US20130056227A1 - Swell-based inflation packer - Google Patents
Swell-based inflation packer Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20130056227A1 US20130056227A1 US13/224,945 US201113224945A US2013056227A1 US 20130056227 A1 US20130056227 A1 US 20130056227A1 US 201113224945 A US201113224945 A US 201113224945A US 2013056227 A1 US2013056227 A1 US 2013056227A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- fluid
- swell
- packer
- inflation
- shell
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B33/00—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
- E21B33/10—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells in the borehole
- E21B33/12—Packers; Plugs
- E21B33/1208—Packers; Plugs characterised by the construction of the sealing or packing means
Definitions
- Embodiments described relate to inflation packers for use in downhole isolation.
- inflation packers are disclosed which are configured with a conventional or non-conventional shell equipped to accommodate novel media for inflation. More specifically, emerging downhole swell-based materials may be accommodated by the shell in a manner that provides synergistically improved seal capacity to the packer.
- Closing off well regions as noted above is generally achieved by way of setting one or more inflatable packers.
- packers may be set at downhole locations and serve to seal off certain downhole regions from other productive regions.
- Delivering, deploying and setting packers for isolation may be achieved by way of coiled tubing, or other conventional line delivery application.
- isolation may be pre-determined, for example, where packers are secured at set positions about a tubular in advance of its installation in the well.
- subsequent packer deployment or inflation may be fairly sophisticated, given the amount of precision involved. For example, proper packer inflation may be quite challenging, given the high and variable temperature and pressure extremes often present downhole which can affect fluid inflation.
- packer inflation is achieved in a single shot, one-way manner.
- a rupture disk and piston assembly may be utilized in conjunction with a one-way check valve for inflation of the packer to a predetermined pressure. That is, the packer assembly may be exposed to sufficient pressure for rupturing of the disk in a manner that triggers piston based fluid inflation of the packer to the predetermined amount. At such time the valve may be permanently turned off to hold the packer in a sealingly inflated state in the well.
- the inflated packer is unlikely to remain in sealing engagement with the well wall. That is, due to natural leakage, downhole pressure or temperature changes, or even dehydration at the packer well wall interface, a conventional inflation packer is unlikely to maintain a seal beyond about 5-7 years or so. This is problematic given that the intended life of the well is more likely in the range of more than twenty years.
- a variety of measures may be undertaken in order to address inflation packer failure during the life of the well. For example, direct intervention in the form of re-inflation may be attempted. However, given standard packer configurations follow-on placement and deployment of a new packer is generally a more viable alternative. Further, in some circumstances a cementing intervention may be attempted whereby cement is deposited at the location of the failing packer in hopes of reintroducing a seal at the location.
- swell packers may be utilized. So, for example, issues associated with packer deflation may be avoided. Unfortunately, however, such packers are nevertheless subject to degradation over time in the face of harsh downhole conditions. So, for example, it remains unlikely that such packers would remain effective for say, an intended twenty year well life. As a result, operators are likely left with the option of costly follow-on remedial interventions or ultimately foregoing reliable isolation whether inflation packer or swell packers are utilized.
- a downhole isolation packer is detailed.
- the packer includes a shell configured for placement about a tubular for downhole use.
- a swellable material is located within a cavity of the shell. Further, the packer is configured with an inner fluid void taking up space in the cavity between an inner surface of the shell and an outer surface of the swellable material.
- FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of an uninflated swell-based inflation packer taken from 1 - 1 of FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 1B is a cross-sectional view of a prior art embodiment of a conventional inflation packer.
- FIG. 1C is a cross-sectional view of a prior art embodiment of a conventional swell packer.
- FIG. 2 is a sectional side view of the swell-based inflation packer of FIG. 1A in an inflated state disposed in a well for isolation.
- FIG. 3 is an overview of an oilfield revealing the well of FIG. 2 with the deployed swell-based inflation packer disposed therein.
- FIG. 4A is a schematic side view of the swell-based inflation packer in an uninflated state.
- FIG. 4B is a schematic side view of the swell-based inflation packer with an inflated inner fluid void.
- FIG. 4C is a schematic side view of the swell-based inflation packer with swell material inflating into the void.
- FIG. 4D is a schematic side view of the swell-based inflation packer with swell material inflating to reach an outer shell of the packer and eliminate the void.
- FIG. 5 is a sectional side view of an alternate embodiment of an uninflated swell-based inflation packer disposed in a well and having a swell-based shell.
- FIG. 6 is a flow-chart summarizing an embodiment of deploying and utilizing a swell-based inflation packer downhole in a well.
- Embodiments herein are described with reference to certain types of downhole packers. For example, these embodiments focus on the use of packers for isolating certain downhole regions in conjunction with the use of production tubing. However, a variety of alternative applications may employ such swell-based packers, such as for well stimulation, completions, gravel packing, or isolation for water injection. Additionally, alternative packer-like devices, such as plugs, chokes, flow control valves and restrictors may take advantage of materials and techniques disclosed herein for use in a well or any other suitable conduit. Regardless, embodiments of packers disclosed herein are configured for inflation in a manner that incorporates an internal swell-based material.
- FIG. 1A a cross-sectional view of a swell-based inflation packer 100 is shown.
- the cross-sectional view is taken from 1 - 1 of FIG. 2 where the packer 100 is depicted within a well 380 in an inflated state.
- the packer 100 is shown in an uninflated state in FIG. 1A (and the noted inflated state in FIG. 2 ).
- the packer 100 includes an outer shell 110 serving as a bladder disposed about an inner fluid void 120 and swell material 130 .
- the packer 100 itself is disposed about a mandrel in the form of a tubular 160 . More specifically, production tubing defining an inner channel 115 for hydrocarbon recovery is depicted.
- tubulars and mandrels for different types of applications may make use of a packer 100 as detailed herein.
- the above noted swell material 130 may include any number of polymer particle types and configurations as are often employed in conventional swell packers and as detailed further below.
- the shell 110 may also be of a traditional non-swell polymeric material such as a conventional non-reactive rubber as is often employed in conventional inflation packers.
- the shell 510 may also be made up of swellable polymer (see FIG. 5 ).
- the fluid void 120 may be of negligible volume in advance of inflation as detailed below.
- the packer 100 upon inflation and swelling, the packer 100 is configured to achieve an enhanced fluid isolating seal at the inner wall 187 of the casing 185 . As depicted in FIG. 2 , this seal is achieved in a manner substantially eliminating the void 120 as well as deflation and/or degradation issues often found in conventional packers.
- FIGS. 1B and 1C cross-sectional views of more conventional prior art packers 101 , 102 are depicted in FIGS. 1B and 1C . More specifically, FIG. 1B reveals an embodiment of a prior art inflation packer 101 and FIG. 1C reveals a prior art swell packer 102 . In both cases, the packers are shown deployed for isolation after a significant period of use, perhaps more than about 5-7 years downhole.
- the exclusively bladder-type inflation packer 101 is subject to natural deflation over a period of use. That is, a single shot, one way nature of rupture disk/check valve inflation is generally employed for an inflation packer 101 . Thus, it is left susceptible to deflation over a period, whether naturally through its polymeric bladder material, valve leakage, or as well pressures change. Whatever the case, unsealed openings 150 , 155 are prone to develop adjacent the casing 187 or tubular 161 walls. This differs from embodiments of the swell-based packer 100 of FIG. 1A which is not reliant on pressure based inflation in order to maintain the seal and avoid such openings.
- a swell packer 102 of swell material is depicted after a period of use, subject to natural degradation and cracking 157 . That is, the packer 102 achieves a seal with the casing 185 after an initial swell period in which it is exposed to the downhole environment. However, over time, long after an adequate seal is achieved, the packer 102 remains exposed to the downhole environment and its naturally harsh conditions. As a result, the depicted cracking 157 and degradation may ensue, leaving the packer 102 prone to failure. Again, this differs from embodiments of the swell-based packer 100 of FIG. 1A which substantially avoids exposure of its swell material 130 to the downhole environment due to the presence of its more durable outer shell 110 .
- FIG. 2 a sectional side view of the swell-based inflation packer 100 of FIG. 1A is depicted in an inflated state, following a significant period of use. Nevertheless, the swell of the swell material 130 has fully displaced the fluid of the void 120 depicted in FIG. 1A in such a manner that an isolated, near-solid polymeric mass remains isolated within the protection of the outer shell 110 . Thus, with the swell eliminating deflation concerns and the shell 110 protecting the swell material 130 , the integrity of the packer 100 and its seal remain intact.
- the swell-based inflation of the packer as depicted in FIG. 2 may be achieved in a conventional manner.
- an inflation tool 375 may be provided in conjunction with the packer 100 .
- the tool 375 may include a conventional rupture disk and valve mechanism such as a one-way check valve or a flapper valve. Regardless, rupture of the disk and inflation may proceed in a manner delivering a predetermined amount of fluid to the void 120 , as determined by pressure (see FIG. 1A ). Further, in one embodiment, control over such inflation may be regulated over a line 200 equipped to deliver data and/or hydraulics from oilfield surface equipment 360 (see FIG. 3 ). Such inflation is detailed further with reference to the schematics of FIGS. 4A-4D hereinbelow.
- the swell material 130 may take an initial form of bead, pellet, powder or other suitable form tailored for its degree of interaction with inflation fluid. Additionally, solid bands or rings of the material 130 may be disposed about the tubular 160 to provide a degree of structural rigidity. As for the inflation fluid itself, water, perhaps mixed with constituents tailored to enhance the inflation may be utilized.
- the swell material 130 such as polymers drawn from a betaine group prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization. Additional fillers, vulcanizing agents and other substances may be incorporated into the material 130 along with particular concentrations of cations and/or anions grafted thereto so as to tailor the sensitivity of the swell. From a structural standpoint, non-elastomeric polymers, fillers, plasticizers, and various fibers may also be incorporated into the swell material 130 .
- FIG. 3 an overview of an oilfield 300 is depicted with the well 380 of FIG. 2 accommodating the swell-based inflation packer 100 of FIG. 1A therein. More specifically, in the embodiment shown, the well 380 and casing 185 are shown traversing various formation layers 390 , 395 . Indeed, the lower formation layer 395 may accommodate a production region 385 with a variety of perforations 387 to enhance hydrocarbon recovery therefrom. Alternatively, the upper formation layer 390 may be unproductive, water producing or otherwise sought to be isolated from recovery. Thus, the swell-based inflation packer 100 may be utilized as a measure of providing added isolation of the intake for the production tubing 160 from the upper formation layer 390 .
- recovery will be limited to fluids from below the packer 100 , preferably from the production region 385 in particular. Even more notably, such recovery may be enhanced over time due to the reliability of the isolation provided by the packer 100 which is less susceptible to deflation, cracking or other age-based failures.
- deployment of the packer 100 for such isolation may be initiated by the inflation tool 375 as described above. This may involve fluid inflation followed by a swell period for a length of time determined based on the particular swell material 130 selected (see FIG. 2 ). As also, noted above, this inflation may be initiated by surface equipment 360 disposed at the oilfield surface 300 . More specifically, a control unit 365 for directing packer deployment and other downhole applications may be disposed adjacent the well head 350 (along with a line 355 for transporting recovery fluids). Indeed, a rig 370 may be disposed over the well 380 for supporting a host of additional surface equipment for a variety of different downhole applications.
- FIGS. 4A-4D schematic representations of the swell-based inflation packer 100 over the course of an inflation application are depicted. More specifically, FIG. 4A is a schematic side view of the packer 100 in an uninflated state. FIG. 4B is a schematic side view of the packer 100 with an inflated inner fluid void 120 whereas FIG. 4C reveals the more internal swell material 130 inflating into the void 120 . Lastly, FIG. 4D is a view of the packer 100 with the internal swell material 130 reaching a full swell and contacting the outer shell 110 in a manner substantially eliminating the void 120 .
- the packer 100 goes from the uniflated profile of FIG. 4A to the inflated profile of FIG. 4B in relatively short order. That is, as alluded to above, the inner fluid void 120 may be rapidly inflated as directed by surface equipment 360 , perhaps through use of an inflation tool 375 (see FIG. 3 ).
- the particular fluid utilized for the inflation may be water-based as indicated above, oil-based, diesel-based, or a wellbore or other suitable inflation fluid.
- the inflated packer 100 may undergo the above-noted swell period as the swollen void 120 is overtaken by the swell material 130 . That is, for a period, the swell material 130 will absorb, adsorb or otherwise soak up the fluid volume of the void 120 until it makes substantially uniform contact with, and is restrained and protected by the inner surface of the outer shell 110 . All in all, this may take from many hours to perhaps days or even months depending on the particular swell material 130 selected.
- FIG. 5 a sectional side view of an alternate embodiment of an uninflated swell-based inflation packer 500 is shown disposed in the well 380 .
- the material of the outer shell 510 is now swell-based. That is, as opposed to, for example, a conventional non-reactive rubber, the shell 510 may be constructed of a swellable polymer.
- the swell period noted above may be substantially reduced. That is to say, the time it takes for substantial elimination of the fluid void 120 by fluid uptake may be reduced.
- the void 120 is now defined substantially entirely by swell-based material (i.e. that of both the inner swell material 130 and the shell 120 ).
- Such an embodiment may be of particular advantage where rapidly achieving a completed swell is of greater import than, for example, an extended downhole packer life.
- an added degree of rapidity may also be found in terms of the swell of the shell 510 in particular. This would be the case where the shell 510 is constructed of a material swellable upon exposure to fluids likely present downhole (ie. wellbore type fluids). That is, where the outer surface of the shell 510 would be exposed to such fluids already in the well 380 and the inner surface of the shell 510 is exposed to such fluids via inflation as noted above.
- FIG. 6 a flow-chart summarizing an embodiment of deploying and utilizing a swell-based inflation packer in a well is depicted.
- a swell-packer as detailed hereinabove may be delivered to a target location in a well by conventional means as indicated at 615 .
- the packer may then be inflated as noted at 635 by inflation with an inflation fluid that is reactive with a swell material within the packer.
- an interior swell material may be swollen by the fluid.
- Swelling of the swell material within the packer may take place until the material cohesively reaches an outer shell of the packer, thereby sealably isolating the target location with a structurally uniform inflated and swollen packer (see 695 ). Furthermore, achieving this type of isolation may be further aided by use of a shell which is also constructed of swell material as noted at 675 .
- Embodiments described hereinabove provide a manner by which packer reliability may be substantially enhanced, thereby extending useful packer life as well.
- the amount of time and expense dedicated to remedial interventions and/or packer replacements for conventional inflation or swell packers may be kept to a minimum.
- the combination of inflation and swell-based materials may also be utilized to speed up inflation.
Abstract
An isolation packer. The packer is both an inflation packer and swell-based. That is, an outer shell or bladder may be utilized in conjunction with internal swell material. In advance of inflation, a void or cavity may be disposed between the inner surface of the shell and an outer surface of the swell material. Thus, fluid inflation of this void may result in an inflation that becomes swell-material filled until the void is eliminated leaving behind a more unitary and swollen packer of enhanced reliability.
Description
- Embodiments described relate to inflation packers for use in downhole isolation. In particular, inflation packers are disclosed which are configured with a conventional or non-conventional shell equipped to accommodate novel media for inflation. More specifically, emerging downhole swell-based materials may be accommodated by the shell in a manner that provides synergistically improved seal capacity to the packer.
- Exploring, drilling and completing hydrocarbon and other wells are generally complicated, time consuming, and ultimately very expensive endeavors. As a result, over the years, a significant amount of added emphasis has been placed on well monitoring and maintenance. Once more, perhaps even more emphasis has been directed at initial well architecture and design. All in all, careful attention to design, monitoring and maintenance may help maximize production and extend well life. Thus, a substantial return on the investment in the completed well may be better ensured.
- In the case of well monitoring and logging, mostly minimally-invasive applications may be utilized which provide temperature, pressure and other production related information. By contrast, well design, completion and subsequent maintenance, may involve a host of more direct interventional applications. For example, perforations may be induced in the wall of the well, debris or tools and equipment removed, etc. In some cases, the well may even be designed or modified such that entire downhole regions are isolated or closed off from production. Such is often the case where an otherwise productive well region is prone to produce water or other undesirable fluid that tends to hamper hydrocarbon recovery.
- Closing off well regions as noted above is generally achieved by way of setting one or more inflatable packers. Such packers may be set at downhole locations and serve to seal off certain downhole regions from other productive regions. Delivering, deploying and setting packers for isolation may be achieved by way of coiled tubing, or other conventional line delivery application. Alternatively, isolation may be pre-determined, for example, where packers are secured at set positions about a tubular in advance of its installation in the well. Regardless, subsequent packer deployment or inflation may be fairly sophisticated, given the amount of precision involved. For example, proper packer inflation may be quite challenging, given the high and variable temperature and pressure extremes often present downhole which can affect fluid inflation.
- At present, packer inflation is achieved in a single shot, one-way manner. For example, a rupture disk and piston assembly may be utilized in conjunction with a one-way check valve for inflation of the packer to a predetermined pressure. That is, the packer assembly may be exposed to sufficient pressure for rupturing of the disk in a manner that triggers piston based fluid inflation of the packer to the predetermined amount. At such time the valve may be permanently turned off to hold the packer in a sealingly inflated state in the well.
- Unfortunately, over time, the inflated packer is unlikely to remain in sealing engagement with the well wall. That is, due to natural leakage, downhole pressure or temperature changes, or even dehydration at the packer well wall interface, a conventional inflation packer is unlikely to maintain a seal beyond about 5-7 years or so. This is problematic given that the intended life of the well is more likely in the range of more than twenty years.
- A variety of measures may be undertaken in order to address inflation packer failure during the life of the well. For example, direct intervention in the form of re-inflation may be attempted. However, given standard packer configurations follow-on placement and deployment of a new packer is generally a more viable alternative. Further, in some circumstances a cementing intervention may be attempted whereby cement is deposited at the location of the failing packer in hopes of reintroducing a seal at the location.
- Unfortunately, all of the above-noted measures come with considerable drawbacks. Namely, a significant amount of time and expense is required to shut down operations, rig and re-rig equipment at the oilfield surface, and run an intervention. Once more, regardless of the particular remedial intervention attempted, restoration of completely functional seal to its original form is unlikely.
- As an alternative to inflation packers, swell packers may be utilized. So, for example, issues associated with packer deflation may be avoided. Unfortunately, however, such packers are nevertheless subject to degradation over time in the face of harsh downhole conditions. So, for example, it remains unlikely that such packers would remain effective for say, an intended twenty year well life. As a result, operators are likely left with the option of costly follow-on remedial interventions or ultimately foregoing reliable isolation whether inflation packer or swell packers are utilized.
- A downhole isolation packer is detailed. The packer includes a shell configured for placement about a tubular for downhole use. A swellable material is located within a cavity of the shell. Further, the packer is configured with an inner fluid void taking up space in the cavity between an inner surface of the shell and an outer surface of the swellable material.
-
FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of an uninflated swell-based inflation packer taken from 1-1 ofFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 1B is a cross-sectional view of a prior art embodiment of a conventional inflation packer. -
FIG. 1C is a cross-sectional view of a prior art embodiment of a conventional swell packer. -
FIG. 2 is a sectional side view of the swell-based inflation packer ofFIG. 1A in an inflated state disposed in a well for isolation. -
FIG. 3 is an overview of an oilfield revealing the well ofFIG. 2 with the deployed swell-based inflation packer disposed therein. -
FIG. 4A is a schematic side view of the swell-based inflation packer in an uninflated state. -
FIG. 4B is a schematic side view of the swell-based inflation packer with an inflated inner fluid void. -
FIG. 4C is a schematic side view of the swell-based inflation packer with swell material inflating into the void. -
FIG. 4D is a schematic side view of the swell-based inflation packer with swell material inflating to reach an outer shell of the packer and eliminate the void. -
FIG. 5 is a sectional side view of an alternate embodiment of an uninflated swell-based inflation packer disposed in a well and having a swell-based shell. -
FIG. 6 is a flow-chart summarizing an embodiment of deploying and utilizing a swell-based inflation packer downhole in a well. - Embodiments herein are described with reference to certain types of downhole packers. For example, these embodiments focus on the use of packers for isolating certain downhole regions in conjunction with the use of production tubing. However, a variety of alternative applications may employ such swell-based packers, such as for well stimulation, completions, gravel packing, or isolation for water injection. Additionally, alternative packer-like devices, such as plugs, chokes, flow control valves and restrictors may take advantage of materials and techniques disclosed herein for use in a well or any other suitable conduit. Regardless, embodiments of packers disclosed herein are configured for inflation in a manner that incorporates an internal swell-based material.
- Referring now to
FIG. 1A , a cross-sectional view of a swell-basedinflation packer 100 is shown. The cross-sectional view is taken from 1-1 ofFIG. 2 where thepacker 100 is depicted within a well 380 in an inflated state. For sake of illustration, thepacker 100 is shown in an uninflated state inFIG. 1A (and the noted inflated state inFIG. 2 ). Regardless, thepacker 100 includes anouter shell 110 serving as a bladder disposed about aninner fluid void 120 and swellmaterial 130. In the embodiment shown, thepacker 100 itself is disposed about a mandrel in the form of a tubular 160. More specifically, production tubing defining aninner channel 115 for hydrocarbon recovery is depicted. Although other forms of tubulars and mandrels for different types of applications may make use of apacker 100 as detailed herein. - The above
noted swell material 130 may include any number of polymer particle types and configurations as are often employed in conventional swell packers and as detailed further below. Additionally, theshell 110 may also be of a traditional non-swell polymeric material such as a conventional non-reactive rubber as is often employed in conventional inflation packers. However, in one embodiment theshell 510 may also be made up of swellable polymer (seeFIG. 5 ). Further, thefluid void 120 may be of negligible volume in advance of inflation as detailed below. Regardless, upon inflation and swelling, thepacker 100 is configured to achieve an enhanced fluid isolating seal at theinner wall 187 of thecasing 185. As depicted inFIG. 2 , this seal is achieved in a manner substantially eliminating the void 120 as well as deflation and/or degradation issues often found in conventional packers. - By way of comparison to the swell-based
inflation packer 100 ofFIG. 1A , cross-sectional views of more conventionalprior art packers FIGS. 1B and 1C . More specifically,FIG. 1B reveals an embodiment of a priorart inflation packer 101 andFIG. 1C reveals a priorart swell packer 102. In both cases, the packers are shown deployed for isolation after a significant period of use, perhaps more than about 5-7 years downhole. - With specific reference to
FIG. 1B , the exclusively bladder-type inflation packer 101 is subject to natural deflation over a period of use. That is, a single shot, one way nature of rupture disk/check valve inflation is generally employed for aninflation packer 101. Thus, it is left susceptible to deflation over a period, whether naturally through its polymeric bladder material, valve leakage, or as well pressures change. Whatever the case, unsealedopenings casing 187 or tubular 161 walls. This differs from embodiments of the swell-basedpacker 100 ofFIG. 1A which is not reliant on pressure based inflation in order to maintain the seal and avoid such openings. - With specific reference to
FIG. 1C , aswell packer 102 of swell material is depicted after a period of use, subject to natural degradation and cracking 157. That is, thepacker 102 achieves a seal with thecasing 185 after an initial swell period in which it is exposed to the downhole environment. However, over time, long after an adequate seal is achieved, thepacker 102 remains exposed to the downhole environment and its naturally harsh conditions. As a result, the depicted cracking 157 and degradation may ensue, leaving thepacker 102 prone to failure. Again, this differs from embodiments of the swell-basedpacker 100 ofFIG. 1A which substantially avoids exposure of itsswell material 130 to the downhole environment due to the presence of its more durableouter shell 110. - Continuing now with reference to
FIG. 2 , a sectional side view of the swell-basedinflation packer 100 ofFIG. 1A is depicted in an inflated state, following a significant period of use. Nevertheless, the swell of theswell material 130 has fully displaced the fluid of the void 120 depicted inFIG. 1A in such a manner that an isolated, near-solid polymeric mass remains isolated within the protection of theouter shell 110. Thus, with the swell eliminating deflation concerns and theshell 110 protecting theswell material 130, the integrity of thepacker 100 and its seal remain intact. - The swell-based inflation of the packer as depicted in
FIG. 2 may be achieved in a conventional manner. For example, aninflation tool 375 may be provided in conjunction with thepacker 100. Thetool 375 may include a conventional rupture disk and valve mechanism such as a one-way check valve or a flapper valve. Regardless, rupture of the disk and inflation may proceed in a manner delivering a predetermined amount of fluid to thevoid 120, as determined by pressure (seeFIG. 1A ). Further, in one embodiment, control over such inflation may be regulated over aline 200 equipped to deliver data and/or hydraulics from oilfield surface equipment 360 (seeFIG. 3 ). Such inflation is detailed further with reference to the schematics ofFIGS. 4A-4D hereinbelow. - Continuing with reference to
FIG. 2 , theswell material 130 may take an initial form of bead, pellet, powder or other suitable form tailored for its degree of interaction with inflation fluid. Additionally, solid bands or rings of thematerial 130 may be disposed about the tubular 160 to provide a degree of structural rigidity. As for the inflation fluid itself, water, perhaps mixed with constituents tailored to enhance the inflation may be utilized. - A variety of options are available for the
swell material 130 such as polymers drawn from a betaine group prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization. Additional fillers, vulcanizing agents and other substances may be incorporated into thematerial 130 along with particular concentrations of cations and/or anions grafted thereto so as to tailor the sensitivity of the swell. From a structural standpoint, non-elastomeric polymers, fillers, plasticizers, and various fibers may also be incorporated into theswell material 130. - Referring now to
FIG. 3 , an overview of anoilfield 300 is depicted with the well 380 ofFIG. 2 accommodating the swell-basedinflation packer 100 ofFIG. 1A therein. More specifically, in the embodiment shown, the well 380 andcasing 185 are shown traversing various formation layers 390, 395. Indeed, thelower formation layer 395 may accommodate aproduction region 385 with a variety ofperforations 387 to enhance hydrocarbon recovery therefrom. Alternatively, theupper formation layer 390 may be unproductive, water producing or otherwise sought to be isolated from recovery. Thus, the swell-basedinflation packer 100 may be utilized as a measure of providing added isolation of the intake for theproduction tubing 160 from theupper formation layer 390. As such, recovery will be limited to fluids from below thepacker 100, preferably from theproduction region 385 in particular. Even more notably, such recovery may be enhanced over time due to the reliability of the isolation provided by thepacker 100 which is less susceptible to deflation, cracking or other age-based failures. - Continuing with reference to
FIG. 3 , deployment of thepacker 100 for such isolation may be initiated by theinflation tool 375 as described above. This may involve fluid inflation followed by a swell period for a length of time determined based on theparticular swell material 130 selected (seeFIG. 2 ). As also, noted above, this inflation may be initiated bysurface equipment 360 disposed at theoilfield surface 300. More specifically, acontrol unit 365 for directing packer deployment and other downhole applications may be disposed adjacent the well head 350 (along with aline 355 for transporting recovery fluids). Indeed, arig 370 may be disposed over the well 380 for supporting a host of additional surface equipment for a variety of different downhole applications. - Referring now to
FIGS. 4A-4D , schematic representations of the swell-basedinflation packer 100 over the course of an inflation application are depicted. More specifically,FIG. 4A is a schematic side view of thepacker 100 in an uninflated state.FIG. 4B is a schematic side view of thepacker 100 with an inflatedinner fluid void 120 whereasFIG. 4C reveals the moreinternal swell material 130 inflating into thevoid 120. Lastly,FIG. 4D is a view of thepacker 100 with theinternal swell material 130 reaching a full swell and contacting theouter shell 110 in a manner substantially eliminating thevoid 120. - With specific reference to
FIGS. 4A and 4B , thepacker 100 goes from the uniflated profile ofFIG. 4A to the inflated profile ofFIG. 4B in relatively short order. That is, as alluded to above, theinner fluid void 120 may be rapidly inflated as directed bysurface equipment 360, perhaps through use of an inflation tool 375 (seeFIG. 3 ). The particular fluid utilized for the inflation may be water-based as indicated above, oil-based, diesel-based, or a wellbore or other suitable inflation fluid. - With specific reference to
FIGS. 4C and 4D , theinflated packer 100 may undergo the above-noted swell period as theswollen void 120 is overtaken by theswell material 130. That is, for a period, theswell material 130 will absorb, adsorb or otherwise soak up the fluid volume of the void 120 until it makes substantially uniform contact with, and is restrained and protected by the inner surface of theouter shell 110. All in all, this may take from many hours to perhaps days or even months depending on theparticular swell material 130 selected. - Referring now to
FIG. 5 , a sectional side view of an alternate embodiment of an uninflated swell-basedinflation packer 500 is shown disposed in thewell 380. In this embodiment, the material of theouter shell 510 is now swell-based. That is, as opposed to, for example, a conventional non-reactive rubber, theshell 510 may be constructed of a swellable polymer. Thus, the swell period noted above may be substantially reduced. That is to say, the time it takes for substantial elimination of thefluid void 120 by fluid uptake may be reduced. This is because, thevoid 120 is now defined substantially entirely by swell-based material (i.e. that of both theinner swell material 130 and the shell 120). Such an embodiment may be of particular advantage where rapidly achieving a completed swell is of greater import than, for example, an extended downhole packer life. - In the embodiment of
FIG. 5 , an added degree of rapidity may also be found in terms of the swell of theshell 510 in particular. This would be the case where theshell 510 is constructed of a material swellable upon exposure to fluids likely present downhole (ie. wellbore type fluids). That is, where the outer surface of theshell 510 would be exposed to such fluids already in the well 380 and the inner surface of theshell 510 is exposed to such fluids via inflation as noted above. - Referring now to
FIG. 6 , a flow-chart summarizing an embodiment of deploying and utilizing a swell-based inflation packer in a well is depicted. Indeed an embodiment of a swell-packer as detailed hereinabove may be delivered to a target location in a well by conventional means as indicated at 615. The packer may then be inflated as noted at 635 by inflation with an inflation fluid that is reactive with a swell material within the packer. Indeed, as indicated at 655, an interior swell material may be swollen by the fluid. - Swelling of the swell material within the packer may take place until the material cohesively reaches an outer shell of the packer, thereby sealably isolating the target location with a structurally uniform inflated and swollen packer (see 695). Furthermore, achieving this type of isolation may be further aided by use of a shell which is also constructed of swell material as noted at 675.
- Embodiments described hereinabove provide a manner by which packer reliability may be substantially enhanced, thereby extending useful packer life as well. Thus, the amount of time and expense dedicated to remedial interventions and/or packer replacements for conventional inflation or swell packers may be kept to a minimum. Further, in some cases, the combination of inflation and swell-based materials may also be utilized to speed up inflation.
- The preceding description has been presented with reference to presently preferred embodiments. Persons skilled in the art and technology to which these embodiments pertain will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structures and methods of operation may be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principle, and scope of these embodiments. For example, whereas the inflated and swollen device detailed herein is provided in the form of a packer for downhole isolation, other types of devices for alternative applications may be involved. Along these lines, such devices may be directed at marine applications, or water and sewage line repairs. Furthermore, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining only to the precise structures described and shown in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read as consistent with and as support for the following claims, which are to have their fullest and fairest scope.
Claims (20)
1. A downhole isolation device for placement in a well, the device comprising:
a shell for disposing about a downhole mandrel; and
a swellable material disposed within a cavity of said shell, the device having an inner fluid void between an inner surface of said shell and an outer surface of said material.
2. The device of claim 1 wherein said shell is of a non-swell polymeric material.
3. The device of claim 2 wherein said shell material is a non-reactive rubber.
4. The device of claim 1 wherein said shell is configured to protect said swellable material from exposure to downhole exposure.
5. The device of claim 1 wherein said swellable material is of one of bead, pellet and powder form.
6. The device of claim 1 wherein said swellable material includes at least one solid band thereof about the mandrel.
7. The device of claim 1 wherein said shell is of a swellable polymer to reduce a swell period of the device.
8. The device of claim 7 wherein the swellable polymer is swellable upon exposure to a wellbore type fluid.
9. A downhole isolation packer comprising:
a shell for disposing about a downhole tubular; and
a swellable material disposed within a cavity of said shell, the packer having an inner fluid void between an inner surface of said shell and an outer surface of said material.
10. The packer of claim 9 wherein said tubular is production tubing.
11. A method of providing fluid isolation at a target location of a conduit, the method comprising:
delivering a swell-based inflation device to the target location;
inflating a fluid void of the device with an inflation fluid;
swelling an interior swell material of the device with the fluid to achieve the isolation.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the fluid isolation is employed in one of a downhole wellbore application, a marine application, water line repair and sewage line repair.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein the downhole wellbore application comprises utilizing one of a water-based fluid, an oil-based fluid, a diesel fluid, and a wellbore type fluid as the inflation fluid for said inflating.
14. The method of claim 12 wherein the downhole wellbore application is configured to provide a substantially effective seal in a wellbore for a period exceeding about 7 years.
15. The method of claim 11 wherein said inflating comprises supplying a predetermined amount of the inflation fluid to the void in a one-way manner.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein the predetermined amount of the inflation fluid is pressure determined.
17. The method of claim 11 wherein said swelling takes place over the course of a swell period as the swell material takes up the inflation fluid.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein a duration of the swell period is tailored based on the types of swell material and inflation fluid employed.
19. A method of providing fluid isolation at a target location in a wellbore of a well, the method comprising:
delivering a swell-based inflation packer to the target location;
inflating a fluid void of the packer with an inflation fluid;
swelling an interior swell material of the device with the fluid; and
swelling a shell of the packer exterior the swell material with the fluid to reduce a swell period of the packer.
20. The method of claim 19 wherein the fluid is a wellbore type fluid and the shell is swellable upon exposure thereto at a surface within the packer and at an opposite surface exposed to the wellbore.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/224,945 US20130056227A1 (en) | 2011-09-02 | 2011-09-02 | Swell-based inflation packer |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/224,945 US20130056227A1 (en) | 2011-09-02 | 2011-09-02 | Swell-based inflation packer |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20130056227A1 true US20130056227A1 (en) | 2013-03-07 |
Family
ID=47752248
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/224,945 Abandoned US20130056227A1 (en) | 2011-09-02 | 2011-09-02 | Swell-based inflation packer |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20130056227A1 (en) |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2517207A (en) * | 2013-08-16 | 2015-02-18 | Meta Downhole Ltd | Improved isolation barrier |
GB2498097B (en) * | 2011-12-23 | 2015-06-17 | Swelltec Ltd | Downhole isolation methods and apparatus therefor |
US11299955B2 (en) | 2018-02-23 | 2022-04-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Swellable metal for swell packer |
US11365599B2 (en) * | 2019-02-11 | 2022-06-21 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Energizing seals with swellable materials |
US11499399B2 (en) | 2019-12-18 | 2022-11-15 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Pressure reducing metal elements for liner hangers |
US11512561B2 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2022-11-29 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Expanding metal sealant for use with multilateral completion systems |
US11519239B2 (en) | 2019-10-29 | 2022-12-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Running lines through expandable metal sealing elements |
US11560768B2 (en) | 2019-10-16 | 2023-01-24 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Washout prevention element for expandable metal sealing elements |
US11572749B2 (en) | 2020-12-16 | 2023-02-07 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Non-expanding liner hanger |
US11578498B2 (en) | 2021-04-12 | 2023-02-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Expandable metal for anchoring posts |
US11761293B2 (en) | 2020-12-14 | 2023-09-19 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Swellable packer assemblies, downhole packer systems, and methods to seal a wellbore |
US11761290B2 (en) | 2019-12-18 | 2023-09-19 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Reactive metal sealing elements for a liner hanger |
US11879304B2 (en) | 2021-05-17 | 2024-01-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Reactive metal for cement assurance |
US11898438B2 (en) | 2019-07-31 | 2024-02-13 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods to monitor a metallic sealant deployed in a wellbore, methods to monitor fluid displacement, and downhole metallic sealant measurement systems |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030196795A1 (en) * | 2002-04-17 | 2003-10-23 | Andrew Kutac | Inflatable packer with prestressed bladder |
US20040020662A1 (en) * | 2000-09-08 | 2004-02-05 | Jan Freyer | Well packing |
US20040194971A1 (en) * | 2001-01-26 | 2004-10-07 | Neil Thomson | Device and method to seal boreholes |
US20050110217A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2005-05-26 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Swelling layer inflatable |
US20080142222A1 (en) * | 2006-12-18 | 2008-06-19 | Paul Howard | Differential Filters for Stopping Water during Oil Production |
US20100051294A1 (en) * | 2007-02-07 | 2010-03-04 | Swelltec Limited | Swellable packer with fluid supply |
US20100163252A1 (en) * | 2007-04-06 | 2010-07-01 | Loic Regnault De La Mothe | Method and composition for zonal isolation of a well |
US20120090857A1 (en) * | 2010-10-15 | 2012-04-19 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Swellable Member, Swell Controlling Arrangement and Method of Controlling Swelling of a Swellable Member |
US20120292013A1 (en) * | 2011-05-18 | 2012-11-22 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Inflatable Tool Set with Internally Generated Gas |
-
2011
- 2011-09-02 US US13/224,945 patent/US20130056227A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040020662A1 (en) * | 2000-09-08 | 2004-02-05 | Jan Freyer | Well packing |
US20040194971A1 (en) * | 2001-01-26 | 2004-10-07 | Neil Thomson | Device and method to seal boreholes |
US20030196795A1 (en) * | 2002-04-17 | 2003-10-23 | Andrew Kutac | Inflatable packer with prestressed bladder |
US20050110217A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2005-05-26 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Swelling layer inflatable |
US20080142222A1 (en) * | 2006-12-18 | 2008-06-19 | Paul Howard | Differential Filters for Stopping Water during Oil Production |
US20100051294A1 (en) * | 2007-02-07 | 2010-03-04 | Swelltec Limited | Swellable packer with fluid supply |
US20100163252A1 (en) * | 2007-04-06 | 2010-07-01 | Loic Regnault De La Mothe | Method and composition for zonal isolation of a well |
US20120090857A1 (en) * | 2010-10-15 | 2012-04-19 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Swellable Member, Swell Controlling Arrangement and Method of Controlling Swelling of a Swellable Member |
US20120292013A1 (en) * | 2011-05-18 | 2012-11-22 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Inflatable Tool Set with Internally Generated Gas |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
Shin-Etsu Silicone, Characteristic properties of Silicon Rubber Compound, 19 April 2009 * |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2498097B (en) * | 2011-12-23 | 2015-06-17 | Swelltec Ltd | Downhole isolation methods and apparatus therefor |
GB2517207A (en) * | 2013-08-16 | 2015-02-18 | Meta Downhole Ltd | Improved isolation barrier |
US11299955B2 (en) | 2018-02-23 | 2022-04-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Swellable metal for swell packer |
US11365599B2 (en) * | 2019-02-11 | 2022-06-21 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Energizing seals with swellable materials |
US11512561B2 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2022-11-29 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Expanding metal sealant for use with multilateral completion systems |
US11898438B2 (en) | 2019-07-31 | 2024-02-13 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods to monitor a metallic sealant deployed in a wellbore, methods to monitor fluid displacement, and downhole metallic sealant measurement systems |
US11560768B2 (en) | 2019-10-16 | 2023-01-24 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Washout prevention element for expandable metal sealing elements |
US11519239B2 (en) | 2019-10-29 | 2022-12-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Running lines through expandable metal sealing elements |
US11761290B2 (en) | 2019-12-18 | 2023-09-19 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Reactive metal sealing elements for a liner hanger |
US11499399B2 (en) | 2019-12-18 | 2022-11-15 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Pressure reducing metal elements for liner hangers |
US11761293B2 (en) | 2020-12-14 | 2023-09-19 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Swellable packer assemblies, downhole packer systems, and methods to seal a wellbore |
US11572749B2 (en) | 2020-12-16 | 2023-02-07 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Non-expanding liner hanger |
US11578498B2 (en) | 2021-04-12 | 2023-02-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Expandable metal for anchoring posts |
US11879304B2 (en) | 2021-05-17 | 2024-01-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Reactive metal for cement assurance |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20130056227A1 (en) | Swell-based inflation packer | |
US8651179B2 (en) | Swellable downhole device of substantially constant profile | |
AU2009316835B2 (en) | Use of swellable material in an annular seal element to prevent leakage in subterranean well | |
US10184321B2 (en) | Mitigating leaks in production tubulars | |
US20110067889A1 (en) | Expandable and degradable downhole hydraulic regulating assembly | |
AU2011293743B2 (en) | Rapid swelling and un-swelling materials in well tools | |
US11136856B2 (en) | Well apparatus and associated methods | |
US20090218107A1 (en) | Reservoir Tool for Packer Setting | |
WO2016171666A1 (en) | Swellable component for a downhole tool | |
GB2428263A (en) | Wellbore sealing system | |
US20130284436A1 (en) | Method of providing an annular seal, and wellbore system | |
WO2016171665A1 (en) | Modular swell packer element | |
EP2271819B1 (en) | A tool for shutting off openings or leaks in a well bore | |
US8353355B2 (en) | Drill string/annulus sealing with swellable materials | |
JPT staff | Versatile Swellable Packer Tool Provides Reliable and Economical Zonal Isolation | |
Ueta et al. | First use of Swell Technology in Campos Basin Proves Water Conformance Solution-Case History in Campos Basin-Brazil | |
WO2011151650A2 (en) | Well intervention and control method and apparatus |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SPONCHIA, BARTON;REEL/FRAME:027501/0679 Effective date: 20111212 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |