US20180073532A1 - System and process for joining dissimilar materials and solid-state interlocking joint with intermetallic interface formed thereby - Google Patents
System and process for joining dissimilar materials and solid-state interlocking joint with intermetallic interface formed thereby Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20180073532A1 US20180073532A1 US15/694,565 US201715694565A US2018073532A1 US 20180073532 A1 US20180073532 A1 US 20180073532A1 US 201715694565 A US201715694565 A US 201715694565A US 2018073532 A1 US2018073532 A1 US 2018073532A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- groove
- friction stir
- intermetallic
- dovetail
- tool
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 130
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 61
- 238000005304 joining Methods 0.000 title claims description 11
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 title description 24
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 238000003466 welding Methods 0.000 claims description 53
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 claims description 51
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 29
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 26
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000013021 overheating Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000007769 metal material Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 34
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 28
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 20
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 20
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 11
- 238000009864 tensile test Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000002149 energy-dispersive X-ray emission spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000011229 interlayer Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000005253 cladding Methods 0.000 description 6
- 229910000765 intermetallic Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 6
- UONOETXJSWQNOL-UHFFFAOYSA-N tungsten carbide Chemical compound [W+]#[C-] UONOETXJSWQNOL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000011049 filling Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000013590 bulk material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004898 kneading Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001125 extrusion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron Substances [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910015370 FeAl2 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910000710 Rolled homogeneous armour Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002203 pretreatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001878 scanning electron micrograph Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004626 scanning electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012916 structural analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052582 BN Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- PZNSFCLAULLKQX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Boron nitride Chemical compound N#B PZNSFCLAULLKQX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920000049 Carbon (fiber) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910017372 Fe3Al Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium Chemical compound [Mg] FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZOKXTWBITQBERF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Molybdenum Chemical compound [Mo] ZOKXTWBITQBERF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910001315 Tool steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000002441 X-ray diffraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005275 alloying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009529 body temperature measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004917 carbon fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010288 cold spraying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008119 colloidal silica Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000724 energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002506 iron compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000011777 magnesium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052750 molybdenum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011733 molybdenum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010587 phase diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005498 polishing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003825 pressing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012827 research and development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- DECCZIUVGMLHKQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N rhenium tungsten Chemical compound [W].[Re] DECCZIUVGMLHKQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tungsten Chemical compound [W] WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052721 tungsten Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010937 tungsten Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052727 yttrium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- VWQVUPCCIRVNHF-UHFFFAOYSA-N yttrium atom Chemical compound [Y] VWQVUPCCIRVNHF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16B—DEVICES FOR FASTENING OR SECURING CONSTRUCTIONAL ELEMENTS OR MACHINE PARTS TOGETHER, e.g. NAILS, BOLTS, CIRCLIPS, CLAMPS, CLIPS OR WEDGES; JOINTS OR JOINTING
- F16B5/00—Joining sheets or plates, e.g. panels, to one another or to strips or bars parallel to them
- F16B5/0004—Joining sheets, plates or panels in abutting relationship
- F16B5/0008—Joining sheets, plates or panels in abutting relationship by moving the sheets, plates or panels substantially in their own plane, perpendicular to the abutting edge
- F16B5/0012—Joining sheets, plates or panels in abutting relationship by moving the sheets, plates or panels substantially in their own plane, perpendicular to the abutting edge a tongue on the edge of one sheet, plate or panel co-operating with a groove in the edge of another sheet, plate or panel
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K20/00—Non-electric welding by applying impact or other pressure, with or without the application of heat, e.g. cladding or plating
- B23K20/12—Non-electric welding by applying impact or other pressure, with or without the application of heat, e.g. cladding or plating the heat being generated by friction; Friction welding
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K20/00—Non-electric welding by applying impact or other pressure, with or without the application of heat, e.g. cladding or plating
- B23K20/12—Non-electric welding by applying impact or other pressure, with or without the application of heat, e.g. cladding or plating the heat being generated by friction; Friction welding
- B23K20/122—Non-electric welding by applying impact or other pressure, with or without the application of heat, e.g. cladding or plating the heat being generated by friction; Friction welding using a non-consumable tool, e.g. friction stir welding
- B23K20/1265—Non-butt welded joints, e.g. overlap-joints, T-joints or spot welds
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16B—DEVICES FOR FASTENING OR SECURING CONSTRUCTIONAL ELEMENTS OR MACHINE PARTS TOGETHER, e.g. NAILS, BOLTS, CIRCLIPS, CLAMPS, CLIPS OR WEDGES; JOINTS OR JOINTING
- F16B17/00—Connecting constructional elements or machine parts by a part of or on one member entering a hole in the other and involving plastic deformation
- F16B17/008—Connecting constructional elements or machine parts by a part of or on one member entering a hole in the other and involving plastic deformation of sheets or plates mutually
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16B—DEVICES FOR FASTENING OR SECURING CONSTRUCTIONAL ELEMENTS OR MACHINE PARTS TOGETHER, e.g. NAILS, BOLTS, CIRCLIPS, CLAMPS, CLIPS OR WEDGES; JOINTS OR JOINTING
- F16B5/00—Joining sheets or plates, e.g. panels, to one another or to strips or bars parallel to them
- F16B5/08—Joining sheets or plates, e.g. panels, to one another or to strips or bars parallel to them by means of welds or the like
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K2103/00—Materials to be soldered, welded or cut
- B23K2103/18—Dissimilar materials
- B23K2103/20—Ferrous alloys and aluminium or alloys thereof
Definitions
- the invention generally relates to methods for joining dissimilar materials and more particularly to connections between dissimilar metals having different melting points.
- Joining materials such as steel to aluminum, titanium, magnesium, or copper, or any combination thereof, has proved difficult for a variety of reasons.
- the prior art generally teaches that when these materials are joined that the temperatures must be maintained generally low so as to prevent the formation of brittle intermetallic compounds, which are generally believed to cause the welds to be brittle and fail.
- Most prior art methodologies for joining dissimilar materials have focused on getting rid of these brittle intermetallic portions especially when the intermetallic is the only means of joining the two dissimilar metals together.
- a method for connecting two dissimilar materials having different melting points wherein a first material having a higher melting point than a second material is plasticized to fill a preformed groove, shape or depression in the surface of a second material.
- the first and second materials are heated together (preferably rubbed and heated by friction) to obtain plasticization of the lower melting point material so as to cause the plasticization of the material and the movement of the material into the surface feature (groove) in such a way so as to form intermetallic features of the material within the solid state joint.
- the temperature within the joint is controlled so as to prevent overheating of the weld. Examples of how this temperature control is achieved is described in more detail in the detailed description.
- the method maybe performed using a friction stir welding device that extends to a plunge depth greater than the thickness of the second material.
- a friction stir welding device that extends to a plunge depth greater than the thickness of the second material.
- Various other features of the friction stir method may be appropriately modified so as to obtain the desired result. This may include varying the rate of traverse, process temperature, force pressures, rotation speeds, tool operational orientation, tip and shoulder temperatures, pretreatments including surface coatings, pre-fillings and other pretreatments and other parameters.
- pretreatments including surface coatings, pre-fillings and other pretreatments and other parameters.
- various configurations and operations of the various apertures, features, grooves, dovetail shaped depressions or other features of the devices may also be employed.
- the groove contains nested dovetail grooves and the friction stir welding tool is plunged into to the lower of two nested dovetail grooves such that a portion of the material defining the lower groove contacts the friction stir welding tool and results in the forming at least one feature of higher melting temperature material that extend upward into the lower melting temperature material.
- the friction stir welding tool is plunged into to the lower of two nested dovetail grooves such that a portion of the material defining the lower groove contacts the friction stir welding tool and results in the forming at least one feature of higher melting temperature material that extend upward into the lower melting temperature material.
- FIG. 1 shows a prior art configuration of a friction stir welding arrangement for use in connecting different materials
- FIG. 2 shows failed joints created by the arrangement shown in FIG. 1 with no metalurgically bonded interlayer.
- FIG. 3 shows an example of two materials of differing melting points joined in an overheating process where intermetallics are intentionally formed at the dissimilar interface.
- FIG. 4 shows an example of one embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 5 shows an intermetallic reinforced connection prior to tensile testing.
- FIG. 6 shows specimens after tensile testing when an intermetallic is intentionally formed at the dissimilar interface performed on various disclosed examples.
- FIG. 7 shows plots of the data reflected in Table 1.
- FIG. 8 shows SEM photographs of the intermetallic features in the filled dovetail sections corresponding to FIG. 7 and Table 1.
- FIGS. 9-11 show various embodiments and configurations of friction stir welding tools with mechanical contact shown being necessary to create metallurgical bond.
- FIGS. 12-14 shows various feature designs and the respective joints formed therein.
- FIGS. 15-18 show examples of such friction stir tooling.
- FIG. 19 shows information of one set of process parameters.
- FIG. 20 shows load vs. extension curves for different plunge depths.
- FIG. 21 shows the failure morphologies discovered during tensile testing having the data shown in FIG. 20 .
- FIG. 22 shows different interlayer thicknesses that are generated under the present embodiment.
- FIG. 23 shows an arrangement of one tested embodiment
- FIG. 24 shows a cross section of one tested configuration
- FIG. 25 shows various dovetail geometries.
- FIGS. 26-27 show the results of testing on the dovetail geometries of FIG. 25 .
- FIG. 28 shows the maximum tensile load per unit length of weld (i.e. specimen thickness) plotted against different dovetail grooves and welding conditions.
- FIG. 29 is a plot of a function of extension for different dovetail geometries.
- the present invention centers around the joining of dissimilar materials by utilizing a combination of embedded portions of a first material within a preformed geometric shape or groove located in another material under process conditions and tooling geometries able to form an intermetallic interconnection or layer at the dissimilar interface within the preformed shape or groove.
- Joining metals with different melting temperatures can be accomplished by extruding a lower melting temperature material into groves in a higher melting temperature material while simultaneously forming a metallurgical bond within the groove at the interface between the dissimilar metals. Joints with this configuration exhibit superior strength and ductility compared to other known techniques for Friction Stir Welding (FSW) of aluminum to steel.
- FSW Friction Stir Welding
- a method for creating such a connection using a friction stir welding tool to heat the materials, cause plasticization and the formation of intermetallic features and layers are described. Contrary to prior art which teaches that intermetallics and layers should not be created within preformed grooves, the method described herein teaches that creating intermetallics and layers within preformed grooves significantly improve strength and ductility.
- FIGS. 3-25 demonstrate various examples and embodiments of the invention.
- FIG. 1 a prior art configuration of a friction stir welding arrangement for use in connecting different materials is shown.
- a friction stir welding tool FSW
- a material typically the lower melting point material
- the tool and the plasticized zone that the rotating tool forms are traversed over a joint or along or raster path.
- the lower melting temperature material is heated by the friction stir welding device the lower temperature materials is plasticized and flows down into the preformed grooves in the higher temperature material.
- the configuration is arranged such that the tool does not enter into the dovetail and is far from contacting the higher melting temperature material to prevent mixing conditions and elevated temperatures which would form intermetallic layers at the interface between the higher and lower melting point materials.
- lower temperature welds are stronger because of the more finely grained microstructures that performing welds under these conditions can create. Therefore existing teachings in the art of friction stir welding try to run the weld as cold as possible and to avoid higher temperature operating conditions and the formation of intermetallic interfaces.
- connections that are formed by plasticizing and pushing the softened material down into without forming an intermetallic connection or layer results in a purely mechanical interconnection that may provide mechanical strength in one direction but does not include metallurgically bonded interlayer in other direction that the present invention provides.
- An example of the failure after tensile testing is shown in the photograph in FIG. 2 for a single and double dovetail joints with no metallurgically bonded interlayer.
- two materials of differing melting points are joined in a process wherein what is typically termed as overheating of the joint occurs and an intermetallic layer is formed within in the dovetail interconnect and strengthens rather than weakens the connection between the higher and lower temperature materials.
- Friction Stir Dovetailing a custom designed friction stir welding pin extends into the preformed feature (groove, slot, dovetail, or other depression of a predesignated geometry) and generates heat sufficient to both plasticize the lower melting point material such that it flows into the preformed feature while also heating the higher melting point material through rubbing to a point whereby the filled feature contains intermetallic features (or layer) at the joint interface.
- FIG. 4 An example of such an arrangement for performing this method is shown in FIG. 4 . This methodology has shown to be effective when the traverse rate is between 10 mm to 200 mm per minute, the process temperatures range from about 300° C.
- the vertical force is between about 1,000 pounds to about 25,000 pounds and the tool rpm between about 50 rpm to about 1000 rpm.
- All possible parameter combinations for all possible materials have not been examined and parameters outside the general ranges given may also produce the desired intermetallic. Thus the ranges given should not be viewed as restrictive but are exemplary. In other embodiments combinations of other heating methodologies may also be utilized whereby insertion of the tip of the FSW into the higher temperature material is not always necessary to achieve the formation of intermetallic features.
- Table 1 The data reflected in Table 1 is plotted in FIG. 7 and illustrates the effect of the formation of an intermetallic interface.
- samples A no intermetallic interface was formed.
- examples B and C these intermetallic interfaces were formed to different degrees.
- the data shows the inclusion of the interface in sample B increased the max. tensile load by 107% and extension at max. load increased by 92%.
- sample C the max. tensile load was increased by 42% and extension at max. load increased by 5%.
- the improvements attained with B (with intermetallic) compared to A (no intermetallic) are even larger when considering the load and extension at 75% of maximum load where failure is conventionally defined.
- the friction stir welding tool is inserted or oriented so as to contact the bottom or side of the groove and generate additional heat at these points of contact.
- This method generates heat at the interface where it is needed to form the intermetallic and is not generated in the bulk material where overheating could degrade the properties.
- This rubbing between the tool and underlying steel exposes atomically clean surfaces which facilitate formation of intermetallics.
- the groove or the dovetail may contain features that when brought into contact with the FSW tool cause this heating to take place and enhance the formation of intermetallic features.
- the shape of the FSW tool or tip may be modified so as to engage selected portions of the groove or the groove may be variously configured to engage with the FSW tool in a particular way. Examples of various modifications are shown in FIGS. 9, 10, and 11 .
- FIG. 10 shows an embodiment wherein the dimensions of the dovetails are proportioned to be generally shallow and small as compared to the pin diameter of this tool. Because the dovetails are shallow and small compared to the diameter of the pin tip, the overheated area created by contact between the pin and high temperature material is generally larger compared to other arrangements and is sufficient to generate a hot layer of material that can form a continuous layer of intermetallic features above and within the dovetails.
- induction heating is used to produce localized heating at the interface.
- plasticized material is forced through narrow openings between the tool and the higher melting temperature material within the dovetail to produce high temperature while the material flows. This localized heating within the gaps will cause localized heating within the gaps allowing for formation of intermetallic layers in the openings.
- the formation of intermetallic hooks of higher melting material are formed by running the tool within the dovetail while the tool is biased such that it contacts one or both side of the dovetail joint and higher temperature material into a hook as shown in FIG. 11 .
- This provides an advantage in that it increases the area of intermetallic contact between the dissimilar materials and assists in forcing the materials together.
- generally squared grooves are formed in the higher temperature material and then heated with the friction stir welding tool to cause the corners of the device to rise and form hooks in the lower melt temperature materials.
- the heating process forms intermetallic hooks. These hooks are formed by plunging the tool into to the lower of two nested dovetails (as shown in FIG. 12 ) such that the edges of the tool contact the corners of the lower dovetail resulting in the formation of two hooks of higher melting temperature material that extend upward into the lower melting temperature material.
- mechanical interlocking is accomplished by deforming groves that are easier or faster to manufacture. In instances a rastering grid can be produced. When the friction stir processing tool is sufficiently close to or contacts these grooves during welding, these grooves can have sections that are deformed and form intermetallic features that fill groves and provide strong interlocking. While straight grooves are shown for purposes of illustration this is not meant to be limiting. Various alternatives and modifications can be undertaken to deform the groove during welding to create mechanical interlocking or increase the amount of mechanical interlocking. In addition to the geometry that is shown a variety of other geometries including nesting features, multiple T-slots or notches or other fabricated features may be used to created layers of interlocking features. In some embodiments the dovetails or other mechanical interlocking features with rounded corners improve flow of material into the dovetail and reduce fatigue.
- the tool temperature and force are maintained constant so as to provide consistency along the weld path and manage the strength of the various parts. This is accomplished in one set of embodiments by controlling the tool temperature control algorithm and a force control algorithm in conjunction with techniques where the tool contacts the dovetails. Constant tool temperature and position improves consistency of the intermetallic layer and uniformity of size of generated hooks or new features along the weld path and from part to part. In some applications improved performance was obtained when a two piece friction stir welding tool was utilized wherein the pin and shoulder of the tool can move axially relative to one another.
- the pin can extend into the dovetail as material is worn from the pin without affecting the shoulder position. This could be done for example by having a servo actuated pin and shoulder that allows for selective connection and release. In another embodiment a spring loaded pin could be used to force more material out and keep pin length relatively constant despite wear on the pit itself.
- the upper low melting temperature materials are being extruded into the dovetail groves of underlying high melting temperature materials using a counter-clock wise threaded pin within the FSW tool. Thus clockwise rotation of the tool causes downward extrusion of the plasticized material. Locally heating dovetail interface caused metallurgical bonding by kneading action.
- the present invention utilizes the combination of mechanical interlocking with intermetallic formation
- various modifications and alterations could be made so as to enhance and foster the development of intermetallic interconnects at a lower temperature.
- a materials such as Yttrium, Tungsten, Molybdenum, Iron compounds and others could be applied to reduce the temperature or improve the rate of formation of intermetallic to the dovetail joints prior to FSD. This could be done using cold spray, thermal spray or any other deposition method which can also be used to tailor the composition of the intermetallic layer.
- pre-filled dovetails are utilized wherein the mechanical grooves in the higher temperature material is pre-filled with lower melting temperature material. This can reduce or eliminate the excess material that maybe removed from the top of the lower melting temperature material when filling the dovetail.
- This prefilling can be accomplished by filling the groove with bar stock, powder chips of other forms of the lower temperature material.
- a laminated approach could be used wherein arc welding, strip cladding or other fusion welding techniques are used to bond lower temperature materials such as aluminum inside of the dovetails and then execute friction stir welding to create the intermetallic hooks and interconnects. This can improve process robustness, welding speed and can prevent the formation of a recess at the top of the weld from material lost to fill the dovetail.
- friction stir welding was used to apply cladding by creating a dovetail grid similar to the grid shown in FIG. 14 .
- grid connotes a square or rectangular geometry it is to be understood that the grid can be circular or any other shape and while the grid would likely be two dimensional on flat cladding and three dimensional on contoured cladding these parameters are not limiting.
- This cladding arrangement allows for the use of a grooved grid for forming a mechanical interlocks that will in turn dramatically improve resistance to ballistic impact and provides the multi directional strength and fatigue life of thick section cladding.
- a two pass technique for accomplishing this was utilized wherein one pass of the friction stir device was made to create the intermetallic layer or layers along the dovetail interface and a second pass, run at much cooler process conditions followed which increased the strength of the material inside the dovetail while maintaining the intermetallic interface.
- Specialized tooling capable of 1) heating the dissimilar metal interface within or adjacent to the dovetail to temperatures higher than the stir zone and 2) “kneading” a thin interfacial layer to locally mix the dissimilar metals can also assist in the performance of the method.
- the simultaneous localized temperature rise and kneading at the dissimilar metal interface are achieved by pressing the tool against the higher temperature material during FSD.
- Tool and dovetails configurations can be designed in coordination to allow for contact anywhere or everywhere within the dovetail. This method enables the formation of intermetallic and/or amorphous bonding at the dissimilar interface, which reinforces the joint, while stir zone temperatures are kept low. A low stir zone temperature are preferable for minimizing degradation of bulk material properties in the lower melting point material.
- Tooling Friction stir tools have been developed with features specifically intended to extrude lower melting point metal into dovetail grooves in a higher melting point material; while simultaneously forming a metallurgical bond at the dissimilar interface.
- the tools contain an insert (such as tungsten-carbide, tungsten-rhenium, polycrystalline boron nitride, etc. . . . ) within the pin tip which enables high wear resistance and consistency of the metallurgical bond.
- a tungsten-carbide insert could be press fit into an H13 steel FSW tool.
- the insert rubs against the higher melting point material, within the dovetail groove, and gives dramatically improved tool life and wear resistance compared to tools without a tip insert.
- the intent is to protect insertion of high wear resistant materials into FSW tools as a pin, or pin insert, for the purpose of rubbing the higher melting temperature in a dissimilar dovetail joint—for the purpose of creating a metallurgical bond.
- a tip insert is the tool feature that interacts with the dissimilar material interface.
- the insert can be flat or convex, and may contain scrolls, stepped spirals or other features that enhance “kneading” of the dissimilar materials and also expose new material and push surface impurities away from the interface. Illustrative insert configurations are shown in FIG. 17 .
- the insert may be circular, hexagonal, square, or any shape desired. These features are unique from other tip features attempted in FSW because these features are designed to push material outward and to encourage the formation of a metallurgical bond at a dissimilar metal interface.
- FIG. 16 a shows the H13 FSW tool with circular tungsten carbide tip insert after eight linear feet of welding.
- the pin is not deformed and the tungsten carbide insert has no visible sign of wear.
- FIG. 16 b shows a H13 FSW tool without a tip insert after eight linear inches of welding. Wear and deformation is immediate when a hardened insert is not used when rubbing to generated an intermetallic bonding layer. Use of a tungsten carbide insert dramatically improves tool wear for this new process.
- two examples of FSW tools having tungsten-carbide inserts within the pin tip were used, see FIG. 18 .
- the upper tool contains a cylindrical insert and the lower tool contains a hexagonal insert.
- the cylindrical insert configuration was used to join AA6061 to Rolled Homogenous Armor (RHA) MIL-DTL-12560J in a lap weld configuration.
- the upper material of the lap joint was 0.5′′ thick AA60601 and the lower material was 0.5′′ thick RHA containing a single dovetail.
- a single tool was used to weld eight linear feet without visible signs of wear or degradation of the tip insert.
- FIG. 19 shows that in use, the temperature was higher at the face of the tip insert (area of rubbing on the RHA) than at the shoulder which is an important for making the key feature for forming a metallurgical bond. In traditional FSW, the shoulder is the highest temperature—which is not desirable in the present arrangement.
- FIG. 20 shows load vs. extension curves for different plunge depths (0.599′′, 0.603′′, 0.608′′ and 0.620′′) of the FSW tool.
- the 0.599′′ case did not involve rubbing of the tip insert within the dovetail grooves for the express purpose of determining baseline strength in the absence of a metallurgical bond.
- the other three plunge depths were intended to impart increasing amounts of rubbing between the tip insert and base of the RHA dovetail.
- a total of 26 specimens were tensile tested (qty 6 for 0.599′′, qty 5 for 0.603′′, qty 6 for 0.608′′, qty 9 for 0.620′′).
- the four curves in the following plot represent an average of each grouping. From this plot it is clear that the highest strength and largest ductility (extension) is for a plunge depth of 0.608′′. A smaller plunge depth of 0.603′′ gives lower strength and ductility as does a larger plunge depth of 0.620′′.
- FIG. 21 shows that the failure morphology during tensile testing (AA6061 being pulled to the right and RHA being pulled to the left) is very different for each of the four curves in the above plot.
- the aluminum simply pulls out of the dovetail as the aluminum corner plastically deforms.
- a weak metallurgical bond is formed which fractures in a brittle manner and then shears at the aluminum corner.
- the metallurgical bond does not fracture and failure occurs in the bulk aluminum within the dovetail resulting in higher strength and ductility.
- the case with the highest strength and ductility is for the 0.608′′ plunge depth where shear failure occurs in the bulk material.
- FIG. 22 shows different interlayer thicknesses (2.2 micron on left, 1.3 micron in middle and 100 nm on right) that are generated.
- the phase (for example, intermetallic or amorphous) and strength of the metallurgical bond at the dissimilar interface are affected by temperature as well as the strength of the heat affected zone in the aluminum.
- Controlling temperature in the stir zone and the dissimilar metal interface simultaneously can be performed by modulating the spindle axis speed, torque, current, power or any combination of these variables.
- the temperature of the dissimilar interface is preferably controlled by modulating the position, forge force or motor torque of the forge axis.
- Control algorithms governing the temperatures in the stir zone and at the dissimilar interface operate independently, but may be linked together as part of multivariable control scheme.
- the spindle axis is used to control the temperature of the stir zone and the forge axis to control the temperature at or near to the dissimilar interface. This could be done with a monolithic tool or with a two piece tool where the shoulder and pin can move relative to each other along the forge axis.
- Another embodiment of this concept is to use the spindle axis to control the temperature at or near the dissimilar interface and the forge axis to control the temperature of the stir zone. This could be done with a monolithic tool or with a two piece tool where the shoulder and pin can move relative to each other along the forge axis.
- the spindle axis is controlled by commanding speed, torque or power to regulate temperature and the forge axis is controlled by commanding a force, velocity or position change to regulate temperature.
- FSW machines that allow the pin to rotate relative to the shoulder one spindle axis can control the temperature of the stir zone, while the other control the temperature at the dissimilar interface.
- the friction stir dovetailing process can also be used to join dissimilar materials with a myriad of different joint configurations.
- metal with a higher melting point for example steel
- a metal having a lower melting point for example aluminum
- This “buttering” can be single or double sided and the thicker section can be either the higher or lower melting point material.
- the buttered layer, or underlying steel may contain features (not illustrated due to the limitless embodiments) such as tabs, angles, holes, slots and other features that enable subsequent fusion welding of joints having a final configuration that is otherwise unweldable for dissimilar metals.
- Buttering can also enable subsequent fusion welding of a nearly limitless array of other structures and attachments such as extrusions, brackets, threaded shafts, fittings and so forth (also not illustrated here due to the numerous possibilities). Buttering can also overcome clearance/access issues during manufacturing that are currently preventing adoption of FSW in vehicle applications.
- the buttering approach can also enable fusion welding in areas for materials where welded properties are more beneficial than FSW; all while simultaneously allowing a joint between dissimilar metals. Another example is the enabling of interior joints that are otherwise impossible for dissimilar metals.
- the chemistry of intermetallic or amorphous layers/regions affects the mechanical properties and microstructure of the metallurgically bonded interface.
- the intent is to protect the use of cold spray to deposit a layer of metal within the dovetail to modify the chemistry of the metallurgical bond at the dissimilar interface.
- One embodiment of this concept is to spray a thin layer of cold spray material on the inner surfaces prior to friction stir dovetailing.
- the dovetail groove could be filled partially or fully with cold spray material prior to FSW.
- cold spraying 7000 series aluminum into the dovetails of underlying steel would reduce/eliminate the presence of aluminum alloying elements and therefore change the structure/properties of the bonded interlayer.
- Solid-state joining of thick section aluminum to steel plate was achieved using a custom designed pin tool in a friction stir welding device to flow a lower melting point material (AA6061) into dovetail grooves previously machined into the surface of an underlying material having a higher melting point (rolled homogeneous armor [RHA]). Repeating dovetails form a mechanical interlocking structure akin to metallic Velcro, however the forming of intermetallic interconnects by the friction stir welding tool strengthened this interconnection.
- 38.1 mm (1.5 in.) thick AA6061 was joined to 12.7 mm (0.5 in.) thick RHA plates. Tensile test data showed specimens failing in the processed aluminum rather than at the joint interface.
- Plates of RHA procured to MIL-DTL-12560J were dual disc ground to a thickness of 12.7 mm and pre-machined dovetail grooves shown in FIG. 23 .
- the RHA plates were inserted into AA6061-T651 sandwich structures having a total thickness of 38.1 mm.
- FSD was performed using a tool made from H13 tool steel that was heat treated to obtain RHC 45.
- the one-piece FSW tool consists of a scrolled shoulder and a frustum shaped (6.1°) threaded+3 flatted pin.
- FSD was performed using a tool rotational speed of 275 RPM and welding speed ranging between 25-50 mm/min.
- FIGS. 26-27 A scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was employed to investigate the intermetallic formation. Tensile testing of sandwich plates was performed using a 50 kip MTS test frame to ascertain tensile test and microstructural observations. The results of that testing are shown in FIGS. 26-27 . Structural analysis of a dovetail joints between AA6061 and RHA subjected to tensile load was simulated using LS DYNA finite element software. The simulation predicted the failure of tensile specimens with, and without, the formation of IMCs along Al and RHA dovetail interface. Cases for 1, 2 and 3 dovetails having the outlined geometries (shown in FIG. 25 ) were structurally analyzed.
- FIG. 25 Transverse macro sections of Al-RHA joints with different dovetail geometries are shown in FIG. 25 .
- the macro-sections clearly demonstrate the effective filling of Al into the dovetail grooves regardless of dovetail geometric variations.
- the FSD process is quite robust in terms being able to fully fill the grooves. For example, welds were performed (from 200 to 275 rpm and 25 to 100 mm/min) with the tip of the tool ranging from 2 mm above the RHA surface to having the tool tip in contact with the bottom of the dovetails. In all cases, the grooves were fully filled with no voids observed. While FIG.
- FIGS. 26 and 27 provide a macro-view of weld cross sections in terms of defect formation and dovetail filling, metallographic analysis is needed to determine the bonding state along the Al-RHA interface. SEM analysis at the Al-RHA interface of specimens in are shown in FIGS. 26 and 27 respectively.
- the data indicates that interfacial bonding has occurred due to the formation of an IMC measuring 0.5 ⁇ m to 1 ⁇ m thick in narrow dovetail grooves and 1.0 ⁇ m to 2.0 ⁇ m thick in wider dovetail grooves.
- the SEM micrographs suggest that incipient melting of AA6061 during FSD might cause bonding between RHA and Al with the formation of an intermediate transition layer which will be further confirmed as IMCs from energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis.
- EDS energy dispersive spectroscopy
- the macro cross section shows the deformed layer of RHA near the upper region of dovetails where the stir tool intentionally contacted the RHA during processing to locally increase temperature and promote IMC formation. Consequently, the growing of IMCs were evident outside the dovetail in the SEM and EDS analysis. Frictional heating due to contact between the stir tool and RHA may result in the Al being melted locally, thereby resulting in the formation of IMCs. According to the EDS spectra and elemental composition, the intermetallic compounds FeAl2, Fe3Al or Fe2Al might form in the Al-RHA interlayer.
- FIG. 28 presents the maximum tensile load per unit length of weld (i.e. specimen thickness) plotted against different dovetail grooves and welding conditions. It was observed that nested dovetails result in higher strength than single wider dovetails regardless of welding speed. The higher load carrying capacity provided by nested dovetails is due to the additional interlocking that resists deformation in the tensile and transverse directions. In the absence of IMC, there does not appear to be a statistical difference in the load at failure on the weld speed range of 25-50 mm/min. However, inclusion of the IMC within the wider single dovetail at 25 mm/min was found to increase strength compared to the case of no IMC. This speaks to the role of IMC formation for improving joint strength. The narrow dovetails welded at 25 mm/min have IMC formation outside the dovetail and interestingly show higher strength than the wider dovetails with IMC. From this data, we concluded that the formation of IMCs significantly improves joint strength.
- the normalized load (load per unit weld length) as a function of extension for different dovetail geometries is plotted in FIG. 29 .
- Failure of the narrower dovetail specimen (A) occurred due to fracture of the brittle intermetallic layer on one side of the sandwich structure at peak load which is followed by ductile failure of bulk Al due to eccentric loading.
- For the specimens D and E successive separation of dovetails occurred after reaching the maximum load as the dovetails tend to unzip one pair after another. This phenomenon is indicated by the changes in slope of the load curves on their descending part as tensile testing progress to joint failure.
- the volume of the filled Al in the nested dovetail is high enough to encounter the tensile loading near the region of the additional interlock, resulting in failure in the Al with the failure plane perpendicular to the loading direction.
- the failure of the tensile specimen C is similar to specimen B.
- an additional contribution of bonding between Al and RHA with the formation of IMCs resulted in a bulk Al failure rather than a failure at the joint. This is indicative of the strength of the joint and demonstrates the viability of extending to a wide range of material stack-up (50 mm or higher thickness) to form dovetail interlock.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Pressure Welding/Diffusion-Bonding (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention claims priority from and incorporates by reference provisional patent application No. 62/393,409 entitled System And Process For Joining Dissimilar Materials And Solid-State Interlocking Joint With Intermetallic Interface Formed Thereby filed Sep. 12, 2016. It also incorporates provisional patent application No. 62/533,851 entitled The Joining Of Dissimilar Metals Through Formation Of Dovetail Extrusions With Metallurgically Bonded Interfaces filed: Jul. 18, 2017.
- This invention was made with Government support under Contract DE-AC0576RL01830 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
- The invention generally relates to methods for joining dissimilar materials and more particularly to connections between dissimilar metals having different melting points.
- A world of rising energy necessitates approaches for reducing the amount of energy needed to perform standard tasks. Among approaches under development are lighter more fuel efficient vehicles. Reducing the weight of vehicles can be accomplished in a variety of ways including replacing heavier steel regions with lighter weight materials such aluminum, plastic, carbon fiber or other dissimilar materials. However, difficulty has arisen in attempting to find ways to robustly join dissimilar materials in a way that provides the needed strength and resiliency that exists in structures that are made from the same material. Preferably, and in some instances by requirement, these seams and interconnects must be welded together. Welding is fairly straight forward when the two materials have similar melting points but becomes more and more difficult when the materials have vastly different melting points or other characteristics.
- Joining materials such as steel to aluminum, titanium, magnesium, or copper, or any combination thereof, has proved difficult for a variety of reasons. The prior art generally teaches that when these materials are joined that the temperatures must be maintained generally low so as to prevent the formation of brittle intermetallic compounds, which are generally believed to cause the welds to be brittle and fail. Most prior art methodologies for joining dissimilar materials have focused on getting rid of these brittle intermetallic portions especially when the intermetallic is the only means of joining the two dissimilar metals together.
- One of the ways that this is done is by isolating the other metal from the molten aluminum during the arc welding process. Techniques such as coatings, or inserting bimetallic inserts that contain portions of each of the two types of metals and which were formed by another process and welding the materials to the inserts are methodologies that have been taught and practiced. However, the needs for these additional steps increase the complexity and cost and are generally unsuitable in a high throughput manufacturing environment because of these issues and concerns.
- Hence what is needed is a process for forming high strength joints between dissimilar materials in ways that are simpler cheaper and more effective than the current methodologies. The present invention is a significant step forward in addressing these needs.
- Additional advantages and novel features of the present invention will be set forth as follows and will be readily apparent from the descriptions and demonstrations set forth herein. Accordingly, the following descriptions of the present invention should be seen as illustrative of the invention and not as limiting in any way.
- In one embodiment of the disclosure a method for connecting two dissimilar materials having different melting points is described wherein a first material having a higher melting point than a second material is plasticized to fill a preformed groove, shape or depression in the surface of a second material. The first and second materials are heated together (preferably rubbed and heated by friction) to obtain plasticization of the lower melting point material so as to cause the plasticization of the material and the movement of the material into the surface feature (groove) in such a way so as to form intermetallic features of the material within the solid state joint. Preferably and in some embodiments the temperature within the joint is controlled so as to prevent overheating of the weld. Examples of how this temperature control is achieved is described in more detail in the detailed description.
- In some embodiments the method maybe performed using a friction stir welding device that extends to a plunge depth greater than the thickness of the second material. Various other features of the friction stir method may be appropriately modified so as to obtain the desired result. This may include varying the rate of traverse, process temperature, force pressures, rotation speeds, tool operational orientation, tip and shoulder temperatures, pretreatments including surface coatings, pre-fillings and other pretreatments and other parameters. In addition, various configurations and operations of the various apertures, features, grooves, dovetail shaped depressions or other features of the devices may also be employed.
- In one exemplary arrangement the groove contains nested dovetail grooves and the friction stir welding tool is plunged into to the lower of two nested dovetail grooves such that a portion of the material defining the lower groove contacts the friction stir welding tool and results in the forming at least one feature of higher melting temperature material that extend upward into the lower melting temperature material. In addition to this single exemplary embodiment a variety of other embodiments are also described and set forward.
- The result of the implementation of this methodology for joining materials is the formation of a joint that has a geometric shape defined by a preformed groove in a first metal material having a first melting point that has been filled with a second material that has a second lower melting point that has been plasticized and heated to both fill the preformed groove and form intermetallic containing features. This method and these joints can be found in a variety of heterogeneous combinations including combinations of aluminum to steel and other metallic and non-metallic combinations.
- Various advantages and novel features of the present invention are described herein and will become further readily apparent to those skilled in this art from the following detailed description. In the preceding and following descriptions we have shown and described only the preferred embodiment of the invention, by way of illustration of the best mode contemplated for carrying out the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modification in various respects without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description of the preferred embodiment set forth hereafter are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.
-
FIG. 1 shows a prior art configuration of a friction stir welding arrangement for use in connecting different materials -
FIG. 2 shows failed joints created by the arrangement shown inFIG. 1 with no metalurgically bonded interlayer. -
FIG. 3 shows an example of two materials of differing melting points joined in an overheating process where intermetallics are intentionally formed at the dissimilar interface. -
FIG. 4 shows an example of one embodiment of the present disclosure. -
FIG. 5 shows an intermetallic reinforced connection prior to tensile testing. -
FIG. 6 shows specimens after tensile testing when an intermetallic is intentionally formed at the dissimilar interface performed on various disclosed examples. -
FIG. 7 shows plots of the data reflected in Table 1. -
FIG. 8 shows SEM photographs of the intermetallic features in the filled dovetail sections corresponding toFIG. 7 and Table 1. -
FIGS. 9-11 show various embodiments and configurations of friction stir welding tools with mechanical contact shown being necessary to create metallurgical bond. -
FIGS. 12-14 shows various feature designs and the respective joints formed therein. -
FIGS. 15-18 show examples of such friction stir tooling. -
FIG. 19 shows information of one set of process parameters. -
FIG. 20 shows load vs. extension curves for different plunge depths. -
FIG. 21 shows the failure morphologies discovered during tensile testing having the data shown inFIG. 20 . -
FIG. 22 shows different interlayer thicknesses that are generated under the present embodiment. -
FIG. 23 shows an arrangement of one tested embodiment -
FIG. 24 shows a cross section of one tested configuration -
FIG. 25 shows various dovetail geometries. -
FIGS. 26-27 show the results of testing on the dovetail geometries ofFIG. 25 . -
FIG. 28 shows the maximum tensile load per unit length of weld (i.e. specimen thickness) plotted against different dovetail grooves and welding conditions. -
FIG. 29 is a plot of a function of extension for different dovetail geometries. - The following description includes examples of various embodiments of the present invention. It will be clear from this description of the invention that the invention is not limited to these illustrated embodiments but that the invention also includes a variety of modifications and embodiments thereto. Therefore the present description should be seen as illustrative and not limiting. There is no intention in the specification to limit the invention to the specific form disclosed, but, on the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the claims.
- The present invention centers around the joining of dissimilar materials by utilizing a combination of embedded portions of a first material within a preformed geometric shape or groove located in another material under process conditions and tooling geometries able to form an intermetallic interconnection or layer at the dissimilar interface within the preformed shape or groove. Joining metals with different melting temperatures can be accomplished by extruding a lower melting temperature material into groves in a higher melting temperature material while simultaneously forming a metallurgical bond within the groove at the interface between the dissimilar metals. Joints with this configuration exhibit superior strength and ductility compared to other known techniques for Friction Stir Welding (FSW) of aluminum to steel.
- In one embodiment, a method for creating such a connection using a friction stir welding tool to heat the materials, cause plasticization and the formation of intermetallic features and layers are described. Contrary to prior art which teaches that intermetallics and layers should not be created within preformed grooves, the method described herein teaches that creating intermetallics and layers within preformed grooves significantly improve strength and ductility.
-
FIGS. 3-25 demonstrate various examples and embodiments of the invention. Referring however, first toFIG. 1 , a prior art configuration of a friction stir welding arrangement for use in connecting different materials is shown. In such an arrangement a friction stir welding tool (FSW) and a material are brought into contact and the material (typically the lower melting point material) is plasticized by the rotating tool. The tool and the plasticized zone that the rotating tool forms (stir zone) are traversed over a joint or along or raster path. When the lower melting temperature material is heated by the friction stir welding device the lower temperature materials is plasticized and flows down into the preformed grooves in the higher temperature material. - Typically the configuration is arranged such that the tool does not enter into the dovetail and is far from contacting the higher melting temperature material to prevent mixing conditions and elevated temperatures which would form intermetallic layers at the interface between the higher and lower melting point materials. Generally speaking, it is believed that lower temperature welds are stronger because of the more finely grained microstructures that performing welds under these conditions can create. Therefore existing teachings in the art of friction stir welding try to run the weld as cold as possible and to avoid higher temperature operating conditions and the formation of intermetallic interfaces. As a result the connections that are formed by plasticizing and pushing the softened material down into without forming an intermetallic connection or layer results in a purely mechanical interconnection that may provide mechanical strength in one direction but does not include metallurgically bonded interlayer in other direction that the present invention provides. An example of the failure after tensile testing is shown in the photograph in
FIG. 2 for a single and double dovetail joints with no metallurgically bonded interlayer. The lower melting point material, aluminum in this case, easily tears out from the groove within the higher melting point material (steel in this case). - In embodiments of the present invention, such as the example shown in
FIG. 3 , two materials of differing melting points are joined in a process wherein what is typically termed as overheating of the joint occurs and an intermetallic layer is formed within in the dovetail interconnect and strengthens rather than weakens the connection between the higher and lower temperature materials. - In one example of this process called Friction Stir Dovetailing (FSD) a custom designed friction stir welding pin extends into the preformed feature (groove, slot, dovetail, or other depression of a predesignated geometry) and generates heat sufficient to both plasticize the lower melting point material such that it flows into the preformed feature while also heating the higher melting point material through rubbing to a point whereby the filled feature contains intermetallic features (or layer) at the joint interface. An example of such an arrangement for performing this method is shown in
FIG. 4 . This methodology has shown to be effective when the traverse rate is between 10 mm to 200 mm per minute, the process temperatures range from about 300° C. to about 600° C., the vertical force is between about 1,000 pounds to about 25,000 pounds and the tool rpm between about 50 rpm to about 1000 rpm. All possible parameter combinations for all possible materials have not been examined and parameters outside the general ranges given may also produce the desired intermetallic. Thus the ranges given should not be viewed as restrictive but are exemplary. In other embodiments combinations of other heating methodologies may also be utilized whereby insertion of the tip of the FSW into the higher temperature material is not always necessary to achieve the formation of intermetallic features. - Contrary to the teachings in the art, the formation of this intermetallic connection between, for example, aluminum and steel within these locking sections significantly improves joint strength. This process is particularly applicable to thick section joints where no other practical solution currently exists. An intermetallic reinforced connection is shown in
FIG. 5 . - The effectiveness of FSD with an intermetallic layer for an AA6061 and Rolled Homogeneous Armor joint is demonstrated through tensile test data which shows specimens failing in the processed aluminum rather than at the joint interface. (see
FIG. 6 ). -
TABLE 1 Extension at 75% of Extension at Maximum Maximum Maximum 75% Maximum Weld Load Load Load Load Set N/mm mm N/mm mm A 560 ± 6 1.42 ± 0.04 420 ± 6 2.57 ± 0.05 B 1175 ± 36 2.73 ± 0.26 881 ± 27 5.36 ± 0.32 C 797 ± 25 1.49 ± 0.04 582 ± 18 2.24 ± 0.03 - The data reflected in Table 1 is plotted in
FIG. 7 and illustrates the effect of the formation of an intermetallic interface. In samples A, no intermetallic interface was formed. In examples B and C these intermetallic interfaces were formed to different degrees. As the data shows the inclusion of the interface in sample B increased the max. tensile load by 107% and extension at max. load increased by 92%. In sample C the max. tensile load was increased by 42% and extension at max. load increased by 5%. The improvements attained with B (with intermetallic) compared to A (no intermetallic) are even larger when considering the load and extension at 75% of maximum load where failure is conventionally defined. Contrary to the teachings of the prior art, a process that includes infilling with intermetallic formation has shown to be an effective process of joining and welding dissimilar materials and does not weaken the weld as the prior art suggests. In this described arrangement the entire dissimilar interface within the dovetail can react to stresses in more than a mechanical interlock in one direction. With intermetallic present, failure has been driven into the bulk material away from the joint; a highly desirable failure mode. - This arrangement prevents sheering of the angled lower temperature piece such as aluminum and dovetail pullout resulting in greatly improved strength of the joint. This results in lap sheer samples that fail in the lower temperature material, not at the joint. The results show that using FSP or FSW to extrude a plasticized material into an existing feature/s in a material of higher plasticization temperature with the intent to create a mechanical interlock where an intermetallic is created at the dissimilar material interface within the dovetail during the process is superior to joints where the intermetallic interconnect are not formed. SEM photographs of the intermetallic features in the filled dovetail section are shown in
FIG. 8 . Table 2 below shows the process conditions which generated the aluminum-steel intermetallic described inFIG. 8 leading to the data depicted inFIG. 7 . -
TABLE 2 Tool Avg. Avg. Avg. Plunge Shoulder Shoulder Rotational Forge Weld Avg. WC TIP Depth Scroll Temperature Speed Force Power Temperature Weld Set (mm) Numbers Degrees (C.) RPM kN kW Degrees C. A 15.22 3 470 170 35 4.95 475 B 15.45 3 470 150 57 4.85 490 C 15.45 2 470 400 19 5.25 570 - In addition to the various examples provided herein, a variety of other alterations or various variations to the basic concept are also contemplated, and various modifications to the process and processing parameters can be undertaken. In one embodiment of the present invention, the friction stir welding tool is inserted or oriented so as to contact the bottom or side of the groove and generate additional heat at these points of contact. This method generates heat at the interface where it is needed to form the intermetallic and is not generated in the bulk material where overheating could degrade the properties. This rubbing between the tool and underlying steel exposes atomically clean surfaces which facilitate formation of intermetallics. In other embodiments, the groove or the dovetail may contain features that when brought into contact with the FSW tool cause this heating to take place and enhance the formation of intermetallic features. In other embodiments the shape of the FSW tool or tip may be modified so as to engage selected portions of the groove or the groove may be variously configured to engage with the FSW tool in a particular way. Examples of various modifications are shown in
FIGS. 9, 10, and 11 . -
FIG. 10 for example, shows an embodiment wherein the dimensions of the dovetails are proportioned to be generally shallow and small as compared to the pin diameter of this tool. Because the dovetails are shallow and small compared to the diameter of the pin tip, the overheated area created by contact between the pin and high temperature material is generally larger compared to other arrangements and is sufficient to generate a hot layer of material that can form a continuous layer of intermetallic features above and within the dovetails. In other embodiments of the invention induction heating is used to produce localized heating at the interface. In other embodiments plasticized material is forced through narrow openings between the tool and the higher melting temperature material within the dovetail to produce high temperature while the material flows. This localized heating within the gaps will cause localized heating within the gaps allowing for formation of intermetallic layers in the openings. - In other embodiments of the invention, the formation of intermetallic hooks of higher melting material are formed by running the tool within the dovetail while the tool is biased such that it contacts one or both side of the dovetail joint and higher temperature material into a hook as shown in
FIG. 11 . This provides an advantage in that it increases the area of intermetallic contact between the dissimilar materials and assists in forcing the materials together. In other embodiments generally squared grooves are formed in the higher temperature material and then heated with the friction stir welding tool to cause the corners of the device to rise and form hooks in the lower melt temperature materials. In other embodiments the heating process forms intermetallic hooks. These hooks are formed by plunging the tool into to the lower of two nested dovetails (as shown inFIG. 12 ) such that the edges of the tool contact the corners of the lower dovetail resulting in the formation of two hooks of higher melting temperature material that extend upward into the lower melting temperature material. - While this specific example is provided the particular squared form of the groove should not be seen as limiting and it should be understood that various other embodiments wherein the geometry provides that pushing the tool into a fabricated groove or slit or against the edge of a groove slit so as to cause the higher melting temperature alloy to form a hook or other feature that extends into the lower melting temperature material during friction stir processing, welding or dovetailing are also contemplated. Examples of such configurations and embodiments are found for example in
FIG. 13 . - In other arrangements such as the one shown in
FIG. 14 mechanical interlocking is accomplished by deforming groves that are easier or faster to manufacture. In instances a rastering grid can be produced. When the friction stir processing tool is sufficiently close to or contacts these grooves during welding, these grooves can have sections that are deformed and form intermetallic features that fill groves and provide strong interlocking. While straight grooves are shown for purposes of illustration this is not meant to be limiting. Various alternatives and modifications can be undertaken to deform the groove during welding to create mechanical interlocking or increase the amount of mechanical interlocking. In addition to the geometry that is shown a variety of other geometries including nesting features, multiple T-slots or notches or other fabricated features may be used to created layers of interlocking features. In some embodiments the dovetails or other mechanical interlocking features with rounded corners improve flow of material into the dovetail and reduce fatigue. - Preferably the tool temperature and force are maintained constant so as to provide consistency along the weld path and manage the strength of the various parts. This is accomplished in one set of embodiments by controlling the tool temperature control algorithm and a force control algorithm in conjunction with techniques where the tool contacts the dovetails. Constant tool temperature and position improves consistency of the intermetallic layer and uniformity of size of generated hooks or new features along the weld path and from part to part. In some applications improved performance was obtained when a two piece friction stir welding tool was utilized wherein the pin and shoulder of the tool can move axially relative to one another.
- In cases where the pin is contacting the high temperature material within the dovetail, the pin can extend into the dovetail as material is worn from the pin without affecting the shoulder position. This could be done for example by having a servo actuated pin and shoulder that allows for selective connection and release. In another embodiment a spring loaded pin could be used to force more material out and keep pin length relatively constant despite wear on the pit itself. In another embodiment of the invention the upper low melting temperature materials are being extruded into the dovetail groves of underlying high melting temperature materials using a counter-clock wise threaded pin within the FSW tool. Thus clockwise rotation of the tool causes downward extrusion of the plasticized material. Locally heating dovetail interface caused metallurgical bonding by kneading action.
- In as much as the present invention utilizes the combination of mechanical interlocking with intermetallic formation various modifications and alterations could be made so as to enhance and foster the development of intermetallic interconnects at a lower temperature. In one example, a materials such as Yttrium, Tungsten, Molybdenum, Iron compounds and others could be applied to reduce the temperature or improve the rate of formation of intermetallic to the dovetail joints prior to FSD. This could be done using cold spray, thermal spray or any other deposition method which can also be used to tailor the composition of the intermetallic layer.
- In another example pre-filled dovetails are utilized wherein the mechanical grooves in the higher temperature material is pre-filled with lower melting temperature material. This can reduce or eliminate the excess material that maybe removed from the top of the lower melting temperature material when filling the dovetail. This prefilling can be accomplished by filling the groove with bar stock, powder chips of other forms of the lower temperature material. In another embodiment a laminated approach could be used wherein arc welding, strip cladding or other fusion welding techniques are used to bond lower temperature materials such as aluminum inside of the dovetails and then execute friction stir welding to create the intermetallic hooks and interconnects. This can improve process robustness, welding speed and can prevent the formation of a recess at the top of the weld from material lost to fill the dovetail.
- In one application friction stir welding was used to apply cladding by creating a dovetail grid similar to the grid shown in
FIG. 14 . While the term grid connotes a square or rectangular geometry it is to be understood that the grid can be circular or any other shape and while the grid would likely be two dimensional on flat cladding and three dimensional on contoured cladding these parameters are not limiting. This cladding arrangement allows for the use of a grooved grid for forming a mechanical interlocks that will in turn dramatically improve resistance to ballistic impact and provides the multi directional strength and fatigue life of thick section cladding. In one set of preferred embodiments a two pass technique for accomplishing this was utilized wherein one pass of the friction stir device was made to create the intermetallic layer or layers along the dovetail interface and a second pass, run at much cooler process conditions followed which increased the strength of the material inside the dovetail while maintaining the intermetallic interface. - Specialized tooling capable of 1) heating the dissimilar metal interface within or adjacent to the dovetail to temperatures higher than the stir zone and 2) “kneading” a thin interfacial layer to locally mix the dissimilar metals can also assist in the performance of the method. The simultaneous localized temperature rise and kneading at the dissimilar metal interface are achieved by pressing the tool against the higher temperature material during FSD. Tool and dovetails configurations can be designed in coordination to allow for contact anywhere or everywhere within the dovetail. This method enables the formation of intermetallic and/or amorphous bonding at the dissimilar interface, which reinforces the joint, while stir zone temperatures are kept low. A low stir zone temperature are preferable for minimizing degradation of bulk material properties in the lower melting point material. Examples of such tooling are shown in
FIGS. 15-16 . Tooling Friction stir tools have been developed with features specifically intended to extrude lower melting point metal into dovetail grooves in a higher melting point material; while simultaneously forming a metallurgical bond at the dissimilar interface. The tools contain an insert (such as tungsten-carbide, tungsten-rhenium, polycrystalline boron nitride, etc. . . . ) within the pin tip which enables high wear resistance and consistency of the metallurgical bond. For example, a tungsten-carbide insert could be press fit into an H13 steel FSW tool. The insert rubs against the higher melting point material, within the dovetail groove, and gives dramatically improved tool life and wear resistance compared to tools without a tip insert. The intent is to protect insertion of high wear resistant materials into FSW tools as a pin, or pin insert, for the purpose of rubbing the higher melting temperature in a dissimilar dovetail joint—for the purpose of creating a metallurgical bond. These illustrative examples are not intended to restrict the possible configurations. - In one embodiment a tip insert is the tool feature that interacts with the dissimilar material interface. The insert can be flat or convex, and may contain scrolls, stepped spirals or other features that enhance “kneading” of the dissimilar materials and also expose new material and push surface impurities away from the interface. Illustrative insert configurations are shown in
FIG. 17 . The insert may be circular, hexagonal, square, or any shape desired. These features are unique from other tip features attempted in FSW because these features are designed to push material outward and to encourage the formation of a metallurgical bond at a dissimilar metal interface. -
FIG. 16a shows the H13 FSW tool with circular tungsten carbide tip insert after eight linear feet of welding. The pin is not deformed and the tungsten carbide insert has no visible sign of wear. By comparison,FIG. 16b shows a H13 FSW tool without a tip insert after eight linear inches of welding. Wear and deformation is immediate when a hardened insert is not used when rubbing to generated an intermetallic bonding layer. Use of a tungsten carbide insert dramatically improves tool wear for this new process. In one set of tests two examples of FSW tools having tungsten-carbide inserts within the pin tip were used, seeFIG. 18 . The upper tool contains a cylindrical insert and the lower tool contains a hexagonal insert. The cylindrical insert configuration was used to join AA6061 to Rolled Homogenous Armor (RHA) MIL-DTL-12560J in a lap weld configuration. The upper material of the lap joint was 0.5″ thick AA60601 and the lower material was 0.5″ thick RHA containing a single dovetail. A single tool was used to weld eight linear feet without visible signs of wear or degradation of the tip insert.FIG. 19 shows that in use, the temperature was higher at the face of the tip insert (area of rubbing on the RHA) than at the shoulder which is an important for making the key feature for forming a metallurgical bond. In traditional FSW, the shoulder is the highest temperature—which is not desirable in the present arrangement. - In one set of experiments nine sets of lap joints were welded having key parameters within the following ranges. Tool speed 100-250 rpm, federate up to 7.5 cm/min, force 25-100 kN, torque 250-350 Nm, tip temperature 450-550 degrees C., shoulder temp 400-500 degrees C. These samples were then tested at different plunge depths.
FIG. 20 shows load vs. extension curves for different plunge depths (0.599″, 0.603″, 0.608″ and 0.620″) of the FSW tool. The 0.599″ case did not involve rubbing of the tip insert within the dovetail grooves for the express purpose of determining baseline strength in the absence of a metallurgical bond. The other three plunge depths were intended to impart increasing amounts of rubbing between the tip insert and base of the RHA dovetail. A total of 26 specimens were tensile tested (qty 6 for 0.599″,qty 5 for 0.603″,qty 6 for 0.608″,qty 9 for 0.620″). The four curves in the following plot represent an average of each grouping. From this plot it is clear that the highest strength and largest ductility (extension) is for a plunge depth of 0.608″. A smaller plunge depth of 0.603″ gives lower strength and ductility as does a larger plunge depth of 0.620″. -
FIG. 21 shows that the failure morphology during tensile testing (AA6061 being pulled to the right and RHA being pulled to the left) is very different for each of the four curves in the above plot. For the 0.599″ plunge depth, the aluminum simply pulls out of the dovetail as the aluminum corner plastically deforms. For the 0.603″ plunge depth, a weak metallurgical bond is formed which fractures in a brittle manner and then shears at the aluminum corner. For the 0.62″ case, the metallurgical bond does not fracture and failure occurs in the bulk aluminum within the dovetail resulting in higher strength and ductility. The case with the highest strength and ductility is for the 0.608″ plunge depth where shear failure occurs in the bulk material. -
FIG. 22 shows different interlayer thicknesses (2.2 micron on left, 1.3 micron in middle and 100 nm on right) that are generated. The phase (for example, intermetallic or amorphous) and strength of the metallurgical bond at the dissimilar interface are affected by temperature as well as the strength of the heat affected zone in the aluminum. Controlling temperature in the stir zone and the dissimilar metal interface simultaneously can be performed by modulating the spindle axis speed, torque, current, power or any combination of these variables. The temperature of the dissimilar interface is preferably controlled by modulating the position, forge force or motor torque of the forge axis. Control algorithms governing the temperatures in the stir zone and at the dissimilar interface operate independently, but may be linked together as part of multivariable control scheme. - In one embodiment the spindle axis is used to control the temperature of the stir zone and the forge axis to control the temperature at or near to the dissimilar interface. This could be done with a monolithic tool or with a two piece tool where the shoulder and pin can move relative to each other along the forge axis. Another embodiment of this concept is to use the spindle axis to control the temperature at or near the dissimilar interface and the forge axis to control the temperature of the stir zone. This could be done with a monolithic tool or with a two piece tool where the shoulder and pin can move relative to each other along the forge axis. Typically the spindle axis is controlled by commanding speed, torque or power to regulate temperature and the forge axis is controlled by commanding a force, velocity or position change to regulate temperature. In FSW machines that allow the pin to rotate relative to the shoulder one spindle axis can control the temperature of the stir zone, while the other control the temperature at the dissimilar interface.
- The friction stir dovetailing process can also be used to join dissimilar materials with a myriad of different joint configurations. For example, metal with a higher melting point (for example steel) can be “buttered” (coated) with a metal having a lower melting point (for example aluminum) such that subsequent fusion welding can be performed to form previously impossible configurations for dissimilar metals. This “buttering” can be single or double sided and the thicker section can be either the higher or lower melting point material. The buttered layer, or underlying steel, may contain features (not illustrated due to the limitless embodiments) such as tabs, angles, holes, slots and other features that enable subsequent fusion welding of joints having a final configuration that is otherwise unweldable for dissimilar metals. Buttering can also enable subsequent fusion welding of a nearly limitless array of other structures and attachments such as extrusions, brackets, threaded shafts, fittings and so forth (also not illustrated here due to the numerous possibilities). Buttering can also overcome clearance/access issues during manufacturing that are currently preventing adoption of FSW in vehicle applications. The buttering approach can also enable fusion welding in areas for materials where welded properties are more beneficial than FSW; all while simultaneously allowing a joint between dissimilar metals. Another example is the enabling of interior joints that are otherwise impossible for dissimilar metals.
- The chemistry of intermetallic or amorphous layers/regions affects the mechanical properties and microstructure of the metallurgically bonded interface. The intent is to protect the use of cold spray to deposit a layer of metal within the dovetail to modify the chemistry of the metallurgical bond at the dissimilar interface. One embodiment of this concept is to spray a thin layer of cold spray material on the inner surfaces prior to friction stir dovetailing. Alternatively, the dovetail groove could be filled partially or fully with cold spray material prior to FSW. For example, cold spraying 7000 series aluminum into the dovetails of underlying steel would reduce/eliminate the presence of aluminum alloying elements and therefore change the structure/properties of the bonded interlayer.
- The following examples are provided as illustrations of the principles and embodiments described above:
- Solid-state joining of thick section aluminum to steel plate was achieved using a custom designed pin tool in a friction stir welding device to flow a lower melting point material (AA6061) into dovetail grooves previously machined into the surface of an underlying material having a higher melting point (rolled homogeneous armor [RHA]). Repeating dovetails form a mechanical interlocking structure akin to metallic Velcro, however the forming of intermetallic interconnects by the friction stir welding tool strengthened this interconnection. In one example, 38.1 mm (1.5 in.) thick AA6061 was joined to 12.7 mm (0.5 in.) thick RHA plates. Tensile test data showed specimens failing in the processed aluminum rather than at the joint interface.
- Plates of RHA procured to MIL-DTL-12560J were dual disc ground to a thickness of 12.7 mm and pre-machined dovetail grooves shown in
FIG. 23 . The RHA plates were inserted into AA6061-T651 sandwich structures having a total thickness of 38.1 mm. FSD was performed using a tool made from H13 tool steel that was heat treated to obtain RHC 45. The one-piece FSW tool consists of a scrolled shoulder and a frustum shaped (6.1°) threaded+3 flatted pin. FSD was performed using a tool rotational speed of 275 RPM and welding speed ranging between 25-50 mm/min. All welding was performed using a position control mode where the forge force is a response variable of the commanded plunge depth. Welds were made on the top side, then machined flat, and the assembly was turned over to weld the bottom side. Tensile specimens were cut from the welded Al-steel to an average thickness of 12.0 mm using a water jet. A cross section is shown inFIG. 24 . Standard grinding and polishing sequences were followed for metallographic sample preparation and final polished surface was obtained using colloidal silica (<0.05 μm). - A scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was employed to investigate the intermetallic formation. Tensile testing of sandwich plates was performed using a 50 kip MTS test frame to ascertain tensile test and microstructural observations. The results of that testing are shown in
FIGS. 26-27 . Structural analysis of a dovetail joints between AA6061 and RHA subjected to tensile load was simulated using LS DYNA finite element software. The simulation predicted the failure of tensile specimens with, and without, the formation of IMCs along Al and RHA dovetail interface. Cases for 1, 2 and 3 dovetails having the outlined geometries (shown inFIG. 25 ) were structurally analyzed. - From the finite element simulations, it was observed that shear failure of the Al dovetail occurred for configuration with one, two and three dovetails when no intermetallic connection is present. Therefore, simple dovetail interlock without bonding doesn't have impact on structural integrity regardless of the number of dovetails. The testing showed that joint strength is improved when IMC is present at the Al-RHA interface within the dovetail. In the case of IMC being present, only two dovetail features are required to cause failure in the bulk Al. In general, the results of this structural analysis indicate that, the presence of IMCs formation improves joint efficiency in the FSD process. As a result, steps were taken to generate an IMC at the Al-RHA interface while simultaneously filling the dovetail grooves.
- Transverse macro sections of Al-RHA joints with different dovetail geometries are shown in
FIG. 25 . The macro-sections clearly demonstrate the effective filling of Al into the dovetail grooves regardless of dovetail geometric variations. The FSD process is quite robust in terms being able to fully fill the grooves. For example, welds were performed (from 200 to 275 rpm and 25 to 100 mm/min) with the tip of the tool ranging from 2 mm above the RHA surface to having the tool tip in contact with the bottom of the dovetails. In all cases, the grooves were fully filled with no voids observed. WhileFIG. 25 provides a macro-view of weld cross sections in terms of defect formation and dovetail filling, metallographic analysis is needed to determine the bonding state along the Al-RHA interface. SEM analysis at the Al-RHA interface of specimens in are shown inFIGS. 26 and 27 respectively. - The data indicates that interfacial bonding has occurred due to the formation of an IMC measuring 0.5 μm to 1 μm thick in narrow dovetail grooves and 1.0 μm to 2.0 μm thick in wider dovetail grooves. The SEM micrographs suggest that incipient melting of AA6061 during FSD might cause bonding between RHA and Al with the formation of an intermediate transition layer which will be further confirmed as IMCs from energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. The formation of IMCs was confirmed by elemental quantitative analysis using EDS. The spot (area) and line scanning energy spectrum results are combined with the SEM micrograph in
FIG. 27 . The atomic percentage of corresponding line scans of Al and Fe at the intermediate transition layer indicate a diffusion profile of Al and Fe across the interface suggesting IMC formation. Moreover, the EDS spot analysis of this layer showed 79 at. % Al and 14 at. % Fe. In FSD, intense plastic deformation of AA6061 by the stirring tool might cause incipient melting of Al in close proximity to the RHA due to high localized temperature. The increased heat input caused by the tool contacting and deforming the RHA resulted in the formation of possible multiple IMCs (AlFe, Al3Fe, FeAl2, Al4Fe, Al13Fe4, Al5Fe2 etc.) at the bonding interface which might be further confirmed from temperature measurement during FSD, phase diagram analysis and corresponding X-ray diffraction analysis. - The macro cross section shows the deformed layer of RHA near the upper region of dovetails where the stir tool intentionally contacted the RHA during processing to locally increase temperature and promote IMC formation. Consequently, the growing of IMCs were evident outside the dovetail in the SEM and EDS analysis. Frictional heating due to contact between the stir tool and RHA may result in the Al being melted locally, thereby resulting in the formation of IMCs. According to the EDS spectra and elemental composition, the intermetallic compounds FeAl2, Fe3Al or Fe2Al might form in the Al-RHA interlayer.
-
FIG. 28 presents the maximum tensile load per unit length of weld (i.e. specimen thickness) plotted against different dovetail grooves and welding conditions. It was observed that nested dovetails result in higher strength than single wider dovetails regardless of welding speed. The higher load carrying capacity provided by nested dovetails is due to the additional interlocking that resists deformation in the tensile and transverse directions. In the absence of IMC, there does not appear to be a statistical difference in the load at failure on the weld speed range of 25-50 mm/min. However, inclusion of the IMC within the wider single dovetail at 25 mm/min was found to increase strength compared to the case of no IMC. This speaks to the role of IMC formation for improving joint strength. The narrow dovetails welded at 25 mm/min have IMC formation outside the dovetail and interestingly show higher strength than the wider dovetails with IMC. From this data, we concluded that the formation of IMCs significantly improves joint strength. - The normalized load (load per unit weld length) as a function of extension for different dovetail geometries is plotted in
FIG. 29 . Failure of the narrower dovetail specimen (A) occurred due to fracture of the brittle intermetallic layer on one side of the sandwich structure at peak load which is followed by ductile failure of bulk Al due to eccentric loading. For the specimens D and E, successive separation of dovetails occurred after reaching the maximum load as the dovetails tend to unzip one pair after another. This phenomenon is indicated by the changes in slope of the load curves on their descending part as tensile testing progress to joint failure. For the nested dovetail welded at 25 mm/min corresponding to specimen C, failure occurred in the processed Al rather than at the dovetail interlock. As mentioned earlier the volume of the filled Al in the nested dovetail is high enough to encounter the tensile loading near the region of the additional interlock, resulting in failure in the Al with the failure plane perpendicular to the loading direction. The failure of the tensile specimen C is similar to specimen B. However, an additional contribution of bonding between Al and RHA with the formation of IMCs resulted in a bulk Al failure rather than a failure at the joint. This is indicative of the strength of the joint and demonstrates the viability of extending to a wide range of material stack-up (50 mm or higher thickness) to form dovetail interlock. - While various preferred embodiments of the invention are shown and described, it is to be distinctly understood that this invention is not limited thereto but may be variously embodied to practice within the scope of the following claims. From the foregoing description, it will be apparent that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
Claims (15)
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/694,565 US20180073532A1 (en) | 2016-09-12 | 2017-09-01 | System and process for joining dissimilar materials and solid-state interlocking joint with intermetallic interface formed thereby |
US16/564,872 US20200016687A1 (en) | 2016-09-12 | 2019-09-09 | Methods and Devices for Connecting Two Dissimilar Materials |
US18/494,648 US20240058891A1 (en) | 2016-09-12 | 2023-10-25 | Methods and devices for connecting two dissimilar materials |
US18/494,629 US20240052862A1 (en) | 2016-09-12 | 2023-10-25 | System and process for joining dissimilar materials and solid-state interlocking joint with intermetallic interface formed thereby |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201662393409P | 2016-09-12 | 2016-09-12 | |
US201762533851P | 2017-07-18 | 2017-07-18 | |
US15/694,565 US20180073532A1 (en) | 2016-09-12 | 2017-09-01 | System and process for joining dissimilar materials and solid-state interlocking joint with intermetallic interface formed thereby |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/564,872 Continuation-In-Part US20200016687A1 (en) | 2016-09-12 | 2019-09-09 | Methods and Devices for Connecting Two Dissimilar Materials |
US18/494,629 Division US20240052862A1 (en) | 2016-09-12 | 2023-10-25 | System and process for joining dissimilar materials and solid-state interlocking joint with intermetallic interface formed thereby |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20180073532A1 true US20180073532A1 (en) | 2018-03-15 |
Family
ID=61559262
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/694,565 Abandoned US20180073532A1 (en) | 2016-09-12 | 2017-09-01 | System and process for joining dissimilar materials and solid-state interlocking joint with intermetallic interface formed thereby |
US18/494,629 Pending US20240052862A1 (en) | 2016-09-12 | 2023-10-25 | System and process for joining dissimilar materials and solid-state interlocking joint with intermetallic interface formed thereby |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US18/494,629 Pending US20240052862A1 (en) | 2016-09-12 | 2023-10-25 | System and process for joining dissimilar materials and solid-state interlocking joint with intermetallic interface formed thereby |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20180073532A1 (en) |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20170197274A1 (en) * | 2014-07-10 | 2017-07-13 | Megastir Technologies Llc | Mechanical flow joining of high melting temperature materials |
US20170216961A1 (en) * | 2014-07-10 | 2017-08-03 | Megastir Technologies Llc | Friction stir extrusion of nonweldable materials for downhole tools |
US20180044499A1 (en) * | 2016-08-09 | 2018-02-15 | Hamilton Housewares Pvt. Ltd. | Reheatable and washproof container with insulation properties |
CN108838510A (en) * | 2018-08-01 | 2018-11-20 | 沈阳航空航天大学 | A kind of welder and method improving the agitating friction weldering hook-shaped defect of lap joint |
US20190126561A1 (en) * | 2017-10-26 | 2019-05-02 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Friction stirring interlocking of dissimilar materials |
US20190257332A1 (en) * | 2018-02-20 | 2019-08-22 | Dana Automotive Systems Group, Llc | Two Material Joint Design |
US10792770B1 (en) * | 2017-11-29 | 2020-10-06 | Geocent, LLC | Vacuum chuck system for a weld tool |
CN111906430A (en) * | 2019-05-10 | 2020-11-10 | 财团法人金属工业研究发展中心 | Friction stir welding tool and method for joining metal plate and thermoplastic composite plate |
US11020816B1 (en) * | 2018-09-05 | 2021-06-01 | Seagate Technology Llc | Methods of forming a friction stir weld between a steel piece and an aluminum piece, and related assemblies |
US20210205919A1 (en) * | 2020-01-02 | 2021-07-08 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Methods Of Joining Dissimilar Metals Without Detrimental Intermetallic Compounds |
CN113500285A (en) * | 2021-07-07 | 2021-10-15 | 上海交通大学 | Friction stir welding joint made of dissimilar metal materials and method for preparing friction stir welding joint and improving strength of friction stir welding joint |
US11167375B2 (en) | 2018-08-10 | 2021-11-09 | The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York | Additive manufacturing processes and additively manufactured products |
US11253945B2 (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2022-02-22 | Hyundai Motor Company | Method for joining hot-stamped steel sheets |
CN114643406A (en) * | 2022-04-01 | 2022-06-21 | 哈焊国创(青岛)焊接工程创新中心有限公司 | Friction micro-rivet welding method for light alloy and fiber reinforced composite material |
CN114654071A (en) * | 2022-03-22 | 2022-06-24 | 大连交通大学 | Friction stir welding method for pre-slotting and then filling hot wire |
WO2023077300A1 (en) * | 2021-11-03 | 2023-05-11 | 黄山学院 | Method for modifying surface performance of lightweight alloy |
US11890788B2 (en) | 2020-05-20 | 2024-02-06 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Methods and process for producing polymer-metal hybrid components bonded by C—O-M bonds |
-
2017
- 2017-09-01 US US15/694,565 patent/US20180073532A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2023
- 2023-10-25 US US18/494,629 patent/US20240052862A1/en active Pending
Cited By (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20170197274A1 (en) * | 2014-07-10 | 2017-07-13 | Megastir Technologies Llc | Mechanical flow joining of high melting temperature materials |
US20170216961A1 (en) * | 2014-07-10 | 2017-08-03 | Megastir Technologies Llc | Friction stir extrusion of nonweldable materials for downhole tools |
US10695861B2 (en) * | 2014-07-10 | 2020-06-30 | Mazak Corporation | Friction stir extrusion of nonweldable materials for downhole tools |
US20180044499A1 (en) * | 2016-08-09 | 2018-02-15 | Hamilton Housewares Pvt. Ltd. | Reheatable and washproof container with insulation properties |
US10577474B2 (en) * | 2016-08-09 | 2020-03-03 | Hamilton Housewares Pvt. Ltd. | Reheatable and washproof container with insulation properties |
US20190126561A1 (en) * | 2017-10-26 | 2019-05-02 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Friction stirring interlocking of dissimilar materials |
US10369748B2 (en) * | 2017-10-26 | 2019-08-06 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Friction stirring interlocking of dissimilar materials |
US10792770B1 (en) * | 2017-11-29 | 2020-10-06 | Geocent, LLC | Vacuum chuck system for a weld tool |
US11253945B2 (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2022-02-22 | Hyundai Motor Company | Method for joining hot-stamped steel sheets |
US20190257332A1 (en) * | 2018-02-20 | 2019-08-22 | Dana Automotive Systems Group, Llc | Two Material Joint Design |
US10895276B2 (en) * | 2018-02-20 | 2021-01-19 | Dana Automotive Systems Group, Llc | Two material joint design |
CN108838510A (en) * | 2018-08-01 | 2018-11-20 | 沈阳航空航天大学 | A kind of welder and method improving the agitating friction weldering hook-shaped defect of lap joint |
US11167375B2 (en) | 2018-08-10 | 2021-11-09 | The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York | Additive manufacturing processes and additively manufactured products |
US11426818B2 (en) | 2018-08-10 | 2022-08-30 | The Research Foundation for the State University | Additive manufacturing processes and additively manufactured products |
US11020816B1 (en) * | 2018-09-05 | 2021-06-01 | Seagate Technology Llc | Methods of forming a friction stir weld between a steel piece and an aluminum piece, and related assemblies |
CN111906430A (en) * | 2019-05-10 | 2020-11-10 | 财团法人金属工业研究发展中心 | Friction stir welding tool and method for joining metal plate and thermoplastic composite plate |
US20210205919A1 (en) * | 2020-01-02 | 2021-07-08 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Methods Of Joining Dissimilar Metals Without Detrimental Intermetallic Compounds |
US11890788B2 (en) | 2020-05-20 | 2024-02-06 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Methods and process for producing polymer-metal hybrid components bonded by C—O-M bonds |
CN113500285A (en) * | 2021-07-07 | 2021-10-15 | 上海交通大学 | Friction stir welding joint made of dissimilar metal materials and method for preparing friction stir welding joint and improving strength of friction stir welding joint |
WO2023077300A1 (en) * | 2021-11-03 | 2023-05-11 | 黄山学院 | Method for modifying surface performance of lightweight alloy |
CN114654071A (en) * | 2022-03-22 | 2022-06-24 | 大连交通大学 | Friction stir welding method for pre-slotting and then filling hot wire |
CN114643406A (en) * | 2022-04-01 | 2022-06-21 | 哈焊国创(青岛)焊接工程创新中心有限公司 | Friction micro-rivet welding method for light alloy and fiber reinforced composite material |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20240052862A1 (en) | 2024-02-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20240052862A1 (en) | System and process for joining dissimilar materials and solid-state interlocking joint with intermetallic interface formed thereby | |
US20240058891A1 (en) | Methods and devices for connecting two dissimilar materials | |
Padhy et al. | Friction stir based welding and processing technologies-processes, parameters, microstructures and applications: A review | |
Singh et al. | Recent research progress in solid state friction-stir welding of aluminium–magnesium alloys: a critical review | |
Mahto et al. | A comprehensive study on force, temperature, mechanical properties and micro-structural characterizations in friction stir lap welding of dissimilar materials (AA6061-T6 & AISI304) | |
Firouzdor et al. | Al-to-Mg friction stir welding: effect of material position, travel speed, and rotation speed | |
Kaushik et al. | Effect of tool geometry in dissimilar Al-steel friction stir welding | |
Huang et al. | Material flow and mechanical properties of aluminum-to-steel self-riveting friction stir lap joints | |
Mahto et al. | A study on mechanical properties in friction stir lap welding of AA 6061-T6 and AISI 304 | |
Zhou et al. | Effect of pin profile on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir spot welded Al-Cu dissimilar metals | |
Lan et al. | Microstructural evolution during friction stir welding of dissimilar aluminum alloy to advanced high-strength steel | |
Singh et al. | Parametric effect on dissimilar friction stir welded steel-magnesium alloys joints: a review | |
US20100089977A1 (en) | Friction stir welding of dissimilar metals | |
Sahu et al. | Al/Cu dissimilar friction stir welding with Ni, Ti, and Zn foil as the interlayer for flow control, enhancing mechanical and metallurgical properties | |
Prabhakar et al. | A comprehensive review of friction stir techniques in structural materials and alloys: challenges and trends | |
Vilaça et al. | Linear friction based processing technologies for aluminum alloys: surfacing, stir welding and stir channeling | |
Nasiri et al. | Failure analysis of tool used in refill friction stir spot welding of Al 2099 alloy | |
Verma et al. | Challenges, process requisites/inputs, mechanics and weld performance of dissimilar micro-friction stir welding (dissimilar μFSW): A comprehensive review | |
Fall et al. | Effect of process parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir-welded Ti–6Al–4V joints | |
Shankar et al. | Dissimilar friction stir welding of Al to non-Al metallic materials: An overview | |
Memon et al. | Friction spot extrusion welding on dissimilar materials AA2024-T3 to AA5754-O: effect of shoulder plunge depth | |
Bilgin et al. | Investigation of heat-assisted dissimilar friction stir welding of AA7075-T6 aluminum and AZ31B magnesium alloys | |
Sadeghi et al. | Friction stir spot welding of TiO 2 nanoparticle-reinforced interstitial free steel | |
Pasha et al. | Influence of process and tool parameters on friction stir welding–over view | |
Bang et al. | Mechanical properties of dissimilar A356/SAPH440 lap joints by the friction stir spot welding and self-piercing riveting |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WHALEN, SCOTT A.;ROSS, KENNETH A.;REZA-E-RABBY, M.D.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20170908 TO 20170918;REEL/FRAME:043614/0001 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE, PACIFIC NORTHWEST DIVISION;REEL/FRAME:044796/0204 Effective date: 20171023 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: AWAITING RESPONSE FOR INFORMALITY, FEE DEFICIENCY OR CRF ACTION |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |