US20140222204A1 - Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function - Google Patents
Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20140222204A1 US20140222204A1 US14/176,323 US201414176323A US2014222204A1 US 20140222204 A1 US20140222204 A1 US 20140222204A1 US 201414176323 A US201414176323 A US 201414176323A US 2014222204 A1 US2014222204 A1 US 2014222204A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- manipulator
- slave manipulator
- force
- slave
- master
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A61B19/2203—
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/70—Manipulators specially adapted for use in surgery
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/30—Surgical robots
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/30—Surgical robots
- A61B34/37—Master-slave robots
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/70—Manipulators specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/76—Manipulators having means for providing feel, e.g. force or tactile feedback
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J13/00—Controls for manipulators
- B25J13/02—Hand grip control means
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J17/00—Joints
- B25J17/02—Wrist joints
- B25J17/0258—Two-dimensional joints
- B25J17/0266—Two-dimensional joints comprising more than two actuating or connecting rods
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J3/00—Manipulators of master-slave type, i.e. both controlling unit and controlled unit perform corresponding spatial movements
- B25J3/04—Manipulators of master-slave type, i.e. both controlling unit and controlled unit perform corresponding spatial movements involving servo mechanisms
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/28—Surgical forceps
- A61B17/29—Forceps for use in minimally invasive surgery
- A61B2017/2926—Details of heads or jaws
- A61B2017/2927—Details of heads or jaws the angular position of the head being adjustable with respect to the shaft
- A61B2017/2929—Details of heads or jaws the angular position of the head being adjustable with respect to the shaft with a head rotatable about the longitudinal axis of the shaft
-
- A61B2019/2223—
-
- A61B2019/2292—
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/30—Surgical robots
- A61B2034/304—Surgical robots including a freely orientable platform, e.g. so called 'Stewart platforms'
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/30—Surgical robots
- A61B2034/305—Details of wrist mechanisms at distal ends of robotic arms
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/06—Measuring instruments not otherwise provided for
- A61B2090/064—Measuring instruments not otherwise provided for for measuring force, pressure or mechanical tension
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/50—Supports for surgical instruments, e.g. articulated arms
- A61B2090/506—Supports for surgical instruments, e.g. articulated arms using a parallelogram linkage, e.g. panthograph
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T74/00—Machine element or mechanism
- Y10T74/20—Control lever and linkage systems
- Y10T74/20207—Multiple controlling elements for single controlled element
- Y10T74/20305—Robotic arm
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a manipulation system in which automatic operation of a slave manipulator that follows manual operation of a master manipulator is bilaterally controllable by means of communication, and particularly to a manipulation system having a force feedback capability.
- the master-slave concept used in commercially available multi-DOF forceps systems has advantages of, for example, capability of remotely and intuitively operating the forceps. To provide more accurate, safer workability, it is desirable to provide force feedback to the operator. To this end, studies on forceps with a force sensor provided in the vicinity of the tip of the forceps are underway.
- a multi-DOF forceps system using electric actuators to drive the master and slave portions not only cannot feed a minute force back to the operator because of a high reduction ratio, but also has an insufficient movable range and results in a bulky apparatus. Further, attaching a force sensor to the forceps is not an easy task in consideration of practical factors, such as reduction in size, sterilization, and calibration.
- a pneumatic actuator which has nonlinear characteristics, is inferior to an electric actuator in terms of controllability, but has advantages of, for example, presenting passive softness, having a high mass-to-output ratio, and producing a large force without a reduction gear train.
- a multi-DOF forceps system has been proposed (see the non-patent document 1), in which the slave portion includes a 3-DOF forceps manipulator using pneumatic cylinders and the pressure in each of the pneumatic cylinders is used to estimate the external force acting on the tip of the forceps instead of using a force sensor.
- a multi-DOF forceps system has been proposed (see the non-patent document 2), which includes a 3-DOF pneumatic manipulator that holds and drives the 3-DOF forceps manipulator described in the non-patent document 1 in a region outside the abdomen.
- Non-patent document 1 Bilateral control of multi-DOF forceps system having force sensing capability using pneumatic servo technology, Japan Society of Computer Aided Surgery, pp. 25-31, (2005), Kotaro Tadano, Kenji Kawashima
- Non-patent document 2 Development of master-slave system having force feedback capability using pneumatically-driven multi-DOF forceps: Development of manipulator for holding forceps, Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics, 1A1-A03, (2006), Kotaro Tadano, Kenji Kawashima
- the forceps manipulator In the multi-DOF forceps system described in the non-patent document 1, the forceps manipulator has only three degrees of freedom, which does not allow the motion of the human hand to be reproduced.
- the forceps manipulator includes a mechanism that converts the linear motion of a pneumatic cylinder into rotational motion, so that reduction in weight of the forceps manipulator is difficult to achieve.
- the master and the slave portions are configured in the same manner, which does not necessarily provide an optimum structure in terms of operability.
- An object of the invention is to provide a compact, lightweight manipulation system that excels in operability and has a force feedback capability.
- the manipulation system having a force feedback capability is a manipulation system in which automatic operation of a slave manipulator that follows manual operation of a master manipulator is bilaterally controllable by means of communication.
- the manipulation system is characterized in that the force acting on the slave manipulator is fed back to the master manipulator by operating the master manipulator primarily under electrically-driven speed control and the slave manipulator primarily under pneumatically-driven force control.
- the master manipulator it is not necessary to compensate for the dynamics and the self-weight of the master manipulator in the motion range of a user, allowing highly accurate, broadband positional control, which is specific to an electrically-driven system, and in the slave manipulator, nonlinearity characteristics specific to a pneumatically-driven system presents passive softness, provides a high mass-to-output ratio, and produces a large force.
- the manipulation system is characterized in that the master manipulator includes a 3-DOF translation unit and a 4-DOF orientation unit connected to the translation unit, and the slave manipulator includes a 3-DOF holding unit and a 4-DOF grip unit held by the holding unit.
- the manipulation system is characterized in that the translation unit, the orientation unit, the holding unit, and the grip unit are configured as a delta mechanism, a gimbal mechanism, a combination of a parallel link mechanism and a gimbal mechanism, and a wire mechanism, respectively.
- the master manipulator and the slave manipulator are thus configured differently from each other, so that the shapes thereof can be optimized in terms of operability.
- the manipulation system is characterized in that the grip unit includes pneumatic rotary actuators and wires connected to the pneumatic actuators, and the grip unit is driven by pulling motions of the wires in response to the motions of the pneumatic actuators.
- the grip unit can therefore directly transmit the swing motions of the pneumatic actuators, so that the weight of the slave manipulator can be reduced.
- the manipulation system is characterized in that the force acting on the grip unit is estimated from the drive forces of the pneumatic actuators by making use of the back drivability thereof. No force sensor is therefore required on the grip unit, thereby providing advantages of reducing the size of the grip unit, making disinfection of the grip unit easy, and eliminating the need for calibration of the grip unit.
- the manipulation system is characterized in that compliance-based control is applied to the slave manipulator. Therefore, the slave manipulator will not produce an excessive force. Further, the manipulation system is characterized in that position-based impedance control in which a force control loop includes a motion control loop is applied to the master manipulator, and force-based impedance control in which a motion control loop includes a force control loop is applied to the slave manipulator.
- the slave manipulator can be stably operated by imparting a moderate viscosity effect to the master manipulator.
- the manipulation system is characterized in that automatic operation of the slave manipulator that follows manual operation of the master manipulator is bilaterally controlled by means of wired communication.
- the master manipulator can therefore remotely operate the slave manipulator by means of the Internet.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram showing a manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to an embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing the exterior of the master manipulator shown in FIG. 1 ;
- FIG. 3 is a perspective view showing the translation unit shown in FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 4 is a perspective view showing the orientation unit shown in FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 5 is a perspective view showing the exterior of the slave manipulator shown in FIG. 1 ;
- FIG. 6 is a perspective view showing the holding unit shown in FIG. 5 and also shows a pneumatic circuit for driving a pneumatic cylinder;
- FIG. 7 is a perspective view showing the grip unit shown in FIG. 5 ;
- FIG. 8 is a perspective view showing the forceps showing in FIG. 7 ;
- FIG. 9 is, a perspective view showing the forceps holding unit shown in FIG. 7 ;
- FIG. 10 is a control block diagram of the multi-DOF forceps system.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram showing a manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to an embodiment of the invention.
- the manipulation system having a force feedback capability is a multi-DOF forceps system 100 including a master manipulator 101 , a master controller 103 , a slave manipulator 105 , and a slave controller 107 .
- the multi-DOF forceps system 100 is a remote manipulation system in which automatic operation of the slave manipulator 105 that follows manual operation of the master manipulator 101 is remotely controllable by means of wired communication between the master controller 103 and the slave controller 107 .
- the master manipulator 101 primarily operates under electrically-driven positional control using electric actuators, and includes a 3-DOF translation unit 110 configured as a delta mechanism and a 4-DOF orientation unit 120 connected to the translation unit 110 and configured as a gimbal mechanism.
- the slave manipulator 105 primarily operates under pneumatically-driven force control using pneumatic actuators, and includes a 3-DOF holding unit 150 configured as a combination of a parallel link mechanism and a gimbal mechanism and a 4-DOF grip unit 160 held by the holding unit 150 .
- an electric actuator particularly a combination of a high reduction-ratio gear train and an electric motor
- a pneumatic cylinder is used, for example, in that highly accurate, broadband positional control is possible, and that applying motion control-based force control eliminates the need for compensation for the dynamics and the self-weight of the master manipulator 101 in the motion range of the operator.
- a pneumatic actuator which has nonlinear characteristics, is inferior to an electric actuator in terms of controllability, but has advantages, for example, presenting passive softness, having a high mass-to-output ratio, and producing a large force without a reduction gear train.
- the master controller 103 includes a computer 31 and a servo amplifier 32 .
- the slave controller 107 includes a computer 71 , a servo valve 72 , an air supplier 73 , and a pressure gauge 74 .
- the computer 31 in the master controller 103 sends a tip position signal, which is obtained by performing kinetic computation on a signal SPM from each encoder in the master manipulator 101 , to the computer 71 in the slave controller 107 using UDP/IP communication.
- the computer 71 in the slave controller 107 sends a control signal SCS to the servo valve 72 based on the received position signal.
- the servo valve 72 adjusts compressed air CPA from the air supplier 73 based on the received control signal SCS, and supplies the adjusted compressed air to the slave manipulator 105 , so that the operation of the slave manipulator 105 is automatically controlled to follow the manual operation of the master manipulator 101 .
- the computer 71 in the slave controller 107 sends a calculated target value of the force produced at the tip to the computer 31 in the master controller 103 using UDP/IP communication.
- the computer 31 in the master controller 103 sends a control signal SCM to the servo amplifier 32 based on the received force signal. Based on the received control signal SCM, the servo amplifier 32 feeds the force acting on the slave manipulator 105 back to the master manipulator 101 .
- FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing the exterior of the master manipulator 101 .
- FIG. 3 is a perspective view showing the translation unit 110 .
- FIG. 4 is a perspective view showing the orientation unit 120 .
- the orientation unit 120 is fixed to the translation unit 110 with screws, which is in turn fixed to, for example, a housing (not shown) with screws.
- the master manipulator 101 is similar to the slave manipulator 105 in that the number of degrees of freedom is seven, but differs from the slave manipulator 105 in that the master manipulator 101 uses a parallel link mechanism and has a compact structure.
- the translation unit 110 includes a circular mounting plate 111 , three motors 112 , three links 113 , three sets of parallel links 114 , and a triangular fixture plate 115 as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 .
- the mounting plate 111 has a plurality of through holes 111 a drilled in the vicinity of the outer circumferential edge at uniform angular intervals, and screws 111 b are inserted into the through holes 111 a to fix the mounting plate 111 , for example, to a housing.
- the three motors 112 are disposed on the mounting plate 111 and fixed thereto with screws at uniform angular intervals (120 degrees) along a circumferential line inside the outer circumferential edge in such a way that each of the motor shafts 112 a is oriented along a tangential line of the mounting circumferential line.
- Each of the motors 112 is an AC servo motor with a harmonic gear transmission and an encoder built therein.
- the link 113 is assembled in such a way that one end (rear end) thereof is fixed to the motor shaft 112 a and the other end (front end) is supported by a bearing 113 a in such a way that the bearing 113 a becomes perpendicular to the axis of the link.
- the parallel link 114 includes two links 114 a and two link shafts 114 b , and adjacent ends of the two links 114 a are rotatably supported at both ends of the two link shaft 114 b in such a way that the two links 114 a can be translated with a predetermined distance maintained therebetween.
- One of the link shafts 114 b fits in the bearing 113 a attached to the tip of the link 113 .
- the fixture plate 115 is fixed in such a way that a bearing 115 a disposed at each apex of the triangle is oriented parallel to the axis of the beating 113 a attached to the link 113 .
- the other link shaft 114 b fits in the bearing 115 a fixed to each apex of the fixture plate 115 .
- the thus configured translation unit 110 is a delta mechanism having three degrees of freedom in total, that is, having the link 113 being rotatable around the motor shaft 112 a of the motor 112 in the direction indicated by the arrow “a” in FIG. 3 , the parallel link 114 being rotatable around the tip of the link 113 in the same direction as the rotational direction “a” of the link 113 and in the direction perpendicular thereto indicated by the arrow “b” in FIG. 3 , and the fixture plate 115 being rotatable around the tip of the parallel link 114 in the same direction as the rotational direction “a” of the link 113 .
- the translation unit 110 is therefore characterized in that it produces a large translation force and maintains the same orientation independent of its position.
- the orientation unit 120 includes, as shown in FIGS. 2 and 4 , an attachment plate 121 that is L-shaped in the side view, a first motor 122 , a first motor fixture plate 123 that is U-shaped in the side view, a second motor 124 , a second motor fixture plate 125 that is L-shaped in the side view, a third motor 126 , a third motor fixture plate 127 that is L-shaped in the side view, a cylindrical rotating arm 128 , a force sensor 129 , a force sensor fixture plate 130 that is L-shaped in the side view, a rectangular column-like manipulation finger support arm 131 , and a rod-like manipulation finger 132 .
- the attachment plate 121 has a plurality of through holes 121 a drilled in one end thereof, and screws 121 b are inserted into the through holes 121 a to fix the attachment plate 121 to the fixture plate 115 .
- the first motor fixture plate 123 to which the first motor 122 is fixed with screws, is fixed to the other end of the attachment plate 121 with screws in such a way that the motor shaft 122 a is oriented parallel to the fixture plate 115 .
- One end of the second motor fixture plate 125 is fixed to the motor shaft 122 a of the first motor 122 , and the second motor 124 is fixed to the other end of the second motor fixture plate 125 with screws in such a way that the motor shaft 124 a is oriented perpendicular to the motor shaft 122 a of the first motor 122 .
- One end of the third motor fixture plate 127 is fixed to the motor shaft 124 a of the second motor 124 , and the third motor 126 is fixed to the other end of the third motor fixture plate 127 with screws in such away that the motor shaft 126 a is oriented perpendicular to the motor shaft 122 a of the first motor 122 and the motor shaft 124 a of the second motor 124 .
- the rear end of the rotating arm 128 is connected and fixed to the motor shaft 126 a of the third motor 126 in such a way that the axial direction of the rotating arm 128 is oriented in the axial direction of the motor shaft 126 a of the third motor 126 .
- the force sensor 129 is fixed to the tip of the rotating arm 128 via the force sensor fixture plate 130 in such a way that the rotating shaft 129 a of the force sensor 129 is oriented perpendicular to the motor shaft 126 a of the third motor 126 .
- the manipulation finger support arm 131 is supported at the tip of the rotating arm 128 in such a way that the rear end of the manipulation finger support arm 131 is rotatable around the rotating shaft 129 a of the force sensor 129 .
- the manipulation finger 132 includes a hollow cylindrical body 132 a and a solid cylindrical slider 132 b that is inserted through the body 132 a and slidable in the axial direction.
- the tip of the body 132 a is rotatably supported at the tip of the manipulation finger support arm 131 in the same direction as the rotating shaft 129 a of the force sensor 129 .
- the tip of the slider 132 b is inserted and secured in a hole 128 a drilled in a substantially central area of the rotating arm 128 .
- Each of the first motor 122 , the second motor 124 , and the third motor 126 is an AC servo motor with a harmonic gear transmission and an encoder built therein.
- the force sensor 129 is a six-axis force sensor capable of detecting translational forces in three axial directions perpendicular to one another and moments around the three axes.
- the thus configured orientation unit 120 is a serial gimbal mechanism having four degrees of freedom in total, that is, having the second motor fixture plate 125 being rotatable around the motor shaft 122 a of the first motor 122 in the direction a in FIG. 4 , the third motor fixture plate 127 being rotatable around the motor shaft 124 a of the second motor 124 in the direction ⁇ in FIG. 4 , the rotating arm 128 being rotatable around the motor shaft 126 a of the third motor 126 in the direction ⁇ in FIG. 4 , the manipulation finger support arm 131 being rotatable around the rotating shaft 129 a of the force sensor 129 in the direction S in FIG.
- the orientation unit 120 is therefore characterized by its broad movable range that covers the motion of the human hand.
- FIG. 5 is a perspective view showing the exterior of the slave manipulator 105 .
- FIG. 6 is a perspective view showing the holding unit 150 .
- FIG. 7 is a perspective view showing the grip unit 160 .
- the grip unit 160 is fixed to the holding unit 150 with screws, which is in turn fixed to, for example, a housing (not shown) with screws.
- the slave manipulator 105 is similar to the master manipulator 101 in that the number of degrees of freedom is seven, but differs from the master manipulator 101 in that the slave manipulator 105 uses a combination of two sets of parallel link mechanisms and a gimbal mechanism as well as a wire mechanism and has a compact structure.
- the holding unit 150 includes a rectangular base plate 151 , a parallel link support shaft 152 , two sets of parallel links 153 , a grip unit support base 154 , three pneumatic cylinders (pneumatic actuators) 155 , 156 , and 157 , and three cylinder fixture plates 158 a , 158 b , and 158 c .
- Two bearings 151 a are disposed on and fixed to the base plate 151 with a predetermined distance therebetween. The two bearings 151 a rotatably support the parallel link support shaft 152 .
- a rod support 151 b which rotatably supports a block 155 ab fixed to the tip of the rod 155 a of the first pneumatic cylinder 155 , is also disposed on and fixed to the base plate 151 between the bearings 151 a .
- the body 155 b of the first pneumatic cylinder 155 is supported by one end of the cylinder fixture plate 158 a , which is L-shaped in the side view, and the other end thereof is fixed to a substantially central portion of the parallel link support shaft 152 .
- each of two links 153 a and 153 b which form one of the parallel links 153 , is rotatably supported at the corresponding end of the parallel link support shaft 152 .
- one end of a link 153 c which is part of the other parallel link 153
- a substantially central portion of the link 153 c is rotatably supported at a substantially central portion of the link 153 a .
- One end of a link 153 d which is part of the other parallel link 153 , is rotatably supported at the other end of the link 153 a .
- the other ends of the links 153 c and 153 d are rotatably supported by the cylinder fixture plate 151 .
- the body 156 b of the second pneumatic cylinder 156 is supported by one end of the cylinder fixture plate 158 b , which is L-shaped in the side view, and the other end thereof is rotatably supported at the portion where the links 153 b and 153 c are rotatably supported.
- a block (not shown) fixed to the tip of the rod 156 a of the second pneumatic cylinder 156 is rotatably supported between the two ends of the link 153 a .
- the body 157 b of the third pneumatic cylinder 157 is supported by one end of the cylinder fixture plate 158 c , which is L-shaped in the side view, and the grip unit support base 154 is attached to the cylinder fixture plate 158 c in a slidable manner in the direction in which the rod 157 a of the third pneumatic cylinder 157 moves.
- the tip of the rod 157 a of the third pneumatic cylinder 157 is fixed to a fixture plate 154 a fixed to the upper portion of the grip unit support base 154 .
- Each of the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 is a low-friction single rod double acting cylinder.
- both chambers of each of the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 are connected to respective control ports of a five-port, flow-control servo valve 193 (five ports in total: one supply port, two control ports, and two exhaust ports).
- a control signal is used to adjust the opening of one of the control ports of the servo valve 193 , and hence adjust the flow from the supply port into one of the chambers of each of the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 .
- the air in the other chamber is released from the other control port through the corresponding exhaust port to the atmosphere. The pressure difference between both chambers of each of the pneumatic cylinders is thus controlled.
- the thus configured holding unit 150 is a combination of a parallel link mechanism and a gimbal mechanism, the parallel link mechanism having three degrees of freedom in total, that is, having the parallel links 153 being rotatable around the parallel link support shaft 152 in the direction ⁇ in FIG. 6 in response to the motion of the first pneumatic cylinder 155 and being rotatable in the direction ⁇ in FIG. 6 around the portions where the parallel link support shaft 152 and the links 153 a and 153 b are rotatably supported in response to the motion of the second pneumatic cylinder 156 , and the grip unit support base 154 being slidable in the direction ⁇ in FIG. 6 in response to the motion of the third pneumatic cylinder 157 .
- the holding unit 150 can therefore be designed in such a way that the trocar, which is set in the abdomen of the subject during laparoscopic surgery, is a stationary point.
- the holding unit is thus characterized in that it is not necessary to directly support the forceps at the hole into which the forceps are inserted, so that the holding unit 150 can be operated with minimal burden on the body at the hole into which the forceps are inserted, and the position coordinates of the port of the trocar are not required in the kinetics computation.
- a counterweight 159 is used to mechanically compensate part of the self-weight of the holding unit 150 .
- the grip unit 160 which includes forceps 170 and a forceps holding unit 180 as shown in FIGS. 5 and 7 , is now described also with reference to FIG. 8 , a perspective view showing the forceps 170 , and FIG. 9 , a perspective view showing the forceps holding unit 180 .
- the forceps 170 includes a rod-like forceps shaft 171 , a forceps finger holder 172 , and two forceps fingers 173 and 174 .
- the rear end of the forceps shaft 171 is rotatably supported by the forceps holding unit 180 .
- One end of the forceps finger holder 172 is rotatably supported at the tip of the forceps shaft 171 around a rotating shaft 172 a disposed in a direction perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the forceps shaft 171 .
- One end of each of the forceps fingers 173 and 174 is rotatably supported at the other end of the forceps finger holder 172 around rotating shafts 173 a and 174 a disposed in a direction perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the forceps shaft 171 and the rotating shaft 172 a of the forceps finger holder 172 .
- the forceps holding unit 180 includes a box-like holding body 181 , four pneumatic rotary actuators (pneumatic actuators) 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 , four sets of rotary encoders and pressure sensors 186 , 187 , 188 , and 189 , four drive pulleys 190 , 191 , 192 , and 193 , one driven pulley 194 , and three direction conversion pulleys 195 , 196 , and 197 .
- the holding body 181 is fixed to the grip unit support base 154 in the grip unit 150 with screws.
- the forceps shaft 171 is inserted through and rotatably supported by a bearing 181 b attached to a side 181 a of the holding body 181 in such a way that the bearing 181 b covers a hole provided in the side 181 a , and the driven pulley 194 is attached to the rear end of the forceps shaft 171 .
- the first to fourth pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 include cylindrical bodies 182 a , 183 a , 184 a , and 185 a .
- Each of the bodies includes a swinging piece (not shown) having a shaft that is located at the center of the body and can swing within a predetermined angular range, the swinging piece extending from the swinging shaft to the inner circumferential surface of the body, and a partition plate (not shown) extending from the swinging shaft to the inner circumferential surface of the body.
- air supply/exhaust ports 182 b / 182 c ( 183 b / 183 c , 184 b / 184 c , 185 b / 185 c ) provided in the circumferential surface of the body 182 a ( 183 a , 184 a , 185 a ), to and from the two chambers partitioned by the swinging piece and the partition plate so as to swing the swinging plate, a rotating shaft 182 d ( 183 d , 184 d , 185 d ) connected to the swinging shaft is rotated within a predetermined angular range.
- the first to third pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , and 184 to which the first to third rotary encoders and pressure sensors 186 , 187 , and 188 are connected, are attached in line to a side 181 c , which is disposed perpendicular to the side 181 a of the holding body 181 , in such a way that the rotating shafts 182 d , 183 d , and 184 d pass through three holes 181 d arranged in line in the side 181 c , and the first to third drive pulleys 190 , 191 , and 192 are disposed in line and attached to the tips of the rotating shafts 182 d , 183 d , and 184 d .
- the first to third direction conversion pulleys 195 , 196 , and 197 are disposed inside the side 181 c and rotatably supported next to the first to third drive pulleys 190 , 191 , and 192 , respectively.
- Three loop wires (not shown) run from the first to third drive pulleys 190 , 191 , and 192 via the first to third direction conversion pulleys 195 , 196 , and 197 to the rotating shaft 172 a of the forceps finger holder 172 and the rotating shafts 173 a and 174 a of the two forceps fingers 173 and 174 , respectively.
- the three loop wires thus engage the first to third drive pulleys 190 , 191 , and 192 as well as the rotating shaft 172 a of the forceps finger holder 172 and the rotating shafts 173 a and 174 a of the two forceps fingers 173 and 174 , respectively.
- the fourth swing pneumatic actuator 185 to which the fourth rotary encoder and pressure sensor 189 is connected, is attached to the side 181 a in such a way that the rotating shaft 185 d is oriented parallel to the forceps shaft 171 and passes through a hole provided in the side 181 a of the holding body 181 , and the fourth drive pulley 193 is disposed next to the driven pulley 194 and attached to the tip of the rotating shaft 185 d .
- a loop wire (not shown) engages the fourth drive pulley 193 and the driven pulley 194 so that the loop wire runs between the fourth drive pulley 193 and the driven pulley 194 .
- the thus configured grip unit 160 is a 4-DOF wire mechanism for bending, gripping, and rotating, that is, having the forceps finger holder 172 being rotatable around the rotating shaft 172 a in the direction in FIG. 8 in response to the motion of the first pneumatic rotary actuator 182 , the two forceps fingers 173 and 174 being rotatable around the rotating shafts 173 a and 174 a in the direction ⁇ in FIG. 8 in response to the motions of the second and third pneumatic rotary actuators 183 and 184 , and the forceps shaft 171 being rotatable around the rotating shaft 185 d in the direction A in FIGS. 8 and 9 in response to the motion of the fourth pneumatic rotary actuator 185 .
- the forceps 170 and the forceps holding unit 180 are therefore characterized in that they are separable from each other in consideration of the disinfection process.
- FIG. 10 is a control block diagram of the multi-DOF forceps system 100 .
- a 5-port spool servo valve 172 is used to drive the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 and the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 .
- a disturbance observer uses the drive force Fdr of each of the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 as well as the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 , all of which are pneumatic actuators, (the drive force Fdr is calculated using the pressure difference between the chambers) to estimate an external force fext acting on the forceps fingers 173 and 174 , which form the tip of the slave manipulator 105 .
- this control method requires an inverse dynamics model of the whole portion including the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 , the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 , and the forceps fingers 173 and 174 .
- wires are used for power transmission, the modeling is not easy due to friction of the wires and interference among the degrees of freedom.
- a neural network is used to learn a given arbitrary drive pattern.
- the response in a master-slave system will be ideal when the position and the force of the master manipulator are the same as those of the slave manipulator.
- a bilateral control system is used, in which impedance control applied to the master manipulator 101 differs from that applied to the slave manipulator 105 .
- the slave controller 107 makes use of the softness of the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 and the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 to apply a control method in which compliance is imparted to the slave manipulator 105 . That is, since air can be compressed, the slave manipulator 105 has softness. Further, such softness is adjustable by adjusting the pressure of the compressed air.
- the compliance of the slave manipulator 105 can prevent generation of an excessive force.
- the softness of the slave manipulator 105 provides a shock absorbing effect when the slave manipulator 105 hits an object hard.
- the slave manipulator 105 when the slave manipulator 105 comes into contact with a highly rigid environment, the deviation of the position of the master manipulator 101 from that of the slave manipulator 105 increases due to the compliance. Even when the position of the master manipulator 101 deviates from that of the slave manipulator 105 , the operator can work normally because the slave manipulator 105 , which is used for surgery, primarily comes into contact with an organ and the operator works on the organ while looking at images of the slave manipulator 105 through an endoscope.
- the master manipulator 101 desirably operates in a stably manner by imparting a moderate viscous effect.
- the master controller 103 employs a position-based impedance control method (admittance control method) in which a force control loop includes a motion control loop in consideration of the characteristics of the motors 112 , the first motor 122 , the second motor 124 , and the third motor 126 .
- the slave controller 107 employs a force-based impedance control method in which a motion control loop includes a force control loop because the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 and the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 are characterized by high back-drivability and low stiffness.
- the master controller 103 and the slave controller 107 control the master manipulator 101 and the slave manipulator 105 , respectively, in such a way that the manipulators have the following impedance characteristics.
- xs the position and orientation of the tip (forceps fingers 173 and 174 ) of the slave manipulator 105
- xm the position and orientation of the tip (manipulation finger 132 ) of the master manipulator 101
- fs the force that the tip of the slave manipulator 105 applies to the outer environment fm: the force that the operator applies to the tip of the master manipulator 101
- Kd the set stiffness of the slave manipulator 105
- Bd the set viscosity of the slave manipulator 105
- Cd the set viscosity of the master manipulator 101
- ⁇ dr the drive torque at each joint of the slave manipulator 105
- Z the inverse dynamics function for the slave manipulator 105
- q the displacement of each joint of the slave manipulator 105
- Js the Jacobi matrix representing the transition from the displacements of the joints to the displacement of the tip position of the slave manipulator 105
- the force fdr that the tip of the slave manipulator 105 should produce and the target value ⁇ drref of the drive torque of each of the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 and the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 are calculated as follows:
- ⁇ drref ⁇ Js (transposition) fdr+Z ( qs,dqs/dt,d 2 qs/dt 2 ) (5) (in the frame 2 in FIG. 10)
- the equation (4) is substituted into the equation (5), which is then substituted into the equation (3) to derive the equation (1).
- the speed and acceleration among the inputs in the inverse dynamics model are determined from a target value of the trajectory of the master manipulator 101 (in the frame 3 in FIG. 10 ).
- Ja Jacobian representing the transition from the displacements of the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 and the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 to the displacements of the joint
- u the control voltage for the servo valve 172
- Kap proportional gain
- Kai integral gain
- Fdr the drive forces of the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 and the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 calculated from pressure values
- Admittance control is applied to the master manipulator 101 to achieve the equation (2).
- the contact force between the slave manipulator 105 and the external environment is required.
- fdr coincides with fs, so that fdr is supplied as an estimated value to the master controller 103 and the slave controller 107 (in the frame 8 in FIG. 10 ).
- the target drive force value Fdrref of each of the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 and the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 can be produced in a quick and precise manner by the differential pressure control loop in each of the cylinders and actuators. It is therefore possible to compensate the characteristics disadvantageously affecting the positioning, such as air compression properties and a deviation of the neutral point of the valve.
- the force acting on the slave manipulator 105 is fed back to the master manipulator 101 by operating the master manipulator 101 primarily under electrically-driven speed control and the slave manipulator 105 primarily under pneumatically-driven force control. Therefore, in the master manipulator 101 , it is not necessary to compensate for the dynamics and the self-weight of the master manipulator 101 in the motion range of the operator, allowing highly accurate, broadband positional control, which is specific to an electrically-driven system, and in the slave manipulator 105 , nonlinearity characteristics specific to a pneumatically-driven system presents passive softness, provides a high mass-to-output ratio, and produces a large force.
- the slave manipulator 105 which is configured as a pneumatically-driven system, can be installed in an apparatus involving a magnetic field, for example, an MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), and used in surgery.
- the master manipulator 101 includes the 3-DOF translation unit 110 and the 4-DOF orientation unit 120 connected to the translation unit 110
- the slave manipulator 105 includes the 3-DOF holding unit 150 and the 4-DOF grip unit 160 held by the holding unit 150
- the motion of the human hand on the master manipulator 101 side can be reproduced on the slave manipulator 105 side.
- the translation unit 110 , the orientation unit 120 , the holding unit 150 , and the grip unit 160 are configured as the delta mechanism, the gimbal mechanism, the combination of the parallel link mechanism and the gimbal mechanism, and the wire mechanism, respectively
- the master manipulator 101 and the slave manipulator 105 are configured differently from each other and the shapes thereof can be optimized in terms of operability.
- the grip unit 160 includes pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 and wires connected to the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 , and the grip unit 160 is driven by pulling motions of the wires in response to the motions of the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 , the grip unit 160 can directly transmit the swing motions of the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 .
- Such a configuration allows reduction in weight of the slave manipulator 105 .
- the force acting on the grip unit 160 is estimated from the drive forces of the pneumatic cylinders 155 , 156 , and 157 and the pneumatic rotary actuators 182 , 183 , 184 , and 185 by making use of the back drivability thereof, no force sensor is required on the grip unit 160 , thereby providing advantages of reducing the size of the grip unit 160 , making disinfection of the grip unit 160 easy, and eliminating the need for calibration of the grip unit 160 .
- the compliance-based control is applied to the slave manipulator 105 , the slave manipulator 105 will not produce an excessive force.
- the slave manipulator 105 can be stably operated by imparting a moderate viscosity effect to the master manipulator 101 . That is, the control system according to this embodiment allows the operator to feel as if he/she pushes and pulls the master manipulator 101 fixed to a stationary wall via a damper. It is also possible to connect the master manipulator 101 to the slave manipulator 105 via a spring and a damper. The values of the spring and the damper are adjustable by selecting the control parameters.
- the multi-DOF forceps system 100 may be a system using wireless communication or a system that is controllable from a nearby location.
- the multi-DOF forceps system 100 has been described as an endoscopic surgery-assisting apparatus, the multi-DOF forceps system 100 can be configured as an apparatus for training a doctor or an apparatus for evaluating skill.
- the invention has been described with reference to the multi-DOF forceps system 100 used in medical fields as a manipulation system having a force feedback capability, the invention is not limited thereto. The invention is generally applicable to various manufacturing fields.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Robotics (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Manipulator (AREA)
Abstract
A compact, lightweight manipulation system that excels in operability and has a force feedback capability is provided.
When automatic operation of a slave manipulator 105 that follows manual operation of a master manipulator 101 is bilaterally controlled by means of communication, the force acting on the slave manipulator is fed back to the master manipulator by operating the master manipulator primarily under electrically-driven speed control and the slave manipulator primarily under pneumatically-driven force control. Therefore, in the master manipulator, it is not necessary to compensate for the dynamics and the self-weight of the master manipulator in the motion range of a user, allowing highly accurate, broadband positional control, which is specific to an electrically-driven system, and in the slave manipulator, nonlinearity characteristics specific to a pneumatically-driven system presents passive softness, provides a high mass-to-output ratio, and produces a large force.
Description
- The present invention relates to a manipulation system in which automatic operation of a slave manipulator that follows manual operation of a master manipulator is bilaterally controllable by means of communication, and particularly to a manipulation system having a force feedback capability.
- In recent years, surgical operations have been widely practiced in the form of endoscopic surgery to improve QOL (Quality of Life), such as reduction in patient's pain, hospitalization period, and size of the scar associated with the surgery. Endoscopic surgery is performed in such a way that an operator inserts forceps or other related tools through a thin tube (trocar) and performs the surgery while observing images from a laparoscope. Since the scar is smaller than that in open surgery, the burden on the patient is smaller. However, since the operator moves the forceps or other related tools using the abdominal wall as a pivotal point, sufficient degrees of freedom are not provided at the tip of the forceps and hence it is not easy to freely approach the site to be treated. Such a situation requires a highly skilled operator. To reduce the burden on the operator, studies on multi-DOF forceps system have been actively underway, in which robotics technology is used to impart multiple degrees of freedom to the tip of forceps.
- The master-slave concept used in commercially available multi-DOF forceps systems has advantages of, for example, capability of remotely and intuitively operating the forceps. To provide more accurate, safer workability, it is desirable to provide force feedback to the operator. To this end, studies on forceps with a force sensor provided in the vicinity of the tip of the forceps are underway. However, such a multi-DOF forceps system using electric actuators to drive the master and slave portions not only cannot feed a minute force back to the operator because of a high reduction ratio, but also has an insufficient movable range and results in a bulky apparatus. Further, attaching a force sensor to the forceps is not an easy task in consideration of practical factors, such as reduction in size, sterilization, and calibration.
- To address the above problems, studies on a multi-DOF forceps system are underway, in which pneumatic actuators are used to drive the master and slave portions. A pneumatic actuator, which has nonlinear characteristics, is inferior to an electric actuator in terms of controllability, but has advantages of, for example, presenting passive softness, having a high mass-to-output ratio, and producing a large force without a reduction gear train. For example, a multi-DOF forceps system has been proposed (see the non-patent document 1), in which the slave portion includes a 3-DOF forceps manipulator using pneumatic cylinders and the pressure in each of the pneumatic cylinders is used to estimate the external force acting on the tip of the forceps instead of using a force sensor. Further, a multi-DOF forceps system has been proposed (see the non-patent document 2), which includes a 3-DOF pneumatic manipulator that holds and drives the 3-DOF forceps manipulator described in the
non-patent document 1 in a region outside the abdomen. - Non-patent document 1: Bilateral control of multi-DOF forceps system having force sensing capability using pneumatic servo technology, Japan Society of Computer Aided Surgery, pp. 25-31, (2005), Kotaro Tadano, Kenji Kawashima Non-patent document 2: Development of master-slave system having force feedback capability using pneumatically-driven multi-DOF forceps: Development of manipulator for holding forceps, Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics, 1A1-A03, (2006), Kotaro Tadano, Kenji Kawashima
- In the multi-DOF forceps system described in the
non-patent document 1, the forceps manipulator has only three degrees of freedom, which does not allow the motion of the human hand to be reproduced. In the multi-DOF forceps systems described in thenon-patent documents - The invention has been made in view of the above problems. An object of the invention is to provide a compact, lightweight manipulation system that excels in operability and has a force feedback capability.
- To achieve the above object, the manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to the invention is a manipulation system in which automatic operation of a slave manipulator that follows manual operation of a master manipulator is bilaterally controllable by means of communication. The manipulation system is characterized in that the force acting on the slave manipulator is fed back to the master manipulator by operating the master manipulator primarily under electrically-driven speed control and the slave manipulator primarily under pneumatically-driven force control. Therefore, in the master manipulator, it is not necessary to compensate for the dynamics and the self-weight of the master manipulator in the motion range of a user, allowing highly accurate, broadband positional control, which is specific to an electrically-driven system, and in the slave manipulator, nonlinearity characteristics specific to a pneumatically-driven system presents passive softness, provides a high mass-to-output ratio, and produces a large force.
- The manipulation system is characterized in that the master manipulator includes a 3-DOF translation unit and a 4-DOF orientation unit connected to the translation unit, and the slave manipulator includes a 3-DOF holding unit and a 4-DOF grip unit held by the holding unit. Such a configuration allows the motion of the human hand on the master manipulator side to be reproduced on the slave manipulator side. Further, the manipulation system is characterized in that the translation unit, the orientation unit, the holding unit, and the grip unit are configured as a delta mechanism, a gimbal mechanism, a combination of a parallel link mechanism and a gimbal mechanism, and a wire mechanism, respectively. The master manipulator and the slave manipulator are thus configured differently from each other, so that the shapes thereof can be optimized in terms of operability. Further, the manipulation system is characterized in that the grip unit includes pneumatic rotary actuators and wires connected to the pneumatic actuators, and the grip unit is driven by pulling motions of the wires in response to the motions of the pneumatic actuators. The grip unit can therefore directly transmit the swing motions of the pneumatic actuators, so that the weight of the slave manipulator can be reduced.
- The manipulation system is characterized in that the force acting on the grip unit is estimated from the drive forces of the pneumatic actuators by making use of the back drivability thereof. No force sensor is therefore required on the grip unit, thereby providing advantages of reducing the size of the grip unit, making disinfection of the grip unit easy, and eliminating the need for calibration of the grip unit. The manipulation system is characterized in that compliance-based control is applied to the slave manipulator. Therefore, the slave manipulator will not produce an excessive force. Further, the manipulation system is characterized in that position-based impedance control in which a force control loop includes a motion control loop is applied to the master manipulator, and force-based impedance control in which a motion control loop includes a force control loop is applied to the slave manipulator. Therefore, the slave manipulator can be stably operated by imparting a moderate viscosity effect to the master manipulator. Further, the manipulation system is characterized in that automatic operation of the slave manipulator that follows manual operation of the master manipulator is bilaterally controlled by means of wired communication. The master manipulator can therefore remotely operate the slave manipulator by means of the Internet.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram showing a manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to an embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing the exterior of the master manipulator shown inFIG. 1 ; -
FIG. 3 is a perspective view showing the translation unit shown inFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 4 is a perspective view showing the orientation unit shown inFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 5 is a perspective view showing the exterior of the slave manipulator shown inFIG. 1 ; -
FIG. 6 is a perspective view showing the holding unit shown inFIG. 5 and also shows a pneumatic circuit for driving a pneumatic cylinder; -
FIG. 7 is a perspective view showing the grip unit shown inFIG. 5 ; -
FIG. 8 is a perspective view showing the forceps showing inFIG. 7 ; -
FIG. 9 is, a perspective view showing the forceps holding unit shown inFIG. 7 ; and -
FIG. 10 is a control block diagram of the multi-DOF forceps system. -
- 31 computer
- 32 servo amplifier
- 71 computer
- 72 servo valve
- 73 air supplier
- 74 pressure gauge
- 100 multi-DOF forceps system
- 101 master manipulator
- 103 master controller
- 105 slave manipulator
- 107 slave controller
- 110 translation unit
- 112 motor
- 113 link
- 114 parallel link
- 120 orientation unit
- 122 first motor
- 124 second motor
- 126 third motor
- 129 force sensor
- 132 manipulator finger
- 150 holding unit
- 153 parallel link
- 155, 156, 157 pneumatic cylinder
- 160 grip unit
- 170 forceps
- 171 forceps shaft
- 172 forceps finger holder
- 173, 174 forceps finger
- 180 forceps holding unit
- 182, 183, 184, 185 pneumatic rotary actuator
- 186, 187, 188, 189 rotary encoder and pressure sensor
- 191, 192 pressure gauge
- 193 servo valve
- 194 regulator
- 195 air supplier
- An embodiment of the invention will be described with reference to the drawings. The embodiment, which will be described below, does not limit the inventive aspects according to the claims, and of all the combinations of the features described in the embodiment are not necessarily essential in providing means for solving the problems.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram showing a manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to an embodiment of the invention. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability is amulti-DOF forceps system 100 including amaster manipulator 101, amaster controller 103, aslave manipulator 105, and aslave controller 107. Themulti-DOF forceps system 100 is a remote manipulation system in which automatic operation of theslave manipulator 105 that follows manual operation of themaster manipulator 101 is remotely controllable by means of wired communication between themaster controller 103 and theslave controller 107. - The
master manipulator 101 primarily operates under electrically-driven positional control using electric actuators, and includes a 3-DOF translation unit 110 configured as a delta mechanism and a 4-DOF orientation unit 120 connected to thetranslation unit 110 and configured as a gimbal mechanism. On the other hand, theslave manipulator 105 primarily operates under pneumatically-driven force control using pneumatic actuators, and includes a 3-DOF holding unit 150 configured as a combination of a parallel link mechanism and a gimbal mechanism and a 4-DOF grip unit 160 held by the holdingunit 150. - Use of an electric actuator, particularly a combination of a high reduction-ratio gear train and an electric motor, has advantages over the case where a pneumatic cylinder is used, for example, in that highly accurate, broadband positional control is possible, and that applying motion control-based force control eliminates the need for compensation for the dynamics and the self-weight of the
master manipulator 101 in the motion range of the operator. On the other hand, a pneumatic actuator, which has nonlinear characteristics, is inferior to an electric actuator in terms of controllability, but has advantages, for example, presenting passive softness, having a high mass-to-output ratio, and producing a large force without a reduction gear train. - The
master controller 103 includes acomputer 31 and aservo amplifier 32. Theslave controller 107 includes acomputer 71, aservo valve 72, anair supplier 73, and apressure gauge 74. Thecomputer 31 in themaster controller 103 sends a tip position signal, which is obtained by performing kinetic computation on a signal SPM from each encoder in themaster manipulator 101, to thecomputer 71 in theslave controller 107 using UDP/IP communication. Thecomputer 71 in theslave controller 107 sends a control signal SCS to theservo valve 72 based on the received position signal. Theservo valve 72 adjusts compressed air CPA from theair supplier 73 based on the received control signal SCS, and supplies the adjusted compressed air to theslave manipulator 105, so that the operation of theslave manipulator 105 is automatically controlled to follow the manual operation of themaster manipulator 101. - On the other hand, the
computer 71 in theslave controller 107 sends a calculated target value of the force produced at the tip to thecomputer 31 in themaster controller 103 using UDP/IP communication. Thecomputer 31 in themaster controller 103 sends a control signal SCM to theservo amplifier 32 based on the received force signal. Based on the received control signal SCM, theservo amplifier 32 feeds the force acting on theslave manipulator 105 back to themaster manipulator 101. -
FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing the exterior of themaster manipulator 101.FIG. 3 is a perspective view showing thetranslation unit 110.FIG. 4 is a perspective view showing theorientation unit 120. In themaster manipulator 101, as shown inFIG. 2 , theorientation unit 120 is fixed to thetranslation unit 110 with screws, which is in turn fixed to, for example, a housing (not shown) with screws. Themaster manipulator 101 is similar to theslave manipulator 105 in that the number of degrees of freedom is seven, but differs from theslave manipulator 105 in that themaster manipulator 101 uses a parallel link mechanism and has a compact structure. - The
translation unit 110 includes acircular mounting plate 111, threemotors 112, threelinks 113, three sets ofparallel links 114, and atriangular fixture plate 115 as shown inFIGS. 2 and 3 . The mountingplate 111 has a plurality of throughholes 111 a drilled in the vicinity of the outer circumferential edge at uniform angular intervals, and screws 111 b are inserted into the throughholes 111 a to fix the mountingplate 111, for example, to a housing. The threemotors 112 are disposed on the mountingplate 111 and fixed thereto with screws at uniform angular intervals (120 degrees) along a circumferential line inside the outer circumferential edge in such a way that each of themotor shafts 112 a is oriented along a tangential line of the mounting circumferential line. Each of themotors 112 is an AC servo motor with a harmonic gear transmission and an encoder built therein. - The
link 113 is assembled in such a way that one end (rear end) thereof is fixed to themotor shaft 112 a and the other end (front end) is supported by a bearing 113 a in such a way that the bearing 113 a becomes perpendicular to the axis of the link. Theparallel link 114 includes twolinks 114 a and twolink shafts 114 b, and adjacent ends of the twolinks 114 a are rotatably supported at both ends of the twolink shaft 114 b in such a way that the twolinks 114 a can be translated with a predetermined distance maintained therebetween. One of thelink shafts 114 b fits in the bearing 113 a attached to the tip of thelink 113. Thefixture plate 115 is fixed in such a way that a bearing 115 a disposed at each apex of the triangle is oriented parallel to the axis of the beating 113 a attached to thelink 113. Theother link shaft 114 b fits in the bearing 115 a fixed to each apex of thefixture plate 115. - The thus configured
translation unit 110 is a delta mechanism having three degrees of freedom in total, that is, having thelink 113 being rotatable around themotor shaft 112 a of themotor 112 in the direction indicated by the arrow “a” inFIG. 3 , theparallel link 114 being rotatable around the tip of thelink 113 in the same direction as the rotational direction “a” of thelink 113 and in the direction perpendicular thereto indicated by the arrow “b” inFIG. 3 , and thefixture plate 115 being rotatable around the tip of theparallel link 114 in the same direction as the rotational direction “a” of thelink 113. Thetranslation unit 110 is therefore characterized in that it produces a large translation force and maintains the same orientation independent of its position. - The
orientation unit 120 includes, as shown inFIGS. 2 and 4 , anattachment plate 121 that is L-shaped in the side view, afirst motor 122, a firstmotor fixture plate 123 that is U-shaped in the side view, asecond motor 124, a secondmotor fixture plate 125 that is L-shaped in the side view, athird motor 126, a thirdmotor fixture plate 127 that is L-shaped in the side view, a cylindricalrotating arm 128, aforce sensor 129, a forcesensor fixture plate 130 that is L-shaped in the side view, a rectangular column-like manipulationfinger support arm 131, and a rod-like manipulation finger 132. Theattachment plate 121 has a plurality of throughholes 121 a drilled in one end thereof, and screws 121 b are inserted into the throughholes 121 a to fix theattachment plate 121 to thefixture plate 115. The firstmotor fixture plate 123, to which thefirst motor 122 is fixed with screws, is fixed to the other end of theattachment plate 121 with screws in such a way that themotor shaft 122 a is oriented parallel to thefixture plate 115. - One end of the second
motor fixture plate 125 is fixed to themotor shaft 122 a of thefirst motor 122, and thesecond motor 124 is fixed to the other end of the secondmotor fixture plate 125 with screws in such a way that themotor shaft 124 a is oriented perpendicular to themotor shaft 122 a of thefirst motor 122. One end of the thirdmotor fixture plate 127 is fixed to themotor shaft 124 a of thesecond motor 124, and thethird motor 126 is fixed to the other end of the thirdmotor fixture plate 127 with screws in such away that themotor shaft 126 a is oriented perpendicular to themotor shaft 122 a of thefirst motor 122 and themotor shaft 124 a of thesecond motor 124. The rear end of therotating arm 128 is connected and fixed to themotor shaft 126 a of thethird motor 126 in such a way that the axial direction of therotating arm 128 is oriented in the axial direction of themotor shaft 126 a of thethird motor 126. - The
force sensor 129 is fixed to the tip of therotating arm 128 via the forcesensor fixture plate 130 in such a way that therotating shaft 129 a of theforce sensor 129 is oriented perpendicular to themotor shaft 126 a of thethird motor 126. The manipulationfinger support arm 131 is supported at the tip of therotating arm 128 in such a way that the rear end of the manipulationfinger support arm 131 is rotatable around therotating shaft 129 a of theforce sensor 129. Themanipulation finger 132 includes a hollowcylindrical body 132 a and a solidcylindrical slider 132 b that is inserted through thebody 132 a and slidable in the axial direction. The tip of thebody 132 a is rotatably supported at the tip of the manipulationfinger support arm 131 in the same direction as therotating shaft 129 a of theforce sensor 129. The tip of theslider 132 b is inserted and secured in ahole 128 a drilled in a substantially central area of therotating arm 128. Each of thefirst motor 122, thesecond motor 124, and thethird motor 126 is an AC servo motor with a harmonic gear transmission and an encoder built therein. Theforce sensor 129 is a six-axis force sensor capable of detecting translational forces in three axial directions perpendicular to one another and moments around the three axes. - The thus configured
orientation unit 120 is a serial gimbal mechanism having four degrees of freedom in total, that is, having the secondmotor fixture plate 125 being rotatable around themotor shaft 122 a of thefirst motor 122 in the direction a inFIG. 4 , the thirdmotor fixture plate 127 being rotatable around themotor shaft 124 a of thesecond motor 124 in the direction β inFIG. 4 , therotating arm 128 being rotatable around themotor shaft 126 a of thethird motor 126 in the direction γ inFIG. 4 , the manipulationfinger support arm 131 being rotatable around therotating shaft 129 a of theforce sensor 129 in the direction S inFIG. 4 , and thebody 132 a of themanipulation finger 132 being slidable in the axial direction (the direction A inFIG. 4 ) along theslider 132 b when operated by the operator. Theorientation unit 120 is therefore characterized by its broad movable range that covers the motion of the human hand. -
FIG. 5 is a perspective view showing the exterior of theslave manipulator 105.FIG. 6 is a perspective view showing the holdingunit 150.FIG. 7 is a perspective view showing thegrip unit 160. In theslave manipulator 105, as shown inFIG. 5 , thegrip unit 160 is fixed to the holdingunit 150 with screws, which is in turn fixed to, for example, a housing (not shown) with screws. Theslave manipulator 105 is similar to themaster manipulator 101 in that the number of degrees of freedom is seven, but differs from themaster manipulator 101 in that theslave manipulator 105 uses a combination of two sets of parallel link mechanisms and a gimbal mechanism as well as a wire mechanism and has a compact structure. - As shown in
FIGS. 5 and 6 , the holdingunit 150 includes arectangular base plate 151, a parallellink support shaft 152, two sets ofparallel links 153, a gripunit support base 154, three pneumatic cylinders (pneumatic actuators) 155, 156, and 157, and threecylinder fixture plates bearings 151 a are disposed on and fixed to thebase plate 151 with a predetermined distance therebetween. The twobearings 151 a rotatably support the parallellink support shaft 152. Arod support 151 b, which rotatably supports ablock 155 ab fixed to the tip of therod 155 a of the firstpneumatic cylinder 155, is also disposed on and fixed to thebase plate 151 between thebearings 151 a. Thebody 155 b of the firstpneumatic cylinder 155 is supported by one end of thecylinder fixture plate 158 a, which is L-shaped in the side view, and the other end thereof is fixed to a substantially central portion of the parallellink support shaft 152. - One end of each of two
links parallel links 153, is rotatably supported at the corresponding end of the parallellink support shaft 152. With the twolinks link 153 c, which is part of the otherparallel link 153, is rotatably supported at the other end of thelink 153 b, and a substantially central portion of thelink 153 c is rotatably supported at a substantially central portion of thelink 153 a. One end of alink 153 d, which is part of the otherparallel link 153, is rotatably supported at the other end of thelink 153 a. With the twolinks links cylinder fixture plate 151. - The
body 156 b of the secondpneumatic cylinder 156 is supported by one end of thecylinder fixture plate 158 b, which is L-shaped in the side view, and the other end thereof is rotatably supported at the portion where thelinks rod 156 a of the secondpneumatic cylinder 156 is rotatably supported between the two ends of thelink 153 a. Thebody 157 b of the thirdpneumatic cylinder 157 is supported by one end of thecylinder fixture plate 158 c, which is L-shaped in the side view, and the gripunit support base 154 is attached to thecylinder fixture plate 158 c in a slidable manner in the direction in which therod 157 a of the thirdpneumatic cylinder 157 moves. The tip of therod 157 a of the thirdpneumatic cylinder 157 is fixed to afixture plate 154 a fixed to the upper portion of the gripunit support base 154. Each of thepneumatic cylinders - As shown in
FIG. 6 , both chambers of each of thepneumatic cylinders servo valve 193, and hence adjust the flow from the supply port into one of the chambers of each of thepneumatic cylinders - The thus configured holding
unit 150 is a combination of a parallel link mechanism and a gimbal mechanism, the parallel link mechanism having three degrees of freedom in total, that is, having theparallel links 153 being rotatable around the parallellink support shaft 152 in the direction φ inFIG. 6 in response to the motion of the firstpneumatic cylinder 155 and being rotatable in the direction φ inFIG. 6 around the portions where the parallellink support shaft 152 and thelinks pneumatic cylinder 156, and the gripunit support base 154 being slidable in the direction ρ inFIG. 6 in response to the motion of the thirdpneumatic cylinder 157. The holdingunit 150 can therefore be designed in such a way that the trocar, which is set in the abdomen of the subject during laparoscopic surgery, is a stationary point. The holding unit is thus characterized in that it is not necessary to directly support the forceps at the hole into which the forceps are inserted, so that the holdingunit 150 can be operated with minimal burden on the body at the hole into which the forceps are inserted, and the position coordinates of the port of the trocar are not required in the kinetics computation. Further, acounterweight 159 is used to mechanically compensate part of the self-weight of the holdingunit 150. - The
grip unit 160, which includesforceps 170 and aforceps holding unit 180 as shown inFIGS. 5 and 7 , is now described also with reference toFIG. 8 , a perspective view showing theforceps 170, andFIG. 9 , a perspective view showing theforceps holding unit 180. Theforceps 170 includes a rod-like forceps shaft 171, aforceps finger holder 172, and twoforceps fingers forceps shaft 171 is rotatably supported by theforceps holding unit 180. One end of theforceps finger holder 172 is rotatably supported at the tip of theforceps shaft 171 around arotating shaft 172 a disposed in a direction perpendicular to the axis of rotation of theforceps shaft 171. One end of each of theforceps fingers forceps finger holder 172 around rotatingshafts forceps shaft 171 and therotating shaft 172 a of theforceps finger holder 172. - The
forceps holding unit 180 includes a box-like holding body 181, four pneumatic rotary actuators (pneumatic actuators) 182, 183, 184, and 185, four sets of rotary encoders andpressure sensors pulleys pulley 194, and three direction conversion pulleys 195, 196, and 197. The holdingbody 181 is fixed to the gripunit support base 154 in thegrip unit 150 with screws. Theforceps shaft 171 is inserted through and rotatably supported by abearing 181 b attached to aside 181 a of the holdingbody 181 in such a way that the bearing 181 b covers a hole provided in theside 181 a, and the drivenpulley 194 is attached to the rear end of theforceps shaft 171. - The first to fourth pneumatic
rotary actuators cylindrical bodies exhaust ports 182 b/182 c (183 b/183 c, 184 b/184 c, 185 b/185 c) provided in the circumferential surface of thebody 182 a (183 a, 184 a, 185 a), to and from the two chambers partitioned by the swinging piece and the partition plate so as to swing the swinging plate, arotating shaft 182 d (183 d, 184 d, 185 d) connected to the swinging shaft is rotated within a predetermined angular range. - The first to third pneumatic
rotary actuators pressure sensors side 181 c, which is disposed perpendicular to theside 181 a of the holdingbody 181, in such a way that therotating shafts holes 181 d arranged in line in theside 181 c, and the first to third drive pulleys 190, 191, and 192 are disposed in line and attached to the tips of therotating shafts side 181 c and rotatably supported next to the first to third drive pulleys 190, 191, and 192, respectively. Three loop wires (not shown) run from the first to third drive pulleys 190, 191, and 192 via the first to third direction conversion pulleys 195, 196, and 197 to therotating shaft 172 a of theforceps finger holder 172 and therotating shafts forceps fingers rotating shaft 172 a of theforceps finger holder 172 and therotating shafts forceps fingers - The fourth
swing pneumatic actuator 185, to which the fourth rotary encoder andpressure sensor 189 is connected, is attached to theside 181 a in such a way that therotating shaft 185 d is oriented parallel to theforceps shaft 171 and passes through a hole provided in theside 181 a of the holdingbody 181, and thefourth drive pulley 193 is disposed next to the drivenpulley 194 and attached to the tip of therotating shaft 185 d. A loop wire (not shown) engages thefourth drive pulley 193 and the drivenpulley 194 so that the loop wire runs between thefourth drive pulley 193 and the drivenpulley 194. - The thus configured
grip unit 160 is a 4-DOF wire mechanism for bending, gripping, and rotating, that is, having theforceps finger holder 172 being rotatable around therotating shaft 172 a in the direction inFIG. 8 in response to the motion of the first pneumaticrotary actuator 182, the twoforceps fingers shafts FIG. 8 in response to the motions of the second and third pneumaticrotary actuators forceps shaft 171 being rotatable around therotating shaft 185 d in the direction A inFIGS. 8 and 9 in response to the motion of the fourth pneumaticrotary actuator 185. Theforceps 170 and theforceps holding unit 180 are therefore characterized in that they are separable from each other in consideration of the disinfection process. -
FIG. 10 is a control block diagram of themulti-DOF forceps system 100. A 5-portspool servo valve 172 is used to drive thepneumatic cylinders rotary actuators pneumatic cylinders rotary actuators forceps fingers slave manipulator 105. However, the use of this control method requires an inverse dynamics model of the whole portion including thepneumatic cylinders rotary actuators forceps fingers - In general, the response in a master-slave system will be ideal when the position and the force of the master manipulator are the same as those of the slave manipulator. However, even when such an ideal response is achieved, and hence the operator feels as if he/she were directly doing operation with his/her own hands, the performance of the operation totally depends on the operator. To address such a problem, a bilateral control system is used, in which impedance control applied to the
master manipulator 101 differs from that applied to theslave manipulator 105. - The
slave controller 107 makes use of the softness of thepneumatic cylinders rotary actuators slave manipulator 105. That is, since air can be compressed, theslave manipulator 105 has softness. Further, such softness is adjustable by adjusting the pressure of the compressed air. - The compliance of the
slave manipulator 105 can prevent generation of an excessive force. The softness of theslave manipulator 105 provides a shock absorbing effect when theslave manipulator 105 hits an object hard. - In this case, when the
slave manipulator 105 comes into contact with a highly rigid environment, the deviation of the position of themaster manipulator 101 from that of theslave manipulator 105 increases due to the compliance. Even when the position of themaster manipulator 101 deviates from that of theslave manipulator 105, the operator can work normally because theslave manipulator 105, which is used for surgery, primarily comes into contact with an organ and the operator works on the organ while looking at images of theslave manipulator 105 through an endoscope. - On the other hand, the
master manipulator 101 desirably operates in a stably manner by imparting a moderate viscous effect. To this end, themaster controller 103 employs a position-based impedance control method (admittance control method) in which a force control loop includes a motion control loop in consideration of the characteristics of themotors 112, thefirst motor 122, thesecond motor 124, and thethird motor 126. Theslave controller 107 employs a force-based impedance control method in which a motion control loop includes a force control loop because thepneumatic cylinders rotary actuators - As shown in
FIG. 10 , themaster controller 103 and theslave controller 107 control themaster manipulator 101 and theslave manipulator 105, respectively, in such a way that the manipulators have the following impedance characteristics. - For the
slave manipulator 105, -
−fs=Kd(xs−xm)+Bd dxs/dt (1) - For the
master manipulator 101, -
fm−fs=Cd dxm/dt (2) - In the above equations,
xs: the position and orientation of the tip (forceps fingers 173 and 174) of theslave manipulator 105
xm: the position and orientation of the tip (manipulation finger 132) of themaster manipulator 101
fs: the force that the tip of theslave manipulator 105 applies to the outer environment
fm: the force that the operator applies to the tip of themaster manipulator 101
Kd: the set stiffness of theslave manipulator 105
Bd: the set viscosity of theslave manipulator 105
Cd: the set viscosity of themaster manipulator 101
To achieve the equation (1), impedance control including a force control loop is applied to theslave manipulator 105. The equation of motion of theslave manipulator 105 is expressed in the joint coordinate system as follows: -
τdr−Js(transposition)fs=Z(qs,dqs/dt,d 2 qs/dt 2) (3) - In the above equation,
τdr: the drive torque at each joint of theslave manipulator 105
Z: the inverse dynamics function for theslave manipulator 105
q: the displacement of each joint of theslave manipulator 105
Js: the Jacobi matrix representing the transition from the displacements of the joints to the displacement of the tip position of theslave manipulator 105 - To achieve the equation (1), the force fdr that the tip of the
slave manipulator 105 should produce and the target value τdrref of the drive torque of each of thepneumatic cylinders rotary actuators -
fdr=Kd(xs−xm)+Bd dxs/dt (4) (in theframe 1 in FIG. 10) -
τdrref=−Js(transposition)fdr+Z(qs,dqs/dt,d 2 qs/dt 2) (5) (in theframe 2 in FIG. 10) - Assuming that the dynamic characteristics of the
pneumatic cylinders rotary actuators frame 3 inFIG. 10 ). To produce the torque calculated by using the equation (5) at each joint, mechanics computation is used to convert the torque into the drive force target value Fdrref of each of thepneumatic cylinders rotary actuators -
Fdrref=Jaτdrref (6) (in theframe 4 in FIG. 10) - In the above equation,
Ja: Jacobian representing the transition from the displacements of thepneumatic cylinders rotary actuators - Then, PI control is carried out to produce the drive force calculated by using the equation (6).
-
u=(Kap+Kai/s)·(Fdrref−Fdr) (7) (in theframe 5 in FIG. 10) - In the above equation,
u: the control voltage for theservo valve 172
Kap: proportional gain
Kai: integral gain
Fdr: the drive forces of thepneumatic cylinders rotary actuators - Admittance control is applied to the
master manipulator 101 to achieve the equation (2). -
dxm/dt=(fm−fs)/Cd (8) (in theframe 6 in FIG. 10) -
dqm/dt=Jm(inverse)dxm/dt (in theframe 7 in FIG. 10) - As seen from the equation (8), the contact force between the
slave manipulator 105 and the external environment is required. When the impedance control is applied to theslave manipulator 105, fdr coincides with fs, so that fdr is supplied as an estimated value to themaster controller 103 and the slave controller 107 (in theframe 8 inFIG. 10 ). The target drive force value Fdrref of each of thepneumatic cylinders rotary actuators - As described above, according to the
multi-DOF forceps system 100 of this embodiment, the force acting on theslave manipulator 105 is fed back to themaster manipulator 101 by operating themaster manipulator 101 primarily under electrically-driven speed control and theslave manipulator 105 primarily under pneumatically-driven force control. Therefore, in themaster manipulator 101, it is not necessary to compensate for the dynamics and the self-weight of themaster manipulator 101 in the motion range of the operator, allowing highly accurate, broadband positional control, which is specific to an electrically-driven system, and in theslave manipulator 105, nonlinearity characteristics specific to a pneumatically-driven system presents passive softness, provides a high mass-to-output ratio, and produces a large force. Further, theslave manipulator 105, which is configured as a pneumatically-driven system, can be installed in an apparatus involving a magnetic field, for example, an MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), and used in surgery. - Since the
master manipulator 101 includes the 3-DOF translation unit 110 and the 4-DOF orientation unit 120 connected to thetranslation unit 110, and theslave manipulator 105 includes the 3-DOF holding unit 150 and the 4-DOF grip unit 160 held by the holdingunit 150, the motion of the human hand on themaster manipulator 101 side can be reproduced on theslave manipulator 105 side. Since thetranslation unit 110, theorientation unit 120, the holdingunit 150, and thegrip unit 160 are configured as the delta mechanism, the gimbal mechanism, the combination of the parallel link mechanism and the gimbal mechanism, and the wire mechanism, respectively, themaster manipulator 101 and theslave manipulator 105 are configured differently from each other and the shapes thereof can be optimized in terms of operability. Since thegrip unit 160 includes pneumaticrotary actuators rotary actuators grip unit 160 is driven by pulling motions of the wires in response to the motions of the pneumaticrotary actuators grip unit 160 can directly transmit the swing motions of the pneumaticrotary actuators slave manipulator 105. - Further, since the force acting on the
grip unit 160 is estimated from the drive forces of thepneumatic cylinders rotary actuators grip unit 160, thereby providing advantages of reducing the size of thegrip unit 160, making disinfection of thegrip unit 160 easy, and eliminating the need for calibration of thegrip unit 160. Moreover, since the compliance-based control is applied to theslave manipulator 105, theslave manipulator 105 will not produce an excessive force. - Since the position-based impedance control in which a force control loop includes a motion control loop is applied to the
master manipulator 101, and the force-based impedance control in which a motion control loop includes a force control loop is applied to theslave manipulator 105, theslave manipulator 105 can be stably operated by imparting a moderate viscosity effect to themaster manipulator 101. That is, the control system according to this embodiment allows the operator to feel as if he/she pushes and pulls themaster manipulator 101 fixed to a stationary wall via a damper. It is also possible to connect themaster manipulator 101 to theslave manipulator 105 via a spring and a damper. The values of the spring and the damper are adjustable by selecting the control parameters. - In the embodiment described above, although the
multi-DOF forceps system 100 remotely controllable by means of wired communication has been described, themulti-DOF forceps system 100 may be a system using wireless communication or a system that is controllable from a nearby location. Further, although themulti-DOF forceps system 100 has been described as an endoscopic surgery-assisting apparatus, themulti-DOF forceps system 100 can be configured as an apparatus for training a doctor or an apparatus for evaluating skill. Although the invention has been described with reference to themulti-DOF forceps system 100 used in medical fields as a manipulation system having a force feedback capability, the invention is not limited thereto. The invention is generally applicable to various manufacturing fields.
Claims (14)
1-8. (canceled)
9. A manipulation system having a force feedback capability in which automatic operation of a slave manipulator that follows manual operation of a master manipulator is bilaterally controllable by means of communication, the manipulation system characterized in that the force acting on the slave manipulator is fed back to the master manipulator by operating the master manipulator under electrically-driven speed control and the slave manipulator under pneumatically-driven force control,
wherein the slave manipulator is driven by the pneumatic actuators, and
wherein the force acting on the slave manipulator is estimated from the drive forces of the pneumatic actuators by making use of the back drivability of the pneumatic actuators.
10. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to claim 9 , characterized in that the master manipulator includes a 3-DOF translation unit and a 4-DOF orientation unit connected to the translation unit, and the slave manipulator includes a 3-DOF holding unit and a 4-DOF grip unit held by the holding unit.
11. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to claim 10 , characterized in that the translation unit is a delta mechanism, the orientation unit is a gimbal mechanism, the holding unit is a combination of a parallel link mechanism and a gimbal mechanism, and the grip unit is a wire mechanism.
12. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to claim 11 , characterized in that the grip unit includes pneumatic rotary actuators and wires connected to the pneumatic actuators, and the grip unit is driven by pulling motions of the wires in response to the motions of the pneumatic actuators.
13. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to claim 12 , characterized in that the force acting on the grip unit is estimated from the drive forces of the pneumatic actuators by making use of the back drivability of the pneumatic actuators.
14. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to claim 9 , characterized in that compliance-based control is applied to the slave manipulator.
15. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to claim 9 , characterized in that position-based impedance control in which a force control loop includes a motion control loop is applied to the master manipulator, and force-based impedance control in which a motion control loop includes a force control loop is applied to the slave manipulator.
16. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to claim 9 , characterized in that automatic operation of the slave manipulator that follows manual operation of the master manipulator is bilaterally controlled by means of wired communication.
17. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to claim 9 , characterized in that the slave manipulator is controlled by means of (1) and (2):
(1) The force fdr that the tip of the slave manipulator should produce is calculated as follows:
fdr=Kd(xs−xm)+Bd dxs/dt
fdr=Kd(xs−xm)+Bd dxs/dt
wherein,
Kd: the set stiffness of the slave manipulator
xs: the position and orientation of the tip of the slave manipulator
xm: the position and orientation of the tip of the master manipulator
Bd: the set viscosity of the slave manipulator
(2) The target value τdrref of the drive torque of the pneumatically-driven system is calculated as follows:
τdrref=−Js(transposition)fdr+Z(qs,dqs/dt,d 2 qs/dt 2)
τdrref=−Js(transposition)fdr+Z(qs,dqs/dt,d 2 qs/dt 2)
wherein,
Js: the Jacobi matrix representing the transition from the displacements of the joints to the displacement of the tip position of the slave manipulator
Z: the inverse dynamics function for the slave manipulator
qs: the displacement of each joint of the slave manipulator
dqs/dt, d2qs/dt2: the speed and acceleration are determined from a target value of the trajectory of the master manipulator.
18. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to claim 17 , characterized in that the master manipulator is controlled as follows:
dxm/dt is calculated as follows:
dxm/dt=(fm−fs)/Cd
dxm/dt=(fm−fs)/Cd
wherein,
fm: the force that the operator applies to the tip of the master manipulator
fs: fs is determined from the force fdr that the tip of the slave manipulator should produce
Cd: the set viscosity of the master manipulator.
19. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to claim 9 , characterized in that the slave manipulator is controlled as follows:
The target value τdrref of the drive torque of the pneumatically-driven system is calculated as follows:
τdrref=−Js(transposition)fdr+Z(qs,dqs/dt,d 2 qs/dt 2)
τdrref=−Js(transposition)fdr+Z(qs,dqs/dt,d 2 qs/dt 2)
wherein,
Js: the Jacobi matrix representing the transition from the displacements of the joints to the displacement of the tip position of the slave manipulator
fdr: the force that the tip of the slave manipulator should produce
Z: the inverse dynamics function for the slave manipulator
qs: the displacement of each joint of the slave manipulator
dqs/dt, d2qs/dt2: the speed and acceleration are determined from a target value of the trajectory of the master manipulator.
20. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to claim 9 , characterized in that the slave manipulator is controlled as follows:
The target value of the drive torque of the pneumatically-driven system is calculated by using an equation comprising an inverse dynamics function of [Z(qs, dqs/dt, d2qs/dt2)]:
wherein,
qs: the displacement of each joint of the slave manipulator
dqs/dt, d2qs/dt2: the speed and acceleration are determined from a target value of the trajectory of the master manipulator.
21. The manipulation system having a force feedback capability according to claim 9 , characterized in that the slave manipulator is controlled as follows:
The target value of the drive torque of the pneumatically-driven system is calculated by using an equation comprising dqs/dt and d2qs/dt2:
wherein,
qs: the displacement of each joint of the slave manipulator
dqs/dt, d2qs/dt2: the speed and acceleration are determined from a target value of the trajectory of the master manipulator.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/176,323 US20140222204A1 (en) | 2007-03-01 | 2014-02-10 | Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2007051390 | 2007-03-01 | ||
JP2007-051390 | 2007-03-01 | ||
PCT/JP2008/053614 WO2008108289A1 (en) | 2007-03-01 | 2008-02-29 | Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function |
US52951509A | 2009-12-14 | 2009-12-14 | |
US14/176,323 US20140222204A1 (en) | 2007-03-01 | 2014-02-10 | Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function |
Related Parent Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/529,515 Division US8700213B2 (en) | 2007-03-01 | 2008-02-29 | Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function |
PCT/JP2008/053614 Division WO2008108289A1 (en) | 2007-03-01 | 2008-02-29 | Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140222204A1 true US20140222204A1 (en) | 2014-08-07 |
Family
ID=39738172
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/529,515 Active 2031-04-30 US8700213B2 (en) | 2007-03-01 | 2008-02-29 | Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function |
US14/176,323 Abandoned US20140222204A1 (en) | 2007-03-01 | 2014-02-10 | Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function |
US14/176,318 Abandoned US20140222208A1 (en) | 2007-03-01 | 2014-02-10 | Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/529,515 Active 2031-04-30 US8700213B2 (en) | 2007-03-01 | 2008-02-29 | Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/176,318 Abandoned US20140222208A1 (en) | 2007-03-01 | 2014-02-10 | Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US8700213B2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5327687B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008108289A1 (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2019222495A1 (en) | 2018-05-18 | 2019-11-21 | Auris Health, Inc. | Controllers for robotically-enabled teleoperated systems |
US10675101B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-06-09 | Auris Health, Inc. | User interface for active drive apparatus with finite range of motion |
US10688283B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2020-06-23 | Auris Health, Inc. | Integrated catheter and guide wire controller |
US10835153B2 (en) | 2017-12-08 | 2020-11-17 | Auris Health, Inc. | System and method for medical instrument navigation and targeting |
US10849702B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-12-01 | Auris Health, Inc. | User input devices for controlling manipulation of guidewires and catheters |
US10912924B2 (en) | 2014-03-24 | 2021-02-09 | Auris Health, Inc. | Systems and devices for catheter driving instinctiveness |
US11020016B2 (en) | 2013-05-30 | 2021-06-01 | Auris Health, Inc. | System and method for displaying anatomy and devices on a movable display |
US11037464B2 (en) | 2016-07-21 | 2021-06-15 | Auris Health, Inc. | System with emulator movement tracking for controlling medical devices |
EP3725255A4 (en) * | 2018-09-06 | 2021-10-06 | Riverfield Inc. | Arm device, control method, and program |
US11872007B2 (en) | 2019-06-28 | 2024-01-16 | Auris Health, Inc. | Console overlay and methods of using same |
Families Citing this family (82)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7960935B2 (en) | 2003-07-08 | 2011-06-14 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Robotic devices with agent delivery components and related methods |
US9579088B2 (en) | 2007-02-20 | 2017-02-28 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Methods, systems, and devices for surgical visualization and device manipulation |
CA2861159C (en) | 2006-06-22 | 2018-02-27 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Magnetically coupleable robotic devices and related methods |
US8679096B2 (en) | 2007-06-21 | 2014-03-25 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Multifunctional operational component for robotic devices |
JP5591696B2 (en) | 2007-07-12 | 2014-09-17 | ボード オブ リージェンツ オブ ザ ユニバーシティ オブ ネブラスカ | Biopsy elements, arm devices, and medical devices |
WO2009023839A1 (en) | 2007-08-15 | 2009-02-19 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Medical inflation, attachment, and delivery devices and related methods |
CA2695619C (en) | 2007-08-15 | 2015-11-24 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Modular and cooperative medical devices and related systems and methods |
JP5212797B2 (en) * | 2008-05-19 | 2013-06-19 | 国立大学法人 名古屋工業大学 | Haptic manipulator |
JP5126892B2 (en) * | 2008-12-19 | 2013-01-23 | 国立大学法人 名古屋工業大学 | Multi-degree-of-freedom force-sensing manipulator |
IT1394602B1 (en) * | 2009-05-19 | 2012-07-05 | Univ Bologna Alma Mater | ROTATIONAL MECHANISMS IN CLOSED CHAIN WITH UNCOUPLED AND HOMOCINETIC IMPLEMENTATION. |
CN102029615B (en) * | 2009-09-29 | 2013-06-05 | 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 | Parallel mechanism and translational branched chain thereof |
CN102069495B (en) * | 2009-11-23 | 2014-01-22 | 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 | Parallel robot |
DE102010033326B4 (en) * | 2010-08-04 | 2014-05-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Robot, in particular for carrying out a medical treatment |
EP2600758A1 (en) | 2010-08-06 | 2013-06-12 | Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska | Methods and systems for handling or delivering materials for natural orifice surgery |
JP5032716B2 (en) * | 2010-08-31 | 2012-09-26 | パナソニック株式会社 | Master-slave robot control device, control method, and control program |
DE102011004926A1 (en) * | 2011-03-01 | 2012-09-06 | Karl Storz Gmbh & Co. Kg | Adjustable holding device for an endoscope |
WO2012116454A1 (en) * | 2011-03-02 | 2012-09-07 | Belimo Holding Ag | Actuator with electric motor and motor controller |
JP6174017B2 (en) | 2011-06-10 | 2017-08-02 | ボード オブ リージェンツ オブ ザ ユニバーシティ オブ ネブラスカ | In vivo vascular seal end effector and in vivo robotic device |
JP6106169B2 (en) | 2011-07-11 | 2017-03-29 | ボード オブ リージェンツ オブ ザ ユニバーシティ オブ ネブラスカ | Surgical robot system |
US9519341B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2016-12-13 | Olympus Corporation | Medical manipulator and surgical support apparatus |
WO2013018897A1 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2013-02-07 | オリンパス株式会社 | Surgical implement and medical treatment manipulator |
JP6021353B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2016-11-09 | オリンパス株式会社 | Surgery support device |
JP5936914B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2016-06-22 | オリンパス株式会社 | Operation input device and manipulator system including the same |
JP6081061B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2017-02-15 | オリンパス株式会社 | Surgery support device |
JP5953058B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2016-07-13 | オリンパス株式会社 | Surgery support device and method for attaching and detaching the same |
JP6021484B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2016-11-09 | オリンパス株式会社 | Medical manipulator |
JP6000641B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2016-10-05 | オリンパス株式会社 | Manipulator system |
JP5841451B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2016-01-13 | オリンパス株式会社 | Surgical instrument and control method thereof |
JP6005950B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2016-10-12 | オリンパス株式会社 | Surgery support apparatus and control method thereof |
JP5931497B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2016-06-08 | オリンパス株式会社 | Surgery support apparatus and assembly method thereof |
WO2013018861A1 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2013-02-07 | オリンパス株式会社 | Medical manipulator and method for controlling same |
JP6009840B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2016-10-19 | オリンパス株式会社 | Medical equipment |
US10582973B2 (en) | 2012-08-08 | 2020-03-10 | Virtual Incision Corporation | Robotic surgical devices, systems, and related methods |
EP2579234B1 (en) * | 2011-10-07 | 2018-08-15 | E2M Technologies B.V. | Motion platform system |
SG11201402020XA (en) | 2011-11-04 | 2014-09-26 | Univ Johns Hopkins | Steady hand micromanipulation robot |
JP5883638B2 (en) * | 2011-12-21 | 2016-03-15 | 川崎重工業株式会社 | Delta parallel robot |
EP3970784A1 (en) | 2012-01-10 | 2022-03-23 | Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska | Systems and devices for surgical access and insertion |
EP3845190B1 (en) | 2012-05-01 | 2023-07-12 | Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska | Single site robotic device and related systems |
JP5766150B2 (en) * | 2012-05-29 | 2015-08-19 | 国立大学法人東京工業大学 | Endoscope operation system |
CA2876846C (en) | 2012-06-22 | 2021-04-06 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Local control robotic surgical devices and related methods |
US9770305B2 (en) | 2012-08-08 | 2017-09-26 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Robotic surgical devices, systems, and related methods |
CN103853364A (en) * | 2012-11-29 | 2014-06-11 | 联想(北京)有限公司 | Tactile feedback method, electronic device and tactile feedback system |
US9694455B2 (en) | 2012-12-05 | 2017-07-04 | Alio Industries, Inc. | Precision tripod motion system with six degrees of freedom |
JP6112300B2 (en) * | 2013-01-10 | 2017-04-12 | パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 | Master-slave robot control device and control method, master-slave robot, and control program |
TWI508831B (en) * | 2013-01-28 | 2015-11-21 | Prec Machinery Res & Dev Ct | A joint device for a parallel robot |
CN103085054B (en) * | 2013-01-29 | 2016-02-03 | 山东电力集团公司电力科学研究院 | Hot-line repair robot master-slave mode hydraulic coupling feedback mechanical arm control system and method |
US10058310B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2018-08-28 | Ethicon Llc | Electrosurgical device with drum-driven articulation |
WO2014160086A2 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2014-10-02 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Methods, systems, and devices relating to robotic surgical devices, end effectors, and controllers |
CA2906672C (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2022-03-15 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Methods, systems, and devices relating to force control surgical systems |
JP2016513556A (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-05-16 | ボード オブ リージェンツ オブ ザ ユニバーシティ オブ ネブラスカ | Robotic surgical devices, systems, and related methods |
EP3021779A4 (en) | 2013-07-17 | 2017-08-23 | Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska | Robotic surgical devices, systems and related methods |
WO2015075689A1 (en) * | 2013-11-22 | 2015-05-28 | Sudhir Srivastava | Motorized surgical instrument |
JP6547164B2 (en) | 2014-04-30 | 2019-07-24 | 株式会社人機一体 | Master slave system |
JP6472624B2 (en) * | 2014-08-28 | 2019-02-20 | 国立大学法人東京工業大学 | Robot manipulator |
EP3868322A1 (en) | 2014-09-12 | 2021-08-25 | Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska | Quick-release effectors and related systems |
JP6631528B2 (en) | 2014-10-09 | 2020-01-15 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing method and program |
JP6608928B2 (en) | 2014-11-11 | 2019-11-20 | ボード オブ リージェンツ オブ ザ ユニバーシティ オブ ネブラスカ | Robotic device with miniature joint design and related systems and methods |
US10646990B2 (en) * | 2015-07-17 | 2020-05-12 | The Johns Hopkins University | Delta mechanism with enhanced torsional stiffness |
JP6961146B2 (en) | 2015-08-03 | 2021-11-05 | バーチャル インシジョン コーポレイションVirtual Incision Corporation | Robotic surgical devices, systems and related methods |
ITUB20154977A1 (en) | 2015-10-16 | 2017-04-16 | Medical Microinstruments S R L | Medical instrument and method of manufacture of said medical instrument |
DE102016105682A1 (en) | 2016-03-29 | 2017-10-05 | Technische Universität Darmstadt | Regulated haptic system and method for displaying contact forces |
CN109715081B (en) | 2016-05-18 | 2021-11-09 | 虚拟切割有限公司 | Robotic surgical devices, systems, and related methods |
CN116269696A (en) | 2016-08-25 | 2023-06-23 | 内布拉斯加大学董事会 | Quick release tool coupler and related systems and methods |
JP7090615B2 (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2022-06-24 | ボード オブ リージェンツ オブ ザ ユニバーシティ オブ ネブラスカ | Robot device |
US11357595B2 (en) | 2016-11-22 | 2022-06-14 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Gross positioning device and related systems and methods |
JP7099728B2 (en) | 2016-11-29 | 2022-07-12 | バーチャル インシジョン コーポレイション | User controller with user presence detection, related systems and methods |
US10722319B2 (en) | 2016-12-14 | 2020-07-28 | Virtual Incision Corporation | Releasable attachment device for coupling to medical devices and related systems and methods |
US10112788B2 (en) * | 2017-01-20 | 2018-10-30 | Mid-Columbia Producers | Sweep auger apparatus |
JP6800044B2 (en) * | 2017-02-24 | 2020-12-16 | Ntn株式会社 | Link activator control device and control method |
CN107038944A (en) * | 2017-05-11 | 2017-08-11 | 广东工业大学 | A kind of device of six degree of freedom force feedback operative training |
CN107560777B (en) * | 2017-07-31 | 2019-07-30 | 东南大学 | Based on the three-dimensional force feedback handle restoring force control structure of power/torque sensor and method |
CA3076625A1 (en) | 2017-09-27 | 2019-04-04 | Virtual Incision Corporation | Robotic surgical devices with tracking camera technology and related systems and methods |
CA3087672A1 (en) | 2018-01-05 | 2019-07-11 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Single-arm robotic device with compact joint design and related systems and methods |
CN108582119A (en) * | 2018-04-11 | 2018-09-28 | 南京理工大学 | A kind of hot line robot force feedback master-slave control method and system |
CA3125742A1 (en) | 2019-01-07 | 2020-07-16 | Virtual Incision Corporation | Robotically assisted surgical system and related devices and methods |
CN110385707B (en) * | 2019-07-26 | 2022-05-10 | 重庆邮电大学 | Seven-freedom-degree force feedback operating device with variable working space |
JP6839874B1 (en) | 2020-02-12 | 2021-03-10 | リバーフィールド株式会社 | Surgical robot |
WO2021192291A1 (en) * | 2020-03-27 | 2021-09-30 | リバーフィールド株式会社 | Surgical robot |
CN112719830B (en) * | 2020-12-18 | 2022-05-17 | 江苏大学 | Mechanical arm flexible assembling equipment and control method |
JP2023055151A (en) * | 2021-10-05 | 2023-04-17 | 川崎重工業株式会社 | Control device, robot system, robot control method, and robot control program |
CN114027988B (en) * | 2021-12-07 | 2023-07-07 | 临沂大学 | Main manipulator of three-degree-of-freedom continuum robot and working method thereof |
WO2023112540A1 (en) * | 2021-12-13 | 2023-06-22 | ソニーグループ株式会社 | Support arm device and robot device |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5513100A (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 1996-04-30 | The University Of British Columbia | Velocity controller with force feedback stiffness control |
US5784542A (en) * | 1995-09-07 | 1998-07-21 | California Institute Of Technology | Decoupled six degree-of-freedom teleoperated robot system |
US6377011B1 (en) * | 2000-01-26 | 2002-04-23 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Force feedback user interface for minimally invasive surgical simulator and teleoperator and other similar apparatus |
US6435794B1 (en) * | 1998-11-18 | 2002-08-20 | Scott L. Springer | Force display master interface device for teleoperation |
US20030114962A1 (en) * | 1998-12-08 | 2003-06-19 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc., A Delaware Corporation | Image shifting apparatus and method for a telerobotic system |
US20040149065A1 (en) * | 2003-02-05 | 2004-08-05 | Moran Michael Julius | Tendon link mechanism with six degrees of freedom |
US6786896B1 (en) * | 1997-09-19 | 2004-09-07 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Robotic apparatus |
US20080046122A1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2008-02-21 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Maximum torque driving of robotic surgical tools in robotic surgical systems |
Family Cites Families (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3575301A (en) * | 1968-01-02 | 1971-04-20 | Ibm | Manipulator |
JPH0661481A (en) | 1992-08-04 | 1994-03-04 | Matsushita Electron Corp | Mos-type-semiconductor device |
JPH0655467A (en) | 1992-08-05 | 1994-03-01 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Control device for master slave moving body |
US5762458A (en) * | 1996-02-20 | 1998-06-09 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive cardiac procedures |
US5397323A (en) * | 1992-10-30 | 1995-03-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Remote center-of-motion robot for surgery |
JP2559943Y2 (en) * | 1993-02-01 | 1998-01-19 | 古河電気工業株式会社 | Master-slave manipulator |
WO1994026167A1 (en) * | 1993-05-14 | 1994-11-24 | Sri International | Remote center positioner |
US6406472B1 (en) * | 1993-05-14 | 2002-06-18 | Sri International, Inc. | Remote center positioner |
JP3476878B2 (en) * | 1993-11-15 | 2003-12-10 | オリンパス株式会社 | Surgical manipulator |
WO2005028166A1 (en) * | 2003-09-22 | 2005-03-31 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Device and method for controlling elastic-body actuator |
-
2008
- 2008-02-29 WO PCT/JP2008/053614 patent/WO2008108289A1/en active Application Filing
- 2008-02-29 JP JP2009502555A patent/JP5327687B2/en active Active
- 2008-02-29 US US12/529,515 patent/US8700213B2/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-02-10 US US14/176,323 patent/US20140222204A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2014-02-10 US US14/176,318 patent/US20140222208A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5513100A (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 1996-04-30 | The University Of British Columbia | Velocity controller with force feedback stiffness control |
US5784542A (en) * | 1995-09-07 | 1998-07-21 | California Institute Of Technology | Decoupled six degree-of-freedom teleoperated robot system |
US6786896B1 (en) * | 1997-09-19 | 2004-09-07 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Robotic apparatus |
US6435794B1 (en) * | 1998-11-18 | 2002-08-20 | Scott L. Springer | Force display master interface device for teleoperation |
US20030114962A1 (en) * | 1998-12-08 | 2003-06-19 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc., A Delaware Corporation | Image shifting apparatus and method for a telerobotic system |
US6377011B1 (en) * | 2000-01-26 | 2002-04-23 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Force feedback user interface for minimally invasive surgical simulator and teleoperator and other similar apparatus |
US20040149065A1 (en) * | 2003-02-05 | 2004-08-05 | Moran Michael Julius | Tendon link mechanism with six degrees of freedom |
US20080046122A1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2008-02-21 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Maximum torque driving of robotic surgical tools in robotic surgical systems |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10688283B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2020-06-23 | Auris Health, Inc. | Integrated catheter and guide wire controller |
US11992626B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2024-05-28 | Auris Health, Inc. | Integrated catheter and guide wire controller |
US10675101B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-06-09 | Auris Health, Inc. | User interface for active drive apparatus with finite range of motion |
US10849702B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-12-01 | Auris Health, Inc. | User input devices for controlling manipulation of guidewires and catheters |
US11007021B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2021-05-18 | Auris Health, Inc. | User interface for active drive apparatus with finite range of motion |
US11020016B2 (en) | 2013-05-30 | 2021-06-01 | Auris Health, Inc. | System and method for displaying anatomy and devices on a movable display |
US10912924B2 (en) | 2014-03-24 | 2021-02-09 | Auris Health, Inc. | Systems and devices for catheter driving instinctiveness |
US11037464B2 (en) | 2016-07-21 | 2021-06-15 | Auris Health, Inc. | System with emulator movement tracking for controlling medical devices |
US11676511B2 (en) | 2016-07-21 | 2023-06-13 | Auris Health, Inc. | System with emulator movement tracking for controlling medical devices |
US11957446B2 (en) | 2017-12-08 | 2024-04-16 | Auris Health, Inc. | System and method for medical instrument navigation and targeting |
US10835153B2 (en) | 2017-12-08 | 2020-11-17 | Auris Health, Inc. | System and method for medical instrument navigation and targeting |
WO2019222495A1 (en) | 2018-05-18 | 2019-11-21 | Auris Health, Inc. | Controllers for robotically-enabled teleoperated systems |
US11179213B2 (en) * | 2018-05-18 | 2021-11-23 | Auris Health, Inc. | Controllers for robotically-enabled teleoperated systems |
US11918316B2 (en) | 2018-05-18 | 2024-03-05 | Auris Health, Inc. | Controllers for robotically enabled teleoperated systems |
EP3725255A4 (en) * | 2018-09-06 | 2021-10-06 | Riverfield Inc. | Arm device, control method, and program |
US20210361363A1 (en) * | 2018-09-06 | 2021-11-25 | Riverfield Inc. | Arm device, control method, and program |
US11872007B2 (en) | 2019-06-28 | 2024-01-16 | Auris Health, Inc. | Console overlay and methods of using same |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20140222208A1 (en) | 2014-08-07 |
JP5327687B2 (en) | 2013-10-30 |
US20100139436A1 (en) | 2010-06-10 |
WO2008108289A1 (en) | 2008-09-12 |
US8700213B2 (en) | 2014-04-15 |
JPWO2008108289A1 (en) | 2010-06-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8700213B2 (en) | Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function | |
US8897916B2 (en) | Maneuvering system having inner force sense presenting function | |
JP5452813B2 (en) | Maneuvering system with haptic function | |
US8306656B1 (en) | Method and system for performing medical procedure | |
US9888974B2 (en) | Friction compensation in a minimally invasive surgical apparatus | |
Zemiti et al. | Mechatronic design of a new robot for force control in minimally invasive surgery | |
JP6892967B2 (en) | Systems and methods for controlling robot wrists | |
JP5769209B2 (en) | Maneuvering system with haptic function | |
WO2014108545A1 (en) | An apparatus for generating motion around a remote centre of motion | |
Lee et al. | Modeling and control of robotic surgical platform for single-port access surgery | |
KR20190140818A (en) | Robot arm structure and manipulator for surgical robot comprising the same | |
Tadano et al. | Development of a master slave system with force sensing using pneumatic servo system for laparoscopic surgery | |
WO2023083057A1 (en) | Wrist of master manipulator, and master operating apparatus and surgical robot | |
WO2021188017A1 (en) | Assistive surgical complex | |
Orekhov et al. | A surgical parallel continuum manipulator with a cable-driven grasper | |
Li et al. | A novel 4‐DOF surgical instrument with modular joints and 6‐Axis Force sensing capability | |
Yilmaz et al. | 6-axis hybrid sensing and estimation of tip forces/torques on a hyper-redundant robotic surgical instrument | |
Dai et al. | A robotic laparoscopic tool with enhanced capabilities and modular actuation | |
JP7153335B2 (en) | Surgery support device | |
Tadano et al. | Pneumatically driven forceps manipulator for laparoscopic surgery | |
Li et al. | Master-slave control and evaluation of force sensing for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery | |
Tadano et al. | Development of a pneumatically driven forceps manipulator ibis iv | |
WO2021049189A1 (en) | Medical arm system, arm device, and master–slave system operation method | |
Li et al. | Achieving force perception in master-slave manipulators using pneumatic artificial muscles | |
Tadano et al. | Evaluation of a master slave system with force sensing using pneumatic servo system for laparoscopic surgery |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |