US20140378788A1

US20140378788A1 - Computer system and method for assessing dynamic bone quality

Info

Publication number: US20140378788A1
Application number: US14/484,193
Authority: US
Inventors: Amit Bhattacharya; Nelson B. Watts
Original assignee: University of Cincinnati
Current assignee: University of Cincinnati
Priority date: 2008-03-12
Filing date: 2014-09-11
Publication date: 2014-12-25
Also published as: US8852128B2; US20090234251A1

Abstract

A computer system for assessing dynamic bone quality is provided, including a memory that stores executable instructions, a central processing unit (CPU) capable of accessing the memory and executing the instructions to provide an output, and a receiver for receiving data input and transmitting it to the CPU, wherein the receiver is operably connected to: (1) a plurality of accelerometers, each accelerometer adapted to contact an exterior surface of a human subject at a load-bearing anatomical site and to receive input from each point of contact including acceleration response data; and (2) a force plate adapted to receive input including vertical ground reaction force data provided by a heel strike on the force plate, wherein the CPU executes the instructions to process the input data transmitted from the receiver to provide the output as a bone damping value. A method for assessing dynamic bone quality is also provided.

Description

RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/035,884, filed Mar. 12, 2008, which application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of bone screening and diagnosis. Specifically, the invention relates to a computer system and method for assessing dynamic bone quality in a human subject by measuring the bone shock absorption properties of the bone under realistic, in vivo loading conditions.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Osteoporosis has a significant impact on the population of the United States, with more than 10 million people affected by the disease and 24 million at risk. Osteoporosis is associated with decreased bone mass and deterioration of the trabecular architecture of the bone, which collectively impact the bone's mechanical properties. Often, this degenerative disease leads to bone fracture (2 million per year), with associated costs exceeding $16 billion annually. Traditionally, measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) has been the predominant diagnostic and screening tool for osteoporosis and other degenerative bone diseases.
Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, or DXA, is the most popular current method of assessing bone density. In this method, a subject is exposed to low-dose x-rays having two distinct energy peaks, with different characteristics in soft tissue and bone. Subtraction of the soft tissue absorption allows quantification of BMD. The procedure is carried out while the subject is at rest, thus providing BMD data for the bone under static conditions.
However, structural failure of the human bone rarely occurs under static conditions. A better understanding of bone fracture and prevention requires measurement of the biomechanical properties of the bone when exposed to realistic, in vivo loading—that is, an assessment of “dynamic” bone quality.
The transmission, absorption and attenuation of energy that intakes to the skeleton due to heel strike is an important component of bone physiology and pathology. The human locomotion system, which consists of natural shock absorbers (joints with viscoelastic components, articular cartilage, meniscus, intervertebral disks, trabecular bone, etc.), is subjected to constant loading and impact not only during weight lifting activities but also during normal daily activities such as walking, running, stair-climbing, etc. During heel strike, the vertical force component acting on the foot is on the order of 1.5 times the body weight depending upon walking velocity. These force waves are gradually attenuated by the body's natural shock absorbers on their way toward the head. The process of force wave attenuation is the body's natural way of protecting the most vital organ, the brain.
Among all natural shock absorbers in the human body, the trabecular bone has the highest capacity (170 times higher than that of cartilage) to attenuate incoming shock waves associated with heel-strike during walking and running. Since osteoporosis is associated with decreased bone mass and deterioration of trabecular architecture of the bone, the disease detrimentally changes the bone's natural shock absorbing capacity. The need exists to develop non-invasive, economical tools for assessing and monitoring dynamic bone quality.
The present invention is directed to a computer system and method for quantifying bone shock absorption (BSA) under dynamic conditions in order to assess the dynamic bone quality in a subject. The BSA variable, bone damping (ζ), is a sensitive measure of the bone's structural integrity, a useful diagnostic of osteoporosis, and a valuable indicator of fracture risk.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Bone shock absorption (BSA), as expressed in the measurement of bone damping, is a useful tool in diagnosing osteoporosis and assessing dynamic bone quality.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a computer system for assessing dynamic bone quality, the system comprising:
a memory that stores executable instructions;
a central processing unit (CPU) capable of accessing the memory and executing the instructions to provide an output; and a receiver for receiving data input and transmitting it to the CPU;
wherein the receiver is operably connected to:
(1) a plurality of accelerometers, each accelerometer adapted to contact an exterior surface of a human subject at a load-bearing anatomical site of the subject and to receive input from each point of contact comprising acceleration response data; and (2) a force plate adapted to receive input comprising vertical ground reaction force data provided by a heel strike on the force plate;
wherein the CPU executes the instructions to process the input data transmitted from the receiver to provide the output as a bone damping value.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method for assessing dynamic bone quality in a human subject, the method comprising the steps of:
(a) contacting at least one accelerometer to an exterior surface of a human subject at a load-bearing anatomical site of the subject;
(b) directing the subject to strike a heel on a force plate;
(c) measuring vertical ground reaction force due to the heel strike;
(d) measuring an acceleration response at each of the accelerometers;
(e) processing the vertical ground reaction force and acceleration responses at a CPU to determine a bone damping value; and
(f) comparing the bone damping value to a reference value to assess dynamic bone quality in the human subject.
These and other objects, features, and advantages will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from a reading of the following detailed description and the appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1. Damping values above and below fracture site for fracture and non-fracture subjects with osteoporosis. Absolute damping value of the fracture group was significantly lower than that of the non-fracture group for the lower back (p=0.003) and upper back (p=0.009) regions.

FIG. 2. Damping value data of right femoral condyle for five test groups: healthy adults, healthy youth, individuals with osteoporosis and without fracture, individuals with osteoarthritis, and individuals with osteoporosis and with fracture. Damping values are significantly different for all comparisons (p values ranging between 0.04 and 0.0001), except between healthy adults and healthy youth and individuals with osteoporosis without fracture and individuals with osteoarthritis.

FIG. 3. An embodiment of a computer system of the present invention.

FIG. 4. An embodiment of a computer system of the present invention.

FIG. 5. Representation of acceleration response data in the frequency domain from an accelerometer.

FIG. 6. Example of vertical ground reaction force data generated by a heel strike on a force plate.

FIG. 7. Example of acceleration response data generated at a load-bearing anatomical site, in response to a heel strike.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The following is a list of definitions for terms used herein.
The term “dynamic bone quality,” as used herein, refers to the bone shock absorption properties of the bone when exposed to in vivo loading. Dynamic bone quality can be assessed by measuring the damping properties of load-bearing bones and expressed as a bone damping value.
The term “damping,” as used herein, refers to the ability of any structure to reduce the amplitude of oscillations in an oscillatory system, thus absorbing an applied shock wave. “Bone damping,” as used herein, refers to the ability of a bone to absorb an applied shock wave. In the context of the human musculoskeletal structure, such a shock wave may be produced, for example, by a heel strike. However, one skilled in the art will appreciate that bone damping occurs and can be measured in response to any shock applied to the musculoskeletal structure of the body.
The term “memory,” as used herein, refers to integrated circuits that store information in electronic devices and includes both volatile and non-volatile memory.
The term “executable instructions,” as used herein, refers to machine-executable instructions that are carried out by a central processing unit, or CPU, which accesses the memory in a computer system.
The term “central processing unit,” or “CPU,” as used herein, refers to an electronic circuit capable of accessing memory and executing computer programs stored therein.
The term “output,” as used herein, refers to the result of data processing by a CPU. In one embodiment of the invention, the output is a bone damping value. In another embodiment, output can include dB down in the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) responses at each load-bearing anatomical site; numbers of peaks in the FFT responses at each load-bearing anatomical site; area under the FFT response graphs at each load-bearing anatomical site; and resonance frequency from FFT response graphs at each load-bearing anatomical site. See Ewing, D. J., Modal Testing: Theory and Practice, Research Studies Press Ltd., John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1984). Output can be provided in a variety of ways, including, but not limited to, display on a computer screen or in a printed report.
The term “receiver,” as used herein, refers to any device suitable for receiving acceleration response data from the accelerometers and ground reaction force data from the force plate and transmitting the same to the CPU.
The term “accelerometer,” as used herein, refers to a sensor capable of measuring the rate of change in velocity of the object being tested. In one embodiment of the invention, a plurality of accelerometers is employed, each of which is operably connected to the receiver. Suitable accelerometers include, but are not limited to, wired accelerometers, wireless MEMS based nano-accelerometers, and combinations thereof.
The term “load-bearing anatomical site,” as used herein, refers to anatomical sites that support body segment weights situated immediately above the site of interest. For example, the feet support the weight of the entire body; the knees support the weight of the body above the knees, and so forth. Examples of load-bearing anatomical sites suitable for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, the shin, tibia, femur, and vertebrae. In one embodiment of the invention, accelerometers are contacted to exterior surfaces of the subject at the lower shin above the ankle, tibia, femur, third lumbar vertebra and seventh thoracic vertebra.
The term “non-load-bearing anatomical site,” as used herein, refers to an anatomical site that does not ordinarily support body weight. For example, the arms are generally non-load-bearing anatomical sites, unless a subject uses his arms to support body weight, such as in the event of a fall where the subject uses his arms to brace the impact. Another example of a non-load-bearing anatomical site is the head, and more particularly the forehead.
The term “acceleration response data,” as used herein, refers to the measurement of raw acceleration versus time. Acceleration response data is produced by each accelerometer in response to an applied shock wave to the body, for example, after the subject completes a heel strike.
The term “force plate,” as used herein, refers to an apparatus comprising sensors capable of measuring an applied force. Suitable force plates are commercially available, for example, from Advanced Mechanical Technology, Inc. (Watertown, Mass.). In a specific embodiment of the invention, the force plate is capable of measuring vertical ground reaction force generated by a heel strike.
The term “vertical ground reaction force data,” as used herein, refers to a reaction force generated in response to an applied force. Consistent with Newton's Third Law, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Thus, for example, when a subject strikes a force plate with his or her heel, a ground reaction force is generated. The force plate can capture this ground reaction force in vertical, horizontal, and lateral directions. In one embodiment of the invention, the vertical ground reaction force is measured and the vertical ground reaction force data is used to determine a bone damping value.
The term “heel strike,” as used herein, refers to the act of striking a surface, such as a force plate, with the heel of the foot. For example, a subject can produce a heel strike by stepping or stomping on a force plate.
The term “reference value,” as used herein, refers to an average bone damping value obtained from normal, healthy subjects. In one embodiment, the reference value for bone damping is a range of from about 18 to about 30. In another embodiment, the reference value is a range of from about 20 to about 27. In yet another embodiment, the reference value is a range of from about 22 to about 26. In yet another embodiment, the reference value for bone damping is about 24.

Computer System for Assessing Dynamic Bone Quality

In one embodiment of the invention, a computer system 1 for assessing dynamic bone quality is provided, the system comprising: a memory 2 that stores executable instructions; a central processing unit (CPU) 4 capable of accessing the memory and executing the instructions to provide an output; and a receiver 6 for receiving data input and transmitting it to the CPU 4; wherein the receiver 6 is operably connected to: (1) a plurality of accelerometers 8, each accelerometer adapted to contact an exterior surface of a human subject at a load-bearing anatomical site of the subject and to receive input from each point of contact comprising acceleration response data; and (2) a force plate 12 adapted to receive input comprising vertical ground reaction force data provided by a heel strike on the force plate; wherein the CPU 4 executes the instructions to process the input data transmitted from the receiver 6 to provide the output as a bone damping value (see, for example, FIG. 3). Suitable load-bearing anatomical sites include, but are not limited to, the tibias, the femurs, and the vertebrae.
In another embodiment of the invention, the receiver 6 is operably connected to at least one accelerometer 10 adapted to contact an exterior surface of the subject at a non-load-bearing anatomical site of the subject. Suitable non-load-bearing anatomical sites include, but are not limited to, the head and forehead.
In one embodiment of the invention, the executable instructions comprise performing algorithms on the acceleration response data and the vertical ground reaction force data in order to determine a bone damping value, the algorithms selected from the group consisting Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), transfer function, and Frequency Response Function (FRF).
Many varieties of accelerometers are known in the art and suitable for use in the present invention. Indeed, any accelerometer capable of measuring acceleration response and transmitting acceleration response data from load-bearing and non-load-bearing anatomical sites may be used. In a specific embodiment, the accelerometers (located at either load-bearing or non-load-bearing anatomical sites) are selected from the group consisting of wired accelerometers, wireless accelerometers, MEMS based nano-accelerometers, and combinations thereof. In a more specific embodiment, the accelerometers are wireless MEMS based nano-accelerometers (see, for example, FIG. 4, illustrating a wireless embodiment of the computer system).

Method for Assessing Dynamic Bone Quality

In another embodiment of the invention, a method for assessing dynamic bone quality in a human subject is provided, the method comprising the steps of:

- (a) contacting at least one accelerometer to an exterior surface of a human subject at a load-bearing anatomical site of the subject;
- (b) directing the subject to strike a heel on a force plate;
- (c) measuring vertical ground reaction force due to the heel strike;
- (d) measuring an acceleration response at each of the accelerometers;
- (e) processing the vertical ground reaction force and acceleration responses at a CPU to determine a bone damping value; and
- (f) comparing the bone damping value to a reference value to assess dynamic bone quality in the human subject.

In another embodiment, step (a) further comprises contacting at least one accelerometer to an exterior surface of a human subject at a non-load-bearing anatomical site of the subject, such as the forehead.
The bone damping value can be compared to a reference value, representing normal, healthy individuals, in order to assess dynamic bone quality. In one embodiment of the invention, a bone damping value lower than the reference value indicates a presence or risk of bone disease. In a specific embodiment, the bone disease is selected from the group consisting of osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and bone fracture.
In another embodiment of the invention, the method further comprises determining a bone mineral density, or BMD, of the human subject. Suitable methods for determining BMD are well-known in the art. See, for example, “NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy,” Journal of the American Medical Association 285: 785-95 (2001). In one embodiment, the BMD is determined by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Many types of accelerometers are known in the art and suitable for use in the present invention. Indeed, any accelerometer capable of measuring acceleration response and transmitting acceleration response data from load-bearing and non-load-bearing anatomical sites may be used in the method. In a specific embodiment, the accelerometers are selected from the group consisting of wired accelerometers, wireless accelerometers, MEMS based nano-accelerometers, and combinations thereof. In a more specific embodiment, the accelerometers are wireless MEMS based nano-accelerometers.
In another embodiment of the invention, the processing step (e) comprises performing algorithms selected from the group consisting Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), transfer function, and Frequency Response Function (FRF).

Calculation of Bone Damping Value

Data collected from the force plate and accelerometers after heel strike are used to calculate the bone damping value for each anatomical site of interest. The force plate measures the time domain force profile created by the heel strike (the vertical ground reaction force data). See, for example, FIG. 6. Each accelerometer measures the time domain acceleration profiles caused by the heel strike (acceleration response data) at each anatomical site of interest. See, for example, FIG. 7. The data is transmitted to the computer system, programmed to determine the bone damping value at each anatomical site.
In order to determine bone damping, the musculoskeletal system is treated as a single degree of freedom system responding to the transient force due to heel strike. A Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the vertical ground reaction force data and the acceleration response data at all anatomical test sites is performed. The number of peaks in the frequency domain up to 100 Hz are considered for the analysis. The first dominant frequency and next four peaks in the increasing frequency direction are computed for acceleration waveforms at all anatomical sites. The frequency response function (FRF) of vertical ground reaction force and acceleration response are obtained using the following equation:
FRF=FFT of acceleration response at an anatomical site/FFT of vertical ground reaction force.
Damping value is obtained directly from the measured FRF using the structural bandwidth and resonance frequency method. See Ewing, D. J., Modal Testing: Theory and Practice, Research Studies Press Ltd., John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1984) and Coleman, R E., Experimental structural dynamics: An introduction to experimental methods of characterizing vibrating structures, Author House (2004). By this method, the structural bandwidth is manifest in the FRF real part as the frequency separation between two extrema, symmetric about the resonance frequency, whereas the resonance frequency coincides with a single peak in the FRF imaginary part. The damping value is determined according to the following equation:
Bone damping value ζ=(½)*(structural bandwidth/resonance frequency)
Using this equation, a bone damping value is determined for each anatomical site of interest.

Additional Outputs

Other outputs are also optionally provided by the system, including dB down in the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) curves corresponding to each load-bearing anatomical site; numbers of peaks in the FFT responses at each load-bearing anatomical site; area under the FFT response graphs at each load-bearing anatomical site; and resonance frequency from FFT response graphs at each load-bearing anatomical site.
dB down of an acceleration FFT curve is calculated according to the following method:
dB1=20 log₁₀(A2/A1)
dB2=20 log₁₀(A3/A1)
wherein A1, A2, and A3 are obtained from the FFT curve, as represented, for example, in FIG. 5.

EXAMPLES

The following examples are given by way of illustration, and are in no way intended to limit the scope of the present invention.

Example 1

A Caucasian, post-menopausal female subject has accelerometers placed in contact with load-bearing anatomical sites on the exterior surface of her body, the sites comprising the shin bones immediately above the ankles, the tibias, the lateral femoral condyles, the third lumbar vertebra, and the seventh thoracic vertebra. An additional accelerometer is contacted to her forehead, a non-load-bearing anatomical site. The subject is then instructed to strike her heel on the force plate. The force plate measures the time domain force profile created by the heel strike (the vertical ground reaction force data). Each accelerometer measures the time domain acceleration profiles caused by the heel strike (acceleration response data) at each anatomical site of interest. The data is transmitted to the computer system, which is programmed to determine the bone damping value at each anatomical site.
In order to determine bone damping, the musculoskeletal system is treated as a single degree of freedom system responding to the transient force due to heel strike. A Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the vertical ground reaction force data and the acceleration response data at all anatomical test sites is performed. The number of peaks in the frequency domain up to 100 Hz are considered for the analysis. The first dominant frequency and next four peaks in the increasing frequency direction are computed for acceleration waveforms at all anatomical sites. The frequency response function (FRF) of vertical ground reaction force and acceleration response are obtained using the following equation:
FRF=FFT of acceleration response at an anatomical site/FFT of vertical ground reaction force.
Damping value is obtained directly from the measured FRF using the structural bandwidth and resonance frequency method. By this method, the structural bandwidth is manifest in the FRF real part as the frequency separation between two extrema, symmetric about the resonance frequency, whereas the resonance frequency coincides with a single peak in the FRF imaginary part. The damping value is determined according to the following equation:
Bone damping value=(½*structural bandwidth)/resonance frequency
Using this equation, a bone damping value is determined for each anatomical site of interest. The bone damping value of the female subject at the right femoral condyle is 5.0, significantly lower than the bone damping value of a normal healthy adult. The bone damping data indicate the subject is suffering from osteoporosis and is at risk for developing bone fracture.
Example 2

Decreased Bone Shock Absorbing Capacity in Individuals with Bone Disease

Five groups of subjects undergo dynamic bone quality analysis, the groups including healthy adults (N=10), healthy youth (N=18), individuals with osteoporosis and without fracture (N=39), individuals with osteoarthritis (N=8), and individuals with osteoporosis and with fracture (N=28). Each individual has accelerometers placed in contact with load-bearing anatomical sites on the exterior surface of the body, the sites comprising the shin bones immediately above the ankles, the tibias, the lateral femoral condyles, the third lumbar vertebra, and the seventh thoracic vertebra. An additional accelerometer is contacted to the forehead of the test subjects, a non-load-bearing anatomical site.
Each individual is instructed to strike his or her heel on the force plate. Bone damping values are determined for each subject, corresponding to each anatomical site of interest. The data indicate a progressively decreasing trend in a continuum of data from healthy, young bone to stiffer bone in individuals having osteoarthritis, to even more stiff and brittle bone in individuals having osteoporosis. (See FIG. 2). Damping values are significantly different for all comparisons (p values ranging between 0.04 and 0.0001), except between healthy adults and healthy youth and individuals with osteoporosis without fracture and individuals with osteoarthritis. The data show that individuals with degenerative skeletal disorders have significantly decreased bone shock absorbing capacity, as compared to normal healthy subjects.

Example 3

Damping Values at the Site of Fracture

The data from the two groups of Caucasian post-menopausal female subjects of Example 2 are further considered (osteoporosis with fracture, N=28 and osteoporosis without fracture, N=39) in order to demonstrate the differences in damping values between groups at the site of fracture. The site of fracture was between the third lumbar vertebra (lower back) and the seventh thoracic vertebra (upper back). The absolute damping value of the fracture group was significantly lower than that of the non-fracture group for lower back (p=0.003) as well as for the upper back regions (p=0.009) (see FIG. 1). The absolute damping values for the fracture group due to heel-strike at the fracture sites (damping value at upper back: 1.26 and at lower back: 3.15) were significantly lower than that at tibia (damping value=5.3) and femoral (damping value=5.1) bone sites (data not shown). The results indicate that osteoporosis has a more detrimental impact on damping properties of the bone at the fracture site as compared to non-fracture sites (see FIGS. 1 and 2).
All documents cited are, in relevant part, incorporated herein by reference; the citation of any document is not to be construed as an admission that it is prior art with respect to the present invention.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.

Claims

We claim:

1. A computer system for assessing dynamic bone quality, the system comprising:

a memory that stores executable instructions;

a central processing unit (CPU) capable of accessing the memory and executing the instructions to provide an output; and

a receiver for receiving data input and transmitting it to the CPU;

wherein the receiver is operably connected to:

(1) a plurality of accelerometers, each accelerometer adapted to contact an exterior surface of a human subject at a load-bearing anatomical site of the subject and to receive input from each point of contact comprising acceleration response data; and (2) a force plate adapted to receive input comprising vertical ground reaction force data provided by a heel strike on the force plate;

wherein the CPU executes the instructions to process the input data transmitted from the receiver to provide the output as a bone damping value.

2. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the receiver is operably connected to at least one accelerometer adapted to contact an exterior surface of the subject at a non-load-bearing anatomical site of the subject.

3. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the load-bearing anatomical sites are selected from the group consisting of the shins, the tibias, the femurs, and the vertebrae.

4. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of accelerometers is selected from the group consisting of wired accelerometers, wireless accelerometers, MEMS based nano-accelerometers, and combinations thereof.

5. The computer system of claim 2 wherein the at least one accelerometer is selected from the group consisting of wired accelerometers, wireless accelerometers, MEMS based nano-accelerometers, and combinations thereof.

6. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the executable instructions comprise performing algorithms on the acceleration response data and the vertical ground reaction force data, the algorithms selected from the group consisting Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), transfer function, and Frequency Response Function (FRF).

7. A method for assessing dynamic bone quality in a human subject, the method comprising the steps of:

(a) contacting at least one accelerometer to an exterior surface of a human subject at a load-bearing anatomical site of the subject;

(b) directing the subject to strike a heel on a force plate;

(c) measuring vertical ground reaction force due to the heel strike;

(d) measuring an acceleration response at each of the accelerometers;

(e) processing the vertical ground reaction force and acceleration responses at a CPU to determine a bone damping value; and

(f) comparing the bone damping value to a reference value to assess dynamic bone quality in the human subject.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein step (a) further comprises contacting at least one accelerometer to an exterior surface of a human subject at a non-load-bearing anatomical site of the subject.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein the load-bearing anatomical sites are selected from the group consisting of the shins, the tibias, the femurs, and the vertebrae.

10. The method of claim 7 wherein the at least one accelerometer is selected from the group consisting of wired accelerometers, wireless accelerometers, MEMS based nano-accelerometers, and combinations thereof.

11. The method of claim 8 wherein the at least one accelerometer is selected from the group consisting of wired accelerometers, wireless accelerometers, MEMS based nano-accelerometers, and combinations thereof.

12. The method of claim 7 wherein the processing step (e) comprises performing algorithms selected from the group consisting Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), transfer function, and Frequency Response Function (FRF).

13. The method of claim 7, wherein a bone damping value lower than the reference value indicates a risk of bone disease.

14. The method claim 13, wherein the bone disease is selected from the group consisting of osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and bone fracture.

15. The method of claim 7, further comprising determining a bone mineral density of the human subject.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein the bone mineral density is determined by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).