US20160303703A1 - Scanning Chemical Mechanical Polishing - Google Patents

Scanning Chemical Mechanical Polishing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20160303703A1
US20160303703A1 US14/686,627 US201514686627A US2016303703A1 US 20160303703 A1 US20160303703 A1 US 20160303703A1 US 201514686627 A US201514686627 A US 201514686627A US 2016303703 A1 US2016303703 A1 US 2016303703A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
wafer
head
polishing
sweeping
pad
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/686,627
Inventor
Jun Yang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US14/686,627 priority Critical patent/US20160303703A1/en
Publication of US20160303703A1 publication Critical patent/US20160303703A1/en
Priority to US15/941,839 priority patent/US10593554B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24BMACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B37/00Lapping machines or devices; Accessories
    • B24B37/11Lapping tools
    • B24B37/20Lapping pads for working plane surfaces

Definitions

  • This invention is related to a novel system realizing chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process which is being widely used in semiconductor microchip manufacturing.
  • CMP chemical mechanical polishing
  • CMP process was invented by IBM in 1980s with the purposes to meet the requirement of shrinking depth of focus in lithography patterning and to provide global flat surface to enable multiple stacking metal layer interconnections.
  • the objective of CMP process is to totally or partially remove the unwanted pre-deposited film, and meanwhile it is critical to achieve the within-wafer remaining thickness uniformity requirement with minimum yield-killing defects like scratches, corrosions and particle residues.
  • FIG. 1 Conventional commercial CMP system ( FIG. 1 ) compromises a platen 10 which is made of hard materials like silicon carbide, and the platen 10 is covered with replaceable polishing pad 12 made of synthetic plastic.
  • a wafer 14 is held in a head 16 which pushes the wafer 14 downward to the platen 10 during the polishing and suck up the wafer 14 by vacuum when the polishing is completed.
  • the platen 10 is more than twice of the size of the wafer 14 , and during the polishing both the platen 10 and the head 16 self-rotate in the same direction.
  • Platen 10 and head 16 rotations contribute the mechanical removal of the material, while abrasives based and liquid form slurry 18 is supplied onto the pad 12 during the polishing to provide the chemical removal.
  • An advanced commercial CMP system normally has multiple platens 10 to achieve high throughput or to remove different types of film at different platen 10 , thus it occupies big and expensive clean-room space.
  • Head 16 with multiple-zone pressure control is being used to meet the stringent within-wafer remaining thickness uniformity requirement ( FIG. 2 ), while the number of the zones has been increasing along with the advancing of technology nodes.
  • multiple-zone head 16 requires complicated pneumatic loops and controllers along with other accessories, still it is always difficult to tune the profiles at the regions between the zones.
  • a wafer 14 is held in a multiple-zone head 16 and constrained by a retainer ring 20 .
  • the membrane made airbags 22 touch the backside of the wafer 14 , and the airbags 22 are divided into three ring shape zones which are named after the position: center zone 24 , middle zone 26 and edge zone 28 .
  • Air 30 is supplied to each zone and higher air pressure applied onto the wafer yields higher removal rate while lower air pressure yields lower removal rate.
  • the pressure applied in the center zone 24 is higher comparing to other zones, therefore the removal profile (of the center zone 24 ) 32 is faster than the profiles of other zones.
  • the pressure applied in the middle zone 26 is lower comparing to other zones, therefore the removal profile (of the middle zone 26 ) 34 is slower than the profiles of other zones.
  • the removal profile (of the edge zone 28 ) 36 is set to be flat. Notice that when differential pressures are applied to adjacent zones, the profile at the overlapping areas 38 between the zones does not respond as the same at the center of the zones due to the limitation of physical deformation of the membrane.
  • CMP process is very high, not only because of the highly complicated system and the head 16 , also because of many consumables which are required to be replaced at the end of the life. Those consumables are normally regarded as the slurry 18 , retainer ring 20 , pad 12 and conditioning disk 40 .
  • Slurry 18 is the agent used to chemically remove the film on the surface of the wafer 14 , and it comprises of small particles as the abrasives to enhance the mechanical removal mechanism along with other chemical additives and surfactants. Apparently, the minimum amount of the slurry 18 dispensed during the polishing depends on the size of the platen 10 , and large part of the slurry 18 is spun off from the rotating platen 10 even before it is able to reach the surface of the wafer 14 .
  • Synthetic plastic material based retainer ring 20 is assembled around the head 16 to prevent the wafer 14 from slipping out during the polishing, and it is grooved to allow the slurry 18 to flow through. Retainer ring 20 needs to be replaced before the grooves are worn out.
  • Synthetic polymer based pad 12 is placed on the top of the platen 10 to be the media touching the wafer 14 during the polishing. Grooves of various patterns are printed to the pad 12 during the fabrication, and those grooves provide the paths for slurry 18 to be transported to the entire surface of the wafer 14 . The pad 12 needs to be changed before the grooves are worn out or before the removal rate drops below the acceptable level.
  • the pad 12 tends to generate lower removal rate after longer time polishing, and a conditioning disk 40 is used to refresh the pad 12 surface after each wafer 14 run to recover the removal rate and keep it stable within the lifetime cycle of the pad 12 .
  • Conditioning disk 40 is usually made of tiny synthetic diamonds, and it needs to be changed when the disk starts to lose its capability of sustaining the removal rate.
  • CMP plays a key role in semiconductor microchip manufacturing
  • conventional commercial CMP systems are facing the challenges and difficulties in within-wafer remaining thickness uniformity improvement, ever complicated head 16 design and astronomical consumable costs.
  • This revolutionary invention is targeted to provide total solutions to those issues.
  • this invention is designed to polish a wafer 14 which is placed on a vacuumed stage 42 by a much smaller size of head 16 installed with a pad 12 of the same size.
  • both the stage 42 /wafer 14 and the head 16 /pad 12 are self-rotating, while the head 16 is also sweeping from one side of the wafer 14 to another side.
  • the sweeping can be divided into zones which provide more flexible knobs for profile tuning
  • the head 16 first moves to where a brush 44 resides to clean the pad, and later to where a conditioning disk 40 resides to refresh the pad 12 .
  • a sponge 46 will move onto the wafer 14 to perform post CMP cleaning, and then the wafer 14 will be spun at high speed to be dried.
  • Scanning Chemical Mechanical Polishing is referred to the feature of a smaller size head 16 sweeping on a wafer 14 to achieve the purpose of planarization.
  • Scanning CMP eliminates the complicated multiple zone head 16 , while it provides clinical precision of profile tuning through zonal sweeping methodology. Meanwhile, Scanning CMP greatly reduces the sky-rocketing consumable cost with smaller foot-print and less consumable consumptions.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic depiction of side-view (upper) and top-view (lower) of a conventional CMP system, and is useful for comparing with the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic sectional view of profile tuning by a multiple-zone head 16 of a conventional CMP system, and is useful for comparing with the invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic depiction of side-view (upper) and top-view (lower) diagram of a Scanning CMP system in accordance with the invention. In the top-view, it shows the edge and center positions of the head 16 .
  • FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic sectional view of profile tuning (lower) through zonal scanning methodology (upper, in top-view and it shows the edge and center positions of the head 16 ) in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic depiction of the foot-print comparison between a conventional CMP system (upper) and a Scanning CMP system (lower) in accordance with the invention.
  • the entire process of Scanning CMP consists of the steps of loading, polishing, cleaning, drying and unloading.
  • the wafer 14 is loaded front side (device side) up onto the stage 42 , and the stage 42 will vacuum the wafer 14 tightly.
  • the head 16 covered with a pad 12 moves onto the wafer 14 and touches the surface of the wafer 14 .
  • Down-force is applied to the head 16 through the spindle 48 , while the slurry 18 is supplied to the surface of the wafer 14 at a consistent flow-rate.
  • the head 16 and the stage 42 are self-rotating in the same direction, and meanwhile the head 16 also swings from one side of the wafer 14 to another side of the wafer 14 .
  • the head 16 sweeping is divided into multiple zones 50 (showing eight zones in FIG. 4 ), and different sweeping speed and down-force can be set for each individual zone.
  • different sweeping speed and down-force can be set for each individual zone.
  • the removal profile (of the left zones) 52 is faster than the profiles of other zones.
  • the removal profile (of the left zones) 54 is slower than the profiles of other zones.
  • the removal profile of the most right 2 zones 56 is set to be flat.
  • the boundary of an individual zone is defined as where the center of the head 16 starts and ends.
  • the size of the overlapping area between the adjacent zones is the diameter of the head 16 , and the profile of this overlapping area is impacted by the sweeping speed and down-force of both adjacent zones. Reducing the size of the head 16 will effectively minimize the overlapping area thus provides more precise corrections of the profile, while it will increase the processing time for the whole wafer 14 . Therefore, the size of the head 16 needs to be decided with the consideration of balancing between within-wafer thickness uniformity performance and throughput.
  • An optical fiber 58 assembled in the head 16 provides real-time thickness measurement, and polishing will stop when the thickness target is reached.
  • the flow of the slurry 18 is stopped, and the head 16 lifts up and moves to the cup where the brush 44 locates.
  • the pad 12 touches the brush 44 with applied down-force while both the head 16 and the brush 44 self-rotate. This way, the slurry 18 particles that remain on the pad 12 are removed.
  • the head 16 moves to the cup where the conditioning disk 40 resides.
  • the pad 12 touches the conditioning disk 40 with applied down-force while both the head 16 and the conditioning disk 40 self-rotate.
  • the conditioning disk 40 is stored in the water all the time to prevent it from being dried out. After the conditioning, before next wafer 14 to be loaded, the head 16 moves back to the brush 44 unit but without touching the brush 44 . This way the pad 12 is stored in the water without being dried out.
  • the wafer 14 is spun at high speed and with an option of hot nitrogen purging onto the surface to accelerate the drying.
  • the stage 42 releases the vacuum, and the wafer 14 is removed from the stage 42 .
  • FIG. 5 shows a comparison between this new system and a conventional CMP system.
  • a conventional CMP system it usually consists of loader/unloader 64 , robot/transfer 66 , polishing units 68 , cleaning/drying units 70 and integrated thickness measurement unit 72 .
  • This new system only consists of loader/unloader 64 , robot/transfer 66 , much smaller polishing units 68 and integrated thickness measurement unit 72 .

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Finish Polishing, Edge Sharpening, And Grinding By Specific Grinding Devices (AREA)
  • Mechanical Treatment Of Semiconductor (AREA)

Abstract

A new system design for chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is used in semiconductor microchip manufacturing. In this new design, a wafer is placed on a vacuumed stage facing up, and the wafer surface is polished by a small size polishing pad assembled to a head which sweeps back and forth across the wafer. This new design differs from a conventional CMP system which holds a wafer facing down in a head while applying the pressure to the backside of the wafer, and pushes it onto on a big platen covered with a polishing pad. This new design eliminates the complicated multiple-zone head and its expensive components, while it provides a much robust way of profile turning which is critical to the performance of microchips. This new design also minimizes the usage of consumables and therefore greatly reduces the cost of manufacturing.

Description

    INTRODUCTION
  • 1. Technical Filed
  • This invention is related to a novel system realizing chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process which is being widely used in semiconductor microchip manufacturing.
  • 2. Background
  • CMP process was invented by IBM in 1980s with the purposes to meet the requirement of shrinking depth of focus in lithography patterning and to provide global flat surface to enable multiple stacking metal layer interconnections. The objective of CMP process is to totally or partially remove the unwanted pre-deposited film, and meanwhile it is critical to achieve the within-wafer remaining thickness uniformity requirement with minimum yield-killing defects like scratches, corrosions and particle residues.
  • Conventional commercial CMP system (FIG. 1) compromises a platen 10 which is made of hard materials like silicon carbide, and the platen 10 is covered with replaceable polishing pad 12 made of synthetic plastic. As the carrier of microchips, a wafer 14 is held in a head 16 which pushes the wafer 14 downward to the platen 10 during the polishing and suck up the wafer 14 by vacuum when the polishing is completed. The platen 10 is more than twice of the size of the wafer 14, and during the polishing both the platen 10 and the head 16 self-rotate in the same direction. Platen 10 and head 16 rotations contribute the mechanical removal of the material, while abrasives based and liquid form slurry 18 is supplied onto the pad 12 during the polishing to provide the chemical removal. An advanced commercial CMP system normally has multiple platens 10 to achieve high throughput or to remove different types of film at different platen 10, thus it occupies big and expensive clean-room space.
  • Head 16 with multiple-zone pressure control is being used to meet the stringent within-wafer remaining thickness uniformity requirement (FIG. 2), while the number of the zones has been increasing along with the advancing of technology nodes. However multiple-zone head 16 requires complicated pneumatic loops and controllers along with other accessories, still it is always difficult to tune the profiles at the regions between the zones. As shown in FIG. 2, a wafer 14 is held in a multiple-zone head 16 and constrained by a retainer ring 20. The membrane made airbags 22 touch the backside of the wafer 14, and the airbags 22 are divided into three ring shape zones which are named after the position: center zone 24, middle zone 26 and edge zone 28. Air 30 is supplied to each zone and higher air pressure applied onto the wafer yields higher removal rate while lower air pressure yields lower removal rate. As the examples in FIG. 2, the pressure applied in the center zone 24 is higher comparing to other zones, therefore the removal profile (of the center zone 24) 32 is faster than the profiles of other zones. While the pressure applied in the middle zone 26 is lower comparing to other zones, therefore the removal profile (of the middle zone 26) 34 is slower than the profiles of other zones. As the reference, at the edge zone 28 the removal profile (of the edge zone 28) 36 is set to be flat. Notice that when differential pressures are applied to adjacent zones, the profile at the overlapping areas 38 between the zones does not respond as the same at the center of the zones due to the limitation of physical deformation of the membrane.
  • The cost of CMP process is very high, not only because of the highly complicated system and the head 16, also because of many consumables which are required to be replaced at the end of the life. Those consumables are normally regarded as the slurry 18, retainer ring 20, pad 12 and conditioning disk 40.
  • Slurry 18 is the agent used to chemically remove the film on the surface of the wafer 14, and it comprises of small particles as the abrasives to enhance the mechanical removal mechanism along with other chemical additives and surfactants. Apparently, the minimum amount of the slurry 18 dispensed during the polishing depends on the size of the platen 10, and large part of the slurry 18 is spun off from the rotating platen 10 even before it is able to reach the surface of the wafer 14.
  • Synthetic plastic material based retainer ring 20 is assembled around the head 16 to prevent the wafer 14 from slipping out during the polishing, and it is grooved to allow the slurry 18 to flow through. Retainer ring 20 needs to be replaced before the grooves are worn out.
  • Synthetic polymer based pad 12 is placed on the top of the platen 10 to be the media touching the wafer 14 during the polishing. Grooves of various patterns are printed to the pad 12 during the fabrication, and those grooves provide the paths for slurry 18 to be transported to the entire surface of the wafer 14. The pad 12 needs to be changed before the grooves are worn out or before the removal rate drops below the acceptable level.
  • The pad 12 tends to generate lower removal rate after longer time polishing, and a conditioning disk 40 is used to refresh the pad 12 surface after each wafer 14 run to recover the removal rate and keep it stable within the lifetime cycle of the pad 12. Conditioning disk 40 is usually made of tiny synthetic diamonds, and it needs to be changed when the disk starts to lose its capability of sustaining the removal rate.
  • In summary, CMP plays a key role in semiconductor microchip manufacturing, and conventional commercial CMP systems are facing the challenges and difficulties in within-wafer remaining thickness uniformity improvement, ever complicated head 16 design and astronomical consumable costs. This revolutionary invention is targeted to provide total solutions to those issues.
  • SUMMARY/DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
  • Different than polishing a head-held wafer 14 on a pad 12 covered platen 10, this invention is designed to polish a wafer 14 which is placed on a vacuumed stage 42 by a much smaller size of head 16 installed with a pad 12 of the same size. During the polishing both the stage 42/wafer 14 and the head 16/pad 12 are self-rotating, while the head 16 is also sweeping from one side of the wafer 14 to another side. The sweeping can be divided into zones which provide more flexible knobs for profile tuning After polishing, the head 16 first moves to where a brush 44 resides to clean the pad, and later to where a conditioning disk 40 resides to refresh the pad 12. A sponge 46 will move onto the wafer 14 to perform post CMP cleaning, and then the wafer 14 will be spun at high speed to be dried.
  • The name, “Scanning Chemical Mechanical Polishing”, is referred to the feature of a smaller size head 16 sweeping on a wafer 14 to achieve the purpose of planarization. Scanning CMP eliminates the complicated multiple zone head 16, while it provides clinical precision of profile tuning through zonal sweeping methodology. Meanwhile, Scanning CMP greatly reduces the sky-rocketing consumable cost with smaller foot-print and less consumable consumptions.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic depiction of side-view (upper) and top-view (lower) of a conventional CMP system, and is useful for comparing with the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic sectional view of profile tuning by a multiple-zone head 16 of a conventional CMP system, and is useful for comparing with the invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic depiction of side-view (upper) and top-view (lower) diagram of a Scanning CMP system in accordance with the invention. In the top-view, it shows the edge and center positions of the head 16.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic sectional view of profile tuning (lower) through zonal scanning methodology (upper, in top-view and it shows the edge and center positions of the head 16) in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic depiction of the foot-print comparison between a conventional CMP system (upper) and a Scanning CMP system (lower) in accordance with the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The entire process of Scanning CMP consists of the steps of loading, polishing, cleaning, drying and unloading.
  • 1. Loading
  • At the beginning, the wafer 14 is loaded front side (device side) up onto the stage 42, and the stage 42 will vacuum the wafer 14 tightly.
  • 2. Polishing
  • The head 16 covered with a pad 12 moves onto the wafer 14 and touches the surface of the wafer 14. Down-force is applied to the head 16 through the spindle 48, while the slurry 18 is supplied to the surface of the wafer 14 at a consistent flow-rate. The head 16 and the stage 42 are self-rotating in the same direction, and meanwhile the head 16 also swings from one side of the wafer 14 to another side of the wafer 14.
  • The head 16 sweeping is divided into multiple zones 50 (showing eight zones in FIG. 4), and different sweeping speed and down-force can be set for each individual zone. As the examples in FIG. 4, at the most left 3 zones, slower sweeping speed or higher down-force is used, therefore the removal profile (of the left zones) 52 is faster than the profiles of other zones. In the middle 3 zones, faster sweeping speed or lower down-force is used, therefore the removal profile (of the left zones) 54 is slower than the profiles of other zones. As the reference, the removal profile of the most right 2 zones 56 is set to be flat. The boundary of an individual zone is defined as where the center of the head 16 starts and ends. Therefore the size of the overlapping area between the adjacent zones is the diameter of the head 16, and the profile of this overlapping area is impacted by the sweeping speed and down-force of both adjacent zones. Reducing the size of the head 16 will effectively minimize the overlapping area thus provides more precise corrections of the profile, while it will increase the processing time for the whole wafer 14. Therefore, the size of the head 16 needs to be decided with the consideration of balancing between within-wafer thickness uniformity performance and throughput.
  • An optical fiber 58 assembled in the head 16 provides real-time thickness measurement, and polishing will stop when the thickness target is reached.
  • 3. Cleaning
  • When the polishing is completed, the flow of the slurry 18 is stopped, and the head 16 lifts up and moves to the cup where the brush 44 locates. The pad 12 touches the brush 44 with applied down-force while both the head 16 and the brush 44 self-rotate. This way, the slurry 18 particles that remain on the pad 12 are removed. Afterwards, the head 16 moves to the cup where the conditioning disk 40 resides. The pad 12 touches the conditioning disk 40 with applied down-force while both the head 16 and the conditioning disk 40 self-rotate. The conditioning disk 40 is stored in the water all the time to prevent it from being dried out. After the conditioning, before next wafer 14 to be loaded, the head 16 moves back to the brush 44 unit but without touching the brush 44. This way the pad 12 is stored in the water without being dried out.
  • After the polishing, when the head 16 moves away from the wafer 14, a sponge 46 moves in and touches the surface of the wafer 14, meanwhile chemical 60 starts to flow. The sponge 46 sweeps across the wafer 14 when the wafer 14 self-rotates at the same time. Afterwards the chemical 60 flow stops and deionization water 62 starts to flow to rinse off the remaining chemical 60. Finally, the sponge 46 lifts up and moves back to the original position where it is stored in the water to prevent it from being dried out.
  • 4. Drying
  • After the cleaning, the wafer 14 is spun at high speed and with an option of hot nitrogen purging onto the surface to accelerate the drying.
  • 5. Unloading
  • When the drying is completed, the stage 42 releases the vacuum, and the wafer 14 is removed from the stage 42.
  • The advantages of this new system are:
  • There is no need of multiple-zone, complicated, high cost head 16. But the capability of profile tuning is enhanced through zonal sweeping methodology.
  • Much less usage of the consumables. There is no retainer ring 20 at all since there is no risk of wafer 14 slipping out. The usage of slurry 18, chemical 60 and deionization water 62 is greatly reduced, since the size of the stage 42 is much smaller comparing to a platen 10 in a conventional commercial system. The size of the pad 12 is much smaller, and therefore the consumption and the cost are also low.
  • Small footprint. The size of the stage 42 is exactly the same as the size of the wafer 14, and the stage 42 is much smaller than a platen 10 of a conventional CMP system. Besides it eliminates the independent post cleaning and drying unit since this new system completes polishing, cleaning and drying steps in one single unit. FIG. 5 shows a comparison between this new system and a conventional CMP system. For a conventional CMP system, it usually consists of loader/unloader 64, robot/transfer 66, polishing units 68, cleaning/drying units 70 and integrated thickness measurement unit 72. This new system only consists of loader/unloader 64, robot/transfer 66, much smaller polishing units 68 and integrated thickness measurement unit 72.

Claims (3)

What is claimed is:
1. A method of realizing chemical mechanical polishing process:
A) A wafer 14 is sucked to a self-rotating stage 42 front-side up while a self-rotating smaller sized head 16 covered with pad 12 touching down on the wafer 14.
B) The head 16 sweeps back and forth across the surface of the wafer 14 with applied down-force to remove the surface film and to reach planarization with the assistance of slurry 18.
C) Sweeping route is divided into multiple zones 50, and profile tuning is achieved through zonal sweeping methodology which allows the settings of different sweeping speeds and down-forces for each individual zone 50.
2. Wafer polishing using the method of claim 1, wafer cleaning and wafer drying are fulfilled in one unit.
3. When the total removal amount is huge, it is feasible to combine the method of claim 1 with a conventional CMP system. The conventional CMP completes the bulk polishing while the method of claim 1 completes the final polishing to fine tune the final profile.
US14/686,627 2015-04-14 2015-04-14 Scanning Chemical Mechanical Polishing Abandoned US20160303703A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/686,627 US20160303703A1 (en) 2015-04-14 2015-04-14 Scanning Chemical Mechanical Polishing
US15/941,839 US10593554B2 (en) 2015-04-14 2018-03-30 Method and apparatus for within-wafer profile localized tuning

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/686,627 US20160303703A1 (en) 2015-04-14 2015-04-14 Scanning Chemical Mechanical Polishing

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/941,839 Continuation-In-Part US10593554B2 (en) 2015-04-14 2018-03-30 Method and apparatus for within-wafer profile localized tuning

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160303703A1 true US20160303703A1 (en) 2016-10-20

Family

ID=57128257

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/686,627 Abandoned US20160303703A1 (en) 2015-04-14 2015-04-14 Scanning Chemical Mechanical Polishing

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20160303703A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10391608B2 (en) * 2016-02-24 2019-08-27 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Backside polisher with dry frontside design and method using the same
CN114227525A (en) * 2021-12-24 2022-03-25 济南晶正电子科技有限公司 Method for improving thickness uniformity of wafer by polishing
CN116533133A (en) * 2023-07-07 2023-08-04 合肥晶合集成电路股份有限公司 Grinding method, grinding control system and grinding system

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5599423A (en) * 1995-06-30 1997-02-04 Applied Materials, Inc. Apparatus and method for simulating and optimizing a chemical mechanical polishing system
US20010019934A1 (en) * 1997-03-21 2001-09-06 Matsuomi Nishimura Polishing apparatus including holder and polishing head with rotational axis of polishing head offset from rotational axis of holder and method of using
US6361647B1 (en) * 1999-09-28 2002-03-26 Stras Baugh Method and apparatus for chemical mechanical polishing

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5599423A (en) * 1995-06-30 1997-02-04 Applied Materials, Inc. Apparatus and method for simulating and optimizing a chemical mechanical polishing system
US20010019934A1 (en) * 1997-03-21 2001-09-06 Matsuomi Nishimura Polishing apparatus including holder and polishing head with rotational axis of polishing head offset from rotational axis of holder and method of using
US6361647B1 (en) * 1999-09-28 2002-03-26 Stras Baugh Method and apparatus for chemical mechanical polishing

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10391608B2 (en) * 2016-02-24 2019-08-27 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Backside polisher with dry frontside design and method using the same
CN114227525A (en) * 2021-12-24 2022-03-25 济南晶正电子科技有限公司 Method for improving thickness uniformity of wafer by polishing
CN116533133A (en) * 2023-07-07 2023-08-04 合肥晶合集成电路股份有限公司 Grinding method, grinding control system and grinding system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9630295B2 (en) Mechanisms for removing debris from polishing pad
JP5252517B2 (en) Chemical mechanical polishing method and apparatus using patterned pads
US9399274B2 (en) Wafer polishing method
US9399277B2 (en) Polishing apparatus and polishing method
US10201887B2 (en) Polishing pad having grooves on bottom surface of top layer
JP2010130022A (en) Substrate polishing apparatus, and method of polishing substrate using the same
JP2008290233A (en) Method and device for high-performance low-cost polishing tape for polishing slope and edge of substrate in semiconductor manufacture
KR102661661B1 (en) Substrate cleaning apparatus
US9824903B2 (en) Substrate cleaning apparatus
CN109382707B (en) Dressing device and dressing method for substrate back grinding member
TW200812749A (en) Polishing method and polishing apparatus
TWI766177B (en) Chemical mechanical polishing system and method
EP0763402B1 (en) Method and apparatus for polishing semiconductor substrate
US20160303703A1 (en) Scanning Chemical Mechanical Polishing
CN109531405B (en) Substrate processing apparatus, substrate processing method, and storage medium
JP2009260142A (en) Wafer-polishing apparatus and wafer-polishing method
US10593554B2 (en) Method and apparatus for within-wafer profile localized tuning
CN112476227A (en) Chemical mechanical polishing device
JP6345988B2 (en) Substrate processing equipment
US6813796B2 (en) Apparatus and methods to clean copper contamination on wafer edge
JP2016043442A (en) Polishing device
JP6381503B2 (en) Polishing apparatus, polishing method and semiconductor manufacturing method
JP6336893B2 (en) Polishing equipment
JP6666214B2 (en) Apparatus and method for polishing the surface of a substrate, and a computer-readable recording medium recording a program
JP5257752B2 (en) Polishing pad dressing method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION