US20130080908A1 - User evaluation of content on distributed communication network - Google Patents
User evaluation of content on distributed communication network Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20130080908A1 US20130080908A1 US13/683,514 US201213683514A US2013080908A1 US 20130080908 A1 US20130080908 A1 US 20130080908A1 US 201213683514 A US201213683514 A US 201213683514A US 2013080908 A1 US2013080908 A1 US 2013080908A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- user
- review
- displayed
- reviews
- indication
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
- G06F3/048—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI]
- G06F3/0481—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] based on specific properties of the displayed interaction object or a metaphor-based environment, e.g. interaction with desktop elements like windows or icons, or assisted by a cursor's changing behaviour or appearance
- G06F3/0482—Interaction with lists of selectable items, e.g. menus
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to interactive user tools on a distributed communication network, such as the Internet. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for enabling users of content on a distributed communication network to collectively indicate the degree of helpfulness or usefulness of individual items of contents, such as for example reviews of commercially available products and/or services, usenet postings, news articles, etc., by interactively voting or indicating that particular items of content were helpful or otherwise valuable to the user. Subsequent users then are able to sort retrieved items of content by degree of helpfulness or usefulness according to the number of previous users who have indicated that the individual items of content were helpful or otherwise valuable.
- information can be retrieved in the form of usenet postings, professional reviews, news articles, on-line catalogs, video and audio cups, etc.
- the document relates generally to methods and systems that fulfill the existing need in the art as described above, by providing an interactive user tool on a distributed communication network, whereby a user of an on-line content database can provide an indication that a particular review has been helpful or otherwise valuable to the user in assessing the quality of the content, e.g., in the case of a product review, in determining whether to purchase or use the reviewed product or service.
- a tally of such indications is stored in a database associated with the content, and is displayed to subsequent users who retrieve or otherwise view the content.
- FIG. 1 is a screen display which shows stored items of content, and the provision of an interactive element or icon that allows a user to designate a particular item of content as being helpful or otherwise valuable to the user, according to one embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a screen display of a pop-up window confirming the recording of a user's indication that a particular item of content was found to be helpful;
- FIG. 3 is a screen display of a pop-up window declining to record a user's indication that an item of content is helpful in the event that the user has already interactively indicated as such;
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing a basic program flow for recording an individual user's indications that such user found a particular item of content to be helpful or otherwise valuable to the user, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 1 is a screen display illustrating one particular example of the present invention.
- a user of an on-line consumer products and services ratings and reviews site is interested in computer operating systems, and in particular the AmigaOS operating system.
- a product identification line 100 identifies the AmigaOS as the product whose ratings and reviews are presented on the display.
- a number of scaled numerical ratings 102 based on different criteria are provided for the product, in both graphical and numerical form.
- the available consumer reviews for the product are indicated in review label 104 .
- 468 consumer reviews have been posted for the product and stored in the database.
- One of the stored reviews 106 is displayed at the bottom of the screen.
- an indication 112 is provided of the number of users who have found the displayed review helpful.
- An interactive element or icon 110 is provided adjacent to the displayed review, which enables a user to indicate whether she finds the review helpful by clicking on the element 110 with a pointing device, as is well known in the art.
- a pop-up window can be displayed on the user's display screen, as shown for example in FIG. 2 , which confirms the receipt of the user's indication by the database interface.
- a pop-up window as shown in FIG. 3 may be displayed to the user informing her that only one indication per user per review will be accepted.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a process according to one preferred embodiment of the invention whereby a user may submit an indication for a product/service review as being helpful.
- the example provided hereinafter relates to review of products and/or services for purposes of explanation; however, it is emphasized that the present invention is not limited to product and/or service reviews, but as explained above can be used to filter or sort any individual item of content retrievable by a client from a database.
- the user may be at either a product page at step 402 (as shown in FIG. 1 ), or a review page at step 403 , in which a “helpful” element or icon is displayed.
- the page contains a number of reviews of different products/services by the same individual reviewer (alternatively, the viewer may be at any page which displays items of content).
- the user clicks on the “helpful” element and at step 406 it is determined whether the user is logged onto the server as a registered user. If not, the user is prompted at step 408 to register with the server, or to logon to the server (if the user has previously registered).
- the prompting step may be carried out by displaying a pop-up window to the user.
- a previously registered user logs on to the server by entering her user name and password in appropriate fields, and the user is then returned to the product page or review page from which she clicked on the “helpful” element.
- An unregistered user will click a register element in the pop-up window at step 412 , whereby the user will be directed to a register page 414 .
- the unregistered user enters her personal information into the appropriate fields in the register page, and submits the information at step 416 , whereby the user is successfully registered and logged in, and is brought back to the product or review page where the user again clicks the “helpful” element, which now tallies the indication.
- step 418 the user can be brought directly to step 418 (described below) without being required to again click the “helpful” element.
- step 418 previously stored user data is checked to determine whether that user has already submitted an indication for a particular review as being helpful. This step prevents users from submitting such indication more than once, and thus prevents the artificial inflation of the appearance of helpfulness of reviews. If it is determined that the user has already submitted an indication, at step 422 a pop-up window as shown in FIG. 3 is displayed, notifying the user of an error because the user has already submitted an indication. The user then can close the pop-up window. This process will repeat itself if the user continues to click the “helpful” element for a review for which the user has already submitted an indication.
- step 420 the user's indication is received and counted, and a pop-up window as shown in FIG. 2 is displayed, confirming to the user that the indication has been tallied.
- reviews may be sorted by number of indications of helpfulness or by another criterion as a default. If the user desires to change the order by which the reviews are sorted, the user may click the drop-down menu item 108 to choose alternative sorting criteria by which the reviews will be sequentially displayed. For example, the user may view reviews by submission date, highest rating, or lowest rating. When more than one person has submitted an indication fur particular review, the text string 112 is replaced. with “XX people have found this review helpful.” where XX is the number of indications by different users received for the review.
- a reviewer's “hall of fame” page may be provided, which lists the individual users who have received the most “helpful” indications for reviews they have written. In this way, subsequent users may view the reviewers with the highest number of helpful indications on the “hall of fame” page.
- This information then may be used by the user in a search, such as by searching for all reviews written by a particular reviewer, or by adding the reviewer's name to a search string for a particular product.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/731,019, filed Dec. 7, 2000, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/170,362, filed Dec. 31, 1999, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates generally to interactive user tools on a distributed communication network, such as the Internet. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for enabling users of content on a distributed communication network to collectively indicate the degree of helpfulness or usefulness of individual items of contents, such as for example reviews of commercially available products and/or services, usenet postings, news articles, etc., by interactively voting or indicating that particular items of content were helpful or otherwise valuable to the user. Subsequent users then are able to sort retrieved items of content by degree of helpfulness or usefulness according to the number of previous users who have indicated that the individual items of content were helpful or otherwise valuable.
- 2. Background and Related Art
- It is generally known in the art to survey consumers regarding the quality of particular products and/or services, and to publish or advertise the results of the survey. Recently, with the rapid technological advancement of the Internet, it has become possible for individual consumers to provide narrative reviews of products and/or services, in addition to standardized scaled ratings. Such reviews can be stored in a server database and retrieved and displayed to users (clients) in response to search queries using known search engines.
- As the number of individual consumers participating in on-line product ratings and posting product reviews continues to grow, so does the amount of information available for subsequent users to evaluate.
- In addition to consumer reviews or ratings of products and services, it is possible to retrieve a very large of amount of information from the Internet relating to any subject at all. For example, information can be retrieved in the form of usenet postings, professional reviews, news articles, on-line catalogs, video and audio cups, etc.
- Consequently, there exists a need in the art to provide a methodology by which users may indicate the particular helpfulness or usefulness of certain individual items of content, whereby subsequent users will be ante to sort available reviews by the degree of indicated helpfulness or usefulness, and thereby reduce the amount of information for the user to evaluate, based on the prior experience of other users.
- The document relates generally to methods and systems that fulfill the existing need in the art as described above, by providing an interactive user tool on a distributed communication network, whereby a user of an on-line content database can provide an indication that a particular review has been helpful or otherwise valuable to the user in assessing the quality of the content, e.g., in the case of a product review, in determining whether to purchase or use the reviewed product or service. A tally of such indications is stored in a database associated with the content, and is displayed to subsequent users who retrieve or otherwise view the content.
- This section is intended to provide an overview of subject matter of the present patent application. It is not intended to provide an exclusive or exhaustive explanation of the invention. The detailed description is included to provide further information about the present patent application.
- The invention will be described in detail with reference to the following drawings in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a screen display which shows stored items of content, and the provision of an interactive element or icon that allows a user to designate a particular item of content as being helpful or otherwise valuable to the user, according to one embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 2 is a screen display of a pop-up window confirming the recording of a user's indication that a particular item of content was found to be helpful; -
FIG. 3 is a screen display of a pop-up window declining to record a user's indication that an item of content is helpful in the event that the user has already interactively indicated as such; and -
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing a basic program flow for recording an individual user's indications that such user found a particular item of content to be helpful or otherwise valuable to the user, according to one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 1 is a screen display illustrating one particular example of the present invention. According to the example, a user of an on-line consumer products and services ratings and reviews site is interested in computer operating systems, and in particular the AmigaOS operating system. Aproduct identification line 100 identifies the AmigaOS as the product whose ratings and reviews are presented on the display. - A number of scaled
numerical ratings 102 based on different criteria are provided for the product, in both graphical and numerical form. In addition to the numerical scaled ratings, the available consumer reviews for the product are indicated inreview label 104. In the example, 468 consumer reviews have been posted for the product and stored in the database. One of thestored reviews 106 is displayed at the bottom of the screen. To the right of the review, anindication 112 is provided of the number of users who have found the displayed review helpful. An interactive element oricon 110 is provided adjacent to the displayed review, which enables a user to indicate whether she finds the review helpful by clicking on theelement 110 with a pointing device, as is well known in the art. - Once the user's indication with respect to the displayed review has been received and counted, a pop-up window can be displayed on the user's display screen, as shown for example in
FIG. 2 , which confirms the receipt of the user's indication by the database interface. if the user has already submitted an indication for the displayed review as being helpful or otherwise valuable, a pop-up window as shown inFIG. 3 may be displayed to the user informing her that only one indication per user per review will be accepted. -
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a process according to one preferred embodiment of the invention whereby a user may submit an indication for a product/service review as being helpful. The example provided hereinafter relates to review of products and/or services for purposes of explanation; however, it is emphasized that the present invention is not limited to product and/or service reviews, but as explained above can be used to filter or sort any individual item of content retrievable by a client from a database. - As shown in
FIG. 4 , the user may be at either a product page at step 402 (as shown inFIG. 1 ), or a review page atstep 403, in which a “helpful” element or icon is displayed. In either case, the page contains a number of reviews of different products/services by the same individual reviewer (alternatively, the viewer may be at any page which displays items of content). Atstep 404, the user clicks on the “helpful” element, and atstep 406 it is determined whether the user is logged onto the server as a registered user. If not, the user is prompted atstep 408 to register with the server, or to logon to the server (if the user has previously registered). The prompting step may be carried out by displaying a pop-up window to the user. - At
step 410, a previously registered user logs on to the server by entering her user name and password in appropriate fields, and the user is then returned to the product page or review page from which she clicked on the “helpful” element. An unregistered user will click a register element in the pop-up window atstep 412, whereby the user will be directed to aregister page 414. The unregistered user enters her personal information into the appropriate fields in the register page, and submits the information atstep 416, whereby the user is successfully registered and logged in, and is brought back to the product or review page where the user again clicks the “helpful” element, which now tallies the indication. - In an alternative embodiment, once a user has been successfully logged in, the user can be brought directly to step 418 (described below) without being required to again click the “helpful” element.
- Once the use is logged on to the server as a registered user, at
step 418 previously stored user data is checked to determine whether that user has already submitted an indication for a particular review as being helpful. This step prevents users from submitting such indication more than once, and thus prevents the artificial inflation of the appearance of helpfulness of reviews. If it is determined that the user has already submitted an indication, at step 422 a pop-up window as shown inFIG. 3 is displayed, notifying the user of an error because the user has already submitted an indication. The user then can close the pop-up window. This process will repeat itself if the user continues to click the “helpful” element for a review for which the user has already submitted an indication. - If the user has not already submitted an indication fur the review, at
step 420 the user's indication is received and counted, and a pop-up window as shown inFIG. 2 is displayed, confirming to the user that the indication has been tallied. - As shown in
FIG. 1 , reviews may be sorted by number of indications of helpfulness or by another criterion as a default. If the user desires to change the order by which the reviews are sorted, the user may click the drop-downmenu item 108 to choose alternative sorting criteria by which the reviews will be sequentially displayed. For example, the user may view reviews by submission date, highest rating, or lowest rating. When more than one person has submitted an indication fur particular review, thetext string 112 is replaced. with “XX people have found this review helpful.” where XX is the number of indications by different users received for the review. - According to a further aspect of the invention, a reviewer's “hall of fame” page may be provided, which lists the individual users who have received the most “helpful” indications for reviews they have written. In this way, subsequent users may view the reviewers with the highest number of helpful indications on the “hall of fame” page. This information then may be used by the user in a search, such as by searching for all reviews written by a particular reviewer, or by adding the reviewer's name to a search string for a particular product.
- The invention having been thus described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the same may be varied. in many ways without departing from the spirit and scope of the inventions. For example, while the invention has been described with respect to rating reviews or other content as to “helpfulness,” it is possible to rate the same on alternative characteristics such as writing style, wit or another subjective criterion, or on multiple subjective criteria. All such modifications are intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Claims (27)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/683,514 US20130080908A1 (en) | 1999-12-13 | 2012-11-21 | User evaluation of content on distributed communication network |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17036299P | 1999-12-13 | 1999-12-13 | |
US09/731,019 US8321496B2 (en) | 1999-12-13 | 2000-12-07 | User evaluation of content on distributed communication network |
US13/683,514 US20130080908A1 (en) | 1999-12-13 | 2012-11-21 | User evaluation of content on distributed communication network |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/731,019 Continuation US8321496B2 (en) | 1999-12-13 | 2000-12-07 | User evaluation of content on distributed communication network |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20130080908A1 true US20130080908A1 (en) | 2013-03-28 |
Family
ID=26866015
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/731,019 Active 2026-02-16 US8321496B2 (en) | 1999-12-13 | 2000-12-07 | User evaluation of content on distributed communication network |
US13/683,514 Abandoned US20130080908A1 (en) | 1999-12-13 | 2012-11-21 | User evaluation of content on distributed communication network |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/731,019 Active 2026-02-16 US8321496B2 (en) | 1999-12-13 | 2000-12-07 | User evaluation of content on distributed communication network |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8321496B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060277290A1 (en) * | 2005-06-02 | 2006-12-07 | Sam Shank | Compiling and filtering user ratings of products |
Families Citing this family (39)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7082407B1 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2006-07-25 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Purchase notification service for assisting users in selecting items from an electronic catalog |
US7433832B1 (en) * | 1999-11-19 | 2008-10-07 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Methods and systems for distributing information within a dynamically defined community |
JP2002092261A (en) * | 2000-09-13 | 2002-03-29 | Yamaha Corp | Method for evaluating contents |
US7725338B1 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2010-05-25 | Palmsource Inc. | Time based profile management on palmtop computer |
US7133859B1 (en) * | 2001-01-05 | 2006-11-07 | Palm, Inc. | Category specific sort and display instructions for an electronic device |
US7428496B1 (en) | 2001-04-24 | 2008-09-23 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Creating an incentive to author useful item reviews |
US8554601B1 (en) | 2003-08-22 | 2013-10-08 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing content based on reputation |
US20070061219A1 (en) * | 2005-07-07 | 2007-03-15 | Daniel Palestrant | Method and apparatus for conducting an information brokering service |
US20070078670A1 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-05 | Dave Kushal B | Selecting high quality reviews for display |
US7827052B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2010-11-02 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for reputation management |
US8010480B2 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2011-08-30 | Google Inc. | Selecting high quality text within identified reviews for display in review snippets |
US8438469B1 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2013-05-07 | Google Inc. | Embedded review and rating information |
US20070078833A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2007-04-05 | Powerreviews, Inc. | System for obtaining reviews using selections created by user base |
US7620651B2 (en) * | 2005-11-15 | 2009-11-17 | Powerreviews, Inc. | System for dynamic product summary based on consumer-contributed keywords |
US20070244903A1 (en) * | 2006-04-18 | 2007-10-18 | Ratliff Emily J | Collectively managing media bookmarks |
US7822808B2 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2010-10-26 | Motenet, Inc. | Collection and distribution of sense-on-demand data |
US7979462B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2011-07-12 | Apple Inc. | Head-to-head comparisons |
US7895127B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2011-02-22 | Weiser Anatoly S | Rating-based sorting and displaying of reviews |
US8312036B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2012-11-13 | Apple Inc. | Recommended systems |
WO2008070998A1 (en) * | 2006-12-15 | 2008-06-19 | Sharedreviews.Com Inc. | A method and system for managing online reviews |
AU2008200194B2 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2009-09-03 | Arcturus Securities Pty Ltd | Street Quality Assessment Method and System |
US20080244655A1 (en) * | 2007-03-28 | 2008-10-02 | Nokia Corporation | Viral marketing of broadcast content |
US8108255B1 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2012-01-31 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Methods and systems for obtaining reviews for items lacking reviews |
US8001003B1 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2011-08-16 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Methods and systems for searching for and identifying data repository deficits |
US10083420B2 (en) | 2007-11-21 | 2018-09-25 | Sermo, Inc | Community moderated information |
US8321300B1 (en) | 2008-06-30 | 2012-11-27 | Bazaarvoice, Inc. | Method and system for distribution of user generated content |
EP2364486A4 (en) * | 2008-11-06 | 2012-04-25 | Bazaarvoice | Method and system for promoting user generation of content |
WO2010090724A1 (en) * | 2009-02-05 | 2010-08-12 | Bazaarvoice | Method and system for providing content generation capabilities |
FR2953054B1 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2012-01-06 | Coyote Sys | PERSONALIZED ASSISTANCE SYSTEM FOR DRIVING A VEHICLE |
US20130066710A1 (en) * | 2010-03-02 | 2013-03-14 | Digg, Inc. | Including content items in advertisements |
US9128652B2 (en) | 2010-11-05 | 2015-09-08 | Bazaarvoice, Inc. | Method and system for distribution of content |
EP2521343B1 (en) * | 2011-05-06 | 2019-07-03 | Telia Company AB | Rating a communication party |
WO2012174547A2 (en) * | 2011-06-17 | 2012-12-20 | University Of Washington Through Its Center For Commercialization | Systems and methods for selection-based contextual help retrieval |
US9762428B2 (en) | 2012-01-11 | 2017-09-12 | Bazaarvoice, Inc. | Identifying and assigning metrics to influential user generated content |
US9400847B1 (en) | 2012-01-31 | 2016-07-26 | Bazaarvoice, Inc. | Method and system for pagination of content |
US9396490B1 (en) | 2012-02-28 | 2016-07-19 | Bazaarvoice, Inc. | Brand response |
US10853355B1 (en) * | 2012-03-05 | 2020-12-01 | Reputation.Com, Inc. | Reviewer recommendation |
US9734239B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2017-08-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Prompting subject matter experts for additional detail based on historical answer ratings |
US11257130B2 (en) * | 2017-08-22 | 2022-02-22 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Method and system for review verification and trustworthiness scoring via blockchain |
Citations (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3748646A (en) * | 1971-06-08 | 1973-07-24 | Daktronics | Voting system |
US5377355A (en) * | 1990-09-10 | 1994-12-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for automated procedure initiation in a data processing system including soliciting an evaluation vote from users automatically determined in response to identification of a functional area associated with a document |
US5559943A (en) * | 1994-06-27 | 1996-09-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus customizing a dual actuation setting of a computer input device switch |
US5668788A (en) * | 1996-06-10 | 1997-09-16 | Allison; Avery Vince | Programmed juke box capable of calculating a continuous updated playlist |
US5742767A (en) * | 1995-02-23 | 1998-04-21 | Sony Corporation | Program function extending method and apparatus and data processing method |
US5878399A (en) * | 1996-08-12 | 1999-03-02 | Peralto; Ryan G. | Computerized voting system |
US5881222A (en) * | 1995-01-23 | 1999-03-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for detecting performance problems in a windows-based computer system |
US5886695A (en) * | 1994-12-13 | 1999-03-23 | Microsoft Corporation | System provided child window controls |
US5893098A (en) * | 1994-09-14 | 1999-04-06 | Dolphin Software Pty Ltd | System and method for obtaining and collating survey information from a plurality of computer users |
US5946075A (en) * | 1996-05-21 | 1999-08-31 | Horn; Gerald | Vision screening system |
US5950172A (en) * | 1996-06-07 | 1999-09-07 | Klingman; Edwin E. | Secured electronic rating system |
US5999925A (en) * | 1997-07-25 | 1999-12-07 | Claritech Corporation | Information retrieval based on use of sub-documents |
US6078313A (en) * | 1996-07-30 | 2000-06-20 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Input control apparatus, display control apparatus and display apparatus |
US6137472A (en) * | 1994-10-21 | 2000-10-24 | Acco Usa, Inc. | Method and apparatus for cursor positioning |
US6151584A (en) * | 1997-11-20 | 2000-11-21 | Ncr Corporation | Computer architecture and method for validating and collecting and metadata and data about the internet and electronic commerce environments (data discoverer) |
US6175833B1 (en) * | 1998-04-22 | 2001-01-16 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for interactive live online voting with tallies for updating voting results |
US6247009B1 (en) * | 1997-03-10 | 2001-06-12 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image processing with searching of image data |
US6311190B1 (en) * | 1999-02-02 | 2001-10-30 | Harris Interactive Inc. | System for conducting surveys in different languages over a network with survey voter registration |
US20020010757A1 (en) * | 1999-12-03 | 2002-01-24 | Joel Granik | Method and apparatus for replacement of on-line advertisements |
US6404441B1 (en) * | 1999-07-16 | 2002-06-11 | Jet Software, Inc. | System for creating media presentations of computer software application programs |
US6421724B1 (en) * | 1999-08-30 | 2002-07-16 | Opinionlab, Inc. | Web site response measurement tool |
US6449598B1 (en) * | 1999-09-02 | 2002-09-10 | Xware Compliance, Inc. | Health care policy on-line maintenance dissemination and compliance testing system |
US6489968B1 (en) * | 1999-11-18 | 2002-12-03 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | System and method for exposing popular categories of browse tree |
US6959281B1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2005-10-25 | Freeling Kenneth A | Digital computer system and methods for conducting a poll to produce a demographic profile corresponding to an accumulation of response data from encrypted identities |
US6980962B1 (en) * | 1999-03-02 | 2005-12-27 | Quixtar Investments, Inc. | Electronic commerce transactions within a marketing system that may contain a membership buying opportunity |
US7664669B1 (en) * | 1999-11-19 | 2010-02-16 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Methods and systems for distributing information within a dynamically defined community |
US7711838B1 (en) * | 1999-11-10 | 2010-05-04 | Yahoo! Inc. | Internet radio and broadcast method |
Family Cites Families (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3947669A (en) * | 1974-12-30 | 1976-03-30 | Applied Futures, Inc. | Voting machine |
AU1554795A (en) * | 1993-12-23 | 1995-07-10 | Diacom Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for implementing user feedback |
US5875432A (en) * | 1994-08-05 | 1999-02-23 | Sehr; Richard Peter | Computerized voting information system having predefined content and voting templates |
JP3270983B2 (en) * | 1994-12-21 | 2002-04-02 | ソニー株式会社 | Image data encoding method and apparatus, image data decoding method and apparatus |
US6092049A (en) * | 1995-06-30 | 2000-07-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for efficiently recommending items using automated collaborative filtering and feature-guided automated collaborative filtering |
US6112186A (en) * | 1995-06-30 | 2000-08-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Distributed system for facilitating exchange of user information and opinion using automated collaborative filtering |
US5774121A (en) * | 1995-09-18 | 1998-06-30 | Avantos Performance Systems, Inc. | User interface method and system for graphical decision making with categorization across multiple criteria |
US5794237A (en) * | 1995-11-13 | 1998-08-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for improving problem source identification in computer systems employing relevance feedback and statistical source ranking |
US5872850A (en) * | 1996-02-02 | 1999-02-16 | Microsoft Corporation | System for enabling information marketplace |
US5867799A (en) * | 1996-04-04 | 1999-02-02 | Lang; Andrew K. | Information system and method for filtering a massive flow of information entities to meet user information classification needs |
US5790426A (en) * | 1996-04-30 | 1998-08-04 | Athenium L.L.C. | Automated collaborative filtering system |
US6362837B1 (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 2002-03-26 | Michael Ginn | Method and apparatus for simultaneously indicating rating value for the first document and display of second document in response to the selection |
US6038596A (en) * | 1997-05-23 | 2000-03-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system in a network for decreasing performance degradation triggered by multiple user redundant input events |
US6230185B1 (en) * | 1997-07-15 | 2001-05-08 | Eroom Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for facilitating communication between collaborators in a networked environment |
US6064980A (en) * | 1998-03-17 | 2000-05-16 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | System and methods for collaborative recommendations |
US6275811B1 (en) * | 1998-05-06 | 2001-08-14 | Michael R. Ginn | System and method for facilitating interactive electronic communication through acknowledgment of positive contributive |
US6405159B2 (en) * | 1998-06-03 | 2002-06-11 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | Method for categorizing, describing and modeling types of system users |
US6772139B1 (en) * | 1998-10-05 | 2004-08-03 | Smith, Iii Julius O. | Method and apparatus for facilitating use of hypertext links on the world wide web |
US6405175B1 (en) * | 1999-07-27 | 2002-06-11 | David Way Ng | Shopping scouts web site for rewarding customer referrals on product and price information with rewards scaled by the number of shoppers using the information |
US6466918B1 (en) * | 1999-11-18 | 2002-10-15 | Amazon. Com, Inc. | System and method for exposing popular nodes within a browse tree |
-
2000
- 2000-12-07 US US09/731,019 patent/US8321496B2/en active Active
-
2012
- 2012-11-21 US US13/683,514 patent/US20130080908A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3748646A (en) * | 1971-06-08 | 1973-07-24 | Daktronics | Voting system |
US5377355A (en) * | 1990-09-10 | 1994-12-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for automated procedure initiation in a data processing system including soliciting an evaluation vote from users automatically determined in response to identification of a functional area associated with a document |
US5559943A (en) * | 1994-06-27 | 1996-09-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus customizing a dual actuation setting of a computer input device switch |
US5893098A (en) * | 1994-09-14 | 1999-04-06 | Dolphin Software Pty Ltd | System and method for obtaining and collating survey information from a plurality of computer users |
US6137472A (en) * | 1994-10-21 | 2000-10-24 | Acco Usa, Inc. | Method and apparatus for cursor positioning |
US5886695A (en) * | 1994-12-13 | 1999-03-23 | Microsoft Corporation | System provided child window controls |
US5881222A (en) * | 1995-01-23 | 1999-03-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for detecting performance problems in a windows-based computer system |
US5742767A (en) * | 1995-02-23 | 1998-04-21 | Sony Corporation | Program function extending method and apparatus and data processing method |
US5946075A (en) * | 1996-05-21 | 1999-08-31 | Horn; Gerald | Vision screening system |
US5950172A (en) * | 1996-06-07 | 1999-09-07 | Klingman; Edwin E. | Secured electronic rating system |
US5668788A (en) * | 1996-06-10 | 1997-09-16 | Allison; Avery Vince | Programmed juke box capable of calculating a continuous updated playlist |
US6078313A (en) * | 1996-07-30 | 2000-06-20 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Input control apparatus, display control apparatus and display apparatus |
US6628996B1 (en) * | 1996-07-30 | 2003-09-30 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Input control apparatus, display control apparatus and display apparatus |
US5878399A (en) * | 1996-08-12 | 1999-03-02 | Peralto; Ryan G. | Computerized voting system |
US6247009B1 (en) * | 1997-03-10 | 2001-06-12 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image processing with searching of image data |
US5999925A (en) * | 1997-07-25 | 1999-12-07 | Claritech Corporation | Information retrieval based on use of sub-documents |
US6151584A (en) * | 1997-11-20 | 2000-11-21 | Ncr Corporation | Computer architecture and method for validating and collecting and metadata and data about the internet and electronic commerce environments (data discoverer) |
US6175833B1 (en) * | 1998-04-22 | 2001-01-16 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for interactive live online voting with tallies for updating voting results |
US6311190B1 (en) * | 1999-02-02 | 2001-10-30 | Harris Interactive Inc. | System for conducting surveys in different languages over a network with survey voter registration |
US6980962B1 (en) * | 1999-03-02 | 2005-12-27 | Quixtar Investments, Inc. | Electronic commerce transactions within a marketing system that may contain a membership buying opportunity |
US6404441B1 (en) * | 1999-07-16 | 2002-06-11 | Jet Software, Inc. | System for creating media presentations of computer software application programs |
US6421724B1 (en) * | 1999-08-30 | 2002-07-16 | Opinionlab, Inc. | Web site response measurement tool |
US6449598B1 (en) * | 1999-09-02 | 2002-09-10 | Xware Compliance, Inc. | Health care policy on-line maintenance dissemination and compliance testing system |
US7711838B1 (en) * | 1999-11-10 | 2010-05-04 | Yahoo! Inc. | Internet radio and broadcast method |
US6489968B1 (en) * | 1999-11-18 | 2002-12-03 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | System and method for exposing popular categories of browse tree |
US7664669B1 (en) * | 1999-11-19 | 2010-02-16 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Methods and systems for distributing information within a dynamically defined community |
US20020010757A1 (en) * | 1999-12-03 | 2002-01-24 | Joel Granik | Method and apparatus for replacement of on-line advertisements |
US6959281B1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2005-10-25 | Freeling Kenneth A | Digital computer system and methods for conducting a poll to produce a demographic profile corresponding to an accumulation of response data from encrypted identities |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
Bogart, nowthis.com, 24 Nov 1999, pgs. 1-5 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060277290A1 (en) * | 2005-06-02 | 2006-12-07 | Sam Shank | Compiling and filtering user ratings of products |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20020165905A1 (en) | 2002-11-07 |
US8321496B2 (en) | 2012-11-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20130080908A1 (en) | User evaluation of content on distributed communication network | |
US6839681B1 (en) | Performance measurement method for public relations, advertising and sales events | |
US7895127B2 (en) | Rating-based sorting and displaying of reviews | |
US7937391B2 (en) | Consumer product review system using a comparison chart | |
US9230239B2 (en) | Method and system for providing performance metrics | |
US7003503B2 (en) | Ranking items | |
US6928392B2 (en) | Collecting a user response to an explicit question specifically concerning a particular web page of a website | |
US20050108625A1 (en) | Method and system for selecting rules to validate information submitted on an electronic form | |
US10452778B2 (en) | System and method for managing news headlines | |
US20100153107A1 (en) | Trend evaluation device, its method, and program | |
US20040030525A1 (en) | Method and system for identifying high-quality items | |
JP2002041537A (en) | Advertisement presenting system | |
US20040019688A1 (en) | Providing substantially real-time access to collected information concerning user interaction with a web page of a website | |
US20070168256A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for marketing information to an individual using inquirey management | |
JP2008158823A (en) | Information providing system | |
US20090254421A1 (en) | Method of Matching Potential Clients to Legal Service Providers | |
US20120296780A1 (en) | Systems and methods for exchanging product information | |
US20060116901A1 (en) | Information providing method, recording medium, and server | |
JP2007286803A (en) | Device, method, and program for managing advertisement distribution | |
US20010020235A1 (en) | Indexation system for electronic addresses | |
JP2001282940A (en) | Product evaluation system | |
JP2009087106A (en) | Internet information providing service system | |
JP2003058672A (en) | Evaluation information providing system for store | |
US20040191745A1 (en) | Learning program and recording medium | |
JP2002304555A (en) | Method and system for suggesting product |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: EBAY INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HALF.COM, INC.;REEL/FRAME:032788/0140 Effective date: 20140428 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |