US20130330829A1 - Prediction of acute kidney injury from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel - Google Patents

Prediction of acute kidney injury from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130330829A1
US20130330829A1 US13/911,236 US201313911236A US2013330829A1 US 20130330829 A1 US20130330829 A1 US 20130330829A1 US 201313911236 A US201313911236 A US 201313911236A US 2013330829 A1 US2013330829 A1 US 2013330829A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
level
blood
surgical
post
metabolic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/911,236
Inventor
Sevag G. Demirjian
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Original Assignee
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Cleveland Clinic Foundation filed Critical Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Priority to US13/911,236 priority Critical patent/US20130330829A1/en
Assigned to THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION reassignment THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DEMIRJIAN, SEVAG G.
Publication of US20130330829A1 publication Critical patent/US20130330829A1/en
Priority to US15/262,556 priority patent/US10281455B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/483Physical analysis of biological material
    • G01N33/487Physical analysis of biological material of liquid biological material
    • G01N33/49Blood
    • G01N33/492Determining multiple analytes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/62Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving urea
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/70Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving creatine or creatinine
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/84Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving inorganic compounds or pH
    • G06F19/3437
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/20ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/50ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for simulation or modelling of medical disorders
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2333/00Assays involving biological materials from specific organisms or of a specific nature
    • G01N2333/435Assays involving biological materials from specific organisms or of a specific nature from animals; from humans
    • G01N2333/76Assays involving albumins other than in routine use for blocking surfaces or for anchoring haptens during immunisation
    • G01N2333/765Serum albumin, e.g. HSA
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2800/00Detection or diagnosis of diseases
    • G01N2800/34Genitourinary disorders
    • G01N2800/347Renal failures; Glomerular diseases; Tubulointerstitial diseases, e.g. nephritic syndrome, glomerulonephritis; Renovascular diseases, e.g. renal artery occlusion, nephropathy
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2800/00Detection or diagnosis of diseases
    • G01N2800/52Predicting or monitoring the response to treatment, e.g. for selection of therapy based on assay results in personalised medicine; Prognosis
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T436/00Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
    • Y10T436/14Heterocyclic carbon compound [i.e., O, S, N, Se, Te, as only ring hetero atom]
    • Y10T436/145555Hetero-N
    • Y10T436/147777Plural nitrogen in the same ring [e.g., barbituates, creatinine, etc.]

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to systems and methods for diagnosing illness in a living being and, in particular, is directed to systems and methods for predicting the occurrence of acute kidney injury from parameters derived from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel.
  • Acute kidney injury is a rapid loss of kidney function, which in its severe form, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Its causes are numerous and include low blood volume from any cause, exposure to substances harmful to the kidney, and obstruction of the urinary tract. As a result, AKI can be a complication from a surgical procedure, particular cardiac surgery. AKI may lead to a number of complications, including metabolic acidosis, high potassium levels, uremia, changes in body fluid balance, and effects to other organ systems. Management includes supportive care, such as renal replacement therapy, as well as treatment of the underlying disorder, and the effectiveness of treatment of AKI increases greatly with timely diagnosis.
  • a non-transitory computer readable medium stores machine executable instructions for predicting the likelihood of acute kidney injury.
  • An input interface is configured to receive a plurality of features derived from the results of a post-surgical metabolic blood panel and either a pre-surgical metabolic blood panel or a perisurgical metabolic blood panel.
  • a predictive model is configured to calculate a parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury from the plurality of features.
  • a user interface is configured to provide the calculated parameter to a user in a human comprehensible form.
  • a method for predicting acute kidney injury from a surgical procedure.
  • a first blood serum sample is isolated from a blood sample drawn from a patient before an end of the surgical procedure.
  • a first creatinine level is determined from the first blood serum sample.
  • a second blood serum sample is isolated from a blood sample drawn from the patient after the end of the surgical procedure.
  • a second creatinine level is determined from the second blood serum sample.
  • a parameter is calculated representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury to the patient from at least the difference between the first creatinine level and the second creatinine level. The calculated parameter is displayed to a user.
  • a diagnostic system includes a processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium storing machine executable instructions executable by the processor to predict a likelihood of acute kidney injury.
  • the instructions include an input interface configured to receive a plurality of features derived from the results of a post-surgical metabolic blood panel and either a pre-surgical metabolic blood panel or a perisurgical metabolic blood panel.
  • the plurality of features include a difference in a serum creatinine level between the pre-surgical metabolic blood panel or the perisurgical metabolic blood panel and the post-surgical metabolic blood panel.
  • a predictive model is configured to calculate a parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury from the plurality of features.
  • a user interface configured to provide the calculated parameter to a user in a human comprehensible form.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system for predicting acute kidney injury with parameters derived from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel in accordance with an aspect of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one example of a system for predicting acute kidney injury in accordance with an aspect of the present invention
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a method for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) in accordance with an aspect of the present invention
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a computer system that can be employed to implement systems and methods described herein.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system 10 for predicting the likelihood of acute kidney injury in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
  • the illustrated system 10 utilizes parameters derived from a standard post-surgical metabolic blood panel to accurately predict the likelihood of an acute kidney injury, defined for the purposes of this application as a rapid loss of kidney function resulting in a need for treatment via dialysis.
  • the illustrated system 10 can be implemented as dedicated hardware, software instructions stored on one or more computer readable media, or a combination of hardware and software.
  • a software implementation is used, with a general purpose processor 12 executing machine readable instructions stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium 20 .
  • the instructions can include an input interface 22 configured to receive a plurality of features derived from the results of a post-surgical metabolic blood panel.
  • the input interface 22 can comprise machine readable instructions for providing an input screen to a user to allow the user to enter the plurality of features via an appropriate input device (not shown), such as a keyboard, mouse, or microphone.
  • the input interface 22 is configured to interact with a medical database or other automated data source to extract the plurality of features from recorded results of one or more post-surgical metabolic blood panels.
  • the plurality of features comprise various parameters derived from the determined concentrations of various substances of interest within a patient's blood following surgery. These parameters are calculated from the received post-surgical metabolic blood panel data at a feature extractor 24 .
  • the substances of interest can include two or more of serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, potassium, sodium, bicarbonate, and albumin.
  • the derived parameters can include, for example, the concentrations themselves, a rate of change of a given concentration since the surgery, exponential powers of the concentrations or associated rates of change, and products of concentrations and/or rates of change.
  • the derived parameters can include the concentrations of potassium, sodium, bicarbonate, and albumin, the rate of change (per hour) of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, and one or more cubic terms derived from each of the rate of change of the serum creatinine and the concentrations of sodium and bicarbonate.
  • the parameters derived for the plurality of features are provided to a predictive model 26 , which is configured to calculate a parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury from the plurality of features.
  • the predictive model 26 can be implemented as any appropriate classification or regression model, such as a polynomial model provided via least squares regression procedure, an artificial neural network, a statistical classifier, a support vector machine, or other, similar model.
  • each of the plurality of features has an associated weight, and the predictive model 26 provides a linear combination of the plurality of features. It will be appreciated, however, that since the features themselves can be non-linear functions of the measured concentrations and rates of change, the results of the predictive model can be a non-linear function of the measured concentrations and rates of change.
  • the output of the predictive model 26 represents the likelihood of an acute kidney injury requiring dialysis.
  • An output interface 28 is configured to provide the calculated parameter to a user in a human comprehensible form. Specifically, the output interface 28 interacts with a display, printer, speaker, or other appropriate output device (not shown) to provide the calculated likelihood of acute kidney injury to a user.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one example of a system 50 for predicting acute kidney injury in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
  • the system 50 uses laboratory data from a first postoperative metabolic panel to calculate a change in serum creatinine ( ⁇ Cr) and blood urea nitrogen ( ⁇ BUN) compared to values from a preoperative or perioperative metabolic blood panel.
  • ⁇ Cr serum creatinine
  • ⁇ BUN blood urea nitrogen
  • Each of ⁇ Cr, and ⁇ BUN can be normalized by the time interval from surgery to the first laboratory draw.
  • the system can also utilize serum potassium, bicarbonate, sodium, and albumin levels from the same metabolic panel to further refine the results.
  • the predictor variables were limited to those available in routine metabolic panel which is frequently checked in the perioperative period.
  • the illustrated system 50 can be implemented as a networked computer, comprising a processor 52 , input device 54 , display 56 , and a non-transitory computer readable medium 60 .
  • the system 50 can be implemented as an online calculator accessed via a remote computer via the Internet.
  • the input device 54 and display 56 are located remotely from the non-transitory medium 60 .
  • records can be retrieved from an electronic health records (EHR) database via a database interface 62 , and predictor variables and the outcomes can be extracted from these records at an associated feature extractor 63 .
  • EHR electronic health records
  • One or more predictive models 64 can be generated at a regression engine 65 using features from these metabolic panels and the provision of dialysis within two weeks of surgery (or discharge/death if sooner), as a primary outcome measure.
  • a least squares regression is performed using restricted cubic splines with either four knot locations, at the fifth, thirty-fifth, sixty-fifth, and ninety-fifth percentiles, or five knot locations, at the fifth, twenty-seven and five-tenths, fiftieth, seventy-two and five-tenths, and ninety-fifth percentiles to allow for flexible nonlinear associations with the primary outcome measure using logistic regression.
  • the training set can be limited to fifteen events per predictor degree of freedom, inclusive of the degrees spent due to use of cubic splines, to avoid overfitting the model.
  • the result of each model can be represented as a plurality of sets of at least three parameters for each feature, with a linear term and plurality of parameters representing the non-linear (e.g., cubic) terms of the fitted curve.
  • One example of a predictive model uses a difference between the pre/perioperative serum creatinine as the sole feature.
  • this difference is normalized according to a length of time between the end of the surgery and the performance of the postsurgical metabolic panel, for example, as a number of hours.
  • Using the normalized value allows for the rate of change of the creatinine to be measured, which the inventor has determined to be a better predictor of the decline in renal function.
  • the normalized change in serum creatinine can be used along with the preoperative serum creatinine to further refine the model.
  • the extended model includes preoperative serum creatinine, the normalized change in creatinine and BUN from preoperative values, and serum sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, and albumin.
  • the inclusion of the additional elements in the panel such as potassium, sodium, and bicarbonate also independently contribute to the predictive capacity of the model because they capture clinically relevant downstream complications of renal injury in a multidimensional approach, such as electrolyte perturbations, and acid-base derangements.
  • Serum albumin adjusts for volume shifts that typically occur during surgery, which account not only for the volume burden but also influence the rate and magnitude of change of all elements in the metabolic panel. Table 1 provides example values for each of these four models as determined by the inventor.
  • a user can use the input device 54 to provide values for the features via an input interface 66 . These values are then provided to the predictive model 64 which calculates a parameter representing the likelihood of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis as a weighted non-linear combination of the plurality of features based upon the set of linear and non-linear weights associated with each feature. The resulting parameter can be provided to a display via a display interface 68 to inform the user of the likelihood that a patient represented by the features will require dialysis.
  • the models 64 are based solely on routine metabolic panel that can be obtained within hours of surgery, allowing for early diagnosis of acute kidney injury.
  • the extended model also incorporates the time lapse from the injury event to the laboratory draw, without posing any time restrictions.
  • the use of readily available, standardized, and affordable predictors from routine metabolic panel makes the predictive model easily applicable to any patient. While the example given in Table 1 represents patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the model could easily be extended, with appropriate validation, to virtually any non-cardiac setting.
  • the model has is sufficiently sophisticated to capture complex non-linear relationships between the parameters associated with the routine metabolic blood panel and
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a method 100 for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
  • the method uses changes in basic metabolic panel early after surgery to predict severe AKI requiring dialysis within a two week period following surgery.
  • blood drawn for a preoperative or perioperative metabolic blood panel is mechanically separated to isolate a first serum sample.
  • a blood sample can be drawn from the patient and spun in a centrifuge to separate out blood serum.
  • a preoperative or perioperative level of serum creatinine is determined from the first blood serum sample. It will be appreciated, however, that other parameters can be extracted from the preoperative or perioperative metabolic blood panel, for example, a blood urea nitrogen level.
  • blood drawn for a post-operative metabolic blood panel is mechanically separated to isolate a second serum sample.
  • a post-operative level of serum creatinine is determined from the second blood serum sample. It will be appreciated, however, that other parameters can be extracted from the preoperative or perioperative metabolic blood panel, for example, levels for blood urea nitrogen, sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, and albumin.
  • a parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury to the patient is calculated from at least a difference between the preoperative or perioperative creatinine level and the post-operative creatinine level.
  • this difference can be normalized according to the length of a period of time (e.g., in hours) between the end of the surgical procedure and the drawing of the post-operative metabolic blood panel. It will be appreciated that other features can be used to refine the calculation including any or all the sodium level, potassium level, bicarbonate level, and albumin level determined from the post-operative blood serum sample, the creatinine level from the first serum sample, and a difference between the blood urea nitrogen level from the first serum sample and the blood urea nitrogen level from the second serum sample normalized by the period of time between the end of the surgical procedure and the drawing of the post-operative metabolic blood panel.
  • the calculated parameter is provided to a user at an associated display. If the parameter is within a range associated with a severe risk of acute kidney injury, the user can begin appropriate treatment.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a computer system 200 that can be employed to implement systems and methods described herein, such as based on computer executable instructions running on the computer system.
  • the user may be permitted to preoperatively simulate the planned surgical procedure using the computer system 200 as desired.
  • the computer system 200 can be implemented on one or more general purpose networked computer systems, embedded computer systems, routers, switches, server devices, client devices, various intermediate devices/nodes and/or stand alone computer systems. Additionally, the computer system 200 can be implemented as part of the computer-aided engineering (CAE) tool running computer executable instructions to perform a method as described herein.
  • CAE computer-aided engineering
  • the computer system 200 includes a processor 202 and a system memory 204 . Dual microprocessors and other multi-processor architectures can also be utilized as the processor 202 .
  • the processor 202 and system memory 204 can be coupled by any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures.
  • the system memory 204 includes read only memory (ROM) 206 and random access memory (RAM) 208 .
  • ROM read only memory
  • RAM random access memory
  • a basic input/output system (BIOS) can reside in the ROM 206 , generally containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the computer system 200 , such as a reset or power-up.
  • the computer system 200 can include one or more types of long-term data storage 210 , including a hard disk drive, a magnetic disk drive, (e.g., to read from or write to a removable disk), and an optical disk drive, (e.g., for reading a CD-ROM or DVD disk or to read from or write to other optical media).
  • the long-term data storage 210 can be connected to the processor 202 by a drive interface 212 .
  • the long-term data storage 210 components provide nonvolatile storage of data, data structures, and computer-executable instructions for the computer system 200 .
  • a number of program modules may also be stored in one or more of the drives as well as in the RAM 208 , including an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data.
  • a user may enter commands and information into the computer system 200 through one or more input devices 222 , such as a keyboard or a pointing device (e.g., a mouse). These and other input devices are often connected to the processor 202 through a device interface 224 .
  • the input devices can be connected to the system bus by one or more a parallel port, a serial port or a universal serial bus (USB).
  • One or more output device(s) 226 such as a visual display device or printer, can also be connected to the processor 202 via the device interface 224 .
  • the computer system 200 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections (e.g., a local area network (LAN) or wide area network (WAN) to one or more remote computers 230 .
  • a given remote computer 230 may be a workstation, a computer system, a router, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the computer system 200 .
  • the computer system 200 can communicate with the remote computers 230 via a network interface 232 , such as a wired or wireless network interface card or modem.
  • application programs and program data depicted relative to the computer system 200 may be stored in memory associated with the remote computers 230 .

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Ecology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)

Abstract

Systems and methods are provided for predicting the likelihood of acute kidney injury. An input interface is configured to receive a plurality of features derived from the results of a post-surgical metabolic blood panel and either a pre-surgical metabolic blood panel or a perisurgical metabolic blood panel. A predictive model is configured to calculate a parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury from the plurality of features. A user interface is configured to provide the calculated parameter to a user in a human comprehensible form.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/656,258, filed Jun. 6, 2012, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to systems and methods for diagnosing illness in a living being and, in particular, is directed to systems and methods for predicting the occurrence of acute kidney injury from parameters derived from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a rapid loss of kidney function, which in its severe form, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Its causes are numerous and include low blood volume from any cause, exposure to substances harmful to the kidney, and obstruction of the urinary tract. As a result, AKI can be a complication from a surgical procedure, particular cardiac surgery. AKI may lead to a number of complications, including metabolic acidosis, high potassium levels, uremia, changes in body fluid balance, and effects to other organ systems. Management includes supportive care, such as renal replacement therapy, as well as treatment of the underlying disorder, and the effectiveness of treatment of AKI increases greatly with timely diagnosis.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, a non-transitory computer readable medium stores machine executable instructions for predicting the likelihood of acute kidney injury. An input interface is configured to receive a plurality of features derived from the results of a post-surgical metabolic blood panel and either a pre-surgical metabolic blood panel or a perisurgical metabolic blood panel. A predictive model is configured to calculate a parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury from the plurality of features. A user interface is configured to provide the calculated parameter to a user in a human comprehensible form.
  • In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for predicting acute kidney injury from a surgical procedure. A first blood serum sample is isolated from a blood sample drawn from a patient before an end of the surgical procedure. A first creatinine level is determined from the first blood serum sample. A second blood serum sample is isolated from a blood sample drawn from the patient after the end of the surgical procedure. A second creatinine level is determined from the second blood serum sample. From a predictive model, a parameter is calculated representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury to the patient from at least the difference between the first creatinine level and the second creatinine level. The calculated parameter is displayed to a user.
  • In accordance with still another aspect of the present invention, a diagnostic system includes a processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium storing machine executable instructions executable by the processor to predict a likelihood of acute kidney injury. The instructions include an input interface configured to receive a plurality of features derived from the results of a post-surgical metabolic blood panel and either a pre-surgical metabolic blood panel or a perisurgical metabolic blood panel. The plurality of features include a difference in a serum creatinine level between the pre-surgical metabolic blood panel or the perisurgical metabolic blood panel and the post-surgical metabolic blood panel. A predictive model is configured to calculate a parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury from the plurality of features. A user interface configured to provide the calculated parameter to a user in a human comprehensible form.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The foregoing and other features of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which the present invention relates upon reading the following description with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system for predicting acute kidney injury with parameters derived from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one example of a system for predicting acute kidney injury in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a method for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) in accordance with an aspect of the present invention; and
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a computer system that can be employed to implement systems and methods described herein.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system 10 for predicting the likelihood of acute kidney injury in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. Specifically, the illustrated system 10 utilizes parameters derived from a standard post-surgical metabolic blood panel to accurately predict the likelihood of an acute kidney injury, defined for the purposes of this application as a rapid loss of kidney function resulting in a need for treatment via dialysis. It will be appreciated that the illustrated system 10 can be implemented as dedicated hardware, software instructions stored on one or more computer readable media, or a combination of hardware and software. In the illustrated system 10, a software implementation is used, with a general purpose processor 12 executing machine readable instructions stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium 20.
  • The instructions can include an input interface 22 configured to receive a plurality of features derived from the results of a post-surgical metabolic blood panel. For example, the input interface 22 can comprise machine readable instructions for providing an input screen to a user to allow the user to enter the plurality of features via an appropriate input device (not shown), such as a keyboard, mouse, or microphone. In an alternative implementation, the input interface 22 is configured to interact with a medical database or other automated data source to extract the plurality of features from recorded results of one or more post-surgical metabolic blood panels.
  • In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the plurality of features comprise various parameters derived from the determined concentrations of various substances of interest within a patient's blood following surgery. These parameters are calculated from the received post-surgical metabolic blood panel data at a feature extractor 24. For example, the substances of interest can include two or more of serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, potassium, sodium, bicarbonate, and albumin. The derived parameters can include, for example, the concentrations themselves, a rate of change of a given concentration since the surgery, exponential powers of the concentrations or associated rates of change, and products of concentrations and/or rates of change. For example, the derived parameters can include the concentrations of potassium, sodium, bicarbonate, and albumin, the rate of change (per hour) of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, and one or more cubic terms derived from each of the rate of change of the serum creatinine and the concentrations of sodium and bicarbonate.
  • The parameters derived for the plurality of features are provided to a predictive model 26, which is configured to calculate a parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury from the plurality of features. It will be appreciated that the predictive model 26 can be implemented as any appropriate classification or regression model, such as a polynomial model provided via least squares regression procedure, an artificial neural network, a statistical classifier, a support vector machine, or other, similar model. In the illustrated implementation, each of the plurality of features has an associated weight, and the predictive model 26 provides a linear combination of the plurality of features. It will be appreciated, however, that since the features themselves can be non-linear functions of the measured concentrations and rates of change, the results of the predictive model can be a non-linear function of the measured concentrations and rates of change. The output of the predictive model 26 represents the likelihood of an acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. An output interface 28 is configured to provide the calculated parameter to a user in a human comprehensible form. Specifically, the output interface 28 interacts with a display, printer, speaker, or other appropriate output device (not shown) to provide the calculated likelihood of acute kidney injury to a user.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one example of a system 50 for predicting acute kidney injury in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. Specifically, the system 50 uses laboratory data from a first postoperative metabolic panel to calculate a change in serum creatinine (ΔCr) and blood urea nitrogen (ΔBUN) compared to values from a preoperative or perioperative metabolic blood panel. Each of ΔCr, and ΔBUN can be normalized by the time interval from surgery to the first laboratory draw. The system can also utilize serum potassium, bicarbonate, sodium, and albumin levels from the same metabolic panel to further refine the results. The predictor variables were limited to those available in routine metabolic panel which is frequently checked in the perioperative period. The illustrated system 50 can be implemented as a networked computer, comprising a processor 52, input device 54, display 56, and a non-transitory computer readable medium 60. In one implementation, the system 50 can be implemented as an online calculator accessed via a remote computer via the Internet. In such a system, it will be appreciated that the input device 54 and display 56 are located remotely from the non-transitory medium 60.
  • During a training process, records can be retrieved from an electronic health records (EHR) database via a database interface 62, and predictor variables and the outcomes can be extracted from these records at an associated feature extractor 63. One or more predictive models 64 can be generated at a regression engine 65 using features from these metabolic panels and the provision of dialysis within two weeks of surgery (or discharge/death if sooner), as a primary outcome measure. In the illustrated implementation, a least squares regression is performed using restricted cubic splines with either four knot locations, at the fifth, thirty-fifth, sixty-fifth, and ninety-fifth percentiles, or five knot locations, at the fifth, twenty-seven and five-tenths, fiftieth, seventy-two and five-tenths, and ninety-fifth percentiles to allow for flexible nonlinear associations with the primary outcome measure using logistic regression. The training set can be limited to fifteen events per predictor degree of freedom, inclusive of the degrees spent due to use of cubic splines, to avoid overfitting the model. In this implementation, the result of each model can be represented as a plurality of sets of at least three parameters for each feature, with a linear term and plurality of parameters representing the non-linear (e.g., cubic) terms of the fitted curve.
  • One example of a predictive model uses a difference between the pre/perioperative serum creatinine as the sole feature. In another example, this difference is normalized according to a length of time between the end of the surgery and the performance of the postsurgical metabolic panel, for example, as a number of hours. Using the normalized value allows for the rate of change of the creatinine to be measured, which the inventor has determined to be a better predictor of the decline in renal function. In a third model, the normalized change in serum creatinine can be used along with the preoperative serum creatinine to further refine the model.
  • For a fourth model, readily available and frequently tested early postoperative basic metabolic panel parameters can be used to provide an extended model. Specifically, the extended model includes preoperative serum creatinine, the normalized change in creatinine and BUN from preoperative values, and serum sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, and albumin. The inclusion of the additional elements in the panel such as potassium, sodium, and bicarbonate also independently contribute to the predictive capacity of the model because they capture clinically relevant downstream complications of renal injury in a multidimensional approach, such as electrolyte perturbations, and acid-base derangements. Serum albumin adjusts for volume shifts that typically occur during surgery, which account not only for the volume burden but also influence the rate and magnitude of change of all elements in the metabolic panel. Table 1 provides example values for each of these four models as determined by the inventor.
  • TABLE 1
    ΔCr ΔCr/houra Preoperative Cr ΔBUN/houra Sodium
    Model 1
    Linear term −5.03 (<.001)
    1st cubic term 38.42 (<.001)
    2nd cubic term −138.03 (<.001)
    P, linearb <.001
    P, nonlinearc <.001
    Model 2
    Linear term −16.61 (<.001)
    1st cubic term −198.86 (.007)
    2nd cubic term 2486.9 (<.001)
    3rd cubic term −7563.4 (<.001)
    P, linearb <.001
    P, nonlinearc <.001
    Model 3
    Linear term −9.94 (<.001) −1.56 (.11)
    1st cubic term −33.5 (.65) 24.41 (<.001)
    2nd cubic term 1261.8 (.006) −55.20 (<.001)
    3rd cubic term −4527.0 (<.001)
    P, linearb <.001 <.001
    P, nonlinearc <.001 <.001
    Model 4
    Linear term −4.31 (.10) −0.79 (.45) −0.318 (.001) −0.129 (<.001)
    1st cubic term 52.09 (.50) 19.22 (.003) −1.006 (.37) 0.267 (0.03)
    2nd cubic term 649.12 (.17) −43.84 (.002) 12.374 (.46) −0.601 (.32)
    3rd cubic term −3077.35 (.005) −22.213 (.56)
    P, linearb <.001 <.001 <.001 <.001
    P, nonlinearc <.001 .003 .07 <.001
    Potassium Bicarbonate Albumin C statistic
    Model 1 0.768
    Linear term
    1st cubic term
    2nd cubic term
    P, linearb
    P, nonlinearc
    Model 2 0.779
    Linear term
    1st cubic term
    2nd cubic term
    3rd cubic term
    P, linearb
    P, nonlinearc
    Model 3 0.786
    Linear term
    1st cubic term
    2nd cubic term
    3rd cubic term
    P, linearb
    P, nonlinearc
    Model 4
    Linear term −0.728 (.03) −1.1243 (<.001) −1.344 (<.001) 0.899
    1st cubic term 1.170 (.48) 0.0761 (.51) 1.007 (.22)
    2nd cubic term −2.121 (.68) 0.2344 (.72) −3.948 (.49)
    3rd cubic term
    P, linearb .02 <.001 <.001
    P, nonlinearc .10 <.001 .16
  • During operation, a user can use the input device 54 to provide values for the features via an input interface 66. These values are then provided to the predictive model 64 which calculates a parameter representing the likelihood of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis as a weighted non-linear combination of the plurality of features based upon the set of linear and non-linear weights associated with each feature. The resulting parameter can be provided to a display via a display interface 68 to inform the user of the likelihood that a patient represented by the features will require dialysis.
  • It will be appreciated that the models 64 are based solely on routine metabolic panel that can be obtained within hours of surgery, allowing for early diagnosis of acute kidney injury. The extended model also incorporates the time lapse from the injury event to the laboratory draw, without posing any time restrictions. The use of readily available, standardized, and affordable predictors from routine metabolic panel makes the predictive model easily applicable to any patient. While the example given in Table 1 represents patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the model could easily be extended, with appropriate validation, to virtually any non-cardiac setting. Finally, the model has is sufficiently sophisticated to capture complex non-linear relationships between the parameters associated with the routine metabolic blood panel and
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a method 100 for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. Specifically, the method uses changes in basic metabolic panel early after surgery to predict severe AKI requiring dialysis within a two week period following surgery. At 102, blood drawn for a preoperative or perioperative metabolic blood panel is mechanically separated to isolate a first serum sample. For example, a blood sample can be drawn from the patient and spun in a centrifuge to separate out blood serum. At 104, a preoperative or perioperative level of serum creatinine is determined from the first blood serum sample. It will be appreciated, however, that other parameters can be extracted from the preoperative or perioperative metabolic blood panel, for example, a blood urea nitrogen level.
  • At 106, blood drawn for a post-operative metabolic blood panel is mechanically separated to isolate a second serum sample. At 108, a post-operative level of serum creatinine is determined from the second blood serum sample. It will be appreciated, however, that other parameters can be extracted from the preoperative or perioperative metabolic blood panel, for example, levels for blood urea nitrogen, sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, and albumin. At 110, a parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury to the patient is calculated from at least a difference between the preoperative or perioperative creatinine level and the post-operative creatinine level. In one implementation, this difference can be normalized according to the length of a period of time (e.g., in hours) between the end of the surgical procedure and the drawing of the post-operative metabolic blood panel. It will be appreciated that other features can be used to refine the calculation including any or all the sodium level, potassium level, bicarbonate level, and albumin level determined from the post-operative blood serum sample, the creatinine level from the first serum sample, and a difference between the blood urea nitrogen level from the first serum sample and the blood urea nitrogen level from the second serum sample normalized by the period of time between the end of the surgical procedure and the drawing of the post-operative metabolic blood panel. At 112, the calculated parameter is provided to a user at an associated display. If the parameter is within a range associated with a severe risk of acute kidney injury, the user can begin appropriate treatment.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a computer system 200 that can be employed to implement systems and methods described herein, such as based on computer executable instructions running on the computer system. The user may be permitted to preoperatively simulate the planned surgical procedure using the computer system 200 as desired. The computer system 200 can be implemented on one or more general purpose networked computer systems, embedded computer systems, routers, switches, server devices, client devices, various intermediate devices/nodes and/or stand alone computer systems. Additionally, the computer system 200 can be implemented as part of the computer-aided engineering (CAE) tool running computer executable instructions to perform a method as described herein.
  • The computer system 200 includes a processor 202 and a system memory 204. Dual microprocessors and other multi-processor architectures can also be utilized as the processor 202. The processor 202 and system memory 204 can be coupled by any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. The system memory 204 includes read only memory (ROM) 206 and random access memory (RAM) 208. A basic input/output system (BIOS) can reside in the ROM 206, generally containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the computer system 200, such as a reset or power-up.
  • The computer system 200 can include one or more types of long-term data storage 210, including a hard disk drive, a magnetic disk drive, (e.g., to read from or write to a removable disk), and an optical disk drive, (e.g., for reading a CD-ROM or DVD disk or to read from or write to other optical media). The long-term data storage 210 can be connected to the processor 202 by a drive interface 212. The long-term data storage 210 components provide nonvolatile storage of data, data structures, and computer-executable instructions for the computer system 200. A number of program modules may also be stored in one or more of the drives as well as in the RAM 208, including an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data.
  • A user may enter commands and information into the computer system 200 through one or more input devices 222, such as a keyboard or a pointing device (e.g., a mouse). These and other input devices are often connected to the processor 202 through a device interface 224. For example, the input devices can be connected to the system bus by one or more a parallel port, a serial port or a universal serial bus (USB). One or more output device(s) 226, such as a visual display device or printer, can also be connected to the processor 202 via the device interface 224.
  • The computer system 200 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections (e.g., a local area network (LAN) or wide area network (WAN) to one or more remote computers 230. A given remote computer 230 may be a workstation, a computer system, a router, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the computer system 200. The computer system 200 can communicate with the remote computers 230 via a network interface 232, such as a wired or wireless network interface card or modem. In a networked environment, application programs and program data depicted relative to the computer system 200, or portions thereof, may be stored in memory associated with the remote computers 230.
  • It will be understood that the above description of the present invention is susceptible to various modifications, changes and adaptations, and the same are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the appended claims. The presently disclosed embodiments are considered in all respects to be illustrative, and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims, rather than the foregoing description, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalence thereof are intended to be embraced therein.

Claims (20)

Having described the invention, the following is claimed:
1. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing machine executable instructions for predicting the likelihood of acute kidney injury comprising:
an input interface configured to receive a plurality of features derived from the results of a post-surgical metabolic blood panel and one of a pre-surgical metabolic blood panel and a perisurgical metabolic blood panel;
a predictive model configured to calculate a parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury from the plurality of features; and
a user interface configured to provide the calculated parameter to a user in a human comprehensible form.
2. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the plurality of features includes a change in a creatinine level between the one of the pre-surgical metabolic blood panel and the perisurgical metabolic blood panel and the post-surgical blood panel.
3. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 2, wherein the change in the creatinine level is normalized by a time elapsed between a surgery and the post-surgical metabolic blood panel.
4. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the plurality of features includes a sodium level from the post-surgical metabolic blood panel.
5. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the plurality of features includes a potassium level from the post-surgical metabolic blood panel.
6. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the plurality of features includes a bicarbonate level from the post-surgical metabolic blood panel.
7. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the plurality of features includes a creatinine level from the post-surgical metabolic blood panel.
8. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the plurality of features includes an albumin level from the post-surgical metabolic blood panel.
9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the plurality of features includes a change in a blood urea nitrogen level between the one of the pre-surgical metabolic blood panel and the perisurgical metabolic blood panel and the post-surgical blood panel.
10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein the change in the blood urea nitrogen level is normalized by a time elapsed between a surgery and the post-surgical metabolic blood panel.
11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the predictive model is configured to calculate the parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury as a weighted combination of the plurality of features.
12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11, wherein a first feature of the plurality of features is a non-linear function of a second feature of the plurality of features.
13. A method for predicting acute kidney injury associated with a surgical procedure comprising:
isolating a first blood serum sample from a blood sample drawn from a patient before an end of the surgical procedure;
determining at least a first creatinine level from the first blood serum sample;
isolating a second blood serum sample from a blood sample drawn from the patient after the end of the surgical procedure;
determining at least a second creatinine level from the second blood serum sample;
calculating, from a predictive model, a parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury to the patient from at least a difference between the first creatinine level and the second creatinine level; and
displaying the calculated parameter to a user.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the difference between the first creatinine level is normalized according to a length of time between the end of the surgical procedure and drawing of the blood sample from the patient after the end of the surgical procedure.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein calculating the parameter representing the likelihood of acute kidney injury to the patient comprises calculating the parameter from the normalized difference between the first creatinine level and the second creatinine level and the first creatinine level.
16. The method of claim 15, further comprising:
determining a first blood urea nitrogen level from the first blood serum sample; and
determining a second blood urea nitrogen level from the second blood serum sample;
wherein calculating the parameter representing the likelihood of acute kidney injury to the patient comprises calculating the parameter from the normalized difference between the first creatinine level and the second creatinine level and a difference between the first second blood urea level and the second second blood urea level, normalized by the length of time.
17. The method of claim 16, further comprising determining each of a sodium level, a potassium level, a bicarbonate level, and an albumin level from the second blood serum sample, and calculating the parameter representing the likelihood of acute kidney injury to the patient comprises calculating the parameter from the normalized difference between the first creatinine level and the second creatinine level, the normalized difference between the first blood urea nitrogen level and the second blood urea nitrogen level, the first creatinine level, the sodium level, the potassium level, the bicarbonate level, and the albumin level.
18. A diagnostic system for predicting acute kidney injury associated with a surgical procedure comprising:
a processor; and
a non-transitory computer readable medium storing machine executable instructions executable by the processor to predict a likelihood of acute kidney injury, the instructions comprising:
an input interface configured to receive a plurality of features derived from the results of a post-surgical metabolic blood panel and one of a pre-surgical metabolic blood panel and a perisurgical metabolic blood panel, the plurality of features including at least a difference in a serum creatinine level between the one of the pre-surgical metabolic blood panel and the perisurgical metabolic blood panel and the post-surgical metabolic blood panel;
a predictive model configured to calculate a parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury from the plurality of features; and
a user interface configured to provide the calculated parameter to a user in a human comprehensible form.
19. The diagnostic system of claim 18, wherein the input interface is configured to receive an input from a remote user via an Internet connection, and the user interface is configured to provide the calculated parameter to a display associated with the remote user via the Internet connection.
20. The diagnostic system of claim 18, wherein the predictive model is configured to calculate the parameter representing a likelihood of acute kidney injury as a weighted non-linear combination of a ratio of the difference in a serum creatinine level and a period of time between an end of the surgical procedure and a drawing of the post-surgical metabolic blood panel, a ratio of a difference between a presurgical blood urea nitrogen level and a post-surgical blood urea nitrogen level to the period of time, the presurgical creatinine level, a post-surgical sodium level, a post-surgical potassium level, a post-surgical bicarbonate level, and a post-surgical albumin level.
US13/911,236 2012-06-06 2013-06-06 Prediction of acute kidney injury from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel Abandoned US20130330829A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/911,236 US20130330829A1 (en) 2012-06-06 2013-06-06 Prediction of acute kidney injury from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel
US15/262,556 US10281455B2 (en) 2012-06-06 2016-09-12 Prediction of acute kidney injury from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261656258P 2012-06-06 2012-06-06
US13/911,236 US20130330829A1 (en) 2012-06-06 2013-06-06 Prediction of acute kidney injury from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/262,556 Division US10281455B2 (en) 2012-06-06 2016-09-12 Prediction of acute kidney injury from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130330829A1 true US20130330829A1 (en) 2013-12-12

Family

ID=48626689

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/911,236 Abandoned US20130330829A1 (en) 2012-06-06 2013-06-06 Prediction of acute kidney injury from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel
US15/262,556 Active 2033-10-10 US10281455B2 (en) 2012-06-06 2016-09-12 Prediction of acute kidney injury from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/262,556 Active 2033-10-10 US10281455B2 (en) 2012-06-06 2016-09-12 Prediction of acute kidney injury from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US20130330829A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2013184868A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110491511A (en) * 2019-07-24 2019-11-22 广州知汇云科技有限公司 A kind of multi-model complementation reinforcement machine learning method based on perioperative danger early warning
US20200221990A1 (en) * 2019-01-11 2020-07-16 Quadrus Medical Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods for assessing and evaluating renal health diagnosis, staging, and therapy recommendation
CN113473936A (en) * 2019-02-05 2021-10-01 史密夫和内修有限公司 Robotic surgical data for long term care periods
US11350887B2 (en) 2019-08-07 2022-06-07 Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. Systems and methods for detection of potential health issues
WO2022203140A1 (en) * 2021-03-23 2022-09-29 서울대학교병원 Clinical decision support system and method for acute kidney injury using recurrent neural network prediction model
EP4031006A4 (en) * 2019-09-17 2023-11-29 Quadrus Medical Technologies, Inc. System and method for personalized kidney evaluation, diagnosis and therapy recommendation

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3282948A4 (en) 2015-04-15 2019-04-03 The Johns Hopkins University System and urine sensing devices for and method of monitoring kidney function
CN108986915B (en) * 2018-07-24 2021-07-06 戴松世 Artificial intelligence early prediction method and device for acute kidney injury

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110055141A1 (en) * 2009-08-31 2011-03-03 Bhagwan Mahavir Medical Research Centre Predicting possible outcomes in multi-factored diseases

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8052960B2 (en) * 2009-01-20 2011-11-08 The Penn State Research Foundation Netrin-1 as a biomarker of injury and disease
EP2569631A4 (en) * 2010-05-10 2013-12-04 Austin Health Markers for acute kidney injury
JP2013531240A (en) * 2010-06-23 2013-08-01 アスチュート メディカル,インコーポレイテッド Methods and compositions for diagnosis and prognosis of renal injury and renal failure
US10557856B2 (en) * 2010-09-24 2020-02-11 University Of Pittsburgh-Of The Commonwealth System Of Higher Education Biomarkers of renal injury

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110055141A1 (en) * 2009-08-31 2011-03-03 Bhagwan Mahavir Medical Research Centre Predicting possible outcomes in multi-factored diseases

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Predictive Models for Acute Kidney Injury Following Cardiac Surgery Sevag Demirjian, Jesse D. Schold, Jean-Pierre Yared, and Charles A. Bashour Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2012;59(3): 382-389 *
Serum Cystatin C in Elderly Cardiac Surgery Patients Anne Ristikankare, Reino Poyhia, Anne Kuitunen, Markus Skrifvars, Pekka Hammainen, Markku Salmenpera, and Raili Suojaranta-Ylinen Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2010;89: 689-695 *

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20200221990A1 (en) * 2019-01-11 2020-07-16 Quadrus Medical Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods for assessing and evaluating renal health diagnosis, staging, and therapy recommendation
CN113473936A (en) * 2019-02-05 2021-10-01 史密夫和内修有限公司 Robotic surgical data for long term care periods
CN110491511A (en) * 2019-07-24 2019-11-22 广州知汇云科技有限公司 A kind of multi-model complementation reinforcement machine learning method based on perioperative danger early warning
US11350887B2 (en) 2019-08-07 2022-06-07 Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. Systems and methods for detection of potential health issues
EP4031006A4 (en) * 2019-09-17 2023-11-29 Quadrus Medical Technologies, Inc. System and method for personalized kidney evaluation, diagnosis and therapy recommendation
WO2022203140A1 (en) * 2021-03-23 2022-09-29 서울대학교병원 Clinical decision support system and method for acute kidney injury using recurrent neural network prediction model

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2013184868A1 (en) 2013-12-12
US10281455B2 (en) 2019-05-07
US20160377595A1 (en) 2016-12-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20160377595A1 (en) Prediction of acute kidney injury from a post-surgical metabolic blood panel
Shah et al. Incidence, cost, and risk factors for readmission after coronary artery bypass grafting
Hibbard et al. Improving population health management strategies: identifying patients who are more likely to be users of avoidable costly care and those more likely to develop a new chronic disease
US8793144B2 (en) Treatment effect prediction system, a treatment effect prediction method, and a computer program product thereof
US8096811B2 (en) Computer architecture and process of user evaluation
US20190378619A1 (en) Using machine learning to predict health conditions
US20160321414A1 (en) Diagnostic Test Planning
EP2502147A1 (en) Method and system for determining a fair benchmark for physicians&#39; quality of patient care
Tsuang et al. An acute change in lung allocation score and survival after lung transplantation: a cohort study
JP2018518207A (en) A system for automated analysis and risk notification of clinical values in an intensive care unit
EP2951775A1 (en) Synthetic healthcare data generation
Gardiner et al. Renal oxygenation: from data to insight
Ramaswamy et al. CKD subpopulations defined by risk‐factors: A longitudinal analysis of electronic health records
JP5388564B2 (en) Diabetes care support system, computer program, and recording medium
TWI774982B (en) Medical resource integration system, computer device and medical resource integration method
Grass et al. Challenges of modeling outcomes for surgical infections: a word of caution
WO2021103623A1 (en) Sepsis early warning apparatus and device, and storage medium
Guzek et al. Improving diabetes care using a multitiered quality improvement model
Papanicolas et al. Using a Vector Autoregression Framework to measure the quality of English NHS hospitals
Flath-Sporn et al. Focusing quality improvement initiatives in pediatric plastic surgery: a descriptive study using the pediatric national surgical quality improvement program
Morzywolek Causal inference methods to optimize clinical decision-making in treatment initiation based on routinely collected data
Robitschek et al. Utility of a systematic approach to teaching photographic nasal analysis to otolaryngology residents
Tran Statistical Analysis of the Association between Bilirubin and Survival in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis
Linden et al. Evaluating disease management program effectiveness adjusting for enrollment (tenure) and seasonality
Ashcroft Does machine learning improve the accuracy of clinical risk predictions? An exemplar examining risk of cardiovascular disease

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION, OHIO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DEMIRJIAN, SEVAG G.;REEL/FRAME:030732/0843

Effective date: 20130620

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION