the diameter of the smallest sphere that encloses the particle. Other sensor options include magneto-optical sensor technology, which is capable of working with smaller magnetic particle sizes, but is more costly to implement and subject to contamination problems.
- the magnetic field profile measurements may be taken within a defined area or along a defined path: straight, circular, or any arbitrarily selected and defined path, and recorded at the ICC foundry.
- FIG. 11 shows a magnetic field profile along a defined path where the magnetic flux density has been resolved into three coordinate components B x , B y , and B z .
- FIG. 12 shows a magnetic field profile measured over a rectangular area as would be exhibited by the defined area overlaying an ICC. The profile is a three-dimensional representation of the magnetic flux density measured across the area.
- the magnetic flux density vector has been resolved into three coordinate components, B x , B y , and B z , shown separately in FIGS. 12 a , 12 b , and 12 c .
- the magnetic field profile data would be signed by a private key and written to the ICC's non-volatile memory (“NVM”) during programming.
- NVM non-volatile memory
- the magnetic “fingerprint” is once again read by an external magneto-resistive sensor and the magnetic profile is compared to the values stored on the chip to authenticate the ICC.
- This system would make it very difficult for counterfeit ICCs to make their way into high value applications.
- the system would be fairly inexpensive to implement with almost instantaneous authentication of the PUF over-molded ICCs.
- the use of magnetized particles 4014 creates a unique magnetic fingerprint that can be applied to the manufacture of ICCs by over-molding the encapsulated chip 1001 with a substrate containing magnetized particles 2007 .
- the term “over-molded” is used here broadly to mean anything from adding a partial surface layer over the ICC to completely encasing the ICC.
- One or more sensors, such as a Hall-effect sensor 3001 is formed above the chip body and encased within the housing 2007 . In this embodiment, the sensor(s) 3001 can record a series of analog magnetic intensity readings, in various locations along the substrate, in one, two, or three coordinate directions.
- Such an “internal” Hall-effect sensor can measure average particle size diameters that are less than 0.1 mm. Since these measurements are analog voltages, with a sufficient number of measurements and sufficient analog to digital resolution, unique values can be derived from the measurements. These values can be used for private keys, seeds, etc. which are not stored in the device's memory. Instead, they are read and derived by the device “in flight” (i.e., during operation), thus rendering ineffective any probing attacks by counterfeiters on the chip itself. If a counterfeiter were to attempt to extract the private key from the ICC, it is highly probable that the over-molded magnetic layer will be disturbed and the private key would be lost.
- inventions may, for example, be implemented on an integrated circuit chip on a printer or printer supply component, such as a toner cartridge, that is used to authenticate the toner cartridge for whatever purpose, as well as to perform other functions such as toner level monitoring, sheet count, etc.
- a printer or printer supply component such as a toner cartridge
- a third embodiment of the invention is the application of the PUF authentication technology to bank cards and identification cards with an EMV transaction chip.
- Bank cards 6001 for example, are under constant attack by counterfeiters. For this reason an EMV transaction chip 6002 mounted on a substrate 6003 that replaced the easily counterfeited magnetic strip 7001 shown in FIG. 7 , the back of the bank card 6001 .
- the EMV transaction chip may be used with a personal identification number (“PIN”), but many cards lack this extra protection for convenience of the customer, to reduce data requirements in transactions, and to avoid software upgrades for the PIN operation.
- PIN personal identification number
- Bank cards with EMV transaction chips are mostly used in a contact-based form: the card is inserted into a reader, which creates a circuit that allows handshaking between the card and the payment terminal. A unique transaction is created that involves cryptographic data embedded in the chip.
- NFC near-field communications
- a unique magnetic PUF signature of the analog magnetic intensity readings could replace the PIN requirement to authenticate the bank card.
- the PUF signature would be a second factor authentication for the bank card.
- the substrate of a bank card may be fabricated where dispersed in the substrate is a plurality of magnetic particles.
- the particles are distributed randomly such that it is extremely difficult to reproduce the exact distribution and alignment of particles.
- the substrate and the particles of the bank card form a physical unclonable function.
- the magnetic field profile may be measured by an external sensor, such as a Hall-effect sensor (not shown) in close proximity to the bank card surface. Other sensor options include magneto-optical sensor technology.
- the magnetic field profile measurements may be taken within a defined area or along a defined path: straight, circular, or any arbitrarily selected and defined path, and recorded during manufacture of the bank card.
- the magnetic field profile data would be written to the EVM transaction chip's non-volatile memory.
- the reader When inserted into a card reader 8001 , the reader could sweep a sensor arm across a portion of the bank card and one or more sensors, such as Hall-effect sensors, located on the sensor arm would measure the magnetic field in a defined area or along the defined path.
- sensors such as Hall-effect sensors
- a simple mechanical configuration with a drive cam would determine the path of the sensor arm sweep.
- the sensor or sensor array could be at a fixed location where the bank card slides across the sensors 8003 , 8004 , 8005 , and 8006 as the bank card is inserted into the reader slot 8002 .
- This invention does not require the user to remember a PIN, and the card reader can perform the validation locally.
- the card reader could be configured to transmit the magnetic “fingerprint” to the bank card company server or cloud location for remote authentication when high value transactions are taking place.
- Data that is stored in a cloud location is stored in an accessible network such as the Internet on physical storage devices such as computer servers and storage networks.
- the EMV transaction chip on the card could contain information that would guide the card reader to read the magnetic “fingerprint” in a specific location on the bank card. This location could be different for different cards and would add yet another layer of complexity to the task of counterfeiting a bank card.
- a varying position of the magnetic “fingerprint” could also be configured to act as a rotating encryption key. This rotating key could change on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis.
- the rotating key could be as simple as two keys in which data is read off the “fingerprint” in a forward or reverse motion, which would be the least disruptive to current card reader configurations.
- Known algorithms could be utilized to determine when the “fingerprint” rotates.
- the bank card substrate to which the EMV transaction chip is mounted could be the location of a magnetic “fingerprint” such that removal or alteration of the EMV transaction chip would distort the substrate and thus alter the magnetic “fingerprint,” rendering the authentication inoperable.
- the bank card could be implemented in such a way as to cause tearing to the fingerprint if the chip is removed.
- the card reader may initiate the bank card authentication by sending a request to the EMV transaction chip on the bank card for data.
- the bank card EMV transaction chip may challenge the card reader and wait for a proper response (authenticating the reader) before the bank card security chip transmits the magnetic “fingerprint” authentication data to the reader.
- This challenge and response protocol makes it more difficult for counterfeiters to acquire data from the bank card.
- capacitive sensing technology may be used to detect the presence of the randomly distributed magnetized particles in the bank card, which could provide yet another authentication step for validating the bank card.
- the presence of the magnetized particles could be detected optically by a digital camera chip or by an optical sensor. Similar to capacitive sensing, this could provide an additional authentication step for the bank card.
- This technology could also be used in the same manner described above to authenticate access badges for secure facilities, or for other applications such as passports, government identification cards, driver licenses, etc.
- the PUF technology could stand alone as a security device, or in combination with a integrated circuit chip on the identification card or other security device having non-volatile memory.
- FIG. 4 shows a region of a substrate 4010 .
- Dispersed in the substrate is a plurality of magnetized particles 4014 .
- the particles are distributed randomly such that it is extremely difficult to reproduce the exact distribution and alignment of particles.
- the substrate 4010 and the particles 4014 form a PUF.
- FIG. 5 shows a side view of the substrate 4010 containing the magnetized particles 4014 .
- the field data may be measured while moving the PUF relative to a stationary magnetic field sensor(s) 5001 , 5002 , 5003 or by moving the magnetic field sensor(s) 5001 , 5002 , 5003 next to a stationary PUF, etc.
- the sensors are shown in varying orientations, but such a varied orientation is not necessary. Multiple sensors may be used to reduce the movement and time required to measure the magnetic field over a desired area.
- FIG. 10 shows an example of a method of making a secure device, such as an integrated circuit chip with a PUF overlay or a bank card with an EMV transaction chip with a PUF substrate.
- the magnetizable particles may be of any shape, and may contain neodymium and iron and boron. Alternatively, the magnetizable particles may contain samarium and cobalt. Preferably, the magnetized particles generate a sufficiently strong magnetic field to be detected with a low-cost detector.
- Suitable substrate materials are used that allow formed aggregate pellets of the substrate material and particles to be magnetized.
- the magnetizable particles are magnetized by, for example, subjecting the pellets to a strong magnetic field. After magnetization, the magnetic particles do not clump together because the pellet carrier material is a solid. During the molding process, the pellets are heated and melted prior to molding.
- the substrate carrier is then solidified in an ICC, overlaying an ICC, encasing an ICC, in the body of a bank card, or in the section of a bank card beneath the section of a bank card beneath the position of an EVM transaction chip.
- the carrier may be, for example, a liquid that is caused to become solid by adding a chemical, subjecting to ultraviolet light, increasing its temperature, etc. Causing the carrier to become solid locks the distribution and orientation of the particles.
- a high viscosity liquid is preferred so that the particles may be magnetized shortly before the material is molded. The high viscosity retards the movement of the magnetic particles toward each other while the material is in a liquid state and minimizes clumping of the magnetized particles. Clumping could cause failures of the over-molding process.
- Magnetizing the particles in pellet form yields a more random magnetic field pattern, and is therefore more difficult to clone. Further, the application of a magnetizing field with patterned or randomized orientation may be applied to a formed substrate with random particle positions in order to cause greater diversity of magnetic field orientation.
Abstract
Description
- None.
- The present disclosure relates generally to anti-counterfeit systems and more particularly to physical unclonable functions.
- Counterfeit integrated circuit chips (“ICCs”) are a major concern in the electronic component supply industry because of reliability and security issues. Such counterfeit ICCs are impacting many industrial sectors, including computers, printing, telecommunications, automotive electronics, medical, banking, energy/smart-grid, aerospace, and military systems. The consequences can be dramatic when critical systems begin to fail or act maliciously due to the use of counterfeit or low-quality components causing minor, major, or mission failures, including health or safety concerns.
- The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2012, for example, is focused on defense contractors who do not screen their equipment for counterfeit parts. There can be civil and criminal liability for contractors who do not eliminate counterfeit electronic parts in military equipment, according to the Forbes article, “NDAA May Put Defense Contractors In Prison For Counterfeit Parts,” Feb. 14, 2012.
- The tools and technologies utilized by counterfeiters have become extremely sophisticated and well financed. In turn, this also calls for more sophisticated methods to detect counterfeit electronic parts that enter the market. Hardware intrinsic security is a mechanism that can provide security based on inherent properties of an electronic device. A physical unclonable function (“PUF”) belongs to the realm of hardware intrinsic security.
- In the printer industry, counterfeit printer supplies including ICCs are a problem for consumers. Counterfeit supplies may perform poorly and may damage printers. Printer manufacturers use authentication systems to deter counterfeiters. PUFs are a type of authentication system that implements a physical one-way function. Ideally, a PUF cannot be identically replicated and thus is difficult to counterfeit. Incorporating a PUF in electronic device packaging, including ICCs, deters counterfeiters.
- In the invention described, magnetic field characteristics of randomly placed magnetized particles are exploited by using the magnetic field fluctuations produced by the particles as measured by a sensor, such as a Hall-effect sensor, or an array of such sensors. The invention consists of an ICC encased in or over-molded by a substrate that contains magnetic particles. The magnetized particles generate a complex magnetic field near the surface of the ICC that can be used as a “fingerprint.” The positioning and orientation of the magnetized particles is an uncontrolled process, and thus the interaction between the sensor and the particles is complex. Thus, it is difficult to duplicate the device such that the same magnetic pattern and particle physical location pattern will arise. The randomness of the magnetic field magnitude and direction near the surface of the material containing the magnetic particles can be used to obtain a unique identifier for an item such as an integrated circuit chip carrying the PUF. Further, the placement of the device in the top layer of an integrated circuit chip protects the underlying circuits from being inspected by an attacker, e.g., for reverse engineering. When a counterfeiter attempts to remove all or a portion of the coating, the magnetic field distribution must change, thus destroying the original unique identifier.
- The invention, in one form thereof, is directed to an integrated circuit chip overlain or encapsulated by a PUF comprising randomly placed magnetic particles.
- The invention, in another form thereof, is directed to an integrated circuit chip used in a printer or printer supply component, such as a toner cartridge, that is overlain or encapsulated by a PUF comprising randomly placed magnetic particles.
- The invention, in yet another form thereof, is directed to an EMV (Europay, Mastercard, Visa) transaction chip or embedded microchip on a bank card overlain by a PUF comprising randomly placed magnetic particles.
- The invention, in yet another form thereof, is directed to an apparatus having an EMV transaction chip mounted on substrate that forms the body of a bank card, where a plurality of magnetized particles are dispersed in the substrate to form a PUF.
- The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of the specification, illustrate several aspects of the present disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the present disclosure.
-
FIG. 1 is a view of an integrated chip. -
FIG. 2 is a view of an integrated chip with magnetized particles molded into the housing. -
FIG. 3 is a view of an integrated chip with an array of sensors formed above the chip with magnetized particles molded into the housing. -
FIG. 4 is an orthogonal view of a substrate containing magnetic and non-magnetic particles. -
FIG. 5 is a side view of a PUF and PUF readers. -
FIG. 6 is a view of the front of a bank card with an EMV transaction chip. -
FIG. 7 is a view of the back of a bank card with a magnetic strip. -
FIG. 8 is a bank card chip reader device. -
FIG. 9 is an end view of the bank card chip reader device. -
FIG. 10 is a flowchart of a method of making a secure device. -
FIG. 11 is a magnetic field profile along a defined path. -
FIGS. 12a, 12b, and 12c are three-dimensional representations of the magnetic flux density measured across the area resolved into three coordinate components, Bx, By, and Bz. - In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings where like numerals represent like elements. The embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present disclosure. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that process, electrical, and mechanical changes, etc., may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Examples merely typify possible variations. Portions and features of some embodiments may be included in or substituted for those of others. The following description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense and the scope of the present disclosure is defined only by the appended claims and their equivalents.
- Referring now to the drawings and particularly to
FIG. 1 , when an ICC 1001 is manufactured, it is typically packaged by being attached to ametal lead frame 1008 that is connected tosolder pads wire bonds encapsulant 1006 which is then cured. The encapsulated chip is then molded into aplastic housing 1007. - Referring now to
FIG. 2 , in one embodiment of the invention, the moldedplastic housing 1007 is replaced with the molded plastic housing orsubstrate 2007 where dispersed in the substrate is a plurality ofmagnetized particles 4014. The particles are distributed randomly such that it is extremely difficult to reproduce the exact distribution and alignment of particles. Preferably, the particles are magnetized before dispersion in the substrate to add further randomness to the resulting magnetic field profile. Thus, thesubstrate 2007 and theparticles 4014 form a physical unclonable function out of the molded plastic housing. - The magnetic field profile near the surface of the ICC may be measured by an external magneto-resistive sensor (not shown), a Hall-effect sensor (not shown), or an array of such sensors, in close proximity to the top surface of the ICC. Since the sensing elements are typically around 0.3-0.5 mm below the surface of the sensing device, the average particle size diameter using Hall-effect sensor or magneto-resistive sensor is preferably greater than 0.1 mm. Note that the diameter of a non-spherical particle is the diameter of the smallest sphere that encloses the particle. Other sensor options include magneto-optical sensor technology, which is capable of working with smaller magnetic particle sizes, but is more costly to implement and subject to contamination problems.
- The magnetic field profile measurements may be taken within a defined area or along a defined path: straight, circular, or any arbitrarily selected and defined path, and recorded at the ICC foundry.
FIG. 11 shows a magnetic field profile along a defined path where the magnetic flux density has been resolved into three coordinate components Bx, By, and Bz.FIG. 12 shows a magnetic field profile measured over a rectangular area as would be exhibited by the defined area overlaying an ICC. The profile is a three-dimensional representation of the magnetic flux density measured across the area. The magnetic flux density vector has been resolved into three coordinate components, Bx, By, and Bz, shown separately inFIGS. 12a, 12b, and 12c . The magnetic field profile data would be signed by a private key and written to the ICC's non-volatile memory (“NVM”) during programming. After installation of the ICC onto a circuit card, the magnetic “fingerprint” is once again read by an external magneto-resistive sensor and the magnetic profile is compared to the values stored on the chip to authenticate the ICC. This system would make it very difficult for counterfeit ICCs to make their way into high value applications. The system would be fairly inexpensive to implement with almost instantaneous authentication of the PUF over-molded ICCs. - Referring now to
FIG. 3 , in a second embodiment of the invention, the use ofmagnetized particles 4014 creates a unique magnetic fingerprint that can be applied to the manufacture of ICCs by over-molding the encapsulatedchip 1001 with a substrate containingmagnetized particles 2007. The term “over-molded” is used here broadly to mean anything from adding a partial surface layer over the ICC to completely encasing the ICC. One or more sensors, such as a Hall-effect sensor 3001 is formed above the chip body and encased within thehousing 2007. In this embodiment, the sensor(s) 3001 can record a series of analog magnetic intensity readings, in various locations along the substrate, in one, two, or three coordinate directions. Such an “internal” Hall-effect sensor can measure average particle size diameters that are less than 0.1 mm. Since these measurements are analog voltages, with a sufficient number of measurements and sufficient analog to digital resolution, unique values can be derived from the measurements. These values can be used for private keys, seeds, etc. which are not stored in the device's memory. Instead, they are read and derived by the device “in flight” (i.e., during operation), thus rendering ineffective any probing attacks by counterfeiters on the chip itself. If a counterfeiter were to attempt to extract the private key from the ICC, it is highly probable that the over-molded magnetic layer will be disturbed and the private key would be lost. - These embodiments may, for example, be implemented on an integrated circuit chip on a printer or printer supply component, such as a toner cartridge, that is used to authenticate the toner cartridge for whatever purpose, as well as to perform other functions such as toner level monitoring, sheet count, etc.
- A third embodiment of the invention is the application of the PUF authentication technology to bank cards and identification cards with an EMV transaction chip.
Bank cards 6001, for example, are under constant attack by counterfeiters. For this reason anEMV transaction chip 6002 mounted on asubstrate 6003 that replaced the easily counterfeitedmagnetic strip 7001 shown inFIG. 7 , the back of thebank card 6001. To avoid fraud, the EMV transaction chip may be used with a personal identification number (“PIN”), but many cards lack this extra protection for convenience of the customer, to reduce data requirements in transactions, and to avoid software upgrades for the PIN operation. - Bank cards with EMV transaction chips are mostly used in a contact-based form: the card is inserted into a reader, which creates a circuit that allows handshaking between the card and the payment terminal. A unique transaction is created that involves cryptographic data embedded in the chip.
- For cards that require PINS, the transaction can't be completed without the code, which is not transmitted remotely as with debit and ATM transactions. Some cards are equipped with near-field communications (NFC) radios for contactless EMV transaction, and will work with point-of-sale systems.
- A unique magnetic PUF signature of the analog magnetic intensity readings could replace the PIN requirement to authenticate the bank card. The PUF signature would be a second factor authentication for the bank card.
- The substrate of a bank card may be fabricated where dispersed in the substrate is a plurality of magnetic particles. The particles are distributed randomly such that it is extremely difficult to reproduce the exact distribution and alignment of particles. Thus, the substrate and the particles of the bank card form a physical unclonable function. The magnetic field profile may be measured by an external sensor, such as a Hall-effect sensor (not shown) in close proximity to the bank card surface. Other sensor options include magneto-optical sensor technology. The magnetic field profile measurements may be taken within a defined area or along a defined path: straight, circular, or any arbitrarily selected and defined path, and recorded during manufacture of the bank card. The magnetic field profile data would be written to the EVM transaction chip's non-volatile memory.
- When inserted into a
card reader 8001, the reader could sweep a sensor arm across a portion of the bank card and one or more sensors, such as Hall-effect sensors, located on the sensor arm would measure the magnetic field in a defined area or along the defined path. A simple mechanical configuration with a drive cam would determine the path of the sensor arm sweep. Alternatively, as shown inFIG. 9 , the sensor or sensor array could be at a fixed location where the bank card slides across thesensors reader slot 8002. Data corresponding to the magnetic intensity readings along the sensing path stored in the EMV transaction chip's non-volatile memory and used to validate the magnetic “fingerprint” detected by the card reader at time of the transaction. This invention does not require the user to remember a PIN, and the card reader can perform the validation locally. Alternatively, the card reader could be configured to transmit the magnetic “fingerprint” to the bank card company server or cloud location for remote authentication when high value transactions are taking place. Data that is stored in a cloud location is stored in an accessible network such as the Internet on physical storage devices such as computer servers and storage networks. - As an added layer of security, the EMV transaction chip on the card could contain information that would guide the card reader to read the magnetic “fingerprint” in a specific location on the bank card. This location could be different for different cards and would add yet another layer of complexity to the task of counterfeiting a bank card. A varying position of the magnetic “fingerprint” could also be configured to act as a rotating encryption key. This rotating key could change on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis. The rotating key could be as simple as two keys in which data is read off the “fingerprint” in a forward or reverse motion, which would be the least disruptive to current card reader configurations. Known algorithms could be utilized to determine when the “fingerprint” rotates.
- In another embodiment, the bank card substrate to which the EMV transaction chip is mounted could be the location of a magnetic “fingerprint” such that removal or alteration of the EMV transaction chip would distort the substrate and thus alter the magnetic “fingerprint,” rendering the authentication inoperable. In a further embodiment, the bank card could be implemented in such a way as to cause tearing to the fingerprint if the chip is removed.
- The card reader may initiate the bank card authentication by sending a request to the EMV transaction chip on the bank card for data. The bank card EMV transaction chip may challenge the card reader and wait for a proper response (authenticating the reader) before the bank card security chip transmits the magnetic “fingerprint” authentication data to the reader. This challenge and response protocol makes it more difficult for counterfeiters to acquire data from the bank card. In addition to using the magnetic “fingerprint” or signature of the bank card, capacitive sensing technology may be used to detect the presence of the randomly distributed magnetized particles in the bank card, which could provide yet another authentication step for validating the bank card.
- If at least one face of the bank card is non-opaque, the presence of the magnetized particles could be detected optically by a digital camera chip or by an optical sensor. Similar to capacitive sensing, this could provide an additional authentication step for the bank card.
- This technology could also be used in the same manner described above to authenticate access badges for secure facilities, or for other applications such as passports, government identification cards, driver licenses, etc. The PUF technology could stand alone as a security device, or in combination with a integrated circuit chip on the identification card or other security device having non-volatile memory.
-
FIG. 4 shows a region of asubstrate 4010. Dispersed in the substrate is a plurality ofmagnetized particles 4014. The particles are distributed randomly such that it is extremely difficult to reproduce the exact distribution and alignment of particles. Thus, thesubstrate 4010 and theparticles 4014 form a PUF. -
FIG. 5 shows a side view of thesubstrate 4010 containing themagnetized particles 4014. - The field data may be measured while moving the PUF relative to a stationary magnetic field sensor(s) 5001, 5002, 5003 or by moving the magnetic field sensor(s) 5001, 5002, 5003 next to a stationary PUF, etc. The sensors are shown in varying orientations, but such a varied orientation is not necessary. Multiple sensors may be used to reduce the movement and time required to measure the magnetic field over a desired area.
-
FIG. 10 shows an example of a method of making a secure device, such as an integrated circuit chip with a PUF overlay or a bank card with an EMV transaction chip with a PUF substrate. - The magnetizable particles may be of any shape, and may contain neodymium and iron and boron. Alternatively, the magnetizable particles may contain samarium and cobalt. Preferably, the magnetized particles generate a sufficiently strong magnetic field to be detected with a low-cost detector.
- Suitable substrate materials are used that allow formed aggregate pellets of the substrate material and particles to be magnetized. The magnetizable particles are magnetized by, for example, subjecting the pellets to a strong magnetic field. After magnetization, the magnetic particles do not clump together because the pellet carrier material is a solid. During the molding process, the pellets are heated and melted prior to molding.
- The substrate carrier is then solidified in an ICC, overlaying an ICC, encasing an ICC, in the body of a bank card, or in the section of a bank card beneath the section of a bank card beneath the position of an EVM transaction chip. In an alternate embodiment the carrier may be, for example, a liquid that is caused to become solid by adding a chemical, subjecting to ultraviolet light, increasing its temperature, etc. Causing the carrier to become solid locks the distribution and orientation of the particles. In this case a high viscosity liquid is preferred so that the particles may be magnetized shortly before the material is molded. The high viscosity retards the movement of the magnetic particles toward each other while the material is in a liquid state and minimizes clumping of the magnetized particles. Clumping could cause failures of the over-molding process.
- Magnetizing the particles in pellet form yields a more random magnetic field pattern, and is therefore more difficult to clone. Further, the application of a magnetizing field with patterned or randomized orientation may be applied to a formed substrate with random particle positions in order to cause greater diversity of magnetic field orientation.
- The foregoing description illustrates various aspects and examples of the present disclosure. It is not intended to be exhaustive. Rather, it is chosen to illustrate the principles of the present disclosure and its practical application to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the present disclosure, including its various modifications that naturally follow. All modifications and variations are contemplated within the scope of the present disclosure as determined by the appended claims. Relatively apparent modifications include combining one or more features of various embodiments with features of other embodiments.
Claims (18)
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/808,573 US20190139909A1 (en) | 2017-11-09 | 2017-11-09 | Physical Unclonable Functions in Integrated Circuit Chip Packaging for Security |
US15/809,081 US10566296B2 (en) | 2017-11-09 | 2017-11-10 | Physical unclonable functions in bank cards or identification cards for security |
US17/225,941 US20210242141A1 (en) | 2017-11-09 | 2021-04-08 | Physical Unclonable Functions in Integrated Circuit Chip Packaging for Security |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/808,573 US20190139909A1 (en) | 2017-11-09 | 2017-11-09 | Physical Unclonable Functions in Integrated Circuit Chip Packaging for Security |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/809,081 Continuation US10566296B2 (en) | 2017-11-09 | 2017-11-10 | Physical unclonable functions in bank cards or identification cards for security |
US17/225,941 Continuation US20210242141A1 (en) | 2017-11-09 | 2021-04-08 | Physical Unclonable Functions in Integrated Circuit Chip Packaging for Security |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20190139909A1 true US20190139909A1 (en) | 2019-05-09 |
Family
ID=66327529
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/808,573 Abandoned US20190139909A1 (en) | 2017-11-09 | 2017-11-09 | Physical Unclonable Functions in Integrated Circuit Chip Packaging for Security |
US15/809,081 Active 2038-02-16 US10566296B2 (en) | 2017-11-09 | 2017-11-10 | Physical unclonable functions in bank cards or identification cards for security |
US17/225,941 Abandoned US20210242141A1 (en) | 2017-11-09 | 2021-04-08 | Physical Unclonable Functions in Integrated Circuit Chip Packaging for Security |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/809,081 Active 2038-02-16 US10566296B2 (en) | 2017-11-09 | 2017-11-10 | Physical unclonable functions in bank cards or identification cards for security |
US17/225,941 Abandoned US20210242141A1 (en) | 2017-11-09 | 2021-04-08 | Physical Unclonable Functions in Integrated Circuit Chip Packaging for Security |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US20190139909A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2021050713A1 (en) * | 2019-09-10 | 2021-03-18 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Cryptoanchor reader |
WO2021194606A1 (en) * | 2020-03-25 | 2021-09-30 | Raytheon Company | System and method for authenticating physical objects with randomized embedded information |
US11356287B2 (en) | 2015-10-09 | 2022-06-07 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Injection-molded physical unclonable function |
US20220176727A1 (en) * | 2020-12-04 | 2022-06-09 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Tag System to Mitigate Maliciously Tainted and Counterfeit Products |
US20220343091A1 (en) * | 2021-04-26 | 2022-10-27 | Semikron Elektronik Gmbh & Co. Kg | Device having functional component and a plastic housing element, and method for verifying the authenticity of such a device |
EP4045927A4 (en) * | 2019-10-16 | 2024-02-21 | Lexmark Int Inc | Multidirectional magnetic field area reader system with features |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2021096635A1 (en) * | 2019-10-16 | 2021-05-20 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Multidirectional magnetic field area reader system with features |
Family Cites Families (79)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3675367A (en) | 1970-07-27 | 1972-07-11 | Raymond D Amburn | Apparatus for magnetically treating seeds |
US4218674A (en) | 1975-09-09 | 1980-08-19 | Dasy Inter S.A. | Method and a system for verifying authenticity safe against forgery |
DE2736642A1 (en) | 1977-08-13 | 1979-02-15 | Max Baermann | PLASTIC-BONDED PERMANENT MAGNET AND PROCESS FOR ITS MANUFACTURING |
JPS58171802A (en) | 1982-04-02 | 1983-10-08 | Sumitomo Bakelite Co Ltd | Ferromagnetic resin compound |
US4734695A (en) | 1984-10-04 | 1988-03-29 | Light Signatures, Inc. | Secure card and sensing system |
JPH0817221B2 (en) * | 1990-11-13 | 1996-02-21 | 株式会社東芝 | Semiconductor device and semiconductor wafer mounting method |
JPH04257203A (en) | 1991-02-08 | 1992-09-11 | Kanebo Ltd | Plastic magnet composite |
US5602381A (en) | 1993-05-19 | 1997-02-11 | Nhk Spring Co., Ltd. | Objects to be checked for authenticity, and method and apparatus for checking whether or not objects are authentic |
US5451759A (en) | 1993-06-24 | 1995-09-19 | Nhk Spring Co., Ltd. | Using high-permeability magnetic elements randomly scattered in the objects |
US5981053A (en) | 1993-10-05 | 1999-11-09 | Sandia Corporation | Tamper resistant magnetic stripes |
US5434917A (en) * | 1993-10-13 | 1995-07-18 | Thomson Consumer Electronics S.A. | Unforgeable identification device, identification device reader and method of identification |
DE19653178A1 (en) | 1996-12-19 | 1998-06-25 | Inventa Ag | Thermoplastic processable molding compound, process for producing the molding compound and use thereof |
US5792380A (en) | 1997-04-30 | 1998-08-11 | Eastman Kodak Company | Ink jet printing ink composition with detectable label material |
US5857129A (en) | 1997-11-10 | 1999-01-05 | Xerox Corporation | Toner container with foolproof adaptor |
US6063647A (en) | 1997-12-08 | 2000-05-16 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Method for making circuit elements for a z-axis interconnect |
US7005733B2 (en) | 1999-12-30 | 2006-02-28 | Koemmerling Oliver | Anti tamper encapsulation for an integrated circuit |
US6432559B1 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2002-08-13 | Applied Technologies & Fabrication, Inc. | Tamper-proof identification of solid objects |
JP3893861B2 (en) | 2000-08-18 | 2007-03-14 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Image forming apparatus and replacement parts used therefor |
GB0031016D0 (en) | 2000-12-20 | 2001-01-31 | Alphafox Systems Ltd | Security systems |
US20030040129A1 (en) | 2001-08-20 | 2003-02-27 | Shah Haresh P. | Binding assays using magnetically immobilized arrays |
US7137000B2 (en) | 2001-08-24 | 2006-11-14 | Zih Corp. | Method and apparatus for article authentication |
US6812707B2 (en) | 2001-11-27 | 2004-11-02 | Mitsubishi Materials Corporation | Detection element for objects and detection device using the same |
DE60331427D1 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2010-04-08 | Nxp Bv | METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR PROTECTING A CHIIP AND VERIFYING ITS AUTHENTICITY |
US6766119B2 (en) | 2002-12-16 | 2004-07-20 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Toner cartridge identifying apparatus for an image forming apparatus |
EP1475242B1 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2008-10-08 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Authentication method and system |
US7865722B2 (en) | 2003-07-22 | 2011-01-04 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Method of identifying an object and a tag carrying identification information |
US7218589B2 (en) | 2003-11-24 | 2007-05-15 | General Electric Company | Authenticable optical disc, system for authenticating an optical disc and method thereof |
MXPA06010402A (en) | 2004-03-12 | 2007-01-19 | Ingenia Technology Ltd | Authenticity verification methods, products and apparatuses. |
IL162063A0 (en) | 2004-05-19 | 2005-11-20 | Samuel Kosolapov | Method of authentication using inexpensive unique optical key which can not be duplicatied and inexpensive optical key reader providing |
US7106198B2 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2006-09-12 | Xerox Corporation | Control of programmable modules |
US7408707B2 (en) | 2004-08-04 | 2008-08-05 | Fusion Optix Inc. | Multi-region light scattering element |
EP1841819A1 (en) | 2004-12-07 | 2007-10-10 | Yissum Research Development Company Of The Hebrew University Of Jerusalem | Spherical composites entrapping nanoparticles, processes of preparing same and uses thereof |
WO2006078220A1 (en) | 2005-01-19 | 2006-07-27 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Identification tag, object adapted to be identified, and related methods, devices and systems |
WO2007031908A2 (en) | 2005-09-14 | 2007-03-22 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Improved device, system and method for determining authenticity of an item |
US20080231418A1 (en) | 2005-10-17 | 2008-09-25 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. | Integrated Physical Unclonable Function (Puf) with Combined Sensor and Display |
EP2110776B1 (en) | 2005-12-23 | 2012-10-31 | Ingenia Holdings Limited | Optical authentication |
US7642916B2 (en) | 2006-03-23 | 2010-01-05 | Xerox Corporation | RFID bridge antenna |
CN101479750A (en) | 2006-05-11 | 2009-07-08 | 奇异编号有限公司 | Method of identifying an object, an identification tag, an object adapted to be identified, and related device and system |
US9794247B2 (en) | 2006-08-22 | 2017-10-17 | Stmicroelectronics, Inc. | Method to prevent cloning of electronic components using public key infrastructure secure hardware device |
US20080199667A1 (en) | 2007-02-16 | 2008-08-21 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Magnetic field controlled active reflector and magnetic display panel comprising the active reflector |
JP2010520945A (en) | 2007-03-13 | 2010-06-17 | テヒニッシェ ウニヴェルシテート アイントホーフェン | Inkjet polymerizable liquid crystal mixture |
MY162937A (en) | 2007-10-09 | 2017-07-31 | Sicpa Holding Sa | Security marking authentication device |
JP2009140952A (en) | 2007-12-03 | 2009-06-25 | Fujitsu Ltd | Cpp structure magnetoresistive element, method of manufacturing the same and storage apparatus |
US7704438B2 (en) | 2008-04-25 | 2010-04-27 | Barlog Plastics Gmbh | Process for producing a permanently magnetic molding |
JP5328230B2 (en) | 2008-06-10 | 2013-10-30 | キヤノン株式会社 | Cartridge and electrophotographic image forming apparatus using the cartridge |
JP2011526113A (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2011-09-29 | コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ | Apparatus, system, and method for verifying authenticity, integrity, and / or physical state of an item |
US8742891B2 (en) | 2008-07-16 | 2014-06-03 | Morton Greene | System and method for identifying a genuine printed document |
JP4613234B2 (en) | 2008-09-09 | 2011-01-12 | シャープ株式会社 | Toner cartridge and image forming apparatus using the same |
WO2010067592A1 (en) | 2008-12-12 | 2010-06-17 | 愛知製鋼株式会社 | Rare earth-based bonded magnet |
JP4688938B2 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2011-05-25 | シャープ株式会社 | Developing device, image forming apparatus, and developing device cleaning method |
JP2010197870A (en) | 2009-02-26 | 2010-09-09 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Developing device and image forming apparatus using the same |
SG177518A1 (en) | 2009-07-09 | 2012-02-28 | Bilcare Technologies Singapore Pte Ltd | A reading device able to identify a tag or an object adapted to be identified, related methods and systems |
JP5434869B2 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2014-03-05 | Tdk株式会社 | Manufacturing method of rare earth sintered magnet |
GB201001603D0 (en) | 2010-02-01 | 2010-03-17 | Rue De Int Ltd | Security elements, and methods and apparatus for their manufacture |
JP5140694B2 (en) | 2010-03-17 | 2013-02-06 | 京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 | Toner dispersion member and toner dispersion mechanism provided with the same |
US8331806B2 (en) | 2010-07-20 | 2012-12-11 | Xerox Corporation | Empty bottle detection using a one time foil seal |
GB201013432D0 (en) | 2010-08-11 | 2010-09-22 | Univ Bristol | Method of authentication |
BR112013007504A2 (en) | 2010-09-08 | 2017-08-08 | Bilcare Tech Singapore Pte Ltd | integrated identification information reading unit based on inherent disturbance |
US8478169B2 (en) | 2010-09-29 | 2013-07-02 | Eastman Kodak Company | Development station with dual drive |
US9292717B2 (en) | 2010-12-16 | 2016-03-22 | Peter Malcolm Moran | Apparatus for forming and reading an identification feature and method thereof |
JP5175923B2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2013-04-03 | シャープ株式会社 | Developing device, image forming apparatus, and developer stirring and conveying method |
US8831625B2 (en) * | 2011-08-03 | 2014-09-09 | Spectrum Bridge, Inc. | Systems and methods for processing spectrum coexistence information to optimize spectrum allocation |
DE102012204708A1 (en) | 2012-03-23 | 2013-09-26 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Device and method for authenticating an object |
US8714442B2 (en) | 2012-04-19 | 2014-05-06 | Zortag Inc | System for and method of securing articles along a supply chain |
ITMI20120706A1 (en) | 2012-04-27 | 2013-10-28 | St Microelectronics Srl | AN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARD FOR AUTHENTICATION AND A METHOD FOR THE AUTHENTICATION OF THE INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARD |
US8892008B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2014-11-18 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for reducing residual toner in a rotating container |
US9430680B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-08-30 | Seagate Technology Llc | Tamper sensor |
US20150071432A1 (en) | 2013-09-09 | 2015-03-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Physically unclonable function based on resistivity of magnetoresistive random-access memory magnetic tunnel junctions |
US8761639B1 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2014-06-24 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Replaceable unit for an electrophotographic image forming device having a latching mechanism |
KR102282717B1 (en) | 2014-10-14 | 2021-07-27 | 삼성전자주식회사 | A NFC Card Reader, system including the same, and method there-of |
KR101873855B1 (en) | 2015-02-23 | 2018-07-03 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Triaxial sensor and device including the same for measuring magnetic field |
US9502356B1 (en) | 2015-03-12 | 2016-11-22 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | Device and method with physical unclonable function |
US9553582B1 (en) | 2015-10-09 | 2017-01-24 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Physical unclonable functions having magnetic and non-magnetic particles |
US9929864B2 (en) | 2015-10-09 | 2018-03-27 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Rotating magnetic measurements of physical unclonable functions |
US9917699B2 (en) | 2015-10-09 | 2018-03-13 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Physical unclonable function imaged through two faces |
US9454125B1 (en) | 2015-12-21 | 2016-09-27 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Systems and methods for reincorporating waste toner with fresh toner within a toner cartridge |
US9542576B1 (en) | 2016-08-03 | 2017-01-10 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Magnetic helical physical unclonable function measured above flight |
US9665748B1 (en) | 2016-08-03 | 2017-05-30 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Magnetic helical physical unclonable function measured adjacent to flight |
US9524456B1 (en) | 2016-08-03 | 2016-12-20 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Manufacturing a helical physical unclonable function |
-
2017
- 2017-11-09 US US15/808,573 patent/US20190139909A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2017-11-10 US US15/809,081 patent/US10566296B2/en active Active
-
2021
- 2021-04-08 US US17/225,941 patent/US20210242141A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11356287B2 (en) | 2015-10-09 | 2022-06-07 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Injection-molded physical unclonable function |
WO2021050713A1 (en) * | 2019-09-10 | 2021-03-18 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Cryptoanchor reader |
US20230030797A1 (en) * | 2019-09-10 | 2023-02-02 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Cryptoanchor Reader |
EP4045927A4 (en) * | 2019-10-16 | 2024-02-21 | Lexmark Int Inc | Multidirectional magnetic field area reader system with features |
WO2021194606A1 (en) * | 2020-03-25 | 2021-09-30 | Raytheon Company | System and method for authenticating physical objects with randomized embedded information |
US11635746B2 (en) | 2020-03-25 | 2023-04-25 | Raytheon Company | System and method for authenticating physical objects with randomized embedded information |
US20220176727A1 (en) * | 2020-12-04 | 2022-06-09 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Tag System to Mitigate Maliciously Tainted and Counterfeit Products |
US20220343091A1 (en) * | 2021-04-26 | 2022-10-27 | Semikron Elektronik Gmbh & Co. Kg | Device having functional component and a plastic housing element, and method for verifying the authenticity of such a device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20190157219A1 (en) | 2019-05-23 |
US20210242141A1 (en) | 2021-08-05 |
US10566296B2 (en) | 2020-02-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20210242141A1 (en) | Physical Unclonable Functions in Integrated Circuit Chip Packaging for Security | |
US9292717B2 (en) | Apparatus for forming and reading an identification feature and method thereof | |
EP3577851B1 (en) | Methods and systems for securely storing sensitive data on smart cards | |
US7309017B2 (en) | Secure physical documents, and methods and apparatus for publishing and reading them | |
Drimer et al. | Thinking inside the box: system-level failures of tamper proofing | |
US9117126B2 (en) | Tamper resistant 3D magnetic stripe reader integrated circuit | |
AU2019202240A1 (en) | Physical Unclonable Functions In Bank Cards Or Identification Cards For Security | |
Ferradi et al. | When organized crime applies academic results: a forensic analysis of an in-card listening device | |
CN111783919A (en) | Physically unclonable function for security in bank cards or identity cards | |
JP7013385B2 (en) | Systems and methods for identifying users using graphical barcodes and payment card authentication read data | |
US20160162676A1 (en) | Method, apparatus and system for gesture based security | |
EP3720043A1 (en) | Physical unclonable functions in integrated circuit chip packaging for security | |
EP3719705A1 (en) | Physical unclonable functions in bank cards or identification cards for security | |
CA3038543A1 (en) | Physical unclonable functions in bank cards or identification cards for security | |
CA3038545A1 (en) | Physical unclonable functions in integrated circuit chip packaging for security | |
AU2019202239A1 (en) | Physical Unclonable Functions In Integrated Circuit Chip Packaging For Security | |
US10854251B2 (en) | Physical identifiers for authenticating an identity of a semiconductor component | |
CN111783171A (en) | Physically unclonable function for security in integrated circuit chip packages | |
BR102019006593A2 (en) | PHYSICAL NON-CLONABLE FUNCTIONS ON BANK CARDS OR SECURITY IDENTIFICATION CARDS | |
BR102019006559A2 (en) | NON-CLONABLE PHYSICAL FUNCTIONS IN AN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CHIP PACKAGE FOR SECURITY | |
JP5929513B2 (en) | Metal embedded RFID tag and data reader | |
Kreft et al. | Cocoon-PUF, a novel mechatronic secure element technology | |
CN103182884B (en) | Bankbook and data read-write processing method thereof | |
CN111951032A (en) | Third-party article anti-counterfeiting authentication method | |
Mayes et al. | An introduction to smart cards and rfids |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., KENTUCKY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BUSH, STEPHEN P;DENTON, GARY A;DRUMMOND, JAMES PAUL;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20171106 TO 20171109;REEL/FRAME:044085/0588 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |