US20110185597A1 - Golf shoe with a stabilizing system - Google Patents
Golf shoe with a stabilizing system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110185597A1 US20110185597A1 US13/002,135 US200913002135A US2011185597A1 US 20110185597 A1 US20110185597 A1 US 20110185597A1 US 200913002135 A US200913002135 A US 200913002135A US 2011185597 A1 US2011185597 A1 US 2011185597A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- midsole
- support structure
- golf shoe
- medial
- extending
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A43—FOOTWEAR
- A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
- A43B5/00—Footwear for sporting purposes
- A43B5/001—Golf shoes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A43—FOOTWEAR
- A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
- A43B13/00—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
- A43B13/14—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A43—FOOTWEAR
- A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
- A43B7/00—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements
- A43B7/14—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements with foot-supporting parts
- A43B7/1495—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements with foot-supporting parts with arch-supports of the bracelet type
Definitions
- the invention concerns a golf shoe with a stabilizing system.
- Stabilization of the golf shoe is needed during the swing phase for mainly two reasons. First, if the shoe is unstable due to a sole with a poor grip or a weak upper, injuries to the ankle in the form of sprain may occur in the follow-through phase, i.e. the part of the swing phase where the right handed golfer has hit the ball and is rotating his body and right leg and foot. Second, with a sufficiently stabilized footing, the golfer can concentrate on other parameters than footing to improve his golfing performance. The need for stabilization of golf shoes has been recognized in the golf world for a long time. A typical way of stabilizing such shoe is to reinforce the upper with an additional material, typically a piece of textile sewn onto the upper on the medial and lateral side in the area of the midfoot.
- JP 2005021384A2 Another known solution is described in JP 2005021384A2, where the sole of a golf shoe is extended vertically on the inner side of the shoe along the full longitudinal length of the sole. While both solutions contribute to improving stabilization, they suffer from drawbacks. Sewing additional textiles to the upper is, although giving an opportunity for aesthetic creations, an additional manufacturing step which adds cost to the manufacturing process. Further, the solution described in JP 2005021384A2 only provides partly stabilisation during the swing. In a known manner, the swing phase can be divided into five phases, namely addressing, backswing, downswing, impact and follow-through.
- JP 2005021384A2 will increase stabilisation in the downswing and impact phases, but not in the backswing phase, where the golfer after addressing the ball is raising the club to its highest point and preparing for the downswing.
- Another stabilizing solution is known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,678,329, and concerns an athletic shoe, which has a polyurethane midsole with left and right side upwardly extending portions. The portions are encircling eyelets of the shoe, and the shoe lace is guided through the eyelets.
- the current invention solves the problem of providing a stabilization system for a golf shoe, which system provides improved stabilisation in all phases of the swing.
- a stabilization system according to the characterising part of claim 1 .
- This system stabilises and supports the midfoot during the golfswing, hereby increasing the swing power of the golfer.
- the polyurethane (PU) midsole is extended vertically on the upper in three selected positions, namely on the outside of the upper on the medial arch, on the lateral side of the foot and in the heel area.
- these three vertical support structures which are integrally moulded with the rest of the PU midsole, provide encapsulation of the foot and increased stability, because they are tightly bonded to the upper of the shoe. Bonding takes place during the PU injection process.
- a further inventive stabilizing measure is to connect the medial and lateral support structures through respective lateral and medial beams to the vertically extending heel support. This provides additional support and stabilization especially during the backswing, impact and follow-through phases of the swing.
- the three support structures are extended vertically to a height corresponding to the position of the eyelets on the upper, preferably to the eyelets placed closest to the ankle. In this way the midsole embraces and supports more of the foot than the design of U.S. Pat. No.
- the heel support structure extends vertically to a point above the calcaneus of a wearer, and the PU of the arch support structure and the lateral side support structure encircles one or more eyelets.
- the support structures follow the shape of the upper, they are inclined towards the lacing area, and exert bending force already from manufacturing. This bending force gives an improved grip between shoe and foot, and contributes to keeping the shape of the shoe over time.
- the medial and lateral support structures are moved towards each other, and this has the effect that an even better grip around the foot is achieved once the golfer has laced his shoe.
- the medial arch support structure and the lateral side support structure are formed by beams.
- the beams delimit one or more windows which are devoid of midsole material.
- the free space between the beams can be filled with midsole PU, but this adds to the weight of the shoe. It has been found sufficient for stabilization purposes to have single beams of PU being bonded to the upper. This has the advantage, that the midsole can be kept lightweight.
- each structure is formed by beams defining an essentially triangular shape of the structure which has a window devoid of midsole material.
- triangles add structural strength to a construction.
- a shank is placed in the midsole or between midsole and outsole. It has been found, that increased stability is achieved by using a double shank system, i.e. a first shank fully or partly integrated in the midsole, and a second shank placed between the midsole and the outsole. The second shank is close to the green during addressing, backswing and downswing, while the first shank in the midsole provides stability during impact and follow-through.
- a double shank system i.e. a first shank fully or partly integrated in the midsole, and a second shank placed between the midsole and the outsole.
- the second shank is close to the green during addressing, backswing and downswing, while the first shank in the midsole provides stability during impact and follow-through.
- a particularly good stabilization is achieved, where the two shanks overlap each other in an area of the midsole, which area corresponds to the longitudinal position of the encircled eyelets.
- the toe ends of the shanks are sandwiching the midsole in a place corresponding essentially to the position where the vertically extending beams of the medial and lateral support structures are placed.
- the first shank in the midsole is surrounded by the three vertically extending support structures.
- FIG. 1 is a side view of the inventive golf shoe
- FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the midsole and outsole used in the inventive shoe.
- FIG. 3 is a rear view of the midsole and outsole used in the inventive shoe.
- FIG. 1 is a lateral view of a golf shoe 1 according to the invention.
- a polyurethane (PU) midsole 2 is bonded to a shoe upper 3 .
- Such upper can be made of textile or leather.
- spikes 4 screwed into the outsole 5 provide good grip to the green.
- the outsole 5 and 6 is made of hard density thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), which is bonded to the midsole 2 .
- a shank 20 is placed between the midsole and the TPU outsole, which outsole is thin in the midfoot area. This shank is made of carbon fibres and has a good torsional stiffness.
- the lateral side support structure 7 extends vertically and follows the shape of the upper.
- Beam 10 originates in the longitudinally extending portion of the midsole, and is connected to beam 12 via cross beam 11 .
- the beams are essentially rectangular, thus having rectilinear sections between the structures or portions they connect.
- the beams are tapered in a direction towards the top of the beam, which top therefore has a smaller surface than the base portion of a beam, which is the portion bonded to the upper.
- Beams 10 , 11 and 12 are cast in one piece, integrally injection moulded with the longitudinally extending midsole. More specifically, manufacturing is made by first roughening the upper 3 before PU injection on the places, where beams 10 , 11 , 12 and 14 as well as vertical heel support structure 9 are to be bonded.
- Midsole 2 is in the preferred embodiment made of light polyurethane (PU) material, also called PU light, based on polyester.
- PU light is a known variant of PU, and has a low density (0.35 g/cm 3 ), i.e. is a lightweight material.
- a further characteristic is good shock absorbing properties.
- Shore A hardness is between 38 and 40.
- the lateral side support structure 7 is extended vertically to the area, where laces 17 are placed.
- the support structure encircles two eyelets 18 and 19 with PU cross beam 11 .
- eyelet 21 could be encircled.
- More beams can be added to provide further stability and stiffness of the shoe.
- window 15 delimited by midsole portion 13 , can be filled with PU, but preferably having a lower thickness than the beams 10 , 11 and 12 .
- an additional beam 14 connects the lateral side support structure 7 with the vertical heel support structure 9 , hereby creating a further window 16
- a medial beam 23 connects materially the medial support structure 8 with the heel support structure.
- heel support structure 9 gives a view of the heel support structure 9 from the rear.
- the vertically extending heel support structure extends to a point above the human calcaneus, approximately to the point where the Achilles' tendon is fixated. This results in a firm heel grip. It will be seen from FIG. 3 that support structures 7 and 8 extend slightly above heel 9 .
- FIG. 2 shows in perspective the midsole 2 used in the inventive shoe.
- Shank 22 consists of a mixture of thermoplastic polyethylene (TPE) and nylon and is preferably placed in the top of midsole 2 , recessed into the surface. It extends in longitudinal direction from the heel area to the position, which corresponds to placement of eyelets 18 and 19 . Further stabilization is provided by shank 20 placed underneath the midsole. Shank 20 is made of carbon fibre and reinforced with nylon.
- TPE thermoplastic polyethylene
- the scales of the inventive shoe can be varied.
- the beams 12 and 10 measure 75 millimetres (mm) and 65 mm in length respectively, and have a thickness of 3 mm.
- the full height A-A of heel 9 in FIG. 2 is 80 mm.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physical Education & Sports Medicine (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Footwear And Its Accessory, Manufacturing Method And Apparatuses (AREA)
Abstract
A golf shoe has a stabilizing system consisting of an upper, a longitudinally extending midsole consisting of polyurethane, and a shank, wherein the midsole additionally to its longitudinal extension is extended vertically with a medial arch support structure, a lateral side support structure and a heel support structure. The structures are bonded to the outside of the upper and the medial arch support structure and the lateral side support structure extends upwardly and encircles eyelets for lacing of said upper. In order to further stabilize the golf shoe through all the phases of the swing of a golfer, the heel support structure (9) of said midsole (2) extends vertically to a point above the human calcaneus of a wearer, approximately to the point where the Achilles tendon is fixated. Midsole beams (14,23) are extending from the vertically extending heel support structure towards the vertical medial (8) and lateral (7) support structures.
Description
- This application is entitled to the benefit of and incorporates by reference essential subject matter disclosed in International Patent Application No. PCT/DK2009/000154 filed on Jun. 24, 2009 and Danish Patent Application No. PA 2008 00961 filed on Jul. 8, 2008.
- The invention concerns a golf shoe with a stabilizing system.
- Stabilization of the golf shoe is needed during the swing phase for mainly two reasons. First, if the shoe is unstable due to a sole with a poor grip or a weak upper, injuries to the ankle in the form of sprain may occur in the follow-through phase, i.e. the part of the swing phase where the right handed golfer has hit the ball and is rotating his body and right leg and foot. Second, with a sufficiently stabilized footing, the golfer can concentrate on other parameters than footing to improve his golfing performance. The need for stabilization of golf shoes has been recognized in the golf world for a long time. A typical way of stabilizing such shoe is to reinforce the upper with an additional material, typically a piece of textile sewn onto the upper on the medial and lateral side in the area of the midfoot. In this way the extra piece of textile adds stiffness to the golf shoe. Another known solution is described in JP 2005021384A2, where the sole of a golf shoe is extended vertically on the inner side of the shoe along the full longitudinal length of the sole. While both solutions contribute to improving stabilization, they suffer from drawbacks. Sewing additional textiles to the upper is, although giving an opportunity for aesthetic creations, an additional manufacturing step which adds cost to the manufacturing process. Further, the solution described in JP 2005021384A2 only provides partly stabilisation during the swing. In a known manner, the swing phase can be divided into five phases, namely addressing, backswing, downswing, impact and follow-through. The solution in JP 2005021384A2 will increase stabilisation in the downswing and impact phases, but not in the backswing phase, where the golfer after addressing the ball is raising the club to its highest point and preparing for the downswing. Another stabilizing solution is known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,678,329, and concerns an athletic shoe, which has a polyurethane midsole with left and right side upwardly extending portions. The portions are encircling eyelets of the shoe, and the shoe lace is guided through the eyelets. During the rotational movement of the body through the swing phases, especially in the follow-through phase where the wrist of the foot rotates, there is exerted a rotational force on the shoe which force the concept taught in U.S. Pat. No. 5,678,329 cannot fully handle.
- The current invention solves the problem of providing a stabilization system for a golf shoe, which system provides improved stabilisation in all phases of the swing.
- The problem is solved with a stabilization system according to the characterising part of
claim 1. This system stabilises and supports the midfoot during the golfswing, hereby increasing the swing power of the golfer. In order to support the foot in all five phases of the golf swing, the polyurethane (PU) midsole is extended vertically on the upper in three selected positions, namely on the outside of the upper on the medial arch, on the lateral side of the foot and in the heel area. In combination, these three vertical support structures, which are integrally moulded with the rest of the PU midsole, provide encapsulation of the foot and increased stability, because they are tightly bonded to the upper of the shoe. Bonding takes place during the PU injection process. PU has a larger stiffness than textile, and the stiffness in the three support structures can be customized by varying the thickness of the PU. The thicker the PU, the more stiff the shoe. A further inventive stabilizing measure is to connect the medial and lateral support structures through respective lateral and medial beams to the vertically extending heel support. This provides additional support and stabilization especially during the backswing, impact and follow-through phases of the swing. The three support structures are extended vertically to a height corresponding to the position of the eyelets on the upper, preferably to the eyelets placed closest to the ankle. In this way the midsole embraces and supports more of the foot than the design of U.S. Pat. No. 5,678,329, where the upwardly extending portions only extend to ⅔ of the distance between the bottom surface of the outsole and the lace openings. The heel support structure according to the present invention extends vertically to a point above the calcaneus of a wearer, and the PU of the arch support structure and the lateral side support structure encircles one or more eyelets. As the support structures follow the shape of the upper, they are inclined towards the lacing area, and exert bending force already from manufacturing. This bending force gives an improved grip between shoe and foot, and contributes to keeping the shape of the shoe over time. When pulling the lace, the medial and lateral support structures are moved towards each other, and this has the effect that an even better grip around the foot is achieved once the golfer has laced his shoe. - Advantageously, also the medial arch support structure and the lateral side support structure are formed by beams.
- Preferredly, the beams delimit one or more windows which are devoid of midsole material. In order to increase stability, the free space between the beams can be filled with midsole PU, but this adds to the weight of the shoe. It has been found sufficient for stabilization purposes to have single beams of PU being bonded to the upper. This has the advantage, that the midsole can be kept lightweight.
- Further stabilization is achieved if each structure is formed by beams defining an essentially triangular shape of the structure which has a window devoid of midsole material. As is well known in mechanical and construction engineering, triangles add structural strength to a construction.
- Conventionally, a shank is placed in the midsole or between midsole and outsole. It has been found, that increased stability is achieved by using a double shank system, i.e. a first shank fully or partly integrated in the midsole, and a second shank placed between the midsole and the outsole. The second shank is close to the green during addressing, backswing and downswing, while the first shank in the midsole provides stability during impact and follow-through.
- A particularly good stabilization is achieved, where the two shanks overlap each other in an area of the midsole, which area corresponds to the longitudinal position of the encircled eyelets. The toe ends of the shanks are sandwiching the midsole in a place corresponding essentially to the position where the vertically extending beams of the medial and lateral support structures are placed. The first shank in the midsole is surrounded by the three vertically extending support structures.
- The invention is now described in detail by way of the drawings in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a side view of the inventive golf shoe; -
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the midsole and outsole used in the inventive shoe; and -
FIG. 3 is a rear view of the midsole and outsole used in the inventive shoe. -
FIG. 1 is a lateral view of agolf shoe 1 according to the invention. A polyurethane (PU)midsole 2 is bonded to a shoe upper 3. Such upper can be made of textile or leather. In a known manner,spikes 4 screwed into theoutsole 5 provide good grip to the green. Theoutsole midsole 2. Ashank 20 is placed between the midsole and the TPU outsole, which outsole is thin in the midfoot area. This shank is made of carbon fibres and has a good torsional stiffness. On the upper, the lateralside support structure 7 extends vertically and follows the shape of the upper.Beam 10 originates in the longitudinally extending portion of the midsole, and is connected tobeam 12 viacross beam 11. As seen inFIG. 1 , the beams are essentially rectangular, thus having rectilinear sections between the structures or portions they connect. The beams are tapered in a direction towards the top of the beam, which top therefore has a smaller surface than the base portion of a beam, which is the portion bonded to the upper.Beams TPU outsole -
Midsole 2 is in the preferred embodiment made of light polyurethane (PU) material, also called PU light, based on polyester. PU light is a known variant of PU, and has a low density (0.35 g/cm3), i.e. is a lightweight material. A further characteristic is good shock absorbing properties. Shore A hardness is between 38 and 40. - The lateral
side support structure 7 is extended vertically to the area, where laces 17 are placed. The support structure encircles twoeyelets PU cross beam 11. Alternatively, only or also eyelet 21 could be encircled. More beams can be added to provide further stability and stiffness of the shoe. Alternativelywindow 15, delimited bymidsole portion 13, can be filled with PU, but preferably having a lower thickness than thebeams additional beam 14 connects the lateralside support structure 7 with the vertical heel support structure 9, hereby creating afurther window 16, and amedial beam 23 connects materially themedial support structure 8 with the heel support structure.FIG. 3 gives a view of the heel support structure 9 from the rear. The vertically extending heel support structure extends to a point above the human calcaneus, approximately to the point where the Achilles' tendon is fixated. This results in a firm heel grip. It will be seen fromFIG. 3 thatsupport structures -
FIG. 2 shows in perspective themidsole 2 used in the inventive shoe. A dual shank system provides extra stability of the shoe.Shank 22 consists of a mixture of thermoplastic polyethylene (TPE) and nylon and is preferably placed in the top ofmidsole 2, recessed into the surface. It extends in longitudinal direction from the heel area to the position, which corresponds to placement ofeyelets shank 20 placed underneath the midsole.Shank 20 is made of carbon fibre and reinforced with nylon. - The scales of the inventive shoe can be varied. In a preferred embodiment, the
beams FIG. 2 is 80 mm. - The described embodiments can be combined in different ways.
Claims (6)
1. A golf shoe with a stabilizing system, the shoe having an upper, a longitudinally extending midsole consisting of polyurethane, and a shank, wherein the midsole additionally to its longitudinal extension is extended vertically with a medial arch support structure and a lateral side support structure, said structures being bonded to the outside of the upper and the medial arch support structure and the lateral side support structure extending upwardly to and encircling eyelets in the shaft wherein a heel support structure of said midsole extends vertically to a point above the calcaneus of a wearer and that, respectively, a lateral beam and a medial beam of the midsole is extending from the vertically extending heel support structure towards the vertical medial and lateral support structures.
2. The golf shoe according to claim 1 wherein said medial and lateral support structures are formed by beams extending from the longitudinally extending midsole and upwards.
3. The golf shoe according to claim 2 wherein the beams delimit one or more windows devoid of midsole material.
4. The golf shoe according to claim 3 , wherein said one or more windows have an essentially triangular shape.
5. The golf shoe according to 2, wherein the shank is fully or partly embedded in the midsole, and a second shank is placed between an outsole and the midsole.
6. The golf shoe according to claim 5 wherein said two shanks overlap each other in an area of the midsole corresponding to the longitudinal position of the encircled eyelets.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DKPA200800961 | 2008-07-08 | ||
DKPA200800961 | 2008-07-08 | ||
PCT/DK2009/000154 WO2010003415A1 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2009-06-24 | Golf shoe with a stabilizing system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110185597A1 true US20110185597A1 (en) | 2011-08-04 |
Family
ID=41506707
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/002,135 Abandoned US20110185597A1 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2009-06-24 | Golf shoe with a stabilizing system |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20110185597A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010003415A1 (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130125415A1 (en) * | 2011-10-10 | 2013-05-23 | Tbl Licensing Llc | Anti-fatigue ply rib construction |
KR101345151B1 (en) | 2012-07-26 | 2013-12-26 | (주)그린윙 | Golf shoes with support rubber for helping golf swing |
KR101445636B1 (en) | 2012-07-26 | 2014-10-06 | (주)그린윙 | Golf shoes support rubber manufacturing method |
US20160021977A1 (en) * | 2014-07-22 | 2016-01-28 | Nike, Inc. | Sole structure for an article of footwear including a shank |
US9750304B2 (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2017-09-05 | Nike, Inc. | Article of footwear having talonavicular support |
USD815403S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-04-17 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD838455S1 (en) | 2016-11-17 | 2019-01-22 | Tbl Licensing Llc | Shoe upper |
US10219582B2 (en) | 2011-10-10 | 2019-03-05 | Tbl Licensing Llc | Protection devices for use in shoes or other products |
US20210283875A1 (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2021-09-16 | Adidas Ag | Footwear with padding and midsole structures and the method of making the same |
US20220304420A1 (en) * | 2019-02-22 | 2022-09-29 | Nike, Inc. | Sole structure for article of footwear |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP4011234A1 (en) * | 2020-12-14 | 2022-06-15 | Ecco Sko A/S | An article of footwear |
DE102022201465A1 (en) * | 2022-02-11 | 2023-08-17 | Adidas Ag | Stabilizing element for a shoe upper |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4580359A (en) * | 1983-10-24 | 1986-04-08 | Pro-Shu Company | Golf shoes |
US20090090027A1 (en) * | 2007-10-09 | 2009-04-09 | Nike, Inc. | Footwear with a Foot Stabilizer |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5678329A (en) * | 1996-04-03 | 1997-10-21 | Wilson Sporting Goods Co. | Athletic shoe with midsole side support |
-
2009
- 2009-06-24 WO PCT/DK2009/000154 patent/WO2010003415A1/en active Application Filing
- 2009-06-24 US US13/002,135 patent/US20110185597A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4580359A (en) * | 1983-10-24 | 1986-04-08 | Pro-Shu Company | Golf shoes |
US20090090027A1 (en) * | 2007-10-09 | 2009-04-09 | Nike, Inc. | Footwear with a Foot Stabilizer |
Cited By (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130125415A1 (en) * | 2011-10-10 | 2013-05-23 | Tbl Licensing Llc | Anti-fatigue ply rib construction |
US8635789B2 (en) | 2011-10-10 | 2014-01-28 | Tbl Licensing Llc | Protection devices for use in shoes or other products |
US8943708B2 (en) * | 2011-10-10 | 2015-02-03 | TBL Licsensing LLC | Anti-fatigue ply rib construction |
US9554617B2 (en) | 2011-10-10 | 2017-01-31 | Tbl Licensing Llc | Protection devices for use in shoes or other products |
US10219582B2 (en) | 2011-10-10 | 2019-03-05 | Tbl Licensing Llc | Protection devices for use in shoes or other products |
US10178892B2 (en) | 2011-10-10 | 2019-01-15 | Tbl Licensing Llc | Protection devices for use in shoes or other products |
KR101345151B1 (en) | 2012-07-26 | 2013-12-26 | (주)그린윙 | Golf shoes with support rubber for helping golf swing |
KR101445636B1 (en) | 2012-07-26 | 2014-10-06 | (주)그린윙 | Golf shoes support rubber manufacturing method |
US20160021977A1 (en) * | 2014-07-22 | 2016-01-28 | Nike, Inc. | Sole structure for an article of footwear including a shank |
USD816960S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-05-08 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD816959S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-05-08 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD815818S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-04-24 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD815821S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-04-24 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD815820S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-04-24 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD815816S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-04-24 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD815819S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-04-24 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD815817S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-04-24 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD815823S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-04-24 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD815822S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-04-24 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD816311S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-05-01 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD815824S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-04-24 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD815402S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-04-17 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD817615S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-05-15 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD817616S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-05-15 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD817614S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-05-15 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
USD815403S1 (en) | 2015-05-19 | 2018-04-17 | Nike, Inc. | Shoe |
US9750304B2 (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2017-09-05 | Nike, Inc. | Article of footwear having talonavicular support |
US10292450B2 (en) | 2015-12-30 | 2019-05-21 | Nike, Inc. | Article of footwear having talonavicular support |
USD838455S1 (en) | 2016-11-17 | 2019-01-22 | Tbl Licensing Llc | Shoe upper |
US20210283875A1 (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2021-09-16 | Adidas Ag | Footwear with padding and midsole structures and the method of making the same |
US20220304420A1 (en) * | 2019-02-22 | 2022-09-29 | Nike, Inc. | Sole structure for article of footwear |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2010003415A8 (en) | 2010-03-25 |
WO2010003415A1 (en) | 2010-01-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20110185597A1 (en) | Golf shoe with a stabilizing system | |
US9788599B2 (en) | Torsion control bridge for shoe | |
US9743709B2 (en) | Wrap-around wire support for shoe | |
JP6882843B2 (en) | Asymmetric shoes | |
US20200068987A1 (en) | Soccer Shoe Component or Insert Made of One Material and/or a Composite and/or Laminate of One or More Materials for Enhancing the Performance of the Soccer Shoe | |
US7007410B2 (en) | Article of footwear having a regional cleat configuration | |
AU712111B2 (en) | Athletic shoe, especially soccer shoe | |
US7487604B2 (en) | Soccer shoe component or insert made of one material and/or a composite and/or laminate of one or more materials for enhancing the performance of the soccer shoe | |
US4389798A (en) | Athletic shoe | |
EP3420838B1 (en) | Wrap-around wire support for shoe | |
CA2503379A1 (en) | Item of footwear, particularly an item of sports footwear | |
US20220183421A1 (en) | Article of footwear | |
US11986048B2 (en) | Golf shoe sole with localized sidewalls reinforcement structure | |
US20240090613A1 (en) | Golf shoe with reinforcement structure | |
US20050160630A1 (en) | Soccer shoe component or insert made of one material and/or a composite and/or laminate of one or more materials for enhancing the performance of the soccer shoe | |
US20240065370A1 (en) | Golf shoe with internal longitudinal groove | |
CN112425860B (en) | Golf shoes with composite plates in the midsole to provide deflection and stability | |
EP3788899B1 (en) | Sole element | |
US20230309646A1 (en) | Golf shoe sole with localized sidewalls reinforcement structure | |
US20240065375A1 (en) | Golf shoe with longitudinal flexibility | |
US20050097784A1 (en) | Split-soled golf shoe | |
WO2005096733A2 (en) | Soccer shoe sole component or insert | |
JP2010115371A (en) | Golf shoe |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ECCO SKO A/S, DENMARK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GUEST, STEFAN;REEL/FRAME:026206/0808 Effective date: 20110322 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |