US20170196909A1 - Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition - Google Patents

Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20170196909A1
US20170196909A1 US15/269,962 US201615269962A US2017196909A1 US 20170196909 A1 US20170196909 A1 US 20170196909A1 US 201615269962 A US201615269962 A US 201615269962A US 2017196909 A1 US2017196909 A1 US 2017196909A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
bismuth subnitrate
seal formulation
weight
seal
gel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/269,962
Inventor
Vincent McNally
James Patrick Morgan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Zoetis Broomhill IP Ltd
Original Assignee
Bimeda Research and Development Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=11041329&utm_source=***_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20170196909(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Bimeda Research and Development Ltd filed Critical Bimeda Research and Development Ltd
Priority to US15/269,962 priority Critical patent/US20170196909A1/en
Publication of US20170196909A1 publication Critical patent/US20170196909A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K33/00Medicinal preparations containing inorganic active ingredients
    • A61K33/24Heavy metals; Compounds thereof
    • A61K33/245Bismuth; Compounds thereof
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01JMANUFACTURE OF DAIRY PRODUCTS
    • A01J7/00Accessories for milking machines or devices
    • A01J7/04Accessories for milking machines or devices for treatment of udders or teats, e.g. for cleaning
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K50/00Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
    • A23K50/10Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for ruminants
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/185Acids; Anhydrides, halides or salts thereof, e.g. sulfur acids, imidic, hydrazonic or hydroximic acids
    • A61K31/19Carboxylic acids, e.g. valproic acid
    • A61K31/20Carboxylic acids, e.g. valproic acid having a carboxyl group bound to a chain of seven or more carbon atoms, e.g. stearic, palmitic, arachidic acids
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/02Inorganic compounds
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/06Organic compounds, e.g. natural or synthetic hydrocarbons, polyolefins, mineral oil, petrolatum or ozokerite
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/0012Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
    • A61K9/0041Mammary glands, e.g. breasts, udder; Intramammary administration
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/06Ointments; Bases therefor; Other semi-solid forms, e.g. creams, sticks, gels
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P15/00Drugs for genital or sexual disorders; Contraceptives
    • A61P15/14Drugs for genital or sexual disorders; Contraceptives for lactation disorders, e.g. galactorrhoea
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P29/00Non-central analgesic, antipyretic or antiinflammatory agents, e.g. antirheumatic agents; Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs [NSAID]
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P31/00Antiinfectives, i.e. antibiotics, antiseptics, chemotherapeutics

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a veterinary composition, particularly for the prophylactic treatment of mastitis in cows.
  • Bacterial infection via the teats of a cow is the most common cause of mastitis.
  • the invention is directed towards providing an improved veterinary composition, particularly for the prophylactic treatment of mastitis in dry cows.
  • an antiinfective-free formulation for prophylaxis of intramammary infection comprising a seal formulation to provide a physical barrier in the teat canal.
  • This non-antibiotic approach to preventing new dry period infection in dairy cows has major potential for the dairy industry as it results in the reduction of the incidence of antibiotic contamination in early season milk production.
  • the invention provides a quality improvement to dairy production and will facilitate farmers meeting consumer preferences for reducing the level of antibiotics used in food production.
  • the invention provides an antiinfective-free method of prophylactic treatment of mammary disorders in non-human animals during an animal's dry period by sealing the teat canal with a seal formulation to provide a physical barrier in the teat canal.
  • the invention also provides a prophylactic method of controlling the infection of the mammary gland by a mastitis-causing organism by sealing the gland with a seal formulation to provide a physical barrier in the teat canal.
  • the seal formulation comprises a non-toxic heavy metal salt in a gel base.
  • the heavy metal salt is present in an amount of between 50% and 75% by weight, most preferably approximately 65% by weight. We have found that these are the optimum levels of heavy metal salt to achieve an effective seal.
  • the heavy metal salt is bismuth subnitrate. This is a particularly useful non-toxic heavy metal salt.
  • the base is a gel based on aluminium stearate.
  • the gel includes a vehicle such as liquid paraffin. This formulation has effective processing and use properties.
  • the gel comprises a polyethylene gel.
  • the gel may be based on low density polyethylene or on high density polyethylene.
  • the invention also provides a veterinary composition for use in the prophylactic treatment of mammary disorders in non-human animals during an animal's dry period.
  • the invention provides a process for preparing a seal formulation comprising the steps of adding a non-toxic heavy metal salt to a gel base in at least two separate stages. This process is particularly effective for producing the preferred seal formulation of the invention.
  • a first portion of heavy metal salt is added to a gel base in a first stage and a second portion of the heavy metal salt is added to the gel base containing the first portion of the heavy metal salt.
  • the weight ratio of the second portion of the heavy metal salt to the first portion of the heavy metal salt is at least 1:1, most preferably approximately 2:1.
  • the liquid paraffin is first delivered into a Skerman 800 L kettle.
  • the mixer is run at 20 RPM.
  • the Alugel 30 DF aluminium stearate
  • the mixer is turned off between additions of the Alugel powder.
  • the steam line is opened and the temperature is allowed to rise to 160 to 165° C. This temperature is held for approximately 2 hours to sterilise the mixture.
  • the condensate valve is opened and blown down. Cooling water is then allowed into the jacket to cool the contents to less than 40° C.
  • the base thus formed is then checked for quality. If necessary, the batch base may be homogenised for 10 minutes using a Silverson Homogeniser.
  • the charge port is then opened and 296 kg of the bismuth sub-nitrate is added in 10 kg lots.
  • the contents axe mixed for one minute at 20 RPM between additions of each 10 kg of bismuth sub-nitrate. Mixing is continued for approximately 1 hour at 45 RPM.
  • the mixer is homogenised for 15 minutes using a Silverson Homogeniser.
  • the product is then transferred to a Colibri filling machine for filling into injector tubes.
  • Cows were infused in all four quarters at drying off with the seal formulation prepared as described in Example 1. These cows had previously been determined as uninfected in all four quarters.
  • milk samples were passed through a fibre filter material used in milking machine filters.
  • the milk samples were then analysed by mass spectrometry for bismuth concentration.
  • the average bismuth level in milk drawn at first milking was 3.3 ppm declining to 0.39 ppm at milking No. 10,
  • the maximum level recorded for any individual cow was 8 ppm at first milking.
  • the levels fluctuated in the range 0.001 to 0.03 ppm.
  • the seal formulation described in Example 1 was administered at drying off and has been shown to reduce the incidence of new infection in the dry cow period and in the period around calving. The reduction appears to be comparable with that achieved by prophylactic antibiotic treatment.
  • the seal of the invention very surprisingly offers a non-antibiotic approach to dry cow period prophylaxis.

Abstract

An antiinfective-free formulation for prophylactic treatment of mastitis in dry cows comprises a seal formulation having approximately 65% by weight of bismuth sub-nitrate in a gel based on aluminium stearate. The seal formulation is prepared by adding the bismuth sub-nitrate to the gel base in at least two separate stages.

Description

    INTRODUCTION
  • The invention relates to a veterinary composition, particularly for the prophylactic treatment of mastitis in cows.
  • Bacterial infection via the teats of a cow is the most common cause of mastitis.
  • It is know to treat teats of a cow with a long acting antibiotic in a slow release form with effective cover only being provided whilst minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) levels of the antibiotic are maintained. This period Of cover can vary from 4 to 10 weeks.
  • It is also known to infuse a cloxacillin-based antibiotic into the udder following the last lactation and before the cow is dried off, immediately followed by a seal formation to seal the teat canal.
  • The invention is directed towards providing an improved veterinary composition, particularly for the prophylactic treatment of mastitis in dry cows.
  • STATEMENTS OF INVENTION
  • We have found that if a physical barrier is provided within the teat canal and/or the lower teat sinus during the dry period without the use of antibiotics, the incidence of mammary disorders is substantially reduced. This is very surprising as all conventional treatments involve the use of antibiotics. Because no antibiotics are required very substantial advantages result, without any significant reduction in effectiveness.
  • According to the invention there is provided an antiinfective-free formulation for prophylaxis of intramammary infection comprising a seal formulation to provide a physical barrier in the teat canal.
  • This non-antibiotic approach to preventing new dry period infection in dairy cows has major potential for the dairy industry as it results in the reduction of the incidence of antibiotic contamination in early season milk production. Thus the invention provides a quality improvement to dairy production and will facilitate farmers meeting consumer preferences for reducing the level of antibiotics used in food production.
  • According to another aspect the invention provides an antiinfective-free method of prophylactic treatment of mammary disorders in non-human animals during an animal's dry period by sealing the teat canal with a seal formulation to provide a physical barrier in the teat canal.
  • The invention also provides a prophylactic method of controlling the infection of the mammary gland by a mastitis-causing organism by sealing the gland with a seal formulation to provide a physical barrier in the teat canal.
  • In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention the seal formulation comprises a non-toxic heavy metal salt in a gel base. Preferably, the heavy metal salt is present in an amount of between 50% and 75% by weight, most preferably approximately 65% by weight. We have found that these are the optimum levels of heavy metal salt to achieve an effective seal.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the invention the heavy metal salt is bismuth subnitrate. This is a particularly useful non-toxic heavy metal salt.
  • In one embodiment of the invention the base is a gel based on aluminium stearate. Preferably, in this case, the gel includes a vehicle such as liquid paraffin. This formulation has effective processing and use properties.
  • In another embodiment of the invention the gel comprises a polyethylene gel. The gel may be based on low density polyethylene or on high density polyethylene.
  • The invention also provides a veterinary composition for use in the prophylactic treatment of mammary disorders in non-human animals during an animal's dry period.
  • According to a further aspect the invention provides a process for preparing a seal formulation comprising the steps of adding a non-toxic heavy metal salt to a gel base in at least two separate stages. This process is particularly effective for producing the preferred seal formulation of the invention.
  • Preferably, a first portion of heavy metal salt is added to a gel base in a first stage and a second portion of the heavy metal salt is added to the gel base containing the first portion of the heavy metal salt.
  • In this case preferably the weight ratio of the second portion of the heavy metal salt to the first portion of the heavy metal salt is at least 1:1, most preferably approximately 2:1.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention will be more clearly understood from following description thereof given by way of example only.
  • EXAMPLE 1 Raw Materials:
      • Liquid Paraffin B.P. 434.8 Kg
      • Alugel 30 Dl? (Sterile) 69.2 Kg
      • Bismuth Sub-Nitrate 936.0 Kg
      • B.P.C. (Sterile)
  • To prepare a batch of seal formulation the liquid paraffin is first delivered into a Skerman 800 L kettle. The mixer is run at 20 RPM. The Alugel 30 DF (aluminium stearate) is then added through the transfer port. The mixer is turned off between additions of the Alugel powder. The steam line is opened and the temperature is allowed to rise to 160 to 165° C. This temperature is held for approximately 2 hours to sterilise the mixture. At the end of the, sterilising cycle, the condensate valve is opened and blown down. Cooling water is then allowed into the jacket to cool the contents to less than 40° C. The base thus formed is then checked for quality. If necessary, the batch base may be homogenised for 10 minutes using a Silverson Homogeniser.
  • The charge port is then opened and 296 kg of the bismuth sub-nitrate is added in 10 kg lots. The contents axe mixed for one minute at 20 RPM between additions of each 10 kg of bismuth sub-nitrate. Mixing is continued for approximately 1 hour at 45 RPM.
  • The remaining 640 Kg of bismuth sub-nitrate is then added in 10 Kg lots as above and mixing is continued for 1 hour following the final additions.
  • We have found that the addition of the bismuth sub-nitrate in two separate portions is important in producing a seal which can be processed and used effectively.
  • If necessary, the mixer is homogenised for 15 minutes using a Silverson Homogeniser.
  • The product is then transferred to a Colibri filling machine for filling into injector tubes.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • 5 Cows were infused in all four quarters at drying off with the seal formulation prepared as described in Example 1. These cows had previously been determined as uninfected in all four quarters.
  • Commencing at the first milking after calving, these cows were milked and the composite milk sample collected for analysis. This process was repeated for the first 10 milkings after calving. Milk samples were also collected in the same manner from 5 untreated cows.
  • To simulate the milk handling process within the milking system, these milk samples were passed through a fibre filter material used in milking machine filters. The milk samples were then analysed by mass spectrometry for bismuth concentration.
  • The average bismuth level in milk drawn at first milking was 3.3 ppm declining to 0.39 ppm at milking No. 10, The maximum level recorded for any individual cow was 8 ppm at first milking. For untreated cows the levels fluctuated in the range 0.001 to 0.03 ppm.
  • The seal formulation described in Example 1 was administered at drying off and has been shown to reduce the incidence of new infection in the dry cow period and in the period around calving. The reduction appears to be comparable with that achieved by prophylactic antibiotic treatment. Thus, the seal of the invention very surprisingly offers a non-antibiotic approach to dry cow period prophylaxis.
  • EXAMPLE 3 Evaluation of Seal of Example 1.
      • 4 Mastitis-free cows selected at drying off.
      • 2 Teats in each cow infused at drying-off with seal and remaining teats untreated (day 0).
      • 8 Teats sealed and 8 teats untreated (controls).
      • 3 Days later (day 3) all teats were inoculated into the teat canal (depth of 4 mm; using 22 cfu of Streptococcus dysgalactiae code M and an inoculum volume of 0.1 ml).
      • New infections resulting from use of the inoculum occurred in five (5) of the untreated quarters in the period day 3 to day 13.
      • New infections resulting from use of the inoculum occurred in two (2) of the treated quarters in the period day 3 to day 13.
      • Resulting new infections were monitored daily for 10 consecutive days after inoculation (to day 13).
      • Samples of secretion were collected in an aseptic manner from quarters showing signs of clinical mastitis prior to treatment with antibiotics.
      • All quarters in all 4 cows were sampled in an aseptic manner on day 13 (the last day of the trial)—these samples were used to:
        • (1) check the amount of seal remaining in teats
        • (2) monitor the level of Str. dysgalactiae surviving 10 days
    Clinical Infection Results
  • Inoculation
    CFU/ml Depth Control Seal
    22 4 mm 5a/8b 2a/8b
    63% 25%
    aNumber of new infections
    bNumber of quarters challenged with Str. dysgalactiae
  • EXAMPLE 4 Evaluation of Seal of Example 1.
      • 17 Mastitis-free cows* selected at drying off.
      • 2 Teats in each cow infused at drying-off with seal and remaining teats untreated (day 0).
      • 32 Teats sealed and 32 teats untreated (controls).
      • 3 Days later (day 3) all teats were inoculated into the teat canal (depth of 17 mm; using 1,190 cfu of Streptococcus dysgalactiae code M and an inoculum volume of 0.1 ml),
      • New infections resulting from use of the inoculum occurred in twenty (20) of the untreated quarters in the period day 3 to day 13.
      • New infections resulting from use of the inoculum occurred in eight (8) of the treated quarters in the period day 3 to day 13.
      • Resulting new infections were monitored daily for 10 consecutive days after inoculation (to day 13).
      • Samples of secretion were collected in an aseptic manner from quarters showing signs of clinical mastitis prior to treatment with antibiotics.
      • All quarters in all 17 cows were sampled in an aseptic manner on day 13 (the last day of the trial)—these samples were used to:
        • (1) check the amount of seal remaining in teats
        • (2) monitor the level of Str. dysgalactiae surviving in the teats after 10 days
    Clinical Infection Results
  • Inoculation
    CFU/ml Depth Control Seal
    1,190 17 mm 20a/32b 8a/32b
    63% 25%
    aNumber of new infections
    bNumber of quarters challenged with Str. dysgalactiae
    * A total of 4 quarters were infected in three cows and these quarters were excluded from the study. Therefore 32 quarters were assigned to each treatment.
  • EXAMPLE 5
  • A total of 528 cows in three commerce herds were used. Each herd had a general history of dry period mastitis. The breed of the herds was predominately Fresian or Fresian crosses.
  • Cows with at least three uninfected quarters, immediately prior to drying off, were identified within the three herds. All individual quarters were assumed to be independent units. The treatments used were as follows.
      • 1. Negative Control-Untreated, no infusions at drying off, but teat ends were sanitised with alcohol soaked cotton wool swabs.
      • 2. Positive Control-treated with 250 mg cephalonium in a long-acting base, infused at drying off. This product is known as CEPRAVIN DRYCOW. Cepravin is a trademark of Mallinckrodt Veterinary.
      • 3. Antibiotic with Seal-Cloxacillin benzathine 600 mg in a 4 g unit dose infused at drying off and followed immediately by an infusion of 4 g of a blend of bismuth sub-nitrate (66%) in liquid paraffin with 8.5% Alugel 30DF.
      • 4. Seal—Bismuth sub-nitrate 66% w/w in liquid paraffin with 8.5 alugel 30DF in a unit dose of 4 g infused at drying off.
  • These treatments were randomised among the 528 cows determined to have three of four uninfected quarters at drying off. The treatments were randomised between quarters to achieve as far as possible the same number of quarters per treatment, left and right, front and back.
  • Bacteriological results for individual quarters at drying off and at calving were compared to calculate the incidence of new intramammary infections (IMI). Chi-square testing was used to compare the incidence of the new infection between quarters, treatments and controls.
  • The results of the treatments are summarised in Table 1.
  • This experiment has demonstrated that the antinfective-free seal formulation of the invention administered at drying off is very surprisingly equivalent in terms of prophylactic efficacy, to a long acting dry cow antibiotic. All three treatments reduced new IMI during the dry period by approximately 85%. Surprisingly, there was no significant difference between the antibiotic based treatments and the antibiotic-free treatment of the invention. Thus, this study has shown that by physically sealing the teat canal with a seal which has no bacteriostatic or bacterial action, the dry period IMI may, surprisingly, be controlled. The invention has the potential therefore of achieving dry period prophylaxis on a wide scale, at a lower unit cost, and with no risk of antibiotic residues after calving.
  • The invention is not limited to the embodiments hereinbefore described which may be varied in detail.
  • TABLE 1
    New intramammary infections (IMI) identified during the study, grouped by period and by herd.
    (Within a row, values with differing superscripts are significantly different)
    Number of new IMI (quarters)
    1. Negative controls 2. Positive controls 3. Antibiotic + Seal 4. Seal
    Herd ID 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
    Total no quarters 249 141 138 249 141 138 249 141 139 249 141 138
    DRY PERIOD
    Clinical IMI 10 6 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
    CALVING IMI
    Strep. Spp. 25 21 4 0 4 1 2 1 1 2 2 0
    S. aureus 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
    Coag. Neg. staph. 2 0 4 0 0 1 1 0 1 4 0 2
    Coliforms 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
    Other organisms 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
    Clinical, no growth 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    Total calving IMI 30 28 9 2 7 3 4 2 2 6 4 2
    Total IMI 40 34 11 2 8 4 5 3 2 7 4 2
    Overal IMI rate (%) 16.1 24.1 8.0 0.8 5.7 2.9 2.0 2.1 1.4 2.8 2.8 1.4
    Toatl IMI across herds & 68a 7b 6b 5b
    periods Strep. Spp. IMI
    Other paths IMI 17c 7d 4d 6d
    All paths IMI 85f 14g 10g 13g
    Total quarters 528  528  528  528 
    Overall new IMI Rate 16.1% 2.7% 2.5% 1.9%

Claims (16)

1. A method of prophylactic treatment of mammary disorders in non-human animals during an animal's dry period by sealing the teat canal with a seal formulation to provide a physical barrier in the teat canal, wherein the seal formulation comprises bismuth subnitrate in a gel base, and wherein no antiinfective agent other than bismuth subnitrate is introduced into said teat canal during said animal's dry period.
2. A prophylactic method of controlling infection of the mammary gland by a mastitis-causing organism comprising sealing the gland with a seal formulation to provide a physical barrier in the teat canal, wherein the seal formulation comprises bismuth subnitrate_in a gel base and wherein no antiinfective agent other than bismuth subnitrate is introduced into said teat canal during said animal's dry period.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the seal formulation contains at least 40% by weight of bismuth subnitrate.
4. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the seal formulation contains at least 40% by weight of bismuth subnitrate.
5. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the seal formulation contains from 50% to 75% by weight of bismuth subnitrate.
6. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the seal formulation contains from 50% to 75% by weight of bismuth subnitrate.
7. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the seal formulation contains approximately 65% by weight of bismuth subnitrate.
8. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the seal formulation contains approximately 65% by weight of bismuth subnitrate.
9. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the base is a gel based on aluminium stearate and the base includes liquid paraffin as a vehicle.
10. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the base is a gel based on aluminium stearate and the base includes liquid paraffin as a vehicle.
11. A process for preparing a seal formulation comprising the steps of adding bismuth subnitrate, but no other antiinfective to a gel base in at least two separate stages, wherein a first portion of bismuth subnitrate is added to a gel base in a first stage and a second portion of bismuth subnitrate is added to a gel base containing the first portion of bismuth subnitrate.
12. A process as claimed in claim 11 wherein the weight ratio of the second portion of bismuth subnitrate to the first portion of bismuth subnitrate is at least 1:1 and approximately 2:1.
13. A process as claimed in claim 11 wherein the seal formulation contains at least 40% by weight of bismuth subnitrate.
14. A process as claimed in claim 11 wherein the seal formulation contains from 50% to 75% by weight of bismuth subnitrate.
15. A process as claimed in claim 11 wherein the seal formulation contains approximately 65% by weight of bismuth subnitrate.
16. A process as claimed in claim 11 wherein the base is a gel based on aluminium stearate, and the gel contains liquid paraffin as a vehicle.
US15/269,962 1996-12-18 2016-09-19 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition Abandoned US20170196909A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/269,962 US20170196909A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2016-09-19 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition

Applications Claiming Priority (12)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IE960896 1996-12-18
IE960896 1996-12-18
PCT/IE1997/000085 WO1998026759A1 (en) 1996-12-18 1997-12-17 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US09/319,544 US6254881B1 (en) 1996-12-18 1997-12-17 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US09/694,676 US6340469B1 (en) 1996-12-18 2000-10-24 System for prophylactic treatment of mammary disorders
US10/028,987 US6506400B1 (en) 1996-12-18 2001-12-28 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US30409302A 2002-11-26 2002-11-26
US10/899,308 US20050175713A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2004-07-27 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US12/410,092 US20100055202A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2009-03-24 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US13/179,391 US8758831B2 (en) 1996-12-18 2011-07-08 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US14/184,100 US20150051300A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2014-02-19 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US15/269,962 US20170196909A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2016-09-19 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/184,100 Continuation US20150051300A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2014-02-19 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20170196909A1 true US20170196909A1 (en) 2017-07-13

Family

ID=11041329

Family Applications (9)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/319,544 Expired - Lifetime US6254881B1 (en) 1996-12-18 1997-12-17 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US09/694,676 Expired - Lifetime US6340469B1 (en) 1996-12-18 2000-10-24 System for prophylactic treatment of mammary disorders
US10/028,987 Expired - Lifetime US6506400B1 (en) 1996-12-18 2001-12-28 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US10/304,093 Abandoned US20030235625A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2003-08-11 Antinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US10/899,308 Abandoned US20050175713A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2004-07-27 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US12/410,092 Abandoned US20100055202A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2009-03-24 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US13/179,391 Expired - Fee Related US8758831B2 (en) 1996-12-18 2011-07-08 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US14/184,100 Abandoned US20150051300A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2014-02-19 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US15/269,962 Abandoned US20170196909A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2016-09-19 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition

Family Applications Before (8)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/319,544 Expired - Lifetime US6254881B1 (en) 1996-12-18 1997-12-17 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US09/694,676 Expired - Lifetime US6340469B1 (en) 1996-12-18 2000-10-24 System for prophylactic treatment of mammary disorders
US10/028,987 Expired - Lifetime US6506400B1 (en) 1996-12-18 2001-12-28 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US10/304,093 Abandoned US20030235625A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2003-08-11 Antinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US10/899,308 Abandoned US20050175713A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2004-07-27 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US12/410,092 Abandoned US20100055202A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2009-03-24 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US13/179,391 Expired - Fee Related US8758831B2 (en) 1996-12-18 2011-07-08 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
US14/184,100 Abandoned US20150051300A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2014-02-19 Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition

Country Status (16)

Country Link
US (9) US6254881B1 (en)
EP (1) EP0971690B2 (en)
JP (1) JP4328886B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE223201T1 (en)
AU (1) AU724518B2 (en)
BR (1) BR9714935A (en)
CA (1) CA2274796C (en)
DE (1) DE69715259T3 (en)
DK (1) DK0971690T4 (en)
ES (1) ES2183223T5 (en)
GB (1) GB2334886B (en)
IE (1) IE970892A1 (en)
NZ (1) NZ336153A (en)
PT (1) PT971690E (en)
WO (1) WO1998026759A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA9711362B (en)

Families Citing this family (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IE970892A1 (en) * 1996-12-18 2000-02-09 Bimeda Res And Dev Ltd A veterinary composition
EP1424995B1 (en) * 2001-09-10 2010-07-14 Bimeda Research And Development Limited A bio-security system
SE524623C2 (en) * 2002-08-08 2004-09-07 Bofors Defence Ab Insulated cartridge sleeve and ammunition, procedure for the manufacture of such sleeves and ammunition, and the use of such sleeves and ammunition in several different weapon systems
US8487002B2 (en) * 2002-10-25 2013-07-16 Paladin Labs Inc. Controlled-release compositions
TWI319713B (en) * 2002-10-25 2010-01-21 Sustained-release tramadol formulations with 24-hour efficacy
US20040197422A1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2004-10-07 Pfizer Inc Veterinary compositions for treating mastitis
GB0229642D0 (en) 2002-12-20 2003-01-22 Pfizer Ltd Veterinary compositions for treating mastitis
US20060172006A1 (en) * 2003-10-10 2006-08-03 Vincent Lenaerts Sustained-release tramadol formulations with 24-hour clinical efficacy
NZ548748A (en) 2004-02-02 2010-09-30 Bimeda Res & Dev Ltd Method and device for treating a teat canal of an animal
BRPI0507279A (en) 2004-02-02 2007-06-26 Bimeda Res & Dev Ltd method and device for treating an animal's teat canal
US20050191270A1 (en) * 2004-02-27 2005-09-01 Hydromer, Inc. Anti-infectious hydrogel compositions
WO2007048219A2 (en) * 2005-09-09 2007-05-03 Labopharm Inc. Sustained drug release composition
AU2013202381B2 (en) * 2006-10-10 2016-05-05 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Intra-mammary teat sealant formulation and method of using same to reduce or eliminate visual defects in aged cheeses
EP2079477B1 (en) * 2006-10-10 2017-07-26 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Intra-mammary teat sealant formulation and method of using same to reduce or eliminate visual defects in aged cheeses
NZ571347A (en) * 2008-09-17 2010-04-30 Mastitis Res Ct Ltd Anti-infective formulation and methods of use
WO2010062194A1 (en) * 2008-11-28 2010-06-03 Bomac Research Limited Animal treatment formulation and methods of use
AU2009322372B2 (en) 2008-12-04 2014-09-25 Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health USA Inc. Intramammary teat sealant
NZ595229A (en) 2009-04-08 2012-08-31 Wisconsin Alumni Res Found Intra-mammary teat sealant formulation and method of using same to reduce or eliminate visual defects in aged cheeses
EP3046605B1 (en) 2013-09-16 2019-01-09 Zoetis Services LLC Assembly for sequentially delivering substances, and associated methods
US10569106B2 (en) 2015-04-24 2020-02-25 Sanuwave, Inc. Tissue disinfection with acoustic pressure shock waves
CA3003938A1 (en) 2015-10-29 2017-05-04 Bimeda Research & Development Limited A teat seal formulation
EP3370698B1 (en) 2015-11-03 2022-01-26 Zoetis Services LLC Sol-gel polymer composites and uses thereof
JP7123971B2 (en) 2017-04-20 2022-08-23 ゾエティス・サービシーズ・エルエルシー Veterinary compositions for use in treating mastitis and related methods
WO2018224680A1 (en) 2017-06-09 2018-12-13 Bimeda Research & Development Limited Intramammary veterinary composition
CN111629766A (en) 2017-12-01 2020-09-04 硕腾服务有限责任公司 Hydrogel composition and use thereof
CA3087822C (en) * 2018-01-18 2022-08-02 Zoetis Broomhill Ip Limited Internal teat sealants and their use in the prevention of bovine mastitis in the dry cow
EP3513767A1 (en) * 2018-01-18 2019-07-24 Bimeda Research & Development Limited Internal teat sealants and their use in the prevention of bovine mastitis in the dry cow
GR1010072B (en) 2019-05-15 2021-09-15 Αριστοτελειο Πανεπιστημιο Θεσσαλονικης - Ειδικος Λογαριασμος Κονδυλιων Ερευνας Edible veterinary intramammary teat sealant formulations and method for their preparation

Family Cites Families (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB792545A (en) 1955-07-27 1958-03-26 Novo Terapeutisk Labor As Manufacture of antibiotic preparations having a protracted effect
US3222252A (en) 1962-11-01 1965-12-07 Heinz J Kraus Preparation and method for the prevention, treatment, and control of mastitis in bovine udders
GB1312918A (en) 1969-07-08 1973-04-11 Beecham Group Ltd Veterinary treatment
GB1441747A (en) * 1972-10-18 1976-07-07 Lazonby B Veterinary compositions
GB1455296A (en) * 1973-05-24 1976-11-10 Beecham Group Ltd Veterinary treatment
CA1052697A (en) 1974-03-29 1979-04-17 Upjohn Company (The) Composition for treating mastitis in animals
US4049830A (en) * 1974-11-13 1977-09-20 Milmark Research, Inc. Bovine teat dip
GB1547164A (en) 1975-08-14 1979-06-06 Beecham Group Ltd Veterinary compositions
US4022199A (en) 1975-09-24 1977-05-10 Fetty Walter W Method of preventing the spread and control of mastitis
US4113854A (en) 1977-01-10 1978-09-12 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Prophylactic treatment of mastitis
US4172138A (en) * 1977-03-23 1979-10-23 Rhodes Russell E Method and composition of matter for the treatment of dry cows for mastitis
IL59948A0 (en) 1979-05-21 1980-06-30 Rech Applications Therap Penicillanic acid derivatives,their production and pharmaceutical compositions containing them
US4344967A (en) * 1979-08-07 1982-08-17 Devro, Inc. Film forming composition and uses thereof
EP0076068A3 (en) 1981-09-25 1985-05-15 Beecham Group Plc Intramammary veterinary compositions and method for their use
IE53610B1 (en) 1981-12-14 1988-12-21 Merck & Co Inc Waterless thixotropic composition
GB8629481D0 (en) * 1986-12-10 1987-01-21 Beecham Group Plc Veterinary treatment
US5017369A (en) 1987-03-03 1991-05-21 Marhevka Virginia C Film-forming teat sealer for prevention of mastitis and use thereof
US5195966A (en) * 1987-12-24 1993-03-23 Diversey Limited Treatment of mastitis and applicator therefor
US5593384A (en) * 1989-03-23 1997-01-14 Halem; Stephen H. Controlled infusion administration of pharmaceuticals
CA2041774C (en) * 1990-11-27 1994-04-19 Mircea A. Mateescu Use of cross-linked amylose as a matrix for the slow release of biologically active compounds
JPH0660104B2 (en) 1990-12-17 1994-08-10 鈴木 忠 Remedy for dairy cow mastitis
RU2028798C1 (en) 1991-04-08 1995-02-20 Институт животноводства УААН Method of cow mastitis prophylaxis
GB2273443B (en) 1992-12-08 1997-01-08 Bimeda Res Dev Ltd Veterinary composition for the treatment of mastitis
WO1995031180A1 (en) 1992-12-08 1995-11-23 Bimeda Research And Development Limited A veterinary composition
JP3288550B2 (en) 1994-05-02 2002-06-04 オーバーシーズ ファーマテック株式会社 Oral topical formulation for killing Helicobacter pylori
US5529770A (en) 1994-12-09 1996-06-25 West Agro, Inc. Viscous liquid conditioning topical germicides
DE19502629C2 (en) 1995-01-19 1998-11-05 Grace Gmbh Use of a composition based on polyol-treated silicon dioxide as an anti-blocking agent
WO1996023581A1 (en) 1995-02-01 1996-08-08 Duracell Inc. Slurry forming process and slurry transfer and densification through vacuum pumping
JP3851371B2 (en) 1995-02-25 2006-11-29 久光製薬株式会社 Non-aqueous oil-based ointment base and skin external ointment
IE970892A1 (en) 1996-12-18 2000-02-09 Bimeda Res And Dev Ltd A veterinary composition
US6107344A (en) * 1999-02-16 2000-08-22 Webco Chemical Corporation Aqueous germicidal film forming composition for applying to teats of dairy cows
US20050192547A1 (en) * 2002-01-31 2005-09-01 Modak Shanta M. Combinations of antiseptic and antibiotic agents containing medical devices
US20040197422A1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2004-10-07 Pfizer Inc Veterinary compositions for treating mastitis

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DK0971690T4 (en) 2015-07-13
CA2274796C (en) 2006-12-05
US6254881B1 (en) 2001-07-03
CA2274796A1 (en) 1998-06-25
DE69715259T2 (en) 2003-08-07
US20150051300A1 (en) 2015-02-19
BR9714935A (en) 2000-10-03
US6506400B1 (en) 2003-01-14
DE69715259T3 (en) 2015-08-20
US8758831B2 (en) 2014-06-24
NZ336153A (en) 2000-06-23
WO1998026759A1 (en) 1998-06-25
DK0971690T3 (en) 2002-12-23
AU7735198A (en) 1998-07-15
US20030235625A1 (en) 2003-12-25
GB9913953D0 (en) 1999-08-18
JP4328886B2 (en) 2009-09-09
US20050175713A1 (en) 2005-08-11
US20110268819A1 (en) 2011-11-03
EP0971690B2 (en) 2015-04-01
ZA9711362B (en) 1998-08-28
EP0971690B1 (en) 2002-09-04
JP2001506648A (en) 2001-05-22
AU724518B2 (en) 2000-09-21
US6340469B1 (en) 2002-01-22
ATE223201T1 (en) 2002-09-15
ES2183223T5 (en) 2015-05-07
ES2183223T3 (en) 2003-03-16
US20100055202A1 (en) 2010-03-04
EP0971690A1 (en) 2000-01-19
GB2334886A (en) 1999-09-08
PT971690E (en) 2002-12-31
GB2334886B (en) 2000-08-23
IE970892A1 (en) 2000-02-09
DE69715259D1 (en) 2002-10-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8758831B2 (en) Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
AU720243B2 (en) Method for the prevention and treatment of mastitis
EP0323109B1 (en) Treatment of mastitis and applicator therefor
Bramley The effect of subclinical Staphylococcus epidermidis infection of the lactating bovine udder on its susceptibility to infection with Streptococcus agalactiae or Escherichia coli
Oliver et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and strategies for controlling mastitis in heifers during the periparturient period
Meaney Effect of a dry period teat seal on bovine udder infection
Boddie et al. Evaluation of postmilking teat germicides containing Lauricidin®, saturated fatty acids, and lactic acid
González et al. Outbreaks of clinical mastitis caused by Trichosporon beigelii in dairy herds
McArthur et al. Efficacy of a latex teat sealer
EP0789581B1 (en) Method for the prevention and treatment of bovine mastitis
CA2558684C (en) Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
Nagahata et al. Controlling highly prevalent Staphylococcus aureus mastitis from the dairy farm
Oliver et al. Heifer mastitis: prevalence, risk factors and control strategies
Oliver et al. Evaluation of a postmilking teat disinfectant containing a phenolic combination for the prevention of mastitis in lactating dairy cows
Aungier et al. A study of the efficacy of intramammary antibiotics in the treatment of clinical mastitis
MXPA99005684A (en) Antiinfective free intramammary veterinary composition
Cızmecı et al. Determination of the effects of different dry cow therapy on udder health in dairy cows.
Nickerson et al. Mastitis control in replacement heifers
El-Kholy et al. EFFECT OF POST MILKING DISINFECTANTS AS PROPHYLACTIVE MEASURE IN CONTROL OF MASTITIS
Poutrel et al. HAL Id: hal-00901028
Bilal et al. FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF MASTITOGENS AS AFFECTED BY POST MILKING TEAT DIPPING AND Staphylococcus aureusVACCINATION IN SAHIWAL COWS

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION