US20160134340A1 - Method and apparatus for processing feedback in a wireless communication system - Google Patents

Abstract

A method and apparatus for processing feedback implemented in a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) comprises estimating a channel matrix. The effective channel is calculated and a precoding matrix is selected. Feedback bits are generated and transmitted.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
• This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/318,495, filed Jun. 27, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/928,198, filed Oct. 30, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,798,212 issued Aug. 5, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/863,432, filed Oct. 30, 2006, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/863,720, filed Oct. 31, 2006, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/870,503, filed Dec. 18, 2006, all of which are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein in their respective entirety, for all purposes.
FIELD OF INVENTION
• The present invention is related to wireless communication systems.
BACKGROUND
• Controlled feedback is used in a communication system to add layers of control to the system. The feedback systems currently used in wireless communication systems are generally complex and consume valuable resources. One such system that employs feedback is an evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA) multiple-in multiple-out (MIMO) system. Improving the efficiency of feedback and rank and link adaptation to the closed-loop MIMO system for E-UTRA may therefore tend to improve MIMO link performance and system capacity, as well as reduce signaling overhead.
• It would therefore be beneficial to provide a method and apparatus for processing feedback that could be employed, for example, in an E-UTRA MIMO system for both downlink (DL) and uplink (UL) communications.
SUMMARY
• A method and apparatus for processing feedback implemented in a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) is disclosed. The method includes estimating a channel matrix. The effective channel is calculated and a precoding matrix is selected. Feedback bits are generated and transmitted.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
• A more detailed understanding of the invention may be had from the following description, given by way of example and to be understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
• FIG. 1 shows an example wireless communication system, including a plurality of wireless transmit/receive units (WTRUs) and a base station;
• FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a method of reset processing feedback;
• FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of a method of fast adaptive processing feedback;
• FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of a method of slow adaptive processing feedback;
• FIG. 5 shows a functional block diagram of a WTRU and the base station of FIG. 1;
• FIG. 6 shows an alternative functional block diagram of a WTRU and the base station of FIG. 1; and
• FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of an additional method of processing feedback.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
• When referred to hereafter, the terminology “wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU)” includes but is not limited to a user equipment (UE), a mobile station, a fixed or mobile subscriber unit, a pager, a cellular telephone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a computer, or any other type of user device capable of operating in a wireless environment. When referred to hereafter, the terminology “base station” includes but is not limited to a Node-B, a site controller, an access point (AP), or any other type of interfacing device capable of operating in a wireless environment.
• FIG. 1 shows an example wireless communication system 100, including a plurality of WTRUs 110 and a base station 120. As shown in FIG. 1, the WTRUs 110 are in communication with the base station 120. Although two WTRUs 110, and one base station 120 are shown in FIG. 1, it should be noted that any combination of wireless and wired devices may be included in the wireless communication system 100.
• FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a method 200 of reset processing feedback. In reset processing, non-differential feedback is utilized. In step 210 of method 200, the channel matrix is estimated. Once the channel matrix is estimated, the effective channel is calculated (step 220). In one example, the effective channel is calculated as a multiplication of the channel estimate and the precoding matrix, such as H_eff=H_est×T, where H_est is the channel estimate and T is the precoding matrix. The effective channel is calculated for all possible candidate precoding matrices, sub-matrices, or vectors. A metric is computed using the effective channel that may include signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR), throughput, block or frame error rate, channel capacity, and the like.
• A precoding matrix or vector is then selected or calculated (step 230). The best matrix, submatrix or vector should be selected based on channel quality, SINR, throughput, block error ration (BLER), frame error ratio (FER) or other similar measures or combinations. For example the SINR for a linear minimum mean squared error (LMMSE) receiver can be computed and the precoding matrix that has the largest SINR may be selected. Other methods based on effective channels and their corresponding CQI measurements can also be used to select the precoding matrix or vector. In the case of calculating the matrix or vector, the channel matrix estimate is used as a base and the precoding matrix is computed by performing, for example, a singular value decomposition (SVD) or eigen-value decomposition (EVD) on the channel matrix estimate, and then quantized using a predetermined codebook.
• One way for selecting the precoding matrix is that the channel responses H are estimated and a singular value decomposition (SVD) is performed on the estimated Hs to obtain a precoding matrix V. For N streams of MIMO transmission, where 1≦N≦N_t, A is a sub-matrix of V that represents the N stream precoding of data. Furthermore B_i is the possible combinations of N column vectors of a matrix F. All the possible combinations of column vectors of F, (i.e., all the possible B_i), may be searched and the one selected which maximizes the sum of norm of the inner product or correlation of A and B_i in the search in accordance with the following equation:
• $\begin{array}{cc}T=\underset{B_i}{\max }\sum _{j=1}^N<{A\left(:,j\right)}^{*},B_i\left(:,j\right)>.& \mathrm{Equation}\left(1\right)\end{array}$
• A discrete Fourier transform (DFT) matrix may be utilized for MIMO precoding, and a set of precoding matrices can be constructed using a DFT matrix multiplied with different phase shifts. The set of DFT matrices can be used as a MIMO precoding codebook based on whether the precoding matrix is either selected or quantized.
• A DFT matrix can be represented by
• $w_{m,n}={}^{\mathrm{j2\pi }m\frac{n}{N}},$
• where m=0,1,2, . . . ,N−1 and n=0,1,2, . . . ,N−1. A two-by-two (2×2) DFT matrix may be expressed as:
• $\begin{array}{cc}{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="2"\; label="F"\; filenames="US20160134340A1-20160512-D00003.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">F</figure-callout>}}_{2\times 2}=\left[\begin{array}{cc}1& 1\\ 1& -1\end{array}\right].& \mathrm{Equation}\left(2\right)\end{array}$
• A four-by-four (4×4) DFT matrix may be expressed as:
• $\begin{array}{cc}{F}_{4\times 4}=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1& 1& 1& 1\\ 1& j& -1& -j\\ 1& -1& 1& -1\\ 1& -j& -1& j\end{array}\right].& \mathrm{Equation}\left(3\right)\end{array}$
• A set of precoding matrices can be generated using different phase shifts in accordance with the following equation:
• $\begin{array}{cc}{w}_{m,n}={}^{\mathrm{j2\pi }m\left(n+\frac{l}{L}\right)/N},& \mathrm{Equation}\left(4\right)\end{array}$
• where m=1,2, . . . ,N−1, n=0,1,2, . . . ,N−1 and 1=0,1,2, . . . ,L−1. To generate a set of eight 4×4 matrices, L=8 and N=4 are used, where N and L are design parameters to generate L DFT matrices of size N×N. Accordingly, a set of 4×4 precoding matrices may be constructed as follows:
• $\begin{array}{cc}{F}_{4\times 4,0}=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1& 1& 1& 1\\ 1& {}^{j\frac{1}{2}\pi }& {}^{\mathrm{j\pi }}& {}^{-j\frac{1}{2}\pi }\\ 1& {}^{\mathrm{j\pi }}& {}^{\mathrm{j2\pi }}& {}^{\mathrm{j\pi }}\\ 1& {}^{-j\frac{1}{2}\pi }& {}^{\mathrm{j\pi }}& {}^{j\frac{1}{2}\pi }\end{array}\right];F_{4\times 4,1}=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1& 1& 1& 1\\ {}^{j\frac{1}{16}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{9}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{15}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{7}{16}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{1}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{7}{8}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{1}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{7}{8}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{3}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{5}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{13}{16}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{11}{16}\pi }\end{array}\right];F_{4\times 4,2}=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1& 1& 1& 1\\ {}^{j\frac{1}{8}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{5}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{7}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{3}{8}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{1}{4}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{3}{4}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{1}{4}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{3}{4}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{3}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{1}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{5}{8}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{7}{8}\pi }\end{array}\right];F_{4\times 4,3}=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1& 1& 1& 1\\ {}^{j\frac{3}{16}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{11}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{13}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{5}{16}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{3}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{5}{8}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{3}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{5}{8}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{9}{16}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{1}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{7}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{15}{16}\pi }\end{array}\right];F_{4\times 4,4}=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1& 1& 1& 1\\ {}^{j\frac{1}{4}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{3}{4}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{3}{4}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{1}{4}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{1}{2}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{1}{2}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{1}{2}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{1}{2}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{3}{4}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{1}{4}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{1}{4}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{5}{4}\pi }\end{array}\right];F_{4\times 4,5}=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1& 1& 1& 1\\ {}^{j\frac{5}{16}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{13}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{11}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{3}{16}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{5}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{3}{8}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{5}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{3}{8}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{15}{16}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{7}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{1}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{9}{16}\pi }\end{array}\right];F_{4\times 4,6}=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1& 1& 1& 1\\ {}^{j\frac{3}{8}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{7}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{5}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{1}{8}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{3}{4}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{1}{4}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{3}{4}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{1}{4}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{9}{8}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{5}{8}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{1}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{3}{8}\pi }\end{array}\right];F_{4\times 4,7}=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}1& 1& 1& 1\\ {}^{j\frac{7}{16}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{15}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{9}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{1}{16}\pi }\\ {}^{j\frac{7}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{1}{8}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{7}{8}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{1}{8}\pi }\\ {}^{-j\frac{11}{16}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{13}{16}\pi }& {}^{j\frac{5}{16}\pi }& {}^{-j\frac{3}{16}\pi }\end{array}\right].& \mathrm{Equation}\left(5\right)\end{array}$
• A set of 2×2 matrices may be generated and constructed in a similar manner.
• In step 240, feedback bits are generated and transmitted. The feedback bits include the corresponding codeword index. In the case of 4×4 MIMO matrix, and for full rank, (i.e., the rank equals four (4)), an index associated with one of the matrices identified in equation (5) may be used as the feedback input. For a rank less than four (4), an index associated with one of the column subsets of the matrices in equation (5) may be used as the feedback input. For the case where the rank equals one, an index associated with one of the column vectors of the matrices may be used as the feedback input.
• An additional feedback mechanism utilizes adaptive processing. In general, adaptive processing is either “fast adaptive” or “slow adaptive” depending on degree of accuracy of updating with respect to the desired precoding matrix or convergence rate.
• FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of a method 300 of fast adaptive processing feedback. Fast adaptive processing feedback is a fast tracking method and can be used as a stand-alone feedback or as a feedback which is in conjunction with the full precoding matrix feedback depicted in method 200 of FIG. 2. In step 310, the differential precoding matrix or delta matrix is computed. Then the differential precoding matrix or delta matrix is quantized (step 320).
• Feedback bits are generated and transmitted (step 330), where the feedback bits correspond to a codeword index of a differential codebook. The more feedback bits that are used, the faster the precoding matrix is updated using the feedback bits, which represent the differential precoding matrix. Accordingly, faster adaptive processing may be achieved.
• FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of a method 400 of slow adaptive processing feedback. Slow adaptive processing feedback is a slow tracking method and can be used as a stand-alone feedback or as a feedback which is in conjunction with the full precoding matrix feedback (reset) depicted in method 200 of FIG. 2. Slow adaptive processing feedback can also be used in conjunction with the differential precoding matrix feedback depicted in method 300 of FIG. 3, or a combination of the methods 200 and 300 of FIGS. 2 and 3, respectively.
• In step 410, a single binary sign bit is computed, and the single binary sign bit is then transmitted (step 420), for example from a receiver device to a transmitter device. The single binary sign bit, b[n], may be computed using a measurement of the effective channel in accordance with the following equation:
• 
  b[n]=sign(q[n]).   Equation (6)
• The measure q[n] is an effective channel measurement for the preferred direction that maximizes the received power. If Ω₁[n] and Ω₀[n] are denoted to be Ω₁[n]={tilde over (T)}[n] exp(F[n])Y and Ω₀[n]={tilde over (T)}[n]exp(−F [n])Y, respectively, then q[n] may be expressed as:
• 
  q[n]=∥H[n+1]Ω₁ [n]∥ _F ² −∥H[n+1]Ω₀ [n]∥ _F ².   Equation (7)
• If the direction of received power maximization is toward Ω₁[n] , then b[n]=1 is transmitted (step 420). Otherwise, the direction of received power maximization is toward Ω₀[n], and the feedback b[n]=−1 is transmitted (step 420).
• The index to the best precoding matrix or vector is selected and fed back, (i.e., transmitted). The precoding matrix is updated during the period between resets or between full precoding matrix updates for the following feedback interval by the single binary bit for slow adaptive processing, or slow tracking of the best selected precoding matrix which is selected at reset period.
• For example, letting Nt denote the number of transmit antennas and Ns denote the number of transmitted data streams, the precoding matrix that is fed back is T[n] for a feedback instance n. The precoding matrix T[n], then, is updated by the single binary bit b[n] that is fed back from a receiver at feedback instance n+1. The precoding matrix is updated from T[n] to T[n+1] using feedback bit b[n].
• Grassmann manifold or Grassmann line packing can be used to define the beamforming space. A signal flow along the curve of the shortest length in Grassmann manifold G_Nt,Ns and can be expressed as:
• 
  Q(t)=Q(0)exp(tX)Y,  Equation (8)
• where Q(0) and Q(t) are the points in Grassmann manifold space at time 0 and t respectively. X is a skew-symmetric matrix and is restricted to be of the form:
• $\begin{array}{cc}X=\left[\begin{array}{cc}0& -Z^H\\ Z& 0\end{array}\right].& \mathrm{Equation}\left(9\right)\end{array}$
• The matrix Y may be expressed by:
• $\begin{array}{cc}Y=\left[\begin{array}{c}{I}_{N_s}\\ 0_{\left(N_t-N_s\right)\times N_s}\end{array}\right].& \mathrm{Equation}\left(10\right)\end{array}$
• The precoding matrix and its update may then be defined in accordance with the following equation:
• $\begin{array}{cc}T\left[n+1\right]=\tilde{T}\left[n\right]\exp \left(b\left[n\right]F\left[n\right]\right)Y,\mathrm{where}& \mathrm{Equation}\left(11\right)\\ F\left[n\right]=\left[\begin{array}{cc}0& -G^H\left[n\right]\\ G\left[n\right]& 0\end{array}\right],& \mathrm{Equation}\left(12\right)\end{array}$
• and has dimension Nt by Nt. {tilde over (T)}[n]=[T[n] E[n]] is a unitary matrix of dimension Nt by Nt and E[n] is the orthogonal complement of T[n]. Matrix Y has dimension Nt by Ns. Matrix G[n] is a random matrix and has dimension Nt−Ns by Ns. Matrix G[n] is used to approximate matrix Z and is generated with a certain distribution, of which one example is uniform distribution. Another example is independent and identical complex Gaussian distribution with zero mean and variance β². That is, each entry of G[n] is independently and identically distributed, (e.g., CN(0,β²)). However, other proper distributions for G[n] may also be considered and used. The exponential term exp(b[n]F[n])Y represents the signal flow from the current to the next precoding matrix along the curve of the shortest length in the beamforming space. The single binary bit b[n] determines one of the two opposite directions of the signal flow determined by F[n] along the curve of the shortest length in the beamforming space when the precoding matrix is updated.
• In order to obtain the same update for the precoding matrix, the matrix G[n] should be known to both a transmitter and receiver. This can be done by synchronously generating G[n] by pseudo random number generators at the transmitter and the receiver at the time when communication between the transmitter and receiver starts. However, signaling may also be utilized to communicate the information about matrix G between the transmitter and receiver.
• The parameter β² in matrix G is a step size of the precoding matrix update and can be static, semi-static or dynamic. For optimum performance the parameter β² should be adaptively adjusted according to Doppler shift, with the value of β² increasing as Doppler frequency increases, and vice versa.
• The feedback rate, or feedback interval, depends on the rate of channel variation or vehicle speed. The optimum feedback rate or interval may be determined using simulations. A fixed feedback rate or interval can be used to compromise between different vehicle speeds or channel variation. A feedback rate or interval can also be configured or reconfigured to meet certain performance requirements. Additionally, if information about vehicle speed or Doppler shift are available, that information may be used to configure or reconfigure the feedback rate or interval. The step size of the precoding matrix update can also be determined or optimized according to different rates of channel variation.
• T[n+1], given T[n] and G[n], may be computed using compact singular (CS) decomposition and the like. For example, the matrix G[n] may be decomposed using singular value decomposition (SVD) in accordance with the following equation:
• 
  G[n]=V ₂ΘV₁ ^H.  Equation (13)
• The matrix Θ is a diagonal matrix such that:
• 
  Θ=diag(θ₁,θ₂, . . . , θ_{N s} ).   Equation (14)
• The variables θ_i, where i=1,2, . . . , N_s, are the principal angles between the subspaces T[n] and T[n+1]. If the feedback bit b[n] is −1, −G[n] may be decomposed instead.
• The values of sin (θ_i) and cos (θ_i) for i=1,2, . . . , N_s, are computed and diagonal matrices C and S are constructed such that:
• 
  C=diag(cos θ₁,cos θ₂, . . . ,cos θ_N),  Equation (15)
• and
• 
  S=diag(sin θ₁,sin θ₂, . . . ,sin θ_{N s} ).  Equation (16)
• The matrix T[n+1] may be computed in accordance with the following equation:
• $\begin{array}{cc}T\left[n+1\right]=\tilde{T}\left[n\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}{V}_1\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="2"\; label="C\; V"\; filenames="US20160134340A1-20160512-D00003.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">C</figure-callout>}& \\ V_{}{}_2S\end{array}\right].& \mathrm{Equation}\left(17\right)\end{array}$
• Reset processing or non-differential feedback may be used initially and periodically every N transmission time intervals (TTIs) to reset the error arising from differential and binary feedback. In addition, reset or non-differential feedback may be used aperiodically. The fast adaptive processing or differential feedback may be used for “X” TTIs following the initialization, reset or non-differential feedback. The slow adaptive processing or binary feedback may be used between the time when a fast adaptive feedback period ends and the time when the reset or non-differential feedback begins.
• FIG. 5 shows a functional block diagram 500 of a WTRU 110 and a base station 120′ of FIG. 1. The WTRU 110 and base station 120′ of FIG. 5 are configured to perform any combination of the methods 200, 300, and 400 described in FIGS. 2, 3, and 4, and are in wireless communication with one another. The methods 200, 300, and 400 in FIGS. 2, 3, and 4 can be used in different time or different feedback intervals between the base station 120′ and the WTRU 110. In the example shown in FIG. 5, the base station 120′ may be considered as a transmitter, or transmitting device, while the WTRU 110 is a receiver, or receiving device.
• In addition to other components that may be included in a WTRU, (e.g., a transmitter, a receiver, and the like), the WTRU 110 of FIG. 5 includes a channel estimator 115 and a feedback bit generator 116 in communication with the channel estimator 115. In addition, the WTRU 110 includes a first antenna 117 and a second antenna 118. As depicted in FIG. 5, the first antenna 117 is in communication with the channel estimator 115 and may receive and forward wireless communications from the base station 120 to the channel estimator 115. The second antenna 118 is in communication with the feedback bit generator 116 and may receive a signal from the feedback bit generator 116 and transmit it to the base station 120′. It should be noted however, that any number and configuration of antennas may be included in the WTRU 110. For example, the first antenna 117 may be in communication with the feedback bit generator 116 and the second antenna 118 may be in communication with the channel estimator 115. The channel estimator 115 is configured to perform the channel estimation functions described in methods 200, 300, and 400 of FIGS. 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The feedback bit generator 116 is configured to generate the feedback to be transmitted back to the base station 120′ in accordance with the methods 200, 300, and 400 of FIGS. 2, 3, and 4, respectively, or any combination of methods 200, 300, and 400.
• A generate matrix G functional block 531 is in communication with the feedback bit generator block 116 of the WTRU 110, and a doppler adjustment block 541 is in communication with the generate matrix G functional block 531. The generate matrix G functional block 531 and doppler adjustment block 541 are configured to perform the related functions described in methods 200, 300, and 400, of FIGS. 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
• In addition to other components that may be included in a base station, (e.g., a transmitter, a receiver, and the like), the base station 120′ includes a precoding block 121, a precoding matrix update block 122, a rank adapter 123, and a multiplexer (MUX) 124. The precoding block 121 is in communication with the precoding matrix update block 122, the rank adapter 123 and the MUX 124. In addition, a first antenna 125 is in communication with the MUX 124 and may receive a signal from the MUX 124 to facilitate wireless communication to the WTRU 110. A second antenna 126 is in communication with the precoding matrix update block 122, and may facilitate the reception of wireless communications received from the WTRU 110. It should be noted again that either antenna, 125 or 126, may be in communication with any of the components. The precoding block 121 is further configured to receive a data signal, and the MUX 124 is configured to also receive a pilot signal. In addition, the precoding block 121, precoding matrix update block 122, and the rank adapter 123 are configured to perform the related functions described in methods 200, 300, and 400, of FIGS. 2, 3, and 4, respectively, or any combination of methods 200, 300, and 400.
• A generate matrix G functional block 530 is in communication with the precoding matrix update block 122 of the base station 120′, and a doppler adjustment block 540 is in communication with the generate matrix G functional block 530. The generate matrix G functional block 530 and doppler adjustment block 540 are configured to perform the related functions described in methods 200, 300, and 400, of FIGS. 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
• FIG. 6 shows an alternative functional block diagram 600 of a WTRU 110 and a base station 120″ of FIG. 1. The WTRU 110 and base station 120″ of FIG. 6 are configured to perform any combination of the methods 200, 300, and 400 described in FIGS. 2, 3, and 4, and are in wireless communication with one another. The WTRU 110 shown in FIG. 6 is substantially similar to the WTRU 110 described above in FIG. 5. In the example shown in FIG. 6, the base station 120″ may be considered as a transmitter, or transmitting device, while the WTRU 110 is a receiver, or receiving device.
• A generate matrix G functional block 631 is in communication with the feedback bit generator block 116 of the WTRU 110. A doppler adjustment block 641 is in communication with the generate matrix G functional block 631. The generate matrix G functional block 631 and doppler adjustment block 641 are configured to perform the related functions described in methods 200, 300, and 400, of FIGS. 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
• In addition to other components that may be included in a base station, (e.g., a transmitter, a receiver, and the like), the base station 120″ includes a precoding block 621, a precoding matrix update block 622, a link adapter 623, and a multiplexer (MUX) 624. The precoding block 621 is in communication with the precoding matrix update block 622, the link adapter 623 and the MUX 624. In addition, a first antenna 625 is in communication with the MUX 624 and may receive a signal from the MUX 624 to facilitate wireless communication to the WTRU 110. A second antenna 626 is in communication with the precoding matrix update block 622, and may facilitate the reception of wireless communications received from the WTRU 110. The precoding block 621 is further configured to receive a data signal, and the MUX 624 is configured to also receive a pilot signal. In addition, the precoding block 621, precoding matrix update block 622, and the link adapter 623 are configured to perform the related functions described in methods 200, 300, and 400, of FIGS. 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
• A generate matrix G functional block 630 is in communication with the precoding matrix update block 622 of the base station 120″. A doppler adjustment block 640 is in communication with the generate matrix G functional block 630. The generate matrix G functional block 630 and doppler adjustment block 640 are configured to perform the related functions described in methods 200, 300, and 400, of FIGS. 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
• FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of an additional method 700 of processing feedback. In step 710, the channel matrix His measured. A sign bit is then computed (step 720), based on the direction of the geodesic that maximizes received power. The sign bit is then transmitted (step 730), for example from a receiver to a transmitter, and the precoding matrix is updated (step 740) by the transmitter using the sign bit so that the new precoding matrix approaches the direction of maximizing receiver power for the next precoding operation.
• Although features and elements are described above in particular combinations, each feature or element can be used alone without the other features and elements or in various combinations with or without other features and elements. The methods or flow charts provided herein may be implemented in a computer program, software, or firmware tangibly embodied in a computer-readable storage medium for execution by a general purpose computer or a processor. Examples of computer-readable storage mediums include a read only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a register, cache memory, semiconductor memory devices, magnetic media such as internal hard disks and removable disks, magneto-optical media, and optical media such as CD-ROM disks, and digital versatile disks (DVDs).
• Suitable processors include, by way of example, a general purpose processor, a special purpose processor, a conventional processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in association with a DSP core, a controller, a microcontroller, Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) circuits, any other type of integrated circuit (IC), and/or a state machine.
• A processor in association with software may be used to implement a radio frequency transceiver for use in a wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU), user equipment (UE), terminal, base station, radio network controller (RNC), or any host computer. The WTRU may be used in conjunction with modules, implemented in hardware and/or software, such as a camera, a video camera module, a videophone, a speakerphone, a vibration device, a speaker, a microphone, a television transceiver, a hands free headset, a keyboard, a Bluetooth® module, a frequency modulated (FM) radio unit, a liquid crystal display (LCD) display unit, an organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display unit, a digital music player, a media player, a video game player module, an Internet browser, and/or any wireless local area network (WLAN) module.

Claims (20)

What is claimed is:

1. A wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) comprising:

a channel estimator configured to estimate a channel matrix;

a feedback generator configured to:

calculating a plurality of effective channels for a plurality of candidate precoding matrices, wherein each respective effective channel is determined based on a multiplication of the channel matrix and a respective candidate precoding matrix;

determine a metric for each of the plurality of effective channels; and

generate feedback bits based on a selected precoding matrix; and

a transmitter configured to transmit the feedback bits.

2. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein each metric is determined based on at least one of: a signal to interference noise ratio (SINK) for a respective effective channel, a block error rate (BER) associated with the respective effective channel, or a channel capacity associated with the respective effective channel.

3. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein the feedback generator is further configured to select the precoding matrix from the plurality of candidate precoding matrices based on the determined metrics, wherein the precoding matrix is selected based on being associated with a largest signal to interference ratio (SNIR).

4. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein the feedback generator is further configured to determine the selected precoding matrix based on one of a singular value decomposition (SVD) or an eigen-value decomposition (EVD) of the channel matrix estimate.

5. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein the feedback generator is further configured to quantize the selected precoding matrix using a predetermined codebook.

6. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein the feedback bits comprise a codeword index.

7. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein the transmitter is further configured to send a single bit, the single bit indicating an update that is to be applied to the selected precoding matrix.

8. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein the feedback generator is further configured to construct the plurality of candidate precoding matrices using a discrete Fourier transform (DFT) matrix.

9. The WTRU of claim 8, wherein the feedback generator is further configured such that the DFT matris is multiplied with different phase shifts.

10. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein the feedback generator is further configured to update the selected precoding matrix.

11. A method performed by a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU), the method comprising:

estimating a channel matrix;

calculating a plurality of effective channels for a plurality of candidate precoding matrices, wherein each respective effective channel is determined based on a multiplication of the channel matrix and a respective candidate precoding matrix;

determining a metric for each of the plurality of effective channels;

generate feedback bits based on a selected precoding matrix; and

transmitting the feedback bits.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein each metric is determined based on at least one of: a signal to interference noise ratio (SINR) for a respective effective channel, a block error rate (BER) associated with the respective effective channel, or a channel capacity associated with the respective effective channel.

13. The method of claim 11, further comprising selecting the precoding matrix from the plurality of candidate precoding matrices based on the determined metrics, wherein the precoding matrix is selected based on being associated with a largest signal to interference ratio (SNIR).

14. The method of claim 11, further comprising determining the selected precoding matrix based on one of a singular value decomposition (SVD) or an eigen-value decomposition (EVD) of the channel matrix estimate.

15. The method of claim 11, further comprising quantizing the selected precoding matrix using a predetermined codebook.

16. The method of claim 11, wherein the feedback bits comprise a codeword index.

17. The method of claim 11, further comprising sending a single bit, the single bit indicating an update that is to be applied to the selected precoding matrix.

18. The method of claim 11, further comprising construct the plurality of candidate precoding matrices using a discrete Fourier transform (DFT) matrix.

19. The method of claim 18, further comprising multiplying the DFT matris with different phase shifts.

20. The method of claim 11, further comprising updating the selected precoding matrix.

Images